Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/November 2020

File:New York and Jersey City Skyline Panorama.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2020 at 14:05:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#United States
Info created by Pierre Blaché - uploaded by User:Kestreltail - nominated by Kestreltail -- —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 14:05, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing detail and good composition and lighting, in my opinion. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 14:05, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose High resolution, but other problems: bad crop on the right side, bottom crop should be tighter, wb seems to be off. With New York skyline pictures we can be picky (I guess I'm not the only one here seen this view with my bare eyes). However, I gotta admit the existing FPs in the category are not much better. —kallerna (talk) 15:32, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I agree that there's a bit too much water; what do you think of the possible crop I added in the image notes? Also, I have seen this view with my bare eyes, but only on a cloudy day. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 18:43, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I have no problems with the crops, and it's great to see both the Jersey City and Lower Manhattan skylines together (plus Ellis Island, which should get a category and be mentioned in the description). However, a lot of the buildings feel washed out to me. I feel like this was a hazy late morning, not ideal for the shoot, but I wonder whether selectively increasing saturation could help. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:00, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I've been a lot in NY but this was an exceptional clear day. Btw the geotag is wrong, camera location can't be in lower Manhattan. --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 20:58, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

+1 on the coords. This is the view from Liberty Island. Daniel Case (talk) 02:42, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment You know that I live in Manhattan, right? Time of day can be an issue in terms of haze, not just the day's weather. And in no way would I call that an exceptionally clear day. It's not exceedingly rare to have cloudless blue skies here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:32, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There are at least five oily spots in the sky at right. --Cayambe (talk) 23:01, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Vertical distortion (left side), harsh contrast (in some areas the contrast is too much resulting in black solid) and finally Satured colors. Sorry --Wilfredor (talk) 00:32, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I like the idea of both skylines in one shot, but the colors here just don't work. Daniel Case (talk) 02:42, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:36, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Laila Peak.jpg (delist), delisted[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2020 at 12:56:01

Info (Original nomination)
Delist Nice view, but far below today's FP and QI standards. --A.Savin 12:56, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --Ivar (talk) 17:55, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --StellarHalo (talk) 19:24, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Pretty, but tiny. Give me twice this resolution and I'd vote to keep. Cmao20 (talk) 19:41, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I feel like we should keep really good or striking small pictures from the early digital photography age as historical. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:59, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Below 2 MP. A landscape would have to be in the 2-4 MP range for me to say "I wouldn't vote for this now, but I wouldn't delist it either." -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:29, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Slightly underexposed (sky), and the WB seems too warm, but the main issue is definitely the size. In years 2000-2001 I remember I was among the first to own a digital camera, working with floppy disks (almost this model). Maximum resolution 0.35 Mpx 🔬😭 Nice gadget at these old times to avoid developing the photos on paper before inserting them in university reports, however I really don't think any of these documents would have ever made a great image. Even at this period it was very clear the quality was disappointingly low compared to the standards -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:45, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Per Ikan Kekek. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 15:04, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Regretful delist If there were some way we could at least recognize the independently commendable elements (the composition and lighting), I wish we could. In those areas it could certainly serve as an example to emulate.Daniel Case (talk) 20:07, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist I am not swayed by Ikan's arguments; there is no such category as far as I'm aware, and this image doesn't meet the current FP bar, imo.--Peulle (talk) 21:43, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment If historical digital photos can't be grandfathered in, why vote? Someone should create a bot that will automatically remove FP status from all photos below 2MP and run it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:28, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What does "historical digital photos" mean? A picture shot with a shortage of pixels? If it was taken with a film camera, the picture would appear far better. Example (year 1943, size 8,073 × 6,449 pixels). (And example of a digital photograph uploaded in 2005 that I would support again in 2020). Does a lithograph become more interesting if digitalized with a bad (very old) image scanner? It doesn't make sense -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:55, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Points well taken, but why not do this kind of delisting with a bot? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:04, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I do think that there should be some kind of acknowledgement of good pioneering use of the new digital technology, but if we want to revoke the FP status of everything under 2MP, a bot should be created and run. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:07, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As for me, the photo is also a bit short on wow side, although it of course may have been considered unusual at the timepoint of promotion. But meanwhile we have lots of impressive mountain views, and I'm also not quite sure if the upright format is the best one for this scenery. That said, I still think what should be delisted is not to be decised via bot, but needs consensus instead. --A.Savin 16:34, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agree -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:22, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 8 delist, 2 keep, 0 neutral => delisted. /--A.Savin 13:41, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ancien hôtel des Postes de Charleroi (DSC 0278).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2020 at 07:22:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Belgium
Info by -- Trougnouf (talk) 07:22, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Trougnouf (talk) 07:22, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Looks like a good QI, but I'm not really wowed by the light or the motif, sorry.--Peulle (talk) 09:00, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I agreed with Peulle at first but looking at it some more the soft light and the beautiful clouds have won me over. Support is only weak because I feel it is a little bit oversharpened and there is a little colour noise. Cmao20 (talk) 19:43, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done more denoising, less sharpening. Thank you ! --Trougnouf (talk) 17:23, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support The clouds radiating from the center really enhance the composition. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:30, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Peulle. Daniel Case (talk) 02:42, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:05, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like this. The lighting is subtle but the main building still has a luminosity which makes it stand out against its surroundings. The composition works for me: just the right amount of sky above the tower, and just about as much empty pavement showing below as is viable, and a clear view of the main building without obstruction or distraction. Detail is sharp at full screen (34" 4K) and sufficient at 100%. --Bobulous (talk) 19:29, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:26, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. -- Karelj (talk) 17:13, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:40, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cartouchière - vue d'ensemble 11-o.lau-F169.LA1140-01.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2020 at 12:11:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Jewellery
Info all by -- Cephas (talk) 12:11, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cephas (talk) 12:11, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Good photo; but are there jpg artefacts in the background or is it the structure of the background? There is also some color noise in the background. --Llez (talk) 15:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per Llez. Daniel Case (talk) 19:27, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:43, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Neuntöter mit erbeutetem Heupferd im Geo-Naturpark Bergstraße-Odenwald.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2020 at 06:57:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Laniidae (Shrikes)
Info created & uploaded by Hwbund - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 06:55, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 06:55, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:07, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent action shot. I nominated this one at QIC a few days ago with the idea it would make a great FP too. The two little twigs at the left could be deleted, but their presence is not a deal-breaker in my view. The light and the smooth background are very nice -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:36, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:01, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 08:02, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent focus, solid composition, subject has wow factor.--Peulle (talk) 08:55, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. --Aristeas (talk) 09:21, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:42, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 13:52, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 14:54, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:49, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 18:24, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:04, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great shot but it would be definitely better if the croppsed tips of branches on the left are cloned out Poco a poco (talk) 07:35, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:49, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Basile and Poco, the twigs at the left are a bit distracting. Cmao20 (talk) 15:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:41, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support but per Poco. Daniel Case (talk) 17:00, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 20:56, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:42, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Laniidae (Shrikes)

File:Beilstein - Burg Hohenbeilstein und Unteres Schloss - Ansicht vom Birkenweg mit Abendsonne.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2020 at 19:35:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Germany
Info At the top of this picture is Hohenbeilstein Castle, built in 1080 and restored and rebuilt in the nineteenth century. At the bottom we have Unteres Schloss, a listed villa built from 1906 to 1908. I really like the warm evening light and the satisfying composition. created by Aristeas - uploaded by Aristeas - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 19:35, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 19:35, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:06, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:22, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice, but the sky is noisy, somehow I don't understand why it had to be shot at ISO-400? --A.Savin 00:56, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It was not easily possible to use a tripod (I took this photo standing on a parking place, people and cars cruising around me ;–), I wanted f/10 to get enough DoF at 94mm, and so I selected ISO 400 to get 1/125 s in order to avoid camera shake. --Aristeas (talk) 07:05, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

IMO it would be nothing wrong about using, for example, f/7.3 and 1/50 sec exposure. Tripod? For god's sake, a Sony A7Rx user hardly ever needs a tripod ;-) --A.Savin 13:02, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I will provide a version with noise reduction in the sky as soon as possible (hopefully tomorrow or at Monday), but at the moment I am working hard as a member of the jury for WLM 2020/DE and can’t do any photo editing ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 07:05, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Info New version with less noise uploaded. @Aristeas: Please revert, if it's not meeting Your expectations. --Ivar (talk) 08:58, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Iifar: Thank you very mich for helping out! (Maybe I will take the freedom to upload my own de-noised version created from the RAW file next week, but your version is definitely a good improvement, I will take it as a measure for my own attempt.) --Aristeas (talk) 11:01, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Appealing light, interesting architecture. Assuming no tripod was taken, the settings seem consistent to me (minor noise in the sky, honestly not a deal-breaker in my view). High resolution and appropriate DoF -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:55, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you very much, Cmao20, for nominating and all of you for your comments and support. --Aristeas (talk) 07:05, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 09:00, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:08, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
This one, FF, paid some 2000, but ISO 400 migth be problem. A.Savin !? --Mile (talk) 11:33, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:36, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support In Ivar's version well fixed, thanks. --A.Savin 13:02, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:13, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:12, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose None of the three buildings is large enough in the scene to keep the attention, so it feels like the three buildings together define the composition, and the way they're laid out doesn't feel balanced. Also, the way the trees suddenly burst in to obscure the building at the bottom-left makes it feel even less balanced. Lighting and detail are excellent, but the arrangement just doesn't fit together for me. --Bobulous (talk) 19:15, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I'd like more space at the bottom --Llez (talk) 06:00, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I understand your wish very well, but the problem is that at the bottom there are some very ugly modern buildings which would spoil the image … Next week I will have a look at the RAW file if I can rescue some more pixels at the bottom, but we cannot do much, sorry. --Aristeas (talk) 11:01, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:46, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support. I see Bobulous's point but overall the image still works for me. Daniel Case (talk) 20:33, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:44, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Trougnouf (talk) 10:30, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 00:27, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#Germany

File:Blick vom Wachtküppel nach Nordosten.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2020 at 20:11:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Hesse
Info First snow on the Wasserkuppe in the Rhön Mountains. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 20:11, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 20:11, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very good quality and labeling and would be an excellent VIC nom, but the composition is perfectly OK but not great to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:56, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No sense of connection between the foreground, midground, and background. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:25, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose A good quality and pretty photo but not for me an excellent composition Cmao20 (talk) 16:04, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per King and Cmao. Daniel Case (talk) 18:53, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:15, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Friedhof ohlsdorf november 2019 30.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2020 at 16:23:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
Info created by Dirtsc - uploaded by Dirtsc - nominated by Dirtsc -- Dirtsc (talk) 16:23, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Dirtsc (talk) 16:23, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice, a really arty composition with beautiful light. Cmao20 (talk) 19:46, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree. Really good, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:55, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very beautiful indeed, but the bright part looks unnatural. It is totally OK for the sun to be blown out. We shouldn't resort to fake highlight recovery to artificially suppress the brightness of the sky when the color information just isn't there. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:27, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support KoH is right, but I still love the composition and light. ;–) Sidenote: It’s a pity and I do not understand why this photo did not pass the pre-jury for WLM 2020 :–(. But the pre-jury is always somewhat tricky … and always kills a few of the best submissions. --Aristeas (talk) 08:41, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Aristeas: Thanks for the sidenote! Greetings --Dirtsc (talk) 16:30, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:12, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:12, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:14, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I love the scene, but why is the metalwork so much softer and lighter in the areas where the sky is seen? --Bobulous (talk) 19:17, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:50, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:36, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:27, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mosbatho (talk) 20:21, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Like King of ♥, I like everything about the image except for the unnatural glow and sudden decrease in sharpness in the upper right corner of the gate. --MB-one (talk) 12:40, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose what have you done to the top right of the gate Dirtsc? Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:47, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Charlesjsharp: I tried a rework, but didn't want to change the original. Please tell me, if you think the version File:Friedhof ohlsdorf november 2019 30a.jpg might be better. I'm not quite happy with the new version yet, because it is darker than the original. Greetings --Dirtsc (talk) 19:00, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see more artefacts. Sometimes you just cannot recover overexposed areas. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:26, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. I am saying that the bright area should be even brighter than it is right now. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:43, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 00:24, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural elements#Doors

File:Rose-ringed parakeet (Psittacula krameri borealis) male Jaipur 2.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2020 at 13:23:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Psittaculidae (True Parrots)
Info Compares well with existing zoo FP. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:23, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:23, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Solid FP Cmao20 (talk) 19:44, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great getting everything from the head to the back of the tail feathers so sharp, and a beautiful bird. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:58, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 22:56, 23 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose colors are washed. some vibrance, etc --Mile (talk) 11:34, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 20:09, 24 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:56, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:25, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 08:53, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:39, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 00:26, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Psittaculidae (True Parrots)

File:Martial eagle (Polemaetus bellicosus) in flight.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2020 at 13:47:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Genus : Polemaetus (Martial Eagle)
Info Africa's largest eagle. Vulnerable on the IUCN Red List. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:47, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:47, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful eagle, and including this one, there are only 2 QIs of this species. We've seen sharper photos of birds in flight, but I'm supporting this. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:14, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:05, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. Cmao20 (talk) 16:01, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Podzemnik (talk) 19:39, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose valuable, yes, but not FP due to technical problems. It's on the small side, there's halo effect due extensive processing, not that sharp etc. Due to processing it also looks quite unnatural IMO. —kallerna (talk) 09:03, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per kallerna. I think the sharpening halo may just be sunlight through the feather tips, but I can't be sure. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Case (talk • contribs) Sorry. Daniel Case (talk) 18:49, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there isn't a sharpening halo. Shadows have been lightened. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:37, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Yea, well Frank S. gave you a mission. Quality is much bellow some FP (see picture of bird above), despite "vulnerable". Problem with colors, contrast. --Mile (talk) 08:21, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Obviously, birds in flight are a very challenging subject, so we certainly cannot expect the technical quality of a focus-stacked HDR panorama. But this really doesn't strike me as an outstanding example of BIF-photography either. --El Grafo (talk) 11:37, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 18:41, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 18:47, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with El Grafo's point. --Gnosis (talk) 00:26, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. --Suisant (talk) 13:28, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:39, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

NASA Exoplanet Exploration Halloween posters 2020, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2020 at 15:17:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Dark Matter - Something else is out there
A radiating thriller of cosmic proportions! Gamma Ray Ghouls
Macs 2129-1 Galactic Graveyard

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Science
Info Three retro-horror poster artworks from NASA in time for Halloween. I like these light-hearted fun ways of pushing for science and knowledge about space. As a nice bonus, they are also available in Spanish versions. In line with a previous similar nomination, I'm nominating the png-versions. Created by NASA-JPL/Caltech - uploaded and nominated by Cart. -- Cart (talk) 15:17, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cart (talk) 15:17, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per my vote in the other nomination. Cmao20 (talk) 16:10, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Enthusiastic Support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:20, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question What about of the others posters like zombie worlds? --Wilfredor (talk) 16:51, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zombie Worlds FINAL 39x.png and File:Rains of Terror FINAL 10 15 HERO.png were nominated and promoted to FP with the batch last year. These are this year's Halloween posters presented as new posters here. There is an old one, Flares of Fury Poster, created in 2016-03-21 according to the file data, that they posted again on one of their interactive pages for this Halloween. --Cart (talk) 17:09, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thanks for the explain --Wilfredor (talk) 00:42, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Podzemnik (talk) 19:36, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:09, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:29, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:04, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:57, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:31, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:08, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 20:08, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support if these existed when I nominated the others, I would've included them. so support for the same reasons. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:32, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:09, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Science

File:Bubalus bubalis (water buffalo) bathing in a rust-colored pond and looking at viewer, head above water, Don Det, Laos.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2020 at 22:26:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae_(Bovids)
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:26, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:26, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice.--Ermell (talk) 22:37, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 23:20, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 06:38, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:28, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great quality and nice compo Poco a poco (talk) 12:49, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:09, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I can feel his smell.--Claus 15:16, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 16:31, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--PierreSelim (talk) 16:46, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 17:57, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Podzemnik (talk) 20:50, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:05, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes! --El Grafo (talk) 11:29, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:29, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 16:59, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 18:38, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:58, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 02:42, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:46, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:39, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 20:06, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:49, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:58, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 24 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:56, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae_(Bovids)

File:Jeanette Scissum at Marshall Space Flight Center.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2020 at 00:02:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
Info created by NASA/MSFC - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:02, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:02, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cvmontuy (talk) 02:50, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice photo of someone I wish I had already known about. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:25, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 11:14, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cmao20 (talk) 13:46, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Not an FP. Moon dominates and the file cabinet on the right is highly distracting. Face is not well lit. Seven Pandas (talk) 22:14, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Seven Pandas. Daniel Case (talk) 04:02, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Seven Pandas and Daniel Case: I'm confused about the month-old face comment. She is African-American, and the photo was shot a little overexposed to try and get more detail in her face with the filmstock of the time, so I think it's as all-out as it could have been. Adam Cuerden (talk) 13:35, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Adam Cuerden: Her face doesn't bother me; I know we're asserting the main value of the image is historic. But ... I think SP had a point about how, if she's the basis for nominating the image for FP, it really works as one if she's only a quarter of the total image and not the most prominent thing in it. Daniel Case (talk) 16:56, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per above. This would make a wonderful VI and probably a good FP at en.wikipedia, but I wouldn't call this a top-notch environmental portrait. --El Grafo (talk) 09:07, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 15:29, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Seven Pandas --StellarHalo (talk) 09:46, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:42, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 06:37, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bernardo Bellotto - Miodowa Street in Warsaw - Google Art Project.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2020 at 07:47:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Exteriors#Towns
Info created by Bernardo Bellotto - uploaded by Artinpl - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 07:47, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrei (talk) 07:47, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I am not sure about the countless small white dots at the bottom (reflections?), but overall a good reproduction of a painting with high historical value. --Aristeas (talk) 18:00, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Probably good historical value but the light annoys me quite a bit. Most of the things are in the shadow that doesn't excite me much. --Podzemnik (talk) 20:48, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The quality at full resolution is not good. Google Art Project is either a hit or miss and this one is a miss. --StellarHalo (talk) 22:10, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. -- Karelj (talk) 16:55, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per StellarHalo. Daniel Case (talk) 23:20, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The reproduction seems fine to me, although this is obviously a losing battle. Cmao20 (talk) 07:44, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination per above. Thank you all! --Andrei (talk) 11:54, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cospudener See mit Kraftwerk Lippendorf, 1708281031, ako.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2020 at 23:28:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Germany
Info Making an FP out of the steam from the cooling towers of a power station sounds like a tall order, but I think Code has managed it. It impressed me with the stillness of the reflections and the elegant simplicity of the composition. Created by Code - uploaded by Code - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 23:28, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 23:28, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A bit dark, and WB a bit too blue. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:08, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'd probably vote for this photo if something more than the leftmost third were cropped out. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:57, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose underexposed, main subject forms maybe 5 % of the photo area, better quality could be expected for a such static subject. —kallerna (talk) 09:06, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support What a smoke! I like how the reflection underlines the scale of the smoke. --Podzemnik (talk) 20:49, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per kallerna. Maybe the right half by itself would have had a shot. Daniel Case (talk) 05:05, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Honestly I think the photo would be much more boring if you cropped out the space at the left. But i knew this nomination was a bit risky -not too surprised it failed. Cmao20 (talk) 07:41, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cmao20 (talk) 07:41, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/

File:Karte baikal2.png (delist), delisted[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2020 at 09:31:38

Info Not in SVG, outdated (Ust-Orda Buryat Okrug is no longer an autonomous federal subject of Russia and is now a full part of the Irkutsk Oblast), unnecessary frame, top crop way too close to the lake, visible watermark in the bottom right corner, no legend whatsoever explaining the map's symbols, no unit for any of the summit elevations (Original nomination)
Delist Visually appealing for a digital map from 16 years ago but lacking in cartographic standards -- StellarHalo (talk) 09:31, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist as nominated.--Peulle (talk) 12:16, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nom. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:19, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per nom. --El Grafo (talk) 15:09, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --Claus 15:17, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Seven Pandas (talk) 20:00, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist per above. --Cayambe (talk) 20:53, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist -- Karelj (talk) 16:54, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Doesn't even work as a map of the lake since it doesn't show the whole lake. Daniel Case (talk) 03:54, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist Definitely no longer an FP. Non-SVG maps should rarely have the star. Cmao20 (talk) 07:45, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 10 delist, 0 keep, 0 neutral => delisted. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:54, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:2018 fiji, 10 april, freeway, dwarf hawkfish (40966872195).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2020 at 06:37:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Cirrhitidae_(Hawkfishes)
Info created by q phia - uploaded by Christian Ferrer - nominated by Ivar (talk) 06:37, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 06:37, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive. Per w:Dwarf hawkfish, this fish doesn't grow longer than 7 cm. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:55, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:38, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 11:26, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Podzemnik (talk) 20:48, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 22:02, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:06, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:27, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Quality is very good and I'd like to support it but the WB is off, it's too warm Poco a poco (talk) 17:47, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:44, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:47, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 23:17, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 07:43, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:54, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish#Family_:_Cirrhitidae_(Hawkfishes)

