User:A.Savin/Archive/2021/1

Vandalism is not appreciated

Alex, HNY. I see that this (above :) template has various language versions on top of it. I may prepare a Turkish text if you would like to add it to the template. --E4024 (talk) 17:20, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

Hi, I think you can add it to Template:Test2/lang (not protected). --A.Savin 17:28, 6 January 2021 (UTC)

You think... But I'm more clumsy than you think. :) I tried to do it. It looks not bad, but when I tried it on my TP, all other language texts give this message: "NOTE: Please do not use this template directly! This is just for translation. Use {{Test2}} instead!" That means the one I made still has something to fix. Can you give a minute of yours to look at it? Please. Thanks in advance. --E4024 (talk) 00:20, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

What's wrong with it? If I look at your talkpage, and switch to Turkish, it looks fine. --A.Savin 00:30, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Well, then that means I managed to do something without knowing how to do it. :) Thanks a lot. --E4024 (talk) 13:42, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:PK Karachi asv2020-02 img69 New Memon Mosque.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:PK Karachi asv2020-02 img69 New Memon Mosque.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 7 January 2021 (UTC)

Обход блокировки

Здравствуйте. Вы заблокировали User:MilHistExp, он появился под новой учётной записью User:Fü S IV7. Можно и его туда же? Ибо задолбал сил нет никаких. --Netelo (talk) 19:05, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Done Бессрочка для обеих. --A.Savin 19:42, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Wiki of Functions followup

Hi there, I'm a researcher for the Wikilambda project. Last month we held a naming contest and I'm following up with those who voted to see if you might be willing to provide some feedback to help guide the project.

This would be a 45 minute conversation about your past experience with other Wikimedia projects and thoughts about the future of this new initiative. I'm hoping to gather a wide range of perspectives so I'd be interested in your opinion regardless of whether you plan to have further involvement.

As a way of saying thanks, the research team is offering a $35 gift card (in your local currency) for participation. We could chat by phone or through a website for audio conferencing.

If you're interested just pick a time slot from this calendar link:
https://calendly.com/wikilambda/voter

Hope to hear from you soon!

// jeff (design researcher) (talk) 11:32, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Spb DLT Store asv2019-09.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Spb DLT Store asv2019-09.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 20 January 2021 (UTC)

Namibia-Dollar

Grad die größere Löschung gesehen, grummel. Aktiviert bitte mal den CommonsDelinker wieder, in der Afrikaans-Wikipedia schweigt der seit November. (Auch wenn ich den aus Gründen nicht mag). Geldscheine, Wappen und anderes gibt es dann nur noch lokal. Groete. -- SpesBona 21:50, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

Inviting you to join the Universal Code of Conduct consultation on Wikimedia Commons!

Dear A.Savin,

Thank you for your hard work to create the sum of all knowledge that is freely sharable to every single human being across the world. As our diverse community grows, we need a guideline that will help all of our work collectively and constructively where everyone feels safe, welcomed, and part of a team. That is why the Wikimedia movement is working on establishing a global guideline called the Universal Code of Conduct, often referred to as UCoC.

After the months-long policy consultation, we have prepared a draft policy (available in many languages). We’re currently in the second phase of the process. During this round of consultation, we want to discuss the implementation of this policy. We want to hear from you on how this policy can be enforced on the Wikimedia Commons community and what might be needed to do so.

The discussion is taking place on Commons:Universal Code of Conduct consultation. You can also share your thoughts by replying to this message (Please ping me so I get notified), posting your message on my talk page. I am perfectly aware that some thoughts cannot be expressed publicly, so you can always share your opinion by emailing me as well.

As a valued member of the Commons community, please share your thoughts, ideas, and experiences that relate to UCoC. Let us know what needs to be improved so we can build a more friendly and cooperative space to increase editor engagement and retention of new users.

Wikimedia projects are governed by you. So, it is you who needs to step up to ensure a safe, comfortable, and pleasant working environment.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you! Wikitanvir (WMF) (talk) 11:17, 22 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Berliner Philharmoniker at Brandenburg Gate...

Hello A.Savin
I am sorry for the few clumsy categorization manipulations in an ongoing restructuring phase.
For your summary of modification "why not? he is with double-bass" : the categories "People with double-bass" and "People playing double-bass‎" in progress, are general categories whose file content is very important (as for other instruments). Structurally, a photograph with people with a double bass or people playing the double bass, are double bassists since photography freezes a snapshot of the moment which does not allow the distinction.
Currently, with possibly some clumsiness, I am in the process of setting up the corresponding categories in order to have a simple and coherent structure. I am using the excellent classification which has already been made for the category of pianos. To prepare for classification, I started to structure by origins of artists. And to avoid getting overwhelmed, to structure by place or genre : Military double-bassists, Street double-bassists and Classical double-bassists in distinction with the instrument : Street double basses and Double basses outdoors.
By apologizing again for the few manipulations that may disturb the implementation of the corresponding categorizations.
Cordially, —— DePlusJean ^(Talk) 03:15, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

