Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/April 2022

File:Zwellende bladknop van een tamme kastanje (Castanea sativa). 16-03-2022. (d.j.b).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 Mar 2022 at 16:18:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Fagaceae
Info Swelling leaf bud of a sweet chestnut (Castanea sativa). Focus stack of 37 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:18, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 16:18, 22 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:44, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 452786 06:31, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:34, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Considering how small the bud is, it's a magnificent capture. -- Radomianin (talk) 08:13, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. --Aristeas (talk) 10:40, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:26, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:47, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:18, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:32, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Fagaceae

File:Bobby Ancell.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Apr 2022 at 23:00:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Paintings
Info created by Kristinamac - uploaded by FastilyClone - nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 23:00, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ezarateesteban 23:00, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It would appear that the subject of the painting is notable in the world of sports and that the painter might not be otherwise notable. She does not have an en.wiki article, at any rate. Should she? No offense to her or anyone else, but I'm not loving this as an artwork. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:09, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Ikan. Daniel Case (talk) 04:40, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This is the sort of thing which may be a good candidate for Wikipedia's FPC: it's a good quality portrait of a notable person for whom we do not have a free image, and a painting that is worthy enough to have been displayed publicly as a mural. It undoubtedly enhances the article in a meaningful way. As for Commons FPC, I don't know -- photos of paintings are typically higher resolution at FPC, for starters, and usually by notable artists. Don't know that it needs to be that way -- I'm just skeptical it'll find support. A side point, googling the subject, I do see this photo. I can't find the rest of the image, but it's similar enough that it makes me wonder if this is a COM:DW. I think we'd need to see the full other photo to make that determination, but it does look like this other portrait may have been based on a specific photo as well. Valuable work indeed, but may be problematic for Commons to host. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 15:55, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:24, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:NJ-139 and I-78 Jersey City November 2021 001.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2022 at 04:02:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#United States
Info created by King of Hearts - uploaded by King of Hearts - nominated by King of Hearts -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:02, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:02, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:21, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 07:55, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:33, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 452264 13:55, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:37, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great drone shot! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:33, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:41, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 13:57, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Frank. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:34, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:46, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:17, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:24, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges#United States

File:Egyptian goose (Alopochen aegyptiaca) gosling 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2022 at 09:32:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus_:_Alopochen
Info Egyptian goose (Alopochen aegyptiacus) gosling, all by Alexis Lours -- Alexis Lours (talk) 09:32, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Alexis Lours (talk) 09:32, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Confident-looking youngster. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:46, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 13:19, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 452194 13:55, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely subject and good quality. -- Radomianin (talk) 15:32, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:35, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:37, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Virtual-Pano (talk) 20:42, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:29, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 07:00, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. --Aristeas (talk) 09:22, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:43, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 13:57, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:26, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:53, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:07, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:45, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:47, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:20, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:59, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Micha (talk) 18:58, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:12, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus_:_Alopochen

File:Динофитовая микроводоросль, выделенная из осадков Амурского залива в 2020 году.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Apr 2022 at 00:45:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Other lifeforms
Info Dinophyte microalgae isolated from Amur Bay sediments / created by Irina Moroz micro - uploaded by Irina Moroz micro - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 00:45, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Colleagues, be careful with arguments about the weight of the file, it's exclusive) -- JukoFF (talk) 00:45, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I abstain from voting on this image at this time. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:05, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Question What do you mean by the "weight" of the file? It's above 2 MP, if you mean the size. It's tilted, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:35, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I meant 457 Kb. JukoFF (talk) 22:33, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:42, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 452841 23:20, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 09:04, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:05, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Although it is a pity that we do not have the name of this dynophyceae GerardGiraud (talk) 19:52, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:21, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 07:57, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --El Grafo (talk) 10:32, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:11, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:13, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Other lifeforms

File:Het Koningin Wilhelminabos. Levenspad KWF Kankerbestrijding. 28-02-2022. (actm.) 13.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2022 at 15:24:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Netherlands
Info The Queen Wilhelmina Forest. Life path KWF Cancer Control. Bridge over the water feature in the memorial forest. A simple photo of a wooden bridge that seems to blend in with its surroundings.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:24, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:24, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not a special bridge in my opinion -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:12, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very nice light, but not an unusually great composition to my eyes, and Basile's point is also valid. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:22, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The bridge does indeed blend in well with its surroundings. That's the problem with this photo. Daniel Case (talk) 04:47, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others --El Grafo (talk) 08:43, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment (I’m undecided on the photo.) Proposed another gallery link: We can just use the ‘Netherlands’ section of the general ‘Bridges’ gallery page, it already contains several footbridges. --Aristeas (talk) 09:46, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the gallery link.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:43, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Technically, a bit overcontrasty and oversharpened IMHO. As for the motiv, I don’t see anything breathtaking here. Just a pic of a wooden bridge, sorry. --Kreuz schnabel 11:33, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I feel sorry for this pic because it's a strong QI with nice light and nice shadows, there's genuinely nothing wrong with it...but I'm not sure it is impressive enough for FP. Cmao20 (talk) 14:22, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Thanks for the comment.--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 16:49, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:MTAB IORE 112 and 101 Stenbacken - Torneträsk.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2022 at 07:09:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
Info created & uploaded by David Gubler – nominated by Ivar (talk) 07:09, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 07:09, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 07:55, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:36, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Given the cloudy sky, the water appears unnaturally blue and has a strange uneven texture. I wonder if it has been over-processed? --Tagooty (talk) 08:40, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:37, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 452520 13:55, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:36, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:39, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support well chosen point of view --Virtual-Pano (talk) 20:31, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Virtual-Pano. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:50, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:31, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful, and the water, while not pinpoint sharp and possibly just a bit noisy, seems plausible to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:09, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 05:56, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 07:00, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:46, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 13:55, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:25, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:13, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:50, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 06:32, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:44, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:17, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:09, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:58, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:24, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles

File:Purple Sunbird (Cinnyris asiaticus) in Sundarbans East Wildlife Sanctuary 01.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Apr 2022 at 18:15:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Nectariniidae (Sunbirds and Spiderhunters)
Info created and uploaded by Touhid biplob - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 18:15, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 18:15, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kritzolina (talk) 18:21, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A number of issues for me. Transition plumage never shows off a sunbird well. The composition is unbalanced and the technical quality (sharpness/noise) fall short of FP. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:31, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I agree that the high level of noise makes this one borderline, but the bird is pretty enough to feature IMO Cmao20 (talk) 00:07, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. JukoFF (talk) 00:21, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 452894 05:40, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Very beautiful. Could do with local noise reduction (background) and some careful local sharpening. --Aristeas (talk) 10:43, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles, and in addition to his issues I just find the overall composition too busy. Daniel Case (talk) 19:23, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good composition, wonderful colors. Yann (talk) 08:32, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. --Tagooty (talk) 03:04, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I would be likely to support if it were cropped substantially on the left for compositional reasons and to eliminate some unsharp foreground. I will try to post a suggested crop in a minute. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:24, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative Version[edit]

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Nectariniidae (Sunbirds and Spiderhunters)
Info Cropped version suggested by Ikan Kekek. I invite @Kritzolina, Charlesjsharp, Cmao20, JukoFF, Rosalina450280, Aristeas, Daniel Case, Yann, and Tagooty: to consider the new version. --IamMM (talk) 08:22, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 08:22, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Composition is better, though slightly too tight, but it is still a bird in transition plumage and not looking its best. The noise and lack of sharpnessa are even more noticeable. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:34, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[Edited:] ~~Weak Support Oppose per Charles, whose points are valid, and Daniel.~~ -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:39, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I apologize, but it turns out, the photo that resulted from the crop I approve of is too noisy and unsharp to be one of the best on the site. I could not have anticipated that, but I can't overlook it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:11, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support. JukoFF (talk) 13:46, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Also fine. --Yann (talk) 14:59, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per above. Cmao20 (talk) 16:13, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose still, per Charles the composition has improved but at the expense of the technical issues. Daniel Case (talk) 17:55, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Case, Charlesjsharp, and Ikan Kekek: I tried to reduce the noise, please check the new version. -- IamMM (talk) 04:19, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment You were successful in reducing the noise, but is the sharpness sufficient for an FP of a hummingbird? I'm not sure. I'll cross out my vote and punt this to others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:56, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support per Yann. --Aristeas (talk) 13:51, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Noise is better, but sharpness below par for FP. --Tagooty (talk) 14:01, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Noise OK now, but still unsharp. Sunbirds developed independently of hummingbirds. Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:14, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 451061 01:39, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:23, 2 April 2022 (UTC))[reply]

File:John P. Robarts Research Library.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Apr 2022 at 06:16:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Canada
Info created & uploaded by Maksimsokolov - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 06:16, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 06:16, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Exemplary use of “falling lines” for a good reason: the perspective emphasizes the features of the building and makes it appear as an expressionist artwork (while the same building, from some other perspective, may very well look like “just some modern building”). --Aristeas (talk) 08:24, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Princess Rosalina 💄 451289 09:07, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:21, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:29, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:01, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support somehow the upper part of the building feels a bit dark. But I like the contrast between the highly ordered, strictly geometrical bottom versus the seemingly random organic shapes of the sky. --El Grafo (talk) 08:03, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 14:24, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:20, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:53, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:42, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Canada

File:Painted storks (Mycteria leucocephala) roost with mammals.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2022 at 07:37:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Ciconiidae (Storks)
Info The bark of these dead trees attracts the mammals. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:37, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:37, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really interesting. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:45, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support What does the bear want there? The color banding in the sky is a bit disturbing.--Ermell (talk) 08:41, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose What a gorgeous sight! An obvious candidate to POTY :) - Benh (talk) 08:59, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think not. Picture of the Century, surely. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:25, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Sri Lankan leopard is missing here. --Ivar (talk) 10:10, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, he was there but jumped off before I was set up. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:02, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Question Is this a photomotage? In my opinion the shadows of the branches and of the bear and the ape don't fit together (the sun comes from left, as the branch behind the ape shows, but the ape itself is equal lighted. The belly should be in shadow when lit from the same direction as the branch it is perched on), also there is a difference in sharpness of the branches and the mammals. The light halo around the branches and the storks is missing around the mammals, the type of contour is different, less sharp. --Llez (talk) 11:20, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All 100% genuine as you would expect on 1 April. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:37, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK, then

Support for today! ;-) --Llez (talk) 13:47, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support per Llez ;–). Thank you for this amusing candidate, Charles! --Aristeas (talk) 14:59, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Seems perfectly legit. Cmao20 (talk) 18:23, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao. Daniel Case (talk) 19:10, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Time is up. Here is the original photo. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:55, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File talk:Painted storks (Mycteria leucocephala) roost with mammals.jpg -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:35, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nell Mercer 1910-20.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Apr 2022 at 05:18:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
Info Unknown photographer - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:18, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 05:18, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:36, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I am going forth and back on this one. On the one hand, your restauration is excellent (as always), her smile is natural and charming, and I also like how the photo just fades at the bottom. On the other hand, the face seems not as sharp as the collar, therefore I wonder whether the photographer has focussed imperfectly or if there is a tiny little bit of motion blur … Please correct me if I am missing something. --Aristeas (talk) 08:42, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It's a very 1910s aesthetic. I don't entirely love it, but I also don't like changing past aesthetics. 23:14, 26 March 2022 (UTC) Adam Cuerden (talk) 23:14, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The 1910s were kind of a nadir in photographic quality. You started to be able to take photos quickly. Candid shots were possible, you didn't need to find a pose that you could hold motionless for minutes on end, you could go into a random place and take a photo... But they weren't as good, as user-friendly as the old ones. The benefits outweighed what they lost, and eventually, cameras and film caught up - as did all the photographers who suddenly had to learn new techniques - but the cost of that freedom and the need to retrain was that the quality dipped for a while. Adam Cuerden (talk) 03:58, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for your explanantions, Adam! This photo could even be taken as a good example for the benefits and drawbacks you mention – I imagine it would have been difficult to capture her natural, spontaneous smile with the old, slower photographic technique, but on the other hand the photographer was not able to frame and focus as meticulously as before. --Aristeas (talk) 10:22, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose The 'fading' doesn't work for me. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:22, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
That is entirely fair. I've always been tempted to crop it, but it feels wrong to. Adam Cuerden (talk) 04:02, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I really can't decide for a similar reason as Aristeas. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:03, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:20, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support JukoFF (talk) 22:12, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm gonna go with my gut and Oppose. A historic photo that illustrates a period of poor-quality photography seems to me to be a perfect COM:VIC candidate but not one of the best photos on the site. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:22, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Princess Rosalina 💄 452115 08:30, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:44, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:2020-09-16 165855 Soviet submarine B-515.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2022 at 16:22:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Other
Info created & uploaded by Tim Rademacher - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 16:22, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 16:22, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's short on the quality front (noisy, impossible to read most fine labels) but the stitching is flawless and it is still fascinating, even more in the current context. - Benh (talk) 17:35, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great to watch through the 360° viewer -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:11, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 451687 02:03, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile and Benh. The DoF could be longer, but it's fascinating and well-done. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:21, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:55, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:31, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support First aid from Germany? --Michielverbeek (talk) 05:33, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment East Germany, presumably. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:06, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
At the risk of being a killjoy: I wouldn't be surprised if that was just a regular modern kit they have ready for visitors bumping their head. I've been in one of those museum pieces (this one's in Hamburg). While they try to make it as safe as possible (e.g. by squeezing in a semi-proper staircase), there are still plenty of opportunities to hurt yourself if you're not careful. Anyway, I love how the thumbnail makes it look quite roomy but as soon as you use the proper panorama viewer it feels authentically tight. Support. El Grafo (talk) 08:41, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:27, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Benh and Basile. --Aristeas (talk) 08:29, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 14:32, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:50, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support exactly per Benh Cmao20 (talk) 14:21, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:08, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:02, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:59, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kreuz schnabel 19:28, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Colin (talk) 18:31, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:00, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Other

File:Belva Ann Bennett Lockwood.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2022 at 04:10:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
Info created by Benjamin Joseph Falk - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 04:10, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 04:10, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:20, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:41, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:31, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 452875 09:53, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice portrait, good restoration, as always. --Yann (talk) 12:33, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 14:34, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 18:42, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 22:16, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Yann. -- Radomianin (talk) 17:31, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:03, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:04, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 06:27, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Colin (talk) 18:33, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:55, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Women

File:Dhaulagiri from Ghorepani.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2022 at 02:07:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Nepal
Info This is a view of the Dhaulagiri Massif from Ghorepani village in Myagdi district, Nepal. Created by Madhabdhk - uploaded by Madhabdhk - nominated by C1MM -- C1MM (talk) 02:07, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- C1MM (talk) 02:07, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too shadowed in the front and just a small (beautiful) part is not shadowed --Michielverbeek (talk) 05:29, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The shadows aren't well controlled. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:11, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This composition has yet to fully convince me, but I like it much more than you guys; it makes sense as a set of layers, if you're not trying to move your eyes around the whole composition including curves between the layers; the peaks in sunlight are quite beautiful; and though there's some posterization in the low-light areas, we've featured a whole bunch of lower-light images (more silhouetted) with more layers of mountains that are much more posterized, so it's all in how you look at this and perceive it artistically. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:23, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:55, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ankara asv2021-10 img17 Atakule.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2022 at 13:57:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Towers#Turkey
Info Top section of the Atakule TV tower, Ankara at evening blue hour, all by me --A.Savin 13:57, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 13:57, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Crisp and sharp, beautiful contrast between the cool blue hour light and the warm orange light at the undersides. --Aristeas (talk) 15:45, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 18:49, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas -- IamMM (talk) 20:07, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 452263 01:38, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ich mag die Stimmung und die Einfachheit des Bildes. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:10, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:15, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas and Frank. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:19, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:13, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment feels like it needs a bit of ccw rotation? --El Grafo (talk) 10:09, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done, I think. --A.Savin 03:50, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, a tiny amount. Charlesjsharp (talk) 18:49, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:52, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:23, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special light, but agree with El Grafo and Charlesjsharp the picture is slightly tilted -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:13, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:04, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:04, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:06, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Colin (talk) 18:37, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --El Grafo (talk) 07:20, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:27, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Towers#Turkey

File:Stellerite - Takat, Imilchil, Midelt Province, Drâa-Tafilalet Region, Morocco.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2022 at 18:40:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Rocks_and_minerals#Minerals
Info all by Ivar (talk) 18:40, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:40, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:01, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support, but can you identify the stone the crystals are embedded in in your file description? Is it granite? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:51, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment sorry, I can't. --Ivar (talk) 04:49, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- IamMM (talk) 20:06, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 451711 01:38, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:08, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:01, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:24, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:15, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:23, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks like some fruit slices got stuck on it ... Daniel Case (talk) 18:13, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:02, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:08, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:07, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:25, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:27, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Rocks_and_minerals#Minerals

Variability in Polititapes aureus[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2022 at 06:29:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Polititapes aureus
Right valve
Polititapes aureus
Left valve
Polititapes aureus var. beudanti
Right valve
Polititapes aureus var. beudanti
Left valve
Polititapes aureus var. mabillei
Right valve
Polititapes aureus var. mabillei
Left valve

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family: Veneridae
Info Polititapes aureus is characterized by a color pattern on the shell consisting of brown lines, spots and rays. The inner surface of the shell is more or less yellow (golden = Latin: aureus). The variation "beudanti" differs by the partially violet coloring of the inside. The "mabillei" variation has a predominantly whitish shell, only the lunula and the back side are colored brown; created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 06:29, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 06:29, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Lmbuga (talk) 12:17, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 451071 14:30, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:35, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not a valid set according to the rules, because it does not "show all possible variations". This page seems to indicate there are more variations for this species, and our guidelines are clear: "Not acceptable: A few breeds of cats". We are in this case in my opinion. They are Valued Images, but not FP -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:41, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Sorry, but your link leads to a list of synonyms (!), NOT varieties. Synonyms are quite different from varieties, they are the names by which a species has been described by differernt authors, regardless of shape or color. Several synonyms can include identical forms or varieties, they are not morphologically differentiated, unlike varieties! --Llez (talk) 05:20, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The page contains 65 times the word "variété" (variety, in French) and says twelve forms belong to the subgenus Polititapes ("douze formes appartiennent au sous-genre Polititapes").

How many varieties are presented in your set, two? Beudanti and mabillei, so why 3x2 pictures? And where is it written that these two varieties are the only 2 possible? (cf guidelines "unless they share a defining characteristic and represent all possible examples of that)". -- Basile Morin (talk) 06:09, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The text you cited above and you linked to was published in 1939! This more than 80 years old work corresponds in no way to the current state of research. The taxonomy, the species concept and the definition of varieties is completely different today than it was then. BTW "twelve forms belong to the subgenus Polititapes" you say, but this set shows not Polititapes (the whole genus) but only the species Polititapes aureus! --Llez (talk) 06:32, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The page does not talk (only) about "synonyms", that's what I meant with this quote. By the way, almost all the synonyms mentioned in the Wikipedia page are unaccepted. Moreover, the question of the diversity, concerning the varieties, remains. Would a set nomination of 50 races (like varieties) of dogs be acceptable here? 🤔 No. Thus, it is the same here, in my opinion. Imagine a set showing a picture of dog captioned "Dog", and then two pictures called "Dog Labrador Retriever" and "Dog Poodle". Weird, right? -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:05, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia refers to WoRMS, and WoRMS only works at the species level. "Acceptet" in WoRMS and Wikipedia means that it is an accepted species. Approved subspecies and varieties are therefore always listed with "not accepted" (as species!), but it does not mean, they are not accepted as subspecies or variety. --Llez (talk) 08:48, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We agree the two "var." of your set, mabillei and beudanti, are not valid species, right? And they certainly don't form a whole group. Thus, your set is not valid according to our guidelines (see COM:FPC).

