Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/July 2013

File:Heic1311a.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2013 at 03:40:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

This image shows the two galaxies interacting. NGC 2936, once a standard spiral galaxy, and NGC 2937, a smaller elliptical, bear a striking resemblance to a penguin guarding its egg.

Info created by NASA, ESA Y Hubble Heritage Team - uploaded by Fabian RRRR - nominated by LuisArmandoRasteletti -- LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 03:40, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 03:40, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support not the usual space image. Penyulap ☏ 08:15, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I make an alternative for you, I use a string of tools too long to mention. It's awesome fun, I think everyone loves to manipulate space images, although I don't have any liquid helium for an image sensor or lasers to create 'artificial stars' it's fun just the same. I can do more with the image, if you do not mind, and please make suggestions too. Penyulap ☏ 09:37, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:05, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mainz Theodor-Heuss-Bruecke blaue Stunde Panorama.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2013 at 08:53:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by -- Arcalino (talk) 08:53, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Info this image was already nominated, but not featured. The criticized errors were fixed, there is some unavoidable motion blur on the ship's mast because of the long exposure time.
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 08:53, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's near impossible to take a long exposure of lights over the water and boats, without noticing all the boats blur. I know what that's like :) this is a very well done example, lucky it's protected water and so calm. Nice. Penyulap ☏ 11:51, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 12:28, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Removing around eight spots in the sky is better. --Laitche (talk) 13:53, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support as I did. --Kadellar (talk) 14:40, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ArildV (talk) 06:50, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --Julian H. (talk/files) 17:40, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Please check the sky, there are some dust spots. --Ivar (talk) 18:38, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Info Dust spots removed. Thanks for your reviews. Arcalino (talk) 20:50, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Trace (talk) 21:25, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:48, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:08, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas

File:Quarzo morione.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2013 at 16:37:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Yiyi - uploaded by Yiyi - nominated by Yiyi -- Yiyi (talk) 16:37, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Yiyi (talk) 16:37, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment—Can you lighten the background?—Kelvinsong (talk) 16:22, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Mmm... I'm afraid, I'm not able... -- Yiyi (talk) 09:10, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OpposeToo blurry areas f / 5.6 is not a good choice. The lighting is bad. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:02, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:09, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sapo común (Bufo bufo), Hartelholz, Múnich, Alemania, 2013-04-15, DD 11.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jun 2013 at 18:49:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Common toad (Bufo bufo), Hartelholz, Munich, Germany. All by me, Poc o² 18:49, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 18:49, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cute, and a very high def, high res image.--Earth100 (talk) 13:13, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Poc o² 18:15, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:04, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blackness Castle, Blackness, Scotland.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2013 at 06:39:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by West Lothian Archaeology / Dr John Wells - uploaded by Dr John Wells - nominated by Pine -- Pine^✉ 06:39, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pine^✉ 06:39, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It may be worthwhile reading the en:Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Blackness Castle, Blackness, Scotland..jpg first. This is a difficult subject, shot in a novel way using a compact waterproof camera. More details here. Colin (talk) 15:46, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:33, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hrad Beckov - panorama 1.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2013 at 14:50:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 14:50, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 14:50, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not bad. --Llorenzi (talk) 17:02, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The lighting is a bit flat. That plus the off perspective with the piece of wall obscuring the corner of the fort, makes it rather hard to get a feeling of depth in the image. I suppose a different viewpoint would have been better. --Dschwen (talk) 16:51, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:28, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schilthorn with Bernese Alps, 2012 August.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2013 at 18:44:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Ximonic - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 18:44, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 18:44, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not bad. --Llorenzi (talk) 17:01, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful! --Earth100 (talk) 13:12, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 17:06, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 15:04, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Arcalino (talk) 15:06, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 16:46, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 18:25, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:05, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:32, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 06:47, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas

File:Strömsberg bruk June 2013 15.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2013 at 20:20:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info The Lancashire forge of Strömsbergs bruk. Strömsberg is a old iron mill and village in Tierp Municipality, Sweden. created, uploaded and nominated by -- ArildV (talk) 20:20, 22 June 2013 (UTC) (V-wolf have taken some of the images used for images notes, and also loaned me a tripod. thanks!)[reply]
Support -- ArildV (talk) 20:20, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support hehe, the tripod was a bit crooked, if you like me to, I could rotate the image for you. Otherwise, quite nice. Penyulap ☏ 08:13, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks. Please do rotate the images.--ArildV (talk) 08:24, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Info New version uploaded with small tilt correction.--ArildV (talk) 15:10, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:24, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 21:07, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 08:53, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:29, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Agrigent BW 2012-10-07 12-52-27.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2013 at 08:13:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created - uploaded - nominated by -- Berthold Werner (talk) 08:13, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:26, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:CST-100.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2013 at 08:39:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by NASA - uploaded by Ras67 - nominated by Alborzagros -- Alborzagros (talk) 08:39, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alborzagros (talk) 08:39, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose quite ordinary. I draw comparable doodles in an hour. Real stuff takes time, or at least more than an hour. Penyulap ☏ 06:42, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose—Not special and fairly unrealistic.—Kelvinsong (talk) 02:22, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gildir (talk) 22:08, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:23, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Schloss Moyland Panorama, 1.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2013 at 17:55:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Rainer Lippert, Alchemist-hp - uploaded by Rainer Lippert - nominated by me (suggested by Tuxyso) -- J Kadavoor J e e 17:55, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- J Kadavoor J e e 17:55, 23 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Penyulap ☏ 06:19, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Böhringer (talk) 10:08, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice! --Arcalino (talk) 15:08, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 00:58, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:32, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^{talk 21:23, 29 June 2013 (UTC)}[reply]

Neutral Focal length of 9 mm + apparent perspective correction: The shape of the towers is unnatural. -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 22:59, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Die Türme sind in Natura leicht oval und haben eine flache Seite zum Innenhof hin, siehe Google-Maps. Ferner ist das Bild ein Stitching aus etlichen Einzelbildern die zuerst eine Verzeichnungskorrektur unterzogen wurden. Grüße, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 11:53, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alchemist-hp points out that the tower, in real life, has a deliberate 'unnatural' shape in its architecture. The image is not a single photograph, it is a synthesis of multiple images. Penyulap ☏ 12:04, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thanks for clarifying. -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 04:44, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:24, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Bibliothèque du Grand Séminaire de Strasbourg 12.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2013 at 18:38:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Ctruongngoc - uploaded by Ctruongngoc - nominated by Paralacre -- Paralacre (talk) 18:38, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Info View of Strasbourg in the Nuremberg Chronicle, 15th century.
Support -- Paralacre (talk) 18:38, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:19, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Common Blackbird.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2013 at 15:04:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Andreas Trepte - uploaded by Andreas Trepte - nominated by BNK -- BNK(talk) 15:04, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- BNK(talk) 15:04, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 09:24, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 18:09, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 03:55, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice shot :) --PierreSelim (talk) 05:58, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good timing for the best moment --Arcalino (talk) 12:58, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 10:11, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:07, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support well done and useful. -- Trace (talk) 20:31, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Arctic Kangaroo (✉ • ✎) 15:41, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:36, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:34, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:17, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

File:IPhone5black.png, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2013 at 12:17:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Pixeden.com - uploaded by TheMostAmazingTechnik - nominated by TheMostAmazingTechnik -- TheMostAmazingTechnik (talk) 12:17, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- TheMostAmazingTechnik (talk) 12:17, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose—No wow, exactly what is this good for, it's not even useful for app artwork because of the specular highlight. It's just a stock image. And why is it a bitmap?—Kelvinsong (talk) 02:29, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice to see a phone not portrayed in the usual Japanese anime style presentation, or the black and white 'I'm such a brilliant photographer' style. This is exactly the sort of image phone fans use to identify the different models. Penyulap ☏ 11:55, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 04:41, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:48, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:08, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lacerta agilis female 2013 G2.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jul 2013 at 05:15:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded by George Chernilevsky - nominated by -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:15, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Info Photo of the sand lizard taken in wild. This is a small lizard. Length of the head is less than 20 mm. In the bottom of the head traces of teeth (black dots) are visible. It is "kiss" (catch) of a male.
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 05:15, 24 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 07:59, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 14:38, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:05, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Arcalino (talk) 13:02, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The long fiber above the eye is a bit disturbing. -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 21:31, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 10:09, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:20, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 12:32, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:07, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Reptiles

File:Megaloceroea recticornis MHNT.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2013 at 17:17:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by -- Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:17, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:17, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:01, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 08:20, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Joydeep _Talk 13:20, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 15:47, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 17:15, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ~y (talk) 21:07, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 03:53, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 10:10, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Trace (talk) 20:31, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 12:28, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:35, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:19, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

File:Cree Indian (HS85-10-13885) edit.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2013 at 23:00:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by G.E. Fleming, restored, uploaded and nominated by Christoph Braun (talk) 23:00, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I discovered this one working through in the Commons:Picturing Canada collection, which has a few I'm hoping to send to FPC in future. Aesthetically, it's probably one of the two or three stand-out images. Historically, this was taken in 1903 in western Canada, just as the life of the prairies was changing dramatically; it's a significant moment of social history. Andrew Gray (talk) 23:12, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 04:35, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Turn685 (talk) 11:52, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good work! --Arcalino (talk) 12:53, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great! Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 10:51, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:56, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great work. -- Trace (talk) 20:33, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good work! --— D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 13:45, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 14:57, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:40, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- GerardM (talk) 18:22, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:43, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 19:00, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People

File:BMW Welt, Múnich, Alemania, 2013-04-22, DD 19.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2013 at 18:17:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Night view of the BMW Welt, Munich, Germany. All by me, Poc o² 18:17, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 18:17, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Underexposed Sorry --The Photographer (talk) 20:43, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No problem, lightened up Poc o² 21:12, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above. Daniel Case (talk) 15:25, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice colors --Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 03:45, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Joydeep _Talk 18:26, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 07:45, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Mono 21:27, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:08, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poc o² 11:11, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Coat of arms of Seychelles.svg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2013 at 22:44:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by User:Sodacan - uploaded by Sodacan - nominated by Turn685. A detailed vector illustration of the Coat of Arms of the Republic of Seychelles.
Support -- Turn685 (talk) 22:44, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Glasshouse (talk) 02:27, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Photographer (talk) 17:34, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support, I’m awestruck! --Paralacre (talk)
Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 12:29, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support—Love, Kelvinsong talk 00:21, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 07:22, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 07:16, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Poc o² 11:15, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Computer-generated

File:Drottningholm June 2013 03.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2013 at 19:28:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Drottningholm palace and palace church seen from Teaterplanen (the Theatre Square). Created, uploaded and nominated by -- ArildV (talk) 19:28, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ArildV (talk) 19:28, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good quality! Nice! --Arcalino (talk) 20:56, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice and IMO would be much better with a crop of 250px at the low part --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:19, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Sharp, but the composition and lighting seems bland imo. Perhaps a crop of the bottom street and the building cut off on the left would help... —Mono 21:29, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poc o² 11:11, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Elfin Saddle Gyromitra infula.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2013 at 19:42:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by -- H. Krisp (talk) 19:42, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as author -- H. Krisp (talk) 19:42, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:59, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Joydeep _Talk 13:20, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 17:24, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ~y (talk) 21:08, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 03:57, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bad lighting; distracting background. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:56, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:09, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 09:45, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:35, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:29, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Poc o² 11:19, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Fungi

File:Falco tinnunculus (Linnaeus, 1758).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2013 at 14:33:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Michael Gäbler - uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 14:33, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 14:33, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice --Arcalino (talk) 15:25, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support A nice sharp portrait. Shame the beak is damaged (is that because it is a captive bird?) and not full body shot. Colin (talk) 15:26, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The falconer Ludger Kluthausen do not cut the beaks in his own falcon house in the Wildpark Neuhaus. See his own Harris's Hawk by his falcon house in the Wildpark Neuhaus. The beak by the Harris's Hawk is not damaged. I don't know what happened.--Michael Gäbler (talk) 18:12, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 18:21, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
IMHO that is not one of your best falcon portrayals (and you can do VERY well). Question I wonder why you choose a relatively low resolution. I guess the bird was sitting on the falconer hand, right? With regard to the shooting conditions I tend to vote with slight oppose. --Tuxyso (talk) 18:27, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The kestrel sat leaning forward in front of me and his legs were back. The depth of field was not large enough to represent the whole body and the legs sharp. Therefore, I contented myself with this Half length portrait of kestrels. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 19:34, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:50, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's a nice sharp image, but I'm not happy with the composition. I feel either a head-only portrait or a full body (which I read was not possible due to conditions) portrait would have been better. -- ~y (talk) 22:34, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As per ~y. --Laitche (talk) 05:25, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not often you get this kind of portrait pose with a bird. Daniel Case (talk) 15:27, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:43, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 13:35, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 21:26, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 10:14, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Poc o² 11:14, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

File:Lindau Harbor Lake Constance MS Schwaben 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2013 at 17:35:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by me. --Julian H. (talk/files) 17:35, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as author. -- Julian H. (talk/files) 17:35, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice picture of a wonderful place --Arcalino (talk) 17:45, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support High quality, good light, very nice composition. --Tuxyso (talk) 18:21, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful Poc o² 18:22, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 18:40, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Trace (talk) 21:24, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 08:33, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Joydeep _Talk 13:20, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 17:15, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 03:44, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 18:00, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Poc o² 11:13, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Orchis-mascula-Formation.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jul 2013 at 11:45:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Orchis mascula (the early purple orchid)

Info created by Tuxyso - uploaded by Tuxyso - nominated by Tuxyso Note that this a a very tiny flower. The height is about 10 centimeters. -- Tuxyso (talk) 11:45, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 11:45, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 15:07, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support—Kelvinsong (talk) 16:22, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 19:05, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 10:09, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:23, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:33, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 11:17, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Poc o² 11:18, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Flowers

File:Panorama Bled 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2013 at 13:21:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Mihael Grmek - uploaded by Mihael Grmek - nominated by Mihael Grmek -- Mihael Grmek (talk) 13:21, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mihael Grmek (talk) 13:21, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment ~~Posterization in the sky and water and~~ a bit distortions, the rest is very nice :) --Laitche (talk) 14:57, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't see any posterisation. A lovely image. Colin (talk) 15:36, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