"Double-bassists" and "People with double-bass" is different category tree. The first one means the occupation (pictures do not have to show them with a double-bass), the second one -- people depicted with a double-bass (they don't have to be a double-bassist). --A.Savin 03:35, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Regarding File:Kuca sda svijetlom I DUHOM (1 of 1).jpg

I have tried to get this file speedy deleted before for being a potential copyvio. However, it didn't end up being deleted as quick unlike other photos from the same author. Since I consider that photo to be "good", I decided to nominate this for QI. As I know, the image ended up being rejected and later finally tagged for deletion with the right reason by you. For this reason, I'm here to thank you for doing that stuff. Mario Jump 83! 06:38, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sabahattin Ali signature.jpg

Hi Savin. Can you bring back this photo? Author rights is officially public now. I will revise Commons license. --Kingbjelica (talk) 12:20, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

Done. --A.Savin 14:06, 24 January 2021 (UTC)

By your leave

Since you did not answer my question about whether you would template me for categorizing your photograghs, I took the liberty of creating Category:Taung tombs in Kirthar National Park. Is that allowed for me to do? Krok6kola (talk) 01:09, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Apologies

Sorry about [1], that was finger trouble on my part. Andy Dingley (talk) 03:12, 29 January 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:SL Bundala NP asv2020-01 img17.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:SL Bundala NP asv2020-01 img17.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#A.Savin

Hi, just to let you know I have open a sub-topic about you. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 07:20, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

Просьба

Здравствуйте ещё раз. Новая просьба.

Вообще удалить все эти файлы, потому что я там напортачил — загружу по новой. --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 15:11, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Сделано. --A.Savin 16:58, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Why do you refuse to let me add Pakistan to Category:Tentative List for future World Heritage Sites?

Why? Other countries are listed there (except India and one other), so why do you refuse to let me add Pakistan? Krok6kola (talk) 23:42, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

There is Category:UNESCO World Heritage Tentative List Sites in Pakistan, what is the difference? --A.Savin 23:47, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Pakistan should be represented there. Thank you for letting me add it. Krok6kola (talk) 23:55, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

You explain what's the difference? --A.Savin 23:57, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

I feel that it is important for Pakistan to be represented there, as that list indicates the large number of "Tentative" sites Pakistan has. Pakistan struggles to upgrade and protect its sites so they will be listed, but it lacks the resources to do so. Norway and probably other countries help, but I so wish more of the world knew the treasures existing in Pakistan. (I know getting Pakistan on that list will not change the world, but I want to do everything I can, even if it seems so very little.) Krok6kola (talk) 00:17, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

You explain what's the difference? --A.Savin 00:19, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

One shows only those in Pakistan; the other shows those in Pakistan along with those in other countries around the world. (Just look at what is in the two categories and you can see for yourself.) Krok6kola (talk) 14:04, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Once again: what is the difference between "UNESCO World Heritage Tentative List Sites in Pakistan" and "Tentative List for future World Heritage Sites in Pakistan"? Maybe I'm stupid, but I don't understand. --A.Savin 14:07, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

(edit conflict) One shows you the "Tentative" sites in Pakistan only; the other show the list of "Tentative" sites in other countries also, so you can compare those countries are able to upgrade their applications by fulfilling the UNESCO recommendations to reach full UNESCO World Heritage status with those that are not. The failure in Pakistan for so many sites is due to Pakistan's lack of resources to fulfill the UNESCO recommendations. (See UNESCO World Heritage website for specific reasons.) Hope this helps. Krok6kola (talk) 15:46, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

So you mean, the difference between "Tentative sites list in Pakistan" and "Tentative sites list in Pakistan" is, that the one shows Pakistan and the other shows other countries also? Well... OK. --A.Savin 16:05, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

@Elkost: Maybe you have an idea? What's the difference? Thanks. --A.Savin 14:21, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Although there is no difference in content (I suppose), obviously they differ in form. Such 2 models of naming the country categories are avoided – the easier is to rename the only 2 categories of India and Pakistan (“UNESCO World Heritage...”) like the others (“Tentative List for...”). --Elkost (talk) 15:10, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Done. --A.Savin 15:33, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

A request

Hi. I enlarged a DR by mistake; can you kindly close it? BTW please also delete the unnecessarily opened cat. Thanks a lot. E4024 (talk) 23:57, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Please participate in the Universal Code of Conduct consultation on Wikimedia Commons!

Dear A.Savin

Thank you for your hard work to create the sum of all knowledge that is freely sharable to every single human being across the world. As our diverse community grows, we need a guideline that will help all of our work collectively and constructively where everyone feels safe, welcomed, and part of a team. That is why the Wikimedia movement is working on establishing a global guideline called the Universal Code of Conduct, often referred to as UCoC.

After the months-long policy consultation, we have prepared a policy (available in many languages) that has been ratified by the Board of Trustees. We’re currently in the second phase of the process. During this round of consultation, we want to discuss the implementation of this policy. As a member of the functionary team of Wikimedia Commons, your opinion on enforcement is of great value. We want to hear from you on how this policy can be enforced on the Wikimedia Commons community and what might be needed to do so. There are a few enforcement questions so you can easily outline your answers based on them. Please do not hesitate to bring any more questions/challenges you think are not yet discussed.