Please have a look at this set nomination. My comment may "speak" to you 😆

The major problem here is the potential diversity of "varieties" / races. Like dogs or cats -- Basile Morin (talk) 09:29, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support Subject to the above comment. I can't judge that.--Famberhorst (talk) 05:12, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Synonyms are a completely different thing than varieties. A link to a recent publication that gives the list of accepted varieties would be welcome here, though it's maybe not easy as all publications are not freely available. But well OK I trust Llez. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 06:22, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful and educative. --Aristeas (talk) 08:32, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I know nothing of shells, but a common-sense Google (e.g. this web page seems to show that there are many variations of this species which are not included in this nomination. Ivar will have a view on this topic. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:49, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:53, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Llez: please provide a link, where we can see all accepted varietes of Polititapes aureus. I couldn't find any. --Ivar (talk) 16:24, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others wrt being a set. Also I don't think the quality is great here compared to other shells. We have often 80MP of mostly black and when you examine each shell, many are out of focus for most of their area, and none appear to have pixel-level sharpness. In other words, I think this is at most 20MP or less, of resolution. -- Colin (talk) 18:51, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Colin. Daniel Case (talk) 03:52, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment As there ist a huge variability and no shell looks like another you have a lot of transitions between the varieties and ist is often not easy to separate them. Therefore there is no consensus of the different authors about the number and the differention of the forms and varieties. I choose the three forms of the species which can easy be distinguished by a single clear character and with no doubt. But I think it is better I withdraw my nomination. --Llez (talk) 03:58, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Berlin-Panorama vom Fernsehturm.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2022 at 18:13:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Germany
Info Panoramic view (360°) from the viewing floor of the Berlin Television Tower over Berlin. All by me. -- Milseburg (talk) 18:13, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Milseburg (talk) 18:13, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Extremely detailed and instructive. The subdued light lowers the contrast so that even buildings in the shade are easily recognizable. – IMHO such 360° panoramas fall into their own aesthetic category, so that their composition cannot be judged the same way as in normal landscape photos, etc. Instead of harmonic proportions, mass distribution, counterpoints, etc., what matters here are the well-chosen viewpoint, the technical implementation, even transitions in lighting and clean stitching. All these things have been done very well in this photo. --Aristeas (talk) 07:22, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 452958 10:21, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support So detailed. Slowly scrolling across made me feel like I was watching the opening credits of a movie. Daniel Case (talk) 18:10, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per others. Nice dramatic overcast sky, too. Would you consider doing this again in brighter light and at sunset? It would be awesome to have a set of these! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:59, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Highly detailed and educational. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:04, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support The sky appears to bright in thumbnail view but that does not matter if you look at the big size. --Ermell (talk) 08:49, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:08, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't normally like 360 degree panoramas, but this one does impress me. Cmao20 (talk) 13:49, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support well balanced composition and good stitching --Virtual-Pano (talk) 22:30, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:17, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Germany

File:Larus smithsonianus juvenile1.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Apr 2022 at 21:31:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus_:_Larus
Info: following feedback on the recent set, renominating a single photo with improved shadows; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:31, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:31, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:28, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support works well on it's own --Virtual-Pano (talk) 18:28, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 452485 00:48, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Unappealing light -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:19, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Basile. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:34, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good composition but lighting is not exceptional. --Tagooty (talk) 05:10, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Basile on lighting. Good image but not enough wow for FP. --GRDN711 (talk) 01:53, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fine for me. Cmao20 (talk) 14:17, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --The Cosmonaut (talk) 06:05, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mangrove Reflection Wide Ashtamudi Kollam Kerala Mar22 A7C 01464.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Apr 2022 at 08:34:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#India
Info Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 08:34, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lone mangrove in Ashtamudi Lake, Kollam, Kerala. A composition of serenity, with the sharp image of the tree juxtaposed against the hazy background, the reflection reaching out towards the viewer slightly distorted by the gentle ripples in the water -- Tagooty (talk) 08:34, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The slightly off-center composition is a bit unsettling to me; it should either be perfectly centered or very clearly off-center (rule of thirds). Also, a little too much sky. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:38, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done @King of Hearts: Thanks for the suggestion. I've centred the tree. As it is leaning slightly, perfect centering is debatable. --Tagooty (talk) 08:53, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support Beautiful minimalism. --Aristeas (talk) 10:35, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 451503 13:55, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:36, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great image! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:30, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I would support this if this were cropped closer right and left; all the gray vagueness slows eye movement and detracts from the composition, in my opinion. I think if you were to crop out a bit less than halfway toward the middle on both sides, I'd be happy. However, it looks like the image will be featured as is. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:03, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Ikan Kekek: Please see this portrait image. Would you like me to nominate it as an alternative? --Tagooty (talk) 06:07, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I would. I would vote for that version. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:00, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Added a portrait image as an alternative. I invite @King of Hearts, Aristeas, Princess Rosalina, Martin Falbisoner, Frank Schulenburg, Ikan Kekek, Kritzolina, and Navneetsharmaiit: to consider the alternative below. --Tagooty (talk) 14:05, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support I actually love how the tree is so small in this vast (and yes vague) grey world --Kritzolina (talk) 06:59, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support The composition is so simple, yet so powerful. --Navneetsharmaiit (talk) 10:38, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:22, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:52, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Minimalist -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:19, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas and Basile. In full screen mode, I think this version works better. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:20, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 06:24, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:49, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:46, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:20, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support I prefer this one --Llez (talk) 10:58, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative[edit]

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#India
Support Portrait image of the landscape scene above -- Tagooty (talk) 13:57, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per my remarks above. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:08, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 452593 22:26, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Minimalist -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:19, 28 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:06, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support I won't say no to this version, but I definitely would prefer the other one --Kritzolina (talk) 06:13, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 06:30, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hard to choose; both versions have their merits. --Aristeas (talk) 08:20, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:44, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 16:23, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:53, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 14:23, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Beautiful --Adarsh Patel (talk) 05:28, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support I prefer this one. --El Grafo (talk) 10:29, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry to spoil the party but I much prefer the landscape format. There is no reason to crop it so narrowly, let it breathe. For me the whole point of this pic is the isolated tree within the blank, empty environment. And cropping it closely round the tree spoils that. Cmao20 (talk) 14:20, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Cmao. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:26, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Cmao. Yann (talk) 17:55, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:44, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#India

The chosen alternative is: File:Mangrove Reflection Wide Ashtamudi Kollam Kerala Mar22 A7C 01464.jpg

File:Utsjoki Church in Utsjoki, Lapland, Finland, 2021 September.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Apr 2022 at 14:15:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Finland
Info A really beautiful and colourful autumn photo of an historic Finnish church. created by Ximonic - uploaded by Ximonic - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:15, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 14:15, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wonderful combination of beautiful nature, historic building and good light. (I had this photo in my favorites, too ;–).) The slightly converging verticals are IMHO completely OK here as we are clearly looking up. --Aristeas (talk) 15:23, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Still technically summer when this was taken, but ... it is well north of the Arctic Circle, so we have some ... uh ... latitude with this. Daniel Case (talk) 03:12, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

hehe Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:13, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support Princess Rosalina 💄 451302 03:51, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:02, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Beautiful light and colors, but the composition doesn't add up to me. Very good QI to my eyes. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:18, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 08:38, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:09, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:09, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Ikan. Really beautiful and nothing really wrong here, but not that striking in compsition, plus a bit unclear as for the subject. Assuming, according to the file name, the church to be the main subject, then there’s too little visible of it. --Kreuz schnabel 12:29, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per others, quite nice but a clear composition is lacking here. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 06:21, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I like the composition because of how you can see the church emerging from behind the trees, but of course everyone is entitled to their opinion. Cmao20 (talk) 13:43, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per others. This image is good quality but does not have the wow for FP IMHO. --GRDN711 (talk) 15:52, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Christian Ferrer. -- Karelj (talk) 14:51, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose The trees are cut at the top, and the building looks very ordinary. Part of it is obstructed. Nice light, but per Ikan Kekek -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:24, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support could be better, but good enough for me (someone who typically does not get excited by sharp photos of churches) — Rhododendrites ^talk | 17:08, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Christian Ferrer. --Fischer.H (talk) 17:14, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Cmao20 (talk) 18:08, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--Cmao20 (talk) 18:08, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hannover - Neues Rathaus - Empfangshalle - Decke (7374).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2022 at 18:19:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Germany
Info Ceiling of the New Town Hall (Neues Rathaus) in Hanover. created by T meltzer - uploaded by T meltzer - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 18:19, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 18:19, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Superbly done capture in very good quality. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:34, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Unfortunately, I have to add in my review that stronger noises are visible in the upper left area. Therefore I change my vote to Neutral for now. I apologize for that. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:04, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Radomianin I'm afraid I agree with you, it looks like the author forgot to do selective denoising on one particular corner of the photo, and I think this does make it some way short of FP. Cmao20 (talk) 21:11, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--Cmao20 (talk) 18:08, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:2017 - Київ - Місячний вечір на Замковій горі.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2022 at 16:31:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Ukraine
Info created by Moahim - uploaded by Moahim - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 16:31, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrei (talk) 16:31, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely light, colours and composition, though as often with Moahim's pictures I do feel the noise reduction is a little bit too much. Cmao20 (talk) 18:27, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:25, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 20:51, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful! -- Radomianin (talk) 20:55, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 451892 01:56, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:42, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support A wonderful arrangement of beautiful colours and ornate forms, like the theatrical scenery for some fairy tale. Great find! --Aristeas (talk) 08:23, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:12, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:25, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:47, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 01:44, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:14, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful, per others, though a bit small. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:48, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lotje (talk) 09:02, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:43, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 15:52, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 14:57, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment likely support, but what is going on with the streaking on the building at the bottom? — Rhododendrites ^talk | 17:26, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Rhododendrites: I guess that the building is being renovated and that there are two huge tarpaulins hanging from the scaffolding in front of the façade, reproducing images of the façade. The tarpaulins do not hang perfectly vertically, but show some wrinkles and stripes ... --Aristeas (talk) 18:30, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:49, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Ukraine

File:Camellia × williamsii 'Jury's Yellow'. 28-03-2022 (d.j.b.) 03.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2022 at 15:22:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Theaceae
Info Delicate beauty of the Camellia × williamsii 'Jury's Yellow' flower. Location. Garden sanctuary JonkerValley. Focus stack of 21 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:22, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:22, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Question can you remove dark "halo" made by stacking program around the flower? --Ivar (talk) 16:15, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done. correction Thank you for your reviews.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:11, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Ivar (talk) 14:51, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support Cmao20 (talk) 18:23, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:13, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Question About how big is the diameter of the flower? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:49, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your question: note added. ~81mm.--Famberhorst (talk) 17:09, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thanks. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:17, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support Classic, though not extremely original -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:38, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 451065 01:56, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 04:44, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:40, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful. --Aristeas (talk) 07:20, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 08:03, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Lmbuga (talk) 12:24, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 17:58, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:19, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:48, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Theaceae

File:Gibson's Albatross 0A2A4153.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2022 at 16:12:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Diomedeidae_(Albatross)
Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Ivar (talk) 16:12, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Ivar (talk) 16:12, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:38, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Clear FP yet again. Cmao20 (talk) 18:26, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:21, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:37, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:22, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 452861 01:56, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:12, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 04:44, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:41, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:06, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. --Aristeas (talk) 08:18, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:12, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Lmbuga (talk) 12:21, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 17:57, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support and not cropped. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:26, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:46, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:41, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Colin (talk) 18:43, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent! --Tagooty (talk) 02:37, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:44, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:48, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family_:_Diomedeidae_(Albatross)

File:Fitzrovia Chapel 2017-09-17-7.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2022 at 04:42:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#United Kingdom
Info created and uploaded by Colin - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 04:42, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 04:42, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support I’m not usually a fan of fishey lenses. But in this case the fishey was used with a great deal of care and taste, so the photo gives a stunning impression of this beautiful chapel. --Aristeas (talk) 08:31, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks like HDR but is not marked as such?--Ermell (talk) 09:00, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:19, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:10, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Lmbuga (talk) 12:18, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 451999 14:30, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful, well done Cmao20 (talk) 19:34, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:04, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 06:18, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:48, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:59, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fitzrovia Chapel is unusual in that it originally stood in the courtyard of a hospital, which later got demolished and replaced by a housing development. -- Colin (talk) 18:18, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:01, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings/Ceilings#United Kingdom

File:WLM - 2020 - Stralsund - St. Nikolai Kirche.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2022 at 09:48:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Germany
Info View of the St. Nicholas Church in the old town centre of Stralsund, Germany. Created and uploaded by Moahim – nominated by --Aristeas (talk) 09:48, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support A beautiful view with good colours and clear light that makes the buildings look three-dimensional. I especially like that this shot emphasizes the dominant role of the church in the midst of the historic town and the surrounding landscape, that is, as it was once planned by the master builders of this old Hanseatic city. --Aristeas (talk) 09:48, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Apt analysis of photo and motif, Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:28, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kritzolina (talk) 11:27, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 12:20, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 452360 14:30, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:13, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:23, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:35, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:24, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 01:43, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:02, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:55, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support WB is a little on the cool side, though. Daniel Case (talk) 03:54, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:59, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:17, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 19:19, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Germany

File:Blue-tailed bee-eater (Merops philippinus) Yala.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Apr 2022 at 14:21:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Meropidae (Bee-eaters)
Info One current FP. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:21, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:21, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:28, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 20:51, 29 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:13, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 452099 02:03, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support A beautiful bird, and good sharpness, considering that per Wikipedia, these birds are 23-26 cm long at full size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:25, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I know I'm biased... But the green background (yes not grey but is it really always better?) distracts from the colours of the bird and the bird itself, the resolution is higher yet at the same time the crispness is lower (compare: [1] [2]... So what's the point in this nomination -- perhaps to legitimate the replacement by this picture in all WP articles? Sadly that wouldn't surprise me... --A.Savin 04:13, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The other photo is better, for the reasons you state, but I still like this photo per se. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:23, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Both have the same sharpness. Which background you prefer is a matter of taste - the green or the grey sky with thorns. There is no legitimate reason for A.Savin to oppose. Perhaps he might like to vote on this current FP which has garnered significant support. Just voting on nominations by users you dislike is unwarranted aggression. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:07, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Both have not the same sharpness. Besides both links for direct comparison, you also can see here what would my picture look like if just upscaled to the same width as yours... As you may see, then, all the feathers, the eye, the beak etc. (surprisingly?) look very similar, but OK, just keep calling white black and black white, it's hopeless. --A.Savin 13:08, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:21, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:01, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:56, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Both are fine photographs of this bird. Fwiw, I think A.Savin's is better for Wikipedia as the bird is better isolated on a neutral background, which will look clearer in thumbnail. But this isn't Wikipedia and on Commons we can have more than one FP of a subject. Let's just rejoice these are both proper FP quality bird photos, not, cough, this blurry mess. -- Colin (talk) 18:27, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Colin. --Aristeas (talk) 07:32, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 05:56, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Meropidae (Bee-eaters)

File:Speyer - Gedächtniskirche der Protestation - Erdgeschossfenster - Der zwölfjährige Jesus im Tempel.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2022 at 01:24:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Single stained glass windows
Info One of the most beautiful stained glass window photos I have seen on Commons - excellent image quality with superb control of light and noise, plus a really interesting and beautiful window and a detailed image description to tell us what's going on here. created by Aristeas - uploaded by Aristeas - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 01:24, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 01:24, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:31, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:42, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you very much for the nomination, Cmao20! With this photo I wanted to show the stained glass window as it appears to the visitor to the church – so the area around the window is dark, but not black (as often in such photos), but in a warm twilight and just recognizable. --Aristeas (talk) 08:48, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 452476 09:54, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support as per the nomination text. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:57, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 14:28, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:44, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 19:40, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good image of another church interior without wow. FPs have to reach out to me. --GRDN711 (talk) 16:08, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think it has 'wow' certainly compared to the other FPs in the category, and that it is better than all but two or three of them, but maybe you wouldn't have voted for them either, so fair enough. Cmao20 (talk) 18:10, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:06, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:03, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:02, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Micha (talk) 18:56, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Colin (talk) 18:33, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:21, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support crisp and well balanced colours, but the crop is distracting from my point of view. A sqaure [1:1] would enhance the impact of the stained window --Virtual-Pano (talk) 21:39, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Ivar (talk) 06:43, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural elements#Single stained glass windows

File:Launch of Shenzhou 13.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2022 at 12:25:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Space exploration#Space launch vehicles
Info Created by ForrestXYC, photoshopped by FoolPiasar - uploaded by ForrestXYC - nominated by ForrestXYC -- ForrestXYC (talk) 12:25, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ForrestXYC (talk) 12:25, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 19:03, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Regretful oppose Looks nice at thumb, but a lot of unsharpness and noise. Daniel Case (talk) 22:19, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Case: This is a long-distance shot with few observation points and a bad shooting angle. The tail flame itself is very bright. I did my best to get this shot. Because the rocket is really fast, the shooting is really difficult. —ForrestXYC (talk) 04:43, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I understand. I just think we've gotten better photos of rocket launches. If other editors think that the beauty and historicity of what you captured here outweighs the technical issues, they are free to express that in their !votes. Daniel Case (talk) 04:49, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Daniel Case: Fine☑️, thanks for your review. -ForrestXYC ☎️ 05:06, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support After a comparison with our space launch FPs I think this photo deserves the start, too. (Some of the existing FPs are technically better, but most of these have been taken in better light, hence were easier to take. Some of the existing PFs are more impressive, but this one is more than impressive enough to me, too ;–).) --Aristeas (talk) 06:58, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- FoolPiasar ※ 👉talk👈 08:17, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 451619 10:21, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Basically per Aristeas. Very difficult shooting conditions, quality maybe a bit worse than similar images, but great over-all image. Also, it's about time a Chinese rocket makes it into the gallery. --El Grafo (talk) 10:27, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas Cmao20 (talk) 14:23, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 16:35, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support I would like to echo Aristeas' and El Grafo's persuasive statements; this photo has wow effect. -- Radomianin (talk) 17:38, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Erick Soares3 (talk) 18:44, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm undecided, but does anyone know what's producing the pink/purple light? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:03, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ikan Kekek: The main reason for the variation of tail flame of rocket is the difference of fuel and combustion state. Rocket tail flame color is mainly divided into two kinds, chemiluminescence spectrum and black body radiation spectrum. --ForrestXYC ☎️ 23:34, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Understood, and thanks. I was wondering whether a particular chemical reaction was causing that color, and which fuel was involved. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:19, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ikan Kekek: Sorry, the question is out of the range of my strength.😅 -ForrestXYC ☎️ 10:11, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support -- Colin (talk) 18:36, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 14:30, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:32, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Space exploration#Space launch vehicles