File:Pencak silat api.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2020 at 13:02:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info created by Muchtamir - uploaded by Muchtamir - nominated by Danu Widjajanto -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 13:02, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 13:02, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question Can we please have a full-sized photo? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:16, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too small.--Peulle (talk) 20:41, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Background too distracting. Daniel Case (talk) 05:41, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral - moral support. doesn't have much of a chance at FPC because of the resolution but it's a really fun shot — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:54, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Amazing but sadly too small Cmao20 (talk) 07:46, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:52, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sandhill crane in flight over Llano Seco.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2020 at 11:43:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Order_:_Gruiformes_(Cranes_and_relatives)
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 11:43, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 11:43, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice! High quality and I love the background. I would maybe do a slightly tighter crop. —kallerna (talk) 12:27, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:18, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition, but I would trim a bit off the bottom, Frank. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:47, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice!--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:10, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 15:26, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 16:31, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very beautiful; besides the obvious documentary value it has also some abstract beauty. --Aristeas (talk) 18:01, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seven Pandas (talk) 19:59, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support It'd be even cooler if the bird behaved itself and flew a bit lower, exactly in the middle of the blue line. --Podzemnik (talk) 20:45, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 20:51, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent capture with adequate settings -- Basile Morin (talk) 21:43, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:07, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:19, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support very good shot --Mile (talk) 08:19, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Brilliant --StellarHalo (talk) 08:45, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:26, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:42, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:43, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:57, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 02:41, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:01, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:38, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 20:05, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support really excellent. may be a good candidate for the "walk us through a FP" segment of the next Commons Photographers meeting — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:50, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:57, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Close to flawless. Cmao20 (talk) 07:45, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 01:50, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 11:52, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 29 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:53, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Order_:_Gruiformes_(Cranes_and_relatives)

File:Tūranga (library), Christchurch City, New Zealand.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2020 at 07:23:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#New_Zealand
Info All by me. It's Tūranga, a new public library in Christchurch, New Zealand. The old one was destroyed during the earthquakes. It's usually quite busy around so I'm quite pleased that I managed to take this shot without cars and people. -- Podzemnik (talk) 07:23, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Podzemnik (talk) 07:23, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 08:28, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I may be a lone dissenter, but the front of the building feels too in-your-face to me. The right side has a decent rhythm and I like the design on the bottom right of the front, but I just find the building in general upsetting to view and not part of a great composition, although I'm of course happy that a new public library was constructed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:40, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:18, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The more I look at it the more that cropped tree on the left bothers me. Daniel Case (talk) 04:11, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I've come back to this several times, and I really want to support it, but Daniel Case has a point about the tree. The library building and the hotel next to it work well together. I wish that you could've walked just a few steps to the right to avoid that tree, while keeping the hotel on the right side. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 22:05, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:32, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Daniel -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:05, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:55, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I like the rest of the image enough to forgive the cropped tree. --StellarHalo (talk) 13:51, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per StellarHalo. --Suisant (talk) 13:37, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:57, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#New_Zealand

File:Une tartiflette sortie du four.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2020 at 08:15:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info nominated by Benoît Prieur -- --Benoît (d) 08:15, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- --Benoît (d) 08:15, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sharp and appetizing-looking photo of the tartiflette. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:36, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No reason to have assymetic and 'tilted' tile pattern. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:39, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Ikan but I also take Charles' points. Cmao20 (talk) 13:50, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose no wow. Kruusamägi (talk) 16:39, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Looks very yummy and certainly good photographic quality, but per Charlesjsharp and Kruusamägi. --MB-one (talk) 12:27, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose +1. --Peulle (talk) 21:41, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 16:57, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. -- Karelj (talk) 17:08, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:56, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Church of St Sebastian, Ponta Delgada, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2020 at 09:25:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

View of the exterior of the church.
General view of the nave towards the altar.
General view of the nave back from the altar.
High altar.
Chapel.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
Info Church of St Sebastian, Ponta Delgada, São Miguel Island, Azores, Portugal. The church, built between 1531 and 1547, is one of the landmarks of the capital of the island. I propose these images as a set because I believe that each of them deserves the FP star alone and because the set depicts this beautiful church from different viewpoints giving a comprehensive view of it (3rd criteria "A group of images depicting the same subject from different viewpoints"). Note that there is already a closer look of the high altar that became FP and could have been added to this set. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 09:25, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 09:25, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Interested to see how this set is interpreted. For me, the images, high quality as they are, do not depict 'the same subject from different viewpoints'. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:30, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The subject is the church and I offer different view of parts of it Poco a poco (talk) 18:15, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment In the exterior image there is a car that is distracting and the "General view of the interior." there is a problem of distortion of the verticals, the upper part is stretched towards the sides (check the verticality of the columns) --Wilfredor (talk) 12:53, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wilfredor: I reworked the image of the exterior view: the van is gone, I also improved the verticals. I've also made some adjusments of the interior view and added one additional image of the interior looking from the altar back to the entrance. Poco a poco (talk) 18:15, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Almost everything is fine but "General view of the nave back from the altar." has the same problem now fixed in "General view of the interior.", please, fix it too and I will support it. Thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 21:06, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wilfredor: I had already anticipated this feedback and rework the second interior image before I added it to the set, but I made now some additional adjustments. --Poco a poco (talk) 09:16, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sigo observando el problema de las columnas en "General view of the nave back from the altar.", la parte superior de las columnas esta inclinada hacia afuera, esto es fácilmente corregible usando las guías en Photoshop. --Wilfredor (talk) 15:28, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wilfredor: ¿¿cómo lo ves ahora?? si sigo sin atinar, ¿podrías añadir una nota? Poco a poco (talk) 18:09, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support IMHO Good now --Wilfredor (talk) 19:04, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Distortion quite strong on the first image, looks like the tower is falling down. --Ivar (talk) 12:58, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ivar: I readjusted the perspective of the tower Poco a poco (talk) 18:15, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Imho it's not fixable, because shooting point was too close to the church. --Ivar (talk) 18:25, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I was Ivar, indeed as far as I could and I also took the side further from the tower. The church is in the middle of the city and there are usually tons of people walking around specially visiting bars or restaurants nearby. I could manage this shot without people thank you patience and COVID-19. Poco a poco (talk) 18:39, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Amazing images, on the whole. I really like all three interior views and I think they should definitely be FP. The exterior isn't so clear for me, the van is distracting and I agree with Ivar that the tower looks like it's falling backwards. Cmao20 (talk) 13:57, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cmao20: as mentioned above I addressed the mentioned issues of the external image Poco a poco (talk) 18:15, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thanks, I mean honestly it's an amazing set and I'm not going to quibble any further. Cmao20 (talk) 21:04, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The last two photos are unreservedly FPs to me. I'm not as sure about the rest. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:35, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I like all the photos and IMHO at least the first (now) and the two last really deserve the star, ~~but I am not sure about the set idea.~~ --Aristeas (talk) 09:33, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support OK, looking again at it. The photos are really good, and maybe I just need to think again about the meaning of a set ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 09:32, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:16, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The black point should be made more intense, especially on the first image which looks washed out. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:40, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@King of Hearts: I've adjusted the darker areas, please, have a look Poco a poco (talk) 19:40, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:59, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:55, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Suisant (talk) 13:34, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:55, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

File:Goodyera repens flowers in detail - Männiku.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2020 at 19:30:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family_:_Orchidaceae
Info Very tiny flowers of Creeping lady's-tresses, focus stacked of 46 images. The background is sky through the trees. All by Ivar (talk) 19:30, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 19:30, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 22:11, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful light, nice natural background. The DoF could have been more consistent, still enough crispy sharp areas to appreciate currently -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:02, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 01:36, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive, considering the size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:23, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Definitely unsharp even on 12 MPx and ~~some CA all across the plant~~ (reflexion). But i like thia back color, much better than that light green. --Mile (talk) 07:40, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Unsharp if this was a photo of large flowers, but they are tiny Mile. Please have another look. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:13, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Charlesjsharp I still think stack could be better, i have one in a similar size, manual shots before stack, the flower was on the hill (windy-moving). Unless pic was scaled-up !? APS-C might not be best for small macros. --Mile (talk) 11:53, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@PetarM: Nothing was upscaled. All my Nikon images tends to be a bit soft and usually additional sharpening is added. "Definitely unsharp" is imho very harsh assessment. --Ivar (talk) 12:24, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ivar Maybe i should say "sharp enough", but stack could be done more appropriate. --Mile (talk) 12:38, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I may be missing something here, but the description implies these flowers are 5 x 7mm, but yours are 30 x 30mm Mile. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:14, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Charlesjsharp My whole flower was 30×30 mm, all that sqaured size. Means each white blossom was under 10mm. I suppose Ivar gave a blossom size, not the complete size of the flower we are looking at ? --Mile (talk) 16:08, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mile: You are comparing quite flat inflorescence with the one that has hairy flowers. 9 stacked images versus 46, they are not quite comparable. --Ivar (talk) 16:25, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ivar We won't get far here. But you gave me a mission, I will try to find this flower in soon future. I will try to reaffirm my objectives here. Maybe I will fail too, but let's have a try. --Mile (talk) 16:45, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mile: You need to wait at least for the next summer to find this rare species in Slovenia. Good luck with that! Anyway, the asessment "Definitely unsharp" is imo not competent. --Ivar (talk) 17:01, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thats OK, i put this on Bookmark and see habitat, Central Europe too. --Mile (talk) 19:19, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support per Basile. --Aristeas (talk) 09:23, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Mile, this kind of shots have limited wow to me, therefore I really expect crispy sharpness, which unfortunately isn't the case here Poco a poco (talk) 15:19, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:58, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fine considering the flowers are very small. I don't think it's really that unsharp at all. Cmao20 (talk) 07:51, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:48, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:37, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Podzemnik (talk) 19:44, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:49, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 23:49, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asparagales#Family_:_Orchidaceae

File:TRADISI MAUDU LOMPOA TAKALAR.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2020 at 13:05:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info created by Muchtamir - uploaded by Muchtamir - nominated by Danu Widjajanto -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 13:05, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 13:05, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Overprocessed (like this one by the same author) -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:41, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Pity but per Basile. --Podzemnik (talk) 20:43, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile but even if that overprocessing weren't a problem it's still a bad composition. Dramatic, yes, but chaotic. Daniel Case (talk) 05:39, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Amazing photo but Basile is right about the overprocessing Cmao20 (talk) 07:47, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 23:50, 3 November 2020 (UTC))[reply]

File:Tallinna Teeninduskool 009-kokalabor pano.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2020 at 16:45:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
Info created by Lauri Veerde - uploaded & nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 16:45, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 16:45, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Please, add more information about how it was done. Thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 21:03, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:32, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:29, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 09:40, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support If ever there are stitching errors, I didn't find them :-) Interesting interior -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:46, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 18:46, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 23:48, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#People at work

File:Tallinna Tööstushariduskeskus 005-omblusklass pano.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2020 at 16:54:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
Info created by Lauri Veerde - uploaded & nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 16:54, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 16:54, 25 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting and good. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:25, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:33, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:46, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 09:40, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:49, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 18:46, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 23:49, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#People at work

File:Banff from Sulphur Mountain 2020.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2020 at 01:10:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Canada
Info created by Sahagunethan - uploaded by Sahagunethan - nominated by Sahagunethan -- Sahagunethan (talk) 01:10, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Sahagunethan (talk) 01:10, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose subject in the shadow --StellarHalo (talk) 06:46, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per StellarHalo. --Fischer.H (talk) 18:36, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Beautiful view but not a great composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:50, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others; also the bluish tint, the general unsharpness and slight noisiness of much Banff. I know it looked great when you were there (I've been there myself, though a long time ago) but this picture just didn't convey it. Daniel Case (talk) 19:17, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very pretty but the problem for me is that the composition is a bit lacking. I'd like to see more landscape and less sky Cmao20 (talk) 07:48, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:57, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bergtocht van Guarda via Ardez en Ftan naar Scuol. 20-09-2019. (d.j.b) 10.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2020 at 05:27:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Doors
Info A decorative and funny door knocker. With wear spots in the paint layer. The shadow effect gives the photo an added value for me. Guarda was awarded (the Wakker Prize) for the preservation of its architectural heritage in 1975.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:27, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:27, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support My father used to photograph door knockers in many countries, therefore I know many of them. This one would have been a showpiece for his collection ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 09:13, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Oversaturated, highlights/shadows adjusted too much, no wow. The light is also too harsh. —kallerna (talk) 11:18, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful object, beautiful colors and good quality; very good for me -- Spurzem (talk) 20:38, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Harsh shadows and light spoil it in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:12, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely colours and textures in the wood Cmao20 (talk) 07:53, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Kallerna. Daniel Case (talk) 15:33, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Cmao20 --Llez (talk) 15:39, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:56, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Kallerna. I don't find this doorknocker funny or special. --StellarHalo (talk) 13:49, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:27, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dirt jump IMG 7609.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2020 at 12:09:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual_sports
Info created - uploaded by Fischer.H - nominated by me. -- Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 12:09, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 12:09, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:30, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:08, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:25, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 16:49, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:34, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:48, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:38, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:57, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 02:40, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:55, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:52, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support:-) --XRay ^talk 10:03, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:02, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Peulle (talk) 20:40, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:22, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:34, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:37, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Meiræ 20:04, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support rad! — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:55, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:54, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:06, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 12:21, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Tournasol7 (talk) 13:15, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 24 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:25, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Sports#Individual_sports

File:Iglesia de San Juan de Mata y San Félix de Valois, Bratislava, Eslovaquia, 2020-02-01, DD 78.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2020 at 12:18:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors
Info created and uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by MB-one -- MB-one (talk) 12:18, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- MB-one (talk) 12:18, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful church facade, unusual shape. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:22, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Shooting point was too close, church is distorted. Compare with this. --Ivar (talk) 13:52, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment If you've seen it in person, I'd defer to you, but otherwise, looking through the photos in Category:Church of St John of Matha, Bratislava, I'm not convinced. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:59, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question I really feel shrunk on both sides. Very tight crop. Possible more space around? -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:12, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for the nom MB-one! I had to get close to the church to photograph it, taking a shot with 30 cables wasn't an option. Will upload a new version with a more "natural" look later today Poco a poco (talk) 15:16, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose With this much distortion, this one should not be a QI. Even without the distortion, I fail to be amazed of the photo. Just a church facade. —kallerna (talk) 15:35, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Heavy distortion, shade divides the facade in two, very tight crop - this is not among the finest on Commons. --Ivar (talk) 15:54, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment New version uploaded with more crop on both sides and adjustments of perspective and aspect ratio Poco a poco (talk) 18:01, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The framing is still too cramped after minor change -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:17, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Beautiful place, good quality and the distortion is really not that bad, I'm not sure why there are so many complaints about it. But the shade falling across the left of the facade is a bit distracting. Maybe would have been better at a different time of day. Cmao20 (talk) 07:55, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others.--Peulle (talk) 08:56, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 18:30, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Very weak oppose I don't mind the distortion, but I do mind the shade. Daniel Case (talk) 17:14, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Cmao20. --Aristeas (talk) 19:04, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:27, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ayuntamiento, Ponta Delgada, isla de San Miguel, Azores, Portugal, 2020-07-29, DD 126-128 HDR.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2020 at 17:38:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Portugal
Info Ponta Delgada City Hall, a 17th-century structure constructed to house the municipal council/authority, situated in the civil parish of São Sebastião, municipality of Ponta Delgada, Azores archipelago, Portugal. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 17:38, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 17:38, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very clear sight lines and beautiful details. Notably empty; is that due to the pandemic, or is that just typical of that town or both? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:46, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ikan Kekek: I've only been once in Ponta Delgada but knowing that tourism was down to 20% I believe that this scene is usually more crowded Poco a poco (talk) 16:46, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:57, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:55, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 10:03, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:35, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 16:53, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:19, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:34, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:36, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:52, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Quite striking and a very good quality photo. Cmao20 (talk) 07:52, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:48, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Tournasol7 (talk) 13:15, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:07, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Portugal

File:WLM - 2020 - Schloss Schönbrunn - Kronprinzengarten - 01.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2020 at 13:10:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Austria
Info created & uploaded by User:Moahim - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:10, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think the dramatic streaming clouds and the way they echo the shapes below make this photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:10, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ Despite the clouds a bit too dull light for me, sorry. The crane is also annoying and I feel like it could be cloned out well, though for a support from me this still would not suffice. --A.Savin 14:13, 26 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Neutral now that the crane has been removed. --A.Savin 13:15, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I guess I'm the only one who likes this. I'll leave this nomination up until probably tonight Eastern Standard Time and then withdraw if there are no supporting votes. I'm surprised, but we react differently to what we see, and that's natural. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:59, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like it, it's very dramatic. Cmao20 (talk) 11:27, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great composition and clouds. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:26, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'd also clone out the crane --Llez (talk) 15:47, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment User:Moahim's last contribution was on September 29, so we should assume we have to take this photo as it is, at least for now, though it wouldn't be a shock if Moahim shows up. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:54, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done I have cloned out the crane, at least. --Moahim (talk) 21:02, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:10, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 09:57, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm not a big fan of these harsh contrasts, especially in the clouds but also on the resulting darkness of the left side. I would much prefer this composition in a soft light. --Trougnouf (talk) 10:25, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The contrast depends on the lighting conditions, which is quite strong, but natural here and there are no clipping in the shadows, nor in the lights, and saying "like it/don't like it" is a completely subjective manifestation of individual taste. --Moahim (talk) 20:18, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Of course it's subjective! These decisions aren't made by bots. At this point, I'm going to withdraw, because criticizing people's opinions as "subjective" is fairly meaningless and also irrelevant to FPC, whose guidelines specifically mention "wow" as a factor in voting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:59, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Contrast is too harsh imo. --Gnosis (talk) 00:28, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The same, as to Trougnouf. --Moahim (talk) 20:18, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose Per Gnosis, it doesn't look realistic too me and the size/detail not superb, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 13:11, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The details in the photo are not superb, but, IMHO, quite sufficient. --Moahim (talk) 20:18, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question User:Moahim, do you want to try to rescue this nomination by addressing criticisms expressed in this thread, to stave off my withdrawing the nomination as not likely to succeed? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:53, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Thanks for taking a look and for your votes, everybody!~~ -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:59, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Withdrawing at 6x support / 3x oppose and one day before it ends anyway? --A.Savin 10:32, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Alright, I'll rescind the withdrawal, but I don't like that people are being criticized for "subjective" opinions. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:31, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:09, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Knolparasolzwam (Chlorophyllum rhacodes) 26-10-2020 (d.j.b.).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2020 at 16:21:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Agaricaceae
Info Shaggy parasol (Chlorophyllum rhacodes). Focus stack of 15 photos. To get a good view of the cap, the bottom and the stem of this mushroom. the camera had to be anchored just above the ground.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:21, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:21, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Impressive picture, but I think I have found some artefacts (see annotations). Mind having another look? --Lynxbiru (talk) 18:26, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Ca’s removed. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:42, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The sharp borders of the desaturation brush are visible at the left side of the stem. Maybe you can fix that?--Ermell (talk) 19:36, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Correction. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:03, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support nice work.--Ermell (talk) 06:40, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:56, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:06, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There are still a few red pixels in the left corner between the cap and the stalk (there's already a note in that area) Poco a poco (talk) 09:11, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Red dots removed. Thanks for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:23, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Looks good to me Poco a poco (talk) 16:46, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Excellent! -- Spurzem (talk) 09:43, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 13:07, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:02, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 16:55, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lynxbiru (talk) 20:16, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:52, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ahmad^talk 05:07, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:34, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:53, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive focus stack. Cmao20 (talk) 07:51, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 08:10, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 18:10, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:43, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 01:47, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Tournasol7 (talk) 13:15, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 11:25, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Fungi#Family : Agaricaceae

File:Wooden gate with open double door leading to the garden of Isshinin Buddhist temple in the compounds of Chion-in Kyoto Japan.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2020 at 01:42:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Japan
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:42, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:42, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very nice but would like to see a bit of brightening. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:56, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:38, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:05, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 02:40, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm glad you nominated this really peaceful picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:37, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As you know, you are the instigator of this candidature. Thank you very much -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:10, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You bet! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:57, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Llez (talk) 06:59, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:59, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Spurzem (talk) 09:42, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 10:02, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Suisant (talk) 13:22, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:02, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:34, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 16:41, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:18, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MB-one (talk) 18:52, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Peaceful picture like this one also really help to get over these difficult times. --Aristeas (talk) 09:36, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:35, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:21, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:56, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:52, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 07:52, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Like a Japanese painting you can walk into ... Daniel Case (talk) 02:28, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Tournasol7 (talk) 13:15, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 11:25, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Japan

File:Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord -- 2020 -- 7824-6.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2020 at 12:27:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#Germany
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay ^talk 12:27, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Info This photograph reached the 8th place at Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Germany --XRay ^talk 12:45, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay ^talk 12:27, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 14:51, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special!--Famberhorst (talk) 16:48, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Exzellent! -- Spurzem (talk) 17:31, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seven Pandas (talk) 01:17, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:04, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:33, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:45, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:53, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cmao20 (talk) 16:00, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Podzemnik (talk) 19:39, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:12, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Congrats.--Ermell (talk) 22:40, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support This photo was one of my personal highlights in WLM 2020/Germany. --Aristeas (talk) 17:54, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Different. Daniel Case (talk) 23:55, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I think all 4 should be in focus. --Mile (talk) 08:31, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm. But there are only 3. --XRay ^talk 10:02, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:50, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:18, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Industry#Germany