~~I added the image notes of posterization :)~~ Deleted. --Laitche (talk) 16:13, 26 June 2013 (UTC)--Laitche (talk) 17:00, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I can see the posterization in my monitor(Dell U2413) definitely but I can't see any posterization my another monitor(Dell U2412M). That's very surprising! --Laitche (talk) 16:32, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I think that depends on the monitor setting so I withdraw the above comment about posterization. --Laitche (talk) 16:57, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The buildings on the right are leaning out, it needs a perspective correction, otherwise great! Poc o² 18:26, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Laitche and Poco have sharp eye. I like it anyway, nice winter-time panorama. --Mile (talk) 20:39, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Question Did you use any post-processing filters like NIK Color Efex or something else?. If not I can just say: Wow, you captured a very nice mood. Personally I am not fully convinced of the left bank line because it leads out of the picture. But it would not change my support. --Tuxyso (talk) 06:07, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment No, no filters were used for this picture. Not on site as not in post production. I took this photo in early morning (about 6am) in very cold morning (about -15°C). I had just about 20' of such conditions, so I was lucky to be there at the right time. I will try to correct the distortion on the right side of the image as soon as I can, TNX. --Mihael Grmek (Mihael Grmek) 10:25, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Then: Very nice. You took the right moment. --Tuxyso (talk) 12:37, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support WOW! --Pudelek (talk) 14:56, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support before the distortions will be corrected :) --Laitche (talk) 15:20, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:00, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Distortion Corrected. --Mihael Grmek (Mihael Grmek) 20:13, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Cannot see any real difference, buildings in both sides are still leaning out Poc o² 18:08, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 10:45, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 17:25, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great colors! --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:48, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support of course. --Kadellar (talk) 22:01, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Poc o² 11:16, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Ardea cinerea 2013-06-29.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2013 at 18:45:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info All by Laitche -- Laitche (talk) 18:45, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Laitche (talk) 18:45, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support, can you find a category for the location (Birds in Japan?)-- Paralacre (talk)

Added Category:Birds of Japan. Thanks --Laitche (talk) 04:53, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Ivar (talk) 11:12, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:01, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Trace (talk) 20:35, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The exposure of the bird looks bad to me. Arctic Kangaroo (✉ • ✎) 15:39, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Arcalino (talk) 19:46, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 17:02, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:22, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 18:37, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mehdi^Talk 05:03, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /{{{sig}}}

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

File:B. Obama, A. Merkel and K. Wowereit at the Brandenburg Gate 2013.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2013 at 19:05:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by an employee of the U.S. Federal Government - uploaded by Excolis - nominated by Excolis -- Excolis (talk) 19:05, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Excolis (talk) 19:05, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose due to composition. Blurry heads are too distracting as well. Saffron Blaze (talk) 02:20, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Great subject, but some counter-clockwise rotation (could be corrected) and blurry heads in the foreground (maybe a different shot from the same event?). --Julian H. (talk/files) 08:14, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Poor composition. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:50, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poc o² 17:23, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hoher Kasten Paragliding.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2013 at 20:57:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Endrjuch - uploaded by Endrjuch - nominated by Endrjuch -- Endrjuch (talk) 20:57, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Endrjuch (talk) 20:57, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I believe this nomination was not listed in the date it was submitted. The same bug happened to another picture few days ago. The nomination should be submitted again. --G Furtado (talk) 12:09, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I belive you are right – what would be the appropriate procedure for cases like this? Concerning for the photograph itslef: I'm torn here. First of all, the subject is great and the composition is excellent. But then there is the high amount of mist/fog in the air. On the one hand this is – to some point – normal for aerial pictures covering a bigger distance and it makes the paraglider stand out against the background. But on the other hand this leads to the fact that huge parts of the image (everything but the paraglider) has this milky-white blanket all over it … --El Grafo (talk) 08:16, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the page was created on June 19th and not indexed in the candidate list until June 28th, but since this nomination did not get any supporting votes (apart from author) after 5 days, the rule 8.1 applies for a speedy decline. The nomination shall not submitted again, sorry. Poc o² 17:37, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poc o² 17:37, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zizina otis, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 04 10 2012.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2013 at 08:07:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Zizina otis (Lesser Grass Blue). Created / uploaded / nominated by Joydeep _Talk 08:07, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Joydeep _Talk 08:07, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 08:48, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Can the clipped whites be corrected? I also don't find the quality to be exceptionally good, definitely in comparison to some photos we had here recently. --Julian H. (talk/files) 09:53, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quality and level of detail does not reach FP bar, sorry. Nonetheless a nice and useful photo. --Tuxyso (talk) 10:11, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Idem --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:52, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Over-saturated. --Arctic Kangaroo (✉ • ✎) 15:40, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oversaturated? There may be some quality issues but is it really oversaturated? -- Joydeep _Talk 16:33, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination -- Joydeep _Talk 17:58, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bratislava (Pressburg, Pozsony) - panorama.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2013 at 14:52:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 14:52, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 14:52, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice and very good quality --Arcalino (talk) 08:25, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A pity it doesn't show the futuristic bridge on the right.--G Furtado (talk) 12:11, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 07:51, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Namaqua Chamäleon-01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jul 2013 at 14:58:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Hans Stieglitz - uploaded by Hans Stieglitz - nominated by BNK -- BNK(talk) 14:58, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- BNK(talk) 14:58, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support too --Paralacre (talk)
Support Ю. Данилевский (talk) 17:34, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 18:09, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral The light's a little too harsh and angle could have been better from ground-level. -- ~y (talk) 21:37, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 03:56, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 21:15, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 10:11, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:33, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 07:52, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Reptiles

File:Rowing boat on a house roof - Fira - Santorini - Greece - 02.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2013 at 21:08:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Norbert Nagel (talk) 21:08, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 21:08, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great shot. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:54, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 13:34, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Trace (talk) 20:39, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice colors, lighting, subject, ... FP! Poc o² 21:26, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:44, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Moonik (talk) 12:20, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 12:45, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:38, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 19:43, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 13:30, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 17:02, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:18, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Joydeep _Talk 18:22, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 07:53, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles

File:Réfectoire de l'abbaye Saint-Jean des Vignes.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jul 2013 at 19:50:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Yoann Gonthier - nominated by Johann Grimm -- ♣ Johann G. 19:50, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ♣ Johann G. 19:50, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 07:54, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:BMW Welt, Múnich, Alemania, 2013-04-22, DD 05.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2013 at 18:19:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Touratech BMW F800GS motorbike hanging of the BMW Welt roof, Munich, Germany. All by me, Poc o² 18:19, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 18:19, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 03:52, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Norbert Nagel (talk) 21:11, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:06, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Very artistic, nice composition and colors -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:42, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Original composition. Nice. --Kadellar (talk) 21:56, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 07:19, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 15:24, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 17:01, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 18:30, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles

File:Skeppsbron june 2013.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2013 at 05:55:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Skeppsbron seen from Södermalm. Stockholm, Sweden. The picture was taken about an hour and a half after sunset (23.35), to capture the beautiful summer nights in Stockholm. Single exposure. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 05:55, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ArildV (talk) 05:55, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 06:21, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice. -- Moonik (talk) 07:04, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:57, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Frank Schulenburg (talk) 12:51, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rjcastillo (talk) 15:24, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alex Florstein (talk) 17:01, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kadellar (talk) 17:59, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Trace (talk) 19:21, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:12, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Lovely scene. There's a dust-spot up the top left that would be nice to eliminate. -- Colin (talk) 21:29, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you. dust spot removed. I'm honored by the support.--ArildV (talk) 22:12, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wonderful. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:31, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice dusk. -- Laitche (talk) 04:06, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Arcalino (talk) 10:32, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Joydeep _Talk 18:22, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Julian H. (talk/files) 18:23, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 19:44, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Turn685 (talk) 21:25, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Like a postcard... /á^(!) 19:29, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mehdi^Talk 05:04, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 17:17, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --19:30, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 18:31, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Tennis club cienfuegos.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2013 at 14:55:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Nino Verde - uploaded by Nino Verde - nominated by Nino Verde --Nino Verde (talk) 14:55, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've received here and in some other places comments about excessive posprocessing and surrealistic view. Here posprocessing really exists, but is not so much as you mention it. To prove it i gave you link to plain JPEG (conversion+resize only) and also link to RAW+XMP (sorry but xmp is made by Photoshop CC). This is shot in such way. Probably overexposing is present on the white building, but it has no visible texture, thus it is neglible. --Nino Verde (talk) 08:13, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Question "Transplanted" sky? Looks surrealistic. --Alex Florstein (talk) 17:22, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Nope. I can show you raw file with this image. --Nino Verde (talk) 18:35, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No need, I believe you. It is excellent composition, but shades are pretty strange anyway, and for some reason I can't feel the depth of the picture. --Alex Florstein (talk) 21:36, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The PP has created such flat lighting it has lost all depth. Saffron Blaze (talk) 02:23, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It is not PP. Check my notes, i've added at Info. --Nino Verde (talk) 08:13, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's a beautiful building and a fine composition but it also has the look of very aggressive shadow/highlight application. Saffron Blaze (talk) 10:50, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose horrible IMO--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 03:50, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The plain JPEG doesn't have the depth issue and is not oversaturated. IMO, the unnatural oversaturation of the sky and the foreground vegetation is the main problem, and they are not present in the plain JPEG version. A secondary issue is that the clouds look like they have suffered from something like Clarity (LR term, I don't know what it's called in PS) so that they have dark halos around them. --Julian H. (talk/files) 08:24, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like it the way it is. I personally do not see the sky issue raised by Julian. The only thing which slightly distracts is the relatively old car in front of the building (a different car had been better). But all in all the composition is very good most notably the diagonal leading lines, the intergration of trees and bushes with a nice green tone, the street lamp at the right front and,... There had been much worse examples regarding saturation which got more support. --Tuxyso (talk) 14:17, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- That image you linked failed to be promoted: Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral => not featured. Saffron Blaze (talk) 16:22, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The building is taken in two-point perspective but the road looks one-point perspective. I think they don't get good feeling from this kind of composition mostly (imo).--Laitche (talk) 06:12, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support It looks unnatural, but it isn't : sometimes such a lightning happens, imho. And the composition is OK. -- Trace (talk) 20:33, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Trace. Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 18:00, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Whites are overexposed unfortunately. Also, the colors look strange. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:31, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 10:10, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Mono 21:26, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per King of Hearts. Tomer T (talk) 11:52, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Over processed in the management of light colors and dark tones. I agree with :Tuxyso we've seen worse, but this is not a reason to continue :) --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:28, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 18:28, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arran's northern hills from Ardrossan ferry.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2013 at 21:25:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Colin - uploaded by Colin - nominated by Colin -- Colin (talk) 21:25, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Isle of Arran is known as "Scotland in miniature" because it is divided in two by the Highland boundary fault with a lowland south and a highland north. This panorama shows all of the north of the island viewed from sea. It was one of those rare West of Scotland days with clear sunny weather and the hilltops clear of clouds. -- Colin (talk) 21:25, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral A tad bit low on wow factor, I'm afraid. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:32, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:12, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crique de l'Anau, Sète, Hérault 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jul 2013 at 17:36:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:35, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:35, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:31, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Gamaliel (talk) 20:29, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 07:14, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Mono 21:25, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mehdi^Talk 05:03, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 18:42, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 07:56, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ArildV (talk) 08:06, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --J aviP96 18:51, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:11, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Kranj 19.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2013 at 20:08:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Meho29 - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 20:08, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 20:08, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good work, useful, best in scope. -- Trace (talk) 20:38, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Arcalino (talk) 19:45, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice, but I'm tempted to crop out the bottom quarter. -- Colin (talk) 21:39, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Mono 21:25, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mehdi^Talk 05:03, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:44, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Right corner in the downside of the image seems to be a bit problematic. And in my opinion the image would get better if it would be cropped a bit, so the treetops in front would get less space. Kruusamägi (talk) 17:07, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:36, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --J aviP96 18:53, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 20:51, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:Stachys sylvatica - mets-nõianõges.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2013 at 13:07:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Ivar (talk) 13:07, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as author -- Ivar (talk) 13:07, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Laitche (talk) 13:33, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Joydeep _Talk 16:45, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 09:18, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:03, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Trace (talk) 20:34, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 17:02, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:25, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mehdi^Talk 05:03, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 17:00, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --J aviP96 18:53, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:09, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Flowers

File:The Illustration of The Siberian War, No. 16. The Japanese Army Occupied Vragaeschensk (Blagoveshchensk).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jul 2013 at 02:14:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Shobido & Co. - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:14, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 02:14, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 13:36, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:49, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Trace (talk) 20:34, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 19:49, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Gamaliel (talk) 20:33, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mehdi^Talk 05:02, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --J aviP96 18:54, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:36, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:17, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media

File:IAO-Hanle-high energy gamma ray telescope-UnderRainbow.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jul 2013 at 11:23:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by indiajoe - uploaded by indiajoe - nominated by indiajoe -- Indiajoe (talk) 11:23, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain -- as author Indiajoe (talk) 11:23, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose CA and overexposure on white buildings, sorry. Nice rainbow though. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:35, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:58, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jornada de las Estrellas de Balonmano 2013 - Selección masculina de España - 04.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2013 at 21:53:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Albert Rocas with the Spain national handball team at the Spain Handball All Star Game 2013, in San Sebastián de los Reyes, Madrid, Spain. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Kadellar (talk) 21:53, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kadellar (talk) 21:53, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I understand how difficult it is to take good pictures during sport events. This one has a high quality, the player's move perfectly shown (and that is very useful for wikipedia), but isn't the background a little distracting ? -- Trace (talk) 06:06, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I think it is difficult to avoid, a handball field is quite small (40x20 meters).--ArildV (talk) 07:03, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - I agree with Arild. See it is wide open at f2.8 and with 100mm (160 actually). It's not easy to have a more diffused background. --Kadellar (talk) 17:58, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I also agree. -- Trace (talk) 19:22, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Small size, but good quality and high EV and useful to illustrate handball.--ArildV (talk) 07:03, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It feels a bit orange casted. Otherwise very good :) --PierreSelim (talk) 14:37, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I already corrected WB before uploading. Unfortunately there were two kinds of light, one cold, the other very warm, due to some dark yellow windows, so I tried to get a balance between them. A colder WB looked blueish imo. --Kadellar (talk) 17:56, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gildir (talk) 15:44, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Arcalino (talk) 10:37, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
SupportPyb (talk) 14:10, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 17:44, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mehdi^Talk 05:04, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karelj (talk) 20:25, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Florian Fuchs (talk) 11:26, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:00, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Sports

File:Dianthus arenarius arenarius - nõmmnelk Pakri3.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2013 at 07:59:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Ivar (talk) 07:59, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as author -- Ivar (talk) 07:59, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good and nice picture and subject -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:10, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The composition is just too messy. Without the caption/boxes I can't tell what I'm supposed to be looking at, which is a problem. Colin (talk) 10:57, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment You can't distinguish dominating white flowers from the rest of the image? I wanted to show specifically the natural habitat of the sand pink on the cliff. --Ivar (talk) 11:12, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Yes, I'm sure it is a useful picture when used in context with body/caption text that explains what it is of. Sometimes the most useful picture isn't that great a picture. But without the text this is just a random bit of cliff with a few wild flowers. I think a featured pic needs to stand on its own as a great picture. Colin (talk) 13:31, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Golden sunlight, very good quality and composition, high encyclopedic value. --Vamps (talk) 11:55, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 16:47, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Colin, Poc o² 17:06, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Difficult to understand what is being shown in the photograph, average composition --Dey.sandip (talk) 08:21, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Ivar (talk) 11:04, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:12, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pont Saint-Joseph, Agde, Hérault 01.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2013 at 05:14:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Christian Ferrer - uploaded by Christian Ferrer - nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:13, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:13, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Shadows in the foreground a little distracting, not very good composition as well --Dey.sandip (talk) 08:11, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Ivy-covered pole blocks the view of the bridge, lighting is bland. —Mono 18:37, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:13, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scopus umbretta -Kruger National Park, South Africa-8a.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jul 2013 at 07:19:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by hyper7pro - uploaded by Snowmanradio - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 07:19, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 07:19, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:57, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Penyulap ☏ 14:21, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Not impressed by the lighting, sharpness (feet, tail) is an issue. Kleuske (talk) 15:48, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 18:36, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Lighting is no good. ✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎ 16:10, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

why ? (wanting to know what could be done as a possible lab request, as I honestly can't see what needs adjusting) Penyulap ☏

I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 19:41, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Designer Sophie Albou and models, Carrousel du Louvre, 2009.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2013 at 04:46:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Dominique Charriau - uploaded & nominated by Paris 16
Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 04:46, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose quality (noisy and lack of detail) below average. --Vamps (talk) 11:58, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Interesting and original but unfortunately per Vamps, lacks sharpness, sorry, Poc o² 17:19, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Technical quality not good, composition wise looks more of a snap-shot of a fashion show --Dey.sandip (talk) 08:24, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 17:06, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Plant cell cycle.svg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2013 at 18:46:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info While both plant and animal cells are eukaryotes that undergo open mitosis, the two processes differ a lot.
Plants, unable to divide through cleavage, do so by building a new cell wall across the middle the the cell.
As such, they don't dismantle their secretory apparatus, and build a structure known as the phragmoplast
which acts as scaffolding for the new cell wall. In addition, lacking centrioles, the nuclear envelope of a
plant cell takes on the job of generating the mitotic spindle fibers.

All by by Kelvinsong. Sources and individual cell drawings can be found on the file page. Accompanies the classic File:Animal cell cycle.svg.—Love, Kelvinsong talk 18:46, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support—Love, Kelvinsong talk 18:46, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Penyulap ☏ 14:22, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 18:37, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mehdi^Talk 05:04, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--El Grafo (talk) 12:53, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Maybe there should be more attention payed to the cell plate formation and maturation? That still is one of major differences between animal and plant cell divisions as much of the rest is rather similar. Currently it isn't that much noted out in the image what is plant cell specific. Also, it could be more clearly pointed out where to start looking at the image (i.e where the cycle "starts"). Kruusamägi (talk) 17:26, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 17:05, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thomas Hicks - Leopold Grozelier - Presidential Candidate Abraham Lincoln 1860 - cropped to lithographic plate.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jul 2013 at 12:16:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Thomas Hicks and Leopold Grozelier - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden Adam Cuerden (talk) 12:16, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 12:16, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:39, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Trace (talk) 21:04, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:49, 2 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 09:02, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Arcalino (talk) 10:36, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 07:55, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --J aviP96 18:50, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 17:04, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media

File:Spiessbock-Etosha-01.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2013 at 08:00:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Hans Stieglitz - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 08:00, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 08:00, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:52, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Nikhil(talk) 16:10, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Joydeep _Talk 17:57, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose gemsbok are easy to see in Etosha and there could be much better photographs, especially with respect to light. -- ~y (talk) 07:27, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Shoshie8 (talk) 18:25, 10 July 2013 (UTC) Not eligible to vote --A.Savin 22:46, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination per Yathin. Tomer T (talk) 07:58, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:20130330 - Vendée Volley-Ball Club Herbretais - Foyer Laïque Saint-Quentin Volley-Ball - 105.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2013 at 19:49:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Pyb - uploaded by Pyb - nominated by Pyb -- Pyb (talk) 19:49, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pyb (talk) 19:49, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice colors!--Paris 16 (talk) 05:25, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support great moment. Does it look nicer if it is brighter? --Kadellar (talk) 13:33, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I've brighten up the picture. Is it enough ? Pyb (talk) 21:15, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, perfect imo ;) Why don't you upload a new version in this file (to have it featured)? Thanks!! --Kadellar (talk) 23:34, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support --JLPC (talk) 07:54, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Dust spot, noise level could be reduced. --Vamps (talk) 12:04, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Claus (talk) 12:11, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 07:21, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Asiana Airlines Boeing 777-200ER; HL7742@HKG;31.07.2011 614fz (6052589349).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2013 at 18:11:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by AeroIcarus - uploaded by Russavia - nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 18:11, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ezarateesteban 18:11, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
weak Oppose: Imo, that's just another typical planespotter picture. We have thousands like this and this very one doesn't really stand out in any way. The quality is good but not outstanding (there seems to be some kind of "halo" around the fuselage, sharpness it OK but not great …), crop could be a little bit tighter at the bottom, the background is dull and the crane at the right tends to disturb the composition. Maybe it's because I've seen too many pics like that and I'm getting bored of them, but for me there is very little "wow" in it. All in all, there's nothing really bad in this pic but it's not great either. --El Grafo (talk) 10:09, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment As a likeminded person, we could simply tell these folks that Hong Kong hasn't really been a place for "wow" photography since Kai Tak closed, what seems to be a lifetime ago. :( russavia (talk) 12:29, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - I didn't notice that this was taken in Hong Kong – that of course explains the background: en:Air pollution in Hong Kong. --El Grafo (talk) 08:10, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Oversharpened but not sharp. --Julian H. (talk/files) 17:09, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose -- Shoshie8 (talk) 18:27, 10 July 2013 (UTC) Not eligible to vote --A.Savin 22:47, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 07:19, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mission control center.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2013 at 06:08:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by NASA - uploaded by TheDJ - nominated by Pine -- Pine^✉ 06:08, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pine^✉ 06:08, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Because if one of us had taken this picture it would be torn to shreds but because it is NASA we accept any old crap quality. Colin (talk) 08:12, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Colin, unremarkable quality. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:33, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Pretty boring composition wise, also technical quality is not good --Dey.sandip (talk) 08:17, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 07:19, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nilgans 1170II 20130704.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2013 at 13:46:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Alopochen aegyptiaca (Egyptian Goose, adult) in the evening sunlight. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Caecilius Mauß (talk) 13:46, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Caecilius Mauß (talk) 13:46, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice moment and light, but there's lot of noise and some sort of color banding on the water, sorry. --A.Savin 21:09, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Nearly Fixed. You are right. I reduced noice as far as possible (IMO), but the more I reduce, the more sharpness declines. As far as I can see, the only noise is in the background and mainly between the darker and lighter parts of the waves. I don´t know, wether this is caused by the small DOF or maybe the lens has passed its optimal image quality at maximum focus length. In my opinion the appeareance of colour banding in the lower left part has similar reasons. (I think this is what you meant(?).) --Caecilius Mauß (talk) 19:37, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Shoshie8 (talk) 18:30, 10 July 2013 (UTC) Not eligible to vote --A.Savin 22:48, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 07:20, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Open air museum Petronell (by Pudelek).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jul 2013 at 10:52:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 10:52, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 10:52, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:14, 3 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 10:04, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mehdi^Talk 05:04, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Arcalino (talk) 21:13, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A QI but the subject is sterile and the composition not interesting enough for me. Colin (talk) 10:46, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Colin. Tomer T (talk) 09:43, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:35, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Others --Dey.sandip (talk) 08:29, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 07:21, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Melierax canorus argentior (Kgalagadi).jpg

File:Esko-Juhani Tennilä kiihtyneenä eduskunnassa 2009.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jul 2013 at 19:14:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Ville Oksanen (source: Flickr) - uploaded by á - nominated by á /á^(!) 19:14, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support /á^(!) 19:14, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose unpleasant motion blur. Tomer T (talk) 18:55, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I very much disagree on the unpleasantness of the motion-blurring. It lends the image a sense of action and urgency. Kleuske (talk) 10:23, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very poor technically and the blur is distracting and unpleasant. Colin (talk) 10:53, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Vamps (talk) 12:01, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Blur is extremely distracting other than that it's not a wow pic. Flickrworker (talk) 19:24, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:52, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Three sisters, Monument Valley.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jul 2013 at 22:11:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded & nominated by Clément Bardot -- Clément Bardot (talk) 22:11, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Clément Bardot (talk) 22:11, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:34, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Un-inspiring image, looks more like a snapshot. Opposing mainly due to lack of "wow" --Dey.sandip (talk) 08:09, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 08:04, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:52, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Gero Clemens Hocker.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jul 2013 at 18:18:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Jean11 - uploaded by Jean11 - nominated by Jean11 -- Jean11 (talk) 18:18, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jean11 (talk) 18:18, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment strong blue chromatic aberration --Vamps (talk) 12:00, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I wouldn't describe the CA as "strong". This is a full-size image so you're going to spot things at 100%. The lighting and focus are very good and the pose better than the current article lead picture imo. Colin (talk) 16:42, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think it's not CA, it's false color, false color in her hair, no false color (Example of false color on JP Pentax website.) and this is good quality photo imo :) --Laitche (talk) 02:08, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose visible CA, a tad underexposed, unbalanced composition. Sharpness is great. Regards, Christoph Braun (talk) 11:39, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral CAs are marginal, I also do not see a compositional problem. But I am missing something special. It's a technically well done and very sharp studio shot, but imho the studio light does not create moodful light here justifying this photo becoming an FP. --Tuxyso (talk) 20:46, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Info maginal CA removed
Comment Ok, he isn´t a woman, the special is his view, see his eyes.
Comment I didn't realize that blue CA... --Laitche (talk) 15:43, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Mono 17:39, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:52, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Brandenburg St-Katharinenkirche 08 (MK).jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2013 at 16:01:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Ceiling of the Katharinenkirche in Brandenburg an der Havel (Germany) c/u/n by me, mathias K 16:01, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- mathias K 16:01, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination --mathias K 19:19, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:BennyTrapp Iberischer Laubfrosch Hyla molleri Burgos Spanien.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2013 at 19:40:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Benny Trapp - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 19:40, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 19:40, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support—…I don't want to know the English translation of the filename—Love, Kelvinsong talk 03:07, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Whatever you imagined it could mean, you'd probably be disappointed: That's just the user name + german and scientific name of the species + the place the picture was taken. Even if you'd translate the German name directly into English it'd be pretty boring: iberean leaf-frog. Random fun fact: Schöner Runzelbruder – the German name of Rhytidiadelphus loreus – translates to beautiful wrinkle-brother ;-) SCNR, --El Grafo (talk) 12:54, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Joydeep _Talk 09:56, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --El Grafo (talk) 12:59, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kleuske (talk) 15:03, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 16:17, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:05, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 18:21, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:48, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 08:12, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:17, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mehdi^Talk 16:26, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Porn - No ! --Jebulon (talk) 19:28, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 06:20, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Amphibians

File:Ceriagrion coromandelianum male, Burdwan, West Bengal, India 09 07 2013.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2013 at 07:22:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Created/ uploaded/ nominated by Joydeep _Talk 07:22, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Joydeep _Talk 07:22, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:58, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 12:09, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 16:25, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 17:00, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Trace (talk) 14:59, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 17:59, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Shoshie8 (talk) 18:22, 10 July 2013 (UTC) Not eligible to vote --A.Savin 22:46, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support Poc o² 19:39, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 08:09, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:42, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 06:18, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

File:Praha floods 2013 centrum 9.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jul 2013 at 20:16:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Karelj -- Karelj (talk) 20:16, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 20:16, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nice image, but the composition is too confusing. It seems like the fence seperates the pavement from the river, and so it seems odd that the swans and ducks are on the pavement side. In order to understand the image and the situation, I had to use Google Street View to understand how they got there (and I assume they are looking for food left on the pavement). Tomer T (talk) 10:23, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's a flood. As it says in the title so therefore it's not strange or weird. Flickrworker (talk) 19:46, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

That's not it. What is weird is that the fence seems to seperate the fence from the pavement, i.e. there is no access from the pavement to the river. If the strange stone floor in the bottom left of the image wasn't there, one could have seen that the fence doesn't seperate the pavement from the river, and that it leads to a path along the river (as can be seen from the link I gave to Google Street View). Tomer T (talk) 07:38, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 06:17, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:13-06-07 RaR LB Wes Borland 10-2.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2013 at 15:41:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Achim Raschka, small retouche by Regi51 - uploaded by Achim Raschka (original), retouched version by Regi51 - nominated by Achim Raschka -- Achim Raschka (talk) 15:41, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Achim Raschka (talk) 15:41, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Morray (talk) 19:31, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ganz große Klasse! Gratulation, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 04:50, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose not too dynamic. Tomer T (talk) 10:24, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jean11 (talk) 21:29, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 14:02, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I don't like the cropping; it seems like there is either to little void to the right or to much to the left of the person. --heb [T C E] 14:35, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poc o² 17:40, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arecaceae.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2013 at 05:59:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Rjcastillo - uploaded by Rjcastillo - nominated by Rjcastillo -- Rjcastillo (talk) 05:59, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rjcastillo (talk) 05:59, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well ex- and composed backlightphotography. --Caecilius Mauß (talk) 20:41, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:34, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Can't see much in terms of composition or "wow" to be feature-worthy. Its a back-lit situation that has been managed well though. --Dey.sandip (talk) 08:23, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Joydeep _Talk 19:36, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poc o² 17:39, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:BMW Welt, Múnich, Alemania, 2013-04-22, DD 03.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2013 at 12:17:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Night view of the BMW Welt, Munich, Germany. All by me, Poc o² 12:17, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 12:17, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:15, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:45, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ezarateesteban 00:46, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:40, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --J aviP96 18:50, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Mono 19:30, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, I'm not very fond of the composition with so much black sky (but that's not the reason I oppose). The images has a high and unnecessary noise level (why IS0 400?) and not a very high level of sharpness and details. I need a stronger "wow" to support a images with this technical quality.--ArildV (talk) 22:07, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Joydeep _Talk 19:35, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Tooo dark --Claus (talk) 12:10, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 08:06, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 17:35, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Poc o² 17:42, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Falnau.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2013 at 12:48:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Pierre Dalous - nominated by Citron -- Citron (talk) 12:48, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Citron (talk) 12:48, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Trace (talk) 14:57, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support FP!--ArildV (talk) 15:50, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 16:14, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Joydeep _Talk 17:46, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good --Rjcastillo (talk) 17:50, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:05, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful Poc o² 18:22, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Makele-90 (talk) 19:49, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support POTY candidate right here. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:47, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice :) --Laitche (talk) 06:13, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 07:58, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Gamaliel (talk) 18:13, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 08:12, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Žiga (talk) 12:20, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:17, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Julian H. (talk/files) 22:28, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Maire (talk) 14:48, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely! Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 22:38, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mehdi^Talk 16:26, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Porn-No ! --Jebulon (talk) 19:25, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jean11 (talk) 21:38, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great shot! --mathias K 09:46, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:33, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 24 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:33, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

File:Minla strigula - Doi Inthanon.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2013 at 12:50:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison - nominated by Citron -- Citron (talk) 12:50, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Citron (talk) 12:50, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Trace (talk) 14:57, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 16:14, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:05, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 19:36, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Claus (talk) 12:08, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Gamaliel (talk) 18:13, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 06:46, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 08:13, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Shoshie8 (talk) 05:40, 13 July 2013 (UTC) Sorry, can't vote yet Shoshie8 (talk) 06:35, 13 July 2013 (UTC) Not eligible. -- Joydeep _Talk 07:14, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mehdi^Talk 16:26, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 16:39, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --mathias K 09:46, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:34, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

File:Viking Line terminal June 2013.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jul 2013 at 12:28:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Check-in (car entrance) at the Viking Line ferry terminal in Stockholm. Created, uploaded and nominated by-- Arild Vågen (talk) 12:28, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ArildV (talk) 12:28, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:45, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well catched mood of twilight hour, sharp, interesting point of view. (IMO picture could be horizontal leveled out a little bit. Seems to incline to the left.) --Caecilius Mauß (talk) 20:33, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The composition seems awkward to me with the road in the third bottom of the picture and a boring sky. --Selbymay (talk) 17:19, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't think the composition is very good. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 18:33, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Mediocre composition and subject. No "wow" -- Dey.sandip (talk) 08:19, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment For your information Viking Line ferry terminal in Stockholm is not a mediocre subject. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:53, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No WOW factor and I think the subject placement is bad. Should have been tighter. Flickrworker (talk) 09:15, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Poc o² 17:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Andy Murray Toyko 2011.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2013 at 19:40:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Christopher Johnson - uploaded by User:Flickrworker - nominated by User:Flickrworker -- Flickrworker (talk) 19:40, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Flickrworker (talk) 19:40, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would support if it hasn't been an ad Shoshie8 (talk) 05:37, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It's not an advert. Flickrworker (talk) 08:15, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 08:27, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Helsinki July 2013-14.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2013 at 17:54:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info The Green House in Helsinki Botanical garden, Finland. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:54, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:54, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:05, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 19:37, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 07:59, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Joydeep _Talk 10:19, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 11:33, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 13:13, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Arcalino (talk) 17:01, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 20:57, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 08:14, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:16, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Steinsplitter (talk) 22:00, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mehdi^Talk 16:26, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done! Very nice light, resolution and composition. --mathias K 09:45, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 18:53, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 08:30, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Sabine Lisicki 2013 RG 002.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2013 at 19:34:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Carine06 - uploaded by Regi51 - nominated by flickrworker -- Flickrworker (talk) 19:34, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Flickrworker (talk) 19:34, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 08:28, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Villebois-Lavalette RD 5 2013.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2013 at 19:45:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Created and uploaded by JLPC, nominated by Joydeep _Talk 19:45, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Joydeep _Talk 19:45, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 07:05, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:23, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice --Rjcastillo (talk) 13:10, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:39, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 08:16, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Arcalino (talk) 11:48, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:13, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Steinsplitter (talk) 22:00, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 06:32, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mehdi^Talk 16:26, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow composition!--Jebulon (talk) 19:21, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support + Comment : thanks a lot to Joydeep for the nomination. Thanks to all voters too. --JLPC (talk) 18:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 07:50, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Leone marciano, Vicenza.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2013 at 11:26:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Pottercomuneo (talk) 11:26, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pottercomuneo (talk) 11:26, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:00, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Chain bridge, budapest, hungary.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2013 at 21:23:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Endrjuch - uploaded by Endrjuch - nominated by Endrjuch -- Endrjuch (talk) 21:23, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Endrjuch (talk) 21:23, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Crop/composition, white balance, not so high resolution. --Mile (talk) 05:58, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unsharp (why f/29?), composition, white balance. -- -donald- (talk) 10:03, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bad composition. -donald-: The f/29 is for allowing a long exposure, when you don't have an ND filter. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:18, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 10:40, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Face by the Mantled guereza.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2013 at 14:40:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Michael Gäbler - uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 14:40, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 14:40, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 12:13, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jean11 (talk) 21:47, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 10:42, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Glyptothek, Múnich, Alemania, 2013-02-03, DD 01.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2013 at 19:41:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Museum Glyptothek, built by order of Bavarian King Ludwig I to host his collection of Greek and Roman sculptures, Munich, Germany. All by me, Poc o² 19:41, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 19:41, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:22, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Joydeep _Talk 19:33, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sky's not interesting. Doesn't show the building off. Should have been taken on a sunny day. Flickrworker (talk) 19:49, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice smooth lighting and composition with a good quality. --mathias K 13:24, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 14:17, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 10:42, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Polypogon monspeliensis (1).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2013 at 19:24:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Morray - uploaded by Morray - nominated by Morray -- Morray (talk) 19:24, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Morray (talk) 19:24, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:23, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support ---Mehdi^Talk 07:32, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --El Grafo (talk) 09:45, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 17:29, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 21:48, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 19:40, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 11:52, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Claus (talk) 12:10, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 08:07, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Beautiful image but the caption is very minimalist. We would have liked to know the place. Scientifically this work is bad. It's a shame that good work is untapped because without caption, an image will not be used. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:52, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment actually the position was there in the exif. For some reason the Bot did not extract it this time. I now did manually and also added some text. What else information are you thinking of? --Morray (talk) 15:25, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Jean11 (talk) 21:32, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 18:20, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 10:45, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants

File:RybnoeDistrict 06-13 Konstantinovo Oka River 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2013 at 17:01:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by A.Savin --A.Savin 17:01, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- A.Savin 17:01, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer 17:48, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Joydeep _Talk 18:21, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Stas1995 (talk) 18:32, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ю. Данилевский (talk) 18:33, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mile (talk) 05:44, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JLPC (talk) 06:43, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 11:46, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 13:22, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kikos (talk) 15:45, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alex Florstein (talk) 16:48, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support wow! -- Steinsplitter (talk) 21:57, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support superb -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:49, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mehdi^Talk 16:25, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support lovely mood. -- Jebulon (talk) 19:16, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Trace (talk) 23:22, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Maire (talk) 08:00, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 18:58, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 10:48, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:The Five Pavilion bridge.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2013 at 22:31:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Gisling - uploaded by Gisling - nominated by Gisling -- Gisling (talk) 22:31, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gisling (talk) 22:31, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very strong colour noise, clipped whites, composition too tight on the sides, tilted. --Julian H. (talk/files) 22:15, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 10:41, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:View of Puente Nuevo bridge in Ronda Spain.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jul 2013 at 21:47:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Moroder - uploaded by Moroder - nominated by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:47, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:47, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Belles perspectives!!! -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:19, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support ---Mehdi^Talk 07:32, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support wow, great view. Tomer T (talk) 07:56, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Lighting is harsh, dark shadow in the mid-section -- Dey.sandip (talk) 08:13, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Karelj (talk) 20:26, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice view, but I dislike the shadow. If the geocode is correct, it was taken towards north-east, so 14:00/15:00 would've been optimal. In full view, again, it looks rather soft. Unfortunately, it's often a problem with your photos, no idea why. --A.Savin 21:01, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I like them that way, I don't sharpen (anyone can do it). Thanks for your comment --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:16, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support In my opinion Wow! there is. Really a great view. Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 21:46, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- As per above + composition unspectacular.Fotoriety (talk) 23:01, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really neat perspective and wow factor outweighs the problems for me. —Mono 18:38, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 19:22, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Yes, the pov is really nice but per A.Savin the image is soft (specific to lens?) while there are post-processing problems: left quarter of the sky is posterized and there are white halos in several areas of high contrast. Sting (talk) 20:51, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pottercomuneo (talk) 20:57, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Dey.sandip --Laitche (talk) 13:51, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support The shadow adds to the relief, and the lighting gives a surreal atmosphere --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:46, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support wow!--Steinsplitter (talk) 21:53, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Joydeep _Talk 07:17, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 13:50, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Strong banding in left area of the sky, oversharpened and very tight composition around the upper edge. It's a pity because the resolution and the subject are amazing. --Julian H. (talk/files) 14:12, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What I believe you consider banding is the pattern of the clouds that day. I have it on several pictures taken that moment. The sharpening is really a matter of taste. I don't like it either (anyone can do it after downloading the picture) but many reviewers keep asking for it... Thanks for the review anyhow --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 15:29, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Sorry Wolfgang, I have to agree with Julian. Color banding is there, imho it could be fixed with denoising the sky. But the main problem for me is oversharpening. --Ivar (talk) 19:06, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 14:18, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pudelek (talk) 09:15, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 17:46, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 10:51, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:白马寺全景.jpg, not featured[edit]

White Horse Temple in Luoyang

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2013 at 22:47:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Gisling - uploaded by Gisling - nominated by Gisling -- Gisling (talk) 22:47, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Gisling (talk) 22:47, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 10:41, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rolsø Ødekirke Panorama 2.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2013 at 06:05:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Villy Fink Isaksen - uploaded by Villy Fink Isaksen - nominated by Villy Fink Isaksen -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 06:05, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 06:05, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, nice view but imo the picture misses something special to make it "... the best commons offers". I generally don`t like the no WOW argument, but It goes in that direction. But definitely a good candidate for QI and maybe also VI. --mathias K 08:33, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No special light, no special composition. For quality improvement I would apply some masked sharpening and try to soften the sky (there are some strange artefacts). --Tuxyso (talk) 07:46, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

' I withdraw my nomination --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 08:14, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Fireworks over Ponte Vecchio.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2013 at 20:12:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

everything by myself -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 20:12, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 20:12, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning. Flickrworker (talk) 21:32, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support good photo --Rjcastillo (talk) 13:12, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good. --Arcalino (talk) 17:00, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 08:17, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Steinsplitter (talk) 21:59, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Quality flaws can be excused due to the action going on. --Julian H. (talk/files) 22:26, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:19, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mehdi^Talk 16:26, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice --mathias K 09:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 13:14, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Rotonde Villette interieur.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Jul 2013 at 09:36:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Myrabella - uploaded by Myrabella - nominated by Myrabella

Light and shadow inside the Rotonde de la Villette, Paris, France, that was a former tax office. -- Myrabella (talk) 09:36, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Myrabella (talk) 09:36, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mono 17:40, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JLPC (talk) 20:54, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Jebulon (talk) 19:12, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Trace (talk) 23:21, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support very, very nice compostion of architecture, light and shadow. --mathias K 09:19, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 19:00, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 08:23, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Claus (talk) 09:48, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice! -- Arcalino (talk) 17:01, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 20:50, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:02, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors

File:Alstroemeria aurantiaca.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2013 at 18:35:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by JJ Harrison - uploaded by JJ Harrison - nominated by Mono -- —Mono 18:35, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- —Mono 18:35, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Clément Bardot (talk) 20:10, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment—This is barely minimum size—Love, Kelvinsong talk 03:10, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 08:11, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mehdi^Talk 16:26, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --heb [T C E] 14:36, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 18:38, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice! -- Arcalino (talk) 17:05, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:51, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Flowers

File:Basilica of Our Lady of the Pillar and the Ebro River, Zaragoza.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2013 at 18:36:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Jiuguang_Wang - uploaded by Jiuguang_Wang - nominated by Mono -- —Mono 18:36, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- —Mono 18:36, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Clément Bardot (talk) 20:11, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Typical WLM laureate. Overprocessed IMO, looks unnatural to me.--Jebulon (talk) 21:00, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Very nice mood but not so good quality at full size: generaly soft image, CAs in the half left, problem of alignment at the right (motion like, see notes). Sting (talk) 21:02, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The colours are weird. --PierreSelim (talk) 05:50, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Sting. --El Grafo (talk) 13:14, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yeah, a bit romanticized, but it sure made me want to read the article and even visit the place myself. Saffron Blaze (talk) 17:57, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice place indeed, Poc o² 18:20, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Very pretty, and due to the high resolution I will give the pixel-level unsharpness a pass. But there is strong CA at the left. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:49, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per last nomination: Strong colour noise. Also some very strong CAs on the towers. --Julian H. (talk/files) 07:30, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jean11 (talk) 18:43, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but overdone colours and lacking quality. --mathias K 09:52, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Per User:Saffron Blaze. --heb [T C E] 14:38, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 09:36, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 6 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:50, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Deutsche Bank Taunusanlage.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2013 at 09:47:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by Der Wolf im Wald -- Wolf im Wald (de) 09:47, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolf im Wald (de) 09:47, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Trace (talk) 14:57, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose -- Shoshie8 (talk) 18:18, 10 July 2013 (UTC) Not eligible to vote --A.Savin 22:45, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The clouds on the building on the right are distracting people from looking all the way up. Flickrworker (talk) 19:44, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- That came close to being the redeeming factor in my view... '"De gustibus non disputandum est, as the Romans said. Kleuske (talk) 10:13, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support very nice one! Good sharpness/resolution and a nice compostion with these two skyscrapers caming out of the forest. ;-) --mathias K 09:49, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --heb [T C E] 14:40, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 18:48, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice! -- Arcalino (talk) 17:04, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm not bothered by the clouds ... they actually improve the image, IMO, by making it look more natural and less like something that might have been done in Photoshop. Daniel Case (talk) 05:08, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support could be sharper but otherwise good. --Pine^✉ 19:03, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — ℳ₪Zaplotnik 08:42, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:49, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Orb River, Vieussan, Hérault 03.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2013 at 17:19:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Christian Ferrer - uploaded by Christian Ferrer - nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:19, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:19, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Clément Bardot (talk) 20:10, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Joydeep _Talk 17:48, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Low contrast in the areas further away and clipped whites would be avoidable by taking the photo at a later hour. Both result from the sun being not too far outside of the frame on the right. --Julian H. (talk/files) 07:36, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 08:10, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pudelek (talk) 13:23, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 17:20, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 14:19, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 18:35, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I have to agree with Julian. This is a much stronger image without its right one-sixth. Daniel Case (talk) 05:16, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I feel the branches in the foreground are too dominant. It's nice to include them to guide the viewer into the picture, but not when they have so much visual weight that they make the main landscape look small. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:08, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:52, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Stanisław Samostrzelnik, Św Stanisław.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2013 at 21:53:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Stanisław Samostrzelnik - uploaded by Kpalion - nominated by Kpalion — Kpalion^(talk) 21:53, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Kpalion^(talk) 21:53, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 04:31, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Maire (talk) 11:37, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Spot the green winged fire-breathing dragon. — Kpalion^(talk) 22:15, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --heb [T C E] 14:39, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 18:43, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:49, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Women heptathlon LJ French Athletics Championships 2013 t144221.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jul 2013 at 09:36:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Emmanuelle Chazal competes in the women's heptathlon long jump final during the French Athletics Championships 2013 at Stade Charléty in Paris, 13 July 2013.
Info created by Jastrow - uploaded by Jastrow - nominated by PierreSelim -- PierreSelim (talk) 09:36, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great Wow for me. -- PierreSelim (talk) 09:36, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Formidable. -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:47, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Top Poc o² 10:46, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support very good --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 11:13, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 11:33, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I was just going here to nominate it. --ArildV (talk) 16:17, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mehdi^Talk 16:25, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 17:18, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:46, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 18:59, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Jebulon (talk) 19:11, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jean11 (talk) 21:46, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Trace (talk) 23:20, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --mathias K 09:00, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great shot! Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 18:45, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 19:06, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Claus (talk) 09:48, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support One of our best sports pictures yet, and our best picture of a female athlete. Daniel Case (talk) 05:02, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Et hop ! --Myrabella (talk) 15:07, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:31, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JukoFF (talk) 09:31, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:47, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Sports

File:Білий слон.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jul 2013 at 14:25:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Ukraine
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Swift11 -- Swift11 (talk) 14:25, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Swift11 (talk) 14:25, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:10, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 17:41, 9 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Maire (talk) 11:39, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Trace (talk) 14:59, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 19:39, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- People waving just cheapens it for me.Fotoriety (talk) 23:56, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I see posterization. Is that just my screen or can someone confirm it? --Julian H. (talk/files) 07:38, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I can see it too (in the sky) -- Joydeep _Talk 10:18, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. In that case, I

Oppose. --Julian H. (talk/files) 13:45, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose even in a thumb I can see posterization. --Laitche (talk) 15:38, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 08:10, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Julian and Laitche, posterization. -- Joydeep _Talk 07:16, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Posterization, sorry. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:21, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Posterization, sorry. --mathias K 09:54, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the new version does not Posterization! --Swift11 16:41, May 2014 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:53, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bee July 2013-1a.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2013 at 17:52:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Honey bee feeding on nectar. University of Helsinki Botanical Garden, Finland. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:52, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 17:52, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Gamaliel (talk) 18:12, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 08:14, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but practically everything is out of focus --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:16, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry Alves, but you have several comparable shots with much better quality. So we know you can do better... ;-) Regards mathias K 09:42, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - seems a bit shaken. --heb [T C E] 14:46, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 07:20, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bünsowska huset February 2013 02.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2013 at 15:47:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Bünsowska huset (the Bünsow building), Strandvägen 29-33, Stockholm. Built 1886-1888. Architect: Isak Gustaf Clason. Exposure fusion from a single exposure. Created, uploaded and nominated by-- Arild Vågen (talk) 15:44, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ArildV (talk) 15:44, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 16:15, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support great view --Rjcastillo (talk) 17:53, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:05, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 19:38, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 08:00, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. --Laitche (talk) 09:05, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Joydeep _Talk 10:20, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Claus (talk) 12:07, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Arcalino (talk) 17:02, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 08:13, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Steinsplitter (talk) 22:00, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mehdi^Talk 16:26, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --mathias K 09:45, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - I'm sorry but I'm going to go against the masses on this one for two reasons: First the mast just left of the building is quite distracting to me, but the cut up boats both left and right, makes it look a bit odd to me. --heb [T C E] 14:42, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 07:21, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Sarah Vaughan - William P. Gottlieb - No. 1.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2013 at 14:54:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by William P. Gottlieb - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:54, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:54, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~{{neutral}}~~ -- Usually not a big fan of images of performers, but this one is the exception. The thing above her head bothers me slightly. Kleuske (talk) 15:02, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Unfortunately, we can't really go back and get a better shot. With historical media, sometimes flaws are unavoidable. Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:26, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - True. But that (sadly) isn't the issue. Still, the image is good enough to get the benefit of the doubt. Kleuske (talk) 10:57, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:47, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kleuske (talk) 10:57, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Gamaliel (talk) 18:13, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 18:51, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — ℳ₪Zaplotnik 08:42, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 07:21, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Stachys palustris - soo-nõianõges.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jul 2013 at 19:12:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Ivar (talk) 19:12, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as author -- Ivar (talk) 19:12, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:55, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Trace (talk) 23:20, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice lighting and sharpness with a very good use of the dof. --mathias K 09:07, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 19:37, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 20:55, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 07:39, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 08:22, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 17:43, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:07, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 17:44, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 07:18, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Flowers

File:Temple Mount.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2013 at 00:42:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by David Baum - uploaded by David Baum - nominated by Pine -- Pine^✉ 00:42, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pine^✉ 00:42, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose strong perspective distortion. darkweasel94 01:16, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above, I´ve tried a correction and I think this would look better. --mathias K 08:58, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- yes it would, but such corrections should preferably be done from a raw or at least original JPEG file. darkweasel94 09:14, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - I know, this was just a quick and dirty 2 clicks test to show how ist could look... --mathias K 11:09, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 07:17, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tramo de Gmunden, vagono 100.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jul 2013 at 20:07:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by darkweasel94 - uploaded by darkweasel94 - nominated by darkweasel94 -- darkweasel94 20:07, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- darkweasel94 20:07, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - sorry but I just find the lamps to the right (especially the top one) to be to disturbing... :( I like the way you caught the tram though :) --heb [T C E] 14:49, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for your feedback. Do you think it might be better if the entire lamps are visible? I can change the crop if you think so, that's no problem. darkweasel94 15:41, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - I was thinking more of cloning/retouching them out of the image. --heb [T C E] 12:30, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - I don't really want to do that, because I think a photo, especially a FP, should show what reality is like - removing the lamps would deceive the viewer. darkweasel94 12:42, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the background of the mountain seems a little hazy. Flickrworker (talk) 17:04, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 07:17, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

image:Ponte Vecchio at dusk 1.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jul 2013 at 20:17:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

everything by myself -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 20:17, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 20:17, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:47, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Brilliant! --Arcalino (talk) 09:54, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:23, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support good photo --Rjcastillo (talk) 13:12, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 08:17, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Unfortunate crop. Better images are available. Kleuske (talk) 14:20, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Kleuske. Although not perfect (clipped whites beyond what is unavoidable), the Quality is sufficient imo, but the crop on the left doesn't work well enough for FP imo. --Julian H. (talk/files) 22:25, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Info: New version! I've cropped the left side of the image, removing the remaining grass on the river's bank. Is it ok now? --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:25, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but I think a wider view would work much better. The left side is cut of way to early and it would be nice to see the whole bridge on the left side. --mathias K 09:39, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Info: Reverted to original version! Mathias - I guess you're right. Personally I like my original image a bit better, even though there might be some disturbing elements on the left side. So I'll keep giving it a shot with this one. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:26, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Better, but imo still too tight on the left side. Maybe a 2 segment pano would have been the best?! Regards mathias K 12:54, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - True, a two segment panorama could have helped - maybe. It's difficult, though, to find a really perfect spot for taking pictures of the bridge from this side of the river. Just have a look at Street View using the image's geo reference... --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 14:02, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - I´ve allready done that, and your right it`s difficult but imo not impossiple... ;-) Regards mathias K 15:21, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I see the points about the grass at the left, but I think that it follows the border of the image in a nice enough way, to not really do anything negative. --heb [T C E] 14:45, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
weak Oppose Quality ok but not at highest level (see right side), but specially the crop is spoiling it. To me it is something in the middle of the way between a detail and an overview picture. You can make something better out of it Poco² 19:52, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I'm open to suggestions. Maybe a crop like this - focusing on details of the scenery and also paying more attention to 'formalities' like the rule of thirds would be better.
  Detail of Ponte Vecchio at dusk
  I'm better not going to offer this as an alternative though, considering there are only a couple of hours left in this voting period - and also because this image would be a major variation of the original nomination. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 21:05, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 17:38, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 07:20, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Chapalmalania.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2013 at 11:26:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Monkeysdrawer - uploaded by Monkeysdrawer - nominated by Dvdgmz -- Dvdgmz (talk) 11:26, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done scientific illustration. Unique free recreating the extinct mammal chapalmalania.-- Dvdgmz (talk) 11:26, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 18:33, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 13:44, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — ℳ₪Zaplotnik 08:45, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 17:39, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 13:24, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cygnus olor portrait (MK).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2013 at 06:52:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info portrait of a Mute Swan (Cygnus olor) c/u/n by me, mathias K 06:52, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- mathias K 06:52, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:23, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Gamaliel (talk) 18:12, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Jean11 (talk) 21:44, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 17:03, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Love the water droplets. Daniel Case (talk) 05:12, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 19:48, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 15:00, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 17:38, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 13:25, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

File:Fossa de les cavernes.png, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2013 at 11:38:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Daniel Burch Caballé - uploaded by Daniel Burch Caballé - nominated by Dvdgmz -- Dvdgmz (talk) 11:38, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done scientific illustration. Unique free image on Commons of this extinct animal -- Dvdgmz (talk) 11:38, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 18:33, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No difference with a photograph of Cryptoprocta ferox. No Wow effect. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 13:54, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Can you explain your reasons? This is not a photography, this is a scientific illustration that shows the animal features. --Dvdgmz (talk) 07:38, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The difference between the extinct form and the current form is the size. The "scientific" illustrator did not have much difficulty. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:48, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose--Atamari (talk) 22:00, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per its scientific merit, the only free image that depicts C. spelea. Last time I looked, "Must be different from a photograph of a related animal" was not a requirement for FPs.--Leptictidium (talk) 07:38, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 13:23, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ранок на Кальміусі.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2013 at 08:00:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Balkhovitin - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 08:00, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 08:00, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:23, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment stitching error?--Claus (talk) 12:05, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 15:57, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great habitat and athmosphere. --Mile (talk) 05:43, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Arcalino (talk) 11:47, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Steinsplitter (talk) 21:58, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Mile. Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 22:36, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks like a painting. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:18, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Mehdi^Talk 16:26, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose sorry to spoil the party. It is of course a very nice scenery, but for my taste it has too much saturation, looks slightly ccw tilt and has a rather small resolution. --mathias K 09:35, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 18:56, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 17:39, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 13:24, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

Illustrations about the crystallisation in Naica, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2013 at 08:26:47 (UTC)

Main page, the girl seeing giant crystals
Location of naica Mine in the World
Location and difference between crystal caves in Naica
Crystals in "espadas" cave
Crystals in "cristales" cave
Size differences between caves
All things are made by atoms and molecules
Molecular difference between crystals and glass
What are crystals formed
Calcium sulphate and water form gypsum crystals
The molecules are stacked
Speed of crystallization in "espadas" result in smaller crystals
Slowly crystallization in "cristales" cave result in giant crystals
Temperature differences determine the density and velocity
This is why there are giant crystals in Naica

Info created by CarolGC - uploaded by CarolGC - nominated by Dvdgmz -- Dvdgmz (talk) 08:26, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good didactic images for Children, consistency amongst the set, technical and artistic quality, useful contribution for wikibooks -- Dvdgmz (talk) 08:26, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed.

B.p. 08:16, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 13:22, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alaskan Way Viaduct Seattle Twilight.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2013 at 21:22:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Alaskan Way Viaduct and port of Seattle at the twilight, looking southeast, all by Adbar (talk) 21:22, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. The framing is a little bit awkward (the lamp on the left is cut off, and the lamps on the right could be positioned better), and slightly unsharp. OK overall though. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:35, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose generally per above but the composition could be better with less sky and more space on the left side. --mathias K 08:46, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Lacks much "wow" factor, plus it appears a bit noisy. Tiptoety ^talk 17:47, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 06:13, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lymantria dispar MHNT Chenille.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jul 2013 at 08:56:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Archaeodontosaurus - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 08:56, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 08:56, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done! -- mathias K 09:41, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 09:47, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:57, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Magnificent specimen indeed. Only one thing bothers me, why f/29? Lens diffraction kicks in and overall sharpness suffers from it. --Ivar (talk) 13:11, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Probably trying to maximize DOF if for macro.Fotoriety (talk) 23:14, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JLPC (talk) 17:40, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Joydeep _Talk 17:58, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Trace (talk) 21:39, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:28, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 18:13, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 19:37, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Claus (talk) 20:03, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Le plus Wow; c’est de trouver une image, faite par soit, alors que l'on ne s'y attend pas. Merci à Tomer T. Pourquoi F29 ? C’est une bonne question. Ce n’est pas une image de studio. Je suis au pied de l’arbre et la chenille sur l’écorce est difficile à voir. J’avais dans mon sac une feuille de papier et j’ai déposé la chenille dessus. Là on la voit bien. Mais la chenille n’a pas aimé et s’est mise à parcourir le papier. La photo est prise la chenille en mouvement et comme je travaille en manuel la mise au point est faite par la position de l’appareil. F29 est un bon compromis. Je suis un débutant en photographie du vivant, j’ai passé mon temps à photographier des fossiles, des animaux naturalisé ou des œufs… çà me change beaucoup.

The more Wow, that is to find an image made by either, while we do not expect. Tomer T.Why F29? That's a good question. This is not a studio picture. I'm at the foot of the tree and the the caterpillar on bark is difficult to see. I had in my bag a piece of paper and I put the caterpillar above. Here we see well. But the caterpillar did not like and started to browse the paper. The photo is taken in the caterpillar movement and as I work in manual focus is made by the position of the device. F29 is a good compromise. I am a beginner in photography of the living, I spent my time photographing fossils, stuffed animals or eggs here ... change me. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:42, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 17:47, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Citron (talk) 09:35, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support The sharpness is not perfect, maybe there is some noise, but given the conditions, I think it is a GREAT picture.--Jebulon (talk) 15:48, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 05:13, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 13:21, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

File:La tour Eiffel2013.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2013 at 04:07:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Acpid] - uploaded by Acpid - nominated by Acpid -- Acpid (talk) 04:07, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Acpid (talk) 04:07, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice photo, but: Insufficient resolution for a static object in my opinion, the sky is edited towards unrealism and I don't prefer this to a centered perspective. The fact that they are rebuilding the restauraunt layer in there doesn't help. --Julian H. (talk/files) 07:43, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Julian. Unsharp, quality is not enough for FP. --Joydeep _Talk 10:38, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unreal sky, as noted. Daniel Case (talk) 03:39, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Lack of sharpness --Arcalino (talk) 16:05, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. per above — Stas1995 (talk) 20:50, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 05:52, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mutinus caninus in UK.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jul 2013 at 22:07:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Stu Phillips - nominated by Citron -- Citron (talk) 22:07, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Citron (talk) 22:07, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 05:51, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:2011 women's Euro keirin final.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2013 at 10:09:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by ...someguy - uploaded by Flickrworker - nominated by Flickrworker -- Flickrworker (talk) 10:09, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Info The final of the women's keirin at the 2011 European Track Cycling Championships won by Victoria Pendleton.
Support -- Flickrworker (talk) 10:09, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Reluctant Oppose - Blurry foreground is a bit distracting. Sorry--Nikhil(talk) 23:58, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Nikhilb239 — Stas1995 (talk) 20:53, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:10, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Berlin - Messe Berlin2.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jul 2013 at 20:24:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Wladyslaw -- Wladyslaw (talk) 20:24, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 20:24, 11 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice perspective. The light is not ideal, coming further from the right would be better, but I think it works because the light comes through the windows. --Julian H. (talk/files) 22:17, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above --mathias K 09:29, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 09:48, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Pine^✉ 19:04, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — ℳ₪Zaplotnik 08:45, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 17:40, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ST ○ 16:26, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Removing three dust spots in the sky is better :) (This is not vote.) --Laitche (talk) 03:12, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /— Stas1995 (talk) 20:50, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:Open air museum Petronell - Thermae, Villa Urbana and Valetudinarium.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Jul 2013 at 09:41:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 09:41, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 09:41, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice the central pathway is near dead centre and so invites the viewer up it. Flickrworker (talk) 22:44, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:51, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Nice overview with a good quality, but the cut off red info tablet down right spoils the overall view imo. --mathias K 09:22, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 17:40, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 19:12, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 18:10, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Icy Waterfall By Daniel Åhs Karlsson.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2013 at 16:10:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by danielåhskarlsson - uploaded by danielåhskarlsson - nominated by danielåhskarlsson -- Danielåhskarlsson (talk) 16:10, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Danielåhskarlsson (talk) 16:10, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This will be the first of many, I'm afraid. Seriously blown highlights on the ice and the buildings above look too dark. Basically, overexposed. Daniel Case (talk) 05:05, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: per above