File:NPG 2010 112 Lucia Chamberlain by Zaida Ben-Yusuf.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2022 at 19:40:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
Info created by Zaida Ben-Yusuf - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:40, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:40, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support A careful portrait in delicate light by a very interesting photographer. – There is a little white object (see image) note where I wonder whether it is a feature of the clothes or some remaining dust. Could you please have a look? (Just as a hint/question, not as critique of your restauration which is, as always, excellent.) --Aristeas (talk) 07:56, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- @Aristeas: I was eyeing that a lot. It's either a hatpin or similar, or damage, but if it's damage, it doesn't match any other damage on the photo, and you almost never see only one bit of damage on a photo, so my presumption is real. Adam Cuerden (talk) 11:08, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  - Thank you very much, Adam! That sounds very reasonable to me, it’s always great to learn from your experience. --Aristeas (talk) 08:41, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking portrait and nicely sharp at larger than original size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:57, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 17:49, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:21, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 01:57, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tagooty (talk) 02:24, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:52, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:53, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 06:27, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination It's been pointed out that I somehow upscaled the image before restoration, so I'm going to redo this. Expect it back in a few days. Sorry! Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:25, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- For the record, it's redone, but I don't feel it would be right to keep the votes. Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:39, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Indak Boy Kadayawan Festival 1.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Apr 2022 at 14:21:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Events
Info created and uploaded by Fpj455 - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 14:21, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 14:21, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Question What are they holding? That should be identified in the file description. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:45, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ikan Kekek: I changed the description, but I have no idea what is in his hand. This festival is about indigenous tribal cultures, so dance costumes can contain strange things. Look at Category:Kadayawan Festival. -- IamMM (talk) 19:14, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment User:Fpj455 last contributed on March 15, so maybe they can come back and provide this information; I wouldn't have expected you to know it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:52, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Ikan Kekek Looks like they're doing the Hendrix, probably on some form of Philippine boat lute (or, more likely, a non-functional prop version thereof). Something along the lines of kudyapi or faglong, I guess? El Grafo (talk) 10:06, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That does look like a faglong. Thanks! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:57, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support Great emotions, great colors! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:09, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Busy, distracting background. Daniel Case (talk) 03:16, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support The festival atmosphere is great. --ForrestXYC ☎️ 05:12, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Frank and ForrestXYC. Yes, quite busy, but that also contributes to the festival atmosphere I can feel in this photo. --Aristeas (talk) 07:01, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Composition is cluttered and the main figure is not in focus. 1/640 sec not fast enough? Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:17, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 451300 10:21, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles and Daniel. Good COM:VIC candidate, though. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:01, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:14, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles and Daniel. -- Karelj (talk) 20:26, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Love the facial expression, but as others have pointed out, the composition is quite cluttered. --El Grafo (talk) 08:41, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:55, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:SBB Historic A 3-5 705 Rümlingen Viaduct.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2022 at 06:54:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
Info created & uploaded by David Gubler – nominated by Ivar (talk) 06:54, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Ivar (talk) 06:54, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I don't think this is one of his finest. Is there motion blur? The smoke obscures the view of the train. And the tree top right? Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:24, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

All of this is fine, but the pole in the foreground annoys me. Yann (talk) 19:58, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination --Ivar (talk) 06:33, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hortus Haren. ‘10 jaar Kunst in de Hortus’, 09-10-2020 (d.j.b.) 02.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2022 at 12:11:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures outdoors
Info created & uploaded by Famberhorst - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 12:11, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 12:11, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good sharp photo of an interesting sculpture in its environment; nice colours and light. --Aristeas (talk) 09:52, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hulged (talk) 10:11, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you for the nomination of my photo.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:27, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 17:07, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 18:10, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 01:12, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 01:54, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 06:23, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 451205 01:07, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:56, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 09:44, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:02, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures#Sculptures outdoors

File:Newly eclosed individual of Pachliopta aristolochiae – Common Rose.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2022 at 08:06:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Papilionidae (Swallowtails)
Info created by Sarpitabose - uploaded by Sarpitabose - nominated by Bodhisattwa -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 08:06, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 08:06, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:25, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:30, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 09:00, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Suggested this at QI. Really nice. Charlesjsharp (talk) 09:01, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 09:40, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:20, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 15:48, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking composition, good quality. --Tagooty (talk) 02:21, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hulged (talk) 10:12, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:54, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Eye-catching composition, interesting pairing -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:33, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 15:03, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 17:02, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:06, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 18:10, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:15, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 01:10, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:48, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yeriho (talk) 19:33, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 452701 01:07, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:56, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:02, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Papilionidae (Swallowtails)

File:Antique cash register in a cafe, Darjeeling.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Apr 2022 at 15:26:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Machines
Info All by Subhrajyoti07 -- Subhrajyoti07 talk 15:26, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Subhrajyoti07 talk 15:26, 31 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:14, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 05:01, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 452002 06:13, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 11:10, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow, nice motif Cmao20 (talk) 18:23, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:07, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Gallery link added. Your friendly gallery link service ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 08:14, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:12, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:39, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:47, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't like the background. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:36, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose it's an interesting object, but I'm having trouble finding "wow" from the overall scene/composition — Rhododendrites ^talk | 17:11, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 23:33, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Machines

File:Atelier Nadar - Jacques Isnardon, Vaudeville.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2022 at 15:30:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info created by Atelier Nadar - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:30, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:30, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 17:45, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I guess that was good sharpness in those days, right? What about the lighting? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:42, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Given it has good dark-light contrast, I'd say pretty good. Adam Cuerden (talk) 19:06, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  - Oh, is this about how it's darker around him? Pretty sure that's just artistic dodging to fade out the edge of the photo in an interesting way, kind of the photographic equivalent of a painting like this. Photo editing hardly began in our generation, but aesthetic tastes change. Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:35, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
    - Photo editing pretty much started with the inception of photography itself. Photomontage, for instance, is nothing that needed Photoshop to become popular. Early superstars like Le Gray were master manipulators - out of sheer necessity. Otherwise "HDR" (hehe) images would have been impossible. To all romanticists who still believe that it was digital photography that killed off the holy concept of authenticity: Go to your room - that discussion started in the 1850s (seriously)! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 16:02, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Interesting discussion, guys. I feel like the subject is himself in shadow. There's more light on the outer parts of the photo. I find that very strange. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:25, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know what might have caused that effect. I wouldn't say the subject is really in shadow. Isnardon does cast a shadow though and the outer parts of the background are remarkably bright, sure. I do like it actually. --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:21, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:50, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:07, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:39, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hulged (talk) 10:10, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 10:21, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:56, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 17:14, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Virtual-Pano (talk) 15:43, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 01:47, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 13:30, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 452440 01:07, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 04:08, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:57, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 23:35, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Men

File:Blue tiger butterfly at Kairwaan, Dehradun district.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2022 at 15:31:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
Info created by - uploaded by - nominated by Satdeep Gill -- Satdeep Gill (talk) 15:31, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Satdeep Gill (talk) 15:31, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose It is always sensible to look at an existing FP of a species and see if your image is as good. And you already have two nominations on the go.Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:24, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good quality and composition but IMO not as good as Charles' existing FP or indeed this one which I nominated and withdrew Cmao20 (talk) 21:43, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Good, and would have been a perfectly reasonable FP candidate if not for the competition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:56, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charles. Daniel Case (talk) 17:18, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 23:34, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Green bee-eater in Patiala, India.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2022 at 15:28:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Meropidae (Bee-eaters)
Info created by - uploaded by - nominated by Satdeep Gill -- Satdeep Gill (talk) 15:28, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Satdeep Gill (talk) 15:28, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose This is, I'm afraid, only just QI and if cropped a sensible amount would be too small and too soft. A bird on a wire is also never ideal. It is also sensible to check whether a portrait-style image like this could be good enough to be considered for the infobox in a Wikipedia article. This isn't. Please check the current nomination for a bee-eater to see how you must enter the appropriate FP category. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:30, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Relatively small resolution, low level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:38, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It's sharp, with good bokeh, and I don't mind the barbed wire. I also appreciate a roomy crop when it makes sense (although typically you want a little more space in the direction it's facing than space behind it), but as others say, it's just rather small compared with FPs of birds these days. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 17:01, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing wrong with it but too small for FP in 2022, the detail on the bird is too little especially seeing it only takes up a small part of the frame. Cmao20 (talk) 21:42, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others, especially Cmao20 and Basile (I think it's OK that the bird is on a wire). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:04, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Very weak oppose A good image technically as it is, but per others I think it could be cropped in a bit, and that would make it too small. Daniel Case (talk) 17:17, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 23:34, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Red-tailed hawk in Central Park (24796).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2022 at 22:22:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes#Genus_:_Buteo
Info "Yearbook" photo, immature red-tailed hawk (Buteo jamaicensis), class of 2022. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:22, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support This immature hawk landed maybe 10 feet from me, allowing for some decent headshots. I nearly nominated the silly one, but this one is sufficiently technically better that it seemed like the more natural nom. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 22:22, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:16, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great shot. Already saw it on Twitter this morning and hoped you'd nominate it. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:29, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I like the other photo, too, though. Yeah, they are big, confident birds, not the least bit scared of or put off by the presence of people. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:09, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive eyes. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:44, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:48, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 08:08, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:13, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:39, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:51, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hulged (talk) 10:10, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 10:20, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:57, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 16:57, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 18:10, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:13, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 01:07, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 14:35, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the idea of this being its yearbook photo. I considered imagining what its dot-dots would read like, and making some up, but that was too open-ended. Maybe, what quote would it use? Daniel Case (talk) 01:51, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"You wanna piece of me?" -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:02, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I think that's what the small woodland creatures it tends to swoop down on might say to it! Daniel Case (talk) 18:52, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 451113 01:07, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:18, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:57, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Ivar (talk) 05:59, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Accipitriformes#Genus_:_Buteo

File:2017 - Київ - Світанок над Дніпром.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2022 at 16:25:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Ukraine
Info created by Moahim - uploaded by Moahim - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 16:25, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrei (talk) 16:25, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support A very harmonious composition, despite the lens flare Cmao20 (talk) 18:27, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support It's the lens flare that gives the photo its special charm. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:03, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Fantastic scene. --FoolPiasar ※ 👉talk👈 23:49, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 452255 01:56, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 05:42, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:04, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Almost too delicate to be true. --Aristeas (talk) 08:26, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. --Ermell (talk) 09:01, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:11, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Lmbuga (talk) 12:20, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Distracting lens flare -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:48, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:19, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile. Sorry. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 04:46, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You probably really hate J.J. Abrams movies --Andrei (talk) 10:02, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Of course, anyone is free to reject such a photo because of the light effects, this is completely valid, such effects are definitely a matter of taste. Nevertheless I want to make a technical note: In such an extreme contre-jour situation, where the sun is somewhere mid in the image, it is really difficult to avoid lens flares completely. In fact, I’m rather surprised that there aren’t more flares in this photo – many lenses would produce a whole series of light spots and so-called ‘ghosts’ across the image in this situation. The light effect visible in this photo also seems to consist less of lens flares and more of diffraction spikes, an effect that is often even brought about on purpose. Overall, I would call the shot remarkably clean (considering the extreme backlight, see above). --Aristeas (talk) 10:22, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I appreciate your remarks. However, I'm not sure about the composition, either. It's a pretty scene, but the big lamppost closest to the viewer calls too much attention to itself and causes a tension that doesn't fit in with the rest of the scene. I also find the long sunray distracting because of its direction in the context of the rest of the picture. In terms of movies and TV shows, I do find it strange that lens flares are often deliberately used. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:38, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Thank you. (And I agree with you completely regarding the overuse of lens flares etc. in movies and TV: IMHO most times that’s just kitsch ;–).) --Aristeas (talk) 07:27, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Lens flare, lamppost in the middle... Yann (talk) 17:53, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per others. Nice image, but not exceptional. --Tagooty (talk) 02:36, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Aristeas --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:59, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Tagooty. --Fischer.H (talk) 17:07, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:34, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges#Ukraine

File:Hanuman Langur or Gray Langur.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Apr 2022 at 15:59:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Cercopithecidae_(Old_World_Monkeys)
All by Subhrajyoti07 -- Subhrajyoti07 talk 15:59, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Subhrajyoti07 talk 15:59, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support What looks like some netting in the background is distracting me a little because it makes it clear the setting is not fully natural. Otherwise very good. Cmao20 (talk) 18:25, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This is actually inside a zoo. So these monkeys are moving around in the open in the visitors' area. Infact this monkey is sitting on a bench meant for visitors.-Subhrajyoti07 talk 18:40, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 452731 01:56, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Slightly qualified support Fur is blown or nearly blown on the top of the head, and looks a little unnatural on the lower right leg. Daniel Case (talk) 02:08, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Gallery link added. Your friendly gallery link service ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 08:16, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Thank you. I was actually finding it difficult.- Subhrajyoti07 talk 08:39, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A zoo image showing 'captive' surroundings. Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:33, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 07:57, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, the quality isn't high enough for a zoo photo. The face isn't particularly sharp and the fur is blown in places. Composition isn't appealing. -- Colin (talk) 18:42, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charlesjsharp. -- Karelj (talk) 14:53, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Agree with Charles -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:28, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Charlesjsharp. --Fischer.H (talk) 17:09, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment With due respect to all fellow wikimedians who have voted on this photo, following is the Histogram of this picture from LR Link. There are no clips either in Highlights or Shadow.

The lens is a macro prime and is tack sharp with focus on the eyes of the primate. The aperture was the widest at f/2.8 as it was a cloudy day which I admit is not the optimal aperture for this shot but raising the ISO much (this was ISO 400) was not an option as my DSLR is quite outdated and introduced unacceptable noise. Regarding the venue being captive, here's the description from the wikipedia page - "Nandankanan Zoological Park is a 437-hectare zoo and botanical garden in Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India". So there is a zoo but this animal is not part of the zoo enclosure. My previous comment should have been worded better. Anyways, I feel this photo should be considered keeping these points in view- Subhrajyoti07 talk 10:25, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

- Comment "clipping" does not necessarily mean "RGB at 100%". There is considerable loss of detail in the bright parts visible, even if the numeric brightness might still be below 100% due to subsequent normalisation – there are large "mash" areas of nearly one colour with not a single hair to be seen. --Kreuz schnabel 13:05, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The blown white areas in the fur make it insupportable for me, even if it was crisp sharp (which it isn’t). Is this a JPG out of camera, and if so, is the raw file still with us? I might like to have a try with RawTherapee :) --Kreuz schnabel 12:49, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Kreuz, I am sharing the original NEF file for this shot here

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:35, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Malabar pied hornbill (Anthracoceros coronatus) male.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2022 at 21:27:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Bucerotidae (Hornbills)
Info No FPs of this species, high-resolution photo with good quality and composition. created by Charlesjsharp - uploaded by Charlesjsharp - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 21:27, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 21:27, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Expert shot, perfectly composed, no quality flaws. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:40, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:33, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support What a beak! -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:27, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The casque is hollow and it augments the calls of both males and females. It is also a sign of sexual maturity. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:25, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support (But is "Bloack 5" in the file description actually "Block 5"?) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:15, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

indeed it is. Support Thanks for the nom. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:23, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:40, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 05:55, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:13, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 06:23, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:07, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 07:33, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 14:34, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 16:50, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:02, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 01:44, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 451037 01:06, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:08, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 06:38, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:22, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:01, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:19, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 09:34, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Vulp❯❯❯here! 09:34, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family : Bucerotidae (Hornbills)

File:Bluethroat near Jalalpur, Patiala 02.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2022 at 06:13:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Muscicapidae_(Old_World_Flycatchers)
Info created by - uploaded by - nominated by Satdeep Gill -- Satdeep Gill (talk) 06:13, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Satdeep Gill (talk) 06:13, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It's a bit small, so I guess you had to do a big crop. Have you tried a little sharpening? Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:01, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Too soft without any improvements. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:35, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support I second Charles that this picture is maybe a tiny bit undersharpened, but undersharpened is better than oversharpened. It's all in focus and the bird has a nice pose. Cmao20 (talk) 19:34, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 06:19, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. --Aristeas (talk) 08:32, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:51, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:52, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:41, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Charlesjsharp. The head is partly blurred. --Tagooty (talk) 02:30, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support I like that the background is soft but also helps to frame the subject. Bigger would be better, but I find the sharpness ok and like the morning light. Might also be worth nominating File:Синьшийка 0833.jpg (same species, a bit bigger, with the blue throat) — Rhododendrites ^talk | 17:31, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:17, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. Opposing is arguably nitpicky and is certainly holding this photo to a very high standard, but isn't that the whole point of "This is a featured picture on Wikimedia Commons and is considered one of the finest images"? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:29, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Charlesjsharp, @Tagooty, @Ikan Kekek and others: I have uploaded another version of this image here: File:Bluethroat near Jalalpur, Patiala - Version 2.jpg. Let me know if you think this is a better image and should replace the one nominated here? Satdeep Gill (talk) 04:49, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes please. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:34, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support I prefer the new version. -- IamMM (talk) 06:37, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The second version is sharper and a little brightened. I'd consider not opposing it, and I might support it, except that the bright parts of the bokeh trunk are distracting me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:54, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 451314 01:07, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment As the second version is not presented as an alternative, I have removed the thumbnail to let the bot closing this nomination correctly. Positive and negative votes should be clearly associated to a single picture (example) -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:21, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative[edit]

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Muscicapidae_(Old_World_Flycatchers)

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 17:40, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Muscicapidae_(Old_World_Flycatchers)

The chosen alternative is: File:Bluethroat near Jalalpur, Patiala 02.jpg

File:Green garden lizard (Calotes calotes) juvenile and common jezebel (Delias eucharis) female.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2022 at 11:45:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Agamidae (Dragon Lizards)
Info The lizard climbs a flowering bush and waits for a insect... The butterfly escaped. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:45, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:45, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Lmbuga (talk) 12:13, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Arose just like yesterday's nomination? ;-) --Llez (talk) 12:18, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be honest here. I moved in to snap the butterfly without knowing the lizard was there. Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:51, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 452327 14:30, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support This seems like a still from a good nature documentary, except that it's higher-quality than a still from a video would usually be. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:15, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support A really special capture and probably one of your best yet Cmao20 (talk) 19:35, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 19:49, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support poor Lizard had to stay hungry.--Ermell (talk) 20:22, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Well someone has taken a bite out of the butterfly already; might have been the lizard. Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:46, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support I was going to oppose before noticing the lizard :-) -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:53, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 01:41, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose good quality and quite unusual, but too busy. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 06:23, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Serendipity! —Bruce1ee^talk 06:29, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special and funny. --Aristeas (talk) 08:34, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Colin (talk) 18:55, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special! -- Radomianin (talk) 19:31, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:26, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Christian. Daniel Case (talk) 18:45, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Christian. -- Karelj (talk) 14:28, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support on the basis that we should provide technical leeway for special moments — Rhododendrites ^talk | 17:04, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, of course it has technical weaknesses, but I would rather have taken this shot than the far higher technical quality hornbill just nominated. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:32, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support busy indeed but the timing trumps the imperfect composition imho --Virtual-Pano (talk) 15:18, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Rhododendrites --El Grafo (talk) 12:49, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 09:46, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 09:35, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:36, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Reptiles#Family : Agamidae (Dragon Lizards)

File:Karnival 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2022 at 11:24:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
Info created by Lance Anthony - uploaded by Lance Anthony - nominated by Kritzolina -- Kritzolina (talk) 11:24, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Kritzolina (talk) 11:24, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Disclaimer: Since I have suggested [3] to Kritzolina to nominate the most impressive pictures from Wiki Loves Folklore also at FPC, I am indirectly involved in this nomination. ;–) It is interesting that no one has voted so far; probably some of us are torn back and forth. Indeed, this is an unusual image, both as a carnival image and as a portrait. The crop seems too tight at first (I would like to see more of the wings [?] on her costume), but on the other hand it draws the eye very efficiently to her face, which is very impressive because of the combination of colourful make-up and the mask over it. The statue (?) on the right in the background is a bit perplexing, but it too seems to be looking at the woman in the foreground, like an echo of the viewer; it’s a clever idea. Unfortunately, the topmost of the feathers on her mask are overexposed and the sky in the upper left shows some posterization; this disturbs the otherwise technically good picture somewhat, but does not ruin the overall impression which is, of course, impressive enough. --Aristeas (talk) 14:10, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 15:41, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 23:23, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Yeriho (talk) 19:31, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 451564 01:07, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Aristeas. Adam Cuerden (talk) 10:11, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 09:35, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:37, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Women

File:Royal crematorium of King Rama IX at night.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2022 at 20:36:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Thailand
Info created & uploaded by Supanut Arunoprayote - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 20:36, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 20:36, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment ~~the smallest of tilts...~~ Charlesjsharp (talk) 20:49, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I would second that. @Supanut Arunoprayote: Could you have a look? This is a very impressive photo and I would like to support it as featured picture, but it needs a small counterclockwise rotation to correct the tilt. Thank you! --Aristeas (talk) 08:38, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support I third the motion but will support as is. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:33, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done @Aristeas: @Charlesjsharp: Thanks for your review. ----Supa A. 19:56, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support Thank you very much, Supa! --Aristeas (talk) 08:36, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:30, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I really (really) like the reflection. The darkness and yellow color cast, not so much, sorry. - Benh (talk) 17:32, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral per the tilt. Daniel Case (talk) 18:50, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support and personally I like the colours. Cmao20 (talk) 18:11, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support for the adjusted version. Definitely an FP worthy photo, imho. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:42, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 06:24, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:54, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 452779 01:07, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 09:35, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:00, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 1 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:16, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Thailand

