User talk:Domob

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Domob!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- 15:15, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Domob!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:10, 25 December 2011 (UTC)

• Image:Roemerbruecke, Oberaich, Austria, Detail.jpg was uncategorized on 24 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:10, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Roemerbruecke, Oberaich, Austria, Bogen.jpg was uncategorized on 24 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:10, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Roemerbruecke, Oberaich, Austria, von unten.jpg was uncategorized on 24 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:10, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Roemerbruecke, Oberaich, Austria, Weg.jpg was uncategorized on 24 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:10, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Roemerbruecke, Oberaich, Austria, Schild.jpg was uncategorized on 24 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:10, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Roemerbruecke, Oberaich, Austria, Zustieg.jpg was uncategorized on 24 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:10, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Roemerbruecke, Oberaich, Austria, hinten.jpg was uncategorized on 24 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:10, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Roemerbruecke, Oberaich, Austria, vorne.jpg was uncategorized on 24 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:10, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Roemerbruecke, Oberaich, Austria, schraeg.jpg was uncategorized on 24 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:10, 25 December 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Martinskapelle, Bruck an der Mur, Austria, Turm.jpg was uncategorized on 25 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:11, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Meilenstein, Bruck an der Mur, Austria.jpg was uncategorized on 25 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:11, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Koernerschule, Bruck an der Mur, Austria, Eingang.jpg was uncategorized on 25 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:11, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Schifferturm, Bruck an der Mur, Austria.jpg was uncategorized on 25 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:11, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Mariensaeule, Bruck an der Mur, Austria, Saeule.jpg was uncategorized on 25 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:11, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Mariensaeule, Bruck an der Mur, Austria, Gruppe.jpg was uncategorized on 25 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:11, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Autopatrolled rights given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. - FitIndia ^{Talk Mail} 15:11, 24 November 2019 (UTC)

Requesting permission

Hey Domob, Thank you for uploading wonderful pictures. With your permission, I'd like to post picture(s) you've uploaded on Commons from the social media accounts of Wikimedia Commons. Do you consent to the use of the photo(s) on Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, Telegram, Vkontakte etc.? If you agree then how would you like to be attributed (username/real name)? Thank you. ~ Nahid ^Talk, Wednesday 23:15, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for getting in touch! You are of course very welcome to post my images (as long as you follow the CC BY-SA rules, which it sounds like you were planning to anyway). Please credit me as "Daniel Kraft". Out of curiosity, do you already have any specific images in mind that you want to use? --Domob (talk) 04:55, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you, Domob. I do not have any specific in mind at this moment, collecting the users consent first who are willing to grant permission. Will of course add necessary attribution (example) but even if we do so there are certain restriction on social media's terms of use that's why we need to ask permission for this specifically. You can read more here at Commons:Social media/permission obtained. If you still agree then we can add your name to the list. You can also add your information yourself if you wish to do so. Best, ~ Nahid ^Talk 11:35, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

I see, thanks for the explanation! Yes, I consent to use of my uploads on social media as long as they are attributed to me. I've added myself to the list, but feel free to adjust it if I did not fill in the data correctly. In case my pictures do get used, is there a way for me to know about this just so I can check out the posts myself (just out of curiosity)? --Domob (talk) 13:11, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you again. Yes, you can follow the social accounts of Wikicommons on FB, Twitter or Instagram for the posts. I normally add multiple posts in a queue and buffer post them automatically from those accounts. Best, ~ Nahid ^Talk 14:57, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Sossusvlei Dune Rippled cropped.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 7 July 2020 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Glecksteinhütte front 20200121.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 21 January 2021 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Spitzkoppe Rock Arch Panorama with even sky.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Crestasee panosphere 20210614.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Crestasee panosphere 20210614.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holyrood Palace main entrance 20211021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I'd have retouched the WB to make it warmer, but ok --Poco a poco 09:55, 6 November 2021 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review, I agree. I've updated with warmer WB. --Domob 11:11, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

[1]

Hi,

Sorry for this revert; I don't know how I did it: I did a mistake among my open tabs.

It was totally a mistake. My excuses.