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

Tomer T (talk) 08:18, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bald Eagle Head sq.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2013 at 05:01:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

all by Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:01, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:01, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The hairs on the very top look a little blown out. Any chance of recovering it from the raw file? --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:10, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Info Unfortunately there's nothing I can do in this case. The equipment I took the picture with wasn't my own - and I didn't notice the jpg-only setting until it was too late and the bird gone... a pity. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:49, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Not too much of a distraction in any case, so weak Support. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:12, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 08:23, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 20:04, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:04, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 14:56, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Arcalino (talk) 15:59, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:43, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 17:53, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 11:18, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 13:00, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 13:13, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds

File:2011 Subaru Forester - S Edition (5442761431).jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2013 at 13:42:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by NRMA Motoring and Services - uploaded by Paris 16 - nominated by Paris 16
Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 13:42, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry too dark for my liking. Should have been taken in sunlight/middle of the day/on a sunny day. Flickrworker (talk) 14:11, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 15:06, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice image for a Subaru-folder, but I'm not wowed into featured territory. Kleuske (talk) 15:40, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support because nice image for a Subaru-folder --Ralf Roleček 14:58, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Ralf no need to be pointy. Everyone's entitled to their opinion. Flickrworker (talk) 17:37, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Info The file was deleted for copyright violation per Commons:Deletion requests/File:2011 Subaru Forester - S Edition (5442761431).jpg. --Julian H. (talk/files) 18:53, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tule Fog California - 2005.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jul 2013 at 06:04:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Already a FP in English Wikipedia. created by NASA, MODIS - uploaded by Tatiraju.rishabh - nominated by Tatiraju.rishabh -- Tatiraju.rishabh (talk) 06:04, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tatiraju.rishabh (talk) 06:04, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:43, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 20:57, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 17:41, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 19:15, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— Stas1995 (talk) 08:06, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Saslong udu da Sacun ora.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Jul 2013 at 21:46:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Moroder - uploaded by v - nominated by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:46, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 21:46, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not sharp. Flickrworker (talk) 22:33, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Really nice composition and colors, but unfortunately too hazy IMO. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:17, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠. --mathias K 09:10, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral. Too hazy (per King of Hearts) — Stas1995 (talk) 21:00, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice picture! --Llorenzi (talk) 19:40, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 3 neutral → not featured. /— Stas1995 (talk) 08:07, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Berlin Cathedral from Muehlendammbruecke.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Jul 2013 at 19:22:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Berlin Cathedral at night, seen from the Mühlendammbrücke c/u/n by me -- mathias K 19:22, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- mathias K 19:22, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment might look better if the entire cathedral reflection were visible. darkweasel94 20:06, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm, maybe you're right. But sadly the original file don't give any space in that direction, so i cant try it. And, I like the actual crop/composition pretty much. :-) Regards mathias K 22:11, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Clément Bardot (talk) 21:29, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose There is more potential in the pic. -- -donald- (talk) 06:03, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm not sure whether it's easy or even possible to find a better perspective, but the bridge, for me, covers too much of the building. It generally feels like it's in the background rather than centered (composition-wise) in the photo. --Julian H. (talk/files) 08:09, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 17:41, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— Stas1995 (talk) 20:39, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lemur Catta (Linnaeus, 1758).jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Jul 2013 at 14:01:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Michael Gäbler - uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 14:01, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 14:01, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Flickrworker (talk) 22:41, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very Nice. --Clément Bardot (talk) 01:25, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral very nice and not with the typical zoo look. But the nice tail of the Catta is totally missing and I think for a shot like this the sharpness could be a little bit better. --mathias K 09:13, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Funny I don't think that Lemur's understand move over there and sit down so we can see your tail. Flickrworker (talk) 12:17, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- yes, very funny. But I never said something like that. --mathias K 13:08, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Info I made a sharper update. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 22:14, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- sharpness is better. But now I realized something strange in the background from the upper left to ~~down right corner~~ middle right. Looks like there was done some cloning?! --mathias K 09:45, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 14:03, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 20:46, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /— Stas1995 (talk) 20:40, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Little Owl.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jul 2013 at 18:56:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by محمد الفلسطيني - uploaded by محمد الفلسطيني - nominated by محمد الفلسطيني -- محمد الفلسطيني (talk) 18:56, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- محمد الفلسطيني (talk) 18:56, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support clear and suitable to be a featured photo.--لا روسا (talk) 20:16, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mohatatou (talk) 20:19, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very nice in preview, but very poor quality at 100 %. --A.Savin 21:12, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per A.Savin. --Julian H. (talk/files) 22:13, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per A.Savin. -- Joydeep _Talk 07:11, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose sadly, cause the preview is really nice. --mathias K 09:24, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 21:01, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Savin --Claus (talk) 09:49, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— Stas1995 (talk) 21:05, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Open air museum Petronell - Thermae and Valetudinarium.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jul 2013 at 13:20:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 13:20, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 13:20, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice pic but the tree on the right is very detracting as it blocks the view of the walk way and imo would not be a featured pic Flickrworker (talk) 16:14, 12 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support IMO tree don't block the view, it's the view of the entrance -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:34, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice, but I dońt think it is a featurable scenery.--Jebulon (talk) 19:15, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry but per Jebulon. --mathias K 09:25, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— Stas1995 (talk) 21:03, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hérault River, Agde 09.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jul 2013 at 20:06:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Christian Ferrer - uploaded by Christian Ferrer - nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:04, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:04, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support a little grainy but good enough. --Pine^✉ 00:58, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
weak Support per above. Nice picture. Although the D600 could produce sharper ones, the composition works for me. --mathias K 08:48, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 20:54, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 17:42, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:59, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice picture! --Llorenzi (talk) 19:39, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 17:44, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /A.Savin 22:36, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:Vajdahunyad Castle In Budapest.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2013 at 19:49:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Endrjuch - uploaded by Endrjuch - nominated by Endrjuch -- Endrjuch (talk) 19:49, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Endrjuch (talk) 19:49, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose sorry, but on the left too dark, oe areas on the castle and wrong WB. --mathias K 12:42, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per mathias: A lot of clipping. --Julian H. (talk/files) 08:17, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /A.Savin 22:39, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Vista de Garachico, Tenerife, España, 2012-12-13, DD 05.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2013 at 18:19:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info View of Roque de Garachico and the homonymous village in front of it, Island of Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain. All by me, Poc o² 18:19, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 18:19, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:01, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 08:22, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ArildV (talk) 08:50, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~Neutral~~ Nice overview, but the overall image quality could be better (you´ve shown sharper and higher quality ones here...) and I think it would benefit from a thighter crop (see anonation). --mathias K 09:00, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Agree fully with your comment. I just uploaded a new version with a tigther crop Poc o² 22:01, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
weak Support now. Thanks for the edit! The image quality still isn´t one of your bests but in addition to the view it is good enough I think. --mathias K 09:15, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, but please, if applicable striketrhough the first vote, you cannot vote twice. Poc o² 21:19, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~Neutral~~ The new crop is better and the composition works well now~~, but I think the amount of color noise is a little too high to support~~. --Julian H. (talk/files) 08:11, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Color noise reduced Poc o² 19:37, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Significantly better, thanks, Support. --Julian H. (talk/files) 19:48, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 17:46, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support now. --JLPC (talk) 11:21, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ю. Данилевский (talk) 12:47, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:35, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 06:00, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Széchenyi Chain Bridge in Budapest at night.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2013 at 14:51:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by --The Photographer (talk) 14:51, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support only minor flaws and more than enough wow! -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 15:50, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Needs clockwise rotation. -- Julian H. (talk/files) 16:51, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Wow! — Stas1995 (talk) 20:52, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Trace (talk) 21:08, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Mono 21:25, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:32, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Crop, white-balance, sky noise. --Mile (talk) 06:39, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Very nice one, but the crop on the left and right side is too tight imo. --mathias K 08:49, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral nice, but it's tilted --Pudelek (talk) 09:14, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose white-balance.--Claus (talk) 09:44, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice! -- Arcalino (talk) 16:59, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Too much noise in the sky. Tiptoety ^talk 17:49, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice perspective of this landmark, but there are a couple of issues that make me oppose: it is a bit too noisy (see e.g. the trees on the very right), the crop on the right is also unfortunate, but specially (also right side) the perspective problemas are spoiling it, the right side of the picture is leaning in (cushion distortion), sorry Wilfredo. Poc o² 20:00, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 17:45, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support, good image, but I think the name of the photo should be more appropriate. --Brateevsky (talk) 10:29, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done The Photographer (talk) 03:29, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 19:17, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 23:36, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Béria Lima ^msg 18:36, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 5 oppose, 2 neutral → featured. /— Stas1995 (talk) 22:26, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

File:Figura de Elefante.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2013 at 23:40:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Rjcastillo - uploaded by Rjcastillo - nominated by Rjcastillo -- Rjcastillo (talk) 23:40, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Rjcastillo (talk) 23:40, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, it is a nice picture and definitely a QI but I´m missing something special to make it FP. --mathias K 08:41, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support darkweasel94 01:23, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 11:31, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— Stas1995 (talk) 10:58, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tomteboda February 2013 01.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jul 2013 at 08:47:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Tomteboda post terminal in Stockholm. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 08:47, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ArildV (talk) 08:47, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:57, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 21:31, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Blurry on the far left side of the image. I'd probably support a cropped version. --Pine^✉ 19:00, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for your comment and suggestion. Im not sure, i like the composition and a crop will make it worse. The main object is sharp, is that not enough for an aerial? If you have a concrete proposal for crop, please add a note.--ArildV (talk) 19:34, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not really a wow image. Ok you get the feel for the length of the building but it lacks depth imo seems a bit too 2d for my liking. Flickrworker (talk) 22:05, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /— Stas1995 (talk) 10:57, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crisopid July 2013-9.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2013 at 22:19:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info A high resolution depiction of a gorgeous Green LaceWing. Please notice the delicate details of the wing venation, very difficult to capture due to size, small motions and diffraction. I don't think it is possible to go beyond the genus in the identification. Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:19, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:19, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --Julian H. (talk/files) 08:09, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 08:53, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 09:29, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 12:07, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good --Rjcastillo (talk) 13:02, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good --Jebulon (talk) 15:52, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 16:02, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:05, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 05:13, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 03:25, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 17:52, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Compliments --Llez (talk) 10:56, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 11:44, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 16:29, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods

File:Golden Hour at Emerald Bay.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2013 at 09:09:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Frank Schulenburg - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 09:09, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 09:09, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Citron (talk) 09:33, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support The top crop is a bit tight but overall no question, FP Poc o² 11:59, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 12:10, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 13:08, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 13:15, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 13:53, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 16:02, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 05:12, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support The most photographed spot on Lake Tahoe and ... it looks like it's being done for the first time. Such detail! (the little stone observation platform on the island, the firelight in the foreground ... wow!). Daniel Case (talk) 05:10, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 17:49, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:58, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Question Just wondering, if this was taken during the golden hour, shouldnt the colours be a bit more golden rather than bluish? --Muhammad (talk) 22:51, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Info Thanks for nominating my photo; I really appreciate the positive feedback. I was snowed under with work over the last two weeks and didn't notice this nomination ;-) You'll find the blue hour photo on Flickr. I actually think it's better than the one I uploaded here… What do you think? --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:52, 24 July 2013 (UTC) [reply]
- I think it is, if only for the little bit of additional sky. --Julian H.^✈ (talk/files) 15:55, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - I like more the color of the sky in the current one. Tomer T (talk) 08:05, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Tomer T (talk) 13:51, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Panoramas

File:Ivan Nikčević.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2013 at 19:14:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Steve Fair - uploaded by BokicaK - nominated by Flickrworker -- Flickrworker (talk) 19:14, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Flickrworker (talk) 19:14, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Massive noise (difficult to handle with indoor sport shots) but the focus is wrong. Not the player is sharp but some part (the note) at the bottom of the image. --Tuxyso (talk) 20:20, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not a single face is sharp. V-wolf (talk) 16:10, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 16:30, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pont du Tivoli, Sète, Hérault 03.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2013 at 04:06:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Christian Ferrer - uploaded by Christian Ferrer - nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:05, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:05, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Good value, nice light, good composition but oversharpened with a sharpening radius that is too big. --Julian H. (talk/files) 08:15, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I withdraw my nomination OK, thanks for comment, I live at a few second of this bridge (you can see my home) and I will be back here with the same composition but with better quality -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:48, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 16:30, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Poullignac Travaux LGV Caterpillar RM500 2013.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2013 at 11:05:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by JLPC - uploaded by JLPC - nominated by JLPC -- JLPC (talk) 11:05, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- JLPC (talk) 11:05, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Looks like it needs rotation, but then the chains tell a different story. Strange. --Julian H. (talk/files) 15:39, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 16:02, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Nikhil(talk) 16:33, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 05:12, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 14:58, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support To the undiscerning eye, it might be just another good-quality picture of some heavy equipment. But if you look at the detail, it tells a story (although of what, I'm not sure). It's as good as any of our best portraits of a person. Daniel Case (talk) 23:27, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 11:41, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 14:24, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:08, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support "wow effect" for such a vehicle ? Yes. As Daniel Case.--Jebulon (talk) 23:48, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good quality and milieu. V-wolf (talk) 16:08, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 18:59, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 16:29, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles

File:Schweizerhaus Schloßpark Ritzebüttel 2013.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jul 2013 at 21:38:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Swiss House ("Schweizerhaus") at palace garden of Ritzenbüttel Castle
created by Tuxyso - uploaded by Tuxyso - nominated by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 21:38, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 21:38, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Nice, but I think the mood comes better with some less lights. I`ve tried a slightly darker upload (less "lights" and "whites" in LR5) and I think this would work better (especially when done in the RAW file). --mathias K 09:32, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I am not convinced. Especially the light and bright spots make the original photo somehow special. But if you like I can send you the RAW file. What do other voters think about the alternative suggestion? --Tuxyso (talk) 10:04, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Lets give it a try, send me the raw and I will see what I can do. --mathias K 10:15, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I think it´s better with less lights -- Arcalino (talk) 16:57, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Altternative[edit]

Info Alternative Version with less lights, saturation and slightly other perspective. Done by me, with the original RAW send to me by the creator, Tuxyso. --mathias K 08:25, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support --mathias K 08:25, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Arcalino (talk) 17:27, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support - I prefer this version. Tiptoety ^talk 17:47, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 17:46, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support this version -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:02, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 19:19, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 05:12, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 20:48, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support The crowd has decided :) --Tuxyso (talk) 22:07, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 03:24, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /— Stas1995 (talk) 14:57, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places

The chosen alternative is: File:Schweizerhaus Schloßpark Ritzebüttel 2013 edit (MK).jpg

File:Berlin 775 Twilight fire 28 Oktober 2012.JPG[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2013 at 10:16:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Allager-wiki - uploaded by Allager-wiki - nominated by Allager-wiki -- Allager-wiki (talk) 10:16, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Allager-wiki (talk) 10:16, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose -- Lensflares, perspective distortions, unfortunate crop (TV-tower), subject unclear and not a very good composition. Sorry. Kleuske (talk) 10:44, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above. ~~--2.202.31.109 10:49, 20 July 2013 (UTC)~~Sorry, forgot to log in... --mathias K 11:14, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose While the poorly cropped tower is the main dealbreaker for me, I have to agree with the other opposes. It just looks like a typical tourist photo you'd find on someone's Facebook page. Daniel Case (talk) 23:23, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: of distortions, composition, crop, exposure etc. - V-wolf (talk) 16:26, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed.

