Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/April 2024
File:Upper Salmon River6.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2024 at 17:44:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Canada#New Brunswick
- Info: Upper Salmon River shrouded in mist; second nomination. The first one nearly passed; redeveloped to address the common criticism of the colours being too dull. All by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:44, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:44, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support as I did last time. Cmao20 (talk) 19:40, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 20:52, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't anything to look at. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:34, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- You don't what? --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:45, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- Sorry, I don't SEE anything to look at. There is nothing interesting to look at. A very dull scene or a dull day. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:50, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- You don't what? --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:45, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 00:30, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Composition is fine, but dull light and bland colors. You could have the same clouds with sunny parts somewhere. Gray landscape, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:16, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support again. There are some gray, foggy days and landscapes that are beautiful and give me a feeling of peace. I still remember visiting the temple complex in Besakih, on the slopes of Gunung Agung in Bali, in fog with a light, misty rain in 1976. This is a more purely natural landscape, but it has at one remove (because I'm not experiencing it in person) some of the same feeling to me. That's in addition to what I find a very satisfying composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:20, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice moody atmosphere. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:15, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per above, not extraordinary in my eyes Poco a poco (talk) 09:09, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Ikan, exactly. – Aristeas (talk) 12:15, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Temperate support There is a lot to look at with a mysterious feel and quiet contemplative atmosphere. With regard to emptiness and void and some Zen quality you can almost say: what is not there can be more important than what is there. Canada’s nature and geological features remind of magnificent mountain ranges in Siberia, particularly Altai and Ergaki/Sayan ranges, and to a certain extent even the Caucasus Mountains. Not sure if this photograph is exceptional enough, but it’s not bad at all, quiet and secluded, and I’d vote for it. --Argenberg (talk) 22:03, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 23:08, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support For me atmospheric.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:33, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 10:20, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:42, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per above, not extraordinary, IHMO. -- Karelj (talk) 12:40, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose There's a fine line between overcast and atmospheric, and this is sadly too much of the former IMO, sorry. BigDom (talk) 13:52, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Dull light, no "wow" for me. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 21:43, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Julesvernex2 (talk) 21:59, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
File:R-1830 engine on C-47 at factory 1942.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2024 at 11:31:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#1940-1949
- Info Employee being trained on installing an aircraft engine, United States 1942 - uploaded by Cobatfor - nominated by --Thi (talk) 11:31, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Thi (talk) 11:31, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:14, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:03, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 00:27, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive for a 1942 photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:09, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support And definitely useful. --LexKurochkin (talk) 06:27, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:39, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive. – Aristeas (talk) 10:16, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Looks like an Alien set with Sigourney Weaver fixing the engine for intergalactic flight. --Argenberg (talk) 13:17, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:44, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:36, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition and quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:03, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:03, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Chapelle armentieres 393 397 rte nationale.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2024 at 12:45:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
- Info An architectural curiosity. Created by Velvet - uploaded by Velvet - nominated by Velvet -- Velvet (talk) 12:45, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Velvet (talk) 12:45, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Unusual and interesting motif and good sharp photo outweighs average/slightly dull light conditions, overall deserves the star Cmao20 (talk) 23:08, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 00:27, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:38, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk)
- Support Unusual and creative composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:45, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:38, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:04, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:25, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Kruusamägi (talk) 11:35, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
File:020 African blue flycatcher at Kibale forest National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2024 at 20:19:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Stenostiridae (Fairy flycatchers)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:19, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:19, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice moment. 21:27, 27 March 2024 (UTC) Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:27, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:41, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 21:51, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:08, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 22:26, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great composition Cmao20 (talk) 23:49, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:38, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Striking color and as noticed by Cmao20, excellent composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:09, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:49, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:30, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 09:29, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:34, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:51, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 18:17, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:29, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:10, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:32, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:01, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Cape Town (ZA), Wale Street -- 2024 -- 3544.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2024 at 16:44:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#South Africa
- Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 16:44, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 16:44, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lovely and colorful. ★ 23:01, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Shame about the cars, but great photo anyway Cmao20 (talk) 23:45, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support The cars add character. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:36, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ultra vibrant colors! -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:11, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Right crop seems a little close, but still really nice to me. There's a UFO on the upper left. :-) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:51, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice capture of the colourful streets of Bo-Kaap district! --PierreSelim (talk) 06:40, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 09:29, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:50, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 18:17, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:41, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support ~Moheen (keep talking) 01:31, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Nice colors but the cars spoil a good portion of the compo Poco a poco (talk) 07:32, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:10, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:30, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Piazza della Libertà - San Marino - 2024 02 13 - GT 01.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Apr 2024 at 22:33:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors
- Info The Public Palace is the heart of San Marino’s political life and history, and it is here that the installation ceremony of the Captains Regent takes place every 6 months: on April 1 and October 1, every year. The Statua della Libertà, or Statue of Liberty, is positioned in the middle of Piazza Della Libertà, San Marino's major official plaza, which also houses the Parliament. Created, uploaded, nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:33, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 22:33, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose A very detailed large image. However, harsh contract, centred element in the composition, right building cut, and no wow --Wilfredor (talk) 00:31, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for judging my photo. Waiting for a warmer light in this place is not convenient because you would have this result as well as the sun against the lens. Terragio67 (talk) 05:27, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- thanks for the explain Wilfredor (talk) 12:48, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for judging my photo. Waiting for a warmer light in this place is not convenient because you would have this result as well as the sun against the lens. Terragio67 (talk) 05:27, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good to me. If pictures of monuments with strong light and shadows were good for de Chirico, I don't see why they can't be good in the art of photography, too, and I don't find this light overly harsh by any means. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:03, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Vertical orientation is useful for example in encyclopedias. --Thi (talk) 08:50, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 10:23, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:44, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Ikan. There must be more than one way to take good photographs of buildings; sometimes strong light and shadows work very well. (And thank you for the hint to de Chirico, one of my favourite painters ;–). – Aristeas (talk) 10:53, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:48, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 12:39, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:32, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support I actually quite like the light conditions here. Cmao20 (talk) 16:43, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:05, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 20:23, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:28, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Guaita Fortress - San Marino - 2024 02 13 - GT 02 (details).jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2024 at 21:31:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications#San_Marino
- Info I wanted to photograph the Guaita Fortress in detail, because from the colour, size and shape of its sandstone bricks, it is possible to trace the century in which its walls were built. I described what was said in the image annotations. Created, uploaded, nominated by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 21:31, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 21:31, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:40, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Superb resolution and quality Cmao20 (talk) 23:49, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 00:25, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:39, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great! FYI, Roman numerals are not usually used for centuries in English, so 19th century, 20th century, etc. But it's by no means essential to change that. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:48, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the clarification, it's my fault. When I published the image I was in a hurry and I wrote in a shortened way mixing what was written in Latin (romans num.) and English on the tourist reference booklet... Now, I fixed It... Terragio67 (talk) 05:42, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:28, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:33, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:29, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 16:49, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:34, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:12, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:34, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:59, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:06, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Campamento de ganado de la tribu Mundari, Terekeka, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-28, DD 36.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2024 at 22:15:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Standing_people
- Info Mundari woman observing the White Nile after sunrise, Terekeka, South Sudan. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 22:15, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 22:15, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support At first I thought that the person was looking ahead and protecting himself from some pesticide, it reminded me of some scenes from Shernobill but then I understood that it was someone looking at the lake --Wilfredor (talk) 22:27, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent and strangely melancholy photo but I would have rotated it slightly so that the opposite bank was straight. Cmao20 (talk) 23:51, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Corrected, thank you for your comment and point, Poco a poco (talk) 17:48, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 00:24, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful. There appears to be a water droplet on the lens just to the right of the tall tree on the left. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:40, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Removed, thank you, Ikan, Poco a poco (talk) 17:48, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Sure thing. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:52, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Needs perspective correction. --Thi (talk) 09:31, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thi: do you mean the tilt (it's corrected now)? Poco a poco (talk) 17:48, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support Even if there are some pitfalls in the image that are relatively disturbing, it is necessary to consider the difficulties of moving in safety around the South Sudan territory and the ungenerous environment and also some diseases such as dengue fever which forgives no one... Finally I have to say that the image in its composition conveys emotions, melancholy and information of cultural interest. Thanks Diego. -- Terragio67 (talk) 10:00, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- (Just to point out, dengue is endemic in major cities like Singapore and Kuala Lumpur. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:08, 28 March 2024 (UTC))
- I know it's not the same, but it reminds me of when I was nominating photos from Venezuela and it was so difficult to explain that an apparently simple photo carries many dangers behind it. But it makes me think about whether a photo should be good regardless of the circumstantial aspects. Wilfredor (talk) 16:48, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 10:13, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 18:16, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:53, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:32, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 15:28, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:42, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 16:47, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Reminds me of my earlier trip to the African savanna, albeit with no people. Wolverine XI 19:28, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:13, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:36, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:05, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Mütsik.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2024 at 07:28:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Daphniidae
- Info created by Janeklass - uploaded by Janeklass - nominated by Janeklass -- Janeklass (talk) 07:28, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Janeklass (talk) 07:28, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Please add a description above. Yann (talk) 10:24, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment If this little creature is a member of the Ceriodaphnia genus, it belongs to the Daphniidae family, right? Then please use Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Daphniidae as gallery link (just as I have corrected this above) – and also for any other photos of any Daphniidae. Thank you! – Aristeas (talk) 10:42, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Identified by genus and quite interesting. I have another request, though: Could you please state in the file description what degree of magnification we are seeing? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:39, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Magnification in photomicrography is actually a very complex concept. People may not understand it. When I say that the magnification is 10x, you have to understand what 10x is about. This is related to the size of the camera sensor and requires special calculations to measure it. But in the end, this information does not give anything to the viewer, because it is not understood. It's easier to tell how big the water flea itself is, but I usually don't measure them. Janeklass (talk) 17:24, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support I still feel that it's helpful, but I think this photo is worth supporting, in any case. The other one shouldn't be an FP without the categorization being fixed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:52, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:46, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 23:49, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:42, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:40, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 20:23, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 21:58, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 06:58, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
File:002 Black-headed weaver building its nest at Kibale forest National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2024 at 20:03:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Ploceidae (Weavers)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:03, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:03, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I don't think the composition matches up to the exisitng range of weaver nest-building FPs, but I cannot claim to be be unbiased. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:50, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- I think the angle of this one is more interesting with the wings wide open. Also I like that the nest is smoothly integrated below the leafs hiding it from predators that would look at it from above. Giles Laurent (talk) 22:32, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- I was not aware that weavers chose to build their nests in sites where they are hidden from predators. Where did you read this? Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:29, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Well in southern Africa for example the following birds are predators of weavers adults : Ovambo sparrowhawk, Little sparrowhawk, Peregrine falcon and Lanner falcon. The following birds are also predators for eggs and chicks of weavers : Purple heron, Gabar goshawk, Black kite, Common fiscal and African grey hornbill. So it is no surprise that hiding the nest from predators is an advantage for adults, chicks and eggs. Giles Laurent (talk) 13:01, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- So no evidence to support your statement that 'the nest is smoothly integrated below the leafs hiding it from predators that would look at it from above.'. It might be best to delete that. It's not good to invent bird behaviour. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:42, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Well I didn't said that weavers would usually prefer to hide their nests, I only said that I liked the fact that this one was hidden. And this one is indeed hidden from the predators they have that might look at it from above because it is hidden below the leafs. Wether it was intended or not is another question. This behaviour is more rare to see than most of the weaver nest you will see. This is why I said that I liked it because it shows something less common. Weavers often build their nests close to human habitations and I guess that human proximity can bring some kind of protection to them as well. Giles Laurent (talk) 10:47, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- The bird appears to be building or interacting with its nest. This species of bird often builds hanging nests with materials such as grass and branches. The bird is using its beak and legs to manipulate materials in the nest structure, a common behavior during the breeding season. The bird's posture, with wings spread and feathers ruffled, could also be a display behavior to attract a mate or a defensive response to a possible nearby threat. Wilfredor (talk) 10:59, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- This male is simply building its nest [[User:Wilfredor|Wilfredo]. A well-built nest is needed to attract a female. We do not see any display behaviour or defensive response here. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- The bird appears to be building or interacting with its nest. This species of bird often builds hanging nests with materials such as grass and branches. The bird is using its beak and legs to manipulate materials in the nest structure, a common behavior during the breeding season. The bird's posture, with wings spread and feathers ruffled, could also be a display behavior to attract a mate or a defensive response to a possible nearby threat. Wilfredor (talk) 10:59, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Well I didn't said that weavers would usually prefer to hide their nests, I only said that I liked the fact that this one was hidden. And this one is indeed hidden from the predators they have that might look at it from above because it is hidden below the leafs. Wether it was intended or not is another question. This behaviour is more rare to see than most of the weaver nest you will see. This is why I said that I liked it because it shows something less common. Weavers often build their nests close to human habitations and I guess that human proximity can bring some kind of protection to them as well. Giles Laurent (talk) 10:47, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- So no evidence to support your statement that 'the nest is smoothly integrated below the leafs hiding it from predators that would look at it from above.'. It might be best to delete that. It's not good to invent bird behaviour. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:42, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Well in southern Africa for example the following birds are predators of weavers adults : Ovambo sparrowhawk, Little sparrowhawk, Peregrine falcon and Lanner falcon. The following birds are also predators for eggs and chicks of weavers : Purple heron, Gabar goshawk, Black kite, Common fiscal and African grey hornbill. So it is no surprise that hiding the nest from predators is an advantage for adults, chicks and eggs. Giles Laurent (talk) 13:01, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- I was not aware that weavers chose to build their nests in sites where they are hidden from predators. Where did you read this? Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:29, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- I think the angle of this one is more interesting with the wings wide open. Also I like that the nest is smoothly integrated below the leafs hiding it from predators that would look at it from above. Giles Laurent (talk) 22:32, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:47, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:23, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:08, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fine composition in my view, and the action is well frozen at 1/2000s -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Please add the species of bird to the categories; it's very hard to compare this to other photos of the bird without the correct category. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:32, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Done category added. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:22, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile Cmao20 (talk) 02:10, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support The composition seems a bit random and accidental but the bird, sensing the danger of falling on its back, has shown all its beautiful plumage, even in a scene and accidental composition that seems like a product of play. --Wilfredor (talk) 02:20, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:55, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:40, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Top as always. ★ 19:18, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The feathers look good but the peak and leg look overprocessed to me Poco a poco (talk) 07:30, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the review. It is an action shot of a weaver flapping it's wings so a speed of 1/2000s was needed. It was in a dark area as it was in the shadows of trees so ISO 6400 was needed. With high ISO it is inevitable and normal that some small detail can be less visible, especially in areas with more shadow than the rest. Giles Laurent (talk) 13:21, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:15, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:39, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:03, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 13:22, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Chicken on the grounds of Melville Castle.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2024 at 19:05:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phasianidae_(Grouse,_Partridges,_Peafowl,_Pheasants,_Quail,_Turkeys)
- Info Chicken on the grounds of Melville Castle in Scotland. created by Grendelkhan - uploaded by Grendelkhan - nominated by Grendelkhan -- grendel|khan 19:05, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- grendel|khan 19:05, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Unattractive setting, not helped by bird in background. An image of a chicken should be pretty special for FP. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:52, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not exceptional. Exceptional sharpness would be required, for example. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:33, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Solid QI but not exceptional photo for such a common bird. Cmao20 (talk) 02:09, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not outstanding. --Thi (talk) 13:28, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Bales of PET bottles closeup.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2024 at 17:18:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Containers
- Info created by Grendelkhan - uploaded by Grendelkhan - nominated by Grendelkhan -- grendel|khan 17:18, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- grendel|khan 17:18, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Strong oppose This image is technically poor and, more importantly, ethically wrong. Its crop is awkward, and its composition is lacking. You cannot feature an image of plastic bottles. This tool kills millions of animals each year; they are omnipresent, and I can't bear them. To say I'm disappointed is a huge understatement. Wikimedia Commons is a large project, and we cannot feature images that encourage global destruction. Wolverine XI 21:11, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose There is nothing ethically wrong with this image at all, I disagree with the above vote on that score. It should absolutely be possible to feature a picture of something that causes environmental destruction. Featuring something doesn't mean that we approve of it. It means that the photograph is good enough to provoke emotions in us, which might be curiosity, or wonder, or - just as easily - horror. A picture illustrating how much damage mankind is causing to the environment is absolutely worthy of FP if otherwise good quality and well composed. It might inspire people to become more interested in environmental protection.
- That said, I do agree with the above vote that the composition/crop of this image is not outstanding and that this precludes it from FP to me. Cmao20 (talk) 22:10, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- In 2011, my dog choked on plastic and died. As a child, I was devastated. That is the fundamental reason I believe plastic bottles are unethical; I have seen plastics on beaches, in suburban areas in all of the nations I have visited, and even in the most remote locations. So, if I follow your logic, a picture of, say, individuals robbing from a bank will discourage theft? No, it won't. Humans speak and speak and speak, but they do not act. I have done my part, and I would like to encourage you to do yours. @Cmao20: you might want to reconsider your statement. Wolverine XI 11:04, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- What about mosquitoes? Are they allowed or not? I remember them biting my cousin in 2009. Maybe time to update our eligibility rules for some topics? -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:20, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Wolverine, I'm sincerely sorry for your loss. However, my brother was hit by a car in front of me in 1970, and I don't oppose car nominations on that basis. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:32, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Basile, mosquitos are not an issue; they do not harm the environment. It's also difficult to update what has been ingrained in your brain for so long. Ikan, wait, you can still recall events from the 1970s. Wow, I am impressed. I've never lived during the decade, but I imagine it was fantastic. Anyways, thanks for your condolences. I'd also add that we all handle stressful situations in different ways, and this is just how I handle things, I suppose. Wolverine XI 19:30, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- I was born in 1965. The 70s had some excellent music, but it was a horrible decade for New York City, which almost went bankrupt during the Fiscal Crisis and was dangerous, scary, violent and dirty, though affordable. I'll add that I also couldn't vote on an FPC nomination for a very good photo of a heroic equestrian statue of Khmelnitsky that truly glorifies that Jew-murderer, but I abstained while stating why I was too biased to vote yea or nay and didn't oppose for that reason. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:09, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Basile, mosquitos are not an issue; they do not harm the environment. It's also difficult to update what has been ingrained in your brain for so long. Ikan, wait, you can still recall events from the 1970s. Wow, I am impressed. I've never lived during the decade, but I imagine it was fantastic. Anyways, thanks for your condolences. I'd also add that we all handle stressful situations in different ways, and this is just how I handle things, I suppose. Wolverine XI 19:30, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Wolverine, I'm sincerely sorry for your loss. However, my brother was hit by a car in front of me in 1970, and I don't oppose car nominations on that basis. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:32, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- COM:FPC: "An image "speaks" to people, and it has the capacity to evoke emotion such as tenderness, rage, rejection, happiness, sadness, etc. Good photographs are not limited to evoking pleasant sensations..." -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:56, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- What about mosquitoes? Are they allowed or not? I remember them biting my cousin in 2009. Maybe time to update our eligibility rules for some topics? -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:20, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- In 2011, my dog choked on plastic and died. As a child, I was devastated. That is the fundamental reason I believe plastic bottles are unethical; I have seen plastics on beaches, in suburban areas in all of the nations I have visited, and even in the most remote locations. So, if I follow your logic, a picture of, say, individuals robbing from a bank will discourage theft? No, it won't. Humans speak and speak and speak, but they do not act. I have done my part, and I would like to encourage you to do yours. @Cmao20: you might want to reconsider your statement. Wolverine XI 11:04, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Interesting texture and educational picture. We had similar subjects promoted FP in the past, like a truck in a recycling center, for example. Unfortunately not the best technical quality here -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:15, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Yes, important picture, and the idea that it's immoral to photograph subjects that show the ills of society is abhorrent to me, because it suggests to me that the moral thing is to ignore them, and ignoring them is the best way to ensure that they continue, unchallenged. Consider nominating in an appropriate scope in COM:VIC if there isn't already a VI in that scope and this is best in scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:46, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Actually, the picture is about PET bottles recycling. So, it is ethical and respectful attempt to avoid ill and ugly wasting of natural resources and minimizing ecology damage. But I agree with you about the principle. We should show ugly, ill, unpleasant things if we want to solve the problems. LexKurochkin (talk) 20:13, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed, these are among the very few plastic bottles that are being recycled at least once. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:45, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Actually, the picture is about PET bottles recycling. So, it is ethical and respectful attempt to avoid ill and ugly wasting of natural resources and minimizing ecology damage. But I agree with you about the principle. We should show ugly, ill, unpleasant things if we want to solve the problems. LexKurochkin (talk) 20:13, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Honestly, screw plastic bottles and single-use plastics that have destroyed our oceans, but this image is a perfect showcase of why they suck and why their production deserves to die in vein (and having done several beach cleanups, I can attest that the problem is only getting worse). But, I'm not a fond of the crop so I will too oppose, but agree with Ikan Kekek that this would be more appropriate for COM:VIC. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:32, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- I've nominated it at Commons:Valued image candidates/Bales of PET bottles closeup.jpg. Thank you for the suggestion. grendel|khan 20:45, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The idea that featured pictures are selected weather some people believe the subject to be immoral etc. is absurd to me. Good pictures should be regarded as what they are: Good pictures. Only because you don't like what's depicted in them dosen't make them bad/not worthy. TheImaCow (talk) 11:39, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Agree that the composition is not completely compelling. However when I look for a while at the photo in full size, it works for me – like an ugly, but impressive wallpaper. Such a photo must express abundance, and this one does. Imagine this, say, as a big wallpaper in a bar etc. It would be much cooler than the usual “beautiful nature” wallpapers – and a much better reflection of our current western way of life. – Aristeas (talk) 10:13, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Spiral staircase at Melville Castle.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2024 at 16:25:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Stairs
- Info created by Grendelkhan - uploaded by Grendelkhan - nominated by Grendelkhan -- grendel|khan 16:25, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- grendel|khan 16:25, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Because the photo shows just the stair, I have taken the liberty to change the gallery link to the special Stairs section. – Aristeas (talk) 16:56, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The legs in the shadow area, and the shadow area are distracting. And don't find anything special in this stairs. In addition, light is not very good here. Sorry. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 18:21, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I hate to do this because it's a rly good effort and gets some things right but looking up or down a spiral staircase is quite a common motif and for me the composition really needs to be perfect for it to be considered one of the best on Commons. Take a look at the image notes I added which note the issues I have with this composition. Cmao20 (talk) 02:06, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Would pass as a quality image. --Thi (talk) 13:34, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. It also lacks the exceptional sharpness of some featured stairwell pics and is a bit noisy in places. I'm not as sure it would pass QIC as Thi is, because of the left and right crops and moderate sharpness. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:03, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Chestnut-eared Laughingthrush 0A2A1831.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2024 at 18:49:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Leiothrichidae_(Laughingthrushes)
- Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Ivar (talk) 18:49, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:49, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment this would need a crop for FP. JJ Harrison? Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:20, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support, nah this compo works. --SHB2000 (talk) 20:39, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The photographer should be given the opportunity of whether he wants to stick with with the unbalanced image. I would be surprised. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:33, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think a crop roughly along the lines of the note I have suggested would improve this picture, but regardless, FP as it is to me. Cmao20 (talk) 22:11, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:37, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Another crop suggested with image note. Still acceptable composition in my opinion, because the branch is quite nice -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:20, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support I don't find a crop necessary. There's lead room in the direction the bird is facing. In addition, the branches are in large measure sharp, so at least arguably part of the subject. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:42, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:08, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile --Ermell (talk) 09:32, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:40, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support but agree wtih Cmao20 and Basile that a tighter crop would be beneficial - less tree, more bird. --GRDN711 (talk) 13:05, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 18:17, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 19:22, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 07:00, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:43, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support I favor this composition over some of our usual mugshots --El Grafo (talk) 13:43, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support and +1 for Ikan’s and El Grafo’s comments. – Aristeas (talk) 16:45, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 20:22, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 21:57, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:29, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Agree with Charles, that crop isn't the best, sharpness is great Poco a poco (talk) 07:36, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:08, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Enrico Fermi 1943-49.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2024 at 21:33:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1940-1949
- Info created by US Department of Energy, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Yann
- Support Good quality picture of famous scientist. FP on English WP. -- Yann (talk) 21:33, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 21:51, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nom. If anyone can identify the thing to his right (the viewer's left), it might be worth adding that to the file description. Or maybe not, because it's blurry; I could go either way, but I think it would be interesting to know what we're seeing. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- The object in the lower left corner can be seen very little and is out of focus. Could it be a paraffin heater? I come to this conclusion because Fermi needed it for practical experiments in the laboratory, but it could also be something else. Terragio67 (talk) 06:53, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice one Cmao20 (talk) 02:11, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yann, you did a really good restoration, the most annoying scratches have completely disappeared. Terragio67 (talk) 06:57, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Terragio. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:40, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 17:20, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:18, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:40, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 23:21, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Cape Town (ZA), Waterfront, Clock Tower, Detail -- 2024 -- 2911.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2024 at 10:46:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Another possible gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Unsorted
- Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 10:46, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Info This detail photograph is a sample for minimalist photography. --XRay 💬 10:46, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 10:46, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:22, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support The composition is balanced, with the blue dial acting as a focal point and strategically placed to create visual interest. --Wilfredor (talk) 16:58, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:38, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Question Where's the tower? I'm not seeing it. Wolverine XI 19:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- As described, it's a detail of a tower. And if you could see the whole tower, it wouldn't be a minimalist photograph. --XRay 💬 19:40, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Wilfredor. – @XRay: We could also use Styles and Techniques#Minimalism as gallery. What do you think? That would also avoid/answer questions like the above. ;–) – Aristeas (talk) 19:23, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- I don't know how to add to two galleries. But the gallery you proposed is suitable and good too. You can change the gallery if you like. --XRay 💬 19:42, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:02, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support If it is in Minimalism gallery. --Thi (talk) 21:59, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I think I'd like the composition better with the curve in the upper part cropped out, but that's just personal taste. Nice photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:05, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- I like it as it is. ;-) So the blue dot is respecting the golden spiral. --XRay 💬 05:59, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- That's interesting, and I hadn't thought of the implication of a spiral. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:25, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- I like it as it is. ;-) So the blue dot is respecting the golden spiral. --XRay 💬 05:59, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Info I changed the gallery to Styles and Techniques#Minimalism. --XRay 💬 05:59, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:33, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:27, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:05, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:19, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:41, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:03, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 10:03, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
File:A view of the Milky Way supermassive black hole Sagittarius A* in polarised light (eso2406a).jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2024 at 14:34:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Others
- Info created by Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) collaboration, uploaded by OptimusPrimeBot, nominated by Yann
- Info The Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) collaboration, who produced the first ever image of our Milky Way black hole released in 2022, has captured a new view of the massive object at the centre of our Galaxy: how it looks in polarised light. This is the first time astronomers have been able to measure polarisation, a signature of magnetic fields, this close to the edge of Sagittarius A*. This image shows the polarised view of the Milky Way black hole. The lines overlaid on this image mark the orientation of polarisation, which is related to the magnetic field around the shadow of the black hole.