The discussion is taking place on Commons:Universal Code of Conduct consultation. You can also share your thoughts by replying to this message (Please ping me so I get notified), posting your message on my talk page. I am aware that some thoughts cannot be expressed publicly, so you can always share your opinion by emailing me as well.

As a valued member of the Commons community, please share your thoughts, ideas, and experiences that relate to UCoC. Let us know what needs to be improved so we can build a more friendly and cooperative space to increase editor engagement and retention of new users.

Wikimedia projects are governed by you. So, it is you who needs to step up to ensure a safe, comfortable, and pleasant working environment.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you! Wikitanvir (WMF) (talk) 10:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Do you know about this?

Karez System Cultural Landscape? It is on the Tentative List for future World Heritage Sites in Pakistan, but I can find nothing on the Commons. Krok6kola (talk) 22:00, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

I don't know this one, and there seem to be no such media on Commons so far. But maybe 4nn1l2 can help you ([2]). --A.Savin 22:37, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

@Krok6kola: I didn't find anything on Commons too. I just would like to mention that karez is the same as qanat (I looked into the category but there was nothing in it about Pakistan). It should also be noted that it is not one single karez that they are going to register, but a group of 4 representative karezes (out of more than 1000 active karezes there). You may find seeing the similar registered heritage in Iran useful. 4nn1l2 (talk) 10:17, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

@4nn1l2: Thank you for your response. Yes I know about qanat, and also there are karaz in Xinjiang. e.g. Category:Turpan water system. The word qanat has taken over and subsumed karaz, so maybe any karaz in Pakistan have had the same fate. Surprising though that the thorough description provided by the Government of Pakistan for UNESCO has resulted in no images at all. Krok6kola (talk) 16:41, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:TR Pamukkale Laodicea asv2020-02 img11.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:TR Pamukkale Laodicea asv2020-02 img11.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 8 February 2021 (UTC)

Please take a short survey regarding UCoC

Hello A.Savin,

I would like to inform you that we now have a survey in place to take part in the UCoC consultation. It is not a long one and should take less than 10 minutes to complete. You can take the survey even if you have already participated in the on-wiki consultation. It has a different set of questions and allows you to participate anonymously and privately.

As a member of the Commons functionaries, your opinion is especially essential. Please click here to participate in the survey.

You are still welcome to participate in the on-wiki discussions. If you prefer you can have your say by sending me an email. You can also drop me an email if you want to have a one-to-one chat.

Thank you for your participation! Wikitanvir (WMF) 13:53, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Kirov Oblast Falyonki asv2019-05 img8.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kirov Oblast Falyonki asv2019-05 img8.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for making an infobox for a new category I made. I have tried but cannot figure out how to make them. --Krok6kola (talk) 14:49, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Анекдот

Анекдот очень хорош --Stolbovsky (talk) 17:23, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

Спасибо. Придумал, впрочем, не я. Я бы желал, чтобы я был не столь одинок на Викискладе, а вешать это на свою страницу не было необходимости. --A.Savin 17:37, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

File:SL Ella asv2020-01 img29 Dhowa Temple.jpg

This file, one of the current month POTD, was uploaded by you under LAL license, but now the problem is that Sri Lanka doesn't allow FOP photographs and IMHO the LAL is not enough to cover out this fact, however as it's a POTD I am not interested in filling a normal deletion request, so is there be possible that other license be chosen rather than LAL? --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 01:33, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

I don't understand what's the problem? The temple is old enough for PD-old (see Dhowa rock temple). --A.Savin 01:43, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Why??

Why did you delete my bureaucrat request??? 𝓛𝓲𝓵𝓑𝓲𝓰𝓑𝓻𝓪𝓲𝓷𝓼 (talk) 15:20, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:SL Colombo asv2020-01 img37 Maradana station.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:SL Colombo asv2020-01 img37 Maradana station.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Checkuser

Hi A. Savin, take a look to Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/EduWiki if you want to add anything, regards!!! Ezarateesteban 23:06, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thuringia Tambach-Dietharz asv2020-07 img33 Meister-Eckhart-Weg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 17:21, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thuringia Tambach-Dietharz asv2020-07 img37 Postamt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 17:21, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thuringia Tambach-Dietharz asv2020-07 img42 Lutherkirche.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 16:51, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aachen Hauptbahnhof 10-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 17:22, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! U8 Berlin Leinestrasse 12-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 16:50, 27 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thuringia Schmalkalden asv2020-07 img21 Viba Nougat-Welt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 09:52, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thuringia Zella-Mehlis asv2020-07 img08 Rathaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks very good to me. -- Ikan Kekek 09:39, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 3 March 2021 (UTC)

Old DR, waiting to be closed.