Green bee-eater hunt[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2022 at 19:34:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

A pair of bee-eaters are looking for insects
One spots a target and focuses on it
The bird flies off

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Meropidae (Bee-eaters)
Info Photos from the new Sri Lankan issue of A Sharp Eye on wildlife photography. I was going to include this image of a successful hunt, but it was from a previous foray. All by Charlesjshapr -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:34, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:34, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: 1 and 2 are too similar, though I'd support either as a separate nomination; 3 is too blurred. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 21:00, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good sequence. --GRDN711 (talk) 23:03, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 451718 01:08, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose lack of sharpness. --Ivar (talk) 06:37, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support A nice sequence, beautiful colours. Maybe a bit too much sharpening (in post), but I leave it to our wildlive photography experts to judge this. --Aristeas (talk) 10:51, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A set "Green bee-eater hunt" should show the complete hunt, not only the beginning. --Llez (talk) 11:56, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose nice sequence, but it's not really a "set" and despite the title it does not include the actual hunt. --El Grafo (talk) 12:36, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. Cmao20 (talk) 13:37, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose lack of sharpness, and 1 and 2 too much similar. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 17:59, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose In the fourth missing image, the bee-eater remembers he has a dentist appointment, and returns to the branch till 11:00. In the fifth missing image, the rear bee-eater ponders how birds, who famously have no teeth, could possibly have dental appointments. In the sixth image, the first bee-eater, concedes this is fair point and flies off to have some cross words with his dentist. This is not a set. -- Colin (talk) 22:40, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I'm relaxed if the community does not consider this a set El Grafo Llez Colin. I had thought that a set of individual images were preferred to composite images, but happy to stick to composites. Charlesjsharp (talk) 07:08, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this one works even as a composite, but yes a strip-cartoon format may work for some works. The love-bird sequence was cute, but this one is just lacking the spark. As El Grafo notes, a hunt needs predator and prey. -- Colin (talk) 08:23, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Daniel Case (talk) 02:32, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Regretful oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 02:30, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Charlesjsharp (talk) 12:29, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fairytale - Lake Saiful Muluk.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Apr 2022 at 07:33:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Pakistan
Info created by Tahsin Anwar Ali - uploaded by Tahsin Anwar Ali - nominated by C1MM -- C1MM (talk) 07:33, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- C1MM (talk) 07:33, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:42, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Very beautiful, but CA at top left and right. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:13, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment A wonderful view, but the CAs are, sorry, terrible. I am flabbergasted that a Canon “L” lens has such extreme CAs. I have tried to reduce the CAs but had no real success. Could someone else who has more experience in image editing help here? That would be great! --Aristeas (talk) 08:28, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed. --Cart (talk) 08:54, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very very much, Cart – you have done a great job, the image is much better now! --Aristeas (talk) 09:28, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support for the version fixed by Cart. --Aristeas (talk) 09:28, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Indeed much better, but I'm noticing some dust spots - particularly 1 in the upper left corner, 1 in the upper middle. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 10:55, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I have never been to Pakistan, but I don't think the sky nearly looked like this when the photo was taken. Way over processed. - Benh (talk) 21:16, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:34, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Amazing scenery. Unfortunately, way overprocessed. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:42, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I have to agree with Frank. Cart did, as always, a great job, but this image needs more than CA removal. Daniel Case (talk) 06:01, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Overprocessed. Excessive contrasts -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:16, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --Fischer.H (talk) 17:01, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Basile, lovely photo but too much 'clarity' applied in Photoshop IMO, doesn't look realistic anymore Cmao20 (talk) 18:13, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 12:03, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Кальдера вулкана Головнина. Вулканический берег.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Apr 2022 at 13:34:56 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Far Eastern Federal District
Info The shore of the lake in the caldera of Golovnin vulcano, Kurils Nature Reserve, Russia; also claimed by Japan in the Kuril Islands dispute. Created by Екатерина Васягина – uploaded by Naturephotographers – nominated by --Aristeas (talk) 13:34, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support When I saw this photo on the QIC page (thanks to IamMM for nominating it!), I was immediately fascinated. I love the vivid colours with their contrast of warm and cold shades; comparison with other photos (1, 2, 3 …) suggests that the colours are authentic, they are probably caused by the vulcanic nature of the lake. The view vertically from above transforms the whole picture into an abstract work of art. The size is not extreme, but OK (6 megapixels), and the photo is very sharp, crisp and clean and therefore I am fine with the resolution. --Aristeas (talk) 13:34, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment This is not a political nomination, please do not make it a political vote ;–). Nature on the Kuril Islands cannot help the orders of a certain ruler in Moscow, and nature has also not started the Kuril Islands dispute. --Aristeas (talk) 13:41, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you Aristeas.--Ermell (talk) 16:50, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Indeed fascinating; this photo might be an inspiration for an abstract painting. -- Radomianin (talk) 18:28, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I know it is not a political nomination, but it is insensitive and untimely. The originator has not updated user page to reflect the current situation. Why would you want to nominate an image that actively promotes a Russian tour company. I do think a quick withdraw would be sensible @Aristeas: . Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:53, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Charlesjsharp: This is a political stance, and it is completely unacceptable. Not all people from Russia support the war, and there is no reason to censor private projects complete independent of the war. Please withdraw your comment. Yann (talk) 20:06, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Charlesjsharp: I second Yann, please take your political ramblings elsewhere. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:55, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed. I'm a Russian, I'm against war and I'm feeling with the civilians of Ukraine, and as you may guess now I'm feeling heavily betrayed by my country. Because of that, probably I'm not going to go there again (and submit more quality pictures of Russia for Commons) for decades now, maybe even for the rest of my life. But I'm strictly against refusal of any Russian stuff by other users, who maybe do not support this shit either, yet do not have the possibility to escape timely (OK we don't know about this one user... however note that their websites/Facebook/VK have not been updated since 2019 or so, that means we really cannot say anything here...). That said I can fully understand if some Ukrainians now say "no Tchaikovsky/Tolstoy/Chekhov... anymore" or so, but someone like Charlesjsharp (from England, a wealthy European country far from Ukraine + Russia, far from the war, far from Putin etc.pp..) is not in the position IMHO... Meanwhile the offensive and slanderous comments by him are not surprising to me, however this here is really outrageous. When will the community finally recognize that all the "featured/quality/valued" contents by this user is actually a "tainted gift" for Commons and the whole Wiki movement? Where is Jimbo's famous statement that "toxic users" belong banned no matter the past contributions?... Regards --A.Savin 21:37, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:49, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent quality and an amazing scenery. --A.Savin 21:37, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 23:09, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:19, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 452983 01:06, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support The attractive combination of colors perfectly works as an abstract for me, it looks like someone poured fake saffron on the stones. It is true that the propaganda machine of authoritarian governments, in collaboration with organized Western lobbies, uses the beauties of their own country as a tactic of propaganda and to deceive public opinion. I am not unfamiliar with this issue and I believe that we should be very sensitive and not allow FPC to be used to promote such material (although there are some exceptions that can also turn bad propaganda into good FP). To me, this particular image is just a view of a natural scene in which there is no contentious and irritating factor, so I do not consider Charles's argument valid here. -- IamMM (talk) 05:36, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 06:39, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Stunning! --Yann (talk) 08:48, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:26, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --El Grafo (talk) 12:28, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely photo, and politics is irrelevant. Cmao20 (talk) 13:37, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:21, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:04, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support I thought this was some abstract crystal formation. Хорошо! Очень красиво! Daniel Case (talk) 20:14, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:02, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 09:42, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:20, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 09:34, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:49, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Russia#Far Eastern Federal District

File:Cenote Kankirixché.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2022 at 03:33:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Natural#Mexico
Info: abyss of light; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:33, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:33, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Really striking photo. (There's a red link on the category page, though.) -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:55, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you; category fixed. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:14, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Lit areas on the surface very overexposed, and seem to have been overprocessed. Daniel Case (talk) 01:59, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support I'm not really sure how anyone could expect it not to be 'overexposed'. Light shining directly on a surface makes it glaringly bright. Let's not be afraid of that. Cmao20 (talk) 18:12, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 452565 10:41, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 09:35, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:54, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Museum of History and Archaeology of the Middle Urals stairwell, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2022 at 06:06:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Viewing down.
Viewing up.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Interiors#Russia
Info: stairwell of the Museum of History and Archaeology of the Middle Urals; all by me. -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 06:06, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 06:06, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral as a set. I'd support the second image (viewing up) if nominated independently though --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:37, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I like both photos very much, but could the one looking down be denoised effectively without creating any other problems? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:46, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done: denoised. The Cosmonaut (talk) 07:10, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ Big improvement. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:37, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose We have other pictures looking up and down spiral stairwells that I think are better. Daniel Case (talk) 06:03, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I haven't decided how to vote on the set yet, but I have left a crop suggestion for the first image that I think would make it a lot more satisfying a composition. At the moment the spiral motif doesn't quite hit the viewer strongly enough, for me. Cmao20 (talk) 18:15, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done: I agree, this does improve the composition; cropped. The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:40, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Unfortunately, I disagree and rescind my supporting vote. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:26, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Doesn't work for me. Perhaps the landscape crop is part of the problem. Charlesjsharp (talk) 08:28, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Weak support With the new crop this is satisfying enough for FP as a set. Cmao20 (talk) 15:22, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 451140 10:41, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 09:35, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:13, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Shell of Polititapes aureus, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Apr 2022 at 07:06:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Polititapes aureus
Right valve
Polititapes aureus
Left valve

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family: Veneridae
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 07:06, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 07:06, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support at 2.6 cm (full-page size is bigger than that), these photos are sharp, but these photos are not sharp at 30% of full size. I know this is an odd question, but are they unnecessarily large? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:36, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I always make full-size photos of each of the 5 views with a 6000x4000 px Camera. Mounted together they reach the given size. I don't like to downsize them afterwards even if there is a risk of some blurring. Everyone who wants to can downsize the photos as he likes to get more sharpness (As far as I know Wikimedians don't like downsized photos very much). The size of the picture also depends on the form of the valve, this one is photographed in the same way, but the form of the valve is quite different and so consequently also the format of the picture. --Llez (talk) 07:58, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry Llez, but I don't think these are among the finest shell photos. Perhaps these have proved especially hard to get all-in-focus but there's just too much of each shell that is out of focus and the in-focus bits are not sharp. I appreciate you don't like to downsize but at the same time, there is no point in offering more resolution than your lens captured. I have looked at a lot of your other high-resolution shell images, and they appear to have more detail. Further, compared to the other detailed and even colourful shells in our gallery, these are really very boring and plain. Not all subjects invoke wow, and I think, of all your shells, this one is absent wow. -- Colin (talk) 10:10, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Colin. Daniel Case (talk) 15:29, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 2 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 13:13, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hans Andreas Dahl-On the mountaintop.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Apr 2022 at 19:12:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Exteriors
Info created by Hans Andreas Dahl - uploaded by Monfie - nominated by Monfie
Support -- Monfie (talk) 19:12, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I haven't seen this painting, but the photo doesn't seem very sharp. Also, it's essential to specify the dimensions of the painting, the material (is it oil on canvas or, for example, on paper?), and not just the geographic coordinates but the name of the museum where the painting is (if it's in a museum). -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:40, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Beautiful painting but the fine detail in brush strokes is just not captured Cmao20 (talk) 13:58, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ivan Kekek. Sea Cow (talk) 15:20, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose lack of sharpness. --Ivar (talk) 18:43, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others; at this point nominator should consider withdrawing this image. Daniel Case (talk) 04:30, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination Monfie (talk) 18:32, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Dülmen, Hiddingsel, St.-Johannes-Nepomuk-Kapelle -- 2012 -- 7105.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Apr 2022 at 09:38:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Germany
Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 09:38, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Info The photograph is 10 years old and was made for a book project. But it hasn't lost its charm over the years. Thank you, Ikan Kekek --XRay 💬 09:38, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- XRay 💬 09:38, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support I feel a satisfying near-symmetry in this composition, and I also like the contrast and colors. It's a great composition because it is simple but has enough details and variation to satisfy the eye. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:50, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:54, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:04, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 452842 00:31, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:15, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support So symmetrical -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:33, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 12:05, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 19:16, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:20, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hulged (talk) 00:29, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 09:28, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ikan Kekek has said it all here. Cmao20 (talk) 13:52, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:55, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 15:14, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#Germany

File:Maria Hilf - Moosbronn - 06 - Miraculous image.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Apr 2022 at 09:36:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Germany
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 09:36, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Llez (talk) 09:36, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:49, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 21:59, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:03, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 452477 00:31, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 04:10, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:11, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:17, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very beautiful. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:59, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:20, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hulged (talk) 00:28, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 09:28, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:57, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:55, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 15:14, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Germany

File:Ulmus glabra flowers - Keila.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2022 at 05:15:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Ulmaceae
Info all by Ivar (talk) 05:15, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 05:15, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good, detailed capture. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:17, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:37, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:47, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. --Aristeas (talk) 09:42, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 09:51, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hulged (talk) 10:09, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --IamMM (talk) 10:18, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:00, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- FoolPiasar ※ ♥ talk ♥ 14:24, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support the light direction combined with subject makes for something a little different — Rhododendrites ^talk | 16:51, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 18:10, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 21:11, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:41, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Rhododendrites. Sort of looks like a match being struck that got turned into a flower. Daniel Case (talk) 18:35, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good quality image, but I do not see reasom for FP nomination, IHMO. -- Karelj (talk) 18:41, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 452618 01:07, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:10, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 08:58, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 09:43, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 09:35, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 20 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 15:18, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family_:_Ulmaceae

File:California State Capitol during blue hour-3982.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Apr 2022 at 20:54:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_States
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:54, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 20:54, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:02, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:34, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 452735 00:31, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 04:09, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:19, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:21, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:57, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:49, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:31, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Michielverbeek (talk) 19:42, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:20, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hulged (talk) 00:27, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:35, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 09:28, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:57, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:54, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 18:43, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the how it's lit - Benh (talk) 21:33, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 18:18, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 14:00, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 05:44, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United_States

File:Istanbul asv2021-11 img03 Hemdat Israel Synagogue.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2022 at 13:50:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Turkey
Info Interior of Hemdat Israel Synagogue, Kadıköy/Istanbul. All by me --A.Savin 13:50, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 13:50, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent, sharp and beautiful interior, despite some small distortions. Cmao20 (talk) 18:16, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. Also beautiful and atmospheric light. --Aristeas (talk) 18:25, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:28, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 20:36, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Andrei (talk) 22:29, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:12, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 06:23, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Virtual-Pano (talk) 15:41, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very interesting room, also with the corona tapes. Resolution and sharpness are outstanding. But the crop isn't. The composition isn't really wowing me. Sorry. --Milseburg (talk) 16:39, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Quite honestly, I agree. It's wonderful to see a photo of a synagogue in Istanbul, but the angle doesn't work to me as a great composition for FP. I think this is a really useful VI/QI. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:58, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry, but I think this angle-of-view is emphasising the distortions of a 15mm lens too much. A crop may help. -- Colin (talk) 09:08, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A very wow-y room, but as others have pointed out already, the composition doesn't do it justice. It feels to me like you were trying to somehow squeeze in as much of the ceiling as possible, while kind of forgetting about the rest. I get it, the ceiling is beautiful, but from up there you won't get a good view of it anyway. Colin's suggested crop might be able to fix that. --El Grafo (talk) 09:31, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 452212 01:06, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per other opposers. --Ivar (talk) 06:41, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Unfavorable composition. But it's probably not easy without assembly of several photos. The cut light at bottom left don't help too. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:17, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 09:43, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per above Poco a poco (talk) 21:16, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative[edit]

Support --A.Savin 11:16, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:52, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 13:59, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support I do still think the other image could work as an FP if it were the top half of a vertorama. Daniel Case (talk) 18:38, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 452212 01:06, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:19, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support I mildly prefer the other one but this is IMO fine for FP Cmao20 (talk) 13:36, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 17:01, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice but too tight at bottom. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:17, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
⚠️ Not a valid alternative, in my opinion, because too different from the original -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:31, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose + the chandelier is cut. Very tight crop, top and bottom -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:31, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What else should have been there on top, just curious? --A.Savin 03:44, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Lead room, and same under the chandelier. Space missing IMO -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:51, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Per Basile and Christian Poco a poco (talk) 21:16, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 05:43, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Turkey

The chosen alternative is: File:Istanbul asv2021-11 img04 Hemdat Israel Synagogue.jpg

File:Jane M. Byrne Interchange 4-1-22.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Apr 2022 at 15:53:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#United States of America
Info created by Sea Cow - uploaded by Sea Cow - nominated by Sea Cow -- Sea Cow (talk) 15:53, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Sea Cow (talk) 15:53, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose perspective distortion. Tomer T (talk) 16:41, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
To be perfectly honest, i'm only recently getting antiquated with lightroom, and have exactly zero Photoshop experience. I feel really guilty asking you this, but do you have any experience fixing perspective distortion? If you don't want to help, I completely understand. Sea Cow (talk) 18:30, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Tomer T is probably talking about vertical lines leaning inward on that picture (I have no idea what else it could be). While I personally think that converging lines are normal here, especially when looking downward, many reviewers abhor that, and mistakenly call it distorsion. But it is not, rectilinear lens are supposed to render these converging lines ;) Benh (talk) 19:21, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much for your response. Sea Cow (talk) 19:38, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Sea Cow: Here's the help page in case you're using Lightroom Classic: Correct distorted perspective in photos using Upright. It's a super easy fix. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 22:47, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'm rather lost, so I'm just going to use auto, even though manual is probably better, thank you for your response. Sea Cow (talk) 23:11, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Antiquated" with Lightroom? Since we don't have AutoCorrect on this, I can only imagine that's a Freudian slip of some sort ... . Daniel Case (talk) 17:21, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Whoopsies, acquainted. Sea Cow (talk) 19:53, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Tomer T. I have gone into lightroom and adjusted the perspective distortion. I hope you can take another look. Sea Cow (talk) 23:14, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You might find Commons:Photography terms#Perspective correction helpful. You are going to get diverging verticals if you point the camera "down" rather than level (just as people on the ground get converging verticals if they point their camera "up" to get the top of a church spire in the frame). But of course if you fly your drone high and point it level, you may get 50% sky. The correction that Lightroom has applied here doesn't fully "fix" the verticals, but doing so is likely to bring its own problems, as one ends up with the opposite problems of the viewpoint definitely being "downwards" and the proportions of buildings looking odd. As Benh says, some people looking at such images will find the effect of sloping verticals to be odd, and a compromise partial correction may help. There may be some advise on the web wrt drone photography about finding the balance between horizontal and downwards shots. -- Colin (talk) 11:17, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support I quite like it. And there's nothing technically wrong with the diverging verticals. Cmao20 (talk) 16:05, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Any drone shot that does not include sky is so distorted that it needs no perspective correction. At some point the line between an upright view and a bird's eye view is blurred and it no longer makes sense to force everything to look like an upright view. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 03:55, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20 and King of Hearts. --Aristeas (talk) 13:52, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think that a lot of people have agreed, and somewhat built consensus that trying to fix the vertical distortion can bring a lot of issues, and that no matter what, a birds eye view is going to have some distortion. I'm going to revert the upload with the lightroom distortion edits back to the original. Sea Cow (talk) 15:28, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per King. I think some day we're going to get to the point where drones can take pictures at a quality level equivalent to the current generation of DSLRs. And then we can quibble about the divergent verticals in this picture, or replace it with one where those can be and are corrected. But until then ... well, the straight verticals aren't really the subject of this image, are they? Daniel Case (talk) 18:45, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 452519 01:06, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'd prefer a perspective-corrected version --Llez (talk) 09:00, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Quite a rich and complex form in a positive way. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:01, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 09:35, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 8 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 05:43, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Bridges#United States of America

