User talk:Animalparty/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

File:Sylvia Earle sculpture, Googleplex.jpg

File:Sylvia Earle sculpture, Googleplex.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

— SMUconlaw (talk) 12:48, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

العربيَّة ∙ Deutsch ∙ español ∙ English ∙ français ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（台灣）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hi Animalparty, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

INeverCry 22:14, 24 September 2016 (UTC)

Albion Prints

I have uploaded the file:Boulenger-Fish-of-the-Congo-1899-Hand-Col-Print.-Microthrissa-Royauxi-Nannocharax-Labeo-8-183148-p(ekm)416x312(ekm).jpg ‎from the website www.albion-prints.com. Is this okay? The website says "This is a sold item and has been left in the Public Domain for research purposes. Images are available for public use with an acknowledgement to www.albion-prints.com". I can't find a licence for the image, the original of which was published over 100 years ago. --Quetzal1964 (talk) 11:24, 4 October 2016 (UTC)̴̴̴̴

@Quetzal1964: Hmm, this might be tricky. Copyright rules in Belgium apply 70 years after death of the author/creator. While George Albert Boulenger wrote the 2 volume Matériaux pour la faune du Congo: Poissons nouveaux, the plates were drawn by P. J. Smit and J. Green. P. J. Smit is likely Pierre Jacques Smit, who died in 1960, and thus his works are still under copyright in the original country and cannot be uploaded to Commons, although they may be uploaded to English Wikipedia (see e.g. File:Varanus_salvator.jpg and this deletion discussion. I'm not yet aware of the identity or death date of J. Green, which is needed to ascertain public domain status. (Unfortunately, this means that many or all of the files at Category:Matériaux pour la faune du Congo may need to be removed from Commons). Animalparty (talk) 18:59, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks, yes that is tricky and my question seems to have caused a bigger problem than I anticipated. I came across the image while looking for resources on ̣Microthissa royauxi but didn't use it.--Quetzal1964 (talk) 19:45, 4 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Art-in-print-cover-1.jpg

File:Art-in-print-cover-1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Jcb (talk) 20:55, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

Mistaken block

Animalparty, I accidentally blocked you while handling a prolific sock-puppeteer. Please accept my apologies for the mistake; I caught and lifted the block immediately and made note of my error in the log. Эlcobbola _talk 20:14, 30 October 2017 (UTC)

CC-NC license cannot be uploaded to Commons

Hello. Per Commons:Licensing, any media under CC-NC licenses (non-commercial) is incompatible with Commons. Unfortunately, this means that File:Echimys vieirai-IackXimenes~2005.jpg and File:Echimys chrysurus-IackXimenes~2005.jpg, published under the CC BY-NC 4.0 license, must be deleted. Please check the licenses carefully for future uploads. Cheers, -Animalparty (talk) 00:15, 5 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi Animalparty. Thank you for bringing my attention to this point. I focused on Creative Commons Attribution Licenses but I didn't realize that non-commercial ones were incompatible with Commons. All the best, Manudouz (talk) 19:00, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

@Manudouz: No worries! PS, you don't have to (and should not) duplicate conversations: you can reply to the original comment on your Talk page, and use {{Reply}} or {{Ping}} to notify the target user, as I did here to you. Cheers, Animalparty (talk)

Category:Histoire_Naturelle_des_Poissons

Histoire Naturelle des Poissons has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:24, 28 November 2017 (UTC)

Congratulations, Dear license reviewer

If you use the helper scripts, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named `license+` and `license-`.

Hi Animalparty, thanks for your request for license reviewer status. The request has been closed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can now start reviewing files – please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Potential backlogs include Flickr review, Picasa review, Panoramio review, and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:

importScript('User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR

importScript('User:Rillke/LicenseReview.js'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons ^webchat on irc.freenode.net. You can also add {{User license reviewer}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! Jianhui67^T★C 16:02, 23 December 2017 (UTC)

Please conisder adding iw-links here on Commons

Dear Animalparty,

Thanks for creating new categories here on Commons as you did recently for Category:Dean Baquet. It would be great if you could as well add the interwiki-link to the corresponding page on en-wikipedia by clicking here on commons in the sidebar menu under 'In Wikipedia' on 'Add links' and then putting in the appearing pop-up box the link to the corresponding article on en-wikipedia. This will add a link to commons to all language versions of the corresponding article on en-wikipedia. Moreover this will avoid the corresponding article to be included in the maintenance category en:Category:Commons category template with no category set.

Many thanks if you could consider to do so, indeed this would reduce my efforts on adding these iw links later through patrolling the pages listed on the pre-mentioned category on en-wikipedia. I would like to thank you for all the great work you are realizing on en-wikipedia and here on commons.