File:Jekleni most pri Radečah (Iron bridge on Sava river at Radeče; IG. GRIDL fabrik, 1894).jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2020 at 16:52:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges
Info Renomination (I had problems with moire in the bottom, now solved ...to compare before/after in 100% ). It's fisheye shot. All by --Mile (talk) 16:52, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Leting now to previous voters: Cmao20, Seven Pandas, Johann Jaritz, Charlesjsharp, Ikan Kekek, Milseburg, Daniel Case , Isiwal.
Support -- Mile (talk) 16:52, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as before distortion doesn't work for me. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:52, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Even better. Seven Pandas (talk) 19:55, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but it looks overprocessed to me (saturation mostly). 'Wow' could be better under more exciting light conditions. --Podzemnik (talk) 20:42, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I respect the criticisms above, and I'll look at any further edits with interest, but I really like looking forward to the end of the bridge. Very good composition, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:44, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles & Podzemnik. --Ivar (talk) 06:23, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Podzemnik --StellarHalo (talk) 06:41, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. -- -donald- (talk) 11:42, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Big wow! --MZaplotnik^(talk) 18:44, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles and others. Daniel Case (talk) 19:10, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support As before. Fisheye is fine when used for artistic purposes Cmao20 (talk) 07:47, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Still distorted. --Milseburg (talk) 20:04, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Mile (talk) 20:17, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Collier - vue d'ensemble 11-o.lau-F261.LA978-01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2020 at 18:46:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Jewellery
Info all by -- Cephas (talk) 18:46, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cephas (talk) 18:46, 27 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice object, good composition. A category for necklaces should probably be added, and possibly some for the materials used. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:09, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:55, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting. --Podzemnik (talk) 19:39, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:58, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 18:47, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:51, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:23, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Jewellery

File:Champlain Quebec city.jpg (delist), not delisted[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2020 at 10:58:55

Info Best image quality (Original nomination)
Delist and replace File:Petit Champlain at night, Quebec city.jpg -- Wilfredor (talk) 10:58, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace with due respect to this photo, which is also beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:28, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The existing image is better. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:53, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This crop is perfectly fit to narrow street.--Claus 13:04, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace --Ivar (talk) 14:38, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per my previous comments, I like the composition of the old image. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:24, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace The new photo is higher quality and I am fond of the square composition. Cmao20 (talk) 16:07, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace This is a hard one ;–). The quality of the new one is better, but the composition is better in the old image. But we can feature just one of them, and if the author prefers the new one, I will follow him here. --Aristeas (talk) 18:06, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace per Aristeas --StellarHalo (talk) 22:12, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the old picture has a more interesting composition (lights, crop), especially the castle which is hardly visible in the new one. --Trougnouf (talk) 10:14, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Old version has better composition and overall aura. MZaplotnik^(talk) 18:50, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace per my comments on the nomination of the other one. Daniel Case (talk) 04:05, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 7 delist, 5 keep, 0 neutral => not delisted. /--A.Savin 12:27, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stanford Memorial Church October 2019 HDR.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2020 at 01:23:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#United States
Info This was taken from the organ loft, which is normally not open to the public. I was fortunate enough to attend a talk by Stanford organist Robert Huw Morgan as part of college reunion, and captured this shot at the end of the lecture. All by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:23, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:23, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Hight quality and details, good gold light very lovely, however, ghosts problem and people distracting. If the ghost is removed I will change my vote to support Wilfredor (talk) 04:11, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unusual enough church interior to work for me, and it's really quite rare in churches to get access to the gallery. --A.Savin 04:13, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking view and HDR well done in my view. It's very rare that I vote on a church's interior (pro or against) but this picture is special for me. The angle is excellent, the red carpet appealing, and the design of the lamps reminds me Art Nouveau -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:54, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per A.Savin and Basile. --Aristeas (talk) 09:38, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The altar is very bright, did it look like this for real? Poco a poco (talk) 13:09, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Poco a poco: The sun is shining right into the window, so yes, it is very bright. Most of my HDRs require only 3 exposures (± 2), this one actually required 5 (± 4). I experimented with even more highlight recovery, but doing that dulls the colors to the point where it doesn't represent the reality of how bright the window was. So I went with the brightest possible setting where the details of the stained-glass windows are still preserved. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:20, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks, it would have then probably been better to take the shots later but fine Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:43, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Very well done. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:32, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:16, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:48, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good photo and as you point out has uniqueness value. I am a bit bothered by the highlights but if this is the best compromise I trust your judgment. Cmao20 (talk) 07:57, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:40, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 04:05, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:47, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Tournasol7 (talk) 13:15, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:52, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 12:26, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#United States

File:Žumberk (Žár) 01.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2020 at 07:52:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements
Info all by Suisant7 -- Suisant (talk) 07:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Suisant (talk) 07:52, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A nice enough photo, but missing the special wow factor that would make me say that it is one of the fines images on Commons.--Peulle (talk) 08:33, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Peulle. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:54, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support IMO very beautiful. Nice composition placing the church at an intersecting third. I thought the light was a bit dull at first but it's grown on me, the wow is subtle but it's there. Cmao20 (talk) 16:06, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Architecture is really not special. Flat sky and average light. Too ordinary -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:18, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 01:08, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 12:28, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ferrier Fountain, Christchurch, Canterbury, New Zealand.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2020 at 20:24:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#New_Zealand
Info All by me. It's Ferrier Fountain in Christchurch, New Zealand. The fountain gets illuminated with bright colours, see eg. here. I think that this colour fits quite well with the sky and the colour of the trees. There are some technical shortcoming (montion blur in the trees) but I think it's acceptable. It's never really windless here... -- Podzemnik (talk) 20:24, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Podzemnik (talk) 20:24, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question Have you got a shot that doesn't crop the water on the left? Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:38, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Charlesjsharp: No I don't have such a shot. I was after the lines (columns) as I didn't find the whole fountain with water that exciting - see eg. here. --Podzemnik (talk) 00:52, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support Fun and interesting, but I agree with Charles it would be better if it wasn't cropped on the left. Cmao20 (talk) 23:21, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:44, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Cmao20 --StellarHalo (talk) 16:38, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
weak oppose sorry, it's a great fountain, but I find that left crop really holds my attention. IMO a crop that's tighter than the other one you linked but which includes the whole structure would be preferable. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:45, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 19:27, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:18, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Typhoon Hagupit set off waves in Yuhuan, Zhejiang.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2020 at 15:30:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural_phenomena#Storms
Info created by 陈灵恩 - uploaded by MintCandy - nominated by Alcremie --IN (talk) 15:30, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IN (talk) 15:30, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Dramatic moment, but small photo. I hope there's a larger full version that can be uploaded. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:33, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose We don't need to see a larger full version to know that it won't provide much more detail, since a downsampled high-res photo should be razor-sharp at the lower resolution. While this is a somewhat special event, it's not special enough IMO to accept an image with mediocre quality near the minimum resolution. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:57, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unfortunately I have to agree with king --Wilfredor (talk) 22:17, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Resolution aside, I have a problem with the composition: the busy background distracts from the subject. A good photo for a newspaper's front page, but not an FP. Daniel Case (talk) 03:36, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:17, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coffee Shop - Upper East Side (50535467862).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2020 at 05:07:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other
Info created by ajay_suresh - uploaded by Epicsunwarrior - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 05:07, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I believe now the iPhone (with iPhone 12 Pro) can take a FP. -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 05:07, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Sorry Arion but I disagree. The composition is quite nice here but the detail at full size is not there for a 5.7mpx image. Cmao20 (talk) 08:03, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Cmao20. Sorry, I am not against phone pictures, but the quality here is not enough. Even if not all 12 MPix are used. -- -donald- (talk) 09:36, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- A nice motif, btw. I would remove the "no parking" sign. -- -donald- (talk) 11:29, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose +1. --Peulle (talk) 12:37, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Hmm, sorry, but the image is not catching me --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:16, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. Not bad but not an FP to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:27, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 07:41, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:40, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2020 -- 3427.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2020 at 12:53:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Fagaceae
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay ^talk 12:53, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay ^talk 12:53, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The sun is convincing for me. The sun's position directly between the branches and directly above the bifurcation and the harmonic sun rays are caught perfectly. The overall quality is good. --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:15, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per PantheraLeo. Cmao20 (talk) 16:29, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 20:23, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:28, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:23, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:51, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wohohow. -- -donald- (talk) 11:26, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:10, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I would have tried a more symmetric crop here but still very nice Poco a poco (talk) 16:30, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per PantheraLeo. --Aristeas (talk) 17:48, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:54, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:11, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Podzemnik (talk) 22:59, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:12, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:41, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family_:_Fagaceae

File:Gustave Caillebotte - Rue Halévy, vue d'un sixième étage.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2020 at 08:20:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Exteriors#Streets
Info Rue Halévy, vue d'un sixième étage (Halévy Street, View from the Sixth Floor), created in 1878 by French Impressionist painter Gustave Caillebotte. In private collection. created by Gustave Caillebotte - uploaded by StellarHalo - nominated by StellarHalo -- StellarHalo (talk) 08:20, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- StellarHalo (talk) 08:20, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice painting in very good condition and a very good photo. Too bad it's not in a museum. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:10, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 18:45, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:54, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:49, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. Also an interesting perspective. --Aristeas (talk) 09:33, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice to have a work by Caillebotte, more remembered for his financial support of his fellow Impressionists than (usually) his paintings, as an FP. Daniel Case (talk) 05:03, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support IMO an obvious FP Cmao20 (talk) 07:49, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 02:02, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:38, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:39, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Exteriors#Streets

File:Maria Wörth Pfarrkirche hll. Primus und Felizian und Gerlitzen Ost-Ansicht 06052019 6854.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2020 at 08:10:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Austria
Info A well-composed photo that juxtaposes the church against the dramatic mountain background. created by Johann Jaritz - uploaded by Johann Jaritz - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 08:10, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 08:10, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Quite beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:23, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:02, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Tournasol7 (talk) 13:15, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination. --Aristeas (talk) 17:46, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:34, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:31, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:09, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:01, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:32, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Podzemnik (talk) 23:01, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:41, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Austria

File:Statuette - vue de profil 11-o.lau-F109.LA876-02.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2020 at 11:07:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures
Info all by -- Cephas (talk) 11:07, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cephas (talk) 11:07, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Cephas i think all that dust should be cleaned, there is even on sculptures (left). I see back was made, but that white area is a bit spoiling. So i think from bottom-up it could have less contrast. ALso white area could be circular, to contrast with object. Something like this. Also bottom of sculptures should be in focus. I know, lot of work with these. --Mile (talk) 13:21, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the comments. It is my first experience with this type of photography. I will just drop this FP proposition. --Cephas (talk) 13:26, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination --Cephas (talk) 13:29, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:LOOK Keo Blade Carbon clipless pedals.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2020 at 07:45:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects#Others
Info LOOK Keo Blade Carbon clipless pedals, my photo. --Mile (talk) 07:45, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 07:45, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unappealing ~~low quality cut out.~~ Colour noise. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:51, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry Mile, IMO this is a good photo but not a great one per Charles' points, and for a subject that doesn't have very much 'wow-factor' to me, it would need to be really perfect. Cmao20 (talk) 21:08, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Charlesjsharp this is not cut-out, it's stitch of few shots. It would be strange to have noise here (put notation). Cmao20 i might agree its no wow, but among all this churches, birds, flowers i at least put some refeshing shot. And it's done good, see similar (not same) model from producers. 1, 2 Nothing to change. I even think i put ligth better. --Mile (talk) 11:04, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain the areas I have highlighted in the notes that look like cut outs, please Mile. Are you saying you have not edited out any background? Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:00, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Charlesjsharp that is great, i have edited (on 500%) right part, some mm where overhighlited. It's casting in mold, not Omega watch polishing. The up-left part is same as original, so not much to edit. --Mile (talk) 17:47, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yup, those are seams from the carbon molding process (just checked my copy, coincidentally I own a pair of these pedals). Mile, above you make a comparison with Look's official product shots and argue there is nothing you would change. I would argue instead that you could blow out the background so it is a uniform white. As it currently stands, there is a discernible difference between the top (brighter) and the bottom (darker) Julesvernex2 (talk) 19:40, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
OK, we got cycler here. Good so you can explain. Julesvernex2 i did tried all white before, but I like some nonclinical back. But lets try now, changed too all-white. --Mile (talk) 20:14, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose, no wow. Daniel Case (talk) 05:57, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Cmao20 --Fischer.H (talk) 09:32, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:38, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:May Beck, near Whitby (11842444125).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2020 at 07:12:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges
Info created by Bryan Ledgard - uploaded by User:Fæ - nominated by Gbawden -- Gbawden (talk) 07:12, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gbawden (talk) 07:12, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The light doesn't work for me, sorry. The image also appears tilted (looking at the bridge), the sky is bright and the general sharpness not overly impressive.--Peulle (talk) 09:12, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The shadows are too dark, it seems that the sky was overblown and afterwards a bit darkened, the branches before the sky are burnt. -- -donald- (talk) 11:24, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I see what you were going for, the composition is nice, but for me the colours are not rich enough. Cmao20 (talk) 21:10, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 05:54, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:37, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Salmonlarvakils.jpg (delist)[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2020 at 15:40:34

Info Too small (Original nomination)
Delist I know that the FP standards for underwater photography are quite lenient, assuming that this is taken from underwater. Even so, imo, this is way too small for FP. --StellarHalo (talk) 15:40, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It's 2,274,429 px and interesting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:59, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep and the young has only a few millimeters --Llez (talk) 18:36, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I wouldn't vote for this one today, but there are worse than this FP to delist first -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:28, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
weak keep A lot of JPEG artefacts in the background, but it's an interesting and unique photo. Like Basile I wouldn't vote for it today, but I think we can let it stay FP, it's hardly a disgrace to the accolade. Cmao20 (talk) 21:59, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination I had a feeling that this would not get far but I was still interested in hearing what you guys had to say. --StellarHalo (talk) 18:26, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iglesia de la Anunciación, Mindelheim, Alemania, 2019-06-21, DD 22-24 HDR.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2020 at 16:25:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany
Info High altar of the Annunciation church, Mindelheim, Germany. The church dates from 1250 and was back then a monastery that changed responsibilities over the centuries. From the town of Minhdelheim to the Augustines, to the Jesuites, to the Maltese and finally to the Catholic Church in the 19th century. The current aspect of the church was reworked back in the 18th century. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 16:25, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 16:25, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per the laudatio of this photo we wrote on the winner page ;–). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aristeas (talk • contribs)
Indeed, you opened my eyes about the speciality of the image when I read it :) I forgot to mention that the image made it to the rank 9 of WLM Germany, Poco a poco (talk) 19:05, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:48, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Congrats.--Ermell (talk) 20:44, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you Ermell! A miracle, you didn't make it to the final having so many good ones in the "semifinal". Poco a poco (talk) 14:48, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you. That`s life. I am satisfied with the result.--Ermell (talk) 19:09, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful interior and good detail on the altar. Cmao20 (talk) 21:12, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:23, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:49, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:16, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:56, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:33, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 07:06, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:35, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:55, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 23:02, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany

File:KiwiRail DXC class Cass.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2020 at 14:40:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
Info created & uploaded by David Gubler - nominated by Ivar (talk) 14:40, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 14:40, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:56, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:09, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:28, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful scenery, nice colour contrast. --Aristeas (talk) 17:55, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 18:37, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:48, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 20:23, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:45, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cmao20 (talk) 21:12, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 07:03, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:49, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:15, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:58, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:30, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 20:55, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Balabinrm (talk) 21:22, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:54, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good quality and good composition. --Mosbatho (talk) 19:09, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:44, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:35, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Yaakoub45 (talk) 17:02, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The train is so well positioned, and the scenery so stunning, as to totally negate any discordant effect of the large concrete bridge abutment at lower right. I can feel the winter breeze on my face as I look at it. Daniel Case (talk) 18:52, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 24 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 23:02, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles

File:MJK 42332 Colombischlössle (Freiburg).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2020 at 18:35:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Germany
Info I like how the photographer has combined diagonal and orthogonal lines, bright and dark areas, interior and exterior (blue sky) to an image which expresses both dynamics and rest, bound together by symmetry. This photo won the 1st price at Wiki Loves Monuments 2020 in Germany. Created and uploaded by Martin Kraft – nominated by Aristeas (talk) 18:35, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Info The Colombischlössle (“little Colombi castle”) was built around 1860 in Gothic revival style as a widow’s residence for Duches Maria Antonia Gertrudis von Zea Bermudez y Colombi. The stairwell with its glass cupola roof has been preserved in its original state.
Support --Aristeas (talk) 18:35, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:47, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:06, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:41, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:10, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 21:14, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:06, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:50, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I saw last year's cell phone won. --Mile (talk) 11:12, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:17, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 13:31, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 15:09, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:55, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:36, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 08:58, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 13:14, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Solid FP --Wilfredor (talk) 21:07, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Balabinrm (talk) 21:21, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Podzemnik (talk) 22:54, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Benh (talk) 12:23, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:43, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:34, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 23:01, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#Germany

File:Parnassia palustris - Niitvälja bog2.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2020 at 19:44:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Celastraceae
Info Focus stacked of 12 images, all by Ivar (talk) 19:44, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 19:44, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 21:15, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:07, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:36, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
May i ask to change name, probably bog2 is not some official name, but might be 2nd edition. Its similar down where we room in Castle No.13. --Mile (talk) 11:08, 4 November 2020 (UTC) p.S. Otherwise good shot.[reply]

Mile: commons has already file Parnassia palustris - Niitvälja bog.jpg, that's why current one has nr 2 at the end. I see no reason to rename it. --Ivar (talk) 11:40, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I know, i would try to add word somewhere, blossom, flower, close-up, macro...those numbers are spoiling. --Mile (talk) 11:46, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:18, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 13:29, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 20:09, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:38, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 13:15, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Podzemnik (talk) 22:53, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:34, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:34, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 23:00, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family_:_Celastraceae

File:Wydma Łącka - luty 2015 (4 of 13).jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2020 at 20:00:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural#Poland
Info created by Azi 92 - uploaded by Azi 92 - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 20:00, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrei (talk) 20:00, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: it's not sharp enough, has chromatic aberrations and a non too impressive resolution.--Peulle (talk) 21:40, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

It's an overstatement, Peulle. In my humble opinion, it is sharp enough and is perfectly fine. Or maybe I missed a point in time when three thousand pixels became not enough. --Andrei (talk) 21:50, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Puelle. Not sharp enough to make up for the low resolution StellarHalo (talk) 23:09, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Peulle. Resolution and sharpness must be better. --XRay 💬 09:19, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maria zu den Ketten - Miraculous image 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2020 at 06:51:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues indoors
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 06:51, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 06:51, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Spurzem (talk) 09:41, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:43, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 11:53, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Suisant (talk) 13:19, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:03, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I think the category should be Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings. And opposing because IMHO just another church interior picture, I do not understand why we should feature them all. —kallerna (talk) 15:11, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support If it's an excellent photo, why not? There are so many church buildings with beautiful interiors.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:33, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:17, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I think our standards for church interiors are high enough that a 21.7 MP image with softness in some areas (e.g. top right) isn't quite up to par. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:08, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There are chromatic aberrations on several places. --A.Savin 04:20, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Done --Llez (talk) 06:42, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Support Good now. --A.Savin 13:12, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:37, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:51, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support IMO a splendid motif, maybe could be a little sharper but still FP to me. Cmao20 (talk) 07:53, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 12:46, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:29, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Tournasol7 (talk) 13:15, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Yaakoub45 (talk) 16:58, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--MZaplotnik^(talk) 13:27, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures#Statues indoors

File:Hortus Haren. ‘10 jaar Kunst in de Hortus’, 09-10-2020 (actm.) 45.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2020 at 14:59:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures outdoors
Info created & uploaded by User:Agnes Monkelbaan - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:59, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I've been enjoying Agnes' series of photos of sculptures at Hortus Haren, and I think this one, with its twirling action and IMO interesting interaction with the leafy background, would be a worthy FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:59, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really a nice interplay between shapes and shades of green. --Aristeas (talk) 07:39, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 08:59, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 13:16, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you for nominating my photo.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:34, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My pleasure! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:31, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support per Aristeas. Cmao20 (talk) 21:57, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seven Pandas (talk) 19:21, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:05, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 18:10, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like all the dirt on the glass in closeup. Daniel Case (talk) 19:08, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:25, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures outdoors

File:TR Pamukkale White Terraces asv2020-02 img16.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2020 at 14:53:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Turkey
Info Partial view of the Pamukkale Travertine Terraces (World Heritage Site), near Denizli/Turkey --- all by A.Savin --A.Savin 14:53, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 14:53, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:03, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not a great overall view of the place, dull composition of very photogenic place. The light is rather harsh - highlights adjusted quite much which results in unnatural look + underexposure of white parts. I also do not like your practice of changing your photos to all Wikipedia pages, although better images are available. This should not be the lead picture in Pamukkale articles. Just google Pamukkale and see the images and you know what I'm talking about. —kallerna (talk) 15:06, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I change not on "all Wikipedia pages", but only where it seems a clear improvement to me. --A.Savin 15:17, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Generally that is of course a good practice. The problem here is that this is clearly a "partial view", and hence should not be the lead image on Pamukkale articles. —kallerna (talk) 15:23, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Discussion" which has nothing to do with this nomination

I agree with the revert on the Pamukkale article. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:34, 31 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Info First, this is an FP nomination and not the page to discuss the EN Pamukkale article (this would be en:Talk:Pamukkale). Second, the image which currently is there I didn't replace, please stop spreading lies (once again). --A.Savin 03:04, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lies - once again? What? I'm talking about several Wikipedia articles, and definitely you have changed the lead image on several language versions. —kallerna (talk) 07:46, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

As you might have seen on the comment's level, I was referring to Charlesjsharp's claim not yours. --A.Savin 13:26, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please withdraw your allegation that I am spreading lies (once again) A.Savin. Please behave. You put this image as the lead image and it was removed and replaced with a more suitable one. Both the original one and the current one are more suitable than this one. Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:11, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Of course it's a lie, as I didn't replace this picture by mine, as you may easily check in the history. That said, your claim I was reverted in English article is a lie, as I wasn't reverted and that's pretty obvious for anyone who is able to check the according revision history. Any more questions? No? You're welcome. --A.Savin 12:55, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support IMHO it is refreshing that this photo shows the Pamukkale terraces from another point of view than the most usual ones. --Aristeas (talk) 09:42, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. This is a rare photo. Usually in Pamukkale, the landscape is filled with crowds of tourists, and such a shot cannot be taken. Vibrant, clear colors, superior quality -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:06, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:19, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:50, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per George Chernilevsky, I think the composition is quite thoughtful and effective too. Cmao20 (talk) 07:55, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:12, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Tilted 2° ccw. Looking at the platform and the haze layer. --Milseburg (talk) 20:01, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:33, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:06, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Kallerna. Daniel Case (talk) 06:09, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per kallerna --StellarHalo (talk) 13:19, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:26, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Turkey