---

Benoît (d) 11:36, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

No worries, I thought so. I just was a bit confused initially and double checked my edit to make sure I hadn't done something weird or wrong. :) --Domob (talk) 11:45, 9 November 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Reformierte Kirche Langnau am Albis.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support. Unfavorable light but useful for me -- Spurzem (talk) 11:04, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 20:11, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:23, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Holyrood Palace icosahedron 20211021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:56, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edinburgh Castle from Esplanade 20211019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMHO, underexposed (also not a fan of the blurred birds). Fixable. --C messier 09:13, 7 November 2021 (UTC)  Done I've redeveloped a bit brighter and retouched the birds. --Domob 10:58, 7 November 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --C messier 15:05, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Discussion at QIC talk page

A discussion is being held here, over the reviewing process at QIC and the possibility of improving our Image Guidelines. As a regular contributor to the project, your opinion would be most welcome and valued. Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:59, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! River Orchy landscape 20211022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Slightly softish but I think of good quality. --Ximonic 16:11, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Falkirk Kelpies 50mm 20211021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 15:10, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glencoe Lochan reflections 2 20211022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice reflection --Michielverbeek 18:30, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rannoch Moor viewpoint 20211022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:27, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glencoe Lochan reflections 1 20211022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Technical quality on the borderline (poor detail, some noise) but a very nice picture, especially when viewed on a smaller size. -- Alvesgaspar 22:17, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Edinburgh Greyfriars Bobby monument 20211019.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Needs some tilt/perspective correction. --C messier 19:09, 8 November 2021 (UTC)  Done I've redone perspective and tilt, is it better now? As far as I can tell, all the verticals especially on the church in the background are correct now; I don't think the tombstone itself can be perfectly vertical in addition, as this is just natural perspective. --Domob 11:00, 9 November 2021 (UTC) Perspective is better but the church in the background looks slightly tilted CCW. --C messier 12:49, 9 November 2021 (UTC)  Done I've given it another try. Somehow this picture is really hard to adjust, not sure why. --Domob 16:35, 9 November 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --C messier 22:23, 11 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:05, 14 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loch Tulla panorama 20211022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:47, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kilchurn Castle side 20211022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice composition and lighting, technical quality is on the borderline. Please correct the tilted horizon. Alvesgaspar 22:06, 11 November 2021 (UTC)  Done Thanks, I've fixed the tilt. --Domob 05:51, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loch Lomond panosphere 20211022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality and beautiful atmosphere. --Aristeas 11:03, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:56, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rannoch Moor Loch Ba panorama 20211022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 17:35, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sihlwald Herbst panosphere 20211109.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 21:43, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glencoe Lochan reflections 3 20211022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment A bit of black point adjustment would remove the impression of a faded image. A very nice composition.--Johannes Robalotoff 18:29, 12 November 2021 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review! I originally adjusted the exposure settings (including the black point) on a different (wider) crop and completely agree that they were not optimal for the crop chosen in the end. I've updated them now. --Domob 11:18, 13 November 2021 (UTC)  Support Thank you for the improvement. --Johannes Robalotoff 16:19, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kilchurn Castle front 20211022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Color artifacts due to overexposure of the sky. --Johannes Robalotoff 18:17, 12 November 2021 (UTC)  Done I've reprocessed the highlight compression and reduced the pink artefacts. Is it better now? --Domob 11:11, 13 November 2021 (UTC)  Support Yes, the horrible pink is gone now. (There is a bit of it left behind the tree. One could argue if this is tolerable or not. May be yes, so I promote, but if you would like to fix that too, that would be welcome.) -Johannes Robalotoff 16:43, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Inverlochy Castle 4 20211023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 19:58, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loch Lomond rock 20211022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 15:22, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:00, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Victoria Street, Edinburgh, facing uphill.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment There is a lot of image in this category, to differentiate yours it would be good to give the direction of the shot. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:41, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
•  Comment Good point, I've amended the proposed scope. This is the main view of the street found on the internet typically, but it certainly makes sense to include the direction in the scope. --Domob (talk) 07:13, 14 November 2021 (UTC)
•  Support Ok for me --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:29, 15 November 2021 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:03, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glen Coe stone bridge 20211022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 17:32, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loch Awe and railway bridge 20211022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 22:29, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 20 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Loch Lochy panorama 20211024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 16:08, 18 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 06:57, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Inverlochy Castle 2 20211023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 08:56, 19 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 22 November 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Glencoe Lochan reflections 3 20211022.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Glencoe Lochan reflections 3 20211022.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jacobite on Glenfinnan Viaduct 2 20211024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 11:20, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kilchurn Castle distant 20211022.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMHO, a bit underexposed. --C messier 17:37, 20 November 2021 (UTC)  Done Redeveloped a bit brighter --Domob 10:36, 21 November 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --C messier 16:23, 21 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jacobite on Glenfinnan Viaduct 1 20211024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 07:11, 25 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Beauly Priory 1 20211024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:20, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glenfinnan Viaduct 3 20211024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, beautiful composition --Michielverbeek 18:42, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Urquhart Castle 2 20211024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:20, 24 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:05, 26 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jacobite on Glenfinnan Viaduct 3 20211024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Urquhart Castle 1 20211024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jacobite on Glenfinnan Viaduct 4 20211024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 19:22, 27 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 30 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Glenfinnan monument 20211024.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Leaning to the left IMO --Ermell 20:12, 27 November 2021 (UTC)  Done Adjusted the tilt, is it better now? --Domob 13:56, 28 November 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:43, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:02, 2 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elgin Cathedral 2 20211025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:14, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elgin Cathedral 3 20211025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 11:14, 5 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elgin Cathedral 1 20211025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hulged 11:53, 6 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:11, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balmoral Castle panorama 20211026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:36, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Elgin Cathedral panorama 20211025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:24, 7 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:03, 10 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balmoral Castle 3 20211026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Parsa 2au 12:28, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balmoral Castle 2 20211026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 11:56, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Balmoral Castle garden 20211026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:32, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Craigendarroch pond reflection 20211026.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 08:00, 9 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adliswil christmas lights 3 20211213.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Parsa 2au 16:02, 13 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:08, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Bern Panorama von Rosengarten 20211007.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bern Panorama von Rosengarten 20211007.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:00, 16 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adliswil christmas lights panosphere 20211213.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:40, 15 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:13, 18 December 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Reformierte Kirche Langnau HDR 20210615.jpg

