User talk:PetarM/Archive 1
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Tip: Categorizing images
Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.
Here's how:
1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:
2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.
[[Category:Category name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:
[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".
When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").
Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.BotMultichillT 06:09, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Hram v Omsk.JPG is uncategorized since 7 May 2009.
- Image:Carev Dvor.JPG was uncategorized on 19 August 2009.
- Image:ErmitageStairs.JPG was uncategorized on 1 September 2009.
- Image:Slava.JPG was uncategorized on 31 January 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:11, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
- Image:Harkov vokzal.jpg was uncategorized on 11 August 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:52, 12 August 2011 (UTC)
TUSC token 70ee9ab13d36a5e07e1f7047eaa8d6b6
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
TUSC token 40c43b549376d30612877a113d499b4e
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
![]() |
File:Monument to Soviet cosmonauts.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
--Justass (talk) 18:07, 6 November 2009 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:39, 14 December 2009 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 09:55, 22 February 2010 (UTC)
Quality image
Privet George, image Seasquirt.jpg which You nominate as Quality image is already Feautered image. --Mile (talk) 14:26, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
- Hi! I know it. It are independent awards. Both awards FP and QI (or more) are correct result for one photo.
- With best regards, --George Chernilevsky talk 17:22, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Irtish v Omsk.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
![]() |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Hram v Omsk.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Hram v Omsk.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
![]() |
/FPCBot (talk) 00:01, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
Noise
Hello, of course one can always argue how much noise is tolerable in a Quality Image. But IMO an even slightly noisy sky can easily be fixed. Best regards --Pjt56 (talk) 09:14, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Св Наум.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Irtysh River.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pobednik na Kalemegdanu 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
FP Promotion
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:San Marco cathedral in Venice.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:San Marco cathedral in Venice.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
![]() |
/FPCBot (talk) 00:04, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Onion domes
Hello PetarM. No doubt for me, your Onion Domes of Omsk are OF COURSE a valued image, in real life. You are now, as I was last days, in the nets of an endless discussion about the "scope". As usual. Like me some days ago, it's visible that you're becoming a little bit ...nervous... Don't break down ! Good luck (but you will surely loose at the end, if there is an end). However, you're a good photographer, don't worry ! Friendly, --Jebulon (talk) 22:55, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
"Onion domes" - adjusting the scope
Hello Mile/PetarM, Before nominating your own challenger, if you decided to do so, would you allow me a further recommandation about the scope wording? I would suggest a slight rewording, from "Russian onion domes" to "Onion domes in Russia". The reason is that with "Russian onion domes", any Russian Orthodox Church anywhere in the world falls within the scope (e.g. File:Whitestone Blue Onion jeh.JPGthat I've just picked up at random). Personnaly, I won't look over all images of Russian Orthodox churches in Commons to find a decent competitor, but be aware that a VI within this scope could be demoted some day by a picture taken in another country. If you feel like following this friendly advice, just change the wording in the scope field and in the present "VIC-scope-change" template (no need of a new one IMO). Furthermore, it would match the category—it's a good reason too. The exterior/interior subscopes question is of secondary importance. Regards, --Myrabella (talk) 13:37, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Onion domes in Russia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Onion doomes of Cathedral of the Annunciation.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Russian Revival domes in Russia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Church of Saint Naum (Macedonia).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Misprint in a title
Hello Petar M, Congratulations for the double promotion of File:Onion doomes of Cathedral of the Annunciation.JPG. I just wanted to point out to you a misprint in the title of your file: "doomes" instead of "domes". It would be worth to be renamed :-) Regards --Myrabella (talk) 15:24, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
- You can use the Template:Rename... or ask an admin ;-) --Myrabella (talk) 21:56, 3 April 2010 (UTC)
Aligator
Thank you for the care you have been my skull to aligator. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:46, 15 April 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Basilica Santo Antonio in Padova.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Alsacian costumes
Thanks for supporting my set !--Jebulon (talk) 22:43, 18 April 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pratto dela Valle in Padova.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Hram v Omsk.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Monastery Ravanica .JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Moštanica Monastery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Ravanica Monastery.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sunflower fields in Šumadija.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Please use the correct date format
