User talk:CAPTAIN RAJU/Archive 3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Bahasa Indonesia ∙ dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ euskara ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ Simple English ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ ქართული ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 → Archive 7
Leave a message Send an Email

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:LSUpMWLU8LQ.jpg

rename this file --PavelMukhin98 (talk) 14:20, 11 May 2019 (UTC)!!![reply]

✓ Done--CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 14:34, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:TyXXIwt7994.jpg

rename this faile --PavelMukhin98 (talk) 15:23, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:LSUpMWLU8LQлр.jpg

rename this faile --PavelMukhin98 (talk) 15:25, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done-CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 02:09, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Andriy_parubiy.jpg

rename this faile --PavelMukhin98 (talk) 15:27, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done-CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 02:09, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:5wLEH3MWcG0.jpg

rename this faile --PavelMukhin98 (talk) 15:28, 11 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done-CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 02:09, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Andriy parubiy.jpg

File:Andriy parubiy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
PavelMukhin98 (talk) 12:34, 12 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Владимир_Камоедов_(cropped).jpg

rename this faile --PavelMukhin98 (talk) 05:16, 16 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:City of Vienna,Austria in 2019.74.jpg

File:City of Vienna,Austria in 2019.74.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
Herzi Pinki (talk) 19:17, 17 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Adaptation de LEGENDE

Bonjour, et merdi pour le renommage de File:Troisfontaines (Moselle) croix de chemin.jpg. Mais je ne peux pas adapter la LEGENDE français : Walscheid (Moselle) croix de chemin => français ; Troisfontaines (Moselle) croix de chemin. Sais-tu comment le faire? --Havang(nl) (talk) 10:59, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Targa automobilistica Italia 1999 ZA 198•SG motocicletta.png

Hi, you recently renamed this file adding the Word "motocicletta" (motorcycle), but It Is a car plate, not a motorcycle Moxmarco (talk) 20:07, 5 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming File:Greta Zimmer 1939 Passport photograph (cropped).jpg

1939 passport issued by the government of Austria for "Grete Sara Zimmer," the middle name added by national socialist decree

Hi there, you recently declined the renaming of the file to Grete Zimmer 1939 Passport photograph (cropped). The reason you gave was that renaming would not comply with renaming guidelines. As a matter of fact, my reason was that I accidentally misspelled the name of depicted person when uploading the cropped pic. So misspelling of a given name seems to me like one of the best reasons there are. Would you please rename it for me? For reference please see WP article Greta Zimmer Friedman where the proper spelling of her maiden name is mentioned, or the original file on the right. The signature shows the proper spelling of her given name. Thanks a lot, Willi P (talk) 06:11, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Concert in Italy.102.jpg
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Concert in Italy.102.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ 日本語 ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ruthven (msg) 16:29, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao! Ho controllato e nessuna immagine è recuperabile. O sono foto storte, oppure riproducono i maxischermi del concerto (che tu non hai il diritto di riprodurre senza l'autorizzazione dell'organizzazione del concerto). Fai conto però che lo standard al quale miriamo per le foto dei concerti è del tipo della foto qui affianco. Tienine conto per il futuro ;) Ruthven (msg) 15:23, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

Yours sincerely, Ruthven (msg) 16:35, 11 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
Taivo (talk) 06:49, 21 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Images from Prague

Hello, I have found a large number of your photos in this category: [1]. Thank you for contributing to Wikimedia Commons. While some of the images are useful, some less so, and many look just like random shots. Please keep in mind, that the purpose of Commons is to illustrate other Wikimedia projects and provide _informative_ images (see [2]); it is not meant to be a storage of everything found on your camera.

Specifically, there are images so dark that you could barely see what's on them (e.g. [3]), some are very blurry ([4]); in some cases there are multiple images with negligible differences between them ([5], [6]), particularly of major tourist attractions which have been shot thousands of times.

Please remove the images that are of low quality or have no information value. For those that do fit the scope, please put them in proper categories, so that their usefulness is increased and they could be found where people expect to look for them (as Prague is a big city, category 'Prague' is too generic).

Moreover, in my view the category '2019_in_Prague' should be reserved to images whose subjects are specific to that year (e.g. 2019 events or construction taking place in 2019), not _any_ images taken in 2019.

Thank you for consideration. JiriMatejicek (talk) 08:05, 22 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming 2 moe files?

Hallo Captain :)
the following files have the same problem:

Could you take a look on it? Thanks by --Keks by 15:11, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming

Hello! Please respect the user schema of the filename at File:Alter jüdischer Friedhof in Rees (2016).jpg. All my filenames begins with the city, the last is my Id. I'll fix your renaming. For the next renaming please respect the rules at Commons. Thank you. --XRay talk 16:31, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

