User talk:KuK

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Hello - thank you for providing images to the wikimedia commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the commons should be useful to all users of wikimedia projects - this is possible only if the images can be found by other people. To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should either place the images on topic pages (galleries), or put the images directly into a category, or do both. Which of those possibilities is preferred is however a matter of debate, see here.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There is a large number of completely unsorted images on the commons right now, see Commons:Really unused. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do! Thank you. -- Duesentrieb 26 June 2005 13:04 (UTC)

LCAC[edit]

Please provide a link to the site where you got Image:LCAC.JPG. Also, more information on what the image depicts would be appreciated. Thanks, dbenbenn | talk 26 June 2005 16:53 (UTC)

Indications of use[edit]

Thank you both for your comments. I have provided some further information on the source and content of some of my pictures. At this opportunity I have noticed that there is no indication of the use of these pictures in the German wikipedia. So they are in fact not unused, but the list "what links here" is empty. Is there any solution to this problem?--KuK 13:54, 16 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Image:JadeWeserPort 1.JPG[edit]

Please add your images to appropriative pages and/or categories where other users could easily find them. --EugeneZelenko 14:53, 28 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Containerschiff.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright Image:Containerschiff.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

GeorgHH 12:56, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image:Feederschiff-HH.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright Image:Feederschiff-HH.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

GeorgHH 12:58, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Tsumeb Railway.JPG[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Tsumeb Railway.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. GeorgHH 13:04, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Tsumeb 2.JPG[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Tsumeb 2.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. GeorgHH 13:05, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Tsumeb 3.JPG[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Tsumeb 3.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. GeorgHH 13:05, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Tsumeb_Railway.JPG[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Tsumeb_Railway.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. __ ABF __ ϑ 11:42, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Tsumeb_3.JPG[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Tsumeb_3.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. __ ABF __ ϑ 11:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image Tagging Image:Tsumeb_2.JPG[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Tsumeb_2.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. __ ABF __ ϑ 11:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tsumeb-Bilder[edit]

Hallo KuK, ABF hat die Bilder wiederhergestellt, und ich habe die Dateibeschreibungen überarbeitet. Ich nehme mal an, das du der direkte Erbe bist und deswegen über die Bildrechte verfügst (Bist du nicht direkter oder alleiniger Erbe, müssen sie gelöscht werden. Du solltest aber noch den Namen des Fotografen hinzufügen.
Ich beziehe mich auf deutsches Recht, da wir hier aber ein internationales Projekt sind, kann ich dir aber nicht versprechen das die Bilder bleiben werden, evtl. sieht es international anders aus. --GeorgHH • talk   12:18, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Auch an dieser Stelle erstmal herzlichen Dank! In der Tat bin ich der alleinige Erbe und bestätige das in der gleichen Form, wie jemand, der selber ein Bild aufgenommen hat, bestätigt, dass er der alleinige Rechteinhaber ist. Er muss dafür auch seine Identität nicht preisgeben, was ich hier ebenfalls vermeiden möchte. Natürlich bin ich per e-mail erreichbar (ist ja in dieser Angelegenheit auch schon mal geschehen) und könnte auf diesem Wege weitere Informationen geben. M.E. muss es aber analog zu Eigenaufnahmen ausreichen, wenn man den Besitz der Rechte bestätigt. Sonst würden alle Bilder vom Tod des Fotografen an für 70 Jahre in einen Sonderstatus fallen, in dem die Rechteinhaber nur eingeschränkt über sie verfügen können. Das kann eigentlich nicht sein. Vielleicht gibt es aber eine bessere Stelle als diese Nutzerseite, um das mit Experten zu besprechen? Wäre für einen Hinweis dankbar!--KuK 12:40, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Ich denke bei deinen Bilder ist jetzt alles klar, Diskussionsbedarf sehe ich momentan nicht. Falls du weitere Fragen dazu hast solltest du es auf de:Wikipedia:Urheberrechtsfragen oder hier auf Commons talk:Licensing zur Dikussion stellen. Vielleicht hilft dir ja auch schon UrhG.
Übrigens ist es hier auf Comons (auch für Admins) nicht immer einfach abzuschätzen, ob, wie bei deinen Bildern, der uploader wirklich der Rechteinhaber ist, oder jemand irgendwo ein Bilder heruntergalden hat und es hier wissend oder auch unwissend als eigenes Werk bzw. als angeblicher Rechteinhaber hochlädt. Daher kann es schon mal zu Missverständnissen oder unberechtigten Löschung kommen, nichts für Ungut. --GeorgHH • talk   15:07, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Vielen Dank für Deinen Kommentar. Jetzt müssen wir nur noch ABF überzeugen, dass die Sache in Ordnung ist und er die Löschhinweise rausnimmt. Ich kann im übrigen die Situation der admins gut verstehen und bin sehr dankbar, dass sich jemand die Mühe macht, Commons sauber zu halten. Das ist bestimmt oft ein wenig befriedigendes Geschäft. Deshalb bin ich auch nicht böse, sondern nur bemüht, der WP trotz der Schwierigkeiten solche Bilder zu erhalten, die mir zugleich legal und interessant erscheinen. Gruß --KuK 19:41, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Wellershoff.JPG[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 15:05, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I assume this problem solved through GrummelJS now!?--KuK 19:15, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Heinrich Lange.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 15:11, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I assume this problem solved through GrummelJS now!?--KuK 19:15, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Refinery WHV 2.JPG[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 09:30, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Should be done now.--KuK 11:18, 24 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Selfportraits[edit]

