Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2015-09

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Deleted per no permission received Commons:Deletion requests/File:FC de Pesca.JPG, there is a new OTRS ticket that I can validate after undeletion. --V.Riullop (talk) 14:12, 25 August 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done @V.Riullop: Please add the permission. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:06, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The file in question is the official logo of the International Labour Organization. I am an employee of the ILO and have been tasked with ensuring the logo in the article is the correct one. It has been published in numerous places around the web. This image is available for fair use. http://www.ilo.org/global/lang--fr/index.htm — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jesmith627 (talk • contribs) 8:49, 31 Aug 2015 (UTC)

Hello. Fair use is not accepted at Common. cf. Commons:Fair use. --KurodaSho (talk) 08:59, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 10:54, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:01 Virgen del Socavón Monumento Vigilante.jpg

reason=Soy el autor, y ha sido mal utilizada en todas partes, y nadie cumple los términos de la licencia que se tiene que mencionar al autor|subpage=File:01 Virgen del Socavón Monumento Vigilante.jpg|year=2015|month=September|day=5}}

--Marchelo99 (talk) 01:05, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

The file hasn't been deleted, so there is nothing to undelete. Furthermore, you're the one who nominated it for deletion, so this request doesn't make any sense at all. LX (talk, contribs) 09:06, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 19:48, 5 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: {{PD-textlogo}} is clearly an acceptable license, so the deletion rationale "still no license at all" is wrong. Might not have been added to the file description, but the outcome should have been "kept". Josve05a (talk) 12:04, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

Pinging the deleting-admin JuTa and DR-participant Amitie 10g. Josve05a (talk) 12:10, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done as above. Yann (talk) 19:20, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by ChrisSteffler

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Dear Wikimedia Commons,

My name is Chris Steffler, a Sony Music artist and I am writing to you today to send you verification that I have legal write to apply an image to Wikipedia’s Platinum Blonde (Band) page (Wikipedia). Our legal dept at Sony Music has issued a letter from vice president of the legal dept Ms.Judy Nueberg and I am not understanding why I cannot attach our letter here.

I am happy to donate $100.00 to Wikipedia for correction of this matter and to see the photo info you provided below undeleted.

Thank you, Chris Steffler PlatinumBlonde.com Toronto Canada

This media was probably deleted. Thanks for uploading File:Platinum Blonde 1984.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded (File:Platinum Blonde 1984.jpg) and the above demanded information in your request. ChrisSteffler (talk) 19:32, 17 August 2015 (UTC)


 Not done: OTRS volunteers will take care of this if a permission is received. Yann (talk) 20:32, 5 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This is a candid photograph taken in person at the match in Mid Wales in 2003.


 Not done Small picture copied from Twitter. Yann (talk) 20:05, 5 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hi,

The image belongs to Open magazine and is free content (for other users to use and download). Hence, being a part of Team Open, I request you to please undelete the image from our Open Wiki-page. Its hampering the page without the magazine cover. --Nehadey3 (talk) 12:52, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Neha Dey Team Open 31.08.2015

Hi, No such file ever existed on Commons. You didn't upload any file. Could you give more information? Regards, Yann (talk) 10:53, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done No answer. Yann (talk) 20:06, 5 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This is MY original artwork for the cover of MY software product so it should not have been deleted. I would like to know why someone can delete a picture without knowing it's background. A hunch should not be good enough. Please undelete this picture. Anyone is free to use this picture with no restrictions as stated when I uploaded it. N8080 (talk) 16:07, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi, As for all content previously published, a formal written permission is needed. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:49, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 20:07, 5 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This photo is foto made by Senator Borys-Damięcka photografer, edited by myself and approved by her to put it in internet. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arabadzic (talk • contribs) 20:02, 31 August 2015‎ (UTC)

Hi, A free license and a formal written permission from the copyright owner is needed. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:51, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 20:08, 5 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kingspeed25 (talk • contribs) 02:01, 1 September 2015‎ (UTC)

Well, no file by that name has ever existed on Commons, you haven't provided a reason for the undeletion request, and you forgot to sign your entry. But after digging through the history of this page to identify who created this section, I see that you have uploaded File:Eric Millegan headshot 2015.JPG and posted this help desk question before changing your mind and removing the question again.
Wikimedia Commons (this site) is a repository of free, educational media files used by Wikipedia, other Wikimedia projects, and others. The free part is very important – it's a founding principle of Commons that we should only host content that can be used, modified and redistributed by anyone for any purpose, including commercial purposes. Therefore, Commons only hosts copyrighted content if the copyright holder has explicitly agreed to publish the content under a free license. File:Eric Millegan headshot 2015.JPG was deleted because there was no sign that the copyright holder had approved publication under a free license.
Based on your description in the help desk question, it sounds like File:Eric Millegan headshot 2015.JPG was a photo of you – presumably taken by someone else. Normally, the person who creates a photo is the copyright holder and therefore the only one who can issue a valid license. See Commons:OTRS for instructions on how to obtain and submit an appropriate release statement. LX (talk, contribs) 16:32, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 20:10, 5 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: The image is a property of Lucano 1894 srl as it belongs to its archive of product images. It has been used just to represent the product, the bottle of Amaro Lucano (descriptive purpose). There is no commercial purpose. 92.223.187.160 09:41, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi, As for all content previously published, a formal written permission is needed. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:49, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 20:11, 5 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I am the owner of my song The Brain Collapses, I have permission to present, and license the track as recorded.

Sincerely,

Darrin Huss Psyche Enterprises — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ghostchild (talk • contribs) 16:29, 1 September 2015‎ (UTC)

Hi, As for all content previously published, a formal written permission is needed. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:49, 2 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 20:11, 5 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The file deleted was the theatrical release poster of the film, The Spectacular Jihad of Taz Rahim. The poster was released in theaters around the US as well as published by various magazines and newspapers. It also currently being used to promote the film for it's online release as is evidenced on the Bollywood streaming site, Shahzu.

The makers have made this image available to the creative commons and for use publicly without any restrictions. The poster can be found at the following Bollywood Trade site, Business of Cinema, as well as on it's facebook page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Filmistan (talk • contribs) 02:22, 3 September 2015‎ (UTC)

Hi, As for all content previously published, a formal written permission is needed. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:51, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 20:13, 5 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The stated file should not have been deleted as has been made for public use. The file deleted was the theatrical release poster of the film, Simanaheen. The poster was released in theaters around Bangladesh and India as well as published by various magazines and newspapers. It also currently being used to promote the film for it's online release as is evidenced on the Bollywood streaming site, Simanaheen.

The makers have made this image available to the creative commons and for use publicly without any restrictions. The poster can be found on it's facebook page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Filmistan (talk • contribs) 02:27, 3 September 2015‎ (UTC)

Hi, As for all content previously published, a formal written permission is needed. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:51, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 20:14, 5 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This file should have not been deleted as it my own original work. I took the picture at the Dhaka premiere of Skyfall, at which Rahsaan Islam was in attendance. I have made this work available for public use and for the creative commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Filmistan (talk • contribs) 02:29, 3 September 2015‎ (UTC)

Hi, A formal written permission from the copyright owner is needed. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:52, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 20:14, 5 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please undelete "Burton_Goldfield_image.jpg". It was deleted in the past because I didn't add its copyright and licensing status. I was unaware of how to add such info then. I was also offline. Now I know the right step to take. Please help me undelete the file. ThanksFatima 77 (talk) 03:30, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi, A formal written permission from the copyright owner is needed. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:53, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 20:15, 5 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The deletion of this file was an incorrect action and violates the Wikimedia rules. the image file JuliusDobos2010.jpg is FREE to distribute content. This can be verified with The Creative Shop, Inc. (which I have done) by emailing to contact@thecreativeshop.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tatsiana n (talk • contribs) 04:03, 3 September 2015‎ (UTC)

Hi, Please forward the permission to COM:OTRS, then the file can be undeleted. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:49, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done as above. Yann (talk) 20:15, 5 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Aam Aadmi Party Flag.jpg

This is a file created by our team. It was a mistake i did not license it correctly and was forced to be offline and so it was deleted. Please reinstate soon as possible. This is official site logo as well.

Non-free use rationale. Non-free use rationale logo Bolterc (talk) 17:55, 5 September 2015 (UTC)


 Not done Fair use not allowed here. Please upload on the English Wikipedia. Yann (talk) 20:02, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Files uploaded by Smartartone100

To Wikipedia

Please undelete the file called When the Time is Right.

Please undelete the file called Looking up to Cuuba'.

Please undelete the file called When the 'Assassinations Series no 15 Rudi Dutschke'.

I am writing the profile for Paul Eachus who is an international artist (please see his website: http://www.pauleachus.com/ ). I would like to include this image as an example of his drawing work. I am in fact his wife and have total permission to distribute and promote his work and if you need me to provide any proof please let me know how I can do it.