File:Nguyen Aïn Nuä'C (Ho-Chi-Minh), délégué indochinois, Congrès communiste de Marseille, 1921, Meurisse, BNF Gallica.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2013 at 21:32:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Agence Meurisse - uploaded, stitched, restored and by nominated by me -- Jebulon (talk) 21:32, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support This very rare picture of Nguyễn Ái Quốc, the future Ho Chi Minh, taken in Marseille, France, in 1921, at the beginning of the very first congress of the French Communist Party, of which he is one of the "founding fathers". He was at the moment the representative of the French Indochina. This press picture I've restored has a very high value, and a very good technical quality too. The size and resolution are very big. I think it could be one of our FP in our historical gallery of VIP !-- Jebulon (talk) 21:32, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support For its historical significance. Kleuske (talk) 12:50, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support High HV.--JLPC (talk) 17:26, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 09:55, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tout est dans le regard --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:16, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Peut-être, mais moi c'est à ses oreilles -bertillonnage, on ne se refait pas !- que je l'ai reconnu (aucune identification possible par le texte de la description, et en plus, ils ont écorché son nom. Mais pas de doute, c'est lui, même si j'ai passé du temps à vérifier...). Je suis assez fier de cette trouvaille et de cette rareté...--Jebulon (talk) 16:30, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support high value - thanks for putting your effort in restoring the original scan! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:30, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support as others, high historical value. --Joydeep _Talk 18:09, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great historic value, and well-done restoration. Daniel Case (talk) 22:51, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support as others. --Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 11:38, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others. --Cayambe (talk) 17:48, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above. -- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 23:53, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others --ArildV (talk) 07:20, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 11:39, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical

File:Panorama Hafen Cuxhaven Alte Liebe 2013.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2013 at 22:04:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Panoramic view over habour of Cuxhaven photographed from Old Love ("Alte Liebe")
created by Tuxyso - uploaded by Tuxyso - nominated by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 22:04, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 22:04, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 23:30, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 03:15, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:52, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice panorama, very sharp even at full resolution.--ArildV (talk) 07:38, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mihael Grmek (talk) 08:09, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 08:15, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 09:02, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment stitching errors --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 09:43, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Correcture is currently to time consuming for me. I withdraw and ask for some help and will the image nominate later again. --Tuxyso (talk) 10:26, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jaguar F-Type unveiled at the Paris Auto Show 2012.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2013 at 12:32:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by NRMA Motoring and Services - uploaded by Paris 16 - nominated by Paris 16
Support -- Paris 16 (talk) 12:32, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:28, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Nikhil(talk) 00:35, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Julian H. (talk/files) 06:30, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 19:38, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support But this photo was taken before the Paris Auto Show 2012. Something wrong here.--Claus (talk) 19:58, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 17:50, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I only see advertisement here. No wow at all. Sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 15:45, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 18:02, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Info If this has the same author as the deleted proposed featured Subaru image then this maybe a copvio. Flickrworker (talk) 21:35, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 13:25, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles

File:Theodor-Heuss-Platz Bremerhaven 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2013 at 08:41:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Tuxyso - uploaded by Tuxyso - nominated by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 08:41, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 08:41, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Statue in the centre takes viewer's eye. Therefore I assume it's the subject of the picture and it's too small to be seen. Flickrworker (talk) 10:05, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Please look into the description: The subject is the whole square, the architectural ensemble with the statue, but it is not the main motive: Place of Theodor Heuss in Bremerhaven with statue of the former mayor of Bremen Dr. Johann Smidt who is the founder of Bremerhaven A contra vote because the statue is too small is imho debatable - but for sure it is your decision. --Tuxyso (talk) 11:10, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Ok but the composition is not helped by the "train track" paving which automatically steers the eye towards the statue, hence why I assume that the statue should have had a greater influence on the image. Flickrworker (talk) 21:58, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the composition, it gives a good general view of the plaza. Tomer T (talk) 10:59, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:06, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:16, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 05:59, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Raghith 10:24, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 11:31, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice perspective through the nice 10mm objective, on the other side I don't see any wow or originality when looking at it. Both, the statue in the center and the background are not special to me. If the background would be more symmetric and the 2 people waking not shown I could have supported it, sorry. Poco² 20:03, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I understand your argument, but I am of another opinion. Not every city is Paris or London - it is only Bremerhaven :). IMHO the place with statue in the center is photographed in the best possible way. I do not really see why this square is less interesting than the plenty of squares you've nominate here. Nonetheless thanks for your deliberative review instead of just writing "No Wow". --Tuxyso (talk) 20:49, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Arcalino (talk) 16:03, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 17:49, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support— ℳ₪Zaplotnik 14:06, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 20:51, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose --Kikos (talk) 08:28, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Opposing without any reason is not very helpful. --Tuxyso (talk) 08:41, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--ArildV (talk) 07:30, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 13:30, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Tuscan Landscape 6.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2013 at 09:15:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info everything by Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:15, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Martin Falbisoner (talk) 09:15, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 20:59, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:37, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 17:46, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:08, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llorenzi (talk) 19:21, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice light, very good sky, I would reduce a bit noise from it, but nevertheless FP. --Ivar (talk) 18:54, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Agree with Ivar -- MJJR (talk) 20:49, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support especially for the sky. -- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 23:53, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 16:26, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 13:24, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Elbphilharmonie Hamburg 03.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2013 at 17:52:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Huhu Uet - uploaded by Huhu Uet - nominated by Huhu Uet -- Huhu Uet (talk) 17:52, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain als Autor -- Huhu Uet (talk) 17:52, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It's a nice photo of the building, but I think the comparison to the existing FP of this building shows where the problems lie: The light is quite bad with most of the building being in the shadow, and all three channels are clipped somewhere, so the photo is clearly overexposed and/or oversaturated. --Julian H. (talk/files) 10:41, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 07:44, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hamburg Musicaltheater Der König der Löwen 03.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2013 at 17:42:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Huhu Uet - uploaded by Huhu Uet - nominated by Huhu Uet -- Huhu Uet (talk) 17:42, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain als Autor -- Huhu Uet (talk) 17:42, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 07:44, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Roques de García, Parque Nacional del Teide, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, España, 2012-12-16, DD 15.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2013 at 20:54:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Roques de García (rock formations) with the Teide (highest peak in Spain with 3718m over sea level) in the background, Teide National Park, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain. All by me, Poc o² 20:54, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 20:54, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing special.--Claus (talk) 19:54, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 20:22, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I prefer (and support) the wider crop you´ve had before (maybe with a little less sky)! The image is better balanced and shows the nice stone formation on the left side. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Leviathan1983 (talk • contribs)
Done! I considered both options, but after seeing the results I have to agree with you, a panorama touch makes the image much more interesting Poc o² 19:49, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Although you've tried to frame the peak of Teide with the two rocks the composition is somehow unbalanced and does not really catch my attention. --Tuxyso (talk) 20:14, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ For me the composition works very well now! Thanks for the edit. --109.45.0.127 20:53, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Please, login before voting, thanks, Poc o² 08:34, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Damn auto log off! ;-) Next try: Support --mathias K 11:21, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm not impressed with the light, sharpness and composition. --Ivar (talk) 08:49, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Thanks for your comments, I'm taking it back, though, Poc o² 18:07, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 07:49, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:San Francisco Ferry Building (cropped).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2013 at 00:33:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by JaGa - uploaded by JaGa - nominated by Nikhil -- Nikhil(talk) 00:33, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Nikhil(talk) 00:33, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer(talk) 05:12, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support very nice view and good quality. --mathias K 12:45, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Arcalino (talk) 16:00, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 17:51, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the composition - the interplay between the course of the bridge and the tower in the foregorund which visually terminates the bridge. Quality is very high. A bit pity that the letters on the building are on the other side, nonetheless a very good photo. --Tuxyso (talk) 20:23, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Julian H. (talk/files) 08:21, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 20:55, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 17:30, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 07:48, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:Schopfheim - Wiesenbrücke5.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2013 at 19:48:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Wladyslaw. Note: this bridge of concrete and steel was build in 1912 and is but for all it's short span a very remarkable bridge -- Wladyslaw (talk) 19:48, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Wladyslaw (talk) 19:48, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 07:45, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tenagodus trochlearis 01.JPG, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2013 at 14:23:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 14:23, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 14:23, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 15:19, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Arcalino (talk) 15:59, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support How many pictures did you do to make the image of the center? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:13, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Info It is a stack of about 10 pictures. --Llez (talk) 21:12, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 16:35, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 17:42, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 17:54, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 05:13, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Jacopo Werther ^iγ∂ψ=mψ 22:38, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 20:46, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 07:46, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Bones, shells and fossils

File:Berlin at night.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2013 at 09:27:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Allager-wiki - uploaded by Allager-wiki - nominated by Allager-wiki -- Allager-wiki (talk) 09:27, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Allager-wiki (talk) 09:27, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nice illumination and blue sky, but technical just average (not so good balanced) and boring and not harmonious composition, e.g. the lamps at the bottom of the pic are disturbing --Wladyslaw (talk) 11:05, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not really dark enough to see the subject although the sky is cool. The light from the building to the left detracts a great deal and overall it's quite boring. Sorry. Flickrworker (talk) 16:58, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but per Wladyslaw. --mathias K 12:36, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 20:56, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 13:34, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Paracirrhites forsteri Forsters Hawkfish juvenile PNG by Nick Hobgood.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2013 at 12:33:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Nhobgood - nominated by Citron -- Citron (talk) 12:33, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Citron (talk) 12:33, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 17:26, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 20:36, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:00, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 11:34, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:08, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 11:45, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 18:06, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:08, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 20:44, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 09:47, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 13:32, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish

File:Thulin-Blériot XI replica.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2013 at 11:01:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created & uploaded by Ritchyblack - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 11:01, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 11:01, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kleuske (talk) 11:04, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support great! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:33, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow! -- Arcalino (talk) 17:45, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:59, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Some halos around the lines, but acceptable. Shutter speed and angle are spot-on. --Julian H. (talk/files) 11:25, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 18:55, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --ArildV (talk) 07:32, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 16:26, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice and original Poc o² 09:47, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 13:33, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles

File:Kei Nishikori 1, Wimbledon 2013 - Diliff.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jul 2013 at 18:53:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Diliff - uploaded by Diliff - nominated by Pine -- Pine^✉ 18:53, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Pine^✉ 18:53, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support very good! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 19:28, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 19:38, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow, bad background.--Claus (talk) 19:53, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It's a sporting event how is the background bad. You can't do anything about it. Flickrworker (talk) 21:52, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:34, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great action shot. --mathias K 12:32, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 17:54, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 18:57, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
weak oppose First: The photo has a very high quality particularly for a sport shot. Sport shots are are ofter quite noisy and have low resolution (due to massive noise reduction and/or downscaling). But I am missing something special with this photo here. More a technically autofocus and shutter delay test than a featured picture. I am with Klaus that the background is unfortunate and a bit distracting. --Tuxyso (talk) 20:30, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Distracting background, tight framing, and a bit weak on "wow" factor. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:39, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Nikhil(talk) 14:15, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 08:20, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Sports

File:Marma läger 20.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2013 at 20:28:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info All by me -- V-wolf (talk) 20:28, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as uploader -- V-wolf (talk) 20:28, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 20:37, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support. I like it but perhaps the contrast between the lit front and the shadowed side could be evened out a little? It's a bit jarring. Daniel Case (talk) 22:44, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Question Is it not possible to take this with all visible sides lit (i.e. is the shadowed side facing north)? darkweasel94 13:41, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Do you mean from the other front angle? V-wolf (talk) 15:15, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Question Can you try to lighten the dark areas? -- -donald- (talk) 10:03, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Done V-wolf (talk) 15:25, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Good quality and nice building, but I dislike the tight crop at three sides, and the shadows (even if they have been lightened). --A.Savin 10:08, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 08:19, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Festival of lights berlin.JPG[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jul 2013 at 09:29:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Allager-wiki - uploaded by Allager-wiki - nominated by Allager-wiki -- Allager-wiki (talk) 09:29, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Allager-wiki (talk) 09:29, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support The joy of photography --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 17:29, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose. Awesome shot! Unfortunately, due to the unsharpness and noise (especially color noise), I cannot support this. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:08, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Question Are there probably copyright issues due to the artists of the festival of light? --Tuxyso (talk) 20:18, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— Stas1995 (talk) 12:44, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Copulating pair of brown bears.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jul 2013 at 21:55:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Michael Gäbler - uploaded by Michael Gäbler - nominated by Michael Gäbler -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:55, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Michael Gäbler (talk) 21:55, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support darkweasel94 01:25, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support More animal pr0n! I like the detail—the sweat and the expressions on their faces. The more natural setting (was it actually in the wild?) sets it apart from our other pictures of bears gettin' it on. Daniel Case (talk) 04:49, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Something about the colors just don't look right to me - too purple, maybe? I'll support if the color is fixed. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:03, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Contrast edited out. --Julian H. (talk/files) 07:44, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As per King, the colours seem too bright and unnatural. Flickrworker (talk) 09:59, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Info I made an update. The color is fixed. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 13:48, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure it is "fixed". I think the tint could be moved a bit more towards green and less purple. Colin (talk) 19:36, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Info This is a new update with more green, less purple and less contrast. I used Photoshop. I thank Tomer and all of the other for help and advice. You are a good team. Please check the picture if it meets your expectations. --Michael Gäbler (talk) 00:25, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as other. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:14, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A pity, I'm really sorry, but per others.--Jebulon (talk) 21:41, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Michael Gäbler (talk) 15:02, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative[edit]

