Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/November 2015

File:Ericushöft (Hamburg-HafenCity).14.12471.ajb.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2015 at 19:37:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
Info Historic quay wall Ericushöft and sourroundings in Hamburg. Created by Ajepbah - uploaded by Ajepbah - nominated by Christian Ferrer --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:37, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:37, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zcebeci (talk) 21:28, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice photo, but technically there is a remarkable variation of sharpness across the image. The center is tack sharp whereas especially the right side is much worse. --Tuxyso (talk) 21:55, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sakhalinio (talk) 23:51, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support for the wow. The sides may not be the sharpest, but the quay wall is the subject and is very sharp, so I don't see it as too big an issue. -- Thennicke (talk) 05:47, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:28, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:58, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:48, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support This perspective is special for me in spite of some quality issues. --Laitche (talk) 18:10, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking and well-done enough to make me forgive that tight crop at the bottom. Daniel Case (talk) 04:57, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. Contrast could be (a little bit) better. --XRay ^talk 17:13, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 09:35, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 07:02, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 11:48, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 09:47, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:47, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:05, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes

File:Black-crowned night heron (young bird), October 2015, Osaka.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2015 at 21:46:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Info c/u/n by Laitche (talk) 21:46, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Laitche (talk) 21:46, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Benh (talk) 22:18, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral The background is a little too busy for me. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:13, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- Ali Zifan 04:04, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 06:08, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I agree that the background is a bit busy, but not enough to prevent me supporting, as the image is otherwise excellent. An interesting composition and the background provides a hint of the environment. Diliff (talk) 09:38, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition. Charles (talk) 12:10, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 13:48, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 18:03, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I also prefer a more blurred background, but it's fine this way. --Kadellar (talk) 20:52, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zcebeci (talk) 21:35, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Warning ! This is a fake ! It has only "one" leg ! 😜😜--Jebulon (talk) 22:24, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Jebulon: posing like this :) --Laitche (talk) 22:44, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Really ? I'm just kiding, man !--Jebulon (talk) 22:54, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I know... --Laitche (talk) 23:12, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support I have decided to support this version for its brighter colors even though I think the crop is better composed. Daniel Case (talk) 04:02, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful. --Tremonist (talk) 15:02, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks the Pantanal. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:41, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:36, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 12:46, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Slightly too much lead room. --Hockei (talk) 17:02, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway FP, but I really would cut it a bit on the left side. --Hockei (talk) 14:31, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support this composition is much better IMO.--Hubertl 09:37, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 07:47, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

File:Cornaro chapel in Santa Maria della Vittoria in Rome HDR.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2015 at 21:48:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Sculptures
Info The Ecstasy of Saint Teresa (alternatively Saint Teresa in Ecstasy or Transverberation of Saint Teresa; in Italian: L'Estasi di Santa Teresa or Santa Teresa in estasi) is the central sculptural group in white marble set in an elevated aedicule in the Cornaro Chapel, Santa Maria della Vittoria, Rome. It was designed and completed by Gian Lorenzo Bernini, the leading sculptor of his day, who also designed the setting of the Chapel in marble, stucco and paint. It is generally considered to be one of the sculptural masterpieces of the High Roman Baroque. It pictures Teresa of Ávila. All by LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:48, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:48, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bello --Verde78 (talk) 10:44, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really nice. --Tremonist (talk) 14:57, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:47, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Very nice -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:13, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Such vivid colors and details. Daniel Case (talk) 05:46, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 07:28, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 17:13, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent! --Uoaei1 (talk) 17:54, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:08, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 09:34, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful. Atsme😊^Consult 12:55, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 07:02, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:57, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 05:16, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Sculptures

Info Demoted/Delisted to not featured per this consensus. --Cart (talk) 14:00, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Laon Cathedral Nave 2, Picardie, France - Diliff.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2015 at 17:53:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Diliff -- Diliff (talk) 17:53, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Diliff (talk) 17:53, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ Distortion problem, please see note. I will change my vote of course if the problem is fixed. --The Photographer (talk) 18:00, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- There is no note...? I don't know what distortion you're talking about but it's probably the same distortion that you would see in all my other interior photos. It's inherent of the wide angle of view and can't really be 'fixed' - it just is what it is. Diliff (talk) 18:18, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

distortion --The Photographer (talk) 18:27, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I see what you're talking about now. It's not distortion, it's the actual shape of the building. The leaning horizontal lines are in the original files before stitching too and I make sure my camera is completely horizontal and centred before I shoot. The leaning lines that you noted are probably partially because the choir is not aligned with the nave - if you look carefully you can see that it angles slightly to the left. Diliff (talk) 19:16, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I make sure my camera is completely horizontal and centred your comment

There are not always and visual hints that you are off-centre your comment

After reviewing the photograph from top to bottom I have concluded that the photograph was not taken from the exact center. I recommend the use of laser device to find the center. --The Photographer (talk) 10:58, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I added two notes mores, I see the same situation in the windows and columns. Maybe it appears to be a bit stiff towards the upper left corner? --The Photographer (talk) 19:34, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's possible you're right that I wasn't centred, but the point I was making above and below (in comments to Mile) is that there isn't always one single centre of a church or cathedral. Different areas of the church often have different centres, and some of them are not perfectly symmetrical in the first place. I'm not going to bring a laser range meter to a church. ;-) It's not necessary - I'm not a surveyor, I'm a photographer. The only reason you're even questioning whether I was perfectly centred is because FPC is so oriented towards pixel peeping. There are professional architectural photographers out there making a good income with photos that are not so perfectly aligned as this image IMO and people just accept the image as it is instead of asking for absolute perfection. In any case, as I said, I don't believe the problem you pointed out has anything to do with not being centred. The left side of the central triforium leans upwards while the right side is (virtually) straight. Whether this is because it actually increases in height or whether it is some other geometric issue, I cannot say, but I do know that the lines of this part of the building are not straight in reality. If it was a problem of not being centred, both the left and right sides of it would be leaning but they would be leaning at the same angle, not at different angles. Diliff (talk) 19:29, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment Diliff. This is a great picture and I agree with you, it can't be fixed, try fix it could spoil your technique. Best way is take again. The possibility that there is an asymmetry in the Cathedral is possible, but unlikely.Please correct me if I'm wrong, This shot has a no possible opening for the human eye and therefore perhaps Jebulon commentary, however, the inclination generated by the possible lack of center or asymmetry creates a misperception of reality from my point of view. This image is perfect, the technique is perfect, however, I am trying to provide a comment for your images may be better. I am a faithful follower of you, however, this small detail could be corrected with another shot, break your technique for me is not an option.--The Photographer (talk) 10:12, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Sorry no. Just because I know the place very well and I don't recognize this cathedral which is my favorite gothic one. This projection disagreement, as usual.--Jebulon (talk) 19:27, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Those two "horizontals" at notes aren't as they suppose to be despite central position. But I would definitely put this version, which is much more interesting. Just crop the bottom up to the pillars. --Mile (talk) 20:01, 22 October 2015 (UTC) p.S. On the other hand, they might be such in real, I already experienced similar stuff.[reply]
- The problem with the horizontals is also often because the central aisle of the church is not actually the true centre of the church. There are not always and visual hints that you are off-centre when you are there in the church and just a few centimetres here or there is enough to create this slight tilt on some horizontal lines. It's very difficult and not always solvable. Even if I did align myself with the centre of the church, it would mean that I would be closer to the left or right side of the aisle and then the aisle would look off-centre. These churches are old and asymmetrical and the photo can't always be symmetrical when this is the case. Diliff (talk) 21:25, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice atmosphere! -- Wolf im Wald 21:48, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support the issues mentioned - if avoidable at all - don't spoil this great picture for me --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:06, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Wolf and Martin. --Tremonist (talk) 12:50, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Honestly I don't really care about whether it's perfectly symmetrical or not. The picture is great in quality and composition and has a high educational value. Additionally I find it very beautiful. Of course it's an interpretation of reality somehow - just like every other photograph in this world. What are we complaining about? Let's step back for a moment and reflect about our standards! We promoted lots of pictures in the last months which were not even close to the quality of this one. --Code (talk) 14:54, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:45, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:45, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 09:54, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I also was in Laon recently, as you can see from my own FP nomination, and I also took a photo like this one. But this one is much better. --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:16, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 05:13, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

File:Palacio Real de Olite, Navarra, España, 2015-01-06, DD 07-09 HDR.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2015 at 20:29:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications
Info View of the narrow Villavieja street with the Palace of the Kings of Navarre in the background, Olite, Navarre, Spain. Olite is a village with a population of less than 4000 marked by the castle, built during the 13th and 14th centuries and one of the seats of the Court of the Kingdom of Navarre, since the reign of Charles III "the Noble". Poc o² 20:29, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 20:29, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good composition. --Laitche (talk) 20:47, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done! -- Wolf im Wald 21:45, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 22:08, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:21, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Colors washed out, lack of contrast.--Jebulon (talk) 23:24, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support the foggy background gives the picture a special touch that I like. --Merops (talk) 03:51, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 05:50, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support great composition & mood --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:02, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Sakhalinio (talk) 10:26, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 12:52, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Colors of the castle too pale, perhaps they could be fixed though. Charles (talk) 15:23, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Jebulon, Charles, they are pale in the picture, because they were pale when I took it. It isn't surprising in such a foggy day. Poc o² 16:20, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Ah!, you should have had a few drinks and waited for the fog to clear little by little.... Charles (talk) 16:22, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- A few drinks means shake blur in general...--Jebulon (talk) 16:25, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Then you would talk of a QI and not a FP, I am afraid, but fine. Poc o² 16:27, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Qualified support I'm !voting for this on perspective grounds, though I'd like to know a little bit more about when it was taken (the timestamp is obviously wrong). I don't mind the colors, and knowing that it was taken in a light fog explains a lot (otherwise I'd think it was overprocessed). Daniel Case (talk) 16:52, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I was taken at around 9:30 a.m. Poc o² 17:45, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Code (talk) 17:36, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, I'm with Jebulon on this one. It looks like a well-done DRI missing just a little bit of editing to make it look less faded. — Julian H.^✈ 09:52, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hockei (talk) 10:29, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support The foggy air gives some depth to it. A refreshing exception among the other, usually very crisp, streetview FPs. --Ximonic (talk) 15:23, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 05:14, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications

File:Palazzo Barberini (Rome) - Bernini's staircase.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Oct 2015 at 20:29:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info created and uploaded by Livioandronico2013 - nominated by Σπάρτακος -- Σπάρτακος (talk) 20:29, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Σπάρτακος (talk) 20:29, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, don't like the composition. -- Wolf im Wald 21:43, 22 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for nomine --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 05:46, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Interesting geometrical shapes, nice contrast. --Tremonist (talk) 12:53, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Interesting perspective, but too dark. That's a case where HDR might work. Yann (talk) 14:19, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Yann. Daniel Case (talk) 16:52, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 05:15, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stained-glass Antwerp 3a.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2015 at 23:49:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info Three stained-glass windows in the Cathedral of Our Lady, Antwerp. From left to right: Saint Ursula and Saint Gaspar, by E. Didron, 1873; Alexander Farnese offering the keys of Antwerp to Our Lady, by Stalins & Janssens, 1884; and Our Lady of Stekske, by Stalins & Janssens, 1878. There are 34 large stained-glass windows in the cathedral. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:49, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:49, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent Quality. --The Photographer (talk) 23:52, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 07:00, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I suppose you made 3 different shots and stitch them in one, but problem in there is visible difference in exposition and WB, so you should enframe them separately giving some space between them. Borders in shadow are disturbing and one might think this is original appearance. Otherwise vitrages are great. --Mile (talk) 08:08, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Mile. The seams are very prominently not matching. — Julian H.^✈ 09:11, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Question I can't really see the mismatched seams that well ... can someone point them out in a note? Daniel Case (talk) 03:50, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I put two notes. --Mile (talk) 13:47, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can anything be done about this? I suppose the changes would take longer, won't they? --Tremonist (talk) 15:17, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Info The only thing that can be done is to paint the offending areas by cloning. I'm not sure I will or should do that. @Mile: the differences between the windows are colour differences, not caused by variations in wb or exposition. Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:58, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Alvesgaspar: I am talking for differences in shadows. Vitgares are fine. You just cut each from your originals and put them in one photo, some white spacing between. I cant solve it from this one since you made some unlucky borders and rectangles...and this is FP worthy. --Mile (talk) 17:18, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Thanks to all for the suggestions. I will re-submit a new version with improvements. Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:49, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Human gallstones 2015 G1.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2015 at 05:55:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Others
Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:55, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Info Human gallstones, all removed in one patient. Grid scale 1 mm.
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:55, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kikos (talk) 07:52, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Hight EV, however, composition and flash looks like a hasty decision. --The Photographer (talk) 12:59, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good in combination with the scale below. --Tremonist (talk) 14:56, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per The Photographer.--Fotoriety (talk) 21:53, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Tremonist. --Iotatau (talk) 08:07, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Lighting is not up to Commons' FP standards for table-top photography. Looks like direct, hard, undiffused, on-camera flash? Probably a good candidate for QI, VI and Wikipedia FPC, but not for Commons FPC, imho. --El Grafo (talk) 09:56, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per El Grafo. — Julian H.^✈ 15:30, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per El Grafo. That the subject is something unpleasant doesn't help. Daniel Case (talk) 17:25, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose not good enough for a table work (Light). --Hubertl 11:32, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:42, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:45, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Little egret flighting over Yamato River.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2015 at 22:33:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Laitche (talk) 22:33, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Laitche (talk) 22:33, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Soaring. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 03:57, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 12:34, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose colors, light, sharpness (cant see any detail on left wing). I get left diagonal compo, but its still to big, would crop. --Mile (talk) 15:19, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Cropped but reverted since crop ruind this mood and I prefer with clouds (which lit up by the setting sun) in the reflection, Regards. --Laitche (talk) 15:58, 1 November 2015 (UTC) Strange, I can see the datail both right and the left wings and the wavy reflecting light on the lower part of left wing. --Laitche (talk) 16:35, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination. Thanks Johann Jaritz, Hubertl. --Laitche (talk) 18:11, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:2014.07.14.-15-Machern--Schornsteinfeger.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2015 at 13:10:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Nymphalidae_.28Brush-footed_butterflies.29
Info All by me. -- Hockei (talk) 13:10, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Hockei (talk) 13:10, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:11, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support though I would crop out more of the plant for an FP of a butterfly. Charles (talk) 15:20, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

now much better. Charles (talk) 14:28, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:19, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Qualified support per Charles; I think we could do without the bottom fifth and maybe even some of the right. Daniel Case (talk) 18:28, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Info New version. Removed dust spots and changed crop. --Hockei (talk) 13:37, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great! --Tremonist (talk) 15:43, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:02, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 09:19, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera

File:Green hairstreak (Callophrys rubi) 3.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2015 at 21:02:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera
Info all by Charlesjsharp -- Charles (talk) 21:02, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charles (talk) 21:02, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:47, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Zcebeci (talk) 18:02, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Love the irridescence on the wings, which is actually improved a bit by the inevitable unsharpness. It would probably be even better cropped in on both sides ... that whole right side is basically dead space. Daniel Case (talk) 21:23, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Merops (talk) 05:44, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support great! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:50, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful! --Tremonist (talk) 15:36, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 10:12, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support J e e 17:37, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 18:10, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 09:21, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera

File:Götska tornet September 2015 02.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2015 at 08:33:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info Götska tornet (The Gothic Tower) in the grounds of Drottningholm palace garden. Since 1991 a World Heritage site. Created, uploaded by and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 08:33, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ArildV (talk) 08:33, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Great picture for me Sakhalinio (talk) 10:26, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Colours contrast nicely. --Tremonist (talk) 12:57, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Simple but beautiful. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:21, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Gonna have to dissent here. First, color gets a little dark near the top (Graduated filter perhaps?) Second, I find the trees just a little too distracting from the tower. A shame, but for me as good as a QI can get without getting to FP. Daniel Case (talk) 06:27, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Thank you for review, no filter was used on the camera. I understand your vote, but personaly I dont think the trees are disturbing. The tower is part of the park and surrounded by all these beautiful centuries-old trees. Although it is possible (especially with an ultra wide angle lens) to completely isolate the tower from the trees, i dont think its a good idea here. The tower and the trees is part of the the natural landscape park, or English garden, from the late 1700s north of the palace and the baroque garden. --ArildV (talk) 07:05, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I understand wanting to show it in context. But the right third of the image detracts from the simplicity of the tower, for me. Daniel Case (talk) 17:03, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Pudelek (talk) 10:57, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I think a wider ratio would look much better. --Kadellar (talk) 21:15, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Good quality but sorry I cannot find wow with this photo, crop change could be help this... --Laitche (talk) 21:58, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 09:19, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lençóis de Areia.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2015 at 16:28:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info created and uploaded by Jardelsliumba (edited by Behn) - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:28, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:28, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support edited is a big word: I only checked "remove CA" in LR :). A simple picture, but I like the mood a lot. Wonder if it wouldn't be even better with a little crop at the bottom. - Benh (talk) 16:59, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful mood and textures. Daniel Case (talk) 19:52, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good, with Daniel. --Tuxyso (talk) 22:00, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:42, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice, but descriptions in more langages would be great. --Yann (talk) 20:33, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support yes. Perfect mood. --Hubertl 10:13, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Blue note. --Laitche (talk) 03:19, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 09:20, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Saussurea alpina esthonica - Eesti soojumikas - Niitvälja soo2.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Nov 2015 at 19:04:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Asteraceae_.28Sunflowers.29
Info all by Ivar (talk) 19:04, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 19:04, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:47, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wasn't expecting to !vote this way but, after seeing the detail closeup, I did. Daniel Case (talk) 20:01, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Merops (talk) 05:45, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:04, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 11:32, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:41, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:59, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Simple is best... --Laitche (talk) 03:22, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 09:21, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants

File:Campo flicker (Colaptes campestris) female.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2015 at 09:48:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Info created and uploaded by Charlesjsharp - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 09:48, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 09:48, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 05:32, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- good capture, but with much noise Merops (talk) 05:49, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good,in every way --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 07:00, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice colours, but more noise and less sharpness than similar shots of similar birds. Especially unfortunate because the chroma noise would be easy to correct. — Julian H.^✈ 08:20, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @Julian Herzog: Better now? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:18, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - @ArionEstar, @Charlesjsharp: Too much in my opinion, the feathers and the trunk lost a lot of detail. — Julian H.^✈ 10:23, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    - less NR now! Charles (talk) 11:01, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      - Look at the variation in the yellow feathers around the neck, most of that gets lost. Sorry for not being specific enough in the comment above. It's a tradeoff with the background noise, of course. — Julian H.^✈ 11:13, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Chroma noise reduced. Charles (talk) 10:13, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @Charlesjsharp: Could you add location in the description? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:22, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Thanks. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:43, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Qualified support Nothing wrong technically and nice pose, but I'd like to know a little more about that apparent golden-tinged light. Was the sun filtered through turning leaves or something? Daniel Case (talk) 15:51, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- No, photo was taken at 4pm in typically beautiful Pantanal late afternoon light. Similar to this image that one editor said was over-saturated. Charles (talk) 17:09, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful little fellow! --Tremonist (talk) 15:20, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 15:15, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support But I would prefer more room at the left side and less at the right side. --Hockei (talk) 17:08, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support but as Hockei --Hubertl 11:36, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 11:50, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 18:09, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:11, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

File:Egyptian Olives.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2015 at 07:22:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink
Info Featured picture on Arabic Wikipedia.created by Dina Said - uploaded by Dina Said - nominated by ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 -- ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:22, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:22, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The background confuses me. On one hand, it looks physical and not digital, on the other hand, it's basically a huge display or enlarged jpeg compression artifacts. Can someone help me understand this? — Julian H.^✈ 09:48, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @Julian Herzog: Some texture is still visible because I think was applied a filter "Gaussian blur", "blur form" or maybe simply anti noise at its maximum in some areas, specialy top and side, but not at the whole background. That said it's suppositions. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:25, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @Julian Herzog: I see it resembles paintings.Thank you
  - I'm not talking about any small-size detail, the artifacts I am referring to are visible in the thumbnail here. It's like a 100x100 pixel file was scaled up to fill the whole background. — Julian H.^✈ 08:32, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    - @Julian Herzog: Pushed very far the filters I was talking about can do these kind of thing, sometimes only visible at preview and not at full resolution. They are degraded (en:Color gradient) pixel which can not be seen at full resolution due to a filter that smoothes, but can been seen from "far". --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:07, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      - @Christian Ferrer: Hm, I don't see how any blur algorithm can lead to ringing and macroblocking. — Julian H.^✈ 10:17, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
        @Julian Herzog: For macro photo, I used or tried sometimes this kind of filter, and already have had this kind results, this is why I think it's similar here but of course I'm not sure at 100%. The fact of flattering with a filter, forces each pixel to harmonize with those next, this causes a spreading and as a pixel merger. If you push it further you will start obtain banding, and if you push even further you will start to obtain on the image big simple geometric shapes (big banding, squares (giant pixels? :), rectangles). My theory. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:39, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I looked at it carefully again and again; to me, these are DCT artifacts — Oppose on that basis. — Julian H.^✈ 13:48, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I let my heart speaking. I like it.--Jebulon (talk) 19:07, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Question The background appears to be a patterned glass table. Is this assumption correct? Daniel Case (talk) 00:51, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @Daniel Case: Possibly --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:07, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Poor retouch and fake background --The Photographer (talk) 12:47, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose In my opinion the green colours in the image are oversaturated. 19:58, 25 October 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Colours look unnatural. --Tremonist (talk) 15:34, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 18:09, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:06, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Groupe Tribal Percussions - 248.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2015 at 10:51:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Medium69 -- Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:51, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:51, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I cannot see the merit in this. Charles (talk) 17:18, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Idem, sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 18:57, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice focus and good DoF, nice moment, with shutter speed fine to see some drumstick movement. --Kadellar (talk) 13:44, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Great color and detail, but no wow. A very well-done QI. Daniel Case (talk) 18:37, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Kadellar. Yann (talk) 09:54, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice capture -- Thennicke (talk) 10:36, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Charles and Daniel. --Tremonist (talk) 15:18, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:06, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Meridian Gate, Beijing.jpg, not featured[edit]

Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture

@Legolas1024: Please use the standard nomination template. This nomination lacks lots of information. --Code (talk) 13:10, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It's most probably overprocessed. --Tremonist (talk) 13:52, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose --Tremonist (talk) 15:04, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Nice blue, however I preffer a composition with the entire building --The Photographer (talk) 15:00, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The filename and the description is that of the Meridian Gate, it helps if the photo actually included the gates (arch entranceway). -- KTC (talk) 15:08, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Feels oversaturated, bottom crop seems random. I think an interesting composition is possible with the ground missing, but not with parts sticking into the frame. — Julian H.^✈ 15:23, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose Per all the other opposers. Daniel Case (talk) 17:24, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Verde78 (talk) 12:17, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delist --Legolas1024 18:33, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Legolas1024: You mean {{Withdraw}}? --Laitche (talk) 18:43, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Laitche: Yes. Thank you--Legolas1024 01:38, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Then why don't you post the {{Withdraw}}, anyone cannot withdraw this nomination except you. --Laitche (talk) 10:32, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:13, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Potsdamer Platz, Berlin, 151024, ako.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2015 at 06:37:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
Info Potsdamer Platz in Berlin-Mitte with the following buildings (from left to right): Office building by Renzo Piano, Kollhoff-Tower (by Hans Kollhoff), Bahntower by Helmut Jahn, Beisheim Center (various architects). The photo was taken the same day as this one, but in the early morning light. Size, quality and light could make it better than just QI, I think. All by me -- Code (talk) 06:37, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Code (talk) 06:37, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Certainly an interesting photo. One can almost read the sign posts, meaning resolution seems to be quite ok. --Tremonist (talk) 13:58, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support maybe building on right edge could be cropped --Mile (talk) 14:53, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cropping the right would also crop the station in half. — Julian H.^✈ 15:25, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good mood. --Laitche (talk) 16:15, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 17:17, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:36, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kadellar (talk) 17:51, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think we can have both this and the late-afternoon take as FPs ... they show the difference the light of different times of day can make to the same cityscape. I further imagine that future architectural historians will use these pictures when they retroactively identify a school of early 21st-century high-rise architecture they will dub "Shardism", accompanying them with text like "Architects reacted to a world that increasingly saw itself as fractured and fragile by designing buildings that reflected this perception ..."
On a personal note, I am glad to see these pictures, for I remember that the neighborhood depicted, before the war the unquestioned heart of Berlin, was upon my first visit there in 1988 a large empty lot, inaccessible between the two barriers of the Berlin Wall. Daniel Case (talk) 18:52, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Case: The building on the left was designed by the same architect as the shard, indeed. --Code (talk) 09:55, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Verde78 (talk) 12:14, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perfect perspective, interesting morning light, outstanding quality. --Tuxyso (talk) 21:33, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
ist mir zu stark verzerrt, unnatürlich. --Ralf Roleček 07:50, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:37, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:08, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes

File:The Siege of Osaka Castle.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2015 at 11:05:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media
Info created by several artists commissioned by Kuroda Nagamasa / National Geographic, uploaded by Kelson, nominated by Yann (talk) 11:05, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very high resolution of 17th century Japanese art. -- Yann (talk) 11:05, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes, it's great, Yann, I agree. --Tremonist (talk) 13:51, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Could be sharper but interesting pano. --Mile (talk) 14:50, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow, amazing work --The Photographer (talk) 15:01, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 15:31, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is right hand screen of the pair byōbu, can you find the left hand? If you can find that, the set nomination is better, I think. --Laitche (talk) 15:59, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks. That's interesting, but the quality is so different, so it wouldn't make a nice set. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:52, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Ok, if you can find the left hand of this quality, that would be great :) --Laitche (talk) 21:37, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    - Sure, but you have better chances than me, as I don't speak Japanese. ;o) Yann (talk) 10:09, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:35, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:44, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Quality digitizations. Daniel Case (talk) 22:16, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 07:01, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:38, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 22:57, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 13:11, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media

File:Ulm Germany Interior-of-Ulm-Minster-01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2015 at 09:30:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings
Info Interior view of Ulm Minster which happens to carry the highest church tower of the world. I took the photo with a single shot, using a 17 mm wide angle tilt shift lense. As the minster is pretty dark inside, I created a three image HDR image. Ulm Minster is a jewel of tourism in southern Germany, hence it was not possible to get this view without people. The long time exposue created some motion blur of the people, but in my opinion, it is not disturbing within the huge image but is giving an idea of the shere dimensions of the nave

All by -- CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 09:30, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 09:30, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, I don't share your opinion about the blurry persons. I find them very disturbing, in consideration of the efforts made by others to avoid people in their photographs.--Jebulon (talk) 19:05, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree but I'm sympathetic to Uwe in this case, because in these big cathedrals, it's almost impossible to avoid people. Usually the only way is to shoot multiple images (often as many as 10 or 20) and then merge them, masking out the people in each one and hoping you were able to capture a whole scene without people (it's impossible to know for sure until you get home and try to process it!). I do sometimes do this, but it's not a simple job and it's made extra hard when the room is so busy. Sometimes the central aisle is never empty even if you wait half an hour or more. Diliff (talk) 10:14, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Mild support Due to their relatively small scale overall within the image, I'm not really bothered by the people. But it would have been easier to be less bothered by them if this had been a longer exposure. If you're going to be shooting with long exposures less than a second, it might be worth the time to try to avoid having moving people in them. Daniel Case (talk) 04:53, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support as Daniel Merops (talk) 05:42, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support People don't bother me , the subject is beautiful and take well enough (sure the 400 iso not help) but the composition is very beautiful.--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 07:05, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:48, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:46, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great, and the ghost persons do not disturb that much --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:12, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:24, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 10:11, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:09, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 17:09, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings

File:Antwerp July 2015-3.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Nov 2015 at 23:58:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info Street in old Antwerp in a cloudy afternoon. It took me some time to decide to come here with this photo owing to the less-than-perfect image quality. But I found the mood and composition so attractive than I couldn't resist. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:58, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:58, 24 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:04, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Street at bottom of image leaves much to be desired. Daniel Case (talk) 04:08, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I think without sky makes a person feel narrow in this case. --Laitche (talk) 14:30, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Agree with Daniel and Laitche much, but think composition to be ok. --Tremonist (talk) 15:15, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I actually like open compositions like this but it seems that too much details have been lost at the bottom. ---Ximonic (talk) 15:11, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
SupportConvincing enough, IMO. I find the mood and composition so attractive that I cannot resist to support. And the technical quality is not that bad--Jebulon (talk) 17:06, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:53, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bloemknop wilde peen (Daucus carota). Locatie, De Kruidhof Buitenpost.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2015 at 18:23:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants| #Family: (Umbelliferae of Apiaceae).
Info Flower bud wild carrot (Daucus carota). Location, The Kruidhof in the Netherlands.created by Famberhorst - uploaded by Famberhorst - nominated by Famberhorst -- Famberhorst (talk) 18:23, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 18:23, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:17, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:43, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:54, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support It might seem so unremarkable and unlikely a subject for an FP, but this works. Daniel Case (talk) 02:51, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 05:36, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:01, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 07:01, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 11:29, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 03:52, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 09:47, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 18:33, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:57, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants

File:Grey heron, October 2015 II.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2015 at 14:33:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Info created/uploaded/nominated by Laitche (talk) 14:33, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Laitche (talk) 14:33, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
crop per note --Mile (talk) 14:54, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I cropped that same as your suggestion before nom but reverted, cause that crop made this photo boring. --Laitche (talk) 15:26, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Benh (talk) 16:34, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support but an aperture of 6.3 or so would have been better for the background. --Kadellar (talk) 17:45, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 18:28, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks the Pantanal. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:55, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I feel of a bit déjà vu but thanks :) --Laitche (talk) 22:26, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Superb colors and detail. Daniel Case (talk) 23:38, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Daniel Case. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 07:08, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Crisp, nice shot. Atsme☯^Consult 12:35, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:02, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice shot. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 16:18, 29 October 2015 (UTC) [reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:25, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:39, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 18:07, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:54, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

File:Neues Schloss Schlossplatzspringbrunnen Jubiläumssäule Schlossplatz Stuttgart 2015 02.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2015 at 15:54:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info Schlossplatz in Stuttgart before sunrise, Jubiläumssäule (1846) in the centre. All by me. — Julian H.^✈ 15:54, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 15:54, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's a nice time of day for such an image; everything looks very silvery. Technically flawless too, to my eyes. -- Thennicke (talk) 16:10, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice mood and nice template... --Laitche (talk) 16:18, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice light and composition - Benh (talk) 16:35, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 17:16, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Code (talk) 17:27, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice, nice, nice! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:35, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Early bird! --Kadellar (talk) 17:44, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:01, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:09, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 07:07, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Der frühe Vogel fängt den Wurm... -- -donald- (talk) 13:24, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:02, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:27, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pudelek (talk) 20:24, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 11:47, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:39, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 22:55, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:55, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Gendarmenmarkt-Konzerthaus-Franzoesischer-Dom-2015.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2015 at 19:30:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gendarmenmarkt with Konzerthaus Berlin and French Cathedral (Berlin

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info all by me -- Tuxyso (talk) 19:30, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 19:30, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Merops (talk) 20:05, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:25, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment but please note the typo in the file name ("Franzoesicher") --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:27, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done, thanks for the hint, Martin. --Tuxyso (talk) 21:19, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The distortion on the dome (and even further in that direction) is just too obvious to ignore. Great image otherwise. Daniel Case (talk) 21:40, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the review, Daniel. Just for information purpose: I've not done any perspective correction by software. It is not stitching but a single shot. I've photographed it with the Nikon AF-S 14-24mm at a full frame camera. As far as I know it is currently the best available ultra wide angle lens for Nikon. If your contra is just based on technical consideration I do not know what can be done better with a single shot photo. --Tuxyso (talk) 21:45, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I understand those limitations. I've banged my head against them too. But if you can't make it work (this isn't a matter of perspective; the distortion is obvious even in the thumbnail), you can't expect people to look past it and support it here. Daniel Case (talk) 03:48, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Per Daniel Case, + too prominent shadow in foreground.--Jebulon (talk) 22:27, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
can you please point out what shadows are meant? Imho the morning light is quite fortunate here because it draws the attention to the buildings. Can you also point out how to make this photo better. There is a famous German saying: "Meckern kann jeder Bauer aber besser machen das fällt ihm sauer." - criticism is easy, making constructive proposals for improvement is not. --Tuxyso (talk) 22:38, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Most of the place is all in shadow, I think that's meant. Besides, Daniel is right, there is a distortion that can't be ignored. How to do this any better I can't tell you, though, I'm sorry. --Tremonist (talk) 15:08, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I know from my own experience that Gendarmenmarkt is very difficult to photograph. I think the only way to take such a photo in an acceptable quality is to create a multirow panorama. There's not enough space to get everything on the picture without heavy distortion otherwise. The other thing is that there's few time each day when the light situation is acceptable at all. Has to do with all the surrounding buildings. In this case I think there's too much shadow. Additionally the people all around are quite disturbing here, I think. An exposure of around one second would have been better aesthetically, I think. The sky and the composition are very nice, however. --Code (talk) 17:33, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I had my complaints during the QI nomination. I accepted it as QI, but sorry, not for FP. --Hubertl 09:41, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination A candidature does not make sense anymore. Nonetheless: Thanks to the reviews - the photo is not good enough. --Tuxyso (talk) 20:38, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kunsthistorisches Museum HDR 0082.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2015 at 09:53:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info all by Hubertl
Info HDR picture from the base of the Maria-Theresia-Monument as seen on the bottom.
Support -- Hubertl 09:53, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose dont like color --Verde78 (talk) 12:12, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Verde78 ti pregherei di rivedere il tuo voto,capisco che il colore non ti piaccia ma normalmente qui giudichiamo la composizione,il cosiddetto effetto WOW. Io punterei più su un neutrale.... Ciao e grazie 18:34, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This green is exactly as it is. Are you questioning the picture or just the color? --Hubertl 14:00, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good and interesting. --Code (talk) 12:54, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:00, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Color by Vassilakou?! ;-) --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:19, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Including tooth gap, see dome... ;-) --Hubertl 17:45, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice.--Famberhorst (talk) 18:06, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:34, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support interesting colours --Pudelek (talk) 20:22, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the colors. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:38, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice idea, but posterization on dome and adjacent cupolas. Daniel Case (talk) 05:26, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 07:01, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bad quality (noise, sharpless, CA, strong flare, star trails like astrophoto while other are picked from single shot, probably hot pixles). But it passed QI - User:Spurzem ? Was HDR necessary ? I see now it become strange habbit, night HDR. But it more spoil than benefit. Composition, I would cut foreground, this pillars of fountain doesn't help. --Mile (talk) 07:27, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment really interesting! I didn´t support your picture yesterday, and this is now the revenge? This is not a Kindergarten, Mile! --Hubertl 10:32, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Hubertl Definitely not a kindergarten. My vote is not a revenge vote, I have explained you all. And as you can see, there are many more who found the same issue, but revenge vote is what you did on my nominee where nobody follows you. Do you feel the difference ? Don't worry, wont answer you with revenge vote. --Mile (talk) 07:58, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 07:48, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unnatural lighting, posterization, foreground and pretty dark sky (should have been taken during the blue hour) doesn't work for me. --Ivar (talk) 08:05, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thanks for reminding me, that this colors are unnatural, I always meant, that this is normal and just painted. And surprise, the sky is dark. Probably, because it´s very late in the evening and the Vienna street lights illuminate the streets, not the sky. Unfortunately, at blue hour time, this pretty cracy effect doesn´t take place, so I captured it this late. BTW: There are more interesting situations in Vienne beside blue hours. --Hubertl 09:53, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 10:39, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose based on the quality issues, especially around the dome. Also not a fan of the green light, but I guess someone there found it suitable. :) — Julian H.^✈ 13:28, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support What a dream! --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 15:09, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:34, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose There is strong noise in the sky. Even this snapshot of mine has less. (And I don't like this kitschy green either, but this alone would be a reason to ignore the nomination, not to oppose.) --A.Savin 01:49, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Color noise from the sky removed. New version.--Hubertl 08:26, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Combining night photography and green lighting is a good idea, but your image falls short in quality as others have mentioned above. I'd prefer a less stout composition, something similar to File:Maria-Theresien-Platz Kunsthistorisches Museum Wien 2010.jpg, sacrificing a clear view on the museum's entrace unless you are willing to climb the Maria Theresa statue. You might want to add to the file's description why and for what occassion the building is or appears to be illuminated in green light. Nonetheless this is definitely worth another try. Regards, Christoph Braun (talk) 17:45, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Hubertl 20:23, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bombus soroeensis - Crepis tectorum - Keila2.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2015 at 19:37:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera
Info all by Ivar (talk) 19:37, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 19:37, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:51, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 21:15, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 21:22, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too blurry --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:34, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not sharp enoigh - not really QI. Charles (talk) 18:13, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:28, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Even if it weren't unsharp, background is too cluttered for subject to be as stunning as photographer wanted it to be. Daniel Case (talk) 20:14, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Ivar (talk) 13:31, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plumbeous seedeater (Sporophila plumbea) male.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2015 at 18:08:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Info all by Charlesjsharp -- Charles (talk) 18:08, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charles (talk) 18:08, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 20:59, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The hidden part of the tail is unfortunate.--Jebulon (talk) 21:09, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Wrong determination. In my opinion the picture shows a Grayish baywing, but not a seadeater.

