User talk:Another Believer/Archive 12

Your most memorable shot of 2021

Happy New Year! As always at the beginning of the new year, I'm inviting you to share your most memorable shot of the past year. Which of your photos stood out in 2021? Which image created special memories that you'd like to share with others? On behalf of the Commons Photographers User Group I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best for 2022. Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:25, 8 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salt Lake City, Utah (2021) - 070.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 16:32, 22 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salt Lake City, Utah (2021) - 107.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:12, 25 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico (2021) - 149.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:32, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico (2021) - 151.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:06, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Southeast Portland, Oregon (January 23, 2021) - 104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:00, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Southeast Portland, Oregon (January 23, 2021) - 103.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:00, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Southeast Portland, Oregon (January 23, 2021) - 036.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 11:39, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Southeast Portland, Oregon (January 23, 2021) - 071.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 11:39, 3 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salt Lake City, Utah (2021) - 272.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 20:52, 4 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 7 February 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Malecón, Puerto Vallarta (2014) - 21 (cropped).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:39, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Malecón, Puerto Vallarta (2014) - 36 (cropped).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:39, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mt. Angel, Oregon - October 2020 - 59.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:28, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oregon City, Oregon (2018) - 120.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 16:20, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salt Lake City, Utah (2021) - 179.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:19, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salt Lake City, Utah (2021) - 149.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:19, 16 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 19 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Salt Lake City, Utah (2021) - 339.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 13:46, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Save the date: Commons Photographers meeting next week

Extended content

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group, Please save the date: on Saturday, June 19th, our next virtual Zoom meeting is going to take place. As you know, one goal of these meetings is to share knowledge about different types of photography. This time, we've lined up the following presentations: Photography in Nigeria Photographing vehicles I started printing my images – here’s what I've learned so far… If you'd like to participate in this event, please consider signing up on this page. Also, if you'd like to present at one of the next meetings, please send me a quick note. Sharing your experiences and learnings with others can make a huge difference! I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best! Hope to see you on the 19th. Warmly, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:13, 8 June 2022 (UTC)

This Sunday!

Hi, this is just a quick reminder: the next virtual meeting of our user group is scheduled for Sunday, June 19, 16:00 UTC. Topics are: “Photography in Nigeria”, “Photographing Vehicles”, “Wildlife photography and citizen science”, and “I started printing my images – here’s what I've learned so far…”. I'm thrilled about this great agenda and I'm looking forward to connecting with you again. Stay safe and all the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:08, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Quick update on behalf of the Commons Photographers User Group

Extended content

Dear member of the Commons Photographers User Group, I hope you're well and enjoy taking photos for Wikimedia Commons. Here are a couple of quick updates on behalf of our group: Our next virtual meeting will take place on Saturday, August 27. At this point we have two presentations lined up: Suitable! Unsuitable! How to choose photos for a Wikipedia for children, “Klexikon” (Ziko) The aperture and its (less known) effects (XRay) You can sign up for the event on this page: Virtual Meeting on August 27, 2022. – Given that we can accommodate more speakers, I'll invite you to get in touch with me in case you'd like to present on the 27th. You can reach me any time on my talk page or by sending a quick email. Also, we now have a page for local events organized by members of our user group: Local events 2022. Please check it out and consider organizing an event yourself! And finally, we're planning on offering a Post-processing Workshop on October 8. Please save the date; an events page with more information will go up later. Thanks for being a member of our group and for sharing your works under a free license. Have fun taking pictures! All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:23, 18 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portland, Oregon (May 28, 2018) - 025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:56, 23 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portland, Oregon (May 28, 2018) - 031.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 19:03, 25 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 28 August 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Portland, Oregon (May 28, 2018) - 032.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ezarate 21:18, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oregon (August 20, 2022) - 135.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 10:42, 2 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Oregon (August 20, 2022) - 134.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 13:01, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Hong Kong (2017) - 959.jpg

Extended content

File:Hong Kong (2017) - 959.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! A1Cafel (talk) 02:57, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Hong Kong (2017) - 958.jpg

Extended content

File:Hong Kong (2017) - 958.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! A1Cafel (talk) 02:57, 14 September 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Los Angeles, California (September 8, 2022) - 298.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 05:37, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Los Angeles, California (September 8, 2022) - 245.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 06:08, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Los Angeles, California (September 8, 2022) - 242.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 05:37, 17 September 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

You're invited to provide input…

Dear fellow member of the Commons Photographers User Group,

At our last meeting end of August, we talked about getting in touch with the Wikimedia Foundation and offering our help for improving Wikimedia Commons. Today, I invite you to provide your input on a draft open letter to the Foundation. Over the course of the next ten days, we'll further improve the text together, before inviting people to sign it. If you're interested in providing input, please engage in the discussion on the talk page of the draft.