- Support High quality and resolution, a milestone in astronomy. -- Yann (talk) 14:34, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Same reasons as Yann. vip (talk) 14:47, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 15:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support obviously (official and best quality available, unique and highly valuable picture). Cheers, VIGNERON (talk) 16:10, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:34, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Yann and VIGNERON --LexKurochkin (talk) 17:27, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 17:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:16, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support We've hit a breakthrough! Excellent image of high importance. Wolverine XI 19:38, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:58, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Quite amazing to look at! Glad we can host a copy of it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:51, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support ~Moheen (keep talking) 01:29, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:33, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:20, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:03, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:26, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:42, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:02, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:28, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 23:21, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 09:59, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Alberto Santos-Dumont by Nadar.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2024 at 17:06:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1890-1899
- Info originally created by Nadar - firstly uploaded by GabrielDorneles - atemply restored by Wilfredor - conclusively restored by Yann - finally nominated by ★ -- ★ 17:06, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 17:06, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good portrait of a pioneer of aviation. Cmao20 (talk) 17:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 17:49, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 19:46, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support I was confused by the various versions of this picture in the previous nomination, but this one does look good and plausible. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:49, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 21:50, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- per Ikan Terragio67 (talk) 04:35, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Ikan. – Aristeas (talk) 08:17, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:27, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:45, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 23:20, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Wonder Wheel sign (84111p).jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2024 at 16:33:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Lighting devices
- Info The neon sign at the entrance to the Wonder Wheel, a 150-foot-tall ferris wheel at Coney Island in New York. An iconic cultural monument (there is a film named after it), the Wonder Wheel was built in 1920 and is an 'eccentric ferris wheel' in which some of the passenger cabins are not fixed directly to the rim of the wheel, but instead slide along sets of rails between the hub and the rim. It's the second-largest ferris wheel of this kind in the world and certainly the most famous (the largest is a near-exact replica of it). I think it would be great to have an FP of this amazing motif and this picture is very colourful, well-framed, and extremely sharp even at huge full size. created by Rhododendrites - uploaded by Rhododendrites - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:33, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 16:33, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support It would be nice at night too. --XRay 💬 16:45, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support XRay's aesthetics? ★ 19:16, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support per nomination. – Aristeas (talk) 19:27, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support I wonder? Wolverine XI 19:35, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 20:56, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 05:01, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:26, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:27, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:44, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:01, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 23:21, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Paudorf Waldweg am Eichberg-4927.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2024 at 20:39:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Austria#Lower Austria
- Info Another beautiful forest scene with crepuscular rays shining through trees. I know I nominated one superficially similar last month but this one has a very different composition and is by a different photographer in a different part of the world. created by Isiwal - uploaded by Isiwal - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:39, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 20:39, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support May be a bit corny, but excellent execution. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:26, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Cmao20, could you link the other nominee? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:44, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Ikan Kekek, here, but as I say, different photographer, different country, just maybe similar style. Cmao20 (talk) 22:22, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed, not that similar. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:29, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 23:01, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice effect -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:12, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 07:37, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:20, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 09:49, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:46, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:10, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:13, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:51, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support :-) --XRay 💬 05:11, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 10:57, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose - Registering my opposition to yet another picture where shaded elements are brighter than lit elements because of "hdr". Very pretty otherwise. -- KennyOMG (talk) 19:22, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 20:22, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 06:34, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 17:09, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:40, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 22:29, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Reminds me of camping expeditions in the American woods. Wolverine XI 13:19, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 07:36, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:07, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Antiquarium, Münchner Residenz.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2024 at 20:42:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Germany
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 20:42, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Info Another previous FP --Wilfredor (talk) 20:45, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Quite little for the quantity--Ermell (talk) 20:52, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support It's FP quality, but as it is, the caption is basically meaningless. My support is conditional on fixing that. I know what this building is, but the caption wouldn't really give me a clear idea if I didn't, and I have no idea what room this is specifically and what interesting features I should be looking out for in here. Cmao20 (talk) 21:41, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Done Please, let me know if it's ok for you. Thanks Wilfredor (talk) 22:05, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Much better, thank you. Cmao20 (talk) 22:17, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 21:56, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lots of fun to look around. Good complement for Jebulon's FP. I'll be in Munich soon and will try to take the time to visit this place. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:11, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:05, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral per Ikan, your photo looks very well balanced in proportions, and it's really beautiful. Too bad the slightly asymmetrical verticals (especially the right side) and the design of the floor that curves to the right (take the two central lines of the floor tiles as a reference). --Terragio67 (talk) 04:47, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support, but... Wilfredor, did you photograph all those busts? Apparently we just have 15 photos of them [1]... RodRabelo7 (talk) 21:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Not all but several, all need to be identified and categorized even, for example Wilfredor (talk) 11:42, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- If possible categorize them with Category:Busts in the Antiquarium, Münchner Residenz. Thanks, RodRabelo7 (talk) 05:42, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the category but there were countless busts there in that palace, I would have to confirm first if they were in that room specifically, it is an absurdly large palace. For now I will add them to Busts in the Münchner Residenz Wilfredor (talk) 13:43, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- If possible categorize them with Category:Busts in the Antiquarium, Münchner Residenz. Thanks, RodRabelo7 (talk) 05:42, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Not all but several, all need to be identified and categorized even, for example Wilfredor (talk) 11:42, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:29, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 08:01, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:06, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:01, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Je-str (talk) 14:45, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 17:57, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 23:20, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:32, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Ushba with the eponymous glacier.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2024 at 10:45:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Georgia
- Info created by Деан Лазаревски - uploaded and nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:45, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 10:45, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 10:51, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:53, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:43, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The sky should be denoised. Otherwise good. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ermell (talk • contribs) 19:25, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 20:41, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive sight! I don't find the sky very noisy, though it is noisier on the right side. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:48, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment too noisy as it is. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:35, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Ermell and Charlesjsharp: I've de-noised the sky.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:36, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Actually, it was more posterisation and that is still a bit disturbing. But the motif is magnificent.--Ermell (talk) 19:33, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:07, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:54, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support The drone (game) is worth the candle. --Terragio67 (talk) 00:09, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Mosquito larva2.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2024 at 05:07:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Diptera#Family : Culicidae (Mosquitos)
- Info created by Janeklass - uploaded by Janeklass - nominated by Janeklass -- Janeklass (talk) 05:07, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Janeklass (talk) 05:07, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Excellent, but please work on the categories. Is there is no category for mosquito larvae? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:18, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- I changed the category. Janeklass (talk) 08:27, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:35, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good and impressive Cmao20 (talk) 14:45, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 21:11, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:29, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 20:48, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 08:03, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Kruusamägi (talk) 11:38, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:07, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:00, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 13:12, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:08, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 17:41, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 23:20, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 09:58, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Khubayb ibn Adiy Mosque, Bordj Bou Arréridj, Algeria.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2024 at 14:44:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
- Info created by Lamri LATRECHE - uploaded by Lamri LATRECHE - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 14:44, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 14:44, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Unfortunately, the bottom of the building is cropped away. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:33, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Charlesjsharp what about this version? Riad Salih (talk) 20:18, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- The composition (with bottom crop?) is much better. The technical quality would rule it out for FP for me though. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:24, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- So I will nominate this one instead of the current image. The resolution is 7,229 × 9,036px, if we reduce the resolution to around 4,000 pixels, the technical quality should still be acceptable in my opinion for FP. Riad Salih (talk) 20:32, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- The composition (with bottom crop?) is much better. The technical quality would rule it out for FP for me though. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:24, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Charlesjsharp what about this version? Riad Salih (talk) 20:18, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Charles. This photo doesn't have enough of the beautiful mosque and has more sky than necessary, though it's a good sky, and I would be likely to oppose the other photo on technical grounds. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:28, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek is this worth nominating? Riad Salih (talk) 15:31, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Riad Salih, I would give the one you link a 'weak support'. The composition is much better than this one. The image quality at full size is a bit questionable but the resolution is huge so I think it's FP overall. Cmao20 (talk) 15:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- I said I'd be likely to oppose it on technical grounds. I leave it to your discretion whether to nominate it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:48, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Riad Salih, I would give the one you link a 'weak support'. The composition is much better than this one. The image quality at full size is a bit questionable but the resolution is huge so I think it's FP overall. Cmao20 (talk) 15:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose, with regret. Poor crop. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:33, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Riad Salih (talk) 17:09, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
File:ASSEKREM.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Apr 2024 at 21:55:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Other#Algeria
- Info created by Mohammed AissaMoussa - uploaded by Mohammed AissaMoussa - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 21:55, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 21:55, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Night shot but still Underexposed in my view -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:59, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose the town(?) is too noisy. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:07, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @SHB2000n There is no town, only a few camping tents. It's the desert. As for the noise, I can attempt to remove it, the picture is 10 years old, and the person taking the picture was standing far away in an attempt to capture the Assekrem. Regards. Riad Salih (talk) 15:14, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, I do realise that it's quite hard to capture such a shot. --SHB2000 (talk) 20:39, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @SHB2000n There is no town, only a few camping tents. It's the desert. As for the noise, I can attempt to remove it, the picture is 10 years old, and the person taking the picture was standing far away in an attempt to capture the Assekrem. Regards. Riad Salih (talk) 15:14, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Hmm, tough one. I'm not sure the quality is quite as good as many recent FP night shots but also I like the composition and when I look at it at full size I'm not sure it's really underexposed, just a dark scene without much natural light. I'm not sure I like the star trails. I thought this was going to be a photo of a meteor shower at first. Cmao20 (talk) 22:45, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Not sure why would anyone call this underexposed while it is not. It's kind of ridiculous that any image that doesn't have 95%+ of its pixels crammed in the middle 10% of the tone curve will be called under/overexposed. If anything this image has amazing lighting. imho. ---- KennyOMG (talk) 19:49, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Too much blackness on the right part, with extremely high contrasts. The content is difficult to distinguish. High dynamic range imaging may have improved the contrasts here. This is a very dark scenery, with a few silhouettes, rather small in the center. The blurry foreground is not so appealing. There's quite a high level of noise, visible CAs in the light trails, and no metadata exif. Shutter speed was either too short or too long, in my opinion, because these light trails look like shooting stars. Another time of the day, like blue hour for example, would have been better. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:19, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Kiwi da Itália.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2024 at 20:01:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Fruits (raw)
- Info Kiwifruits from Italy in a grocery store, Colatina, Espírito Santo, Brazil. Created, uploaded and nominated by ★ -- ★ 20:01, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support x0y0 is purposely missing to aesthetically/artistically differentiate from my orange-based FP. Nice textures overall. -- ★ 20:01, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 20:16, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose IMO the stickers spoil it all. Sorry. Yann (talk) 20:47, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The missing one makes the composition less satisfying, and the random assortment of stickers doesn't help. Cmao20 (talk) 21:43, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Very good but not an FP per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:24, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination ★ 11:08, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Campamento de ganado de la tribu Mundari, Terekeka, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-30, DD 52.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2024 at 07:17:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family_:_Bovidae_(Bovids)
- Info Watusi cows lying in a cattle camp of the Mundari tribe after sunrise, Terekeka, South Sudan. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 07:17, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 07:17, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:05, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't like the crop; I'd rather see complete cattle rather than half-animals. Wolverine XI
- Support Interesting to see how similar these cows are to Indian cows. Yann (talk) 10:54, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Wolverine 11. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:02, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Wolverine 11. -- Karelj (talk) 13:07, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support IMO there's nothing wrong with this crop. The subject is the two cows in the foreground and they are both included in full, and very sharp and detailed (considering truly huge resolution). Unless you were to do some sort of panorama, no way to avoid cropping the cows in the background, but this doesn't bother me. A wider panorama would be boring because all there'd be to see would be...more cows. Anyway, the subject is sharp, well-focussed, and the lighting is nice. Cmao20 (talk) — Preceding undated comment was added at 14:47, March 30, 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The lighting and the half animals. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:36, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support The animals in the center are the main subject, any animal cut to the back is a product of the same scene, impossible to control unless you have some kind of power to talk to the cows so that they do not leave the frame. --Wilfredor (talk) 21:33, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support The lighting (very atmospheric) and per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 08:04, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:40, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Wolverine. -- Ivar (talk) 09:57, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Charles -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:43, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Ok, thanks for the feedback, I take the nom back Poco a poco (talk) 10:37, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Demarche du pachyderme.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2024 at 09:30:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Burkina Faso
- Info created by YABRE CLAUDE - uploaded by YABRE CLAUDE - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 09:30, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support It's rare to see a very good photo from what is largely a very undocumented country (Burkina Faso), and it shouldn't be a surprise that this photo won 1st place in WLE 2023-BF. I specifically chose this gallery since it doesn't just showcase the elephant, but the elephant in a human landscape (so yeah, the motorbike in the background is partially what makes this image for me). --SHB2000 (talk) 09:30, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:18, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The road and the motorbike ruin it for me (and the light). This is an everyday sighting that does not make an FP. I don't agree with the gallery. This could be anywhere. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:55, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Well, I'm pretty sure this is also an "everyday sighting". You're very good at having half-standards for your own pictures and double standards for everyone else. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:14, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- An everday sighting of the bird; but not an everyday photo. Many many Australians have photographed the galah, but failed to upload a better one to Commons. As with the elephant, common animals demand higher standards, not double or half. There are dozens better elephants than this on Commons. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:37, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- You have failed to, in part or in full, read my top comment (for which we have zero FPs of). --SHB2000 (talk) 23:10, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- I can actually read. In this sort of composition, it is immaterial where the photo was taken. If there was any relevance to Burkina Faso it would have to be in the motor bike, but the quality is so bad you can't make anything out. This image falls way short of QI. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:41, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- An everday sighting of the bird; but not an everyday photo. Many many Australians have photographed the galah, but failed to upload a better one to Commons. As with the elephant, common animals demand higher standards, not double or half. There are dozens better elephants than this on Commons. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:37, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Charlesjsharp is right about the light. It penalizes the composition which, in my honest opinion, works. --Terragio67 (talk) 21:47, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose IMO excellent composition, I love the juxtaposition of the elephant with the bike, but questionable image quality. The elephant is oversharpened (clear oversharpening haloes) and there is not a lot of fine detail at full size. Also evidence of manipulation (either poor cloning or poor selective sharpening) around the trunk. Cmao20 (talk) 22:49, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 00:28, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Something is wrong in the background. Overprocessed? Also 2 red links in the categories -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:17, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The elephant seems oversharpened to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:28, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Quality of the large size version does not match the criteria. --Thi (talk) 13:39, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Havelock Island, Mangrove tree on the beach, Andaman Islands.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2024 at 12:54:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#India
Commons:Featured_pictures/Plants#Family_:_Rhizophoraceae - Info A solitary mangrove tree on the emerald beach, looking rather bizarre, even ethereal. Mangroves are incredibly tough and have root adaptations to cope with harsh coastal conditions. They live on mud, sand and coral rock in salt water most other plants would not tolerate. Havelock (Swaraj Dweep), Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Andaman Sea, Indian Ocean. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 12:54, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Argenberg (talk) 12:54, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:13, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The previous tree-on-a-beach nomination had a tree that dominated the composition. This one, in the centre of the image, doesn't work for me either. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:50, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment When I first saw this tree, I was so fascinated that I immediately decided to make it the focal point of the composition and place it right in the middle. Moving it left and right seemed to upset the balance. I have never seen tropical mangroves so isolated and growing on sand so prominently, so I believe centered composition works best here. That’s a conscious and deliberate choice. I forgot to mention, the tree is quite tall, about 9 metres (30 ft) high. --Argenberg (talk) 18:06, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Works for me. Finding a single isolated tree with its roots partly exposed right on the shoreline is pretty cool. Image quality is very good. Cmao20 (talk) 23:14, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 00:26, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support This is definitely unusual. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:37, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20 and SHB2000 -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:46, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Slightly noisy but really nice and a very unusual sight. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:57, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support The tree looks good and I love the colors and the sky. --Giles Laurent (talk) 09:29, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:38, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Giles. – Aristeas (talk) 10:46, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
weakSupport I like the subject, composition, lighting,but technically the image is questionable even for QI level(yes, I see, that it is already QI) --LexKurochkin (talk) 18:21, 28 March 2024 (UTC) edited --LexKurochkin (talk) 17:33, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- The image is from 2009, and the assessment is from 2021. While not quite on par with modern high-resolution sensors coupled with premium glass, I think the level of detail is more than adequate for a 10MP resolution. It was a good sensor with a good copy of the lens, the first Olympus micro four thirds camera ever made. --Argenberg (talk) 23:03, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed :) LexKurochkin (talk) 17:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- I think the image quality is fine. The tree is very sharp. The corner sharpness is maybe a little bit less but still adequate. Not much noise and the image is properly processed with plausible colours. We shouldn't make FP quality standards so high that a jpeg from a compact system camera with a decent lens is precluded. I still think this is one of the best FPs I have ever nominated even though the quality is worse than this picture. Composition and subject are more important. Cmao20 (talk) 21:49, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Agreed :) LexKurochkin (talk) 17:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:42, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Reminds me of the Caribbean; such beautiful memories. Wolverine XI 13:12, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 16:50, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I've to agree with Charles, I cannot see the extraordinary aspect of the image, even if I wish to be there now :) Poco a poco (talk) 07:28, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:05, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:27, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
File:Lismore Lighthouse seen from a boat 5.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Apr 2024 at 09:58:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#United_Kingdom
- Info Thank you all for the feedback on my other nominations. I ran this through QIC, it struck me as particularly beautiful, and the composition seems similar to other photos in the gallery. I hope that this is a good candidate. Created by Grendelkhan - uploaded by Grendelkhan - nominated by Grendelkhan -- grendel|khan 09:58, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- grendel|khan 09:58, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I would prefer light shining from this side. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:31, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Info I have some of those! Which of these would you suggest as an alternate?
- File:Lismore_Lighthouse_seen_from_a_boat.jpg, File:Lismore_Lighthouse_seen_from_a_boat_2.jpg, File:Lismore_Lighthouse_seen_from_a_boat_3.jpg, or File:Lismore_Lighthouse_seen_from_a_boat_4.jpg? grendel|khan 13:10, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. File:Lismore Lighthouse seen from a boat 4.jpg is the best of the photos you link, but it's not an alt because the composition is so different. I'm not sure I'd vote for it or it would pass if nominated, but I do think it's a QI if nominated at QIC. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:24, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry. Good image quality but I miss outstanding light conditions or an outstanding composition. I think the bottom crop is too tight and the lighthouse is placed too centrally, it'd be better to place it a third of the way into the frame. I like the clouds in the background and I think it's a good QI. FP lighthouse pictures: have a look at this where you have the nice warm sunset lighting and the lighthouse is placed at a more satisfying point in the frame. Or, this would be an example of how to make it work with duller/greyer lighting because here you have the reflections and the choppy waves to add something to the composition. Very different photos to yours in some ways, but you get the idea. Cmao20 (talk) 14:36, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Question Are any of the alternatives linked above acceptable? grendel|khan 17:06, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Cmao. --SHB2000 (talk) 22:11, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Category:Featured pictures by User:Diliff (delist), not delisted[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Apr 2024 at 18:06:38
- Info Per Commons:Village pump#Guidance re possible copyleft trolling, Diliff has an extensive history of using Commons for copyleft trolling (at least 12 incidents mentioned so far). He has used the companies Pixsy and Fossick to aggressively demand money from anyone using his images without proper attribution (even after they correct the attribution). This trolling even led to someone closing their website and business after using one of Diliff's photos from Wikipedia. Diliff does not respond to inquiries about these monetary demands on-wiki or questions about how to properly attribute him, likely because shaking people down for money doesn't look good in public. Copyleft trolling has become a major problem for Commons and the FUD it creates is a major reason why people do not reuse images from Commons or trust Creative Commons licenses. Copyleft trolling is toxic to our projects and our mission and should not be tolerated. At the very least, we should not be featuring Diliff's images, as this facilitates Diliff's copyleft trolling and exploitation of our project. It also endangers our reusers and leads to bad PR for Commons like this Reddit thread. And since Diliff's trolling has created uncertainty about the freedom to re-use these images without meeting onerous conditions (such as including the entire text of the license),[2] I would contend that these images no longer meet the featured picture criteria. Nosferattus (talk) 18:06, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Just to clarify that when you say 'onerous conditions such as the entire text of the license', this is not correct. The talk page message you link to there is from someone who has got the wrong idea. The image pages for this author's work are quite clear that the single line '"Photo by DAVID ILIFF. License: CC BY-SA 3.0" is sufficient attribution. Cmao20 (talk) 17:17, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delist -- Nosferattus (talk) 18:06, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I can see no evidence presented that this is the fault of the user in question rather than a company attempting to spam people in his name. And when you say he 'does not respond' to these inquiries, he has not been active on Wikimedia Commons since 2020, so it would be a bit weird if he had. Cmao20 (talk) 18:38, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Pixsy doesn't shake people down out of the blue, they are hired by content creators to do it. Nosferattus (talk) 18:50, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- It is telling that they have provided no evidence to the people on the receiving end of these claims that they are acting on Mr Iliff's behalf, though. Hence them using his user page to attempt to contact him directly.
- The claims are of course legally unenforceable. This website discusses the questionable business model of this company in more detail. Quote: 'But it may be illegal for Pixsy to send a threatening letter that claims, without a reasonable basis, that they represent someone who has a registered copyright on the image. In the United States, the image must be registered with the U.S. Copyright Office in order to sue for damages. Some people threatened by Pixsy have said that the company failed, after repeated requests, to produce the supposed copyright for the image. One person said that Pixsy provided them with a “[b]atch copyright registration of 750 images,” but the “image in question” was “neither listed or shown...Some people say that Pixsy has gone away after they demanded proof that the image was subject to a registered copyright.'
- Without actual evidence of his involvement in these claims, and with evidence of the unscrupulous tactics of this website, I am inclined to believe that Mr Iliff, who was a user in good standing in this community for many years, is unlikely to be the party at fault here. Cmao20 (talk) 19:05, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Here is some evidence: https://imgur.com/DTqdbjB. Nosferattus (talk) 23:05, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Again IMO very telling that the only identifying information here is that he lives in Melbourne, which is something that you can find by just looking at his user page. Cmao20 (talk) 14:12, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Here is some evidence: https://imgur.com/DTqdbjB. Nosferattus (talk) 23:05, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Pixsy and Fossick demands are indeed worrying, and I would like to have Diliff's opinion about this issue, but until then, I am assuming good faith. Yann (talk) 19:28, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment There is a difference between the copyright assessment and the technical evaluation of the photographs in question. The nature of the evidence, at first glance, may seem circumstantial; therefore, it is essential to allow both parties involved including Diliff the opportunity to present their arguments thoroughly and appropriately. It is noteworthy that the disputed images have the appropriate licenses and have been previously selected as featured, which underscores their compliance with established selection criteria. And even in the hypothetical case that the user Diliff is blocked, which does not make sense since they are an inactive user, the featured status of the images would remain unchanged. This precedent has already been observed in similar situations with other users, reinforcing the autonomy of content valuation based on its own merits, regardless of the situation of any individual user. --Wilfredor (talk) 22:19, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Bad behavior by Diliff, if this is all true, but Keep per Wilfredor. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:18, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: I think you'd want to use {{Keep}} over {{Oppose}} since the Oppose pictogram can be perceived as a Delist pictogram. --SHB2000 (talk) 03:13, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Edited accordingly. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:49, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep I agree with Ikan Kekek. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:47, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The FP's in question were promoted in accordance with the rules, without known cases of sockpuppetry, multiple voting and the like. That's what counts here, IMO. With a delist of all the bunch, we would punish Commons and not Diliff who hasn't been active for a long time. --A.Savin 03:04, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- @A.Savin: So you don't think that featuring these images puts more reusers in danger of being copyleft trolled? Nosferattus (talk) 15:13, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Featured status is seldom a reason to reuse a picture. --A.Savin 17:16, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- @A.Savin: So you don't think that featuring these images puts more reusers in danger of being copyleft trolled? Nosferattus (talk) 15:13, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
Delist I have to concur that his FPs should be removed because treating people in that manner is not nice.Ohh, I see where I went wrong. Changing to Keep now. Wolverine XI 14:49, 1 April 2024 (UTC)- Keep per Cmao20, Wilfredor and A.Savin. – Aristeas (talk) 07:55, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep The project needs the pictures. --Thi (talk) 10:08, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep I don't understand this. We can't delist the work of someone.... Don't be jealous please. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 13:42, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep We should not be blackmailed by a company with very dubious business model and low standards for identity verification into blocking a user and delisting or deleting his very high quality work. Cmao20 (talk) 14:12, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep per others.--Ermell (talk) 10:03, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep But I would not support any further FP nominations as the money-chasing actions done in his name don't look good. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:46, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with you. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:25, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- As the main regular contributor who has been nominating them, I would prefer to avoid controversy and will not nominate any more. Cmao20 (talk) 15:37, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep according to the reasons already mentioned by colleagues. -- Radomianin (talk) 22:02, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep Per reasons above Юрий Д.К 07:33, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Keep User does not seem very active anymore, licence trolling is not good but it's also quite easy to complain about it when you never credits author or pay for any picture. For now, I think we should keep it. I don't see a valid reason to delist. --PierreSelim (talk) 17:07, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Confirmed results: Result: 1 delist, 12 keep, 0 neutral => not delisted. /-- Radomianin (talk) 22:53, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
File:فتاتين من الريف ينقلان الماء على الحمار.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2024 at 15:39:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Others
- Info created by Sofiane mohammed amri - uploaded by Sofiane mohammed amri - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 15:39, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 15:39, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:12, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Strong support As someone who comes from these places, I see myself riding that donkey. I remember growing up in a town with dirt roads, free animals walking down the street, charming people without malice, an innocence now lost in a world full of so much upheaval. Thank you for this nomination --Wilfredor (talk) 16:15, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your heartfelt words. I do appreciate it. Riad Salih (talk) 18:22, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't know you came from North Africa Wilfredo... Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:33, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- from Venezuela, I was referring to a rural place Wilfredor (talk) 22:52, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't know you came from North Africa Wilfredo... Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:33, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I struggle to see how this composition could be one of our finest. Centred subject, unpleasant background. Cute youngsters but poor technical quality. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:48, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Charlesjsharp
- Thank you for providing your feedback. Although it is indeed possible to crop the image and center the subject, I have a different perspective on this matter. The girls in the photograph were captured spontaneously by the Sofiane from the side of the road, and there are alternative versions available (image 1, image 2), I personally prefer this one. Regards Riad Salih (talk) 18:28, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Actually I ws criticizing the fact that the subject was vaguely centred. I didn't want it more centred. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:30, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 00:25, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:37, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Very cute, but too shallow depth of field. The donkey and the cans are out of focus (unsharp). Moreover, the heavy white road is too distracting at the background, sorry. There's a lot of empty space in this picture, and the background is very blurry. It gives the impression that the subject is small in its unspectacular environment. The lead room is at the left, while more space is given at the right, as part of the composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:40, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment per Basile and Charles, I think the subject should be less centered, and the lead room is on the left. I have left a crop suggestion note that I think improves the image. I like the mood, in spite of some technical deficiencies. Would vote for the crop. Cmao20 (talk) 02:19, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Interesting suggestion but very small resolution, then, only 2470 x 1900 pixels -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:19, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool composition to me, I don't mind the background, and it's nicely blurred. Very good DoF, in my opinion. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:53, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Ikan. – Aristeas (talk) 10:49, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:55, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Expressive, but not very sharp and the background is too distracting on a large version. --Thi (talk) 21:57, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Good capture but sharpness/DoF and the background are pushing me back, I stay neutral Poco a poco (talk) 07:34, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Charlesjsharp. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:16, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 13:43, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Karelj (talk) 13:55, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 10:03, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Ademwortel (pneumatoforen) van een moerascipres (Taxodium distichum) 18-03-2024 (d.j.b.).jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2024 at 06:21:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Cupressaceae cypress Taxodium distichum .