I have tried to upload this image a few times and it was rejected as copy right violation. As I am doing this for the first time and also very unfamiliar to the system I thought I may have done this incorrectly so I tried to upload the image a few times in a different way. The original Photo is a large scale photo and the jpeg image is only a documentation of the original image.

Many thanks Smartartone100— Preceding unsigned comment added by Smartartone100 (talk • contribs) 05:23, 05:38‎, and 05:44‎, 27 August 2015 (UTC)

Hi, Please send the permission to COM:OTRS, then the files can be undeleted. Yann (talk) 20:04, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: as above. Yann (talk) 13:26, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Undeletion request due to valid OTRS-ticket:2015082610014288 Doc Taxon (talk) 22:53, 6 September 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done: and renewed the problem tags. Don't forget to apply a valid license. JuTa 07:23, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I saw this in Category:Files uploaded by Josve05a (delete) and read the DR notice on the file page about the eyesore copyrighted poster next to the exibit, and went ahead and cropped it off. When I proceded to add a {{vk}} and explain it in Commons:Deletion requests/File:"Golden" Malaysian Flag made up of 20 cents coins (15059571464).jpg, I found out that it already had been closed, although the file was still there. Therefore I request “undeletion” of this never-/not-yet-deleted file. -- Tuválkin 21:48, 7 September 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done: Cropped, and DR closed. Yann (talk) 11:46, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Solicito o restauro do arquivo Brasão de Itatira.jpg. A figura é o brasão real do Municipio, é de uso público e não tem direitos autorais conhecidos. Favor verificar em: http://www.itatira.ce.gov.br/. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Valberto Silva (talk • contribs) 13:20, 26 June 2015‎ (UTC)

A figura é de uso público. Foi recortado de uma figura já existente no site http://www.itatira.ce.gov.br/ ou https://www.facebook.com/Prefeituraitatira. Ninguém tem direitos autorais sobre essa figura. Além disso esta no meu álbum particular no flickr, https://www.flickr.com/photos/59682926@N05/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.6.140.39 (talk • contribs) 19:14, 27 June 2015‎ (UTC)

This request has been sitting around for nearly a month now. Pinging the six admins that we have that are native Portuguese speakers (Beria, Dantadd, DarwIn, Érico Júnior Wouters, Teles and Waldir).
If I understand the request correctly, the uploader claims that the coat of arms in question "is for public use and has no known copyright", but this claim seems to be unsubstantiated. It is possible that {{PD-BrazilGov}} applies, but it would need to be demonstrated that the coat of arms was first published prior to 1983. LX (talk, contribs) 15:10, 20 July 2015 (UTC)
No response for well over two months now. Re-pinging the Portuguese speakers that have been active since the last ping: DarwIn, Érico Júnior Wouters, Teles and Waldir. LX (talk, contribs) 19:55, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
I agree. We should have more information on its sources. We can't tell if PD-BrazilGOV applies without having more information of when it was created.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 20:30, 2 September 2015 (UTC)
I'm truly sorry for not seeing this before, but I have nothing to add to what Teles said already. Without more information on the way the coat of arms was created, we can't restore it. If I well recall PD-BrazilGOV does not apply directly to CoAs.-- Darwin Ahoy! 15:25, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Then would somebody please close it? LX (talk, contribs) 05:17, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: as above. Yann (talk) 08:04, 9 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:"Fenêtre"- CAPC, Bordeaux 2013.jpg

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bpmc47 (talk • contribs) 07:14, 5 September 2015‎ (UTC)

Oops! Looks like you forgot to state a reason for the undeletion request (and also to sign and date the request). The reason for deletion is stated in Commons:Deletion requests/File:"Fenêtre"- CAPC, Bordeaux 2013.jpg. You're going to have to explain why you think that doesn't apply. LX (talk, contribs) 09:10, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: No answer. Yann (talk) 08:02, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The file named File:黃延禎.jpg is a photo of a statue of a General that is publicly displaying in a military school in China to commemorate the General. Although not knowing who the sculpturer is, which I can find out later, I actually got the photo from the descendant of the General. Therefore, although I might not have the license option chosen correctly when submitting the photo, I believe the photo should be able to be used here without violated any copy rights. What do you think?

Best regards, --LindaXu60 (talk) 01:41, 4 September 2015 (UTC)LindaXu60 4th Sep 2015

  • Owning the photo is completely beside the point: ownership of intellectual property rights is generally separate from ownership of physical objects.
  • Being a descendant of the General is irrelevant: intellectual property rights would belong to the sculptor and his/her heirs, not the subject of the sculpture.
  • There are to sets of rights we need to clear up here: the rights to the photo and the rights to the sculpture. - Jmabel ! talk 22:14, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: as above. Yann (talk) 17:52, 9 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I don't get it why the file has been deleted,

I (the writter of the article), uploaded the photo which I took, and granted wikimedia the usage for it - So there is no violation of copyright. Therefore I am requesting the undelation of the file..


 Not done: as above. Yann (talk) 17:53, 9 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Free screenshots. Unless these files contains unquestionable (and not de minimis) non-free elements, please restore these files as soon as possible. --Amitie 10g (talk) 07:10, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

 Comment It seems that the background of these files is not free. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:58, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: as above. Yann (talk) 17:53, 9 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I want to undelete this file because I am a member of Cornerstone community and give permission for this image to be used on Wikimedia Commons and Wikipedia.

Joshua.parris (talk) 11:59, 8 September 2015 (UTC)


 Not done: as above. Yann (talk) 17:54, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

son fotos sacadas por mi y tengo derecho hacer lo que quiera con ellas

Franco Ramono (talk) 21:46, 28 June 2015 (UTC)

Es copiada de [1], si es tuya sigue el pŕocedimiento descripto en COM:OTRS --Ezarateesteban 21:12, 8 August 2015 (UTC)


 Not done: - Steinsplitter (talk) 11:17, 10 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Images are licensed as cc-by-2.0 and were verified as suitable for use on commons by the Flickr2Commons upload bot.

It seems the user who deleted the files (User:1989) has been blocked for misuse of these tools.

- RaviC (talk) 11:59, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

 Oppose These are COM:DW of copyrighted software screens. INeverCry 19:26, 29 June 2015 (UTC)
That isn't true. The icons are actually from the open source Numix Project (circle theme - see here). The rest is just AOSP. --RaviC (talk) 10:59, 1 July 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: open source is not always free licensed. Steinsplitter (talk) 11:20, 10 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: i do not believe these are a copyright violation the person got them from here https://www.flickr.com/photos/pestoverde/16928811487/in/photolist-rPPhPK-ragwhU-rPFexE-rMWzS8-ragw9C-rPGmvY-ragvMf-7Rrvkm

At most it is AOSP with GAPPS and the uploader said they were actually numix icons https://numixproject.org/

i have reviewed this also the numix icons are under Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-SA 3.0) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/deed.en_US

the images from flicker are under this license Attribution 2.0 Generic (CC BY 2.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Jonnymoon96 (talk) 01:07, 24 July 2015 (UTC)


 Not done: The software (background, icons etc.) seems not freel licensed. COM:DW Steinsplitter (talk) 11:22, 10 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Restitución de imagenes

Solicito la restitución de las imágenes abajo relacionadas, ya que las mismas han sido cedidas por la Dirección General de la Guardia Civil Propietaria de los derechos de autor de las mismas. Envió la autorización pertinente (licencia Reconocimiento-compartir igual 3.0 (CC BY-SA 3.0)) a la dirección permissions-es@wikimedia.org.

--Pepeito grillo (talk) 06:47, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

 Question @Pepeito grillo: Could you please fix the links above, like I did on the first picture? Thanks, Yann (talk) 10:05, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

DONE Yann --Pepeito grillo (talk) 10:36, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Yann Quiero saber el estado en el que se encuentra la restitución de las imágenes borradas, ya que quiero finalizar el trabajo que tengo comenzado. Gracias.--Pepeito grillo (talk) 05:42, 24 August 2015 (UTC)

@Pepeito grillo: I am undeleting some of these, which seem to be old paintings. Please add or correct the missing information: date, author, source. See File:Luis Dabán y Ramírez de Arellano.jpg as an example how to do it. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:53, 25 August 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done: by Yann Steinsplitter (talk) 11:23, 10 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Als Neuling verstand ich das Hochladen von Bildern auf Wikimedia bezüglich Lizenzierung nicht. Hatte mehrere Versuche gemacht, scheiterte aber jedesmal. Mittlerweile habe ich die Vorschriften der Lizenzierung mehrmals gelesen, und ich meine jetzt auch zu wissen, was ich machen muss. - Deshalb ersuche ich, die bereits hochgeladenen Bilder OB 0198 und FP 0065 wieder zu aktivieren, damit ich sie ordnungsgemäss in den Text einfügen kann. - Mit bestem Dank, Sofia König (Sofia König (talk) 07:08, 28 July 2015 (UTC))