File:Palacio Grassalkovich, Bratislava, Eslovaquia, 2020-02-01, DD 24.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2020 at 21:13:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Slovakia
Info Grassalkovich Palace, Bratislava, Slovakia. The Rococo-late Baroque, finished in 1760 for Hungarian aristocrat Antal Grassalkovich, is the residence of the president of Slovakia. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 21:13, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 21:13, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sadly, flags positioning is very unfortunate. --Andrei (talk) 22:02, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Not symmetrical: the left side of the building is longer than the right side, and there is also one more fence section at the left, adding to the imbalance. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:28, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Looks like the passion for this picture is kind of moderate, I take it back, Poco a poco (talk) 15:29, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 15:29, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Canary Wharf from Limehouse London June 2016 HDR.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2020 at 01:11:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#United Kingdom
Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:11, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:11, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking photo and beautiful colours. --Aristeas (talk) 09:44, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 15:33, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support This view is pretty much invisible now because of new constructions in front: Google Maps. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 16:19, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Beautiful light reflections but boring buildings make for a boring motif that the overall composition doesn't compensate for, IMO. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:47, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:49, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't exactly love the buildings, but KoH has captured them very elegantly Cmao20 (talk) 07:56, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20 --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:41, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:15, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 18:08, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 11:30, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Tournasol7 (talk) 13:15, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:07, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:46, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:14, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The green light on the left is a tiny bit distracting but good good. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:04, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Benh (talk) 12:22, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Yaakoub45 (talk) 16:59, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:10, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#United Kingdom

File:Cimitero monumentale Vantiniano famiglia Da Ponte Domenico Ghidoni Brescia.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2020 at 09:26:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Italy
Info All by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:26, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:26, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Normal image, not a special composition, not an original subject -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:52, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I really like this picture, I think it works really well in capturing the melancholy character of the statue, but the photo is IMO slightly motion-blurred at full-res. I will still support because this is 51mpx and the blur is not visible at lower size. Cmao20 (talk) 07:59, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose pov and crop on both sides Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:00, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Charles and the motion blur. Daniel Case (talk) 15:57, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above --Andrei (talk) 21:56, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:12, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ninna-ji's Golden Hall, front view of the Shingon Buddhist temple, Ukyō-ku, Kyoto, Japan.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2020 at 05:39:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Japan
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:39, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:39, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:28, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:28, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 13:16, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support A cloudy day is perfectly fine for photographing architecture as long as there is good texture in the clouds. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:26, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 18:53, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Balabinrm (talk) 21:20, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:20, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent. Cmao20 (talk) 22:01, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Podzemnik (talk) 22:53, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 07:01, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:11, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --C messier (talk) 18:47, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Nanour Garabedian (talk) 22:27, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry Nanour Garabedian, but with less than 50 contribs on Commons you cannot vote. --A.Savin 01:43, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:54, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:24, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 18:11, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:12, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:35, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Japan

File:Palacio Belvedere, Viena, Austria, 2020-02-01, DD 90-92 HDR.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2020 at 11:06:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Austria
Info Upper Belvedere Palace during the blue hour, Vienna, Austria. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 11:06, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 11:06, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Splendid! -- KennyOMG (talk) 11:11, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Straightforward presentation, but that's sufficient and maybe even preferable when the subject has so many beautiful sculptures in its facade. Beautiful photograph. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:25, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 13:17, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 18:55, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Balabinrm (talk) 21:19, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 21:27, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 07:09, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:21, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan Kekek. Cmao20 (talk) 22:02, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Podzemnik (talk) 22:52, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 07:02, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:11, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:54, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:26, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 18:12, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:48, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:13, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Austria

File:Parc du réservoir Beaudet.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2020 at 00:43:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Canada
Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 00:43, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question What would it be like without the foreground shore? Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:23, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
May I express my opinion? that would be a better compo Poco a poco (talk) 13:50, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like this with both shores. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:36, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Me too. --Wilfredor (talk) 20:00, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Nice abstraction of colors and textures. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:53, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose - not enough birds~~ :) Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:21, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

There was a moment when I unintentionally scared the birds and caused a chain reaction creating a cloud of birds, there were so many that it seemed more like an atmospheric event. Apparently this was a rare event that I came across by chance (I was going to have a medical exam on my way between Quebec City and Montreal), there were professional wildlife photographers waiting for this event --Wilfredor (talk) 02:05, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:47, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very beautiful photo. Cmao20 (talk) 08:00, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:42, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 12:45, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:20, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very beautiful. --Aristeas (talk) 17:42, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Alt version per Poco and Charles recomendation[edit]

Info I added this alternative version per Poco a poco and Charlesjsharp. Thanks --Wilfredor (talk) 20:00, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Wilfredo, I don't like this. I meant to crop a bit just off the bottom, not the sides or top. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:09, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Charlesjsharp Sorry I had misunderstood, I have uploaded another version, tell me what you think --Wilfredor (talk) 20:26, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Doesn't work, composition is too simple and a bit unbalanced. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:53, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The foreground shore is needed for context. Without it the composition just looks random. Cmao20 (talk) 08:00, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I prefer it, but unfortunately there are still bits of grass visable. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:59, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:08, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:33, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support That's a lot of birds there. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:03, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:09, 10 November 2020 (UTC))[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Canada#Québec

The chosen alternative is: File:Parc du réservoir Beaudet.jpg

File:Vignes près du Pic de Vissou - October 2020.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2020 at 20:53:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Hérault
Info created - uploaded - nominated by me. -- Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 20:53, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 20:53, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:13, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I find the composition very satisfying. Cmao20 (talk) 22:03, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Podzemnik (talk) 22:51, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 07:04, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:10, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 19:23, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:53, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:28, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 09:22, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. --Aristeas (talk) 10:08, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 18:13, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 06:05, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks like a scene Cézanne might have painted ... Daniel Case (talk) 17:54, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:21, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/France#Hérault

File:Billie Eilish - Los Angeles 2017 (08).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2020 at 05:39:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Musicians and singers performing
Info created by Justin Higuchi - uploaded by AgWoolridge - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 05:39, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 05:39, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support A bit small but good concert photo. Cmao20 (talk) 08:04, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 09:15, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Crop and closed eyes. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:55, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. Performers often close their eyes when they are getting their soulfulness from inside or performing from memory. Signed, a professional musician. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:26, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Good, but not great, imho. I'm fine with the eyes being closed, but the way she's holding (definitely not playing) her instrument feels awkward. --El Grafo (talk) 15:50, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles --StellarHalo (talk) 20:00, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles. Yes, a musician with their eyes closed, really digging into themselves for that extra something special in their performance, can make an FP. But here she's more or less facing the viewer. Daniel Case (talk) 16:29, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The composition doesn't work well enough for this to be a featured picture. Closed eyes, body partially out of the picture. /Julle (talk) 01:09, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above --Andrei (talk) 21:56, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Die geschlossenen Augen drücken Gefühl aus, man hört förmlich den leise verklingenden Ton. Anders gesagt: Dieses Foto ist kein Passbild und soll es auch nicht sein. -- Spurzem (talk) 12:32, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 10:39, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dendermonde town hall and belfry during golden hour (DSCF0501).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2020 at 08:10:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Belgium
Info I thought the golden-hour lighting here was really soft and beautiful. created by Trougnouf - uploaded by Trougnouf - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 08:10, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 08:10, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose May be on the tower, but not the facade. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:54, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:22, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Tournasol7 (talk) 13:14, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 17:47, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not so sharp it could be. Probably lost on f/11. And tilted. Agree with Ikan, really nice spot, too bad. --Mile (talk) 11:23, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment f/11 gives the most overall sharpness on this Fujinon XF18-55mm lens, and the camera was on a tripod. I don't think the settings could have been better. I improved the sharpening in software, though I also reprocessed the whole picture with filmic which handles colors and lights better imo, I think it's an improvement but I will revert (or just apply the better sharpening) if it's deemed to be a regression. --Trougnouf (talk) 13:20, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Trougnouf true you are, saw review, best at f/11. But I am sure you lost sharpness somewhere, unless bad copy of lens !? Could we see original somewhere ? --Mile (talk) 18:13, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I've posted it on (google drive). I think the lens worked well (up until a couple months ago when it was terminated), I used it for the vast majority of pictures I've uploaded on Commons, and other pictures taken at the same time/place (waiting for pedestrians to walk away) show similar sharpness. --Trougnouf (talk) 18:31, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My try. Its a bit more sharper. The building is high, you lost some with perspective correction. Put some middle option. But we do have here some who want all to be parallel. Even the original is not so sharp as i think it could be. --Mile (talk) 19:22, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for sharing your take on it! Ultimately I prefer a softer look and colors, but I've applied a bit more sharpening and more pronounced contrasts to match what I like best about yours somewhat. --Trougnouf (talk) 20:33, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support :-) --Trougnouf (talk) 13:20, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Danu Widjajanto (talk) 16:02, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The light! --Podzemnik (talk) 23:01, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Charles and Mile. Doesn't seem out of the ordinary enough for FP. Daniel Case (talk) 03:49, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles --StellarHalo (talk) 06:22, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Yaakoub45 (talk) 17:00, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 10:41, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Belgium

File:Golden-crowned kinglet at JBWR (11835).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2020 at 22:13:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Regulidae_(Kinglets)
Info A tiny, hyperactive bird with a cool haircut: a golden-crowned kinglet hanging onto a ~~cedar~~ tree in New York. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:13, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:13, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:10, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:45, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely, sharp image. Cmao20 (talk) 08:01, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:43, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice and sharp, but the dappled light is unfortunate as are the areas of over-exposed chest feathers and the branches/leaves on the left hand side Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:57, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I regard the dappled light as a feature. But the branches on the left could be either cropped out or expanded -- I felt like including a hint of it framed the bird a little bit, but I'm not necessarily sure it's doing that. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:51, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles, sorry. --Ivar (talk) 12:20, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the tree is a juniper, not a cedar (cedars are very different, compare this!); correction added to pic - MPF (talk) 12:37, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Ah! Thanks. I happened to just listen to a Radiolab podcast largely about a juniper tree passed off as a cedar. :) Oops. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:51, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Charles, mainly for the dappled light --StellarHalo (talk) 04:04, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I am normally quite happy to defer to Charles on matters of nature photography, but in this case I think the lighting is more a part of the environment than detracting from the quality. The plants surrounding the bird have such a structure that they let only small spots of light through, rather than a large open field of light. Therefore, the lighting is part of the scenery. Given that the quality is otherwise high, with crystal sharp focus and good composition, I'm on the supporting side for this one.--Peulle (talk) 11:42, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I like in fact the dappled light but the detail of some areas is just gone Poco a poco (talk) 16:29, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support considering Peulle’s and Poco’s arguments. --Aristeas (talk) 17:44, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I find it hard to resist this one even with the shadow on its face. Daniel Case (talk) 07:40, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I actually quite like the light. It's quite interesting. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:02, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 10:38, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Regulidae_(Kinglets)

File:Heuschrecke Schatten-20190630-RM-075941.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2020 at 09:34:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Tettigoniidae (Katydids or bush crickets (UK))
Info created & uploaded by Ermell - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 09:34, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 09:34, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:43, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not compelling. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:53, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Compelling to me, though of course it's a matter of taste. Cmao20 (talk) 16:23, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles --StellarHalo (talk) 04:07, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support refreshing. --Aristeas (talk) 17:47, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for the nom.--Ermell (talk) 20:55, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:10, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose sorry, but it's hard to find wow effect and encyclopedic value for me in this. --Ivar (talk) 10:35, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fun --Podzemnik (talk) 23:00, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Regretful oppose A clever idea, but this image was not the best execution. Daniel Case (talk) 06:09, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others --Fischer.H (talk) 09:35, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Useful. Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 11:40, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 10:43, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kibbutz Guard 1936.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2020 at 09:18:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1930-1940
Info created by Zoltan Kluger - uploaded by Oyoyoy - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 09:18, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 09:18, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 18:21, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question Is this a famous photo in Israel? It is striking. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:40, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Ikan Kekek: , I don't believe it's too famous in its own right, but I'm no art expert. I do know that the photographer is notable and famous, and I do see a reference and some analysis of it here. It is a historic document of early Palestine Jewish settlement by Government Press Office. Tomer T (talk) 10:43, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Yes, it's a famous picture. May deserve FP status due to its historical significance. For me personally, however, it has never really appealed to me as I don't like the turn-sideways pose and the composition, which lacks context. --Peulle (talk) 11:38, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:09, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 22:09, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:50, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 21:55, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 10:42, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Waibstadt - Jüdischer Friedhof - mittlerer Teil - Ansicht vom Hauptweg 1.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2020 at 07:52:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Germany
Info created by Aristeas - uploaded by Aristeas - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 07:52, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support, and thanks to Ikan Kekek who gave me the idea to nominate it -- Andrei (talk) 07:52, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sure thing. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:56, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sharp and carefully composed - FP to me. Cmao20 (talk) 22:04, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks quite gloomy - quite appropriate for a cemetery. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:50, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 07:04, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:47, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:09, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:53, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 09:21, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you very much, Andrei, for nominating and all of you for your support! I have missed this, sorry. --Aristeas (talk) 10:06, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:01, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 18:14, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the way the moss on the headstones and the encroaching trees are suggesting the inevitable erasure of the individual lives of the dead, their reabsorption into nature, a process which as I've said in another FPC of a cemetery ultimately awaits all of us. Daniel Case (talk) 17:58, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I agree, and I think it has added poignancy as a photo of an old Jewish cemetery in Germany that was damaged by the Nazis while they were doing their best to wipe out the Jewish people. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:53, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:49, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Other#Germany

File:Loreleyblick Maria Ruh (2).jpg (delist), delisted[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2020 at 20:21:10

Info There is a new and better version. (Original nomination) --Milseburg (talk) 22:06, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace File:Loreleyblick Maria Ruh 2020.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Milseburg (talk • contribs) - Yes. --Milseburg (talk) 12:00, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace -- -donald- (talk) 06:13, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace Light and sky better, resolution higher -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:19, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace per Basile. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:38, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace per nom.--Peulle (talk) 11:35, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace --StellarHalo (talk) 14:13, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:33, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace per Basile. Cmao20 (talk) 20:43, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace --Cayambe (talk) 20:16, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delist and replace Daniel Case (talk) 19:06, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:
Result: 10 delist, 0 keep, 0 neutral => delisted. /--A.Savin 02:28, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rhombische Schnittstelle HQ OpenCL 10K 20200705.png, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2020 at 13:10:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

$Image of a fractal with only rhomb notches in different sizes$

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Computer-generated#Mathematics
Info Image of a fractal with only rhomb notches in different sizes created/uploaded/nominated by PantheraLeo1359531 -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:10, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:10, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:34, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fractals are fun. Cmao20 (talk) 20:40, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. Fun, and it works well as a form. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:35, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:03, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:37, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Wikiolo (talk) 16:28, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:01, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:18, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Computer-generated#Mathematics

File:Main Divide from Yeats Ridge Hut, West Coast Region, New Zealand.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2020 at 22:48:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/New_Zealand#West_Coast_(Te_Tai_Poutini)
Info All by me. It's the Main Divide from Yeats Ridge Hut, West Coast Region, New Zealand. I quite like the layering of different ridges with main snowy ridge (Main divide) in the back. Stitched from 2 photos. -- Podzemnik (talk) 22:48, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Podzemnik (talk) 22:48, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:23, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:34, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:42, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 23:10, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:51, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Splendid. --Aristeas (talk) 10:13, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 18:37, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 05:51, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:03, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:37, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nomination. Cmao20 (talk) 20:30, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:30, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:28, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:31, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:43, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:10, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/New_Zealand#West_Coast_(Te_Tai_Poutini)

File:Castle of Gy 13.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2020 at 13:11:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#France
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 13:11, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain -- Tournasol7 (talk) 13:11, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice, pretty interior. Cmao20 (talk) 21:11, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
OK shot but similar request as on Ivars flower. Unless this is really named Gy 13 ? --Mile (talk) 11:10, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes, it might be unusual, but some places have only two letters in their name --Andrei (talk) 21:54, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Compositionally too busy for me to call it an FP. Daniel Case (talk) 16:24, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:41, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lac des Mines d'Or 14.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2020 at 13:08:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Haute-Savoie
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 13:08, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain -- Tournasol7 (talk) 13:08, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 13:22, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:54, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 15:31, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support A peaceful scenery. --Aristeas (talk) 17:51, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pink sunsets are always stunning. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:33, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Info King of Hearts; it was a sunrise :) Tournasol7 (talk) 20:55, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --A.Savin 20:26, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:47, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice subtle colours and beautiful reflections. Cmao20 (talk) 21:09, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:28, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:49, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:13, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:58, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 20:14, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:28, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Tournasol7 i would crop bottom, so would be simetric shadows-skyline. And if you crop some left to put tress on thirds-rule u win. --Mile (talk) 09:31, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Let me cast a protest against processing. There are some halos but especially behind/around the trees in the mid-left. -- KennyOMG (talk) 11:17, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:36, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:23, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:40, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/France#Haute-Savoie

File:Marina Bay Sands and illuminated polyhedral building Louis Vuitton over the water at blue hour with pink clouds in Singapore.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2020 at 06:32:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Singapore
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:32, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Blue hour with pink clouds, neo-futurist architecture -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:32, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:23, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:59, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Tournasol7 (talk) 13:14, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 14:10, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 16:07, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 16:28, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 17:49, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:33, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:52, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cmao20 (talk) 21:01, 3 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:12, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 20:56, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Balabinrm (talk) 21:23, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The sitting photographer is a wee bit annoying but interesting view of Marina Bay Sands. --Podzemnik (talk) 22:58, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done Tourist removed. I agree he was a bit distracting at full size, Podzemnik. Thanks -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:12, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Basile Morin: Nice, thanks. --Podzemnik (talk) 01:54, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Schnobby (talk) 08:36, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's very nice, but I don't think the LV building is levelled. - Benh (talk) 12:21, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 21:45, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose If Marina Bay Sands looks like that in real life, then the last scene of Crazy Rich Asians must have either taken place somewhere else, or used some heavy SFX. Daniel Case (talk) 02:21, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:36, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Daniel Case. I really like the light and composition overall, but as an architecture enthusiast I can't let the distortion on Marina Bay Sands go unexcused. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 01:19, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:39, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Singapore

File:Sunset over Rouen, Normandy, France, September 2020.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2020 at 08:53:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#France‎
Info created by Pierre Blaché (Flickr) - uploaded and nominated by Paris 16 -- Paris 16 (talk) 08:53, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 08:53, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unsharp and over-saturated. Stitched panorama mixing a blurry frame with a regular one. Just compare the right side with the center. It's also very clear the colors and the clarity have been altered excessively to create this unrealistic appearance. A potential at the beginning but not well done. Among other problems, huge noise in the sky, weird halo around the spire of the cathedral, red pixels in the clouds at the left -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:46, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:31, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Stunning light but Basile is quite right, the left-hand side of the picture is not in focus and there is a really obvious stitching seam where the blurry bit meets the sharp bit. Cmao20 (talk) 20:32, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Beautiful but per other opposes, overprocessed or misprocessed. Daniel Case (talk) 21:19, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:40, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:A home away from home. - Flickr - skylerorking.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2020 at 12:20:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
Info created by Skyler King - uploaded by Red panda bot - nominated by Gbawden -- Gbawden (talk) 12:20, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gbawden (talk) 12:20, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose That's terrible quality, even at thumbnail size and even for a phone. --El Grafo (talk) 12:28, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Blown highlights, unnatural colours. --Tagooty (talk) 14:42, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: the quality is far below FP standards.--Peulle (talk) 15:58, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Morschpoort, Leiden 7047.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2020 at 18:43:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Netherlands
Info All by C messier -- C messier (talk) 18:43, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Morschpoort, Leiden, is located at the west side of the old city. The West Gate is accesible via a drawbridge and both are reflected at the calm water of the canal. Support -- C messier (talk) 18:43, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A fair QI, but neither the scene nor the lighting really wows me, sorry.--Peulle (talk) 21:41, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Peulle --Fischer.H (talk) 09:26, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Peulle. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:47, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Peulle. Daniel Case (talk) 21:20, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:19, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lavender waxbill (Estrilda caerulescens).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2020 at 00:00:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Estrildidae_(Estrildid_Finch)
Info A sharp and well-composed photo of a bird for which we don't currently have an FP. created by Charlesjsharp - uploaded by Charlesjsharp - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 00:00, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 00:00, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:05, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:50, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:35, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:47, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 09:24, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:14, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Yaakoub45 (talk) 16:54, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 18:39, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 23:45, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:13, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:01, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for the nom Cmao20 Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:15, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 09:34, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:13, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Shagil Kannur (talk) 15:30, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 19:42, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:04, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:47, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:54, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Estrildidae_(Estrildid_Finch)