Hi PetarM,
Thank you for your contributions to Commons. I noticed you mentioned a date on File:Sinagoga u Novom Sadu.JPG. Please know that in order for dates to be automatically detected and translated into other languages it needs to be in the YYYY-MM-DD
format (ie. 2024-01 for January 2024 or 2024-08-17 for 17 August 2024). Also, for other (less specific) dates use {{Other date}} for centuries, ranges, 'circa' etc. like this: {{other date|between|1899|1903}}
for "between 1899 and 1903
". This way the dates will be translated internally into the user's language preference. I've fixed it for you here. See for example the result in Serbian: here. Thanks again. –Krinkletalk 18:58, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pobednik.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! A woman's eye.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Kaymakchalan-Serbian-Chapel.JPG
Hi PetarM; I'm sorry that you are unhappy with Berthold Werner's review, but please make your points by discussing the image and its subject in your review comments. Attacking another user is often disruptive. Also, referring to certain indigenous peoples as "bushmen" may be pejorative and is best avoided. [1] My suggestion is to explain your "reason for nominating" the image at the time of the nomination (as you did for this image). That will help reviewers understand the significance of your work. If it isn't promoted, you might nominate it later with the scope "Battle of Kajmakchalan" or "Kajmakčalan". Thank you. Walter Siegmund (talk) 17:52, 22 January 2011 (UTC)
Muskrat
I believe, your muskrat is a nutria?! --Kürschner (talk) 17:00, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
- I agree. To correct the name of a file, please use {{Rename}} (Commons:File renaming). Walter Siegmund (talk) 17:51, 23 January 2011 (UTC)
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biberratte --Kürschner (talk) 09:26, 24 January 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nutria (Myocastor coypus).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
- Congratulations too!--Kürschner (talk) 17:16, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sant Vasily cathedral in Moscow.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
This template is not acceptable. All users of an image, both those inside the WMF projects and those outside, must be able to use an image without having to contact you. Rather than going through all the images that use it (see below) and removing it, I would appreciate it if you would simply change it, such as
- "Please review the full license requirements carefully before using this image. Although it is not required, I would appreciate it if you would tell me of any use outside Wikipedia by sending an e-mail to petarslo@yahoo.com.
Thank you, Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:46, 19 February 2011 (UTC)
- File:A woman's eye.JPG
- File:After study desk-detail.JPG
- File:Ajdar Kadi.JPG
- File:Avtozavodskaja.JPG
- File:BitolaPanorama.jpg
- File:BitolaŠSokak.JPG
- File:Bitolj-srpsko vojno groblje.JPG
- File:BitolskiKorzo.JPG
- File:Black-headed Gull (Larus ridibundus) in fligth.JPG
- File:Boško Šiljegović - grob.JPG
- File:Brekinja.JPG
- File:Canon Powershot A590.JPG
- File:Čapljani.JPG
- File:Čaršija.JPG
- File:Church of the Epiphany (Yaroslavl) 04.jpg
- File:Čirilo i Metodije HDR.jpg
- File:CrkvaBair.JPG
- File:Domat.JPG
- File:Donji Hrastovac.JPG
- File:Faberge egg.JPG
- File:Gimnazija Bitolj.JPG
- File:Hotel Zepter - Kozarska Dubica.JPG
- File:Hram v Omsk.JPG
- File:Hrvatska Dubica.JPG
- File:Irtish v Omsk.JPG
- File:Jasenovčani.JPG
- File:Jevrejsko groblje.JPG
- File:Kozarska Dubica.JPG
- File:Manastir Moštanica I.JPG
- File:Manastir Moštanica.JPG
- File:Monastery Manasija - Serbia.JPG
- File:Monastery Ravanica .JPG
- File:Novigrad.JPG
- File:Nutria (Myocastor coypus).jpg
- File:Onion domes of Cathedral of the Annunciation.JPG
- File:Pobednik.JPG
- File:Pobrđani.JPG
- File:Royal Flush.JPG
- File:Russian bride.jpg
- File:San Marco cathedral in Venice.JPG
- File:Sant Vasily cathedral in Moscow.JPG
- File:SarenaCesma.JPG
- File:Staza (opština Sunja).JPG
- File:Šumdaija sunflower fields.JPG
- File:Sunja (Croatia).JPG
- File:Sv. Kliment Ohridski.JPG
- File:Sveti Sava in Belgrade.JPG
- File:Time of harvest in village of Lug - Serbia.JPG
- File:Toshe-Proeski-grave.JPG
- File:Uspensky sobor.JPG
- File:Vedro Polje.JPG
- File:Volga river at Kazan.JPG
- File:White ushanka.JPG
- File:Yekaterinburg monument to all Russian fallen soliders.JPG
- File:Адмиралитет-Петроград.JPG
- File:Крккардаш - Битола.JPG
- File:Ниџе Планина.JPG
- File:Св Климент.JPG
- File:Св Наум.JPG
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Sunja (Croatia).JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Your RfA
Hi PetarM. Unfortunately, I've closed your RfA as unsuccessful based on the community's view that you aren't quite ready to take on the role of an admin. I'm sure in six months everyone would be happy to reevaluate. Best regards, –Juliancolton | Talk 19:48, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
FP Promotion
![]() |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Dutch army Pzh-2000 firing on Taliban in Chura. June 16, 2007. Photo by David Axe.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dutch army Pzh-2000 firing on Taliban in Chura. June 16, 2007. Photo by David Axe.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
![]() |
/FPCBot (talk) 21:59, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Anas acuta.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Stara Ljubljana.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Grafiti v Ljubljani.JPG, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jasenovac Memorial Area.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Serbian chapel
Hi PetarM