Hi, how are you? This one is going to complete three months soon. Seems like a clear case. Thanks in advance. --E4024 (talk) 01:32, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thuringia Zella-Mehlis asv2020-07 img10 LouisAnschuetzStr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:06, 1 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 4 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thuringia Zella-Mehlis asv2020-07 img04 StBlaise Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Question The photo is nice, but the very top of the church is cropped out. Is it possible to make new version with some space above the building? --LexKurochkin 11:21, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
Comment I know. But this one photo is only available like this; mea culpa. --A.Savin 01:52, 1 March 2021 (UTC)
Weak support After very long thinking I consider it a minor problem. Actually, I do like everything else in this photo :) --LexKurochkin 10:53, 7 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! House on SmolSquare Moscow asv2018-01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:23, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BaltiyskPillau 05-2017 img17 German cemetery.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 21:08, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bologoe asv2018-08 img33.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice picture. -- Ikan Kekek 23:19, 9 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PK Chaukhandi Necropolis near Karachi asv2020-02 img01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharp detailed photo --Michielverbeek 19:52, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KostrzynNadOdra 09-2017 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 20:03, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Nordend Betriebshof 09-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 20:06, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hibla Gerzmava M2017-05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Looks OK. --Argenberg 10:39, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Istanbul asv2020-02 img45 Hagia Sophia.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 09:36, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
Support Beutiful --Mike1979 Russia 14:09, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ET Afar asv2018-01 img63 Lake Karum area.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:23, 10 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 13 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Museum fuer Kommunikation asv2019-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. Die Lichtverhältnisse ueberzeugen. --Mosbatho 21:11, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berliner Philharmoniker at Brandenburg Gate asv2019-08-24 img20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Argenberg 16:02, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bogolyubovo asv2019-01 img06 Intercession Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality and beautiful photo. Thanks! --LexKurochkin 12:56, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
Support Good. --Mike1979 Russia 13:31, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SL Bundala NP asv2020-01 img31.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, especially under given conditions --PantheraLeo1359531 15:14, 11 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ivanovo asv2018-08 img10 2nd Workers Settlement.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support I like it. --Mike1979 Russia 12:53, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ET Amhara asv2018-02 img113 Wereta.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 14:02, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frechen aerial photo 10-2017 img04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:07, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kienberg B-Marzahn 06-2017 img13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Clément Bardot 13:32, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SL Badulla asv2020-01 img01 Railway station.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:49, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quedlinburg asv2018-10 img19 Rathaus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 12:59, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Gasometer Schoeneberg asv2018-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --IamMM 14:51, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ET Addis asv2018-01 img31 Minilik Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Andrew J.Kurbiko 18:19, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ivanovo Obl Palekh asv2018-08 img18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --IamMM 14:51, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow Metro Rasskazovka asv2018-08 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 14:49, 14 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Copyright violations

Please take a look at these steps, systematic copyright violations. 188.162.39.28 01:11, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spb DLT Store asv2019-09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 21:52, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! E-burg asv2019-05 img11 City Pond skyline.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 21:52, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koeln Stadtwald 10-2017 img2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 21:52, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! TR Izmir asv2020-02 img37 Karşıyaka monument.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 13:10, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Admin help requested

Dear Admin, an unexperienced user is making insistently wrong categorization as you may see here, not respecting anything they read in edit summaries, and of course not our categorization rules. I do not want to be reverting them again and again and falling into a 3-revert vio situation. Please take a look at their edits around "We miss Turkey". Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 01:01, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Thanks again, Savin. Can you also protect the file and DR that User:Amatarael kind of vandalize every now and then? --E4024 (talk) 01:26, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
I hope it's OK I closed it as deleted. --A.Savin 01:29, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
I guess the blog where it was used also belong to the same person; so there must not be any issue. Have a good day/evening. E4024 (talk) 01:32, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

COM:AN/U

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Edit-warring and A.Savin. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

Andy Dingley (talk) 02:39, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

I've really no clue what you have against me Andy Dingley and why are you harassing and bashing and insulting me; I'm sure the day will come and you will have to pay your price. --A.Savin 03:14, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ivanovo Obl Lukh asv2018-08 img03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 15:47, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ivanovo Obl Rodniki asv2018-08 aerial view1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:14, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! EastSideMall Berlin asv2018-11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:14, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ET Afar asv2018-01 img16 Dallol.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:14, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ET Addis asv2018-01 img41 Bole Airport.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality and nice photo. --LexKurochkin 18:15, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kizhi 06-2017 img04 Oshevnev House.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:35, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aachen aerial view 10-2017 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:01, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Istanbul asv2020-02 img25 Topkapı Palace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 21:00, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PK Karachi Airport asv2020-02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 21:00, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow Metro SmolenskayaFL asv2018-09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:07, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

COM:AN/U

Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ Tagalog ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ العربية ∙ +/−

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Retaliatory deletions by A.Savin. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

Andy Dingley (talk) 13:03, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Delete

Привет! Можешь удалить эту категорию? Обнаружил что она существует после того, как создал категорию о том же самом, но с более верным официальным названием на английском языке. --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 23:21, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Сделано. --A.Savin 01:41, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Istanbul asv2020-02 img48 Galata Tower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 20:23, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Túllio F 20:31, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moscow Tyufeleva Grove asv2018-08 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 23:07, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Support Good quality. --Túllio F 20:31, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kungur asv2019-05 img07 Ice Cave.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Coordinates should be entered in SDC. --F. Riedelio 12:53, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

Category:Russian FOP cases/deleted (non-architectural)?