File:Lighthouse, Ramsgate Royal Harbour.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2020 at 06:31:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info created by Hugh Llewelyn (Flickr) - uploaded by Yaakoub45 - nominated by Yaakoub45 -- Yaakoub45 (talk) 06:31, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Yaakoub45 (talk) 06:31, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not fantastic to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:23, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, nothing special for FP. And it's not a good QIC (perspective, noise, sharpness). --XRay 💬 09:18, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not impressive enough for a feature, sorry. --Cayambe (talk) 09:39, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 05:05, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:53, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Львівський університет ім, Франка.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2020 at 15:46:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors
Info created by DimasSolo - uploaded by DimasSolo - nominated by DimasSolo -- DimasSolo (talk) 15:46, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- DimasSolo (talk) 15:46, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry DimasSolo, it's a nice motif but this doesn't have the quality for FP. I like the colours though. I'm assuming this is an unprocessed out-of-camera JPEG because it is quite blurry and has a lot of chromatic aberration at full size. Do you shoot in RAW? Because the Canon EOS 1100D should be capable of much better quality than this, I think if you went back to the RAW files you could process a much better photo than this. But the quality level you have here in terms of lack of detail at full-size is unlikely to pass QI let alone FP. Other issues (less important) - we usually prefer perspective correction on photos of architecture so that the verticals are straight. And I would also prefer to see a bit more at the bottom, I think the crop is a bit arbitrary there. Cmao20 (talk) 16:23, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Sorry, insufficient quality. --A.Savin 16:17, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Goéland argenté (Larus argentatus) - tête (1).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2020 at 08:28:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes
Info Head of a herring gull (Larus argentatus) in Saint-Malo (Ille-et-Vilaine, France). -- Gzen92 ^[discuter] 08:28, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gzen92 ^[discuter] 08:28, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Details in feathers. Lighting. Need better for such a common bird. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:10, 5 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Good QI but I think I agree with Charles, the lighting is pretty dull for such a common bird. Cmao20 (talk) 22:01, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I understand, I tried to correct the brightness. Gzen92 ^[discuter] 08:47, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Charles and Cmao. Daniel Case (talk) 03:43, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Spurzem (talk) 12:26, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 14:05, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ounianga Lakes from ISS.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2020 at 04:47:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Satellite images
Info created by NASA - uploaded by Monfornot/Ras67 - nominated by Ras67 -- Ras67 (talk) 04:47, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very interesting structures with high educational value. -- Ras67 (talk) 04:47, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The quality at full resolution is unsatisfactory, especially for such a small area overall. Very few satellite images are FP-worthy and this image is not one of them. --StellarHalo (talk) 03:03, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per StellarHalo, impressive but the detail is too blurry at full-res. Cmao20 (talk) 11:49, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment IMHO the "physical" sharpness is OK, so that i have not sharpened the image afterwards the RAW processing. Regards --Ras67 (talk) 17:18, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Regretful oppose per StellarHalo. Daniel Case (talk) 17:53, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 14:06, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Viburnum opulus fruits - Keila.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2020 at 06:12:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Adoxaceae
Info Focus stacked of 27 images, all by Ivar (talk) 06:12, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 06:12, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:51, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:09, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:14, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:59, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:50, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --PierreSelim (talk) 13:46, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ -- DimasSolo (talk) 14:28, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry DimasSolo, but only editors whose accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. --Ivar (talk) 14:33, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ivar I have more than 50 edits in the Ukrainian Wikipedia. Why I can`t vote? Regards, DimasSolo (talk) 14:54, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DimasSolo: from the rules above: only registered contributors whose Commons accounts have at least 10 days and 50 edits can vote. --Ivar (talk) 15:01, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ok! Thanks, DimasSolo (talk) 15:03, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

DimasSolo when you come back and oppose for a FP candidate, you also need to explain why you do so --Poco a poco (talk) 19:40, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:12, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:15, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:12, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 12:28, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 15:28, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 15:35, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:53, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:27, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Poco a poco (talk) 19:40, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:47, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent. Cmao20 (talk) 11:49, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beginning to look a lot like Christmas ... Daniel Case (talk) 18:44, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --El Grafo (talk) 13:17, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 13:45, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 14:05, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family_:_Adoxaceae

File:President of Poland Andrzej Duda Full Resolution.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2020 at 21:51:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info created by Jakub Szymczuk - uploaded by Danu Widjajanto - nominated by Danu Widjajanto -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 21:51, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 21:51, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I objectively don't feel that the resolution is high enough to impress. This is a modern-day photo of a current head of state, not an old photo of a famous historical figure (where images are fewer and farther between), so as an official portrait taken this recently, I'd really expect a bit more.--Peulle (talk) 22:09, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree. Not particularly outstanding. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:18, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I doubt the full resolution claim, the photo was made with a 50MP sensor. Besides nothing special about this portrait. --Granada (talk) 07:16, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above, although the resolution is fine --Andrei (talk) 21:28, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose That's certainly a professional grade formal portrait (*cough*), but that's about it. Good candidate for COM:VI, but for FP it lacks WOW-factor. --El Grafo (talk) 12:45, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per above Poco a poco (talk) 20:53, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose no wow Buidhe (talk) 15:11, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, technically a good portrait but otherwise nothing special. MartinD (talk) 15:44, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. So technically accomplished a portrait that I would not be able to tell the difference between him and his Madame Tussaud's wax dummy, if he has one. Daniel Case (talk) 03:51, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:34, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Palacio primacial, Bratislava, Eslovaquia, 2020-02-01, DD 32.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2020 at 16:53:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Slovakia
Info Entrance to the inner courtyard of Primate's Palace, Bratislava, Slovakia. In the back of the image you can see the fountain with a sculpture of the legend of Saint George and the Dragon. The neoclassical palace is located in the Old Town of the city and was built from 1778 to 1781 for Archbishop József Batthyány, after the design of architect Melchior Hefele. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 16:53, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 16:53, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Lacking in wow factor. --Peulle (talk) 21:43, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose In this instance I tend to agree with Peulle. Great quality but the motif just isn't very special. Cmao20 (talk) 12:00, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. I don't even think cropping to just the doorway would work because we're missing the transom or whatever and it seems a little off-center. Daniel Case (talk) 05:43, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Poco a poco (talk) 12:50, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 12:50, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marktkirche, Wiesbaden, Nave view 20200613 1.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2020 at 11:05:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany
Info Interior of the Marktkirche in Wiesbaden, Germany. The Marktkirche was built in 1853–1862 as a prestigious Nassauer Landesdom and therefore decorated with all the artistic means of the Gothic Revival style (mixing in some elements from other styles). Created and uploaded by DXR – nominated by --Aristeas (talk) 11:05, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Of all the fine church interior photos DXR has contributed to WLM 2020 I was particularly impressed by this one. It captures the dreamlike, somewhat unreal atmosphere of this church, and at the same times reproduces the beautiful details sharp and in high resolution. -- Aristeas (talk) 11:05, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Big wow. So clean that it looks computer generated. What a pity with the labels on the benches. - Benh (talk) 13:53, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:03, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unbelievable good resolution and quality. Clear support --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 15:28, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Some colour fringes on windows (red in the middle, and blue at the right) need to be fixed. --A.Savin 15:42, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm fairly sure they are the stained glasses' own colour. - Benh (talk) 17:20, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Are they? Unfortunately I could not find detailed photos of these windows anywhere, but if so, why are there no stained glasses on the left window too? --A.Savin 17:42, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot answer the last question (seems that this was just the choice of the artist), but I also think that the windows, while being more or less transparent or gray for the most part, have a coloured border, red for the windows in the middle, blue for the windows on the right; it is better to see at the right. --Aristeas (talk) 17:45, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I reviewed the source files and indeed, the colours are not fringing, but rather faint elements of the stained glass, framing the larger clear parts of the windows. As far as I can see, the left side has virtually no such framing, while in the centre it is clearly red and blue on the right side. --DXR (talk) 22:39, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support OK, seems fair enough to me. --A.Savin 23:08, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:21, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others. A superb photo of a beautiful interior. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:49, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Many thanks for the nomination; Aristeas! --DXR (talk) 22:39, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:56, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent image --Tagooty (talk) 14:46, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:27, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:50, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 20:44, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:36, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes, this was on my list to nominate. Cmao20 (talk) 11:54, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:18, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 13:46, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Buidhe (talk) 15:11, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:55, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:12, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Germany

File:Mirage Las Vegas December 2013.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2020 at 07:52:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States
Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:52, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:52, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:07, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --StellarHalo (talk) 13:48, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cmao20 (talk) 22:05, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --Gnosis (talk) 00:10, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 07:04, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:47, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I checked image few times (in few days), am i missing something !? What i dont like: you could wait sunset, or sunrise to equal some EV with the sky. Then you choose to prolong time to capture blurred float of water and lake. It migth work on lake a bit, but "falls" capture so small part is hard to see in thumb. The result is you have blurred tree branches which were obviously moving. Refraction of light on Hotels is very strong, especially red at Caesars. Bottom crop could be done, that shadow. --Mile (talk) 17:51, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:52, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:37, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:08, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Yaakoub45 (talk) 17:02, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 18:15, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:09, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Sorry, I don't see what is special about this picture. A good photo of the Mirage, for sure, but not wowing. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 01:23, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Mile. I think this is an FP-capable view of the Mirage, but not under these conditions. Also, unfortunately, due to the long exposure, the reflections of the lights have been posterized, and look artificial or overprocessed whether they were or not. Daniel Case (talk) 18:19, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I agree with Daniel, the reflection is not adding value, I'd have tried to focus more on the building and that waterfalls structure in front of it Poco a poco (talk) 19:49, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:04, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 3 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:11, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#United States

File:Ballet Don Quijote en Teatro Teresa Carreño 3.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2020 at 18:17:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events_(Arts,_concerts,_shows...)
Info Theatrical Artwork by Laura Fiorucci. Picture, uploaded by --Wilfredor (talk) 18:17, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Good photo, but there are what I guess are white hot pixels in various parts of the picture. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:26, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done Thanks, please let me know if it's ok for you Ikan Kekek --Wilfredor (talk) 21:35, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice action shot, but pov is too low and the underside of both the stage and the dancer isn't good. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:40, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree that it's not perfect, but it's exciting and good and I think it's a worthy nominee. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:50, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Gracias por la foto, es hermosa. Es muy difícil tomar en el aire a una bailarina, en un movimiento que dura menos de un segundo. Laura Fiorucci (talk) 02:49, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 07:04, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:52, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 10:10, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:18, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:07, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! --PierreSelim (talk) 13:46, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Regretful oppose per Charles. I think it would be more effective if it was cropped in to mostly the dancer; however, it does not appear you could do that without making the image too small for FP. Daniel Case (talk) 18:22, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:29, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:03, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:08, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People#Events_(Arts,_concerts,_shows...)

File:Keralanadanam hs boys 7.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2020 at 15:41:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info Kerala Natanam (Kerala Dance) is a new style of dance that is now recognised as a distinct art form evolved from Kathakali, a form of Indian dance-drama

All by Shagil Kannur -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 15:41, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 15:41, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose Doesn't seem sharp enough to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:43, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose You're not wrong. --Peulle (talk) 21:44, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 03:36, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:10, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Novopetrivs'ke town, Ukraine.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2020 at 13:29:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Ukraine
Info created by DimasSolo - uploaded by DimasSolo - nominated by DimasSolo -- DimasSolo (talk) 13:29, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- DimasSolo (talk) 13:29, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's a decent image, but I do not see anything special here. --Cayambe (talk) 15:33, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Cayambe. It's an out-of-camera JPG (which means: not post-processed from RAW) with typical technical flaws, such as chromatic aberrations. You may try to nominate the picture at COM:QIC, but first (at the very least) need to fix the CA, remove the big dust spot in the middle, and use appropriate COM:Categories. --A.Savin 15:52, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. No special composition, either. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:45, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice photo of a pretty landscape but the composition doesn't appeal to me, and the image quality is a little on the low side with chromatic aberrations and unsharpness. Cmao20 (talk) 11:56, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, no wow per others. Daniel Case (talk) 05:40, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:10, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Raupe P1270551.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2020 at 18:22:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Erebidae_(Erebid_Moths)
Info created by Fischer.H - uploaded by Fischer.H - nominated by Fischer.H -- Fischer.H (talk) 18:22, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Fischer.H (talk) 18:22, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support, although it's a small photo. But I think it's a small caterpillar. You might mention its size in the file description. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:24, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too small and with little definition. Assuming id of this image is correct, File:Acronicta aceris caterpillar - Keila.jpg is much better. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:37, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Small, but the caterpillar fills most of the frame and it seems pretty sharp to me. Cmao20 (talk) 22:07, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose id is correct, but the resolution is rather low, downsampled or heavy crop? --Ivar (talk) 06:14, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment due to the size of the caterpillar (approx. 4 cm long) the picture was severely cropped.--Fischer.H (talk) 09:55, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support per Cmao. --Aristeas (talk) 10:12, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles --StellarHalo (talk) 17:03, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao, although perhaps more could be cropped at top and bottom. Daniel Case (talk) 19:25, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles Poco a poco (talk) 20:55, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:09, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Contre-jour photograph of the careening of a pirogue at sunset with sunlight through a hole in its roof Si Phan Don Laos.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2020 at 00:29:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:29, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:29, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support At the first glance the sun star on the boat seemed irritating, but once I got it it was a nice aha experience. --Aristeas (talk) 18:34, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:40, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Just the kind of image I like --Kritzolina (talk) 07:20, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 07:32, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:57, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent. Cmao20 (talk) 12:02, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:51, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:23, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 13:48, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 14:57, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support One little spot of magic ... Daniel Case (talk) 19:57, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:48, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:27, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats

File:Wespe auf Blütenblättern-20200905-RM-081907.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2020 at 12:55:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera#Family : Vespidae (Hornets, Paper Wasps, Potter Wasps, and Yellowjackets)
Info created & uploaded by Ermell - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 12:55, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 12:55, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment looks very good, but id is wrong! Vespula germanica looks like this --Ivar (talk) 13:25, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Info This is probably Polistes dominula or Polistes gallicus. --Ivar (talk) 14:05, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support As I said in QIC, it's amazing you (Ermell) were able to focus-stack a wasp! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:46, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support highest quality. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:59, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support and made file description changes. Remarkable stacking! --Ivar (talk) 18:17, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others. --Aristeas (talk) 18:29, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Did it move afterwards? so close to the lens and long enough quite for a focus stacking is rare Poco a poco (talk) 18:48, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Info The wasp had probably spent the night on the bloom and was slowly warming up. 10 minutes later it took off. Thank you for the help about the species Ivar, I unfortunately do not know much about it. Thanks for the nom Tomer T and all the support.--Ermell (talk) 20:32, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Flabbergasting 🐝 -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:36, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:37, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:42, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:00, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
SupportExtraordinary photo. Cmao20 (talk) 12:04, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 20:56, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done Ermell. Good stack. --Mile (talk) 11:14, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:24, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 13:48, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 14:56, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's an incredibly high-quality image on more than FP level. Too bad the species is not identified, really no chance to do? --A.Savin 16:23, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment according to the yellow spots on the mandibles, I categorized yet as Polistes gallicus. Tomer T (talk) 12:30, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:13, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:57, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:36, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:47, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:34, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera#Family : Vespidae (Hornets, Paper Wasps, Potter Wasps, and Yellowjackets)

File:Wroclaw- zespol Dworca Glownego.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2020 at 21:27:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Train_stations
Info created by Jar.ciurus - uploaded by Jar.ciurus - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 21:27, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrei (talk) 21:27, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good composition and colours. Cmao20 (talk) 12:01, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:22, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The very blurry (right side) and noisy (left side) background distracts me, the station itself is not that sharp nor that spectacular, and I just don't find anything amazing about the composition that would countervail all of this. I'd agree that this is a good photo, but I don't think it's close to great, sorry. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:45, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 16:40, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Andrei (talk) 23:35, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Azadi Tower at night in low angle.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2020 at 00:19:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Iran
Info created and uploaded by بهادر های زاده - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 00:19, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 00:19, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support Wonderful composition, but IMO it would be sharper at f/8 for example. --XRay 💬 07:33, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sharp enough for me. Cmao20 (talk) 12:05, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others. I'm close to being on the fence on this one, but I agree that the composition is irresistible, and the sharpness is not bad even for a 2020 FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:42, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao/Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 19:16, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:48, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others. --El Grafo (talk) 13:15, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:24, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 13:48, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 14:55, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The file lacks a description. --Cayambe (talk) 12:02, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ok for the brief description in Farsi and English. Both should be expanded IMO. --Cayambe (talk) 21:02, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cayambe You will find the arabic description in the right side of the screen, however, I added a small english description too. --Wilfredor (talk) 13:12, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment You mean there's a Farsi description on the right side. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:39, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:13, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:57, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really impressed by the sharpness of this lens at f/4. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:09, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:38, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:47, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 09:37, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:07, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Towers#Iran

File:Michelau Weinberg-20201024-RM-165125.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2020 at 04:55:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#Germany
Info created & uploaded by User:Ermell - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:55, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I just love this composition. If you know what species that tree is, let's add a category for it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:55, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:04, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 07:34, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Confirms the idea that the good photographer is the one who sees the simple, but great motifs which are ~~overseen~~ overlooked by other people. --Aristeas (talk) 09:03, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Overlooked, and yes indeed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:32, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Ah, thank you! These words are ‘false friends’ between English and German. --Aristeas (talk) 19:15, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's a very easy thing to get wrong, since look and see are near synonyms. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:52, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

And further "oversight" is one of English's better-known contronyms ... but only something you overlooked is an oversight. Daniel Case (talk) 05:40, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:04, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Colors and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:41, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:07, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:14, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:47, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for the nom Ikan.--Ermell (talk) 23:47, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment My pleasure. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:03, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:27, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great! --El Grafo (talk) 13:12, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 13:14, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:25, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 13:49, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 14:54, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:15, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 13:09, 14 November 2020 (UTC)--Wilfredor (talk) 13:09, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:13, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:37, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:57, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:46, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:40, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 09:35, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 24 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:06, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Agriculture#Germany

File:Fontana del Pantheon in Rome.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2020 at 15:01:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Italy
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 15:01, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 15:01, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The right crop doesn't work for me and the left crop is also questionable. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:43, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Awkward composition, not special enough -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:05, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Tournasol7 (talk) 08:00, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ademwortels (pneumatoforen) van een moerascipres (Taxodium distichum) 11-11-2020 (d.j.b.) 02.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2020 at 07:05:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Cupressaceae cypress Taxodium distichum .
Info Cultivated; knees of a Taxodium distichum. around a bald cypress. Focus stack of 23 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 07:05, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 07:05, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 07:35, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support That's quite nice. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:00, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good idea. --Aristeas (talk) 09:10, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:08, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:27, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 13:49, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:12, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:56, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:45, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:16, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:42, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Cupressaceae

File:Château Frontenac, Quebec city, Canada.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2020 at 05:02:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Canada
Info created & uploaded by User:Wilfredor - nominated by User:Ikan Kekek -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:02, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I know we already have several FPs of the Château Frontenac, but it's a great building and this is a way different view than we've featured so far. I find the fact that it's majestically on high, with colorful fall trees and beautiful Lower City buildings below to be glorious, almost fairy tale-like except for the Quebecois folks in the picture, for whom this is an everyday view. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:02, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:04, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful image to me.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:43, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 07:35, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 07:40, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support very beautiful! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:44, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 09:10, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Danu Widjajanto (talk) 09:16, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:07, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Colors and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:39, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Magnificently colourful. Cmao20 (talk) 12:07, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice, where does the violet colors in the sky come from? it was too early for sunset Poco a poco (talk) 20:28, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It was because the image was taken with the combination of 3 images at different times to obtain this color combination and to eliminate the presence of cars, btw I added this information in the description of the image, thank you for the question. --Wilfredor (talk) 01:57, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, now I get it, the result is great, thanks for adding the information in the file (otherweise I'd have asked for it :P) Poco a poco (talk) 09:20, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, after so many years that we have shared here sometimes I feel like I can almost read your mind :p --Wilfredor (talk) 12:47, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Ermell (talk) 23:35, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:26, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support great colors, good composition ! --Mile (talk) 11:16, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:26, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 13:49, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 14:52, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:12, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:56, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:46, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Love the way the combination of different times of day gives the image an almost fantastical quality, like the cover of some paperback in that genre (For that reason, I would consider it not so much a retouched image as a composite. Daniel Case (talk) 05:45, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 09:35, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:42, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Canada

File:Wilde Karde IMG 2069.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2020 at 10:36:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asterales # Family:Asteraceae
Info created by Fischer.H - uploaded by Fischer.H - nominated by Fischer.H -- Fischer.H (talk) 10:36, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Fischer.H (talk) 10:36, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Seven Pandas (talk) 00:52, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'd want the flowers to be within the DoF. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:24, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done --Fischer.H (talk) 16:25, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question That was for me? Didn't work. I think the DoF had to be set starting closer to the camera when you shot the photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:20, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Shagil Kannur (talk) 15:29, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ikan, the standard is getting pretty high...--Poco a poco (talk) 19:38, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Ikan and Poco, I really like the colours but the out of focus bit is really obvious. Not sure I can support it when it is that distracting. Cmao20 (talk) 11:47, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per DoF. Daniel Case (talk) 17:51, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:41, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Молодий кулик-довгоніг в дельті Дунаю.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2020 at 10:52:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Family_:_Recurvirostridae_(Avocets_and_Stilts)
Info created by Ryzhkov Sergey - uploaded by Ryzhkov Sergey - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 10:52, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrei (talk) 10:52, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 12:08, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:39, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:13, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Graceful. --Aristeas (talk) 19:24, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:25, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 23:25, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seven Pandas (talk) 00:22, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:42, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:25, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:27, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:40, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 13:10, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:27, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 13:50, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 14:42, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ... though I would like to see a bit more of space above the wings. --Cayambe (talk) 14:57, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:16, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 15:47, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:12, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:35, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:54, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 21:28, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:45, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 09:36, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:23, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 26 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:43, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Family_:_Recurvirostridae_(Avocets_and_Stilts)

Norwich Cathedral Choir, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2020 at 11:45:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Looking towards the altar
Looking towards the organ