- Info This young breath root (pneumatophores) grows 4 meters from the trunk of a bald cypress (Taxodium distichum) above the wet ground. Focus stack of 15 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 06:21, 28 March 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 06:21, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Neat! --SHB2000 (talk) 07:42, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support ! --Terragio67 (talk) 10:05, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 10:40, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Question Is this oversaturated? Other images online don't seem to be so red (but may be different species) and the greens here is very vivid. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:57, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Answer: the dark swampy soil and tiny young breathroot are soaking wet. The other much older and larger breathing roots are much higher and dry and the colors are more sedate. The red color of this young breath root appears even redder because it is wet.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:49, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Mmmmm. Wetness doesn't do this! Did you process from RAW? Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:33, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Answer: All my photos are taken and edited in RAW.--Famberhorst (talk) 16:26, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great work. It does seem maybe a little oversaturated though, but only you can say for sure. Cmao20 (talk) 02:02, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Oversatured --Wilfredor (talk) 02:16, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Quite pretty, and Famberhorst's explanation for the degree of saturation is definitely plausible to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 16:47, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:14, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:04, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:25, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Joseph Karl Stieler's Beethoven mit dem Manuskript der Missa solemnis.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2024 at 10:16:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/People#Paintings
- Info Joseph Karl Stieler, Beethoven with the Manuscript of the Missa Solemnis, 1820. - uploaded by Adam Cuerden - nominated by --Thi (talk) 10:16, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:16, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:44, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 00:10, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 09:54, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:34, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good reproduction of a famous portrait painting. – Aristeas (talk) 11:51, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:29, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:23, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 19:18, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 10:07, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:06, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Anolis humilis female.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2024 at 17:07:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles
- Info created & uploaded by Charlesjsharp - nominated by Junior Jumper -- Junior Jumper (talk) 17:07, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Junior Jumper (talk) 17:07, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I think this could be FP but the detail around the top of the head looks quite strange to me. Charlesjsharp is it possible you could either work on that, or tell me it's not a problem and the RAW looked like this? Cmao20 (talk) 17:21, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per creator’s wishes, however I think it can be FP when issues are sorted. Cmao20 (talk) 22:51, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Thanks for the nom, but the reason this is on my talk page is that the focus-stacking went all wrong and I've not had time to sort it!. Sorry Junior Jumper. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:17, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Charlesjsharp: No problem buddy! Thanks for your reply. I withdraw my nomination--Junior Jumper (talk) 16:41, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Escadaria Teatro Amazonas.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2024 at 11:08:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Brazil
- Info Staircase of the Amazon Theatre, Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil. It is an opera house in the heart of the Amazon rainforest. Created and uploaded by Susan Valentim - nominated by ★ -- ★ 11:08, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 11:08, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Compelling photo of great architecture but the blown highlights are a flaw. Cmao20 (talk) 14:31, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I dislike this perspective, and the blown lights don't help. Wolverine XI 17:10, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose dislike composition, it feels like it should be horizontal Chepry (talk) 09:54, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination ★ 09:16, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Basílica de San Pedro, Ciudad del Vaticano low light.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2024 at 11:40:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings#Vatican_City
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 11:40, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:24, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 16:46, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:09, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support I don't see any flaws in this image, and thanks for releasing it in the public domain, Wilfredor. Wolverine XI 19:15, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Wil is a top-FP user. ★ 19:17, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks Wilfredor (talk) 19:26, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Wil is a top-FP user. ★ 19:17, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:25, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:00, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Nice, but we don't see low light, so did you increase the light in post-production, if so how much, and if you want to show a low-light interior, might you decrease the brightness? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:54, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Low light refers to the noise reduction profile used in topaz denoise Wilfredor (talk) 22:31, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- So it just decreases noise and doesn't increase brightness? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:13, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Exactly, this has more to do with how the noise is reduced and not the ambient light. This type of noise reduction profile better eliminates noise indoors. Wilfredor (talk) 04:55, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- OK, I understand. I'll live with this photo longer before making a decision. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:24, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- So it just decreases noise and doesn't increase brightness? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:13, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I'm confused about the focus point. The left side is not as sharp as the right side. In fact the last guy on the left was sharpend but not the column behind him. That looks awkward (please, check Topaz sharpening mask). The baldachin is not sharp (even with Topaz) and the windows at the top are blown (HDR should always we done in church interiors). I'm really not convinced Poco a poco (talk) 07:25, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The quality level is IMHO not at FP level, the focus is around the third column with a too shallow DoF. The baldachin is not sharp and the areas closer to the camera (more than half of the image) isn't sharp either. Poco a poco (talk) 16:56, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 11:26, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 13:46, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 16:36, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:02, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Very good, and I'm not upset it's being passed, but weak oppose per Poco. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:57, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
Alt version[edit]
- Info Thanks to the @Poco a poco: comment, I just uploaded a new version, I hope this has corrected the problem, also apply a white balance based on the column color. I apologize for taking so long to respond. --Wilfredor (talk) 22:44, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Wilfredor, it looks better, but is the lavender color around the window frames in the dome above the altar real or CA? I'm not seeing it a lot so far in a web search. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:49, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done Incredible, you are a very good observer, I had to look for close photos I took of the windows to confirm this. Thanks Wilfredor (talk) 04:22, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- this picture of the window. It has created doubts in me if it really was CA. I would like to ask for your guidance Wilfredor (talk) 14:50, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: What do you think? Wilfredor (talk) 23:57, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- I already voted to support below. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:00, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: What do you think? Wilfredor (talk) 23:57, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Based on your comment I'm pinging some people because they might prefer this other version. @Cmao20, SHB2000, MZaplotnik, Aristeas, Ermell, and LexKurochkin: --Wilfredor (talk) 04:25, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yes, I prefer this version. --SHB2000 (talk) 04:28, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral No, I prefer the first version. I visited St. Peter's Basilica in Vatican twice, and the first version looks more realistic to me. In the second version light significantly changed making the overall impression slightly unnatural IMO. LexKurochkin (talk) 06:17, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral I also prefer the first version, it seems more authentic. MZaplotnik(talk) 15:32, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support, but Lex's remarks give me some pause. I haven't visited Rome since 1998, and though that will change in a few days, I don't know if we'll get to the Vatican or not on a brief trip. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:22, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Rome is an excellent city to visit, just be careful, especially if you come from a developed country, with people who seem to argue over anything or try to take advantage of you. It reminds me a lot of Latin America in that last aspect Wilfredor (talk) 15:43, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, but I've been to Rome 3 times before and grew up in New York when it was really dangerous, so I expect I'll be OK this time, too. I speak Italian, too, though I'm rusty. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:25, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Vatican is marvelous place. Sweet memories of old good times. I hope you'll have good chance to get to Vatican soon. LexKurochkin (talk) 18:28, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, if not this time, soon. I have been to Saint Peter's, but quite a while ago. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:26, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- I recommend going to Sunday mass, you say that you are going to pray and you can go to the interior part (the altar of the dove), unfortunately I was honest and said that I am not Catholic, I only wanted to take photos which access was denied Wilfredor (talk) 03:31, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- My girlfriend is Catholic. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:56, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- If you engaged in relationships before marriage, then you're not adhering to Catholic principles, nor are you if you skip Mass every Sunday. I served as an altar boy for many years and received my education at a seminary. It's common to encounter individuals who identify as Catholic but don't fully practice the faith. I'm not implying that your girlfriend falls into this category. It was merely an intriguing subject I thought worth bringing up. Perhaps we could shift this conversation elsewhere, so as not to clutter this nomination with unrelated commentary Wilfredor (talk) 13:15, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- My girlfriend is Catholic. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:56, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- I recommend going to Sunday mass, you say that you are going to pray and you can go to the interior part (the altar of the dove), unfortunately I was honest and said that I am not Catholic, I only wanted to take photos which access was denied Wilfredor (talk) 03:31, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, if not this time, soon. I have been to Saint Peter's, but quite a while ago. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:26, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Rome is an excellent city to visit, just be careful, especially if you come from a developed country, with people who seem to argue over anything or try to take advantage of you. It reminds me a lot of Latin America in that last aspect Wilfredor (talk) 15:43, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support I prefer this one, nice job. --Terragio67 (talk) 19:31, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:58, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Edgar Degas - Ballet (L'Étoile).jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2024 at 05:37:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/People#Groups
- Info A painting by Edgar Degas. It is known by several names: Ballet, L'étoile and Danseuse sur la scène - uploaded by StellarHalo - nominated by --Thi (talk) 05:37, 2 April 2024 (UTC)Thi
- Support --Thi (talk) 05:37, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:46, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 00:10, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- This seems like a very good reproduction of a pastel to me, but I haven't been to Paris since 2002, so I don't remember what colors were in this work, and the reproductions on Commons vary widely in coloration. Please comment about that, StellarHalo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:32, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- I was not the photographer. As stated on the file page, this image was from the Vogue website. You could compare it to the one on the Musée d'Orsay website. StellarHalo (talk) 08:11, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support It does look very good. The colors are considerably different from those in the photo you linked. I'll assume these are correct, but I could be wrong. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:23, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- I was not the photographer. As stated on the file page, this image was from the Vogue website. You could compare it to the one on the Musée d'Orsay website. StellarHalo (talk) 08:11, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:29, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:23, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:08, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 19:49, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 10:26, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:05, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Circomphalus foliaceolamellosus, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2024 at 10:24:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page
-
Right valve
-
Left valve
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Veneridae
- Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 10:24, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 10:24, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:06, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 12:09, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:48, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:49, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:33, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 19:11, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 23:19, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:32, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:46, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:57, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 09:53, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 11:55, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Terragio67 (talk) 23:59, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:34, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 10:25, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:55, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Common kingfisher in flight.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2024 at 16:09:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Alcedinidae_(Kingfishers)
- Info created and uploaded by Prasan Shrestha - nominated by Nirmal Dulal -- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 16:09, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 16:09, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:06, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 17:35, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 17:39, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice. Please correct king fisher to kingfisher after nomination is closed, Nirmal, and sort out red link. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:32, 2 April 2024 (UTC) Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:32, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Info I have created the proper category and edited the description. LexKurochkin (talk) 18:56, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you @Charles & @LexKurochkin 🙏🏻 -- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 02:22, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Info I have created the proper category and edited the description. LexKurochkin (talk) 18:56, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 19:09, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Je-str (talk) 20:34, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 23:19, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support The rest of the photo seems to echo this kingfisher's grace and sleekness in flight. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:24, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I had the same thought when I saw this photo for the first time. LexKurochkin (talk) 05:45, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Someone here like speed /s. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:33, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:59, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 09:51, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Concorde :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:42, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive, especially considering the speed of flight of kingfishers – with the bare eye I see only a blue something whooshing past. – Aristeas (talk) 11:59, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Karelj (talk) 13:23, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:40, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:57, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:30, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:24, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 19:47, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 10:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:54, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:07, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Ponta Verde Lighthouse landscape - Maceió, Brazil.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2024 at 17:06:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Brazil (if featured)
- Info Ponta Verde Lighthouse, Maceió, Alagoas, Brazil. Created and uploaded by Lageandre - nominated by ★ -- ★ 17:06, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 17:06, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Not bad, but dull light and image quality, while acceptable, would IMO need to be perfect in order to elevate this one to FP. Cmao20 (talk) 18:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Part of the “dull light” problem is that the image has not enough contrast – the file uses only the midtones – and that the saturation is too low. We can repair this partially. Here is a rough attempt. It may need additional work (e.g. the saturation may be too high now in some parts), but it shows what is possible. Cmao20, would you consider the edited version as worth a discussion? – Aristeas (talk) 20:27, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- I preffer the alt version Wilfredor (talk) 20:51, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Alternative[edit]
- Support ★ 21:16, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support This is much more like it. Cmao20 (talk) 21:35, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 21:51, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:32, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you for nominating it as alternative, ★. – Aristeas (talk) 07:03, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for editing it! ★ 10:11, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Just a regular image. Wolverine XI 08:38, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 11:33, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:28, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 13:48, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- weak Support This version is better, despite it is a bit oversaturated and slightly too bright IMO, but I would prefer something in between the two versions. --LexKurochkin (talk) 17:53, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 17:59, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:30, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 00:21, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 10:09, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
File:The Red Rumped Swallow.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2024 at 16:20:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Hirundinidae_(Swallows)
- Info created and uploaded by Prasan Shrestha - nominated by Nirmal Dulal -- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 16:20, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 16:20, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 17:40, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:30, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:07, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 23:19, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice photo. I guess the bird has mud all over its beak and adjacent parts of its face? If you're pretty sure that's true, you could add that to the file description. w:Red-rumped swallow shows some pictures of this species collecting mud for nest construction. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:23, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:32, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:01, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 09:51, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 12:00, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:40, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:57, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Terragio67 (talk) 23:58, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:29, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:24, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice--Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:51, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 10:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:54, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Redstart (Phoenicurus phoenicurus) male ringed Malta.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2024 at 19:49:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Muscicapidae (Old World Flycatchers)
- Info Bird ringing is a vital activity that helps protect birds. In Malta, birds are humanely caught in mist nets which are checked every ten minutes. Each bird is ringed and weighed before being released. About 10% are retraps (i.e. they have been ringed before). Ringing has shown that birds from at least 48 countries use Malta during migration. Unfortunately, Malta has the densest population of bird hunters in the European Union. The high numbers of wild birds illegally shot in Malta has led to the European Commission taking legal infringement proceedings against the Maltese Government over Article 5 of the Birds Directive. Many thanks to BirdLife Malta for access to their ringing programme. No FPs of this species. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:49, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:49, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Question Maybe was there a misuse of AI or cloning tool that ended up accidentally removing the nail from the hand? --Wilfredor (talk) 01:35, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- No; that's how it is. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 05:59, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support thanks for answer --Wilfredor (talk) 12:26, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Maybe copy your explanations to the caption on the image page? They are interesting and not many future users will see them here. Cmao20 (talk) 15:41, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done Thanks. Charlesjsharp (talk) 22:20, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:56, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:44, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 08:03, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 08:19, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:41, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:25, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 19:24, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
File:078 Wild Common kestrel in flight at Pfyn-Finges Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2024 at 23:18:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Falconidae (Falcons)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:18, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:18, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:45, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Question Quite good. What are the two black specks below the left wing and one white sort of line above the back of the left wing? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:17, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- The two black spots below the tail are pieces of soil because the bird was grabing preys in a field and that his claws are still dirty with soil. The white thing is probably hair, feather or dust that was flying in the wind or fell from the bird. Giles Laurent (talk) 09:17, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thanks for explaining. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:05, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- The two black spots below the tail are pieces of soil because the bird was grabing preys in a field and that his claws are still dirty with soil. The white thing is probably hair, feather or dust that was flying in the wind or fell from the bird. Giles Laurent (talk) 09:17, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:32, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 06:37, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:22, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:03, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 09:47, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:38, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent capture of a bird in flight, difficult shot and very good light. Congrats -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:40, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:41, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:33, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:56, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Terragio67 (talk) 23:53, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:27, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 08:05, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:41, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:26, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support awesome Chepry (talk) 10:23, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:53, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 19:22, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Laverty Falls.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2024 at 00:19:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Canada#New Brunswick
- Info: Laverty Falls, Fundy National Park; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support That's really appealing. I like the angle. Your other photo is quite good, too, and interesting; I'm just living with it some more before voting on it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:12, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:31, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support What a good waterfall pic. A real sense of movement and dynamism, and great image quality. Cmao20 (talk) 15:45, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:55, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Ikan Kekek en Cmao20.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:24, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 08:12, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good exposure time. (We all know these silky-soft very-very-long-exposure photos of waterfalls; at the first glance they look great, but at the second glance they are rather artificial. Here 1/15 s was used and the result looks very realistic.) – Aristeas (talk) 08:23, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:27, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:06, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 10:21, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:52, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Amazon5.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2024 at 09:16:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Brazil
- Info Aerial view of the Amazon Rainforest, near Manaus, the capital of the Brazilian state of Amazonas. Created by Neil Palmer (CIAT) - uploaded by Flickr upload bot - nominated by ★ -- ★ 09:16, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support I noticed we don't have any FPs of the Amazon Forest. Thanks to Neil Palmer for taking this awesome shot! -- ★ 09:16, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The crop is a bummer; I wanna see more of the landscape. Wolverine XI 18:20, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Summarizing other people’s work as “bummer” is also annoying. Wowless ≠ bummer. ★ 19:10, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose It’s quite good but could be sharper and I don’t think the composition is great with that big shadow in the bottom right. We are having more and more drone pictures presented at FPC and I think we can afford to be a little more picky. Cmao20 (talk) 19:50, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The shadow on the lower right is in the wrong place for the composition, to my mind. Valuable, though, and probably an excellent VI in the right scope. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:13, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination ★ 11:06, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Antiopella Cristata.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2024 at 09:44:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class_:_Gastropoda
- Info created & uploaded by Roberto Strafella – nominated by Ivar (talk) 09:44, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 09:44, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 17:18, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:22, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:53, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Pretty, excellent details. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:30, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:19, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 06:33, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 08:00, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Looks so precious. – Aristeas (talk) 08:30, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:43, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:30, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:04, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 19:15, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 10:17, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:51, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 19:11, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Bielefeld 1 Mark 1921.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2024 at 11:59:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Others#Money (banknotes)
- Info Issued in 1921 by the "Stadt-Sparkasse of Bielefeld", reproduced from an original banknote, uploaded and nominated by --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:59, 3 April 2024 (UTC).
- Support -- Palauenc05 (talk) 11:59, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 17:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:53, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good one. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:28, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:18, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 06:37, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Interesting Notgeld banknote with an unusual combination of factual information about Bielefeld and jokes. – Aristeas (talk) 08:32, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:30, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:01, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ǃǃ --Terragio67 (talk) 19:12, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 10:16, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
File:The common greenshank (Tringa nebularia).jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2024 at 09:38:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus_:_Tringa
- Info created by Mildeep - uploaded by Mildeep - nominated by Nabin K. Sapkota -- Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 09:38, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 09:38, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 09:46, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support I was going to say nice; but interesting is better. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:07, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:51, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:23, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:53, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support great timing Chepry (talk) 10:18, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 20:17, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yes, interesting and good. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:31, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support-Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 04:09, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:20, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 06:35, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 08:01, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 08:30, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:19, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:42, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:29, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:02, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow--Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:50, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:51, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 19:15, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Caucasus, Ingushetia, Ингушские боевые и смотровые башни, горы Кавказа.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2024 at 20:21:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Russia
- Info A close-up view of the entire Erzi medieval complex, circa 16th century, illuminated by the rays of the setting sun through broken cloud cover. Fortified Ingush military towers of Erzi, in Armkhi Valley on the northern slopes of the Greater Caucasus Range, Ingushetia, Central Caucasus. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 20:21, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Argenberg (talk) 20:21, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:40, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ingush towers are so interesting. I found and successfully nominated a picture of them a while ago but this one is even better. Great light and composition. Cmao20 (talk) 21:45, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support These remind me a bit of the Svan towers, but there are obvious differences. It seems like the practice of building towers was quite common among various peoples of the Caucasus.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:22, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Aside from other Nakh towers, they most closely resemble the Khevsur and Tushetian towers in Dusheti and Akhmeta territories, modern-day Georgia. --Argenberg (talk) 23:49, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Really pleasant motif, and I love the overcast and fog on the mountains and the warm light on the towers. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:23, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment There's a strange orange/brown spot on the left edge about 15% down from the top. BigDom (talk) 03:02, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- This is a UFO. I can see at least six other insect UFOs in this photo, and three more UFOs that could be either flying insects or distant birds. --Argenberg (talk) 14:50, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 07:55, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Ikan. The existing Ingush tower FPs are in the “Towers” gallery, hence I have taken the liberty to change the gallery link to that section, too. – Aristeas (talk) 08:13, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:44, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 14:59, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 10:15, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:49, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:08, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Karelj (talk) 10:28, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:36, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 19:13, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Schwarzenberg Alpe Hochälpele Kapelle Winter.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2024 at 17:12:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Austria
- Info A beautiful photo of a modest chapel in snowy weather, in front of a mist-covered valley. IMO a superb example of high-key photography. created by Heimfoto - uploaded by Heimfoto - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:12, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 17:12, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:52, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 20:17, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lovely, great, excellent nomination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:25, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition, light, impressive sea of clouds, and adequate depth of field -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:51, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:18, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per Ikan. Lovely indeed. --LexKurochkin (talk) 06:29, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 07:02, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support The shield limits the quality somewhat.--Ermell (talk) 07:58, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful; great find, thank you for the nomination. – Aristeas (talk) 08:33, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:17, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:44, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:32, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:05, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Ermell, but what a wonderful shot... --Terragio67 (talk) 19:10, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 10:00, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:50, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support very beautiful. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 13:14, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Igreja do Carmo (Porto) 2.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2024 at 21:51:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Portugal
- Info Azulejos, a form of ceramic ornamental artwork, on the outside of the Igreja do Carmo, an eighteenth-century baroque church in Porto, Portugal. created by T meltzer - uploaded by T meltzer - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 21:51, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 21:51, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Nice, but the light feels mediocre to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:15, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support bottom is cut --Wilfredor (talk) 01:31, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- True. I wondered whether this would be a problem when I nominated it but to me doesn't matter because the azulejos are the cool bit and there is nothing rly to see at the bottom except the bottom of the door. Let's see how votes go. Cmao20 (talk) 14:21, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yes and that user is like a FP machine Wilfredor (talk) 18:07, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- True. I wondered whether this would be a problem when I nominated it but to me doesn't matter because the azulejos are the cool bit and there is nothing rly to see at the bottom except the bottom of the door. Let's see how votes go. Cmao20 (talk) 14:21, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:48, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 19:41, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very interesting example – despite the bottom crop the framing works very well, the stone walls appear like a frame for the azulejos. – Aristeas (talk) 07:03, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support nicely composed but I miss the very bottom of the door Chepry (talk) 09:57, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 10:41, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 17:25, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:51, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:10, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:06, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:16, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
File:DpedroI-brasil-full.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2024 at 11:06:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Paintings
- Info Last portrait of the emperor D. Pedro I, whilst in Brazil, with imperial garment. He was the founder and first ruler of the Empire of Brazil, where he was known as "the Liberator". His abdication occurred exactly on this day 193 years ago. Created by Simplício Rodrigues de Sá - uploaded by Tonyjeff - nominated by ★ -- ★ 11:06, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good reproduction. -- ★ 11:06, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Nice portrait but low resolution for a painting reproduction in 2024. Cmao20 (talk) 13:56, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Seven megapixels = low? ★ 17:24, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose For a reproduction of a piece of static media, yes, absolutely. It's not like it's a moving subject that can fly away. Also lack of definition in the brushstrokes. Cmao20 (talk) 19:48, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Ok. ★ 15:09, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Brown booby (Sula leucogaster plotus) male in flight Michaelmas Cay.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2024 at 20:22:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Sulidae (Boobies and Gannets)
- Info One FP of a female. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:22, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:22, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support A piercing stare indeed. Cmao20 (talk) 20:29, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 22:21, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:11, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Did you ask permission for taking this portrait? It looks very angry with you :-) Basile Morin (talk) 01:34, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I have written personality rights. He was cross that, because he could fly so well, he missed out on a coveted move role. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:03, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Sad story, like the grumpy fish that could swim so well :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 10:26, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Did they consent to personality rights (or are they under 16 per QLD law?)? /s --SHB2000 (talk) 21:56, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Age 72 in booby years. Same as me. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:19, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:14, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 09:30, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 09:51, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 10:56, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:32, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:46, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 09:30, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:09, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 05:55, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Bryophyte Leaf Cells.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2024 at 17:40:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Phylum : Bryophyta
- Info created & uploaded by KarlGaff - nominated by Kruusamägi (talk) 17:40, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Kruusamägi (talk) 17:40, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:02, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice, cool that they are so regular. Cmao20 (talk) 20:27, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 22:22, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. Great natural abstraction and great documentation. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:15, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:46, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Ikan. – Aristeas (talk) 07:12, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 09:52, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 10:54, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 13:46, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:47, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:09, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Cayambe (talk) 19:03, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:22, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Оризови полиња во Кочанско Поле.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2024 at 09:13:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#North Macedonia
- Info created by Деан Лазаревски - uploaded by Kiril Simeonovski - nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:13, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:13, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Interesting, but it looks dark. Can you do something about it? Yann (talk) 11:12, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Right. Here is an edited version – brighter (about 1 EV) and with reduced CAs. Question @Деан Лазаревски and Kiril Simeonovski: Should I upload this as a separate file or should I upload it as a new version over your original file? – Aristeas (talk) 12:42, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Aristeas: Thanks for brightening it up. I think you can upload it as a new version over the original file.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:59, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done You are now discussing the edited version ;–). Hope it helps, – Aristeas (talk) 13:10, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support I'll be honest I'm not sure how outstanding/wow-y it is, but I think the quality and composition is good and it's cool to see what this kind of field looks like from above. Cmao20 (talk) 14:27, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:46, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 19:39, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:01, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:47, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 06:51, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 10:12, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support I would have left out the bottom right corner but ok.--Ermell (talk) 17:24, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:53, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 08:11, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:07, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 05:57, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:18, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Tribu Laarim, Kimotong, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-23, DD 57.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2024 at 10:49:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
- Info Portrait of an old man of the Laarim Tribe with a stick and a neck rest, Kimotong, South Sudan. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 10:49, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 10:49, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice portrait. Yann (talk) 11:11, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Another excellent one. Cmao20 (talk) 14:28, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:48, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:46, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 17:20, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 18:45, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:11, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Hat, orange shirt & necklace, focus and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:29, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:47, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Classy; shame about the manufacturer's logo on his tunic. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:06, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 10:11, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 19:34, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:47, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:08, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support A photo full of character. --XRay 💬 05:56, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:20, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Werkspoorkathedraal 2017.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Apr 2024 at 21:22:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Industry#The Netherlands
- Info created by Choinowski - uploaded by Choinowski - nominated by Choinowski -- Choinowski (talk) 21:22, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Choinowski (talk) 21:22, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
- Comment That's pretty interesting. I don't know the building, but I'm guessing someone will complain that this needs perspective correction, but I think it's rather more of an abstract silhouette. I'll live with it longer before making a decision, but I'm glad you brought this photo to our attention. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:07, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your feedback. The image features parts of the interior of The Werkspoorkathedraal (see dutch wiki). As you can see it's an image made by and uploaded by me with the intention to see how this Featured Picture process works. I am well aware that this is a more abstract picture and I already learned it has some flaws with perspective :). Choinowski (talk) 16:51, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think the bottom crop could be better - it would be better if those windows were not partially cropped - but overall I like this quite a lot. Per Ikan, good abstract work and while the perspective is converging, it’s IMO okay for a picture where the overall artistic impression is what matters. Cmao20 (talk) 15:21, 1 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:06, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Ikan and Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 15:31, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per my remarks above. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:37, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:59, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:28, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:22, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:56, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Parque Nacional da Serra da Capivara (32500309346).jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2024 at 15:10:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Others
- Info Close-up view of the Pedra Furada (Portuguese for Drilled or Pierced Stone), a natural arch at the Serra da Capivara National Park, Piauí, Brazil. Created by Ministério da Cultura - uploaded by Sturm - nominated by ★ -- ★ 15:10, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 15:10, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Interesting sight but IMO not a great composition. Image quality is fine but the big out of focus bits of plant in the foreground are annoying and I don't really get a good idea of the majesty of the view through the arch. No English caption or geotagging. Cmao20 (talk) 15:47, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination ★ 12:26, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Elderly man attended by emergency services in Omoide-Yokocho.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Apr 2024 at 17:13:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/People#People at work
- Info It's not a QI, but it's a lucky street photography shot done in bad light (near sunset in a crowded alley), and "A bad picture of a very difficult subject is better than a good picture of an ordinary subject", so I figure it's worth a try; created by Grendelkhan - uploaded by Grendelkhan - nominated by Grendelkhan -- grendel|khan 17:13, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- grendel|khan 17:13, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I think possibly Personality rights' problems, unless the man consented to publish this photo. Also, a scenery like this (someone picked up by emergency doctors and taken to hospital) is not at all uncommon, especially in big cities. --A.Savin 19:30, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The red board is the first problem. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:14, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Nomination denied. Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines because only two active nominations per user are allowed. |
File:Marmora Dam1.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2024 at 00:39:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Canada
- Info: Marmora Dam in Ontario. While normally an unattractive concrete structure, it is illuminated by warm light and flanked by the autumn colours, creating a surprisingly harmonious composition. All by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think the reason you are getting less interest in this one is because so much of the subject is in shadow. But personally I like the composition, per nomination. The autumn colours are subtle but nice, and there are gentle leading lines along the waterline and in the water that lead the eye from the shadowed areas to the part of the structure that's lit. Not the most obvious FP but IMO pretty good. Cmao20 (talk) 15:50, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:55, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20 and my comments on your other nomination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:39, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment There is a weird construction of the railung (see note). Composed of different, not fitting parts by photoshop? Besides that, the right upper part is not very sharp. --Llez (talk) 05:40, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- It's a white warning sign mounted to the railing. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:55, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Most of it is in the shade and the right side is overexposed. No wow for me. Sorry.Ermell (talk) 08:15, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Ermell Poco a poco (talk) 10:39, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose as Ermell above Chepry (talk) 10:04, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Ermell -- Karelj (talk) 10:36, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:12, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Kayak-MarChiquita-Bsas-feb2024.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2024 at 23:50:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats
- Info all by me-- Ezarateesteban 23:50, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ezarateesteban 23:50, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Technically OK, but nothing outstanding or eye-catching. Wolverine XI 18:17, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Knysna (ZA), Knysna River, Marina -- 2024 -- 2308.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2024 at 10:39:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Boats
- Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 10:39, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Info The photo does not show any particular lighting situation. The special feature is the simplicity. The boat is the main motif of a simple landscape. -- XRay 💬 10:39, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 10:39, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support I could see this in an art gallery. Cmao20 (talk) 14:17, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Question: any way to fix the blown highlights? --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:49, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Not easy to see. I made minor improvements at the lights. Thank you. --XRay 💬 06:09, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:44, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20, and the lighting is good to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:01, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing special here. A big part of boring "field" of algae and a very common boat. Thevlight has nothing special too. Good QI, but not FP to me. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 10:08, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I have to concur, sorry, Poco a poco (talk) 18:14, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry XRay, but for me there is too much "simplicity" in this image. --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:38, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose No wow. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:58, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Half of the nomination time, 4 support, 4 contra. I think the result can't be a FP. Thank you for your reviews. --XRay 💬 09:22, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Kerala Natanam Dance of Kerala.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2024 at 07:03:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
- Info Kerala Natanam is one of the classical dance forms of Indian state Kerala. All by Shagil Kannur -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:03, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:03, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment They should have done this beautiful woman a favour and smoothed out her facial skin a little. The eyes are too soft for my taste. You should be able to recognise the pupils.--Ermell (talk) 08:42, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, indeed. The details were added to the description. Shagil Kannur (talk) 08:54, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The crop is too tight, and the image could be technically better. Wolverine XI 18:29, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Focus was given to the facial expression of the artist. That's why tightly cropped.-Shagil Kannur (talk) 16:07, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination-Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
File:The Pinnacle, Grampians National Park Sunrise.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2024 at 08:24:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Australia#Victoria
- Info created and uploaded by Joshua Tagicakibau - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 08:24, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:24, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support It could be a lot sharper but the mood is magical Cmao20 (talk) 13:47, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:50, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Too bad about the great atmosphere. Poor quality, out of focus. Everything has to be right for "excellent". Sorry Je-str (talk) 14:44, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:35, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:48, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 09:53, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:35, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:35, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:55, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:57, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:54, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Campamento de ganado de la tribu Mundari, Terekeka, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-27, DD 04.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2024 at 08:29:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family_:_Bovidae_(Bovids)
- Info Watusi cow and a boy within the smoke of burning cow dung in a cattle camp of the Mundari tribe, Terekeka, South Sudan. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 08:29, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 08:29, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Unsure about this one. I think that because there's so much smoke there just isn't a lot to see in the composition, and the light is IMO a bit pale and dull. Cmao20 (talk) 14:01, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Well, what I can say is that the picture shows pretty good the scene I experienced. At the end of the day my eyes were red...Poco a poco (talk) 15:58, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Sounds miserable, and I applaud you for braving these conditions to get us these shots! I think the difference for me is that this one is hazy but has great light. In this shot I'm missing that wonderful golden light and it means the haze detracts from rather than adds to the composition for me. Cmao20 (talk) 17:30, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support I’m not sure why there are no supporting votes for this image. I think it’s great. It has some cinematic quality to it. Objects are placed harmoniously across the frame making up the composition. There is a sense of movement and stopped motion concurrently, freeze alongside some spontaneity. Smoke and dust add mystery to the scene, distilling objects into curves and shapes. A horned animal and a young human together in obscurity. The only weak point for me on closer inspection is the industrial bag with modern inscriptions, but otherwise it is good, I would say, captivating. --Argenberg (talk) 23:53, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Special mood. Interesting interplay of lighted dust / mist, and silhouettes. But tight crop at the bottom, as part of the composition. The two dark and sharp horns are striking enough, and the front view is appealing -- Basile Morin (talk) 04:13, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 21:19, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose per Cmao. --SHB2000 (talk) 21:58, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 00:52, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support as per Basile. Yann (talk) 10:06, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Argenberg. – Aristeas (talk) 17:41, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Lismore Lighthouse seen from a boat 4.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2024 at 04:58:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#United_Kingdom
- Info Nominating based on feedback at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lismore Lighthouse seen from a boat 5.jpg. created by Grendelkhan - uploaded by Grendelkhan - nominated by Grendelkhan -- grendel|khan 04:58, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- grendel|khan 04:58, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
NeutralThe composition is better but the sky is quite dull and overall although this is a solid QI I'm not sure it's outstanding enough for FP. If you had this composition but with the sky from the other image, now we'd be talking. Cmao20 (talk) 15:52, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support after reading Aristeas's well-phrased comment. Cmao20 (talk) 16:34, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:54, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:28, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Not that flashy as many other lighthouse scenes, but after living a while with it I really like the pure white shapes of the buildings before the inhospital landscape and the delicate shades of the sky. – Aristeas (talk) 06:57, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:34, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas --LexKurochkin (talk) 12:03, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:55, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:55, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
File:The Asian Paradise Flycatcher.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2024 at 03:51:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Unsorted
- Info created by and uploaded by Prasan Shrestha - nominated by Krish Dulal -- Krish Dulal (talk) 03:51, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Krish Dulal (talk) 03:51, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 05:58, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 06:50, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 07:59, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support would be worth trying less aggressive processing settings. And a 4 x 2 crop? Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:51, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- For the crop, it's a good idea. We should try it. Riad Salih (talk) 17:31, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- the noise removal seems too aggressive to the point that the feathers lost any detail Wilfredor (talk) 12:49, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- For the crop, it's a good idea. We should try it. Riad Salih (talk) 17:31, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:37, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:31, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Shagil Kannur (talk) 16:09, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support-- Riad Salih (talk) 17:31, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:06, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Question As described, is this not a Blyth's paradise flycatcher (Terpsiphone affinis) and should be categorized as such? --GRDN711 (talk) 02:49, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @GRDN711 this is Terpsiphone paradisi and I think its categorized properly. -- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 13:16, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @GRDN711 this is Terpsiphone paradisi and I think its categorized properly. -- Nirmal Dulal (talk) 13:16, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you, Nirmal. Looked into this further and accept your comment. Good image. --GRDN711 (talk) 13:27, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 07:04, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 10:30, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:59, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 15:48, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Low definition on the feathers (too much noise removal?), but so graceful and beautiful. – Aristeas (talk) 17:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:58, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
File:064 Mountain gorilla climbing a tree at Bwindi Impenetrable Forest National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2024 at 23:24:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Hominidae (Great_Apes)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:24, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:24, 2 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Some problems with branches in the foreground but taking into account that it is a photo in its natural environment, it is formidable --Wilfredor (talk) 01:28, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Wilfredor, and also because gorillas are unfortunately so rare, but despite the drawbacks, this is a just plain good photo with a great view of the gorilla. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:14, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- These gorillas are habituated so after a long hike it is very easy to get close. Unfortunately, you only have one hour with them and the light is often poor. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:24, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Wilfredor and Ikan Kekek. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:32, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The lack of detail in the head and the foreground leaves. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:22, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- I don't see any lack of detail on the head considering it is shot from a long distance (600mm zoom) at ISO 4000 because it is a dark forest. Also Bwindi Impenetrable Forest is dense with vegetation so some leafs in the foreground are inevitable, especially from a long distance. I actually think the leafs give a nice sense of depth and give accurate representation of the forest density. Having this picture of the full body of a wild mountain gorilla of a certain age in such dense environment is actually quite lucky in my opinion. Giles Laurent (talk) 09:36, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- You were very unlucky to have to take the photo from so far away. Usually you will be taken very close to the group you have been allocated. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:05, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- We were able to go closer to the group a bit later but as it is a dense forest, you would not be able to see the whole body from closer as it would always be partially hidden behind dense vegetation. Giles Laurent (talk) 11:47, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- You were very unlucky to have to take the photo from so far away. Usually you will be taken very close to the group you have been allocated. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:05, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- I don't see any lack of detail on the head considering it is shot from a long distance (600mm zoom) at ISO 4000 because it is a dark forest. Also Bwindi Impenetrable Forest is dense with vegetation so some leafs in the foreground are inevitable, especially from a long distance. I actually think the leafs give a nice sense of depth and give accurate representation of the forest density. Having this picture of the full body of a wild mountain gorilla of a certain age in such dense environment is actually quite lucky in my opinion. Giles Laurent (talk) 09:36, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Although it is clearly a rare shot of a gorilla in its natural habitat, I don't like the lighting, especially on the face. It looks bright and whitish like a camera flash. For me, no wow, I'm sorry. --Till (talk) 11:29, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- No flash was used and I would never use that on any animal. The light was coming from a natural opening in the forest. The brightness on the face is natural as it comes from the reflection of the light due to wet or oily skin of the face in comparison with the fur that is dark. Giles Laurent (talk) 11:42, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- No offense, I didn't say a flash was used. But the lighting looks a bit like that to me, i.e. a bright white light seemingly coming from the direction of the camera. Of course it is natural lighting; I just don't think the photo is FP. Till (talk) 16:07, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- No flash was used and I would never use that on any animal. The light was coming from a natural opening in the forest. The brightness on the face is natural as it comes from the reflection of the light due to wet or oily skin of the face in comparison with the fur that is dark. Giles Laurent (talk) 11:42, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Distracting blurry "blobs", especially those in front of the gorilla, hiding part of the body.