File:Jinan Grand Theater-20150520-RM-170343.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Apr 2022 at 22:16:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#China
Info Interior of the Jinan Concert Hall. All by me -- Ermell (talk) 22:16, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 22:16, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:21, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:58, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 08:31, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:37, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 452465 10:40, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 17:16, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:16, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:21, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hulged (talk) 00:26, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:18, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:35, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 09:28, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:57, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:59, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:26, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 18:18, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 05:46, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Architectural elements#Glass ceilings and skylights

File:Ricchi giardini nel Palazzo di Monforte a Palermo, bozzetto di Filippo Peroni per I Vespri siciliani (s.d.) - Archivio Storico Ricordi ICON000132 - Restoration.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Apr 2022 at 16:55:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Entertainment#Music_and_Opera
Info created by Filippe Peroni - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:55, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:55, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:40, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 452012 00:31, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful. (Resolution seems not that high, but the reproduction is very sharp and we can study the brushwork in detail, so the original is probably small and therefore the resolution is apt.) --Aristeas (talk) 07:18, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:19, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. According official data of Casa Ricordi collections in Milan, the original has a size of 210 x 270 mm. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:54, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thank you very much for this information, Radomianin! I have looked for the size, but did not find it. – I have taken the liberty to add the size information to all three files on Commons; I hope this is OK. --Aristeas (talk) 13:55, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for that! Aye, the Ricordi archives are a little bit... I want to say disorganised, but that's not quite right, but certainly unique in how they organise. Or maybe I'm just used to clicking to the catalogue record in Gallica for information about which performance a thing was attached to and, in fact, every archive is weird. Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:11, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Cayambe (talk) 15:51, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 17:16, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:14, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hulged (talk) 00:27, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 09:28, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:57, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 05:44, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Entertainment#Music_and_Opera

File:Bloemknoppen van een Tellima grandiflora. 08-05-2021 (actm.).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Apr 2022 at 14:56:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Saxifragaceae
Info Flower buds of a Tellima Focus stack of 13 photos.}}
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:56, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:56, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Best viewed in full size, the detail is lovely Cmao20 (talk) 15:23, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:05, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:39, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 20:01, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 05:45, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:08, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:18, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. --Aristeas (talk) 09:08, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good quality image, but I do not see reasom for FP nomination, IHMO. -- Karelj (talk) 18:42, 7 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 452029 01:06, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:20, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 06:37, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:06, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 09:01, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 09:42, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:20, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 09:34, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:35, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Saxifragaceae

File:Treppenhausdecke Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht (Hamburg).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Apr 2022 at 14:48:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#Germany
Info created & uploaded by T meltzer - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 14:48, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 14:48, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:04, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 17:15, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 18:00, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 18:17, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 21:21, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:46, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hulged (talk) 00:26, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 452145 01:24, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:24, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:34, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 06:58, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 09:28, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:57, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:00, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 17:38, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 18:47, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:25, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 15:55, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 18:16, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 14:00, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:26, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors#Germany

File:Red muntjac (Muntiacus muntjak malabaricus) male.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2022 at 07:54:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Cervidae (Deers)
Info created & uploaded by Charlesjsharp - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 07:54, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 07:54, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:02, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Hm. This frontal view at such a long distance does not quite work for me, there’s not depth left here. The animal’s nose seems to grow right out of its throat, I get no idea of the actual body dimensions. Looks somehow unintentionally funny to me. Good craftsmanship but unfortunate angle. --Kreuz schnabel 20:33, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The background does not highlight the subject -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:10, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose In addition to noted compositional shortcomings, there is sort of a strange, unnatural silvery cast on the fur, most pronounced on the lower legs, that suggests over- or misprocessing. Daniel Case (talk) 04:18, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 10:55, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Muscari armeniacum im Schnee 20220403 01.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2022 at 06:30:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants/Asparagales#Family_:_Asparagaceae
Info Armenian grape hyacinth (Muscari armeniacum) in snow. All by me. --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:30, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 06:30, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 08:33, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 09:28, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:59, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:58, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:03, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 19:04, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 451591 02:21, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:32, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful, nice contrast of green and blue/violet to the snow. --Aristeas (talk) 08:44, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:23, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 19:03, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 14:00, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:01, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:08, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 14:06, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants/Asparagales#Family_:_Asparagaceae

File:Sediment Sloshes in Solway Firth.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2022 at 11:58:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Satellite images#Europe
Info created by NASA - uploaded by StellarHalo - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 11:58, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 11:58, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Scientifically interesting and also just beautiful to look at with all the colours and textures Cmao20 (talk) 13:59, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:58, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 16:56, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:12, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 451561 02:20, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:41, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. --Aristeas (talk) 08:45, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:34, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kritzolina (talk) 11:21, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:22, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:18, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:50, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 14:00, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:00, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:09, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 14:07, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Satellite images#Europe

File:A shape created using light painting.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2022 at 15:55:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects
Info- A led light source hung from a piece of string from the ceiling has been rotated and the free wheeling motion of the same captured in a single long exposure shot. The rotation has been affected by specific directional airflow. All by Subhrajyoti07 -- Subhrajyoti07 talk 15:55, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Subhrajyoti07 talk 15:55, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- C1MM (talk) 16:08, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Something very different, I like it! --Kritzolina (talk) 11:22, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 22:12, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Elegant and educative. --Aristeas (talk) 07:59, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Kritzolina and Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 11:34, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Princess Rosalina 💄 452345 13:45, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well executed and educational. I suggest that you update the Summary Description in the image page with details of the process. --Tagooty (talk) 05:41, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Updated the concept through which this photo was done in image description - Subhrajyoti07 talk 04:35, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 17:57, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:20, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Something definitely different Poco a poco (talk) 18:35, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:16, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects

File:Tasmanian Native-hen - Adventure Bay.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2022 at 06:35:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Rallidae_(Coots,_Rails_and_Crakes)
Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Ivar (talk) 06:35, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Ivar (talk) 06:35, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 08:06, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:29, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 10:52, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:23, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:41, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 452121 14:44, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --El Grafo (talk) 15:29, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Bird is excellent but no room at the bottom and too much at the sides. Charlesjsharp (talk) 15:37, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I hadn't seen it, but I do prefer the English Wikipedia FP. Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:22, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:00, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support: suboptimal crop --The Cosmonaut (talk) 19:22, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Technically excellent but just a QI because this does not stand out enough from our other bird pictures for me. Daniel Case (talk) 02:34, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:59, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hulged (talk) 00:30, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 09:28, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:56, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose JJ Harrison makes extraordinary bird images to the point that that he sometimes competes with himself. This is good but IMHO Gallinula mortierii 1.jpg, already a featured picture on the English language Wikipedia, has better color, lighting and cropping. GRDN711 (talk) 17:22, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to nominate it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:52, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's a good photo but too small for me, I would sadly have to oppose it for that reason. We could always ask him if he can provide a higher resolution version. He has done this for a number of his older FPs. Cmao20 (talk) 21:21, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's actually sharper than this one at the same size. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:58, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Llez (talk) 06:06, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 17:00, 17 April 2022 (UTC))[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds#Family_:_Rallidae_(Coots,_Rails_and_Crakes)

File:Видра.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2022 at 09:32:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Mustelidae_(Mustelids)
Info created by Byrdyak - uploaded by Byrdyak - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 09:32, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrei (talk) 09:32, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:51, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 15:02, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 16:52, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 18:12, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support I might like a longer DoF, but what a face! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:31, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:10, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:40, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 03:42, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:29, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 08:03, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Princess Rosalina 💄 451638 13:45, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:33, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 14:01, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Lupe (talk) 22:52, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 05:00, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:21, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:31, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Ivar (talk) 13:50, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family_:_Mustelidae_(Mustelids)

File:Портрет оленя взимку.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2022 at 09:39:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family_:_Cervidae_(Deers)
Info created by Byrdyak - uploaded by Byrdyak - nominated by Andrew J.Kurbiko -- Andrei (talk) 09:39, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Andrei (talk) 09:39, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 12:34, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 13:49, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent Cmao20 (talk) 13:52, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 15:04, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 16:44, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 18:11, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:25, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good composition and very detailed --Michielverbeek (talk) 20:40, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:39, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 03:41, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:30, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:48, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:16, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:04, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support There is an other deer reflecting in his eye? --A.Savin 13:20, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Princess Rosalina 💄 451752 13:45, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent! --Tagooty (talk) 05:39, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:28, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 14:01, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support God are we lucky people share this sort of very high quality photos for free. - Benh (talk) 14:05, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:59, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:21, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:29, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:05, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 25 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Ivar (talk) 13:50, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family_:_Cervidae_(Deers)

File:20141026 T-38 Talon Alliance Air Show 2014-1.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2022 at 14:48:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air transport#Military jet aircraft
Info created by Balon Greyjoy - uploaded by Balon Greyjoy - nominated by Balon Greyjoy -- Balon Greyjoy (talk) 16:20, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Balon Greyjoy (talk) 16:20, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment There was a technical problem with the original nomination; therefore the FPCBot has closed it prematurely. Instead of resetting it again and again I have just created a /2 nomination (this one) and copied the information and votes from the original nomination. Hope it helps. --Aristeas (talk) 14:51, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 19:18, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 09:28, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Karelj (talk) 13:28, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 452794 02:21, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good photo but not sharp enough for FP in my view Cmao20 (talk) 19:35, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 22:13, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Long Tack Sam poster by Adolph Friedlander.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2022 at 14:16:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Entertainment#Theater
Info created by the studio of Adolph Friedlander - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:16, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:16, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Info This might be slightly early, but my laptop died last night, so doing this while I feel up to it, since it'll be a while before I'm able to do much more for Commons. Hopefully the disk isn't toast. Just kind of want to get this out there before anything else goes wrong. Adam Cuerden (talk) 14:16, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good resolution, careful restoration. I hope your orginal files are recoverable. -- Radomianin (talk) 16:57, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:24, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Added a category to FPC Ezarateesteban 20:00, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, thank you. Sorry, mobile editing is a bit awkward. Might have so. Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:40, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 03:41, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. --Aristeas (talk) 08:11, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Princess Rosalina 💄 452282 13:45, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:00, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 06:30, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:08, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:22, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:15, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic media/Entertainment#Theater

File:Seegasse 9, 11, 13 Bad Windsheim 27-03-21 025.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Apr 2022 at 19:44:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany
Info This one's all about the bright contrasting colours on the three houses of otherwise-identical design. Hopefully you will find it interesting enough for FP. created by Tilman2007 - uploaded by Tilman2007 - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 19:44, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 19:44, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow for me --Michielverbeek (talk) 20:24, 8 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think there is some potential here, but: 1) the composition is too right-heavy, i.e. some of the left-hand side should be cropped out; and 2) the shadows at the bottom are distracting. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:33, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support This photo has also caught my eye before. I understand the critique, but when I look at it in full size, I am still very impressed by it. For me the beautiful light and colours just work. --Aristeas (talk) 07:54, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Certainly nice but the viewing angle is just too ordinary for me, too straightforward, to generate any wow. The lighting does not emphasise the "bright contrasting colours" meant by the author, instead it rather smoothens them. The cut-off adjacent building & tree make the framing look arbitrary. A wide-angle full frontal view with full light on the houses might work perfectly, as well as a steeper angle from the left from wider distance to get the three closer together. Something more … inspired than an angle that any walking-by tourist would choose, sorry. And yes, the shadows nail it for me too per KoH. --Kreuz schnabel 08:35, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I think it could work with a tighter crop. See note. Daniel Case (talk) 19:20, 9 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment That’s a good idea. --Aristeas (talk) 07:09, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: would support with perspective correction and the left house cropped out. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:02, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative[edit]

Support Alternative crop added and @Michielverbeek, Aristeas, Kreuzschnabel, Daniel Case, The Cosmonaut, and King of Hearts: Cmao20 (talk) 14:46, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: better, but still leaning to the right. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:54, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@The Cosmonaut: It is quite difficult to improve the perspective correction, because these old buildings have imperfect verticals and it is impossible to get all of the verticals exactly vertical ;–). But … maybe we can get it a bit better. What would you think about this version? Just curious. Best, --Aristeas (talk) 10:05, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Aristeas, do feel free to overwrite my alt with a better one if you like. Cmao20 (talk) 13:45, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Cmao20. But I am just not sure – because these buildings are old, no version looks perfect. What would you think about my attempt? Is it better or at least equal? --Aristeas (talk) 16:14, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like a pretty uncontroversial improvement to me, the verticals are as close to vertical as you're going to get. Cmao20 (talk) 16:18, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much! I will exchange the alt image and ping all voters (see below). --Aristeas (talk) 18:37, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:38, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 452857 02:21, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:43, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you! The crop increases the effect of this photo. --Aristeas (talk) 07:04, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:27, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support This version I like more. -- Radomianin (talk) 16:37, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Cmao20, The Cosmonaut, Ikan Kekek, Princess Rosalina, Daniel Case, Famberhorst, and Radomianin: Since The Cosmonaut has emphasized that the buildings (mostly the leftmost ones) are leaning to the right, I have tried to improve the perspective correction of the crop. As suggested by Cmao20, I have exchanged the image of this alternative nomination. Please check if this version is OK for you. Please note that it was not possible to get all verticals straight – these are old buildings which are not perfectly rectangular ;–). Thank you and sorry for the extra work. --Aristeas (talk) 18:37, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I support either version, but yours is slightly better. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 18:45, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OK This new version has enhanced the photo even more, Aristeas. Thank you very much for the careful editing :) -- Radomianin (talk) 19:38, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I can now Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:09, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:12, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 14:33, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:06, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:14, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Germany

The chosen alternative is: File:Seegasse 9, 11, 13 Bad Windsheim 27-03-21 025 pcorr crop.jpg

File:Zwellende bladknop van een paardenkastanje (Aesculus) 24-03-2022. (d.j.b).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Apr 2022 at 15:40:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Sapindaceae
Info Swelling leaf bud of a Horse-chestnut Aesculus hippocastanum. Focus stack of 37 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:40, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 15:40, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very rich in detail. -- Radomianin (talk) 16:41, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:50, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 18:10, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 22:55, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 03:40, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:31, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 08:07, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:13, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Princess Rosalina 💄 452909 13:45, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:00, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 17:12, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking image --Tagooty (talk) 05:38, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 14:01, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:20, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:59, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:23, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:16, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Sapindaceae

File:Almeja gigante (Tridacna maxima), Temple, Sharm el-Sheij, Egipto, 2022-03-26, DD, DD 33.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2022 at 08:15:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class : Bivalvia
Info created and uploaded by Poco a poco - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 08:15, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 08:15, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is one I'm voting for. Sharp, beautiful and quite well-composed. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:46, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ikan Kekek and many others: I agree with your assessment, and would add that looking to the category this shot is probably the one with the overall best quality/crop/detail (and on top of a very signifcant species), but please, let me give you some feedback about all you cannot see here (behind the scene). Stingrays or lionfishes are rare. The set nom of the lionfishes deals with the first lionfish I saw in my life after about 70 dives (I saw a few more afterwards in the same area, that's true). These 2 species are from dangerous to very dangerous. If you get stung by one of these guys your vacation is over, so you shouldn't get too close (getting things focused with e.g. a 100 mm lens uderwater can be really challenging, so I usually use my 15-35 mm, which means I have to get closer) and you'll not see them often. On the other side, clams don't raally move (if you get very close, they close, but that's it) and are no risk (as long as you don't introduce your hand in the clam :) ) so, as long as you hold the camera firmly and focus properly you'll get a sharp shot. Furthermore you find giant clams everywhere in the Red Sea, indeed I'll upload a few more examples to prove that. I just aim to say here, that those things are not visible at once but do play a very important role form the photographer point of view. --Poco a poco (talk) 16:40, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Understood, but I didn't vote against the lionfish nomination, and my reason for opposing the stingray nom had nothing to do with sharpness. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:11, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I know, but I think that I had a discussion with you about this topic before, that's why I brought it up. This nice image was easy to take and gets big support. Poco a poco (talk) 18:56, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support per Ikan. --Aristeas (talk) 10:08, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 13:16, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Princess Rosalina 💄 451478 13:45, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very interesting Cmao20 (talk) 14:02, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Will not say no :) Thank you, IamMM! Poco a poco (talk) 15:35, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Ikan. --Ivar (talk) 17:12, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 17:30, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 18:57, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:07, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hulged (talk) 09:28, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 14:01, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 15:13, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 16:48, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:04, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:19, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:57, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:23, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:55, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 09:14, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 16:56, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals#Class : Bivalvia

File:Government Gardens in Rotorua 02.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2022 at 13:50:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/New Zealand
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 13:50, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 13:50, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nothing special here in my view. The platform at the left is quite ugly -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:26, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Tournasol7 (talk) 14:12, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Grand Rue in Mur-de-Barrez (1).jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2022 at 13:54:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#France
Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 13:54, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 13:54, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good QI, no wow for me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:10, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 14:40, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ikan. Too monotone and dull light, doesn't stand out from other photos of French streets. Daniel Case (talk) 16:01, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Ikan and Daniel -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:28, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --Tournasol7 (talk) 14:12, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Blue Star Flower Focus Stack-20220410-RM-170959.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2022 at 20:19:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Asparagales
Info All by me -- Ermell (talk) 20:19, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 20:19, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support In full screen mode the bloom is literally shining. Schön! -- Radomianin (talk) 21:09, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:09, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support So beautiful. --Aristeas (talk) 05:46, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:56, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:16, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 10:27, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 14:00, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:11, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 452284 23:57, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:57, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:24, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:27, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:54, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 09:13, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hulged (talk) 12:05, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support as always for your focus stacks Cmao20 (talk) 15:16, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Colin (talk) 19:13, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 23:22, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family_:_Asparagales

File:Lycaena tityrus - Kulna.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2022 at 05:46:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Lycaenidae_(Blues,_coppers_and_hairstreaks)
Info all by Ivar (talk) 05:46, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 05:46, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow!--Ermell (talk) 05:50, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:55, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:16, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support wow indeed! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 07:23, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:19, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hulged (talk) 09:27, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 14:00, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support !! -- Radomianin (talk) 15:23, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:13, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 452135 23:57, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't know where you (and Ermell, et al.) find all of these perfectly still, droplet-covered insects, but it makes for a good photo. I picture some cameras with a hotshoe-powered spray bottle timed to spray just before the shutter. :) — Rhododendrites ^talk | 01:03, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:55, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:26, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very beautiful. Congrats -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:24, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:50, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 09:12, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:17, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Colin (talk) 19:29, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 19 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 20:37, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family_:_Lycaenidae_(Blues,_coppers_and_hairstreaks)

File:Kee monastery Spiti Valley (edited).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2022 at 13:26:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
Info created and uploaded by Ksuryawanshi, nominated by UnpetitproleX (talk) 13:26, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- UnpetitproleX (talk) 13:26, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please, check the perspective correction and remove the magenta CAs. Tournasol7 (talk) 13:57, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested improvements made