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#United Kingdom
Info Two very high-resolution views of the choir of Norwich Cathedral in opposite directions. Norwich Cathedral is one of England's 26 medieval cathedrals, and when it was built it was the largest building in East Anglia. Surprisingly we don't have any FPs of the interior of this cathedral (we have one of the spire, but that's an exterior view). created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 11:45, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 11:45, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The view toward the organ is great. The other view is not as good, IMO, because it has overexposed stained glass windows. I support the set, overall. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:37, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:12, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 19:25, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:26, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 01:43, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:26, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:45, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:59, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:28, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 13:50, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 14:48, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Buidhe (talk) 15:07, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 10:39, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:12, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:31, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:54, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:44, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 09:36, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:44, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:44, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#United Kingdom

File:House of Legends (Lviv).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2020 at 20:10:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues outdoors
Info created by DimasSolo - uploaded by DimasSolo - nominated by DimasSolo -- DimasSolo (talk) 20:10, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- DimasSolo (talk) 20:10, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The statue is in the shadow and there is a lot of chromatic aberration (green fringe) around it. --Cayambe (talk) 20:50, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Seven Pandas (talk) 00:21, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I have been several times in the House of Legends, and i really like this sculpture. But this is modern art, there is no FOP in Ukraine -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:01, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per George. --Mile (talk) 21:31, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per George. -- Karelj (talk) 14:47, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per George as well (and it should be nominated for deletion, then). But it's also technically deficient, particularly in handling its contrast ... the statue is too dark and the clouds appear overexposed. Daniel Case (talk) 06:46, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:37, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:2017, cuba, jardines aggressor, finca de pepe, yellowfin grouper (37504673796).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2020 at 06:37:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Serranidae_(Serranids)
Info created by q phia - uploaded by Christian Ferrer - nominated by Ivar (talk) 06:37, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 06:37, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seems very high-quality for an underwater photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:48, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 12:38, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:16, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Weak due to ligthing and compo, detail is superb Poco a poco (talk) 18:56, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan, very impressive photo. Cmao20 (talk) 11:50, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:17, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 13:46, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:01, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:10, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish#Family_:_Serranidae_(Serranids)

File:Cimitero Vantiniano monumento funebre famiglia Maffei Erizzo di Abbondio Sangiorgio sinistra Brescia.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2020 at 05:48:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Italy
Info Nomination suggested by Ikan Kekek. All by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 05:48, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 05:48, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very expressive funerary monument, a 27-year-old mother cut down in her prime. I anticipate some criticisms of the photo, but this monument really gets to me, and if Moroder feels that this is his best photograph of it, it gets my support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:09, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 10:49, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Composition does not work. Croped text and unsupportive back. --Mile (talk) 16:48, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan, it's very moving. But could you crop out the black border at the right-hand side? Cmao20 (talk) 11:48, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Mile. From this angle I think an image of mostly the statue would have had a better chance. Daniel Case (talk) 17:56, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Mile Poco a poco (talk) 20:54, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Composition and the subject is not special enough -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:00, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:11, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Magallana gigas - Mytilus edulis - Centre Ostréicole - Leucate.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2020 at 06:25:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Class : Bivalvia
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 06:25, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 06:25, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 12:28, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support An empty oyster-shell texture ... I never would have thought of it. Daniel Case (talk) 18:47, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 11:02, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:01, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:10, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:寒食帖.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2020 at 09:19:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/Exteriors#Landscape_panoramas
Info created by Su Shi - uploaded by Cold Season - nominated by alcremie--IN (talk) 09:19, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--IN (talk) 09:19, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Tempered Support Great documentation! The painting itself looks sadly damaged, but I don't know if anyone would dare to do a digital restoration of it, and it's almost 1,000 years old, so I think the nomination of this really valuable scan is worth a supporting vote. However, I feel like because so much more of this scroll is calligraphy than painting, it should probably be nominated as a work of calligraphy. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:46, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Valueable, but not excellent. -- -donald- (talk) 14:29, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Per Ikan, I think this could benefit from some restoration before we consider it as an FP. Daniel Case (talk) 04:22, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:10, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Herfstaster (Aster thomsonii) 16-10-2020 (d.j.b.).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2020 at 16:13:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Asteraceae
Info Flower of an autumn aster (Aster thomsonii). Focus stack of 17 photos.}}
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:13, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:13, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Really good, but I find it strange not to see any part of the stem at all. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:23, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Answer: That will come. because there was no stalk left on during shooting. I just wanted to show the flower. and preferably as flat as possible.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:41, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question Was the flower actually on a surface? If so, would you consider showing the actual background? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:48, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments. My intention was to leave the beauty of the flower alone. In October, the plant itself is a rainy and messy whole. That's not a pretty background. You have to rely on the detail. I personally think it is a beautiful flower in itself.The flowers of this autumn aster are flat. This can also be seen in the photo.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:52, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose +1 for Ikan. Tomer T (talk) 16:28, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support It does look a bit odd to have no stem visible at all, but it's very beautiful. Cmao20 (talk) 11:51, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:59, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The stem missing at the bottom looks awkward in my view, too. It makes the flower unnatural, even if it is intentional. It reminds me this nomination, not my taste either -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:57, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:07, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Katarina kyrka och kyrkogård January 2013.jpg (delist)[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2020 at 16:18:30

Info I saw this FP while searching for a better photo in the german article. It was elected in 2013, but compared to recent nominations it clearly lacks "wow-factor". Only a QI, but no FP to me. Already, the FP-nomination 2013 was very close. No outstanding technical quality or composition. (Original nomination)

* Delist -- Tesla - 💬 16:18, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

okay, thanks for feedback, I didn't know that delisting is a process with slightly different rules, where technical quality is mainly in focus :) --Tesla - 💬 20:39, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Even though I was one of the opposers back then... It's still a good quality image and for delisting more than just "no wow" should be required. --A.Savin 17:54, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Indeed still a good image. --Aristeas (talk) 18:32, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per others. I'd probably oppose and wouldn't support it if this were a new nomination, but otherwise, I agree entirely with Alex. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:51, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep IMO no reason to delist a sharp, good-quality 18mpx image with nice light. Cmao20 (talk) 20:33, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Nomination withdrawn.

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:53, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Laguna de los Tres color.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2020 at 21:49:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Argentina
Info created by Almonroth - uploaded by Almonroth - nominated by Danu Widjajanto -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 21:49, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Danu Widjajanto (talk) 21:49, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There are a lot of CAs, especially around the stones in the foreground --Llez (talk) 06:19, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Wonderful composition, but a lot of CAs and sharpness should be better. --XRay 💬 12:27, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Apart from the technical issues, there is too much of Fitz Roy hidden by clouds. --Milseburg (talk) 15:40, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support In spite of the obvious CAs, I think this is a beautiful photo. Cmao20 (talk) 11:54, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Milseburg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fischer.H (talk • contribs)
Neutral I like this and the clouds around the mountain don't bother me since the lake is supposed to be the subject. But I do think the CA could be cleared up some more. Daniel Case (talk) 18:07, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 08:39, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dülmen, Börnste, Teiche in der Heubachniederung, Baum -- 2020 -- 3512.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2020 at 12:24:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Fagaceae
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 12:24, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 12:24, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'll give this photo a little love. I believe I see what you saw - a tree with very interesting roots rhymed by the branches in a good composition. I could judge this photo better if I had a big enough screen to look at it at full size from some distance away, but I think I've gotten enough sense of it on my smaller screen. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:45, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:38, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:19, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I agree it's a striking tree but a) the background tree is a little distracting and b) at full size the roots and background look sort of unrealistic, perhaps overprocessed. Daniel Case (talk) 05:39, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Daniel Case. --Fischer.H (talk) 09:39, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Burnt sky and light on the branches with color alterations. The composition is nice but the image is not working at full size in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:48, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:50, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 13:52, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rouleau de Bostan 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2020 at 15:07:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Haute-Savoie
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 15:07, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 15:07, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose Beautiful scene, but with at less than 2,000 pixels high I would expect better sharpness. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:04, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per KoH - can you try it with a bit less noise reduction? It has potential but I think it's too fuzzy at full size at the moment. Cmao20 (talk) 20:02, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unsharp in too many places, and I don't think this was the best light. I'm sure it looked great when you were there but the camera just couldn't capture what you saw. Daniel Case (talk) 19:20, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:39, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Along the Ili River, Yining, Xinjiang 2020-10-03.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2020 at 14:55:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#China
Info created by Charlie_Qi - uploaded by NGGULS - nominated by IN (talk) 14:55, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--IN (talk) 14:55, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Distortion problems. --Wilfredor (talk) 15:12, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very noisy, very unsharp in places, uncorrected perspective and merely a nice sunset snap but not a great composition. This wouldn't pass at QIC, either. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:32, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Pretty but sadly it needs a perspective correction and the image quality is not very good at full size. Cmao20 (talk) 20:00, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ikan. All the technical fixes in the world, even if possible, will not do anything about this being just another unexceptional sunset pic. Daniel Case (talk) 19:16, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question Time to withdraw, or still hoping for ~~seven~~ nine enthusiastic last-minute votes? ;-) Sorry but while it shouldn’t be actually impossible to get a phone shot featured here, it would have to be a breathtaking image to make up for the technical shortcomings (which this, sorry to say, Oppose isn’t). Nice scene but poor shot of it – noisy, unsharp, distorted, colour banding in the sky. --Kreuz schnabel 09:36, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:21, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ship M V Kavarathi in Lakshadweep 3.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2020 at 17:10:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport
Info All by Shagil Kannur -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:10, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 17:10, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Tilted CCW, see skyline. Correction needed -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:56, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Nothing special, no WOW -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:56, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose +1. --Peulle (talk) 19:15, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. Possible VI. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:29, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as above --Mile (talk) 21:30, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others, underexposed, poor composition (too tight on top, too much space on bottom). --Kreuz schnabel 19:41, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others; time to withdraw nom with no new support !votes beyond nominator in four days. Daniel Case (talk) 03:33, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:21, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:TR Izmir asv2020-02 img57 Salepçioğlu Mosque.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2020 at 13:51:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Turkey
Info Interior of the Salepçioğlu Mosque in Konak, İzmir ---- all by A.Savin --A.Savin 13:51, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 13:51, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:01, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:57, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose CA on highlighted windows. It is blurred in corners (above). --Mile (talk) 16:36, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Certainly not true. --A.Savin 16:57, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, A.Savin correct me. Actually King of ♥ just confirmed in comment bellow. But also question for King, so if this would be on 10 Mpx, from some other user which owns "poor" camera, you would oppose, because of less pixels !? I look opposite, this is expensive camera, giving photographers all what needs to remove mistakes, since each pixle has much more infos than would some 10 Mpx have. --Mile (talk) 09:47, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support The CA is just not significant enough to worry about, and the corners are fine given the high MP count. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:23, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 17:49, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:36, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support The image would be definitely better cropping a bit left and right to get right of the door frames Poco a poco (talk) 18:49, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:42, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose. Beautiful mosque, but compared to other interiors we've been promoting, I'm not that impressed with the sharpness, and I think that should count. I'll add that I'm not penalizing the photo for being large and judged the sharpness at 60% of full size. The upper parts of the dome are not within the focus. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:04, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support Sharpness could be better, but good composition. --XRay 💬 07:29, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per KoH, a big, beautiful, thoroughly impressive file. I don't want to quibble about minor imperfections on something this good. Cmao20 (talk) 11:57, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:20, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 13:46, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:13, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:59, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Mile and Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 03:34, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:26, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Turkey

File:Teatro de Santa Isabel, Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2020 at 19:27:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Brazil
Info created and uploaded by Wilfredor - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 19:27, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 19:27, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:25, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Sorry, IMO sharpness should be better and the lights are overexposed. --XRay 💬 07:30, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support A bit unsharp in places but a great motif. Cmao20 (talk) 12:01, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:22, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 13:47, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:58, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Regretful weak oppose per XRay. Daniel Case (talk) 16:36, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:49, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 09:34, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Cmao. --Aristeas (talk) 18:30, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:09, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Spurzem (talk) 13:23, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:23, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#Brazil

File:Vista panorámica de Bratislava, Eslovaquia, 2020-02-01, DD 50-55 PAN.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2020 at 15:42:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Slovakia
Info Panoramic view of Bratislava from the Bratislava Castle, Slovakia. The metropolitan area of Slovakia's capital comprises a about 660.000 inhab., about 12% of the country's population. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 15:42, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 15:42, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very similar as Belgrade. Photo could be redone, highlights on left could get some color back. Something like. But i would do from the original file. --Mile (talk) 10:16, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support This photo deserves some more love. The light, while not extraordinary, is soft, gentle and attractive, and the image quality is super, with lots of sharp and interesting details to explore. Cmao20 (talk) 11:59, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good but not that spectacular, and the background is hazy. I think a subset of this motif that extends from the 3rd modern tower to the left of the church to a bit right of the bridge would be more compelling as a composition, so I'll mark it, but I think less haziness would be needed for me to support a nomination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:50, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ikan Kekek: I applied a crop but a slight one (see KoH suggestion) and I also reduced the haziness (among other changes) Poco a poco (talk) 12:39, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I would actually suggest a different, less aggressive crop than Ikan (see annotation). The tree in the top left corner is distracting, so I'd like to remove it while keeping as much of the left side as possible. A slight refinement on the right side would also be beneficial, as there is a little bit of wasted space there. But I feel Ikan's approach would frame the main subjects too tightly. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:15, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

King of Hearts: I've opted for your crop (among other changes), I agree with your judgement Poco a poco (talk) 12:39, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:19, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Ikan. A valiant attempt to take a winter cityscape without snow, but the light is just too harsh and direct at the left. Daniel Case (talk) 05:08, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Case: I've reduced the hightlights on the left (among other changes) Poco a poco (talk) 12:39, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Very weak support now. Daniel Case (talk) 16:34, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Big improvement. I'll deliberate. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:46, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
So, Ikan Kekek, what is the result of your deliberation? the clock is ticking :) Poco a poco (talk) 12:06, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:11, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 10:19, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:23, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Columbella major 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2020 at 08:24:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Columbellidae
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 08:24, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 08:24, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:09, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sharper than usual at full size. Very impressive! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:40, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 20:22, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Species identification seems accurate, as always -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:07, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:23, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:42, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:53, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:50, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 10:06, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:14, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:02, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 09:49, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 18:20, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. Cmao20 (talk) 20:10, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:07, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:53, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:35, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 16:14, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:09, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:35, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Wilfredor (talk) 16:48, 20 November 2020 (UTC)FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 20 November 2020 (UTC)--Wilfredor (talk) 16:48, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Shells#Family : Columbellidae

File:Henri II et Catherine de Médicis edit.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2020 at 12:53:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues indoors
Info created by Roi Boshi - edited & uploaded by Ottojula - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 12:53, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 12:53, 11 November 2020 (UTC)~[reply]
Oppose The composition is not striking. Either both statues in focus, or focus only one one. --Tagooty (talk) 14:39, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose +1. --Peulle (talk) 15:57, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the composition. And why selective focus shouldn't be appropriate in this setting is beyond me. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:06, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Frank. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:33, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Frank, the composition is great, and selective focus helps it to look more dynamic because the sharp statue stands out from the background. Cmao20 (talk) 12:04, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Frank; I only wish that the in-focus parts (the king’s face and his hands) were a bit sharper, this would further increase the effect of the selective focus. --Aristeas (talk) 19:18, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:24, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Tomer. Daniel Case (talk) 20:00, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:48, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. This image is 10 years old, and for me it does not look to be on current top standard. --Uoaei1 (talk) 05:56, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above, sorry. --Ivar (talk) 14:44, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Wilfredor (talk) 16:49, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures#Statues indoors

File:Iglesia del colegio de los Jesuitas, Ponta Delgada, isla de San Miguel, Azores, Portugal, 2020-07-30, DD 06-08 HDR.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2020 at 12:54:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Portugal
Info Rich baroque altar of the Church of the Jesuit College, Ponta Delgada, São Miguel Island, Azores, Portugal. Note that there is another FP of this subject, see FPC here. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 12:54, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 12:54, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think this is different enough from the existing FP, and it's a really beautiful interior and very well photographed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:36, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:23, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:41, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:25, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:50, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 09:37, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 10:04, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:20, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 16:21, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 18:21, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:13, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 22:34, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:53, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:47, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:33, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:57, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 16:15, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 18:04, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:15, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Wilfredor (talk) 16:48, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Portugal

File:Plaza de Toros de Maracaibo 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2020 at 12:59:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family_:_Bovidae_(Bovids)
Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 12:59, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would really like to know how this image has been created. At first glance, it looks incredibly sharp and detailed. Then, looking at the audiences faces, some kind of a horror movie starts rolling. Not a single one of those faces looks real, they’re all distorted, with green haloes around their eyes, some with gross noses or missing mouths. Then, some of the limbs don’t fit. Hands casting no shadow where they should, and looking as if cut out from an entirely different image. The foreground people in the arena look like a poorly done cut-out, too, especially against the red wall. I am not sure if you want to share this secret with us, but for me, this is clearly Oppose not one of the best images there are on Commons – while it might be one of the most ingenious ones. --Kreuz schnabel 19:34, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Done This is a monstrous criminal secret passed down from a family kept for generations, it would be impossible to reveal it here :P. Now seriously, I had left the Topaz Gigapixel facial recognition option enabled. btw, I rollbacked and left at its original size. --Wilfredor (talk) 23:05, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support. --Gnosis (talk) 06:29, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Neither the composition nor the resolution is very impressive to me. --Peulle (talk) 10:20, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Kreuz schnabel. When i saw them, like zoombies on zombi party with Adress on Artiodactyla#Family_:_Bovidae_(Bovids). Not so well choosen. --Mile (talk) 11:08, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It would be nice to have a category of zombies --Wilfredor (talk) 20:51, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Disgusting cruelty to an animal. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:57, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Charlesjsharp, a disgusting scene. --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:02, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Some of the faces still look slightly zombified. But more importantly, the composition lacks focus. Cutting about a quarter from both the top and the left already makes quite a difference in that regar, imho. --El Grafo (talk) 10:04, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Poor composition and not the best quality. Further in my opinion it is not the kind of images we should present here. -- Spurzem (talk) 13:17, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the feedback and comments supports and opposes ones --Wilfredor (talk) 00:40, 20 November 2020 (UTC)--Wilfredor (talk) 00:40, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Agence Rol - 23-10-11, Toulon, cuirassé Suffren.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2020 at 07:24:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Ships
Info created by Agence Rol - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 07:24, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 07:24, 12 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I could quibble about the right crop, but it's an impressive battleship and well captured in this 109-year-old photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:04, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ikan Kekek: I go with the philosophy that if people want to reuse it as a cropped image, that's what {{CSS image crop}} is for, as the uncropped maximises reuse - need a wide, short image? You have what you need to crop it. Want to write about Toulon's naval history? There you go! And so on. Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:28, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The crop might have been wider. However, no-one can go back in time to 1911 to retake this photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:39, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I mean more that you can make it fit the desired shape: Cut top and bottom for a panorama-style website banner, leave as is for a poster, crop tight for a ship thumbnail. I think I think in print terms more than some here. Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:03, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Right. But you can't make the crop wider than it is. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:36, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 13:49, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 09:36, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support tempered by the fact that I shouldn't have had to add all the categories. Daniel Case (talk) 18:21, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 14:07, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Michaelertrakt, Hofburg, Viena, Austria, 2020-01-31, DD 133.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2020 at 16:58:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Austria
Info Interior view of the dome of Michaelertrakt (St. Michael's Wing), Hofburg, center of Vienna, Austria. The buildings belongs to the Hofburg, the official residence and workplace of the President of Austria and was formerly the principal imperial palace of the Habsburg dynasty. It was built in the 13th century but the Michael's Wing was one of the later expansions (1889 to 1893) and serves as the connection between the Winter Riding School and the Imperial Chancellery Wing. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 16:58, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 16:58, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a way to correct the lower and left edges a bit cut off? --Wilfredor (talk) 17:05, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I improved the crop to improve symmetry, Wilfredor Poco a poco (talk) 13:35, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Without the net, for sure.--Ermell (talk) 19:33, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I mean there's not much chance of getting rid of the net, so on that basis, it's the best photo possible. Great detail and quality. Cmao20 (talk) 11:20, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, there is none. The dome is over an opened pass for cars and pedestrians and the net will always be there to prevent pigeons from making a mess there Poco a poco (talk) 13:15, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The net is ugly -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:04, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unfortunately, I agree with the others. However, this should be nominated at COM:VIC. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:27, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Poco a poco (talk) 12:19, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 12:19, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bergtocht van Gimillan (1805m.) naar Colle Tsa Sètse in Cogne Valley (Italië). Zicht op de omringende alpen 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2020 at 07:51:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural/Italy#Aosta_Valley
Info I thought that this was a well-composed and dramatic mountain landscape. created by Famberhorst - uploaded by Famberhorst - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 07:51, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 07:51, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive Buidhe (talk) 15:08, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you for nominating my photo.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:23, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:10, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:43, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I like the view but the WB seems way too warm. Daniel Case (talk) 19:18, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:06, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:13, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:52, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 16:13, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:34, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Italy#Aosta_Valley

File:Ciechanów, wieżowy zbiornik wyrównawczy (3).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2020 at 08:23:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Poland
Info created by 1bumer - uploaded by 1bumer - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 08:23, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrei (talk) 08:23, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question No possibility of a square(r) version with more generous top and bottom crops, as I asked about on QIC? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:30, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Unfortunately, I don't have a wider frame, I was limited by the 18 mm focal length --1bumer (talk) 06:02, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The author seems to be not active, although I left a notification --Andrei (talk) 10:37, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. Support because it's a fine photo with a terrific composition, even so. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:52, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support The tower on the left side justifies the rectangular crop. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 16:17, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the rectangle too. --XRay 💬 16:20, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 17:03, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per KoH. --Aristeas (talk) 18:25, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cmao20 (talk) 20:32, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 20:50, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:58, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:23, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:20, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:34, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:01, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 16:16, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:21, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:29, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:36, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Towers#Poland