If you have any further questions on this do not hesitate to contact me. Best regards and already now my very best wishes for you for the New Year.Robby (talk) 07:48, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

review image :)

Hi how are you? I want to use these images. Please review the pictures : 1 - 2 - 3 - 4 - 5 - 6 - End :) If it was hard for you, Dont do it my friend ;) and another thing, this images have "Tasnim" Permission You can see it in the footer. JomaIran ^گفتگو 10:13, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

@JomaIran: These all look to be created by Tasnim News Agency, and so are appropriately licensed. However, since you did not take the photographs, you should not list yourself as author, and should not use the template {{cc-by-sa-4.0}}. This image is credited to Foad Ashtari for instance, and so File:Mehdi Taremi Iran Uzbekistan.jpg should state "Foad Ashtari" or ""Foad Ashtari/Tasnim News Agency" as Author, not JomaIran. Please double check the authors, and give them credit. Finally, to automatically submit your uploads for review, you can add {{LicenseReview}}, and someone will soon verify the license. Thank you, -Animalparty (talk) 23:54, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi, Thank you for guide, I did the things you said. Thank you again. JomaIran ^گفتگو 08:39, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

File tagging File:N-decemspinosa.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:N-decemspinosa.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Wdwd (talk) 10:34, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bill Kurtis.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

A kitten for you!

Thank you for catching my error. I don't know how to say thanks in wiki's visual editor

JenniferNM (talk) 08:12, 8 February 2018 (UTC)

File:Inocybe aurea 542682.jpg

Dear Animalparty,

If you have time, please mark or review the image above. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:01, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

@Leoboudv: done! Animalparty (talk) 22:08, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Thank You for your help. I may have 1 more image. I don't know. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:09, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Comment: This is the last image file...if you can help review it.
File:Inocybe lanatodisca 361940.jpg

Have a good day, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:20, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for everything. Kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:26, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

A Question

Dear Animalparty, I found 2 final mushroom species/spores that Commons has no images of. Could you consider reviewing it? Its your decision, of course.

Best Regards from Metro Vancouver, Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:15, 9 February 2018 (UTC)

@Leoboudv: Sure thing. Would you mind reviewing File:Vadasaurus herzogi by Nobu Tamura.jpg in return? Animalparty (talk) 00:33, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks for marking the images. I just marked your photo. I had left the hous to do some shopping for groceries. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:37, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

2 images

Dear Animalparty ,

If you have time, please kindly review these 3 images.

Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 18:44, 10 February 2018 (UTC)

@Leoboudv: done. I also reviewed and corrected the Author of File:Inocybe rimosoides 409139.jpg, per source. Looks like Dave W photographed the mushrooms and Linas Kudzma photographed the spores. I don't know much about Mushroom Observer, but that may be something to double check when uploading. Cheers, Animalparty (talk) 00:44, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Thanks. I can always credit both of them in the text. I see you have now done that. Thanks for helping with this Inocbye mushroom project. I'm almost finished with it now. Than I will rest. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:16, 11 February 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Shane Smith at TechCrunch Disrupt NY 2014.jpg

Yours sincerely, --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 21:42, 12 March 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Bill Kurtis 2014.jpg

Yours sincerely, Ytoyoda (talk) 02:36, 22 July 2018 (UTC)

File listed for deletion

File source is not properly indicated: File:Jamaica First German Presbyterian Church (historical).jpeg not entirely sure if the template to add to the file would be self, as it was cleaned of the reverse print coca cola in photoshop recently, or free lic since the image was from 1906 and freely avail to use....CaptJayRuffins (talk) 00:36, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

@CaptJayRuffins: I see that you've added the Google Books source, which verifies date of publication and public domain status. I went ahead and removed the missing source template. For future uploads, we always need credible documentation of first/early publication (e.g. book, newspaper, magazine), or even where you found the image (e.g. a website hosting an image with info on the image's author, date, provenance, etc.) Beyond establishing public domain status, this publication info also aids researchers and historians. Also, it's best to use {{Information}} to clearly and neatly display date, source, explanatory text, etc. For public domain or otherwise free images that you have modified from the original state (like cleanup, enhancement or retouching) you can add the {{Retouched picture}} template as well, for instance to distinguish original photographer from retoucher, or if there are multiple versions of an image on Commons. Let me know if you have any questions. Cheers! --Animalparty (talk) 02:24, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

Thanks, I don't actually know how to say this so you won't take offence, but ref#1 indicated the source. There was a reverse bleed thru of the CocaCola on the image and I removed it using photoshop. It was a primary source... But thanks for the usage tags, I can make use of the tl|retouched picture and tl|info tags, I didn't know those before...

CaptJayRuffins (talk) 03:38, 19 August 2018 (UTC)

File:Katharine_Graham.jpg

Good day. I suggest changing File:Katharine_Graham.jpg from "speedy delete" as you tagged it to a deletion request. Reasons: File has been on Commons for about 9 years, and is currently in use in some 20 Wikimedia projects. Your reasoning for deletion may be solid, but for such widely used image I think it best that there is a discussion on record rather than it disappearing for reasons that people on other projects and non-admins would not be able to see any explanation for after the file is deleted. Thanks for your attention. Cheers, -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 05:05, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

@Infrogmation: fair enough, I have done so. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Katharine Graham.jpg. --Animalparty (talk) 05:22, 2 September 2018 (UTC)

File:Arabian babbler (Turdoides squamiceps) group.jpeg

File:Arabian babbler (Turdoides squamiceps) group.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

2A02:810A:880:13C4:9CE7:316B:BF65:882A 20:10, 19 October 2018 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:140618-N-PX557-044 (14265686129).jpg

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:140618-N-PX557-044 (14265686129).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 19:52, 28 November 2018 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Sirlanz

Hello. Help vote. Thanks you. Pv sindhu (talk) 05:23, 30 December 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Giselle Blondet (2012).jpg

Yours sincerely, Ytoyoda (talk) 18:01, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Martin Mull (footprints in cement).jpg

File:Martin Mull (footprints in cement).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:22, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Avalero.jpg

Hola Animalparty, La foto que subí tiene el mayor tamaño posible. Puedes verlo en el enlace de Flickr donde se encuentra alojada: https://www.flickr.com/photos/unav/27464466638/in/album-72157674321221740/ Un cordial saludo y muy feliz año nuevo.--Hard (talk) 10:29, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

@Hard: La foto que subiste era de 426 x 640 px y tenía el enlace y la licencia incorrectos (cc-by-4.0). Subí el tamaño original (1232 × 1853), con cc-by-sa-2.0. El revisor de la licencia Flickr (FlickreviewR 2) funciona mas mejor con la imagen original. Saludos, --Animalparty (talk) 18:23, 8 January 2019 (UTC)

@Animalparty: , perdona. Aunque ya he subido varias fotos, no controlo mucho el tema de las subidas de los formatos y de las licencias de las fotos. Muchas gracias por tu ayuda. Un cordial saludo, --Hard (talk) 08:32, 9 January 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Katharine Graham in the 1970s.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

File:Mascara Sagrada 2009.jpg

You need to check your records there, I originally uploaded File:Mascara Sagrada 2009.jpg, but have not touched it since then, so please don't come at me with false accusations. MPJ-DK (talk) 22:36, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Apparently I did 3 years ago, didn't realize since I don't use commons a lot, found the note as I was cleaning out my talk page. Delete away. MPJ-DK (talk) 22:44, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

@MPJ-DK: Thanks for understanding. Also, please note again that we cannot host images with Non-commercial or non-derivative restrictions. These are indicated in the lower right of the images on Flickr. Please review Commons:Licenses for the types of licenses allowed, especially Commons:Licensing#Well-known licenses. Cheers, --Animalparty (talk) 22:49, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Yeah I realize that and will pay more attention to that in the future. MPJ-DK (talk) 22:58, 21 January 2019 (UTC)

Sara Lund

Maybe I'm missing something, but I don't see the point of adding Category:Sara Lund to an image file unless you are going to create the category in question. - Jmabel ! talk 01:47, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

@Jmabel: I'm only human, and make mistakes or forget to follow through sometimes. File:20th OEMF - Sara Lund 01A CROP.jpg this image can also go into it, to accompany the article en:Sara Lund. Thanks for the reminder. --Animalparty (talk) 02:05, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Wonderful. & I wasn't intending to pull your chain with my "Maybe I'm missing something..." About one time out of five when I'm wondering what's going on in the actions of some experienced user, it turns out the action made perfect sense, for reasons I'd missed. - 03:30, 23 January 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Chef Andrew Fairlie (cropped).jpg

Yours sincerely, Abzeronow (talk) 22:45, 27 January 2019 (UTC)

Category:Guillaume Dheulland

I am curious why you moved all the files from Category:Guillaume Dheulland to the new Category:Guillaume d'Heulland, when the BnF [1] has specifically rejected that spelling (found in Benezit)? He himself spelled it Dheulland on this signed engraving, as well as on numerous other signed engravings: e.g., 2, 3, 4, 5, 6. --Robert.Allen (talk) 07:27, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

@Robert.Allen: I may very well be wrong, and if so, worry not, it is fixable. I was merging duplicates on Wikidata and chose what I thought made sense. I made a good faith effort to create a category and before noticing the previously existing one. VIAF indicates just about every conceivable permutation, from "Guillaume Dheulland" to "Guillaume d'Heuland", so you can see how uncertainty can arise. I was actually intending to ask someone fluent in French to look into it, as I don't read or speak French. If Dheulland is the winner, I'll move everything back.--Animalparty (talk) 07:40, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

I would vote for keeping his name Dheulland, per the main French library (the BnF), the signed engravings, and the majority of other identity files at VIAF (listed under "Preferred Forms"). The entry at the Library of Congress follows Benezit, which they cite, but the BnF, also cites Benezit and specifically rejects that spelling of the name. --Robert.Allen (talk) 10:00, 1 March 2019 (UTC)

Why do you think Commons has quality control?

It doesn't. They'll keep *anything*, even complete and utter shoite, because of some compulsive image hoarding thing.Tony May (talk) 17:23, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

@Tony May: I'm not sure what exactly you are talking about, or why you asked me. You seem to be upset that other people have uploaded photographs of trains that you dislike. Are you concerned these might detract from the photographs of trains that you've uploaded? Having some redundant or less-than-stellar images is par for the course: we don't have a staff of professional photographers out to document everything on earth. No one is obligated to use any image they don't like. If you can point to a clear example of "utter shoite", and make a solid case for why it qualifies for Commons:Deletion policy, have at it. Personally I find my time is better spent in creating rather than taking away. Cheers, --Animalparty (talk) 18:42, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

picture

Dear Oudus,

I am coordinating the publication of a new textbook of zoology (in Italian) and I wonder whether it is possible to use your picture published in

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File%3AWhip_Scorpion_body_(9672115742).jpg

In the case, you will be credited for it. Thank you in advance for your attention.

Best regards Loriano

-- Loriano T. Ballarin, Associate Professor of Zoology Dipartimento di Biologia, Università di Padova Via U. Bassi 58/B, 35100 Padova - Italy Tel.: +39 049 827 6197 Fax: +39 049 827 6199 Email: loriano.ballarin@unipd.it Website: https://sites.google.com/site/ascidianbiologylab/our-staff/loriano-ballarin — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 147.162.3.230 (talk) 12:14, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

@147.162.3.230: Dear Professor Ballarin: While you correctly identified Oudus as the author of File:Whip_Scorpion_body_(9672115742).jpg, I am not Oudus: the Flickr user Oudus created the photograph, and published it on Flickr under the CC BY 2.0 license, I merely transferred it to Commons for reuse. As stated in the file's Licensing section, you are free to copy, distribute, adapt, and transmit the work, without needing additional permission, so long as attribution is given. See the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 description for more details on the license, and Commons:Reusing content outside Wikimedia and Commons:Credit line for guidelines on how to reuse material and credit the author: Note that in the case of this image, Wikimedia Commons (this website) is not the original source of the image, it's merely a host to a copy. Cheers, --Animalparty (talk) 17:13, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Aprobación

@Animalparty: Solicito su aprobación por favor para las siguientes imágenes File:Andrés_Bustamante.jpg,File:Magdalena Leonel de Cervantes.jpg,File:Luis-Doctor García.jpg,File:Christian Martinoli 2.jpg,File:Ana Serradilla.jpg,File:Florinda Meza.jpg,File:Emmanuel Viña del Mar.jpg,File:Hulk in CDMX.jpg --Xoaw (talk) 00:06, 18 May 2019 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:K-K-K-Katy - Duke A3702.jpg

Copyright status: File:K-K-K-Katy - Duke A3702.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:K-K-K-Katy - Duke A3702.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:37, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Senator Mike Gabbard 2015 (cropped).jpg

File:Senator Mike Gabbard 2015 (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Vera ^(talk) 08:20, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Marianne Groß (2013).jpg

العربية ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская‎ ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ русский ∙ ไทย ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Marianne Groß (2013).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

sourced to image since deleted as copyvio Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 13:56, 2 November 2019 (UTC)

@BevinKacon: I'm sure this was a generic boiler plate message, but it's unhelpful and impertinent to the issue at hand. While the original image was already deleted, and I don't care if this one is too (the deleting admin should have seen it), the "derivative" is clearly {{Own work}}, and clearly credited to the original author (Norberto1410) and sourced to such with {{Extracted from}}. What more evidence, template, or statements of license would you be seeking? Cheers, --Animalparty (talk) 00:05, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
To perform file name swaps.
When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Portraits of Katherine Schmidt.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Charles B. Hanford, portraits.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

File tagging File:Fusion Series 2174.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Fusion Series 2174.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Fusion Series 2174.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Masur (talk) 17:51, 13 November 2019 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Idina Menzel.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Gould Drexel

Thanks for catching my error with the Gould Drexel image. Do you have an account at Familysearch? Always good to check that the correct is there too. 23:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

@Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): I don't have a Familysearch account, and don't edit any other database besides Wikidata. It's easy to get confused when these aristocratic families (Drexels, Biddles, Goulds, Astors, Vanderbilts, etc.) all recycle the same names with their children! I'm currently trying to sort out the wives of Frank Jay Gould: his first was named Helen Kelly (and her sister was Miss Eugenia Kelly), and his second was Edith Kelly (whose sister was Hetty Kelly!), so captions like "Mr & Mrs Gould and Miss Kelly" are ambiguous. --Animalparty (talk) 23:25, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

You can add a link to Familysearch at Wikidata. If they had a passport between 1914 and 1925 Familysearch will have the passport applications with photos for comparison. We were able to resolve several mixups using them. You can usually fill in missing birth and death dates from the various docs at FS. RAN (talk) 23:44, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Erica C Barnett.png

File:Erica C Barnett.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Dennis Bratland (talk) 04:10, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Alban Berg (1885–1935) 1909 © Madame d’Ora (1881–1963) Albertina FotoGLV2000-7689.png

Yours sincerely, Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:33, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

File:David Spade live on the Farley Brothers show.webm

File:David Spade live on the Farley Brothers show.webm has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Eatcha (talk) 07:38, 7 January 2020 (UTC)

File:No a la censura (41701310552).jpg

File:No a la censura (41701310552).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 12:40, 17 January 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Betsey Johnson, Red Dress Collection 2007 (cropped).jpg

Yours sincerely, QTHCCAN (talk) 19:50, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Prepending in VisualFileChange

Reg. Special:Diff/389114826: Hello!

Don't forget to end the text you're inserting with \n (enter key) if you want it on a new line. Otherwise the header might break as when you inserted {{Personality rights}}. I fixed the entries.Jonteemil (talk) 15:26, 26 April 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Arthropleura, Parco Natura Viva.jpg

Yours sincerely, Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:46, 28 May 2020 (UTC)

File:Jeffrey Ross July 26, 2009 (5428434535).jpg

File:Jeffrey Ross July 26, 2009 (5428434535).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Despite tag on Flickr, unlikely that The Comedy Store has relicensing rights from Mark David/PictureGroup

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

Closeapple (talk) 19:25, 28 June 2020 (UTC)

copyright

Hello AnimalParty, Apologies is I shouldn't be writing here! You have marked two images that I have uploaded as possible copyright violations. I have requested those to be deleted because they are not copyright violations. But I have been allowed to freely use them. I have emails from Culture Vannin (the organisation that David Fisher has given these images to) to show that I have permission to use these images freely. I hope this clear it up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by CáitChrainn (talk • contribs) 18:12, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

@CáitChrainn: Does Culture Vannin allow anyone to use the images for any purpose, even commercially? Acceptable licenses must allow unrestricted reuse by anyone, not just on Wikipedia or Flickr. When uploading images that you are not the creator of, or that differ from previously published licenses, credible evidence of permission must be forwarded to COM:OTRS: see especially: COM:OTRS#If you are NOT the copyright holder. Ideally, Culture Vannin or other authorized representative of David Fisher should submit proof of permission. In general, works in the UK are copyrighted for a period of 70 years after the creator's death, unless ownership and copyright was legally transferred to another organization or individual. Culture Vannin would need to declare that they are authorized to redistribute images under new licenses. Additional questions can be posted to Commons:Village pump/Copyright. Cheers, --Animalparty (talk) 18:35, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

@Animalparty: Ah ok, I see what you mean. I'll make sure those David Fisher photos are deleted and re-upload them with the proper credible evidence. Thanks very much for helping! CáitChrainn (talk) 18:40, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Mariamonk.jpg

File:Mariamonk.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:09, 22 August 2020 (UTC)

Unidentified photographer

Maybe you can identify the one red linked photographer in this montage. I figured out the others. --RAN (talk) 01:50, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

@Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): I think that is William H. Towles (1871/2-1954), commonly known as Will, who, along with his brother Clarence was active in the Baltimore and Washington D.C. areas, and was president of the Photographers' Society of Pennsylvania in 1915. He was also a photography instructor and authored at least one photography book. He married Miss Bertha J. Evans in 1897. A biographical account is in Who's Who in the Nation's Capital (1921), which gives his birth date as Feb. 9, 1872, in Frostburg, Maryland. --Animalparty (talk) 03:20, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Excellent! The left half of the W was truncated, good research. --RAN (talk) 03:45, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Man_in_White_Costume.jpg

(This conversation moved from User:Animalparty)
You contacted me about the file: Man_in_White_Costume.jpg I had uploaded.

Could you please delete this file, as I uploaded a similar one from Flickr to the Roger Pryor Dodge site.

Thank you!

Waverley123

@Waverley123: : First, please conduct conversations on User talk pages (AKA Discussion pages, like this one), not on User pages themselves. Secondly, please always sign your Talk page comments using four tildes (~~~~), which automatically adds your user name and a time stamp. Regarding File:Man_in_White_Costume.jpg and File:Whitecostume.jpg: You can request a deletion of exact duplicates or scaled down duplicates by editing the file you wish deleted and adding {{Duplicate}} (e.g. {{Duplicate|Larger file.jpg}}. But, more importantly, be aware that not every photo on the internet is posted by the legal copyright holder, and Flickr is notorious for fraudulent license laundering. Generally only the creator or legal owner of rights to an image can decide which license to grant. For media in the public domain (e.g. first published in the U.S. prior to 1925), then appropriate public domain templates should be used, e.g. {{PD-old-70-expired}} or {{PD-US-no notice}}, not misleading and false Creative Commons licenses. All files uploaded that are not your own original creations require sufficient evidence that they are in the public domain or that the copyright owner has released them under a suitable license. For instance, File:RogerPryorDodge-MuraDehn.jpg, there is currently no evidence that the photo is "licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International", and the date, source, and author do not suggest the license is correct, although it may well be public domain due to age if you can provide credible evidence of publication. Cheers, --Animalparty (talk) 03:57, 29 October 2020 (UTC)

File tagging File:George P. Bush in Texas Capitol. 2019 (cropped).jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:George P. Bush in Texas Capitol. 2019 (cropped).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:George P. Bush in Texas Capitol. 2019 (cropped).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

FunnyMath (talk) 01:09, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

File:Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif answers questions after a meeting with Japanese Foreign Minister Taro Kono, May 16, 2019.jpg

File:Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif answers questions after a meeting with Japanese Foreign Minister Taro Kono, May 16, 2019.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: source=https://www.gettyimages.com/detail/news-photo/iranian-foreign-minister-mohammad-javad-zarif-answers-news-photo/1144018847

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Remitamine.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 19:40, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Onychomys torridus torridus.jpg

Yours sincerely, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 23:41, 12 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Iris 1970 (IA iris19701970cool).pdf

Examples like this and a number of other seed catalogs in the same collection are PD-US-nonotice or PD-US-not-renewed, but I didn't feel confident changing them en-masse. I am however placing them in the relevant category and tagging with {{Wrong licence}} when I find a PD-USGov tag.

Much appreciated if you could review the category Category: Henry G. Gilbert Nursery and Seed Trade Catalog Collection when you have time, updating the licences appropriately.

Examples of these can also be found using an 'insource:/usda-nurseryandseedcatalog/' search.

Thanks in advance. ShakespeareFan00 (talk ) 10:03, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

Aside: If someone wanted to go through images from these and identify specifc taxa noted in them it would be much appreciated. II don't know any specialists in this area though. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:05, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

File tagging File:William Sergeant Kendall - Elisabeth Kendall 1987.624.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:William Sergeant Kendall - Elisabeth Kendall 1987.624.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:William Sergeant Kendall - Elisabeth Kendall 1987.624.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Howhontanozaz (talk) 16:00, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

File:William Sergeant Kendall - Elisabeth Kendall 1987.624.jpg

File:William Sergeant Kendall - Elisabeth Kendall 1987.624.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Howhontanozaz (talk) 19:05, 28 January 2021 (UTC)

File:H4712-L60541001.jpg Pay attention to licensing Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. File:H4712-L60541001.jpg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file description page. Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ svenska ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ +/−

Please do not claim copyright on images you did not create, and/or that are in the public domain. Scanning or photographing a pre-existing image (like this one) does not grant you new copyright or attribution rights. Always indicate the source and enough evidence to credibly indicate the public domain status or copyright license. ----Animalparty (talk) 22:15, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Hi Animalparty,

The process to upload directly to the Wiki article only allowed me to state that I had the copyright to it. It's about 100 years old and was given to me for my research - I haven't seen anything else like it on the internet. The original copyright holder passed in 1940. That should qualify for public domain I would think.

--Ilikewiki2020 (talk) 16:04, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

I have looked into it more and have changed the license tag accordingly. --Ilikewiki2020 (talk) 22:11, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Code issues in User:Animalparty/common.js

Hi Animalparty, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

You edited User:Animalparty/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

ISSUE: line 18 character 47: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: importScript('User:Magnus Manske/sdc tool.js')

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 20:21, 27 February 2021 (UTC).

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Homo naledi skeletal specimens (cropped).jpg

Yours sincerely, Fæ (talk) 17:26, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Could you please explain...

You cropped File:Amy_Madigan_(40389212382).jpg. You could have kept the original, and made the cropped version a brand new image. You chose to overwrite the original.

But you didn't say why, in your edit summary, or on File talk:Amy_Madigan_(40389212382).jpg.

Are you responsible for other similar crops? Geo Swan (talk) 05:44, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

@Geo Swan: See Commons:Village_pump/Archive/2019/06#Requesting_a_Large-scale_Courtesy_Deletion_of_Personal_Images_of_Myself and Category:Pending removals to be checked. I may have cropped other images created by the same person, in reasonable and respectful compliance with their wishes. --Animalparty (talk) 05:49, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. I did find that discussion, on my own, a few minutes ago.

I am going to suggest that either (1) all the affected images should have been explicitly listed at the discussion; (2) or every crop should contain a link to the discussion, in its edit summary. If the images were explicitly listed at the discussion, then those with questions over the images could find the discussion with the "what links here" button.

I think your edits, related to that discussion, not only have to make sense to the other people who participated in that discussion, but they have to make sense to uninvolved third parties, like myself, who review what is left behind, later. Geo Swan (talk) 06:00, 8 April 2021 (UTC)

About public domain images, a question

Thank you Animalparty. If I make a modification to an image in the public domain, here from Wikimedia Commons, and generate a new upload, will its license be the standard license from Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0) or will it enter the public domain too? Mário NET (talk) 18:16, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

@Mário NET: If you make minor modifications to a public domain image (for example, simple crops, slight color adjustment, or simple arrows and labels), then the modified image is still probably in the public domain. If you modify the image so much that it becomes a new creative work (see threshold of originality and derivative works), then you could potentially claim authorship and copyright of the new image (but not the original), and release it under any license of your choice. Public domain means that either the copyright has expired (it was published too long ago), or that the creator/copyright holder has explicitly abandoned copyright. Most Creative Commons licenses still indicate the work is under copyright: the creator retains some control over how the image is reused. If you reuse or modify an image released under a CC-BY or CC-BY-SA license, you must attribute the creator, and must indicate if changes have been made (and if modifying a CC-BY-SA image, you must release the modified version under the same or compatible license as the original). This is why the CropTool is so useful: it automatically adds {{Extracted image}}, which indicates the image is modified (cropped) from a larger image. Other templates include {{Retouched picture}} (where you can specify the changes made as well as the editor who made the changes), and {{Derived from}} (useful for more extensive modifications, and/or collages assembled from multiple images). --Animalparty (talk) 02:29, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

ːThanks. I have a lot to study about it. Mário NET (talk) 07:27, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Ettore Arrigoni degli Oddi.jpg

File:Ettore Arrigoni degli Oddi.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Derived from a deleted file (An 1997 image is not old enough to be in PD)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 08:41, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

It seems the photograph was taken in 1900 - https://archive.org/details/Ettore-Arrigoni-degli-Oddi-PHAIDRA_o_3295 Shyamal L. (talk) 12:27, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

We need your feedback!

Hello. Apologies if this message is not in your native language: please feel free to respond in the language of your choice. Thank you!

I am writing to you because we are looking for feedback for a new Wikimedia Foundation project, Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW). SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet. We are now focusing on designing and building image suggestion features for experienced users.

We have some questions to ask you about your experience with uploading images here on Wikimedia Commons and then adding them to Wikipedia. You can answer these questions on a specific feedback page on Mediawiki, where we will gather feedback. As I said, these questions are in English, but your answers do not need to be in English! You can also answer in your own language, if you feel more comfortable.

