User talk:廣九直通車/Archive 3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ecce Homo - Elías García Martínez.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review

File:Chow_Wai-hung_portrait.jpg

So Had OTRS receives any response after added {{OTRS received}} template? Thank you. --SCP-2000 14:23, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

@SCP-2000: Nope. We have responded to the client, but we currently have no response, regards.廣九直通車 (talk) 03:14, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

J20 NATO reporting name?

I had added the NATO reporting name of J20 is "Black Eagle" but you reverted it. I guess you got confused with the links as I had added it with others (sorry, my mistake). Here is the link https://www.airforce-technology.com/projects/chengdu-j20/. Please check it out. User070510 (talk) 11 July 2020 (UTC)

@User070510: I find no content that supports your claim. Moreover, it is a fact that NATO reporting name for fighter jets all starts with a "F" (Flanker, Fulcrum, etc.). Would you quote relevant content regarding your claim? Many thanks.廣九直通車 (talk) 03:10, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Congratulations, dear license reviewer

If you use the helper scripts, you will find the links next to the search box (vector) or as single tabs (monobook). They are named license+ and license-.

Hi 廣九直通車, thanks for your request for license reviewer status. The request has been closed as successful, and you've been added to the list of reviewers. You can now start reviewing files – please see Commons:License review and Commons:Flickr files if you haven't done so already. We also have a guide how to detect copyright violations. Potential backlogs include Flickr review and files from other sources. You can use one of the following scripts by adding one of the lines to your common.js:

mw.loader.load('//commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:ZooFari/licensereviewer.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript'); // stable script for reviewing images from any kind of source OR
mw.loader.load('//commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Majora/LicenseReview.js&action=raw&ctype=text/javascript'); // contains also user notification when review fails, auto blacklist-check and auto-thank you message for Flickr-reviews.

Important: thou shalt not review thy own uploads, nor those of anyone closely related to you!

Please feel free to join us on IRC: #wikimedia-commons webchat on irc.freenode.net. You can also add {{User license reviewer}} to your user page if you wish. Thank you for your contributions on Commons! --- FitIndia Talk ✉ 05:57, 20 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Meizu 17.jpg

Hello. This file is shot by myself, I cannot understand why it has license problem?--30000lightyears (talk) 11:31, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

@30000lightyears: I find this image on the Internet dated well before your date of upload, as screenshots of videos on Bilibili. This means that your image have been published on exterior sources before uploaded to Commons.廣九直通車 (talk) 14:13, 3 August 2020 (UTC)

{{回应}}:All right. I'll deal with it. Thanks!--30000lightyears (talk) 09:52, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

@30000lightyears: And by the way, evidence provided on deletion request indicated that the image is used by other sources before the date of upload, regards.廣九直通車 (talk) 02:35, 5 August 2020 (UTC)

File:61752285759db8944d1954ed1e9b309f taken by konghhyy123.jpg

照片的拍攝作者是konghhyy123，他寄信告訴我：「授權我寄好了。對不起我有點忙」，因此我想請您驗證OTRS。如果沒看到，那麼會不會他授權是寄到permissions-zh-hant@wikimedia.org，麻煩您。謝謝--Kai3952 (talk) 01:45, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

@Kai3952: 是的，我们已经收到有关的电邮，现在正在处理中。廣九直通車 (talk) 03:10, 8 August 2020 (UTC)

An unfree Flickr license was found on File:Los Angeles Fire Department on scene of 2020 Tujunga Fire.jpg

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ français ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Nederlands ∙ sicilianu ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ +/−

A file that you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Los Angeles Fire Department on scene of 2020 Tujunga Fire.jpg, was found available on Flickr by an administrator or reviewer under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Wikimedia Commons, per the licensing policy. The file has been deleted. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY), BY SA (CC BY-SA), CC0 (CC0) and PDM (PDM) are allowed on Wikimedia Commons. If the Flickr user has changed the license of the Flickr image, feel free to ask an administrator to restore the file, or start an undeletion request.

Elisfkc (talk) 00:33, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

@Elisfkc: Thank you for your notification.廣九直通車 (talk) 02:44, 25 August 2020 (UTC)

License review of image

Hi! Could you review the file Simula 50 years - IEEE.jpg when you got time? Thanks. - Premeditated (talk) 14:15, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

@Premeditated: ✓ DoneFor your instance.廣九直通車 (talk) 07:14, 29 August 2020 (UTC)

我被人糾纏，請問我該怎麼辦？

您好，雖然我有向Administrators' noticeboard/User problems呈報，但是對方仍然找我爭論，也沒有管理員前往處理。我被他糾纏，原因正如他說：「如果不是看到編輯歷史是你去改分類的話，我根本不會到你的討論頁留言」，這很明顯他有en:WP:CIR問題，他不允許別人去動到他的分類。他糾纏我不僅浪費我時間，我也害怕他又會再犯，請問我該怎麼辦？--Kai3952 (talk) 02:14, 6 September 2020 (UTC)