File:Close-up view of the head of a white tiger, yawning with the tongue out.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2020 at 00:40:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support 👅 -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:40, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pretty sleepy cat, good photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:02, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sweet! I think I'd prefer a wider, landscape format crop, though. --El Grafo (talk) 13:10, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 13:11, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 13:50, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 14:41, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:59, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:57, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:07, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support :-) --XRay 💬 10:41, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:12, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:53, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:44, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:51, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 18:16, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Eminently memeable. Daniel Case (talk) 19:16, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for confirming a feeling I had too. A meme caption like "IIIIIIIIIIIIII don't care"? Basile Morin (talk) 01:47, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:06, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm not in favour of promoting photos of made-made animals. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:13, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 14:13, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:33, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)

File:Lang Ranch Oakbrook North Ranch Thousand Oaks May 2019 panorama 5.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2020 at 04:26:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United States#California
Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:26, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:26, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:56, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Good quality. Which stitching software did you use, King of Hearts? --Mosbatho (talk) 16:38, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 18:24, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:30, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:52, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:47, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:32, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:31, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:00, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 16:16, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:23, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:28, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:35, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/United States#California

File:Wooden walkway leading to a hut with straw roof in front of karst mountains at sunset, Vang Vieng, Laos.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2020 at 02:11:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Laos
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:11, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:11, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yet another wonderfully picturesque photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:41, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:01, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:17, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:54, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 18:24, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another special one. It's nice to see how subtle changes in the light make your photos have a different atmosphere every time. Cmao20 (talk) 20:27, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:52, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:59, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 16:15, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:07, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:24, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral White aura at the top at the edges of the mountains with the sky, also excessive noise reduction resulting in loss of detail in the vegetation of the mountains. --Wilfredor (talk) 17:09, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:18, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:35, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Laos

File:Kawasaki c751 eunos.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2020 at 13:36:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
Info created and uploaded by Calvin Teo - nominated by IN (talk) 13:36, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--IN (talk) 13:36, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice but tilted, grainy and unsharp. --Basotxerri (talk) 14:58, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Not only that, but the image also has a copyright watermark text at the bottom right, and therefore cannot be QI, FP or VI, per the Guidelines: "No advertisements, signatures, or other watermarks in image."--Peulle (talk) 15:50, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: see comments above.--Peulle (talk) 15:50, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

I withdraw my nomination and go to the Chinese Wikipedia and revoke this picture's local FP there.--IN (talk) 16:10, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maison d'Armagnac in Rodez 13.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2020 at 20:43:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 20:43, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 20:43, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 13:09, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Nice light, but I feel that landscape would have been more appropriate than portrait here. Cmao20 (talk) 23:25, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, the cutting on the left spoils it for me. --Kreuz schnabel 06:01, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question Are those blue halos, or is that blue light hitting the top margins of the buildings? I also would prefer to see the rest of this pretty building on the left. Is that possible? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:18, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unfortunatelly not...Tournasol7 (talk) 08:17, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose halos Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:15, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Tournasol7 (talk) 19:20, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Beckum 2 Mark Beckumer Pütt.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2020 at 17:48:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Others#Money
Info created by the Town of Beckum, Germany in 1918 - reproduced, uploaded and nominated by Palauenc05
Support -- Palauenc05 (talk) 17:48, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Attractive and amusing Notgeld example in excellent reproduction. --Aristeas (talk) 18:27, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:49, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:26, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Spurzem (talk) 13:12, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:31, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:20, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:36, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:02, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 16:16, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:22, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:35, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Others#Money

File:Fliegerdenkmal auf der Wasserkuppe.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2020 at 18:56:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Germany
Info Aviator-Memorial on the Wasserkuppe, Hesse. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 18:56, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 18:56, 13 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 10:40, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 15:12, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 09:32, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:43, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kreuz schnabel 19:43, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 17:13, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 18:16, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 19:57, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tesla - 💬 20:29, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:05, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Intersection of horizon and bird doesn't work for me. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:11, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't see anything special enough for FP enough in this, sorry. Daniel Case (talk) 05:31, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support It works for me. The idea is very creative, the lighting is fine, the texture of the snow is good enough and there are no quality problems. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:57, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Eye-catching and distracting board. Subject is not special enough, I agree with Daniel -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 16:13, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The composition is fairly simple, but this photo gets my vote for being just plain attractive and pleasant, with nice detail in the foreground. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:38, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Nothing special about this, sorry. The broad foreground sabotages the remote detail to the rear. --Aliwal2012 (talk) 16:52, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:35, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Other#Germany

File:Jynx torquilla крутиголовка.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2020 at 21:51:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds#Order_:_Piciformes_(Woodpeckers_and_Relatives)
Info created by Nppgrandmeadow - uploaded by Nppgrandmeadow - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 21:51, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrei (talk) 21:51, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I suggested nominating this when I saw it at QIC. It's sharp and a good composition, and it shows camouflage really well without the bird being at all hard to see in this context. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:40, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 05:34, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support background denoising would make it even better. --Ivar (talk) 07:03, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very sharp image, overall a strong candidate. Cmao20 (talk) 07:59, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:28, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:32, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:15, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:19, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:40, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:04, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 16:17, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:56, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:18, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --El Grafo (talk) 12:24, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:14, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:07, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 13:13, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:49, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Order_:_Piciformes_(Woodpeckers_and_Relatives)

File:Aks The Reflection Taj Mahal.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2020 at 07:55:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#India
Info The Taj Mahal, but with a very different composition than any of the four existing FPs (1, 2, 3, 4). IMO this definitely adds something new. created by Antrix3 - uploaded by Antrix3 - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 07:55, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 07:55, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent, very beautiful composition -- Spurzem (talk) 13:07, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes, the composition is great and I very much appreciate the inclusion of the adjacent buildings.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:50, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:31, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I see a number of dust spots on the water part, they should be fixed.--Peulle (talk) 16:05, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Peulle, that should be fixed now. Cmao20 (talk) 16:48, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I still see lots of them. Am I alone in this? --Peulle (talk) 17:44, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

They are still there on rigth side of lake, but beter than before. But i would suggest crop as shown. --Mile (talk) 17:51, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Dust spots are still there. --Fischer.H (talk) 17:56, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Peulle, Fischer.H, are you sure you have cleared your cache? They are definitely not there for me. If not I would appreciate a note as to where you can still see them, as I am struggling to find any at all. Cmao20 (talk) 07:48, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:18, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Dust spots have been removed. --Fischer.H (talk) 08:21, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:48, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support (I wouldn't crop the picture.) --XRay 💬 11:18, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per XRay --Llez (talk) 13:06, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:51, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 16:17, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:58, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:16, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:21, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Nice mood and reflection, but I would apply the suggested crop. The symmetry is not quite there due to different distance between the towers. --A.Savin 17:13, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 13:15, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:10, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Palauenc05 (talk) 14:22, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#India

File:SBB RAe TEE II Silenen - Erstfeld.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2020 at 07:09:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
Info created & uploaded by David Gubler - nominated by Ivar (talk) 07:09, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 07:09, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support An older image, but still good quality, and well composed. Cmao20 (talk) 08:01, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Spurzem (talk) 13:08, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:07, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Nice composition. —Bruce1ee^talk 05:51, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:18, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:43, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support I've seen the filesize and had a look to the edges. IMO there are JPEG artifacts. Please try to upload an uncompressed file. --XRay 💬 11:21, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 13:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:50, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 16:17, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:55, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:17, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:21, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment bush bottom left is not ideal Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:25, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Palauenc05 (talk) 14:24, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles

File:Tagus Toledo June 2016 001.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2020 at 08:48:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#Spain
Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:48, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:48, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice scene, but is it really one of the finest images on Commons? The house in front in particular looks a bit overexposed and lacking in sharpness.--Peulle (talk) 11:24, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Peulle: I checked carefully and nothing is blown out. Could it be perhaps that it simply looks too bright on your monitor? Maybe the old version looks better to you, but it looked a tiny bit too dark to me so I added +0.25 exposure. In terms of sharpness, I don't see a huge problem. Note that if you point your camera down and correct the vertical distortion in Photoshop, the lower areas will need to be upsampled and hence will appear slightly less sharp than the upper areas. But to me there's hardly any noticeable unsharpness anywhere. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:43, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I see what you saw, KoH: It's a very nice motif. But looking at the buildings on the left and right, are the horizontals horizontal? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:34, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Ikan Kekek: I added a little more vertical correction; better? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:43, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I really don't see much difference. The building in the background on the left with the flags below it seems to be going up as it goes further left, whereas the buildings on the right may be doing up to the right, though that's less clear. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:21, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ikan Kekek: First refresh your browser to make sure you are getting the most recent version of the image. (There should not be a bird in the upper left sky.) Try downloading the image and zooming in to 400%. If you measure any column of three windows on the building on the left, you'll see that it is completely straight. As for the right side, most of the verticals are perfectly straight; an antenna is leaning out and one edge of the building below is leaning in a little bit, suggesting that those lines weren't straight to begin with and overall the image is level. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:01, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I had cleared my cache before viewing the new version. I take your point that I'm experiencing some kind of optical illusion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:51, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Appealing composition, interesting viewpoint -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:16, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. Nice to see some of the less prominent places in Toledo. --Aristeas (talk) 18:18, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Composition and quality seem good to me. Cmao20 (talk) 19:59, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support A good photograph that stands with the sort of landscapes that might be painted of this scene. Daniel Case (talk) 05:36, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 15:48, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Agrimonia eupatoria - Keila.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2020 at 20:10:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Rosaceae
Info Focus stacked of 24 images, flower ⌀ ca 9 mm, buds ⌀ ca 3 mm. All by Ivar (talk) 20:10, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 20:10, 14 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:50, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 20:09, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:07, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- front flower is blurred and it shouldn't be in a focus stack. Seven Pandas (talk) 01:17, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Seven Pandas: please add a note, where the flower is blurred. And what do You mean by second remark that it should't be stacked? This very small flower will be in focus only with stacking. --Ivar (talk) 06:04, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not saying it shouldn't be stacked I'm saying in a focus stack the main subject (here the yellow front flower) shouldn't be blurred. This front yellow flower is unsharp and lacking in detail. The rear part of the subject with small buds is much sharper. Seven Pandas (talk) 23:46, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Seven Pandas: nothing on the front flower is blurred. The petals of the flower are more homogeneous and just have less details than buds. This is how blurry (not stacked) flower looks like. --Ivar (talk) 08:22, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

very nice of you to tell me in subtle way I'm an idiot. Seven Pandas (talk) 10:15, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I beg your pardon, but I said and meant nothing of the sort. --Ivar (talk) 10:35, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Ermell (talk) 10:08, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 18:20, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:08, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tesla - 💬 20:28, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The edges of the flower are not in focus. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:09, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Details are very fine, nothing is blured neither unsharp. The silhouettes of flowers in backgroud are a bit distracting though, but this is still accpetable and a very fine image. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 22:40, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Christian Daniel Case (talk) 03:36, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:55, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 16:14, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 23:20, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family_:_Rosaceae

File:Holy-Shrine-Of-Imam-Reza حرم-امام-رضا Davoud-Davoudi 3.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2020 at 18:18:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Iran
Info created by DavoudDavoudi - uploaded by DavoudDavoudi - nominated by 4nn1l2 -- 4nn1l2 (talk) 18:18, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 4nn1l2 (talk) 18:18, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Welcome to Featured Picture Candidates! However, this photo is way too small to be featured for this kind of subject. Do a search for featured pictures in Category:Mosques in Iran for some examples of featured pictures on similar motifs. Also, minor point: The filename should include the word "holy", not "holly", which is a type of plant. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:40, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Filename fixed. 4nn1l2 (talk) 21:49, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This is a beautiful photo, but it is not FP to me. Although it is quite sharp, it is very small for an architectural FP, and the blown-out sky in the corners also makes it less than outstanding. We have some lovely FPs of Iranian mosques - check out the work of Poco a poco and Amirpashaei - and I think this picture would struggle to compete with them. Cmao20 (talk) 23:24, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan and Cmao. Also, I find the image a little overexposed and awkwardly cropped. Daniel Case (talk) 19:11, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:20, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Clitocybe nebularis with Deformity on the cap., featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2020 at 18:46:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

One side.
Other side.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Tricholomataceae
Info (Clitocybe nebularis) clouded agaric with deformity on the cap. Focus stack of 20 photos. The deviation on the cap resembles a small elephant trunk.--Famberhorst (talk)
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 18:46, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 18:46, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:47, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:44, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:54, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:17, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 11:17, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:23, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 13:08, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 16:18, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Superb! Seven Pandas (talk) 20:07, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:15, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment not actually one side and another Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:27, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Question: what would Thee like to call it? Front and backside?--Famberhorst (talk) 18:48, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would prefer that the two images are from opposite sides... Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:08, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank Thee for your answer. But I don't know what you mean.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:56, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:25, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 06:41, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:19, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Fungi#Family : Tricholomataceae

File:Museo di Santa Giulia Coro delle Monache Crocifissione Ferramola Brescia.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2020 at 03:13:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Religion#Christianity
Info All by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 03:13, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 03:13, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:00, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:56, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:20, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:52, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 11:16, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 13:10, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 16:18, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:14, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very beautiful photo. Cmao20 (talk) 23:27, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 13:16, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:39, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:25, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Religion#Christianity

File:Abtei Seckau Basilika Innenraum 06.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2020 at 10:34:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Austria
Info Interior of Seckau Basilica, Styria, Austria. All by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:34, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:34, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 11:15, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:47, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 13:11, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Tesla - 💬 15:13, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 16:18, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive, and I like the warm light. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:28, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:36, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:13, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Clearly outstanding. Cmao20 (talk) 23:31, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:20, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 16:13, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 13:17, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support – It echoes many similar images from the past? --Aliwal2012 (talk) 16:27, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:41, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:43, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 14:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Austria

File:Fire salamander (Salamandra Salamandra).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2020 at 09:06:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Amphibians#Order_:_Caudata_(Newts_and_Salamanders)
Info Close-up of Fire salamander (Salamandra Salamandra). Stack of 29 images + LED ligth. My work. --Mile (talk) 09:06, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 09:06, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 13:09, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:37, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the reflections in the eyes --Uoaei1 (talk) 20:08, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support High level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:09, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:41, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:50, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 10:06, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:17, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 09:48, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 18:20, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:12, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tesla - 💬 20:27, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Don't like the crop. Reflections are distracting as is blurred forground. The definition isn't great. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:03, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:04, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:53, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:47, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:56, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 16:14, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:37, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice stacked photo.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:22, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Wilfredor (talk) 17:10, 20 November 2020 (UTC)--Wilfredor (talk) 17:10, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support – Stunning stacked photo. I'm featuring it on the Afrikaans Wikipedia's home page next month! --Aliwal2012 (talk) 16:57, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 16:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Amphibians#Order_:_Caudata_(Newts_and_Salamanders)

File:SL Anuradhapura asv2020-01 img31 Abhayagiriya Stupa.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2020 at 01:38:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Sri Lanka
Info The Abhayagiriya Stupa in Anuradhapura, Sri Lanka ---- all by A.Savin --A.Savin 01:38, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 01:38, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive stupa, photographed about as well as could be, I think. About how tall is the stupa? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:15, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
75 m (but originally it had 115). --A.Savin 13:58, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:44, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. Cmao20 (talk) 08:17, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:13, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 12:40, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 13:19, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 20:00, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:28, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Top crop is slightly too tight but very nice overall. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:11, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:47, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Sri Lanka

File:AMD Ryzen 7 1800X.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2020 at 10:28:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Machines
Info created by Brian Wong - uploaded by 空气小猫 - nominated by IN (talk) 10:28, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--IN (talk) 10:28, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good composition but a lot of CA and unsharpness at full size. Cmao20 (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Cmao20: I have adjusted the brightness, contrast, saturation, and sharpness, please comment again. Thanks. Pseudo Classes (talk) 17:31, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ SmallTim (talk) 18:18, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
SmallTim: Not eligible to vote, less than 50 edits on Commons. --A.Savin 20:29, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
The chromatic aberration got much worse by raising saturation. Oppose as for now, might switch to support if this is adressed properly --Kreuz schnabel 18:51, 23 November 2020 (UTC) Uploaded a new version, de-CA’ed and less saturated than the latest edits (which were overdone IMHO). Abstain as editor. --Kreuz schnabel 19:07, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Kreuzschnabel: agreed, but while in your version the surrounding main board looks better, it has reduced contrast on the CPU, making the print (or whatever that is) harder to read than in the original. Any chance you could have another look at that? Cheers, --El Grafo (talk) 09:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I am not that blown away by this shot to put hours of editing into it. Feel free to revert or upload your own version. --Kreuz schnabel 10:00, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. To be honest: I feel the same. --El Grafo (talk) 11:55, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed.

File:Brisbane Riverfire 2009 Bridge.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2020 at 04:08:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Australia
Info created by Pauls Parking - uploaded by Woodford52 - nominated by IN (talk) 04:08, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--IN (talk) 04:08, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, There are perspective and CA issues, and the top crop is not ideal.--Peulle (talk) 07:58, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I wouldn't support it, but come on there are much worse pictures promoted crop and perspective wise. - Benh (talk) 10:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed. You need to slow down or withdraw some of your other nominations. This is your fourth active nom right now. --Cart (talk) 10:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eichhörnchen IMG 1316.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2020 at 18:21:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Sciuridae_(Squirrels)
Info created by Fischer.H - uploaded by Fischer.H - nominated by Fischer.H -- Fischer.H (talk) 18:21, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Fischer.H (talk) 18:21, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support This time the tail is complete ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 18:33, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:55, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Animal is great. I don't like the building in the background. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:06, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Spurzem (talk) 13:10, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Unfortunately, no other background was available at the time of recording. --Fischer.H (talk) 15:43, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per charlesjsharp. Sorry but the background is too disturbing for FP (the problem is not the urbanised area in general but the harsh edges from the roofs and the wires in the sky, the squirrel itself is very cute though :)).--Tesla - 💬 08:53, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles and Tesla. Could do with a bit of brightness. Furtunately, my dog’s sleeping in the kitchen so I can open this at full size without him leaping into it instantly :D --Kreuz schnabel 09:43, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cute, sharp enough and I don't mind the background, as human-inhabited areas are part of squirrels' habitats. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:34, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:20, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per other opposers and after looking current FP-s of Family Squirrels, sorry --Ivar (talk) 08:43, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others --El Grafo (talk) 12:26, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, background is too busy, per others. Daniel Case (talk) 03:23, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Fischer.H (talk) 08:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Turmfalke P1200751.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2020 at 16:18:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds # Falconiformes/Fam.Falco tinnunculus
Info created by Fischer.H - uploaded by Fischer.H - nominated by Fischer.H -- Fischer.H (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Fischer.H (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ SmallTim (talk) 18:29, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
SmallTim: Not eligible to vote, less than 50 edits on Commons. --A.Savin 20:30, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Distracting background, looks partly oversaturated (claws), low resolution, and generally does not quite pass the threshold of bird FPs. --Kreuz schnabel 18:48, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not sharp enough for FP. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:58, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The resolution is a bit small and the sharpness could be better.--Peulle (talk) 08:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Fischer.H (talk) 08:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:7 am in New York (Unsplash).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2020 at 10:36:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Settlements#United_States
Info created by Ben o'bro - uploaded by 空气小猫 - nominated by IN (talk) 10:36, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--IN (talk) 10:36, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support bit soft, but otherwise great composition and gorgeous illuminated street - Benh (talk) 14:33, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I don't know about this one. I agree with Benh that it's a fine composition and the light is beautiful, but I have trouble thinking of this uniformly unsharp a photo as one of the very best on the site. Is there any possibility of getting in touch with the photographer and seeing whether a bit of sharpening could be done? I doubt how much it would help, but it might be worth trying. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:16, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Lack of sharpness on both sides. Incidentally no metadata -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:54, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ A little bit unsharp but really not so bad, and otherwise per Benh. Cmao20 (talk) 20:17, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The edits have made the picture much worse. Cmao20 (talk) 08:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose It's from Unsplash so I doubt that we can contact the photographer asking for sharpening. Currently too unsharp to me, light is great anyway. --Tesla - 💬 20:26, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Tesla Delacroix: This file is published under the CC0, so I think it can be modified by everyone. I will try to sharpen it. Pseudo Classes (talk) 07:22, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ping me if you've sharpened it, but a modification of the RAW file would achieve better results.--Tesla - 💬 08:58, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Tesla Delacroix: Done. Pseudo Classes (talk) 17:10, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Now it looks oversharpened, unnatural and much worse. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:22, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Agree -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:07, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Basile Morin. --Fischer.H (talk) 18:01, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 18:49, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Basile Morin, Fischer.H, and Daniel Case: I have adjusted the brightness, saturation, and sharpness, please comment again. Thanks. Pseudo Classes (talk) 17:10, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please revert. ❌ Quality is very bad now -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:07, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Pseudo Classes (talk) 17:55, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~: After adjusted, the picture becomes more satisfying. SmallTim (talk) 18:24, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
SmallTim: Not eligible to vote, less than 50 edits on Commons. --A.Savin 20:28, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 15:09, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:HG7 5913.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2020 at 09:17:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Iran
Info A view from interior of Nasir-ol-Molk Mosque, Shiraz, Iran. created by Herbert karim masihi - uploaded by Herbert karim masihi - nominated by محک -- Ταπυροι (گپ) 09:17, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ταπυροι (گپ) 09:17, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Shiasun (talk) 09:31, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not so sure about the unusual colors of carpets. (For comparison) --Gnosis (talk) 09:37, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Distorted perspective, and lacks symmetry; probably the photographer should have positioned slightly more to the left. The file should be renamed to a meaningful name, no matter the result. --A.Savin 13:39, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per A.Savin and also could be sharper -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:48, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Colors do seem off compared to existing FPs/QIs of this mosque's interior, and circular portions of the ceiling are not that sharp. Compare File:Mezquita de Nasirolmolk, Shiraz, Irán, 2016-09-24, DD 57-59 HDR.jpg, for example. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:21, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The file has been renamed to “Nasir-ol-Molk Mosque (inside).jpg” - Déjà vu • ✉ 17:47, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very beautiful and image quality is acceptable, but it's the asymmetry that bothers me. Cmao20 (talk) 20:15, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Oversaturated and posterized on the stained glass, also unsharp and per others. Daniel Case (talk) 05:17, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose – agree with Daniel, Oversaturated with magenta --Aliwal2012 (talk) 17:11, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 9 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 15:08, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Petite Venise depuis le pont de la rue de Turenne (Colmar).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2020 at 11:42:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
Info Little Venice from the rue de Turenne bridge in Colmar (Haut-Rhin, France). -- Gzen92 ^[discuter] 11:42, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gzen92 ^[discuter] 11:42, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't feel like this is one of the best images on Commons.--Peulle (talk) 10:21, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I feel like I'd like to see more on either side, although I understand why you went for the very narrow crop to focus on the one building and its reflections. The image quality is very good, and overall I think it just about works. Cmao20 (talk) 20:21, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose crop. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:05, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Peulle. --Fischer.H (talk) 18:00, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice photo, but the composition isn't blowing me away. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:35, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 18:52, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 15:09, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:SHACKLETON LC130 TAKEOFF-HR.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2020 at 13:20:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport
Info created by Charles Kaminski - uploaded by ToprakM - nominated by ToprakM --ToprakM ^✉ 13:20, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ToprakM ^✉ 13:20, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very good photo quality for 2007 and might be a useful valued image in the right scope, but I don't like parts of the plane being cropped out. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:20, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan, very striking photo but the cropped bits of the plane make it less than excellent. Cmao20 (talk) 11:14, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, awkward crops. Daniel Case (talk) 18:55, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Kreuz schnabel 21:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:54, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sea Turtle in Apo Island.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2020 at 13:58:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Cheloniidae (Sea Turtles)
Info created & uploaded by Anna Varona - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 13:58, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 13:58, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support proof that there's no need for big fancy camera to take great underwater pic. - Benh (talk) 14:26, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 16:08, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Beautiful, ~~but I see magenta halos on some of the corals on the left. If that's CA, it needs to be eliminated. If it's not CA, what is it?~~ -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:12, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Looks like tricky CA. I tried and failed to fix it --Ivar (talk) 19:31, 16 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:55, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm sorry, I don't think this should be an FP with so much magenta CA. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:05, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan.--Peulle (talk) 10:18, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Peulle: what do you think of recent fixes? Tomer T (talk) 16:29, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but I'm still seeing those thick bands of CA, I don't feel like I can support this one.--Peulle (talk) 15:55, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support This one was worth to save, and author we won't probably see here. Would be good to have original but some is done. Check again Ikan Kekek,Peulle. I think is was problem with housing, this is too much CA for a good camera. --Mile (talk) 11:06, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 17:06, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support after the great edit by Mile. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:54, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Tesla - 💬 20:24, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent underwater photography. Cmao20 (talk) 20:25, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:59, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Mile -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:29, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 08:00, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:30, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 20:47, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:58, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 16:15, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 23:25, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:15, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 06:51, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:57, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Reptiles#Family : Cheloniidae (Sea Turtles)

