Commons:Bundesarchiv/Error reports/Archive/2011
|
This page is an archive. Please do not edit the contents of this page. Direct any additional comments to this page. |
January, 2011
January 2, 2011
- File:Bundesarchiv B 145 Bild-F030710-0030, Bonn, Bundeskanzler Brandt mit Bundeswehrführung.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv B 145 Bild-F030710-0028, Bonn, Bundeskanzler Brandt mit Bundeswehrführung.jpg
In der jeweiligen Liste der abgebildeten Personen fehlt de:Gert Jeschonnek, Vizeadmiral, Inspekteur der Marine.--KuK (talk) 16:32, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
OK Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ist in der Bundesarchiv-Bilddatenbank geändert! Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 19:12, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
- Ja, da vielleicht. Aber was ist mit den bisher unveränderten Texten unter den hier eingestellten Bildern? Wie sollen die korrigiert werden? Ich möchte dort nichts ändern, sondern das den Zuständigen überlassen.--KuK (talk) 17:25, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
- Genau, insbesondere da das Hochladen von korrigierten Versionen vom Bundesarchiv wegen zu niedriger Auflösung für "reguläre" Benutzer anscheinend unmöglich ist. --Illythr (talk) 02:50, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
- Ja, da vielleicht. Aber was ist mit den bisher unveränderten Texten unter den hier eingestellten Bildern? Wie sollen die korrigiert werden? Ich möchte dort nichts ändern, sondern das den Zuständigen überlassen.--KuK (talk) 17:25, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 101I-297-1729-23, Im Westen, Selbstfahrlafetten "Grille".jpg
- Keine Selbstfahrlafette "Grille" sondern Panzerjäger "Marder III" Ausführung M. Eine Grille Ausf. M sieht so aus. --Denniss (talk) 16:52, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
- OK Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ist in der Bundesarchiv-Bilddatenbank geändert! Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 19:12, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
_2.jpg){kind=link}
January 17, 2011
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-1987-0630-037, Strand zwischen Markgrafenheide und Stolters.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-1987-0630-038, Strand zwischen Markgrafenheide und Stolters.jpg
Bei Stolters handelt es sich vermutlich um einen Tippfehler (statt dem a wurde das s getroffen), der Küstenabschnitt nennt sich Stoltera -- Niteshift (talk) 12:51, 17 January 2011 (UTC)
- OK Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ist in der Bundesarchiv-Bilddatenbank geändert! Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 19:12, 27 January 2011 (UTC)
February 2011
February 25, 2011
Das Bild zeigt den Breiten Weg, nicht die Hellenstraße, wie im Text angegeben. Geo-Koordinaten des Fotografenstandpunkt habe ich hinzugefügt. Hadhuey (talk) 12:52, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
- OK Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ist in der Bundesarchiv-Bilddatenbank geändert. Fehler im Originaltitel müssen hingegen überichtigt übernommen werden! Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 14:24, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
February 28, 2011
Das Bild zeigt die Aiguille de Bionnassay im Mont-Blanc-Massiv, gesehen von der Aiguille du Gouter, also keinen Berg, der jemals in Tirol lag. --Tufka (talk) 20:23, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
- OK Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ist in der Bundesarchiv-Bilddatenbank geändert. Fehler im Originaltitel müssen hingegen überichtigt übernommen werden! Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 14:24, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
March 2011
March 1, 2011
Es ist nicht der Stammweg 23 (den gibt es gar nicht), sondern der Steinweg 68–66 (v.l.n.r.) mit dem Durchgang zum Neustädter Kirchhofe / Nikolaikirche. --Quedel (talk) 09:44, 1 March 2011 (UTC)
- OK Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ist in der Bundesarchiv-Bilddatenbank geändert. Fehler im Originaltitel müssen hingegen unberichtigt übernommen werden! Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 14:37, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
March 13, 2011
Für den Fall, dass es noch jemanden interessiert: User:Martin-loewenstein hat die Bildbeschreibung wie folgt geändert: [1] Ob das stimmt, kann ich allerdings nciht beurteilen, ich habe jedenfalls die alte Beschreibung wieder hergestellt und die neue als Kommentar eingefügt. -- Timo Müller Diskussion 10:04, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3ABundesarchiv_Bild_102-08880%2C_USA%2C_M%C3%B6nch_mit_Seismographen.jpg&action=historysubmit&diff=51862988&oldid=37140926){kind=link}
- OK Vielen Dank für den Hinweis. Ob es sich bei der auf dem Foto abgebildeten Person jedoch wirklich um einen Angehörigen des Jesuitenordens handelt, erscheint zumindest fragwürdig, da selbige keine einheitliche Tracht hatten; vgl. hierzu beispielsweise de:Jesuiten
March 24, 2011
Dateiname ist offensichtlich falsch. Es sollte "File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-W0128-310, Unterwellenborn, Maxhütte.jpg" heißen.