請看看special:diff/447742104，這就是他說的，而且是我警告他之後，他繼續說的話。我有要求他停止，但他仍然繼續找我說special:diff/448010413，因此我不相信他說他不會再煩我。他的行為完全都是衝著我來，否則我做到他要求之後，他本該就要停下爭論，實在看不出此人是對commons.wikimedia有何貢獻之處。--Kai3952 (talk) 02:24, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
@Kai3952: 這點我同意，畢竟你確實給出了有關的建議。共享只有Commons:Disputed territories作為參考，而且只針對克里米亞半島的問題。個人認為應將有關的論述加入Commons:Categories for discussion/2019/09/Category:Taiwan等頁有關中國/中華民國/台灣，以及其他爭議領土的資訊，並把Commons:Disputed territories升格為有約束力的政策。廣九直通車 (talk) 08:48, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
  • 1.雖然你是這麼說，但是請你看看他的構想：special:diff/447248065。由此可知，他是將臺灣島及澎湖看成Taiwan，並且他是將Kinmen、Matsu以及Taiwan看成三個分類，全歸類於Republic of China，最終使Republic of China只會有Category:XXX in Kinmen、Category:XXX in Matsu、Category:XXX in Taiwan這三個子類別。
  • 2.他的構想有一個很嚴重的問題，就是不符乎實際。因為Taiwan有自己的歷史，清朝被歸為臺灣省，日本則僅納臺灣島及澎湖群島為其領土，1945年之後被中華民國統治，而且領土範圍不同於清朝、日本，在國際地位上，也是將Republic of China看成是Taiwan。若真要實行他的構想，他勢必要前往Commons:Categories for discussion/2019/09/Category:Taiwan討論，可是他不願意去討論，反而他自己跑題，變成討論我認不認同金門是屬中華民國這個話題，最後他跑去臺灣維基社群facebook控訴我。
  • 3.目前commons.wikimedia在分類上是大多數採用Taiwan，僅存少數的分類是Republic of China，這確實存在問題，尤其是1945年以後的歷史，還有現在的臺灣，在各方面都是等同於現在的中華民國，這造成每次要建立起一個分類頁面，命名Category:XXX in Taiwan還是Category:XXX in the Republic of China就是個問題，因此必須要先從這裡討論解決。--Kai3952 (talk) 10:22, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
本人對於共享分類的架構不是太清楚，純粹就是看到有合適的分類就塞檔案進去。不過根據有關討論的存檔，請問有關的問題有沒有解決？因為本人最近現實生活比較繁忙，不太方便回復討論頁。廣九直通車 (talk) 12:56, 15 September 2020 (UTC)
好吧，這件事也只能交由社群討論，所以我剛才去COM:VP/P提案了，你看看：special:diff/465930144--Kai3952 (talk) 12:54, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

License review of image

Hello @廣九直通車: I have seen that you accepted the responsibility of being a license reviewer because you want to reduce the awful backlog in reviewing images, so I ask you please review these images, some of them have not been reviewed for months and some from last year. Please

發現有用戶上傳疑似侵權圖片，但證據不足，如何是好？

你好，近日我發現新用戶Anhuicarspotter所上載的圖片當中有不少跟網上的其他圖片非常相似，疑似是從網上下載然後再改少少細節再上載至維基媒體，例如這張圖片跟我在網上找到的幾乎一模一樣，但證據不足，請問這樣是否已構成侵犯版權？是否應要刪除？-User3204 (talk) 09:07, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

@User3204:  Delete同意您的看法。加上有关图片是在Anhuicarspotter上传至共享前就在网上流传，大概率是侵权照片，应予删除。廣九直通車 (talk) 09:10, 14 October 2020 (UTC)

可以幫助檢查嗎？

File:2020-01-19驅散集會.webm

感謝！--Cmsth11126a02 (talk) 10:17, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

@Cmsth11126a02: ✓ Done，如有需要请随时通知。廣九直通車 (talk) 10:35, 7 November 2020 (UTC)

最近遇到COM:FOP Taiwan問題，我想請你協助

您好，最近遇到問題，我想請你協助。根據Reke向我反映「戶外藝術品著作權」這問題，他認為COM:FOP Taiwan規定不符當地的法律情況；然而在此之前，已經有很多人按COM:FOP Taiwan規定提報，很多照片早就被刪除了，但是Reke從未向他們反映，而且我看你今年在這裡也有按COM:FOP Taiwan規定提報刪除，所以在這麼多人當中，只有我對這張照片提報刪除才引起他反映，使我不得不懷疑他是故意找我麻煩，尤其是他和我說話之後，到現在完全沒有行動，放由之前的照片刪除，並沒有去Commons:Undeletion_requests申請恢復照片，甚至他也沒向Wcam、Aymatth2、Taiwania Justo這些人反映，因為COM:FOP Taiwan是他們寫的。問題是Reke居然說維基五大支柱「不要墨守成規」，這等於是他要放任著問題不管。我有將此事告訴COM:HD，到現在沒有人理會。面對COM:FOP Taiwan這種事，我不知道該怎麼辦，這問題不但是要討論修改COM:FOP Taiwan規定，還要對過去被刪除的照片去一一翻案，這是一件很龐大的工程，並非是我一個人可以做的到，而且這事也必須要有對版權以及法律有足夠的了解。僅管我知道你不是臺灣人，但是我有找過他們，他們沒有一人理會。如果這問題不去解決，別人是不會怎麼樣，可以照樣提報刪除，只是Reke是針對我一人，只有我做的事才會引起他反映，那麼我在commons.wikimedia工作編輯就會遇到阻礙，這正是我向你求助的原因。--Kai3952 (talk) 01:08, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

@Kai3952: 其实我也有过被错误FOP资料提出错误删除讨论的经历（好像也是台湾，某座室外佛像的图片，当时COM:FOP Taiwan声称户外作品没有FOP）。由于我感觉有关法律条文和COM:FOP Taiwan的解释有点出入，我会抽时间向他询问一下情况。廣九直通車 (talk) 13:10, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
另，这种情况个人认为ping一下有关管理员也是可行的方法。廣九直通車 (talk) 13:10, 29 November 2020 (UTC)
他說的是臺灣的版權法律，但是他沒有指出他是看見哪一條法律outdoor 2D art work是允許FOP。我看很久也是沒有看見，若是有的話，法律應當會明確指出，可是只有在第58條有指出戶外藝術作品是建築物或雕塑品，並沒有指出是2D藝術作品，那麼我按照當時FOP Taiwan規定是沒有錯。
至於你說管理員，請你看看他在COM:HD說的話，他說他收到很多人關於我帶給別人麻煩的投訴（或說抱怨），所以很明顯他是針對我而來，那麼找管理員是不會有用，管理員不會想理會私人恩怨。
我認為你找他，還不如將此事放到COM:VPP作為提案，由那些熟悉FOP的人去判斷會是最適合的。我沒有提案是因為此事變成私人恩怨，容易會將Reke對我這個人做事與態度加入看法，那麼他們就不會明白我提案是想做什麼。自11月21日到現在過了10天，除了看到他只是在這裡移除「works and outdoor 2D artistic」這一段話，他並沒有按照他說：「去做你所謂的保母工作」去為這件事討論並設法解決，只因為他仗著維基五大支柱「不要墨守成規」。因此我想將此事託付給你，幫我提案。--Kai3952 (talk) 12:22, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