Grayish baywing
Plumbeous Seedeater, compare the beaks

Merops (talk) 06:01, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Until correct id established Charles (talk) 11:07, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:2015.07.11.-03-Mulde Eilenburg--Gemeine Heidelibelle-Maennchen.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2015 at 12:40:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family:Libellulidae Skimmers
Info All by me. -- Hockei (talk) 12:40, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Hockei (talk) 12:40, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Question Can you determinated the dragon fly with that image? Merops (talk) 20:00, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Info Sympetrum vulgatum. It's written in the description on the project page. Also the picture is classified in the respective category and gallery. --Hockei (talk) 15:10, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
In England it would probably be a Sympetrum striolatum, but I'm not familiar with your country's dragonflies. Charles (talk) 12:20, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support Some small blown areas, but at this scale not much you can really do about it and otherwise I like the balance of color and detail between the insect and the bokeh. Daniel Case (talk) 20:39, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice, but per Daniel. --Tremonist (talk) 15:10, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:53, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:56, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
weak because there is no standard copulating action! --Hubertl 11:34, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Verrrry nice. Atsme😊^Consult 22:12, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 14:47, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Odonata

File:Archduke Leopold Wilhelm of Austria.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2015 at 08:15:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Sculptures
Info Bust of Archduke Leopold Wilhelm of Austria with velvet red backlight. --Mile (talk) 08:15, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 08:15, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support very good! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:46, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Question Shouldn't the image end where the object ends at the bottom? The extension of the background beyond the object seems odd to me. — Julian H.^✈ 09:08, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @Julian why should it ? This kind of framing give a bust more artsy value. Stretching podium to picture edge isn't so esthetic solution in this case. Don't let should's and must's spoil your imagination. At the end, beauty is always in the eye of observer. --Mile (talk) 11:28, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Support Better now in my opinion, thanks. — Julian H.^✈ 13:28, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

* Support I like the background the way it is. Charles (talk) 14:30, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support I liked the background the way it is, until, I noticed it is all photo-edited Charles (talk) 14:30, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Now OK. Charles (talk) 17:42, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Per Charles. That edge just doesn't look right the more you look at it. Daniel Case (talk) 04:48, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I aligned the edge. Hope you like it now. Daniel Case, Charles, Julian... --Mile (talk) 08:08, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support OK now with template noted. Daniel Case (talk) 17:50, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

- Comment Are you saying the background is all natural, not photo-edited? Charles (talk) 09:41, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - @Charles: Not at all, I made this background (but isn't that obvious ?), and it deliver much better feeling when observing statue. It extract it tonal and with contrast. And this is not first case, sculptures are often done with artificial backgrounds in photos. And I am sure I did good job with no mistakes, and it takes some time to make it. I am actually surprised by voting so far, since I don't see any flaw here. --Mile (talk) 09:58, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Info Charles check here, too see what is good way to treat sculptures, artificial background is way to solve the issue. --Mile (talk) 10:04, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I like the image and I'm sure you weren't trying to deceive, but FP guidelines say you should use {{Retouched picture}}. Then I can support. Charles (talk) 12:07, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done Template added. --Mile (talk) 13:39, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 18:04, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support 800 iso isn't the max,but the result is good LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:54, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- LivioAndronico I dont understand what did you mean. If I could go lower ISO ? Probably for a stop, to higher, also for a stop max and not to spoil it. But no such fine details on sculpture anyway so no harm even if some higher ISO. --Mile (talk) 17:22, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Nothing Petar. I simply say that to be a picture at ISO 800 is a good result. LivioAndronico ^(talk) 20:25, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:32, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Come on, Mile ! More good pictures of ART here in FPC ! This one is excellent, I'm not sure the {retouched} template is necessary here, as the new bg is obvious, with no doubts for the viewer.--Jebulon (talk) 22:35, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanx Jebulon for kind words. There will be some more to come, I will try to make some original appearance for sculptures, not to look like just boring shot. But I am worried for paintings here...obviously my nominee will fall short for one vote. --Mile (talk) 09:19, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Verde78 (talk) 10:45, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:13, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the composition is fine, but for me it is not sharp enough for FP.--Hubertl 10:01, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 14:46, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Sculptures

File:Santissima Trinità degli Spagnoli (Rome) - Interior.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Nov 2015 at 06:57:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
Info All by LivioAndronico ^(talk) 06:57, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LivioAndronico ^(talk) 06:57, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good, simple shot become rare here. Fresco above could be in one. --Mile (talk) 07:56, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:45, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support That crop at the top should bother me more than it actually does . Daniel Case (talk) 04:32, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 18:04, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 19:22, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Seems both right and the left sides are leaning to inward imho, Here, Regards. --Laitche (talk) 20:31, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Right, Done thanx--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:40, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support and the seventh ;-) --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:59, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Grandissimo !--Verde78 (talk) 10:46, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:14, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 14:48, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

Info Demoted/Delisted to not featured per this consensus. --Cart (talk) 13:59, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stift Altenburg Kirche Kuppelfresko 01.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2015 at 08:07:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
Info Fresco in the dome of Altenburg Abbey Church (Lower Austria) by Paul Troger (1733): The apocalyptic vision of St. John. All by -- Uoaei1 (talk) 08:07, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Uoaei1 (talk) 08:07, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 09:31, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice one. --Code (talk) 09:32, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Verde78 (talk) 12:16, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Beautiful. Atsme☯^Consult 12:20, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:00, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support And 7 LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:34, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pudelek (talk) 20:23, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:51, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 20:34, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:38, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 07:01, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 13:28, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 15:40, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:40, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 14:35, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 06:32, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 19:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

File:Berliner Dom vor Sonnenuntergang.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2015 at 22:44:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
Info all by Der Wolf im Wald -- Wolf im Wald 22:44, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolf im Wald 22:44, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 07:48, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 11:17, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:46, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 12:40, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fernsehturm on the background is a bit distracting, but nevertheless FP for me. --Ivar (talk) 12:43, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:16, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 13:44, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:05, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 15:38, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:43, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:32, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 23:03, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ivar --A.Savin 01:46, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Iver and I think it's just my imagination but feel of a bit déjà vu, maybe the clone is allowed? in this case... --Laitche (talk) 04:11, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think this is your déjà vu. ;-) -- Wolf im Wald 12:19, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Kasir (talk) 16:32, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Dэя-Бøяg 03:16, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 06:30, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:20, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings

File:DHC6 Barra.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2015 at 22:15:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles#Propeller_aircraft
Info De Havilland Canada DHC-6 is going to take off on the intertidal mudflats at Traigh Mhor, Barra (outer Hebrides), Scotland, created by KaiBorgeest, uploaded by KaiBorgeest, nominated by KaiBorgeest
Support -- KaiBorgeest (talk) 22:15, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Quite greyish overall. --Tremonist (talk) 14:42, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A competently-done but ultimately very ordinary picture of a plane. Daniel Case (talk) 20:55, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:19, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dülmen, Wildpark -- 2015 -- 8871-7.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2015 at 16:03:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay ^talk 16:03, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay ^talk 16:03, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
weak because it´s not really foggy nor really clear. But interesting composition. --Hubertl 17:21, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Agree with Hubertl. --Code (talk) 06:11, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 07:01, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 07:48, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:44, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 12:44, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:13, 30 October 2015 (UTC
Support What a sunset! --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 15:31, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support The reflection makes it special. Daniel Case (talk) 16:04, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:42, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:54, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 09:45, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support What a sunrise! --Laitche (talk) 04:18, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:24, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 13:07, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm very jealous of that one. - Benh (talk) 07:55, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:17, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Prokaryote cell.svg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2015 at 03:56:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Computer-generated
Info A diagram of a typical prokaryotic cell. This vector diagram entirely created and nominated by Ali Zifan 03:56, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ali Zifan 03:56, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Educational. If you need a larger version, it can be resized without reducing image quality. It also passed under the W3C validator without any warnings nor errors. --★Poké⁹⁵ 04:41, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support SVG is not a standar and I dont care W3C Validor. Nice and clean desing. Please, could you do a spanish version? --The Photographer (talk) 11:42, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Ali Zifan 23:07, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@The Photographer:

Comment SVG maybe not be a standard and the W3C validator may not make sense, but the SVG cares because it can be resized at any size without reducing image quality. Maybe someone might say an oppose due to this image being small even though the image can be made larger without reducing image quality. :) ★Poké⁹⁵ 11:56, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure why you say SVG is not a standard (see [1]. W3C call them recommendation, but this is the same for HTML, CSS and all.). I haven't followed how it's evolved lately but I'm fairly certain it has good support on all major browsers, which allows for things like D3.js to work quite well. - Benh (talk) 12:54, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The pili are annotated twice (pilus, upper left; pili, lower right). Also: pili points to one single pilus. I'll support once this will be 'corrected'. --Cayambe (talk) 13:44, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Cayambe:

Done. I updated it. Ali Zifan 22:54, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Cayambe (talk) 06:29, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment To be fair, I've found that most tools that do open SVG still don't understand and properly implement half the damn spec, like masks, filters, and CSS.

Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) is an XML-based vector image format for two-dimensional graphics that has support for interactivity and animation. The SVG specification is an open standard developed by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) since 1999

Web browsers that support SVG will display the drawing by itself. While SVGs are very practical and helful, slow adoption of the spec in browsers requires cautious use. SVG was adopted by the W3C in 1999, but it wasn’t until 2004 that a browser added the spec. A full list of browser support for SVG can be found at caniuse.com. BTW, Since SVG 1.1 does not officially support a standard for multiline text, this document represents a "best-fit" standard. I know that this file is a AI export, however, I want to note that Inkscape svg is basically the same as plain svg, just with a few extra commands (in separate namespaces) added, which the Inkscape tools use to keep track of their work. The most common problems that I’ve seen with using SVG so far are that Internet Explorer tends to clip resized images rather than actually resizing them and that Webkit-based browsers such as Google Chrome and Safari will resize and stretch images in strange ways. --The Photographer (talk) 14:30, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support I'll leave the technical issues to those who know what they're talking about. Otherwise, it's a very well-done diagram; I am also amused that a casual reader at first glance sees what looks like a tampon that needs a shave. Daniel Case (talk) 04:16, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image is perfect. --The Photographer (talk) 10:47, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:00, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:49, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 15:46, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:16, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Computer-generated

File:Utö kyrka October 2015 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2015 at 21:06:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
Info Utö church on the island Utö in Stockholm Archipelago. Like most Swedish rural churches the church is surrounded by a cemetery, stone wall and tall trees. I love this church, built in 1849-50 and designed by the very significant Swedish 1800-century architect Johan Fredrik Åbom. I tried to focus on both the church and the surrounding site, with the church, the cementery, the trees and the sea in the background. I chose October to avoid too much distracting leaves, while still capturing the beautiful autumn colors. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 21:06, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ArildV (talk) 21:06, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good and interesting. I guess that the dynamic range was not easy to handle so it's quite impressing how blue the sky still is. --Code (talk) 06:07, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Code. --Tremonist (talk) 13:16, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice calendar photo --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:42, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:05, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Delightful. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 15:32, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 15:59, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support More than calendar photos :) --Laitche (talk) 16:33, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:43, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting angle, well-done, that might not have paid off. Daniel Case (talk) 18:59, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:52, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:55, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support scenic --Mile (talk) 08:21, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 12:39, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 06:30, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:18, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings

@George Chernilevsky: Please select categories carefully. --A.Savin 11:23, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:ময়নামতি রাণীর কুঠির (Maynamati Ranir Kuthir).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2015 at 15:11:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info created by আরিফ হোসেন সাঈদ - uploaded by আরিফ হোসেন সাঈদ - nominated by NahidSultan -- ~ Nahid ^Talk 15:11, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~ Nahid ^Talk 15:11, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The colours appear oversaturated. --Tremonist (talk) 15:52, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Aggressive oversatured and overmanipulation --The Photographer (talk) 16:58, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per the comment above. — Julian H.^✈ 13:32, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose Potential FP done in by horrendous overprocessing. Daniel Case (talk) 16:03, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:42, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:17, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Canaletto - Bucentaur's return to the pier by the Palazzo Ducale - Google Art Project.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2015 at 08:53:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media
Info created by Canaletto / Google Art Project, uploaded by Dcoetzee, nominated by Yann (talk) 08:53, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 600 Mpx reproduction. Interesting painting, nice colors. -- Yann (talk) 08:53, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree with Yann. --Tremonist (talk) 13:21, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 13:55, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great! --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 15:35, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:43, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 20:40, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:04, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 07:59, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kasir (talk) 16:32, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 13:07, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Saw this a while ago, but forgot to nominate it :) Very fascinating view of Venice and I hope they complete the new Bucentaur soon enough! - Benh (talk) 07:54, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 06:58, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 13:10, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media

File:KotaKinabalu Sabah GCV-Eponyma-in-Likas-Bay-04.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2015 at 10:03:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles
Info General Cargo Vessel EPONYMA in Likas Bay (Malaysia), accompagnied by tug boat Bestarri.

All by -- CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 10:03, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 10:03, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 11:16, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good composition. --Tremonist (talk) 13:22, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 13:46, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Tremonist. --Laitche (talk) 14:39, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Laitche. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 15:36, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Johann Jaritz. --Code (talk) 17:38, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Code. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:04, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 23:02, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:42, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 09:44, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wouldn't expect it to work but it does ... there's a certain simplicity of form. Daniel Case (talk) 16:32, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 17:34, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 13:08, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles

File:Uniek door eb en vloed steeds wisselend kweldergebied. Locatie, Noarderleech Provincie Friesland 39.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2015 at 08:03:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info Unique by tides ever-changing marsh area. Location, Noarderleech Profince Friesland in the Netherlands.

created by Famberhorst - uploaded by Famberhorst - nominated by Famberhorst -- Famberhorst (talk) 08:03, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 08:03, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 18:03, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A bit right tilted.--Zcebeci (talk) 21:33, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done correction. Thank you.

* Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:42, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Oppose. A bit low on wow factor. When I'm on the fence like this, the low resolution tips me toward the "oppose" category. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:06, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support The first one of these Frisian beach photos I can support. Gives me the feeling of being there. Daniel Case (talk) 05:11, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:00, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose per King. — Julian H.^✈ 15:42, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
weak --Hubertl 09:35, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:25, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 18:40, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Martyrs' Shrine, Kaohsiung.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2015 at 16:52:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info created by Legolas1024 - uploaded by Legolas1024 - nominated by -- Legolas1024 16:52, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Legolas1024 16:52, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I am sorry, sky is Overexposed --The Photographer (talk) 16:57, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong oppose per The Photographer. Daniel Case (talk) 19:18, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per two previous opposers. --Cayambe (talk) 10:56, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Photographer. --Tremonist (talk) 13:13, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: of general overexposition, and not only the sky. All -even small- white parts have no details.--Jebulon (talk) 16:46, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Brain Surface.SVG[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2015 at 08:57:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Computer-generated
Info All by -- The Photographer (talk) 08:57, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral -- The Photographer (talk) 08:57, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Several issues.
- The 3D effect is presumably no more factual than attempts to colourise b&w films. It appears you've taken a line-drawing where the lines approximate the sulci (groves) and major fissures in the brain and created cushion effect to illustrate the gyri (bumps) without reference to a real 3D subject lit appropriately.
- This is now getting many steps removed from the original artwork that appeared in Gray's Anatomy. That work was drawn to show the lobes of the brain and not necessarily to be an accurate representation of all the surface details, which (without lobe colouring) is all this image contains. Compare with an illustration showing in detail and naming the sulci and gyri of the brain. While I'm no neurosurgeon, I'm sure that getting the details right on this is something fairly important for an educational resource.
- I'm reluctant to feature work based on a medical illustration 100-years-old, other than as a historical curiosity. The brain hasn't changed, of course, but I would think the field of medical illustration has improved just as our maps are better than those 100 year ago.
- The effect is overdone IMO. Like when you lean on the clarity slider in Lightroom. It's just nothing like a brain looks like, and far too distracting a background surface for anyone to annotate. -- Colin (talk) 13:39, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, I don't find the three-dimensional effect convincing or attractive. — Julian H.^✈ 13:43, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, per the opposers. --Tremonist (talk) 14:40, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. Looks like its best use would be as an app icon. Daniel Case (talk) 02:31, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose look flat and very unnatural, sorry -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:50, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: of too much issues, and per oposers opinions.--Jebulon (talk) 23:03, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:The Main hall of Imperial Ancestral Temple.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2015 at 17:29:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info created by Legolas1024 - uploaded by Legolas1024 - nominated by Legolas1024 -- Legolas1024 17:29, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Legolas1024 17:29, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed. --KTC (talk) 18:14, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment In terms of the photo itself, there's issues with converging verticals which is fixable, there might also be a slight tilt CW, the foreground is a bit bright, and is that a headless child in the bottom right :-o? -- KTC (talk) 18:14, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request：Please help me withdraw all nominations, and if I want take a photo without people in the photo is impossible in China unless my father is premier or mayor. Chinese Architectures couldn't adapt this game……T_T……--Legolas1024 18:39, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I think this is not a game and simply put the template {{Withdraw}} to your own nominations to withdraw, Regards. --Laitche (talk) 19:10, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(Edit conflict) Legolas1024, the objection wasn't that there are people in it, but that the girl in the bottom right of the image don't have a head as a result of stitching. There's a few places in this image where the stitching doesn't quite align so is quite visible. If you would like to withdraw your nominations, just post {{Withdrawn}} in it. Have a look at Commons:Image guidelines. That page may help you find out what reviewers here on FPC look for. I look forward to seeing more images of beautiful historical buildings from you in the future. -- KTC (talk) 19:15, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

- The girl is not headless. Her head is just hidden behind the rostrum of the architectural structure, have a better look ;-) --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:45, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:25, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bellavita and CPCCT head office 20100907.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2015 at 16:28:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info created by Axilera - uploaded by Axilera - nominated by kasir -- Kasir (talk) 16:28, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kasir (talk) 16:28, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Perspective not done, not sharp at all and very noisy. --Code (talk) 17:16, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Code above. Atsme😊^Consult 21:46, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as others above --Hubertl 12:37, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: too many technical flaws--Jebulon (talk) 21:53, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Akhtamar Island on Lake Van with the Armenian Cathedral of the Holy Cross.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2015 at 06:20:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info - uploaded by Serouj - nominated by Golden Bosnian Lily -- Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 06:20, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 06:20, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Sorry, but the image size is too small: "2 million pixels" are needed. - Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:54, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Comment What a pity! Great composition and light! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:43, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It really looks nice! I agree with Arion. --Tremonist (talk) 14:14, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Väike-Maarja kirik 14-05-2013.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Nov 2015 at 14:14:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings
Info all by Ivar (talk) 14:14, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 14:14, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Zcebeci (talk) 21:30, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice detail and color. Daniel Case (talk) 14:58, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Daniel. --Tremonist (talk) 14:59, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:48, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent quality, interesting subject. Maybe it could be a tiny little bit brighter. --Code (talk) 06:31, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I nominated this photo in English and Persian (Farsi) wiki. That was featured in both. Alborzagros (talk) 15:09, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Great except for quite a lot of clipping. — Julian H.^✈ 15:37, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. Part of the roof of the chapel a little bit overexposed. --XRay ^talk 17:15, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:48, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Interesting idea and perspective but I think there's much better angle for this subject with this idea. --Laitche (talk) 15:44, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose honestly, the WOW for me is much more in the cloud and the cloud pattern. But this seems not be the subject.--Hubertl 19:28, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 09:48, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Ivar has set so high standard for church images of that kind that I'm not sure it that one could reach that bar. Kruusamägi (talk) 23:00, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 1 oppose, 3 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:24, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings

File:ANA soldier with RPG-7 in 2013-cropped.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2015 at 06:31:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info Afghan National Army (ANA) soldier firing an RPG-7 rocket-propelled grenade launcher during a training exercise
Info created by Staff Sgt. Ezekiel Kitandwe - uploaded by Brandmeister - nominated by Thennicke -- Thennicke (talk) 06:31, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support For timing and general technical merit as well as image value -- Thennicke (talk) 06:31, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support excellent! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:29, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Minimal purple chromatic aberration --The Photographer (talk) 12:58, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sakhalinio (talk) 13:36, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support in spite of large totally blown area. --Tremonist (talk) 14:53, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Question It'd surely look blown in real life, no? Are there cameras that can capture such extreme dynamic range?? -- Thennicke (talk) 06:36, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, most probably there aren't any cameras capable to do this. Still, we commonly don't tend to support photos with large blown areas, but there are exceptions. --Tremonist (talk) 14:03, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support Boooooooom! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:39, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- KTC (talk) 17:01, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support A good hint why one should never stand behind a rocket launcher. :) --Ximonic (talk) 19:30, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose BOOOOOOM, a military fake, not more. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 07:14, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A set up shot sure, but fake as in the RPG is not real, or it was photoshoped in or something, seriously? <_<

Support, I only dislike the obligatory military vignette. Still, a very good (and interesting) depiction of an RPG being launched. — Julian H.^✈ 15:34, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hockei (talk) 16:54, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:27, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kadellar (talk) 17:50, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose For Alchemist--Σπάρτακος (talk) 07:02, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Info and the main question: need we a "glorification of war" perhaps at our main page as a PotD? --94.134.228.185 09:16, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That's a valid concern, but there are plenty of military images that have been promoted on commons. Why do you see this one as more supportive of such activity than the rest? I nominated it for image quality, independent of subject. Would you have the same concern with images like [2], [3] and [4]? -- Thennicke (talk) 10:07, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose As Alchemist. I don´t want to support any of this kind of pictures. --Hubertl 11:31, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment If an image support the war or not, this is an interpretation of the observer. The role of Wikipedia is not achieve world peace, the function is to provide free knowledge no matter how crude that is. --The Photographer (talk) 11:34, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @The Photographer: you are wrong! This is or can be a similar Wikipedia-Commons political decision, how our guideline about the GFDL 1.2 only license! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 13:27, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Regards, Christoph Braun (talk) 17:24, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 18:08, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request @Golden Bosnian Lily: Your reason? --Hockei (talk) 18:18, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I hate war and people who support such a crap! --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 18:36, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And because you hate the war you can hide every free and encoclopedyc information about the war. --The Photographer (talk) 18:58, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment @Golden Bosnian Lily: I hate war too. But photography is not all about the good things in life. It can show how horrible people can be to each other too. Besides, this image is at a firing range, as it says in the description. And you should address my point that other war photos have been promoted before opposing, or you are being irrational and having a kneejerk reaction to what is otherwise a very high-quality and encyclopaedic image. -- Thennicke (talk) 01:14, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Per Alche LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:37, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Benh (talk) 11:26, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 21:25, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People

File:Grand staircase ceiling with Apotheosis of the Renaissance fresco (Kunsthistorischen Museum).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2015 at 17:13:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
Info Grand staircase ceiling with Apotheosis of the Renaissance fresco (Kunsthistorischen Museum, Vienna). All by --Mile (talk) 17:13, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 17:13, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Some might ask why symmetry is broken, but I can live with this. It's a great photo with many details. --Tremonist (talk) 13:59, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Tremonist. Sharpening is not as subtle as one would like but it nevertheless does not detract from the detail it was meant to help us see. Daniel Case (talk) 18:43, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:23, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Verde78 (talk) 12:18, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 07:02, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose doesn´t work for me at all with this unsymmetrical crop, and it´s oversaturated too. --Hubertl 10:01, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
A revenge vote Hubertl ? Interesting so far you are only on both of my nominees. Should I comment issues you've mentioned or is useless in this case ? Oversaturated ? Cmon...at least have some dignity. --Mile (talk) 07:54, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Тајга (talk) 18:02, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great!--Soundwaweserb (talk) 18:37, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Uncentered but impressive. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:30, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
ArionEstar its centered on vertical. I find it much more interesting, and at least something different then we see again and again, centered vertical, centered horizontal... Lets pick up something from technical drawings, if thing is identical, they don't draw it all, they have semi or quarter shot as well. Translated into this, missing bottom of it is same as is above the fresco. From there on, up to the observer whether he like it or not. --Mile (talk) 19:03, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 02:45, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors

File:Pfarrwitwenhaus - Groß Zicker 2015.05.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2015 at 10:52:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture#Germany
Info created by Fuxxtech - uploaded by Fuxxtech - nominated by Atamari -- Atamari (talk) 10:52, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Atamari (talk) 10:52, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please fix the dust spot (near tree). --XRay ^talk 16:11, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - to me it looks more like a bird in the distance. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 17:45, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - that is also my opinion. --Atamari (talk) 19:31, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - there's a circle with a darker blue tone, probably from using the bandaid tool or stamp tool, or it might be something on the lens. Atsme😊^Consult 21:44, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A little bit too dark in the center, a little bit too unsharp at the peak of the roof, and a little bit too cluttered overall. Daniel Case (talk) 05:33, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I see this was taken with the 18-55 kit lens, which is in my experience notoriously unsharp in the corners (pretty much unusably so for FPC). -- Thennicke (talk) 11:22, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Large round dustspot in the sky left to the tree at right.--Cayambe (talk) 13:18, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Yeah - now I see it. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 13:25, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Please see note for dust spot !--Jebulon (talk) 16:54, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral Good composition, but per others. --Tremonist (talk) 14:25, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 21:30, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Marina (ship, 2011), Sète 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2015 at 23:32:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles
Info Marina (ship, 2011) in the harour of Sète, France. All by Christian Ferrer --Christian Ferrer (talk) 23:32, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 23:32, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice golden light! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:38, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 03:54, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful light. --Code (talk) 09:31, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Incredible quality/detail, nice lighting and distraction-free composition. -- Thennicke (talk) 11:17, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 12:00, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 12:26, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 17:22, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:09, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I see sharpening artefacts, especially on the water (or is it posterization?). Can you fix it? --Ivar (talk) 18:15, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 18:17, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment per Ivar about water and posterization on the tanks behind the ship, that's not distracting but if you could fix it, that would be better :) --Laitche (talk) 18:27, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Laitche: @Iifar: , Done thank you, is it good now? --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:04, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think a bit too much processing about this photo but ok now :) --Laitche (talk) 19:11, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's still not perfect, but nevertheless FP for me. --Ivar (talk) 19:37, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
@Laitche: @Iifar: , can you check again as I have upload again another version less processed? --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:49, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I think the way of processing is different from prev edit but not sure this version is less processed or not and you already have enough good processing skill :) --Laitche (talk) 20:37, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Jebulon (talk) 21:45, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:32, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 06:27, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 06:58, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:21, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:41, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:19, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles

File:Olios argelasius MHNT.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2015 at 23:32:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida
Info Olios argelasius. Created by Archaeodontosaurus - uploaded by Archaeodontosaurus - nominated by Christian Ferrer --Christian Ferrer (talk) 23:32, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 23:32, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 03:53, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Perfect work by Archeo -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:54, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unlike insects, spiders are difficult to naturalize, abdomen must be blown with a small pipe. I never happened. Thank you to Christian. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:54, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:23, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 13:05, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 17:21, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support J e e 17:29, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 17:38, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:10, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 21:15, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:33, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 21:30, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 06:27, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 06:58, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:20, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:20, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida

File:Paul-Löbe-Haus, Berlin-Mitte, 151024, ako.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2015 at 06:54:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info West facade of the Paul-Löbe-Haus in Berlin-Mitte. The building was designed by architect Stephan Braunfels and built between 1997 and 2002. It's one of the buildings of the German parliament. Most pictures of this building are quite flat because they were taken from directly opposite the main facade, so I tried a different composition and I believe it works well. It shows the dimensions of the building as well as its position in relation to the Reichstag (right side, behind the Paul-Löbe-Haus), so that it also results in a foreground/background, new/old, big/small contrast. All by me. -- Code (talk) 06:54, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Code (talk) 06:54, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting building, high resolution. --Tremonist (talk) 13:54, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 17:17, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:05, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The tree in front just ruins it for me. Daniel Case (talk) 22:14, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Daniel Case: Well, honestly it took me some work to get the tree into the picture this way, but this may be a matter of taste. Thanks for your vote anyways. --Code (talk) 09:29, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Hubertl 09:33, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:24, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose For Daniel--Σπάρτακος (talk) 07:02, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 07:50, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 14:12, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Santa Maria della Vittoria in Rome - Interior.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2015 at 13:00:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
Info All by LivioAndronico ^(talk) 13:00, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LivioAndronico ^(talk) 13:00, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:01, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 18:10, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:22, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Can you improve the overexposure of the holy image? --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:42, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks but unfortunately, the light was very strong and this is the best I could do.Thanx. --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 16:26, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support Good detail in limited lighting. Daniel Case (talk) 14:45, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I am not so satisfied with that fresco appearance and color temperature. I saw earlier you got often problem with 2 different sources of light, which bring WB off in one case, or even in both. But I realized earlier baroque and rococo is killing WB and sharpness and considering kit lens result is just fine. --Mile (talk) 17:05, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Dэя-Бøяg 03:11, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Magnificent. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 04:22, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 06:26, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 06:58, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 11:44, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:15, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:39, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 14:10, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors

Info Demoted/Delisted to not featured per this consensus. --Cart (talk) 14:02, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lasiodora parahybana 2015 G1.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Nov 2015 at 19:14:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida
Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:14, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:14, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:43, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please add a category above. Yann (talk) 20:08, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 20:17, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Nice detail, but it is hard to distinguish the spider and the background at first since they're both fairly dark, and I also find the background somewhat cluttered and distracting. Daniel Case (talk) 03:47, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yes, the background is busy, but that's how you'd likely see it in the wild - spiders don't like to be out in the open. Nice specimen, and good focus. -- Thennicke (talk) 04:34, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Agree with Thennicke, the background is busy, but not distracting. —Bruce1ee^talk 04:58, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support as others. Nice beast! Yann (talk) 10:07, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Natural setting, nice. Atsme☯^Consult 12:23, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:01, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support wow, is a wild animal? can you add a geolocation? --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:31, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
CommentChristian, geolocation doesn´t help really, it/she isn´t there anymore ;-) --Hubertl 17:48, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think for the specialists of nature, observation places are important data --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:52, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am just kidding, Christian... --Hubertl 23:11, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Famberhorst (talk) 18:02, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:42, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 07:01, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 15:41, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 20:46, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 09:46, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support but need geolocation to know where he is busy wandering. J e e 17:35, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 06:33, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 09:03, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida

File:Stelzenläufer (Himantopus himantopus).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2015 at 17:49:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes
Info created and uploaded by Merops - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:49, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:49, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support The subject is a bit small for a big bird but nice :) --Laitche (talk) 18:12, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support This one is good, considering 840 mm very good. --Mile (talk) 18:14, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 18:16, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:31, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:22, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 13:13, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bird's as sharp as its beak. Daniel Case (talk) 16:20, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support excellent. Charles (talk) 18:16, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Marvellous. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 04:19, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 06:23, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 06:57, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:11, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good photo. Therefore my pro, but more luminance-denoising would be better. I don't like this. --Hockei (talk) 14:45, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 09:02, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes

File:Bundesrat der Schweiz 2015.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2015 at 10:35:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical
Info The official picture of the Swiss Federal Council and Federal Chancellor for 2015 (there's only one every year). For several years now the Chancellery has decided to release it under a free license after some lobbying from Wikimedia CH.
Info created by Christian Grund & Maurice Haas - uploaded by TharonXX - nominated by Popo le Chien -- 10:35, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Popo le Chien ^ouah 10:35, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Verde78 (talk) 12:15, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice shot. Atsme☯^Consult 12:21, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Too dark shadows. -- -donald- (talk) 13:22, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Lack of contrast, especially in the lower part. Also lacks sharpness a bit, it appears, at least in certain areas. --Tremonist (talk) 14:59, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good image quality, but no reason for FP nomination, nothing special. --Karelj (talk) 22:15, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Karelj. Daniel Case (talk) 05:26, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kadellar (talk) 13:10, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 18:06, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Would you please be kind enough to explain why ?--Jebulon (talk) 23:11, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Transparent trousers... --Laitche (talk) 10:23, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Is it a fashion statement or related to the picture (and in either case, whose pants)? Popo le Chien ^ouah 12:34, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - See note (Ueli Maurer). --Laitche (talk) 18:02, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. I think I will never oppose because of fashion thing... --Laitche (talk) 18:31, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:51, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I disagree with the "nothing special". I find it very special in contrary. But The overall quality is not that good IMO. Didier and Simonetta are unsharp, for instance.--Jebulon (talk) 17:02, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 6 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 18:07, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chain moray eel.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2015 at 12:22:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish
Info created and uploaded by Atsme, nominated by Verde78 -- Verde78 (talk) 12:22, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Info Chain moray eel under a feather duster. The eel was hiding deep inside a crevice in a coral reef at around 40 ft (12 m) deep. It peeked out long enough for the shot. Location was the Dutch Caribbean about 100 ft (30 m) out from the coastline of Bonaire. Atsme😊^Consult 01:42, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Verde78 (talk) 12:22, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Atsme☯^Consult 12:38, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Nice view, but not sharp at all at maximum resolution. --Tremonist (talk) 15:54, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Peer Tremonist --The Photographer (talk) 16:58, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perfect colors, good composition, nice background. A 2006 shot made with 8 MPx compact/bridge camera which could put ashame many of animal shots we see today here (and made with stellar FFs etc etc). I asked Atsme to confirm this: its made with underwater housing, and foto is upscaled, not downscaled as many people do here. When I wanted to see other shots in category, I saw its only one - so exclusive shot. To get underwater shots like this is more rare than usual. This is not a bird on a tree on daylight but shot under strobes (diving photo storbes are some kind of state of art stuff), visibility down there is different topic than we are used to, its not air, and currents are moving divers pretty much. --Mile (talk) 17:32, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support No QI but good composition and colours LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:31, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I fail to understand the merit of upscaling a digital photo. Anyway, my main problem is that many areas, even within the subjects, drop to complete blackness. The dynamic range of the scene is clearly not captured adequately. — Julian H.^✈ 13:37, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Julian; there's a lot of noise in this one. Daniel Case (talk) 15:36, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I noticed that WP has few underwater FP candidates, and I hope it's not because we're throwing the baby out with the bath water. Critiques of underwater photography should not be on the same scale as land shots or photographs taken in controlled environments, or under optimum conditions. They certainly shouldn't be dismissed for lacking certain attributes one cannot possibly achieve under such an extreme environment. If you've never experienced underwater photography, please try to imagine the conditions. It's difficult enough to capture an elusive critter on land, but to capture one that's hiding inside a dark crevice on a reef structure at depths of 30 to 40 ft is far more difficult. In addition to dealing with currents, you're dealing with constant motion while trying to maintain neutral buoyancy, all the while trying to keep your subject in focus. It makes underwater photography a rather daunting task and highly dependent on post-processing. You have no tripod, varying visibility, limited natural lighting depending on depth, light refraction, and you cannot touch the coral or attempt to stabilize yourself on the ocean floor because it creates backscatter. Macro photography brings even greater challenges when both the photog and subject are constantly moving; depth of field, freezing action, dynamic ranging and proper lighting without back scatter is something everyone should attempt at least once. 😆 Add to that, the fact that you're working with a fixed amount of air in a bulky cylinder on your back, fins for feet, limited vision through a mask while trying to keep an eye on your subject and steady yourself in the current without landing on a scorpion fish or fire coral. It's a far cry different from shooting on land. There's also a risk factor in getting close enough to a live subject, which shouldn't be more than 2 to 3 ft away, or only inches if you're shooting macro. Underwater critters will either be frightened away by your exhaust bubbles, or become defensive and attack you. I just hope that while editors are judging underwater images they will at least consider the level of difficulty and place a bit more emphasis on composition and lighting, especially underwater macro shots. With regards to the merits of upscaling, I agree that it lacks merit on most levels, except when the image is unique enough to warrant a bit of quality loss for enlargement purposes, especially when a purchaser wants to use that image for the company's trade show display. Happy editing! Atsme😊^Consult 16:46, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 18:07, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Maria Laach Kirche Flügelaltar 01.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2015 at 07:43:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Austria
Info Winged altar in late gothic style at the parish- and pilgrimage church Maria Laach am Jauerling, Lower Austria. Anonymous master, 1480. All by me -- Uoaei1 (talk) 07:43, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Uoaei1 (talk) 07:43, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Qualified to sit with our other church-interior FPs. Daniel Case (talk) 20:31, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support An altarpiece! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:40, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Even when there is a gap between the main subject and the pretty boring background. But that is not your fault. --Hubertl 07:35, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 15:40, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice object, excellent geometry, very sharp. Well done! -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:47, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 17:31, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 18:03, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Austria

File:Squid colors.tif, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2015 at 11:18:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class_:_Cephalopoda
Info A curious Caribbean reef squid (Sepioteuthis sepioidea) on Bari Reef (Bonaire, BES Islands), hovering in front of the camera flashing its colors -- Atsme☯^Consult 11:18, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Atsme☯^Consult 11:18, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Verde78 (talk) 12:15, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Question Why tif format? in the backgorund there are visible compression artefacts. -- -donald- (talk) 13:21, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- LZW is lossless compression - a good bokeh effect underwater (not an easy task) with the refraction of background light (while avoiding backscatter) may be what you're calling compression artifacts. Atsme😊^Consult 13:40, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Oppose Nice shoot and excellent quality, however, category and description are incompletes,example: species name is missing. I will change my vote if its fixed. Btw, the background could be improved and chromatic blur noise too (Removing chromatic aberration and maybe a selective gaussian blur for the background). Its in natural enviroment? Caribbean could be a location too general. Thanks --The Photographer (talk) 16:26, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The Photographer, how about less aggressive approach requesting to the volunteer this data, in opposition of this aggressive way to demand that? -- RTA 16:41, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comments are constructive criticism in order to improve the photographer quality, in this case Atsme. Please, you could make comments about this nomination and not about voters comments.--The Photographer (talk) 16:49, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The Photographer, I added species name and gave more details on location, tried to Wikilink to Caribbean reef squid article on EnWiki but it red linked. Squid was shot at 30 ft. depth in its natural environment on the reef. Hope I added the information where it was supposed to be added. Thank you. Atsme😊^Consult 17:54, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - - Hi Atsme, I added more information, please, could you add the location?. Thanks --The Photographer (talk) 18:33, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      - Ok, done (Category). Also, I blurred the bokeh and am uploading the alternate version. Not sure what to do after it's uploaded. Atsme😊^Consult 19:41, 29 October 2015 (UTC) ^{Add: see alternate upload per recommendation by The Photographer File:Squid_colors_2.tif Atsme😊^Consult 21:59, 29 October 2015 (UTC)}[reply]
Neutral Alternative is better I think. --Tremonist (talk) 13:11, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative 1[edit]

Info Same image with gausian blur applied to bokeh background
Support Atsme😊^Consult 00:18, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Surely: a very interesting animal, but I wanted a JPG version. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 01:03, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment no problem, ArionEstar. I made such a task possible especially for you. 😆 Simply download the image and save it in whatever format you prefer. Atsme😊^Consult 01:23, 30 October 2015 (UTC) ^{ArionEstar see [[File:Squid_colors_2.jpg]] - it's the JPG version you wanted. Atsme😊^Consult 21:37, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  Like hehehhe -- RTA 18:27, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]}
Support The background is here much better. -- -donald- (talk) 07:30, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Photographer (talk) 08:30, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:10, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:44, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:33, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice colors --Mile (talk) 16:56, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 21:45, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Dэя-Бøяg 03:18, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Verde78 (talk) 12:26, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative 2[edit]

Info JPG version. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:57, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support @Atsme: Thank you so much! Great, great, great! More aquatic animals! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:57, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The background is posterized caused by jpeg compression. --Laitche (talk) 05:07, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 17:29, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 18:06, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals#Class_:_Cephalopoda

The chosen alternative is: File:Squid_colors_2.tif

File:General Staff Building Eastern Wing.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2015 at 19:03:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
Info General Staff building in Saint Petersburg, view from Moyka river. --Alex Florstein (talk) 19:03, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Info created, uploaded, nominated by Florstein -- Alex Florstein (talk) 19:03, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alex Florstein (talk) 19:03, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 06:25, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 07:37, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 11:43, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:44, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perspective! Daniel Case (talk) 18:27, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 19:00, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 11:19, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:16, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 21:19, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Claus 16:14, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:16, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes

File:L'Umbracle, Valencia, Spain - Jan 2007.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2015 at 13:05:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info created and uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:05, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Super strong support Great composition, great light and great quality! Congratulations Diliff! -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 13:05, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:01, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent. --Cayambe (talk) 14:10, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Jebulon (talk) 16:06, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Thanks for the nomination Arion. :-) One of my older images! Diliff (talk) 17:55, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent. Charles (talk) 18:10, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support and seven. --Laitche (talk) 18:17, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Code (talk) 19:15, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:22, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:52, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Delightful. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 04:17, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 06:22, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:58, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sakhalinio (talk) 11:25, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 11:43, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:08, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Maire (talk) 15:50, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 19:24, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:15, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Skokloster castle (by Pudelek) 2.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Nov 2015 at 20:20:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications
Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 20:20, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 20:20, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:36, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Can you please clone the blurry birds out? I would support it then. --Code (talk) 06:10, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 07:01, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perfect image. I would clone out the birds, the white sign in the middle of the pic in front of the right bushes and would try to clone out the white foil on the right roof. -- -donald- (talk) 07:43, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I clone out the birds and the white sign :) --Pudelek (talk) 09:44, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:15, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support now. --Code (talk) 13:28, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 13:40, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 15:32, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:42, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support But could we have it geotagged too? I know the category has a tag, but as noted earlier people seem to want them with every FP nom where they might be applicable now. Daniel Case (talk) 18:50, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
done --Pudelek (talk) 18:56, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 19:23, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:53, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:56, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 16:19, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Excuse me guys, but somehow I cannot find anything particularly outstanding in this actually nice QI of a nice building... --A.Savin 17:43, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 13:07, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 06:31, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:14, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications

File:Amiens Cathedral Organ and Rose Window, Picardy, France - Diliff.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2015 at 09:12:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Diliff. The organ and rose window of Amiens Cathedral. Please note also that this is an image that is best viewed in detail, as the thumbnail seems to make it look muddy and undetailed, which is not the case - there are a lot of details in the organ and window that need to be seen at 100% to be appreciated. -- Diliff (talk) 09:12, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Diliff (talk) 09:12, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 11:41, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Code (talk) 13:14, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:36, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support wonderful! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:08, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:25, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 16:33, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 17:15, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 17:27, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 18:50, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Colin (talk) 21:14, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great detail; love the way the color in the stained glass sets off the neutrality of the stone. Daniel Case (talk) 16:53, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Verde78 (talk) 12:27, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:19, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 13:13, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

File:Blad Hydrangea paniculata.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2015 at 06:58:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants| #Family: (Hydrangeaceae)
Info created and uploaded by Famberhorst - nominated by Σπάρτακος -- Σπάρτακος (talk) 06:58, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Σπάρτακος (talk) 06:58, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 07:48, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 12:39, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful colour contrast. --Tremonist (talk) 13:20, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Trmonist. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 15:34, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 19:23, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support And seven. Per Tremonist. Daniel Case (talk) 02:27, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose a bit too ~~harsh light~~ bright high light for this subject and seems slightly oversaturated. --Laitche (talk) 03:53, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 13:07, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support color looks a bit strong but I'm AGF that the color is not excessively computer-enhanced. Nice composition and contrast. --Pine^✉ 07:06, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 13:09, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants

File:Dülmen, Alte Brennerei Löhning -- 2015 -- 8664-8.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2015 at 12:08:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay ^talk 12:08, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay ^talk 12:08, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment One note added. --Ivar (talk) 12:38, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed Sorry. CAs top right (at the window) fixed. Thanks for your advice. --XRay ^talk 12:43, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Ivar (talk) 14:17, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:36, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 14:40, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 15:37, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support fine composition - with the bottles and everything. --Hubertl 19:21, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is the full context for the still-lifey photo of those bottles, yes? If so, this is actually a case where more is more. This space has incredible character, well-captured by this photo. Good job. Daniel Case (talk) 16:54, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. You're right. You can see the bottles at the window. The objects are reminiscent of the former distillery. It is the entrance of the building. --XRay ^talk 17:35, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support Nice. Atsme😊^Consult 21:51, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like wide angle shots, and it's beautifully used here. Nice lighting - Benh (talk) 07:52, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I feel exactly the contrary of Benh, sorry. Artificial and unnecessary wide angle shot. Not pleasant for me.--Jebulon (talk) 16:37, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 06:29, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nice subject, but the pipe on the left looks distorted toward the top of the photo. --Pine^✉ 06:54, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 13:09, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Fehmarnsundbrücke as seen from Großenbroderfähre 20140817 1.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2015 at 06:55:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges
Info created and uploaded by DXR - nominated by Σπάρτακος -- Σπάρτακος (talk) 06:55, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Σπάρτακος (talk) 06:55, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive view of the entire sound. --Tremonist (talk) 13:43, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:06, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:14, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:27, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support In thumbnail just a well-known bridge; in closeup the detail is amazing. Daniel Case (talk) 06:53, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:35, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support. A bit low on wow but the sheer size makes up for it. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:24, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks a lot for the nomination, Σπάρτακος --DXR (talk) 09:40, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:19, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 13:12, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges

File:Imam Hussein Hadith inscription 00 (4 B).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2015 at 09:28:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical
Info created by لا روسا - uploaded by MagentaGreen - nominated by لا روسا -- لا روسا (talk) 09:28, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- لا روسا (talk) 09:28, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Supportباسم (talk) 12:17, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It does not appear entirely sharp at maximum resolution. Resolution could be higher. --Tremonist (talk) 14:46, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Tremonist. Daniel Case (talk) 16:20, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 13:08, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Santarém May 2015-9a.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2015 at 11:35:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info The River Tagus viewed from Portas do Sol, Santarém, Portugal. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:35, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:35, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 11:41, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice view of a great river. --Tremonist (talk) 13:33, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kikos (talk) 14:05, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:09, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:23, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 15:53, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 17:15, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support It was in my intention to nominate it soon or later. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:23, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 17:26, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 18:00, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 18:50, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support my vote is superfluous, but I do it anyway --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:08, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 05:15, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Great composition. Nikhil (talk) 05:52, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 07:37, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Benh (talk) 11:23, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow. Just wow. I found myself looking at it a lot longer than I needed to. Daniel Case (talk) 18:16, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great composition and contrast. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:22, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fico blz --The Photographer (talk) 19:15, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Claus 16:12, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:17, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 13:13, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Shasta dam under construction new edit.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2015 at 21:17:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical
Info created by Russell Lee, uploaded by Chick Bowen, nominated by Yann (talk) 21:17, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support High resolution and good quality image of industrial building, 1942. -- Yann (talk) 21:17, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support WOW. -- Thennicke (talk) 01:21, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 04:15, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support for historical value. --Pine^✉ 06:47, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:59, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per above. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 07:36, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support A color tonality we don't see often. I like it very much, valuable and non reshotable. --Mile (talk) 08:06, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --El Grafo (talk) 10:01, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sakhalinio (talk) 11:25, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 11:42, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Mile--ArildV (talk) 12:22, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:43, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Historical interest outweighs technical shortcomings. Daniel Case (talk) 19:34, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Daniel Case. --Laitche (talk) 14:40, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support extra --Verde78 (talk) 12:01, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 19:22, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 13:11, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical

File:2015.07.04.-08-Eilenburg Ost--Vogel-Wicke.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2015 at 16:48:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Fabaceae
Info All by me -- Hockei (talk) 16:48, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Hockei (talk) 16:48, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support For the color. Daniel Case (talk) 16:19, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Daniel. --Tremonist (talk) 14:15, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Hockei (talk) 08:29, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lielstraupe loss.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2015 at 23:10:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications
Info all by Kruusamägi (talk) 23:10, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 23:10, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose because of quality issues (leaning tower) and lack of wow. --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:41, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Dark, trees. --Mile (talk) 17:16, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too dark and too busy. Daniel Case (talk) 21:10, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, per the opposers. --Tremonist (talk) 14:11, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Kruusamägi (talk) 16:00, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Evoluir para conectar.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2015 at 06:35:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#sun
Info Power lines and sunset in the Serra da Canastra National Park.
Info created and uploaded by Heris Luiz Cordeiro Rocha - nominated by Thennicke -- Thennicke (talk) 06:35, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice example of silhouetting and a powerful mood (for me). I especially like the sun's colour gradient due to the cloud on the horizon. -- Thennicke (talk) 06:35, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kikos (talk) 07:19, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cables are not disturbing in this case; cables work here. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 07:47, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Benh (talk) 08:10, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:15, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive. --Laitche (talk) 13:48, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 14:28, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Added English description. A well-done exception to the YAFS "rule" because it adds something else to the sunset. Oppose On second thought, Colin has a point. Daniel Case (talk) 17:46, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:43, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 20:24, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The quality of the JPG is dreadful. Blocky artefacts and posterisation. The sharpening by Thennicke has only made this worse. Google images: "pylons sunset" and see this is neither original nor a great example wrt composition. The perspective effect leads the eye towards a murky area below the sun. -- Colin (talk) 23:03, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Reverted to original -- Thennicke (talk) 01:19, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:39, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bad jpeg artifacts even at 50%. I'm entirely fine with this being promoted due to wow though. :) — Julian H.^✈ 11:39, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @Julian Herzog: Is it fixable? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:46, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Not from this file, as far as I can tell. — Julian H.^✈ 12:19, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Now that I've turned my monitor's brightness up (duh) I can really see the jpg issues on the ground. I'll be sure to do that before nominating next time. Perhaps we could raise the black level to kill the artifacts in the dark areas? -- Thennicke (talk) 13:32, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The best solution is always to try to contact |the author (though language difficulties can be an issue). This image used Lightroom so there's hope there is a RAW file that could be used to save a higher quality image. I'd expect a 12MP image to be at least a couple of MB in size so this looks suspiciously low. -- Colin (talk) 13:55, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Language difficulties are not an issue: he probably is Brazilian, and I am also. The issue is that he does not seem very active. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:01, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The wow is there, but the quality is not up to it, sorry. --Ivar (talk) 17:35, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination despite a lot of support, for the quality issues mentioned -- Thennicke (talk) 05:01, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment a pity... --Laitche (talk) 05:08, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment to @Thennicke: Let's wait a bit and see what other people think. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 09:48, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@ArionEstar: The author's got a lot of other excellent images under his uploads; FP should be only for the very best of them. I don't think that an image with such artifacts deserves FP. Thanks for showing such enthusiasm though. (I've also got another open nomination now so I can't reopen this one) -- Thennicke (talk) 10:28, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Thennicke: It is allowed up to 2 active nominations. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 11:13, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArionEstar, please, Thennicke has already stated he no longer believes this is among the finest, and is entitled to withdraw it. Let's not have an image promoted that really isn't our "finest". -- Colin (talk) 14:07, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Colin: A pity that this happens: 1, 2... 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:35, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArionEstar I don't understand your links and what your point is. It isn't at all a shame that pictures that aren't actually "our finest" aren't promoted. Is this some Brazilian bias, that you won't accept there are really big technical problems here. -- Colin (talk) 16:09, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Colin: I just requested to leave this nomination active for maybe someone comes up with some comment and/or someone who can improve it. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:43, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support (Yes, it's withdrawn. I like the image. It has a good Wow.) --XRay ^talk 13:56, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cloudless sulphur (Phoebis sennae marcellina) male.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2015 at 21:19:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera
Info created and uploaded by Charlesjsharp - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:19, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice color contrast. -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:19, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 21:31, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Brilliant. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 07:27, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but the yellow colour is not everything. Here is posterization strong visible. Also lack of detail in my eyes. Maybe Charlesjsharp can rework it. --Hockei (talk) 10:24, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment A nice capture of course! - but not an image I would propose for FP status. Charles (talk) 10:37, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Immediately, I withdraw my nomination. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:52, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iglesia de San Pedro de los Francos, Calatayud, España, 2014-12-29, DD 030-032 HDR.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2015 at 16:18:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info Pipe organ of the gotic church of San Pedro de los Francos, located in Calatayud, Aragon, Spain. The original temple was founded in the 12th century by order of Alfonso I, "The Battler" to offer the french people who helped him in the Battle of Cutanda (1120) against the Almoravids and stayed definitely in Calatayud a place to pray, but the current church was built 2 centuries later. The organ, which almudejar wooden base dates from end of the 15th century, was built in Calatayud and was supposedly work of Miguel de Monreal. All by me, Poc o² 16:18, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 16:18, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:44, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 04:51, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice tones and good symmetry. Daniel Case (talk) 18:08, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:31, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 05:05, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Neptunbrunnen (Berlin-Mitte).Blick vom Fernsehturm.2.09011281.ajb.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2015 at 19:58:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info created & uploaded by Ajepbah - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 19:58, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 19:58, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 04:47, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 16:13, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I would perhaps have liked stronger color, but there's enough wow in the symmetry to not complain. Daniel Case (talk) 18:17, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:55, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Nice composition, unfavorable angle. --Laitche (talk) 10:51, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment can you do anything to increase the color saturation? --Pine^✉ 06:52, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:29, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Pine: I'm afraid, but IMO the saturation is quite realistic (have a look at the people's clothes). The pavement is unfortunately not very colorful. --Ajepbah (talk) 20:42, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

After some thought, weak support. This seems to fit the Commons FP criteria. However, I think this would be better suited to FP on English Wikipedia and perhaps other language Wikipedias, where the relatively plain aesthetics are less important that the good informative value that this photo has. --Pine^✉ 20:53, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 05:19, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, sorry. The symmetry is nice and so is the quality, but the slight backlight makes the colours look dull. The relatively large flat area around the subject isn't helping in that regard. — Julian H.^✈ 21:13, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Julian H., Kruusamägi (talk) 16:04, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment For me, the colours of pavement are shown as the are: light grey and light red/pink ;-) --Ajepbah (talk) 18:53, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, absolutely, that's not the issue. The issue is that the scene has a high contrast with many areas being dark due to being backlit, others being quite bright. As a result, most of the picture has to be at either end of the histogram, while only the central part of the histogram can really show strong colours (which mirrors our perception - very bright and dark areas can't really show a lot of colour). The pavement is not backlit, so that's the least problematic. All the colours are correct I assume. But they get lost in the picture, in my opinion. — Julian H.^✈ 11:22, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 05:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Nizwa Fort Detail.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2015 at 18:58:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications
Info Detail of Nizwa Fort, Oman, built in the 17th century. Currently it is Oman's most visited national monument. The photo here is a renomination of a candidate I've just recently withdrawn. I really wouldn't do that usually, but in this case I received a couple of supporting votes after I had closed the nomination myself. So I'd like to give it another shot - pinging Verde78, Tremonist, Hubertl. All by myself, --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:58, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:58, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Shelter behind sandy walls. I like it! --Hubertl 19:20, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:51, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 21:50, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Thennicke (talk) 01:43, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 04:45, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like this balance of the elements. --Laitche (talk) 14:17, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unsharpness on the parapets, per my oppose at the previous nomination. So much right otherwise, though ... Daniel Case (talk) 16:22, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 18:04, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:28, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose color --Verde78 (talk) 11:58, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment?? Verde78: The nomination got your support just a few days ago... --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:13, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - The world is full of strange :) --Laitche (talk) 16:23, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 05:06, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications

File:Rathaus Muenchen Innenansicht.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Nov 2015 at 19:51:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
Info created & uploaded by Harro52 - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 19:51, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 19:51, 30 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 04:46, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose When I saw this picture at WLM-DE I thought about nominating it for FP myself. Then I saw that the lamps look really strange, maybe HDR processing went wrong. Hard to say as the photographer didn't provide any information. But this is certainly not a single shot IMO. Very nice picture otherwise. --Code (talk) 07:19, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kasir (talk) 16:31, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Regretful oppose Great image generally but per odd ringing around lights noted by Code. Daniel Case (talk) 18:11, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Looks like a star filter was used for the effect on the lights. It's a beautiful picture but it needs a little tilt and crop. Atsme😊^Consult 21:55, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sharpening white lines everywhere, especially on the ceiling.--Jebulon (talk) 22:00, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Beautiful scenery, but this looks too artificial. --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:48, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 06:28, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Regretful oppose per Code. --Tremonist (talk) 14:30, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 05:07, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[[:]], not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2015 at 02:20:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/ Commons:Featured picture candidates/

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports
Info created by 亂跑的牛 - uploaded by Алый Король - nominated by Алый Король -- Алый Король (talk) 02:20, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Алый Король (talk) 02:20, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nice but very noisy and CA visible. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 05:14, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose For Alchemist an light too hard for me--Σπάρτακος (talk) 09:39, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too much chroma noise. --Laitche (talk) 14:31, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Laitche. --Tremonist (talk) 14:54, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per other opposers, Laitche most of all. Shame ... it would have been nice to have this as an FP. Daniel Case (talk) 03:43, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @Daniel Case: Is this photo more preferable? --Алый Король (talk) 06:28, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Afraid not. The same issues applies, except this time with the addition of motion blurred hand and cue. -- KTC (talk) 15:05, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Mile (talk) 08:37, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Black-collared Hawk Mato Grosso(Brazil).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2015 at 19:27:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Info created by Merops - uploaded by Merops - nominated by Merops -- Merops (talk) 19:27, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Merops (talk) 19:27, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Nice capture, but I prefer the rule of thirds. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:37, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The Rule of third is a good guideline for the composition of pictures, but I think not for this capture.

I have added 2 other version of the image. Maybe the second version is a better crop but I am not sure Merops (talk) 20:13, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Per you. Better crop. A tight crop is better for static subjects. This is an action scene. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:42, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Yes, give room to this bird! Yann (talk) 21:08, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I love the composition as it is with the fish in the claws, but I think it might be a bit noisy for FP. Charles (talk) 14:25, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Per Yann and Charles. Am waiting for an alternative, because I like the composition. --Tremonist (talk) 15:08, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Many thanks to ArionEstar, Yann, Charles and Tremonist for you comments. I have upload a new version, what is your opinion? Merops (talk) 17:06, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The spots below are water drops dripping from the plant? --Tremonist (talk) 17:23, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

yes Merops (talk) 19:11, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment A bit soft now I'm afraid. Charles (talk) 00:05, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--Mile (talk) 08:37, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deng Linlin 2009.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2015 at 08:18:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports
Info created by Steven Rasmussen - uploaded by Алый Король - nominated by Алый Король -- Алый Король (talk) 08:18, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Алый Король (talk) 08:18, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too much noisy for FP --Σπάρτακος (talk) 09:36, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral There is a strange quality problem that makes inferior leg look like a gangrenous leg --The Photographer (talk) 12:02, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Overprocessing. --Laitche (talk) 14:34, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Laitche. --Tremonist (talk) 14:51, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Noisy and out of focus. Daniel Case (talk) 04:25, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 18:18, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:View to the Assumption Cathedral of Yaroslavl.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2015 at 09:33:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
Info created, uploaded, nominated by Florstein -- Alex Florstein (talk) 09:33, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alex Florstein (talk) 09:33, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 10:24, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
There is as a trace in the sky to the right of the cathedral, what is it? can you clone it out? --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:02, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Well... I have no idea. But anyway it's gone now. --Alex Florstein (talk) 15:19, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 16:15, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Asymmetry works here well. --A.Savin 17:46, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:48, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support As there is a religious building and no cityscape, I changed the category, I hope it's ok. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:54, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Competently done tourist shot—too many other details at the expense of a striking composition. QI perhaps but no FP for me. Daniel Case (talk) 05:14, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 18:17, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not good composition. Image has been over-processed, with a glow round the building. No wow. -- Colin (talk) 19:47, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I also think that the composition is not ideal and the light is not special. — Julian H.^✈ 20:12, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with oposers, sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 21:55, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose random composition, distracting fence in the foreground. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:26, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 22:53, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose mostly colors and too high contrat are problem. Light wasn't good. --Mile (talk) 08:20, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per other opposes. --Laitche (talk) 10:27, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. And the clouds are quite dark. --Tremonist (talk) 14:27, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Verde78 (talk) 12:02, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 8 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 15:04, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Biologists.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2015 at 21:57:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info created and uploaded by Victoria Achkasova and Pavel Panchenko - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 21:57, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 21:57, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Is this a joke? I can't support such a nonsense parody of serious science work. Yann (talk) 22:27, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment "Serious science work"? Why so serous? Why should whatever topic be taken like that? In my opinion that caricaturistic depiction is just brilliant. Kruusamägi (talk) 23:12, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Women could be great biologists, but this looks sexist. Yann (talk) 17:42, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thous two even happen to be biologists according to the image description. But I don't see how is this sexist. What does the gender got to do with this? Would you say it is sexist when there would be two men doing the same? Kruusamägi (talk) 20:27, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No, just no. -- KTC (talk) 00:21, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose "Science ... It's a girl thing! Science ... It's a girl thing!" Seriously ... this looks like one of those weird stock images BuzzFeed occasionally finds when it looks through stock image catalogs for images related to a particular term. Daniel Case (talk) 05:24, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think that Commons also needs images that could be use as stock photos. And I think it is too limiting to only stay within "encyclopedic" and with its narrowed down version. Yes, it doesn't depict scientists at work, but that's not the point of that photo. And its far better lifestyle advertisement than this over-the-edge EU commercial. Kruusamägi (talk) 20:27, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Interesting approach for showing science but studio setting is not attractive (objects are setting randomly) and the level of image quality is a bit low (e.g. overexposed hair and forehead), so not an FP, imo. --Laitche (talk) 18:35, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It is not necessary at all to make such derogative statements. If you treat people like this, this will fall back negative on me personally as a member of the community and all the others as well. And this is not acceptable. Thanks, Laitche for your "normal" comment. Especially administrators should know this! Ping: Daniel Case and, Yann, you should learn what sexism really is, maybe you will learn, what a ironic point of view maybe is. I have a lot of female students in my classes (not biology), believe me, it´s not so strange as it seems. Ivo, thanks for your engagement! --Hubertl 20:09, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, no more mathematical chance of success.--Jebulon (talk) 21:50, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Jebulon, I don't see why should mathematical chance of success be relevant here. Do you add that template to other nomination in that reason? I mean, I can easily accept this image not getting the FP status, but I think this discussion here is relevant and should continue. And I don't see how this images doesn't fall under guidelines. Kruusamägi (talk) 12:44, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Kruusamägi, that's fine for me. FPX may be contested, so you did. All the tools are working.--Jebulon (talk) 16:03, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think photomontage is no problem to be an FP but should be categorized in Non-photographic media/Computer-generated like this one. I'm not sure this photo is photomontage or not though. --Laitche (talk) 05:29, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Well it isn't "Computer-generated". I agree that there isn't good category for images like this, but this is also one reason I nominated that. There should be more conceptual photographs like that in Commons and it seems like a good image to draw attention to that topic. Kruusamägi (talk) 12:44, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Ok, I got it. I meant if this photo were a photomontage. --Laitche (talk) 13:49, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. Even if this cannot be an FP, this photo is enough worthy, I think. --Laitche (talk) 03:59, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I had support the visual object itself if the light was not so strong for my tastes. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:13, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Tremonist (talk) 14:22, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm not sure it's good enough to support, in particular I'm not happy with the overexposed hair and lab coats. However, I think the reactions here are a bit harsh. This picture sure isn't a good representation of a biologist's daily work, but that's not a reason to oppose, IMHO. I think both the idea and execution are pretty good, and the picture is very well usable in a context where a not-so-serious representation of "Biology" is appropriate. --Kabelleger (talk) 14:50, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