- OK Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ist in der Bundesarchiv-Bilddatenbank geändert! Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 14:37, 28 March 2011 (UTC)
April 2011
April 28, 2011
In der Bildbeschreibung scheint mir hinter "UBz:" ein Textteil zu fehlen. Wschroedter (talk) 09:25, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
- "UBz:" heißt wohl „Unser Bild zeigt“: somit fehlt dann kein Textteil (UBz: den Vorsitzenden der FDJ, Erich Honecker, während eines Besuches im August 1952.). --Botaurus (talk) 10:38, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
April 30, 2011
Es dürfte sich wohl um die Orte Cretzschwitz (heute Ortsteil von Gera) und Wüstenhain (Ortsteil von Brahmenau) handeln, beide nordwestlich von Gera gelegen und benachbart. Andere Orte mit ähnlichen Namen sind mir im ehemaligen Kreis Gera-Land jedenfalls nicht bekannt. --slg 00:44, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
- OK Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ist in der Bundesarchiv-Bilddatenbank geändert. Fehler im Originaltitel müssen hingegen unberichtigt übernommen werden! Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 12:39, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
May 2011
May 1, 2011
Bei dem abgebildeten Fahrzeug handelt es sich entgegen der Bildbeschreibung und dem Dateinamen nicht um eine Straßenbahn, sondern um einen Bus. Um genauer zu sein, ist es ein Standard-Linienbus I, Modell O 305 von Mercedes-Benz. --79.199.36.33 16:24, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
- OK Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ist in der Bundesarchiv-Bilddatenbank geändert. Fehler im Originaltitel müssen hingegen unberichtigt übernommen werden! Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 12:55, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
May 12, 2011
Hier handelt es sich wohl nicht wie angegeben um Manfred Brunner, sondern um das Foto des verstorbenen deutschen Botschafter in Spanien, Guido Brunner. OTRS-Ticket. Lt. Vita Manfred Brunner ist dieser Jahrgang 1947 und hätte am Erstellungtag des Bildes das zarte Alte von 30 Jahren gehabt. Das Bild zeigt m. E. aber eine deutlich ältere Person. --ST ○ 22:02, 12 May 2011 (UTC)
- siehe zum Vergleich auch: Website der Landeshauptstadt München mit Foto Manfred Brunners. Botaurus (talk) 04:03, 13 May 2011 (UTC)
- OK Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ist in der Bundesarchiv-Bilddatenbank geändert! Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 12:55, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
May 15, 2011
This picture wasn't taken in Tokaj. The right place is Debrecen. File:Bundesarchiv Bild 101I-244-2324-09, Ungarn, Debrecen, Panzer V "Panther".jpg --Beroesz (talk) 18:23, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
- OK Thank you very much for your advice, we have changed it already in our database! Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 12:55, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
This picture wasn't taken in Tokaj. The right place is Debrecen. --Beroesz (talk) 18:30, 15 May 2011 (UTC)
- OK Thank you very much for your advice, we have changed it already in our database! Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 12:55, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
May 16, 2011
Fehler im Dateinamen: Es ist die Deponie Schönberg, habe die Datei auf den richtigen Namen verschoben. Gruß -- Niteshift (talk) 18:05, 16 May 2011 (UTC)
- OK Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ist in der Bundesarchiv-Bilddatenbank geändert! Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 12:55, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
May 23, 2011
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-J27759, Arnheim, getarntes Sturmgeschütz.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-J27757, Arnheim, Sturmgeschütz in den Strassen der Stadt.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 101I-220-0636-14, Russland, Aufladen von Munition.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 101I-220-0636-16, Russland, Aufladen von Munition.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 101I-220-0636-07, Russland, "Hummel" und Sturmgeschütz III.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 101I-220-0636-08, Russland, Panzerspähwagen und Sturmgeschütz III.jpg
Kein Sturmgeschütz/StuG III sondern eine de:Sturmhaubitze 42 - kurzes Rohr mit größerem Kaliber da eine 105 mm Haubitze statt der langen 75 mm Sturmkanone 40 eingebaut war. Die untersten zwei Bilder gehören wohl zur gleichen Serie wie die beiden darüber, würden also die gleiche StuH42 zeigen. Beim Bild -07 kann man recht am Nacken des Soldaten die Mündungsbremse erkennen, die Rohrlänge entspricht dem der StuH42. --Denniss (talk) 14:53, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
- OK Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ist in der Bundesarchiv-Bilddatenbank geändert!Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 14:43, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Der Panzer links ist kein Sturmgeschütz IV - anhand der sichtbaren Rohrmündung ist das ein großes Kaliber mit sehr kurzem Rohr - kann also nur der de:Sturmpanzer IV sein. --Denniss (talk) 15:09, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
- OK Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ist in der Bundesarchiv-Bilddatenbank geändert!Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 14:43, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Kann eigentlich auch nur ein Sturmpanzer IV sein - ein anderes Fahzeug auf Panzer-IV-Basis mit einem solchen Aufbau ist mir nicht bekannt. --Denniss (talk) 15:09, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
