User talk:CAPTAIN RAJU/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

Bahasa Indonesia  dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  euskara  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  română  español  português  English  français  Nederlands  polski  galego  Simple English  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  українська  ქართული  հայերեն  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 5

Category:January 2016 in Rome è un sottoinsieme di Category:2016 in Rome, che a sua volta è un sottoinsieme di Category:2016 in Italy. Pertanto, i file inclusi nella prima, ma sono anche in finale e reinserimento è iterativo.--JT Curses (talk) 21:09, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please don't add this category if files are already listed in Category:Hills of Italy; this is overcategorisation. Cheers. Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:58, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rodhullandemu,Ok,next time I don't added Hills category.thanks. CAPTAIN RAJU () 17:06, 5 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:My former girlfriend.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 14:03, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:


Wikimedia Commons has a specific scope

العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | español | فارسی | suomi | français | Frysk | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | polski | português | русский | sicilianu | slovenščina | ไทย | Türkçe | українська | 简体中文 | +/−


Thank you for your contributions. Your image or other content, File:Prostitute waiting a customer.07.jpg, was recently deleted, or will soon be deleted, in accordance with our process and policies, because it was not, or is not, within our scope. Please review our project scope, but in short, Commons is targeted at educational media files including photographs, diagrams, animations, music, spoken text and video clips. The expression “educational” is to be understood according to its broad meaning of “providing knowledge; instructional or informative”. Wikimedia Commons does not contain text articles like encyclopedia articles, textbooks, news, word definitions and such. Each of these other kinds of content have their own projects: Wikipedia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary and Wikiquote. If the content seems to fit the scope of one of those other projects, please consider contributing it there. Otherwise, consider an alternative outlet. If you think that the deletion was in error because the contribution really was in scope, you can appeal it at Commons:Undeletion requests, giving a reason why it fits our scope to help others evaluate the matter. Thank you for your understanding.

--Túrelio (talk) 13:52, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Category discussion warning

Images by CAPTAIN RAJU has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Stefan2 (talk) 00:19, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:Pomezia railway station.38.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 10:26, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:Captain raju model in the england.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 10:28, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. ~riley (talk) 06:09, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have RAJU/Archive 1 granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Commons:Rollback. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. ~riley (talk) 07:04, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Prostitute talking a customer.03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magnus (talk) 07:08, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. ~riley (talk) 09:16, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2015 is open!

You are receiving this message because you voted in R1 of the 2015 Picture of the Year contest.

Dear CAPTAIN RAJU,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2015 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the tenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2015) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. In Round 1, there were 1322 candidate images. There are 56 finalists in Round 2, comprised of the top 30 overall as well as the top #1 and #2 from each sub-category. In the final round, you may vote for just one or maximal three image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 28 May 2016, 23:59:59 UTC.

Click here to vote »

Thanks,
-- Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee 09:42, 22 May 2016 (UTC)

No freedom of panorama in Italy

There is no freedom of panorama in Italy, and as such your uploads may be copyright violations. See Commons:Freedom of panorama#Italy and Template:NoFoP-Italy. 80.221.159.67 00:22, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I created a village pump discussion at Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Files of User:CAPTAIN RAJU of Italian buildings. Many of your photos depict Italian buildings in public domain and are free of issues. Thanks for your contributions! 80.221.159.67 00:48, 18 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

consent for image of identifiable person?

Hi CAPTAIN RAJU, did you ask the depicted and fully identifiable person in File:Prostitute waiting a customer.20.jpg, File:Prostitute waiting a customer.19.jpg, File:Prostitute waiting a customer.18.jpg, File:Prostitute waiting a customer.17.jpg, File:Prostitute waiting a customer.16.jpg, File:Prostitute waiting a customer.15.jpg, File:Prostitute waiting a customer.14.jpg, File:Prostitute waiting a customer.13.jpg, File:Prostitute waiting a customer.12.jpg, File:Prostitute waiting a customer.11.jpg for permission to publish her portrait? --Túrelio (talk) 21:42, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, I've noticed that you have filed the pictures I uploaded as copyright violations. Can you tell me how I can upload the logo of a company without any such issues? Like how is Facebook's logo on wikipedia in that case? I want to upload the logo of this company: http://quarrio.com/ Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anasayubi (talk • contribs) 04:11, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ː Hi,Anasayubi I've added copyright tag because,Your uploading picture was copyright violations.You can not use the license.Please follow this page.Thanks.