*:I have tried to fix the issues to the best of my abilities, though admittedly, I am a rookie. Does it look fine now? If someone else can make the required fixes in a better way, I recommend reverting my changes and doing so. UnpetitproleX (talk) 17:56, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A wonderful view, but a difficult photograph ;–). Looking at the photo I got the impression that the view is tilted; we need a small perspective correction, but what is more important is the rotation. This has the disadvantage that we must crop the photo after rotation. Here is my attempt; I am not really satisified with it, but maybe it is better. What do you think? --Aristeas (talk) 09:07, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Aristeas: Your version is better than mine! The CA removal is better and the perspective correction is also better. The crop was something that was bothering me in my version too, but in any case the crop is only slight, and does not alter the image in any substantial way at all. Could you upload your version to the original image page itself? Thanks for your help! UnpetitproleX (talk) 10:00, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@UnpetitproleX: Thank you for your approval ;–). I did not want to override the original image (by uploading my version to the original image page) because the image has been changed substantially (different crop) and because the original image is already a QI. But there is another solution: There are no votes yet (besides your own) for this nomination, therefore I have just exchanged the nominated version by the edited version and renamed the nomination page accordingly. So this nomination is now about the improved version. Best, --Aristeas (talk) 10:51, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Aristeas: Thanks for the move, I had already overridden the original and added you as additional author, since I thought the crop though different, was only slight, and the image is widely used accross wikis so the improved version made sense. As for the QI, the improvements you made were also suggested at the nomination there, especially for a future FP nomination. Apologies if I shouldn't have. This works as well. --UnpetitproleX (talk) 11:31, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Tournasol7: Done by Aristeas. — UnpetitproleX (talk) 11:34, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wonderful! Yann (talk) 11:46, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support A splendid view. --Aristeas (talk) 12:06, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 12:07, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 451561 05:58, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support But I'd like to have more information on the monastery in the file description, also the geolocation --Llez (talk) 15:28, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done: Added detailed description, ~~but the exact geolocation is tough, since the original image didn’t have it.~~ UnpetitproleX (talk) 16:41, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Thanks for the detailed information --Llez (talk) 05:50, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  - Comment I have added an estimated geolocation (comparing angles and perspective of the photo with aerial imagery and topographical maps); it’s a fair guess I hope. --Aristeas (talk) 07:35, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The posterization in the blue sky is very disturbing.--Ermell (talk) 21:04, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done I have tried to reduce the posterization in the sky. --Aristeas (talk) 08:08, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:16, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 09:20, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hulged (talk) 12:03, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 13:48, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Definitely a beautiful scene Cmao20 (talk) 15:17, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support - Benh (talk) 07:37, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:58, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:48, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:57, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:42, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings

File:Raya de arrecife (Taeniura lymma), Temple, Sharm el-Sheij, Egipto, 2022-03-26, DD, DD 05.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Apr 2022 at 18:14:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Dasyatidae
Info Bluespotted ribbontail ray (Taeniura lymma), Temple, Sharm el-Sheikh, Red Sea, Egypt. It is a fairly small ray, not exceeding 35 cm (14 in) and known predators of the bluespotted ribbontail ray include hammerhead sharks (Sphyrna) and bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops). Widespread in the nearshore waters of the tropical Indo-Pacific region, the bluespotted ribbontail ray has a range that extends around the periphery of the Indian Ocean from South Africa to the Arabian Peninsula to Southeast Asia. While timid and innocuous towards humans, the bluespotted ribbontail ray is capable of inflicting an excruciating wound with its venomous tail spines. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 18:14, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 18:14, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:56, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 452425 01:24, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 09:28, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 09:55, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Very bad quality image, almoast zero contrast. -- Karelj (talk) 13:23, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support I'm not sure why you think this. The fact that this photo shows the ray's camouflage is one of the main features here, so expecting it to stand out from the background is not really fair. As for 'very bad quality'...the eye is tack-sharp even at full (33 megapixel) resolution. Cmao20 (talk) 13:55, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Cmao20, I'm also curious and would really like to know how Karelj would have done it better. Do you have a suggestion? This species is a night hunter and therefore hide during the day in holes and/or camouflage under the sand, like you can see here. Poco a poco (talk) 13:59, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
OK, this is excelent example of camouflage and very good from this point. But the nomination of it as FP means, that this image will appear one day on main page of Commons. And try to imagine, what will be the reaction of Commons main page visitor on this image: Oh, this is terrible ...., do they really have nothing better to show people around? So I think, that it very good Quality image and I believe, it will be shown in many (all) wikipedia articles about Bluespotted ribbontail ray or Camouflage. And that is my reason for opposose voice in this FP nomination. -- Karelj (talk) 14:39, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't have to appear on the main page. We are promoting considerably more than 365 pictures a year so it's impossible for all FPs to appear on the main page. I respect your reasoning if you just don't think camouflage photos have sufficient wow-factor for FP, but accusing the photo of being 'very bad quality' was just untrue. Cmao20 (talk) 15:12, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I'm not going as far as Karelj, however the wow is indeed limited here IMO. --A.Savin 17:33, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per A. Savin. Daniel Case (talk) 20:00, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree. This is a valuable photo, but because of the true excellence of the ray's camouflage, there isn't that much to see here. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:57, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support In the preview it may look boring, but when I view this photo in full size I am excited to study how well the camouflage works. It’s impressive how an animal with such a showy outside (the blue dots) can hide so well. Only the eye looks vivid, very vidid. --Aristeas (talk) 08:42, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support I believe a "Wow" does not have to be shiny or colorful. For me it is one of those images that I might return to several times. If this was featured on the main page, I would be so much more intrigued then by some of the conventionally "Wow"-images. --Kritzolina (talk) 11:57, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:16, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:08, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow, per others. -- Colin (talk) 19:21, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:39, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish#Family_:_Dasyatidae

Lionfish, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Apr 2022 at 17:59:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page

Side view
Top view

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family_:_Scorpaenidae_(Scorpionfish)
Info Common lionfish (Pterois miles), Temple, Sharm el-Sheikh, Egypt. The common lionfish grows up to 35 cm (14 in) in length and is mainly nocturnal and hides in crevices during the daytime. It feeds on fish and small crustaceans and it has few predators, probably because of its venomous spines, but larger lionfish do prey on smaller ones. Its dorsal fin has 13 long strong spines that are highly venomous and have caused death to humans in some reported cases. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 17:59, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 17:59, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 20:57, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have trouble evaluating underwater photos a lot of the time, because I don't know how much focus to expect for an FP. That said, my reaction is that I'm unconvinced either photo is an FP, and the goldfish with blue eyes somewhat steal the show in the first picture, with the one right next to and partly overlapping with some of the lionfish's spines problematic for the composition. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:45, 10 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ikan Kekek: I've nominated these images because they are very sharp (I've taken something like 50.000 pictures underwater) and in addition we are here talking about one of the most venomous fishes, so you don't want to get too close to it. I'll upload this evening a new version without that goldfish. Poco a poco (talk) 06:35, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ikan Kekek: Done Poco a poco (talk) 09:13, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 452984 01:24, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 09:28, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 09:54, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good high resolution pictures of a venomous creature. also this does seem to fit the rules for sets being discussed on FPC talk. Cmao20 (talk) 13:53, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:02, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose imo they are not outstanding in the FP category Scorpaenidae (Scorpionfish), the background is too distracting for me. --Ivar (talk) 18:41, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I would agree with you, but to be fair, most pictures from the FP gallery are from Zoos. - Benh (talk) 19:36, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Very well done technically, and QIs, but the problem for me with FP is that as with so many other animal photos I've opposed, the creature's ability to blend into its background works too well here, with a background this busy. Daniel Case (talk) 19:59, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20 and Benh’s hint. --Aristeas (talk) 08:36, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:25, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support The retouched picture needs a {{Retouched}} template. --Yann (talk) 15:12, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thank you Poco a poco (talk) 19:07, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Llez (talk) 06:07, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose As others note, as an image these aren't great. I think we may be confusing VI or something about collecting an ok image of a species, with FP, which is supposed to make the viewer go wow. We have wow photos in this category. The top view is a particularly weak image. Possibly these would work better as moving images, where subject isolation is achieved through movement. -- Colin (talk) 19:27, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:38, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish#Family_:_Scorpaenidae_(Scorpionfish)

File:Elephant running.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2022 at 12:20:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Elephantidae (Elephants)
Info created & uploaded by Byrdyak - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 12:20, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 12:20, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:15, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 451343 05:58, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 08:47, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 10:10, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 14:04, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:31, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 18:26, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:29, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking view, good light -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:34, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:46, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:15, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hulged (talk) 12:02, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:19, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:41, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 07:36, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 11:36, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 17:08, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Colin (talk) 19:32, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support such a dynamic picture - Benh (talk) 07:34, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile and Benh. -- Radomianin (talk) 09:59, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:44, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:16, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Family : Elephantidae (Elephants)

File:Schloss Wernigerode nach Sonnenuntergang.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2022 at 15:00:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Germany
Info I enjoyed the colours and atmosphere in this sunset photo. The castle is a neo-Romantic nineteenth century building but there have been castles n this site since the twelfth century. No FPs of this building. created by GZagatta - uploaded by GZagatta - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:00, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:00, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great lighting mood. -- Radomianin (talk) 17:00, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Yes the mood is captured very well, however the image is a bit soft, resolution not impressive, maybe also the crop is a bit too wide -- which means that with a tighter crop this would end up in an even lower resolution. --A.Savin 17:28, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support The background unsharpness isn't as noticeable as it has been in some other images we've promoted. Daniel Case (talk) 22:09, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support I understand the reservations, but the background unsharpness doesn’t bother me. The slight softness of the main subject (the castle) may be explained by noise reduction (ISO 1,600). Of course a tripod shot with base ISO value and f/8 or so would have been crisper, but the photographer did his best to get a good shot even without a tripod, and the light and the composition are very good. --Aristeas (talk) 07:56, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Princess Rosalina 💄 451093 13:46, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 17:34, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per A.Savin. The Gallery has significantly higher impact and quality images. --Tagooty (talk) 05:45, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas -- IamMM (talk) 18:43, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:19, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Compo and ligthing are really good but the detail is rather low, so hard to support/oppose Poco a poco (talk) 18:37, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support per above. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:07, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Support per above, but the mood is very special and well captured. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 09:16, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Colin (talk) 19:17, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:44, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:17, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications#Germany

File:Sri Lankan elephant (Elephas maximus maximus) female and young 6.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2022 at 14:20:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Elephantidae (Elephants)
Info The first five images in the FP gallery are Asian elephants. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:20, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 14:20, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent capture and good quality, however I do wonder if it's slightly tilted. Cmao20 (talk) 15:03, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support The amazing content of the image greatly makes up for any other issues. Sea Cow (talk) 15:18, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ikan Kekek (talk) 16:35, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Fischer.H (talk) 17:23, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 18:45, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:13, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice, and the bird is a good add-on -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:02, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 451397 02:20, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose For me, this has no wow. It looks like an ordinary capture of a scene that's all too common. The composition doesn't help guide the viewer's attention, there's no separation between subject and background, and I don't see how this is any special compared to other images of elephants. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:34, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Frank. Daniel Case (talk) 17:23, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:00, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 13:51, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I've to agree with Frank, the moment captured isn't extraordinary and the elephant in the back is spoiling the compo, Poco a poco (talk) 18:38, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral quite nice, nice enough to not to oppose. IMO the bird at right is more disturbing than elephant in the back, at least for me. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 09:23, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I like the bird. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:19, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose It is difficult. We have a few great elephant photos, a lot of ordinary ones and a few really boring ones that make me question if "wow" is still part of the criteria. This one isn't a great still image. -- Colin (talk) 19:20, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Sorry for the last minute oppose, but I'm afraid I'll have to agree with the other opposers, especially comparing it with the more recent nomination of Elephant running.jpg. --El Grafo (talk) 13:02, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 5 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:18, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Family : Elephantidae (Elephants)

File:Green bee-eater (Merops orientalis ceylonicus) 2.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Apr 2022 at 21:29:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Meropidae (Bee-eaters)
Info No FPs of this species. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:29, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 21:29, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'd support this one. – You've opposed imgages in the past where the bird is looking away from the viewer… --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:31, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support The one Frank links to is nice and I would support but this one is sharper and matches well with your existing FP of the blue tailed bee eater promoted earlier this month Cmao20 (talk) 13:49, 12 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 451871 13:50, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Qualified support Some of the feathers look a little weird, and there's a slight ring on some of the ones in back. But given the shutter speed, focal length and ISO involved, this looks like it was a tough picture to take, one of the ones where 90% of the achievement was getting it at all so I feel these things can easily be forgiven. Daniel Case (talk) 19:30, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 18:06, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Cmao20 and Daniel Case. --Aristeas (talk) 08:23, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose several overexposed areas, lacks of fine details unsuccessfully compensed by sharpening (=oversharpening). This image is not among the finest of Commons, e.g. compare to this photo of a bird within the same genus (sise, sharpening, fine detail, post processing, exposition...). A valuable image yes, a QI this is questionable, a FP absolutely not IMO. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 06:27, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Christian, it's overcooked and details in some areas are gone due to overexposure. That magic AI sharpening SW cannot save everything... Poco a poco (talk) 18:33, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose I agree, too, especially as this bird is not tiny (27–29 cm per w:European bee-eater). It's a good enough photo that opposing is holding it to a very high level, but that's quite reasonable for FPC. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:33, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose per Christian. --Ivar (talk) 13:51, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:00, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others -- Colin (talk) 19:15, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I'd still support the other one. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:33, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 7 support, 5 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:11, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:The Ardabil Carpet - Google Art Project.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Apr 2022 at 20:11:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Clothing and textiles
Info created by unknown artist / Victoria and Albert Museum - uploaded by DcoetzeeBot - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 20:11, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 20:11, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very impressive. --Aristeas (talk) 08:10, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Hulged (talk) 12:00, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Interesting photo Cmao20 (talk) 15:19, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:00, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 16:57, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:44, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:37, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 14:30, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 19:31, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 451281 08:59, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Valuable contribution for the Commons archive. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:18, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:33, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment No-one is objecting to the right crop, which cuts off part of the carpet? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:17, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:43, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 23:47, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects#Clothing and textiles

File:Узброеныя Сілы Украіны. Беларускі полк.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Apr 2022 at 00:48:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Info created by Паўлюк Шапецька - uploaded by Паўлюк Шапецька - nominated by Illegitimate Barrister -- – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 00:48, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 00:48, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Please add {{PR}} in all your pictures with people -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:37, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking photo to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:44, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Question Striking photo, good quality for a smartphone shot. Because this photo documents an ongoing war, I would like to know a bit more about it before voting. According to this discussion, the photo shows Belarusians fighting for the Ukraine/Ukrainian army, maybe belonging to the Kastuś Kalinoŭski Battalion (the photo is used in the article on that battalion, but the men in the photo have different insignia with different text, so I am not sure). Could somebody who understands Ukrainian and/or Belarusian and therefore can read some more sources tell us whether this seems plausible or not? And then please add a short English description to the photo explaining it? Thank you very much! (Don’t get me wrong! If the information is true, I admire the heroism of these men! But in every war there are also propaganda, disinformation and false-flag operations, therefore I am a bit cautious.) --Aristeas (talk) 10:03, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

To answer a small part of my own question: The lower badge on the right upper arm of the leftmost soldier shows the sign (double cross) and the name of the Young Front (Малады Фронт); according to the article, this soldier is Dzyanis Urbanovich which is also chairman of the Youth Front. So these parts are fitting and seem plausible. Nevertheless I would still want to know more about the connections … --Aristeas (talk) 08:17, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose sorry, composition looks somewhat snapshotty to me. Tomer T (talk) 11:30, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Tomer & no wow. --A.Savin 13:17, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose I'd prefer to wait until the 'fog of war' has lifted a little until we promote documentary photos of this conflict. Cmao20 (talk) 14:01, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Tomer. It’s not bad, nothing really wrong here, but I don’t see much of breathtaking excellence on the other hand. --Kreuz schnabel 20:36, 13 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Well taken, historically important and likely a QI/VI. But not exceptional enough as an image for FP. Daniel Case (talk) 15:25, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Паўлюк Шапецька 08:10, 15 April 2022 (UTC)
Support I haven't seen any other shot better than this one dealing with the Russian invasion Poco a poco (talk) 18:28, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 23:05, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't remember supporting images taken with a smartphone before, so I looked carefully over and over and now I can say IMHO this is an FP. The reaction of the body and face of each of them is unique and reminds me of shooter video games, as well as good quality. -- IamMM (talk) 05:47, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. I hope these guys are all still alive and in good health. --Uoaei1 (talk) 12:00, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. -- Karelj (talk) 18:55, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:18, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sh2-216 c lsho 1218m+812m+903m 2933m 49h.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2022 at 12:00:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Astronomy#Nebulae
Info created by Ram samudrala - uploaded by Ram samudrala - nominated by Mike Peel -- Mike Peel (talk) 12:00, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Mike Peel (talk) 12:00, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 12:31, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support More strong work from this author Cmao20 (talk) 15:21, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow is certainly there, and also high educational value. Yann (talk) 16:55, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 22:23, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:11, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Looks like the sort of thing you'd see in a movie and say "Yeah, that would never look like that in real life". Daniel Case (talk) 03:25, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:36, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:03, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support A cosmic, interstellar “wow” ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 05:34, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I would very strongly suggest to choose a better file name. "Sh2-216" is the name of the object, the rest is just irritating. Should have been done prior to nominating (and there were times when nominations with such file names have been rejected regardless of anything else). --Kreuz schnabel 07:37, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
@Kreuzschnabel: You could rename if you want, but see the comment about the same issue at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ic1805 136x420+92x420+147x420 2625m 43.8h.jpg. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 15:45, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Better don’t. Renaming now could break the ongoing nomination severly :) --Kreuz schnabel 16:06, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

+1. Yann (talk) 18:21, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 451283 08:59, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Daniel and Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:14, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:52, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:35, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:51, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hulged (talk) 23:28, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support as an astronomy buff, this photo quite amazes me. Only thing I'd suggest is a better file name, but I guess it's too late now. --SHB2000 (talk) 03:47, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 13:16, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Astronomy#Nebulae

File:Georges Rochegrosse - Jules Massenet - Roma.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2022 at 16:22:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Non-photographic_media/Entertainment#Theater
Info created by Georges Rochegrosse - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:22, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:22, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:20, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:05, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 06:26, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 451825 08:59, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 10:25, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:52, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:56, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 15:02, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:37, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hulged (talk) 23:26, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 03:45, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 05:20, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 13 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:06, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Non-photographic_media/Entertainment#Theater

File:Vy BM 69 Hjuksa bru.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2022 at 13:47:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
Info created & uploaded by David Gubler – nominated by Ivar (talk) 13:47, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support – Ivar (talk) 13:47, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support I don't think it's one of his sharpest photos but the excellent composition makes up for it Cmao20 (talk) 15:22, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 22:22, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support –- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:10, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support —Bruce1ee^talk 07:35, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 08:55, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:02, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support another superb photo by David Gubler. Tomer T (talk) 10:45, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 11:36, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 15:58, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 17:06, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. --Aristeas (talk) 05:34, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 452294 08:59, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Imho, a straight wow. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:10, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:54, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:36, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:52, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I like the composition, the subject, and everything but the color of the sky. Please push the slider back a bit – this looks overcooked. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:19, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- I've uploaded a new version with the blue taken back some. Unfortunately the blues often tend to be a bit over-the-top with the drone camera. --Kabelleger (talk) 20:55, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 15:26, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:42, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Awesome -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:43, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hulged (talk) 23:27, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support this photo makes me want to go to wherever this is taken in. --SHB2000 (talk) 03:46, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:06, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles

File:Double Petal Flower Side Front Adenium Obesum Graft Apr22 D72 23135-151 ZS Pr.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2022 at 05:34:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Apocynaceae
Info Double-petal pink flower of Adenium obesum (Desert rose) cultivar after rain. Cultivar grafted on rootstock. Focus stack of 9 images. Uthandi, Chennai, India. Created by Tagooty - uploaded by Tagooty - nominated by Tagooty -- Tagooty (talk) 05:34, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tagooty (talk) 05:34, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support I am not sure whether the focus stacking is perfect (some areas are less sharp than others). But IMHO that is not so important because in any case this is a beautiful photo which captures the delicate beauty of the flower. --Aristeas (talk) 09:52, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 452141 23:57, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:56, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Beautiful --Adarsh Patel (talk) 15:34, 16 April 2022 (UTC)}[reply]
Support --Hulged (talk) 12:04, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support The composition as a whole with focus stacking seems worthy of FP --Navneetsharmaiit (talk) 14:36, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice Cmao20 (talk) 15:17, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:46, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 9 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 12:58, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family_:_Apocynaceae