- OK Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ist in der Bundesarchiv-Bilddatenbank geändert!Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 14:43, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 101I-476-2051-07A, Italien, getarntes Sturmgeschütz III.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 101I-476-2051-08A, Italien, getarntes Sturmgeschütz III.jpg
Durchmesser und Länge des Rohres sprechen klar für eine Sturmhaubitze 42. --Denniss (talk) 15:21, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
- OK Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ist in der Bundesarchiv-Bilddatenbank geändert!Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 14:43, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Das erste Fahrzeug links ist klar eine StuH42, auf der rechten Seite das vierte Fahrzeug von vorn (ohne den schwebenden mitzuzählen). --Denniss (talk) 15:37, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
- OK Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ist in der Bundesarchiv-Bilddatenbank geändert!Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 14:43, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Das Rohr ist vergleichsweise dick und kurz, auch ist die frontale Öffnung der Mündungsbremse recht groß - zu 95% eine StuH42. --Denniss (talk) 15:37, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
- OK Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ist in der Bundesarchiv-Bilddatenbank geändert!Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 14:43, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Vom Laufwerk her ein de:Renault R-35 --Denniss (talk) 15:50, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
- OK Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ist in der Bundesarchiv-Bilddatenbank geändert!Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 14:43, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
May 27, 2011
Orginalbeschreibung : Das faschistische Deutschland im II. Weltkrieg 1939-45 Berlin wird am 1. Februar 1945 zum "Verteidigungsbereich" erklärt. [...] Höhrt sich m.E.n. nach einer weit später hinzugefügten Beschreibung an, und dürfte recht wenig mit der Orginalen Bildunterschrift zu tun haben, auch wenn es die älteste noch Überlieferte ist.
May 30, 2011
See [2], it's about a wrong date in description of a picture of the funeral of Werner Mölders. --Hæggis (talk) 10:06, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
![[2]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_183-H0422-0502-001,_Berlin,_Beisetzung_Oberst_Werner_M%C3%B6lders.jpg&oldid=23540666&diff=next){kind=link}
- OK Thank you for your advice, we have changed it already in our database!Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 14:43, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
June 2011
June 13, 2011
Anhand der Pilotenkanzel (Form zu rund an der Front, bei der Ju 88 deutlicher Absatz) keine Junkers Ju 88, wie schon von jemand anderen eingefügt ist das eine Dornier Do 17. --Denniss (talk) 17:03, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
- OK Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ist in der Bundesarchiv-Bilddatenbank geändert! Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 14:55, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
June 15, 2011
Das Bild zeigt das Motorrettungsboot "Weser" der DGzRS --EM311 (talk) 20:57, 15 June 2011 (UTC)
- OK Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ist in der Bundesarchiv-Bilddatenbank geändert! Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 14:55, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
June 16, 2011
genanntes Bild zeigt die gleiche wendische Hochzeit wie File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_102-11632,_Spreewald,_Wenden-Hochzeit.jpg, historische Bildbeschreibung vermutlich unpassend, siehe Diskussionsseite, --Slick (talk) 15:15, 16 June 2011 (UTC)
- OK Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, aber Fehler im Originaltitel müssen unberichtigt übernommen werden! Aus diesem Grund wurde ein Archivtitel angelegt und in diesem eine richtige Beschreibung vorgenommen. Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 14:55, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
June 19, 2011
Tippfehler im Ortsnamen Warbends -> Warbende, auf File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-31305-0002, Warbende, Bauer beim Melken.jpg verschoben. -- Niteshift (talk) 19:40, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
- OK Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ist in der Bundesarchiv-Bilddatenbank geändert! Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 14:55, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
Fehler in Orts und Kreisnamen: Warbende, Neustrelitz, verschoben auf File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-31305-0001, Schweinehaltung auf Volksgut Warbende, Kreis Neustrelitz.jpg. Gruß -- Niteshift (talk) 19:53, 19 June 2011 (UTC)
- OK Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ist in der Bundesarchiv-Bilddatenbank geändert! Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 14:55, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
June 20, 2011
Schreibfehler in Beschreibung: "noch vor kurzem mit der Lupe zu suchen: der Hort Hellersdorf im Osten der Hauptstadt" ... mMn muss es "Ort" heißen -- Acf (talk) 17:03, 20 June 2011 (UTC)
- OK Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ist in der Bundesarchiv-Bilddatenbank geändert! Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 14:55, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
June 22, 2011
Tipfehler im Archivtitel wurde korrigiert: Zugmachine -> Zugmaschine. --Martin H. (talk) 20:25, 22 June 2011 (UTC)
- OK Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ist in der Bundesarchiv-Bilddatenbank geändert! Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 14:55, 27 June 2011 (UTC)
July 2011
July 5, 2011
The man to Himmler's left is his adjutant, Karl Wolff.