Hello. Is it necessary to have a subgroup under Category:Russian FOP cases/deleted which is Category:Russian FOP cases/deleted (non-architectural)? In my knowledge there is now FOP for Russian architecture, and this subcategory (just my opinion) is already redundant. There is no subgroup under Category:United States FOP cases/deleted (except those involving Puerto Rican FOP cases). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:29, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Probably meanwhile this can be merged indeed. --A.Savin 12:04, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Spb 06-2017 img01 Spit of Vasilievsky Island.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:31, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! PK Hyderabad asv2020-02 img17 Tilak Incline.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:29, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ET Axum asv2018-01 img35 view from hill.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:05, 19 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Что не так с фото?

Почему-то была удалена пара загруженных мной фото 17 марта 2021 Г.: File:Round tower, 1884.jpg и File:Ivanovsky descent.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_%D0%A1%D0%B5%D1%80%D0%B3%D0%B5%D0%B9_6662

Как помню, эти фото, выпущенные при царе Горохе в виде открыток. Т. е. все мыслимые потуги на авторское право тут не действуют по временной причине. И по причине свободного хождения в народе. Что тогда ещё надо? Поднимать из могил фотографов? Прошу разъяснить. И ещё. Ивановскую башню выдернули из соответствующей статьи, а что с Круглой? Это то пожелтевшее фото? --Сергей 6662 (talk) 11:20, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Я так понял, номинация была из-за неверной лицензии PD-art, где надо знать дату публикации (@Stolbovsky: ). Посмотрел оба файла ещё раз: фото башни можем сразу отмести из-за крайне низкого качества и по нему невозможно увидеть, что оно действительно дореволюционное. Фотографию Ивановского спуска восстановлю и заменю там лицензию на {{PD-RusEmpire}}, вроде должно быть всё с этим в порядке. --A.Savin 12:11, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SL Colombo asv2020-01 img13 Town Hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:41, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kizhi 06-2017 img19 Cape Navolok bay.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 14:47, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kizhi 06-2017 img11 Lazarus Resurrection Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 14:47, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koeln Hohenzollernbruecke 10-2017 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --XRay 14:47, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KostrzynNadOdra 09-2017 img3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Ermell 15:40, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BMHW B-Niederschoeneweide 08-2017 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 21:35, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bahnhof B-Charlottenburg 07-2017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 21:35, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Istanbul asv2020-02 img23 Topkapı Palace.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 21:35, 23 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bologoe asv2018-08 img03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 22:08, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Support I like it --Mike1979 Russia 10:26, 24 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 27 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ET Afar asv2018-01 img114 Afdera.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good; IMHO it would be even better if you make it a bit brighter. --Aristeas 08:39, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
Done. --A.Savin 15:14, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
Support Thank you very much! --Aristeas 08:54, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SL Demodara near Ella asv2020-01 img13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality and interesting. --Aristeas 15:29, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SL Colombo asv2020-01 img32 Elphinstone Theatre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality--Ermell 12:57, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! SL Bundala NP asv2020-01 img20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality.--Ermell 13:00, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Volkspark Friedrichshain 09-2017 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments ̺ Support Good quality--Ermell 12:59, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cottbus 07-2017 img20 StMary Church.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 13:53, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Bogolyubovo asv2019-01 img06 Intercession Church.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bogolyubovo asv2019-01 img06 Intercession Church.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Suzdal asv2019-01 img39 Kremlin Cathedral.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Suzdal asv2019-01 img39 Kremlin Cathedral.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 7 April 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:PK Thatta asv2020-02 img08 Shah Jahan Mosque.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:PK Thatta asv2020-02 img08 Shah Jahan Mosque.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 12 April 2021 (UTC)

Moving my uploaded image

Hey! dear actually I was moving my uploaded image File:Gyaanipedia g logo.png to File:Gyaanipedia.png but an information box suddenly popped up so now I'm a little bit confused that is it safe to move a file. If you can then I request you kindly move the file. Thanking you with due respect. Pokai (talk) 15:26, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Фотографии с сайта auto.ru

Добрый день! Участник по имени Юдор занимается тем, что загружает на commons фотографии с сайта auto.ru, низкого разрешения, без exif-данных и т.д. Это легко обнаружить, если воспользоваться сервисом поиска фотографий, примеры: 1, 2. Весь его вклад состоит из таких снимков. Машины загружены на сайт объявлений из разных городов, вряд ли фотографировал их он сам. Либо пусть докажет, показав оригиналы. 188.162.39.86 13:51, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Участник на этом не успокоился и продолжил загружать снимки с чужих сайтов, ещё и за логотипы взялся. 178.176.166.67 23:18, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
- Ещё один любитель загрузки логотипов появился. 178.176.167.184 04:40, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
  - Снова загрузка лого Ауруса не по правилам. 91.222.29.33 15:39, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Thuringia Suhl asv2020-07 img20 PlDerDtEinheit.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Thuringia Suhl asv2020-07 img20 PlDerDtEinheit.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