File:Acronicta aceris caterpillar - Keila.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Dec 2020 at 05:55:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Noctuidae_(Owlet_Moths)
Info all by Ivar (talk) 05:55, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 05:55, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question Excellent quality but the yellow bristles look a bit overexposed/oversaturated, esp. those near the center of image, leading to loss of detail. Any chance to improve that? --Kreuz schnabel 10:04, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Kreuzschnabel: this caterpillar was moving (focus stacking not possible) and some of her hair were not in focal plane. --Ivar (talk) 10:16, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Nice colours but I guess the movement is why the focus is not great. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:20, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Ivar (talk) 05:32, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Site des Orgues 024.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2020 at 07:12:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#France
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 07:12, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 07:12, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Immense resolution and beautiful scenery but I find it missing a great composition. Cmao20 (talk) 13:29, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I tend to agree with Cmao20, but I think if you crop to the left of the bushy tree, you can make the composition work. I've added a note with a proposed crop, but it's only approximate. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:30, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Cropped as proposed --Llez (talk) 13:40, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I might crop just a hair more to the left, but this works for me already. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:13, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose per Cmao. I actually think the crop made the composition weaker, as the path on the left now just leads outside of the frame; in the original, the tiny path of grass at the left delineates a path towards the main subject. The cropping of the tall tree on the right also makes it so that there is no longer any justifiable reason for having so much sky. I suggest splitting up the files and presenting the new crop as an alt, as overwriting should only be done on an FPC where the newer version is uncontroversially better. Let me know if you'd like me to help using my admin tools. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 14:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I suggest a further crop that gets rid of the distracting bush at lower right, most of the pathway, and the less interesting part of the rock formation off to the right. Daniel Case (talk) 06:02, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I withdraw my nomination And nominate a version with the above mentioned crop --Llez (talk) 13:33, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schloss Stolzenfels 01 Koblenz 2015.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2020 at 19:44:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications
Info created by Schaengel - uploaded by Schaengel - nominated by Till.niermann -- Till (talk) 19:44, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Till (talk) 19:44, 17 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
~~Neutral~~ for now. Great photo but quite a lot of green and purple CA dotted around. Can you fix that? Cmao20 (talk) 07:59, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Much better. A sharp and competently-executed photo of a beautiful motif, so it is FP to me now. Cmao20 (talk) 23:29, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

- Comment I‘m afraid I don‘t have the means to do that. --Till (talk) 16:50, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The problem is that Schaengel has left us some years ago in a rage, therefore he will probably not help us here. --Aristeas (talk) 18:12, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment Just removed the CAs in GIMP and brightened the forest a bit, but I don’t want to upload a new version during the voting. --Kreuzschnabel 09:58, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    - Comment Thank you! But as CAs seem to be an issue for all voters so far, it might be a good idea to replace the current image by the one that you corrected. --Till (talk) 14:25, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      - There you are. Might not be perfect but CA shouldn’t be a serious issue any more. @A.Savin: , @Cmao20: , please re-check :) --Kreuz schnabel 16:24, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Apart from CA's, the light is a bit weak for me. --A.Savin 01:11, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose CAs, and light too harsh. --Kreuz schnabel 09:48, 19 November 2020 (UTC) Abstain as co-editor now ;) --Kreuz schnabel 16:30, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good edit and nice composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:32, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 23:19, 19 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Very weak oppose Low light (perhaps underexposed?) and large shaded areas in background throw this one off for me. Daniel Case (talk) 04:03, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good now. @Kreuzschnabel: Thank you very much for your improvements! --Aristeas (talk) 13:12, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 02:21, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sperling Weibchen-20201025-RM-163340.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2020 at 19:48:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Passeridae (Sparrows)
Info Sparrow on a sunflower in a garden in Upper Franconia. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 19:48, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 19:48, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 13:22, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 13:28, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support ... though the bluish 'shadow' in the lower left is a bit disturbing. --Cayambe (talk) 16:12, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment yes, and there's some sort of double image on the leaf (see note) and the tail's a bit odd. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:03, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Done @Cayambe: @Charlesjsharp: I tried to fix it. Unfortunately I cannot change anything on the tail.--Ermell (talk) 21:41, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The unsharp leaves are a bit distracting, but look how sharp the bird's claws are! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:05, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. ··· 🌸 Rachmat04 · ☕ 06:41, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:48, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:32, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:40, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 19:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:43, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support The leaf is a bit distracting, but the expression on the bird's face is enough to overcome it. Daniel Case (talk) 03:26, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:49, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:34, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 02:20, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Passeridae (Sparrows)

File:Forrest Gump Point Monument Valley November 2018 003.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2020 at 21:22:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United States#Utah
Info created & uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 21:22, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 21:22, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:44, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Personally I prefer File:Forrest Gump Point Monument Valley November 2018 001.jpg, and I plan to nominate it once the Photo Challenge voting period is over. @Tomer T: Could you please withdraw this nomination? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:51, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Alternatively, what do people think about a set nomination of these two (001 and 003)? It's not without precedent, e.g. Commons:Featured picture candidates/Set/Boston skyline from East Boston. But I just prefer for my image to not run concurrently in both processes; my personal rule is that I don't nominate my PC submissions for FPC during the voting period as it may influence the results. So I'm happy to restart this at the beginning of December, in whichever form. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:15, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@King of Hearts: , a set nomination seems like a good idea to me. Tomer T (talk) 11:53, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination I'll let User:King of Hearts handle this as he'd prefer. Tomer T (talk) 06:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Casas Coloradas, Plaza Alta, Badajoz, España, 2020-07-22, DD 49.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2020 at 16:48:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Spain
Info View of the "Casas Coloradas" (Spanish for "Red Houses"), Badajoz, Spain. The facades are one of the most beautiful elements of the "Plaza Alta" (Spanish for "High Square"). The houses along with the square date from the Middle Age where the square was used as a market. Poco a poco (talk) 16:48, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 16:48, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Beautiful. This nomination could very well pass without any edits to the photo, but I'm wondering if just a little sharpening would further improve it. I don't know and therefore ask you what you think. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:16, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ikan Kekek I've increased sharpness Poco a poco (talk) 13:40, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:02, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Striking, but I don't think you were so lucky with the light. Cmao20 (talk) 11:19, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:36, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the sky is partly overexposed. --Ivar (talk) 21:00, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ivar: Fixed Poco a poco (talk) 10:28, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral better, but the light conditions (harsh midday sunlight in the summer) were not favorable. --Ivar (talk) 10:48, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Imo the light is not optimal for FP, sorry. Btw there is a problem with the aspect ratio. The arches, which I guess in reality are round (or semicircular), as you can see from other pictures of the building, look very flat and actually, since they are seen from the side, they should look much higher than semicircular. That results by correcting the vertical lines. --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 04:20, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Wolfgang Moroder: fair enough, I improved the aspect ratio and the symmetry of the image, what do you think now? --Poco a poco (talk) 10:28, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think the correction is not enough. A round arch (arco de medio punto) in an oblique projection must become a stilted arch ( arco realzado/peraltado). I appreciate that you corrected the symmetry but I still believe the light is not good enough for FP (just my personal taste) I prefer this in regard to the light, more "dramatic". --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 12:50, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Moroder. I think this is just a difficult subject: you took this at the height of the summer sun, which results in boring colors, and any lower and there would be distracting shadows. What I generally do in these tight situations is wait for dusk: sometimes 10-15 minutes after sunset simply to get nice, even illumination does the trick, other times I prefer the blue hour look. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Light, per Moroder and King. Daniel Case (talk) 03:23, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Poco a poco (talk) 15:00, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poco a poco (talk) 15:00, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Interior of church of São José, Ponta Delgada, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2020 at 12:32:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

General view
High altar
Side chapel
Side chapel
Ceiling

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Portugal
Info St Joseph's church, Ponta Delgada, São Miguel Island, Azores, Portugal. The baroque temple dates from 1709 but it's located over an former temple from the 16th century in the middle of the city. c/u/n by me, Poco a poco (talk) 12:32, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 12:32, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support ~~but with one condition~~ IMO the ceiling image is blurred, perhaps because one of the images that went into making the HDR is either motion-blurred or out of alignment with the others. This should probably be fixed before the set is promoted. Other than that, extraordinary photographs. The other four images would each make very strong FP candidates. Cmao20 (talk) 13:27, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Cmao20, thanks for your feedback, there was indeed room for improvement, what do you think now? Poco a poco (talk) 14:07, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Much better! Cmao20 (talk) 16:27, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:34, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:47, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:27, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:40, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:42, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:41, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 18:24, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 22:09, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:35, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:02, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Portugal

File:Wroclaw - wieza Uniwersytetu Wroclawskiego z ksiezycem w tle.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2020 at 09:38:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Poland
Info created by Jar.ciurus - uploaded by Jar.ciurus - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 09:38, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrei (talk) 09:38, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:40, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:26, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The crescent moon makes it very special. Cmao20 (talk) 13:49, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 14:28, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:27, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question Can the verticals on the right side be fixed? --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:37, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- I tried some cropping but it seems that correcting it would mean cutting a part of a spire --Andrei (talk) 09:02, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - Andrei: if you then scale down 2-3% it should work, Poco a poco (talk) 18:42, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    - Poco a poco can you check if it's better or not? I'm slowly learning how to use GMIP. --Andrei (talk) 19:21, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
      - An improvement indeed. There is a slight tilt now in cw direction but hard to notice (I'd had applied a perspective correction for the whole image -both sides- and not just a deformation to get the right side straight, but as said, good enough now) Poco a poco (talk) 22:42, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 18:25, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:42, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:52, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:37, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 11:28, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kingsif (talk) 06:16, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:27, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Towers#Poland

File:2017, cuba, jardines aggressor, playa bonita, spineyhead blennie (23700572188).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2020 at 15:24:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Chaenopsidae
Info created by q phia - uploaded by Christian Ferrer - nominated by Ivar (talk) 15:24, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 15:24, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support hello there! — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:58, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amazing! --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:33, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 22:09, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sharp enough, especially considering that according to w:Acanthemblemaria spinosa: "It grows to a total length of 2.8 cm (1.1 in)." -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:05, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Peulle (talk) 08:03, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Gnosis (talk) 08:51, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 17:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 18:28, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:31, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 22:21, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:47, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:42, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 11:29, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:44, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kingsif (talk) 06:14, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:26, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish#Family_:_Chaenopsidae

File:Kandanaar kelan theyyam at Peeleri vayanattukulavan kaavu 10.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2020 at 19:32:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info Theyyam (Teyyam, Theyam, Theyyattam) is a popular ritual form of worship in Kerala and Karnataka, India. Theyyam consisted of several thousand-year-old traditions, rituals and customs. There is no stage or curtain or other such arrangements for the performance. The devotees would be standing or some of them would be sitting on a sacred tree in front of the shrine. In short, it is an open theatre.

All by Shagil Kannur -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 19:32, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 19:32, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but the scene is a bit too chaotic for me to know what I'm looking at. I also think the file info page could be a bit better.--Peulle (talk) 08:01, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Arms and part of the fire cut at the right -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:22, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Maybe if it included the entire fire. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:45, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Dramatic photo but not an oustanding composition for me, per Ikan. Cmao20 (talk) 22:23, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile. Daniel Case (talk) 21:17, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The right crop is the main factor Kingsif (talk) 06:14, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:25, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lac du Salagou - October 2020.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2020 at 14:25:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/France#Hérault
Info created - uploaded - nominated by me. -- Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 14:25, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 14:25, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support great composition IMO — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:00, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support well done! --Ivar (talk) 19:46, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seven Pandas (talk) 22:42, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:13, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 11:19, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:39, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 18:27, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:39, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 22:16, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:48, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Pleasant colors -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:17, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 11:28, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Messily natural and all the more beautiful for it ... Daniel Case (talk) 18:30, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:27, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/France#Hérault

File:School of sardines at the Monterey Bay Aquarium (12056).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2020 at 14:47:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Other#United_States
Info the Monterey Bay Aquarium Open Ocean exhibit. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:47, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support This exhibit is IMO quite special. It's a big, open, completely dark room with a great big viewing window looking out to somewhat less dark water. It was an exercise in capturing crisp silhouettes with decent contrast and not-completely-blurred fast-moving fish in a dark place. There are obvious technical shortcomings but I think the wow factor makes up for them. Curious what others will think. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 14:47, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support a great idea well executed! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:28, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:34, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 20:44, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:54, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Big wow and wonderful composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:06, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others: tricky shot well done! --El Grafo (talk) 09:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really great! --Cart (talk) 10:50, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Creative use. --Mile (talk) 11:29, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 19:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 09:55, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:38, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Martin. --Aristeas (talk) 18:28, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:39, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Everything has been said - a creative idea well-executed. Cmao20 (talk) 22:18, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:20, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:47, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:17, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 11:29, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support A very cool picture, in so many ways. Really, we should make it lead image in Public aquarium, because it just ... it explains the concept more eloquently than any words could. Daniel Case (talk) 19:41, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kingsif (talk) 06:13, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:27, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Other#United_States

File:Nazareno de San Pablo.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2020 at 00:42:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures
Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 00:42, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question What materials is this sculpture made from? If you know, please add that information. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:16, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

It's a sculpture of The Nazarene in the Church of La Chiquinquira, made of wood and using a wig made of human hair. In the seventeenth century, Caracas was struck by the plague of black vomit and at that time, and in the midst of such mortality as a result of the plague, the Nazarene stumbled on the path of the procession, with a lemon tree, entangling in its branches and a large quantity of lemons falling to the ground. "Miracle, Miracle!" Shouted the inhabitants of Caracas, taking said lemons and starting from there a tradition, referring to the healing properties of lemon --Wilfredor (talk) 16:44, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thanks. It's a great story and a striking photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:24, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would just like to clarify that this is an additional religious image is not this, this is another statue of the same saint and same type of devotion. --Wilfredor (talk) 22:32, 20 November 2020 (UTC)--Wilfredor (talk) 22:32, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

What is an additional image? I'm confused. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:37, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is not the original image of the Nazarene, it is an image of the Nazarene but in another position, it is not a replica --Wilfredor (talk) 22:42, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I see. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:41, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Well captured and good quality. Cmao20 (talk) 08:16, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:11, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 12:40, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The hair like real mixed with the sculpted beard doesn't make for an aesthetic combination. Poor design in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:03, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 13:18, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:45, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above --Andrei (talk) 19:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above, the statue is not the best artwork --Uoaei1 (talk) 20:17, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I agree; it looks almost like a plastic or wax likeness of someone with hair added. However, it's interesting and a well-composed and shot photo, and that's enough for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:57, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support Great depth and colors Kingsif (talk) 06:22, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:15, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures

File:Hong Kong Light Rail Light Trails.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2020 at 10:11:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Transport#Metro_stations
Info created and uploaded by Prosperity Horizons - nominated by IN (talk) 10:11, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--IN (talk) 10:11, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose ~~Without categories~~. Except for the light lines little image content.--Ermell (talk) 19:39, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's a composition of light trails, but to my mind, it's a good composition of light trails and works, even if I might prefer a slightly more generous crop on the right. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:22, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Works for me as well --Kritzolina (talk) 21:11, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan, yes it's quite simple, but it's striking and works well for me. Cmao20 (talk) 11:13, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Llez (talk) 12:41, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose does little for me Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:24, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The effect is common, so I'd expect more colors or a more interesting background/compo --Poco a poco (talk) 12:42, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao. Daniel Case (talk) 05:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Little content, no wow on my side either, I agree with others -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:59, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:25, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Eureka Inn, Entrance Hall.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2020 at 14:00:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#United States
Info created & uploaded by Frank Schulenburg - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 14:00, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 14:00, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:43, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Composition too tight, lack a bit of space on the sides. Also the lower left cabinet seems overexposed --Wilfredor (talk) 17:06, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Question Beautiful, but could we get the entire couch on the right in the picture? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:18, 20 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Unfortunately, there's nothing I can do to make this wider with the material I've got. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 05:15, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support It is a little bit tight, but when you're trying to capture a place like this in one frame, you're going to have to make compromises somewhere. Overall I think the architecture is really lovely and there's a lot to look at here. The image quality is great. Any clue as to the reason for the slightly strange assortment of presidential portraits on the wall (Ford on the left, Reagan on the right, and, if I'm not much mistaken, Herbert Hoover in the middle?) Cmao20 (talk) 11:17, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose crop at bottom Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:23, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support When I saw the image the first thing that came to my mind have been "wow". Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:50, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao. --Aristeas (talk) 13:20, 22 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 10:41, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ultimately, the composition works for me, even though I would have preferred a crop slightly further right, and it's a unique, beautiful room with a lot to look at. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:34, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Per Charles, although I understand that there was probably no better way to take the shot Poco a poco (talk) 12:43, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support for the same reason Diego opposes. Daniel Case (talk) 19:04, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support The crop could have been better, but the edges are barely important with this composition. It's an astounding image, and for a room so packed the colors are all great and it doesn't look busy Kingsif (talk) 06:20, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:47, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#United States

File:Englische Rose -The Squire- Raureif-20201107-RM-091853.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2020 at 09:34:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Rosaceae
Info created and uploaded by Ermell - nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 09:34, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 09:34, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:44, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Probably the best ‘rose with hoar frost’ photo I have ever seen. --Aristeas (talk) 18:32, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Really wonderful details on the rose. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:50, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support I almost always support Ermell's focus stacks. Cmao20 (talk) 22:36, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:48, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 08:12, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:24, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for the nom XRay and all the support.--Ermell (talk) 08:41, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:44, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 09:02, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:51, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice, beautiful red -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:14, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 11:32, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 20:45, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:16, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:13, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:37, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family_:_Rosaceae

Physalis peruviana, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Dec 2020 at 05:45:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Calyx open, exposing the ripe fruit
Ripe fruits: whole and cut open

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food_and_drink#Fruits_(raw)
Info all by Ivar (talk) 05:45, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 05:45, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:44, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:06, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:14, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Andrei (talk) 09:28, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 09:54, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:35, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really beautiful. --Aristeas (talk) 18:31, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 21:21, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 22:35, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:07, 25 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:49, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:44, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:49, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 22:46, 26 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:15, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mydreamsparrow (talk) 11:32, 27 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:47, 28 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:13, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:30, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mosbatho (talk) 18:57, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:37, 30 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Food_and_drink#Fruits_(raw)