In fact, after creating the category when I thought the portraits were 4 overall, when I saw they where actually dozens I realizied it was impossible he had selportrayed himself in so many situations, therefore I already asked to change the name into "Portraits and selfportraits": http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:CommonsDelinker/commands

However, the problem is another one. The point is that from a formal point of view, if he owned the negatives, and bequeathed them to the Archive, then he is formally to be considered the author (for unsigned images by unknown author, the owner of the negatives is to be considered the author), otherwise, these images should be deleted for copyright problems (we don't know who the photographer is, and Commons only accepts images free from ANY rights).

The images from the German Archive will create a lot of copyright problems. I am exhamining Italy, and there are scores and scores of images that were clearly added in a period when a 20-year copyright period was the norm for non-artistic images, however, meanwhile the copyright has been revived and stretched to 70 years after the death of the photographer. Therefore, many, if not most, of these images, do not meet the criteria for WikiCommons.

The only images that should not create problems, paradoxically, are the Nazi propaganda ones. The copyright is owned by the German State, as a War booty, and if the State archive who owns them donated them, then the copyright holder legitimally donated them. Fullstop. But an image such as this File:Bundesarchiv N 1603 Bild-362, Erich Stoll, Charly Chaplin-Darsteller, Horst Grund.jpg should be deleted. It is positive that it has not fallen into the PD. Not to mention an image such as this: File:Bundesarchiv Bild 146-1977-160-12, Italienische Soldaten ergeben sich.jpg: it is highly unlikely that a German photographer was atop of the hill, amidst the British troops, to shoot images to send to Nazi Germany. This is patently a British image, reused for anti-Italian propaganda by the nazi after the Armistice. A Crowm copyright could exist on this image. Which should therefore go. Helas, since it is important, from a historical point of view.

Since we are at it, I would appreciate help in categorizing these images by photographer. You miught ghave, or not, noticed I started the job. Most photographers are only listed by their surname, we should find out their name and death date. In order to delete all the copyright violations. best wishes. --User:G.dallorto (talk) 15:29, 24 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File:USS Boxer and USS Bainbridge.jpg[edit]

dansk ∙ italiano ∙ sicilianu ∙ Deutsch ∙ català ∙ magyar ∙ čeština ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ português ∙ English ∙ hrvatski ∙ français ∙ Nederlands ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ polski ∙ galego ∙ íslenska ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:22, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

Done, --KuK (talk) 17:47, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quellenangaben deiner Uploads[edit]

Hallo!