And regarding Eigruber: The series of photos from the Mauthausen visit seems to actually be from two visits. It is shown by Eigruber wearing different uniforms and Himmler is also wearing different uniforms. Example:
In the following, Himmler is wearing long trousers and Eigruber is wearing a black uniform with the SS officers cap with a skull.
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_192-195,_KZ_Mauthausen,_Himmlervisite.jpg
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_192-140,_KZ_Mauthausen,_Himmler_mit_Eigruber.jpg
In these however, Himmler is not wearing long trousers and Eigruber is not even wearing an SS-uniform:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_192-014,_KZ_Mauthausen,_Besuch_Heinrich_Himmler.jpg
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_192-108,_KZ_Mauthausen,_Besuch_Heinrich_Himmler.jpg
http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_192-110,_KZ_Mauthausen,_Besuch_Heinrich_Himmler.jpg
It also seems that Ernst Kaltenbrunner is in Himmler's company when Himmler is wearing long trousers but not in the other one.
- OK Thank you very much for your advice, we have changed it already in our database! Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 14:45, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
July 10, 2011
Karl Gebhardt was promoted to SS-Gruppenführer on 30.1.1943. The caption says he was SS-Brigadeführer.
- OK Thank you very much for your advice, but the caption means his grade in the "Waffen-SS" and not his grade in the common "SS". Gebhardt was promoted to SS-Brigadeführer of the "Waffen-SS" on 1.10.1940.
July 12, 2011
Allgemeiner Bildfehler
Comment nothing to be done
July 13, 2011
This photo has a wrong description ,this is after battle of denmark strait,the photo was taken at 06:19. The doubt of description is clearly sugerated by using "probably"-wahrscheinlich .Corect description of the photo is :http://www.bismarck-class.dk/bismarck/gallery/gallbismdenmarkstrait.html The number 12 photo posted there is the same
- Bundesarchiv caption still holds the wrong SMS prefix for both british ships - should be HMS. --Denniss (talk) 10:09, 14 July 2011 (UTC)
- OK Thank you very much for your advice, we have changed it already in our database! Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 14:45, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
July 24, 2011
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 101I-667-7142-24, Flugzeug Blohm - Voß BV 238 V1.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 101I-667-7143-06, Flugzeug Blohm - Voß BV 238 V1.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 101I-667-7143-02, Flugzeug Blohm - Voß BV 238 V1.jpg
- Blohm & Voss ist der richtige Firmenname. --Denniss (talk) 01:12, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
- OK Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ist in der Bundesarchiv-Bilddatenbank geändert! Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 14:45, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
July 29, 2011
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 101I-757-0037N-26A, Norwegen, Schwerer Kreuzer "Lützow".jpg
- The image does not depict the heavy cruiser Lützow - the first vessel to carry that name was sold to the Soviet Union by April 1940, and the second does not match the photo. See for instance, the four secondary battery turrets in this photo of Deutschland/Lützow, which are not present on the ship in the above photo. The photo is clearly the cruiser Admiral Hipper, as her sister Blücher had been sunk by Norwegian coastal guns in the early morning hours of 9 April 1940. Parsecboy (talk) 14:04, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
- Nevermind, I see that the image has already been corrected in the Bundesarchiv database. The title still needs to be moved here on Commons, however (along with File:Bundesarchiv Bild 101I-757-0038N-11A, Norwegen, Schwerer Kreuzer.jpg as well). Parsecboy (talk) 14:07, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
- Comment file was moved to File:Bundesarchiv Bild 101I-757-0037N-26A, Norwegen, Schwerer Kreuzer "Admiral Hipper".jpg
- Nevermind, I see that the image has already been corrected in the Bundesarchiv database. The title still needs to be moved here on Commons, however (along with File:Bundesarchiv Bild 101I-757-0038N-11A, Norwegen, Schwerer Kreuzer.jpg as well). Parsecboy (talk) 14:07, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
August 2011
August 31, 2011
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 101I-134-0783-20, Polen, Ghetto Warschau, katholischer Priester.jpg
- The image does not depict a katholischer Priester but a Hazzan/Cantor in traditional Jewish Cantorial Gowns; see a white gown http://www.gotjudaica.com/largeimage.asp?Image=cs-cantor-gown&Name=Cantorial%20Gowns%20&%20Hats%20-%20Custom%20Made He is probably chanting a burial service. There is a corpse in a plain wooden casket in front of him (of which we can see the foot). The body is dressed in a white kittel (shroud) and a tallit. (Laurifindil (talk) 21:48, 31 August 2011 (UTC))