BTW: The old name wasn't wrong. There was no reason for renaming. --XRay talk 16:45, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Editing conflict: He and me couldn't smell that this is your ID. I ask you to label you files correctly. The new jewish cemetrey exist since 1872. If you don't label it uniqe something like this happens... :/ --Keks by 16:46, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Yelling the old name wasn't wrong but don't restoring the old one. --Keks by 16:51, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ich mach's mal auf deutsch: Sind denn beide Friedhöfe Stadtmauer-Friedhöfe? Oder war die Bezeichnung nicht doch genau genug? Sorry, ich erinnere mich nicht daran, dass du mich um eine Änderung gebeten hattest. Auf solche Anfragen reagiere ich eigentlich. Ärgerlich wird's für mich, wenn mein Schema ignoriert wird. Dann passen an vielen Stellen die Sortierungen nicht und mein Bot geht auch von dem Schema aus. Ich habe die Datei bereits wieder umbenannt, bin dir im Namen aber entgegengekommen. Die Regeln hier bei Commons hätten übrigens eine Umbenennung nicht gestattet. Es lag kein wirklicher Grund vor. --XRay talk 16:53, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Woher soll der nicht-versierte Sucher denn wissen, welcher denn jetzt der Stadtmauerfriedhof ist? Daher wollte ich eben einen sinnvolleren Namen. Ich hatte dich nicht um Änderung gebeten, da ich gleich 4 Bilder vermischt in einer Kategorie zur Umbenennung erbeten habe, da bin ich nicht aktiv genug auf Commons, um jeden einzeln anzusprechen. Tut mir leid, dein Schema kannte ich nicht, werde aber in Zukunft darauf achten. Versprochen! Ich habe übrigens unter commons:File naming nichts bezüglich eigenen IDs o.ä. gefunden (du hast ja oben die Regeln von Commons erwähnt). Egal, Schwamm drüber :)
Deepl-Translated: How is the inexperienced seeker supposed to know which cemetery is now the Stadtmauerfriedhof? That's why I wanted a more meaningful name. I didn't ask you to change it, because I asked for 4 mixed images in one category to be renamed, so I'm not active enough on Commons to address each one individually. Sorry, I didn't know your scheme, but I'll take care of it in the future. I promise! By the way, I didn't find anything under commons:File naming concerning own IDs or the like (you mentioned the rules of Commons above). Anyway, no more about :) --Keks by 18:03, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Der Keks: Just a little text from Commons:File renaming: Not of less importance is the purpose the filename is believed to have; contributors frequently categorizing files have different demands from those who create, process, manage and upload them. Uploaders often have schemas naming their files; moving files might break them. If possible, language and schema should be preserved, as well as the camera or catalogue number. Some people also believe that the filename is part of the license agreement. --XRay talk 20:35, 5 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Picture of Prague in 2019.03.jpg

File:Picture of Prague in 2019.03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 07:01, 5 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, ~Cybularny Speak? 09:14, 31 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments Italia 2019, è iniziato! Il tuo contributo è prezioso!

English | Italiano | +/−

Hi,

You're receiving this message because you've previously contributed to the annual Wiki Loves Monuments contest in Italy. We'd be delighted if you would do so again this year and upload your photos to share the italian cultural hertage with the world!!

You can find more details at the Wiki Loves Monuments Italia website and here. If you have images taken in other countries you can check the international participants.

This year's contest runs until 30 September 2019.

If you need help please contact me! --Marta Arosio (WMIT) (talk) 13:24, 5 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

নামান্তর

Category:Media requiring renaming - rationale 1 এ অনেকগুলি নামান্তরের অনুরোধ করেছি। যতগুলি পারেন, করে একটু সাহায্য করবেন। --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 13:50, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ঠিক আছে, আমার কিছু ছবি আপলোড করার বাকি আছে,সেই গুলো কমপ্লিট হলে আমি ফাইল মুভের কাজে নিয়যিত থাকবো । ধন্যবাদ।CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:56, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments

Ciao, grazie per la tua partecipazione a Wiki Loves Monuments, ho visto che sei stato uno dei maggiori contributori, complimenti! Tuttavia per la prossima volta dovrei chiederti di seguire la procedura guidata di caricamento, perché così facendo vengono aggiunti in automatico gli identificativi dei monumenti, che a loro volta permettono il collegamento con wikidata e il reperimento delle autorizzazioni corrette. Grazie e buon lavoro! --Marta Arosio (WMIT) (talk) 09:48, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Se possibile, il codice, che corrisponde alla proprietà P2186 su Wikidata, andrebbe ora inserito a mano, foto per foto... --Marta Arosio (WMIT) (talk) 09:50, 1 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

RFA Support

Hi. Since I cannot edit on Commons:Administrators/Requests/Fitindia anymore, I wanted to thank you for your support on my recent successful RFA, Your trust and faith in my candidature is much appreciated and I could not have done it without your support. Warm regards FitIndia Talk Mail 15:12, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted content

Deutsch |English |español |français |Türkçe |македонски |मराठी |العربية | +/−
float 
Thank you for your interest in contributing to Wikimedia Commons, a non-profit media repository with the primary scope of providing educational and informative images and media. Self-photographs or photographs of family members and friends, where these photographs are not educational and are not used on any project, are considered to be out of the project scope and may be subject to deletion.

If you have objections to the proposed deletion of your image(s), please see the links to the relevant deletion discussion(s) (listed above or below this message box). If the image is already deleted, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter.

This message is not intended to be taken personally. Thank you for your understanding.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ruthven (msg) 11:24, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Ruthven (msg) 11:29, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Renaming

This renaming was not at all according to the named criterion, quite the opposite, actually. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 20:53, 9 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Statue of the Little Mermaid in 2019

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

--Dannebrog Spy (talk) 11:12, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beautiful nature in 2019.01.jpg

File:Beautiful nature in 2019.01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−
BevinKacon (talk) 15:21, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Warning for repeated vandalism

বাংলা ∙ čeština ∙ словѣньскъ / ⰔⰎⰑⰂⰡⰐⰠⰔⰍⰟ ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ 日本語 ∙ македонски ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−
 
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Beautiful nature in 2019.01.jpg, you will be blocked from editing Wikimedia Commons.

--BevinKacon (talk) 13:23, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@BevinKacon: Thanks for your important notice/advice.I will be careful and keep this my mind in the next time editing on wikimedia commons.take care.thanks again.CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 13:50, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CAPTAIN_RAJU/Archive_3&oldid=379371395"