- as I'm very interessed by the history of WW 1, I've translated in french the caption of your picture of the foggy chapel on the peak. I' seen you asked Myrabella for that, I hope it is not a problem! Anyway, it is
Done now. Very nice picture, with a high educational and historical value.--Jebulon (talk) 08:32, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
St. George's Church (Staro Nagoričane).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Izabrana slika
Vidim da mi je poznata slika na Glavnoj strani, a onda se setih da je tvoja. Čestitam :) mickit 20:42, 26 June 2011 (UTC)
I think your changes are too strong, though useful. Could you please instruct me about what changes you applied, so I could fix the original file and re-upload it? BTW, it would be much better not to overwrite the image with your version but to upload a separate fork version. Anyway, this is useless now because I'd like to use your luminosity method and then reupload my retouched image :-).--PereslavlFoto (talk) 07:35, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
You say: "lower ligthness and change color tonality". How did you lower the lightness? Did you use levels, with what settings of white, gamma, black? Or did you use curves, with what settings of input and output? How did you change color tonality, with selective colors? Or with levels by separate channels? With what settings? By the way, I found the white windows in the result become yellow.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 14:26, 9 July 2011 (UTC)
Comparing two variants of the photo I can catch your idea and will improve the image, and upload the fine version tomorrow. Thank you for the idea.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 11:56, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mountain biking .jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Hello Petar, For Your information, this kind of image is allowed in the VI project, there is even a specific gallery for them: Commons:Valued images by topic/Historical/Documents. The exclusion is only for .pdf files like this, I think. --Myrabella (talk) 09:52, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
VI
there is a problem with your nomination in VI. Have you not put an extra space before the file name when you've created? --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:59, 11 August 2011 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Electric locomotive ChS2.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Electric locomotive ChS2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
File:Slovenian_Parliament.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Warfieldian (talk) 21:38, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Maximarket.tif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
84.61.170.156 18:55, 26 August 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Mihailovsky sobor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kharkiv Metro.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Tvoja slika
Naleteo sam na ovaj članak, na kome su objavili dosta slika sa Commonsa. Na jednoj kao potpis stoji PetarM, pa rekoh da ti javim ako nisi video. Pozdrav! --Lošmi (talk) 05:52, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
What happened to rotation ?!
[Moved from Commons:Contact us.]
Suddelny some of my photos which were made in portrait mode are wrong rotated, but if You click on them they are fine. Also they were OK orientated...till few days ago. What happened !?
Like this : case 1
Now, if i ask for rotation, then original in full size migth show up wrong. --Mile (talk) 10:24, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
- It is about a software update, which started using the en:Exif orientation tag in images. Many images have been rotated with software that do not change the tag after rotation and thus instructs the software to rotate them ones more. You should find lots of discussion with a small search on the site. See e.g. Commons:Rotation. --LPfi (talk) 10:39, 8 December 2011 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cross-country skiing.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
Quality Image Promotion
![]() |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! History of photography.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
![]() |
File:Aerogram.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Ww2censor (talk) 14:07, 22 March 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Android DarkyRom.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sreejith K (talk) 05:46, 3 April 2012 (UTC)
Hi, do you think you can translate this template? Thanks. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 09:05, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Tasa i karte.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
sугсго 15:49, 4 May 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Harkov vokzal.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Anatoliy (talk) 21:21, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
TUSC token 124675d342fad3c2b5e00390589aa5dd
I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
Featured image
I have nominated one of your great images for featured status. Just to let you know. Bravo, sjajne su... :) --WhiteWriter speaks 19:57, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Ljubljanjski zmaj.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
And also:
Yours sincerely Eleassar (t/p) 09:20, 20 July 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely Eleassar (t/p) 21:38, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:National Geographic december 1983.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Smooth_O (talk) 09:14, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:National Geographic december 1983.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Hammersoft (talk) 14:48, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Eleassar (t/p) 08:30, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Zmajski most 2.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Eleassar (t/p) 12:48, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:James Bond Mail art.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.