Moreover, I agree with Till about the light.Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:38, 3 April 2024 (UTC) updated comment (new version uploaded) -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:25, 5 April 2024 (UTC) - Weak support The big blurry bits of vegetation are unfortunately a little bit distracting but personally I think the detail on the face is fine and I like the composition overall. I get the reasons for oppose and they make sense but I think it's still a good photo. Cmao20 (talk) 15:44, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:56, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Definitely a difficult picture to take, respect, but the light on the face looks too unnatural. Sorry.Ermell (talk) 08:10, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Unfortunately, pictures that were taken under difficult conditions or rarely depict animals are often not adequately honoured. In this case, however, I stand by my opinion because the photo is simply not as perfect as it should be for FP. --Ermell (talk) 21:53, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 08:20, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Cute, but those leaves spoil it unfortunately. I'll try my luck later with some Bwindi shots, too Poco a poco (talk) 10:40, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- won't we all! Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:11, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Info New version uploaded with highlights edited (press cmd+R on mac or ctrl+F5 on windows with image open to force refresh). What do you think now Till, Basile Morin and Ermell ? --Giles Laurent (talk) 11:10, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Ping everyone who's voted when you make substantial changes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:18, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if I like that you darkened the photo, but I won't change my vote. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:19, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Ping everyone who's voted when you make substantial changes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:18, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Alternative[edit]
- Info Here's an alternative version that shows off the mountain gorilla more prominently, and whose crop reduces considerably the number of foreground elements. Pinging all the previous voters as suggested: Wilfredor, Ikan Kekek, SHB2000, Charlesjsharp, Till, Basile Morin, Cmao20, ★, Ermell, Aristeas and Poco a poco. Thank you in advance for the new review and wishing a nice sunday to everyone. --Giles Laurent (talk) 23:53, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support both versions -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:53, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support This composition may be better. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:50, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 08:54, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Biased, but I much prefer this youngster in a tree in the same forest or relaxing on the ground (or making a face?). Even though they are not FP quality, I also prefer this and that one. Over to you, Poco a poco for the Bwindi shoot out... Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:10, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review. Even though some are not bad, I personally think that all the pictures you linked are either of way lower quality (no fur sharpness) or of less interesting composition (no bokeh, etc.). Also they are all of very young individuals so they are not the same subject and they are also much smaller and much easier to photograph in a dense environment. -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:45, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Ikan. – Aristeas (talk) 10:55, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:43, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:58, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Son of farmer in dust bowl area, Cimarron County, Oklahoma, 8b38282.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2024 at 09:33:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1930-1939
- Info created by Arthur Rothstein, restored by AgnosticPreachersKid and Yann, uploaded and nominated by Yann
- Support Another moving picture of the Dust Bowl. We don't have FP of children from that period yet. -- Yann (talk) 09:33, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Moving but very low quality. Grainy and Overprocessed compared to the original that is showing much more nuances in the shades -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:34, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin: I uploaded a new version which should address at least part of your concerns: denoised, more light... Please tell me what do you think. Yann (talk) 10:18, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the notification. Still overprocessed in my view. Just a different processing, but the same kind of modification, with excessive contrasts. The shades in gray scale are not original. More worryingly, this format is not faithful to the author's choice. While the original photograph was almost a square, here it is a rectangle. And when the author decided to grant a large space below the feet, as well as an infinity sky (giving the impression that the child is small in the environment), here the current crop seems to be altering this management of the space. There was also an eye-catching object at the left, like a dark shadow, that has been totally suppressed, for whatever reason I can't support -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:25, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Honestly, there is less contrast here than in the original, not more. Yann (talk) 12:26, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Very honestly, the dark grays in the original are black, and the light grays white. Which means that the contrasts have increased. Moreover, the derivative seems upscaled, as part of the resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:23, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Well, the dark grays are... dark grays, and the light grays are... light grays, which means a decreased contrast. And there is nothing upscaled. Yann (talk) 13:56, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- When superimposing the original TIFF and this derivative JPG on Photoshop, the derivative version appears bigger in size. Which is weird, since the source indicated on the page is unique, with a specific resolution. At least it's not clear where the larger resolution comes from, if it exists. Concerning the shades, I mean there's a difference between the original and this version. The original nuances appear richer and more subtle to me. Best regards -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:13, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- I uploaded the original JPEG below: no crop and no contrast adjustment. IMO the version above is better, but we will see... Yann (talk) 14:40, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Basile. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:55, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral The alternative version is better IMO, and it keeps more historical value as it is. --LexKurochkin (talk) 18:49, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose alt version is better Chepry (talk) 10:20, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
Alternative[edit]
- Info Original: no crop and no contrast adjustment. Yann (talk) 14:39, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Although there's some natural vignetting, this version is more authentic in my view, true to the author's capture. Perhaps a FP -- Basile Morin (talk) 15:14, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:55, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:58, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 18:41, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 10:20, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Argenberg (talk) 22:02, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 08:54, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 10:56, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Terragio67 (talk) 21:09, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:55, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
File:The great egret (Ardea alba).jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2024 at 09:36:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus_:_Ardea
- Info created by Mildeep - uploaded by Mildeep - nominated by Nabin K. Sapkota -- Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 09:36, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Nabin K. Sapkota (talk) 09:36, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:25, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:39, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose We already have 16+ FPs of this species. I don't think this is high enough technical quality/composition for another. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:10, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Karelj (talk) 13:19, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fully take Charles's point but I think the composition of this one with the wings extended is nice enough to make it a bit different Cmao20 (talk) 15:51, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:23, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:54, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Halo on the neck? Noise on the upper neck and head. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:36, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20 – yes, this one is different. – Aristeas (talk) 08:29, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:29, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think, it does not matter how many FPs we already have. If a photo is interesting and technically of fine quality (with some exceptions for historically valuable ones), it should be FP. This photo is interesting and definitely has educational and encyclopedic value. --LexKurochkin (talk) 14:55, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 10:18, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 17:27, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:52, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:55, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- per LexKurochkin Giles Laurent (talk) 00:56, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Meligethes aeneus Magnolia stacked-20240331-RM-102118.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2024 at 20:35:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Magnoliaceae
- InfoCommon pollen beetles(Meligethes aeneus) on a magnolia blossom. The size of the beetles is about 2mm. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 20:35, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ermell (talk) 20:35, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:36, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 10:32, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Superb. – Aristeas (talk) 17:47, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:30, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:15, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 15:48, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:56, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:57, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:59, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Bergtocht in de omgeving van bergdorp S-charl 17-09-2019. (actm.) 01.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2024 at 04:30:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Liquid
- Info Mountain tour in the vicinity of the mountain village of S-charl. Clemgia is a tributary of the mountain river Inn and here resembles a swirling body of water.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:30, 4 April 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:30, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:12, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Sorry, v good quality as usual and nice light but I miss an outstanding compositional idea. Cmao20 (talk) 14:24, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Moderate Support: The motion of the currents is enough of a compositional idea for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:51, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:47, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Good job but the subject lacks wow in my eyes, Poco a poco (talk) 20:01, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I think this would be better suited for Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Liquid since it shows the free flow of streaming water exceptionally well. While we have plenty of FPs from Grisons (Graubünden), there is no photo of such natural streaming water in the phenomena gallery. --Cart (talk) 21:21, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your suggestion. Should I customize the gallery?--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:44, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Als je dat leuk vindt. Jij bepaalt waar je de wilt nomineren. Ik denk dat het misschien beter in die galerij past. --Cart (talk) 06:07, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for explaining. I have adjusted the gallery.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:44, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Ikan. --SHB2000 (talk) 00:12, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per Ikan. – Aristeas (talk) 07:04, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Poco a poco. -- Karelj (talk) 16:17, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Ikan --Terragio67 (talk) 21:25, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:06, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Support good composition. --XRay 💬 06:38, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose as per Cmao20. Yann (talk) 10:04, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Arc de Triomphe de l'Étoile at night.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2024 at 21:35:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#France
- Info All by. -- Wilfredor (talk) 21:35, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry. Nice blue hour shot but the uncorrected perspective distortion is obvious even in thumbnail size. Cmao20 (talk) 21:54, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I did this intentionally. If I were to correct the vertical lines, it would result in a completely unrealistic form because the element is very close. This is the best practice to follow in these situations. Thank you for your critique. Wilfredor (talk) 22:25, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- I understand that, but the leaning Eiffel Tower in the background just looks too weird for me. Cmao20 (talk) 22:49, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- If I "correct" the vertical, there will be a huge bulge at the top of the triumphal arch, I'm going to raise an alt so you can see it yourself Wilfredor (talk) 23:04, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- I understand that, but the leaning Eiffel Tower in the background just looks too weird for me. Cmao20 (talk) 22:49, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- The arch itself is fine to me, but I don't like the things leaning in the background on both sides. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:17, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
Alt[edit]
- Info @Cmao20: Observe the totally deformed upper part --Wilfredor (talk) 23:13, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support I know you don’t intend me to support this version, but it is obviously better to my mind. Perspective correction is a trade-off, but this is an improvement and looks much more satisfying. Cmao20 (talk) 23:37, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- I find this version horrible but I respect your comment, I'm curious to know what others think Wilfredor (talk) 23:46, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- I like this better, but I won't support it if the photographer hates it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:18, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- No, you can support, its just my opinion Wilfredor (talk) 01:20, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support OK. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:48, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I prefer this version too (with PC). But I don't like the works at the bottom, but you have nothing to do with it. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 07:30, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support A very interesting comparison – very helpful when one wants to discuss advantages and disadvantages of perspective correction. Call me crazy but I prefer the version with PC. ;–) In the end this tells much about our visual habits. – Aristeas (talk) 08:36, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:37, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:05, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
OpposeSorry, but too much distortion for FP. Yann (talk) 11:44, 7 April 2024 (UTC)- @Yann: Please take another look Wilfredor (talk) 18:58, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Wilfredor: : to compensate for the distortion, the entire image should be stretched vertically; I played around with it, and it looks much better. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:09, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the recommendation, I managed to solve the perspective problem Wilfredor (talk) 18:57, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Right, better. I removed my oppose vote. Yann (talk) 19:03, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the recommendation, I managed to solve the perspective problem Wilfredor (talk) 18:57, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:16, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose For me, the top corner is uncomfortably close to the top edge of the frame. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:56, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:56, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Camellia × williamsii 'Jury's Yellow'. 25-03-2024 (d.j.b.).jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2024 at 04:22:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Theaceae
- Info Flower buds of a Camellia × williamsii 'Jury's Yellow'. Focus stack of 16 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:22, 8 April 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:22, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:16, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 10:37, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:27, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 16:28, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:06, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:50, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 17:52, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Argenberg (talk) 22:44, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 15:47, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 09:25, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:00, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Vanuatu-humans-of-vanuatu-11.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2024 at 21:27:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Mixed & Groups
- Info created by Graham Crumb, uploaded by Russavia, nominated by Yann
- Support Very good portrait. Very few FPs of mother and children. No FP of Vanuatu. -- Yann (talk) 21:27, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Nice characterful sharp portrait. But I could do with more space at the bottom, their heads seem too low in the frame for me. Cmao20 (talk) 21:53, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Nice, but I'd prefer if the child were also in focus. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:19, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great first FP of Vanuatu. --SHB2000 (talk) 03:23, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Charming picture but unfortunately the child's face is blurred and the layout is not perfect.--Ermell (talk) 07:53, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Since I highly doubt that the author does it and it is a photo external to the commons, I decided to apply a sharpening filter on the girl's face. anybody can rollback me if its not well Wilfredor (talk) 12:33, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- It looks very unnatural to me and produced a checked pattern somewhat like newspaper pictures. I would absolutely oppose this version. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:52, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Not bad, but AI unfortunately still produces these idiosyncratic patterns.--Ermell (talk) 17:28, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- I've reverted it because I don't think I like it either and would probably strike my support for it, sorry Wilfredor. AI is not quite there yet with this. Cmao20 (talk) 14:54, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Not bad, but AI unfortunately still produces these idiosyncratic patterns.--Ermell (talk) 17:28, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- It looks very unnatural to me and produced a checked pattern somewhat like newspaper pictures. I would absolutely oppose this version. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 15:52, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Since I highly doubt that the author does it and it is a photo external to the commons, I decided to apply a sharpening filter on the girl's face. anybody can rollback me if its not well Wilfredor (talk) 12:33, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:50, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 08:55, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 10:55, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Wrong focus and/or too shallow DoF, the kid is unsharp Poco a poco (talk) 18:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Santa Maria in Trastevere church in Rome (12).jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2024 at 11:31:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings/Ceilings#Italy
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 11:31, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 11:31, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support I've seen higher resolution ceilings but it's very pretty and excellent sharpness. Cmao20 (talk) 13:10, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 19:06, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:47, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:42, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:05, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:52, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Riad Salih (talk) 17:20, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support An outstanding ceiling. – Aristeas (talk) 17:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 4:46, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 05:55, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Stunning --Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:06, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 09:24, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:00, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 11:50, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Santa Maria in Trastevere church in Rome (13).jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2024 at 11:29:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious_buildings/Ceilings#Italy
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 11:29, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 11:29, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support How beautiful. Cmao20 (talk) 13:09, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I miss the symmetry. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:59, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 19:08, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:47, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:40, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:06, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:51, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 17:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:34, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 4:49, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 06:01, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 11:50, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 09:25, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:00, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support One of the best images I've seen on Commons. Wolverine XI 06:10, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Kathakali of Kerala at Nishagandhi dance festival 2024 (135).jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2024 at 08:26:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
- Info Kathakali is a traditional form of classical Indian dance, and one of the most complex forms of Indian theatre.All by Shagil Kannur -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 08:26, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 08:26, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Good quality and interesting, but dark makeup and clothes on a dark background is unfortunate. Yann (talk) 11:14, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Normally this art form is being performed in dark background. Kindly watch some videos and reconsider your vote. Shagil Kannur (talk) 12:39, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Interesting Cmao20 (talk) 14:25, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:47, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fascinating. I can just about imagine how long the person needs to get ready like that. --Ermell (talk) 17:24, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:01, 4 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Classic(al). – Aristeas (talk) 07:05, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:50, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support I miss cropped bottom, but still it is very nice Chepry (talk) 10:14, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Apart from the face, nothing is sharp. --Palauenc05 (talk) 12:40, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Palauenc05. --SHB2000 (talk) 21:57, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Caméléon commun-Oran-Algerie.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2024 at 04:12:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Chamaeleonidae (Chameleons)
- Info created by Terki hassaine samir - uploaded by Terki hassaine samir - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 04:12, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 04:12, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose sorry to say, but the head is out of focus Chepry (talk) 07:01, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Chepry. Sorry, it's a good picture but I don't think it matches up to our best chameleon photos because of the out of focus head and the shadows creeping into the frame at the bottom. Cmao20 (talk) 14:42, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Chepry @Cmao20 thank you for your feedbacks. Riad Salih (talk) 17:00, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Riad Salih (talk) 17:01, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Elizabeth II Lying-in-State - 02.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2024 at 21:51:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical#2020-now
- Info A slice of history, and an end of an era. Note that ordinary mourners were prohibited from photographing this event unless they had special permission. We are very lucky that a Commons user managed to secure such permission and released the images under a Creative Commons license, since it is very unlikely that any media organisations will follow suit. created by KTC - uploaded by KTC - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 21:51, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 21:51, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The lying-in-state guard includes members of the Royal Company of Archers in the foreground as well as the Coldstream Guards. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:20, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you Charles. I will add these notes to the image page. They definitely improve the nomination. Cmao20 (talk) 16:08, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:39, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It's very rare for one of my nominations to have only got one vote after four days. More feedback on this would be appreciated, either positive or negative. Cmao20 (talk) 14:50, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- The overall composition cannot really be criticized. It is what it is. The couple front left are not as reverent as I'd like and don't reflect the mood of the live TV pictures. The Beefeater (front right) is out of position. Online images show that a higher PoV was better and that the scene is more compelling when the queuing lines were tidier. No reason to oppose though. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:42, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks, Charles. Very thoughtful review. Cmao20 (talk) 12:26, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The composition doesn't work (mainly because of the people), and the image lacks sharpness. Wolverine XI 06:13, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Can you point me to where it lacks sharpness? I thought it was very sharp personally Cmao20 (talk) 12:26, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Sharpness seems fine, considering that 1/40sec, F2.8 and IS0 1600 had to be used. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:45, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Cmao20 (talk) 22:19, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
File:CN 312 004 Ilseng - Hamar.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2024 at 14:51:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
- Info created & uploaded by David Gubler – nominated by Ivar (talk) 14:51, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 14:51, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice light, clouds, and ploughed furrows in the fields. Cmao20 (talk) 15:44, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support agree Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:58, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support nice subtle colours & light Terragio67 (talk) 16:44, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 19:00, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Nice composition and good light. But: Minor CAs (lights of the train), a little bit noisy and sharpness could be better. --XRay 💬 19:04, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice late afternoon shadows. —Bruce1eetalk 23:01, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:05, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:52, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 17:54, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:23, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Light, appealing composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:45, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per Basile Morin --Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:04, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 09:23, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:34, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:00, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support but per XRay. Sharpness could have been better.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:34, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lovely scenery. Wolverine XI 06:11, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Basile Morin and Wolverine XI --LexKurochkin (talk) 10:40, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Fairweather-Pano1.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2024 at 22:34:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United_States#Alaska
- Info created by LucasBrown - uploaded by LucasBrown - nominated by LucasBrown -- LucasBrown (talk) 22:34, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- LucasBrown (talk) 22:34, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- The current version of this image is not the one I uploaded — User:Ponderosapine210 brightened it. Should this be acknowledged in the "info" line? If so, how? - LucasBrown (talk) 22:42, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- It depends on whether or not you like the change. If you do, no acknowledgment needed. If you don’t, you can revert it to the previous version. Personally I don’t really approve of making changes to other people’s images without asking them, unless the change is really obvious and uncontroversial. Cmao20 (talk) 23:39, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- I have no objections to the change. - LucasBrown (talk) 23:41, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- It depends on whether or not you like the change. If you do, no acknowledgment needed. If you don’t, you can revert it to the previous version. Personally I don’t really approve of making changes to other people’s images without asking them, unless the change is really obvious and uncontroversial. Cmao20 (talk) 23:39, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I like it very much and think it could be FP but the horizon seems to dip in the middle and rise again towards the edges. It might benefit from stitching a bit more carefully. Cmao20 (talk) 02:22, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Probably related but created by is really David W. Brown. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:55, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: agree that this needs to be restitched. Needs denoising as well. Assuming the original files have been preserved, this definitely has a potential of being a FP with skilful post-processing, despite coming from a very old DSLR. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:29, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Dolderbahn Bhe 1-2 1 Waldhaus Dolder - Bergstation Dolderbahn.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2024 at 23:07:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
- Info created by David Gubler - uploaded by David Gubler - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 23:07, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 23:07, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool. Very different from David's usual trains but I really like the subject. Good composition. Cmao20 (talk) 02:23, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:45, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:02, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support despite the centred composition. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:51, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --A.Savin 19:35, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:26, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 15:45, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 17:45, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 21:16, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 04:46, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support I dont like the composition--Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:01, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:08, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:03, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 09:22, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:01, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nicely captured. Wolverine XI 06:21, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 10:38, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Bolshoy Tkhach, Adygea, Western Caucasus, Большой Тхач, скалы на вершине, Адыгея.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2024 at 19:58:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Southern Federal District
- Info There are a few good ones from this photo series but I think this is my favourite. An imposing and atmospheric landscape of rocky outcrops surrounded by low cloud in the Adyghe Republic, a very underrepresented part of the world at FPC. created by Argenberg - uploaded by Argenberg - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 19:58, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 19:58, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:03, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thanks, Cmao20, for nominating this file. Let’s see if it gets enough support. --Argenberg (talk) 13:37, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive scenery. – Aristeas (talk) 17:55, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:14, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm sorry, the composition doesn't work for me. Lighting and level of detail not extraordinary either IMHO. Poco a poco (talk) 20:25, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Dull light, shadowy sides at the left, unspectacular clouds hiding the view, and something special is missing in the center in my opinion. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:37, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others opponents. -- Karelj (talk) 12:03, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sun in the foreground, but the clouds get in the way of my enjoyment of the view. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:35, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Sorry Argenberg, I think your pics are great but I don't think this one is going to pass sadly. It looked good for a while but people don't like the composition. Personally I thought the clouds added atmosphere but looks like I got this one wrong. Cmao20 (talk) 14:52, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Rickshaw-Driver-Haridwar AB.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2024 at 09:45:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
- Info created by Chepry - uploaded by Chepry - nominated by Chepry -- Chepry (talk) 09:45, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Chepry (talk) 09:45, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Not the best sharpness, but an impressive scene, esp. the facial expressions. --Palauenc05 (talk) 12:35, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Palauenc05 Cmao20 (talk) 16:31, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support yes, per Palauenc05 Terragio67 (talk) 21:16, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 01:04, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great photo, because unlike so many other photos that please the viewer with a pretty view or satisfying form (not that there's anything wrong with that!), this one touches the heart and makes the viewer think about the men's labor and lives. And it also has a good form. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:59, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Nice photo, but the bottom is missing.--Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:21, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 10:24, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:36, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Cape Town (ZA), Sea Point, Nachtansicht -- 2024 -- 1867-70 - 2.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2024 at 10:35:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo_techniques/Styles_and_Techniques#Intentional_camera_movement_(ICM)
- Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 10:35, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Info Once again a creative picture. This picture combines several techniques. On the one hand it was created from two photos (multiple exposure) and on the other hand the ICM technique was used. Both photos were taken separately, each with horizontal and vertical movement. When they were put together, they were positioned appropriately again. -- XRay 💬 10:35, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 10:35, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support No logical reasoning, but I like the idea and execution. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:34, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Charles. Just a cool piece of artwork. Cmao20 (talk) 14:13, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice idea but it could also be anywhere else.--Ermell (talk) 17:23, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support: strangely mesmerising. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:47, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per others above --Terragio67 (talk) 19:28, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support That's pretty cool. --SHB2000 (talk) 21:55, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 01:04, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:45, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:49, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:10, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't see what everybody else does. It's a weird idea but not in a good way. Wolverine XI 18:27, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Photography has various forms of expression. Photographic art comes with many different facets. Honestly, I understand if someone can't do anything with this type of photo, but I find your comment disrespectful. --XRay 💬 05:53, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- That was never my intention. I've always been referred to as weird, but I never considered it disrespectful. Because our upbringings are different, I might not view something as disrespectful as you do. Wolverine XI 08:20, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Photography has various forms of expression. Photographic art comes with many different facets. Honestly, I understand if someone can't do anything with this type of photo, but I find your comment disrespectful. --XRay 💬 05:53, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:27, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, it doesn't work for me. This kind of picture should work for objects in mouvement, but not for buildings. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 10:11, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others opponents. -- Karelj (talk) 10:40, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Abstract. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:57, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 10:23, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Mathieu Burgaudeau during time trial training of Itzulia Basque Country race - stage 1.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Apr 2024 at 17:32:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Sports#Individual sports
- Info created by Shougissime - uploaded by Shougissime - nominated by Shougissime -- Shougissime (talk) 17:32, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Shougissime (talk) 17:34, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --PierreSelim (talk) 20:05, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support I'm not sure I've seen enough cycling photos to say how extraordinary this is, but I like it very much anyway. Superb image quality. Cmao20 (talk) 00:42, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you, I appreciate your comment! Shougissime (talk) 19:18, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Karelj (talk) 11:52, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:19, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 17:50, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 04:45, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 07:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:09, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:01, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:01, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 10:37, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Campamento de ganado de la tribu Mundari, Terekeka, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-30, DD 50.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Apr 2024 at 20:14:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family_:_Bovidae_(Bovids)
- Info Mundari man giving a massage to a Ankole-Watusi cow in the cattle camp, Terekeka, South Sudan. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:14, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:14, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Question Did you do any selective denoising on the boy's skin? Or is his skin very very smooth? --Wilfredor (talk) 20:18, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Wilfredor: a bit too mucho of denoising, I guess. I've uploaded a new version, which looks better IMHO. FYI, too Ivar Poco a poco (talk) 20:26, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thanks, much better Wilfredor (talk) 20:30, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Wilfredor: a bit too mucho of denoising, I guess. I've uploaded a new version, which looks better IMHO. FYI, too Ivar Poco a poco (talk) 20:26, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support This one has exactly the combination of beautiful light and interesting subject that elevates it above the other nomination for me. Top work. Cmao20 (talk) 00:40, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:40, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 13:13, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment denoised area visible around the boy. -- Ivar (talk) 15:44, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Should look better now in the new version, if not, could you add a note? --Poco a poco (talk) 20:27, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support fine with me now. -- Ivar (talk) 06:40, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Fun fact: if this nomination is successful, it will be my FP number 1,000 on Commons :) Poco a poco (talk) 07:50, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well it would be churlish to stand on the sidelines. An amazing breadth of subjects. What is next I wonder??? Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:22, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- What is next? Nothing, believe me Poco a poco (talk) 17:56, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:33, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:08, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:02, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Snow Canyon.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Apr 2024 at 01:33:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/United_States#Utah
- Info: Snow Canyon; second nomination. Nearly passed the first time; redeveloped to improve fidelity. All by-- The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:33, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support I voted for it last time. But this is a big improvement. Cmao20 (talk) 00:51, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 02:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:30, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:02, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:37, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:03, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive and improved. – Aristeas (talk) 14:06, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:10, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:01, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 10:36, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Bungle Bungle Range Purnululu National Park, Carpark.png, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2024 at 23:09:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Australia#Western Australia
- Info created and uploaded by Maclearite - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 23:09, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support I realise this may not be the finest photo that one could take, but I consider it great given how far remote and inaccessible this place is, even for remote Western Australia standards. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:09, 5 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Beautiful, unusual scenery, but largely unsharp/oversharpened and just not good enough quality for FP. Could be a good VIC nom, depending on its competition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:03, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support mainly per Ikan. It's fascinating and one of the most interesting photos on the FP page right now both in terms of the landscape and the composition - square crop works rly well - but image quality is not great and resolution isn't that high, looks oversharpened to compensate for lack of detail. Cmao20 (talk) 15:48, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Good idea but technically poor, IMO. I would also like to see more of the sky. Wolverine XI 18:23, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Trier Mahnmal für Sinti und Roma.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Apr 2024 at 11:01:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures outdoors
- Info All by --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:01, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Palauenc05 (talk) 11:01, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Saw this among the Photo challenge entries a couple of days ago and really liked it. Nice light and composition, good work. BigDom (talk) 13:38, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:19, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very striking and superb light. Cmao20 (talk) 00:53, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:29, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 04:45, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:12, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 08:19, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 09:21, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Terragio67 (talk) 10:38, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 13:18, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:04, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support The light makes the sculpture appear threedimensional. – Aristeas (talk) 14:09, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:15, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 07:15, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support The only thing missing was a group of monkeys breaking skulls --Wilfredor (talk) 20:36, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:28, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 17:58, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:05, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Indian Roller, Kolkata.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2024 at 06:08:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Order : Coraciiformes (Kingfishers, Bee-eaters, Rollers, Motmots, and Todies)
- Info created by Anjan Kumar Kundu - uploaded by Anjan Kumar Kundu - nominated by Bodhisattwa -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 06:08, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 06:08, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow --Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:19, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support That's just – impressive of all things. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:23, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree but the quality is just not there. It's either upscaled or unsharp (or both), sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 08:07, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- I believe that perfect sharpness is not the most important factor of breathtaking photo that deserves to be FP in every other way Chepry (talk) 12:58, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Karelj (talk) 09:54, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Almost there, but very tricky to get in focus. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:00, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
Support--Yann (talk) 10:23, 6 April 2024 (UTC)- Support ★ 12:36, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 12:58, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral I don't know if it's something we should approve for use in this section because it adds details that didn't exist in the original photo, but I tried Topaz Photo AI and it did a miracle on this photo. I am not a seller nor do I have anything to do with that company. --Wilfredor (talk) 13:12, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but I'm pretty sure this isn't just unsharp, it's upscaled - the haloes and moiré around the edges of the bird are almost always characteristic of upscaling - and I don't think that's a practice we should encourage at FP. Cmao20 (talk) 15:52, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- I have asked the author. At the very least, it should be mentioned. Yann (talk) 11:42, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- No answer, so I removed my vote. Yann (talk) 10:01, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral I'm conflicted, but I will not oppose. Wolverine XI 18:16, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Sorry, but per Charlesjsharp. --LexKurochkin (talk) 20:34, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Charles.--Ermell (talk) 21:16, 6 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Cmao20 – the upscaling is easily visible. – Aristeas (talk) 17:45, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Henrysz (talk) 20:15, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor pixel-level quality. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:58, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Igreja de Nosso Senhor do Bonfim Salvador Corredor Lateral Esquerdo Azulejos 2021-7125.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Apr 2024 at 12:26:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Walls
- Info Azulejos of lateral corridor, Church of Nosso Senhor do Bonfim, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. Created and uploaded by Prburley - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:26, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 12:26, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support It could be sharper in some places but the resolution is high and the artwork is really beautiful. Cmao20 (talk) 13:20, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:38, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 14:05, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:27, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support I regrettably am very weak when it comes to photos of Portuguese culture. It's not technically perfect, but we need more photos of these countries --Wilfredor (talk) 22:16, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:54, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:53, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 14:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:22, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Black Kite (Milvus migrans)- Juvenile.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2024 at 03:47:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes#Genus_:_Milvus
- Info created and uploaded by Mildeep - nominated by Krish Dulal -- Krish Dulal (talk) 03:47, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Krish Dulal (talk) 03:47, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 05:58, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 07:59, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great!