- OK Thank you very much, we have changed it already in our database! Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 13:52, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
September 2011
September 1, 2011
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 102-12899, Sarojini Naidu.jpg
- Image is not Sarojini Naidu, but Kamaladevi Chattopadhyaya - errata reportedy Dr.Adam Chattopadhyaya Seattle, WA 2011 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 184.77.115.165 (talk • contribs) 20:39, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- OK Thank you very much, we have changed it already in our database! Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 15:02, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
- File:Bundesarchiv DVM 10 Bild-23-63-51, Panzerschiff der Deutschland-Klasse.jpg
- Image clearly shows the Deutschland, Admiral Scheer had a different bridge/mainmast construction. See Deutschland and Admiral Scheer --Denniss (talk) 21:35, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
- OK Thank you very much, we have changed it already in our database! Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 15:02, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
- File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_183-W1028-507,_Erlangen,_Freimaurer_bei_Zeremonie.jpg
- Die Loge heisst "zu den drei Cedern", nicht Zedern.
- OK Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ist in der Bundesarchiv-Bilddatenbank geändert! Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 15:02, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
September 6, 2011
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-K1216-501, Berlin, Neue Reichskanzlei, Marmorgalerie.jpg
- Presumably the caption should read ,,in einer Länge von 146m und einer Breite von 12m (not 14,6m)
- OK Thank you very much, we have changed it already in our database! Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 15:02, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
September 9, 2011
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-27664-0003, Murohin, Leseabend im Kulturhaus.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-27664-0001, Murohin, Vorlesen im Kulturhaus.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-27386-0007, Murohin, Blick in das Kulturhaus.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-27386-0006, Murohin, Blick in das Kulturhaus.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-27386-0005, Murohin, Bibliothek des Kulturhauses.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-27386-0004, Murohin, Leseraum des Kulturhauses.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-27386-0003, Murohin, Bibliothek des Kulturhauses.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-27386-0002, Murohin, Blick in das Kulturhaus.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-27386-0001, Murohin, Blick auf das Kulturhaus.jpg
- Ortsname jeweils richtig Murchin statt Murohin, Dateien wurden hier bereits auf richtigen Namen verschoben. Gruß -- Niteshift (talk) 21:44, 9 September 2011 (UTC)
- OK Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ist in der Bundesarchiv-Bilddatenbank geändert! Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 15:02, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
September 10, 2011
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-1989-0201-007, Landkreis Greiswald, Dr. Siegfried Metzner (CDU).jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-1989-0201-006, Landkreis Greiswald, Dr. Siegfried Metzner (CDU).jpg
- statt "Landkreis Greiswald" sollte es "Kreis Greifswald" (ohne Land-) heißen. -- Niteshift (talk) 00:57, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
- OK Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ist in der Bundesarchiv-Bilddatenbank geändert! Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 15:02, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
September 22, 2011
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1973-077-63, Panzerschiff "Lützow".jpg
- Wenn das Bild von 1938 (eher früher) ist, dann hieß das Schiff noch Deutschland. --Denniss (talk) 00:33, 21 September 2011 (UTC)
- OK Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ist in der Bundesarchiv-Bilddatenbank geändert! Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 15:02, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
September 23, 2011
- File:Bundesarchiv B 145 Bild-F078951-0010, Hamburg, Deichstraße.jpg
- Die Originalbeschreibung ist falsch: Das Bild zeigt die Krameramtsstuben und nicht die Deichstraße. --Mogelzahn (talk) 20:28, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
- OK Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ist in der Bundesarchiv-Bilddatenbank geändert! Fehler im Originaltitel müssen hingegen unberichtigt übernommen werden. Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 15:02, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
September 24, 2011
The names of some of the women are misspelled. The correct names are Eliška Deutschová-Klimková, Gertruda Sekaninová-Čakrtová (compare here), and on the very right Margita Schwalbová. Nazgul02 (talk) 11:13, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