Once the collecting of feedback will be over, we will sum it up and share with you a summary, along with updated mocks that will incorporate your inputs.

Also, if you want to keep in touch with us or you want to know more about the project, you can subscribe to our newsletter.

Hope to hear from you soon! -- Sannita (WMF) (talk to me!) 09:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

File:William Russell at BAFTA 1998 (cropped).jpg

File:William Russell at BAFTA 1998 (cropped).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Derivative of File:Williamrussellatbafta1998.jpg

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Neveselbert (mobile).

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 23:46, 22 October 2021 (UTC)

File:Craig Kilborn Nob Hill San Francisco (cropped).jpg

File:Craig Kilborn Nob Hill San Francisco (cropped).jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: Re-creation of the image deleted per Commons:Deletion requests/File:CKWikiPhoto.jpg.)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : George Ho.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 08:36, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

File:MeeSiam.jpg

File:MeeSiam.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Эlcobbola _talk 16:13, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

LOC Images

Are you going to take over from User:Fae the automated uploading of the latest tranches of LOC image dumps at Flickr Commons? --RAN (talk) 06:27, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

@Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): No, I have no plans to do so, as I lack the skills of Fae and the time. Cheers, --Animalparty (talk) 22:11, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

I never learned how he did it either, I asked him to show me the tool, but he never responded. I guess he had already left. Very sad for the project. --RAN (talk) 22:45, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Sorry that I am loading the low resolution images from Flickr instead of the LOC ones. The Flickr entry has the crowdsourced context. I wish there was a way to automate adding a link to the Flickr entry, it usually has more accurate date and better identification of the people in the image. Fae missed loading about 1 in 500 of the Bain collection. --RAN (talk) 19:43, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

File:Maler, Grafiker und Bildhauer Alfonso Hüppi (38900721975).jpg

File:Maler, Grafiker und Bildhauer Alfonso Hüppi (38900721975).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Martin Sg. (talk) 13:06, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

File:Gen. Pavel visits ISTC-083 (25259382642).jpg

File:Gen. Pavel visits ISTC-083 (25259382642).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Wikione223 (talk) 19:11, 26 January 2022 (UTC)

University and college yearbooks

University and college yearbooks has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

–IagoQnsi (talk) 04:37, 5 February 2022 (UTC)

File: Tachypompilus unicolor.jpg

This file was licensed for use under Creative Commons 4.0, according to the licence information on http://inaturalist.ca/observations/3903168. I am not going to request a reversal of your decisions regarding the three images I uploaded on 2 September but I would like a fuller explanation, the other two images had Creative Common 3.0 licences. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Quetzal1964 (talk • contribs) 06:25, 03 September 2016 (UTC) Read through the licences and I understand, no need for a response.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Quetzal1964 (talk • contribs) 06:39, 3 September 2016 (UTC)

File:Rafter Romance (1933) still 1.jpg
File:Mort Mills and Paul Newman (Torn Curtain).jpg

Hello Animalparty, Can you please do a cropped version of this files to only show the images of American actor and director Norman Foster and American actor Mort Mills (just crop to show the entire left side of both images).— Preceding unsigned comment was added by 190.57.34.195 (talk) 23:37, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

Library of Congress images

Are you taking over from User:Fae the loading of LOC images? I just saw that you are loading the hires images from the LOC website to overwrite my lowres Flickr Commons versions. Thank you! Occasionally I find a few that did not load and are missing, when comparing Flickr Commons to Wikimedia Commons. Flickr Commons has a project to add context and date the images. I was wondering if your process will find those few missing images from the Bain Collection. RAN (talk) 18:22, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

@Richard Arthur Norton (1958- ): , No, I am not doing anything as methodical as Fae's work. Much more random and piecemeal. If I'm working on an article that has a low resolution LOC image, or notice a category containing several low resolution images, I'll upload full res (and sometimes crops/touch ups). I don't have the programming knowledge or computer power to do what Fae or massive bot uploaders do. --Animalparty (talk) 20:32, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

That was the problem, he never showed anyone how he did it before he retired from the WikiUniverse. I sent him several emails asking if he would make a short YouTube video to show what tools he used, but he never responded, he may have died. Same for my contact at LCCN, he would make changes in their database after I mailed him a list of errors and conflations, then one day he never wrote back, I am assuming he retired, since I never found an obit for him. --RAN (talk) 21:09, 27 July 2022 (UTC)

Tone

Hi, while I appreciate your input on the Wikidata Infobox, I've reverted this simply because of the tone. It seems to be a repeating pattern. I'm happy for you to add the topic back for discussion, but please could you just raise the issue, and drop the hyperbole and attacking? That's particularly important at the moment since we have a GSoC student working on the development. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 06:28, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

File:Ping pong balls (15779205799).jpg

File:Ping pong balls (15779205799).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Mztourist (talk) 09:06, 6 October 2022 (UTC)

Thanks again

I had the opportunity to use the crop tool today. It is soooooooooooo much easier than the technique I was using.

Thanks again. WomenArtistUpdates (talk) 00:20, 14 October 2022 (UTC)

Digital commonwealth and other GLAM files to Commons upload tool(s)

- [2]

Is there a way to mass upload files (such as the one you uploaded above) from digitalcommonwealth.org or other similar websites. I have used the flickr to commons tool. Is there a similar tool for GLAM websites?