若是以我提報刪除照片這事來說，其實問題不只是COM:FOP Taiwan，還有侵權。

  • 你看看File:Memorybank2019-萬安國小振興分校.jpg使用的是{{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}，但是他給的是「https://memorybank.culture.tw/event/zh-tw/event_004/943 」這個連結，結果出現是「Copyright © 2019 文化部國家文化記憶庫 版權所有」，當然會發生有人誤以為是侵權就提報刪除這情況，而這個誤解就是來自於上傳者沒有提供版權頁，也沒有使用OTRS驗證，而且還誤用{{Cc-by-sa-4.0}}這模板，如此是的確會與其他人同樣是自己拍攝的照片產生混淆，因為看起來是一樣的，比如：File:AAC6262 01路思義教堂.jpg。
  • 面對這問題，Reke只是解釋版權頁在這裡，然後他就再也沒去理會，所以這問題到現在仍存在，理由是：別人只會看見照片，因此上傳者必須要提供完整的版權訊息，否則未來一定會有人將照片拿去刪除。我記得版權的舉證責任是上傳者，不確定是不是根據Commons:Project scope/Evidence？由於Reke是臺灣維基媒體基金會的人，而這照片是來自臺灣維基媒體基金會與文化部合作舉辦的「集記憶」活動，可是那也僅止於他們，而我們這裡是commons.wikimedia，即使不要按照規定，版權也應當要顧及才是，否則只有Reke和他們參與活動的上傳者會知道，在這種情況下，我們要求完整版權訊息應該不算過分或為難吧？然而他就是不這麼想，反而要求我別添加麻煩給人（比如：COM:FOP Taiwan那件事就是要我先查）。

以上二點可知，版權問題還是要由Reke來做才能獲得解決，因為他們那些參與活動的上傳者，很多是經由臺灣維基媒體基金會協助才知道怎麼參與，所以關於上傳照片應當注意的版權，最好解決方式還是由每一位上傳者去做，這就必須仰賴臺灣維基媒體基金會協助與教導。可是你也看見了COM:FOP Taiwan，Reke想法對這件版權問題是一樣，他是要我自己去查版權頁，並且要求我改掉提報刪除照片這毛病。我認為他這個想法很危險，照片這麼多，假如每一張都如此做，那麼我會想到我過去「因大量編輯而抗拒autopatrol」這件事，同樣的邏輯觀念，他們每次活動都會上傳很多照片，不一定人人會老實，萬一有侵權或可疑的照片，我們要從茫茫大海中一一查驗就夠花時間，還要再幫他們找到版權頁並提供到commons.wikimedia，如此的費工就是Reke說的保母工作（實際上是上傳者必須要做的舉證責任），我擔心這會被癱瘓，但我現在還在思考如何向管理員呈報這件事，因為到現在他們還有很多從活動中上傳的照片是我們不知道有多少沒被發現到，這還不包括從Facebook上傳的照片，Reke也是要求我別看見FBMD就提報刪除，總之他就是希望我什麼照片都不要刪除，好像意思在暗示他們的照片沒有問題，是我在找他們的麻煩，然後當那些人（英語系用戶，比如JuTa、Jeff G.）提報刪除時，他馬上將原本對我的敵意消失，轉由正常的討論方式去談事情。老實說，Reke行為不僅對照片版權沒帶來幫助，反而阻礙到我對照片提報刪除的權益，我不確定他情況是否適合被舉報給管理員？--Kai3952 (talk) 13:50, 2 December 2020 (UTC)

License Review request

您好，请你帮忙review这个目录Category:Cotton Game。谢谢。Larryasou (talk) 05:47, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

@Larryasou: ✓ DoneFYI.廣九直通車 (talk) 11:02, 13 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Fairy Tales for Worker's Children.djvu

File:Fairy Tales for Worker's Children.djvu has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Prosfilaes (talk) 07:18, 2 January 2021 (UTC)

麻煩您可以在您上載的警車圖片分類加上汽車型號嗎？

如題 User3204 (talk) 14:00, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

@User3204: 这个我能够分辨的话自然会做到，例如大部分美国警车（毕竟太好辨认）。至于其他品牌的话，则未必能够准确辨认型号。我日后也会尽量留意型号有关的分类，谢谢。廣九直通車 (talk) 13:08, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

FOP-Taiwan

我在COM:AN詢問有關於FOP-Taiwan按照台灣版權法律的問題，但是沒有人理會，反而Reke在這裡討論說的話，卻有很多人給他答覆，我不太懂這是為什麼？如果這問題僵持著，我擔心會面臨二種狀況：

  1. 可能我創建的類別會被刪除（因為圖片被刪除而導致類別是空的），因此造成我接下來很難決定是否繼續創建像Category:Temple doors in Taiwan或 Category:Temple paintings in Taiwan諸此的類別。
  2. 可能我會按照FOP-Taiwan政策，將全部照片含有2D藝術品（例如：繪畫）逐一提報刪除，屆時我將再次被Reke像他說的這般痛罵我是毀人心血。

為此，我是進退二難。我不理會，分類工作就停滯不前；我理會，變成照片全被我刪掉。這當中只能靠大家從FOP-Taiwan解圍，我這舉動就是如Reke所說，我令人討厭的原因。我知道我問題就是頭腦太死，行事只懂按照FOP-Taiwan，不知變通，也不知為他人設想，所以我這問題他才沒有將我舉報給管理員。可是我們依然要解決FOP-Taiwan，不能因為政策是這麼規定，我們知道了就睜一眼閉一眼，卻不去將照片刪除，我提議修改政策就能保留照片，反倒被Reke痛罵，我真不知道他所謂推卸責任是在想什麼。我希望請你幫忙，若是這僵局再不解圍，我勢必只能按照FOP-Taiwan，將所有的照片刪掉。--Kai3952 (talk) 12:43, 25 December 2020 (UTC)