- OK Thank you very much, we have changed it already in our database! Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 15:02, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
Böses Foul: Wilhelmshafen! Richtige Schreibweise: Wilhelmshaven. --KuK (talk) 17:14, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
- OK Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ist in der Bundesarchiv-Bilddatenbank geändert! Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 15:02, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
September 26, 2011
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-F0413-0027-001, Berlin, Plattenbauten, Altbauten.jpg
- Diese zehngeschossigen Neubauwohnblocks stehen nicht an der Rhinstraße sondern am Rosenfelder Ring. Die entsprechende zusätzliche Kommentierung ist bereits erfolgt. --Lotse (talk) 14:01, 26 September 2011 (UTC) – Siehe auch die Notizen im Bild. --Lotse (talk) 21:26, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- OK Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ist in der Bundesarchiv-Bilddatenbank geändert! Fehler im Originaltitel müssen hingegen unberichtigt übernommen werden. Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 15:02, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 101I-310-0884-16, Italien, Panzer V (Panther) in Stadt.jpg
- This picture was taken in Rome, Italy, from the corner between viale Manzoni and via Emanuele Filiberto, as can be clearly seen here. --Piero Montesacro (talk) 19:47, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- OK Thank you very much, we have changed it already in our database! Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 15:02, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
_in_Stadt.jpg){kind=link}
September 28, 2011
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 101I-186-0194-07A, Russland, Panzersoldat.jpg
- This is very likely to be the German Armoured troops Lieutenant Colonel Gustav-Adolf Riebel (see here), with binoculars and awards. Born on 13 March 1896, promoted to Major general on 1 August 1942, killed in action 23 August 1942. --Piero Montesacro (talk) 23:00, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
- OK Thank you very much, we have changed it already in our database! Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 11:20, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
- File:Bundesarchiv_N_1603_Bild-210,_Messina,_Flüchtlingswagen.jpg
- This picture was definitely taken in Messina, and surely not in Palermo: see the monument at Our Lady at the Port entrance, seen in the background of the picture. There is no such structure in or around Palermo. --Piero Montesacro (talk) 23:04, 28 September 2011 (UTC)
- OK Thank you very much, we have changed it already in our database! Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 11:20, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
September 29, 2011
- File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-729-0001-28,_Italien,_Überführung_von_Kunstschätzen.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 101I-729-0005-27, Italien, Überführung von Kunstschätzen.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 101I-729-0005-25, Italien, Überführung von Kunstschätzen.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 101I-729-0001-23, Italien, Überführung von Kunstschätzen.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-729-0001-16,_Italien,_Überführung_von_Kunstschätzen.jpg
People, locations and dates added to the pictures listed above. --Piero Montesacro (talk) 20:57, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- OK Thank you very much for your advice, we have changed it already in our database!--Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 18:29, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
October 2011
Oktober 17, 2011
Im Bildbeschreibungstext steht, „UBz: In dem kleinen mecklenburgischen Dorf Kruckow im Kreis Dommin, ....“; Die erwähnte Kreisstadt heißt Demmin. Im Commons-File habe ich die Korrektur schon durchgeführt. mfG --Botaurus (talk) 14:04, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
- OK Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ist in der Bundesarchiv-Bilddatenbank geändert! Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 11:23, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
October 21, 2011
File:Bundesarchiv Bild 192-029, KZ Mauthausen, Himmler, Kaltenbrunner, Ziereis.jpg The author of this Photo is Francisco Boix, a spanish Photographer who was in nazi concentration camps during the IIWW.--Manuchansu (talk) 15:31, 21 October 2011 (UTC)
- Thank you very much, we have changed it already in our database! Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 11:36, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
- Comment Sorry, my colleague made a mistake: Francois Roix isn't the photographer! See Cornelia Brink: Ikonen der Vernichtung. Berlin 1998, p.113-115 or David Wingeate Pike: Spaniards in the Holocaust: Mauthausen, Horror on the Danube, London 2000, p. 126-128. The photos were taken by the SS-Men Paul Ricken, Fritz Kornatz, Hermann Schinlauer. We can't be sure which photo was taken by whom, so the photographer in our database is "unknown" (="o.Ang."). Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 18:54, 23 November 2011 (UTC)