+1 --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:15, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Actually it deserves a Support vote. --Kabelleger (talk) 20:01, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 07:52, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cucurbita pepo 2015 G2.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2015 at 18:07:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink
Info created, uploaded, nominated by George Chernilevsky -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:07, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Pumpkin just before Halloween ;-) -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:07, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perfect timing! Makes me want to dress up and go trick or treating. Atsme😊^Consult 21:39, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 03:58, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 12:08, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 13:07, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I really don't find this outstanding, sorry, George. Light is rather dull, composition is not really striking. QI but not FP. --Kadellar (talk) 13:09, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow. A pumpkin placed on some grass? Neither natural nor Halloween situation. Top looks over-exposed. -- Colin (talk) 19:42, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Kadellar. — Julian H.^✈ 20:13, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others; no wow here. Daniel Case (talk) 03:23, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others --El Grafo (talk) 18:15, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Tremonist (talk) 14:22, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 07:52, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stained-glass Antwerp 4.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Nov 2015 at 17:46:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info Three stained-glass windows in the Cathedral of Our Lady, Antwerp. From left to right: Our Lady of Stekske, by Stalins & Janssens, 1878; Saint Ursula and Saint Gaspar, by E. Didron, 1873; and Dedication of the statue of Our Lady of Lourdes by arcebishop Deschamps, by Stalins & Janssens, 1885. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:46, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:46, 31 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support better --Mile (talk) 07:44, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 13:06, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 17:38, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:08, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:03, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 06:58, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:23, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 07:51, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

File:2015-03-03 Geneva Motor Show 3908.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2015 at 12:06:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles
Info Ferrari 488 GTB. Foto: Norbert Aepli
Support -- Verde78 (talk) 12:06, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose An out-of-the-box photo without postprocessing but far too much photographic issues (too much reflections, slight chromatic aberrations, perspective issues). Also composition not convincing and people in background very disturbing. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 13:10, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per CE. Nice work if it was on someone's Instagram feed, but there are so many ways to photograph a Ferrari better, even at a car show. Also, the crops are waaaay too tight. Daniel Case (talk) 21:02, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Tremonist (talk)
Oppose Sorry,for the opposers and more DoF isn't good LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:45, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No WOW.--Ricardo Esteban Gutierrez (talk) 14:32, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 15:46, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Monasterio de San Martín, Santiago de Compostela, España, 2015-09-23, DD 43.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Nov 2015 at 08:20:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
Info View of the main nave of the church of the monastery of San Martiño Pinario, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia, Spain. The temple, a work of Mateo López and González de Araújo, Bartolomé Fernández Lechuga and José de Peña y Toro, was finished in 1652. The jewel of the church ist the elaborated reredos, the biggest designed Fernando de Casas Novoa of baroque style. All by me, Poc o² 08:20, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 08:20, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment What's happened to the windows between the angels? Look strange...LivioAndronico ^(talk) 13:03, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Well, yes, there is some overexposure, but I hope that it isn't that distracting Poc o² 13:36, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
weak support No,for me no. The architecture is beautiful, the altar very rich and interesting point of view. The window is small compared to the photo.LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:33, 1 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
weak support per Livio --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:44, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Captures the contrast between the intricate altar and plain walls quite well. Daniel Case (talk) 14:43, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Question Was this version extracted from 1st uploaded ? Look like same mistake as last time, very dark original and lifting. --Mile (talk) 16:58, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Not really, something when wrong with a batch of HDRs and only the one with middle exposure was considered, not the others. This version is the result of the original one and 2 more frames, one over and the other one underexposed Poc o² 20:00, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 06:26, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 11:44, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:16, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice view! --Alchemist-hp (talk) 05:18, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 15:48, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

File:Dülmen, Börnste, Weide -- 2015 -- 9921.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Nov 2015 at 16:57:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Germany
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay ^talk 16:57, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay ^talk 16:57, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive light and composition! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:42, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Crepuscular rays done so well you can practically hear the heavenly choir going "AHHHHHHH ...". Daniel Case (talk) 21:04, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:39, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Thennicke (talk) 07:35, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 08:09, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Benh (talk) 08:10, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Sakhalinio (talk) 13:22, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Daniel. --Tremonist (talk) 13:16, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 13:28, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 13:49, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:36, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:43, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 11:26, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Code (talk) 17:01, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support May the light be with you... --★Poké⁹⁵ 05:09, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:11, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:16, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:12, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support very nice! --Pudelek (talk) 13:06, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 00:25, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Germany

File:Autumn in Caucasus.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2015 at 07:00:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info created by SKas - uploaded by SKas - nominated by SKas -- KSK (talk) 07:00, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- KSK (talk) 07:00, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Interesting subject and good quality. But please remove the purple CA on the ridge at the right. --Code (talk) 19:17, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Thanks for reviewing. I tried to remove the purple CA on the ridge at the right. --KSK (talk) 20:46, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support Daniel Case (talk) 00:09, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Code (talk) 05:47, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
weak support because quality is not that great at 100%, but then again I've been looking at some medium format 645z landscape shots lately so I might be spoiled ;-) But I'm not here for pixel-peeping and it's looking more than good enough at screen size. The scenery looks amazing, the lighting suits the subject and it's well framed. --El Grafo (talk) 12:41, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:10, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 14:49, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Porta Macedonia, Skopie, Macedonia, 2014-04-16, DD 105.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2015 at 09:51:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info created by Poco a poco - uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:51, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:51, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you for the nomination Kiril! this was also one of my own FP candidates :) Poc o² 10:59, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Vertical is ok but the horizontal is tilted ccw. --Laitche (talk) 15:20, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

* Oppose This is FPC. The obvious horizontal issue should have been corrected before nomination. Sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 16:23, 2 November 2015 (UTC)--Jebulon (talk) 21:20, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Those yellow street light act very strange, filter attached ? CA somewhere, tilt. --Mile (talk) 17:13, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment New version uploaded (tilt and highlights in the middle, couldn't see any CA). Sorry for that capital sin, Jebulon, but I can hardly read the mind of everybody around here and guess which picture is going to go through FPC without previous notice. Poc o² 19:52, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Every sin can be forgiven, my son, as every vote can be revokable. The fault was not yours, but of the nominator. Anyway, I still wonder you are able to upload a tilted picture !!--Jebulon (talk) 21:20, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I left notes in problematic spots. --Mile (talk) 08:03, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 01:01, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support The lights behind the arch don't bother me as they're not the subject of the picture and, indeed, are rather small compared to it. Daniel Case (talk) 02:20, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support although the street lights are a bit strange... --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:47, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 11:44, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:10, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I've uploaded a new version with some slight improvements of symmetry and perspective Poc o² 20:04, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 14:50, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Cepelinai 1, Vilnius, Lithuania - Diliff.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2015 at 09:05:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Food_and_drink
Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Diliff. My first foray into a new style of photography on FP: food. This is an iconic Lithuanian dish, the Cepelinai, a potato dumpling filled with meat or cheese, and named after the Zeppelin airship that it resembles. I should note that this is not a studio photo, it was simply a photo I took while at a restaurant in Lithuania, so it was hand-held and not arranged specifically for the photo. I'm not saying this as an excuse, but hopefully that can be appreciated when judging. Also, I took a photo of the same dish with the dumpling cut open, but I was unsure about whether this would make a useful set or whether just one should be nominated. Your thoughts on a possible set would be appreciated too. -- Diliff (talk) 09:05, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Diliff (talk) 09:05, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think the other one is more interesting. At first look, I thought these were eggs. Yann (talk) 10:29, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Do you think it works as a set (before and after cutting) or do you think only the second one is needed then? I know they look a bit like eggs but that's why I added the explanation of what they are. ;-) Diliff (talk) 10:32, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - For things with fillings, such as here, I think they would work as a set. -- KTC (talk) 14:20, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I support, I'm hungry. --Tremonist (talk) 13:41, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Question Please, could you add a recipe and the chef?. I could preffer a entire vision range, maybe more DoF. Btw, a dish could be a art work and this picture a derivate work?. Btw, I have been photographing my plate before to eat every day for a year XD. I am not alone! --The Photographer (talk) 19:09, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I am waiting for someone to complain the majority of the photo is out of focus and confidently assert that you should have focus-stacked. -- Colin (talk) 21:08, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I very much like the focus here; but wonder why the file size is only 866 KB. Not a technical geek; so afraid to ask this stupid question (?) here. :) J e e 02:48, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Jee, the file size is small mostly because there isn't a lot of detail in much of the image. The plate and background contains very little detail and the JPEG compression algorithm is able to store it efficiently. Many people make the mistake of confusing file size and resolution. As a general rule, lower compression (larger file size) results in a better quality image, but it isn't always as simple as that. It's usually possible to significantly compress an image without affecting the image quality as long as you know the limits and have a good understanding of what JPEG compression artifacts look like. For those who don't, the rule of thumb to use low compression/large file size is a simple but effective way of keeping maximum image quality but some people go a bit too far IMO and this results in huge file sizes with no visible improvement in image quality. Many of the huge files on Commons (50mb+) could be re-compressed to 10-15mb without any obvious difference in quality. The problem is that for archival purposes, the size is not much of a problem, but for practical purposes (ease of download), smaller is better. Anyway, enough said I think. Diliff (talk) 13:20, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Diliff; now I understood. In my macros, where the background is unfocused, the file size is less than in an image where everything is in focus. File size is reduced a lot while denoising a macro background too. This may be first time I saw an image of you in such a small file size. J e e 13:34, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support Nice presentation and color; at this range I understand about the focus. Daniel Case (talk) 06:57, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Mmm sorry Diliff but in this case per Colin, it's very nice for your own SNS (nice colors and good exposure) but not an FP for me. If you purposely used this shallow DOF, I want to know that purpose and cut off of the shadow in front is also a minus point (did you raise the front side of the plate?), imho. Regards. --Laitche (talk) 04:17, 5 November 2015 (UTC) P.S. I think if this photo were not your work, it would get at least 4 oppose votes before my vote... --Laitche (talk) 04:22, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, I think Colin's comment was sarcastic (if I understand properly). J e e 04:39, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Jee but if there wasn't Colin's comment, I think my vote is same except the part "but in this case per Colin" :) --Laitche (talk) 04:57, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I was mocking FPC, which seems to demand focus stacking for all still-life photography. Only on Commons FP would you find anyone suggesting that professional-class food photography (of dishes served on plates) must use focus stacking and have front-to-back sharpness of the whole subject. Having said that, the shallow DoF here is probably more due to the low light conditions forcing the camera settings, rather than artistic choice, though sometimes one feeds the other. -- Colin (talk) 08:08, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I assumed Colin's comment was sarcastic too, because I made it quite clear at the top that this is not a studio food shot. For the same reason, it's not possible to focus stack a moving insect in macro photography, but there is usually still someone in the peanut gallery who insists that focus stacking is necessary for his support vote. ;-) Likewise, I think it's silly to expect someone to set up a tripod and studio lighting in a public restaurant - this is not paid professional food photography. There are two reasons for the shallow DoF: One, I had no choice because it was a dark restaurant, and two, because it's normal for food photography. I'm not saying it should be done simply because others do it, but it is a common aesthetic in food photography. As for the other criticisms, they are fair and legitimate, but I can only mention again that there were practical restrictions to the photography that were dictated by the fact that I was in a public restaurant. ;-) Diliff (talk) 08:27, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I can easily understand the difficulty in a restaurant from my experience, last week. :) J e e 09:39, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:23, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I think the other photo with one dumpling cut open is superior as it properly illustrates the dish. But the presentation is very plain ("boring centred photograph" some would say). I think if we aspire to FP having professional-level food photography (and it should, and doesn't) then the subject needs to be presented as one might see in a recipe book or food magazine -- part of a well-dressed table, carefully lit and composed. Oh, and there's nothing wrong with cropping the plate (someone suggested in another FPC that this was a no no) though it needs to be done deliberately rather than accidentally. This is just QI imo, and I agree with Laitche's comment that if some newbie had nominated this it would have not survived a day (which isn't to say it is terrible, but that everyone is being over-generous in holding back). -- Colin (talk) 08:08, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I certainly agree with you that this isn't world class food photography, but compare it to existing food FPs, particularly non-studio style shots, and I think you would find it's comparable, as that's what I did before nominating. There are some FPs with better settings (a set table, more pleasant background etc), but the vast majority have a simple table, or white background. I suppose we have to find a balance between comparing candidates to their FP peers, and aiming for a minimum benchmark standard though. Diliff (talk) 08:33, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - I agree the current standard of food photography on Commons is poor yet there is no good reason for this. It isn't like there are huge technological challenges or expensive equipment required. I'm not sure the "Picture taken of food I'm about to eat in a restaurant" photo genre, which is apparently extremely popular on social media, is ever likely to generate an FP. Same goes for tourist photos in the middle of the day in summer, or difficult snaps of celebrities at events. It is difficult to do that well, compared to a planned photo, but that isn't really an excuse I feel that should mean we are happy to accept the result as "among our finest images". I would love it if someone raised the game on food photography, as you have done for cathedral interiors, say, and that's why I don't think we should lower the bar merely because everything to date has been disappointing. -- Colin (talk) 10:37, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    - I do totally agree with you, except that I disagree that there's no good reason for it - I think there's an additional barrier to quality food photography: for many dishes, the Photographer has to also be a decent cook, or know someone who's willing to cook some nice looking dishes just for the photo (ok, and to eat it afterwards which I suppose could be an incentive to make friends with budding chefs!). I think the lack of an intersection between the two genres is the main reason why the quality of food photography is not at the standard of cathedrals. With grand buildings, all we have to do as photographers is turn up with the appropriate skills and equipment, we don't have to build it beforehand. :-) Diliff (talk) 18:58, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      - I'm not sure the lack of access to decent food is that big a problem: cooking elaborate dishes to entertain friends is quite popular :-). Not everyone has the talent personally, but then not everyone lives near a great metropolis or in a natural biodiversity hotspot. And it doesn't have to be cooked food: even a simple cold lunch, picnic or salad could be presented well. I reckon we just haven't had anyone turn up here to inspire and/or offer advice, and Wikipedia isn't exactly a recipe website, so the focus there would be on notable dishes. -- Colin (talk) 08:45, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Food photo is what we lack here. They often say dish should be shot from above, I don't agree always, here is ok as is. But background is invasive, color of table is too strong, food could be in focus all - stacking, shadow of dish isn't lucky neither, crop could be same distance dish-edge at least on top and on sides. --Mile (talk) 08:09, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- There you go Colin, it finally happened. I should focus stack. Diliff (talk) 08:21, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - :-) -- Colin (talk) 08:45, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Now I convinced. I love the focus where I start to bite. J e e 13:37, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination. Close, but no cigar. 2 supports short, and a few too many opposes to pass. Back to the drawing board. I don't usually have the opportunity to shoot asethetically pleasing food but if I do, I'll give it another try. Diliff (talk) 11:27, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:2015.07.15.-07-Erlichsee Oberhausen-Rheinhausen--Kleines Wiesenvoegelchen.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2015 at 14:54:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family:Nymphalidae (Brush-footed butterflies)
Info All by me. -- Hockei (talk) 14:54, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Hockei (talk) 14:54, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:43, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's certainly a nice scene captured well. --Tremonist (talk) 13:30, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Mild support I wish it had been possible to crop to just the thistle the butterfly's on, but I see it would probably create more problems than it solves. Daniel Case (talk) 19:23, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose We already have high quality FP of this species, File:Coenonympha pamphilus qtl1.jpg Charles (talk) 10:31, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I knew it. Nonetheless, it is a completely different composition. And the butterfly looks different. --Hockei (talk) 10:42, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I think the quality of the existing one is pretty hard to equal... Charles (talk) 15:02, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination --Hockei (talk) 19:35, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Many-banded daggerwing (Marpesia chiron) underside.JPG[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2015 at 20:47:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals
Info created and uploaded by Charlesjsharp - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:47, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:47, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 22:25, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice detail on the butterfly, but color noise in the bokeh. And even so, composition isn't FP-level for me. Daniel Case (talk) 02:18, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Nor for me! Charles (talk) 17:43, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 09:08, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chester Cathedral (7251396712).jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2015 at 10:57:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Michael Beckwith - uploaded by User:File Upload Bot (Magnus Manske) - nominated by Owain Knight
Support -- Owain Knight (talk) 10:57, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Too soft, too much overexposed stained glass. I also took a photo of this interior which I think is significantly better than this one, but even then I don't think mine is FP quality either (issues with ghosting with the people and imperfect highlight recovery). Diliff (talk) 11:06, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Verticals, cut and peer Diliff --The Photographer (talk) 11:15, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice church,bad photo. Sorry. LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:28, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Diliff -- Colin (talk) 21:03, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Tremonist (talk) 15:49, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Objections noted above make success highly unlikely at this point. Daniel Case (talk) 17:50, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:15-10-28-Pont Bac de Roda Barcelona-RalfR-WMA 3105.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2015 at 19:57:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info Bac de Roda Bridge of architect Santiago Calatrava in Barcelona - all by -- Ralf Roleček
Support -- Ralf Roleček 19:57, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Several dust spots in the sky and extremely noisy for ISO 100. Composition is nice, however. / Lauter Staubflecken im Himmel und sehr verrauscht. Bildgestaltung gefällt mir aber. --Code (talk) 20:16, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Neue Version hochgeladen - Verdammt, du mußt einen sehr guten Monitor haben, die Flecken sind mir durchgerutscht. Woher das Rauschen war, verstehe ich nicht. --Ralf Roleček 20:24, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support now. --Code (talk) 21:17, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 04:16, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:01, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 06:23, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 07:37, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:44, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:15, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wet-blanket oppose Well-done, a QI definitely, but just has too much going on compositionally for FP for me. Daniel Case (talk) 19:30, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute collapsed

Interesting! After Ralf opposed your family picture - for good and obvious reasons - , you are opposing him here now. Don't you think that makes you completely untrustworthy for any review, not only here? --Hubertl 13:11, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry if I'm intruding, but I do not think Daniel do it as spite, however, we should relax a bit. We are here for fun guys. Peace. --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:16, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

normally I understand the opposing opinions here as constructive criticism and feel they usually also be substantial. In this case, I do not understand it but that's not important. --Ralf Roleček 21:59, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And yet another unnecessary personal attack by Hubertl. From my long-term experience, Daniel Case is a very trustworthy reviewer on Commons. Btw, a reviewer can make himself untrustworthy not only with "revenge opposes", but also with "friendship supports"... --A.Savin 01:11, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

When I will talk to you, A. Savin, I will do it explicitely. Everything else I do is not your business. --Hubertl 01:50, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it was clear that your answer would not be particularly intelligent. --A.Savin 02:10, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As Livioandronico2013:

--Ralf Roleček 07:50, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry again for the intrusion ,but A.Savin in your opinion, this is a way to stretch the minds? In my opinion (I say this as a friend, I hope that does not offend you) you're too aggressive. If Hubertl was wrong in your opinion it was enough to say that Daniel Case was in good faith, in an indirect manner and not to attack. Honestly I would expect from an administrator a way of doing more fatherly and I repeat I'm not saying that you're inadequate or another, you should just go softer.I repeat, I am convinced that Daniel is in good faith it is a dear person sincere and forthright as I like. Then each one can have his opinion the world is free. Sorry for the intrusion and if I offended anyone.Peace. LivioAndronico ^(talk) 09:54, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Accusing s/o of revenge votes is a personal insult, and it is not the first one by H. within a couple of days. It is my right to point that out. FPC needs mature participants, not someone who takes everything personally. It is true, however, that this page is a wrong place for such discussions. Should I see similar or inflaming comments by H. in near future, I would transfer the whole issue to COM:ANU. --A.Savin 11:12, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Hubertl 13:06, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 22:48, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:San Carlo al Corso (Rome) - Second Left chapel ceiling HDR.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2015 at 18:41:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
Info All by LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:41, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:41, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The white balance seems off ... Daniel Case (talk) 05:29, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Daniel thanx LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:26, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The gold in the top right corner is slightly overexposed I think, a lot of glaring light seems to enter the lens from the bottom. In such cases, it's sometimes necessary to use your hand or some object as an extended lens hood to reduce glare. — Julian H.^✈ 11:45, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I like it, but Julian has a point here I think. --Tremonist (talk) 16:22, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose bad quality --Verde78 (talk) 09:55, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 22:47, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:مسفوف تونسي بالرمان والزبيب.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Nov 2015 at 14:27:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink
Info Featured picture on Arabic Wikipedia.created by Habib M’henni - uploaded by Habib M’henni - nominated by ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 -- ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 14:27, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 14:27, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:00, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I like the composition, but it's unsharp and grainy at the edges. Daniel Case (talk) 18:20, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Daniel. --Tremonist (talk) 15:18, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 22:49, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bell tower of Church of Beheading of John the Baptist in Moscow.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2015 at 12:09:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
Info created by Dmitry Ivanov - uploaded by Dmitry Ivanov - nominated by Dmitry Ivanov -- Dmitry Ivanov (talk) 12:09, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support ...Tear yourself away from vanity of streets, have a look on the heaven... -- Dmitry Ivanov (talk) 12:26, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support wonderful summer light --Hubertl 16:56, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely colors and very typical "Russian" green. --Mile (talk) 18:17, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per others. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:06, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Mile. Daniel Case (talk) 21:33, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Daniel Case. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 05:02, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --★Poké⁹⁵ 05:12, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:30, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 16:14, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:12, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 13:55, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings

File:Dactylorhiza russowii inflorescence - Niitvälja bog.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2015 at 13:32:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants
Info all by Ivar (talk) 13:32, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 13:32, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:24, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 18:01, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support ---Merops (talk) 19:33, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Code (talk) 06:22, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:11, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:46, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:17, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Verde78 (talk) 12:23, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:57, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 13:56, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants

File:Illuminated Tennōji Park and Abeno Harukas, November 2015, Osaka.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2015 at 19:24:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Laitche (talk) 19:24, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Laitche (talk) 19:24, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice contrast. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:34, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sakhalinio (talk) 03:54, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment maybe too late at night --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:45, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Martin Falbisoner: This photo was taken at 18:39, so about 1 hour after sunset, it means very early at night but November 3rd is a national holiday of Japan (Culture Day) then most of the offices (in the tallest building in Japan) were closing... --Laitche (talk) 11:49, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. And there were so many people in the park due to this lighting up festa on the national holiday so I was waiting about 20 minutes until they have left from there. --Laitche (talk) 12:28, 4 November 2015 (UTC) Or you prefer with ghosts? I think ghosts occasionally give a photo pleasing mood but in this case I avoided the ghosts. --Laitche (talk) 13:18, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support OK, I see. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:38, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment ~~The palace seems distorted~~ --Σπάρτακος (talk) 09:42, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Σπάρτακος: Which palace? If you mean the whole building, that's actually like this. (Did you check the distortion of the building with grid?) And taking 300m tall building from the ground without distortion correcting is impossible. --Laitche (talk) 11:49, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Or you prefer without distortion correcting (distorted) version? If you feel this nomination distorted, that could be seems natural for you :) --Laitche (talk) 13:00, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support I say "seems", if I was sure I would have voted against--Σπάρτακος (talk) 22:32, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support Very nice lights! --Tremonist (talk) 15:10, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 23:57, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support. A little dark but that's fine. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:21, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please see this photo at night in the darkened room :) --Laitche (talk) 02:46, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:43, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:57, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 13:57, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:Knight's tour anim 2.gif, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2015 at 09:09:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animated
Info created by Ilmari Karonen - uploaded by Ilmari Karonen - nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:09, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:09, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Cat is missing. I love it otherwise, would be even better if figure of horse would be presented instead of arrow. A Monte Carlo which brang Prestre de Vauban fort at the end. --Mile (talk) 09:55, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I have added the appropriate category. Putting a figure of horse would cover much of each field and could distract attention from the movement path. Yet, the visibility of the line after the tour ends should be pronounced because of its beauty.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:20, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Its chess. --Mile (talk) 10:57, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like it. High EV. --Tremonist (talk) 13:39, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 14:40, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:24, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hight EV and nice quality --The Photographer (talk) 17:45, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:10, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This is a nice animation but would be better with a horse jumping from place to place. In the end, just two horses would remain in the board: at the first and last squares. Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:48, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 13:52, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animated

File:Rådhuset metro station June 2015.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2015 at 12:17:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info Rådhuset metro station, Stockholm. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 12:17, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ArildV (talk) 12:17, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I thought something like this exist only in Helsinki --Ralf Roleček 12:24, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 12:51, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:30, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is amazing Sakhalinio (talk) 13:57, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great work! --Yann (talk) 14:38, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 14:41, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support sure --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:09, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:23, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Maire (talk) 15:46, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 15:53, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 16:32, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

* Support interesting --Mile (talk) 16:44, 3 November 2015 (UTC) --Mile (talk) 08:34, 9 November 2015 (UTC) Would support 2nd version, since reverted.[reply]

Support Like from the best science fiction movie. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 17:13, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support DoF a little bit too small, may be tilted CW. But: Very nice and wonderful composition. --XRay ^talk 17:25, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

* Support interesting --Mile (talk) 16:44, 3 November 2015 (UTC) I think its too much tilted. Nothing so problematic what couldn't be easily corrected...some minimal requirement for future FP ? --Mile (talk) 14:58, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 17:59, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support POTY finalist of course --The Photographer (talk) 18:25, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 18:49, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support my vote is superfluous, but I do it anyway --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:08, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Code (talk) 20:05, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- wow! Amazing station! Great composition as well! Nikhil (talk) 05:51, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~weak support~~ Yes it's an amazing place, but a bit spoiled by execution. Architectural subject shall have "horizontal lines" not skewed IMO. Still a great wow. - Benh (talk) 11:23, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose the new version introduced even more horizontal "trapeze skewing" distorsion, which I don't like. - Benh (talk) 13:57, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support Not perfect—the man on the escalator is a little motion-blurred—but so what? +1 to Johann's comment. Daniel Case (talk) 18:43, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:22, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Unbalanced compositon.--Verde78 (talk) 12:00, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unbalanced composition ? --The Photographer (talk) 12:09, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Love the pic, but I see his point. While the lines on the ground are level with the "horizon" the escalator is not. Moreover, that massive pillar on the right does give the impression the composition is weighted to the right as well. Saffron Blaze (talk) 17:58, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see it now. As XRay mentioned, its tilted. I suppose ArildV will rotate it. Can be best seen on horizontals of elevator roof. --Mile (talk) 18:34, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Info Thank you all for voting. Mile, XRay, Saffron Blaze, Verde78 new version uploaded. --ArildV (talk) 20:31, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Frankly, in this instance, I think you should just choose which you'd rather featured. There are merits to both versions and the differences are not sufficient to derail this great image. Saffron Blaze (talk) 01:48, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I sorry but after giving the new version a second look, I have restored the original version (also considering comments from Saffron Blaze and Benh). I dont really like the new version.--ArildV (talk) 14:14, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

~~Yes, I suppose its better now~~. For balancing this kind of crop maybe, next time. --Mile (talk) 07:11, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the suggestion, but I dont want to crop the pillars. It also reduces the educational value (less informationabout the station's architecture). --ArildV (talk) 14:17, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:16, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Outstanding! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:46, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Great picture and great station. I'll borrow this project for underground stations in Russia. :) --Brateevsky {talk} 10:25, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:56, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 26 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 13:52, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Stift Seitenstetten Marmorsaal Deckenfresko 01.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2015 at 08:57:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Austria
Info Ceiling fresco of the Marble Hall at Seitenstetten Abbey (Lower Austria) by Paul Troger (1735): The Harmony between Religion and Science. Al by me -- Uoaei1 (talk) 08:57, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Uoaei1 (talk) 08:57, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adorable --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 09:31, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adorável. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:35, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support great! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:37, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 11:22, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 11:46, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 15:43, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support ——Sakhalinio (talk) 16:50, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fresco is nice and lively. Weakness: I saw (earlier and now here) this wide angle lens are unsharp in corners. You might try to put camera rectangular, two shots on 10-12 mm and stitch. Tripod needed. --Mile (talk) 18:12, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Yann (talk) 20:19, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:09, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 13:54, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:31, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 22:27, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 16:15, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 11:35, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I really like --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:10, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 13:53, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Austria

File:The glory of the Prince and the twelve provinces of the Kingdom.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2015 at 18:56:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
Info In 1782 Girolamo Starace Franchis signed the fresco that decorates the ceiling depicting "The Glory of the Prince and the twelve provinces of the Kingdom" in the Royal Palace of Caserta. All by LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:56, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:56, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support ♥♥♥ 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:25, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support The light is a little bit irregular--Σπάρτακος (talk) 09:43, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:10, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Per Σπάρτακος; also distortion near corners. Unavoidable perhaps, I know. Daniel Case (talk) 22:41, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support --Verde78 (talk) 11:58, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 09:00, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 11:30, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:15, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:57, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Mile (talk) 13:54, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors

Info Demoted/Delisted to not featured per this consensus. --Cart (talk) 14:03, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Transept of Saint Spyridon Serbian Orthodox church (Trieste).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2015 at 09:49:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
Info HDR image of Transept of Saint Spyridon Serbian Orthodox church (Trieste). All by --Mile (talk) 09:49, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 09:49, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I will put alternative since no one like it (nor dislike), cropped ceiling of halfcupola only. --Mile (talk) 15:50, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:10, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the original, too. I just had doubts because of the dirt at the ceiling at first, but the photo is really good. --Tremonist (talk) 15:14, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative[edit]

Info Croped version to halfcupola ceiling.
Support --Mile (talk) 16:00, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:09, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:26, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:43, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 09:44, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:13, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Qualified support I like this because it focuses more on the semidome subject, although I wish the crop wasn't quite so tight. Daniel Case (talk) 17:27, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 08:36, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:55, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 14:35, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

The chosen alternative is: File:Transept ceiling of Saint Spyridon Serbian Orthodox church (Trieste).jpg

File:Platycercus elegans Wilsons Prom.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2015 at 21:06:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Info created by JJ Harrison - uploaded by JJ Harrison - nominated by Pine -- Pine^✉ 21:06, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pine^✉ 21:06, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Bojars (talk) 21:13, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Elegant. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:08, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above. I also like the red green contrast --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:47, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It seems that the white balance is too blue. Yann (talk) 13:55, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment a bit small and too shallow DOF for me, and I think sRGB color space is not enough range for this bird. Sometimes I feel sRGB color space is not enough for nature :) --Laitche (talk) 13:58, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Laitche. --Tremonist (talk) 15:06, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:32, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 18:14, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose WB, light, contrast --Mile (talk) 18:38, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Because I know first-hand how hard this species is to photograph - they fly away as soon as they see you. But I agree with Mile that contrast could be improved; it appears washed-out. -- Thennicke (talk) 08:06, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality not quite there. I don't think FP guidelines allow for the fact that certain species are hard to photograph. Charles (talk) 11:20, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality is not there, beaks and legs and tail are out of focus, the main subject is a bit too small for today's birds standards. --Laitche (talk) 04:36, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Kadellar (talk) 19:36, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 11:58, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 00:05, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:MOS KIM-1 IMG 4211 cropped scale.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Nov 2015 at 21:12:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info created by Rama, Tomer T and Musée Bolo - uploaded by Rama - nominated by Pine -- Pine^✉ 21:12, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- --Pine^✉ 21:14, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 21:17, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose unsharp and irregular lighting. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 05:13, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral good quality and interesting but for Alchemist too --Σπάρτακος (talk) 09:40, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral because of some minor problems. --Tremonist (talk) 14:54, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lighting doesn't bother me ... Daniel Case (talk) 02:36, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 07:39, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Archon apollinus bellargus - Beautiful false apollo.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2015 at 09:43:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera
Info Archon apollinus bellargus (Beautiful false Apollo). Created by Zcebeci - uploaded by Zcebeci - nominated by Christian Ferrer --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:43, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:43, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Thennicke (talk) 10:26, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Oh the detail! Daniel Case (talk) 05:56, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 09:29, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:33, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:50, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is SuperB. Ellerinize sağlık (Turkish special thanks). Sakhalinio (talk) 02:09, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support. Superb colors, good sharpness, but the resolution is at the lower limit. --Hendric Stattmann (talk) 12:59, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 16:01, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 16:08, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 12:56, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 11:34, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 14:26, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:03, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera

File:Jonge sperwer (Accipiter nisus) is geringd. Locatie, Natuurterrein De Famberhorst 03.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2015 at 06:04:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds #Family Accipitridae.
Info Young Sparrowhawk (Accipiter nisus) is ringed. Location, Natuurterrein The Famberhorst in the Netherlands. created by Famberhorst - uploaded by Famberhorst - nominated by Famberhorst -- Famberhorst (talk) 06:04, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 06:04, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 09:37, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice! --Tremonist (talk) 14:52, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Great detail but just too much going on for FP for me. Daniel Case (talk) 03:45, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sakhalinio (talk) 05:21, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:16, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

* Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:43, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:00, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Info Demoted to 'not featured' due to sock double vote. 4 October 2018. --Cart (talk) 18:52, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cart (talk) 18:52, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lagangarbh cottage with Buachaille Etive Mòr.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2015 at 08:40:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info The white cottage, next to the river Coupall, is dwarfed by Buachaille Etive Mòr. The cottage, called Lagangarbh, was converted from a crofter's home, and is used as a Scottish Mountaineering Club hut. It can accommodate 20 people, with 10 more in a barn behind. The trees to the west were planted to provide shelter from the wind. The main mountain peak on the left is Stob Dearg at 1022m. It was dark and raining as we drove along the A82 through Glen Coe (it always rains in Glen Coe), but then the sun came out and splashes of light lit up the valley. If you look very closely in the middle of the picture, you can see some hill walkers. All by me. -- Colin (talk) 08:40, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Colin (talk) 08:40, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Halo around the Mountains. --Ralf Roleček 09:15, 8 November 2015 (UTC) ok, the resolution is sooo big. not enough for a oppose[reply]
Support great mood. Makes me want to have a dram of Oban 14. At once. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:26, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great combination of elements. — Julian H.^✈ 13:54, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Martin Falbisoner. I've been there once and this excellent photo takes me back to this wonderful place. --Code (talk) 14:53, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per others including Ralf Roleček. --Laitche (talk) 15:55, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:00, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great landscape with lots of detail ... I was studying it for a while, looking not only (unsuccessfully) for the hikers but also thinking about how I'd go up it. Daniel Case (talk) 04:06, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose halos around the mountains. Please eliminate it, so I'd like to strike my oppose. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 08:50, 9 November 2015 (UTC) now Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:38, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:17, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Ralf, Laitche, Alchemist-hp: sharpening halo removed from mountain edge. -- Colin (talk) 20:12, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support ok now. not perfect but FP in my eyes. --Ralf Roleček 20:25, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sakhalinio (talk) 02:06, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I really like the mood. --Tremonist (talk) 16:03, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 17:14, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 12:58, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 14:22, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 15:09, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Artist's impression of an ultra-short-period planet.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2015 at 16:20:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy
Info created by NASA, ESA and A. Schaller, uploaded by Stas1995, nominated by Yann (talk) 16:20, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Info Artist's impression of SWEEPS-10, the planet with the shortest orbital period yet found. It is 1.6 times the mass of Jupiter and completes an orbit of its star in just 10 hours. It orbits the star SWEEPS J175902.00−291323.7 located in the Galactic bulge at a distance of approximately 22,000 light years from Earth. It is also the hotest known planet, with approximately 1650 degrees Celsius.
Support This is a nice artisitic work with high EV. -- Yann (talk) 16:20, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:20, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree with Yann. --Tremonist (talk) 13:29, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:00, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose "artist impressions" are maybe pretty but dangerous in scientific matters, especially in a media repository for an on-line encyclopedy.--Jebulon (talk) 22:35, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Jebulon, this is made by scientists from NASA and ESA, so do you contest that NASA and ESA are not able to faithfully represent what they know? Regards, Yann (talk) 11:52, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Yann, quote from the file description page : This illustration presents a purely speculative view of what such a "hot Jupiter" might look like. (Emphasized by me). Regards.--Jebulon (talk) 12:48, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    - Jebulon: It is speculative, as nobody was able to go there, and will ever be. However, this is a representation from the people who know best about this subject, and it is a recent discovery, that's why it has a high educational value. Regards, Yann (talk) 13:50, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      - Yann, no need to try to convince me about your own feeling ! Of course you trust it has a FP potential: you nominated it ! I just disagree...--Jebulon (talk) 18:04, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      - Maybe not trying to convince you, but to make clear that this is everything but "dangerous for scientific matters". - Benh (talk) 18:12, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
        Why ?--Jebulon (talk) 20:21, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yann, Sorry, as you already said, a discussion is a good way to "kill" a nomination, this was not my intention of course, but you understand maybe now why I don't nominate anymore for now. FPC is getting more and more a farce...--Jebulon (talk) 20:27, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support High EV and good quality. --★Poké⁹⁵ 05:17, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This is the one which should be used PNG or TIFF (uncompressed format) cause the subject is posterized by jpeg compression. --Laitche (talk) 06:42, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Jebulon. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 08:54, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Yann. - Benh (talk) 10:50, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:05, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 03:04, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Astronomy

File:Gustave Le Gray - Brig upon the Water - Google Art Project.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2015 at 13:26:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical
Info created by Gustave Le Gray, uploaded by Dcoetzee, nominated by Yann (talk) 13:26, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Info Brig upon the Water, by Gustave Le Gray, 1856. Probably the first picture made from 2 different exposures: Le Gray used one negative for the sky, and another one with a longer exposure for the sea, and combined the two into one picture in positive. For details, see High-dynamic-range imaging.
Support -- Yann (talk) 13:26, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support ---Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:12, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support For its importance in the history of photography, and for the lack of any stitching errors despite the unavailability of Photoshop, Lightroom, GIMP or anything else like it . Daniel Case (talk) 18:50, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:34, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:59, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I support a fake ! Without a {retouched} template ! My God. It is the beginning of the end...--Jebulon (talk) 20:24, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 07:32, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support For historical value. --Laitche (talk) 03:29, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:18, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 19:28, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 03:03, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical

File:Horse anatomy.svg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2015 at 14:25:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Computer-generated
Info All by -- The Photographer (talk) 14:25, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I really really really really really really like it! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:22, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Question The source is mentioned as File:Horseanatomy.png by en:User:WikipedianProlific at English language Wikipedia (CC BY-SA 3.0/GFDL). Unless both user's are same, I miss something in attribution info? Jee 02:10, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment On File talk:Horseanatomy.png, someone claimed that this might be a copyright violation (derivative work) from the Grolier Academic Encyclopedia, 1988 edition , volume 10, page 242, but it never went through a proper deletion request. Google Books doesn't allow me to access a full text version of that book – maybe someone with a non-German IP could check that? --El Grafo (talk) 08:43, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@El Grafo: Grolier Academic Encyclopedia version ? --The Photographer (talk) 11:23, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support It is really good and that's what I'm supporting here. --Tremonist (talk) 13:32, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sufficiently different from the Grolier diagram that I do not think it violates copyright. Daniel Case (talk) 19:19, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Case: But isn't it a derivative work of en:User:WikipedianProlific? Does a format change from "PNG" to "SVG" add any new copyright? Event it is true, the "all by me" seems very odd to me. J e e 01:00, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's a derivative work all right, but a derivative work of a GFDL-CC-BY-SA 3.0 work is a CC-BY-SA 3.0 work that we can host here ... that's the whole point of the free license. The format change does not in any way affect the copyright. Daniel Case (talk) 04:50, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Daniel Case. It is my point too; so this need to be credited to en:User:WikipedianProlific unless I miss something. ( I don't want to enter in disputes; but wish every FP need to be properly licensed and credited before appearing in next year's POTY. ) J e e 05:14, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment See people killing nominations with stupid copyviolation comments, however, without nominate this image to copyright violation. lol --The Photographer (talk) 01:58, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It is "silly" to make a DR when attribution can be "fixed". BTW, I remember you protested vigorously when someone (Alchemist-hp if I remember well) made a derivative of your PD work without attributing to you, earlier. :) J e e 03:06, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it was here: Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Street_Craftsman_in_Olinda.jpg. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 12:44, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And here we go. :) J e e 13:08, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And where are the @Rodrigo.Argenton: and @Colin: comment?. Wait moment, oh yes! --The Photographer (talk) 22:33, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Since I was pinged... I agree with Jee: it is vital per the terms of the CC licence that derivative works mention the previous authors along with details of changes made. I suggest using the "Credit line" template as the best way to ensure attribution is correct. This is not "own work". These sorts of things are basic and should be checked prior to nomination if you want a smooth candidate. Only one to blame is yourself, and it is not "stupid" to show some respect for those whose work you are building upon. As for the image, I don't much like the luminous green lines (prefer the original dark red) nor the huge capital initial letters. Otherwise I'm fairly "meh" on this. -- Colin (talk) 23:18, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

??? Do you love me that much? Did you miss me or something? As you need my approval to live, I'll do that soon as possible; x0x0. -- RTA 23:22, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

tending to strong opposition, showing love:

Some areas are nothing close to the real skeleton (check it and I highlighted the main issues), and this should be a educational tool, so you must be accurate and precise. This one, for example, is more useful, and reliable.

I don't know why you choose the EN version to be a feature picture, should be a numeral version the featured, for WP-en, yeah, English, here...

This green arrows are not a intelligent choice, the normal use of this image it will be in white background, and with white, this green don't pass in any contrast of contrast check, even in the bone not passed. The SSE is not a acronym that us for this, so I didn't understand the boldness on this first letters.

The ears are in a strange perspective, best one and the image pointed at the begging.

So, when you decided to just vectorizing a job, and told us that was your work, you should, at least, fixed the problems in the original.

Obs:I had to fix the copyright violations, the original one was a CC-by-SA, that means that derivation of the original should be naming the author and use same license, only restrictions actually, nothing was followed, different from CC0 that we don't have any obligation to name the author or use same license, so you should study more about licenses. -- RTA 21:41, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support Good quality and valid SVG. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:04, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 03:05, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Niitvälja soo - oktoober 2015.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2015 at 14:15:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info all by Ivar (talk) 14:15, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 14:15, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great clouds. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:20, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support More stark Estonian natural beauty Daniel Case (talk) 04:27, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sakhalinio (talk) 05:21, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support there are some technical issues but I don't care in this case... awesome mood! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:15, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:34, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:34, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 18:14, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:44, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 08:12, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hockei (talk) 16:10, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose sorry, this is nothing really special, a sunset effect and some clouds. Not FP for me.--Hubertl 11:28, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Second plan is unsharp. --Jacek Halicki (talk) 12:13, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, per Hubertl, I guess you were not thinking this photo would get this many support votes in two days... --Laitche (talk) 14:07, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The landscape is too dark to do anything for the image, and the silhouette shape isn't that special. — Julian H.^✈ 16:26, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose sorry, but per other opposes. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 08:55, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:03, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:47, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:00, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others, sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 23:00, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 03:06, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Red-legged seriema (Cariama cristata) head.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Nov 2015 at 14:20:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Info all by Charlesjsharp -- Charles (talk) 14:20, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charles (talk) 14:20, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Just the bird and the bokeh ma'am ... nice job. Noise is forgivable. Daniel Case (talk) 04:54, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice face! --Tremonist (talk) 13:33, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It look nice, but a minor crop above would benefit. --Mile (talk) 18:45, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Done @PetarM: --Charles (talk) 21:55, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think its better now. --Mile (talk) 06:45, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hockei (talk) 16:08, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 08:58, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:56, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:01, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 03:05, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

File:Santa Maria in Campitelli (Rome) - Dome.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2015 at 22:15:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
Info created and uploaded by Livioandronico2013 - nominated by Σπάρτακος -- Σπάρτακος (talk) 22:15, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Σπάρτακος (talk) 22:15, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Super Arion support Beatiful colors combination and perfect simmetry! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:51, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support senz'altro ---Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:10, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support very good --Mile (talk) 08:13, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:51, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 19:12, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hendric Stattmann (talk) 19:19, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain thanks for nomination LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:33, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:06, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bravo! Daniel Case (talk) 03:16, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Angelic. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 03:32, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pudelek (talk) 13:04, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:52, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks like a painting. Kruusamägi (talk) 16:06, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent ! A translation of the quotes in edges could help.--Jebulon (talk) 19:48, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Verde78 (talk) 09:52, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 11:32, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support, a crop on the left for symmetry would make it even better. — Julian H.^✈ 08:55, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:06, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! -- Pofka (talk) 19:27, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /★ Poké⁹⁵ 05:36, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

Info Demoted/Delisted to not featured per this consensus. --Cart (talk) 14:04, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vista de Ágreda, España, 2015-01-02, DD 021.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2015 at 21:19:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
Info View of the old town of Ágreda, Castile and León, Spain. Ágreda was a significant town in the Middle Age as strategic border location between the kingdoms of Castile, Aragon and Navarre. The town has a very diverse monumental heritage as it was an important center of the arts and handcrafts where Christians, Jews and Arab-descendants lived in peace. Ágreda is also known as "The Town of the Three Cultures". All by me, Poc o² 21:19, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 21:19, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:22, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 22:25, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:51, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:38, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:06, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sakhalinio (talk) 02:11, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support----Isasza (talk) 21:50, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Nice cityscape with good detail and perspective, which outweigh the clipping on some of the white buildings in the middle. Daniel Case (talk) 02:29, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:52, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 23:17, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 11:33, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:06, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 19:27, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 20:25, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /★ Poké⁹⁵ 05:32, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes

File:2015.07.16.-01-Viernheim--Barbarossa-Fliege-Maennchen.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2015 at 19:39:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Diptera#Family_:_Asilidae_.28Robber_flies.29
Info All by me. -- Hockei (talk) 19:39, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Hockei (talk) 19:39, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Thennicke (talk) 05:01, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:06, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Very nice shot overall, but the eye is already slightly behind the sharp focus. And yes, I know how (censored) hard it is to get these little critters in focus! --Hendric Stattmann (talk) 12:48, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:47, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support As much focus as you were probably going to get. Daniel Case (talk) 20:52, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:39, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:31, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 19:26, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:17, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice. Charles (talk) 12:26, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 02:27, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Diptera

File:Bergtocht van Gimillan (1805m.) naar Colle Tsa Sètse in Cogne Valley (Italië). Zicht op de omringende alpentoppen van Gran Paradiso 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2015 at 16:09:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Italy
Info Mountain hike from Gimillan Colle Tsa Sètse Cogne Valley (Italy). After lengthy rain breaks the clouds over the peaks of Gran Paradiso. created by Famberhorst - uploaded by Famberhorst - nominated by Famberhorst -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:09, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:09, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hendric Stattmann (talk) 19:17, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:25, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful clouds. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:04, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice rocks too! But perhaps a slightly unbalanced composition. -- Thennicke (talk) 05:08, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support beautiful --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:33, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:07, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 13:24, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:47, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:00, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support The air almost tastes fresher breathing it while looking at this picture. Enough done right to forgive the pinkish tinge on the bottom of the clouds in the right background. Daniel Case (talk) 19:02, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:13, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 12:54, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice despite CAs or false-color. --Laitche (talk) 03:28, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:31, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 19:26, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 20:23, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support----Isasza (talk) 21:48, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 02:28, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:HookeFlea01.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2015 at 15:35:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods
Info created by Robert Hooke - uploaded by Jason.nlw - nominated by Jason.nlw -- Jason.nlw (talk) 15:35, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jason.nlw (talk) 15:35, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but....too much small for my taste and more the lower left corner, I do not like LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:27, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral If the lower left corner could be fixed, I might support. Daniel Case (talk) 18:56, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per Daniel. --Tremonist (talk) 13:42, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Livioandronico2013. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:30, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 02:29, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:14-08-05-barcelona-RalfR-001.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2015 at 13:27:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info Hotel W in Barcelona; all by Ralf Roleček
Support -- Ralf Roleček 13:27, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:08, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:44, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't like the light, nor the composition neither the crop at left. Is the license suitable ?--Jebulon (talk) 20:14, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Jebulon, it has FAR licence, which is ok. -- Colin (talk) 23:06, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Jebulon. Our architectural photos have a high standard and this one doesn't have more than an average holiday snap with a DSLR. -- Colin (talk) 23:06, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose While I do like the composition, the sky could be less washed out and frankly the background and building leave a bit to be desired technically. Daniel Case (talk) 05:27, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support ok for me. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 08:53, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:15, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 16:19, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Colin --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:08, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 11:13, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sculpture of Madonna with child and St John (Kunsthistoriches Museum).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Nov 2015 at 09:52:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Sculptures
Info Sculpture of Madonna with child and St John (Kunsthistoriches Museum). Background to black and ray of light with some more dramatic appearance.
Support -- Mile (talk) 09:52, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:50, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:09, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:43, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 19:22, 6 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Elysian. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 07:30, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry Mile but I cannot support the digital ray of light illuminated. --Laitche (talk) 10:21, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I miss any structures of the marble. It is simply too flat --Hubertl 11:25, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The background gradient has no place there in my opinion, and it doesn't match the actual direction of the light. — Julian H.^✈ 11:36, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Info @Julian It match actual direction, I was there, and saw where light is positioned, and its from that direction light is left diagonal, I cant find photo which would show reflector @Laitche Why not ? If background would not be illuminated from other lights something like this would come out. Maybe I did mistake, if I wouldn't write that in description you even wouldn't know (that's called reverse evaluating). @Hubertl my my, third revenge vote in row ? Were you afraid to be first and waited, then building bandwagon ? I don't know if your comment is serious, I will try anyway: for museum handheld shot where tripods are forbidden this is very good quality. I can see details and even dots on it (this is not a macro shot and you wont be able too see anything more). Photo is also on Quality image and at the moment it has plus, and it isn't graded by my "friend", so could say its objective vote. Hubertl I am worried your grading and critique wont help me to get better if they wont be based on something objective. --Mile (talk) 16:09, 7 November 2015 (UTC) p.S Hubertl, of course if you mean serious, than please show me something similar to see what are you looking and asking for (with marble structure)[reply]
Comment Give me a good reason, why I should give someone a serious answer, when he at first accuses me giving revenge votes? --Hubertl 16:46, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the light is coming from the top left. But the shadows on the sculpture suggest that your beam is about 15° off. — Julian H.^✈ 18:28, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Julian You are right its off a bit - 8°. --Mile (talk) 21:10, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Hubertl Giving good reason - my hope I am wrong. --Mile (talk) 18:15, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, the limit of editing is cloning the background. If they made the background or subject (except fixing the errors or flaws) by digital way, that should be categorized to Non-photographic media/Computer-generated. I would reconsider if the category change to Non-photographic media/Computer-generated, but I'm not sure that I would support or not, Regards. --Laitche (talk) 18:25, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Background is serving main subject - sculpture. If museum would have chance and option, it would be something like this. But background isn't original part of sculpture. So why their room would be original and my presentation not ? To put it into Non-photographic media/Computer-generated is a no go. 3D subject, not changed with retouching (sculpture is not affected by retouching). As rules are saying:

Digital manipulations: For photographs...More extensive manipulations, such as removal of distracting background elements, should be clearly described in the image text, by means of the Retouched picture template. Undescribed or mis-described manipulations which cause the main subject to be misrepresented are never acceptable.

So, Retouche template is there from the beginning. Main subject in untouched and in original shape. To put this into category Non-photographic media/Computer-generated beside existing Objects#Sculptures is not an option. Especially when we already have more sculptures there with generated background. --Mile (talk) 19:07, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

So I mean removal of distracting background elements by retouching is acceptable but adding the digital ray is not acceptable as a photograph for me. --Laitche (talk) 19:22, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. If the consensus is OK as a exceptional about the digital ray for sculpture, of course I accept that consensus but I think we would never accept like that digital effect for the scenery and else subject. --Laitche (talk) 19:45, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Info: Illumination on sculpture is original, illumination in background is intensified and its coming from original direction. --Mile (talk) 19:31, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 22:28, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 16:20, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:06, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 11:12, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Sculptures

File:2015.07.16.-04-Viernheim--Feuerlibelle-Weibchen.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2015 at 08:36:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family_:_Libellulidae_.28Skimmers.29
Info All by me. -- Hockei (talk) 08:36, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Hockei (talk) 08:36, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice detail and earth tones. Daniel Case (talk) 15:55, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolf im Wald 17:30, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Daniel. --Tremonist (talk) 16:15, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 11:36, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:09, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 19:29, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Daniel. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:37, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 14:32, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Odonata

File:Canterbury Cathedral Choir 1, Kent, UK - Diliff.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2015 at 11:24:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Diliff -- Diliff (talk) 11:24, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Diliff (talk) 11:24, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great as usual, Diliff! It's a remarkable place of an enormous size and you captured it well. --Tremonist (talk) 13:34, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Indeed it is - very large, and this is just the choir! (the main nave body of the church is behind the camera) Diliff (talk) 15:32, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support My jaw hurts now, as it hit the table. Wow! --Hendric Stattmann (talk) 14:05, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Outstanding. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:45, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I need a bot for: image from Diliff = Support. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:56, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Code (talk) 22:24, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:27, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 02:52, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:10, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 08:16, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:13, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 11:26, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:48, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 09:02, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:59, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 16:46, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 19:20, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:24, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 20:33, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 14:36, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

File:Exeter Cathedral Lady Chapel, Exeter, UK - Diliff.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2015 at 11:18:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Diliff -- Diliff (talk) 11:18, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Diliff (talk) 11:18, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great work, once more! --Hendric Stattmann (talk) 14:10, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really pretty, Diliff! One can even read what's engraved on the plates in the floor. --Tremonist (talk) 14:13, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 18:52, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support beautiful. --Kadellar (talk) 19:31, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Looks good, but middle part could be - EVed. From vitrage to the ground. --Mile (talk) 20:31, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't really understand the problem... It looks correctly exposed to me. Anyway, I know you're only trying to offer positive suggestions but sometimes I think you just have to accept that someone else's photo isn't the way you would have done it, but it's an expression of theirs and doesn't really need to be changed. Unless there's something clearly wrong with the photo that should or could be corrected, just let it be. :-) Diliff (talk) 22:20, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Code (talk) 22:24, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Up there with all the other church interiors. Daniel Case (talk) 02:24, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 02:53, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:11, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Benh (talk) 09:22, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:14, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 11:27, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Photographer (talk) 12:56, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 15:24, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:47, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sakhalinio (talk) 00:14, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 09:01, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:59, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 19:20, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 20:14, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:24, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 20:34, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 14:36, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

File:Poertschach Blumeninsel Pappeln S-Ansicht 06112015 2289.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2015 at 07:11:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info created and uploaded by Johann Jaritz - nominated by Laitche (talk) 07:11, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice :) -- Laitche (talk) 07:11, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 07:26, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 11:22, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not a standout autumn shot for me, unfortunately. Daniel Case (talk) 15:53, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I put you note, I think it is worth as alternative, I tried. --Mile (talk) 18:06, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks Mile, it's up to the creator :) --Laitche (talk) 18:12, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support The choice of foreground and background is very effective: the rich yellows pop out from their more mellow surroundings. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:44, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice! --★Poké⁹⁵ 04:07, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose somewhat per Daniel Case. It's definitely a nice photo. I just miss a little bit of specialness. — Julian H.^✈ 08:40, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition and colors, good quality. Yann (talk) 09:16, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Yann. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:48, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support May be better with the proposed crop. --XRay ^talk 13:55, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment @XRay: I don't think a crop is needed, it is fine as it is. --★ Poké⁹⁵ 10:04, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good autumn shot. Composition works for me. --Code (talk) 15:02, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 22:27, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:38, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:53, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pudelek (talk) 13:05, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 16:16, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:09, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 19:29, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 14:30, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Sunset at Noronhas' beach.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2015 at 12:59:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info created and uploaded by NicolasAlbuquerqueWolf - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:59, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lack of details on the rocks (maybe due to not artificial light) but I love the mood. Good processing. -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:59, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love the mood too; this is definitely how to do a sunset without people saying "YAFS". Daniel Case (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Me too, I Like the mood too. :) --★Poké⁹⁵ 04:02, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Delightful. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 05:01, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others. --Tremonist (talk) 16:12, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
OpposeSorry Daniel Case, but...yet another etc...--Jebulon (talk) 20:44, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 14:21, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, so weak photo, and photo of nothing, nothing special here, nothing that tells me where it's is. Arion reduced even more the educational purpose removing the person (cloning stamping without a warning in the description), leading to a nothing shows me the scale. -- RTA 06:14, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice sunset photo but not an FP for me, especially the colors are not remarkable. --Laitche (talk) 12:56, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 20:39, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 14:34, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Édouard Manet - Jeanne (Spring).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2015 at 10:47:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media
Info created by Édouard Manet, photographed by the J. Paul Getty Museum - uploaded by Revent - nominated by Revent -- Revent (talk) 10:47, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 59.18 Megapixel image, taken by the holding institution, of Le Printemps by Édouard Manet. This was the first painting to ever be imaged in color, and sold at Christies in New York last year for over $65 million. Revent (talk) 10:47, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sure! --Yann (talk) 10:53, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --★ Poké⁹⁵ 11:31, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:37, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --KSK (talk) 19:08, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:31, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support … And 7. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:01, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:12, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 09:29, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 21:13, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sakhalinio (talk) 00:13, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 12:04, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:59, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 19:20, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 03:01, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 20:59, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 14:35, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media

File:Jamnik 05.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2015 at 13:52:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info created by Mihael Grmek - uploaded by Mihael Grmek - nominated by Meho29 -- Mihael Grmek (talk) 13:52, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Superb composition, colors, resolution, sharpness. A beautiful view with the foreground being close enough to not suffer from haziness. --Hendric Stattmann (talk) 14:08, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Hendric. --Tremonist (talk) 14:15, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Question Please add a category above. Yann (talk) 14:50, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 15:17, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:36, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 17:57, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 18:39, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support A pity the cars,but of course is not the fault of the photographer LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:30, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:59, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice! --Laitche (talk) 02:49, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support A little bit too much processing, but the rest of the image is so fine that I don't care. Daniel Case (talk) 03:14, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:09, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kikos (talk) 07:00, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support woa - Benh (talk) 09:21, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 16:19, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:49, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Code (talk) 19:25, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sakhalinio (talk) 00:15, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support weakly per Daniel Case. Some shadows are very dark. — Julian H.^✈ 09:09, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:59, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 16:45, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 19:19, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 20:17, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support----Isasza (talk) 21:42, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 20:33, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 20:57, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 21:01, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 26 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 22:51, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Zionskirche, Innenraum, Berlin-Mitte, 151011, ako.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Nov 2015 at 18:50:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
Info Zionskirche in Berlin-Mitte. The church is of great historical significance. The German Lutheran pastor, theologian, anti-Nazi dissident Dietrich Bonhoeffer worked here for a while and it was a central space for opposition groups in the former German Democratic Republic. The church was damaged heavily during the second world war. During GDR era, the church crumbled more and more. Since German reunification the church is getting renovated incrementally but as you can see there's still a lot to do. I live nearby this church and I like it very much for its morbid charm. All by me --Code (talk) 18:50, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Code (talk) 18:50, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great detail, the lighting is OK for me. --Laitche (talk) 22:39, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Laitche. P.S.: To restore... ;) 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:51, 7 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well-done technically and nice to see this sort of church interior that hasn't been so well kept up. Daniel Case (talk) 04:44, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 05:00, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:29, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The right part (on the column) is burnt, the rest beautiful details--Σπάρτακος (talk) 22:27, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Σπάρτακος: The part is shaded between RGB(242, 244, 233) and RGB(248, 248, 248). Have a look at the histogram. There's nothing overexposed. Please have the kindness to think about your vote once again. --Code (talk) 05:15, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just because it doesn't hit 255 doesn't mean it's not burnt; the line between the white and grey areas is completely lost. That said, this is a very difficult lighting situation and I won't hold that small patch against you. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:11, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 08:52, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral This needs a tilt, a counter-clock one, and it's dark, should be brighter, apart from that it is good. -- RTA 20:39, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:11, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 16:11, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 14:22, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 19:29, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hockei (talk) 07:11, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 10:13, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 22:53, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

File:The ceremony of laying the foundation stone of the Royal Palace.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2015 at 21:28:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
Info All by LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:28, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:28, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support The painting is absolutely ugly and kitschissima, but the photograph is excellent, with a high level of details and a good rendering of the (very vivid -!-) colors. Who are the persons and what is depicted here ? Who is the painter ?--Jebulon (talk) 21:53, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Anyway is Charles III of Spain,thanks LivioAndronico ^(talk) 22:27, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support But beautiful painting I think. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:09, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Jebulon, including 'kitschissima'. ;) Yann (talk) 23:11, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support but kitschissima (shouldn't it be kitschissimo? Anyway...) ;-) --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:08, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:08, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 08:11, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:50, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Jebulon, who seems to be able to vouch for this as an accurate rendering of the original. Otherwise I would wonder about those blues ... Daniel Case (talk) 17:34, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sakhalinio (talk) 00:15, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 15:39, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 16:44, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 19:19, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lmbuga (talk) 20:20, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 02:48, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 20:56, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:32, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 21:01, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 05:36, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors

Info Demoted/Delisted to not featured per this consensus. --Cart (talk) 14:05, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dülmen, Börnste, Waldweg -- 2015 -- 9911.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2015 at 04:47:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Germany
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay ^talk 04:47, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Separated from another nomination (as alternative, see above) --XRay ^talk 04:47, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- XRay ^talk 04:47, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks to Ivar. I've added the proposed image as alternative. --XRay ^talk 18:41, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like more this... LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:51, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:57, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry no, this is not an alternative, but a different picture. Do not deceive reviewers. Please nominate it separately.--Jebulon (talk) 22:52, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great atmosphere. @Jebulon: This is actually a point worth discussing (we can take it offline to FPC talk). Should alts be limited to different renderings of the same exposure, or cover any images that are substantially similar? My view is that if I can't imagine both images being featured, then it should go in the same nomination. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:25, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Please KoH let's have (yet another) discussion on this on FPC talk and get settled. No policy supports Jebulon's opinion and yet we now have two nominations of essentially the same image with the ridiculous situation that both might get promoted. Sorry but I have no desire to see FP cluttered with duplicate images that deviate in the most minor way. -- Colin (talk) 08:24, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 06:10, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Because this should be an alt or wait till the previous image fails. Please nominate one such image at a time. We do not want duplicates at FP. -- Colin (talk) 08:24, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination It should be only one nomination. But the solution with an alternative is treated as wrong. Thanks to the reviewers. I'll renominate this image if the other one did not become FP. --XRay ^talk 08:46, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- This picture is more sharper than the first it's better, I like it more.----Isasza (talk) 21:41, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fernsehturm und Bode-Museum bei Sonnenaufgang, Berlin-Mitte, 151011, ako.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2015 at 19:34:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
Info Bode-Museum and Fernsehturm in Berlin-Mitte at early dawn. The WB was a challenge but I think it's appropriate now. All by me -- Code (talk) 19:34, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Code (talk) 19:34, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose You indeed got the WB right but there's a lot of ringing and posterization on the lights. I know, I know, it was a long exposure. Daniel Case (talk) 04:48, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel's right. I can live with that, though --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:28, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Daniel and Martin. --Tremonist (talk) 14:07, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Good details and composition, but very far too cold and too much contrast. I tried in my PC and photo has potential, with photoshop : (contraste = -29, warm filter 85 = 40%) --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:21, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thank you all for your votes, I think Christian Ferrer is right. I'll reprocess it and maybe give it another try then. --Code (talk) 06:45, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rio de Janeiro Mountains.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2015 at 09:15:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena
Info created and uploaded by Donatas Dabravolskas - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 09:15, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fantastic mood. -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 09:15, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral fake colors --The Photographer (talk) 12:27, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Question Before yelling "Fake!" let me ask the question: Were the colors retouched in such a way that they differ significantly from the actual scene? --Hendric Stattmann (talk) 12:51, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was there, there. I never saw that colors intensity. --The Photographer (talk) 13:04, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@The Photographer: Hello my dear The Photographer! Ok. Can you fix that? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:46, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose It certainly looks over-coloured and this tool indicates the Lightroom modifications made. The problem is, what you see here is the photographer's creation as he/she intended it. It's a bit disrespectful to say "Can you fix it?" Such a hyper-real photography is popular (e.g., http://www.stuckincustoms.com/) and just not the kind of image we tend to value on Commons FP. -- Colin (talk) 20:05, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Colin. Daniel Case (talk) 20:57, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Colin. --Tremonist (talk) 13:44, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Some one saw that we have a whole village at the bottom? This black points that could be birds, but at the final picture, seem to be just dust in the sensor, anyway...

On the winter, because of pollution, and other shits, this colour is not rare too see, but it's a little bit less: similar to this (crazy google photos link, I did not uploaded here, because the amount of noisy/artefacts created raising the shadow, especially in JPEG file), however, in this case, the main problem is not the colour, that is not that much far from real (the alt is even further away from reality) check another image, the main issue is that the colour lead us to the boring sky, and it's so dark at the bottom that we lost this village, the city at the left, creating a illusion of uninhabited site.