A. Savin

Hi my name is Luis one of your pictures appeared on my windows start and I just wanted to tell you that your work is amazing! How do I know you can travel so much? i really love it:) in special especially the photographs of Turkey

Replaced fetured picture

Hello A. Savin, you have delisted this former featured picture per Commons:Featured picture candidates/removal/File:Yom Kippur War. XXXVII.jpg. This replaced file is probably not included here, but I think it should be here. Sorry if I think wrong about this. Uncitoyen (talk) 08:15, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Done. --A.Savin 12:11, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Thanks. Uncitoyen (talk) 12:51, 24 April 2021 (UTC)

Переименовать

Приветствую! Переименовать бы эти два файла, добавив «in the Field», как в родительской категории. --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 14:10, 1 May 2021 (UTC)

Сделано. --A.Savin 00:28, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Благодарю! --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 09:40, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

Je ne suis pas d'accord avec vos modifications

La catégorie Good pictures existe avec Paris, je ne comprend pas pourquoi elle ne pourraient pas exister pour d'autres villes. Si je n'ai pas de réponses de votre part, j'annule tout à mon tour. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:48, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

@Sebring12Hrs: Please keep in mind that a "good picture" is a subjective expression which is not always easy to determine -- that's why we don't have such categories, and should not have. Not all really good pictures on Commons are either QI/FP/VI, as well as not all QI/FP/VI are good pictures. So, I kindly request not to create this kind of categories anymore. --A.Savin 17:01, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

I don't agree. FP, QI and VI are the best pictures of Commons. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 17:52, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

For my part, I don't agree that good pictures of Paris are only those with a QI/VI/FP status. And here is not the right place to discuss it. --A.Savin 17:57, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

Vos suppressions sont également subjectives et n'engage que vous, personnes n'en a été informé, aucun débat, aucune prise de décision et je le répète, cette catégorie existait déjà et existe encore pour d'autres villes. Vous vous attendiez à ce que vos suppressions passent inaperçues peut-être et que j'acceptesans discuter ? On a le droit de discuter quand même. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 18:00, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

I'm fr-0, please open a discussion (in English) at Commons talk:Featured pictures candidates, thank you. --A.Savin 18:02, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

It's not the problem, I will recreate all the good pictures category, because your are not the god of Commons who can delete all the category without any discussions. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 18:54, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

@Sebring12Hrs: Please respect the neutral point of view, and do not re-create your content without prior discussion. Please read COM:Categories first to see what categories are for. Thanks, --A.Savin 18:57, 6 May 2021 (UTC)

If you are ok with "Category:Highlighted pictures of" I will use it for every cities. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 10:45, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

I would recommend to use it only for cities with a relevant number of QI, FP and VI. Such as Rome or Paris. --A.Savin 12:46, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

You don't like this kind of category, it's unbelievable lol. But ok I will not recreate it for all the cities. Rome, and may be Toulouse. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 17:14, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

Neutrality and so on...

Even difficult articles should have a picture. :-) I think I have some sort of wiki-neutrality-record after I created the first free image (not a caricature) of another creepy guy. Still used my other account then. It was bit scary when it hit just about every WP as a main picture before we got photos. --Cart (talk) 15:30, 9 May 2021 (UTC)

Wow cool, should I start a to-do list for you of articles about persons, where we don't have a chance to obtain a free photo? ;) But seriously, I was worried if that's really authentic and not kind of "original research", but on the other hand... who says it should be either a photo or nothing. Well done! glad that my humble comment inspired you. --A.Savin 01:44, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

You don't have to worry, we went through all that with Kim Jong-un. The reasoning went like this:

We don't have any photos of George Washington or Marie Antoinette either, just artists' impressions, and for Byzantine emperors, most artists had never even seen the subject. Even in the age of photography, we still rely on courtroom drawings to convey how perpetrators look to the public. Plus some articles (I don't remember which now) already had street murals with original artistic interpretations as main images. So it had to be an artistic original work, not based on just one photo for photo copyright reasons, but also for artistic reasons. An artist needs a lot of photos to create a sort of 3D image in her/his head of what the person looks like to make an good image. That is how many portraits have been made after the invention of the camera. No caricatures allowed, we have plenty of those on Commons.

In the end people were just happy to have an image, and my simple sketch spawned computer renditions, some of which replaced my drawing until we got a free photo.