Oktober 25, 2011
File:Bundesarchiv Bild 101I-121-0011A-22, Polen, Siegesparade, Guderian, Kriwoschein.jpg Bildauschnitt mit Personenbezeichnungen im Buch "Erinnerungen eines Soldaten" von Guderian, 1950, Seite 81 V.l.n.r: Generalleutnant Mauritz von Wiktorin, General der Panzertruppen Heinz Guderian und Generalmajor Semjon Kriwoschein. Die Dienstgrade entsprechen dem Stand 22. September 1939. --Drdoht 14:31, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
- OK Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ist in der Bundesarchiv-Bilddatenbank geändert! Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 11:40, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-35351-0026, Festakt in der Deutschen Staatsoper Berlin.jpg "Marsel Cachin, Präsident der Französischen Nationalversammlung". Das ist Marcel Cachin mit einem "C".--Zolo (talk) 16:00, 25 October 2011 (UTC)
- OK Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ist in der Bundesarchiv-Bilddatenbank geändert! Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 11:40, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
November 2011
Added location and presumed date. See the image and its Discussion page for details. Thanks, --Piero Montesacro (talk) 16:58, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
- OK Thank you very much for your advice, we have changed it already in our database!--Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 20:02, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Added location and presumed date. This picture was taken in central Tirana, Albania, not Jugoslavia, thus I tend to think the file should be renamed accordingly. --Piero Montesacro (talk) 19:18, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
- OK this was obviously corrected by the Bundesarchiv in the meantime; I've fixed our description accordingly and moved the file to File:Bundesarchiv Bild 101I-049-1605-30A, Tirana, Raupenschlepper Ost mit Anhänger.jpg --:bdk: 01:00, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
- OK Mr. Montesacro, thank you very much for your advice, and BdK for your "ok" ;-!--Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 20:02, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
Als Datum wird 1897 angegeben. Gab es in diesem Jahr schon Stromleitungen und Masten? --Alia 2005 28 November 2011
- Mindestens Telegrafenmansten gab es damals viele. Allerdings steht unter dem Bild auch etwas von 1897/1914.--Nothere (talk) 17 December 2011
- OK I've adapted the date according to the BArch entry now (1897 > "between 1897 and 1914") --:bdk: 01:35, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
December 2011
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1991-068-22, Pottenstein, Bergmassive.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1991-068-23, Pottenstein, Bergmassive.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1991-068-25, Pottenstein, Bergmassive.jpg
Diese Fotos zeigen nicht Pottenstein in Oberfranken, da dort die Felswände etwas kleiner ausgefallen sind. Die zusätzliche Erläuterung (Im Sommer bieten die gewaltigen Abstürze des Hochkönigs und des Tennengebirges vielfältige Möglichkeiten für zusätzliche Hochgebirgs-Kletterausbildung.) weist darauf hin, um welche Berge es sich tatsächlich handelt. Gruß --Janericloebe (talk) 23:04, 9 December 2011 (UTC)
- OK Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, ist in der Bundesarchiv-Bilddatenbank und auf Wikimedia Commons geändert! --Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 08:51, 18 April 2012 (UTC)
- Ist in den Bildbeschreibungen immer noch unklar, dass dies nicht Franken ist. --тнояsтеn ⇔ 13:19, 29 October 2012 (UTC)
Der Name des Orts lautet korrekt de:Lemsdorf.--Olaf2 (talk) 23:48, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
- OK Vielen Dank für den Hinweis, der Schreibfehler ist in der Bundesarchiv-Bilddatenbank und auf Wikimedia Commons geändert!--Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 19:02, 18 January 2012 (UTC)
- File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-311-0926-04,_Italien,_italienische_Soldaten.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-311-0926-05,_Italien,_italienische_Soldaten.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-311-0926-06,_Italien,_italienische_Soldaten.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-311-0926-07,_Italien,_italienische_Soldaten.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-311-0926-08,_Italien,_italienische_Soldaten,_deutscher_General.jpg
- File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-311-0926-09,_Italien,_italienische_Soldaten,_deutscher_General.jpg