In the meanwhile, I hope you're well and have a great time taking photos! All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 08:42, 20 September 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Resolved

Extended content

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Affected: File:Hong Kong (2017) - 383.jpg Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 06:32, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Resolved

Extended content

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Affected: File:Tokyo 2019 56.jpg And also: File:Tokyo 2019 57.jpg File:Tokyo 2019 59.jpg File:Tokyo, 2019 - 320.jpg File:Tokyo, 2019 - 531.jpg File:Tokyo, 2019 - 532.jpg Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 04:45, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Brooklyn, NYC (2020) - 35.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 16:35, 29 September 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Resolved

Extended content

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Affected: File:Chinatown, San Francisco, California (2013) - 14.JPG Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:53, 1 October 2022 (UTC)

Online workshop this weekend

Dear Commons Photographers User Group member,

This coming Saturday, October 8, we'll host an online post processing workshop. On behalf of our events coordinator Shreya I invite you to sign up for the event using this Google form.

I hope you're well. All the best, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:50, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Resolved

Extended content

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Affected: File:Ridgefield, Washington, October 2020 - 26.jpg And also: File:Ridgefield, Washington, October 2020 - 27.jpg File:Vancouver, WA mural, 2016.jpg Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 00:44, 8 October 2022 (UTC)

File:New York City, May 2014 - 071.JPG

Resolved

Extended content

File:New York City, May 2014 - 071.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! A1Cafel (talk) 09:20, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

File:201512 Safety poster at West Yan'an Road station.jpg

Resolved

Extended content

File:201512 Safety poster at West Yan'an Road station.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! A1Cafel (talk) 03:10, 26 October 2022 (UTC)

Category:Flame_of_Freedom

Extended content

Category:Flame_of_Freedom has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! Another Believer (talk) 05:22, 31 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Sculpture inside Tokyo Metropolitan Government Building No.1 (1991) - Tokyo, 2019 - 217.jpg

Resolved

Extended content

File:Sculpture inside Tokyo Metropolitan Government Building No.1 (1991) - Tokyo, 2019 - 217.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! A1Cafel (talk) 03:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Los Angeles, California (September 10, 2022) - 272.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:24, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Los Angeles, California (September 10, 2022) - 283.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:39, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Los Angeles, California (September 10, 2022) - 285.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 06:39, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 13 November 2022 (UTC)

File:San Diego, 2016 - 184.jpg

Resolved

Extended content

File:San Diego, 2016 - 184.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! A1Cafel (talk) 03:16, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Descriptive sign at Teppozu Inari Shrine in Tokyo, 2019 - 264.jpg

Resolved

Extended content

File:Descriptive sign at Teppozu Inari Shrine in Tokyo, 2019 - 264.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! 61.120.241.1 05:14, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Seattle, Washington - November 2022 - 081.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:52, 18 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

File:201512 South Xizang Road station McDonalds advertisement.jpg

Resolved

Extended content

File:201512 South Xizang Road station McDonalds advertisement.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: McDonald's advertisement Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.   Solomon203 (talk) 11:45, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta (November 2022) - 092.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:24, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Puerto Vallarta (November 2022) - 194.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 05:21, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 30 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Portland, Oregon (July 2, 2022) - 164.jpg

Resolved

Extended content

File:Portland, Oregon (July 2, 2022) - 164.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! A1Cafel (talk) 03:30, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Question from the CPUG Board

Dear user group member,

I'm writing you to today on behalf of the board of the Commons Photographers User Group. The past year has been a busy one for us. In 2022, we've had more activities than ever before in the history of our group and you'll find an overview on our group's page.

With that being said, 2022 was also a year of learning for the current board members. Most of us hadn't been involved in running the Photographers User Group and we spent quite some time on getting used to our new roles. We all feel it was a steep learning curve.

That's why, at our last board meeting, we decided to ask our members whether they'd be ok with us serving for another year. Extending our board duties to the end of 2023 would allow us to continue the work we've started this year, and to benefit from the knowledge we've built over the past twelve months.

However, in the end, it's up to you and the other members of our group to decide whether such an extension of our board term should be granted. I invite you to voice your opinion on this page:

Commons:Commons Photographers User Group/Board Elections 2022

We'll gather feedback until December 27, and we'll keep you in the loop about the outcomes of this process.

Thanks so much for your ongoing support of our group. I wish you, your family, and your friends all the best.

--Ailura (talk) 12:32, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Biang Biang Noodles, Seattle (2022) - 5.jpg

Extended content

File:Biang Biang Noodles, Seattle (2022) - 5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you! Mateus2019 (talk) 04:22, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2022/2023!

		* Happy Holidays 2022/2023, Another Believer! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 01:35, 23 December 2022 (UTC)