Exceptional quality--LexKurochkin (talk) 12:06, 7 April 2024 (UTC) - Weak support Great composition and overall fine for this resolution but IMO noisy and oversharpened. Cmao20 (talk) 13:37, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Well, on the second thought after thorough check I agree, it has visible artefacts of oversharpening near high contrast borders, but nevertheless it is great photo IMO --LexKurochkin (talk) 13:42, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Excessive noise due to oversharpening (see the enormous noise between the tail and the tree) --Wilfredor (talk) 22:42, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Yes, NR has not worked well. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:30, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Indeed, overprocessed Poco a poco (talk) 20:27, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Schlosspark Linderhof - Gartenvase 01.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Apr 2024 at 11:40:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Ceramics
- Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 11:40, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 11:40, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:10, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:40, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I miss wow here, a good shot, nothing extraordinary Poco a poco (talk) 20:19, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not special enough, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:29, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Technically OK, but nothing that draws the eye. Wolverine XI 06:24, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination --Llez (talk) 09:39, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Roque de Tecina - La Gomera 01.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2024 at 08:43:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Spain#Canary Islands
- Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 08:43, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 08:43, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 09:58, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:06, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:51, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:06, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:25, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 04:43, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:36, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:53, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:29, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 10:27, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Muang Udon Thani Museum by Don Ramey Logan.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2024 at 16:37:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Other#Thailand
- Info created& - uploaded by Don - nominated by WPPilot -- Don (talk) 16:37, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Don (talk) 16:37, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:58, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Needs perspective correction. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:23, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- In what regard? Should I reduce the bottom? I have a alt, will upload now.--Don (talk) 23:41, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- The trees above the water need to be vertical and the reflections in the water all need to be aligned vertically with them. I tried to correct using Photoshop CS6 but it doesn't sort it. I am guessing the distortion is too much. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:01, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- In what regard? Should I reduce the bottom? I have a alt, will upload now.--Don (talk) 23:41, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Statua della Libertà - San Marino - GT 01 - 2024 03 14.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2024 at 17:54:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues outdoors
- Info The Statue of Liberty of San Marino is a gift received from a German noblewoman, Ms Otilia Heyroth Wagener. She commissioned one of the most esteemed sculptors on the international scene, Stefano Galletti, and gave the order to create the work using the precious Italian Carrara marble as raw material. On 30 September 1876, a few months after the sculptor was commissioned, the Statue of Liberty was solemnly inaugurated in front of the Palazzo Pubblico and gave its name to the square below: Piazza della Libertà (Liberty place). The San Marino government, in response to a gesture as noble as it was welcome, granted the Duchess her noble title as Duchess of Acquaviva, one of the nine castles of the Republic of San Marino. The statue represents freedom as a warrior woman who proudly advances towards the future, with her right hand stretched forward, while holding the flag in her left hand. A crown has been sculpted around the head like a city wall from which the three towers rise, a symbol of San Marino over the centuries. All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 17:54, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 17:54, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Amazing image quality but I feel like I want to see more of the plinth Cmao20 (talk) 20:01, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- I had thought about being able to photograph the base as well, but unfortunately there is not enough space for a complete shot, without creating distortions due to the disproportion of the work. In other words, if we measure the cubic dimensions of the base, the central part and the statue, there are percentage ratios equal to 80%, 10%, 10%. What does it mean? To lose attention on the most important and beauty part: The statue and its significative details. Thanks anyway for your right observation, I am going to create a (little bit) longer version. Terragio67 (talk) 20:21, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Both are OK for me. --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:29, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Both are good, the other one looks slightly better to me --LexKurochkin (talk) 07:02, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Prefer this slightly better than the alternative version. —Percival Kestreltail (talk) 17:59, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
Alternative longer version[edit]
- Comment In this alternative version, I left the complete stitch of twelve images (3 cols - 4 rows). They have contrast and tone slightly stronger.
- Info Read above, please. All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 21:03, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:26, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support For me this is the better and more satisfying version. Cmao20 (talk) 00:36, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Both are very good, this one looks slightly better to me --LexKurochkin (talk) 07:00, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:14, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:40, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:39, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 10:31, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support this one. IMHO the image IMHO fits much better into our Statues outdoors gallery than in the ‘exteriors’ gallery; I have taken the liberty to change the gallery link. It’s not nessary to repeat the gallery link in the ‘Alternative’ section; I have removed that second link. – Aristeas (talk) 13:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the gallery modification and advice. Terragio67 (talk) 17:58, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:19, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:59, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Great sharpness, as usual, but neither the subject, combo or light are extraordinary to me. Poco a poco (talk) 18:12, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Your observations are partly shared by me. For the objective lack of difficulty in taking photos of non-dynamic objects and for the potential subjective feeling of lack of wow (in these specific cases), we agree: this candidacy was a gamble. Lately I've been paying attention to only send photos that have a good chance of being promoted. So why did I want to risk nominating this photo to FP? I'll try to be brief: The statue is made of fine Carrara marble, of which there are different types. Stefano Galletti, author of the statue, chose the whitest marble with purple veins. Now try zooming in on the statue's arms and you'll see the arms veins pop out too! Terragio67 (talk) 05:46, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I dont see any good use of such high pixelage here. It already became factor of disturbance, since nothing else is so small to capture details. I more miss nice texture. --Mile (talk) 07:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- I completely understand your point of view. To go into more detail (example: also visualize the veins of the statue) perhaps, I should have concentrated more on the statue and not on the plaque or the sky or the base... Thank you for expressing your opinion in the comment, I will take it into account in the future! Terragio67 (talk) 10:50, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Twin landspouts south of Milton-Freewater, Oregon on March 5, 2024.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2024 at 16:52:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Storms
- Info created by Tonya Brewer - uploaded and nominated by WeatherWriter -- WeatherWriter (talk) 16:52, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WeatherWriter (talk) 16:52, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The grainy road ruins it. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:23, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I added a crop suggestion. ★ 11:36, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, an amazing sight but not sufficient image quality for FP and also the wires are a problem. Cmao20 (talk) 14:39, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Tunisian tortoise (Testudo graeca nabeulensis) male Cap Bon.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2024 at 20:19:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Testudinidae (Tortoises)
- Info This tortoise is classified as Vulnerable on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. One FP from 2009. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:19, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:19, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support V cute, v sharp, great depth of field Cmao20 (talk) 00:37, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 06:57, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose This composition is not compelling. Wolverine XI 16:49, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 10:33, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:18, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I've looked at it a couple of times and it isn't outstanding to me. Subject is a plus and quality is good, but the compo (surroundings) is a minus. Overall not FP to me, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 18:09, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Is this one suggested below FP, do you think Poco a poco, Wolverine? Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:56, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose With such a slow moving animal, it shouldn't difficult to get a better composition. Yann (talk) 15:42, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- I have no issue with the other two opposes, but yours underestimates the challenges of tortoise photography. These animals have no ground clearance so the only chance of a clear shot is on a hard surface like a rock or man-made path. Look on Google. This is not their natural habitat; they cross paths as quickly as they can. They are not that slow moving and when you are close-up and trying to get to tortoise-eye-level to get a good PoV, they do not stay in frame for very long. This is an action shot of a wild animal at the side of a track, hence 1/1250 sec and the gravelly surroundings that Poco a poco points out. 11:54, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:26, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I would support this instead, which has a more pleasant composition. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:20, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Definitely better. Yann (talk) 19:29, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- I also agree Poco a poco (talk) 20:57, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thanks, but too late to propose it as an alternative. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:54, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Cheval Barbe.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2024 at 16:58:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Equidae_(Equids)
- Info created by Terki hassaine samir - uploaded by Terki hassaine samir - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 16:58, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 16:58, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Ordinary subject + unappealing background + technical faults make for a bad combination. Wolverine XI 06:45, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- I appreciate your feedback, but I respectfully disagree regarding the "ordinary subject." The subject in question is Oran Barb, a rare race. Currently, the only available pictures are in black and white. Riad Salih (talk) 19:46, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose tight crop + per Wolverine 11. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:56, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The vertical orientation doesn't help in this case. ★ 12:33, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Riad Salih (talk) 23:32, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Snowy Himalayan trail, Jammu and Kashmir, India.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2024 at 12:09:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#India
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:09, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- UnpetitproleX (Talk) 12:09, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Great composition but the detail at full size is a little lacking. I think the noise reduction has possibly gone too far. Cmao20 (talk) 22:26, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for the support and input. It can't be due to noise reduction, I didn't apply any denoising. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 00:50, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Some NR will naturally be applied by the camera itself, though, and some older cameras can be quite aggressive with it. Did you take this image in RAW or just JPEG? If the RAW file exists we could see if more detail can be extracted. Cmao20 (talk) 12:40, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Excessive noise reduction. --SHB2000 (talk) 04:40, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- I had to go and check again, but no, I have not applied any noise reduction at all. If the camera has the ability to do so on its own, idk, but I have not even touched the denoise tool. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 09:13, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Elderly entry-level camera. I don't think it has in-camera NR for the settings used, but Darktable could have done some NR without you knowing about it? More likely it is just a poor lens. Wind might be moving the trees' needles? Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:28, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Could be, but saying I overdid NR when I already said I have not used the tool is, frankly, annoying. That's all. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 10:37, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Didn't mean to annoy you, sorry. I'm just trying to explain why the quality is so very poor. I took the trouble to read the camera's manual. Perhaps you can explain it for us? Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:28, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't mean you, Charles. Apologies for not being clear. I don't think the quality is very lacking (just less definition in the trees, imo). Could be because the camera focus was on the trail, rather than the trees. UnpetitproleX (Talk) 21:05, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Elderly entry-level camera. I don't think it has in-camera NR for the settings used, but Darktable could have done some NR without you knowing about it? More likely it is just a poor lens. Wind might be moving the trees' needles? Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:28, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Definition in the trees and snow is lacking. Wolverine XI 07:29, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't understand why this photo looks so bad, many jpg artifacts. I suspect that it is the jpg directly generated from the camera and not a development from the RAW --Wilfredor (talk) 22:30, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination I clearly have a lot to learn. :) --UnpetitproleX (Talk) 19:05, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- And We will be here for you to help you in the process :) Wilfredor (talk) 19:41, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- There are plenty of positives - the composition was really good! You definitely have the eye for a good photograph. Just image quality/processing could be improved. Cmao20 (talk) 03:09, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
File:At Paraty 2023 263.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2024 at 21:49:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Minimalism
- Info created and uploaded by Mike Peel - nominated by ★ -- ★ 21:49, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fresh vibes… -- ★ 21:49, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support as photographer, thanks @ArionStar: for nominating it! Have added a description and tweaked the composition. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 22:29, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
- Question Is this minimalism? Slightly tilted. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:31, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, a lonely umbrella on a beach. ★ 14:41, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- New version uploaded that hopefully fixes the tilt. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 16:11, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Good photo, but not enough wow. Wolverine XI 16:52, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:54, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The compo is fine, quality ok, but the grey coloured water is not really appealing, sorry, not a FP to me. Poco a poco (talk) 18:07, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nominationGiving the nomination to the original author for him to take over this one. ★ 20:12, 12 April 2024 (UTC)- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 06:15, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Sawpit Gorge, Ord River 2.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2024 at 23:28:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Australia#Western Australia
- Info created and uploaded by Jtagi - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 23:28, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:28, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 08:27, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice find. Cmao20 (talk) 14:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:53, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive landscape, good quality for a drone shot. – Aristeas (talk) 15:57, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 21:29, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:16, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 07:19, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:23, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:51, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:22, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:41, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 14:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support The road down the middle makes it. — Rhododendrites talk | 20:46, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Salle des Cariatides in Paris-Louvre.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2024 at 00:58:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues_indoors
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 00:58, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:16, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 11:35, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:25, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The left side is noticeably less sharp than the right side, hopefully not a decentered lens? --Julesvernex2 (talk) 12:51, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- I noticed this in all the photos I took, I don't know the reason. But I still consider it to be sharp enough for FP. Wilfredor (talk) 12:59, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- I know of two ways to test the lens for decentering: the quick but somewhat prone to false positives method ([https://photographylife.com/good-bad-copy-of-lens), and the precise but time consuming method ([https://blog.kasson.com/lens-screening-testing/). That's a very nice lens, I would send it in for repair if it is indeed decentered. Julesvernex2 (talk) 13:36, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- If all your photos taken with the same camera, but with different lenses show (more or less) the same drop of sharpness in one direction, the reason could also be that the sensor and the mount are not correctly aligned (they should be perfectly parallel but often they are not). Then the camera would need to be calibrated (not the lenses). – Aristeas (talk) 17:51, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- I know of two ways to test the lens for decentering: the quick but somewhat prone to false positives method ([https://photographylife.com/good-bad-copy-of-lens), and the precise but time consuming method ([https://blog.kasson.com/lens-screening-testing/). That's a very nice lens, I would send it in for repair if it is indeed decentered. Julesvernex2 (talk) 13:36, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- I noticed this in all the photos I took, I don't know the reason. But I still consider it to be sharp enough for FP. Wilfredor (talk) 12:59, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
Support Still very good and beautiful. – Aristeas (talk) 17:51, 9 April 2024 (UTC)- Support --RodRabelo7 (talk) 18:10, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 21:00, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose - Not special enough, sorry. -- Karelj (talk) 12:00, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- ??? ★ 02:12, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- It is his opinion and should be respected. Wilfredor (talk) 02:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I would just ask him to talk more about it. ★ 10:23, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- people have the liberty to voice their subjective opinions without justifying themselves. Let's avoid overreacting to differing viewpoints; after all, everyone is entitled to their own 'not wow' feelings Wilfredor (talk) 12:46, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I would just ask him to talk more about it. ★ 10:23, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- It is his opinion and should be respected. Wilfredor (talk) 02:14, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- ??? ★ 02:12, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:59, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
SupportFP even though little pitfalls on the left. Rarely you can see this place without people. -- Terragio67 (talk) 03:49, 13 April 2024 (UTC)- Yes, I had to wait a long time Wilfredor (talk) 12:17, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- It seems that some stuff was cloned out from the wall beyond the door? If so, I suggest tidying it up (the shadows look odd and there's something peeking on the left) and adding a retouched picture template. Julesvernex2 (talk) 13:17, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- nothing was cloned, maybe someone passed by quickly? Wilfredor (talk) 14:37, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Perhaps you're referring to a different shot? The image above seems a modified version of this one: [3]. Personally I don't have an issue with cloning stuff out, provided it is well made and clearly stated in the file description. Julesvernex2 (talk) 16:04, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- I already remembered, this was not a clone but an elimination with Photoshop AI Wilfredor (talk) 18:56, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Will strike out my vote if these manipulations are improved and clearly disclosed (e.g., retouched picture template and Digitally manipulated photographs category). --Julesvernex2 (talk) 12:53, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Thanks JulesVerneX2 for having had this glance, I was naive in believing that there was no one there... Wilfredor, please, I will also wait for you to finish your retouches with PS before eventually changing my opinion. Terragio67 (talk) 15:21, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry but I have to agree that the retouching looks incomplete in the door. I have no objections about cloning out (in whatever way) passers-by, bystanders etc., but it should be done properly. Sorry for not noticing this earlier and thanks to Julesvernex2 for the hint. Happy to support when the retouching is completed and documented. – Aristeas (talk) 18:20, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- I will try to do a better job, I confess that Photoshop AI usually does everything automatically, although it is also poorly done when looking at it in more detail. I'm also going to look for other photos I took of that entry without the people to combine them, maybe it's better than cloning Wilfredor (talk) 18:30, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Julesvernex2, Terragio67, and Aristeas: I always maintain transparency with my edits, which is why I upload the original images unaltered. Thanks Julesvernex2 for notify in this instance, there were no people in front of the structure, which is unusual as I had to wait a long time for them to leave. The individuals crossing through the doorway were removed using cloning. I have also reinstated a sign that was completely removed in the previous version; this exit sign is a permanent fixture. I added the retouch template too. Thanks Wilfredor (talk) 22:04, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- I will try to do a better job, I confess that Photoshop AI usually does everything automatically, although it is also poorly done when looking at it in more detail. I'm also going to look for other photos I took of that entry without the people to combine them, maybe it's better than cloning Wilfredor (talk) 18:30, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Will strike out my vote if these manipulations are improved and clearly disclosed (e.g., retouched picture template and Digitally manipulated photographs category). --Julesvernex2 (talk) 12:53, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- I already remembered, this was not a clone but an elimination with Photoshop AI Wilfredor (talk) 18:56, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Perhaps you're referring to a different shot? The image above seems a modified version of this one: [3]. Personally I don't have an issue with cloning stuff out, provided it is well made and clearly stated in the file description. Julesvernex2 (talk) 16:04, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- nothing was cloned, maybe someone passed by quickly? Wilfredor (talk) 14:37, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- It seems that some stuff was cloned out from the wall beyond the door? If so, I suggest tidying it up (the shadows look odd and there's something peeking on the left) and adding a retouched picture template. Julesvernex2 (talk) 13:17, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I had to wait a long time Wilfredor (talk) 12:17, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
File:L'asfodelo mediterraneo.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2024 at 05:11:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family_:_Asphodelaceae
- Info: branched asphodel blooming in Sicily; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:11, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:11, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 12:33, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose due to lack of focus/sharpness. Wolverine XI 16:55, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:51, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:07, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 19:29, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:31, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support at least you didnt overreact with sharpnes. --Mile (talk) 15:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Buger Brücke Neubau Schalung-20240218-RM-102143.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2024 at 20:26:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Others
- Info Orthophoto of the formwork for the concrete mould on a new bridge across the river in Bamberg. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 20:26, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ermell (talk) 20:26, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool abstract Cmao20 (talk) 02:17, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:03, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 17:55, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose - Not special enough, sorry. -- Karelj (talk) 11:57, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 15:46, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 10:45, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Wow. Екатерина Борисова (talk) 16:19, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:30, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 14:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 20:41, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:54, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:06, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Tribu Laarim, Kimotong, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-25, DD 30.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2024 at 17:44:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
- Info Portrait of a woman with her child from the Laarim Tribe, Kimotong, Kapoeta State, South Sudan. c/u/n by- Poco a poco (talk) 17:44, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 17:44, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great! --Yann (talk) 19:26, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support The proximity of my shoulder to the edge of the photo on the right makes me a little uncomfortable. --Wilfredor (talk) 20:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- I provided more crop on the right, no problem. --Poco a poco (talk) 20:55, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- much better, thanks Wilfredor (talk) 21:47, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- I provided more crop on the right, no problem. --Poco a poco (talk) 20:55, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:01, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Again the scarification - interesting how universal this is in their community Cmao20 (talk) 01:40, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ! Terragio67 (talk) 03:34, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 10:02, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 10:26, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 10:57, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 17:50, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:53, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support striking -- Basile Morin (talk) 20:02, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:26, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:42, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 14:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:20, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Schnobby (talk) 12:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --RodRabelo7 (talk) 05:02, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Flamants à Thyna (Sfax).jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2024 at 23:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Phoenicopteridae (Flamingos)
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by TOUMOU -- TOUMOU (talk) 07:15, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- TOUMOU (talk) 07:15, 3 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support A bit dark/underexposed but good nevertheless. Cmao20 (talk) 02:24, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:44, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 07:22, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:01, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 15:12, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Seems a tad too dark for me but is otherwise excellent.--Ermell (talk) 15:53, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Yes it is a bit dark and needs better processing to make it less 'faded'. Nice PoV from water level, but I would ask photographer to crop the blurred bottom. May not be tilted in reality, but a very small rotation would help. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:49, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not done. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:28, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
SupportWorks for me overall but I'd add some brightness Poco a poco (talk) 20:22, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Given the behaviour of the user on other on FPC and QIC, I'll not oppose for now but will take back my support. --Poco a poco (talk) 08:13, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support yes from me under condition of some adjustments (exposure, contrast, white balance), I would also ask photographer to crop the blurred bottom and a little from the left to center the subject Chepry (talk) 08:12, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Too underexposed as it is currently. Like the composition, agree with Charles that it could do with a small rotation. Would definitely consider supporting once it's brightened up a bit. BigDom (talk) 13:40, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose per above. -- Ivar (talk) 15:45, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Cmao20, TOUMOU, Ermell, Charlesjsharp, Poco a poco, Chepry, BigDom, and Iifar: Here is a slightly edited version – rotated a little bit to remove the (apparent) tilt, cropped (especially at the bottom) and brightened up while also increasing the contrast a bit. What do you think? Hope it helps, – Aristeas (talk) 19:24, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Interesting result. Now the heads and the sky are slightly too bright for my taste.Ermell (talk) 21:15, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I'm good to go with edited version. -- Ivar (talk) 06:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @Ermell and Iifar: Thank you for your feedback! I have reduced the extreme highlights a bit; and additionally removed some minor CAs. – Further comments? Should the edited version be offered as an alternative? Best, – Aristeas (talk) 13:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you Aristeas. You are entitled to part of the WLE prize. The more I look at the picture the more I realise that the bokeh was added by the photographer. But I can't see why the little black line on the neck of the fourth flamingo was not removed or what it is. Perhaps an antenna for the remote control? :-)Ermell (talk) 13:27, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you! ;–) Actually I wanted to remove that black line (and another one at the beak of the 6th flamingo), but I thought people could complain about that. But now that you mention it, I have removed both. – Regarding the bokeh I am not sure; it’s a 500mm shot from far away with a distant background, but at ƒ/10, so IMHO the bokeh could look that way. (We had a similar debate about some of JJ Harrison’s bird photos, e.g. here and in other nominations. Therefore I am cautious about that suspicion. At least I cannot find obvious masking errors which are the usual sign for background blur added in post.) – Aristeas (talk) 14:03, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose per BigDom. – Aristeas (talk) 14:11, 11 April 2024 (UTC) Sorry to clutter this nomination with my comments, but there was a problem with the nomination time frame. TOUMOU has created this nomination subpage on 3 April 2024, but it was added only on 9 April 2024 to the list of active nominations. Because of this the nomination period would have been way too short: the bot would have closed this nomination on 12 Apr 2024 at 07:15:28 (UTC), that would be only 5 days instead of the regular 9 days. I have taken the liberty to repair this by copying the internal FPVotingPeriodFlag flag value and the corresponding end date from this nomination which was added to the list of active nominations only some minutes before this nomination. Therefore way this nomination will run for the regular period of 9 days. Hope it helps, – Aristeas (talk) 17:48, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- So why has it been promoted? Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- I do not understand that, too; it seems the bot does not rely only on the value in the {{FPVotingPeriodFlag}} template, but on the creation date of the nomination subpage. Obviously I must do more research on the bot’s behaviour. In any case this is against the rules. – Aristeas (talk) 14:22, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Info Yes, it’s that simple. Assuming that this is the current source code of FPCBot, it simply checks the creation date/time of the nomination subpage (line 324ff.) and does not care at all for FPVotingPeriodFlag and friends. This means: the only way to stop the bot from closing a nomination too early is to copy the nomination to a brand new nomination subpage. – Aristeas (talk) 15:36, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Info Or to tweak the creation timestamp of the nomination subpage – right now I was told that admins can do that. Good to know. Next time such a thing happens we will ask an admin to do this. – Aristeas (talk) 15:55, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Info Yes, it’s that simple. Assuming that this is the current source code of FPCBot, it simply checks the creation date/time of the nomination subpage (line 324ff.) and does not care at all for FPVotingPeriodFlag and friends. This means: the only way to stop the bot from closing a nomination too early is to copy the nomination to a brand new nomination subpage. – Aristeas (talk) 15:36, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- I do not understand that, too; it seems the bot does not rely only on the value in the {{FPVotingPeriodFlag}} template, but on the creation date of the nomination subpage. Obviously I must do more research on the bot’s behaviour. In any case this is against the rules. – Aristeas (talk) 14:22, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- So why has it been promoted? Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed 14:27, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The bokeh is natural.I was lying on the ground and it looks like this. I never touch bokeh .El Golli Mohamed 14:28, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Sorry, but I had to
strike outdelete this result. The bot did close the original nomination way too early. It should end on 17 Apr 2024 around 23:25 (UTC) and not earlier because the nomination has become public and active only on 23:25 (UTC), 8 April 2024. I thought fixing the value of the {{FPVotingPeriodFlag}} would tell the bot to do the right thing but it did not. So the only solution I know to stop the bot from closing this nomination too early again and again is to re-create it from scratch as a new /2 nomination (done here) and to close it manually when the time has come. Sorry for all the confusion. We can avoid all that hassle easily when nominators add their new nomination to the list of active nominations quickly after creating the nomination subpage. – Aristeas (talk) 14:35, 12 April 2024 (UTC) Seems that FPCBot still processes aFPC-results-reviewed
template even when it is striked out. So yet another lesson from this: We must entire delete premature instances of that template, striking out is not sufficient. – Aristeas (talk) 06:16, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- You can continue to add any comments or votes here:
- Oppose I like the composition and muted colours but the image is underexposed, those feathers should be white and not grey. Would support Aristeas' improved version, though! --Julesvernex2 (talk) 15:52, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 14:34, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Garden snail crossing the sidewalk.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2024 at 22:18:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class_:_Gastropoda
- Info A garden snail crossing the pavement after a rainy night; created by Grendelkhan - uploaded by Grendelkhan - nominated by Grendelkhan -- grendel|khan 22:18, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- grendel|khan 22:18, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like this. I find the big blue object in the background a bit distracting but the quality is really good and I generally like the composition. Cmao20 (talk) 02:18, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you! It's a recycling bin; this was a lucky find in the morning before people had taken their bins back inside. grendel|khan 16:18, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:02, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not an extraordinary picture for me. Sorry--Ermell (talk) 15:55, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I'd propose a crop as annotated as alternative --Llez (talk) 15:57, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you; that's proposed below. Good idea! grendel|khan 16:38, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not this composition. Yann (talk) 09:53, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
Alternative cropped version[edit]
- Comment Cropped as suggested by @Llez.