Ich bitte höflich um Entlöschung der beiden im Betreff genannten Bilder. Als Neuling machte ich beim Hochladen von Bildern auf Wikimedia bezüglich Lizenzierung nur Fehler. Mir war leider nicht klar, weshalb die Nennung des Copyrights in der File-Beschreibung (siehe unten das falsche Beispiel) nicht ausreiche für die Veröffentlichung. Mittlerweile habe ich die Vorschriften der Lizenzierung mehrmals gelesen, und ich meine jetzt auch zu wissen, was ich machen muss. - Deshalb ersuche ich, die bereits hochgeladenen Bilder OB 0198 und FP 0065 freizuschalten, damit ich sie ordnungsgemäss in den Text einfügen kann. - Mit bestem Dank, Sofia König (Sofia König (talk) 07:08, 28 July 2015 (UTC))]]

Hier das falsche Beispiel:

A.M. Jehle: Selbstporträt mit Eierohrringen, n.d., S/W-Fotografie, 4.9 x 4.4 cm, Copyright: Anne Marie Jehle Stiftung, Vaduz

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Sofia König (talk • contribs) 14:37, 30 July 2015‎ (UTC)

Please don't start multiple sections concerning the same file. I've moved your second post up here under the existing heading. LX (talk, contribs) 14:43, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: Bitte eine Freigabe an COM:OTRS senden. Steinsplitter (talk) 11:25, 10 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

from: Robert <support@chicodesigns.com> to: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org date: Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 8:35 PM subject: Copyright permission for 5 images recently uploaded

Hello, I have verification from the author / rights holder for these images:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:LeFevre%27s-Library-in-Colorado-Springs.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Robert-LeFevre-at-first-Rampart-Institute-1980-event.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kenneth-Gregg-Jr.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wendy-McElroy-200x200-dpi.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gary-Hudson-at-Freeland-Conf.jpg

They were sent to me by the photographer / author to add to this Wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Rampart_Institute

The author / rights holder, Lawrence Samuels sent me Sharealike 3.0 permissions for these 6 images. See the attached PDF from Lawrence Samuels. If you have any questions or anything send me an email. Have a great day!



from: Lawrence Samuels <lawsamz@gmail.com> to: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org date: Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 11:12 PM subject: Wikipedia permission: Rampart Institute Dear Wikipedia copyright permission:

All of the photos except for one for the Rampart Institute Wikipedia page are the ones I took. As owner of Athena Graphics, I had my own camera equipment and dark room. I was also the first executive director of Rampart Institute. The only photo I did not take was the photo of the library at Rampart College. Robert LeFevre, founder of Rampart College, was also a board member of Rampart Institute. Since Rampart College became defunct in 1975, much of his material from Rampart College were donated to Rampart Institute. We used the Rampart College library photo in one of Rampart Institute flyer (New Renaissance flyer) which is enclosed in attachment. We could not find the original photo, so we took it from the flyer. Let me know your decision. See the archive site for Rampart Institute ( http://rampart.freedom1776.com/ ) which is still being assembled.

--ChicoDesigns (talk) 22:50, 27 August 2015 (UTC)


 Not done: Please contact COM:OTRS Steinsplitter (talk) 11:27, 10 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

from: Robert <support@chicodesigns.com> to: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org date: Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 8:35 PM subject: Copyright permission for 5 images recently uploaded

Hello, I have verification from the author / rights holder for these images:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:LeFevre%27s-Library-in-Colorado-Springs.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Robert-LeFevre-at-first-Rampart-Institute-1980-event.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kenneth-Gregg-Jr.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wendy-McElroy-200x200-dpi.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gary-Hudson-at-Freeland-Conf.jpg

They were sent to me by the photographer / author to add to this Wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Rampart_Institute

The author / rights holder, Lawrence Samuels sent me Sharealike 3.0 permissions for these 6 images. See the attached PDF from Lawrence Samuels. If you have any questions or anything send me an email. Have a great day!



from: Lawrence Samuels <lawsamz@gmail.com> to: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org date: Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 11:12 PM subject: Wikipedia permission: Rampart Institute Dear Wikipedia copyright permission:

All of the photos except for one for the Rampart Institute Wikipedia page are the ones I took. As owner of Athena Graphics, I had my own camera equipment and dark room. I was also the first executive director of Rampart Institute. The only photo I did not take was the photo of the library at Rampart College. Robert LeFevre, founder of Rampart College, was also a board member of Rampart Institute. Since Rampart College became defunct in 1975, much of his material from Rampart College were donated to Rampart Institute. We used the Rampart College library photo in one of Rampart Institute flyer (New Renaissance flyer) which is enclosed in attachment. We could not find the original photo, so we took it from the flyer. Let me know your decision. See the archive site for Rampart Institute ( http://rampart.freedom1776.com/ ) which is still being assembled.

--ChicoDesigns (talk) 22:51, 27 August 2015 (UTC)


 Not done: Please contact COM:OTRS Steinsplitter (talk) 11:28, 10 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hi, I received an OTRS release from this picture. But for some reason I can't upload the file (the editor was blocked here); I tried the older and the new uploader but it always fails. I try to use another name "File:Gsebbaplenario.jpg" but commons said it was deleted. It's there some kinf of cookie blocking the upload? Can someone find the original file and restore it?Willy Weazley 22:11, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

Related ticket.Willy Weazley 22:13, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done: @Willy Weazley: Please add ticket to file. Steinsplitter (talk) 11:08, 10 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Several files related to the IFSCL Wikipedia article.

Hello, I need theese files: File:IFSCL 3.0.0.c - Ataque - Código Lyoko.png, File:IFSCL 3.0.0.c - Ataque de Xana - Entrando en la Zona NoVirt.png, File:IFSCL 3.0.0.c - Torre activada verde.png, File:IFSCL 3.0.0.c mezcla.png, File:Vuelta al Pasado.png, and File:IFSCL 3.0.0.c - Ataque - escaner Aelita.png to be restored while the creator of the game in the screenshots and current holder of the copyright emails permissions-commons@wikimedia.org with the permission to use this files with a free license. Then, in the exact moment I know the creator read my request and his e-mail has been sent, I will apply the { { OTRS pending } } template to all the files.

David Pérez Esteban (talk) 22:20, 1 September 2015 (UTC)

P.S.: I personally took the screenshots from the game and uploaded them.


 Not done: Screenshot is a COM:DW. The orginal work is copyright protected. Steinsplitter (talk) 11:28, 10 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Why this file was deleted? I made this alone, with free software and using only free material. Please, someone can explain me it? The post on my site about the modeling: 1) http://www.ciceromoraes.com.br/blog/?p=1025 and 2) http://www.ciceromoraes.com.br/blog/?p=1056 A big hug — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cicero Moraes (talk • contribs) 23:22, 2 September 2015‎ (UTC)

Related to Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Homo floresiensis models. Yann (talk) 11:55, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: Please send permission to COM:OTRS Steinsplitter (talk) 11:30, 10 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Why this file was deleted? I made this alone, with free software and using only free material. Please, someone can explain me it? The post on my site about the modeling: 1) http://www.ciceromoraes.com.br/blog/?p=1025 and 2) http://www.ciceromoraes.com.br/blog/?p=1056 A big hug — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cicero Moraes (talk • contribs) 23:23, 2 September 2015‎ (UTC)

Related to Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Homo floresiensis models. Yann (talk) 11:56, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: Please send permission to COM:OTRS Steinsplitter (talk) 11:30, 10 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This file was a scan made by me. How is that any different from all of the other passport covers we have on Wikipedia? Are they all going to be deleted? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fmarier (talk • contribs) 23:20, 3 September 2015‎ (UTC)

It's from New Zealand in 2014. That's how it's different.--Prosfilaes (talk) 00:22, 5 September 2015 (UTC)
Passports hosted on (English) Wikipedia may be covered by their non-free content guidelines. Here on Commons, any files that reproduce copyrighted, non-free designs are subject to deletion. Please note that scanning someone else's work does not make it your own work, does not make you the author or copyright holder, and does not mean that you can issue a valid license to the work in question. LX (talk, contribs) 09:01, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: COM:DW Steinsplitter (talk) 11:31, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: Please see the small CC-BY icon (version:4.0, click the icon) at the right bottom of source page: http://fanculture.tistory.com/entry/121202-%EA%B3%B0%EB%93%A4%EC%9D%98-%EB%AA%A8%EC%9E%84-%EC%82%AC%EC%9D%B8%ED%9A%8C

also please see this HTML code at the source page: <img id="ccl-icon-18-0" class="entry-ccl-by" src="http://i1.daumcdn.net/cfs.tistory/resource/1427/static/admin/editor/ccl_black01.png" onmouseover="tistoryCcl.show(this, 3)" onmouseout="tistoryCcl.hide()" alt="저작자 표시"/> Puramyun31 (talk) 14:05, 10 September 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done: Good resource: User:-revi/Tistory — regards, Revi 17:03, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

from: Robert <support@chicodesigns.com> to: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org date: Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 8:35 PM subject: Copyright permission for 5 images recently uploaded

