User talk:LC-de
Archives:
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Leccinum variicolor LC0365.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Leccinum versipelle LC0366.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sympetrum vulgatum LC0368.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cervus elaphus LC0367.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Laccaria amethystina LC0370.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Craterellus tubaeformis LC0374.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tricholoma fulvum LC0373.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lepista nuda LC0372.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Clavulina rugosa LC0369.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion[edit]
|
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Lepista nuda LC0372.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lepista nuda LC0372.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Austerdalen LC0364.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Austerdalen LC0364.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
Hi ; new level 4 for you ?--Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 16:05, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
PH-4 | This user is able to take professional quality photographs. |
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Haematopus ostralegus LC0378.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chroicocephalus scopulinus LC0381.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Celmisia semicordata LC0379.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
IP troll[edit]
Those comments were very likely made by a IP troll who pops up occasionally to take pot shots at reviewers. We don't permit IP to vote and nor should they have any say in how others vote or criticise voting. Before restoring his remarks, you might want to consider whether you are improving Commons or just permitting a coward to be nasty. -- Colin (talk) 18:41, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- You can take contribution to the FPC discussion as an answer here. Additionally Kelvin also made an important point: IPs don't write comments, users do. But in most cases you cannot just simply infer from an IP that the comment came from the same user... --LC-de (talk) 20:38, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
- Replied there. Both of you are lacking the facts and your comments have nothing to do with FPC. Now, if you want to discuss how we review images and assess them as "among our finest" then I'll happily talk to you. If you want to encourage IP trolls... -- 20:45, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Leccinum variicolor LC0365.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Leccinum variicolor LC0365.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/KTC (talk) 23:09, 12 March 2015 (UTC)
FPC[edit]
Hi, Derogatory comment like this does not bring anything useful, and Colin was right to revert it. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:08, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- The starter was adressing some problems with his critics (which are often enough hard on the edge of being derogatory themselves) and then deleting the comment criticizing himself. This looks at least a bit odd to me. If someone is fond of giving harsh critics he should also be able to stand harsh responses. The further reaction then brings me to the conclusion, that the IP might made some valid points here. But I partially agree with you: It was a completely useless comment to a completely useless starter. I won't follow up this discussion anymore. Too much fecal words flying around... but interesting enough: not from the IP... --LC-de (talk) 10:24, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- I wouldn't have reverted it if made by a logged-in user prepared to stick his user name against it, but it's a familiar IP troll. I'm fine with harsh responses by users who sign their posts with a name, what I'm not so happy about is the "please respect my opinions" response which is falsely trying to use some invented etiquette to say "don't critise my review". Equally phony is the "all opinions are equal" viewpoint, when used for the same purpose. Many people at FPC forum are interested in improving both their photographic and their review skills (myself included) and welcome rational criticism of both. Those who can't handle and learn from criticism need to do some growing up. Since I'm not actually editing votes or deleting candidates, the "playing God" idea is just a random insult of no use. For all my concerns expressed, they are just words, nothing more, and people can respond with intelligent discussion or ignore as they see fit. But insults from IPs, we can do without: by definition they are not part of this community and have no vote and no voice. Logging in isn't that hard. -- Colin (talk) 10:56, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
- So is it a familiar IP troll? What makes you confident that it is always the same user behind a given IP if they are dynamically assigned? And where is the difference to a logged-in user? It could give you more confidence, that this is really the same user. So on one side you delete comments because you think its from a certain user, but you cannot be sure, but if you can be sure, you wouldn't do it? Sounds a bit odd to me from a logical point of view.
- I also would strongly oppose the opinion, that IPs are not part of the community. Of course they are. The whole Wiki philosophy is based on the principle that everyone can take part who wants to. This also includes users who don't want to create accounts, log in, forgot it, whatever. The fact, that the configuration used for this project doesn't prevent IP comments can be seen as a manifestation of this principle.
- So I would oppose any comment deletion as long as it wasn't offensive, out of topic or in other ways against agreed rules. It might be impolite to bring up controversal accusations without logging in. It is impolite to just delete those comments as well. --LC-de (talk) 11:48, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is the encyclopaedia anyone can edit. Commons is not. You can't upload files without an account and you can't vote at FP without an account. By and large, IPs don't edit here and don't participate at FP. There's no such "wiki philosophy". You know quite well why someone might post trolling comments as an IP. There are no reasons for such behaviour that improve Commons. -- Colin (talk) 12:06, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
- I wouldn't have reverted it if made by a logged-in user prepared to stick his user name against it, but it's a familiar IP troll. I'm fine with harsh responses by users who sign their posts with a name, what I'm not so happy about is the "please respect my opinions" response which is falsely trying to use some invented etiquette to say "don't critise my review". Equally phony is the "all opinions are equal" viewpoint, when used for the same purpose. Many people at FPC forum are interested in improving both their photographic and their review skills (myself included) and welcome rational criticism of both. Those who can't handle and learn from criticism need to do some growing up. Since I'm not actually editing votes or deleting candidates, the "playing God" idea is just a random insult of no use. For all my concerns expressed, they are just words, nothing more, and people can respond with intelligent discussion or ignore as they see fit. But insults from IPs, we can do without: by definition they are not part of this community and have no vote and no voice. Logging in isn't that hard. -- Colin (talk) 10:56, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hemiphaga novaeseelandiae LC0383.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Veronica subalpina LC0382.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Celmisia plants LC0380.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Aid[edit]
Sorry, I can't understand your words. Can you say your words in simple English, please?