Thank you, --Ooligan (talk) 20:31, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

@Ooligan: Aside from Flickr2Commons I'm not very handy with mass uploading. Commons:GLAMwiki Toolset and Commons:Pattypan might prove helpful. You can also propose bot assisted mass uploads at Commons:Batch uploading, where the community can evaluate feasibility and determine some best practices (e.g. which template and license to use, how best to transfer metadata, etc.) before implementation. And lastly, anecdotally, it appears that the Boston Public Library Flickr stream adds a needless, more restrictive CC license to public domain media (e.g. here), even though they state "no known copyright restrictions," in what resembles Copyfraud. Requiring attribution, and/or a link to a CC license, is not a requirement for faithful scans of public domain images, especially in the US where "sweat of the brow" doctrine doesn't confer any additional copyright authorship to the person scanning or uploading a work (see {{PD-Scan}} and Commons:Threshold of originality). Cheers, --Animalparty (talk) 22:17, 7 March 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for the reply.

In "faithful scans of public domain images"- Is a download or screenshot on a PC of a PD-expired image a faithful scan? Or do I need to do I need to use scanner equipment?

Also, can I take a photo of an original PD photo and release for use it as PD? Similarly, Can I take a photo of a PD-expired photo that has been published in a book and release it as PD?

Thanks, --Ooligan (talk) 00:43, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Downloads and screenshots would be faithful replicas, yes, although screenshots are typically of lowered resolution and thus non-optimal (as would photos of photos). Attribution, while not required, is helpful in tracking provenance. DS (talk) 19:53, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Methodologies

Wanted to be sure you were aware of the methodology described here, which you may find useful. DS (talk) 19:44, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Elisabeth Bergner by Mario von Bucovich, c. 1929 (cropped).jpg

And also:

File:Wilhelm (William) Dieterle by Alexander Binder, c. 1928.jpg

Yours sincerely, . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:56, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

hi!!!

just want to say hi!!!! BoulevardBowl27 (talk) 16:16, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Commons:License review request

Hi. The EN article Kae Miller is up for Good Article nomination, and the reviewer is waiting on two images that I uploaded to be reviewed. I'm a fellow License reviewer, but obviously can't review images I uploaded myself. Would you be so good as to stamp, and thereby confirm that

File:Kae Miller - Landscape.jpg (and therefore its derivative File:Kae Miller - Landscape (cropped).jpg)
File:Kae Miller - Porirua landfill lodge.jpg

are properly licensed at https://www.maxrashbrooke.net/the-good-society/kae-miller ? Max Rashbrooke is an author and her grandson. https://www.maxrashbrooke.net/more-about-me Thank you! --GRuban (talk) 19:08, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Done by another License reviewer. --GRuban (talk) 20:47, 6 February 2023 (UTC)

re: Not all of us contribute to commons

Hi Animalparty/Archive 1:

A while ago you responded to my posting at the Village pump]. I just wanted to thank you, and since you said that you would "be very interested in hearing more about how consumers use and view Commons" I wonder if I can answer some of the questions you may have.

I am an editor who contributes content mainly at the English Wikiquote, where images are an important part of that wiki. My difficulty at Commons, most of the time, is to locate images using the commons categories. If you have any questions please do not hesitate to ask me. I visit Commons periodically and will subscribe to this thread.

Cheers, Ottawahitech (talk) 19:32, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

User talk:Animalparty/Archive 1

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

Albion Prints

Mistaken block

CC-NC license cannot be uploaded to Commons

Congratulations, Dear license reviewer

Please conisder adding iw-links here on Commons

review image :)

File tagging File:N-decemspinosa.jpg

Valued Image Promotion

A kitten for you!

A Question

2 images

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

File listed for deletion

File:Katharine_Graham.jpg

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:140618-N-PX557-044 (14265686129).jpg

Notification about possible deletion

Valued Image Promotion

File:Mascara Sagrada 2009.jpg

Sara Lund

Notification about possible deletion

Category:Guillaume Dheulland

Why do you think Commons has quality control?

picture

Aprobación

Copyright status: File:K-K-K-Katy - Duke A3702.jpg

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Marianne Groß (2013).jpg

Important message for file movers

Valued Image Promotion

Valued Image Promotion

File tagging File:Fusion Series 2174.jpg

Valued Image Promotion

Gould Drexel

Notification about possible deletion

Notification about possible deletion

Prepending in VisualFileChange

Notification about possible deletion

copyright

Unidentified photographer

Man_in_White_Costume.jpg

File tagging File:George P. Bush in Texas Capitol. 2019 (cropped).jpg

Notification about possible deletion

File tagging File:William Sergeant Kendall - Elisabeth Kendall 1987.624.jpg

Code issues in User:Animalparty/common.js

Notification about possible deletion

Could you please explain...

About public domain images, a question

We need your feedback!

LOC Images

University and college yearbooks

File: Tachypompilus unicolor.jpg

Library of Congress images

Tone

Thanks again

Digital commonwealth and other GLAM files to Commons upload tool(s)

Methodologies

Notification about possible deletion

hi!!!

Commons:License review request

re: Not all of us contribute to commons

Navigation menu

Search