Hello, I have verification from the author / rights holder for these images:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:LeFevre%27s-Library-in-Colorado-Springs.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Robert-LeFevre-at-first-Rampart-Institute-1980-event.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kenneth-Gregg-Jr.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wendy-McElroy-200x200-dpi.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gary-Hudson-at-Freeland-Conf.jpg

They were sent to me by the photographer / author to add to this Wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Rampart_Institute

The author / rights holder, Lawrence Samuels sent me Sharealike 3.0 permissions for these 6 images. See the attached PDF from Lawrence Samuels. If you have any questions or anything send me an email. Have a great day!



from: Lawrence Samuels <lawsamz@gmail.com> to: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org date: Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 11:12 PM subject: Wikipedia permission: Rampart Institute Dear Wikipedia copyright permission:

All of the photos except for one for the Rampart Institute Wikipedia page are the ones I took. As owner of Athena Graphics, I had my own camera equipment and dark room. I was also the first executive director of Rampart Institute. The only photo I did not take was the photo of the library at Rampart College. Robert LeFevre, founder of Rampart College, was also a board member of Rampart Institute. Since Rampart College became defunct in 1975, much of his material from Rampart College were donated to Rampart Institute. We used the Rampart College library photo in one of Rampart Institute flyer (New Renaissance flyer) which is enclosed in attachment. We could not find the original photo, so we took it from the flyer. Let me know your decision. See the archive site for Rampart Institute ( http://rampart.freedom1776.com/ ) which is still being assembled.


--ChicoDesigns (talk) 22:49, 27 August 2015 (UTC)


 Not done: If you have sent a mail to OTRS, then OTRS will handle this. Steinsplitter (talk) 11:51, 11 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

from: Robert <support@chicodesigns.com> to: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org date: Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 8:35 PM subject: Copyright permission for 5 images recently uploaded

Hello, I have verification from the author / rights holder for these images:

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:LeFevre%27s-Library-in-Colorado-Springs.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Robert-LeFevre-at-first-Rampart-Institute-1980-event.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kenneth-Gregg-Jr.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wendy-McElroy-200x200-dpi.jpg https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Gary-Hudson-at-Freeland-Conf.jpg

They were sent to me by the photographer / author to add to this Wikipedia page: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Rampart_Institute

The author / rights holder, Lawrence Samuels sent me Sharealike 3.0 permissions for these 6 images. See the attached PDF from Lawrence Samuels. If you have any questions or anything send me an email. Have a great day!



from: Lawrence Samuels <lawsamz@gmail.com> to: permissions-commons@wikimedia.org date: Mon, Aug 3, 2015 at 11:12 PM subject: Wikipedia permission: Rampart Institute Dear Wikipedia copyright permission:

All of the photos except for one for the Rampart Institute Wikipedia page are the ones I took. As owner of Athena Graphics, I had my own camera equipment and dark room. I was also the first executive director of Rampart Institute. The only photo I did not take was the photo of the library at Rampart College. Robert LeFevre, founder of Rampart College, was also a board member of Rampart Institute. Since Rampart College became defunct in 1975, much of his material from Rampart College were donated to Rampart Institute. We used the Rampart College library photo in one of Rampart Institute flyer (New Renaissance flyer) which is enclosed in attachment. We could not find the original photo, so we took it from the flyer. Let me know your decision. See the archive site for Rampart Institute ( http://rampart.freedom1776.com/ ) which is still being assembled.

--ChicoDesigns (talk) 22:50, 27 August 2015 (UTC)


 Not done: If you have sent a mail to OTRS, then OTRS will handle this. Steinsplitter (talk) 11:51, 11 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This image is a publicly available image taken from the website of the village Volkovce. It shows a map of area where Volkovce is.


 Not done: copyrighted, pleade read COM:L Steinsplitter (talk) 11:49, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

this is a screenshot of the official website for the village of Volkovce in Slovakia


 Not done: unfree screenshot Steinsplitter (talk) 11:49, 11 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Good afternoon, I write in regard of the copy right of the file I upload here, Retrato del Dr. Enrique Graue Wiechers, I declare here is property of the Coordinación de Servicios a la Comunidad a department here in Medicine School here at UNAM ( Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México) http://www.facmed.unam.mx/ and http://www.facmed.unam.mx/marco/index.php?dir_ver=92 , for further doubts you may have the person in charge the Digital Communication Department is Gabriela Perera Salazar, the email is com.fm@unam.mx, we can guarantee the image is our property.

Warm regards..

--Cecicahero (talk) 22:50, 10 September 2015 (UTC) September 10th , 2015


 Not done: file is not deleted yet, Steinsplitter (talk) 11:48, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

DR closed as {{Kept}}, then deleted. — Racconish 📥 16:28, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

  • Wait, this file has been kept and has been deleted twice by the same barely active admin who also happens to be the uploader? Mayby we should ask @Ludo29: to explain himself first. Mayby there is something going on that we are not aware off. Natuur12 (talk) 19:20, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
    • I did even before Racconish asked undeletion here, and no answer so far. Yann (talk) 19:45, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
      • Okay, since the user has been active at FR-wiki I either assume that he missed the notice or has given it a low priority. I will leave a note at his FR-wiki talk page. If there is no responce in let's say 24 hours and he continued to edit I will undelete this file. If it is deleted again without proper DR by the same person I will initiate a de-admin discussion. Natuur12 (talk) 19:49, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
        • @Ludo29: has answered on his talk page. His point of view is (1) the closure does not reflect a consensus, particularly on the blur and (2) being the author of the - unused - photo, he would rather have it deleted than published with such a blur. — Racconish 📥 08:04, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
          • Why do you change my words ? Ludo (talk) 08:08, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
            • Just tried to help out by summarizing in English. No misleading intended. Apologies, — Racconish 📥 08:14, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
              • Indeed, I explain that the closure doesn't reflect a consensus, but just a personal opinion. But the second point, it's not he would rather have it deleted than published with such a blur.
              • If the deletion request decided that my own work is not compatible with CC By SA, nobody can use CC By SA to modify my work without my agreement. Publish this picture with a blur, it's modify my work. But it's not allowed, because this picture can't be publish in CC by SA. So, this picture must be deleted. Ludo (talk) 08:31, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
                • The CC-BY-SA license grants the right "to create and Reproduce Adaptations provided that any such Adaptation, including any translation in any medium, takes reasonable steps to clearly label, demarcate or otherwise identify that changes were made to the original Work". How about such a clear statement the original was modified and why it was modified ? — Racconish 📥 08:49, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
                  • CC licenses are not revocable, as a Commons admin you should know that. Even if the label is non-free, the rest of the photo is still free. Ludo29 also argue on his talk page that the photo should have been kept since there were 5 {{Vk}} votes. That's not how it works, deletion debates are not votes. And please stop your personal attacks. Thibaut120094 (talk) 10:29, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment Now, it seems that Ludo29 refuses to discuss on his talk page (he reverted me twice). So I will answer here. Both Racconish and Thibaut120094 are right. And for your interest, it would be better that you 1. keep politeness, 2. follow Commons policies, 3. accept to discuss. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:35, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
  •  Comment: This admin reverted a legitimate concern posted in his talk page and uttered in the edit summary: «rv fouteur de merde». As someone who is not an admin and who was blocked in the past for much milder insults, I expect a swift de-admin discussion, followed by a suitable block. -- Tuválkin 13:35, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Je trouvais que l'argumentation de Ludo, sur sa page de discussion, n'était pas dénuée de fondement, mais vu l'empressement manifesté pour virer mon commentaire, tout à fait dénué d'hostilité (bien au contraire), je suis plus que perplexe... Voilà qui ne redorera pas dans mon esprit le blason de Wikimedia Commons, où il pourrait être tentant de penser qu'il n'y en a pas un pour racheter l'autre. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 16:18, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
    • Okay, so if I understand correctly the uploader is mainly pissed because his upload is blurred and that the original version is deleted. However, deleting own uploads after the file is kept, is misuse of the admin tools. I do understand however, that it can be very frustrating if an upload is blurred and I do understand that people can do something they shouldn't have done in the heat of the moment. As a general rule I think we should be foregiving if people do something they shouldn't have done in anger. Can happen to the best of us. On they other hand, this all happened months ago so there is no excuse to use personal attacks and dodging the discussion at the current time. I understand that my first comment may sound a bit harsh but this is serious offense. I don't think that a block is needed (and yes I do believe that the blocks of Tuvalkin where unfair; especially the first one but that is another discussion). Leaving Ludo's talk page alone for the rest of the day may be more productive. French is not my native language and I always failed my French lessons but this is pretty much a huge nogo in every language and if it means what I think it means it is not really nice and than this is something that should be addressed.
  • On they other hand, is the blurred version this valuable that we should keep it against the author's wishes? It creates drama, anger blood and we have plenty of replacements plus we already have enough drama. It is not unheard of to do a courtesy deletion in cases like this. There is a strong reason why I do believe that we should undelete this file. Keeping it deleted creates a bad precedence. I suggest we give @Ludo29: some time to reflect his own actions. Maybe we can have a laugh about how silly this discussion is tomorrow or maybe not if Ludo decides to walk. Natuur12 (talk) 17:45, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
  • I think we should keep the file deleted as a courtesy if that's Ludo29 wish. That's why I didn't restore the file when Ludo29 deleted it the second time. Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:01, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
  • Agreed, with thanks to @Natuur12: for his wise words. Actually I had stepped in and blurred this image with the sole hope of helping to find a consensus. I was then puzzled by the deletion, did not realize - stupidly - it had been deleted by the uploader himself and I am sorry if I contributed to aggravate him. Cheers, — Racconish 📥 18:07, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