Btw, I don't do requests. But if I see something interesting, I might do something. :-) --Cart (talk) 07:39, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

And guess what just popped up today? :-D In other news, my drawing caused quite a spike in pageviews on en-wiki. Over 3000 visits and no one is complaining. --Cart (talk) 18:20, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Cool. And it's not really likely that we ever obtain a free photo of D., even though there are several (older) press photos. --A.Savin 18:59, 11 May 2021 (UTC)

Переименование

Приветствую! Ошибочно назвал 30 файлов, перепутав фамилии. Нужно заменить «Grigorieva» на «Prokopieva» в этой категории. --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 20:48, 16 May 2021 (UTC)

И ещё ошибку допустил. Переименуйте, пожалуйста, этот файл, добавив дату как здесь. --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 23:09, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
- Огромное спасибо! --Engelberthumperdink (talk) 08:04, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:SL Bundala NP asv2020-01 img30.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:SL Bundala NP asv2020-01 img30.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Вопрос по архивации

Добрый день! У меня на странице в разделе "Обсуждение" последние картинки перестали быть видны. Наверное нужно архивировать её, но не знаю как это сделать. --Knopik-som (talk) 06:21, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Здравствуйте! Просто создайте User talk:Knopik-som/Archive, перенесите туда старые комментарии и поставьте ссылку на архив в начале вашей страницы обсуждения. --A.Savin 11:39, 8 June 2021 (UTC)

Спасибо, всё получилось. --Knopik-som (talk) 00:56, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Berlin Siemensbahn at Siemensstadt asv2021-03 img5.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Berlin Siemensbahn at Siemensstadt asv2021-03 img5.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

FP

Hallo! Ich hatte mir schon gedacht, dass die FP-Kategorien irgendwann zu Diskussionen führen. Klar, die Änderungen an File:Berlin, Flughafen Tempelhof, Smart EQ Forfour -- 2019 -- 4342.jpg sind nur der Anlass. Hin und her editieren will ich nicht, das bringt auch nichts. Dass die Galerien nur für Commons-FP sind, sehe ich auch so. Bei den Kategorien sehe ich das anders. Schon die Wurzelseite Category:Featured pictures beinhaltet speziell für Commons Category:Featured pictures on Wikimedia Commons, aber auch spezielle Kategorien für die Wikipedias. Allein dadurch wird schon suggeriert, dass die anderen Kategorien "by subject" etc. nicht mehr speziell Wikimedia Commons vorbehalten sind. Andernfalls wären die Kategoriebäume unterhalb von "Featured pictures on Wikimedia Commons". Sind sie aber nicht. Oder sollte man all die Kategorien wie "Featured pictures of Berlin" nun unterteilen in "Featured pictures of Berlin on Wikimedia Commons" und "Featured pictures of Berlin on Wikipedia, German" etc.? Ich denke, dass dies vielleicht doch besprochen werden sollte, vielleicht sogar in größerem Rahmen. --XRay 💬 14:00, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Ich habe noch nie gehört davon, dass die FP Kategorien auch für FP's aus Wikipedia da seien. Wo keine feste Regel da ist, sollte Gesunder Menschenverstand angewandt werden. Gerade bei manchen kleineren Wikipedias wundere ich mich, wozu die ihre eigene FP brauchen, und habe den Eindruck, es werde ziemlich alles ohne Bedacht durchgewunken. Die FP Kategorien auf Commons sollten also nicht inflationär mit allem aufgefüllt weren, was irgendwo irgendwann den "FP-Status" bekommen hat. Im Gegenteil wollte ich dich eigentlich bitten, mit deinem Bot diese Kategorien zu säubern. Es sind auch zahlreiche Crops drin, die überhaupt nie im Leben FP waren. MfG --A.Savin 14:13, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Die FPs aus manchem Wikipedia sind manchmal wirklich nicht toll. Manche Bewertungen sind auch etwas eigenartig. Aus den Bewertungen in der deutschsprachigen Wikipedia habe ich mich längst zurückgezogen. Da war allein der Tonfall schon unterirdisch. Du hattest, soweit ich mich erinnere, dieselben Probleme. Wenn die FP-Kategorien nur für Commons-FPs sind, dann sollte zumindest die Wurzelseite aufgeräumt werden. Die Wikipedia-FPs haben dann dort nichts zu suchen. Meine Bilder kann ich anpassen, es gibt noch ein paar mehr als das obige aus Berlin. Die Kategorien kann ich auch gerne mal durchforsten. Das Croptool arbeitet u. a. nicht sauber, aber auch die Leute, die Crops anlegen, sind oft genug oberflächlich. Nervt mich schon wegen der Lizenzverstöße. Ich will bei den Crops nicht als alleiniger Urheber stehen. Aber gut, die Kategorien der QIs habe ich von den Bildern dank Selbstbewertung befreit, dann schaue ich mir auch die FPs an.

Ich habe nun ein kleines Skript programmiert, welches sich die FPs vornimmt und prüft, ob es wirklich Commons-FPs sind. Ingesamt habe ich 545 Dateien gefunden, in denen das Template {{Assessments}} gar nicht oder nicht mit der Option "featured" auftaucht. Der nächste Schritt ist, dort die FP-Kategorien zu entfernen. Nur zur Info führ ich hier mal die ersten 100 davon auf. Vielleicht wirfst du ja mal einen Blick darauf, vier Augen sehen bekanntlich mehr als zwei.