- Info As above, created by Grendelkhan - uploaded by Grendelkhan - nominated by Grendelkhan -- grendel|khan 16:16, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- grendel|khan 22:18, 8 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 05:12, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Not bad, but I would rather like the snail on grass than on the road. Yann (talk) 09:54, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:26, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:57, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The road is not for me, nor the revised panorama crop, and the quality does not compensate (sharpness, detail, light). DoF is not enough. Charlesjsharp (talk) 06:17, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Quality is fine, not overwhelming, lighting, compo, subject not spectacular, sorry, this is no FP to me --Poco a poco (talk) 18:05, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose A better alternative, but not up to standards. A hint for next time out: it would be better if the subject (in this case a snail) was in its natural habitat (i.e. a lush green field or something similar). All the best, Wolverine XI 06:19, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Golden Gate Bridge, San Francisco 13.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Apr 2024 at 18:42:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Golden_Gate_Bridge,_San_Francisco
- Info created by Mike Peel - uploaded by Mike Peel - nominated by Mike Peel -- Mike Peel (talk) 18:42, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mike Peel (talk) 18:42, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Cannot compete with existing FPs. Best without people. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:12, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Interesting, I was looking at the existing FPs and was surprised that they lacked a human connection, which I think this photo would add. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 20:40, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I concur with Charles Poco a poco (talk) 20:20, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per the idea of a 'human connection', I think when you phrase it like that this is quite nice and there's room for it in the gallery. Cmao20 (talk) 00:43, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't mind the people, but there are several competing images for this subject, so we can except something special. In terms of sharpness, composition, and wow, I find this one and this one better. Yann (talk) 09:47, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The quality was not here, blurry mountains without any texture, the bridge looks blurry, the people do not bother me because they are part of the composition but one would expect to see better quality --Wilfredor (talk) 20:32, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Perspective correction + composition + sharpless + no wow factor. Wolverine XI 06:28, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
File:North African Thekla's lark (Galerida theklae carolinae) Gabes.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Apr 2024 at 08:47:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Alaudidae (Larks)
- Info The subspecies that lives on the edge of the Sahara desert. No FPs of the species. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:47, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:47, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 18:20, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:09, 10 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Quality + composition excellent. Cmao20 (talk) 00:52, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Shagil Kannur (talk) 07:00, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
OpposeGreat light and composition, which I think deserve better processing: Topaz has left masking halos around the bird and rock; and false detail in the feathers, particularly around the eye. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 07:17, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done Thanks. New version uploaded Julesvernex2. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:36, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Better, thanks. Contrast is much lower though, was that intentional? Personally I would place it somewhere between the two versions. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 09:44, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done You do realise that you are now in a (distant) second place in the Commons Pernickety Editor Trophy 2024. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:18, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- I'm gunning for the top spot :) Julesvernex2 (talk) 10:23, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done You do realise that you are now in a (distant) second place in the Commons Pernickety Editor Trophy 2024. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:18, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:31, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:37, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you for the improvements and thanks to Julesvernex2 for the constructive hints. – Aristeas (talk) 14:08, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:10, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:25, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 13:26, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --BigDom (talk) 13:50, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 20:04, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The bird image reveals several issues that likely stem from digital processing, particularly noise reduction. A subtle shaded edge is noticeable on the bird's belly, leading me to believe this is an adverse effect of noise reduction, where the program fails to distinguish between noise and the bird's feathers, creating this edge. Another issue is observed in the bird's eye, which appears textureless, giving it a lifeless look, as if the bird were taxidermied. I would strongly recommend not removing so much noise. While noise can be acceptable and even natural in certain contexts, such as the inherent grain from sensors, in other instances it should be avoided, especially when it results from artificial over-sharpening. Another concern I have is the rock at the bottom of the image, which shows completely white, textureless areas, likely due to excessive reflections. It would be beneficial to see if reducing the brightness on the rock could reveal these textures and thus recover details in these areas. --Wilfredor (talk) 20:43, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- I fail to see what you're expressing. And why make the comment so long? Why not summarize the key points? Wolverine XI 06:32, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- There is no limitation for comments, it is long because I think it is a way to honor the author, to explain as best as possible what I intend to decide because English is not my mother tongue. Also because Charles has been doing a lot of good reviews of other photos and deserves a good review too, he has done a lot of previous evaluations but today is an opportunity to return the favor. Some people see negative votes as something bad, but in the case of Charles and yo, they are the votes that we most appreciate because if they are well argued, they help us improve. Wilfredor (talk) 17:10, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- I fail to see what you're expressing. And why make the comment so long? Why not summarize the key points? Wolverine XI 06:32, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per above. El Golli Mohamed 00:05, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Revenge vote noted; see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Flamants à Thyna (Sfax).jpg/2 Charlesjsharp (talk) 00:11, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- I think you may be right. Wolverine XI 06:36, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- I think so. He's opposing all my images at QIC now. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:46, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Revenge vote noted; see Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Flamants à Thyna (Sfax).jpg/2 Charlesjsharp (talk) 00:11, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good compo and quality. Wolverine XI 06:38, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support With some hesitation about the tail feathers out of focus. But overall impression is very good. --LexKurochkin (talk) 10:33, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Tribu Laarim, Kimotong, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-25, DD 19.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2024 at 19:51:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Sitting_people
- Info Kid of the Laarim Tribe drinking goat milk, Kimotong, South Sudan. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 19:51, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 19:51, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 21:41, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support If the child was suckling directly from the goat it would have been perfect. --Wilfredor (talk) 22:19, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Reminds me of the Basile Borin-style works. ★ 23:00, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:15, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:49, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 10:14, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:03, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 13:56, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great composition and light. And I love his expression! Cmao20 (talk) 14:38, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:24, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 17:44, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:17, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:22, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 23:09, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:48, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 20:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 07:51, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Stuor Dáhtá lake along the Kungsleden trail during golden hour in Kvikkjokk-Kabla fjällurskog (DSCF2557).jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2024 at 14:57:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Sweden
- Info There are surprisingly few Swedish FPs. I love the reflections and the calm mood here. created by Trougnouf - uploaded by Trougnouf - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:57, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- No way! Just take a look at the Cart's work! ★ 00:58, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:57, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Calming and beautiful scenery. – Aristeas (talk) 16:03, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 20:42, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 21:11, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support :-) --Trougnouf (talk) 22:22, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support (-:. --SHB2000 (talk) 01:29, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:40, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:15, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:48, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:00, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 14:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wonderful composition, but please remove the CAs. --XRay 💬 17:43, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done, thank you. I couldn't get the exact same development because software evolves but I tried to get as close as possible while leveraging some improvements. --Trougnouf (talk) 11:49, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:19, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:21, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Gorgeous. Well done. — Rhododendrites talk | 20:29, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:21, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 07:53, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Fatima BW 2018-10-05 21-52-30.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2024 at 16:29:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Portugal
- Info created - uploaded - nominated by Berthold Werner -- Berthold Werner (talk) 16:29, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Berthold Werner (talk) 16:29, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Sorry but average quality. ★ 00:56, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Superb composition but I'm not sure it's sharp enough for FP. It could also do with a slight perspective correction. Cmao20 (talk) 14:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Aigle royal Tlemcen.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2024 at 23:35:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes#Genus_:_Aquila
- Info created by Terki hassaine samir - uploaded by Terki hassaine samir - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 23:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 23:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Either not in focus or somehow too soft. Could be camera limitations but 1/250 sec not usually fast enough for hand-held shot using 280mm. F5.6 has restricted DoF. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:24, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry. Great close up in small size but at full size I agree the focus has been missed. Cmao20 (talk) 18:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Riad Salih (talk) 21:42, 18 April 2024 (UTC).
File:Mosque of Algiers Pillar.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2024 at 16:46:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings
- Info created by Abdellah zou - uploaded by Abdellah zou - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 16:46, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 16:46, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose It needs perspective correction. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 21:03, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support The lack of perspective correction doesn't bother me here. This isn't conventional architectural photography, it's about the colours, lines, shapes and repeating motifs. I find this photo artistically worthwhile and great fun to look at. But it is very small. Cmao20 (talk) 14:37, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I appreciate the photographer's eye -- there is a good motif in the architecture and lighting here -- but I find the composition a bit unbalanced and the standard for detail in architectural photos at FPC is higher than 3MP, sorry to say. — Rhododendrites talk | 20:28, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Rhododendrites -- Chepry (talk) 07:53, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Rhododendrites. -- Karelj (talk) 09:06, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Riad Salih (talk) 21:42, 18 April 2024 (UTC).
File:Perth (AU), View from Kings Park -- 2019 -- 0525-30.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2024 at 01:32:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Australia
- Info created and uploaded by XRay - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 01:32, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 01:32, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 02:11, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:15, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Shame about the dull light, but, great photo Cmao20 (talk) 14:40, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:22, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:22, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 23:07, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:19, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice composition with the bend of the roads in the centre, the park and lower houses at the left, the water at the right … – Aristeas (talk) 18:22, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:35, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you, SHB2000, for nominating. --XRay 💬 05:32, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Boehmeria nivea. 31-03-2024 (d.j.b.) 02.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2024 at 04:32:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Urticaceae
- Info Red emerging young shoot of a Boehmeria nivea. Focus stack of 21 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:32, 15 April 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:32, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:15, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 13:55, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:40, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:24, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 18:43, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:22, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:29, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 18:22, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 16:36, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Sofia Massif and Sofia Glacier, Karachay-Cherkessia, Caucasus Mountains.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2024 at 12:33:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#North Caucasian Federal District
Commons:Featured pictures/Natural_phenomena#Snow - Info Sofia Massif (3637) and Sofia Glacier in clouds under fresh autumn snow. This photograph could be considered historic, as the glacier has shrunk significantly in recent decade. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 12:33, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Argenberg (talk) 12:33, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support For me, this photo from 2013 is impressive.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:50, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Glaciers look better in the sunshine. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:50, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- It shows the entire massif with its geological outline, of which the glacier is only a part of. “Glaciers look better in the sunshine” sounds like a gross overgeneralization. It’s at least doubtful. In fact, dramatic weather conditions better convey their unpredictable and menacing nature. --Argenberg (talk) 17:33, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- I've met many glaciers at close quarters. They are predictable and not at all menacing. Google 'glacier' and you will see how sunshine shows a range of blue shades. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:24, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, if you just look at a glacier at close quarters, it may not seem menacing. This particular glacier, and many others, are dangerous to cross and walk on, even with proper skills and equipment. I think there’s plethora of visual information in this shot, considering the motif is the massif in its entirety. --Argenberg (talk) 23:07, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- I've met many glaciers at close quarters. They are predictable and not at all menacing. Google 'glacier' and you will see how sunshine shows a range of blue shades. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:24, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yes, safety first, please. I also agree with Argenberg that glaciers can look better in unpredictable conditions. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:24, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:07, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:37, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:54, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support The prominent mountainous rock in the middle creates a feeling of being on another planet --Wilfredor (talk) 20:33, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- I have the same feelings as you. The landscape looks alien to me too, like a scene from another planet. In addition to the big tower rock, smaller upcrusts and outcrops on the right, fragmented snow, atmospheric mist and overcast sky add to the impression. This is the bed of an ancient glacier that contracted with global warming, but will regain in the next global cooling phase. Here is a closer look at the wall of the glacier bed: File:Karachay-Cherkessia, Caucasus Mountains, Софийские ледники и водопады, Карачаево-Черкесия.jpg The waterfalls at the terminus are 120 m high, and the tower rock you mentioned is also huge, its prominence is probably around 300 m. This whole giant glacier floor will one day be covered with moving ice again, potentially spilling ice into the valley below. It will then look more earthly than today. Now it’s unearthly. --Argenberg (talk) 18:13, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:33, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:06, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:20, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:22, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 11:15, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Catania Cathedral from the Abbey of St Agatha1.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2024 at 05:13:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Italy
- Info: Catania Cathedral viewed from the Abbey of St Agatha; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:13, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:13, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 14:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:43, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:23, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 17:45, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:22, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:22, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:30, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Not bad for a cell phone shot--Ermell (talk) 09:07, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 18:24, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
File:СПб, Петергоф, часовня Иосифа Песнопевца (5).jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2024 at 13:08:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Russia
- Info created by ElenaLitera - uploaded by ElenaLitera - nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 13:08, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 13:08, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Very interesting object, unfortunately not sharp enough. --Palauenc05 (talk) 13:52, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support. Rare object & good quality. Sharpness is satisfactory as far as I can see. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 14:30, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not even a QI, lack of wow, definitely no FP, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 17:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not sharp enough but nothing extraordinary in first place, no "wow" effect Chepry (talk) 07:03, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
Chepry, I'm afraid the rules are you have to provide a reason for an opposing vote for it to be valid, even if the reason is as simple as 'per <other user>'.Cmao20 (talk) 14:38, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done - thank you! Cmao20 (talk) 17:40, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Palauenc05. Good quality but unfortunately insufficient sharpness for FP. Cmao20 (talk) 14:38, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
File:3, Mikhnovskoho Street - Kharkiv.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2024 at 20:23:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Ukraine
- Info created by Lystopad - uploaded by Lystopad - nominated by Lystopad -- Lystopad (talk) 20:23, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Lystopad (talk) 20:23, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 20:59, 11 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:07, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice, cool architecture and a shame it seems so neglected. Cmao20 (talk) 14:40, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 15:56, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Lighting, compo (isn't it too tight?) and quality aren't outstanding, the subject, not sure, what are we actually looking at? and how old? there is no information in the description page. Poco a poco (talk) 18:33, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't get any feedback, so I Oppose for now for the reasons above Poco a poco (talk) 08:09, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Just added some more details to the description. Lystopad (talk) 15:26, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- I didn't get any feedback, so I Oppose for now for the reasons above Poco a poco (talk) 08:09, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose No wow --Wilfredor (talk) 20:34, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Too tight crop and no wow factor for me.--Ermell (talk) 21:32, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:54, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others opponents. -- Karelj (talk) 09:22, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:29, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose - Generally per poco, but I do like the building and think it would be worth taking another shot at it someday. Maybe with better light and from further away (or a wider-angle lens). — Rhododendrites talk | 20:45, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:01, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Igreja de Nosso Senhor do Bonfim Salvador Bahia Fitas do Senhor do Bonfim 2021-7107.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2024 at 20:44:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Clothing and textiles
- Info Ribbons of the Church of Nosso Senhor do Bonfim, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil. Created and uploaded by Prburley - nominated by ★ -- ★ 20:44, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 20:44, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 18:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yes. – Aristeas (talk) 18:27, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I like a colorful subject, but I don't think this narrow DoF and composition quite do the subject justice. Maybe closer, maybe further away, maybe more DoF? It's a difficult call, but for me it falls just slightly on the side of oppose. — Rhododendrites talk | 20:22, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 07:55, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support: a higher f-number would make sense here. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:28, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Rhododendrites. --Ermell (talk) 21:43, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Rhododendrites. -- Karelj (talk) 09:01, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination No chance. ★ 22:11, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
File:001 Olive-bellied Sunbird starting to fly at Kibale National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2024 at 00:53:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Nectariniidae (Sunbirds_and_Spiderhunters)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:53, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:53, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:41, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:51, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful bird, cool posture, nice background. – Aristeas (talk) 15:58, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose It has been so over-processed that there is no definition at all on the feathers. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:31, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review. This is an action shot of a small bird captured at 1/2000s and ISO 4000 was needed since it is a dark forest. The feathers are just as fine as they can get in such conditions, especially with no direct light of the sun. This picture has just as much feather definition than the latest featured pictures of small birds in flight, if not more : 1, 2 3. Giles Laurent (talk) 18:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I’d wish for more definition on the feathers, too, but voters just have decide how is important this is for them. In that recent nomination there is IMHO even less definition on the feathers, but no voter has objected (Wilfredor and me were the only ones to comment on the definition question); that was a bird in flight, yes, but on the other hand it had more light than this one; therefore because that nomination has passed without any objections, we cannot complain much on this one about the missing definition, can we? – Aristeas (talk) 20:00, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- I did mention the overprocessing on the flycatcher FP Aristeas. Those three compositions were all borderline quality, but were more compelling compositions than this one. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:35, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I remember when I lived in Venezuela, at a time when Caracas was considered the most dangerous city in the world, photographing in those streets was a daily risk, not only because of the expensive equipment, but also for one's life. However, the images I captured often received lukewarm reactions on FPC: “no wow”. This greatly frustrated me, as most other users, located in peaceful European cities filled with splendid architecture, faced no such issues. The lesson I learned over time was that a photograph must be able to speak for itself. It shouldn’t matter if it was raining that day, if it was cloudy or sunny, if the place was dangerous, or if I was sick that day. The quality of my photographic equipment shouldn’t matter either. Circumstantial factors are secondary to the visual message that the image must convey. Photographers are frequently expected to explain or justify our images based on these external circumstances, but in reality, the power of a good photograph lies in its ability to transcend those details and connect with the viewer. It is the viewer’s responsibility to investigate and understand the context if they wish, but as photographers, our duty is to capture and transmit emotions and realities that speak beyond the immediate circumstances Wilfredor (talk) 20:26, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I’d wish for more definition on the feathers, too, but voters just have decide how is important this is for them. In that recent nomination there is IMHO even less definition on the feathers, but no voter has objected (Wilfredor and me were the only ones to comment on the definition question); that was a bird in flight, yes, but on the other hand it had more light than this one; therefore because that nomination has passed without any objections, we cannot complain much on this one about the missing definition, can we? – Aristeas (talk) 20:00, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review. This is an action shot of a small bird captured at 1/2000s and ISO 4000 was needed since it is a dark forest. The feathers are just as fine as they can get in such conditions, especially with no direct light of the sun. This picture has just as much feather definition than the latest featured pictures of small birds in flight, if not more : 1, 2 3. Giles Laurent (talk) 18:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 21:28, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:55, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per Aristeas --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:00, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 17:51, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not convinced either, I believe that the lighting conditions were very difficult (bad luck, not the best spot,...who knows) but this quality + composition isn't at FP level to me, sorry. Poco a poco (talk) 08:07, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review. The thing is that with wildlife you can’t decide the light settings, you have to photograph the animal where it is and adapt yourself to its environment. Moreover it is inevitable to go to high ISO and have more challenging light if you want to photograph a bird beginning to fly. I personally think that I was quite lucky to capture this bird in action and with a pose that let’s us admire its beautiful plumage: it is only with wings wide open that you can see the yellow bellow the bird wings and the bird is perfectly positioned to show it to us. I’ve seen no other photography on the internet showcasing the yellow part of this bird (only drawn illustrations in books) as this bird is usually only photographed in static position with wings closed. Giles Laurent (talk) 10:07, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:24, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Berthold Werner (talk) 16:24, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support-- Riad Salih (talk) 16:39, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:50, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 14:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Münstertal 04.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2024 at 08:28:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Baden-Württemberg
- Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 08:28, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 08:28, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 15:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:23, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent. Cmao20 (talk) 18:16, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Don't you just wish you could tilt the roundabout! Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:46, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support You can want something, but the reality is different and also beautiful.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:02, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 07:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:50, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:24, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 07:49, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:27, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Terragio67 (talk) 20:18, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:53, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:41, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Seaside Sanatorium (40873p).jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2024 at 20:09:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_States
- Info The Seaside Sanatorium is a historic medical facility in Connecticut designed by Cass Gilbert. It was the first institution built specifically for "heliotropic treatment" for tuberculosis. The treatment had to do with the role of vitamin D in fighting the disease. Not long thereafter, though, a vaccine was developed, making the treatment unnecessary. It served a couple other purposes before permanently closing. Now it's a public park. It's an unusual space, so I put together a panorama of the building. The other version is nice in that it includes part of the beach, but I think this is the better combination of composition/light. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 20:09, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 20:09, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Really interesting Cmao20 (talk) 00:44, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 01:32, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 07:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:42, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:26, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:46, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:16, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Put down highlights. white bldg on right side is too strong. Even red bricks would seem beter. --Mile (talk) 08:14, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:42, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Tsitsikamma National Park (ZA), Kanus an der Küste -- 2024 -- 1990.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2024 at 18:46:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Boats
- Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 18:46, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 18:46, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 01:42, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 10:55, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 11:34, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:25, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:27, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:00, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:46, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:43, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 14:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:20, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Sorry, I'm trying to understand this one but failing to do so. The position of the partial-kayaks in the frame ... I don't see anything to balance them. Maybe if they perfectly obscured exactly half of the water, or if there were a few kayaks in the distance on the right side... but they're expected enough objects in such a scene that it just seems unnecessarily cut off? Clearly others see something else, so I'd be curious to hear a full review from some folks. — Rhododendrites talk | 20:50, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree overall with Rhododendrites, sorry Dietmar Poco a poco (talk) 15:05, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Euclid’s view of the Horsehead Nebula ESA25170866.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2024 at 14:09:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Nebulae
- Info created by ESA/Euclid/Euclid Consortium/NASA, image processing by J.-C. Cuillandre (CEA Paris-Saclay), G. Anselmi, uploaded by OptimusPrimeBot, nominated by Yann
- Support -- Yann (talk) 14:09, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:16, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:43, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 18:08, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Resolution and quality is too low for FP in my eyes. Lots of disturbing artifacts are also visible.--Ermell (talk) 21:25, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Image quality is not there yet. Wolverine XI 06:42, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:55, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:19, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 13:51, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Yerevan, Brandy barrels, Armenia.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2024 at 20:57:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food_and_drink#Winemaking
Commons:Featured pictures/Photo_techniques/Styles_and_Techniques#Texture_photography - Info An underground cellar with old oak barrels where five to twenty year old wine distillates mature to produce an aged liquor. The location is the Yerevan Brandy/Cognac Factory (est. 1887) underground cellars, Yerevan, Armenia. The same basic blending and aging technology is shared by a number of high-end producers from countries such as Armenia, Russia (Dagestan), Italy, Spain, France (the pioneer of brandy making) and others. All by -- Argenberg (talk) 20:57, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support The composition was chosen to reveal a large, repeating geometric pattern as a side effect for texture photography. -- Argenberg (talk) 20:57, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool idea Cmao20 (talk) 00:45, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 01:24, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support agreed. --SHB2000 (talk) 03:49, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 07:53, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Question Could it be a bit less yellow please? Yann (talk) 09:44, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yann, I’ve reduced the color temperature (-200 kelvin on the Lightroom scale). I believe 3600K is very close the ambient lighting of the scene. --Argenberg (talk) 13:44, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:42, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Could you reduce the noise a bit? Poco a poco (talk) 21:27, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- I’ve learned to appreciate fine luminance noise, here it blends organically into the oak wood fiber, but OK, here’s a version with more noise control. --Argenberg (talk) 13:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- The file size is smaller know, so something was changed but I cannot appreciate it. Will not oppose though and stay Neutral Poco a poco (talk) 15:02, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:29, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:42, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:42, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 20:00, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Yellow-rumped warbler singing (41612).jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2024 at 20:00:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Parulidae_(New_World_Warblers)
- Info male yellow-rumped warbler (Setophaga coronata) singing. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 20:00, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 20:00, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:12, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 00:30, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 01:33, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful. – Aristeas (talk) 09:52, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:42, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:26, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 07:48, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 11:18, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:40, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:29, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ǃ – Terragio67 (talk) 20:16, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:03, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:37, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful, love the background -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:42, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Mangostim.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2024 at 20:12:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Fruits (raw)
- Info Mangosteen fruits in a grocery store, Colatina, Espírito Santo, Brazil. Created, uploaded and nominated by ★ -- ★ 20:12, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 20:12, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:02, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose QI but not FP. Corner sharpness is not very good and I just don't find the forms and shapes here that interesting. We have seen a lot of these pictures of lots of fruit arranged in a grid and I want to see something different. Cmao20 (talk) 01:48, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support I quite like the compo which negates the corner sharpness. --SHB2000 (talk) 11:35, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- I positioned the fruits myself to create an impression of a Battleship puzzle field. ★ 16:18, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Perhaps this would be better received if you used the Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Texture photography instead? It's up to you. --Cart (talk) 18:03, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- I'm still considering to replace it. Let's wait a bit. ★ 10:50, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- I decided to keep the category, since my other previous fruit FPs also belong to the same one. ★ 02:24, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- I'm still considering to replace it. Let's wait a bit. ★ 10:50, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Perhaps this would be better received if you used the Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Texture photography instead? It's up to you. --Cart (talk) 18:03, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support This one is better executed than ArionStar's former candidates. Here (finally) I also have the feeling of an endless pattern. FP to me Poco a poco (talk) 07:58, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Cmao20. -- Karelj (talk) 09:20, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Somehow this photo gives me a big “wow” – probably because of the strong colours contrasting with the black I first thought this was some modernist artwork, and even after realizing that it is a photo I really like this one. – Aristeas (talk) 09:57, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- fake support I would like to support this photo, but since I assisted Arion in applying a sharpness filter, I'm not sure if it's morally right for me to participate and endorse the image myself. That being said, some might think the photo is oversaturated, but that's not the case. One thing Arion and I discussed is how vibrant the colors in Brazil are compared to other places. I love this picture --Wilfredor (talk) 21:34, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:46, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:44, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:51, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 14:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:20, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support - "weak" only because it looks a little oversaturated compared to other photos of mangosteens I've seen. The pattern/motif is good, though. As an aside, I just tried these for the first time a few months ago. Technically they're illegal to import to the US for agricultural reasons, but you can find people selling them on the street in Chinatown (NYC). For as much as they're heralded as the "king of fruits", I didn't really care for them. I wonder if that's just because they had to be frozen (and probably picked too early) in order to ship them to the US. I know that's the case with durians -- we get underripe frozen ones that rot instead of ripen (hard to tell the difference, though :) ). — Rhododendrites talk | 20:53, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Gustave Le Gray - An Effect of the Sun, Normandy - 1987.54 - Cleveland Museum of Art.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2024 at 21:45:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Composites and Montages#Composites (Multiple images merged into one)
- Info created by Gustave Le Gray, uploaded and nominated by Yann
- Info Exploring the dramatic effects of sunlight, clouds, and water, Gustave Le Gray gained immediate recognition for his landmark photographs of the Mediterranean Sea and the English Channel taken between 1856 and 1858. At this time photographic emulsions were not equally sensitive to all colors of the spectrum, making it impossible to achieve a proper exposure for both sea and sky in a single image. Thus, for may of his seascapes Le Gray printed two negatives on a single sheet of paper, a technique called combination printing. One negative was taken of the water and the other of the sky. The overlap often apparent in such multiple negative images is not visible in this skillfully executed print. This picture is mentioned in several books about history of photography.