And also:

• File:Reformierte Kirche Langnau HDR pano 20210615.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 12:59, 20 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adliswil christmas lights 2 20211213.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --V.Boldychev 11:47, 19 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adliswil christmas lights 1 20211213.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 08:40, 21 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

Frohe Weihnachten!

	✴ Happy Holidays, Domob ✴
	Merry Christmas and a happy new year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr! Желаю вам счастливого Рождества и Нового года! --Aristeas (talk) 09:51, 24 December 2021 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Balmoral Castle panorama 20211026.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Balmoral Castle panorama 20211026.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 15 January 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adliswil Kilchbergstrasse panosphere 20211213.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:18, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Valued Image Promoted

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pont del Bisbe, Barcelona.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Quite an ambitious scope. But indeed, it's obviously the best among 84 images. Nevertheless, you shoud leave the assessment "Best in scope" to the reviewers. --Palauenc05 (talk) 06:55, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:11, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zürich Schanzengraben panosphere 20220503.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good quality. --Steindy 17:57, 10 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zürich Schanzengraben Sihl panosphere 20220503.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 19:57, 15 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 18 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zürich Allmendsteg panosphere 20220503.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments blown sun, focus on nearby object + minor stitching flaw (lower left center) Is this fixable? --Virtual-Pano 19:26, 17 May 2022 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review! I've increased highlight compression around the sun a bit more now, but obviously it will always be blown. I also tried to cover the stitching artefact at the rail a bit better (but I don't think it is completely fixable). In most directions, the far-away things are actually in focus (e.g. the tower on Üetliberg), but for some my frames didn't allow that unfortunately. So nothing I can fix here. --Domob 08:04, 18 May 2022 (UTC)  Comment There is quite some improvement. For the unfixable issue I would like to hear a second opinion --Virtual-Pano 19:08, 18 May 2022 (UTC)  Support For me, the overall quality is good enough --PantheraLeo1359531 12:50, 20 May 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spatschlucht Schriesheim 20220507 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spatschlucht Schriesheim 20220507 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 19 June 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spatschlucht Schriesheim edge panosphere 20220507.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 16:41, 2 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 5 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Luftseilbahn Adliswil Felsenegg 20220703.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 10:51, 10 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 July 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fallätsche Rifugio panosphere 20220707.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:46, 18 July 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 21 July 2022 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Balmoral Castle panorama 20211026.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 28 September 2022 (UTC)

POTD Notification

⭐ The file you uploaded, is on the main page! ⭐ The file File:Glencoe Lochan reflections 3 20211022.jpg, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sihlwald Moorwald panosphere 20220718.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 17:17, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 November 2022 (UTC)

File:Maidan Nezalezhnosti Monument.jpg

File:Maidan Nezalezhnosti Monument.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 08:41, 27 November 2022 (UTC)

Category:Kreuzkappelle_Appenzell

Kreuzkappelle Appenzell has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

131.152.231.248 17:27, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

Herzliche Grüße und danke für Deine Fotos!

✴ Happy Holidays, Daniel ✴ Merry Christmas and a happy new year! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Buon Natale e felice anno nuovo! Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr! Aristeas (talk) 10:03, 23 December 2023 (UTC)