File:Istanbul asv2021-10 img12 Yıldız Hamidiye Mosque.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2022 at 00:09:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Turkey
Info I thought it was nice A. Savin managed to get an elevated viewpoint here and that it really helped this photo to convey the majesty and sense of space in the mosque. No FPs of this mosque in the category. created by A.Savin - uploaded by A.Savin - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 00:09, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 00:09, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the fact that we see the entire chandelier, in addition to the rest. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:09, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Thank you for the nom Cmao, this one I would have nominated too, though a bit later. Regards --A.Savin 08:05, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 08:58, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 10:02, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 11:35, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Maybe a bit noisy in some areas --Uoaei1 (talk) 11:56, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:22, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 19:29, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support But the man seems to have a grey halo round his trousers. A few other things have perhaps a grey outline. Is this perhaps some overstrong CA removal? Colin (talk) 19:39, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. --Aristeas (talk) 05:36, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support beautiful composition, but I agree with Uoaei1 - Benh (talk) 07:36, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 451407 08:59, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Striking. The slight image noise is tolerable. -- Radomianin (talk) 10:05, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per cmao20 — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:27, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 13:58, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:39, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:52, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:45, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Outstanding. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:17, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:32, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hulged (talk) 23:26, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 03:45, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mosbatho (talk) 15:44, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 24 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 05:43, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Interiors/Religious buildings#Turkey

File:Sara Borchard (IMO 9354428) arriving at Dublin.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2022 at 12:32:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Ships
Info created & uploaded by N. Johannes - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 12:32, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 12:32, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose No wow. -- Colin (talk) 19:40, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Colin. I would like it more for being a striking red and blue ship, but the land growing out of the bridge looks a little awkward. Daniel Case (talk) 02:48, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose pretty photo, but per Colin. Cmao20 (talk) 15:20, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Colin. --SHB2000 (talk) 03:44, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 12:59, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ramdei, a resident of Nadli, Kangra district, making leaf plates 03.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Apr 2022 at 13:29:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
Info created by- uploaded by - nominated by Satdeep Gill -- Satdeep Gill (talk) 13:29, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Satdeep Gill (talk) 13:29, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 16:53, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:51, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 452056 08:59, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:53, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:00, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 15:01, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:40, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 19:05, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:53, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support {{PR}} added. Green scarf and green leaves with complementary colors -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:49, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 05:15, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:29, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:15, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 16:53, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hulged (talk) 23:25, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 16 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:14, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Women

File:USS Johnston (DD-557) underway on 27 October 1943 (NH 63495).jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Apr 2022 at 16:57:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Ships
Info Unidentified U.S. Navy photographer - restored by Adam Cuerden with text removal presumed to be by User:Cobatfor - uploaded and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:56, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:56, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Info I am so lucky to have a loving, supportive family with enough money to give me a new laptop as an early birthday gift. This was my testing out of it. It went... well. Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:57, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment That's wonderful! Happy Birthday! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:09, 14 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support Daniel Case (talk) 16:07, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 451097 05:58, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:17, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I've been staring at this for a while now, feeling that something was off about the contrast. I was not sure what it was, and I still am not 100% certain. Looking at the original helped a bit though. The original is a very high contrast image, where large parts of the subject are quite dark due to the direction of the sun relative to the ship. In the retouched version, the shadows have been brightened a bit, making things a bit more visible. But somehow, my brain refuses to find this realistic or credible, possibly because there is still so much evidence for hard shadows around. Given that brightening the shadows did not actually reveal anything new in the image, I'd very much prefer the unaltered original (minus the dust spots). However, I'd still not vote for it, because in my opinion, it is not a particularly stunning photograph to start with. --El Grafo (talk) 12:49, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

As the first thing I did after the computer switch, I fear what's uploaded is what's available. Adam Cuerden (talk) 07:15, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support Quite an interesting restoration. --SHB2000 (talk) 03:50, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:40, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Khairdeen urf Pritam, Black and White.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2022 at 04:48:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Men
Info created by - uploaded by - nominated by Satdeep Gill -- Satdeep Gill (talk) 04:48, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Satdeep Gill (talk) 04:48, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 13:24, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Powerful and expressive. -- Radomianin (talk) 14:19, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 15:02, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 16:40, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Love that stubble ... Daniel Case (talk) 17:26, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 18:18, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 19:04, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:41, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:54, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 451781 01:36, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:16, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 05:14, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support powerful portrait, excellent lighting! I'm glad and relieved to see that nobody objects to the high ISO settings. This work reminds me a bit of modern ambrotypes --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:14, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Indeed; IMHO for ISO 12,800 the photo is remarkably clean. --Aristeas (talk) 06:41, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:45, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:15, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:28, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 17:50, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hulged (talk) 23:24, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 03:44, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow. --XRay 💬 12:43, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --UnpetitproleX (talk) 22:48, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Powerful --Tagooty (talk) 05:17, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:01, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: People/Portrait#Men

File:The corn harvest (1881) - Achille Glisenti.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2022 at 00:12:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/People#Duos (depictions of two people)
Info created by Achille Glisenti (1848-1906) - uploaded by Niketto sr. - nominated by Niketto sr. -- Niketto sr. (talk) 00:12, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Niketto sr. (talk) 00:12, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I have proposed another gallery link. Galleries like Places/Agriculture#Italy are used only for photographs; for non-photographic media, like this painting, we have some special gallery pages, e.g. Non-photographic media/People which I propose to use here. Your friendly gallery link service ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 08:31, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Thank youǃ Niketto sr. (talk) 09:21, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:10, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 451081 05:58, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Small reproduction for such a large painting. Your competition for reproductions of paintings on canvas includes huge, extraordinarily sharp and detailed photos by museums and Google Art Project. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:22, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Only 1,486 × 2,339 pixels = too small. Furthermore, according to Jeffrey's Image Metadata Viewer this picture contains "No color-space metadata and no embedded color profile: Windows and Mac web browsers treat colors randomly." -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:32, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Nice painting but too small for a digitisation of a painting in 2022. Take a look at the sizes of the other paintings in the category. Cmao20 (talk) 15:18, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan. --SHB2000 (talk) 03:50, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 3 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /-- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:02, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cedar waxwing in Green-Wood Cemetery (55650).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2022 at 18:10:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes
Info Cedar waxwing (Bombycilla cedorum). All by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:10, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Given how handsome these birds are, I was surprised to see we have no FPs of any species in this family. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 18:10, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support The spots are a bit distracting.--Ermell (talk) 19:01, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

New version, cleaned up. Could you add a note if I missed something? — Rhododendrites ^talk | 19:30, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Perfect!--Ermell (talk) 18:59, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support Poco a poco (talk) 20:54, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:11, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 452000 01:36, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:15, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 04:15, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 05:13, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 05:34, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support great light! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:05, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:53, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:15, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:19, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hulged (talk) 23:23, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:48, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 03:43, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 12:43, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯Sphere! 16:54, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 02:12, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes

File:Coral (Sarcophyton glaucum), Ras Katy, Sharm el-Sheij, Egipto, 2022-03-26, DD, DD 113.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2022 at 20:44:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals#Class_:_Anthozoa
Info Rough leather coral (Sarcophyton glaucum), Ras Katy, Sharm el-Sheikh, Red Sea, Egypt. It's a common species of soft coral found from the Red Sea to western Pacific Ocean, in fact, the Red Sea is the native home to 40% of the known 180 species of soft corals. We have no FPs of this family. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:44, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:44, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well-chosen nominees. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:40, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 451425 01:36, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 05:34, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:37, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:57, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:12, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:16, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 18:57, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:20, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hulged (talk) 23:22, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 03:42, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 12:43, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Tagooty (talk) 05:21, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯Sphere! 16:53, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 02:12, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals#Class_:_Anthozoa

File:Trifolium repens inflorescence - Niitvälja.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2022 at 16:55:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Fabaceae
Info all by Ivar (talk) 16:55, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 16:55, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:31, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 19:03, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:39, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:17, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 451890 01:36, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:06, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very detailed, beautiful light. --Aristeas (talk) 05:13, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 05:33, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:48, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:15, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 16:27, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:18, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hulged (talk) 23:24, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 03:44, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 03:42, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Satdeep Gill (talk) 08:00, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯Sphere! 16:54, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 18 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 02:13, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family_:_Fabaceae

File:Ruby-crowned kinglet in Green-Wood Cemetery (55761).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Apr 2022 at 21:32:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Regulidae_(Kinglets)
Info The ruby-crowned kinglet is one of the smallest birds in the world (other than hummingbirds). It's also constantly moving, making a sharp photo really difficult. They're migratory birds here in New York, though not particularly rare, so I've made hundreds of attempts, and this is the first one I think may be worthy of FP. Where is the ruby crown, you ask? Unfortunately, RCKs rarely show their crown, unlike some other species in their family. You can get a glimpse of the ruby in this other photo of the same bird. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 21:32, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 21:32, 15 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:21, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 08:46, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 10:09, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 14:05, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:32, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 18:29, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Nice but definitely not your best shot. Sharpness is good, not extraordinary, the bokeh is pretty annoying with those halos, the shadow on the bird is not a plus either. Poco a poco (talk) 18:31, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 451885 00:51, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hulged (talk) 12:01, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:19, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose Even given that I'm looking at this on Easter, I still can't get to support. It's a pretty image alright, but I don't see it as FP because of a) Poco's points, b) the unbalanced feel of the composition and c) the shadow across the bird's back. Daniel Case (talk) 15:56, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support The whole scene is what I'd call "sublime". Composition works well (yes, a tighter crop on the right might be something worth looking into, but I trust Rhododendrites to have tried this; also: the more blue on the right can remain, the nicer the contrast with the yellow of the feathers), colors look good (thanks for keeping this natural-looking and not following the current trend of boosting colors)… and all of that together feels more important to me than the fact that the shadow is where the shadow is in this image. In my opinion, this totally deserves being featured. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 03:28, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks. I went back and forth about the crop, and erred on the side of more space. I'm not opposed to a slight right crop (probably with an even slighter top/bottom crop) based on feedback here. I'll wait to see if there are more opinions about that before moving forward, though, given there's already some support. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 03:50, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Taking the photo in its totality, I don't see anyplace to crop that would improve the picture. If you crop the bottom closer, which was the main thing I was considering, you'd delete the branch on the lower left that helps the composition. And there isn't really that much room on the right. I suppose you could crop in slightly on the right, but it hardly seems necessary. The composition is very harmonious to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:20, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Rhododendrites, I think you're right. After looking at the image again, I'd not crop it either. I know how difficult it is to photograph small birds, so this is quite impressive the way it is! --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 14:55, 21 April 2022 (UTC) [reply]

Support according to Frank's convincing commentary. Please do not crop, it would be a loss for the overall composition. Besides, imho, shadow is usually a compositional means of depicting depth. It creates three-dimensionality and plasticity. -- Radomianin (talk) 14:08, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 03:49, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Poco and others. --Tagooty (talk) 05:14, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯Sphere! 16:54, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 14 support, 2 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 07:30, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Regulidae_(Kinglets)

File:Neudenau - Herbolzheim - Felder, grasiger Weg und Birnbaum im April (1.3).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2022 at 05:11:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture#Germany
Info Bare fields, a grassy track and a lonely pear tree near Herbolzheim, Neudenau, Germany. All by Aristeas, crop suggested by W.carter (thank you very much!). --Aristeas (talk) 05:11, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like the harmonious simplicity: the structure on the fields, answered by the contrastring structure of the sky, the green S-bend of the track, the accent set by the lonely tree. --Aristeas (talk) 05:11, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Dynamism and calmness in a single image. Perfect. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:51, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas and Radomianin. I looked at the other versions but couldn't decide which crop was better than the others, so I support the nominated version. -- IamMM (talk) 05:57, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support great! --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:05, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 06:44, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 451058 06:45, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 09:34, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:14, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:58, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 15:14, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent composition Cmao20 (talk) 15:16, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:47, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 17:19, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 18:56, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful. Agree with Cmao20 -- Basile Morin (talk) 22:47, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:21, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hulged (talk) 23:21, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support my favorite of the current nominations — Rhododendrites ^talk | 01:55, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support – quite a beautiful scene. --SHB2000 (talk) 03:34, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 13:13, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ausgezeichnete Komposition; ich mag die Schlichtheit der Szenerie. Toll, was Du aus einem eigentlich simplen Sujet fotografisch herausgeholt hast. Richtig klasse. Herzliche Grüße, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:42, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Vielen Dank! — In terms of composition, part of the credit goes to W.carter/Cart. I knew that something still had to be changed to round off the composition, but I didn’t find the solution; she knew immediately what to do. So thank you again, Cart! --Aristeas (talk) 05:55, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 03:40, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Colin (talk) 11:49, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Milseburg (talk) 12:35, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice, but please remove the dust spot top right. --XRay 💬 12:42, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for spotting it! I will fix this ASAP (right now, I am not at home and have no access to the original image file). --Aristeas (talk) 18:55, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Done Dust spot removed. --Aristeas (talk) 09:02, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support --UnpetitproleX (talk) 22:50, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely composition. --Tagooty (talk) 05:22, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 10:00, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯Sphere! 16:53, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow, excellent. --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:20, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Can't resist it. ;-) --Cart (talk) 12:45, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 31 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 14:15, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Agriculture#Germany

File:Diskit Gompa 2.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2022 at 08:31:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings
Info created and uploaded by KennyOMG - nominated by UnpetitproleX -- UnpetitproleX (talk) 08:31, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support A beautiful shot of the beautiful monastery. -- UnpetitproleX (talk) 08:31, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Top crop is too tight. Resolution is also rather small. Can we have more? Yann (talk) 14:34, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support It is a bit small, and I'm guessing it has been downsampled, but wow-y enough for FP anyway Cmao20 (talk) 15:18, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:11, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 452051 06:40, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:22, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20. --Aristeas (talk) 07:26, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support -- IamMM (talk) 07:45, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too much of the gompa is in shadow to wow me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:47, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hulged (talk) 23:19, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Ikan. --SHB2000 (talk) 03:32, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20 --GRDN711 (talk) 16:21, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Impossible to be a FP. There is an obvious stitching error in the powerlines below. This is not to be ignored. What about all the reviewers? --Milseburg (talk) 09:48, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment You are right! All supporters: Please look at that and reconsider. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:10, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Good catch. I’ll withdraw the nomination so it doesn’t just pass like this. UnpetitproleX (talk) 13:12, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination in light of the stitching error, which I tried to fix—after it was pointed out—but could not. --UnpetitproleX (talk) 13:13, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Lipid Islands on Soap Bubble.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2022 at 16:47:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Reflections
Info created and uploaded by KarlGaff - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 16:47, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 16:47, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support when nature ~~meets~~ creates art. Impressive on so many levels --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:46, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:24, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Martin. --Aristeas (talk) 07:29, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:41, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --El Grafo (talk) 12:02, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 16:54, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:33, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:19, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hulged (talk) 23:17, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 451671 01:32, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support GROOOOOOOOVVVVVYYYYY MAN! Daniel Case (talk) 03:16, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support this is art to the next level --SHB2000 (talk) 03:29, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 05:23, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:57, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:04, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:48, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Colin (talk) 11:51, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 12:41, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯Sphere! 16:52, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:19, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 22:33, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Natural phenomena#Reflections

File:Striegeliger Schichtpilz-Stereum hirsutum-20191216-RM-150832.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2022 at 19:06:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Stereaceae
Info All by me -- Ermell (talk) 19:06, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ermell (talk) 19:06, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive. Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:12, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above. --Ivar (talk) 06:30, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 451123 06:40, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:44, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:47, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:25, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Impressive level of details, beautiful colours, nice background bokeh. --Aristeas (talk) 07:31, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:35, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:37, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 17:01, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good job! --Famberhorst (talk) 17:32, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 18:38, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hulged (talk) 23:16, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:04, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:17, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 03:28, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:04, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 03:38, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:50, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 12:40, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯Sphere! 16:52, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:19, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 22:32, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Fungi#Family : Stereaceae

File:WLM - 2020 - Миколаївський кафедральний собор (Чернівці).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2022 at 15:13:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Ukraine
Info A colourful twilight view over the city of Chernivtsi in southwestern Ukraine towards the Cathedral of St Nicholas. created by Moahim - uploaded by Moahim - nominated by Cmao20 -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:13, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Cmao20 (talk) 15:13, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 18:35, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 18:49, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Quite pretty. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:14, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 452878 06:40, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:23, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very atmospheric. --Aristeas (talk) 07:27, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 07:34, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 09:58, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:26, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:33, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 18:34, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hulged (talk) 23:18, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Yellow lights at blue hour -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:58, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support awesome buildings. --SHB2000 (talk) 03:29, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Clément Bardot (talk) 07:17, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 18:49, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:46, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 12:41, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 10:11, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯Sphere! 16:53, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely! --Domob (talk) 17:00, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:19, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 22:33, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Ukraine

File:Golden Temple, Amritsar 03.jpg[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 May 2022 at 13:42:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious_buildings#India
Info created and uploaded by Bernard Gagnon - nominated by UnpetitproleX -- UnpetitproleX (talk) 13:42, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- UnpetitproleX (talk) 13:42, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose It is a striking scene, but for me too blurred to support as FP, sorry (especially for a rather small resolution). --Domob (talk) 16:54, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose per Domob, very beautiful but not quite sharp enough for FP to me, and also needs straightening. Cmao20 (talk) 18:26, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:13, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Question The idea was to have a FP of the illuminated Golden temple, since this one is headed towards speedy decline, do you think this other QI of illuminated Golden Temple could be a FP? Should I nominate it instead? UnpetitproleX (talk) 00:45, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

IMO, no. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:43, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reviews. --UnpetitproleX (talk) 00:47, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I withdraw my nomination --UnpetitproleX (talk) 00:47, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:A budding lotus flower.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Apr 2022 at 06:15:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Nelumbonaceae
Info All by Subhrajyoti07 -- Subhrajyoti07 talk 06:15, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Subhrajyoti07 talk 06:15, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Unusual composition but I think it works, however the sharpness could be a little better. Cmao20 (talk) 15:20, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose for the same reasons Cmao weak-supports. Daniel Case (talk) 03:19, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support per Cmao20. Gallery link fixed ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 05:18, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 451009 06:40, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose the vertical composition and depth of field don't quite work for me — Rhododendrites ^talk | 01:53, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above. --SHB2000 (talk) 03:48, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 14:24, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Glyptothek München – 18.04.2022 – Augustus Bevilacqua (4).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2022 at 05:18:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures
Info created, uploaded & nominated by Micha -- Micha (talk) 05:18, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- As nominator. --Micha (talk) 05:22, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:43, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well-done portrait-like photograph of the bust. --Aristeas (talk) 07:33, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent, per Aristeas. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:46, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good Work --Bijay Chaurasia (talk) 09:57, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:31, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hulged (talk) 23:16, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 452955 01:32, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support cool photo and per Aristeas. --SHB2000 (talk) 03:28, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 05:21, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:04, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:27, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:20, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:52, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯Sphere! 16:52, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 14:25, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Sculptures#Statues indoors

File:Bloem van een Alstroemeria aurea. 03-07-2021 (actm.).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2022 at 15:49:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Alstroemeriaceae
Info Flower of an Alstroemeria. Focus stack of 23 photos.}}
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:49, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 15:49, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rich colors. The dew drops add a beautiful accent. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:31, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very good.--Ermell (talk) 22:13, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely, per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:17, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hulged (talk) 23:13, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice light, very detailed -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:03, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 451982 01:32, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin and Basile Morin -- IamMM (talk) 02:21, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support must've taken a lot of effort to get something this nice ;-) --SHB2000 (talk) 03:25, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 05:34, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:18, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 16:04, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin and Basile. ---Aristeas (talk) 19:48, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Edge looks a bit oversharpened, but with this picture, so what? Daniel Case (talk) 02:39, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 03:37, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:22, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Colin (talk) 11:53, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 12:39, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 10:10, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯Sphere! 16:52, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- -donald- (talk) 04:46, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:18, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 22:33, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Plants#Family : Alstroemeriaceae

File:Capra bianca domestica.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 May 2022 at 14:02:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals
Info created by PROPOLI87 - uploaded by PROPOLI87 - nominated by (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 14:02, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 14:02, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

A particularly expressive goat, at least to me looking at it is a good mood. It seems to say, "What are you looking at? Have you ever seen a goat?"