我意思是請你向社群說說看，看他們會不會受到你的感召，因此才明白問題嚴重性而前來討論。--Kai3952 (talk) 12:45, 25 December 2020 (UTC)
@Kai3952: 由於本人最近負責了更多維基文庫那頭的工作，加上也入讀了一間以學業壓力聞名的大學，未必能像以往在維基共享這麼活躍。由此延遲了回復實在抱歉。
先說起COM:AN那頭的事情吧，你在那頭的提問得不到回復，大概是管理員認為無需介入。作為一般討論板存在的COM:HD（也包括COM:VP一類的地方），其他人反而會覺得更適合討論，因此才會扎堆到那裡討論吧。
我細閱過COM:HD的內容。藍線下面算是維基共享兩個版權界泰斗的意見，恕小弟不才，我其實看的不太明白。然而他們提及了最低限度（De Minimis）的概念。另外，Aymatth提及了「如果有關國家（司法管轄區）缺乏有關最低限度的司法判決，則我們應該嚴格定義最低限度」的觀點。也許我們應該同時翻找有沒有臺灣司法院司法意見/法律解釋一類的文件？我也會向中文文庫那頭查問一下。
個人認為在翻找司法解釋一類文件後，再向COM:VPC一類的地方提出修正會更好。畢竟，司法界官方文件一定比行政機關的普通公文更有力吧。廣九直通車 (talk) 11:04, 31 December 2020 (UTC)
我知道沒人理。既然他們不想討論，加之Reke直指是我的問題，其實這種情況我無可奈何。因此在你還沒答覆我之前，我已經允諾Reke要求停下一切干預政策（包括FOP-Taiwan）並且不再提交任何照片刪除。不過，他依然纏著我不放。因為他不相信我編輯不會引起用戶糾紛，所以他要求我不要去干預他人在編輯方面的事務。你說這怎麼可能做得到？每個人編輯總是會編輯到別人的，我沒討論會被說胡亂回退，我有討論會被說難以溝通，感覺Reke似乎有意圖逼我離開。最大問題是沒有人幫我。--Kai3952 (talk) 18:23, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

我看到你留下「關於臺灣FOP的事宜」這則訊息。

  • 所謂「法律觀點有誤」，這是建立在 Reke 他一個人自己對法律解讀上一種說法，若真的是社群對臺灣版權法（著作權法）有錯誤解讀，的確需要有法律例證。儘管我在中文維基有說：「證明是Commons社群誤解法律」，這只是應付 Reke 糾纏，不得已下所說的話，純粹是緩兵之計，所以我並不是真的認為社群誤解法律。也就是說，我寧可選擇 Clindberg 所言法律例證，也不會相信 Reke 個人觀點。因此，我已經撤銷我原有對 Reke 的允諾，並重新考慮是否按照 FOP-Taiwan 提刪照片。因為我們不能只為了 Reke 他一個人個人觀點，卻放任所有人上傳侵權照片（拍照等同複製），除非我們可以釐清 FOP-Taiwan 界限，而不是僅僅只引用智慧財產局例子或臺灣版權法（著作權法）規定。
  • 儘管我們知道，他將 FOP-Taiwan 修改為Not OK for indoor works，對於釐清 FOP-Taiwan 界限並沒有解決，最常見例子：臺灣很多寺廟的樑楣有彩繪。你在他那裡留訊息，應該有看到 Reke 對這問題的回應，他認為是我個人問題（對commons方針誤解、缺乏常識或正確判斷），甚至他說這七年來，除了我之外，commons社群（外國人）沒有人會像我這樣，尤其是他對 Solomon203 信誓旦旦說沒問題。如果這問題不解決，或是缺乏法律例證，我認為當前做法最好是先刪除，留下爭議照片並不是處理侵權最好的方式；可是照片數量很多，全部刪除可能引來那一群臺灣人反對，因此現在社群、管理員不再討論此事，這是不是在告訴我，他們默許留下爭議照片？那麼「Not OK for indoor works」怎麼辦？--Kai3952 (talk) 11:36, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

Re: FOP Taiwan

其實這些事情我們諮詢過在台灣多個政府單位擔任著作權法顧問的林誠夏先生，另外在跟政府部門合作的賽事中，那些照片也有台灣文化部的法務部門給過意見。這些人都具有法律(特別是著作權法)專業，但是不是維基社群人，不會上來參與討論，也不太可能為了這個去用大篇幅英文解釋給外國人聽 (而且我們還不付專家諮詢費或薪資，在我們的比賽中提供法律審查時文化部會付)。就算開啟討論，屆時也是由我轉述，然後大家各抒己見。

台灣政府確實刻意在法律上留下模糊的裁量空間，主要是著作權利用的情況複雜，會不會影響著作權人利益終究才是最後考量，也是立著作法需要保護的最終目標，所以對室內2D作品要求有個一刀切的清楚界線很難，但是有些建築物上的塗繪明顯沒有利益替代的問題，例如廟宇建築中出現的繪畫，繪者甚至多以工匠而非藝術創作者自居，不可能來主張相關權利。至於其他有爭議的個案，大可以再致信台灣分會(info@wikimedia.tw)請求給予建議。立法上的故意模糊不可能靠維基社群討論來解決，就算寫出規則也只會是錯的。--Reke (talk) 19:52, 13 January 2021 (UTC)