And I really do not like "over-processed" images as 110% of "winners" in WLE "BR": as this (o.O), but some fine editions, creating a artistic look, could be very interesting, and should be more accepted; here you demonise even fine art, that do not even derail from the educational purpose... Another day I had to hear that B&W should not be FP, because the world is colour-full... We need to stop enter in the Colin's vibe, and not raise to many barriers, to not died in your own poop, that do not mean low the level, but be aware that we have to evaluate by the photo, not by a general rule. -- RTA 06:05, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:33, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alt version[edit]

Info This file was derived from: Rio de Janeiro Mountains.jpg
by dably, small colors and light fixs by The Photographer. Btw, I can't fix it because it could be done from the RAW file, there was a color destruction by the imposition of yellow. However, I try to reconstruct the colors. This is only a representation of what I think could be observed, however, is not the reality. --The Photographer (talk) 16:31, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @The Photographer: Do you consider this colors better? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:51, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - This is not better or worse, it's just my humble representation of what I think can be closer to reality. This colors IMHO could be more closer to reality yes. --The Photographer (talk) 16:54, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Pointless alteration. The colours are a bit faded imo and the technical quality is lacking for FP. And The Photographer, once again, you are not the "Author". This is a derivative work and you must jointly credit the author(s) of the work(s) you derived in a way just as prominent as your own name. This is the law, not an optional nicety. -- Colin (talk) 20:05, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Per Colin Daniel Case (talk) 20:57, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Colin. --Tremonist (talk) 13:43, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Colin. --The Photographer (talk) 16:02, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Colin --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:32, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:52, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mõdriku mõisa peahoone.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2015 at 16:45:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications
Info all by Ivar (talk) 16:45, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:45, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose QI for sure, but I'm just not wowed. Daniel Case (talk) 18:16, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The composition is unbalanced (too right-heavy). --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:26, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:31, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Ivar (talk) 14:34, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:2015 Łężyckie Skałki 01.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2015 at 11:59:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info All by me -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:59, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:59, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Doesn't really excite me, sorry. — Julian H.^✈ 13:52, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Julian. QI but not FP. Daniel Case (talk) 05:57, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. -- Colin (talk) 20:24, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice colours, good composition. Does not need to be exciting, just nature. --Tremonist (talk) 16:00, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Tremonist --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 14:27, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 16:19, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Amadeus (ship, 1910), Sète 01.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2015 at 09:40:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles
Info The Amadeus, an old cod fishing ship from 1910. All by Christian Ferrer -- --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:40, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:40, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 13:52, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral The ship is very good but the buildings are too distracting. --Laitche (talk) 19:53, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Laitche. Daniel Case (talk) 04:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support The buildings are not the photographer's fault. --Tremonist (talk) 16:02, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Per Laitche --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 14:25, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 20:39, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 10:11, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:22, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:CSIRO ScienceImage 2212 CSIRO Parkes Telescope This photo taken in 1969 shows the telescope as it was around the time of the first manned Moon landing.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2015 at 05:16:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Space_exploration#Others
Info Evening shot of the telescope at Parkes, New South Wales, which was used to receive live televised footage of the moon landing.
Info created by CSIRO - uploaded by 99of9's bot - nominated by Thennicke -- Thennicke (talk) 05:16, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support despite an enormous filename -- Thennicke (talk) 05:16, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ Great mood; I think it looks like some descriptive information was accidentally included in the filename and that should be easy to fix. Daniel Case (talk) 07:23, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ Filename is fine and quite common for these bot-uploaded images that have to pick something unique (you won't get it renamed per Commons renaming policy unless it is actually incorrect). Good quality for a historical photo (if this was a NASA image, it would be full of JPG artefacts, but here we can see the film grain). -- Colin (talk) 09:09, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ Not as big as recent images, but good quality and high EV. Yann (talk) 09:14, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- File:CSIRO ScienceImage 4350 CSIROs Parkes Radio Telescope with moon in the background.jpg is better. Yann (talk) 21:46, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beatiful composition. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 09:59, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:29, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good composition. I miss a little bit contrast (darkness). --XRay ^talk 13:53, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think this one shows more detail, even if it's oversharpened a bit. And it has a different crop, which is debatable of course. — Julian H.^✈ 14:00, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree with Julian that the other crop is superior. It does look like the same base-photo, so Thennicke could nominate an alternative here if he wishes. In addition to the crop, as Julian notes, it is a little sharper and better contrast. -- Colin (talk) 16:42, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good. --Code (talk) 14:59, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 15:59, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 16:03, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Alternative.--Jebulon (talk) 20:31, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose For a better chance of the alternative to succeed. --★ Poké⁹⁵ 10:02, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative — File:CSIRO_ScienceImage 4350 CSIROs Parkes Radio Telescope with moon in the background.jpg[edit]

Info Seems to be made from the same material, higher resolution, more detail and more interesting composition. — Julian H.^✈ 08:06, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 08:06, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Much better composition. But sky is pinky, WB is bit off. --Mile (talk) 08:11, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support big wow on the previous version but even more with the moon! - Benh (talk) 10:47, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Better version. -- Colin (talk) 11:14, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Ping Daniel Case, ArionEstar, Martin Falbisoner, Code, Laitche. -- Colin (talk) 11:14, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(Edit conflict) Support Radio Telescope and moon... Great combination! --★Poké⁹⁵ 11:17, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support sure! Even better --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:19, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 13:58, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Also fine. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:20, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 18:15, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per the other defectors . Daniel Case (talk) 21:14, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I didn't know this version existed. Thanks everybody. -- Thennicke (talk) 02:03, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sakhalinio (talk) 02:06, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Code (talk) 05:53, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:08, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 16:03, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 16:11, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Jebulon (talk) 20:31, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Verde78 (talk) 09:53, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 11:34, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 14:22, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 19:28, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hockei (talk) 07:08, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 10:12, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 16:21, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Space_exploration

The chosen alternative is: File:CSIRO ScienceImage 4350 CSIROs Parkes Radio Telescope with moon in the background.jpg

File:2015 Kaplica Ukrzyżowania w Bardzie 02.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2015 at 13:32:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
Info All by me -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:32, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jacek Halicki (talk) 13:32, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:34, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Harsh lighting conditions create blown out highlights and deep shadows. --Hendric Stattmann (talk) 19:28, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Hendric. Not really any wow. -- Colin (talk) 20:25, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:59, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Hendric and Colin. Kruusamägi (talk) 16:08, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:18, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Could perhaps work better with a much warmer atmosphere. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:23, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
weak, in other respects as Christian.--Hubertl 10:11, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 01:03, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Berliner Fernsehturm (Detailansicht).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2015 at 14:04:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers
Info all by Der Wolf im Wald -- Wolf im Wald 14:04, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolf im Wald 14:04, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 15:00, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 12:12, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent! Superb resolution, colors, sharpness. No blown out highlights (difficult task on the metal plates). --Hendric Stattmann (talk) 19:25, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Colin (talk) 20:33, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 22:35, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 03:33, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 08:17, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 09:55, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:53, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing special. Please see the result of this nomination.--Jebulon (talk) 20:15, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree with Jebulon that the composition is nothing special, and one could complain about it being just the upper part of the tower. It seems this is a popular subject for our FP crowd, with loads of good quality images! This gaudy image shows potential for a great city composition. The other picture Jebulon linked had the advantage of being taken from a high vantage point, so the angle of view was much better than this one. But the other image is less than 10MP and fairly sharp whereas this one is more than 70MP and extremely sharp. While that doesn't matter much if I print A4 or view the whole thing on a monitor, this picture allows me to explore the structure in a way that is highly educational to see how it is made and what has been stuck onto it. In our digital world, I can appreciate such a picture in more ways than just standing back and observing the whole thing. Here, I can see as much detail as Spiderman. That is why I think it is worth FP. -- Colin (talk) 20:44, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Also, this one has better light (bottom of the "sphere" is less dark), the colours look much more natural and the top crop is nicer. — Julian H.^✈ 21:00, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:19, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support----Isasza (talk) 21:52, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 23:55, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:01, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 10:08, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 01:01, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Towers

File:Cologne Germany TAKRAF-crane-in-Deutzer-Hafen-01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2015 at 14:23:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Industry
Info A TAKRAF crane in Deutz Industrial Harbour (Deutzer Hafen). I created it as a HDR of three single shots to get the bright sky and the dark port basin harmonized.

All by me. -- CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 14:23, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 14:23, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:37, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I can see what you were thinking but unfortunately on a cloudy day this just doesn't get there. Daniel Case (talk) 22:39, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Question What do you mean? HDR is only feasible on sunny days? --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 06:24, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Cccefalon: I mean that I don't think it looks good enough for FP. Daniel Case (talk) 03:18, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:06, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Quite moody. --Tremonist (talk) 15:53, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The cloudy day is not an issue, and it may be better for contrast with the main subject. But I don't find this main subject extraordinary, neither its photographical treatment. A good QI.--Jebulon (talk) 20:03, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Verde78 (talk) 09:57, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:19, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- It is an usual practice here to explain negative votes. Could you try to do so, even shortly, please ? Thanks in advance.--Jebulon (talk) 11:13, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - There are too many around the crane element that bothers me. Several waste and graffiti below. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:21, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 20:36, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 10:08, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 01:00, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Industry

File:Teide von Nordosten (Zuschnitt 1).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2015 at 13:42:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info all by Der Wolf im Wald -- Wolf im Wald 13:42, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolf im Wald 13:42, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay ^talk 13:51, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:37, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The quality is great, but the light makes it look flat and hazy. — Julian H.^✈ 15:03, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Info It's a distance of 16,5 km to the mountain. Of course it's a bit hazy... ;-) -- Wolf im Wald 16:02, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, absolutely, not your fault. But with light from behind you, the haze is highlighted, whereas light from the side (ideally with a pol. filter) would reduce the effect. It would also show the three-dimensional shape of the terrain. — Julian H.^✈ 16:23, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 18:20, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice, but not outstanding. --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:46, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not only the nice detail, especially given the haze, but I like the way it shows how the terrain of a mountain's lower slopes slowly (or abruptly; see the sharp treeline here) changes as you get closer to the summit. Not something you usually see in mountain pictures; indeed you can't see this at all with a lot of mountains. Daniel Case (talk) 21:16, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Daniel. --Tremonist (talk) 15:54, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:19, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment What details!! I think it is a bit overprocessed (oversharpening), there is a white contour around the mountain, most visible on the right. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:42, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 20:37, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 01:03, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Riley Racing Six, 1500 cm³, Bj. 1935 (2007-06-17).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2015 at 22:21:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles
Info created and uploaded by Spurzem - nominated by Σπάρτακος -- Σπάρτακος (talk) 22:21, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Σπάρτακος (talk) 22:21, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:32, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing special here. Small, not particularly sharp. -- Colin (talk) 20:35, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I would very much like to like this one, but Colin is right. Daniel Case (talk) 06:15, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Colin. --Tremonist (talk) 15:51, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Colin. — Julian H.^✈ 08:48, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not sharp enough --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:08, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 08:34, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tampa Florida November 2013-3a.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Nov 2015 at 23:55:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
Info Tampa, Florida. View to downtown during the morning (subtract 4 hours from Exif time). A natural companion of this FP, taken just after sunrise. Third try! All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:55, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:55, 8 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:42, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment WB a tiny bit too cold? --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:08, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Info A difficult question! WB was already adjusted in such a way as to make more or less white the parts that (I believed) should look that way. But we will never know how the scene looked like to our eyes at the moment. Please check the first version: the difference to the present one is already dramatatic and I don't want to exagerate. -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 09:43, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

~~Support~~ ok --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 13:59, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I prefer the alternative --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:36, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose No wow for me --Uoaei1 (talk) 15:48, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Nice,big,but not extraordinary LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:31, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose wb/tint too green. Lighting not exceptional. -- Colin (talk) 20:38, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. I agree, it seems a bit green tinted to me. Also, looks oversharpened with too large a radius. Almost every edge has a sharpening halo. Diliff (talk) 23:01, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Superb resolution and clarity, nice composition. I moan the sharpening artefacts and a cyan color cast as well - both are fixable. --Hendric Stattmann (talk) 12:53, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Tremonist (talk) 15:50, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tampa Florida November 2013-3g.jpg[edit]

Info New version with corrected white balance and almost no sharpening. I don't want to give up this one, it is one of my favourites! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 00:32, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alvesgaspar (talk) 00:32, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:06, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Thennicke (talk) 05:08, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:17, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support much better --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:35, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Much better, but still now wow for me --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:46, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. Significant improvement in image quality and white balance. Without sharpening, it is a bit soft but the resolution makes up for this. I don't find the composition ideal though as I'd like to see more foreground, but I assume you shot this through a hotel window (which might explain the green tint also?), and this would prohibit you pointing the camera downwards as it would introduce internal reflections on the glass. Not quite impressive enough for a support for me, but the major faults are now fixed. It just is what it is. Diliff (talk) 11:49, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support YES, this is it! I am perfectly OK with the per-pixel sharpness, given the gigantic resolution. --Hendric Stattmann (talk) 12:55, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:50, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 11:31, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:09, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 21:07, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:22, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 08:36, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes

The chosen alternative is: File:Tampa Florida November 2013-3g.jpg

File:Kobell und Steinheil - Neuhauser Straße - München - 1839.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2015 at 06:47:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical
Info One of the incunables of photography: Steinheil's and von Kobell's picture of Munich's Neuhauser Straße with St. Michael's Church on the left side. This photograph was already taken in July 1839 on silver chloride paper. Consequently it has to be considered as pre-daguerreotype. Created by Carl August von Steinheil and Wolfgang Franz von Kobell - uploaded by User:Cybershot800i - nominated by --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:47, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:47, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- EVDiam (talk) 09:47, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:49, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support For historical importance. Daniel Case (talk) 16:02, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 17:09, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Daniel Case. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:10, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 21:01, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 14:10, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical

File:Sir Edward John Poynter lesbia and her sparrow.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2015 at 10:51:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media
Info created by Edward Poynter - uploaded by Austriacus - nominated by Owain Knight
Support -- Owain Knight (talk) 10:51, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 19:29, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:49, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:46, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:36, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 09:30, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:29, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 19:27, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 21:03, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 14:11, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media

File:Vlaho Bukovac - La Grande Iza - Google Art Project.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2015 at 10:45:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media
Info created by Vlaho Bukovac - uploaded by DcoetzeeBot - nominated by Owain Knight
Support -- Owain Knight (talk) 10:45, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support There is some faint external light on the lower right, but that's not enough to ruin this. Daniel Case (talk) 16:05, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 16:24, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice painting, but the white balance looks too cold, and the size is just average. --Yann (talk) 10:11, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:29, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support the quality is great, pro from my side, even, when I don´t like external works here. Nobody is able to compete with the technical ressources of Google. I know how they work. --Hubertl 21:05, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 14:09, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thunderstorms over Estonia on a Copernicus Sentinel-1 synthetic aperture radar image.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2015 at 13:41:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Satellite images
Info created and uploaded by Kaupo Voormansik - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 13:41, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 13:41, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow for me. Daniel Case (talk) 02:56, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's certainly impressive and unusual, a sort of photo not often presented here. --Tremonist (talk) 14:05, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Daniel. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:56, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Kruusamägi (talk) 22:47, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:20141101 Schloss Nordkirchen (06956).jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2015 at 19:19:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places#Germany
Info created by Watzmann, edited by Sir Gawain - uploaded by Watzmann - nominated by Pine -- Pine^✉ 19:19, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pine^✉ 19:19, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:49, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Insufficient quality sorry --A.Savin 23:51, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per A. Savin. Great angle but very noisy. Daniel Case (talk) 17:27, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination per comments about the noise. --Pine^✉ 22:17, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Camel on a sand dune (3679335104).jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2015 at 12:40:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info created by Peter Gronemann - uploaded by File Upload Bot - nominated by Golden Bosnian Lily -- Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 12:40, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 12:40, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No real definition. Small file. Charles (talk) 14:28, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose about 1.2 megapixels. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 15:33, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: the resolution is too small, 2MP needed. - Alchemist-hp (talk) 18:29, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Ochtendmist hangt over 'It Wikelslân. Locatie, De Alde Feanen in Friesland 39.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2015 at 06:30:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info Morning fog hangs over 'It Wikelslân. Location, De Alde Feanen in Friesland. Nature area in the Netherlands. created by Famberhorst - uploaded by Famberhorst - nominated by Famberhorst -- Famberhorst (talk) 06:30, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 06:30, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The red pile destroys the picture. -- -donald- (talk) 07:12, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per donald. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:10, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not really doing anything for me, I'm afraid. -- Colin (talk) 12:50, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your comment.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:43, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kaneohe Bay LC400.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2015 at 10:49:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Panoramas
Info Kāneʻohe Bay area with Kāneʻohe; created, uploaded and nominated by Jörg Hempel
Support -- LC-de (talk) 10:49, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 15:15, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great panoramic view. --Tremonist (talk) 16:08, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Horizon have to be straightened! --Milseburg (talk) 17:31, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
What?! You can't be serious! --LC-de (talk) 18:30, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I think Milseburg being serious is definitely a possibility worth considering. The horizon is bent quite significantly. — Julian H.^✈ 18:36, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Wouldn't call it significantly. It's more like "barely visible". I will not change it, it's not worth it. You might call it "catching a glimpse of the Earth's curvature" if you want. --LC-de (talk) 18:53, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The horizon is bent. I assume this is a stitched image so it is possible for the software to correct that when stitching (Hugin, PtGui, etc). But mainly I think a 6Mp panorama only 1300px tall isn't really "among our finest" for 2015. The standard is really quite a lot higher and there's so little detail of the town. -- Colin (talk) 19:35, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
and there it is - the killer argument: "You probably could have done it in higher res, so I oppose the image because you didn't." I'm not in the mood to conduct this stupid discussion again. --LC-de (talk) 20:56, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination

File:Os Filhos de Pindorama. Cannibalism in Brazil in 1557.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Nov 2015 at 13:14:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media
Info Os Filhos de Pindorama. Cannibalism in Brazil in 1557. created by Theodor de Bry - photographed, uploaded and nominated by -- The Photographer (talk) 13:14, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support More engravings! It would be FP on Wikipedia-en too. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:40, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:33, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Photographer (talk) 12:26, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:48, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Quality digitization of an engraving. Daniel Case (talk) 17:53, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This version is cut on left and right. Yann (talk) 10:14, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It's not, the book is just like that. Look this another version. --The Photographer (talk) 11:16, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This picture should not be presented without some information on its content. The picture derives from a book of Hans Staden (1525 - 1579). He has described the cannibalism of the native people in South America. The truth of this part of his report (and also others of cannibalisme) is very doubtful. It is argued that these reports are made on purpose. The invaders become heroes and the natives are described as dangerous barbarians, finally a bloody conquest is justified. In addition it must be stated that the scene is totally unrealistic.--Christof46 (talk) 17:10, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support One of a kind. Original original. --Mile (talk) 16:05, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Soundwaweserb (talk) 16:24, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:29, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 19:26, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 09:13, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media

File:Monasterio de la Oliva, Carcastillo, Navarra, España, 2015-01-06, DD 16-18 HDR.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2015 at 08:02:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
Info Abside of the abbey of Santa María la Real de la Oliva is an still active Cistercian monastery located in Carcastillo, Navarre, Spain. The abbey was founded in 1150 when the king, García Ramírez of Navarre, died. The temple is inspired in the abbeys of Morimond and Escaladieu. All by me, Poc o² 08:02, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 08:02, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:53, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Light… 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 09:37, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 09:57, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 10:06, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Sakhalinio (talk) 11:31, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:20, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice work with a more spartan church interior than most of the others we've seen. Daniel Case (talk) 03:02, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 07:44, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Code (talk) 08:59, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:14, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:21, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 20:31, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 20:51, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support The right window a bit overexposed, but nevertheless --Llez (talk) 16:30, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:55, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:35, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

File:Ayuntamiento, La Coruña, España, 2015-09-25, DD 141-143 HDR.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2015 at 20:05:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info Front view of the city Hall of A Coruña, also called Municipal Palace, during the blue hour, Galicia, Spain. The modernist building is located in the María Pita Square in the center of the city and was built between 1908 and 1912 following a design of Pedro Ramiro Mariño. It was inaugurated in 1927 by the king Alfonso XIII. The facade is 64 metres (210 ft) width and has 43 windows, whereas the surface of the building is 2,300 m² (24,757.0 sq ft). The 4 statues in the third floor represent the 4 provinces of Galicia (A Coruña, Lugo, Orense and Pontevedra) and over them, in the middle, is the coat of arms of the city. The 2 dames flanking it symbolize Peace and Industry and Work and Wisdom. In the tower in the middle is the clock and the bells, they are made of bronce and tin and weigh 1,600 kilograms (3,527 lb). All by me, Poc o² 20:05, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 20:05, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:16, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good ! And thanks for very interesting explanations.--Jebulon (talk) 20:19, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
You are welcome, that's something I have done in the past, and will always do, as IMHO it enriches the nomination and allows of all us, beginning with me, to learn something about the subjects displayed here. Poc o² 20:58, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I agree ! It is not always possible, and sometimes, I'm afraid it is boring for our fellows here, but...--Jebulon (talk) 23:10, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 06:11, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support a bit oversaturated maybe --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:26, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

* Oppose I put you notes of problematic light halos. Crop is too tight, could get sideways but why on top ? Colors are oversaturated and its a bit overexposed. I don't see any benefit of night HDR, maybe alternative from single shot. I suppose HDR explains that strange light behaviour on Skopje arc, this type of HDR is too artsy. --Mile (talk) 07:28, 11 November 2015 (UTC) Much better, I could even support. You have still some halos on side turrets. Smudge them. --Mile (talk) 20:26, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose plastic looking --Verde78 (talk) 09:56, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's good enough, really. --Tremonist (talk) 13:38, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I'm not bothered by the lighting or the crop, but the distortion on the flanking towers is too noticeable. Daniel Case (talk) 16:45, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
New version: top crop is more generous now, halos are reduced (Mile) and I have made slight adjustments in the the saturation and curves (Verde78) Poc o² 19:55, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
New version: One more of further removal or halos (Mile) --Poc o² 22:02, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 02:59, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support big wow for me - Benh (talk) 09:26, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I guess you can't do much about the towers distortion. The timing and the composition are good, the exposure is perfect, and the colors are great. --Yann (talk) 10:08, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sakhalinio (talk) 00:04, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:20, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 09:09, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:58, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good work --Rjcastillo (talk) 14:27, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Perfect illumination! -- Pofka (talk) 19:24, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good and nice work. Congratulations--Lmbuga (talk) 20:06, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 21:01, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:34, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Now you manage to spoil it. --Mile (talk) 07:25, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Mile, you have managed to really confuse me about your expectations with regards to this picture. Would you please elaborate why you are rejecting now? On Nov. 11th you opposed (halos, top crop, saturation, overexposure) to this candidate. Following that I uploaded 2 versions with which I tried to address all those issues. Your reaction was then to strike through your oppose vote here. One day later, without any comment here or in my talk page you uploaded a new version of this file based on an older version i.e. the improvements that I had introduced following your oppose vote were gone. I left a comment in your talk page that same day about this problem, I kindly asked you to let me know how can I improve the latest version from the RAW file (since after comparing versions it wasn’t really clear to me what you change). As also mentioned in my message in your talk page, I do (as many others here) appreciate if I am asked before my versions are reworked as I believe that I have the best premises (RAW file) to introduce sustainable improvements in the file. In my message I also announced that I'd revert it as to me the updated picture was not a clear improvement, and I did so one day later. You didn’t answer my message so far and just react now opposing again with a comment that puzzles me. Please, could you point out what is the problem of the current version? Poc o² 09:05, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I suppose I did edit from your last edition. Now check posterization on left turret on mine and on this version. Don't you see you put posterization back ? Definitely I shouldn't waste my time with edits anymore. --Mile (talk) 12:59, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Mile: I haven't seen any posterization that would IMHO motivate an oppose and I didn't come to the conclusion either that that issue would be specially noticeable around the left turret. I have uploaded though a new version with a slight rework of the whole sky. Maybe you like this version.

Regarding your comment, I think that a bit more of communication would have helped, a message here, a note there, I just missed that. I have also created alternative versions in FPC of pictures of yours that you didn't want to consider. That was no big deal. Poc o² 18:16, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 02:52, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Falu gruva (by Pudelek).JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2015 at 19:03:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Industry
Info all by by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 19:03, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 19:03, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:06, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great color and detail. Daniel Case (talk) 04:44, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:07, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kikos (talk) 12:56, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Daniel. --Tremonist (talk) 13:39, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't think the category mentioned above ("Places/Architecture/Industry") fit this: there is nothing about architecture here. We probably need a new category for such places. --Yann (talk) 19:26, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:32, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:23, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 11:28, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sakhalinio (talk) 00:04, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Interesting place. It's oversharpened locally in my opinion, which falsifies the colours even in smaller versions. The sky on the top left has strange colours and hints of banding - not too bad but not ideal. — Julian H.^✈ 09:07, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:58, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:14, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 19:25, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support----Isasza (talk) 21:45, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hockei (talk) 07:05, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 20:35, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 10:06, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:35, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 21:01, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:16, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 02:53, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Industry

File:Harimäe torn, vaade lõunasse.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Nov 2015 at 13:32:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info created and uploaded by Amadvr - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 13:32, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 13:32, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fantastic atmosphere! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:25, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Love the rain in the distance ... Daniel Case (talk) 02:55, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others. --Tremonist (talk) 13:46, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Technically, there is little, if anything to complain. But I just don't see the wow factor and the superior encyclopaedic relevance to place it among the very best pictures in WP. --Hendric Stattmann (talk) 14:00, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
weak support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:33, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support Nice atmosphere, though the composition is a bit plain. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:19, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The clouds are nice, but I don't see more than that. — Julian H.^✈ 08:53, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:55, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as others. Yann (talk) 17:56, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support----Isasza (talk) 21:49, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as Hendric Stattmann --LC-de (talk) 10:57, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 02:53, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:View from Rubha nam Brathairean, Isle of Skye.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2015 at 14:46:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info Rubha nam Brathairean (Brothers Point) looking back to the rest of the Isle of Skye, Scotland. Created and uploaded by Colin - nominated by Christian Ferrer --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:46, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:46, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support very nice place! --Ivar (talk) 18:20, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice landscape photo. --Pine^✉ 22:32, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:41, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:20, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charming --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 07:46, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 08:59, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:13, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:17, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 18:30, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 20:07, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 20:31, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support very fine! --Hubertl 20:49, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:28, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sakhalinio (talk) 04:55, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:53, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:13, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kadellar (talk) 17:49, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 18:02, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great landscape, great photo. --Code (talk) 06:04, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:07, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Campilhas July 2015-1.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2015 at 00:39:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info A typical country view of Alentejo, Portugal: a solitary cork oak in an undulated wheat field, after the harvest. Compare with this companion picture. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 00:39, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 00:39, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:26, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:37, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per my !vote on the companion picture. Daniel Case (talk) 16:47, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:37, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 21:31, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sorry to be only the seventh. I was not quick enough to be the first...--Jebulon (talk) 21:46, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support it works, better then the dead "Windows XP" ;-) --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:59, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 02:59, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:14, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sakhalinio (talk) 00:04, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose To empty for me (or not empty enough). No wow. Sorry. Kruusamägi (talk) 01:44, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Light direction is bad for the appearance of both the sky and the ground everywhere but on the very left. — Julian H.^✈ 09:01, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:58, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as others. Yann (talk) 17:57, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm sorry, but it is way too empty for me as well. The nearly clean sky roughly is 50% of the image... -- Pofka (talk) 19:23, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support----Isasza (talk) 21:44, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm not a fan of the light here, sorry. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:09, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 21:00, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 21:01, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as Kruusamägi --LC-de (talk) 11:00, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:21, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Julius Schnorr von Carolsfeld- Ruth im Feld des Boaz.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2015 at 22:27:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media
Info created by Julius Schnorr von Carolsfeld - uploaded by AndreasPraefcke with modifications by Trzęsacz and Crisco 1492 - nominated by Pine -- Pine^✉ 22:27, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pine^✉ 22:27, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:57, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 07:48, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:36, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:26, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:59, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 11:08, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Verde78 (talk) 12:03, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sakhalinio (talk) 04:56, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:50, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:23, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media

File:2015.07.16.-02-Viernheim--Barbarossa-Fliege-Maennchen.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2015 at 06:53:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Diptera#Family_:_Asilidae_.28Robber_flies.29
Info All by me. -- Hockei (talk) 06:53, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Hockei (talk) 06:53, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very special. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 07:47, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support a bit oversharpended? Anyway... --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:11, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:25, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:37, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very unusual and fun. Charles (talk) 14:24, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:14, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Indeed. Very unusual! -- Pofka (talk) 20:06, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kikos (talk) 20:32, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:43, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:27, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sakhalinio (talk) 04:57, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Thennicke (talk) 12:04, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:50, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 12:27, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Diptera

File:Chugush Mount and Horse.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Nov 2015 at 18:34:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info created by Sergei Kazantsev - uploaded by Sergei Kazantsev - nominated by SKas -- KSK (talk) 18:34, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- KSK (talk) 18:34, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I find composition a bit random, horse not in the thirds, not in the centre, nowhere interesting. Not sure if WB is correct. Quality imo not there for FP. --Kadellar (talk) 19:26, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Qualified support Composition doesn't bother me. Could be sharper, but as it is I can support it. Daniel Case (talk) 04:07, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I agree with Daniel. --Tremonist (talk) 13:53, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Kadellar. — Julian H.^✈ 09:12, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose too dull. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 15:38, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Question Interesting. You meant "I don't like it" or something else? --KSK (talk) 08:47, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 12:28, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pseudotachea splendida - variability.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2015 at 15:35:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Bones, shells and fossils
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 15:35, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 15:35, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:48, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 16:05, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 17:52, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:21, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 20:04, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support $Jacopo Werther iγ\partialψ=mψ$ 20:22, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 20:48, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:25, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 09:00, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:51, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 20:59, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Superb. --Cayambe (talk) 21:29, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- --Isasza (talk) 21:31, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sakhalinio (talk) 04:57, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 12:21, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:46, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Code (talk) 06:03, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Need WB, green channel is satured Support Excellent now --The Photographer (talk) 14:48, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Done Better now? --Llez (talk) 19:43, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 12:26, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Bones, shells and fossils

File:Spot-billed duck at Expo’70 Commemorative Park in Osaka, November 2015 II.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2015 at 13:17:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Laitche (talk) 13:17, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Laitche (talk) 13:17, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:03, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely reflections, though a bit tilted. Charles (talk) 14:26, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I have checked the tilt with reflection of the duck's beaks and eye, I think it's not tilted :) --Laitche (talk) 14:45, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  You're right - sorry, it just looked wrong. Charles (talk) 18:37, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - I guess the duck's webbed feet is confusing you. If the water is not transparent, it looks right... --Laitche (talk) 19:05, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 15:34, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:25, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support wow, I love --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:16, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 20:04, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 20:45, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love the water-patterns almost more than the duck itself. Good work! --Hubertl 20:48, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:26, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:59, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Colin (talk) 12:31, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:26, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Hubertl. Daniel Case (talk) 16:48, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 20:59, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- --Isasza (talk) 21:32, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sakhalinio (talk) 04:57, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Hubertl. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 12:23, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:46, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:12, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 18:02, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 05:30, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 12:55, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

File:Egyptian Koshari.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2015 at 12:39:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink
Info Featured picture on Arabic Wikipedia.created by Basma~commonswiki - uploaded by Basma~commonswiki - nominated by ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 -- ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 12:39, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 12:39, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
It's certainly nice to get to know Egyptian dishes, but the photo's quality is so poor that I can't believe that it falls within the guidelines. --Tremonist (talk) 13:36, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @Tremonist: The quality is "4,565 × 3,043" --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 14:02, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Numbers only don't generate photo quality. And please let the banner where it is, until someone might contest this, in accordance with the rules. You may not take it out yourself. Pls read the guidelines. Thank you! --Tremonist (talk) 14:07, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose (formerly FPX) Image does not fall within the guidelines, photo quality is way below the minimum standard expected in this competition, sorry. - Tremonist (talk) 13:59, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- "expected in this competition" competition??? This is FPC list. -- RTA 05:02, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Let give photo a try. Its food photo, vacuumed category on Commons. Definitely isn't inferior than previous food photo we had. Compo is fine, background goes in hand, DOF is a bit shallow, and EV could be upscaled. S vote is more to keep it alive then true support. --Mile (talk) 14:14, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Tremonist. While it's great that the arwiki community is at the point where there are enough of its own FPs for them to feel comfortable nominating them here, and that these are primarily of regional foods, food being generally underrepresented to begin with among our FPs, certain bars still need to be scaled. This is a good composition—I like the sauce about to drip from the ladle—but I think the photographer could have gotten away with at least f/4 and ISO 200, given that the light otherwise looks pretty good. As it is the DoF is so shallow as to be distracting, and the image is also noticeably noisy. Daniel Case (talk) 17:44, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Kadellar (talk) 17:52, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 15:39, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 13:09, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Interior of the Palace of Caserta - Palatine Chapel.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2015 at 18:49:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
Info The Palatine Chapel located inside the Royal Palace, although access is not necessary to enter the royal apartments. For training is inspired by the Chapel of the Palace of Versailles. It was inaugurated in 1784 during the Christmas midnight mass celebrated in the presence of King Ferdinand IV. The royal gallery is decorated with columns and with it the access via a spiral staircase. In the apse there is a large painting by Giuseppe Bonito portraying the Immaculate Conception. The Chapel, especially at Christmas time, become a location for concerts of opera and classical music in general. Often it hosts the Grand New Year's Concert, when the same is not organized in the Court Theatre. All by LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:49, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:49, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Just to not start negative, high contrast, too dark at the centre, overexposure at the left window, this white area in front of the photo is very distracting, a little bit of distortion too, otherwise, would be okay. -- RTA 04:58, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Neither light conditions in older buildings nor decorations inside can be altered by the photographer, who has to take it the way he finds it. I think Livio did a good job here, too, as he did so often in other churches. --Tremonist (talk) 13:43, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 15:41, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~weak oppose~~ nice, but the central part is too dark. --Kadellar (talk) 17:22, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, better now. I don't know if some more contrast would help in the centre section. --Kadellar (talk) 17:31, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose per Kadellar. Daniel Case (talk) 18:06, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Done Kadellar and Daniel Case,more light. Thanks LivioAndronico ^(talk) 09:03, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Livioandronico2013: Sorry, the hard, visible edges of the brightness mask are not appropriate. — Julian H.^✈ 09:07, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

What "visible edges"? Put a note,because I don't see it,thanks LivioAndronico ^(talk) 09:11, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ah ok,now see. New version. Thanks LivioAndronico ^(talk) 09:19, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 21:00, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 22:41, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Red Arrows trio.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2015 at 20:55:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles
Info created and uploaded by Airwolf - nominated by Σπάρτακος -- Σπάρτακος (talk) 20:55, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Σπάρτακος (talk) 20:55, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Both airplane are not really net. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:07, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unsharp in too many places; some CA as well. Daniel Case (talk) 21:21, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too close together. -- Colin (talk) 22:01, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It looks quite extraordinary, but there are quality issues mentioned above. At that speed, though, it surely would be difficult for any photographer to take a clear and entirely unblurred photo. --Tremonist (talk) 13:04, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose Certainly not as common as the usual 737 landing at Heathrow shot, but if you browse around on the various plane-spotting sites, it's not really that extraordinary. Certainly a difficult shot, but when it comes to sharpness and light quality, there's still quite some room for improvement: example 1, example 2, candidate downscaled to about the same size. --El Grafo (talk) 10:41, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 22:43, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Anax imperator Exuvie MHNT Parc de la Maourine.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2015 at 12:41:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata
Info The exuvia of Anax imperator (Emperor dragonfly). Created and uploaded by Archaeodontosaurus - nominated by Christian Ferrer --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:41, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:41, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 13:02, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Certainly high EV. --Tremonist (talk) 13:09, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 14:26, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! --Yann (talk) 16:11, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 16:28, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 21:51, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Why is there a glow in the middle of the image, like lens flare? -- 22:00, 17 November 2015 (UTC) question by Colin --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:14, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe @Archaeodontosaurus: can answer to that. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:14, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support I did it on purpose! Scientific photography is a constraining discipline. For publication of pictures you can not do anything forbidden to remove even a speck of dust. It's a pretty frustrating discipline. So occasionally I allow myself a personal touch, which brings nothing that remains discreet: it is my craziness. But at least I'm sure I'm not a robot. Thank you to all and especially to Christian for his tireless work. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:14, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I was thinking too it is a voluntary gradient color, but in the center there is a small circle where the color changes suddenly becomes clearer and this small circle is visible. I think the question of Colin was about that. The gradient is not perfect, but that don't affect too much the result. The result even with this little issue stay outstanding. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:59, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Besides, I do not master this technique well. The gradient is not linear. I think this is the jpg compression method. I'll try to improve myself on this point. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:43, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:26, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Reminds me of Cell in Dragon Ball... --Laitche (talk) 09:45, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:07, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 18:17, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sakhalinio (talk) 06:17, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Masterpiece --The Photographer (talk) 13:31, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support $Jacopo Werther iγ\partialψ=mψ$ 17:18, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Trace (talk) 08:01, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:19, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Odonata

File:Bombus veteranus - Cirsium vulgare - Keila1.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2015 at 14:02:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera
Info all by Ivar (talk) 14:02, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 14:02, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nothing to distract from this one, and I love the pollen on the bee. Daniel Case (talk) 18:37, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Daniel. --Tremonist (talk) 13:15, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 15:40, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support----Isasza (talk) 21:43, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Colorful. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:11, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:19, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:39, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Hymenoptera

File:Stift Altenburg Kirche Innenraum 01.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2015 at 09:48:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Austria
Info Interior of Altenburg Abbey Church, Lower Austria. Created, uploaded, and nominated by me --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:48, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:48, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice --LivioAndronico ^(talk) 09:58, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Verde78 (talk) 10:56, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 12:14, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 13:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:07, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:37, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 16:19, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 16:29, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:45, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hockei (talk) 17:34, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 17:51, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:52, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:57, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:20, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 18:11, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Code (talk) 06:02, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Basik07 (talk) 01:23, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:37, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Austria

File:2015.07.16.-13-Viernheim--Feuerlibelle-Weibchen.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2015 at 15:22:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Odonata#Family_:_Libellulidae_.28Skimmers.29
Info All by me. -- Hockei (talk) 15:22, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Hockei (talk) 15:22, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- --Isasza (talk) 21:28, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sakhalinio (talk) 05:05, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 12:19, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:14, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 16:31, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Delicate in its beauty and beuatoful in its delicacy. Daniel Case (talk) 18:12, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per Daniel, though I think a little bit more of local highlights could improve it a bit. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:48, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 18:07, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Bzzzzzzz… 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 01:00, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 10:35, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Trace (talk) 08:02, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:50, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Odonata

File:Acacia in Ein Khadra Desert Oasis 00 (87).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2015 at 17:02:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants
Info created, uploaded and nominated by User:لا روسا.-- لا روسا (talk) 17:02, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- لا روسا (talk) 17:02, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support-- --Isasza (talk) 21:38, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Regretful oppose I love the composition, but there's too much unsharpness in the background. Plus the clouds seem to have a faint pinkish tinge. Daniel Case (talk) 06:25, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:31, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 13:32, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:10, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support some technical issues but very impressive mood --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:18, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Fails for me on composition (tree right in the centre), though the quality is also not there. Charles (talk) 14:33, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Well composed but a bit soft, though there is a good resolution. It is an image which I will be happy to have the RAW file to try different processings. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:38, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 20:32, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 20:45, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:01, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Supportباسم (talk) 17:42, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Basik07 (talk) 22:52, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:48, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants

File:Camel Nuweibaa 00 (12).JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2015 at 17:00:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals
Info created, uploaded and nominated by User:لا روسا -- لا روسا (talk) 17:00, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- لا روسا (talk) 17:00, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Random composition, very soft (imo not even QI). Species needed. --Kadellar (talk) 17:26, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I prefer this crop with less sky. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:35, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Kadellar. Daniel Case (talk) 06:29, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 13:27, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:32, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose way off FP as per others. Not in valid category either. Charles (talk) 14:30, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Tremonist (talk) 15:00, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Supportباسم (talk) 17:44, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
SupportBasik07 (talk) 22:53, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No colour contrast between subject and background and per Kadellar. — Julian H.^✈ 10:24, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 21:47, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dülmen, Börnste, Waldweg -- 2015 -- 4649.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Nov 2015 at 16:14:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Germany
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay ^talk 16:14, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay ^talk 16:14, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Piece… 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:19, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice, but I would prefer this version: --Ivar (talk) 17:13, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mist makes it special, although I do agree with Ivar that the version he linked is even better. Daniel Case (talk) 18:39, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Needs a crop out of the road IMO--Jebulon (talk) 23:55, 12 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Benh (talk) 07:48, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Converging lines and too light highlights. -- -donald- (talk) 09:05, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

~~* Oppose~~ ~~Also think some bottom part which is out of focus should be cropped~~. Composition feels unbalanced, I would use zoom in this one in portrait mode. The alternative has bottom in focus, but needs much higher EV. Idea is trees cover sideways so no bushes beyond, that's the case in long end zoom. --Mile (talk) 07:33, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support I very much agree with Daniel. --Tremonist (talk) 13:39, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support but I suggested a crop, I think there is too much road in the foreground (per Jebulon and Mile), our attention should be only on the trees, with the road being much more subtle. -Kadellar (talk) 17:36, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support----Isasza (talk) 21:39, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 13:33, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thanks for your hints with the crop. I just improved this. Sorry, for fixing the problem during nomination period. --XRay ^talk 16:59, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 07:39, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 10:04, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Also good. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:16, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
weak support I think the road could be cropped a little like it is below. I like the colors better in this version. --Pine^✉ 20:32, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative version[edit]

Info-- I like your images Dietmar but I think also they're worth a little more work in post-prod, so let's pop-up these fall colors, trying to maintain that mystery mist, ok? Here's an alternative mine, balancing the colors again a bit out of the blue as well as several other enhancements in colors, levels, etc. Like Jebulon and Mile suggested above, I think too that the area of the road is too big, which points the eye to the bright area at the end of it. Cropping a bit of it focuses better the attention to the canopy. Sting (talk) 17:40, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment-- For what's about your alternative bellow, I think that you understand that you lost the interest of the mist in the trees. But most importantly, if you allow me: forget about that zoom, at least at 15mm, and if you can change it for a better one. It's optical quality at full size is terrible imo. ;-) Sting (talk) 17:40, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Best of all three. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:26, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Photographer (talk) 01:37, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Maybe the eye level is a bit too low. --Laitche (talk) 02:50, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment @Sting: Thanks for nomination this image. Please allow me a comment. Nominating a third image is more than confusing. Your derivate has an JPEG as origin, not the original image (RAW). IMO it's better to develop images from RAW. And yes, your image is more colorful. Whether it is balanced, is surely subjectively. I like the colors you've choosen. In order to be regarded as an alternative, in my opinion, all the processing steps from me would have to be carried out. I nominated my image as FP. If the result is, it isn't, so it is not FP. The derived image I do not consider as my picture. My image was just the basis. If I improve my image developed from RAW both images are very similar.
Your other comment: IMO the lens isn't terrible. But the lens is currently in service. It must be adjusted. May there are better lenses but they are third party lenses (I did not prefer third party lenses) or Canon EF lenses - and much more expensive. Currently I don't extend my equipment. May be in the future - may be full frame.
Thanks again for your assistance. I can learn from everyone's help. --XRay ^talk 07:05, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Of course it's based on the jpeg (but worked on it at 16 bits), that's why it wasn't meant (for me) to be another nomination but more to show an alternative treatment.

Don't worry, I know well that very few of us can afford the replacement of a lens. I too still own one of those, even if it's tagged as an “L” one. I just avoid use it for critical work. Sting (talk)]

Thanks for the alternative treatment. But - sorry - it's not my nomination. Others will review this one. So IMO it should be nominated if the nomination period of original will be finished and the original image does not become FP. --XRay ^talk 16:47, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral I like the other version more. --Tremonist (talk) 15:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative[edit]

Separated as own nomination --XRay ^talk 04:49, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The alternative was withdrawn and will be nominated if this image did not become FP. --XRay ^talk 08:49, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:53, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

The chosen alternative is: File:Dülmen, Börnste, Waldweg -- 2015 -- 4649.jpg

File:Seagate ST33232A hard disk inner view.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Nov 2015 at 19:26:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Machines
Info created by Sting - uploaded by Sting - nominated by Pine -- Pine^✉ 19:26, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pine^✉ 19:26, 13 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 20:08, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:20, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 20:46, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
weak - Weak because, its not perfectly sharp in the rear areas.--Hubertl 20:53, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 07:18, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:54, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:57, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:49, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

File:St Augustine's Church, Kilburn Interior 4, London, UK - Diliff.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2015 at 14:03:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Diliff -- Diliff (talk) 14:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Diliff (talk) 14:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support At first sight I thought it a little dark, what it actually isn't I think, but honestly, is it really necessary to say anything concerning Diliff's photos' quality other than supportive? --Tremonist (talk) 14:29, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 14:40, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 16:19, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 16:24, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:44, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support The horizontals on the far wall and the near floor are bowed. -- Colin (talk) 21:52, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- This is deliberate. For compositional reasons, I gave it a small amount of horizontal compression which slightly bows the horizontal lines. I know it's not ideal but it was a compromise worth making in this instance. Diliff (talk) 07:39, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Ok. I can accept the small distortion on such a wide-angle as this. However, I wonder if then it (for educational purposes) would be useful to create a copy crop version of just the far wall /stained-glass that wasn't distorted. Otherwise someone might think this church had bowed walls. It's quite noticeable at relatively small size, never mind full size, and limits the EV in that area. Considering that your images are a pretty important free resource documenting these churches/cathedrals. -- Colin (talk) 08:51, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:08, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:27, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:10, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:36, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 20:45, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Code (talk) 06:01, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 09:08, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Basik07 (talk) 01:44, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:51, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

File:Mediterranean moonrise, Port-la-Nouvelle.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2015 at 05:24:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured_pictures/Astronomy#Natural_satellites
Info created by Maxime Raynal - uploaded by Bruce1ee - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1ee^talk 05:24, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- —Bruce1ee^talk 05:24, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Astroval1 06:01, 19 November 2015
Support --Sakhalinio (talk) 06:24, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kikos (talk) 07:09, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't like photos of water with moons edited in, and I don't think our guidelines like those either. — Julian H.^✈ 07:29, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Julian. --Cayambe (talk) 10:30, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Question The colors are natural? --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:35, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Fake colors and moon size --The Photographer (talk) 12:46, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. See this article that claims the moon would be 0.3% of the frame at 100mm on full-frame camera. -- Colin (talk) 12:48, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- This, and it becomes orange and squished around the bottom when it approaches the horizon, as with the Sun during a sunrise/-set. — Julian H.^✈ 13:06, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thanks for the article and the feedback – I've learnt something. —Bruce1ee^talk 13:11, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    @Bruce1ee: This is more like an artist's view that a real photo. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:53, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination —Bruce1ee^talk 13:11, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Таллинн. 3.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2015 at 14:43:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
Info created and uploaded by Aleksandr Abrosimov - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 14:43, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 14:43, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Perhaps a crop of the bottom roof-line, that runs from left to right, would draw the eye more towards the rest of the image--where the real magic is happening. Otherwise, the continuous line acts too strongly as a distracting draw.--Fotoriety (talk) 00:18, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Per Fotoriety. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:41, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The upper two-thirds is great but then the bottom clutters it up too much. Daniel Case (talk) 01:37, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per others. --Tremonist (talk) 14:34, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination I like it as it is. Kruusamägi (talk) 11:53, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Iglesia de Santiago, Lestedo, Camino de Santiago, Lugo, España, 2015-09-20, DD 31.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2015 at 17:28:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
Info St James church in the village of Lestedo, municipality of Palas de Rei, one of the jewels along St James's Way, Lugo, Spain. All by me, Poc o² 17:28, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 17:28, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose QI for sure, but just not enough wow to carry it to FP for me. Daniel Case (talk) 03:18, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:40, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support --Tremonist (talk) 14:26, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A QI but nothing amazing for FP. The dark tree on the left with much in shadow is dominating; the telephone wire is distracting. Perhaps a detailed study of the bells and church wall with lichen covering would be interesting. -- Colin (talk) 18:06, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Poc o² 17:39, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fischbussard-4.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2015 at 00:53:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Info created and uploaded by Merops - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:53, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 00:53, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 09:05, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 09:55, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 10:06, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Sakhalinio (talk) 11:31, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't know what's going on here. This image was submitted for FP in the last few days and was not featured. Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Black-collared Hawk Mato Grosso(Brazil).jpg Charles (talk) 12:23, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- This image was not nominated — people preferred this crop, now they can vote on it. — Julian H.^✈ 12:57, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Not so. There was no consensus on the crop. Charles (talk) 13:52, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    - There doesn't need to be a consensus. Clearly, more people support this, so the nomination is justified. — Julian H.^✈ 19:40, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Golden Bosnian Lily (talk) 13:31, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It's a great photo, but not near FP because of softness and noise. Charles (talk) 13:49, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is a bird in flight, not static. Great composition and colors. --Yann (talk) 18:32, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:24, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:20, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose First, I think this went too far the other way in undoing the crop ... ideally it should be more of a square; we have too much dead space on the right. And notwithstanding, it seems rather noisy to me. Daniel Case (talk) 02:58, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @Daniel Case: Really no. This is a perfect composition, with the subject on a third, and 2/3 space ahead of a moving bird. Yann (talk) 19:15, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 07:43, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Daniel --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:15, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support The crop is fine for me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:00, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as other --Verde78 (talk) 12:04, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 21:00, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Noisy but good. I prefer this than this :) --Laitche (talk) 22:54, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:55, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --LC-de (talk) 11:03, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think a little bit more of contrast (or blacks) would help. --Kadellar (talk) 17:53, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
SupportBasik07 (talk) 00:26, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 09:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

File:Torre de San Saturniño, Cambados, Pontevedra, España, 2015-09-23, DD 29.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2015 at 00:38:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info created by Poco a poco - uploaded by Diego Delso - nominated by User:Lmbuga -- Lmbuga (talk) 00:38, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Lmbuga (talk) 00:38, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Info The remains of the fortification are probably located in the first settlement in the area of Cambados. The fortification dates from the second half of the 10th century and was destructed betweeen 1466 and 1470 during the Irmandiño revolts. The fortification had several functions: residence, watching tower and lighthouse. It is an state monument of Spain. Poc o² 08:40, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thanks for the nomination Miguel! Poc o² 08:42, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Sakhalinio (talk) 11:31, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Some of that fungus on the rock near the right might be a little blown, but if that's my only complaint, it's not enough to stop this one. Daniel Case (talk) 23:11, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:20, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great mood. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 09:56, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ Right is overexposed and shadows are too dark. Yann (talk) 19:17, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The composition + light direction (shadows) don't work very much IMO. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:29, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Christian, Yann: I've uploaded a new version with some adjustments in the curves Poc o² 20:17, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I am not really convinced by the composition and the subject, but the exposition quite OK now, so Neutral Yann (talk) 20:41, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My concern is more about the deliberate choice of the position of the photographer and about the direction of the light. Not about the curves or any other processings. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:41, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like it. --Tremonist (talk) 14:57, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support sehr schöne Linien. Wolken und Steine weisen alle zur Ruine. --Ralf Roleček 16:24, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support. A bit weak compositionally (especially with regards to the dividing lines between the sky, sea, and land), and the one distinctive element, the tower, could be further off-center. However, I like how the cirrus clouds lead into the tip of the tower. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:15, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose totally agree with Christian Ferrer --LC-de (talk) 11:01, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 09:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:Caldera Las Cañadas mit Roques de García und TF-21.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2015 at 10:00:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info all by Der Wolf im Wald -- Wolf im Wald 10:00, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolf im Wald 10:00, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:26, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mile (talk) 13:02, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful scenery. --Tremonist (talk) 13:30, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 18:24, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:25, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Great roadscape! (can we have "roadscape" as a category?) Daniel Case (talk) 01:56, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:32, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sakhalinio (talk) 06:23, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:02, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 06:21, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ --Astroval1 08:10, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Users whose accounts have at least 50 edits can vote. --Ivar (talk) 09:23, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 05:09, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 09:45, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:38, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:56, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Kranj - panorama 03.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2015 at 10:53:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Panoramas
Info created by Mihael Grmek - uploaded by Mihael Grmek - nominated by Meho29 -- Mihael Grmek (talk) 10:53, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Very nice picture, a good moment catched, but poor quality. -- -donald- (talk) 12:26, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! The quality is sufficient too, IMO.--Hubertl 15:13, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 15:31, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 16:07, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support there are some minor flaws, but the overall mood outweighs them all. --Ivar (talk) 17:41, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 18:33, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support At 100% it is a bit soft and I'd have been tempted to downsize to around 70% (which is still 12MP) and apply some sharpening to that (there's little point trying to sharpen if the source image is this soft). But having the full-size version means any re-user can downsize as they wish. @-donald-, have a look at the image at 70% -- is that sufficiently sharp (remember also the hills are quite distant)? The nearby tree is possibly a bit distracting, especially when the contrast-boost processing that is applied to the scenery becomes a little too much for this already-contrasty tree. But it is a very nice view with good light and clouds. And from a 10-year-old 10MP camera! -- Colin (talk) 19:25, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 20:43, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kikos (talk) 21:38, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support see Colin. With a D200 it's phantastic. A bit soft but FP in my eyes. --Ralf Roleček 21:39, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:27, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:32, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow - almost like a painting. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:36, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support One of the most striking landscapes here in a while. Daniel Case (talk) 05:38, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Code (talk) 05:59, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sakhalinio (talk) 06:24, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ --Astroval1 (talk) 8:04, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
- Comment Users whose accounts have at least 50 edits can vote. --Ivar (talk) 09:22, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 04:29, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Waow! — Trace (talk) 07:59, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Brilliant! -- Pofka (talk) 09:44, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:37, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Basik07 (talk) 01:52, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 09:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas

File:Mapa politico de Venezuela 1840 restored version.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2015 at 23:22:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps
Info created by Agustin Codazzi
Support -- The Photographer (talk) 23:22, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support More maps! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:29, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. This is only one of a pair of maps that appear to have been published specifically as a pair. The full title of the work, at source, is "Mapa politico de Venezuela antes de la Revolucion de 1810. Mapa politico de la Republica de Venezuela en 1840. Lith. de Thierry freres a Paris. (Caracas 1840)". It seems this work was created to illustrate the areas and extent of the country before and after the revolution. So by cropping it to one map, the point of the original work has been lost. Please restore the pair, along with enclosing border, and nominate that for FP. (There's a template error on your map and also on this nomination page. I suggest not using image templates on FPC as they may bring in categories that are not relevant to FPC. ) -- Colin (talk) 08:30, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support It's a wonderful map and I'd like to support it. However, Colin is right with demanding the pair being restored. I'd thus prefer you provding us with the full pair. --Tremonist (talk) 14:41, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --The Photographer (talk) 13:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:High Coast (Höga kusten) - by Pudelek.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2015 at 17:18:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 17:18, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 17:18, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It is a pleasant enough view, but nothing grabs my attention. It's all a bit the same all over. It isn't a sharp 5Mp so there isn't much detail on offer here compared to many of our FP panoramas. -- Colin (talk) 19:11, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Colin. --Pine^✉ 20:22, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Colin. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:10, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Looks too usual. -- Pofka (talk) 09:41, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Colin. Daniel Case (talk) 17:00, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Pudelek (talk) 10:11, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/

File:Cypripedium calceolus - Kaunis kuldking Keila.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2015 at 14:39:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants
Info all by Ivar (talk) 14:39, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 14:39, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support excellent sharpness. --Pine^✉ 22:33, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:20, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I don't think the light helps this one too much, although the point does get across. I do think, however, it could be improved by a crop squaring it off. Daniel Case (talk) 06:21, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 07:45, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:13, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 20:07, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 20:31, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would crop 15-20% on the right side --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:01, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sakhalinio (talk) 04:56, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:53, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I like that it's off-center, but the space is on the wrong side in my opinion. — Julian H.^✈ 17:58, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as Julian H., this issue disturbs the composition immensely. The technical quality is very good.--Hubertl 06:30, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
SupportBasik07 (talk) 00:38, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 02:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants

File:Four Seasons by Alfons Mucha, circa 1895.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2015 at 18:45:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media
Info created by Alfons Mucha, uploaded by Ragesoss, nominated by Yann (talk) 18:45, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Info Cropped print of four panels each depicting one of the four seasons personified by a woman, thought to have been printed between 1880 and 1910.
Support -- Yann (talk) 18:45, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nice subject, but the scan is quite noisy when viewed at 100%. --Pine^✉ 22:29, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:36, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Pine. Daniel Case (talk) 03:23, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per Pine. --Tremonist (talk) 14:52, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[[Category:]]===File:Santa Croce in Gerusalemme (Rome) - interior.jpg, not featured=== Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2015 at 08:19:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
Info The Basilica of the Holy Cross in Jerusalem (Latin: Basilica Sanctae Crucis in Hierusalem, Italian: Basilica di Santa Croce in Gerusalemme) is a Roman Catholic minor basilica and titular church in rione Esquilino, Rome, Italy. It is one of the Seven Pilgrim Churches of Rome. According to tradition, the Basilica was consecrated circa 325 to house the relics of the Passion of Jesus Christ brought to Rome from the Holy Land by St. Empress Helena, mother of Roman Emperor Constantine I. At that time, the Basilica's floor was covered with soil from Jerusalem, thus acquiring the title in Hierusalem; it is not dedicated to the Holy Cross which is in Jerusalem, but the Basilica itself is "in Jerusalem" in the sense that a "piece" of Jerusalem was moved to Rome for its foundation. All by LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:20, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:20, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:41, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose chairs, more crop sides --Verde78 (talk) 10:57, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Angelic. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 12:16, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't understand Verde78,what changes from the previous? --Σπάρτακος (talk) 13:05, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:11, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:37, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 16:19, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:45, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 19:12, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't know what processing effects you are applying on these images (lots of NR, clarity, possibly) but it just looks like fake painted walls and plasterwork rather than real. I'd rather the photograph looked like a photograph, and 3D objects looked 3D. -- Colin (talk) 21:31, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Chairs and other issues. --Yann (talk) 22:47, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm not bothered by the the chairs, it might have something to do with the lighting, but those capitals in the middle of the ceiling line ... oh my. Daniel Case (talk) 00:30, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Plastic chairs perform like alien here. Central part has strange looking HDR, to much bright with no contrast. --Mile (talk) 07:25, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, the combination of slightly strange light and the chairs make this look weird. — Julian H.^✈ 18:15, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pudelek (talk) 16:38, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Basik07 (talk) 01:22, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Southern crested caracara (Caracara plancus) head adult.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Nov 2015 at 13:45:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Info all by Charlesjsharp -- Charles (talk) 13:45, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charles (talk) 13:45, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice pose. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 14:20, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:18, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Arionestar. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 07:44, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 20:07, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 20:50, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:29, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sakhalinio (talk) 04:56, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Arion. --Tremonist (talk) 14:54, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose jpeg artifacts, lose of fine detail in the forehead feathers. I don't like the framing either, sorry. --Kadellar (talk) 17:51, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

File:Vila Viçosa September 2013-44a.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2015 at 15:04:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info Ducal palace of Vila Viçosa, main facade (detail). Vila Viçosa, Portugal. The whole building is here: All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:04, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:04, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Feels weird to me to crop just below the full column top decorations. Is there a bit more space in the files? — Julian H.^✈ 18:32, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Currently it just looks like an unfortunate crop. If you want to concentrate on the façade, then I suggest crop the top to below the scrolls (?), the left to mirror the tight crop of the right, and the bottom to to eliminate the pavement and those asymmetrical blocks. There's a bit of a curve to the horizontals on the left-hand-side that perhaps could be fixed if you can restitch. We already have File:Vila Viçosa September 2013-810a.jpg featured, and this is not the whole of the width of the building. So I think it needs to work as a minimal/geometric study rather than for its EV (since it is incomplete). -- Colin (talk) 18:59, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Info -- New version uploaded addressing Julian concern: no more available on the top. Also note that the upper columns are not vertical! (please check this one, on the left -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:38, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Guste muito da panorâmica,não entanto, consigo olhar certo contraste forte, mas fiz uma olhada na hora que foi tirada a fotografia e simplesmente não consigo compreender a ração. Fico linda. --The Photographer (talk) 21:01, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support me gusta. buena documentación. --Ralf Roleček 21:37, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done although I had to consult a diccionary to understand your suggestion in Spanish! -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 20:45, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support Eu gosto disso também! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:21, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:32, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:04, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Slight curvature, but perhaps that's unavoidable. Beautiful symmetry and detail otherwise. Daniel Case (talk) 17:06, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 02:24, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support and much better now, thanks. — Julian H.^✈ 07:46, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tambien a mi, me gusta mucho. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 04:27, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 09:44, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 11:00, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 02:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:13-04-13-st-poelten-rathausplatz-704.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2015 at 17:09:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Dreifaltigkeitssäule (St. Pölten) Austria

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info Dreifaltigkeitssäule (St. Pölten) Austria - all by Ralf Roleček
Support -- Ralf Roleček 17:09, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 17:55, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 20:37, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 20:43, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 09:00, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:02, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality ok but don't see what takes this above many QIs we have of images that are just parts of columns/statues. The composition is an arbitrary crop of the top of the whole column, which contains many interesting and relevant details below. The lighting is also harsh with some elements in shadow. This image is a more interesting composition, though it is tilted and could do with a little more separation between elements. This photo and this photo show what is possible with better light and capturing the whole column + surrounds. -- Colin (talk) 12:48, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Colin. --El Grafo (talk) 12:51, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I see Colin's point regarding the lighting, but I also think the images linked to show that a) this is a nice way of simplifying the subject and b) from those images of the context I honestly don't know whether this particular view could have been done with any more favorable lighting. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Daniel Case (talk • contribs)
Oppose per Colin.--Fotoriety (talk) 22:08, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Daniel. --Tremonist (talk) 14:43, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose IQ and composition/crop are problem. --Mile (talk) 07:26, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
SupportBasik07 (talk) 01:12, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 01:03, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:Laupa manor.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2015 at 16:39:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications
Info created by WooteleF - uploaded by WooteleF - nominated by WooteleF -- WooteleF (talk) 16:39, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- WooteleF (talk) 16:39, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose JPG artefacts and poor quality ; sorry. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 17:54, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose sorry, but it´s really too dark, therefore you have too much noise, even in the cloudy sky --Hubertl 20:47, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. Daniel Case (talk) 19:51, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Tremonist (talk) 14:44, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative version[edit]

Info A higher quality jpg of the same image. WooteleF (talk) 18:29, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose it´s not really better now. --Hubertl 20:47, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Better, but still low quality. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 21:24, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. Just too dull and a bit noisy. -- Colin (talk) 12:32, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. This is better, but no wow, unfortunately. Daniel Case (talk) 19:51, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Tremonist (talk) 14:44, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Yann (talk) 21:34, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lens-ring-gaskets-01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2015 at 17:02:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

A set of lens ring gaskets (lens shaped joint rings) for high pressure technologie

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info Those metal lens ring gaskets are used in the high pressure technology of producing polyethylene. The polymerisation of ethylene works at pressures up to 3600 bar. The gaskets are required for the connection of high pressure steel pipes. The leftmost gasket has a weight of nearly 5 kilogram.

All by -- CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 17:02, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 17:02, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 20:44, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:44, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:45, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:41, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Smooth ... Daniel Case (talk) 01:42, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 07:40, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Shining objects are tricky. Good work. — Yann (talk) 09:09, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thank you - indeed, the concave shape drove me crazy. The flashes always found a way for a direct reflex to the sensor. Polarisation filter wasn't a big help. I finally succeeded with a four flash setup and some diffusors and reflectors. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 09:35, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:24, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Masterpiece. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 04:25, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Trace (talk) 07:58, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 09:43, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition LivioAndronico ^(talk) 10:58, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent balanced composition. --Laitche (talk) 12:40, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sakhalinio (talk) 06:00, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very high quality and educational value. --Code (talk) 18:43, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great composition. I think there's a slight misalignment (the small one is too far down), but it's not a huge deal. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:47, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:45, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

File:N. levis caught at Calperum 09.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2015 at 20:15:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles
Info created by David Wells - uploaded by Bungalugs - nominated by Delusion23 -- Del_♉sion23 (talk) 20:15, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Del_♉sion23 (talk) 20:15, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support some dof and sharpness issues... but aaaaaaaaw --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:28, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:09, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- --Isasza (talk) 21:30, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Martin. Daniel Case (talk) 02:34, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sakhalinio (talk) 05:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice, but not properly focused --Uoaei1 (talk) 09:39, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:42, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Tail is out of focus. -- Pofka (talk) 16:33, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Can't understand the opposing votes stating that the tail is out of focus. It is mostly hidden and of no importance to the overall impression. --LC-de (talk) 11:06, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 13:51, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Eyes… 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:11, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose aaaw per Martin, but I don't think the eye is well focused. I don't care about the tail, that's fine. --Kadellar (talk) 17:48, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Kadellar. The eye should be in focus at least. — Julian H.^✈ 18:05, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Amada44 ^{talk to me} 20:08, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Focus and DoF not great. Charles (talk) 23:17, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 21:43, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Reptiles

File:Girl September 2008-1.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2015 at 16:00:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info Second try, after 5 years! Which means that I like this picture very much. Not only for the obvious reason (only understandable by a few, sorry) but also because the composition and colours are very good, comparing favourably with the portraits in our gallery. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:00, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:00, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice portrait. --Yann (talk) 19:07, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, sorry. I'd be very happy to have this quality of photo in my family photos on Flickr (they're not public, in case anyone looks). I spent some time looking at the FP people photos and I think our best tend to have some spark. Either the subject is naturally especially photogenic or the lighting is creative or the pose and look just gets you in the eyes. If the image lacks all these, such as a studio portrait of a boring politician, then it needs to be technically perfect in high resolution. The lighting here is nicely soft but not creative and possibly a little bright so her eyes aren't wide open and round (though some people just don't open their eyes as wide as others). The background doesn't really enhance the portrait imo and the composition is quite ordinary. Her face is like any pretty girl smiling for the camera. After I write this I looked at the previous FP comments and see similar view. It is hard to get a characterful portrait from such a young unblemished face. For example, File:Boy Face from Venezuela (Original).JPG wouldn't get FP as there's no spark. But a creative crop removed the unfortunate ear, and cranking the Lightroom Clarity slider up to 100 made the subject look 10 years older with a more interesting face, even if somewhat dubiously created (I hear Reuters have banned photos processed from RAW, which must all now come as JPG out-of-camera! I'm not encouraging you to over-process a portrait, of course). . -- Colin (talk) 19:09, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose largely per Colin. While it's a nice personal portrait, I don't think this adds a lot of value to Commons and the composition is ordinary. --Pine^✉ 20:21, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support We have another FP like this and the the EV is subjetive. I like this picture --The Photographer (talk) 00:13, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Colin. QI for sure but not an FP portrait. Daniel Case (talk) 06:06, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:48, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Colin. --Tremonist (talk) 15:20, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Alvesgaspar (talk) 15:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:2015.07.02.-04-Schwarzbach Doberschuetz--Wolfspinne-Pardosa lugubris s. str.-Weibchen.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2015 at 13:51:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Family_:_Lycosidae_.28Wolf_spiders.29
Info All by me. -- Hockei (talk) 13:51, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Hockei (talk) 13:51, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really good photo, but little contrast, here probably unavoidable. --Tremonist (talk) 14:32, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Hard to see the subject. The other photos you took are better on that aspect, though possibly overall quality isn't at FP. -- Colin (talk) 18:27, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support "hard to see" is very good in biological images. We see the camouflage of the animal in natural environment. --Ralf Roleček 23:50, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:09, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Colin. The point of the image is to show us the spider. If it shows a bit of its natural environment, great, but I'm not going to grant it an exemption from the FP criteria on those grounds if it also makes it harder to pick out the spider. Daniel Case (talk) 06:04, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Info Just to give to consideration (Not in order to discuss about). This also is a rule: "... A bad picture of a very difficult subject is a better picture than a good picture of an ordinary subject. A good picture of a difficult subject is an extraordinary photograph." --Hockei (talk) 07:22, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think you should consider nominating File:2015.07.02.-03-Schwarzbach Doberschuetz--Wolfspinne-Pardosa lugubris s. str.-Weibchen.jpg (not as an alt, though). It shows the camouflage colours well while still enabling the subject to be visible. Unless the point of a photograph is to demonstrate camouflage, then having an unclear subject is a disadvantage. -- Colin (talk) 10:12, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Then this one is better (no green leave). Regards, Yann (talk) 12:50, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment So I'll nominate another one of these three pictures too. Anyway, for me the composition of this here is much better. And I cannot comprehend why you do not see the spider clear apart from the environment / background. Maybe it is why I have a different colour perception. --Hockei (talk) 08:34, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Kikos (talk) 16:58, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose due to the combination of not quite excellent sharpness and the distracting immediate surroundings of the animal. — Julian H.^✈ 21:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not FP for me. Too soft and limited DoF - and it's too far away.Charles (talk) 23:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Nevertheless I like it, especially more than the other pictures of this spider they have not the necessary composition to be excellent in my opinion. Thanks. --Hockei (talk) 17:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:2015.07.02.-03-Schwarzbach Doberschuetz--Wolfspinne-Pardosa lugubris s. str.-Weibchen.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2015 at 08:37:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Family_:_Lycosidae_.28Wolf_spiders.29
Info All by me. -- Hockei (talk) 08:37, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Hockei (talk) 08:37, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:40, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Not too bad, but the green leave is disturbing. I like this one better. Yann (talk) 21:58, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice detail on the spider, but background is somewhat cluttered and the light seems a little harsh. Daniel Case (talk) 01:16, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I like your spider, but per others, sorry. --Tremonist (talk) 16:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thanks. --Hockei (talk) 18:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Girl dancing with Fur Seal in Anapa dolphinarium.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2015 at 11:02:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info Girl dancing with Fur Seal in Anapa dolphinarium. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Роман Дергунов (talk) 11:02, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Роман Дергунов (talk) 11:02, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Beautiful subject, but oversatured. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:42, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Striking image, but unsharp in too many places. Daniel Case (talk) 05:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Question: My suspicion is, that the original image was not a RAW image, but jpg out of the camera. The deep blue parts at the seal are jpg artifacts, IMO. Am I right? --Hubertl 10:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Hubertl,no, image converted from RAW with 100% quality. The only correction was crop and decreasing highlits and whites. The blue and red parts are reflections (red - girl's dress, blue - wall with "sea" behind and pool with blue walls in front of this pair, original version). --Роман Дергунов (talk) 14:14, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per others, sorry. Good composition, though. --Tremonist (talk)
I withdraw my nomination --Роман Дергунов (talk 17:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