Wenn du Bilder beispielsweise von der Seite der US NAVY nimmst, dann kopier bitte den Link auf die entsprechende Homepage, wo das Foto liegt. BITTE NICHT direkt auf die .jpg-Datei verlinken! Links auf das Bild selbst, also auf die jpg-Datei sind wertlos, da aus diesen Quellen keine Rückschluss auf den Urheberrechtsstatus möglich ist.

Als Beispiel: wurde entsprechend von mir abgeändert.

Gruß und Danke im voraus, High Contrast (talk) 16:16, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

O.K. verstanden, dann muss ich noch ein paar von heute korrigieren.--KuK (talk) 16:18, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Danke für die rasche Reaktion! Übrigens: Deine Kategorisierungsarbeiten im Bereich deutsche Marine sind wirklich hervorzuheben! Was anderes: Kann ich hierbei ([1], [2]) helfen? --High Contrast (talk) 16:36, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Vielen Dank für die Blumen und das Angebot. M.E. ist das erledigt, Bild ist unter neuem, richtigem Namen eingestellt. Die Marinekategorien sind angesichts der Brüche in der deutschen Militärgeschichte wirklich ein Problem. Bei den Engländern ist das die Royal Navy ob im Ersten oder Zweiten Weltkrieg, dazwischen oder danach. Bei uns eiert man mit Kaiserlicher, Reichs-, Kriegs- und sonstigen Marinen herum. So ganz konsistent wird das nie werden.--KuK (talk) 16:41, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

FP Nomination[edit]

Nomination Notification

G'day! I love File:LCAC.JPG, that you've uploaded to Commons, so I've nominated it for Featured Picture status. Its nomination is at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:LCAC.JPG. Best of luck! Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 10:48, 12 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]


File source is not properly indicated: File:Rumsfeld.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Rumsfeld.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 08:48, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Die von dir angegebene Quelle (http://www.defense.gov/multimedia/) reicht leider nicht. Bitte spezifizieren, d.h. konkreter html-Link auf die Seite, wo das Bild zu finden ist. --High Contrast (talk) 08:50, 14 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Vielen Dank für den Hinweis! Ich habe die gesamte US-DoD-Seite abgesucht und gegoogelt, das Bild ist weg. Es war unter dem angegebenen Datum vom 5. Mai 2005 eingestellt. Inzwischen hat man alles bis Oktober 2006 rausgenommen. Das ist natürlich ärgerlich, zumal das Bild auch hier als public domain genutzt wird. Leider kommt dieser Hinweis erst jetzt, vor einem Jahr hätte man die genaue Quelle sicherlich noch gefunden. Ich kann nur versichern, dass es auf einer offiziellen US-Seite als PD freigegeben war. Wenn das nicht reicht, dann muss es weg, womit man vmtl. auch leben könnte. Gruß, --KuK (talk) 17:38, 15 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Neue Jadewerft[edit]

Hallo, habe Dein Bild von der neuen Jadewerft gesehen und darauf eins der Wohnschiffe der Ohre-Klasse entdeckt, auf dem ich 1992 einen Teil meiner Werhdienstzeit verbracht hatte. Ich dachte eigentlich, die Schiffe seien abgewrackt. Damals waren es 3 Schiffe, "Altmark", "Uckermark" und "Wische". Schön, eins davon auf einem aktuellen Foto wiederzuentdecken. *freu* Gibt es die Schiffe noch?

Die VM besaß sechs Schiffe dieser Klasse, von denen noch zwei als Wohnschiffe vorhanden sind. Es handelt sich um Altmark und Wische (ex-Harz, der Name war 1990 anderweitig vergeben). Beide unterstehen dem Marinestützpunktkommando Wilhelmshaven. --KuK (talk) 09:51, 23 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | norsk bokmål | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−
Dear KuK,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team
 Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 22:50, 17 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Westland Aircraft[edit]