@Reke: 你也太誇張。你明知道規則再怎麼制定，也不會百分百貼合著作權法，你卻留下「Not OK for indoor works」這種規則。我不相信外國人看到這種規則不會去刪除照片。此外，「Not OK for indoor works」這種規則本身就是一刀切，沒有將著作權法留下模糊的裁量空間給寫在 FOP-Taiwan。如果光靠每個人自己的判斷，這會留下漏洞，有心人想濫刪照片，我們很難說他們不可以刪，更麻煩的是，每次刪就要每次去挽救，這情況是有可能發生，現在就是為了防止才要討論。即使不可能靠維基社群討論來解決，面對立法上的故意模糊，仍然可以從「模糊中幾個大方向」去討論，對每一個大方向去了解各自不同面向的問題。廟內壁畫、門神已不單單只是個案，這些問題不僅是不同面向，而且類似問題也可能發生在很多場所，比如：車站大廳的地板彩繪。
如果討論不出結果，我是建議在 FOP-Taiwan 說明法律有哪些條文是留下模糊的裁量空間，總比留給別人自己判斷照片是不是違反「Not OK for indoor works」這規則會好多。在說明時，最好舉幾張照片做例子，這樣更清楚，可大大減少社群誤解法律的機會。因為法律要給人裁量，我們也比照這麼做，應該就沒什麼爭議吧？--Kai3952 (talk) 21:07, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

t981130

你可否幫忙檢查t981130電郵？他說他有寄到permissions-commons@wikimedia.org，可是COM:UDR仍然否決。經過我向t981130多次詢問，想知道他哪裡沒做到才被否決，好讓我向User:Nat溝通，結果他答覆：「我不清楚你們審核狀況」，似乎他已經被我弄很煩了。因此，我認為這當中問題，可能是他們看不懂t981130寫的是中文，我想請你幫忙確認看他的OTRS。謝謝--Kai3952 (talk) 15:14, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

@Kai3952: 不好意思，我從去年8月就辭掉OTRS人員的職務了，如果您需要協助的話，可以到Commons:OTRS/List_of_members_by_language#中文查找。個人也推薦找Mys 721tx幫忙，他在我當OTRS人員時也協助過我遇到的不少問題，謝謝。廣九直通車 (talk) 12:44, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi Chris

Could you review this and this photo? I took it from official government's facebook. And this too. The last picture came from a non-copyrighted government website. I'm sorry if this request bothers you, but I've seen your great work as an image reviewer in Commons and I would be pleased to get a review from you. Thanks! --Regards, Jeromi Mikhael (marhata) 17:00, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

✓ Partially doneRefer to the deletion requests.廣九直通車 (talk) 03:35, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

I've been particularly impressed with how this user has handled OTRS issues

  1. 我已經找過 Mys 721tx，你看看他說的話：special:diff/534519288、special:diff/534862714，他說話自我矛盾，令我直覺被他戲耍。他明明知道作者（t981130）在 OTRS 已經寫上名字、照片來源和網址，他卻說沒有EXIF，作者在網站裡張貼的照片不能證明是他本人擁有，這意思等於是他不允許從網站上傳照片到commons，那麼為何有的通過 OTRS 的照片是取自 Facebook，我認為這不公平。
  2. 能不能證明是他本人，這不是我們該做的，我們該做的是「相信」，相信 t981130 是將他自己拍攝的照片發表在巴哈姆特（照片網址：[1]、[2]），有沒有盜用照片，則是他自己要負責，況且他已經給出照片來源和網址，因此 Mys 721tx 不應該用「无元数据、分辨率有限」理由不允許我上傳作者（t981130）的照片。

根據以上原因，我請求你幫我，看哪一位 OTRS 志願者可以處理File:Coastal photo from Nantian Observation Platform, taken by t981130.jpg、File:Coastal photo from Dawu Sea View Trail, taken by t981130.jpg這二張照片 UDR 請求。
此外，我打算電郵，要求作者（t981130）寄到 permissions-zh-hant@wikimedia.org，但是 Mys 721tx 不允許我重覆發送。我認為他是故意刁難，因為他沒告訴我可以怎麼辦，希望你可以幫忙。謝謝--Kai3952 (talk) 02:44, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

還有，如果你要介紹我找誰幫忙，你可以謹慎，多認識、多了解你想舉薦的那人，有把握之後，再介紹給我也不遲，如此可以使你獲得「鑑人之明」、「獨具慧眼」好名聲。--Kai3952 (talk) 02:55, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
@Kai3952: 已在有关讨论页上提出质询。说实话如果我仍然是OTRS人员的话我会在OTRS Wiki私下和他讨论吧。另外我介绍他是他之前当我是OTRS的新人时，他也确实协助了我不少办公和处事技巧。廣九直通車 (talk) 07:09, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
  • 我只知道當你說「他也确实协助了我不少办公和处事技巧」此話，的確會讓我誤以為他待我也會如同待你一樣，這只能說是你人際關係好，可是你不能要求每一個人可以像你一樣，誰不想自己的人際好，問題是我怎麼會知道你是如何和他相處的，所以我只能按照我自己的生活方式去待每一個人。說實在，你人際好並不是我的錯，你明白了嗎？
  • 我不解的是，照片一樣都是從巴哈姆特，也一樣都是作者宣稱是他自己拍攝的，為何在審查OTRS，上一次我找你就通過了，這一次換成Nat、Mys 721tx，他們二人審查都沒通過，究竟是你審查有問題，還是他們有問題？--Kai3952 (talk) 07:26, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
如果按照 Mys 721tx 要求而言，唯一辦法就是作者（t981130）自己上傳帶有 EXIF 的照片，如此才能證明原始照片（照片是他拍的）。問題是……t981130不願意自己上傳，然而他不願意不等於是他盜用別人的照片，有可能是他不想來維基百科參與編輯，也有可能他覺得他對維基百科操作介面不熟，自己上傳會很麻煩。無論作者出於什麼原因不願意自己上傳，我都給予尊重，因此我才請他寄一封 OTRS 授權信，由我代替他上傳照片，這是變通的做法。
基於上述理由，我們不能因為無法證明該網站與OTRS客戶關係，因而阻止變通做法，更何況我沒有找到任何規定，必須要上傳帶有 EXIF 的照片，我只看到必須要給出照片的來源。t981130 給出的網址就是最好的來源證明，所以不應該「有人」雞蛋裡挑骨頭，否則「此人」行為與動機都需要交由社群或管理員檢視，但是我不想把時間浪費在他身上。現在我唯一辦法就是找其他 OTRS 志願者幫忙覆查。如果真要說我的動機，當然就是對File:Coastal photo from Nantian Observation Platform, taken by t981130.jpg、File:Coastal photo from Dawu Sea View Trail, taken by t981130.jpg二個 UDR 請求允許恢復照片，這麼明顯，不知道有什麼好質疑？--Kai3952 (talk) 09:57, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
你看看他向管理員舉報我，這不僅與你說他會幫助人是相反，而且愈來愈離譜。我第一次看到有人幫人幫到向管理員舉報，不知道是他對「drama」一詞誤解，還是他心胸向來如此。現在我後悔找他，但是我沒有責怪你介紹他，是我自己明知道他這人本來就有爭議（他在中文維基當管理員的種種行為曾被社群討論），卻還找他求助，只能說是我自己找罪受。t981130 事情已經拖了二個月，上一次電郵給 King of Hearts 沒回應，昨天我再次找他，若是沒回應，我只能繼續找下一位 OTRS 志願者，否則 t981130 事情拖愈久就愈難處理。有了這一次教訓，在經過檢討之後，如果不是我對 OTRS 授權政策有誤解，那麼就是我太晚知道你從 OTRS 志願者卸任，只是我沒那種時間去在乎這事，眼前必須先將 t981130 事情解決，再來考慮我未來該不該從站外代替作者上傳照片。--Kai3952 (talk) 11:46, 6 March 2021 (UTC)