You say: "Please don't apply this ominous rule before there is a real consensus about it which isn't found during a ad-hoc-eastern-holiday-pseudo-vote."
I can not understand the end of the sentence (...isn't found during a ad-hoc-eastern-holiday-pseudo-vote). Thanks--Lmbuga (talk) 20:25, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
- Just wanted to express that this vote was a farce. And this 4MP rule is not in place so far. Just take a look at Commons:QIC --LC-de (talk) 21:13, 21 April 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Prunus cerasifera LC0385.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Goura victoria LC0384.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion[edit]
|
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Leccinum versipelle LC0366.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Leccinum versipelle LC0366.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:08, 26 April 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tamiops swinhoei LC0386.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Polygonia c-album LC0390.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Fragaria vesca LC0389.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Lacerta agilis LC0388.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen[edit]
Hallo LC-de,
nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.
Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.
Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.
Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.
( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aeonium glandulosum LC0391.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 August 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aeonium glandulosum LC0392.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aeonium glandulosum LC0393.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Saxifraga cotyledon LC0395.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 02:06, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Maniola jurtina LC0396.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Maniola jurtina LC0397.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 August 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Maniola jurtina LC0398.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Branta sandvicensis LC399.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Earth 2016[edit]
Hallo LC-de,
Du erhältst diese Nachricht als Teilnehmer von Wiki Loves Earth 2014 oder 2015. Dieses Jahr wird sich Deutschland wieder am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth beteiligen. Wir würden uns über weitere Bilder von Dir freuen. Der Zeitraum für das Hochladen der Naturbilder ist vom 1. bis 31. Mai 2016.
Für die Weitergabe an den internationalen Wettbewerb ist ab diesem Jahr eine Mindestauflösung von 2 Megapixeln erforderlich. Bitte gib an, in welchem Schutzgebiet oder an welchem Schutzobjekt (z.B. Naturdenkmal, Geotop) die Fotos gemacht wurden. Wenn Bilder gar nicht zugeordnet werden können, gelangen sie nicht in die Wertung. In die Bilder eingefügte Zusätze wie der Name des Fotografen, Datum, Beschreibung oder ein Rahmen sind unerwünscht.
Seit der letzten Runde sind unter anderem Listen aller FFH-Gebiete und EU-Vogelschutzgebiete in Deutschland erstellt worden, die nun ebenfalls auf Bilder warten.
Dieses Jahr wird eine Vorjury die Vorauswahl der Bilder nach den Wettbewerbsregeln übernehmen. Als Teilnehmer aus den Vorjahren kannst Du Dich daran beteiligen. Bei Interesse bitte unter WLE-Vorjury eintragen, ein Zugangscode kommt per E-Mail.
Viel Spaß und Erfolg wünscht im Namen des Organisationsteams,
--Blech (talk) 23:40, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
File:Boloria selene LC0293.jpg[edit]
Guten tag, this picture actually shows Boloria euphrosyne. Would you please make the correction here and in the wikipedia pages that use it ?--LamBoet (talk) 16:02, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Never mind, I did the corrections--LamBoet (talk) 22:13, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dictamnus albus LC0401.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 June 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Anemone sylvestris LC0403.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dictamnus albus LC0402.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 18 June 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gentiana nivalis LC0404.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Orobanche lutea LC0405.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Austerdalsbreen LC0406.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion[edit]
|
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Austerdalsbreen LC0406.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Austerdalsbreen LC0406.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 21 August 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Echium pininana LC0407.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Genista benehoavensis LC409.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Echium wildpretii LC0408.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Viola palmensis LC0412.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion[edit]
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Echium brevirame LC0411.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Wiki Science Competition 2017 has started[edit]
|
It is a world event.
This is a manually inserted message for commons users with knowledge of the English language who are also globally active or who have uploaded images related to the competition's themes (science buildings, microscopic images, scientists, wildlife...).
|