Thank you for your comments on my talk page. However, placing an unnecessary subjective sort key onto only some sub-categories is illogical, and IMHO totally without merit. In most cases, it is best to allow the natural sort order to take precedence, and therefore only apply a sort key to special cases.PeterWD (talk) 19:29, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your answer. When I looked into the Westland category I found nearly all aircraft under "W" for Westland. It is much easier to have an immediate overview if a Lynx can be found under "L" and so on. To my opinion, and I guess to the opinion of the majority of us wikipedians, this is what the sort key is for. So, even if you have a different feeling or taste please accept the common sense. --KuK (talk) 20:25, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Your 'common sense' is illogical. In Wikimedia, the Westland Lynx is known as Westland Lynx; your wish to force it into L for Lynx is your own personal and subjective perspective, not common sense. I believe that you should step back and look at the world in a wider, logical view.PeterWD (talk) 20:53, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I think KuK has a valid point. See for instance at Category:Renault automobiles. HenkvD (talk) 09:49, 3 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for this excellent example how it shoud look like! --KuK (talk) 09:01, 5 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze[edit]

Hallo KuK,

in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.

Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.

In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)

Your account will be renamed[edit]

Hello,

The developer team at Wikimedia is making some changes to how accounts work, as part of our on-going efforts to provide new and better tools for our users like cross-wiki notifications. These changes will mean you have the same account name everywhere. This will let us give you new features that will help you edit and discuss better, and allow more flexible user permissions for tools. One of the side-effects of this is that user accounts will now have to be unique across all 900 Wikimedia wikis. See the announcement for more information.

Unfortunately, your account clashes with another account also called KuK. To make sure that both of you can use all Wikimedia projects in future, we have reserved the name KuK~commonswiki that only you will have. If you like it, you don't have to do anything. If you do not like it, you can pick out a different name.

Your account will still work as before, and you will be credited for all your edits made so far, but you will have to use the new account name when you log in.

Sorry for the inconvenience.

Yours,
Keegan Peterzell
Community Liaison, Wikimedia Foundation

21:42, 17 March 2015 (UTC)

Der WLM-Countdown hat begonnen[edit]

Hallo KuK,

nun ist es wieder soweit. Vom 1. bis zum 30. September findet zum fünften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt. Im Mittelpunkt steht bekanntlich das Fotografieren von Kulturdenkmalen. Du hast an einem der letzten Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen und wir freuen uns auf weitere Bildbeiträge von Dir.

Viele interessante Motive, nicht nur Burgen und Schlösser, sondern auch Fachwerkhäuser, Brücken und Brunnen, technische und Industriedenkmale und vieles mehr gibt es noch zu fotografieren, damit sie in der Wikipedia dokumentiert werden können. Nützliche Tipps findest du auf unserer WLM-Projektseite. Du kannst gerne individuell Fototouren durchführen oder aber Dich auch Gruppentouren anschließen. Besonders freuen wir uns auf Fotos, die Lücken in den Denkmallisten der Wikipedia ausfüllen.

Darüber hinaus kannst Du auch an der Arbeit der Jury teilnehmen, die Mitte Oktober die Fotos bewerten und die Gewinner ermitteln wird. Bis zum 15. August kannst du hier Deine Bewerbung einreichen.

Viel Erfolg und Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia in den bevorstehenden Wettbewerbswochen wünscht Dir das Orga-Team. Wir freuen uns auf Deine Fotos.

( Bernd Gross, 6. August 2015)

Category:Federal Office of Bundeswehr Equipment, Information Technology and In-Service Support[edit]

Moin Kuk, gemäß Category names hätte hier auch der “proper name” Bundesamt für Ausrüstung, Informationstechnik und Nutzung der Bundeswehr verwendet werden dürfen. Der würde dann auch besser zu den Unterkategorien und zu Wikidata passen. Gruß aus der City --Ein Dahmer (talk) 08:53, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Moin, Dahmer, danke für den Hinweis. Mit den Kategorien hier kenne ich mich nicht so gut aus. Wenn Du sie umbenennen willst, ist mir das recht. Gruß, --KuK (talk) 09:28, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oki doki, erledigt. Gruß --Ein Dahmer (talk) 16:53, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:KuK&oldid=540614493"