Re: 现有信息不足以认定该网站与OTRS客户关系

  • 請你看看Commons:OTRS，沒有規定要證明该网站与OTRS客户关系，只要求必須載明版權持有者或拍攝作者，還有照片的來源，這些 t981130 都有提供。儘管 Mys 721tx 要我別再寄，我依然還是電郵給作者，請他證明该网站与OTRS客户关系。
  • 我是覺得他的新規定太為難人，無論是使用帳號 t981130 或是姓名，這些都是作者自己，他有權選擇使用二者任一個來代表是作者或版權持有者。在Commons:OTRS沒有規定下，我電郵作者去證明，其實算是我對不起他，因為這是多餘的要求，甚至可以當成刁難、胡鬧。因此，我擔心作者會被我嚇跑，放棄上傳他的照片。
  • 我知道 Mys 721tx 用意，他希望作者提供原始照片（帶有 EXIF），並且證明自己就是 t981130，可是這做法比你的更嚴格。儘管這是最好的做法，但是我們可以有別的辦法代替，不需要一定這麼為難作者，無奈 Mys 721tx 不聽，還向管理員告我一狀。我想請問你，我們的版權方針是否有規定要像 Mys 721tx 這麼強制要求？--Kai3952 (talk) 15:18, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
對了，Mys 721tx 行為給我想起 Reke 說的話。按照 Reke 邏輯去推論，我與用戶之間討論，說不來就向管理員告狀，我這行為應該被制止，並且立即改進，那麼 Mys 721tx 告我一狀，其實也適用於 Reke 邏輯，他也要被制止，並且立即改進。然而，Reke 從來對他沒有意見，包括在 zh.wikipedia 也是如此，那麼我真的搞不懂為何有如此天壤之別？--Kai3952 (talk) 15:31, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Commons:OTRS/List of members by language

我問過人，發現Commons:OTRS/List of members by language是不準確。有些人早已經不是 OTRS 志願者，但他的名仍然掛在上面。--Kai3952 (talk) 18:53, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

@Kai3952: 不好意思，因为最近现实生活比较繁忙就把这搁在这里几天了。
说实话，我还以为那个页面是Krd管理的，毕竟他可谓OTRS的最活跃的几个用户了。那个清单也说明了是人手整理，因此名单可能不完整及过时，不过如果过时得太严重的话，也许通知一下OTRS义工在COM:ON处理一下会好一些（毕竟，我现在也不是OTRS人员）。
如果需要更精确的用户清单的话，您也许可以参阅Template:OTRS/Users，这个清单由机器人更新。我想OTRS人员作为比较成熟的用户，也会在用户页上注明巴别及有充分时间回复您的请求吧（在OTRS那头怠工的话随时都可能被清出门外）。
希望以上内容能够回答您的问题。廣九直通車 (talk) 11:22, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Kan-etsu Exp bus crash.png

File:Kan-etsu Exp bus crash.pngは私自身が画像を作成して2012年12月7日に投稿しました。File:Kan-etsu Exp bus crash just before.pngも同時に投稿しています。あなたが転載元としてウェブサイトの日付は2015年05月02日です。なぜこれが転載になるのですか？--Marine-Bluetalk✿contribs 10:20, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Kan-etsu Exp bus crash.png I created the image myself and posted it on December 7, 2012. File:Kan-etsu Exp bus crash just before.png is also posted at the same time. The date of the website you are reprinting from is May 02, 2015. Why is this reprinted?
File:Kan-etsu Exp bus crash.png我自己创建了图片，并于2012年12月7日发布了该图片。 同时也发布了File:Kan-etsu Exp bus crash just before.png。 您要转载的网站的日期为2015年5月2日。 为什么要转载？
translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:55, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
@Marine-Blue: But your current version is uploaded on 2016-01-24, which is already published on the mentioned external source dated 2015-05-02. This drew my suspicion. Is the latter version really your work?廣九直通車 (talk) 11:04, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
リンク先のページはウィキメディア・コモンズの画像を転載したものではなく、ウィキメディア・コモンズの画像を直接呼び出しています。ウィキメディア・コモンズの画像を変更すると、リンク先のページの画像も変更されます。--Marine-Bluetalk✿contribs 14:54, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
The linked page is not a reprint of the Wikimedia Commons image, but directly calls the Wikimedia Commons image. If you change the image of Wikimedia Commons, the image of the linked page will also change.
链接的页面不是Wikimedia Commons图像的重印，而是直接调用Wikimedia Commons图像。 如果更改Wikimedia Commons的图像，则链接页面的图像也将更改。
translator: Google Translate via   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:00, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
@Marine-Blue: Oh, I see. A good lesson for me and my future copyright inspection work, and sorry for any inconvenience, thank you.廣九直通車 (talk) 09:50, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

可以看這張相片嗎？

File:VOA Mei Foo primary election.jpg

另外，有關存廢討論結果。

感謝！--Cmsth11126a02 (talk) 11:40, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

✓ Done@Cmsth11126a02: FYI。廣九直通車 (talk) 12:48, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

圖片審查通過被提刪疑問

日前閣下審查通過下圖來源以及許可證，但為何又會被提出刪除請求，且說明另有作者?