If you really want my block, ask it. I insult everyone. And the problem is solved. Thanks. Ludo (talk) 19:32, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

I personally don’t care if you’re blocked or not. But you’re not admin material, at all. -- Tuválkin 20:06, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done: Speedydeleted in violation of COM:CSD policy twince by the same admin without providing a valid reason. Steinsplitter (talk) 12:00, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Per Mozilla style guide the bitmap version of Thunderbird logo is licenced under {{MPL2}}, which is a free license. We have already kept Firefox logo under this provision. Copyright related restrictions here should not be confused with trademark related restrictions (including restriction to alter the trademark), which per non-copyright restrictions policy are not subject to Commons licensing policy. 90.191.109.9 14:48, 11 September 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done: per Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Mozilla_Firefox_3.5_logo_256.png and [2] Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:07, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: see User_talk:Didym P4z (talk) 10:48, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done by Didym already, and discussed at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Armagetron Advanced grid background.png. whym (talk) 02:24, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done: as above. Yann (talk) 09:37, 13 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I took the picture myself. I am extremely disheartened that it has been deleted. As far as I remember, I gave the permission and licensed the file under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license. Nonetheless, it has been deleted. Please, undelete the picture and explain why it has been deleted. - Smmmaniruzzaman (talk) 01:47, 12 September 2015 (UTC)


 Not done: Not deleted. Yann (talk) 09:35, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Related DR is Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Al83tito

I am submitting evindece to support the undeletion of image File:The Fletcher Forum Forum of World Affairs - Academic Journal - Vol 37 Issue 3 - front cover.png. The image was released from copyright by the original source (http://www.fletcherforum.org/2013/10/03/volume-373-available/). If you hover and hold still the cursor over the image, then a note appears that says "this image is not under copyright protection". Thank you. (talk) Al83tito 22:48, 03 Sep 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done: as above. Yann (talk) 11:31, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Luceram1.JPG This was deleted without my knowledge. I am the creator of the file. It was apparently deleted because someone found the file on a holiday accommodation website - http://vacances.seloger.com/provence-alpes-cote-d-azur/luceram/gite-des-remparts-9309268 . It should be obvious that the creator of the advert website has taken the picture from here, not vice versa, without attribution. I am certain that I gave full attribution when I uploade the file.

File:Luceram2.JPG Ditto, though there is no suggestion as to why this removed other than the previous has been found on that site.

File:Fort de Valros.jpg Likewise, deleted without my knowledge. I am the creator of the file. It was uploaded at the same time as actual photograhs of the Fort de Valros when I created that Wikipedia article. It was deleted because "the file is claimed as own work by a user who has uploaded at least one other technical diagram" which actually means nothing to me. It's my own work.

Emeraude (talk) 08:32, 4 September 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done: as per above. However these pictures are small and have no EXIF data. It would be better to upload the original, if possible. Yann (talk) 11:29, 13 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Данный логотип является собственностью АО "АККОНД", и я, являясь представителем данной организации, хотела бы попросить Вас восстановить данное изображение на странице компании в Википедии.

С уважением, Мария Николаева, менеджер по рекламе АО "АККОНД", (8352) 63-33-47, client@akkond.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Maria Nikolayeva (talk • contribs) 13:27, 7 September 2015‎ (UTC)


✓ Done: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 11:17, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This was not copyright violation. On the contrary to the nomination statement of Commons:Deletion requests/File:P-1 02l.jpg, the licensing terms of JMSDF (the source) do permit commercial use and derivative works explicitly. They say 複製、公衆送信、翻訳・変形等の翻案等、自由に利用できます。商用利用も可能です —"[Our materials] can be used freely in manners including reproduction, transmission to the public, translation, modification, adaptation. They can also be used for commercial purposes." whym (talk) 11:46, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Just to clarify. the source page is http://www.mod.go.jp/msdf/formal/gallery/aircraft/shokai/details/p-1.html and their terms are http://www.mod.go.jp/msdf/formal/notice/index.html (summarized in my comment above in English). Pinging @Shizhao and Hedwig in Washington: you were involved at the DR. What do you think? whym (talk) 02:24, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
 Neutral I have to tell you that Google Translator makes a mess out of term statement. I don't think I can be of much help. Given the translation by whym I don't think there's any problem with the file on Commons. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:31, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done: as per above. Yann (talk) 12:12, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: i will try to improve it Benny Hlomani Makamu (talk) 07:09, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

 Oppose Out of scope: duplicate and wrong format. Yann (talk) 09:37, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: as above. Yann (talk) 07:31, 14 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please Please ignore this request. It has been explained to me:

Reason: All ten of my photos, of which "Lindsey Buckingham, July 31, 2012.png" is one, are pictures that I personally took. I thought I had identified them as such via the Wizard and also had given each a free license. Please undelete them and/or tell me what I did wrong. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Sdpmd (talk) 17:45, 13 September 2015 (UTC)


 Not done: as above. Yann (talk) 07:36, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The picture taken was in Devar's house located near my house, how it was copyrighted what is the source?

If you are still not convinced, no problem I can take a own copy from his house, even if done so how do you approve it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sivakumar.wiki (talk • contribs) 10:19, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

@Sivakumar.wiki: Hi,
The license at source is not sufficient (it doesn't allow commercial use). As for all content previously published elsewhere, a formal written permission is needed. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:20, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: as above. Yann (talk) 19:27, 14 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:South Memorial Korzun foto.jpg

Объясните, пожалуйста, на каком основании удалён этот файл. Не могу найти ссылок и обсуждения. Это старая довоенная фотография с могилы. Выдвинувший к удалению пользователь не отвечает, удаливший пользователь "удалён"? Что за бред? Должны же быть причины и обсуждение.5.18.53.230 21:42, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi,
This is obviously not "own" work. More information needed: date, author, publication, etc. Yann (talk) 11:15, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: as above. Yann (talk) 19:26, 14 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hey, Just wanted to understand why doodleblue's logo has been deleted. What are the steps to retrieve them back?

Thanks, Veena Thangavel — Preceding unsigned comment added by Veena Thangavel (talk • contribs) 12:41, 9 September 2015‎ (UTC)

@Veena Thangavel: Hi,
The copyright owner needs to send a permission. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:11, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: as above. Yann (talk) 19:26, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The photo was made by me and edited to look like this. There's nothing going against copyrights.--NoviLab (talk) 15:02, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

@NoviLab: Hi,
As for all content previously published elsewhere, a formal written permission is needed. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:10, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: as above. Yann (talk) 19:26, 14 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

There are still three DRs left in this cat. Is anyone taking care of these? Are these particularly thorny, or were just forgotten? -- Tuválkin 14:05, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

 Comment I cleared 2 of these. Yann (talk) 14:49, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
The one remaining is Commons:Deletion requests/File:Michael Myers (judge).jpg? If I (re-)read that DR, it was about a photo on page 176 of this book, photo by Stanley Polkinghorne Andrew (c.1879-1964). It seems the consensus was that the photo would become public domain in New Zealand on 1 January, 2015, 50 years after the author's death. Now, this leaves the question of the copyright in the United States. We don't have the date of first publication of the photo. But the subject of the photo (1873-1950) looks about 55-65 years old on the photo [3], which would date the creation of the photo circa 1930. (Also, compare to this other photo, dated 1929.) If so, it would be Not-PD-US-URAA. The DR discussion was in 2010, probably during one of the periods when Commons was freezing the deletions of the Not-PD-URAA files. That may be the reason why, back then, this DR was categorized in the category "Undelete in 2015", as if there was no URAA. I'm not sure what is done with the URAA-related files today. However, note that the other photo, File:Michael Myers, New Zealand.jpg, is also by the same photographer, Stanley P. Andrew [4], and thus it would be Not-PD-US-URAA. So, for consistency, the two files should be treated the same way. Either undeleting File:Michael Myers (judge).jpg or deleting File:Michael Myers, New Zealand.jpg. -- Asclepias (talk) 20:11, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done Yann (talk) 19:32, 14 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Dear Wikicommons Team and Permissions,

This response is to request undeletion of file KateCordsenConnecticutStudio.jpeg. I have permission from Kate Cordsen to post the image on Wikicommons, Wikipedia and general web usage. I have sole copyright of the image and full permission of the subject. Please see attached permission letter from Kate Cordsen