Oppose Not great at all, sorry. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:28, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is surely an oppose Cmao20 (talk) 16:07, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Correct. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:28, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Domestic animal partially hidden, nothing special. Yann (talk) 15:13, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose The picture is fine but not outstanding, I like the goat's expression but it's partly hidden by grass and weeds, and the background is quite unattractive with the wire fencing. Please fix the gallery - 'mammals' is nowhere near specific enough, you need to find the correct subcategory. Cmao20 (talk) 16:07, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per other opposers. --Ivar (talk) 18:48, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. Daniel Case (talk) 02:39, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. Nice snapshot but not more than that. Agree fully with Cmao20, plus the centered composition is boring here, fur is partly overexposed, overall poor quality, xtra-low resolution. Please have a look at Commons:Photography critiques first to get some frank opinions on such pics. --Kreuz schnabel 13:12, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others. --SHB2000 (talk) 05:04, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 1 support, 7 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 11:36, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Arenal moteado (Parapercis hexophtalma), Ras Katy, Sharm el-Sheij, Egipto, 2022-03-26, DD, DD 91.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Apr 2022 at 20:33:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Class_:_Actinopterygii_(Ray-finned_Fish)
Info Male Speckled sandperch (Parapercis hexophtalma), Ras Katy, Sharm el-Sheikh, Red Sea, Egypt. It's a species of marine bony fish that grows to a length of around 28 cm (11 in) and is found in shallow waters on the east coast of Africa as far south as Natal, the Red Sea and the western Indo-Pacific. Like other members of the family Pinguipedidae are protogynous hermaphrodites, starting their adult life as females and changing sex to males later. Not only do the fish change sex, but they also change their markings at the same time. Male fish are territorial and defend a harem of females. We have yet no FP of this order. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:33, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:33, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:39, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 451631 01:36, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Daniel Case (talk) 04:16, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 05:34, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:38, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 11:54, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 15:15, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per Daniel.--Ermell (talk) 19:00, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 07:19, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Cayambe (talk) 18:37, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hulged (talk) 23:23, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 03:43, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose not denying its usefulness and the fact there's no FP of this specie/order. But that picture just screams "I'm happy I'm framed it"... and that's about it for me. A Google Image search shows it's possible to get something much more enticing (no I'm not saying it's easy) - Benh (talk) 18:18, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose QI for sure, but no wow at all with this compo (it's not even outstanding within the category Parapercis hexophtalma). --Ivar (talk) 18:46, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 12:43, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯Sphere! 16:54, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 15 support, 2 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 21:07, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Fish#Class_:_Actinopterygii_(Ray-finned_Fish)

File:Edinburgh Castle from Grass Market.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 May 2022 at 00:55:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Historical#1850-1900?
Info created by George Washington Wilson - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:55, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:55, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wish the crop at the top weren't so tight but ... this is a 120-140-year-old photo, after all ... can't be too picky. Daniel Case (talk) 02:07, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support I love it! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:11, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 07:42, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 10:14, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support It’s a pity about the tight crop, but else very good. --Aristeas (talk) 10:20, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Yann (talk) 10:29, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Hulged (talk) 10:40, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --A.Savin 12:42, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:16, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:46, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯Sphere! 16:52, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Just to note, a remaining spot got pointed out on en-wiki, and I did a quick recheck while fixing that. Nothing major found, but I have done a very minor update. Adam Cuerden (talk) 22:50, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:58, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support The crop is really bothering me, but it's such a great image. --El Grafo (talk) 08:43, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:02, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 451579 00:58, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:57, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:47, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Historical#1850-1900

File:Rufous Songlark 5779.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 May 2022 at 10:06:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Locustellidae_(Warblers)
Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Ivar (talk) 10:06, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 10:06, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 10:13, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:09, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:18, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:47, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯Sphere! 16:53, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 16:59, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:19, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 20:35, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 23:46, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support I wasn't sure which photo was the best of this series, but this is an FP, in any case. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:14, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Open beak, nice light -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:57, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Would make a good book cover. Daniel Case (talk) 02:10, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:37, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:14, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:03, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 12:28, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:57, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 451712 09:16, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:41, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:46, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:20, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Hulged (talk) 12:38, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 20:08, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Locustellidae_(Warblers)

File:Mallard duck pair, France.jpg, not featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2022 at 07:12:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus : Anas
Info Mallard duck pair, Moret-sur-Loing, France (Anas platyrhynchos). All by me. -- Clément Bardot (talk) 07:12, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Clément Bardot (talk) 07:12, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support Not unusual birds of course, but I do like the composition Cmao20 (talk) 15:17, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not bad, but doesn't stand out to me from other duck pictures we have. Daniel Case (talk) 03:08, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose A bit too ordinary, IMO. Background is meh -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:50, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support it's a bit too ordinary but I like the composition. --SHB2000 (talk) 03:32, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support The composition is still quite nice.--Vulcan❯❯Sphere! 16:53, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak oppose - I think I would be happy if I got this composition, but I don't think it's otherwise technically quite an FP IMO (light/sharpness). If it were an exceptionally rare, reclusive, or difficult to photograph species, then I might be neutral or weak support, but it is among the most common. (although to be fair, I have not managed an FP of this species myself :) ) — Rhododendrites ^talk | 17:33, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 451564 09:12, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 5 support, 3 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Ikan Kekek (talk) 21:04, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Nigeen Lake pano.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Apr 2022 at 13:09:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#India
Info created and uploaded by KennyOMG - nominated by UnpetitproleX -- UnpetitproleX (talk) 13:09, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- UnpetitproleX (talk) 13:09, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good composition and good quality, an FP to me. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:54, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very beautiful composition and definitely FP but again more resolution would be nice Cmao20 (talk) 15:19, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ermell (talk) 18:54, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 451489 06:40, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Boring long extreme ratio and underexposed panorama - Benh (talk) 06:41, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 07:34, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Too dark. Could be made better. -- -donald- (talk) 08:15, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per others, does not work for me. --El Grafo (talk) 12:06, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:19, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hulged (talk) 23:19, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Benh and donald. My eyes cannot navigate vertically. And the building at the left is out of focus -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:56, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It is a houseboat, probably the one that the picture was taken from. --UnpetitproleX (talk) 00:52, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Whatever it is, this building is just blurry and dark. There's no metadata on the file page, but I assume the depth of field was too narrow. With a tripod, making this part sharp is easy -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:23, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Since the long ratio is being talked about, I must admit that I did think about cropping the image but decided against it because it beautifully captures the magic of Srinagar, be it the different profiles of the anchored Houseboats, the purely navigational—as well as the vegetable seller's—shikaras, the rare uninterrupted view of distant snow clad Pir Panjals, or the Hari Parbat hill and the fort atop it. It has everything, so I just couldn't crop! --UnpetitproleX (talk) 01:05, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral I see the arguments on both sides here. I like the composition, but I don't like the long ratio and I'm feeling the same as Basile here. --SHB2000 (talk) 03:31, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Benh. -- Karelj (talk) 16:55, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Ratio is okay, but too dark and resolution is not outstanding. --Milseburg (talk) 12:36, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redundant Edit

*Edit

~~Edit~~ The edit as it was presented here has since been overwritten with the final edit, the image above thus shows the final edit; this is the original edit that was presented here

I have edited the picture: increased the exposure and cropped out the nearer houseboats on both ends. @Benh, -donald-, El Grafo, Basile Morin, SHB2000, Karelj, and Milseburg: If this version is more agreeable then the nomination can be moved, if not then the I shall withdraw the nomination since it is anyway going to fail. --UnpetitproleX (talk) 19:09, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose You need to ping all voters. I like the left crop but don't like the right crop. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 23:38, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, sorry, I thought I would ping all support voters to reaffirm their vote after the oppose voters gave their inputs about the edit. Probably a bad idea, let me correct it. I’ll also undo the right crop. UnpetitproleX (talk) 08:37, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Alternative, Final Edit[edit]

Final Edit

Here's the final edit. Please vote for this edit below. Darkness and long cut have been addressed, but resolution is the same. Pinging all voters: @Ikan Kekek, Cmao20, Ermell, Rosalina450280, Benh, Aristeas, -donald-, El Grafo, Daniel Case, Hulged, Basile Morin, SHB2000, Karelj, and Milseburg: please recast your vote, for this version, below. --UnpetitproleX (talk) 09:25, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Votes for the final edit:
Support as the nominator and editor. --UnpetitproleX (talk) 09:25, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good for me. --Aristeas (talk) 10:19, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support – looks good to me. Hulged (talk) 10:31, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 10:32, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support This is by far the best version. What are you going to do about the first alt? It will confuse the bot, I guess, but this will have to be handled manually, anyway. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 12:08, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:39, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Best version. --Ermell (talk) 14:19, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯Sphere! 16:53, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support I like exploring panoramics like this (but this format is indeed not suited to "just looking at it"). --Domob (talk) 17:01, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Well done: this edit has had the most positive effect on the image potential. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:22, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral Big improvement, I won't object to this one. --El Grafo (talk) 07:51, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 452702 09:19, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 11 support, 0 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /--Basile Morin (talk) 23:57, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#India

The chosen alternative is: File:Nigeen Lake pano (edited).jpg

File:Wegerich Scheckenfalter Duo auf Rotklee.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 May 2022 at 14:23:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
Info created and uploaded by Sven Damerow - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 14:23, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 14:23, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Domob (talk) 16:57, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Clearly outstanding. Cmao20 (talk) 18:27, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 19:13, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:13, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:31, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 23:46, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. I don't understand all of the categorization, though. There's one kind of butterfly on one flower, right? So how is it both Melitaea on Fabales flowers and Nymphalidae on Trifolium flowers? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:13, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Melitaea is a genus in the family Nymphalidae and Trifolium is a genus in the order Fabales. If we had a category for Melitaea on Trifolium that could replace the two, or if we didn't have any genus-based categories like this, we could just have Nymphalidae on Fabales, but with the current categories it's just about getting to the narrowest cross-categorizations we have. — Rhododendrites ^talk | 02:57, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand. Aren't the two butterflies from the same species? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:03, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, they are. It's like one category is about dogs in Ferraris and the other is about beagles in cars, when the picture shows two beagles in a Ferrari. The butterflies are both the same and in the hierarchical scheme of taxonomy belong to Order: Lepidoptera > [...] > Family: Nymphalidae > [...] > Genus: Melitaea > Species: Melitaea cinxia. The plant is Order: Fabales > [...] > Genus: Trifolium > Species: Trifolium pratense. Now, we have categories for all those different levels of taxonomy for both the butterfly and the plant, but we don't have intersecting categories for them at all levels. We have this genus of butterfly on this order of plant, or this family of butterfly on this genus of plant, but we currently to not have this species of butterfly on this species of plant (beagles in Ferraris). --El Grafo (talk) 08:29, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK, I get it now. Thanks for explaining. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:00, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support The sort of image that middle school girls had on their spiral notebook covers when I was that age (and today, it's their phone wallpaper). Daniel Case (talk) 02:21, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 05:45, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wonderful. --Aristeas (talk) 06:00, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --El Grafo (talk) 08:31, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:05, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kreuz schnabel 12:55, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful composition. The green leaf on the left makes it perfect for me. --Till (talk) 15:52, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 15:58, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:14, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 18:33, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 452586 09:16, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:40, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:45, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Micha (talk) 15:09, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:20, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Hulged (talk) 12:39, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 24 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 00:00, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)

File:Adult white-faced ibis (Plegadis chihi)-4026.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 May 2022 at 02:37:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes
Info created by Frank Schulenburg – uploaded by Frank Schulenburg – nominated by Frank Schulenburg --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:37, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:37, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:39, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 05:42, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great capture; cherry on top is the little wave circle, probably created by a drop falling from the beak. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:58, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 06:12, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:56, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:11, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 10:54, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:18, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 12:24, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful light, excellent focus with large DoF, high resolution -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:05, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 17:44, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Love the water droplets Cmao20 (talk) 20:22, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:52, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Radomianin. --Aristeas (talk) 08:18, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 17:18, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 451188 09:15, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:35, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:43, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:21, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:15, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Hulged (talk) 12:46, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 22 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 06:28, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes

File:Chipmunk with stuffed cheeks in Prospect Park (05980).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 May 2022 at 23:29:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Sciuridae_(Squirrels)
Info An eastern chipmunk (Tamias striatus) ~~playing chubby bunny~~ with its cheeks stuffed. all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 23:29, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 23:29, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:30, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:09, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support How lovely Cmao20 (talk) 00:50, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Good light and low view point. Good quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:50, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 05:44, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support !! -- Radomianin (talk) 06:07, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 06:14, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:36, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very striking point of view. Nice quality! - Benh (talk) 07:49, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --El Grafo (talk) 07:56, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 08:03, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:14, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:11, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 18:16, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:02, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Basile. --Aristeas (talk) 08:11, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:13, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 451622 09:16, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:45, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:17, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Micha (talk) 15:09, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:19, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. --Hulged (talk) 12:42, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 24 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 06:35, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Mammals#Family_:_Sciuridae_(Squirrels)

File:Cicadidae with exuvia, immediately after moulting, in Laos, front view.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 May 2022 at 02:30:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family : Cicadidae (Cicadas)
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:30, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:30, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 02:41, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 05:43, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 06:12, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:33, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Wow, my God ! - Benh (talk) 07:47, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:57, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:17, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 12:25, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kreuz schnabel 12:51, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:11, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:31, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support nice timing/quality — Rhododendrites ^talk | 17:45, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:22, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:53, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great timing. --Aristeas (talk) 08:18, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:12, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Very weak support because of what it depicts. But while it may have been inevitable I find that dropoff in sharpness at the right very difficult to unsee once you've seen it. Daniel Case (talk) 17:16, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --GRDN711 (talk) 18:45, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 451108 09:16, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:43, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:19, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:18, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Hulged (talk) 12:46, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 24 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 06:30, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods#Family : Cicadidae (Cicadas)

File:Kuang Si Falls and a turquoise water pool in Luang Prabang province Laos.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 May 2022 at 02:16:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Laos
Info created - uploaded - nominated by Basile Morin -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:16, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:16, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Très jolie, cette cascade! Amitiés, --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 02:33, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 05:43, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice composition and atmosphere. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:02, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 06:13, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Frank and Ikan. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:20, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:35, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:58, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:11, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:14, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:22, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:29, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Never thought that Laos would have something beautiful like this! --SHB2000 (talk) 04:53, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Look through the rest of Basile's photos of Laos. It seems to be an extremely beautiful country. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 05:57, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's mainly telling me Basile is a skilled photograph ;) I think Laos is not as easy as some other countries to capture right. - Benh (talk) 07:48, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, of course he's highly skilled as well! -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 13:30, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support Lovely, serene and calming. --Aristeas (talk) 08:16, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 452575 09:16, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:36, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:44, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:18, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very nice, although i feel it could have used a little clockwise rotation.--Micha (talk) 15:07, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:18, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Hulged (talk) 12:46, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 21 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 06:31, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural#Laos

File:Northern mockingbird in Green-Wood Cemetery (55669).jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 May 2022 at 23:33:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Mimidae_(Mockingbirds_and_Thrashers)
Info A northern mockingbird (Mimus polyglottos) striking a pose. Mockingbirds are famously aggressive in defending their nests, and this is a "tail up" warning sign that I may have tread too close (unbeknownst to me). all by — Rhododendrites ^talk | 23:33, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support — Rhododendrites ^talk | 23:33, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent. Yeah, I've heard that male mockingbirds can attack people. Have you ever had a problem with one? I have not. I look at them, they sometimes look at me, but I stand still and don't do anything that makes them feel threatened, apparently. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:08, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- I've had them swoop down on me a few times. There was one that made its nest by a Starbucks parking lot where I lived years ago, and it would regularly swoop down on people going between their cars and the door. I've never seen them make contact with a human, though -- more like a divebomb that pulls up at the last minute. They're pretty fearless, though. I regularly see them going after hawks, chasing them away, repeatedly going in to grab some feathers, etc. The hawk is usually pretty unphased, but it's got to be annoying. The only time I wasn't sure if a bird might actually get me was this least tern. There was one little strip of beach open for walking between two protected areas, and it must've built its nest right near the edge, because when people would walk through (including me), it would fly high, circle around, then from maybe 30' away and 20' high, dive straight at me. It would do that, and then hover maybe 10' directly over my head, yelling at me, and did it over and over. I snapped that picture while it was hovering, then went on my way. What I didn't realize then was the reason they hover is because after divebombing, they defecate on the predator/intruder. If it was doing that, it must not have accounted for the wind, because I came out unscathed. :) — Rhododendrites ^talk | 03:13, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very high quality bird photography Cmao20 (talk) 00:51, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support !! -- Radomianin (talk) 06:03, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 06:13, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Ermell (talk) 08:03, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:13, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:12, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 12:26, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:26, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:54, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:14, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 452917 09:16, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:44, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:18, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:19, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Hulged (talk) 12:45, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 17 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--Aristeas (talk) 06:34, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Mimidae_(Mockingbirds_and_Thrashers)

File:Escale à Sète 2022 G.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 30 Apr 2022 at 11:26:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Sailing_ships
Info created - uploaded - nominated by me. -- Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 11:26, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 11:26, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Beautiful light, good composition. Yann (talk) 16:02, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 17:30, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Yann. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:24, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 22:15, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Hulged (talk) 23:15, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Special sky -- Basile Morin (talk) 00:01, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Princess Rosalina 💄 451542 01:32, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 02:19, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support love the sky in the background. --SHB2000 (talk) 03:28, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ivar (talk) 05:34, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:19, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 06:56, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Wideangle distortion, no wow --A.Savin 13:09, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Lovely light Cmao20 (talk) 16:04, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support I think the wideangle makes it more dramatic. And the lighting and mood are just perfect - Benh (talk) 18:30, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Benh. Daniel Case (talk) 18:34, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support per Cmao20 and Benh. --Aristeas (talk) 19:47, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --FoolPiasar ※ 👉talk👈 03:40, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 06:21, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:55, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --XRay 💬 12:40, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support.--Vulcan❯❯Sphere! 16:52, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Definitely a lot of wow for me, the wideangle is well suited to this scene in my view. --Domob (talk) 16:59, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 09:18, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:48, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 25 support, 1 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 14:52, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Objects/Vehicles/Water_transport#Sailing_ships

File:Graphosoma italicum - Kulna.jpg, featured[edit]

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 May 2022 at 05:40:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Pentatomidae_(Shield/stink_bugs)
Info all by Ivar (talk) 05:40, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ivar (talk) 05:40, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Considering the small size of this species, it is a very detailed and educational capture. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:50, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- IamMM (talk) 06:15, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Martin Falbisoner (talk) 06:32, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 07:23, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Ermell (talk) 07:55, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 10:54, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:21, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Schnobby (talk) 12:23, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Kreuz schnabel 12:51, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Basile Morin (talk) 14:07, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Cmao20 (talk) 20:22, 25 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --SHB2000 (talk) 04:52, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Aristeas (talk) 08:19, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Palauenc05 (talk) 17:11, 26 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Daniel Case (talk) 02:05, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Princess Rosalina 💄 451874 09:15, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:34, 27 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 02:43, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Llez (talk) 10:22, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Great. --Micha (talk) 15:03, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support Poco a poco (talk) 10:14, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Hulged (talk) 12:47, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed results:

Result: 23 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /Yann (talk) 14:52, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Pentatomidae_(Shield/stink_bugs)