- Support 1856 example of what we call now HDR. -- Yann (talk) 21:45, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 01:49, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Question Was vignetting an inherent part of the process or could it be avoided? Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:44, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- I guess this is due to the inferior optic quality of that time. Most other images have the same effect. Yann (talk) 12:27, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, but these are images by this photographer. A quick Google didn't find other vignetted shots from the same period. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:38, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- But if you look at photos from the same period here on Commons, for example Category:19th-century photographs of France in the Cleveland Museum of Art where this comes from, there is a mix of with or without vignetting. In those days, just like today, the quality of the photo depended a lot on the quality of the camera. It seems that this photographer had a slightly inferior camera that produced vignetting. If you look at old photos, they are sometimes cut as circles or ovals to remove some of this effect, as it was often inevitable. However, the vignetting also matched the practice of doing oval paintings, especially portraits that predated photography (some examples), so it was sometimes a desired effect. Vignetting has a long history of being a way of emphasizing a subject in paintings (Goya liked it a lot and even old Doré comes to mind), as well as photos, and still is. Commons FPC is one of the very, very few places where it is frowned upon or questioned. --Cart (talk) 17:39, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- My question was technical Cart, not artistic. Was vignetting an inherent part of the process? You clearly know that some cameras of the period produced vignetting. Thank you for that fact. If accurate, it answers my question. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:44, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- In this case it looks like the technical and artistic reasons coincided, so I tried to cover both to answer you question as thoroughly as possible. The more in-depth technical part of vignetting is that for old cameras, it occurs when the diameter of the hole made by the iris in the lens approaches the thickness of the material the iris is made of. So a small iris hole (high f-number) for bright light and an iris made from thick material will give you more vignetting. Old cameras didn't have the thin sophisticated iris blades we have now, sometimes it was just a hole in a plate for the light to pass through. In simple terms you could say that the vignetting is the "shadow" of the hole's wall when the light passes through it. Imperfect lenses also added to this, and they hadn't discovered petal lens hoods yet. But people liked this, and if the effect wasn't strong enough naturally, it could also be added in the darkroom by the photographer. "Photoshopping" is as old as photography. ;-) --Cart (talk) 20:55, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks; that makes sense. Oppose I think then I can oppose on technical or artistic grounds as you can with a smartphone image today. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Charlesjsharp (talk • contribs) 09:31, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support The horizon is incredibly aligned. ★ 15:17, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful and impressive, technically and aesthetically. – Aristeas (talk) 15:58, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:45, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:56, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:06, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:21, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Terragio67 (talk) 04:20, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:32, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 20:56, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
File:ORTH Anostostomidae Deinacrida rugosa in habitat.png, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2024 at 04:00:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Others#Animals
- Info created by Des Helmore - uploaded by Giantflightlessbirds - nominated by Giantflightlessbirds -- Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 04:00, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Info This is one of over 1000 scientific illustrations made over a 30-year career by Des Helmore, released under an open licence by Landcare Research. Helmore was regarded as an insect illustrator with an international reputation. Several of them have value outside of scientific articles, and if the community feels they're technically proficient and significant enough I'll nominate some more. Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 04:10, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 04:00, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I've never seen this massive insect, but the illustration fails to show the massive size and looks as if it fails to illustrates the typical curve of the abdomen. Does not indicate sex. Link on description page is broken. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:15, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- I have seen this insect in life, and that's an accurate portrayal of its proportions and of the abdomen. The wood grain is a pretty good indicator of scale I think. Sex is indicated by the ovipositor (I've added that to the description). The Landcare permissions page has been moved, thank you for picking up on that, so I've fixed the link and have run visual file change replacement on the other 1088 images. Giantflightlessbirds (talk) 10:05, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support It seems I have seen this insect. I trust Des Helmore to make an accurate representation. This is very well drawn, and a good scan. Yann (talk) 15:50, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Yann. Thanks to Giantflightlessbirds for updating all the links! – Aristeas (talk) 07:08, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:46, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:57, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:17, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:00, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Tunisian tortoise (Testudo graeca nabeulensis) male Cap Bon 2.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2024 at 09:05:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Testudinidae (Tortoises)
- Info My recent tortoise nomination failed to make the grade. A couple of people suggested this photo of the same guy as a possible FP. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:05, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:05, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support I liked the other one too but this is cool Cmao20 (talk) 14:05, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support: disturbed environment is much less obvious in this one --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:40, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:28, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:48, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 09:36, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 11:17, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:43, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support I find the environment a little chaotic, even though it is natural, but there is a very pronounced shadow due to the schedule. --Wilfredor (talk) 02:11, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Better. Wolverine XI 06:13, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:30, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Igreja de São Gonçalo Vitória Espírito Santo 2019-3103 (cropped).jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2024 at 14:49:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Brazil
- Info created and initially uploaded by Prburley - cropped and nominated by ★ -- ★ 14:49, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 14:49, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry. The image does not appear symmetrical. It makes an unbalanced impression. Too many elements (windows, glow of wall lights) are disruptively cropped. --XRay 💬 16:54, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Right. ★ 17:21, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Please, try to wait a bit, other people might be able to give you more ideas on how to fix the photo instead of canceling the nomination so quickly. Wilfredor (talk) 20:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Île d'Orléans 048.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2024 at 16:28:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Canada
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 16:28, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Ahem... There really is no reason to flip the finger in the way you do on the permission parameter. You have already been generous enough to supply the cc-zero license. Just because some people here and on the internet are a-holes, you don't need to pick up that behavior too. There are enough bad vibes going around here to power up a small city; we don't need more of that. Please. --Cart (talk) 19:29, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- sorry I removed it Wilfredor (talk) 20:11, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! That was kind of you. --Cart (talk) 20:12, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Tangentially, why is {{WTFPL}} even a template? While I myself have no problem with "Permission is granted to do what the fuck you want to with this document under the terms of the WTF Public License, Version 2." (and take it very lightheartedly), Commons is a multilingual wiki and not everyone (especially non-native English speakers) will perceive it that way. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:15, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- The reason why I asked Wilfredor to remove it was simply because I think we owe it to readers and the people re-using our photos to be met with a civilized tone when they view our best pictures. The bitter aftermath from recent licensing discussions should not spill over to the more "official" part of Commons. Imagine an 8 year-old looking for a picture of an old Canadian house for their school project and be met with that wording. Personally and IRL, I swear a lot, in several languages (you should hear me in Spanish!), but there is a time and place for everything. This is not about how much crude language we editors are comfortable with, but how we present Commons to the rest of the world. I think we could add FPs to the quote. ;-) Regarding the template, since there is an article about it, I guess someone thought it was a good joke to create the template. Templates can be used for so many things, not just for Commons official things. There are plenty of personal and other minor templates. --Cart (talk) 10:09, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, I casually swear a lot in English IRL (sometimes even on-wiki when appropriate), but agreed that this is not the place for it. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:13, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- The reason why I asked Wilfredor to remove it was simply because I think we owe it to readers and the people re-using our photos to be met with a civilized tone when they view our best pictures. The bitter aftermath from recent licensing discussions should not spill over to the more "official" part of Commons. Imagine an 8 year-old looking for a picture of an old Canadian house for their school project and be met with that wording. Personally and IRL, I swear a lot, in several languages (you should hear me in Spanish!), but there is a time and place for everything. This is not about how much crude language we editors are comfortable with, but how we present Commons to the rest of the world. I think we could add FPs to the quote. ;-) Regarding the template, since there is an article about it, I guess someone thought it was a good joke to create the template. Templates can be used for so many things, not just for Commons official things. There are plenty of personal and other minor templates. --Cart (talk) 10:09, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- FWIW the WTFPL license is used on about 6200 files here. Since "whatever the fuck" probably isn't easy to translate, I suspect we should not support it, but that's a separate conversation. It's basically CC0 as far as I can tell. — Rhododendrites talk | 13:32, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Is this just an ordinary house? I think it's a good picture anyway, and I think a well-lit, well-composed photo of an ordinary house ought to be a possible subject for an FP. Cmao20 (talk) 01:25, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Atmospheric and well composed photo of an old but working house. You could argue about the two cropped chairs (that actually mirrors each other), but testing cropping them out makes it looks like a museum. Now you get the sense that this interior continues throughout the house. I'm glad to see that you brought your skill for photographing inside houses with you, all the way from Venezuela to Canada. --Cart (talk) 14:30, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- This house brings back good memories for me. It's located in a secluded area of a rural zone on the island of Orleans, Quebec. A picturesque place surrounded by gardens of vegetables and fruits around the house, and close by, a stable with goats, egg-laying hens, and further away, a wheat plantation with a beautiful old barn that, in the afternoon light, seemed as if the roof was honey-colored. Nearby, a small stream flows. My wife and I went to this place to spend much of her pregnancy there, which brought her peace and tranquility, although soon after came the most difficult event of my life: the loss of our baby at 4 months of gestation, which among other things ended our years-long relationship. I mention all this because I took a photo in front of that house where she was sitting in an old rocking chair, holding her belly with a smile and her eyes closed—probably the most beautiful featured image I ever took, but I had to delete it because keeping it would be torture. Moreover, she and I are no longer together. I know this has nothing to do with this photo but I wanted to provide some context. Behind every photo, there's an additional story. I don't care if this photo is featured or not, this is not a chatgpt speech to manipulate anything. Wilfredor (talk) 18:05, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- We understand. No ChatGPT could sound so sad. Sometimes you just need to say things to lighten the burden of carrying it. --Cart (talk) 23:12, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cart. – Aristeas (talk) 19:29, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 11:12, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:19, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:44, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:45, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cart. – Terragio67 (talk) 20:12, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support I just realised I never actually voiced my support. --SHB2000 (talk) 21:26, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support I would adjust the crop on the right and maybe on the left but overall interesting and FP worthy to me Poco a poco (talk) 14:58, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Sydney Spiny Crayfish 4239.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2024 at 18:18:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Parastacidae_(Crayfish)
- Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Ivar (talk) 18:18, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:18, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Question Does this species climb out of the water and go for a walk? Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:39, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 22:15, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support JJ, you've done it again. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:19, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Detail is good but I wonder the same like Charles, is this picture a real wildlife shot or setup? Poco a poco (talk) 07:55, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Detail is not that good. Much processing and the head-on view gives little DoF. Reflections on the right hand side are distracting.
Surely it is a staged image? More than happy to apologise to John if it isn't.Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:12, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Detail is not that good. Much processing and the head-on view gives little DoF. Reflections on the right hand side are distracting.
- Comment Charlesjsharp & Poco a poco: this specimen is standing in the water! Nevertheless, Euastacus species have the tendency to leave the water and walk about on land. Not knowing any background and adding a comment like Surely it is a staged image is imo very narrow-minded. -- Ivar (talk) 10:40, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- That is true for several species of crayfish. My neighbor on Gotland had a big pond with crayfish, and I would often see them on the road as they went in search of new wet areas. That way they populated a nearby small stream. --Cart (talk) 19:38, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
NeutralNice, but the unfocused reflections on the right side of the picture bother me a lot. ★ 12:29, 14 April 2024 (UTC)- Support. Giving my support as a vote of confidence. JJ is a good photographer overall. ★ 17:04, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I'm not sure it has enough depth of field to be FPC and I suspect JJ would not have chosen to nominate this one. It's QI but not one of his best. Cmao20 (talk) 14:55, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Certainly not a good illustration for an identification book. The fancy bokeh seems to indicate that this time JJ Harrison was after something else: the photo makes the crayfish look like a creature from another planet. This is indeed important and useful. When you want to fire laymen and laywomen for nature conservation etc., you must astonish them and help them to realize how many and diverse are the plants and animals of this world. For that purpose we need photos like this one. (It may seem unbelievable, but I am sure this photo is much more appealing for many “normal” people than our finest crayfish mugshots ;–). – Aristeas (talk) 15:57, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Unfortunately little DoF, I feel sad to have to downvote because I feel it's a good photo --Wilfredor (talk) 22:31, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas. Also I noticed another animal just below him under the water, is it a prey or a baby crayfish ? -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:30, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral - This will sound superficial, but my eyes cannot move past that bright blue area in the bottom-right. It's the brightest thing in the frame, and so different that it's where my eyes naturally rest. The detail on the face of the crawfish is excellent, and I'd probably support if I could just look past the blue speckles. — Rhododendrites talk | 20:36, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:18, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per above Poco a poco (talk) 18:03, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Tribu Laarim, Kimotong, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-24, DD 33.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2024 at 20:51:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
- Info Portrait of a young woman from the Laarim Tribe, Kimotong, Kapoeta State, South Sudan. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:51, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:51, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful and perfect.--Ermell (talk) 21:36, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Another great one. Cmao20 (talk) 01:26, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:19, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 07:47, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great photo in your expected and usual quality. It would be nice to read her name (if she agrees). - Je-str (talk) 08:08, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Definite FP composition and technical quality. Could you spend 20 minutes improving the black background around the subject. Boring work, but needed. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:21, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, I spent 15 min to improve the dark area, I hope you see a difference Poco a poco (talk) 20:05, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thanks, but the extra 5 minutes would have been worth it... Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:31, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Charlesjsharp: my understanding is that I did in 15 min what you asked me to do in 20 min. If there are any issues peding to be adressed, could you add a note? I'd fix them, of course. --Poco a poco (talk) 14:05, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- When you pixel peep there are still grey areas all around the subject. No big deal. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, Charles, there you go 15 + 5 now :) Poco a poco (talk) 19:10, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:10, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:14, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 09:34, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 07:51, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good portrait. Wolverine XI 06:10, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:47, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:48, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:02, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
File:CH.ZH.Langnau-am-Albis Langenberg-Wildlife-Park 2022-02-12 7587 16x9-R 5K.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2024 at 22:24:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)
- Info created by Roy Egloff - uploaded by Roy Egloff - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 22:24, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 22:24, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 02:56, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Would have to be a much better composition for part of a captive animal. For a close up, this is too small for FP but a much better image. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:09, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful and appealing portrait. – Aristeas (talk) 16:02, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 21:12, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 09:48, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:58, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 13:58, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:25, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:37, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:34, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 12:53, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Very sharp, but that's the minimum expectation for a captive animal IMO. I don't think it's a compelling composition, with the light on its back, flat expression, and most of the body missing. — Rhododendrites talk | 20:31, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 07:54, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
Weak support Captive animal but very nice light and compelling angle -- 2A01:CB04:1255:6600:359B:AE4E:283C:D9D4 07:14, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Dear IP, sorry but we can’t count anonymous/IP votes. Please log in and vote again. – Aristeas (talk) 08:43, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Visitors of Louvre and Nike of Samothrace.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2024 at 16:38:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#France
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 16:38, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 22:27, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 01:11, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Too busy scene, too many people spoil the composition. --Palauenc05 (talk) 14:08, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- In choosing this particular photograph, I was aiming to capture the dynamic essence of a museum in full operation, not just its architecture. The museum as a space where people interact with art and culture helps convey the idea that the museum is more than just a container for art; it is a place of encounter, learning, and shared experience, vibrant with the presence of its visitors. Wilfredor (talk) 14:31, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but I agree with Palauenc. --SHB2000 (talk) 05:33, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support, as per Wilfredor's comment. --RodRabelo7 (talk) 05:01, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 20:17, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the reviews --Wilfredor (talk) 11:22, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Campbell water tower, aerial view.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2024 at 07:18:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#United_States
- Info The iconic water tower in downtown Campbell, CA; created by Grendelkhan - uploaded by Grendelkhan - nominated by Grendelkhan -- grendel|khan 07:18, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- grendel|khan 07:18, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Unappealing suburban background. Definitely a QI, but not an FP. --SHB2000 (talk) 09:09, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Image composition and view is particularly poor. Wolverine XI 16:11, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Cabinet card of William Howard Taft by Pach Brothers - Cropped to image.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2024 at 05:08:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1900-1909
- Info created by Pach Brothers - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:08, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:08, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:07, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support America's fattest president. Cmao20 (talk) 14:55, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 21:11, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 07:59, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 06:50, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:03, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 11:13, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Parque Estadual Serra do Rola Moça Tomás Oliveira (02).jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2024 at 17:23:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Arachnida#Family : Lycosidae (Wolf Spiders)
- Info Wolf spider at the Serra do Rola-Moça State Park, Minas Gerais, Brazil. The park is in the metropolitan region of Belo Horizonte, divided between the municipalities of Belo Horizonte, Nova Lima, Ibirité and Brumadinho and has an area of 3,941.09 hectares (9,738.6 acres). Created and uploaded by Otomso - nominated by ★ -- ★ 17:23, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 17:23, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Only about 10 % of the image are in focus. --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:26, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Palauenc05. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 07:42, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination ★ 11:06, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Les Joueurs de cartes, par Paul Cézanne.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2024 at 11:46:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/People#Duos_(depictions_of_two_people)
- Info The Card Players by Paul Cézanne - uploaded by Yann - nominated by --Thi (talk) 11:46, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Thi (talk) 11:46, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yes, that was in my list of FPC. Yann (talk) 11:59, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:49, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:50, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 14:55, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:59, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:48, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 08:11, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:26, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:26, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support One of the most expensive paintings in the history of art. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:05, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:48, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:46, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:06, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Honor guard at Mausoleum of Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2024 at 09:43:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Standing_people
- Info Honor guard at Mausoleum of Mohammed V, Rabat, Morocco. My work. --Mile (talk) 09:43, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 09:43, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support JukoFF (talk) 14:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:45, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Berthold Werner (talk) 15:22, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:47, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:23, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 17:45, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 18:35, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:23, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Off-centre? --SHB2000 (talk) 05:07, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment He isnt in center, neither me, neither vertical of doors is. --Mile (talk) 07:28, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, that ruins the compo for me. Oppose. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:45, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:23, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 08:30, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Argenberg (talk) 15:08, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 18:26, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Curious if you asked him to pose, or if this is his natural "guard face"? :) — Rhododendrites talk | 20:24, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- @talk He is there all day, they have exchange around noon, maybe later. 4 doors - 4 guards, than inside too (each corner), and horse outside complex (2 cavarlyman). --Mile (talk) 08:14, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:56, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Balanced symmetrical composition, good lighting and technical quality. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:52, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:22, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Like the image but would have tried cropping tighter all around to remove the dark lines at the edges and bring the guard closer in the frame. --GRDN711 (talk) 02:49, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done GRDN711 Right you are, i think contrast is better now, passing from white on color guard and doors. It wasnt so much bringing closer but contrast is better. --Mile (talk) 09:30, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 07:51, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Striking composition --Basile Morin (talk) 09:20, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Vista aérea de Puerto Vallarta.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2024 at 17:19:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Mexico
- Info: Aerial view of Puerto Vallarta after departure from the airport; taken from a window of a commercial aircraft. All by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:19, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:19, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Doesn't give us a nice view of the city. Wolverine XI 11:10, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:40, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Campamento de ganado de la tribu Mundari, Terekeka, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-29, DD 242.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2024 at 20:22:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family_:_Bovidae_(Bovids)
- Info Mundari man polishing the horns of one of his Watusi cows in a cattle camp in Terekeka, South Sudan. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Manifest photo, lighting and spectacular daily human activity in this hidden area. I think the noise elimination could be improved, I find it excessive since it has eliminated any texture of the skin on the person's face. Also a chromatic aberration in the bull/cow bear --Wilfredor (talk) 21:48, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment
Some crop above would be helpful.--Mile (talk) 08:16, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Ok, Wilfredor, Mile I made some improvements, thanks for the feedback. Poco a poco (talk) 08:41, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think it better; shepherd head moved up to 2/3 and horn is talking biger size and sunset colors not lost. --Mile (talk) 17:06, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:35, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 17:16, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:23, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 00:12, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 09:04, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful light and scene -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:49, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:41, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 17:04, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:03, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Color, light, composition and subject are wonderful. Acroterion (talk) 12:11, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:43, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Mood, composition, impressive horns! -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:11, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:12, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Self-portrait in a Straw Hat by Elisabeth-Louise Vigée-Lebrun.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2024 at 17:19:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic_media/People#Paintings
- Info Élisabeth Vigée Le Brun, Self-portrait in a Straw Hat, 1782 - uploaded by Aavindraa - nominated by --Thi (talk) 17:19, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Thi (talk) 17:19, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:48, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well-known self-portrait of one of the most important
femalepainters of her time. – Aristeas (talk) 14:27, 20 April 2024 (UTC)- I striked out the “female”; Vigée-Lebrun is one of the most important painters of her time, period. – Aristeas (talk) 08:39, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 17:16, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:23, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 17:24, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:02, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 00:13, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:49, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:42, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:02, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:40, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:07, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Fiestas de San Juan Bautista (Nueva Esparta, Venezuela) 06.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2024 at 19:10:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
- Info created, uploaded, and nominated by WiloJedi -- WiloJedi (talk) 19:10, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WiloJedi (talk) 19:10, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not exceptional in any way. --SHB2000 (talk) 05:06, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like it. Good quality and a fun variety of interesting items. Shame about the out of focus item in the foreground. Cmao20 (talk) 18:13, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Just a comment: these copyrighted objects are not permanently fixed, so this may have some COM:FOP problems. — Rhododendrites talk | 20:23, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Very restless and too many truncated elements. --XRay 💬 07:56, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Xray. -- Karelj (talk) 09:05, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Moral support I like the composition and the colors. Yann (talk) 09:30, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Unimpressive compo and elements. Wolverine XI 06:23, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Good pose, but otherwise something is missing. --Thi (talk) 21:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
File:068 Mountain gorilla close-up at Bwindi Impenetrable Forest National Park Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2024 at 22:18:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Hominidae (Great_Apes)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:18, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 22:18, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
OpposeI'm sorry to oppose another gorilla FPC. But this shot cannot compare, in my opinion, to shots like this.The over-exposed areas are the main problem. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:31, 16 April 2024 (UTC)- Thank you for your review. I just uploaded a new file with highlights edited. In my opinion, this image is more interesting than the one you linked because : 1) the sun is illuminating the mountain gorilla eyes, showing all the beauty of their color in the sun; 2) The eyes of the mountain gorilla image you linked have barely no details distinguishable; 3) I've seen almost no other image on the internet showing how the mountain gorilla eyes are when illuminated by direct sun light. Giles Laurent (talk) 11:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Gorilla eyes and more gorilla eyes Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:28, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- None of your linked gorillas are illuminated by sunlight. Both of your linked gorillas are looking on the far left or far right. First link only show eyes and not the face. Giles Laurent (talk) 15:52, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment FPC is a wonderful place where you can learn so much. Ordinary mortals (like yours truly) would be scrupulous about always citing examples of other photographers in such matters, but certainly not their own insignificant works, to avoid any impression of vanity. But great men are free from such false considerations, and I can only admire Charles’ generosity in liberally presenting us with outstanding examples of his own artistry in his gracious comments. We can all learn a lot from these grandiose gestures. – Aristeas (talk) 08:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- I bow before a great man and ordinary mortal. Although I always thought great men wouldn't need to use sarcasm. FPC is a competition and I'm sorry if the existing FPs I referenced are my own. On another current FP nomination I reference a better image that is not my own. You have also possibly not noticed that when I opposed this nomination it was horribly overexposed; there was also a distracting twig. I am now neutral about it. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:00, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Question ... when you say FPC is a competition, are you being sarcastic? Kritzolina (talk) 10:34, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Indeed... Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:45, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- ... which makes me wonder ... but no, I will not continue. Kritzolina (talk) 17:36, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Please let's maintain the respect and dignity in our comments, set aside sarcasm and ego, and keep the peace in this place. I find it disrespectful what some are doing to Charles. In your obsessive search for photographic prestige, you're trying to discredit him by continuously insulting him. However, beneath it all lies a hidden admiration, a concealed love for Charles, an envy of his photographic ability that you will likely never match. Wilfredor (talk) 12:14, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- ... which makes me wonder ... but no, I will not continue. Kritzolina (talk) 17:36, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Indeed... Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:45, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Question ... when you say FPC is a competition, are you being sarcastic? Kritzolina (talk) 10:34, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- I bow before a great man and ordinary mortal. Although I always thought great men wouldn't need to use sarcasm. FPC is a competition and I'm sorry if the existing FPs I referenced are my own. On another current FP nomination I reference a better image that is not my own. You have also possibly not noticed that when I opposed this nomination it was horribly overexposed; there was also a distracting twig. I am now neutral about it. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:00, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment FPC is a wonderful place where you can learn so much. Ordinary mortals (like yours truly) would be scrupulous about always citing examples of other photographers in such matters, but certainly not their own insignificant works, to avoid any impression of vanity. But great men are free from such false considerations, and I can only admire Charles’ generosity in liberally presenting us with outstanding examples of his own artistry in his gracious comments. We can all learn a lot from these grandiose gestures. – Aristeas (talk) 08:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- None of your linked gorillas are illuminated by sunlight. Both of your linked gorillas are looking on the far left or far right. First link only show eyes and not the face. Giles Laurent (talk) 15:52, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Gorilla eyes and more gorilla eyes Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:28, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review. I just uploaded a new file with highlights edited. In my opinion, this image is more interesting than the one you linked because : 1) the sun is illuminating the mountain gorilla eyes, showing all the beauty of their color in the sun; 2) The eyes of the mountain gorilla image you linked have barely no details distinguishable; 3) I've seen almost no other image on the internet showing how the mountain gorilla eyes are when illuminated by direct sun light. Giles Laurent (talk) 11:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:24, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support A characterful portrait. Cmao20 (talk) 18:15, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20. – Aristeas (talk) 18:29, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support the light makes this a good portrait. I'd recommend cloning out that little twig in the top-right, though -- it's bright enough to be distracting. — Rhododendrites talk | 20:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! Done, new file uploaded -- Giles Laurent (talk) 21:09, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 21:14, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:57, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support A characterful, expressive image. -- Radomianin (talk) 12:45, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support I would still put white/highlight down. --Mile (talk) 16:10, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support The light makes this special, indeed. Thank you for capturing this, Giles Laurent! --Kritzolina (talk) 18:54, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:23, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Giles… ★ 00:20, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:40, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:25, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Terragio67 (talk) 20:22, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Charlesjsharp, The image is a pretty good portrait but the reflection in the completely white eyes and the overexposure is not an interesting light, it is a light that suppresses the details, in my humble opinion --Wilfredor (talk) 02:23, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review. I am not sure you are viewing the latest version of the image (sometimes if you open the image at full size, and later the image is updated and that you open it again after the update, you won't see the new latest version because the old one keeps in the cache of your browser). If you open the image at full size and press cmd+R on Mac or Ctrl+F5 on windows you can force your browser to update the cached version. Could you please try that? Because an updated version was uploaded a few days ago and the highlights were recovered. According to lightroom there is no overexposure area. The fact that there is a small white circle in the eye is completely normal as it is the reflection of the sun. This is completely unavoidable for any eye photographed in the sun. Giles Laurent (talk) 10:31, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I saw after updating the cache, I think the contract is very strong. Thank you for taking this comment constructively. The photo is still wonderful and apparently it will be highlighted, this was just my humble opinion Wilfredor (talk) 12:15, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your review. I am not sure you are viewing the latest version of the image (sometimes if you open the image at full size, and later the image is updated and that you open it again after the update, you won't see the new latest version because the old one keeps in the cache of your browser). If you open the image at full size and press cmd+R on Mac or Ctrl+F5 on windows you can force your browser to update the cached version. Could you please try that? Because an updated version was uploaded a few days ago and the highlights were recovered. According to lightroom there is no overexposure area. The fact that there is a small white circle in the eye is completely normal as it is the reflection of the sun. This is completely unavoidable for any eye photographed in the sun. Giles Laurent (talk) 10:31, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support The eyes. Wolverine XI 06:19, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support The crop is tight at the bottom and at the top, however the overall impression is striking enough with the animal looking at viewer. Good capture -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:07, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:41, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Fischerkirche (main door), Born a. Darß.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2024 at 20:30:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Doors
- Info Main entrance on the west facade of the Lutheran Fishermen's Church in Born a. Darß, Northeast Germany. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Radomianin (talk) 20:30, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:30, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:34, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 00:09, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Love the combination of the simple rough wood on the wall with the colourful wood of the door. – Aristeas (talk) 08:56, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support When you zoom in the middle of the door and scroll up or down you get an interesting screen effect -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:52, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:41, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 17:01, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:45, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:29, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:30, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:06, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:47, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:09, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:45, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Lamp maker, Medina of Marrakech.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2024 at 14:35:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People_at_work
- Info Lamp maker, Medina of Marrakech. My shot. -- Mile (talk) 14:35, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 14:35, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice, something different. Well composed. Cmao20 (talk) 18:18, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support I would have preferred trade some ISO for faster shutter here, but I like the subject and compo. — Rhododendrites talk | 20:17, 16 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 01:25, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:42, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor crop. --SHB2000 (talk) 08:52, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Shaking hand and distracting background. Wolverine XI 06:18, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:52, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:54, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Wolverine XI, sorry. Riad Salih (talk) 04:43, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Maritimes Museum Hamburg (2024)-L1005406.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2024 at 18:02:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Hamburg
- Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:02, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:02, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well-known building that has become an important maritime museum thanks to the donation of an extensive private collection. Solid, well composed picture. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:15, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:20, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:35, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 00:10, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good light; the clouds provide a great background (like a painted theatre scene ;–) for the building. – Aristeas (talk) 08:54, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:51, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Now that's a view! Wolverine XI 11:13, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 17:02, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:45, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:31, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:06, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:46, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:05, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Frost-covered lifebuoy, Lake Siskiyou.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2024 at 20:30:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Ice
- Info Lifebuoy covered in hoarfrost, taken on Lake Siskiyou in Northern California near the town of Mount Shasta. The wooden pillar is located about 15 meters from the shore next to a floating dock secured by a railing. To take the picture, I knelt down and leaned through the handrail. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Radomianin (talk) 20:30, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:30, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- You and Frank are the same person? Wilfredor (talk) 20:47, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Wilfredor: We took a joint photo tour, and we agreed that each photographer's version should be listed under Other versions. We thought this would be interesting - especially for reusers. Frank's version was taken 16 minutes after mine. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 21:16, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- You and Frank are the same person? Wilfredor (talk) 20:47, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thanks for explain it --Wilfredor (talk) 13:09, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support You was able to find the right angle... light and colours are really cools. --Terragio67 (talk) 22:25, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:34, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Yes, symbolic meaning and beautiful. --Yann (talk) 23:33, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 00:06, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:49, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support A beautiful calming still life. – Aristeas (talk) 08:32, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 08:45, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:53, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Joyous! Wolverine XI 11:07, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Delicate color fading on the water, great, Poco a poco (talk) 14:41, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:15, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 16:52, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:28, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful! Looking at both versions of the image, it's incredible the difference lighting makes --Julesvernex2 (talk) 08:54, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:07, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:48, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:12, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 08:48, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:08, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- It’s interesting to compare these images side by side. This one is probably more fitting in terms of composition, depth of field, focusing and white balance, but when you look at the other version, you immediately start noticing the inexplicable, impeccable nature and very special character of the lens, the Summilux-M 35 f/1.4 ASPH, which is hard to beat. The lens is dead serious in its rendering. --Argenberg (talk) 20:59, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice to look at --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:34, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality and composition. --Thi (talk) 09:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent capture. I still remember how cold it was that morning at the lake. While I was focused on getting a view of Mount Shasta, Radomianin found this stunning scene. Congratulations on interpreting it this nicely! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 10:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Trier, 07-12-2023 (actm.) 01.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2024 at 04:19:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors/Germany#Rhineland-Palatinate
- Info Trier, Alter Krahn on the Mosel captured in a fine interplay of lines.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:19, 17 April 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:19, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 07:37, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:04, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:42, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 20:15, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:28, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 09:15, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support I like this interweaving of shadows and perspective (also in the background) that help each other by creating continuity to the composition. --Terragio67 (talk) 09:45, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 19:29, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:43, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose pronounced shadows, too many elements in the composition, graffiti distracts the composition, I feel suffocated watching this --Wilfredor (talk) 02:14, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Unappealing view and light. Wolverine XI 06:15, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:46, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:46, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 04:15, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Solar eclipse on April 8, 2024 in Québec city, pano.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2024 at 11:04:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Astronomy#Eclipse
- Info All by -- Wilfredor (talk) 11:04, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great work! Yann (talk) 11:44, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:03, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:22, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
SupportInteresting! -- Radomianin (talk) 19:57, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Regarding the discussion below: even though the nomination has been withdrawn, I would like to strike my support because of the circumstantial evidence. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:52, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:53, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
SupportCould you explain a bit how these images were created? – Aristeas (talk) 08:50, 21 April 2024 (UTC) Sorry, striked out – see the discussion below. – Aristeas (talk) 18:52, 22 April 2024 (UTC)- I remember that day was very windy. I had been waiting for the eclipse for several days, continuously checking the time. With 20 minutes to go before the eclipse started, I saw people gathering to watch it from my building; some even lacked proper protection. From my vantage point, I spotted a space near these people that was large enough for my tripod. I had a special graduated filter for the eclipse, but when I tried to fit it on my camera, it didn't fit, so I had to use tape to secure the filter to the lens. I used a 100-400mm Z nikon lens with a 2X extender, effectively giving me 800mm on a full-frame format, which made the setup extremely heavy. Despite the limited time, I grabbed my camera and went down to set up on a small mound. The wind was ridiculously strong, so I opted to place metal stakes in each tripod leg to keep it from flying away and added a counterweight to the center to minimize vibration, recalling that Quebec City is often windy due to its proximity to the Saint Lawrence River. After setting up the camera and tripod, I had to keep adjusting it directly towards the sun to account for the movements of the Earth, the Moon, and the Sun. I couldn’t just leave the camera pointed and shoot; I had to periodically recenter the Moon and the Sun in my shots. The photos were taken with a manual setting to minimize exposure during the partial eclipse, capturing significant phases at regular intervals. Later, I developed the images in Lightroom, applying only lens correction and chromatic aberration adjustments, which I didn't really notice. Finally, I merged the images into a single composition using Photoshop. Wilfredor (talk) 12:39, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much! – Aristeas (talk) 16:29, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- I remember that day was very windy. I had been waiting for the eclipse for several days, continuously checking the time. With 20 minutes to go before the eclipse started, I saw people gathering to watch it from my building; some even lacked proper protection. From my vantage point, I spotted a space near these people that was large enough for my tripod. I had a special graduated filter for the eclipse, but when I tried to fit it on my camera, it didn't fit, so I had to use tape to secure the filter to the lens. I used a 100-400mm Z nikon lens with a 2X extender, effectively giving me 800mm on a full-frame format, which made the setup extremely heavy. Despite the limited time, I grabbed my camera and went down to set up on a small mound. The wind was ridiculously strong, so I opted to place metal stakes in each tripod leg to keep it from flying away and added a counterweight to the center to minimize vibration, recalling that Quebec City is often windy due to its proximity to the Saint Lawrence River. After setting up the camera and tripod, I had to keep adjusting it directly towards the sun to account for the movements of the Earth, the Moon, and the Sun. I couldn’t just leave the camera pointed and shoot; I had to periodically recenter the Moon and the Sun in my shots. The photos were taken with a manual setting to minimize exposure during the partial eclipse, capturing significant phases at regular intervals. Later, I developed the images in Lightroom, applying only lens correction and chromatic aberration adjustments, which I didn't really notice. Finally, I merged the images into a single composition using Photoshop. Wilfredor (talk) 12:39, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lovely work. Wolverine XI 11:12, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Interesting but I have some questions here. Are the shots in the upper row really independent from the lower row? because I wouldn't expect the same sun stains top left and bottom right. The alignment is not good either, the distance between the frames looks arbitrary, the distance e.g. between the fourth and fifht (top row) is bigger than the others (same between second and third in the lower row). It would have also been great to capture the whole process, Poco a poco (talk) 14:50, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Poco is right. There is something fishy going on here. If you reduce the intensity (only!) of the image, it looks to me like the top row is the same as the bottom row, only reversed. I opened this in Photoshop and just toggled the levels (ctrl+L) to darker. How is this Wilfredor? 'Pinging' previous voters about this, Yann, ★, The Cosmonaut, Radomianin, SHB2000, Aristeas, Wolverine XI. In this version I have toggled the levels (ctrl+L) to an extreme. In that version there are some very small differences between the two rows; perhaps only half of the eclipse was actually photographed and that series used for both rows. Downloading and checking a photo at higher/lower/extreme 'levels' is always a good way to see what might have been done with it. --Cart (talk) 18:07, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- The bottom row is created to generate geometry from the same shots that are above. Wilfredor (talk) 19:34, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Poco is right. There is something fishy going on here. If you reduce the intensity (only!) of the image, it looks to me like the top row is the same as the bottom row, only reversed. I opened this in Photoshop and just toggled the levels (ctrl+L) to darker. How is this Wilfredor? 'Pinging' previous voters about this, Yann, ★, The Cosmonaut, Radomianin, SHB2000, Aristeas, Wolverine XI. In this version I have toggled the levels (ctrl+L) to an extreme. In that version there are some very small differences between the two rows; perhaps only half of the eclipse was actually photographed and that series used for both rows. Downloading and checking a photo at higher/lower/extreme 'levels' is always a good way to see what might have been done with it. --Cart (talk) 18:07, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Alt version[edit]
- Info In this version, I have implemented Poco a poco's suggestion to maintain an identical space between each lunar phase, and I have also removed the bottom row that could create a mistaken perception that these are subsequent phases, when in reality it is a reflection of the top row to maintain symmetry. As previously mentioned, "only half of the eclipse was actually photographed"; indeed, there was no total eclipse in this city, and I decided not to continue photographing the subsequent phases for fear of damaging the camera sensor. --Wilfredor (talk) 19:48, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Aw, come on! Why did you mirror the sequence in the first place if you weren't trying to make it appear as if you had photographed the whole eclipse? Nothing about this or fear for a damaged sensor was mentioned before I called this image out. How many times are you going to pull these photoshop tricks on us and then try to back-track with scant explanations and whatever. You need to do some serious thinking about how you make and present photos on this forum.