政府開放資料使用是公開的阿...

125px

--鐵路1 (talk) 16:49, 5 April 2021 (UTC)

@鐵路1: 說實話，我也不知道台鐵用了其他人的臉書貼文，而且還沒有標注原作者。尤其有關檔案作為PDF中提取的截圖，也不會有臉書圖片所擁有的EXIF特徵。關於這點，我十分抱歉。
另外雖然我們版權審查員對版權和授權比較熟悉，然而出錯也在所難免。如果您發現經審查的圖片有問題的話也歡迎提出問題/提刪，謝謝！廣九直通車 (talk) 02:58, 6 April 2021 (UTC)
@廣九直通車: 了解，感謝解惑。--鐵路1 (talk) 03:24, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

cropped images are not duplicate

Please reread com:Duplicates. Crops are one thing would mean that an image is not a duplicate. We can have repeats of the same image, just not exact duplicates.  — billinghurst sDrewth 15:43, 23 May 2021 (UTC)

@Billinghurst: Thanks for your reminder.廣九直通車 (talk) 02:55, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! F HLF F2608 CPBMP.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 19:26, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Image Usage Request

Dear 廣九直通車,

Smithsonian Folkways Recordings are currently in the process of developing a new series of curriculum materials (called Smithsonian Folkways Learning Pathways) for educators (mostly music and social studies educators). These unique resources place recordings from the Smithsonian Folkways collection at the center of the learning experience. These will be FREE resources for all educators, everywhere. Each learning pathway is a curated musical journey through a historical, cultural, or musical theme (e.g. Music of the Chicano Movement; Sounds of the Civil Rights Movement; Cajun & Zydeco Music; etc...).

As part of these learning pathways, we are creating interactive student slideshows that will help teachers facilitate learning experiences in any educational environment both in-person or online. We wanted to let you know that we will be using the 'MSC Marina docked at Port of New Orleans' image seen on your Wikimedia Commons webpage. We are planning to use the image for our 'Cajun and Zydeco' learning pathway. We know that the image is under Creative Commons, and we will make sure to give you the credit for the image.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:MSC_Marina_docked_at_Port_of_New_Orleans.jpg

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns about any of the information.

King Regards, Gisele, Smithsonian Folkways Recordings ~~giseh

@Giseh: Please feel free to use our media files, and refer to our guidelines on using our media files outside of Wikimedia projects. Please also note that I'm only the one who moved the file to here, and you should attribute the file to Gnovick, the photographer, thanks!廣九直通車 (talk) 05:21, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! F RW F288 MRU.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 08:47, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

File:The Jecheon city bus 3947.jpg and other

Hi! You added a "No permission" on this file. Is the name in the watermark not the same as the name of the uploader? So what is your worry? --MGA73 (talk) 13:38, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

@MGA73:  Half done My fault for not noticing that the watermark on File:The Jecheon city bus 3947.jpg and File:A city bus that has just arrived at Jecheon Station.jpg are the same with the uploader's user name. After all, it looks like those kind of blatant copyright violation if you upload images with one's website embedded with them. That said, for File:전기기관차 견인 새마을호.jpg and File:Yuseong Bus Route 03.jpg that are marked with another watermark, I'll maintain my suspicion: originally I thought "Safety Confirmation" on File:전기기관차 견인 새마을호.jpg is describing the image, but it seems that this doesn't fits the situation of the latter one, so it's quite likely to be another watermark, regards.廣九直通車 (talk) 13:46, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
Yes usually an URL is not a good sign. But it is not forbidden to upload photos on Internet and later to Wikipedia/Commons. Uploader is no longer active so asking for a permission will only result in deleting the file. Usually I prefer a DR when it is not a clear case so other users can comment. I think in many cases admins do not examine files closely before deleting files tagged with a NPD. --MGA73 (talk) 14:12, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
@MGA73: Please feel free to change the remaining two to regular deletion requests if you believe more discussion is needed, regards.廣九直通車 (talk) 12:45, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Copyright issues

Hi User:廣九直通車, I've not contested against my uploads nor do I plan to do so. I posted them in my early days when I did not know much about the copyright issues. Ever since then I have never uploaded any image. You can check the upload dates of my images as evidence because I do not plan to evoke against copyright any day soon.

File:COVID-19 testing at the KIA.jpg

This image is my last yet to be deleted. I wash my hands off this image and want to assure you that I plan not to engage in anything of this scale ever again. I apologise for all troubles caused but I concur you think through about this ban attempt.Kwesi Yema (talk) 00:32, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

@Kwesi Yema: Thanks for your apology and notification:
  1. You are not banned. What I've placed on your talk page is a warning notice that asks you not to upload files that are copyright violations. However, persistently uploading copyright violations may result in a ban by administrators.
  2. Please be reminded that a copyright violation is always a copyright violation, even if the source is provided. I knew to others who don't know much on copyright, these misunderstandings are quite common, but please remember that. And in general, you can only upload:
    1. Works solely created by you (subject to restrictions like the freedom of panorama — which is the reason why most French buildings and American artworks can't be uploaded here)
    2. Works that their copyright holders (usually their creators) authorized to be freely used for all purposes (including derivative works and commercial uses)
    3. Works that are in public domain of the U.S. and the place of creation
If you want to read more, you may want to refer to some sections of COM:L. Please also feel free to ask me if you have any questions, thank you!廣九直通車 (talk) 05:21, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
And for your reference, I'm going to delete User talk:廣九直通車/en, which seems to be an unintentional duplicate of this discussion section.廣九直通車 (talk) 05:21, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

User:廣九直通車 Thank you. I want to confirm however that if I want to upload an image successfully, can it be a picture of something I took with my phone camera? Let's say that particular thing is for public use, like a train or a road interchange. Kwesi Yema (talk) 22:42, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

@Kwesi Yema: Sure! Please feel free to upload these kind of images. We also have a project named Wiki Loves Africa, dedicated for more media files about what's happening on the African continent, please consider taking part in the project, thanks!廣九直通車 (talk) 02:30, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A FSD GRTW A801 MCTC@1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Peulle 11:13, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
Please add an English description. --Ermell 08:08, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
I think an English description is not necessary, but nevertheless I'll still add for this image.廣九直通車 13:23, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
 Support Good quality.Thanks. --Ermell 21:55, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

We need your feedback!

Hello. Apologies if this message is not in your native language: please feel free to respond in the language of your choice. Thank you!

I am writing to you because we are looking for feedback for a new Wikimedia Foundation project, Structured Data Across Wikimedia (SDAW). SDAW is a grant-funded programme that will explore ways to structure content on wikitext pages in a way that will be machine-recognizable and -relatable, in order to make reading, editing, and searching easier and more accessible across projects and on the Internet. We are now focusing on designing and building image suggestion features for experienced users.

We have some questions to ask you about your experience with uploading images here on Wikimedia Commons and then adding them to Wikipedia. You can answer these questions on a specific feedback page on Mediawiki, where we will gather feedback. As I said, these questions are in English, but your answers do not need to be in English! You can also answer in your own language, if you feel more comfortable.

Once the collecting of feedback will be over, we will sum it up and share with you a summary, along with updated mocks that will incorporate your inputs.

Also, if you want to keep in touch with us or you want to know more about the project, you can subscribe to our newsletter.

Hope to hear from you soon! -- Sannita (WMF) (talk to me!) 09:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Review

Please, review this file https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ariel_Henry_conference.jpg --Aurelio de Sandoval (talk) 20:31, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

@Aurelio de Sandoval: I think your request has been ✓ Done by another license reviewer. In general, if the source itself is credible, it usually won't take us too long to review files.廣九直通車 (talk) 05:02, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

GeoFS screenshot copyright

Hi,

I am the creator and owner of GeoFS (www.geo-fs.com)

I see you just maked some of the GeoFS screenshots I uploaded to Wikimedia as copyright violations.

Would you please remove these violation tags and make sure thase pictures will not be deleted.

Thank you and best regards,

Xavier Tassin GEoFS — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xtassin (talk • contribs) 06:04, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

I've checked out Ticket:2016111610013549, and it contains a statement from an official email of gefs-online.com stating that his user account is Xtassin, so no further COM:VRT confirmation is necessary. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:55, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
@Xtassin and King of Hearts: Thanks for your comments and edits.廣九直通車 (talk) 07:56, 5 October 2021 (UTC)

刪除

File:Tzu-Han Ting at Junior World 2020.jpg，這圖片的授權有問題吧，我不太確定。--寒吉 (talk) 11:07, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

@寒吉: 是的，我已經處理了。看到這種無明確授權的臉書圖片可以善用{{Npd}}提删處理，謝謝。廣九直通車 (talk) 11:20, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Images of W88 and French Forces in Afghanistan.

French : Concernant les deux images de la W88. L'article en lien indiqué bien qu'ils s'agit de photos du Département de l’Énergie. J'ai mit a sa place un lien direct de cette administration : https://www.energy.gov/nnsa/articles/nnsa-completes-first-production-unit-w88-alteration-370 Pour celle des militaires français en Afghanistan, la photo n'apparait plus dans la version anglaise du blog, mais elle reste dans la version française : https://chrishernandezauthor.com/2013/07/12/lexperience-dun-americain-travaillant-avec-larmee-francaise/ - US Military photo -. L'auteur étant un US Marine en activité lorsqu'il était avec les soldats français. English : Regarding the two images of the W88. The linked article indicated although they were photos from the Department of Energy. I put in its place a direct link from this administration: https://www.energy.gov/nnsa/articles/nnsa-completes-first-production-unit-w88-alteration-370 For that of the French soldiers in Afghanistan , the photo no longer appears in the English version of the blog, but it remains in the French version: https://chrishernandezauthor.com/2013/07/12/lexperience-dun-americain-travaillant-avec-larmee-francaise/ - US Military photo -. The author is an active US Marine when he was with the French soldiers. L'amateur d'aéroplanes (talk) 08:41, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

@L'amateur d'aéroplanes: Thanks for your supplementary information. I agree that this and this should fulfill {{PD-USGov-DOE}} now per the direct link. However, I still doubt the public domain status of File:French troops and armor in the Alasai Valley, Kapisa province.jpg. As {{PD-USGov}} only covers work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties, it can't be confirmed whether the image is part of the marine's official duty. Can you provide more information on the context of the image? Many thanks.廣九直通車 (talk) 13:32, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
@廣九直通車: J'ai posé la question sur l'article en question. Je n'a pas vu d'adresse email ou contacté Chris Hernandez. Mais il n'a plus écrit d'articles sur son blog depuis mars 2021. Il indique bien sur ces articles si les photos utilisés sont de lui ou d'autres auteurs. I asked the question about the article in question. I haven't seen an email address or contacted Chris Hernandez. But he has not written any more articles on his blog since March 2021. He clearly indicates on these articles whether the photos used are of him or of other authors. https://chrishernandezauthor.com/2013/07/12/lexperience-dun-americain-travaillant-avec-larmee-francaise/ L'amateur d'aéroplanes (talk) 17:02, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:廣九直通車/Archive_3&oldid=614068266"