User talk:Cephas

Welcome to commons Cephas. What better way than starting off with a Quality Image promotion could there be? :-) --QICbot (talk) 12:07, 12 May 2009 (UTC)

Ardea intermedia

Hello friend. A nice 2024 for you. This map have to be updated after the split of Ardea plumifera and A. brachyrhyncha (Thanks for your maps on these two). Good updated map at Birds of the World. Thanks. Hector Bottai (talk) 17:19, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Cyanocorax dickeyi map.svg

Hi, this map is being used in a current Featured Article Candidate at the English Wikipedia and a question came up about the base map that was used. Can you confirm if File:Mexico template.svg was use as the base for this?

Thanks! Grungaloo (talk) 16:19, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Pinging @Grungaloo I confirm that Mexico template.svg is the base map, but wait before any modification: since it is for a FA, I will make a better and more precise map. --Cephas (talk) 16:26, 31 March 2024 (UTC)

Phaethornis nattereri

Hello friend, hope everything is fine. This map do not reflect current distribution in two isolated areas. See Birds of the World for correction. Thanks. Hector Bottai (talk) 11:06, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Great, thanks.--Hector Bottai (talk) 17:33, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Phaethornis bourcieri

Hello. This map is lacking an isolated population south of the Amazon (see Birds of the World), important because HBW/Birdlife claims to be a separate species Phaethornis major. Thanks Hector Bottai (talk) 17:32, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Pinging @Hector Bottai. Hello Hector, I have questions about this map: I can use BOW for it, or combine maps of P. bourcieri and P. major of IUCN. I would prefer the last solution since updates are more recent on IUCN. What do you think? Also, once done, should I replace the actual map considering all Wps are not using the same classification?--Cephas (talk) 22:01, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello. At this moment the split of P. major is weak. I would do only one map for bourcieri combining both as iucn and replace current. May be a different colour for P. major area would be perfect. Should this change in the future, we change. Thanks. Hector Bottai (talk) 23:48, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Thanks!!--Hector Bottai (talk) 21:22, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Phaethornis griseogularis

Hello. This map is lacking the population of southwest Ecuador and nortwest Peru (see Phaethornis porcullae at IUCN), important because HBW/Birdlife claims to be a separate species Phaethornis porcullae. As in P. bourcieri, I think the best solution at this moment is merge both in one (griseogularis) with the porcullae area in different colour. Both maps are good at IUCN. Thanks. Hector Bottai (talk) 21:28, 6 May 2024 (UTC)