User talk:Tesla Delacroix

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:IntelTesla)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
SpBot archives all sections tagged with {{Section resolved|1=~~~~}} . For the archive overview, see Archive.


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Tesla Delacroix!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 13:02, 12 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiDaheim[edit]

Hallo Tesla! Du könntest Deine in Österreich (selbst) aufgenommenen Bilder noch für unseren Fotowettbewerb WikiDaheim nominieren, da Du sie ja im Wettbewerbszeitraum hochgeladen hast. Das kannst Du, indem Du zu jenen Bildern, die geschützte Natur (z.B. Nationalpark) zeigen, {{WikiDaheim|2020|at|topic=Natural heritage}} einfügst (weitere Wettbewerbskategorien findest Du unter Category:Media from WikiDaheim 2020 in Austria). Wenn Du noch weitere Bilder hast, hast Du noch gut 23 Stunden Zeit, um damit am Wettbewerb teilzunehmen. Außerdem könntest Du Dich, wenn Du magst, an unserer Vorjury beteiligen, wo wir die Bilder mit 1 bis 5 Sternen bewerten - die besten ca. 500 gehen dann zur Hauptjury. Falls Du das willst, kannst Du, nachdem Du dich grad nicht über die Juryseite auf Wikipedia anmelden kannst, auch bei User talk:Braveheart bekanntgeben, dass Du mitmachen willst. Ein Monat vergeht dabei wie im Flug! ;-) Liebe Grüße, --Häferl (talk) 22:50, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Häferl! Vielen Dank für den Tipp! Gerne werde ich morgen noch ein paar Bilder dort einreichen. Ich muss mal sehen, wie viel Zeit ich habe, dann würde ich evtl. auch bei der Vorjury mitmachen ;) Liebe Grüße, --Tesla - 💬 00:41, 4 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viola scroll flash.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Even if I it's not mandatory I think, an English description would help editors to use this photo in other projects. Thank you --Lion-hearted85 21:05, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tea in action.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:17, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Waterdrop art.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:17, 7 October 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Water reservoir near Baden hut.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 21:59, 23 December 2020 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Isel near Clarahütte2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:29, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 29 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luberon Le Désert Blanc 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Very nice (IMHO aesthetically the best of the three). It would be even better if you could avoid sharpening the sky which just increases the noise (see note on the 3rd image). No offence, I just want to help to make good images better. --Aristeas 09:51, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for the feedback! --Tesla Delacroix 12:07, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thank you very much! --Aristeas 14:52, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luberon Le Désert Blanc 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
✓ Done Thanks for the feedback! --Tesla Delacroix 12:08, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 14:52, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luberon Le Désert Blanc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
A nice one. As I see you have applied some sharpening which improved the foreground, i.e. the in-focus area. However the sky is a bit nosiy now. Best solution would be to apply the sharpening only to the in-focus areas (roughly, the foreground) and not to the sky. You can do this in Lightroom. --Aristeas 09:46, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks for the feedback! --Tesla Delacroix 12:08, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thank you! --Aristeas 14:50, 12 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Île d’Or.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Would suggest brightening of the whole image and denoising of the tower --PantheraLeo1359531 13:47, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks! --Tesla Delacroix 15:51, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks --PantheraLeo1359531 15:59, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alcázar Baños María de Padilla.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:15, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Panorama of Ronda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please, check the verticals. --Tournasol7 09:46, 13 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done --Tesla Delacroix 09:29, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Looks good. -- Liberaler Humanist 21:51, 15 January 2021 (UTC)~
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

WikiDaheim 2020[edit]

Hallo Tesla Delacroix, danke für deine Bilder zu WikiDaheim 2020. Sie kommen etwas spät.

Nach dem CropTool muss das Ergebnis oft überarbeitet werden (Beschreibung, Kategorien oder Annotationen stimmen dann oft nicht mehr), gleiches gilt für zeitabhängige Kategorien (wie Wettbewerbskategorien). Du könntest Fremdarbeit reduzieren helfen, wenn du dich selbst um die Bereinigung kümmern würdest. Coole Fotos btw. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 13:13, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Herzi Pinki: Oh, dass noch die Wiki-Daheim Kats drinnen waren, hab ich nicht gesehen. Ich werde beim Croptool zukünftig genauer zu schauen, sorry.--Tesla - 💬 21:41, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Danke --Herzi Pinki (talk) 21:44, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wildenkogel before sunrise.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 09:34, 21 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tree near torrecilla2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Miha Peče 16:11, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palm tree Alcazar of Seville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Miha Peče 16:11, 9 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corinth Canal bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good Quality. --Fischer.H 18:33, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Brücke in Venedig[edit]

That one was difficult ;–)

Hallo Tesla,

Du hattest bei diesem Foto um Bestimmung der Brücke gebeten. Da ich gerade ein paar andere Venedig-Fotos eingeordnet habe, habe ich mich daran versucht – war nicht ganz einfach, da dieser Brückentyp ja relativ häufig ist. Über die Glockentürme im Hintergrund konnte ich den Kanal schließlich als Rio de San Barnaba und die Brücke als Ponte di San Barnaba bestimmen. Es ist die erste Aufnahme dieser Brücke von der Ostseite, wir haben bisher (glaube ich) nur die Westseite, das macht das Bild noch interessanter.

Ich habe mir erlaubt, das Bild auch gleich umzubenennen, da jetzt ein spezifischerer Dateiname möglich ist.

Herzliche Grüße, --Aristeas (talk) 16:08, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Aristeas, vielen Dank für die Bestimmung! Gerade bei der Vielzahl von ähnlichen Brücken sicher keine leichte Aufgabe, aber so ist es nun eingeordnet, danke! --Tesla - 💬 17:09, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]