- I know from what you wrote on your previous nom, that you are in a really bad place in life right now, but you still need to go by the same rules and critique as everyone else here if you participate. --Cart (talk) 20:14, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- I believed that the Earth would continue moving in its usual direction, and my actions were guided by that assumption, not by any malintent. As soon as I recognized the potential for misunderstanding (Poco a poco comment), I promptly clarified that the images might be perceived as representing different phases. I initially didn't address this because the similarities seemed so self-evident to me—both images feature identical shapes and solar spots, mirroring each other perfectly. Even the thumbnails, without being opened to full size, clearly show these inversions. I had assumed these parallels would be apparent for everybody. I've noticed that the more I try to explain, the more complicated situations seem to become, which often leads me to prefer silence. Moving forward, I will make an effort to articulate even those details I consider self-evident, though I can't promise to always do so. This isn't an issue unique to FPC; it's something I've encountered in personal interactions as well. Misunderstandings like these are a problem I'm aware of and continually striving to overcome. Wilfredor (talk) 20:32, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Perhaps you should try to get some professional help during this trying time for you. Even though your friends are here on FPC to support you, non of us can give you adequate advice that anyone who is going through bad times needs. I also notice that this is your third active nomination, and it should have been {{FPD}}-ed. I'm not going to add to your troubles by using that template, but please think about if you can handle critique here for now. Please take care of yourself and do not put yourself in situations that might be stressful for you. Best, --Cart (talk) 11:18, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- I believed that the Earth would continue moving in its usual direction, and my actions were guided by that assumption, not by any malintent. As soon as I recognized the potential for misunderstanding (Poco a poco comment), I promptly clarified that the images might be perceived as representing different phases. I initially didn't address this because the similarities seemed so self-evident to me—both images feature identical shapes and solar spots, mirroring each other perfectly. Even the thumbnails, without being opened to full size, clearly show these inversions. I had assumed these parallels would be apparent for everybody. I've noticed that the more I try to explain, the more complicated situations seem to become, which often leads me to prefer silence. Moving forward, I will make an effort to articulate even those details I consider self-evident, though I can't promise to always do so. This isn't an issue unique to FPC; it's something I've encountered in personal interactions as well. Misunderstandings like these are a problem I'm aware of and continually striving to overcome. Wilfredor (talk) 20:32, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination I guess I haven't been feeling well lately, I'm going to take your advice seriously. Wilfredor (talk) 11:21, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- I really hope you can find some good help. If photography gives you comfort and a sense of continuity, keep uploading photos on Commons and visit your friends here on talk pages instead. I'm sure that more people than I want to support you to get better. --Cart (talk) 11:30, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Wilfredor: don't give it up, you're still one of the best photographers here. ★ 16:17, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- I really hope you can find some good help. If photography gives you comfort and a sense of continuity, keep uploading photos on Commons and visit your friends here on talk pages instead. I'm sure that more people than I want to support you to get better. --Cart (talk) 11:30, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Street life at Marienplatz, Munich - Images from Munich Project 49.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 May 2024 at 16:31:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Germany
- Info created, uploaded by Wilfredor and nominated by ★ -- ★ 16:31, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support #stayherewilfredor -- ★ 16:31, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support, though a better file name would be nice. --SHB2000 (talk) 22:48, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done Also fixed up the rest of the info on the file page. --Cart (talk) 14:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you so much, Cart! ★ 14:52, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Done Also fixed up the rest of the info on the file page. --Cart (talk) 14:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Good image but IMHO not enough wow for FP. Also, the feet cut off on the left side people does not work for me. --GRDN711 (talk) 13:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination FP users are boycotting Wilfredor's photos. ★ 19:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Hi ★, you withdraw a bit too soon. This complex cityscape scene is one of the images for which reviewers need some time – e.g. I wanted to vote on this image but just did not yet find the time to look closely at it. Hence the withdrawal is a pity, also because Cart already put some work into renaming the file and updating the nomination. – Therefore I would also restrain from fast judgements like “FP users are boycotting Wilfredor's photos”. This is a complex scene, it does not cause immediate emotional reactions, hence reviewers need some time and maybe also will just not vote because they are torn. That’s quite common with similar photos and does not imply any personal aversion against Wilfredor. Best, – Aristeas (talk) 09:56, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- These arguments don't convince me that voters no longer trust his photos. ★ 11:52, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Hi ★, you withdraw a bit too soon. This complex cityscape scene is one of the images for which reviewers need some time – e.g. I wanted to vote on this image but just did not yet find the time to look closely at it. Hence the withdrawal is a pity, also because Cart already put some work into renaming the file and updating the nomination. – Therefore I would also restrain from fast judgements like “FP users are boycotting Wilfredor's photos”. This is a complex scene, it does not cause immediate emotional reactions, hence reviewers need some time and maybe also will just not vote because they are torn. That’s quite common with similar photos and does not imply any personal aversion against Wilfredor. Best, – Aristeas (talk) 09:56, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Sawpit Gorge, Ord River.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2024 at 12:15:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Australia#Western Australia
- Info created and uploaded by Jtagi - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 12:15, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:15, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality, and like the colors and the composition. Yann (talk) 12:02, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I prefer this one. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ermell (talk • contribs) 19:59, April 19, 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral There's already an identical FP by the same author. ★ 21:59, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- I wouldn't say identical since they're different areas of the same locality and highlight slightly different landscapes. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:29, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral There's already an identical FP by the same author. ★ 21:59, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support IMHO the two images nicely complement each other to give a good impression of that landscape. We should not featured 20 similar images of the same area, but two complementing FPs are OK. – Aristeas (talk) 14:25, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:23, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:47, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:48, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:32, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:00, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:03, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:31, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Black-and-yellow Broadbill 0A2A8552.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2024 at 19:04:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Eurylaimidae_(Broadbills)
- Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Ivar (talk) 19:04, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 19:04, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Beautiful shoot a lovely bird, however, The noise removal has been so aggressive that it has eliminated the texture of the feathers on the back of the bird's head. --Wilfredor (talk) 19:59, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:13, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:33, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:10, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:39, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:24, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 19:07, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 08:49, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Eye-catching color scheme! -- Radomianin (talk) 13:54, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:04, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 09:16, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 13:28, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:50, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow... Poco a poco (talk) 21:15, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 16:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 11:49, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:33, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Celastrus scandens fruit.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2024 at 14:52:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Celastraceae
- Info: fruit of American bittersweet; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:52, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:52, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:09, 17 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 08:49, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 05:55, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:00, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:46, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:52, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 12:00, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Mold on bread FoV 322um.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2024 at 14:22:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi
- Info created by Pavel.Somov, uploaded and nominated by Yann
- Info Mold on bread. SEM image. FoV 322 µm. Previous FPC with the TIFF version failed.
- Support -- Yann (talk) 14:22, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 14:47, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support I am amazed at the level of detail and to some extent terrifying, I wonder what color this would be? green?--Wilfredor (talk) 20:04, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:43, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:20, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 08:11, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:29, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:06, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 04:21, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:40, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 16:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
File:M114A1 Armored Cavalry Platoon 2.54th Infantry, 4th AD Grafenwohr.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2024 at 22:21:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Military vehicles
- Info created by U.S. Army - uploaded by Schierbecker - nominated by Schierbecker -- Schierbecker (talk) 22:21, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- For your consideration. @Hohum. Schierbecker (talk) 22:21, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment In these days of war, when thousands of people are killed around us every day, I don't need motifs like this. --Palauenc05 (talk) 13:42, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- This isn't a forum. Your comment has no place here. Schierbecker (talk) 17:09, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment 21. april's version is best here and you lose sharpnes with "descren". In any case this cant be FP, we have many old and older shots which are much beter quality and perhaps beter FP too. From movie stars on. Yet, tank above is FP version and QI, which you like to downgrade. --Mile (talk) 18:36, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- OK, I reverted it to that version. Schierbecker (talk) 05:53, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Sikh man, Agra 04.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2024 at 21:58:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
- Info All by Yann
- Support -- Yann (talk) 21:58, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support I'm not fond of the somewhat distracting background, but the rest of the image will do for me. --SHB2000 (talk) 22:34, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:45, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:58, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support could be --Mile (talk) 08:47, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:02, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 13:45, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:53, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Yann, I believe that you need to lighten it a bit up, otherwise really good Poco a poco (talk) 20:58, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Info Pinging @Yann I took the liberty of converting the color space from Adobe RGB to sRGB and slightly brightened the image. You can check out the image via the SwissTransfer link and update it if you like the result. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 10:11, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Radomianin, SHB2000, The Cosmonaut, ArionStar, and Ermell: and @Palauenc05, Agnes Monkelbaan, and Poco a poco: I uploaded the version made by Radomianin. Thanks a lot! Yann (talk) 10:19, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Much nicer! Thank you to both of you. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Agree, you got my Support Poco a poco (talk) 17:03, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Much nicer! Thank you to both of you. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:59, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Authentic portrait. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:24, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:21, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 16:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 20:24, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support A great improvement... --Terragio67 (talk) 21:30, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Palm warbler (41597).jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2024 at 21:33:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Parulidae_(New_World_Warblers)
- Info Palm warbler (Setophaga palmarum), breeding adult (males/females are identical). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 21:33, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 21:33, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:39, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:12, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:34, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:10, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 13:05, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 18:21, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support good shot, colors combine. --Mile (talk) 08:11, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice to look at in pleasant lighting. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:49, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 09:16, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 13:29, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 13:32, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:51, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:16, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 16:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Bosanemoon (Anemone nemorosa) 18-03-2024 (d.j.b.).jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 May 2024 at 04:24:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Ranunculaceae
- Info Half-opened fragile flower bud of a Anemonoides nemorosa. Focus stack of 14 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:24, 22 April 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:24, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 11:22, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:56, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:45, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 09:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:30, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:49, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 16:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:11, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Mosaïque Façade de la porte de la mosaïque d sidi-el-haloui.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2024 at 23:13:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
- Info created by Terki hassaine samir - uploaded by Terki hassaine samir - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 23:13, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 23:13, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support I've a appreciation for the Islamic style. ★ 00:28, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:23, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 22:36, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
Weak supportSupport I highly appreciate the classic Islamic ornaments, too; here I’m a bit unsure about the crop, but it’s beautiful and impressive. – Aristeas (talk) 08:48, 21 April 2024 (UTC)- @Aristeas any suggested crop? Riad Salih (talk) 16:56, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Riad Salih I have tried for a while but you have probably already found the best possible solution. At the bottom the mosaic margins at the left and right continue downwards. This makes the bottom crop look somewhat arbirary – that’s unavoidable as one must cut the image somewhere. To be fair I replace the weak support by a full one. – Aristeas (talk) 18:47, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- @Aristeas any suggested crop? Riad Salih (talk) 16:56, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:48, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice! Wolverine XI 11:11, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Interesting but detail and lighting are not the best Poco a poco (talk) 14:55, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 06:47, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Parc Culturel De l'Ahaggar (91).JPG, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2024 at 21:55:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Texture photography
- Info created by Hamza-sia - uploaded by Hamza-sia - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 21:55, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 21:55, 18 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I consider it as a QI, but not an FP Chepry (talk) 11:03, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Chepry could you please provide further elaboration? Riad Salih (talk) 11:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- It's just a nice photo with decent quality and resolution. No "wow" effect at all, sorry. Also it's pretty noisy with strange compression artifacts (you can see it clearly in darker areas). Composition could be better by i.e. aligning ripple marks with frame diagonal. New category is much better, but from texture photography I expect exceptional quality. Chepry (talk) 14:50, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Chepry could you please provide further elaboration? Riad Salih (talk) 11:47, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice textures. FP to me. @Riad Salih: consider to replace the category to Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Texture photography. ★ 12:20, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you! Riad Salih (talk) 13:29, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Flat light and not an appealing composition to me. For example, the composition of File:Parc Culturel De l'Ahaggar (25).JPG is much better IMO (but not sure it has the technical quality for FP). BigDom (talk) 13:45, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing outstanding. Wolverine XI 16:08, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Arion. This is one of the best ways to capture a dune landscape. --SHB2000 (talk) 21:25, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support I find these sand shapes less uniform than the others but more interesting and almost human --Wilfredor (talk) 02:15, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:23, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral I agree with BigCom but will not oppose Poco a poco (talk) 14:54, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 17:00, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:34, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 15:01, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per other opponents. -- Karelj (talk) 13:35, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Not perfect, but Wilfredor has a point here. – Aristeas (talk) 16:11, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Bufonaria cavitensis 01.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 May 2024 at 09:22:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Bursidae
- Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 09:22, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 09:22, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:03, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:53, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:54, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:43, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 08:11, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:58, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:25, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 12:55, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:16, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Terragio67 (talk) 04:55, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:37, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent detail in all 5 views --Tagooty (talk) 13:25, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 16:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 09:58, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:34, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Milseburg (talk) 16:25, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:56, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 08:12, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Tribu Laarim, Kimotong, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-25, DD 23.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 May 2024 at 05:36:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
- Info Old woman from the Laarim Tribe, Kimotong, Kapoeta State, South Sudan. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 05:36, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 05:36, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 07:45, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment
I would crop dark part (forest) above.--Mile (talk) 08:15, 23 April 2024 (UTC)I don't have Mile's experience, anyway, I subscrive his request.Terragio67 (talk) 11:31, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Mile, Terragio67: Done, thank you! --Poco a poco (talk) 21:37, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 16:04, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:53, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:56, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support A great photo reportage from South Sudan, and this one perhaps has greater value as depicted... --Terragio67 (talk) 03:48, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 04:19, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:45, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 07:42, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mile (talk) 07:58, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 09:17, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:29, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 10:56, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 13:23, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:54, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Striking, dignified pose --Tagooty (talk) 13:34, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 16:23, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 12:34, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Light and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:52, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:33, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Gayle @ El Rey 10 25 2023 (53423439841).jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2024 at 22:12:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Musicians and singers performing
- Info Gayle performing at the El Rey Theatre, Los Angeles, California. Created by Justin Higuchi - uploaded by Tm - nominated by ★ -- ★ 22:12, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 22:12, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Lack of fine detail. Wolverine XI 06:26, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Yes, it's certainly not very detailed. But at least the face is in focus and the overall shot is impressive! -- Radomianin (talk) 20:00, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 23:35, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Event photography is challenging, the light (or better: darkness) and quick movements force use to use wide apertures and high ISO speeds, hence we cannot expect the same leve of details here. – Aristeas (talk) 08:45, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:55, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:40, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:03, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:44, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support 🎶 you're just horny; and fucked up at 2am in the mornin 🎶 (yes, any song is better than that abcdefu song). :p --SHB2000 (talk) 22:50, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- @SHB2000: You have an interesting and refined musical taste… ★ 23:42, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- idk, man, but I cringe very hard when that abcdefu song comes up on the radio (how it is popular on Australian radio is something I don't understand). --SHB2000 (talk) 12:28, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- TikTok tendency… ★ 01:07, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- eugh :-(. --SHB2000 (talk) 04:10, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- TikTok tendency… ★ 01:07, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- idk, man, but I cringe very hard when that abcdefu song comes up on the radio (how it is popular on Australian radio is something I don't understand). --SHB2000 (talk) 12:28, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:12, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:43, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:57, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 15:56, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Celandine and white squirrel in Prospect Park (01490).jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2024 at 21:37:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Other#United_States
- Info A park walking path surrounded by lesser celandine (Ficaria verna), and a bonus rare leucistic white squirrel in the distance. Just a pleasant spring that seemed worth a nom. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 21:37, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Not sure about the gallery. Feel free to adjust. — Rhododendrites talk | 21:37, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful scene. – Regarding the gallery: We could create a new “Parks and gardens” FP gallery which would nicely collect such images which are right now scattered over the “Other places” and other galleries. Let’s dicussus this separately. – Aristeas (talk) 13:38, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 20:29, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 09:39, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:55, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:21, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Giles Laurent (talk) 16:22, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:01, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice trail. Wolverine XI 20:04, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 08:48, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Tribu Laarim, Kimotong, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-23, DD 52.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 May 2024 at 20:44:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Sitting_people
- Info Kid of the Laarim Tribe in front of this home, Kimotong, South Sudan. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:44, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:53, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 17:20, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 21:04, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 11:45, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 14:11, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 03:25, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Problem here is girls skin.
I think you lifted shadow too much and now you can see red, pink, blue dots so texture isn't so nice. I would put back with light, at least to some extent.--Mile (talk) 08:56, 28 April 2024 (UTC) Oppose Yeah, I can agree on the texture. Wolverine XI 19:59, 28 April 2024 (UTC)Good work. You now have my Support. Wolverine XI 13:14, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- @PetarM and Wolverine XI: Yes, there was a bit of chroma noise, removed Poco a poco (talk) 06:55, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment It could be beter. I would not sharpen skin (so much), texture is strange, but at least beter than 1st version. Fly could "fly away" on right hand. --Mile (talk) 08:17, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support A door at her size! I wonder how the parents go through -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:01, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:31, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
File:St. Andrew’s Cathedral, Honolulu (2024)-L1004903.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2024 at 17:59:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States
- Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:59, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:59, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ǃ --Terragio67 (talk) 18:03, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very nice, exciting composition with subtle light impact. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:23, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Not a scene you'd expect from Honolulu! --SHB2000 (talk) 22:35, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 00:10, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 08:53, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 09:51, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not the best view. Wolverine XI 11:08, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:45, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 17:03, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:42, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:06, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Perth (AU), St Mary's Cathedral -- 2019 -- 0403.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2024 at 22:41:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Australia
- Info created and uploaded by XRay - nominated by SHB2000 --SHB2000 (talk) 22:41, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support I do wish the tree wasn't cropped, but the rest of the image negates that for me. --SHB2000 (talk) 22:41, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you for nominating, SHB2000. BTW: I just made some minor improvements. --XRay 💬 10:01, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral Quality is fine, lighting ok, the combo very good, the lacks of symmetry due to the tree makes me not support it, sorry Poco a poco (talk) 14:40, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support I have made a little test: mirrored the left half or the right half of the image to create a completely symmetrical picture. At the first glance the results of both tests looked compelling; at the 2nd one they looked both somewhat boring. Then I switched back at the original image. Now I would say: that the left half features the tree, the right one the free sky is a bit irritating, yes, but also makes the image much more interesting. – Aristeas (talk) 13:27, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:03, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Torri, Cesta e Montale - San Marino - GT 01 - 2024-03-25.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2024 at 21:20:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers
- Info all by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 17:03, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain as author. San Marino has three towers each with a feather on top. The second tower, called Cesta, stands on the highest point of Mount Titano. The fifteenth-century tower is pentagonal in shape. The rooms of the guardhouse and the castellan are currently occupied (since 1956) by the Museum of Ancient Weapons of San Marino. The Montale tower is the smallest of the three towers, it was a watchtower built in the 14th century at a strategically defensive position. From the top of the towers (approximately 750 metres) it is possible to admire breathtaking views, from the Adriatic sea to the Apennines. -- Terragio67 (talk) 17:03, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:52, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
Alternative[edit]
- Info A wider version as stated above. All by Terragio67 -- Terragio67 (talk) 21:20, 20 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support I’m happy to see another perspective on the San Marino fortifications. Prefer the wider version because IMHO it shows the situation of the towers better. – Aristeas (talk) 08:52, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:07, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:42, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support: manages to impress despite haziness and unappealing light. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:44, 21 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:36, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Both are ok for me. --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:34, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 12:05, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:39, 22 April 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support In this view, it is nice that the defensive wall acts as a leading line in the picture. The composition compensates for the unfavorable light. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:24, 23 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:59, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 10:06, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 16:42, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Stunning! Wolverine XI 20:10, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Hassan Tower, Rabat (صومعة حسان).jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 May 2024 at 08:18:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Morocco
- Info Hassan Tower, Rabat (صومعة حسان), my shot.
- Support -- Mile (talk) 08:18, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Amazing Arabic/Islamic architecture as usual. ★ 13:50, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:54, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 14:40, 26 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 03:25, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 20:05, 27 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:56, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Nice. Riad Salih (talk) 09:55, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Terragio67 (talk) 15:45, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 17:53, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Love the blue sky. Wolverine XI 19:58, 28 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:03, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:03, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:30, 30 April 2024 (UTC)
File:Konan7000 and Mt Iwaki.jpg[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 May 2024 at 16:58:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles
- Info created by Amiden - uploaded by Amiden - nominated by Aestivum -- SekisounoAestivum (talk) 16:58, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- SekisounoAestivum (talk) 16:58, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: Less than 2 Mpx. Please read the guidelines. Yann (talk) 17:12, 29 April 2024 (UTC) | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |