User talk:-revi/Archive/2014

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Happy new year, dear visitor!

Happy new year! --레비Revi 03:46, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: --레비Revi 03:46, 2 January 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Elite Filemover Barnstar
Good job in moving files and keep it up! :) Jianhui67 talkcontribs 17:03, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
Thank you. :) --레비Revi 12:07, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --레비Revi 12:07, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Flickr review

Dear Hym411, Thank you for your efforts in flickr reviewing. If you find an image with a given source that is not Flickr at all, but is clearly copyrighted, like facebook, please nominate as copyright violation for speedy deletion. Then there is a little trick when the flickr-source is "farm.static.flickr...." etc. You can retrieve the information for this type of link through the Flinfo tool. You are really helpful, thank you! Kind regards, Lymantria (talk) 10:57, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

  1. OK.
  2. I didn't know about the tool. Thanks for notification. --레비Revi 11:02, 6 January 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --레비Revi 09:55, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

A blog has an odd license statement

Hi Hym411, I find a very odd photography blog, http://wasabcon.tistory.com/664. The main page of the blog has this message: Welcome!​ wasaB's contents​... 타사이트로의 재게시와 무단 2차가공은 금지합니다.. 문의는 방명록이나 댓글로 남겨주세요... (Unauthorized re-publish the site with other secondary processing is prohibited. Contact the guestbook or to leave a comment ...) However, I also find the CC-BY icon at the bottom of the each article of the blog, for example: http://wasabcon.tistory.com/664. what should I do? Should we contact the owner of the blog to clarify the licensing of his/her content? --Puramyun31 (talk) 15:34, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

I think specific article's license setting is more trustable,but still license is unclear, I'll try to contact him in the morning. (If you want to, you can leave him a message now.) --레비Revi 15:41, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Didn't yet you contact the blog owner? Actually I don't perfectly understand Korean. --Puramyun31 (talk) 13:27, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Left a note on guestbook some minutes ago. --레비Revi 13:28, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for your effort. If you have his/her answer, then please leave a message on my talk page. --Puramyun31 (talk) 13:34, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
@Puramyun31: Allowed to upload. --레비Revi 11:11, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
Oh, I hope to thank the blog owner. Best regards. --Puramyun31 (talk) 20:40, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: 레비Revi16:34, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Pétafine onctueuse

Bonjour

La source est bien http://www.flickr.com/photos/23548303@N00/1436650834/ image recadrée et transformée car libre de droit (Source is http:http://www.flickr.com/photos/23548303@N00/1436650834/ cropped and turned image because free right) --JPS68 (talk) 16:18, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thanks for notification, but please only use English or Korean, because I can only speak them. --레비Revi 16:33, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: --레비Revi 16:33, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Puramyun

Puramyun uploaded several images from a Korean site below. There may be more images as I just saw these. Perhaps you could mark them?

Thank You, Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:27, 13 January 2014 (UTC)


Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:48, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

I'll do it as soon as I wake up in the morning. --레비Revi 15:34, 13 January 2014 (UTC)
Already done by Alan (talk · contribs). --레비Revi 04:34, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: 레비Revi 04:34, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

해명 요함

모든 기여를 CCL의 CC-BY-SA 3.0 이상으로 배포한다는 언급을 하긴 했으나, 공용으로의 이전과 저작권 라이선스 부착에 대한 어떠한 통보도 받지 못하였습니다.(물론, 허락을 한 바도 없습니다.) 지금 이 사안의 경우에는 무작정 이동이 시행되었고, 또한 그 내용 역시 잘못된 기술이었다는 점을 감안하면 이는 상당히 심각한 수준으로 판단됩니다. 따라서 여기에 대한 적절한 해명을 요구합니다. --Idh0854 (talk) 17:26, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

모든 기여를 CC BY SA 3.0 이상으로 배포한다는 것은 사진 또한 같은 라이선스로 배포한다고 볼 수 있으며, 사진의 공용 업로드에 대해 업로더에게 통보해야 할 의무는 없습니다. (한국어 위키백과의 문서의 작성자에게 문서의 소유권이 없음을 생각하시면 될 겁니다.) 제 당시 질의는 사진의 라이선스를 밝혀 줄 것을 요구하는 것이었으므로, 해당 사진의 라이선스를 CC BY-SA-3.0 으로 한다는 답변으로 해석한 것입니다. --레비Revi 17:31, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
무슨 말씀인지 모르겠는데요. 지금 제가 말하는 건 단순합니다. 현재 모든 기여를 CC-BY-SA 3.0 이상으로 배포하고 있다고 했다고 했지만, 제가 지금 그 저작물을 그 저작권 라이선스를 선언한다고 한 적도 없고, 제가 그걸 선언하지도 않았는데, 단순 이용자가 대신 선언하고, 또 그것이 자의적 해석에서 비롯되었다는 것이라는 것이 하나 있고요. 또 소유권과 저작권을 혼동하고 계신다는 겁니다. 통보를 받지 못했다는 점은 저작권자로서 이야기하는 것이 아니라, 소유권자로서 이야기하고 있다는 점을 염두에 두시면 좋겠습니다. --Idh0854 (talk) 17:40, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
  1. 그렇다면 라이선스에 대한 점은 제가 잘못 이해했군요. 그 점은 사과드립니다.
  2. 이해하지 못하겠는데요. 원래부터 사진을 옮길 때 사진의 소유권자에게 통보해야 하나요? 전 아니라고 보는데요. --레비Revi 17:43, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
  1. 이해 뿐만 아니라 라이선스를 대신 부착한 것 자체가 문제인 겁니다.
  2. 자신이 아니라고 생각한다고 해서 없는 것도, 아닌 것도 아닙니다. 대한민국 민법 제211조(소유권의 내용)를 보면, ‘소유자는 법률의 범위내에서 그 소유물을 사용, 수익, 처분할 권리가 있다.’라고 명시되어 있으며, 이 말인 즉슨 소유권은 재산권의 일종이라는 의미이며, 이를 흔히 지적재산권 혹은 지적소유권이라 부릅니다. 지적재산권은 저작권과는 별개로서 엄연히 다르다는 점을 유념하시기 바랍니다.
  3. 저는 잘못 기술된 내용에 대한 해명은 아직 듣지 못했습니다.
--Idh0854 (talk) 17:49, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
  1. 알겠습니다. 삭제 신청 하겠습니다.
  2. 알겠습니다.
  3. 1의 대답으로 갈음할 수 있을 것 같군요. --레비Revi 17:52, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
지금 스스로 무슨 말씀을 하는 것인지는 알고 하시는 말씀인가요? 이런 행위를 하신 분께서 삭제 신청을 하겠다는 것은 제 본 저작물은 어떻게 한다는 말이죠? 그리고 저는 해명을 요구했지, 삭제할 것을 말씀드린 적은 없는데, 그렇게 나오시면 곤란합니다. --Idh0854 (talk) 17:55, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
업로드가 관리자에게만 제한되어도 삭제된 파일의 복구는 가능합니다. 그리고 해명에 대해서는 사과 외에는 드릴 것이 없군요. 저는 위에 말씀드린 바와 같이 CC BY-SA-3.0으로 배포하신다는 말을 듣고 파일 또한 같은 라이선스로 배포되는 줄 알았습니다. 지적재산권에 대해 알고 있지는 않았습니다.(물론 무지하다고 해서 무죄일 수는 없다는 점은 알고 있습니다.) 저는 시간이 늦어 자러 가니 답변에 대한 응답은 내일 아침에 하도록 하겠습니다. --레비Revi 18:01, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
학교명과 학과명이 잘못 기술되어 오해를 다분히 일으킬 수 있었던 것에 대한 해명이 ‘알겠습니다. 삭제 신청 하겠습니다.’라는 것인가요? 그리고 저는 단순히 해명을 요구했을 뿐이지, 파일의 이후 행방에 대해서 무언가를 요구한 적은 없다는 것을 알아주시기 바랍니다. --Idh0854 (talk) 18:06, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

제 해명은 위에서 다 했다고 생각하는데요. 저는 아직 모자라서 행간에 얽힌 의미를 읽어내지는 못하겠네요. 파일에 대해서는, 귀하의 발언에 따라 취해야 할 조치를 취했다고 생각하면 되겠습니다. 본인이 CC BY-SA-3.0으로 배포한 적은 없다 고 말씀하시니, 해당 파일의 라이선스가 잘못된 것이며, 해당 파일은 위키미디어 공용 혹은 한국어 위키뉴스에서 존재해서는 안 되죠. 두 프로젝트 모두 공정이용을 허용하지 않으니까요. --레비Revi 18:15, 14 January 2014 (UTC)

저는 학교명과 학과명이 잘못 기재된 것에 대한 해명은 듣지 못했는데, 다 했다고 말하면 뭐라 말씀을 드려야 할까요. 그리고 그 권위주의적 태도가 한국어 위키위키 전반에 퍼져있고, 그렇기 때문에 한국어 위키위키들에 대한 불신이 커져나간다는 사실 역시도 굳이 제가 제 입으로 말씀드려야 하나요? 덧붙여서 저는 분명 위키뉴스에서 라이선스 틀이 없고, 또 모든 기여가 CCL의 CC-BY-SA 3.0 이상으로 배포된다고 말씀드린 적은 있지만,(→ en link) 공정 이용을 한다거나, 대신 CCL의 CC-BY-SA 3.0 이상으로 배포할 것을 선언해달라고 한 적은 없습니다. 그렇기 때문에 위키뉴스에 존재해서도 안 된다는 말씀은 성급한 일반화의 오류입니다. 다시 한 번 의미를 곱씹어보시길 바랍니다. --Idh0854 (talk) 07:10, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
귀하가 한국어 위키위키에 불신감이 생기는 것은 저와 전혀 관련이 없는 일이며, 저로썬 곱씹어도 잘 모르겠네요. 더이상 드릴 말씀이 없는 것 같습니다. --레비Revi 09:35, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
바로 귀하의 토론 태도와 이 사태의 근본적 행위가 지니는 의미가 권위적이라는 것인데, 그것이 본인과 전혀 관계가 없다고 생각하신다면 어쩔 수 없는 노릇일 것입니다. 덧붙여서 저는 귀하께서 자의적으로 제 저작권의 라이선스를 선언했음에도 불고하고, 그것을 철회한다고 발언한 적이 없기 때문에 해당 삭제 토론에서 하시는 말씀은 모두 기존의 문제제기와 같이 자의적 판단에서 비롯된 허무맹랑한 소리일 뿐입니다. --Idh0854 (talk) 10:38, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
권위적이라는 부분에 제가 코멘트를 했나요? 전 귀하의 불신감과는 관련이 없다는 말만 했는데요. 그리고 제 자의적인 라이선스 설정이 잘못됐고, 귀하는 해당 라이선스로 파일을 배포히지 않았다고 했습니다. 그렇다면 라이선스 없음 혹은 허가 없음으로 지워져야겠죠.--레비Revi 10:43, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
(위키뉴스에서 저작권 라이선스 틀이 생기면 스스로 부착할 것임에도 불구하고) 공용으로의 이동 및 자의적으로 행한 라이선스 틀 부착과 잘못된 지식 입력을 입력했다는 것에 해명을 요구했더니, 지우면 그만이라는 그 태도가 권위적이라는 것이며, 그것을 귀하께서 ‘저와 전혀 관련이 없는 일’로 치부하기에, 저는 어쩔 수 없다고 했더니, 거기에 대해서는 코멘트를 하지 않았다고 발뺌하고 계시는 것이 현 상황이라는 점을 직시하시기 바랍니다. 제가 말하고자 하는 바는, 단순히 그것에 대한 해명을 요구하는 것이지, 저는 사진의 삭제를 요구한 바 없고 사진을 어떻게 처리할 것인가, 혹은 라이선스를 바꿀 것인가에 대한 언급도 일절 없습니다. 그럼에도 또다시 자의적 판단에 의거하여 논점 이탈을 하고 계시는 것은 바로 귀하이십니다. 이것이 아무리 기분이 얹짢으셔도─저작권과 소유권이 무시당한 입장도 고려하시고─ 맥락은 바로 이해하셔야 할 것입니다. --Idh0854 (talk) 10:50, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
라이선스 틀은 없다면 본인이 만들면 됩니다. 다시 말하지만, 처음에 기여를 CC-BY-SA-3.0으로 올린다는 발언에 근거, 저는 파일을 해당 라이선스라고 판단했었고, 그에 따라 파일을 해당 라이선스로 이동했었습니다. 설명에 관해서는 해당 기사를 기준으로 쓴 겁니다. 이제 더 말할 것도 없는데, 뭘 계속 해명하라는 지 이해할 수 없네요. --레비Revi 10:56, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
역시나 어딜 가나 빠지지 않네요. ‘없으면 네가 직접 해라’라는 그 사고방식 말입니다. 애초에 그건 논점 자체가 다릅니다. 없어서 안 달았다는 걸 알면, 자신이 직접 해당 라이선스 틀을 만들어놓고 달지 않겠냐고 묻던가, 혹은 자신이 공용으로 옮길 예정인데, 토론란에서 자신의 모든 기여를 CC-BY-SA 3.0 이상으로 배포한다고 하셨던 것을 참고하여 해당 라이선스를 대신 부착해도 되겠냐고 묻는 것이 순리인 것을, 통보할 의무가 없다면서, 자의적으로 해석했다는 것을 마치 당연한 듯이 이야기하고, 기 이후에도 적반하장으로 계속해서 말씀하고 계시는 그 행위에 대해 저는 지금 이야기 하고 있습니다. 공용으로 옮겨와서 서술한 내용 역시 그러합니다. ‘부산대학교 통상학부’는 대체 어디에 있는 학부입니까? 모르는 것을 대충 끼워맞춰 기입하는 건 선의가 아니고, 저 역시 선의로 보고 있지 않습니다. 자신이 선의라고 생각한다고 해서, 타인도 동일하게 생각할 거라고 생각하진 마시기 바랍니다. 모르면 무엇인지 본 소유권자에게 물어보는 것이 맞음에도 불구하고 무작정 기입하여─사진이 속해 있던 기사를 보고 썼다는 거짓말 대신에 몰랐었다고, 사과를 했었으면 어땠을까요─ 잘못된 정보를 전달한 것은 크나 큰 문제입니다. 처음에 잘못된 정보 기입에 대해 해명을 요청했더니, ‘1의 대답으로 갈음할 수 있을 것 같군요.’라고 대답하였고 그 해당 1번은 ‘알겠습니다. 삭제 신청 하겠습니다.’라는 내용에 불과한데, 요구한 해명이란 것이 단순히 알겠다는 것이자, 삭제하겠다는 그러한 무책임한 답변인 것입니까? 책임지지 못할 일은 벌이지 않는 것이 상책입니다. 그럼에도 그렇게 당당하게 나올 수 있는 그 저의가 무엇인지 저는 궁금해집니다. --Idh0854 (talk) 11:12, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
그래서 저는 귀하가 제게 무슨 답을 원하는지도 모르겠고, 귀하가 제가 지금 그 밀을 해 봤자 믿을 리도 없겠죠. --레비Revi 12:07, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
원하는 답이란 건 없습니다. 단순히 해명을 하라는 것인데 일부는 해명도 안 했고, 일부는 주제 이탈을 하고 있으니까, 재차 적절한 답변을 달라는 것일 뿐입니다. --Idh0854 (talk) 13:02, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

좋습니다. 처음으로 돌아가서, 1)파일의 설명에 대해서는 제 딴에는 제대로 쓴다고 쓴 게 잘못 쓴 것 같기도 합니다. 기사를 잘못 봤나 보죠. 2)라이선스는 위에서 말한 대로 귀하의 말을 근거로 한 것은 맞지만, 귀하에게 묻지도 않고 그냥 무작정 옮긴 것, 그리고 라이선스 태그를 무직정 부착한 것도 잘못한 것임을 인정합니다. 제가 할 수 있는 말은 다 했네요. --레비Revi 13:57, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

처음부터 그렇게 말씀하셨으면 될 일 아닙니까? 왜 굳이 자신의 행위가 정당하다는 식으로, 잘못이 없다는 식으로 말씀하셨는 것인지 전혀 이해할 수가 없군요. --Idh0854 (talk) 15:25, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: 레비Revi 15:26, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

The license version of Tistory Creative Commons images

The correct license version of Tistory Creative Commons images is 2.0 kr, see this page. However, I need your help to re-tag many free tistory images. Current license tag of free Tistory images uploaded Commons is CC-BY-3.0. Regards. --Puramyun31 (talk) 21:55, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Also, Can you create a new category, like "Free images from Tistory"? --Puramyun31 (talk) 22:07, 17 January 2014 (UTC)
I'll try some AWB to change license. And Category:Images from Tistory will be created while I am doing. ㅡ레비Revi 04:33, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
@Puramyun31: I saw link now, and I am sure that the 2.0-kr is limited to that link, so it is not for all tistory files. ㅡ레비Revi 08:17, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
AWB wikitext search gives me +400 links with text tistory.com. I will check all pages with this link, and add them to cat, (if file did not have {{LicenseReview}}) add template, and so on. ㅡ레비Revi 13:34, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: 레비Revi 13:34, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Suddenly there are quite a few Korean images in this category but I cannot mark them as I don't know the license for certain. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:54, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Seems already done by someone else. ㅡ레비Revi 03:47, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
  •  Comment: Wow! Someone must have been watching your talkpage because when I made this comment, there were 30 images. Now there is only 4. It was this reviewer who marked the images. Personally, its good to know that he can read Korean. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:24, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: 레비Revi 03:47, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

With this file, the move should have been declined. The uploader had put in a new version, contrary to the guidance, and should have been directed to upload their version to the desired name.  — billinghurst sDrewth 09:50, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't know about that. I will see file history in the future. ㅡ레비Revi 09:53, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
Not a worry. It is not always obvious, and this request was a little quirky. It is never a problem to decline, even temporarily, a rename request while seeking extra information. Just because it is suggested doesn't mean that we do it.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:42, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
OK. :-D ㅡ레비Revi 13:41, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: 레비Revi 13:41, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

M type240-2.jpg에 관한 질문

안녕하세요, 모국어가 한국어라 한국어로 토론문서를 남겨봅니다. 제가 위키피디아 경력이 초보라서 아직 저작권 문제에 대해서 실수하는 편이 많기 때문에 아마도 이번의 경우에도 제가 무언가를 잘못한거지 싶습니다. 우선 삭제하신 File:M type240-2.jpg 사진의 경우 원작자에게 CC3.0으로의 허가를 받은 것인데도 문제가 되는 것에 대한 이유.. 가 궁금하며, 또한 저작권이 문제가 된 것이라면 같이 올린 사진 두개 모두가 삭제가 됐어야 하지 않은가 싶습니다. 늦은 시간에 수고 많으십니다. 확인하시면 간단한 메시지 남겨주시면 감사하겠습니다 :D--Ewigkeits (talk) 14:38, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

삭제가 된 것은 아니고, 삭제가 될 거라고 경고를 한 것입니다. 해당 파일을 허가받으실 때 이메일로 받으셨나요? —레비Revi 14:33, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
허가는 원작자와 직접 쪽지로 주고 받았으며, 파일 원본은 이메일이 아니라 플리커에서 원본을 다운로드 가능하게 설정을 바꿔주셨었습니다.--Ewigkeits (talk) 14:38, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
해당 쪽지를 캡쳐해서 옆의 이메일 보내기 로 보내주세요. 파일의 저작권이 맞다면 제가 삭제 신청을 취소하겠습니다. —레비Revi 14:41, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
이미 지워졌네요. 복구 요청을 넣어야 할 듯 싶네요. —레비Revi 14:44, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
오타가 있는 듯 하여 수정해 드렸습니다. 만약 의도적으로 사용하였을 경우에는 그냥 되돌려 주세요. 좋은 주말 보내시기를 바랍니다!--콩가루 (talk) 14:48, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
늦은 시간에도 친절한 대응 감사드립니다.--Ewigkeits (talk) 15:01, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: 레비Revi 15:31, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, -revi/Archive. You have new messages at Jenny Carnie's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  বাংলা  català  čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  suomi  français  galego  हिन्दी  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  ქართული  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Türkçe  简体中文  繁體中文  +/−

This section was archived on a request by: 레비Revi 14:52, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

RFA (2)

Hello,

I had trouble to find the good way to do it, and, finally, you and I put the good notification in a few second. So, we had a double notification. I let only one, and delete the second. Marianne Casamance (talk) 11:31, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Always, new requests have to be on the top of requests. Have a nice day! :D —레비Revi 11:33, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
OK, have a nice day Marianne Casamance (talk) 11:34, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: 레비Revi 11:33, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi! I found the uploaded picture at [1]

I think, the licence is right for Commons. If not, please inform me about in detail.

Please inform me, how to upload flickre pictures directly from flickr

Thank you Bergwerker (talk) 11:28, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi Bergwerker, I see license suit for Commons, so, you can try Flickr upload bot for flickr files. Have a nice day, —레비Revi 11:31, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
Oh, ok. @Bergwerker: Please put that link to |source= section of {{Information}}, and remove no source template, and replace {{User:FlickrRevieweR/(blah blah)}} to {{FlickrReview}}. Thanks. —레비Revi 11:42, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
You already put link to file description file, so I have put {{FlickrReview}}, and commanded bot to check the file again. I think file will be verified by Flickr Reviewer bot or license reviewer like me. Cheers, —레비Revi 11:46, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: 레비Revi 11:46, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

RFA

Here it is: Commons:Administrators/Requests/Hym411. When you get a chance you'll need to reply directly under my nomination with a statement of acceptance. Good luck! INeverCry 18:15, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. —레비Revi 01:28, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
관리자 선거에서 당선되기를 기원합니다! 그러면 한국어로 무언가를 처리하기, 즉 한국어 삭제 신청이라단지 이러한 것의 처리가 더욱 쉬워지겠지요. --콩가루 (talk) 14:50, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
It was closed as successful. Congratulations and good luck! Jcb (talk) 15:56, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Thanks, @INeverCry, 콩가루, and Jcb: !—레비Revi 16:47, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: 레비Revi 16:47, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Special Barnstar
thanks for your help. Marianne Casamance (talk) 11:36, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Thanks! —레비Revi 11:37, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: 레비Revi 16:49, 31 January 2014 (UTC)


File:Doukas CoA.png

Hi Hym411, sorry but I can not comment. I would have liked this file remain in wikimedia, but must be erased I can not do anything. A greetings Кардам (talk) 02:24, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Why you cannot comment? You commented here, so you can comment on DR page!
File is pretty simple, but I was not sure about copyright status of that file, I nominated for DR. Other admin will comclude this DR.—레비Revi 02:29, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: 레비Revi 02:29, 1 February 2014 (UTC)

Suddenly human flickr review is drowning in images with 60+ images to be marked. I have had to mark 70 images at picasa review today. Goodnight from Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:12, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

FlickreviewR stopped 1 February 2014~3 February 2014, so there probably is many files needing human review.
Picasa review bot is not working since March 2012. —레비Revi 09:17, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
Ok.—레비Revi 09:43, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: 레비Revi 09:51, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Congratulations, Dear Administrator!

čeština  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  English  español  فارسی  suomi  français  magyar  հայերեն  Bahasa Indonesia  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  +/−


An offering for our new administrator from your comrades...

-revi, congratulations! You now have administrator rights on Commons. Please take a moment to read the Commons:Administrators page and watchlist related pages (in particular Commons:Administrators' noticeboard and its subpages), before launching yourself into page deletions, page protections, account blockings or modifications of protected pages. The majority of the actions of administrators can be reversed by the other admins, except for history merges which must thus be treated with particular care. Have a look at the list of Gadgets (on the bottom there are the ones specifically for admins – however, for example the UserMessages are very helpful too).

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons webchat on irc.libera.chat. There is also a channel for Commons admins, which may be useful for more sensitive topics, or coordination among administrators: #wikimedia-commons-admin webchat.

You may find Commons:Guide to adminship to be useful reading. You can find the admin backlog overview at COM:AB.

Please also check or add your entry to the List of administrators and the related lists by language and date it references.

-- Cecil (talk) 15:56, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! —레비Revi 16:50, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
Congratulations my friend! JianhuiMobile (talk) 00:25, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
레비 님 관리자 당선을 축하드립니다. 한국어권 관리자의 역할을 충실히 하기를 기대합니다.--콩가루 (talk) 01:47, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
Hey, congratulations. --Saqib (talk) 09:32, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
@Cecil, JianhuiMobile, 콩가루, and Saqib: Thanks!—레비Revi 13:15, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
Congrats and good luck! Trijnsteltalk 15:17, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
Glad to have you on board! -- Rillke(q?) 11:34, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
@Trijnstel and Rillke: Thanks, too!—레비Revi 11:42, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Congrats Revi! Good luck! (✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 07:52, 3 February 2014 (UTC)

@Arctic Kangaroo: Thanks.—레비Revi 09:11, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: 레비Revi 09:11, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Hello,

Could you please have a look at the contributions of this user? Thanks a lot in advance, Yann (talk) 16:34, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

It seems to be eligible for speedy (or nuke) per COM:NETCOPYRIGHT. All his/her contribution cannot be own work. —레비Revi 22:26, 7 February 2014 (UTC)
@Yann: I nuked it few hours ago.—레비Revi 12:58, 8 February 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: 레비Revi 12:58, 8 February 2014 (UTC)

Just note that there are perhaps 80-100 images from a Korean web site in license review. I cannot verify the license--only you can as you know Korean. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:10, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

I'll do it some everyday (as I am busy in real life these days). —레비Revi 08:15, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • That's quite OK. We are all volunteers anyway. Please mark what you can. I was free the past few days so I could mark 200+ picasa, panoramio and flickr images here but everyone has a limit. Monday is a holiday in Metro Vancouver, Canada so I had a bit more time to mark images too but tomorrow its back to work. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:41, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
And it is wonderful that now Picasa Review Bot 2 (talk · contribs) is working now. —레비Revi 03:42, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Yes, Thank God! The last time I saw slick bot leaving 700-800 images in the picasa images for review category, I almost wept. Its 7:44 PM here on Monday night in Vancouver. Have a good Tuesday in Korea. --Leoboudv (talk) 03:45, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
And fyi, use [[:Category:Category name]] for topic or linking internal link next time.—레비Revi 04:20, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: 레비Revi 08:15, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

조수미씨 초등,고등학교 사진 왜 삭제하셨는지요?

2009년 일본 BS아시히 방송에서 조수미 특집방송중에 나온 사진 캡쳐한 건데요. 유튜브에도 영상이 있고, 조수미씨 초등학교 노래하는 사진은 2004년에 국정홍보처 cf에도 나왔던 사진이구요. 사진출처를 표시안해거 그런건지요?— Preceding unsigned comment added by 175.213.71.107 (talk • contribs)

사진이 자유롭게 사용 가능하다는 증거가 없습니다. 위키미디어 공용에 올라오는 모든 사진은 상업적으로 사용 가능해야 하며, 2차 창작을 할 자유가 보장되어야 합니다. 인터넷 스크린샷은 그러한 내용을 보증할 수 없으며, 말씀하신 대로라면 해당 사진들은 인터넷에서 캡쳐한 사진들이므로 저작권 침해로 간주됩니다. 따라서 삭제한 것입니다.—레비Revi 05:55, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: 레비Revi 05:56, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. If two of us are working through the log at the same time using the script DelReqHandler, which makes closing DRs much faster, it is easy for both of us to close the same DR. I'm lucky there weren't several more doubles. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:03, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Yes, so I always refresh the page when I close one DR with DelReqHandler. :D —레비Revi 14:06, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
The whole point of using DelReqHandler is to avoid page refreshes to speed up our work. As you gain more experience and do more deletions, I'll wager you'll stop refreshing after every closure. By the way, you may find User:Jameslwoodward/Commons notes for administrators useful. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:05, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
:-) Thanks for your useful link. —레비Revi 11:08, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: 레비Revi 16:03, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Re diff: I don't think CommonsDelinker's category move function is working, judging by Special:Contributions/CommonsDelinker, which has no reference to categories in any of the edit summaries. In fact, I've been fulfilling most of the category move requests myself. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 10:38, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Hazard-Bot (talk · contribs) took over category moving. —레비Revi 10:49, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
That's only on the main page of User:CommonsDelinker/commands though. I've been doing most of the requests on the talkpage myself. Can you help weed out or determine which of those requests are controversial, e.g. here? I'm afraid the bot might not know when a category move request has been contested, and will go along with the request disregarding the objections raised. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 10:54, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
Bot only recognize command in COM:CDC. I'll check the talk page, and command uncontroversial things. —레비Revi 10:58, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Please don't. My routine has been, while processing each of the tens of categories there, as follows:

  1. Copy-paste content from former catname to newer catname.
  2. Attribute original authors from former catname's history page.
  3. Use Cat-A-Lot/HotCat to move files & categories to new catname.
  4. Add templates {{Badname}} or {{Category redirect}} to former catname.
    1. If it is a simple misspelling or typo, I use {{Badname}} because I assume autocomplete or Special:Search will automatically look for the newer category name anyway.
    2. If the newer catname is a synonym of the former catname, I use {{Category redirect}}
  5. Create an associated Wikidata item for the newer catname.
  6. Create claim (aka 'statement' on Wikidata) "instance of" with property "Wikimedia category page" for the new item.
  7. If there's a topic on English Wikipedia associated with the newer catname, or if there are stray interwiki links, I also move them to Wikidata.
    1. I will add/change the associated topic's Wikidata item to have claim "Commons category" with the property containing the newer catname.
    2. I will add the claim "category's main topic" to the newer catname's Wikidata item.
    3. I will add the template {{On Wikidata}} to the newer catname to point to item containing the associated topic on English Wikipedia.

I think that Hazard-Bot is not only ill-equipped or ill-configured to be able to judge which category move requests are controversial or uncontroversial, but that it is unable to do 6 or 7, and I think the job of moving such categories is better left for human review. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 11:27, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

I mean, when the request at User talk page is non-controversal, and has no problem, I will let bot do instead of doing Cat-a-lot myself. Other thing will be done by myself. And, I am currently bit busy, so I'll start tomorrow. —레비Revi 11:33, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
There's no problem with doing this per Bot as it only moves request from the main page, those request are only placed there by an admin. All other users place their requests at the talk page where they could be discussed, denied or confirmed and transferred to the main site. --Denniss (talk) 12:04, 15 February 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: 레비Revi 16:04, 15 February 2014 (UTC)

Barnstar for you!

The Copyright inspector Barnstar
티스토리 사진들의 라이선스 문제를 깔끔하게 해결해 주신 레비Revi님께 이 반스타를 드립니다. 감사합니다. Leedkmn (talk) 15:26, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
감사합니다. —레비Revi 15:32, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: 레비Revi 15:32, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Can you please add some more requests to the main page at User:CommonsDelinker/commands if you're going to go through with this? Orrling specified when he asked someone to move the category to also rename the subcategories using "Sign" --> "signs" as rule. Category:Diagrams of Japanese Prefecture Route signs still has some categories like Category:Diagrams of Japanese Prefecture Route Sign for Intersection‎ which need renaming to Category:Diagrams of Japanese Prefecture Route signs for intersection‎s. Oh, can you also check the subcategories for all the other move proposals? Much thanks for taking a look at it again. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 02:24, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

I'm currently bit busy, so if you can make a list with {{Move cat}}, I will put it to COM:CDC. —레비Revi 04:13, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Commanded. Bot will work soon. —레비Revi 13:34, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: 레비Revi 13:34, 21 February 2014 (UTC)

Revert

Hello,

Why did you revert me? [2] Regards, Yann (talk) 15:10, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

As I said above, I'm in mobile (with mobile mode disabled), and I mistakenly clicked Revert button while it was loading. Sorry for the ping you got. —레비Revi 15:12, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: 레비Revi 15:12, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Already voted. —레비Revi 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: 레비Revi 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Dear Hym411,

I apologise for mentioning this but I think the reason most people don't mark many images in the above category is that only a few people can confirm the Korean copyright license sadly. There must be almost 80-100 Korean images here, I think. Maybe you and Alan can confirm the license. I don't know. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:50, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

I'm doing 30 of them, but while changing license from BY-3.0 to BY-2.0-KR, I put the {{LicenseReview}} and that's why we have a such a huge backlog. Anyway, What you have to do is just see the bottom of the page, and find BY logo, and if it exist, pass it, and if not, nominate it for deletion. Default Tistory.com license version is 2.0-kr. —레비Revi 05:58, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
(This only works if source is wasabcon.tistory.com. —레비Revi 06:02, 25 February 2014 (UTC))
All Korean images are reviewed. —레비Revi 14:55, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: 레비Revi 14:55, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Dear Hym411,

Please mark these 2 non-wasabcon images as I cannot confirm the license. I marked 18 Korean images today and that's sufficient I think. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:47, 27 February 2014 (UTC)

  • If you cannot confirm the license, perhaps you should file a DR as I am uncertain that images from blogs sites are acceptable for Commons. Do the blog sites own the rights to these images? Its impossible to tell when one does not know the language sadly. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:01, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Well, that blog is official blog of an event, and I have reviewed few from same site, however just I had no time to review it. I will mark it soon. —레비Revi 06:06, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Both passed. —레비Revi 14:29, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: 레비Revi 14:29, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

You apparently wanted to feed this entry into the bot to process, but strangely, two items only [out of 128] were moved; the rest were not, while the command is not currently at User:CommonsDelinker/commands. Furthermore, can you please use the bot to fix the sorting in all of the year-cats by eliminating the space so that the year comes immediately after the | without a space, like I did here? Thanks a lot. Orrlingtalk 14:34, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Yes, I am aware of it, and I thought because it had a meta-cat template in it. I'll command once more when I get PC. (Mobile now) And, I'm not sure with year-cats things. —레비Revi 15:07, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
I was hoping there's a way of somehow ordering a mass-changing of the indexing keys (from [XXX| 1980] to [XXX|1980]), but probably it's only possible manually. Thanks very much Orrlingtalk 15:21, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Maybe I can use AWB for this, but not sure. I'll take care of CDC first. —레비Revi 15:36, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Hope you not forget to move the cat to the bot ;). Thankz

Rename Category:Film by year (talk) to Category:Film industry by year (0 entries moved, 144 to go) Warning: Please add a reason. Warning: Username of requester missing (user parameter). For transparency and to prevent abuse, please add your username.

Orrlingtalk 01:38, 24 February 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, forgot it. Commanding. —레비Revi 02:49, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
Somehow bot is not moving, so maybe we should move manually. —레비Revi 12:33, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

와사비콘텐츠

File:Bae Suzy at Seoul Art School in 2012 04.jpg의 라이선스가 cc-by인 것을 확인하셨다고 되어 있는데, 저 블로그 어디에 쓰여 있는지 혹시 알 수 있을까요? --Puzzlet Chung (talk) 02:52, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

게시글 맨 아래 View 버튼 위에 저는 보이는데요. BY 아이콘이 있지 않나요? — Revicomplaint? 03:28, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

아, 저기에 있는 걸 못 봤네요. 제가 처음에 의문을 갖게 된 건 다른 사진인데요, 여기에도 똑같이 cc-by가 붙어 있지만 "타사이트로의 재게시및 무단2차가공 특별히 금지합니다"라고 쓰여 있어서요. --Puzzlet Chung (talk) 03:38, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

같은 의문을 제기하신 분이 계셔서 (User talk:Hym411/Archive/2014#A blog has an odd license statement) 블로그 주인 분께 물어봤더니 올려도 된다고 하셨었던 기억이 납니다. — Revicomplaint? 03:42, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

의문이 풀렸습니다. 고맙습니다. --Puzzlet Chung (talk) 03:56, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Revicomplaint? 06:18, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Gabmatzung Lutheran Mission Church 1943 as Field Ambulance.jpg

hello, "Please fix license, from {{CC-zero}}, to suitable PD licenses. You can find list of licenses on COM:L. And, please fix your new file name with spaces. Thanks, — Revicomplaint? 11:58, 4 March 2014 (UTC)"

I am not sure how to do this. Can you please advise 1 - how I can I fix the file name with spaces 2 - What is the appropriate PD licence?

thanks Phenss (talk) 06:14, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

1. File seems to be already renamed.
2. See COM:L. If file is PD because author died 70 years ago, {{PD-old-70}}, if 100 years ago, {{PD-old-100}}, etc. Full list is on COM:L, and you can find best one there. — Revicomplaint? 06:17, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

thanks for your advice. Can you please check the file now and see if I have done teh right one.

thank you

Phenss (talk) 06:32, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Revicomplaint? 06:19, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

categorisation

why?--Scanmap (talk) 09:08, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

It was my mistake, clicking [Revert] button instead of clicking image link. Sorry. — Revicomplaint? 10:10, 5 March 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Revicomplaint? 07:09, 6 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello,
just wanted to notify you that one of the pictures you voted for (File:Dülmen, Bahnhof, Dampflokdurchfahrt -- 2011 -- 1.jpg) in the photo challenge 'Two of something' unfortunately was deleted, freeing one of your votes...
Regards, --Anna reg (talk) 16:53, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Seems it was speedy requested for uploader request, and then declined by Taivo, and regular DRs. Changing vote.... Revicomplaint? 03:10, 17 March 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Revicomplaint? 03:10, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Leitoxx

FYI. the license reviewer request of Leitoxx (talk · contribs) was closed successfull by Tiptoety (talk contribs blocks protections deletions moves rights rights changes), but his autopatrolled permission wasn't removed. User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 13:12, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

@Armbrust: Steinsplitter (talk contribs blocks protections deletions moves rights rights changes) did it. Revicomplaint? 13:26, 20 March 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Revicomplaint? 13:26, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

user:Zetta Lee가 upload한 그림 삭제 요청

한국어 위키와 위키 공용이랑 삭제 방법이 서로 달라서 삭제신청이 제대로 되지 않아 불가피하게 이 곳에 토론을 작성합니다.

user:Zetta Lee가 upload한 그림에 대해서 원 저작자랑 문의 끝에 삭제를 요청하셔서 이 곳에 글을 올리게 되었습니다.

삭제하기로 한 그림 파일 목록은 아래와 같습니다.

  • File:Gyeongbu 1.png
  • File:Seohaean.png
  • File:Pyeongtaekhwaseong.png
  • File:Honam_1.png
  • File:Suncheonwanju.png
  • File:Jungbu.png
  • File:Jungbunaeryuk.png
  • File:Jungang_1.png
  • File:Donghae.png
  • File:Iksanpohang.png
  • File:Dangjinyeongdeok.png
  • File:Pyeongtaekjecheon.png
  • File:Seoulouterring.png
  • File:Daejeongnambu.png
  • File:2ndgyeongin.png
  • File:Gyeongin.png
  • File:Incheonairport.png
  • File:Seocheongongju.png
  • File:Pyeongtaeksiheung.png
  • File:Honambranch.png
  • File:Gochangdamyang.png
  • File:Jungbunaeryukbranch.png

아래는 원 저작자가 저에게 보낸 메일 원본입니다.

-----Original Message-----
From: "(실명 생략함)"<EMAIL ADDRESS HIDDEN> 
To: (개인 메일 주소는 생략함)
Cc: 
Sent: 2014-03-25 (화) 14:26:14
Subject: 메일드립니다.

해당 이미지파일의 출처가 잘못되었으니 삭제 요청드립니다.

--커뷰 (talk) 07:21, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

  1. 이메일 계정은 지웠습니다.
  2. 한국어 위키백과 계정은 모르겠지만, 공용 계정은 Zetta0408이네요. 삭제 했습니다. Revicomplaint? 07:27, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Revicomplaint? 07:27, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear -revi/Archive,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Revicomplaint? 03:05, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

GW Toolset users right is granted by bureaucrats?

Are you sure the GW Toolset users right can only be granted by bureaucrats? The archive at Commons:Requests for rights/Approved/GW Toolset users/2014 shows all recent grants of this right have been done by admins, not bureaucrats. —RP88 07:24, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Nevermind, please ignore my question. I see a patch has been submitted to make this change less than an hour ago. —RP88 07:31, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
No problem :) Revicomplaint? 07:32, 27 March 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Revicomplaint? 07:32, 27 March 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the day March 29 2014 word wrap

Re this, can you make the same changes to the other languages, especially Template:Potd/2014-03-29 (it) and Template:Potd/2014-03-29 (cs)? Thanks. Davidwr (talk) 16:37, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Disregard, the day is over. Davidwr (talk) 04:41, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
Well, sorry: I was sleeping at the moment... Revicomplaint? 11:42, 30 March 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Revicomplaint? 11:42, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

There is the blog owner's answer for your question; see http://toto1024.tistory.com/guestbook. Toto probably did not check the CC-BY icon at the bottom of indivisual page, though not all of Toto's images are CC-BY images. (some of his/her images are CC-BY-NC-ND, since June 11, 2013) --Puramyun31 (talk) 01:52, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Well, he said NO, however, I am not sure what to do. All CCL licenses are irrevocate, so CCL should be valid. Revicomplaint? 03:28, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
It's correct that CC license is irrevocable as you said, However, maybe Toto is not familiar with the license like us. I think it's better to inform him the nature of the license and the CC-BY licensing of his images at the bottom of each posted page before June 8, 2013 to avoid unnecessary misunderstanding. --Puramyun31 (talk) 04:14, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
I'll notify him. Well, I am not sure if we should delete existing files. Revicomplaint? 07:48, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Did you tell him the license is irrevocable? --Puramyun31 (talk) 15:05, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Not yet, maybe tomorrow morning. Revicomplaint? 15:11, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Per VP discussions, I will nominate all toto1024 photos for deletion. Revicomplaint?

Will you do without any notification to Toto? You told me you'll notify him. --Puramyun31 (talk) 00:36, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
I was too busy in my school to notify, and in fact, I forgot it. Anyway, I will nominate them for deletion, so I don't think furthur notify is needed. Revicomplaint? 03:40, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
I do not have a bad faith, but TeleComNasSprVen apparantly doesn't know the copyright notice has been modified (간단한 규칙(수정)). is the notice a revocation of CC-BY license? --Puramyun31 (talk) 07:29, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
I think yes. I considered that, VP discussions, and guestbook message. Revicomplaint? 07:30, 29 March 2014 (UTC)

Preseclection of images

Hello -revi/Archive/2014!

Thank you for your willingness of releasing photographs by you under free licenses on Commons. But there are some image of you which are of substandard quality due to its chosen composition or because of a subotimal catch of the motive - for instance why is it necessary to have this motive ([3], [4]) twice?. As such, please look over your photographs before you want to upload them in order to check which ones are the best and upload only those.

Would be a great support if you do so!

Kindest regards, High Contrast (talk) 09:16, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, forgot to unclick Upload button. Revicomplaint? 09:17, 5 April 2014 (UTC) deleting.. Revicomplaint? 09:17, 5 April 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Revicomplaint? 09:17, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Dear Hym411,

If you think this Korean blog site is OK, please feel free to pass this image as I don't know the language. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:14, 7 April 2014 (UTC)

I am really busy in real life. So, check bottom of article for CC image(like BY or BY and SA), and because I trust that the site owner's CC licensing is valid, if you find CC logo, pass it! Revicomplaint? 02:44, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Revicomplaint? 07:46, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

사진 사용 문의

아래의 사진을 비상업용 기념품 제작에 사용하려합니다. (NGO단체) OTRS 마크가 있어 문의드립니다. 검토 도움 부탁드립니다. 제작 시일이 좀 급합니다. 빠른 검토 부탁드려도 될까요.. 메일로 연락을 주시면 감사하겠습니다.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Zaatari_refugee_camp,_Jordan_(3).jpg


이름: 이신아 메일: <email address hidden>

안녕하세요, 1)이메일 계정은 스팸메일 발송에 악용될 우려가 있어 지웠습니다. 2)해당 파일의 License, 혹은 라이선스 문단의 조건 하에 자유롭게 사용 가능합니다. 좋은 하루 되세요. Revicomplaint? 07:36, 15 April 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Revicomplaint? 07:36, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

ArchiveBot

Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:43, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: Revicomplaint? 07:45, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

김일성

완료하였습니다. 참고로, 마지막 파일은 김일성을 찬양하는 것일라고 보기 어려운 것이, "수령"은 김일성의 직책이므로, 찬양하고 있다고 보기 어렵습니다. 나머지 파일에 대해서는, 찬양조의 내용을 지운 이름으로 이동하였습니다. Revicomplaint? 03:49, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
감사합니다. 그런데, 김일성의 직책이 "수령" 아니고 "주석"이었던 것은 맞지 않슨니까? Elmor (talk) 14:23, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
그랬군요. 그렇다면 {{Rename}}으로 적절한 파일 이름으로 변경을 요청해 주세요. 제가 바빠서.... Revicomplaint? 14:25, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Revicomplaint? 00:52, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

잠깐만요. 이거 파일 아시아나항공 A321이라고 표출하는게 좋을거 같다는 생각이 듭니다 사진 보면 김포공항이라고 보기는 어려울 수 있거든요.--DangSunM (talk) 23:29, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

{{Rename}}을 사용해 주세요... 뭐 사실 Commonist로 올리면서 이름 일괄 부여한 거라서요. Revicomplaint? 00:50, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Revicomplaint? 00:50, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Google is your friend

Hi Revi: I saw your comment on the closure of a file that "google is your friend". If I can find the URL of the violation, I always use it. I'm sure you know that google is tailored for different views around the world and sometimes I can find things that other people cannot and vice-versa. So sorry you don't ping or say "Hi: Revi" which is really handy. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:09, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello Revi,
I saw that you did the translations for the Commons:Photo challenge page to Korean and wanted to ask if you are still interested in translating texts for this project. If you are, there are several things that could be translated: a) the page itself was just actualised, b) we started to translate the challenge descriptions themselves (so far only with langswitch), and c) I just posted translations to French and English for the watchlist notice (MediaWiki talk:WatchlistNotice - the last entry), where other languages could be added.
Best wishes, --Anna reg (talk) 12:27, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi Anna, I will try to do translations tomorrow! Thanks, Revicomplaint? 12:30, 2 July 2014 (UTC)
Great! And you are welcome. --Anna reg (talk) 12:39, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Comeback

No "bye bye Wikimedia". I'm waiting to see you back and I hope you will do so in next couple of hours. --Saqib (talk) 05:43, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

:p Revicomplaint? 08:05, 15 August 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Revicomplaint? 15:41, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Hym411, just out of curiosity, why is this? Lotje (talk) 14:05, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

I requested it. Revicomplaint? 14:11, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
Why, if I may ask? Lotje (talk) 14:14, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
I wanted to update some sentense. Revicomplaint? 14:15, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Revicomplaint? 14:11, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Kwangmo

Can you verify this, please? Go to the official site of Korea Intellectual Property Office. Search for "소방관의꿈" ("The firefighter dream"). 최광모 ("Kwangmo Choi") is registered as the owner. Utcursch (talk) 14:20, 21 August 2014 (UTC)

Yes, KIPRIS result. Revicomplaint? 14:24, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Revicomplaint? 12:32, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello! Fry1989 and I have agreed to a new shade based on the sources #005BA6, you can see the flag here. It is a lighter blue than the one you voted against on 6 August. I think it is the best that we can do without an exact colour law or an E-mail from the Government. What do you think? Maybe you could recast your vote? Thank you very much! --Shibo77 06:04, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done Revicomplaint? 15:25, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: Revicomplaint? 15:25, 8 September 2014 (UTC)

저작권 정보 없는 사진

이 두개의 사진은 저작권 정보에 퍼블릭 도메인이라고 되어 있지만 원본을 봤을 때는 이 라이선스와 맞지 않는 것 같습니다. 즉, 한국어 위키백과의 "저작권 정보 없음" 틀을 붙여야 할 것 같은데 여기서는 어떤 틀을 쓰는지요.ㅡ커뷰 (talk) 17:12, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

가젯 이름이 기억이 안 나는데, delete 뭐시기 (...) 를 켜면 No permission, No source, 삭제 요청 (위백의 삭토) 등의 링크가 제공됩니다. 그걸 쓰셔도 되고, 임시방편으로 {{Npd}}풀어 쓰시면 됩니다. — revi^ 17:16, 3 October 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: revi^ 17:27, 3 October 2014 (UTC)

Congratulations! It has bot status now. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 7 October 2014 (UTC)

Thanks! Bot will start running since this Friday 15:00 UTC (0:00 KST) and it will run every week, same time. — revi^ 14:38, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
Seems crontab death of tool labs affected this bot too. Manually running... — revi^ 13:43, 11 October 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: revi^ 13:43, 11 October 2014 (UTC)

질문

이곳에 올라온 File:Gangbukgu Logo.jpg가 정말로 KOGL 1이 맞나요? BI 부분에 들어가도 아무 표시도 없으며, KOGL일 경우에 별도로 부착한다고 설명하고 있습니다.

그리고 레비님이 만드신 File:Emart Logo.svg 파일은 잘못 제작된 것 같습니다.--Namoroka (talk) 08:15, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

현재는 링크가 죽은 것 같은데, 확인 당시에 저와 라이선스 검토를 한 Russavia 관리자가 해당 라이선스가 KOGL 유형 1로 배포되는 것을 확인 (로고, deed로의 링크를 확인)하였습니다.
잘못 제작한 게 맞습니다만, 고칠 시간이 없어서 방치해두고 있네요. — revimsg 08:17, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
찾아보니 영어 위키백과에 svg 로고가 공정 이용으로 업로드 되어 있는데 어찌 해야 하나요? 참고로 고품질 png 버전은 여기있습니다.--Namoroka (talk) 08:30, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
SVG와 PNG 모두 {{KOGL}}로 올려도 될 것으로 생각되나, 현재는 문서에 공공누리 화면이 없기 때문에 불확실하네요. — revimsg 08:40, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
강북구 로고가 아닌 이마트 로고를 설명드린 겁니다.--Namoroka (talk) 08:46, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
아, 이마트 로고군요. 제가 보기에는 이마트 로고는 단순한 단어들의 연속으로 저작권을 구성하기에 부적합 (COM:TOO)합니다. 올리셔도 문제 없을 듯 합니다. 제 업로드를 덮어쓰셔도 좋습니다. — revimsg 08:50, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
en:File:E-mart logo.svgfa:پرونده:E-mart logo.svg는 삭제 신청했습니다. 덧붙여서 강북구 로고도 새로 올렸는데 파일을 처음에 잘못 올렸습니다. 첫번째 버전 좀 삭제해주세요. File:Logo of Gangbuk District.svg--Namoroka (talk) 09:26, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
공용 파일은 ✓ Done — revimsg 09:29, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: revi^ 15:15, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Valued image candidates/서봉총 금관 금제드리개.jpg

By "datation", I mean the century when this crown was made. (Sorry for my English). Best regards. --JLPC (talk) 12:01, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

@JLPC: Unfortunately, the date crown was made is not known. — revimsg 12:04, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Sorry for the delay : it was lunch time here:). I found this with Google : http://djangoo-unchained.blogspot.fr/2014/08/week-end-gyeongju-jour-3.html. It means the crown was made in the 5th century. It's difficult to be sure, but this page was written by a French man who was born in Corea. Is he right ? Is he wrong ? What do you think of it ?. Best regards. --~~ P.S. : another link : http://m.korea.net/french/NewsFocus/Culture/view?pageIndex=1&articleId=107122 and same datation.— Preceding unsigned comment added by JLPC (talk • contribs) 31 October 2014 13:15 (UTC)
I searched Google, National Museum of Korea (source of the image), Cultural Heritage Administration of South Korea, and Korean Wikipedia, and found no indication on dates. It may be 5th century, but as it is not confirmed, I think it's better not to mention it. — revimsg 13:29, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: — revimsg 03:57, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Questions on Korean terms for KAL 801 map

In regards to File:KoreanAir801Survivorloc.JPG (from the NTSB) what are the Korean translations of the terms? That way I can have a map made in Korean (on the Graphics Lab).

Thanks WhisperToMe (talk) 08:59, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

BTW thanks for helping with the Air China seat map WhisperToMe (talk) 09:00, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
(Edit conflict)  Doing… / No problem :D — revimsg 09:00, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
Here it is:
  • MAIN DECK => 주 기체
  • FIRST CLASS => 일등석
  • PRESTIGE CLASS => 비즈니스 클래스
  • ECONOMY CLASS => 이코노미 클래스
  • LEGEND => 개요
  • Flight attendants => 승무원
  • Passengers => 승객
If I missed anything, please let me know and I'll fix it. — revimsg 09:06, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
Thanks! What is '"number"seats' such as "177 seats"
Also: I think '61"' means "61 inches" so that may need to be converted into the metric system
WhisperToMe (talk) 12:56, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
"(number) 좌석" - Korean has no plural forms. And inch.... google query "61 inches to meter" says 1.54 meter. — revimsg 13:00, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
Thank you! I posted a request at: Commons:Graphic_Lab/Illustration_workshop#Korean_version_of_File:KoreanAir801Survivorloc.JPG WhisperToMe (talk) 15:46, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

I used the name of the Air China Flight 129 article on the Korean Wikipedia and the Korean words for "seat diagram" and put Korean language descriptions for the four CA129 maps WhisperToMe (talk) 16:30, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

No problem to me. — revimsg 04:28, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: — revimsg 04:28, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Code issues in User:-revi/common.js

Hi -revi, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:-revi/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 26 new jshint issues — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ISSUE: line 5 character 91: Script URL. - Evidence: mw.util.addPortletLink('p-tb', 'javascript:importScript("MediaWiki:VisualFileChange.js");', 'Perform batch task', 't-AjaxQuickDeleteOnDemand');
  2. ISSUE: line 46 character 38: Unclosed string. - Evidence: '{{User:-revi/Credits/t}}
  3. ISSUE: line 47 character 70: Unclosed string. - Evidence: {{self|Cc-by-2.0-kr|Cc-by-sa-2.0-kr|attribution=[[User:-revi|Revi]]}}
  4. ISSUE: line 48 character 2: Unclosed string. - Evidence: '
  5. ISSUE: line 49 character 15: Unclosed string. - Evidence: );
  6. ISSUE: line 50 character 18: Unclosed string. - Evidence: }, 100 );
  7. ISSUE: line 51 character 8: Unclosed string. - Evidence: });
  8. ISSUE: line 52 character 9: Unclosed string. - Evidence: else
  9. ISSUE: line 53 character 12: Expected ')' and instead saw '#'. - Evidence: $('#n-uploadbtn>a').attr('href','//commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Upload&uselang='+
  10. ISSUE: line 53 character 13: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: $('#n-uploadbtn>a').attr('href','//commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Upload&uselang='+
  11. ISSUE: line 53 character 25: Expected an assignment or function call and instead saw an expression. - Evidence: $('#n-uploadbtn>a').attr('href','//commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Upload&uselang='+
  12. ISSUE: line 53 character 26: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: $('#n-uploadbtn>a').attr('href','//commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Upload&uselang='+
  13. ISSUE: line 53 character 26: Expected an assignment or function call and instead saw an expression. - Evidence: $('#n-uploadbtn>a').attr('href','//commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Upload&uselang='+
  14. ISSUE: line 53 character 35: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: $('#n-uploadbtn>a').attr('href','//commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Upload&uselang='+
  15. ISSUE: line 53 character 35: Expected an assignment or function call and instead saw an expression. - Evidence: $('#n-uploadbtn>a').attr('href','//commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Upload&uselang='+
  16. ISSUE: line 53 character 39: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: $('#n-uploadbtn>a').attr('href','//commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Upload&uselang='+
  17. ISSUE: line 53 character 39: Bad invocation. - Evidence: $('#n-uploadbtn>a').attr('href','//commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Upload&uselang='+
  18. ISSUE: line 54 character 58: Expected an assignment or function call and instead saw an expression. - Evidence: ((wgUserLanguage === 'en')?'': wgUserLanguage) + 'ownwork');
  19. ISSUE: line 54 character 67: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: ((wgUserLanguage === 'en')?'': wgUserLanguage) + 'ownwork');
  20. ISSUE: line 54 character 67: Expected an identifier and instead saw ')'. - Evidence: ((wgUserLanguage === 'en')?'': wgUserLanguage) + 'ownwork');
  21. ISSUE: line 54 character 67: Expected an assignment or function call and instead saw an expression. - Evidence: ((wgUserLanguage === 'en')?'': wgUserLanguage) + 'ownwork');
  22. ISSUE: line 34 character 47: Unmatched '{'. - Evidence: mw.loader.using('moment', function () {
  23. ISSUE: line 55 character 3: Expected ')' and instead saw ''. - Evidence: });
  24. ISSUE: line 55 character 4: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: });
  25. ISSUE: line 31 character 15: Unmatched '{'. - Evidence: $(function () {
  26. ISSUE: line 55 character 3: Expected ')' and instead saw ''. - Evidence: });
  27. ISSUE: line 55 character 4: Missing semicolon. - Evidence: });

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 18:46, 2 November 2014 (UTC).

Will fix someday, but not now.  revimsg 18:48, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by:  revimsg 18:48, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Code issues in User:-revi/common.js

Hi -revi, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

  1. You edited User:-revi/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
  2. Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new esprima issue — the page's status is now having ERRORS. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
  3. To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!
  1. ERROR: Cannot parse line 46 column 30: Unexpected token ILLEGAL

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 18:46, 2 November 2014 (UTC).

This section was archived on a request by:  revimsg 18:48, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

User:Panoramio upload bot have review copyright status, need User:Panoramio Review Bot again review?--shizhao (talk) 01:47, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

@Shizhao: Even so, I think bot should put review template, with user Panoramio upload bot, not your account. And bot should have Image-reviewer flag when putting LR template. — revimsg 03:16, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
I meant, |user= parameter of review template should be the one of bot, not bot's master. — revimsg 04:30, 2 November 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by:  revimsg 08:15, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

한 가지 문의코자 합니다.

안녕하세요? Revi님. 한가지 문의코자 글을 씁니다. 제가 지난 10월 4일 저작자로부터 사용허락을 받아 사진 2장을 업로드하였습니다. (File:Han Ye-ri at 'Sea Fog' stage greeting 1.jpg, File:Han Ye-ri at 'Sea Fog' stage greeting 2.jpg). 사용허락 메일을 10월 4일 permissions-ko로 발송하였고, 이후 혹시나 해서 10월 6일 재차 permissions-ko로 발송하였고, 10월 8일에는 permissions-commons로도 발송하였습니다. 이후에도 처리가 안 되길래 일감이 쌓여있어 그런가 보다하고 한동안 잊고 있었는데 아직까지도 처리가 안 된 것을 보면 혹 메일이 제대로 전달이 되지 않았나 하는 생각이 듭니다. 메일 주소는 여러 차례 확인하였고, 반송되지도 않은 것을 보면 제대로 보내졌다고 생각되나, 제가 모르는 다른 이유로 제대로 전달이 되지 않았을까 싶기도 합니다. 혹 가능하다면 메일이 전달이 안 되어서 처리가 안 되는지, 아니면 단순히 일이 밀려서인지 알 수 있을런지요? 번거롭게 죄송합니다. --Leedkmn (talk) 07:55, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

@Leedkmn: 안녕하세요. 지난 번에 보내셨던 이메일 주소로 검색을 하여 보았으나, 새로 온 메일은 발견되지 않았습니다. 위키미디어 OTRS의 문제인지, Leedkmn님의 이메일 측 문제인지는 모르갰네요. 번거로우시겠지만 다시 한 번 보내 주시고 말씀 남겨 주시면 확인해 보겠습니다.  revimsg 08:06, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
답변 감사합니다. 제가 방금 다시 permissions-ko로 발송하였습니다. 혹 문제가 있다면 알려주시기 바랍니다. --Leedkmn (talk) 08:19, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
도착하였습니다. 잠시 후 처리하겠습니다. 감사합니다 :)  revimsg 08:42, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done  revimsg 08:47, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
처리해 주셔서 감사합니다 :) --Leedkmn (talk) 08:54, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by:  revimsg 09:08, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

지스타 로고

파일을 올렸는데 현재 지스타 웹사이트에서 로고를 무료 배포하는 관계로 퍼블릭 도메인으로 라이선스를 부착했습니다. 가능한지 확인 부탁드립니다. --양념파닭 (Profile | Talk | Contribution) 03:02, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

무료 배포 != 자유 라이선스.  revimsg 03:21, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
그리고, BY나 BY SA가 붙어있더라도 분명히 그 사람이 제작한 경우가 아닌 경우 (로고 등)는 업로드가 금지됩니다.  revimsg 03:22, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by:  revimsg 15:53, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Yeonmi Park photo

Greetings,

Thanks for the message, yes, I submitted the photo, she gives her permission to post it. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Yeonmi_Park_in_a_hanbok.jpg

As was pointed out by GRuban Keep Except, of course, (see Special:Contributions/Caseylartigue) uploader also uploaded File:Yeonmi_Park.JPG, which does have plenty of metadata and high file size. And, from name at least, uploader seems to be one Casey Lartigue, International Adviser to the Mulmangcho School for adolescent North Korean refugees in Yeoju, South Korea and Helping Others Prosper Through English (HOPE) based in Seoul, and even more relevantly of http://caseyandyeonmi.com/, which is dedicated to his interactions with the photo subject. So it seems quite reasonable that he could get his hands on numerous photos, and happened to pick one he cropped and otherwise edited to make it look good. --GRuban (talk) 22:02, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Casey Caseylartigue (talk) 10:18, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

@Caseylartigue: hello, can you send an email to permissions-commons @ wikimedia.org? That way, we can get your permission in dedicated, permanent archive. (Preferably from your website domain) Thank you for your contributions!  revimsg 10:29, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by:  revimsg 11:28, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Eneryproduction.gif|thumb|250px|Energiproduksjon i MWh/h over en vinteruke

Why was this file-name changed? This graph says nothing about demand, rather what has been produced. The text no longer reflects the file name. I suggest that the file name is reverted.KjellG (talk) 15:57, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Submit a new filemove request and it will be done by other filemover/admin. (I'm going to bed - see cloak on top of this page.)  revimsg 16:01, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by:  revimsg 14:15, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Elio Vittorini

Hello. May I download this file to commons? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Serkanland (talk • contribs)

Well, I am it-0. Maybe you should ask it-N admin. (admin language listed at here)  revimsg 14:07, 10 November 2014 (UTC)
Done. As far as I know that photograph should be PD both in Italy and the US being produced before 1976 (Vittorini died in 1966). The only problem is, being that photograph printed on a 1986 Italian book cover, that we should be sure that the photograph was published in Italy first before 1976. We might be reasonably sure it's PD at least in Italy, but unless we find evidence that the photograph was published in Italy before 1976 we can't be 100% sure it was PD even in the US. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 18:27, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much. --Serkanland (talk) 20:18, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by:  revimsg 23:42, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

User:NorbertNagel/Licence

Sorry for my late answer. Feel free to use my licence as model/template and to modify it according to your needs. Best regards -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 12:50, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Thank you!  revimsg 12:52, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by:  revimsg 12:52, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:금동약사불입상.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:금동약사불입상.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:13, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by:  revimsg 10:35, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Problem in VI

For 금동약사불입상.jpg. There has been a manipulation of the page, so that the BOT can not close. It must be closed manually. If you do not know how, ask me. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 07:54, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

@Archaeodontosaurus: Hi, I think process should be
  1. Remove it from candidates list
  2. Add {{VI}} to file description page
  3. Add {{VI-tiny}} to gallery using the file
  4. Put promotion template to my talk page (maybe I can skip this?)
Correct me if I'm wrong.  revimsg 08:10, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
BTW, I assume this problem is caused by non-latin charactors, but not sure... If that's true, it will cause problem for my another nominations.  revimsg 08:18, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
Ok, it should work.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:48, 4 November 2014 (UTC)--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:48, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
I did everything except {{VI-tiny}}, which I'll do it later. Check if I missed something. (i.e. There is 'Recently promoted list, etc...) I'm mobile right now...  revimsg 09:07, 4 November 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by:  revimsg 10:35, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:서봉총 금관 금제드리개.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:서봉총 금관 금제드리개.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:02, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by:  revimsg 10:35, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Ok, how about this pile?

I found this upload gallery which seems to be a pile of transferred from en wiki images, but some of them seem problemattic. What do you think? Thanks! Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:17, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

I'm on the phone with limited data access, so I will see them in few hours (as soon as I get to home)  revimsg 02:24, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
No worries, I'm never in a hurry. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:37, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
Oh, sorry for the late reply.
File:Carlos Montezuma (o Wassaja).png looks doubtful: Unless enwiki original Summary page has original source to the NIH, it looks not good for me.
File:X (magazine).jpg - source link looks dead; Unless uploader has alternative link that supports his license, it fails License Review and should be deleted.
I'm still on mobile (but with WiFi) so I couldn't do more deeper researches (I couldn't check other images yet, I didn't searched Tineye and Google Images...), but hope this helps you!  revimsg 12:17, 17 November 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by:  revimsg 10:35, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bangasayusang in 6th century from Silla..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

Welcome to commons -revi/s. What better way than starting off with a Valued Image promotion could there be? :-) --VICbot (talk) 06:32, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

How stupid this bot is... copied from User talk:-revi/s.  revimsg 08:32, 18 November 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by:  revimsg 10:35, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Golden ear rings found from "Bubuchong" (Couple grave) in Silla period.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Still silly bot posting this in redirect page...  revimsg 09:13, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by:  revimsg 10:35, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Don't worry

[5] Don't worry I'm rerunning the script and it'll add them soon Amir (talk) 13:37, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks very much for your bot's service! — Revi 13:38, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: — Revi 12:34, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
File:Young Woman at Beach - Tulum Archaeological Site - Quintana Roo - Mexico (15718556656).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kulmalukko (talk) 00:23, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: — Revi 12:34, 24 November 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:청자 거북이 모양 주자.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:청자 거북이 모양 주자.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:16, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: — Revi 05:30, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Pensive Bodhisattva (National Treasure No. 78) 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pensive Bodhisattva (National Treasure No. 78) 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:05, 22 November 2014 (UTC)

This section was archived on a request by: — Revi 05:30, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
F-16C/D Fighting Falcon (Republic of Korea Air Force) in flight.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
This section was archived on a request by: — Revi 05:30, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi -revi, the logo of Maithili Wikipedia seems to be little blur so we managed to update the new version of the logo. As respect to your suggestion here would you please remind us the procedure to update the new version of the logo.Thank you-Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 07:54, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Upload the new logo with new file and point me to the new logo. I'll upload it for you. — Revi 08:01, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi -revi, here is a new logo for Maithili Wikipedia and thanks for your quick respond-Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 09:00, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
I was away for dinner. Anyway I uploaded the new logo: Check if it is applied on mai.wikipedia. Thanks, — Revi 11:14, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi -revi, ya i just checked it and its updated now. Again, thanks and a respect for your great support. I'll hangup again if i got any situation later.-Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 17:09, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
No problem ;) — Revi 17:13, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: — Revi 11:14, 30 November 2014 (UTC)

Yeosu Station

The category does not exist. This is the main station when we arrived from Seoul on the Jeolla Line.Smiley.toerist (talk) 13:28, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done created Category:Yeosu Station. — Revi 13:36, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: — Revi 13:36, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

LR question part 2

I went throgh all the Korean images at LR, and only 17 of them were from the blog marked with the NC-ND license. I sent those to CSD. All the others have only the BY symbol with the pop-up text in Korean. If you tell me here that that clearly represents the {{Cc-by-2.0-kr}} license, I'll start reviewing and passing the rest of the Korean images at LR. INeverCry 04:09, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

Can you give me some examples so I can give you answers? — Revi 04:25, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
Most of them (300+) are from Demical or Pequena (the 2 top links). INeverCry 04:41, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
First, let's start with bottom one (easiest.) - See bottom and find BY logo, click it. It goes to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/kr/ . It's from official account of an event, anyway PROFIT!
For other *.tistory.com images, go to bottom, and find BY or BY SA logo. That's only way to verify the copyright status (other than our part 1 blog's system) for now - I asked blog farm owners to link that logo to appropriate CC link, but they are lazier than me... — Revi 04:48, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
Thanks. I've started passing them, and will do as much as I can until they're done. They don't take long. INeverCry 06:02, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
Finally, some of uploads are deleted due to this LR... but if the ansi's will is true, I will not cross that.
@-revi: sorry for my behaviour that I lost my temper when this LR question is raised. I will not react emotionally to such license change in the future. --Puramyun31 (talk) 15:28, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
Still (s)he didn't changed the license... Hmm. It's unfortunate that they didn't changed the license... :( Anyway it's good to hear that you will try to keep calm. — Revi 17:15, 2 December 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: — Revi 17:15, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi,-revi the i think logo of Maitlili Wikipedia here again restored to the blurry one and the new one i uploaded couple days ago also has been removed or something.Would you please help us there?Thank you-Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 05:51, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

I deleted your temporary file because it is duplicate if new logo. And file log indicates that logo you provided and I uploaded is the newest one. — Revi 11:00, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Thanks -revi i noticed its been resolved.-Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 05:17, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Great :) — Revi 07:33, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: — Revi 07:33, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

EXIF datas of the photos attribute these to different people, which makes to think that the Flickr user is not the copyright holder of the photos. Jespinos (talk) 15:11, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

@Jespinos: I'm currently on mobile, so if you can provide me list of photos from that flickr user, I'll check and delete them as COM:FLICKRWASHING. — Revi 15:15, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
Yeah, my upload was clear mistake. If you can categorize them in Category:Uploads by Revi (delete), I'll mass-delete them using scripts. — Revi 15:20, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for your notify, deleted. I'm adding this flickruser to blacklist... — Revi 15:52, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
User is now blacklisted on Commons. UploadWizard and Flickr-reviewing bot will refuse this user. — Revi 15:57, 4 December 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: — Revi 15:52, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

LR question

There's quite a few images in Category:License review needed sourced to http://ansi9.tistory.com/42 etc. The only license I see is at the very bottom of each page indicating CC-BY-NC-ND/2.0/kr. Does this apply to any/all the images? INeverCry 04:20, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

@INeverCry: Above the NC logo, if you see right side carefully, you'll find "BY" icon. There's still some doubt that it is unclear that file is licensed BY or NC ND.  revimsg 04:35, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
What I get from machine translation is

These works can be used under Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 2.0 License Republic of Korea.

This is what the icon next to the text indicates. There's a lot of images awaiting LR from this source. Looks like a lot of copyvios unless I'm missing something. INeverCry 05:21, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
See above line of that line (NC ND) and see right side carefully. You should see BY logo, otherwise I can take a screenshot for you.  revimsg 06:58, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
I see the symbol that when I drag the pointer over it 3 lines of Korean text come up, each followed by a yes, but it isn't machine translatable. What does it say? What does the NC-ND license apply to? If that BY symbol is a license, why are there 2 different licenses? INeverCry 08:14, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
That probably says
  1. Attributions YES
  2. Commercial use YES
  3. Derivate Works YES
So it is {{Cc-by-2.0-kr}}. Maybe licensor is not aware of CCL and dual-licensed. File a DR for files those licenses are not confirmed and I'll contact the blog owner for clarification.  revimsg 09:12, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • Since you can read the Korean license and know which images are free and not free, please consider passing or failing some of the Korean images in license review. Cheers, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:55, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Hi Leoboudv, I'll try to review some, but my priority task is cleanup my recent photo imports. I'll finish those work by this weekend and back to license review.  revimsg 09:12, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
  • OK. PS: I don't mind marking this kind of image since you and the National Museum would know the license but I thought tistory images were CC BY too since I did not see any restrictions until yesterday. I don't mind if any images I marked from this website be deleted...if necessary but the website operator should be asked first I suppose. I stopped marking Korean images from Korean websites some time ago. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 23:43, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
I already have asked the owner: I'm waiting for the reply. — Revi 04:25, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
 Comment I have trusted CC-BY license of the blog displayed by the blog owner, but now I feel betrayed by this situation, since the blog had not had the license that is at the very bottom of each page indicating CC-BY-NC-ND/2.0/kr until yesterday.
@-revi: Pardon me, but since you have reviewed a lot of images of the blog, can you answer this question? had you seen CC-BY-NC-ND license on there until yesterday? If the files from there should be deleted by the reason (while it depends on the result of your clarification and the later), then will I be liable just because my trust that I didn't become aware of this situation? --Puramyun31 (talk) 10:16, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
Hmm, yes, until the last time I reviewed the files from that source, I could not see any of NC ND logos from the source page, but only BY logo. I'm contacting the blog owner for clarifications.  revimsg 10:31, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Well, think of a flickr: File uploader can choose ARR, CCL. Tistory is blog site, but that concept is same as flickr.  revimsg 11:05, 20 November 2014 (UTC)

Update

@INeverCry, Puramyun31, and Leoboudv: Blog owner replied with the following message:

ㅎㅎ ㅇㅋㅇㅋ

translation: hehe OK

I think he/she has converted the license to Commons-compatible license. Please check (I'm mobile currently) — Revi 10:23, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Still NC-ND. INeverCry 11:44, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Weird.... (S)he replied to me yesterday, so it should have been done. I explained how to make the files free, hmmm.... I'll contact him/her again. — Revi 11:52, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Mass deletions

Is there any specific reason for mass deletion of pictures used from Shahid blog. Mhhossein (talk) 08:03, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

See above. — Revi 08:19, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: — Revi 08:19, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Update Korea

I have completed Category:Andong Station but this need some filling in with locomotives, coaches etc. I have created Category:Railway viaducts in South Korea. You will probably know pictures wich can be added to it.Smiley.toerist (talk) 10:54, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

It's on my off-wiki todo list now and I will add the category whenever I see related images. — Revi 11:01, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

I visited Gangneung station being rebuilt for the winter olympics. Could you create a station category? (4 pictures) (also add File:Korail seaside train.JPG) Smiley.toerist (talk) 23:30, 4 December 2014 (UTC)

Category:Gangneung Station is up. — Revi 04:23, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: — Revi (Alt) (talk) 04:08, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Picture license

Hi @-revi: I used several pictures from Shahidblog website and all of them removed with you. This site mentioned in the site that the content is available under GFDL. The GFDL is one of license in commons site. please explain for me that why remove these pictures from this site? Thank you ZELZAL (talk) 13:55, 7 December 2014 (UTC)ZELZALZELZAL (talk) 13:55, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

I did not delete any of your contributions. — Revi 13:58, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi @-revi: I correct my question and I have similar problem with one user in commons with name of ALIAKAR. I want to use several pictures from Shahidblog site but when I saw you remove all picture from this site, write a question in your talk page. please explain for me that why we can not use picture from this site? Shahidblog website mentioned that the content is available under GFDL. Thank you ZELZAL (talk) 18:36, 7 December 2014 (UTC)ZELZALZELZAL (talk) 18:36, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Please link one of the deleted images, otherwise I cannot know what you are talking about. I have deleted hundreds of images, so you should tell me what you are referring to. Also, I tried to see your deleted contribs, which gave no result. That makes me impossible to know what you are talking about. — Revi 18:46, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

Dr @-revi: I talk about this message: Hello AliAkar,

the following pictures were uploaded from Shahidblog website (Link of this website:http://shahidblog.com/) and the content of this site is available under GFDL but you deleted all of them.Why?

ZELZAL (talk) 19:01, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
Ok, I probably missed something. I'm sorry about that. I'll restore images before 15:00 UTC (00:00 in my timezone), as I am not at home now. — Revi 08:21, 8 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi @-revi: Thanks for your attention. When you restore images? Because I want to use some of them in my article. Please explain for me about the images source or the source had problem? please explain for me about mass deletion reason. ZELZAL (talk) 10:33, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

@ZELZAL: Sorry, I don't have enough time to restore the file this week... @Steinsplitter Can you help him undeleting images? Thanks, — Revi 10:43, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
OK. I do it later. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:08, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Done. @ZELZAL: Please add {{LicenseReview}} to the files. --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:19, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
Thank you very much, Steinsplitter. — Revi 15:47, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
It turned out that my initial deletion was correct. — Revi 11:38, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: — Revi 15:47, 9 December 2014 (UTC)

Korean station

I dont know wich station File:Gyeongjeon Line station.jpg this is. Our train (Eastward) was waiting for another train. File:Gyeongjeon Line bank.JPG was also taken at the station.Smiley.toerist (talk) 21:01, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

If you remember when you took the picture (in KST) and train No. (in ticket), I can search that for you, but otherwise it's too hard to me too :p — Revi 04:12, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
It was the Mugunghwa 1954 train to Busan Bujeon. The crossing with the opposite happened late afternoon.Smiley.toerist (talk) 18:34, 1 December 2014 (UTC)
Heh, Korail blocked their tracking system from public... hmm. — Revi 04:34, 2 December 2014 (UTC)

CC license via OTRS for PD-USGov Files?

Hi, I was surprised to see your latest edits at File:USGS ovis canadensis GNP bighorn rams 0.jpg and File:USGS oreamnos americanus GNP mountain goat2.jpg. Can you please tell me, who sent the OTRS message and why you changed the license? Kim Keating is a full time staff member of USGS http://www.nrmsc.usgs.gov/staff/kkeating he takes lots and lots of pictures as part of his professional duty, su they are in the public domain. Why would you change the licenses? --h-stt !? 13:19, 21 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi, it was mail from Kim Keating, indicating he gave the "permission" to use the file to USGS, and after reviewing source link ( http://nrmsc.usgs.gov/node/433 says "Photo courtesy of Kim Keating, USGS") and his comments on ticket, I believed his arguments are valid. I asked him if he can provide the file in free license, and he said he would provide two images under CC BY 3.0. Whym also agreed that his arguments are valid, so I changed the license, and put {{PermissionOTRS}}. Hope this helps, — Revi 13:23, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
Yes, I believe when USGS asserts it is "courtesy", we should treat it non-PD. For example, it might be that he shoot them on his free time. (I'm not saying this was confirmed nor claimed - just a possible explanation.) whym (talk) 13:43, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
Thanks for the explanation. I'm still skeptical, whether he really can determine the license of those pictures. In my book he has no copyright in the first place, as he did them for the federal government. But as a free license makes no big difference for our use, I won't complain. But of course there is an issue here with reuse. If one of the pictures was already used outside of Wikipedia without naming Keating - due to us showing the picture to be PD - the reusers might now feel in jeopardy. So we should not be generous with permissions just for courtesy. --h-stt !? 15:00, 24 November 2014 (UTC)
@H-stt: I think this is more or less resolved, but just to clarify before this gets archived, I didn't intend to say that we should credit him just to be nicer. As I understand, by putting the wording "photo courtesy of Kim Keating" on their webiste, USGS affirms that Kim Keating took the photo privately (not on duty) and then allowed USGS to use it. It's about trusting USGS, not about trusting the one researcher's claim alone. Of course, USGS might sometimes make mistakes in distinguishing what is on duty and what is not, but I see nothing proving them wrong in this case. As for confusion on the reuser - I agree it's confusing, but keeping showing it as PD won't help either. I believe we should try improving the information we provide, as we know new facts. whym (talk) 12:49, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

photo of Lee Duhee

https://www.evernote.com/shard/s194/sh/bdd3ff55-2e5b-4b12-a82a-8ee80ef151e0/612cb92e508f0a6faac8e6d8bb048ba1
can you see the link above? thank you. Sorry for not leaving sign(No idea how to do it since it is different from wikipedia).— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kwangmo (talk • contribs)

Of course I can, but that's not OTRS ticket. (Signing is same here, four ~s.) — Revi 17:28, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
This section was archived on a request by: — Revi 17:28, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Hand-held Angbuilgu.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
This section was archived on a request by: — Revi 19:08, 29 December 2014 (UTC)