) 16:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wellington Lagoon from City to Sea Bridge.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2015 at 18:20:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places#New Zealand
Info created by Clilly4 - uploaded by Clilly4 - nominated by Pine -- Pine^✉ 18:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pine^✉ 18:20, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The noon lighting just isn't doing any wonders here, with much of the facade in shadow. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not bothered by the lighting so much, but this is too busy an image (although very well-done technically). QI for sure, but not FP for me. Daniel Case (talk) 06:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Daniel. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:24, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per others. --Tremonist (talk) 16:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Pine^✉ 21:31, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ceiling of Honour Grand Staircase in the Palace of Caserta.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2015 at 18:31:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
I withdraw my nomination All by LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:31, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:31, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Question Do you have a version with full frames on the outside painting? --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:05, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, unfortunately with 18mm I could just take this. Thanks LivioAndronico ^(talk) 15:34, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral The CA at the bottom should be correctable ... I'm going to assume that you had good reasons for the crops (and at least they're symmetrical). Daniel Case (talk) 17:37, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per Daniel. Would have been so lovely wihout the crops. --Tremonist (talk) 15:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mustluik Luigetiigis.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2015 at 16:01:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Info all by Ivar (talk) 16:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pine^✉ 18:23, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 21:40, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Body is nice, but let down by the out-of-focus head and the pose isn't that nice. Charles (talk) 23:23, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Charles. Daniel Case (talk) 06:44, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles, mirroring is the only compositional part, an this is not enough for FP. --Hubertl 10:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support --Tremonist (talk) 16:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good QI but centeredness and top-down perspective both don't help. — Julian H.^✈ 15:54, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Ivar (talk) 17:23, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Admirality Saint Petersburg SE facade and park fountain.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2015 at 12:48:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info created, uploaded, nominated by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 12:48, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 12:48, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Sorry ; beautiful image, but I find that people are distracting. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:00, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Beautiful but too much unsharpness away from center. Daniel Case (talk) 05:15, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Verde78 (talk) 10:58, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per others, while I stress the beauty. --Tremonist (talk) 14:34, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:19, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:15-07-20-Plaza-de-las-tres-Culturas-RalfR-N3S 9336.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2015 at 15:00:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info Monument of Tlatelolco massacre, Mexico D. F. - all by Ralf Roleček note: the church is totally tilted!
Support -- Ralf Roleček 15:00, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:02, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I wish the tower and wall top could have been more in focus, but otherwise this works. Daniel Case (talk) 05:19, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 08:21, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 12:20, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:14, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 16:32, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Old but beautiful. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:47, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 19:04, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good quality QI but no wow and subject is cropped. However, the image is currently not eligible for FP because it doesn't have a suitable free licence. Please stop nominating such images (or add the appropriate licences), Ralf, as it is tedious to have to keep pointing it out. -- Colin (talk) 21:22, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Excuse me, i forgot to enter the FAL additional for Colin. --Ralf Roleček 21:34, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It isn't for my benefit, it so that someone (other than Wikipedia) has a chance to actually use your images without breaching the ridiculous licence terms of GFDL. The oppose stands, I'm afraid -- I'm seeing too many QIs nominated at FPC currently. -- Colin (talk) 21:39, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

From my numerous photos are also used in printed books. GFDL is not user-hostile. --Ralf Roleček 21:53, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I followed some of the links but fail to find any that comply with the GFDL by printing full 3279-word text of the licence. It seems people are using your image either by breaking the terms of the licence or because you have agreed terms outside of the licence (which is totally not the point of free works, as one can do that with "all rights reserved" images too). -- Colin (talk) 22:10, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Per Colin. Also, the background people placement is unbefitting.--Fotoriety (talk) 22:37, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good high-quality photo, little wow to me. — Julian H.^✈ 18:13, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per julian. Amada44 ^{talk to me} 20:11, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as per others. --Yann (talk) 12:54, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:37, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alter Steg, Juliusruh (Rügen), Sonnenaufgang, 150617, ako.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2015 at 17:29:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info Remains of an old pier on the beach of Juliusruh (Rügen) at dawn. The pier was used by the fishermen of the Tromper Wiek. All by me --Code (talk) 17:29, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Code (talk) 17:29, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support sehr schön, trotz bzw. gerade wegen der Überstrahlung. --Ralf Roleček 19:25, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:04, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 01:56, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sakhalinio (talk) 05:17, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 12:17, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:13, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 16:31, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:46, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice mood. Daniel Case (talk) 18:20, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 19:01, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry to spoil the mood, but IMO nothing sets this apart from any other sunrise. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:12, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per King. Composition and exposure are not strong as they could be. — Julian H.^✈ 18:08, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice mood and good for calender photo but wow is not FP level for me, sorry. --Laitche (talk) 09:29, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pudelek (talk) 10:14, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:36, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:Mary Pickford cph.3c17995u.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2015 at 19:34:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info created by Moody, uploaded by Trialsanderrors, nominated by Yann (talk) 19:34, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Canadian-American motion picture actress, co-founder of the film studio United Artists. Picture from around 1915. -- Yann (talk) 19:34, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support elegant. --Pine^✉ 20:18, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 23:51, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kadellar (talk) 00:34, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:11, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 04:20, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Trace (talk) 07:57, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 08:58, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 09:40, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 09:43, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great lighting. -- Colin (talk) 10:19, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:31, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 12:35, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 14:41, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Iconic image of an early "America's Sweetheart" of the silver screen. Daniel Case (talk) 20:37, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sakhalinio (talk) 06:03, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:21, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:33, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People

File:Soyuz TMA-16 relocates from Zvezda Service Module to Poisk module.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2015 at 20:15:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Space exploration
Info created by NASA - uploaded by Pline and cropped by Jatkins - nominated by Pine -- Pine^✉ 20:15, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pine^✉ 20:15, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:11, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Trace (talk) 07:56, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 12:28, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 12:59, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Moderate support One would like a better crop, but consider the circumstances under which this was made ... Daniel Case (talk) 20:41, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sakhalinio (talk) 06:11, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 06:41, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 20:07, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:32, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Space exploration

File:Subantarktikskua01.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Nov 2015 at 20:51:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Brown Skua at sea, near Dyer Island, Western Cape, South Africa

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Info created and uploaded by Amrum - nominated by Σπάρτακος -- Σπάρτακος (talk) 20:51, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Σπάρτακος (talk) 20:51, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- --Isasza (talk) 21:28, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Jpeg artefacts. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:05, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think there are any significant JPEG artefacts, certainly not on the bird anyway. There does seem to be some strange shaped noise patterns in the sky behind, but that isn't (IMO) a big enough issue to oppose over, and could probably be mostly eliminated with noise reduction on the sky. Diliff (talk) 14:03, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 01:55, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:23, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:13, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I could support if the CA (rather minimal, actually, as these things go) on the bird's head and wingtip were cleaned up. Daniel Case (talk) 21:20, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per Daniel Case. --Pine^✉ 20:29, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:35, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Albin Egger-Lienz, Die Namenlosen (1916), Heeresgeschichtliches Museum, Wien 0594-Bearbeitet.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Nov 2015 at 10:26:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info All by Hubertl -- Hubertl 10:26, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Info The monumental painting "Die Namenlosen" (The Nameless) by Albin Egger-Lienz, Vienna, Museum of Military History, 1916, Tempera on canvas, 476 x 245 cm.
Support -- Hubertl 10:26, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:38, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Question the image should be cropped to remove the frame that may be copyrighted is not it? --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:36, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Why should a golden painted or gilded wooden frame have any inherent copyrights at all? --Hubertl 13:58, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I thought that part was not free. It was a simple question. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 15:28, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 15:28, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Would support a cropped version without the frame. Regards, Christoph Braun (talk) 22:28, 15 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support although losing the frame wouldn't bother me. Daniel Case (talk) 04:45, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment In this very special case, the frame is important for the understandig of Egger-Lienz´ work, because the painting itself has no border. There are so many pictures, also cropped ones (with poor quality) in the web, there exists a smaller, original version (Oil on canvas, not Tempera) in Paris, named Northern France 1916 (119cm). It´s important to show the crop of the men on the left and right side, and far more at the bottom, as Egger-Lienz made by himself. BTW: This image needed no perspective correction to get it straight. --Hubertl 09:19, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressed by this painting since ever --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 05:17, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:58, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 10:12, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 21:00, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- --Isasza (talk) 21:33, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Unique. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 12:24, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:50, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 19:06, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 02:28, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 14:20, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media#Others

The chosen alternative is: File:Albin Egger-Lienz, Die Namenlosen (1916), Heeresgeschichtliches Museum, Wien 0594-Bearbeitet.jpg

File:Ermitage South facade Saint Petersburg.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2015 at 12:47:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Info created, uploaded, nominated by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 12:47, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 12:47, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Chopped right side of the building (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Winter_Palace_Facade_II.jpg). -- Pofka (talk) 16:27, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment the building is not chopped. What you see on the right side is the building behind. --Hubertl 17:48, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment This is the "Winter Palace" which is a distinct building. The Hermitage museum includes also the building on the right which is the new Hermitage --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 17:54, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    - Comment And, I would greatly appreciate if reviewers would be more precise, and look more carefully at the pictures, not only mine, and therefore give more appropriate motivations. Actually I ask @Pofka: to withdraw his vote since it is based on false judgment --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 18:23, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support There are more than just one view of this palace..--Hubertl 17:48, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Yeah, it's not just another picture - it is a panorama. But I really think that panorama of this building should looks something like that. This photo has too many issues are impossible to fix. --Alex Florstein (talk) 18:09, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. The angle doesn't suit me as well. -- Pofka (talk) 20:45, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose This picture doesn't make me go wow. The Winter Palace deserves a more careful choice of composition, lighting. Even though one had to wait hours to capture the moment. I am sorry. --A.Savin 20:44, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Crop on right is unfortunate and kills it really. You have some twins (the man in the blue jacket, and the pair of security guards with caps). -- Colin (talk) 21:57, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Colin. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:07, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Even though some aspects might be considered problematic, it's still a good photo of a large building, one that's no direct front view as taken often. And, as far as I understood, the building is not cropped, correct, Hubertl? Consequently, I can't criticise this, can I? It might only look as if cropped then. --Tremonist (talk) 13:12, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Tremonist. It's been a very long time since I saw this building myself, but I remember just enough about it to believe that you can't get much choosier than this in how to photograph it. Certainly I don't believe you could improve on the color. Oppose after seeing the photo A. Savin linked to. Daniel Case (talk) 17:10, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Symmetrical view is not easy due to the column in front, but nonetheless not impossible... --A.Savin 20:22, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per A.Savin. The composition doesn't appear to be the strongest that is possible for this building. — Julian H.^✈ 18:22, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per A.Savin and... When a façade of a building isn’t parallel to the plane of a photo, you expect to see more than one wall of a building, for such photos are similar to looking at a corner of a building, when you, as a rule, can see two walls of the building. Else a photo can look unnatural, like here: the Winter Palace doesn’t look like a three-dimensional building, but like a plane panel, a theatre set. Dmitry Ivanov (talk) 18:06, 22 November 2015 (UTC).[reply]
- Why not? Baroque is a theater set itself. Moreover, one could have lengthy discussions about perspective but I can't force you to like it. Cheers --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 20:55, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 14:07, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Old Woman of Bhaktapur - Kathmandu.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2015 at 12:25:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info Old Woman of Bhaktapur, Kathmandu. created by A Vahanvaty - uploaded and nominated by by -- The Photographer (talk) 12:25, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Photographer (talk) 12:25, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I really like --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:37, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good scene. --Tremonist (talk) 14:33, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great portrait. --Yann (talk) 16:12, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 16:29, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really nice. 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:45, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support great moment! --Hubertl 17:50, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great. --Laitche (talk) 18:27, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wish it was bigger but hard to fault otherwise. -- Colin (talk) 21:36, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Another one of those National Geographic-level street shots. Daniel Case (talk) 04:00, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:24, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good, simple foto. --Mile (talk) 07:28, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support A bit small for a 16 Mpx sensor, and the processing is right on the edge of maybe being a little bit too much "National Geographic" for Commons, imho. But it is a mighty fine shot, of course. --El Grafo (talk) 10:47, 18 November 2015 (UTC) Dang, I'd like to get my hands on one of those later model APS-C GR's …[reply]
Regretful oppose great, but really too small. --Kadellar (talk) 17:42, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 21:41, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:32, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 02:25, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Trace (talk) 08:02, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
SupportBasik07 (talk) 01:26, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 04:09, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 14:09, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People

File:Overwoekerde nog levende holle Wilg (Salix). Locatie, Natuurterrein De Famberhorst 05.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2015 at 06:44:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants Salex #Family Salicaceae.]]
Info Overgrown living hollow willow (Salix). Location Natuurterrein The Famberhorst. created by Famberhorst - uploaded by Famberhorst - nominated by Famberhorst -- Famberhorst (talk) 06:44, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 06:44, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 08:22, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 12:13, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 13:06, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:11, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:37, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 16:19, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 16:30, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:49, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It may be useful as an image, but for me there is no wow. This is what QI is for imo. -- Colin (talk) 21:23, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Colin. Daniel Case (talk) 00:26, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Colin. --Kikos (talk) 08:13, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Colin. --LC-de (talk) 11:07, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Colin. --Yann (talk) 15:32, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Info about the photo: in my opinion this is not a picture of any tree but the picture tells the story of the latter part of the life cycle of an old willow (Salix). Years ago, the tree came down (partly uprooted). Then the willow has developed new vertical branches. The horizontal stem is split and the core is rotten. In the hollow space are other plants grown and overgrown willow. Although the old tree still alive. So strong nature can be. --Famberhorst (talk) 16:31, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 17:30, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Kadellar (talk) 17:44, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Colin. — Julian H.^✈ 18:09, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Willows indeed have amazing capabilities for surviving all kinds of disturbances – throw a branch on a gravel bank and you may get a new tree! You can see a good example of those capabilities in the image – but only if you know what you are looking for. The first reaction of a casual observer unfortunately will not be something like "Wow, this tree should totally be dead, but look: it's branching out again!" So, yes, it's telling a story, but not very loudly. --El Grafo (talk) 10:02, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: I respect your opinion. Explanation: This willow is at least 50 years old.--Famberhorst (talk) 06:14, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others above. sorry. Amada44 ^{talk to me} 20:10, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support. My vote not enough for promotion, but as morale support. Really nice and interesting scene and FP IMO. Other lighting (weather or time of day) could be help this picture -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:33, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 9 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 14:09, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Groupe Tribal Percussions - 260.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2015 at 22:31:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/People
Info created and uploaded by Medium69 - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:31, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 22:31, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose-- Nope: over-saturated (first uploaded version was much better on this point). Nice to have lots of exif data, but I had also liked to see a color profile. Sting (talk) 22:40, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment On reflection, reviewing my image, you're right. I arranged a little that.
Comment I think you might have went a bit too far with the distortion correction: The two women at the right look pretty strange in the current version (leaning to the right). In the first version, the look fine to me … --El Grafo (talk) 10:14, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I fixed the problem. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:50, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:26, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Funny group. --Tremonist (talk) 13:29, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Great color, great detail, and not the sort of image we usually see here—but all the same it's kind of busy, and the composition doesn't stand out enough. QI, and a very good one at that, but despite considerable and commendable work it just doesn't make it for me. Daniel Case (talk) 01:46, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not a good photo. -- RTA 04:35, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:42, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Herfst in Historisch park Heremastate 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2015 at 16:38:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info Autumn in Historical park Heremastate (Netherlands). created by Famberhorst - uploaded by Famberhorst - nominated by Famberhorst -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:38, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:38, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support great atmosphere in autumn --Ralf Roleček 17:39, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 17:48, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 18:56, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support @Medium69: Why? 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:03, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This image is beautiful, but I'm not particularly charmed. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 19:11, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wish there was more, though. Daniel Case (talk) 00:27, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sakhalinio (talk) 06:11, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support Romantic. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 06:47, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 10:06, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 20:07, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment we should rename it Herbst, it says Herfst ;) --Kadellar (talk) 21:17, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Question You mean File: File ... Herfst? Herfst is Dutch for Autumn.
Support Nice mood. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 08:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:44, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Newman University Church Interior, Dublin, Ireland - Diliff.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Nov 2015 at 14:05:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Diliff -- Diliff (talk) 14:05, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Diliff (talk) 14:05, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Another large room, another pasterpiece by Diliff! --Tremonist (talk) 14:24, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Pasterpiece? :-) It is a real mishmash of architectural and eclesiastical styles with plenty of marble everywhere, but not in a classical Roman/Baroque style. I think it's an interesting interior though, in a sort of ugly duckling way! ;-) Diliff (talk) 17:01, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thanks a lot for the explanations, Diliff! You always do everything so nicely, my appreciation for that! And, of course, I meant "masterpiece" with "m", a worthy term for the artwork of a real master of photography. I think we are all looking forward to seeing lots more of your beautiful photos. --Tremonist (talk) 13:23, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Please add a category above. Yann (talk) 16:08, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Done, sorry about that. Diliff (talk) 16:55, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 16:18, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 16:24, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:44, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hockei (talk) 17:33, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 21:17, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
weak support I think you've extended the vertical field of view too much to little benefit. The nearest light-ring looks ridiculous (let's agree to disagree on the wide-angle-perspective argument here) and the nearest row of pews could be safely removed. A 16:9 crop starting along the nearest ceiling beam creates a stronger composition imo and avoids the worst of the perspective distortions. -- Colin (talk) 21:46, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:08, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hooray for ugly ducklings--Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:28, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:10, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Should be cropped to note, use bottom diagonals and get rid of bench. They are of no significance, just spoil it. PD correction is pretty heavy. --Mile (talk) 07:22, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- While I'm not opposed to cropping it slightly if the image is too wide (maybe it is), I don't think cropping the bottom as much as you have suggested is a good idea as it unbalances the composition and spoils the 'rule of thirds' composition that this image currently has. I think any cropping should be symmetrical. Diliff (talk) 21:21, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 18:21, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:41, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 20:44, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Code (talk) 06:01, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 09:08, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Feat. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 04:07, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:41, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings

File:Salineras de Maras, Maras, Perú, 2015-07-30, DD 12.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Nov 2015 at 17:42:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info Salineras (salt evaporation ponds) in Maras, Peru. The salt is obtained in Maras since the Inca Empire times and the site is currently composed of around 3.000 ponds of 5 square metres (54 sq ft) each. As the location is surrounded by salty mountains, subterrean water deposits the salty wather in the ponds and the water evaporates due to the exposure to the sun. After aprox. 1 month the level of salt reaches 10 centimetres (3.9 in) and is removed in sacks. All by me, Poc o² 17:42, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 17:42, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support LivioAndronico ^(talk) 18:33, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:02, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice detail. Daniel Case (talk) 00:32, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:21, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sakhalinio (talk) 06:11, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Delightful. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 06:50, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 10:05, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kadellar (talk) 10:56, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:23, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support wow ! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:00, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 20:06, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support The crop is suboptimal (would be better wider), but fantastic view nonetheless. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:58, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:46, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Dülmen, Börnste, Weide -- 2015 -- 4646.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Dec 2015 at 17:31:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Germany
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay ^talk 17:31, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay ^talk 17:31, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It seem to me that the focus is further back than it should be. The only part of the whole photo that appears to be in focus is the wire between the first and the second fence post. But that feels like too small a part of the whole photo to put in focus here, at least to me. I would expect at least one sharp post. — Julian H.^✈ 19:22, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose QI yes, but not exceptional enough compositionally for FP. Daniel Case (talk) 19:43, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination A short time of nomination but I think you're. I wasn't sure too. So you gave me good arguments. Thank you. --XRay ^talk 20:08, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Spot-billed duck at Shitennō-ji Honbō Park in Osaka, November 2015.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Dec 2015 at 13:40:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Info created/uploaded/nominated by Laitche (talk) 13:40, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Laitche (talk) 13:40, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support a bit too short cropped but FP in my eyes. --Ralf Roleček 13:44, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose sorry, but a bit too unsharp (incl. false focus point: the eyes must be sharp) and too tight crop for an FP image. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 15:19, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes, the head is unsharp but not a false focus point it's a motion blur... --Laitche (talk) 15:46, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Laitche (talk) 15:51, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chaîne des Puys - 139.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2015 at 13:45:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Medium69 -- Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:45, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:45, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The lighting is not the best, and slightly unsharp. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I love the setup; however the assortment of clouds in the rear undermine it. Daniel Case (talk) 17:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Nice scenery, but per others. --Tremonist (talk) 16:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 12:19, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Departmental Road D177, Prades-sur-Vernazobre 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Nov 2015 at 12:16:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info A road surrounded by the vineyards of the AOC Saint-Chinian, France. All by Christian Ferrer --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:16, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:16, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support I will always look favorably upon a well-done roadscape. Daniel Case (talk) 17:52, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The road winding to the distance is a popular theme, though it would be better if it didn't disappear in the middle. But I think this is let down by the dull weather and the "dead" areas of land. -- Colin (talk) 18:22, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You highlighted his quality : to not be like a postcard, but a bit original. There is a visual impact what is the purpose of an image in addition to reflecting the reality that it is. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:45, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe dull weather is so unusual in the south of France that it is original to you :-) But in UK this is like many QI that reflect reality as it is, but don't excite the eye enough imo. -- Colin (talk) 19:49, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:07, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Sure LivioAndronico ^(talk) 10:56, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral, well done, of course, but I find this picture too trivial. But not trivial enough for a oppose. --Hubertl 11:17, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose sorry Christian, but per Colin. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 11:49, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 15:06, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Colin. --Kikos (talk) 16:57, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support The image works just fine for me. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 15:19, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, the sad weather doesn't help this photo in my opinion. — Julian H.^✈ 17:44, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing special here. I am also not convinced by image quality. --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:09, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:12, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Los Menhires, Parque de La Torre, La Coruña, España, 2015-09-25, DD 01.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2015 at 10:21:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info Family of Menhirs (1994) is a sculpture group by artist Manolo Paz in the city of A Coruña, Spain. The holes in the rocks are designed to frame different views of the park and the bay through them. Created and uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by Kadellar (talk) 10:21, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kadellar (talk) 10:21, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mood… 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 10:51, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support great mood --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 11:22, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you Kadellar! I woke up really early that day to take this picture Poc o² 11:34, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 11:52, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ralf Roleček 13:34, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:40, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Image has some noise, but nevertheless it's superb. --Ivar (talk) 16:46, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great mood and composition! But it's interesting to see how noisy the 5Ds R gets at ISO 320. --Code (talk) 18:40, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Code, I think that noise comes from brightening in post-processing, not directly from camera. --Kadellar (talk) 18:57, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're right Kadellar, that was the case Poc o² 20:21, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Pofka (talk) 20:06, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Love the mood and the mystery. Daniel Case (talk) 04:24, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent lighting and composition. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:35, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 09:30, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sakhalinio (talk) 04:42, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Look very mystical -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --El Grafo (talk) 14:36, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 16:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 04:02, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 15:51, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support i think i can't add anything, it's all said. Dr. Chriss (talk) 00:47, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:44, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:Mahshi.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2015 at 07:31:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink
Info Featured picture on Arabic Wikipedia.created by Fadyatef - uploaded by Fadyatef - nominated by ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 -- ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:31, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:31, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not enough of it in focus and awkwardly cropped. Daniel Case (talk) 17:38, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Daniel. --Tremonist (talk) 16:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:45, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Roque Cinchado und Teide.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Nov 2015 at 10:02:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural
Info all by Der Wolf im Wald -- Wolf im Wald 10:02, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolf im Wald 10:02, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support good shot, clear and sharp. As I said at the QI-process. Maybe a bit too dark in the shadows. --Hubertl 15:16, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Hubertl. --Tremonist (talk) 16:07, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Impressive size, but I think the light (relatively flat, dark shadows) hurts the separation of different shapes and it's oversharpened in my opinion. — Julian H.^✈ 18:29, 18 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 00:31, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good composition, but the near-noon lighting leaves much to be desired. The large rock is almost entirely in shadow and the ground looks scorched. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:35, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think the light highlights the aridity of the scene. Daniel Case (talk) 05:35, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
In my opinion, even deserts are better at the golden hour than noon in general. There's a time and place for a noon shot, like File:Amboy (California, USA), Hist. Route 66 -- 2012 -- 1.jpg, but here it just doesn't cut it for me. (I guess noon works well when you're trying to convey a theme of "endless desert," but here the composition is too complex for that.) Anyways, it's ultimately a matter of personal preference. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pudelek (talk) 10:01, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support and the seventh. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 11:50, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose QI, but per KoH. --Yann (talk) 12:57, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per King. --Ivar (talk) 08:38, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support think the light is good, later in the day the light would be lower and less shadow on the rock but then would be other parts in shadow, so maybe the photograph made the best which was possible... Dr. Chriss (talk) 00:46, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 13:46, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Kite bug - Nemoptera sinuata.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2015 at 13:25:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods
Info Nemoptera sinuata created and uploaded by Zcebeci - nominated by Christian Ferrer --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:25, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:25, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:42, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:14, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good & Useful --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:58, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 20:06, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:34, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Aaaaaand seven. Love those shades of green in the bokeh, and the overall composition ... almost abstract. Daniel Case (talk) 05:55, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Daniel --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:44, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sakhalinio (talk) 04:42, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 10:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 12:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 16:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 11:13, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 15:52, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 17:54, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --99of9 (talk) 05:14, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Dr. Chriss (talk) 00:47, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not very much definition, but a lovely shot. Charles (talk) 11:58, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 02:12, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

File:Strix nebulosa (Chouette lapone) - 393.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2015 at 13:48:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Medium69 -- Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:48, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 13:48, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:13, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:55, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:34, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Code (talk) 18:46, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 20:06, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support ...and 7--LivioAndronico ^(talk) 23:06, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Daniel --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 12:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good pose. Daniel Case (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sakhalinio (talk) 04:42, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 10:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 12:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 16:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 03:58, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:41, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good, especially the eye. Charles (talk) 11:56, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 02:11, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

File:Chicago from North Avenue Beach June 2015 panorama 2.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2015 at 03:48:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes
Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:48, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:48, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Julian H.^✈ 07:27, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:35, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good time for this scene and nice angle. --Laitche (talk) 13:08, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Laitche. --Tremonist (talk) 13:58, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:57, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Posterized and blown reflections of lights on the water. Daniel Case (talk) 17:08, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The light situation is not really convincing. The sky looks very greyish. A real blue hour shot could be much better, I think. Maybe the light comes from the wrong direction, too. I know it's not fair to complain about sharpness at this resolution but the whole picture looks very soft. All in all a nice panorama, but not one of our finest IMO. --Code (talk) 19:04, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pudelek (talk) 17:24, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose good but not good enough for FP. --Pine^✉ 20:27, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very big,I can accept LivioAndronico ^(talk) 10:59, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kadellar (talk) 14:33, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's the third time, I opened this image to realize, why I can't support it spontaneously. On the first sight its, impressive, of course! It's not because of the IMO not avoidable ghosts, it's because the dark parts lacks almost completely of structure. Sorry. --Hubertl 10:21, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 08:44, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes

File:Cytoplasmic streaming.webm, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Dec 2015 at 23:28:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Animated
Info created and uploaded by Heiti Paves - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 23:28, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 23:28, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Could use some cool-sounding synth music typical of this sort of film clip, perhaps, though. And maybe a subtitle in TimedText explaining what we're looking at in a bit more detail. Daniel Case (talk) 22:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very interesting a nd good,need more consideration LivioAndronico ^(talk) 23:27, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 10:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 16:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning. Never seen that before. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 04:18, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kadellar (talk) 15:44, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 14:59, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pofka (talk) 21:47, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Laitche (talk) 08:41, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animated

File:Scenery of Shinji pond at Expo’70 Commemorative Park in Osaka.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Dec 2015 at 09:01:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Laitche (talk) 09:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Laitche (talk) 09:01, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Laitche, I don't know if you are in favour of dodge and burning, but this bright area of grass diminish the final result of your image. -- RTA 14:11, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done @RTA: New version with reducing highlights, Thanks. --Laitche (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Kikos (talk) 14:28, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support this is less sharp at 100% than I would like, but given the large pixel area and that when downsampled it's got nice aesthetics, I'm supporting. --Pine^✉ 18:25, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Colors… 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 23:09, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Nice but a panorama view maybe would be better LivioAndronico ^(talk) 23:26, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:35, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow, great colors! Maybe just a little oversaturated though... --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:29, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Per Livio. Daniel Case (talk) 04:44, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Sakhalinio (talk) 04:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice compositon, on the edge to a bit too much darkness in the shadow areas, but nonetheless FP for me.--Hubertl 10:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 16:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Mere Zen Buddhism. --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 16:26, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Code (talk) 06:35, 25 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Strong image, beautifully composed. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:09, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 21:29, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Just stunning! -- Pofka (talk) 21:46, 27 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 14:36, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:199 - Buenos Aires - Aéroport international Ezeiza - Janvier 2010.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2015 at 19:58:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
Info created and uploaded by S23678 - nominated by Arion -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:58, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great airport architecture! -- 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 19:58, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:30, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 06:20, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:41, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 13:45, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tremonist (talk) 14:21, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Don't think the projection is a good choice. The sides become dominant and highly distorted and the people in the centre become tiny. An airport terminal is a place for people but the people are practically invisible. -- Colin (talk) 18:02, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support works for me. --Pine^✉ 20:24, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Johann Jaritz (talk) Johann Jaritz 04:24, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Trace (talk) 07:58, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I think the quality in the top area is not what it should be. It's not sharp at 6 MP. — Julian H.^✈ 08:50, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support. If you want to do a 180 panorama, you can't really avoid these kinds of projections. The unsharp area at the top is not great, but it's due to upsampling as a result of the projection. It's better than downsampling other parts of the projection. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:45, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Σπάρτακος (talk) 21:28, 26 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 12:21, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:41, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors

File:Big Dipper Ursa Major over Old Faithful geyser Yellowstone National Park Wyoming Astrophotography.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2015 at 05:24:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy
Info created by Astroval1 - uploaded by Astroval1 - nominated by Astroval1 -- Astroval1 (talk) 05:24, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Astroval1 (talk) 05:24, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, the image quality here is not good enough even considering the very difficult conditions. — Julian H.^✈ 07:31, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The quality is really too low. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 10:37, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Impressive view, but per others. --Tremonist (talk) 13:56, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: per above. -- KTC (talk) 21:40, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Alternative version[edit]

Info I reduced noise in Photoshop. Sky colors keep the same (it is Airglow). I am living in NYC with big light pollution. From home use technology to cleaning up light pollution, but such post processing not working for real dark sky – it is also clean up real colors of airglow. For airglow sky noise reduction a little bit different. Sorry, I hope it is better now. Thanks! Astroval1 (talk) 8:00, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, but at maximum size still not acceptable. --Tremonist (talk) 14:35, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A pity! Great composition! 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 18:25, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative version 2[edit]

Info Thanks for comments, I learn a lot! One more attempt. Thanks! Astroval1 (talk) 1:52, 25 November 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:11, 28 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Osmussaare edelanurk.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Nov 2015 at 23:44:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places
Info all by Kruusamägi (talk) 23:44, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 23:44, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment fine picture, but it´s slightly tilted cw. --Hubertl 06:19, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Info New crop with perspective correction uploaded, please revert, if it's not better. --Ivar (talk) 10:57, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nothing about this should work, but it does. Daniel Case (talk) 17:49, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose While there is some composition balance between the tree and the house, I don't find the scene special enough for FP. It is a bit soft also. -- Colin (talk) 18:15, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Colin. --Pine^✉ 20:23, 20 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Colin. --Medium⁶₉ ^{You wanted talk to me?} 01:06, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 14:43, 21 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hubertl 10:08, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I think the tree and house are too far apart, with nothing else in the composition to generate interest. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:42, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support --Tremonist (talk) 15:18, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Laitche (talk) 08:58, 29 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The arms of the Bourbon family supported by Virtue.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vista de Tarazona, España, 2015-01-02, DD 07.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Roque Cinchado mit Teide.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Phipps Conservatory winter 2015 Broderie Room.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Drottningholm Palace (by Pudelek) 4.jpg