Thank you, Marvin Going --Marvingoing (talk) 13:51, 14 September 2015 (UTC)MarvinGoing Monday, September 14th, 2015 9:50am

I hereby affirm that I , Marvin Going, am the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the attached photo of photographer Kate Cordsen, KateCordsenConnecticutStudio.jpeg I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the free license: Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International. I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project. Marvin Going September 8, 2015


Kate Cordsen

September 8, 2015 Marvin Going has sole ownership of these images. I have given him full, unlimited permission and free license to use the files as he chooses. Thank you, Kate Cordsen Kate Cordsen Katecordsenconnecticutstudio.jpeg Katecordsen.Connecticutstudio.jpeg

The file was never deleted, and it looks like OTRS has removed the speedy delete tag, so nothing to be done. Carl Lindberg (talk) 15:47, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: Nothing to be done. Yann (talk) 19:26, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: May I request that you reconsider? I ask that you link to the research being done by visiting two pages that may provide background context for the utility of the sketch. I have submitted the sandbox article called, "Cincinnati architecture study in formal analysis drawings" ahead of my original intended submission date, in an effort to answer your deletion request on behalf of this user.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User:Eric_Inglert

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Eric_Inglert/sandbox

I am working on an article about formal analysis of Cincinnati architecture and hope to use all of the drawings in that effort.

Thanks in advance for your time and consideration. Eric Inglert (talk) 21:09, 14 September 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done: as above. I also renamed the file. Yann (talk) 08:25, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Michael Wildes, acting as appointed representative to Amy Wildes (his wife) has affirmed that his wife was the photographer and the file should be under cc-by-sa-3.0/GFDL. Ticket:2015091310007479. Storkk (talk) 10:47, 15 September 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done: - Steinsplitter (talk) 12:47, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore the following pages:

Reason: was deleted by Blackcat on 15 September 2015, 11:35:15 because Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Brevbärare.jpg and was uploaded by Josve05a.

Was deleted due to being out of scope, but it was in use, therefore in scope, the policy is pretty unambiguous and clear that we do not judge other wikis usages outside of userspace, and do not editorialize, no matter the quality. Josve05a (talk) 12:44, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

Also pinging Amitie 10g. Josve05a (talk) 12:47, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File uploaded by OSMOND PHILLIPS

All of my pre 1923 photographs were deleted by "Hedwig in Washington" even though it was my own work with the recommendd license and they were all pre 1923 photographs.

I attached several pre 1923 photographs that were deleted by "Hedwig in Washington" even though it was my OWN work. I also added the recommended free license. — Preceding unsigned comment added by OSMOND PHILLIPS (talk • contribs)

@OSMOND PHILLIPS: Hi,
If they are pre-1923 photographs, they are not your own. Now they may be OK because of age, but we require detailed information: author, date of publication, source, etc. Please make a list of the files here with these details if you want them restored. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:25, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: No answer. Yann (talk) 18:55, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

The Person who took the picture is fully aware of pictures getting uploaded in wikipedia page. The pictures were taken by the Island6 employee and were uploaded into their Tumblr Account. And the person who is in charge of their tumblr account is one person who took the pictures. http://island6artscenter.tumblr.com/ I put it in Wikipedia after asking their permission. So I see no point in deleting the pictures since the pictures were taken by Island6 employee and the Island6 Art Center is fully aware of the situation regarding the upload of the pictures into wikipedia. --Za2202 (talk) 05:42, 15 September 2015 (UTC)Arty 2015/09/15

Hi, Please send the permission to COM:OTRS, then the file can be undeleted. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:24, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: as above. Yann (talk) 18:54, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

DestinAsian Indonesia

Could you please un-delete the images that we have uploaded on the DestinAsian Indonesia page : These files are from our own work and we own the copyright.

File:DestinAsian Indonesia Featured Article Kobror Juli Agustus 2015.jpg File:Destinsian Indonesia Featured Article Magelang Mei Juni 2013.jpg File:DestinAsian Indonesia Featured Article Bosnia November Desember 2013.jpg File:DestinAsian Indonesia Featured Article Con Dao Maret April 2015.jpg File:DestinAsian Indonesia cover 14 Mei Juni 2015 issue.jpg File:DestinAsian Indonesia 11 November-Desember 2014 issue.jpg File:DestinAsian Indonesia 10 September-Oktober 2014 issue.jpg File:DestinAsian Indonesia 07 Maret-April 2014.jpg File:Sampul majalah DestinAsian Mei 2013.jpg File:DestinAsian Indonesia 05 November-Desember 2013 issue.jpg File:Cover Perdana DestinAsian Indonesia Maret 2013.jpg

--Destinasianmagazine (talk) 08:29, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

@Destinasianmagazine: Hi,
As for all works which were previously published elsewhere, a formal written permission is needed. Please see COM:OTRS for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:46, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: as above. Yann (talk) 18:54, 16 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

this file came from Flickr and is a public domain file https://www.flickr.com/photos/124253324@N07/16934827415/in/dateposted-public/ --Tikitpok (talk) 12:40, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

This is a derivative work. There is no evidence that the dw is available under a free license. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:59, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 Confused: Shouldn't it be a screen of non-copyrightable material? I don't see anything worth protection in that image. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 13:08, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: as above. Yann (talk) 18:56, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I ask not to delete this photo of spiral stairs. As I saw, will be PD in 2017 according to Slovenian law. But that's matter for freedom of panorama, here we have spiral stairs, which are not invention of author. I think this specific bird view isn't copyvio. It would be also shame it get Feautered nominee.

Its not shot of building itself, but spiral stairs, invented in antique. --Mile (talk) 21:59, 18 September 2015 (UTC)


 Not done: Not deleted yet. Yann (talk) 22:33, 18 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Image:Pierre Nantel au nettoyage des berges du fleuve Saint-Laurent (Longueuil, QC).jpg Image:Pierre Nantel participe aux commémorations du 11 novembre à Longueuil.jpg

These 2 images were deleted for copyright violation. However source of pictures (http://pierrenantel.npd.ca/a-propos) indicates at the end of the page that images are subject to a Creative Commons license (Images mises à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Attribution - Pas d'Utilisation Commerciale - Pas de Modification 4.0 International.)

450gv (talk) 06:40, 17 September 2015 (UTC)


 Not done: Utilisation commerciale est nécessaire pour Commons. Yann (talk) 22:31, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Buenas,

He subido estas y otras imágenes, con el consentimiento de Ricardo Asensio, autor y propietario de estas obras. Soy una persona que sigue sus pinturas desde hace años y me ofrecí a hacerle un articulo en wikipedia, ya que no habia visto que tuviera. El está encantado con la idea y así a ratitos estoy intentando hacerla. No sabia bien como iba lo de las licencias, y ayer hablando con el he encontrado como hacerlo, poniendo una licencia creative commons reconocimiento internacional 4.0. No se como tengo que proceder, ya que todo el material me ha indicado que lo libera con esta o la licencia que se necesite.

Me podeis decir como hacerlo? Muchisimas gracias de antemano y perdonar si ha podido molestar el haberlo hecho incorrectamente, ya que al leerlo puse la opción incorrecta porque no lo entendí bien.

Un saludo --Jenychris (talk) 20:31, 10 September 2015 (UTC)

@Jenychris: Hi,
Plese ask Ricardo Asensio to send a permission. See COM:OTRS/es (in Spanish) for the procedure. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:08, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
@Yann: Buenas Yann,

Le he indicado como tiene que hacerlo para el tema del permiso a Ricardo Asensio, me ha indicado que os ha escrito al correo que ponia en el modelo tipo email. Tengo algunas imagenes que subir más, y nose que tengo que poner, si que han salido de la pagina ricardoasensio.es o que la licencia es creative commons reconocimiento internacional 4.0... Agradeceria que me indicaras como tengo que proceder. Un saludo!


✓ Done: by Jcb. Yann (talk) 18:17, 19 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please restore this file under the CC0 1.0 license which is uploaded from this link : http://www.samanthamariko.com/2015/07/shore-magazine-launch-party.html

{{cc-zero}}

--RenRen070193 02:08, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

 Oppose: The copyright information at the bottom of the page says "© Samantha Mariko 2015". Where is it stated that the content has been released into the public domain? --DAJF (talk) 02:39, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: as above. Yann (talk) 18:15, 19 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Iron Composer Logo.jpg was deleted out of an abundance of caution, apparently. It is gone now; so, I am unable to doublecheck the permissions that were supposedly missing from the file.