Die ersten Kategorien sind entfernt … Es scheint zu funktionieren. Ich mache das aber in kleinen Schritten. --XRay 💬 05:43, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Es gibt Kleinigkeiten, bei denen geht's dann doch daneben. So fehlte dieser Datei das Assessments-Template: File:20180924 UCI Road World Championships Innsbruck Men U23 ITT Callum Scotson 850 8281.jpg. Der Grund ist wohl eine Umbenennung während der Nominierung und dann wurde vergessen, das Template zu setzen. --XRay 💬 08:27, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Tja, mir ist ein Rätsel, was sich Böhringer dabei gedacht hatte. --A.Savin 12:35, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Davon gab es mehrere. Aber mein Skript ist heute mehrfach in kleinen Portionen gelaufen. Unter dem Strich waren es nicht so viele Bilder. Nun sind aber alle, die Kraft Selbsterklärung, als Banner, als Crop oder als ehemaliges FP in den Kategorien zu finden waren, eben dort wieder raus. Wenn Leute eigene Templates geschrieben haben und darin Kategorien versteckt haben, dürften sie noch da sein. Derart individuelle Dinge kann man kaum vernünftig per Skript erkennen. (Ich mag zwar auch Templates, aber Kategorien gehören da möglichst nicht hinein. Cat-a-lot und all die anderen Tools sollten noch immer funktionieren.) Ergo: Erledigt! --XRay 💬 15:49, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:SL Badulla asv2020-01 img11 Muthiyangana Temple.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:SL Badulla asv2020-01 img11 Muthiyangana Temple.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Neukoelln Hermannplatz asv2021-03 img1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Support Good quality. --Nefronus 11:23, 13 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Mari Kraimbrery Logo.webp

Здравствуйте! Не могли бы, пожалуйста, удалить данный файл: File:Mari Kraimbrery Logo.webp. Так как по ошибке я загрузил его в НЕправильном формате и не то изображение. Из-за этого не могу поменять версию файла. Удалите, пожалуйста, а я заново создам. Спасибо! Alxxxxkoaj (talk) 04:21, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Comment

Hi A.Savin, I know it's generally considered fine for editors to air their frustration out on their user/talkpages but in this case the user is blaming Commons for something that's entirely their fault which I disagree with, We all disagree with processes or how things are done from time to time and understandably we vent our frustration out but in this specific case a user harassed someone, used an IP to avoid detection and then got blocked for a day .... how is that Commons' fault?,
I dunno maybe I'm reading too much in to it and maybe I care more than what I should lol,
I respect you as a person and as an admin so obviously wont revert or further whinge over it but I just disagree with it staying,
Anyway I hope you and yours are safe and well my friend, Take care and stay safe, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 11:38, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Criticism on Commons is not a personal attack. --A.Savin 12:08, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Meh fair point, Like I said maybe I was reading too much in to it. Oh well, Cheers. –Davey2010^Talk 12:24, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Sad Day

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Bee_beetle_(Trichius_fasciatus)_and_flower_crab_spider_(Thomisidae_sp).jpg

That may meet the math requirement for promotion but it in no way is a FP worthy photo, especially when you consider that it Charles' and he's super picky on the photos from other people yet lowers the standards for his own photos. BS like this is why I don't upload my own photos. I just enjoy looking fine photos. Seven Pandas (talk) 22:46, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:PK Truck on N-5 near Thatta asv2020-02 img2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:PK Truck on N-5 near Thatta asv2020-02 img2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

User:A.Savin/Archive/2021/1

Vandalism is not appreciated

FP Promotion

Обход блокировки

Wiki of Functions followup

FP Promotion

Namibia-Dollar

Inviting you to join the Universal Code of Conduct consultation on Wikimedia Commons!

File:Berliner Philharmoniker at Brandenburg Gate...

Regarding File:Kuca sda svijetlom I DUHOM (1 of 1).jpg

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sabahattin Ali signature.jpg

By your leave

Apologies

FP Promotion

Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems#A.Savin

Просьба

Why do you refuse to let me add Pakistan to Category:Tentative List for future World Heritage Sites?

A request

Please participate in the Universal Code of Conduct consultation on Wikimedia Commons!

Do you know about this?

FP Promotion

Please take a short survey regarding UCoC

FP Promotion

Thank you

Анекдот

File:SL Ella asv2020-01 img29 Dhowa Temple.jpg

Why??

FP Promotion

Checkuser

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Old DR, waiting to be closed.

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Copyright violations

Quality Image Promotion

Admin help requested

COM:AN/U

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

COM:AN/U

Delete

Quality Image Promotion

Category:Russian FOP cases/deleted (non-architectural)?

Quality Image Promotion

Что не так с фото?

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

FP Promotion

FP Promotion

FP Promotion

Moving my uploaded image

Фотографии с сайта auto.ru

FP Promotion

A. Savin

Categories

Replaced fetured picture

Переименовать

Je ne suis pas d'accord avec vos modifications

Neutrality and so on...

Переименование

FP Promotion

Вопрос по архивации

FP Promotion

FP

FP Promotion

Quality Image Promotion

File:Mari Kraimbrery Logo.webp

Comment

Sad Day

FP Promotion

Navigation menu