Info edit by me. Color adjustments. Tomer T (talk) 12:16, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 12:16, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support more natural looking. Flickrworker (talk) 12:53, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support also good darkweasel94 14:53, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Better. Daniel Case (talk) 22:07, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:05, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I had my initial suspicions that there might have been an overcorrection towards green, but I attributed it to a monitor issue (my monitor has a slight blue-green tint). However, per below it looks like I'm not alone, so Oppose for now. The original photographer should produce a re-edited version from the raw that strikes a balance between the two current versions on the green/magenta scale. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:11, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:19, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above, no change. --Julian H. (talk/files) 06:30, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Raghith 10:24, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Oppose - The edit has lost the sRGB colour profile from the image. This is not acceptable for a Featured Picture, particularly when the original had one (sRGB). This will cause the colours to be wrong on some computers/devices -- e.g., the grass far too green. Also I don't think we should fiddle with colour on the JPG when we have the photographer here with access to the raw file and a professional colour software (photoshop) with which to do it. In addition, the other EXIF data has been lost. Please don't use "Microsoft Windows Live Photo Gallery" to edit featured picture nominations. Colin (talk) 19:29, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for the kind words. Tomer T (talk) 20:04, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Hey Tomer, sorry that's so negative. You do a lot of great work here. The flaw with that edit was the tool, not your intention. I don't think that program is suitable for editing FPs if it removes colour profiles and EXIF data. Colin (talk) 20:49, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Julian H.--Claus (talk) 20:02, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as Colin --Arcalino (talk) 16:08, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose as other. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 17:14, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Different, but not better, sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 21:40, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /— Stas1995 (talk) 08:10, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:A Different Slant on Carina.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2013 at 05:18:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Steveblackimages - uploaded by Steveblackimages - nominated by Steveblackimages -- Steveblackimages (talk) 05:18, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Steveblackimages (talk) 05:18, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose just to the right of centre there is a very noticeable line running from top to bottom as if the image has been stitched there. Flickrworker (talk) 08:07, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 15:23, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Amphiprion ocellaris (Clown anemonefish) by Nick Hobgood.jpg

File:Arched Rock as seen from Goat Rock Beach.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2013 at 02:48:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Frank Schulenburg - uploaded by Frank Schulenburg - nominated by —Mono 02:48, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- —Mono 02:48, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice light and composition. --Tuxyso (talk) 05:44, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good quality, per Tuxyso. I also added a note, I'm not sure what happens there (stitching problem?) but it's not really a problem. --Julian H. (talk/files) 08:13, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 11:11, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 13:53, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 05:12, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Fuzzy. --Laitche (talk) 18:21, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 20:57, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 17:51, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 06:21, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Colina de las Cruces, Lituania, 2012-08-09, DD 28.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2013 at 18:36:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Hill of Crosses, site of pilgrimage near Šiauliai, Lithuania. All by me, Poc o² 18:36, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poc o² 18:36, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment We already have a Featured Picture of this site. The current nomination does not look to me significantly different, nor better. I think we should begin a delist process of the previous FP before featuring this one.--Jebulon (talk) 23:33, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Well, thanks for the comment. I have never understood why sometimes this kind of rule applies and others it doesn't but will take back the nomination Poc o² 09:40, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Poco, as for me it does not sound like a "rule", it was just the expression of my own opinion.--Jebulon (talk) 12:58, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Well, the another picture from Pudelek shows the lateral side, mine the front side and it has non distracting people giving a feeling of the size. Still, after you comment nobody else voted or commented, so I guess that the picture is not as good as I thought, although I travelled to Lithuania explicitly to visit this site...Poc o² 14:31, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Trully sorry. But please notice that I did not oppose...And I am not responsible of the (non) opinion of others...--Jebulon (talk) 19:06, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
No worries my friend! I have other 8500 pictures uploaded :) Poc o² 20:30, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 06:18, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gentoo Penguin bites into a Brown Skua as another Skua steals the Penguin Chick (5751217023).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Aug 2013 at 16:46:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Liam Quinn - uploaded by russavia - nominated by russavia -- russavia (talk) 16:46, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- russavia (talk) 16:46, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Drama for sure but the composition, and in particular the background, is off putting. Saffron Blaze (talk) 21:31, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Image with value but blurry IMO--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 23:33, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 06:20, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Helsinki July 2013-15.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2013 at 22:15:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info The House of the Estates, Helsinki, Finlnad. A very high resolution photo of a beautiful neoclassic building. All by Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:15, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 22:15, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment ~~: just a slight grey spot, easy to fix (see note, please). OK afterwads~~. --JLPC (talk) 11:15, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Done -- Thank you JLPC, I have removed some more... Alvesgaspar (talk) 13:04, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but I think the crop on the sides is too close. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 13:54, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support : wow now. --JLPC (talk) 17:51, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 06:19, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ved kæret nordby.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jul 2013 at 20:52:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by Villy Fink Isaksen -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 20:52, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 20:52, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 21:17, 19 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't like that the trees hide too much of the buildings. Tomer T (talk) 08:49, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 11:16, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Very good technical quality, and the photographer at the window is interesting (is this part of a "Wiki takes-event"?), but: The pond and the benches are the main subjects imho, and both would have benefited of more room to the left. Very little can be revealed from the shadows. I stick to neutral.V-wolf (talk) 21:57, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 06:19, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Sunrise Over the South Pacific Ocean.jpg

File:COCK FIGHT.JPG, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2013 at 12:20:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Amshudhagar - uploaded by Amshudhagar - nominated by Perumalism -- Perumalism Chat 12:20, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Perumalism Chat 12:20, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose wow factor, but quality is low: unsharp and noisy. Tomer T (talk) 13:53, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Bad quality. –Makele-90 (talk) 15:29, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as uploader Perumalism Chat 13:48, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Moral support Get this photographer a good camera! --99of9 (talk) 01:40, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- True, although a 7D is really not the worst of all cameras. It's just that these shots take the best/most expensive gear available to have good quality. --Julian H.^✈ (talk/files) 06:05, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:42, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cirsium arvense - põldohakas.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2013 at 15:01:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info A flowering creeping thistle. All by Ivar (talk) 15:01, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as author -- Ivar (talk) 15:01, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 09:09, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 17:28, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting to see one of these flowers shot in almost-sunset light. Daniel Case (talk) 23:36, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 11:39, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:08, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support V-wolf (talk) 16:19, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Vamps (talk) 20:39, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:47, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Flowers

File:Flatruetvägen July 2013.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2013 at 07:40:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info Road between Mittådalen and Funäsdalen. Härjedalen Municipality, Jämtland County. In the background, Anåfjället (Anå mountain). Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 07:40, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ArildV (talk) 07:40, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 09:02, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:10, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kikos (talk) 12:52, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support –Makele-90 (talk) 15:37, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 17:18, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 22:40, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 07:42, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 10:19, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support V-wolf (talk) 19:40, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:02, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 22:02, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Felix König ✉ 11:09, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:41, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural

File:Heather Watson Forehand Volley (1).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2013 at 12:16:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Keith Allison - uploaded by Flickrworker - nominated by Flickrworker -- Flickrworker (talk) 12:17, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Flickrworker (talk) 12:17, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Multiple issues, foremost: Focus not on eyes, unflattering pose. V-wolf (talk) 16:03, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment First and foremost she's playing a tennis shot. So it's pretty pathetic to decline for an unflattering pose. Secondly she's playing the shot the focus is on the ball and racquet not the eyes, which in this case help direct the viewer as she is looking at the object. Flickrworker (talk) 17:24, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- We have lots of sports photos. If I was an athlete I wouldn't like to be portrayed like this on the front page. She is clearly not doing her best forehand swing. Besides, the focus plane lies on her a-shirt. Other issues: The ball-like logo is drawing attention from the subject. It's very grainy for a daytime shot with a 1d. V-wolf (talk) 21:00, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - Dude she's playing a volley not a forehand. Completely different shots imo. Flickrworker (talk) 21:59, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - "If I was an athlete I wouldn't like to be portrayed like this on the front page." Sorry but that is near bollocks if you have seen some of the images that the BBC have used in its articles of tennis players. Sorry to be sharp but I think that is worth mentioning on that specific point. Flickrworker (talk) 23:09, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Better choice IMO: http://www.flickr.com/photos/keithallison/5986802078/in/photostream/ Saffron Blaze (talk) 21:28, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- That might already be uploaded. All I remember is I got board uploading as there is hundreds by this photographer. Flickrworker (talk) 22:01, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:46, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lufthansa Airbus A320-211 D-AIQT 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2013 at 08:52:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created, uploaded and nominated by me. -- Julian H. (talk/files) 08:52, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Info The photo illustrates en:Airbus A320 family.
Abstain as author. -- Julian H. (talk/files) 08:52, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 11:09, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 14:52, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 17:50, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice and crisp. Daniel Case (talk) 00:12, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 11:42, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 10:04, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Nikhil(talk) 15:44, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:48, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles

File:Psolodesmus mandarinus mandarinus with female of Hydrophylita emporos - journal.pone.0069331.g005.png, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2013 at 23:33:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info A female parasitic wasp (Hydrophylita emporos) hitchhiking on a female damselfly (Psolodesmus mandarinus mandarinus). Created by Shih et al. (2013) - uploaded by Daniel Mietchen - nominated by Daniel Mietchen -- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 23:33, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 23:33, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:45, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ptuj panorama 02.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Aug 2013 at 13:00:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Mihael Grmek - uploaded by Mihael Grmek - nominated by Mihael Grmek -- Mihael Grmek (talk) 13:00, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mihael Grmek (talk) 13:00, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not bad, but stitching errors should be removed (e.g. look at the left bridge railing). --Tuxyso (talk) 14:31, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very nice. The horizon drops away towards the left. Sharpening is also a little heavy but still ok imo. --Julian H.^✈ (talk/files) 16:40, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Info I think I have corrected all the stitchinig errors. --Mihael Grmek 08:10, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't think so. See note. In general the photo looks a bit oversharpened (especially on the sky). Have you tried masked sharpening? --08:12, 25 July 2013 (UTC)
  - I have unsharpened the sky and corrected stitching error. --Mihael Grmek 12:55, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:45, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wales, Pays de Galles, par John Speed, 1610, BNF Gallica.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jul 2013 at 15:39:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by John Speed - uploaded, restored and nominated by me -- Jebulon (talk) 15:39, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support This 1610 map of Wales, by John Speed. Please enjoy the resolution and the level of details ! Cymru am Byth !-- Jebulon (talk) 15:39, 20 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 17:28, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 17:21, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 05:42, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 17:46, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Miniopterus manavi.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2013 at 08:54:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Edgarsh422 - uploaded by Edgarsh422 - nominated by Dvdgmz -- Dvdgmz (talk) 08:54, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good scientific illustration, showing the features and morphology of the animal. Good integration of general and detail views. Resolution 3,2Mpx. Usefull for Wikipedia and Wikispecies -- Dvdgmz (talk) 08:54, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment This image was previously nominated but denied because I had other nominations active, after that nominations are closed I can nominate this again.--Dvdgmz (talk) 08:54, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Is a naturalistic illustration that breaks a little the stereotype, although this, it gives us all the information needed for this type of work. As author --Edgarsh422 (talk) 11:17, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, rather small and too much "artistic" design for my taste. I would prefer the more scientific drawing --mathias K 18:57, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It is not small, is 1,2Mpx over minimum of 2Mpx. --Dvdgmz (talk) 11:21, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment The engravings of Ernst Haeckel from 1904 are good contributions to naturalism, but it's not the only style for scientific illustrations. I think that the Edgarsh422 drawing shows well the features of the animal for an encyclopedia. --Dvdgmz (talk) 11:21, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'd rather be educated by a creative work like this. That other drawing suits en:FP not Commons FPC. Saffron Blaze (talk) 00:49, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per nominator. Leptictidium (talk) 17:39, 23 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per nominator. --Ivan bea (talk) 14:03, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per mathias. Kaldari (talk) 07:39, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per mathias. RichardKongrosian (talk) 07:18, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per nominator.--KRLS (talk) 12:12, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Mathias--Jebulon (talk) 13:02, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Mathias. --Citron (talk) 18:01, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Mathias. ■ MMXX ^talk 15:37, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please, if you can spend a little time to argue the author will have feedback and we will have best orientations to promote this kind of contributions. Thanks.--Dvdgmz (talk) 21:04, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 13:12, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Peter Sagan Maillot Vert 2013.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Jul 2013 at 12:22:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Denismenchov08 - uploaded by Denismenchov08 - nominated by Denismenchov08 -- Denismenchov08 (talk) 12:22, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Denismenchov08 (talk) 12:22, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Redbeard? Several. Bluebeard? Fairytales only. Greenbeard? Wow... That's dedication to the team colors... Kleuske (talk) 14:03, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Info Nothing to do with team colours. Just that he won the green jersey in the TDF so died his hair and 3 week old beard green. Flickrworker (talk) 17:34, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Gildir (talk) 16:28, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose from a wow point of view. Flickrworker (talk) 17:44, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment What do you mean by « wow » (I'm french and I don't understand your remark) ? --Denismenchov08 (talk) 19:04, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - OK I've looked my French up and if I change wow to special you should understand the meaning. For me the picture is not special enough due to knowing when in the etape you took the photo. For me it is not special because they were not racing at that moment in time, they were messing around travailing to kilometre 0. Others are free to support for technical reasons or to even go against me. Flickrworker (talk) 21:19, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice picture, good informative value, perfect for Wikipedia use. Personally I don't think it's necessary that the rider is actually racing to have a good photo. Support for FP, although some parts of the picture are slightly overexposed. -- MJJR (talk) 20:44, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 12:59, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice posture, but I don't like the crop. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:08, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Just an ordinary image with not-so-good crop and some overexposion. Car in the downright corner doesn't suite to the image as well. Kruusamägi (talk) 21:57, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'm always glad to have more action shots, so am a bit forgiving, but I agree with the others that this is not special enough. I would prefer this photo to be taken from further in front of him rather than behind. --99of9 (talk) 01:44, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Kruusamägi --Gzzz (talk) 18:47, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 13:12, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Pont du Tivoli, Sète, Hérault 14.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2013 at 04:36:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Christian Ferrer - uploaded by Christian Ferrer - nominated by Christian Ferrer -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:35, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:35, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Very harmonic composition & good quality, I'll support when you 1) remove the red CA's on the left building (+ windows), 2) find a usage for the picture on any project (wikipedia etc.). --A.Savin 09:54, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Done for both -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:36, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  - There is, however, still some minor CA at the very left of the building. Please remove too. --A.Savin 11:46, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    - Done I think. -- Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:10, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 12:31, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- MJJR (talk) 16:28, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Julian H.^✈ (talk/files) 18:00, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 03:55, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 04:10, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 07:42, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 08:37, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 02:39, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Felix König ✉ 11:08, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 13:10, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

File:RENFE Class 730 Viaducto Martin Gil.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2013 at 11:39:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by David Gubler - uploaded by David Gubler - nominated by Nikhil -- Nikhil(talk) 11:39, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Nikhil(talk) 11:39, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 12:21, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Julian H.^✈ (talk/files) 12:43, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support The composition is really good! --Tuxyso (talk) 15:48, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good. -- MJJR (talk) 16:24, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Joydeep _Talk 16:41, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ximonic (talk) 17:18, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 21:53, 26 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great  Richard  [®]  00:37, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done. -- Daniel Mietchen (talk) 03:54, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mehdi^Talk 04:10, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer(talk) 08:05, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --JLPC (talk) 08:36, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poc o² 09:47, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support I would have nominated it myself. Soerfm (talk) 10:47, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Florian Fuchs (talk) 15:11, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Laitche (talk) 15:21, 27 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 06:57, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Vamps (talk) 20:37, 28 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Pile-on Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:51, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Felix König ✉ 11:07, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Joydeep _Talk 13:10, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture

Commons:Featured picture candidates/

File:Эвакуация автотранспорта трактором Беларус.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Aug 2013 at 20:37:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info all by -- Chelovechek (talk) 20:37, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain as uploader -- Chelovechek (talk) 20:37, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No "wow" factor. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:02, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 0 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Joydeep _Talk 13:11, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]