I uploaded it as the creator of the artwork, and the image of the artwork. When I uploaded the file to Wikimedia Commons, I made it free to use for everyone. If I did not follow the proper procedure to do so, please let me know what I did wrong. The file was on the article for several years, and all of the sudden it has been deleted without warning. I would appreciate any help on this matter. Trumpetrep (talk) 03:45, 19 September 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done: by Krd. Yann (talk) 18:15, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Trabalho Próprio. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fernatvs (talk • contribs)

@Fernatvs: A mesma foto foi encontrada aqui, site que refere que a licença da imagem não é livre. Se a foto for sua ou se tiver permissão do autor, por favor envie email permitindo o uso de acordo com a página C:OTRS.—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 20:33, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: as per Teles. Yann (talk) 10:59, 20 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This file is from the personal archives of my father, now deceased, and was taken by him, at his home, at a private party, in 1958. I am in possession of my father's photo collection, and have his implicit (now posthumous) permission to make any of his personal photographs part of the public domain. This process should not be so complex- this photograph is NOT from the Internet, it is NOT copywrited by anyone, it is a PERSONAL photo of a person which I tried to add to the article about this person on Wikipedia. This person was a personal friend of my family, and was at our house many times in the 1950's and 60's, and was photographed there by my father. I am dismayed that the complexity of this process makes it so difficult to add personal photographs to the Commons. -- Mrnews (talk) 18:30, 14 September 2015 (UTC)

Of course the photo couldn't be taken by himself unless it was a self-shot. Who is the "Eugene Lisansky" who shot the photograph? -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 13:11, 16 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: No answer. Yann (talk) 10:58, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This image is all my own work, i own all possible and conceivable rights to this image. Please undelete. Thank you. Not sure how to communicate better, but i think whoever deleted this should at least ask me first and explain their reasoning. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kinovisual (talk • contribs) 22:51, September 19, 2015 (UTC)

People upload copyrighted works without authorization all the time; thousands are deleted every day. For works which have previously been published, we generally assume that uploads are unauthorized. We require confirmation from the copyright holder via email that the work is indeed intended to be released freely. Please follow the procedure at COM:OTRS and that process will get the file undeleted. Carl Lindberg (talk) 02:44, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: Please send permission to COM:OTRS Steinsplitter (talk) 10:29, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Please undelete File:Robin Lustig voice.wav. Permission has been received as per OTRS ticket:2015071710012361.

Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 17:31, 21 September 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done: - Steinsplitter (talk) 17:34, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Deleted by User:Fastily as an empty category, but the category is not empty. Besides, it is not appropriate to delete categories like this even if empty as {{No license since}} puts files in the category if you add the template with incorrect parameters. --Stefan4 (talk) 17:48, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

 Support Maintenance categories should not be deleted. Carl Lindberg (talk) 18:00, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
✓ Done Rodhullandemu (talk) 18:03, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done: as above. Yann (talk) 22:32, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

1. 因第一次建立維基百科項目以及第一次上傳照片,不知是否缺少哪種項目導致刪除,可否告知該到哪裡補足缺失? 2. 這個檔案是由我個人拍攝創作上傳的 Yaffy0911 (talk) 01:43, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

我们不接受私人照片,一定是要有教育性、能用在维基计划里的照片才行。 -- King of 03:06, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
King of Hearts seems to find a scope issue with this photo, but I kind of disagree. File:柳宏霖.jpg looks like a profile picture of a notable singer. However there is a licensing issue—it didn't have a proper copyright tag. @Yaffy0911: Would you agree to license it under CC BY-SA 3.0? whym (talk) 02:24, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: No reply from uploader. Not done for now then. Steinsplitter (talk) 14:31, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Bitte um wiederherstellung dieser Datei.

Dieses Bild habe ich selbst gemalt. Bei dieser Arbeit geht es um die Textur des Pinsel und Farbe. Nicht die Darstellung ist von Wichtigkeit, sondern die Strukturen des mikroskopischen.

Herzlichen Dank Sergio Fabris --Sergio Fabris (talk) 18:16, 18 August 2015 (UTC) 2015-08-18


 Not done: Bitte Freigabe an COM:OTRS senden. Bin mir unklar ob die Datei in COM:SCOPE ist. Steinsplitter (talk) 14:16, 22 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Das Bild wurde von mir selbst - persönlich - erstellt und darf frei genutzt werden. Das Bild wurde parallel von mir bereits schon im Web genützt auf meinem Blog. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Magejo (talk • contribs) 15:44, 25 August 2015‎ (UTC)


 Not done: Bitte eine Freigabe an COM:OTRS senden. Danke! Steinsplitter (talk) 14:16, 22 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Das Foto Herta Firnberg wurde am FELMI-ZFE gemacht, wie die Fotografin bestätigt hat. Die Wissenschaftsministerin war zu Besuch am Institut. Eine Urheberrechtsbestätigung wurde an Permission-de@wikimedia.org gesendet. (allerdings erst gestern, nachdem das File schon gelöscht worden war)

--Alice im Miniland (talk) 13:33, 27 August 2015 (UTC)


 Not done: Wenn die Fraigabe OK ist, wird das OTRS Team die Datei wiederherstellen. Steinsplitter (talk) 14:18, 22 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Uploads by Jesmith627

UN symbols are generally considered PD. In the case of these logos, it is the UN olive branches, cog wheel and initials in the respective language, so these most likely also qualify for PD-textlogo. Fry1989 eh? 00:11, 2 September 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done: @Fry1989: please add correct license tags. Thanks! Steinsplitter (talk) 14:33, 22 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This file was provided by the owner of the webside I used it in. (Articles 'Plants for a Future' in several languages) The file was sent via email on a request by me. The permit was for all Articles in the Wiki worldwide. It is the logo of the organization. --Elrond (talk) 11:23, 7 September 2015 (UTC)

Permission would need to be sent using the procedure at COM:OTRS. Note that permission must be for everyone and everywhere, not just Wiki articles. If they are not comfortable with that (which would be understandable), then the logo must be uploaded to each Wikipedia directly under a fair use rationale, if the project allows such files (the English Wikipedia does). Commons cannot host fair use files. Carl Lindberg (talk) 12:34, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
some logos of companies e.g. https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/BASF https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/9c/BASF-Logo_bw.svg/250px-BASF-Logo_bw.svg.png or https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/AkzoNobel https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/de/thumb/0/05/Akzo-nobel-logo.svg/171px-Akzo-nobel-logo.svg.png are used in Wiki but be shure, not everyone is allowed to use it everywhere. How does this work? In the way you sayed? How does it work, could you assist me please --Elrond (talk) 17:10, 7 September 2015 (UTC)
Many logos are trademarked but are too simple for copyright. Commons allows non-copyrighted logos even if they are trademarked: we consider trademark a non-copyright restriction. - Jmabel ! talk 22:04, 8 September 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done: Converted to DR: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Logotag.JPG Steinsplitter (talk) 14:46, 22 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This was deleted in 2012, on the grounds that the artist, Thomas Matthews Rooke, died in 1942. Time has passed, so that the 70 year rule no longer catches the artist. So this file could now be undeleted. Charles Matthews (talk) 18:54, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

That was not the grounds; the deletion log says "Not PD in US", and unless was published since 2002, that hasn't changed, as publication 1923-1978 is 95 years from publication, and copyright for posthumous publication 1978-2002 expires in 2048.--Prosfilaes (talk) 23:12, 11 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: see Prosfilaes comment. Steinsplitter (talk) 14:34, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Since when is "unused" or uploader request a sufficient reason for deletion? --Itu (talk) 16:07, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

see Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion#General reasons --Didym (talk) 16:35, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: as above. Yann (talk) 14:31, 22 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This is the picture I've taken myself in 2005. Piotr Tysarczyk


 Not done: Please send permission to COM:OTRS Steinsplitter (talk) 14:47, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Bitte File:EnthusiastiCon19.jpg und File:EnthusiastiCon21.jpg wieder herstellen

Hallo, die beiden Bilder File:EnthusiastiCon19.jpg und File:EnthusiastiCon21.jpg sind im Rahmen der Wikimeida Deutschland-Veranstaltung EnthusiastiCon am 20. Juni 2015 entstanden. Urheber dieser Bilder ist Jason Krüger, der von Wkimedia Deutschland beauftragt wurde, zu fotografieren. Bestandteil des Vertrages ist auch, dass die von ihm aufgenommenen Bilder unter freier Lizenz veröffentlich werden dürfen. Die bei Wikimedia Deutschland als Werkstudierende arbeitende Julia Schütze (Benutzerin:Julia Schütze (WMDE)) hat die beiden Bilder auf Commons geladen. Wir bitten um Wiederherstellung der beiden oben genannten Biler. Eventuell fehlende Informationen editieren wir gern. Viele Grüße Jan Apel (WMDE) (talk) 08:41, 17 September 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done: @Jan Apel (WMDE): Steinsplitter (talk) 14:21, 22 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Семён-день в Красном 2014 85.JPG etc.

