User talk:Jtcurses

Archivo

Category:Baroque architecture in the province of Cádiz

Hola. Por favor no dividas las categorías de arquitectura por provincias. Saludos, tyk (talk) 22:30, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

@Tyk: ¿Por qué?.--JT Curses (talk) 22:32, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

@Tyk: Por cierto, ¿por qué primero deshaces y borras y despues inicias la comunicación.--JT Curses (talk) 22:36, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Porque no están sobrecargadas y lo único que se consigue es que el usuario tenga que hace más veces click para acceder a algo. Las categorías tienen que tener contenido, no sólo unas pocas subcategorías. tyk (talk) 22:39, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

@Tyk: Acabo de empezar y la categoría ya tenía más de 7 subcategorías, sin haber organizado aún los los archivos, ni otras categorías y subcategorías que están perdidas por subcategorías de municipios. ¿En que te basas para hacer está afirmación?. Esta es la misma afirmación que se me ha hecho no se cuantas veces sobre categorías de provincias u otras, pero resulta que la mayoría se han llenado, y la mayoría de aquellas que se borraron han sido vueltas a crear, alguna vez por mi y otras por otros.--JT Curses (talk) 22:47, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

El problema no es crear nuevas categorías. El problema es dividir las que ya existen sin necesidad. Tengo que acostarme. Hoy no puedo hablar más. Bona nit, tyk (talk) 23:03, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

@Tyk: Bona nit. Espero que mañana me puedas decir en que basas si es necesaria o no una categoría, sobre todo no sabiendo que es lo que está haciendo la otra persona, sin saber cual es el resultado de ello y si forma parte de algo que va más allá de esa categoría en concreto, porque la categoría fue creada a las 23.16 y tu la has vaciado a las 23.32, cuando tenía más de 7 subcategorías.--JT Curses (talk) 23:10, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Hola JT Courses. Me opongo por una razón muy sencilla, esto es un proyecto colaborativo, por lo tanto hay que intentar que todo el mundo siga más o menos las mismas pautas de manera que las categorías sigan un orden lógico, coherente y simple para que sean intuitivas y las entiendan el máximo número de usuarios posible. Si un tema está categorizado por comunidades, ¿de qué sirve introducir un nuevo subsistema por provincias? No hay tantos archivos e imágenes que justifiquen que el usuario tenga que hacer más veces click para acceder a algo. Lo único que se consigue con eso es vaciar las categorías de contenido y con ello el número de pantallas que hay que pasar para acceder a los archivos. No es user friendly. La gran mayoría de habitantes de este mundo tiene una conexión internet muy mala y pasar pantalla tras pantalla para llegar a algo no facilita las cosas a nadie. Un saludo, tyk (talk) 20:06, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

@Tyk: Y la forma de actuar en un proyecto colaborativo es deshacer el trabajo de otra persona cuando aún no lo ha ni completado, utilizar la plantilla {{Speedydelete}} incorrectamente para evitar que cualquier discrepancia sea debatida y, después de los hechos consumados, pedir por favor que se cumpla tu criterio. Si un tema está categorizado por países, ¿de qué sirve introducir un nuevo subsistema por autonomías?, ¿cuantos archivos, páginas y subcategorías justifican una categoría?. En fin haz lo que quieras, yo no estoy dispuesto ni a una guerra de ediciones, ni a debatir abstracciones interesadas de temas o tópicos génericos que no dicen nada. Un saludo.--JT Curses (talk) 21:21, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

categories trains in ....

Trains 'in' station xxx are correct, however trains are not 'in' railway lines, but 'on' railway lines. This is because 'in' implies an enclosed space, while trains can only be 'on' a railway line. Examples are: Category:Trains on the Chase Line and Category:British Rail Class 373s by line.Smiley.toerist (talk) 10:38, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

@Smiley.toerist: Thanks for the information and the correction. Regards. --JT Curses (talk) 23:50, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Cantina estacion Mieres Vasco-Asturiano - Gonmi.jpg

File:Cantina estacion Mieres Vasco-Asturiano - Gonmi.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Copyrighted, Florentino Fernández died in 1979 [1] Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

LMLM (talk) 12:10, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Category:Bus_transport_in_the_province_of_Málaga

Bus transport in the province of Málaga has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

E4024 (talk) 19:01, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Eliza

Eliza has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jochen Burghardt (talk) 21:32, 14 March 2019 (UTC)

Category:Cuerpo_de_Bomberos_de_las_Palmas_de_Gran_Canaria

Category:Cuerpo_de_Bomberos_de_las_Palmas_de_Gran_Canaria has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Ivanhercaz (talk) 01:23, 6 July 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Jtcurses,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:14, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Jtcurses,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:24, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey

Share your experience in this survey

Hi Jtcurses,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 20:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Template SpainMapYear

Hola Jtcurses. La plantilla SpainMapYear (00:53 9 feb 2019‎) está duplicada. Existe Template MapsSpain, con el mismo uso. La elaboró AnRo0002 (18:50 11 feb 2019) con dos días de diferencia. He unificado todas las categorías usando la que creó ‎AnRo0002, pues tiene algunas mejoras, y he dejado una nota en Template SpainMapYear. Afectaba a muy pocas categorías. Te felicito por tu buen trabajo en commons. Un cordial saludo, --JMCC1 (talk) 01:47, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

@JMCC1: . Gracias por el aviso y por corregir la duplicación. Un saludo. --JT Curses (talk) 01:56, 21 January 2020 (UTC)

Please upgrade your mobile app

Hello, thank you very much for your contributions. Unfortunately on some of your uploads you have used an old version 2.11, and it has some bugs in it, which require date to be fixed by hand. I am doing that right now, but it would really help out if you could upgrade, so that new uploads will be correct. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:16, 2 February 2020 (UTC)

Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/07/Category:Regions of Spain

Debiendo al disputa entre Verdy p y yo, Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/07/Category:Regions of Spain se convirtió en un lío. No creo que después de la disputa yo pueda manejarlo, y alguién se necesita tratar de formar un consenso y una resolución. ¿Estarías interesado en hacer eso? Creo que ya he expresado suficientemente mi punto de vista, y Verdy p queda bloqueado para un mes y entonces no va a decir más. No sé su nivel de inglés, así que no estoy seguro de si es razonable pedirse que lo haga. - Jmabel ! talk 05:41, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

• Veo que han pasado días desde que has estado activo. Buscaré otro colaborador. - Jmabel ! talk 23:15, 24 July 2020 (UTC)
• Tyk lo hará. - Jmabel ! talk 14:12, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

@Jmabel: : Lo siento, últimamente no puedo dedicar mucho tiempo a Commons. Gracias y un saludo JT Curses (talk) 13:42, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Sant Vicenç de Calders

Hi Jtcurses. Maybe you think I made the change arbitrarily. But in the Declaración de Red de 2020, Adif has designated Sant Vicenç de Calders as the terminus of the Zaragoza-Tarragona line. In the same way, line 600 now ends at the La Boella gauge changer. The entire old section between Vandellós and Sant Vicenç de Calders no longer belongs to line 600. Please consult the Declaración de Red de Adif and you will see with your eyes which is the new situation. CFA1877 (talk) 13:35, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

@CFA1877: Gracias por la información y un saludo. JT Curses (talk) 14:00, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

We need your feedback!

Hello. Apologies if this message is not in your native language: please feel free to respond in the language of your choice. Thank you!

I am writing to you because we are looking for feedback for a new Wikimedia Foundation project, Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW). SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet. We are now focusing on designing and building image suggestion features for experienced users.

We have some questions to ask you about your experience with uploading images here on Wikimedia Commons and then adding them to Wikipedia. You can answer these questions on a specific feedback page on Mediawiki, where we will gather feedback. As I said, these questions are in English, but your answers do not need to be in English! You can also answer in your own language, if you feel more comfortable.

Once the collecting of feedback will be over, we will sum it up and share with you a summary, along with updated mocks that will incorporate your inputs.

Also, if you want to keep in touch with us or you want to know more about the project, you can subscribe to our newsletter.

Hope to hear from you soon! -- Sannita (WMF) (talk to me!) 09:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Estación de Alcázar de San Juan-Mercancías

Buenas tardes Jtcurses. Como sueles tener bastantes imágenes de temas ferroviarios, quería preguntarte si tenías imágenes de esta estación. En el pasado sé que había imágenes en Ferropedia de la estación de mercancías, y me suenan que eran tuyas, pero desde hace tiempo Ferropedia se ha volatilizado de mal manera. Saludos. CFA1877 (talk) 15:33, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

Aqui: Category:Alcázar de San Juan train station hay 3. Un saludo. JT Curses (talk) 19:14, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Perdona hay 3 de la estación de pasajeros, de la de mercancías no. Miraré de subir alguna, pero no se cuando será. Un saludo. JT Curses (talk) 19:20, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Muchas gracias Jtcurses. Quedo a la espera pues. Saludos. CFA1877 (talk) 22:37, 16 August 2022 (UTC)