- All the pictures listed above seem to belong to the very same photo set, taken during the same event and at the same place, which can be easily identified as Rome, viale Carso, near Piazza Bainsizza, as can be easily verified looking here for the File:Bundesarchiv Bild 101I-311-0926-07, Italien, italienische Soldaten.jpg and here for File:Bundesarchiv Bild 101I-311-0926-04, Italien, italienische Soldaten.jpg, File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-311-0926-08,_Italien,_italienische_Soldaten,_deutscher_General.jpg, and File:Bundesarchiv_Bild_101I-311-0926-09,_Italien,_italienische_Soldaten,_deutscher_General.jpg. The German General shown in the latter two pictures is very likely to be Kurt Mälzer, then (March 1944) military commander of the city of Rome, while inspecting Italian troops of the X MAS (belonging to the RSI Navy, and fighting as allied of the Germans) around the time - March 1944 - this unit (most probably the Battalion "Barbarigo") was deployed to contain the Allied beachhead at Anzio - Nettuno, south of Rome. The Italian officer seen near the general is probably the commander of the "Barbarigo", Umberto Bardelli. --Piero Montesacro (talk) 20:16, 26 September 2011 (UTC)
- OK Thank you very much, we have changed it already in our database! Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 15:02, 27 September 2011 (UTC)
- Sorry for my diverging view, Piero, but, barring any better evidence as to the appearance of Herr Mälzer, I seem to rather recognize en:Richard Heydrich, commander of 1st Parachute Division, in at least this picture. --Prüm (talk) 22:00, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
- Prüm is of course referring to General en:Richard Heidrich, simple typo.--Assayer (talk) 22:33, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
- Kurt Mälzer can be seen also here, at the center of the pic, with the same uniform, which I am not sure was ever wear by Richard Heydrich. AFAIK Richard Heydrich had no business in reviewing Italian troops in Rome (while this was routine to the Rome commander, who was Kurt Mälzer), and Heydrich had a distinctive nevus on the left cheek that cannot be seen on the left cheek of the person I do point as Kurt Mälzer. --Piero Montesacro (talk) 20:05, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- The uniform is IMHO a standard formal dress which could have been worn by either of them. It would perhaps be helpful if a more precise date of the image could be found, since Heidrich had left his command of 1. FJD for a period of more than a month in early 1944 (until late February). Unfortunately, I have no information on what he was doing at the time. Also, Heidrich's nevus apparently was on his right cheek, as shown here. --Prüm (talk) 16:40, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
- These two threads [3] [4] of an admittedly dubious forum discuss the very same issue. Apparently the author Sergio Corbatti identifies this general as "Kurt Melzer".--Assayer (talk) 13:27, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
- I am sorry, but it seems to me that File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-L19501, Richard Heidrich.jpg shows a nevus on his left cheek. BTW, the image shown on the Corbatti book appears to be from the same photoset discussed above, and the monocle weared by the Italian officer reviewing the troops, confirms his id as Umberto Bardelli (see here). --Piero Montesacro (talk) 01:03, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
- Heidrich was recipient of the Knight's Cross of the Iron Cross in 1941; the "Generalleutnant" on "Bild 101I-729-0001-28" has no Knight's Cross, so it's very likely, that the person is Kurt Mälzer. --Bundesarchiv-B6 (talk) 19:49, 12 January 2012 (UTC)
- I am sorry, but it seems to me that File:Bundesarchiv Bild 183-L19501, Richard Heidrich.jpg shows a nevus on his left cheek. BTW, the image shown on the Corbatti book appears to be from the same photoset discussed above, and the monocle weared by the Italian officer reviewing the troops, confirms his id as Umberto Bardelli (see here). --Piero Montesacro (talk) 01:03, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
- These two threads [3] [4] of an admittedly dubious forum discuss the very same issue. Apparently the author Sergio Corbatti identifies this general as "Kurt Melzer".--Assayer (talk) 13:27, 17 October 2011 (UTC)
- The uniform is IMHO a standard formal dress which could have been worn by either of them. It would perhaps be helpful if a more precise date of the image could be found, since Heidrich had left his command of 1. FJD for a period of more than a month in early 1944 (until late February). Unfortunately, I have no information on what he was doing at the time. Also, Heidrich's nevus apparently was on his right cheek, as shown here. --Prüm (talk) 16:40, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
- Kurt Mälzer can be seen also here, at the center of the pic, with the same uniform, which I am not sure was ever wear by Richard Heydrich. AFAIK Richard Heydrich had no business in reviewing Italian troops in Rome (while this was routine to the Rome commander, who was Kurt Mälzer), and Heydrich had a distinctive nevus on the left cheek that cannot be seen on the left cheek of the person I do point as Kurt Mälzer. --Piero Montesacro (talk) 20:05, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
- Prüm is of course referring to General en:Richard Heidrich, simple typo.--Assayer (talk) 22:33, 10 October 2011 (UTC)