OTRS Permission has been received. Can you please undelete these photos, so I could double check them and add OTRS template is everything is ok? --D.bratchuk (talk) 09:48, 17 September 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done: @D.bratchuk: Please add otrs template etc. Steinsplitter (talk) 14:36, 22 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

File:Annunciation in KR 2015 Chebotarev 72.JPG

Affected:

And also:

The same as above. OTRS Permission has been received. Can you please undelete these photos (or at least some of them for now), so I could double check them and add OTRS template is everything is ok? --D.bratchuk (talk) 13:34, 17 September 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done: @D.bratchuk: please add otrs templates etc. And please add the OTRS Ticket number to your UDEL request next time to allow faster processing. Thanks Steinsplitter (talk) 14:41, 22 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Own work. CC-BY-SA 3.0 licence Peter Campbell (talk) 13:46, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

File was deleted without warning. Please advise of any licence amendments required. 114.198.25.175 12:43, 19 September 2015 (UTC)


 Not done: per COM:FU Steinsplitter (talk) 14:27, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

i need it very well Abdirizak gelinbacayn (talk) 15:55, 18 September 2015 (UTC)

The file wasn't deleted because it was unneeded. It was deleted as a copyright violation. The source doesn't provide the image under a license compatible with Wikimedia Commons. If you need a flag of Somalia, you can use this one: File:Flag of Somalia.svg. --rimshottalk 08:47, 20 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: as above. Yann (talk) 14:15, 22 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Unknown file

This is the artwork for the ImaginaryFriendsShow.com Podcast. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jakefw (talk • contribs) 2015-09-21T20:22:06 (UTC)


 Not done: COM:OTRS permission needed. Steinsplitter (talk) 14:26, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

--91207Lauf (talk) 06:51, 22 September 2015 (UTC)Es handelt sich um das offzielle Stadtlogo, das wude von der Stadtverwaltung selbst hochgeladen wurde. Bitte um Wiederherstellung.


 Not done: COM:OTRS Freigabe wird benötigt. Steinsplitter (talk) 14:24, 22 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Yo soy el autor de este archivo cual es el problema ????

 Keep deleted El problema es que Wikimedia Commons tiene un propósito educativo y la foto no cumple con ello. Básicamente: No se permite utilizar para fines personales como álbum de fotos. Más información: COM:PS. Un saludo. Alan (talk) 10:39, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: Not deleted yet. Yann (talk) 14:22, 22 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Cual es el problema, yo soy el autor de este archivo , que pasa ???

 Keep deleted El problema es que Wikimedia Commons tiene un propósito educativo y la foto no cumple con ello. Básicamente: No se permite utilizar para fines personales como álbum de fotos. Más información: COM:PS. Un saludo. Alan (talk) 10:39, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Alan Steinsplitter (talk) 14:23, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

yo soy el autor de este archivo , cual es el problema ???

 Keep deleted El problema es que Wikimedia Commons tiene un propósito educativo y la foto no cumple con ello. Básicamente: No se permite utilizar para fines personales como álbum de fotos. Más información: COM:PS. Un saludo. Alan (talk) 10:40, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Alan Steinsplitter (talk) 14:23, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

cual es el problema, es la primera foto del cartel , yo soy el autor, cual es el problema ???

 Keep deleted El problema es que Wikimedia Commons tiene un propósito educativo y la foto no cumple con ello. Básicamente: No se permite utilizar para fines personales como álbum de fotos. Más información: COM:PS. Un saludo. Alan (talk) 10:40, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Alan Steinsplitter (talk) 14:23, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

cual es el problema, yo soy el autor de esa foto, tengo la foto original, cual es el problema ???

 Keep deleted El problema es que Wikimedia Commons tiene un propósito educativo y la foto no cumple con ello. Básicamente: No se permite utilizar para fines personales como álbum de fotos. Más información: COM:PS. Un saludo. Alan (talk) 10:37, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done: Per Alam Steinsplitter (talk) 14:22, 22 September 2015 (UTC)


The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

I have permission from the owner of the photo (and the photographer) who took the portrait to upload it to Wikipedia Commons. The owner will verify the claim over the OTRS email. Deepdraft (talk)


 Not done: OTRS Team will restore the file if the permission is okay. Steinsplitter (talk) 14:23, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Ticket:2015091810006711 has been received regarding these two files. Storkk (talk) 15:40, 22 September 2015 (UTC)


✓ Done Alan (talk) 17:27, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

this is mine photo and it is not for copyright to anyone


 Not done: Please send permission to COM:OTRS Steinsplitter (talk) 18:42, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Poseo autorización con permiso de la propia persona para con la fotografía.

El propietario de los derechos de autor debe enviar un email a COM:OTRS indicando claramente que libera la imagen a un permiso libre ver instrucciones) e identificándose debidamente. Un saludo, Alan (talk) 17:08, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

 Not done Una vez recibido en OTRS un email válido, el agente que lo gestione procederá con el trámite de restauración. Alan (talk) 12:42, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

OTRS files that received permission

Hello,

According to otrs:8452588, could you restore following pictures and {{ping}} me please ?

Best, --Scoopfinder(d) 14:56, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

@Scoopfinder : C'est fait, excepté les deux derniers qui ne semble pas exister, peux-tu revérifier les noms ? Merci. Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:00, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
File:Ruisseau 1974.jpeg and File:Portrait bleu - 1973.jpeg. Sorry for that @Thibaut120094: --Scoopfinder(d) 18:06, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done: restored Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:10, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

This is a picture of Mario Testino that I have been asked to upload onto his Wikipedia page by Mario Testino himself. I am an intern who works at Mario Testino+ so have spoken to the relevant parties necessary to double check whether this content can be used on his Wikipedia page and with the right licensing.

If I have chosen the wrong license for this picture then please advise which one I should use instead and how to go about it.

Otherwise, i would kindly request that this picture be put back up onto his Wikipedia page.

Regards,

Smera Kumar (talk) 09:18, 23 September 2015 (UTC)


 Not done: Please have the copyright owner send permission to OTRS. Thanks! Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:25, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Solicito la recuperación de la imagen en cuestión conforme al correo electrónico que he enviado a permissions-commons@wikimedia.org con la declaración de consentimiento de derechos de autor. Adjunto copia del correo susodicho:

Xavier Prevosti Vives <XXXXXX@gmail.com> 26 de setembre de 2015, 12:33 Per a: permissions-commons-es@wikimedia.org Estimados srs. Han sido eliminadas dos imágenes que utilizaba para la entrada de wikipedia Francisco Canals Vidal. Ambas imágenes, File:Canals&JuanPabloII.jpg y File:Firma-FCV.jpg, junto con todos los documentos, escritos, etc. relacionados con la persona de Francisco Canals Vidal han sido confiados a mi persona por parte de la viuda del mismo, Isabel Surís Fábrega, para su difusión y conocimiento. Les adjunto el documento firmado por ella, por el cual me concede este consentimiento. Por este motivo añado también el consentimiento que recae sobre la página web, http://canals.orlandis.org, para que procedan a la restauración de ambas imágenes. Muchas gracias por su tiempo. Atentamente, Xavier Prevosti Vives

Para permissions-commons@wikimedia.org Por la presente declaro que soy el titular de los derechos de autor exclusivos de la web sobre Francisco Canals Vidal [5]. Consiento publicar dicha obra bajo la licencia libre {{cc-by-sa-2.5-es}} - Reconocimiento-CompartirIgual 2.5 España basada en la ley española. Reconozco que concedo a cualquiera el derecho a usar la imagen en un producto comercial, así como a modificarla de acuerdo a sus necesidades. Soy consciente de que siempre retendré los derechos de autor de mi imagen, así como el derecho a ser reconocido como autor según los términos de la licencia elegida para mi obra. Las modificaciones que otros hagan a la imagen no me serán atribuidas. Soy consciente de que la licencia libre sólo afecta a los derechos de autor, y me reservo del derecho de emprender acciones legales contra cualquiera que use esta obra violando cualquier otra ley, como restricciones de marcas registradas, libelo o restricciones geográficas específicas. Reconozco que no puedo retractarme de este acuerdo, y que la imagen puede o no ser almacenada permanentemente en un proyecto de la Fundación Wikimedia. Firmado: Xavier Prevosti Vives, 26 del septiembre de 2015.

Xpv (talk) 10:37, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

@Xpv: Please send this permission to COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 10:47, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
@Yann: I've alredy done it. Thanks, Xpv (talk) 10:55, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

✓ Done ticket:2015092610008211. Alan (talk) 16:04, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

The undeletion discussion in the following section is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Hedwig in Washington deleted this logo which consists of a variation of the Argentina flag, including the Sol de Mayo (both clearly not subject to copyright), with an inscription in letters that used a simple typography. The reason given was Copyright violation but I find it inappropriate for this file. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 03:19, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

IMHO the sun is above TOO. But feel free to restore if you think I am wrong. :-) Best, --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:21, 27 September 2015 (UTC)
Thanks for your willingness Hedwig in Washington. The sun is a national emblem created by Juan Martín de Pueyrredón (1777-1850), so if exceeds TOO, anyway copyrights have expired. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 04:27, 27 September 2015 (UTC)

✓ Restored Alan (talk) 09:10, 27 September 2015 (UTC)