Request of speedy deletion

Hi, CAPTAIN RAJU.
You have nominated this file for speedy deletion. Please note that another file is also an obvious copyright violation by the same user. Please see: these 40 results. Thank you for your kind cooperation. Regards, --Gabriel Sozzi (talk) 19:14, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ː Hi,Gabriel Sozzi, I've already added copyvio template/nominated tag on two Pictures.See here and another file.Thanks.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 21:20, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi CAPTAIN RAJU, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:CAPTAIN RAJU/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 10 character 274: This character may get silently deleted by one or more browsers. - Evidence: window.vFC_Profiles = {"User:CAPTAIN RAJU/common.js":{"editInputs":{"mdDeleteReason":"copyright violations copied from https://backsexy.com/32/jovencitas-culonas-xxx/","mdEditSummary":"","mdReplacePermission":false,"mdDeleteHeading":"Files uploaded by [[User:Nandito bonito ‎|Nandito bonito ‎]] ([[User talk:Nandito bonito ‎|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Nandito bonito ‎|contribs]])","mdTalkNote":"Yours sincerely,","mdRRegEx1":false,"mdRVar1":true,"mdMatchText1":"","mdReplaceText1":"","selPreserve":"secure","alsoPreserve":""},"action":"cv","objectMembers":{"queryParams":{"target":"Nandito bonito ‎","lestart":"","ledir":"older"},"startInput":{"mode":"User","modeCat":false,"modeUser":true,"modePage":false,"target":"User:Nandito bonito ‎","loadThumbs":true,"loadWikitext":true,"startDate":"","startFile":""}},"proceedAt":{"vals":[],"setVals":["lecontinue"]},"time":"2017-02-05T20:59:16.455Z"}};

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 20:59, 5 February 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

Hello CAPTAIN RAJU, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:24, 22 May 2017 (UTC)


Umbenennung Europa ...

Hallo,

hatte diesen Fehler nicht auf meinem Handy gesehen ... Sorry für die 34 Bilder--Vielen Dank und Grüße Woelle ffm (talk) 14:59, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Könnte falsch sein, es ist kein Problem.behalte die gute Arbeit bei.dank.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 15:25, 2 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I made a move request for this image which you rejected because the target location already exists. The image in question used to exist at that location, but another user improperly overwrote it and made a move request to change its name, which another admin performed. The target location is now a redirect. Would it be possible to delete it and move the image back to where it should be? Thank you. Prosody (talk) 17:46, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ːː I've already moved this file File:Grundriss St Markus Venedig.png (rename done).CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 17:59, 3 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Colosseum in rome.14.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 09:11, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:Colosseum in rome.108.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 09:19, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:Colosseum in rome.127.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 09:22, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My geostationary images

Hi. I have a made a huge mistake and could you please move my images again? This is pretty important and yes, I have now learnt my lesson to not be too excited in the JMA names. Typhoon2013 (talk) 08:13, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ːː Thanks for sending me the message.I can't moved this file.Because the new title has been existing.Only the administrator can move this file.CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:57, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

File:R (Regionale) train in italy.01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 14:07, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:Frecciarossa Train.05.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 14:10, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:Frecciaargento Train.01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 14:11, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:Atac ticket machine of (metro,bus,train).15.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 14:12, 22 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pay attention to copyright
File:Movie poster for "Breathless".jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Túrelio (talk) 18:53, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]