|
Denniss (talk) 14:17, 7 October 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely Eleassar (t/p) 12:25, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Kupola crkve.JPG
- File:SRB cerkev v Ljubljani.jpg
- File:SRBCrkva 2.JPEG
- File:SRBCrkva 3.JPEG
- File:SRBCrkva.JPEG
- File:SRBCrkva.JPG
- File:Sv Ćirilo i Metodije u Ljubljani.JPG
- File:Čirilo i Metodije HDR.jpg
- File:Арханђел Гаврило.jpg
- File:Хорос.JPG Eleassar (t/p) 23:23, 16 October 2012 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Stara Ljubljana.JPG
![]() |
This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Stara Ljubljana.JPG, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Eleassar (t/p) 15:01, 19 October 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Stara Ljubljana.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 08:46, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Štepanjsko naselje - Ob sotočju.JPG
- File:Štepanjsko naselje - Skopska ulica.JPG
- File:Štepanjsko naselje.JPG
Yours sincerely Eleassar (t/p) 20:15, 20 October 2012 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Mesarski most - Prometej.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
And also:
![]() |
Hello, PetarM. You have new messages at Eleassar's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
|
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Sveti Urh.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.
|
Eleassar (t/p) 17:39, 21 October 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Eleassar (t/p) 10:39, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Eleassar (t/p) 12:06, 25 October 2012 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Eleassar (t/p) 15:05, 1 December 2012 (UTC)
2013!
![]() |
* * * 2013 !!! * * * | |
Hi Petar! Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Yours faithfully, George -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:17, 24 December 2012 (UTC) |
![]() |
File:Traveling Russia.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Psychonaut (talk) 09:20, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Postcard of Serbia.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Psychonaut (talk) 09:23, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Конверт Транссибирская магистраль.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Psychonaut (talk) 09:23, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Pismo iz Rusije.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Psychonaut (talk) 09:23, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Транс Сибир конверт.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Psychonaut (talk) 09:24, 17 February 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Конверт Транссибирская магистраль.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Yann (talk) 16:34, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Транс Сибир конверт.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Yann (talk) 16:34, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Postcard of Serbia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Yann (talk) 16:38, 18 February 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Hello, PetarM. You have new messages at Yann's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
|
Yann (talk) 06:31, 22 February 2013 (UTC)
Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Света Ана.jpg
![]() |
This file may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Света Ана.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.
While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Eleassar (t/p) 12:29, 12 March 2013 (UTC)
FP Promotion
![]() |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Balaklava bay.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Balaklava bay.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
![]() |
/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
FP Promotion
![]() |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:St. Volodymyr's Cathedral in Kiev.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:St. Volodymyr's Cathedral in Kiev.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
![]() |
/FPCBot (talk) 22:22, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Eleassar (t/p) 08:20, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Eleassar (t/p) 08:47, 4 September 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Eleassar (t/p) 09:48, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Eleassar (t/p) 08:28, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Eleassar (t/p) 08:33, 13 September 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Eleassar (t/p) 09:59, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Хан Шатыр.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 10:00, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Turkish Airlines PTV.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 10:03, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Kyzylorda.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 10:03, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Astana railway station.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 10:04, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Бишкек.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 10:07, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Камча.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 10:10, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Петропавловск.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 10:10, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Cup of black tea.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Eleassar (t/p) 10:11, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Eleassar (t/p) 10:34, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Template:Idw/layout Eleassar (t/p) 10:35, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Template:Autotranslate Affected:
Eleassar (t/p) 10:42, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Affected:
Eleassar (t/p) 12:32, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Affected:
Eleassar (t/p) 21:50, 23 September 2013 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
Template:Autotranslate Eleassar (t/p) 22:33, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Affected:
Yours sincerely, BaseSat (talk) 14:07, 5 December 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
![]() |
int:wikilove-barnstar-photographers-title |
For the superb picture of the Balaklava Bay Aarp65 (talk) 00:55, 13 December 2013 (UTC) |
2014 !
![]() |
* * * 2014! * * * |
Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Happy holidays! -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:07, 22 December 2013 (UTC) |
Valued Image Promotion
Serbian Christmas meal
In my opinion, you should remove the CA annotations from your file page. Whatever it is that causes a slight coloured edge is sub-pixel and such obsessive pixel-peeping is insulting and harmful to the FP review process. -- Colin (talk) 20:27, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Psychonaut (talk) 09:13, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Эlcobbola talk 19:37, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
FP Promotion
Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement
Commons:Picture of the Year/2013/MessageR2/en
This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement
Commons:Picture of the Year/2013/Results/R2/msg/en
You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.
Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Ljubljana - Anas acuta male.jpg
Hi, was File:Ljubljana - Anas acuta male.jpg taken in Ljubljana (where exactly)? Thanks, regards. --Eleassar (t/p) 09:13, 28 March 2014 (UTC)
Вікі любить Землю, 1–31 травня / Wiki Loves Earth, May 1–31, 2014
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/85/WLE_Austria_Logo_%28no_text%29.svg/85px-WLE_Austria_Logo_%28no_text%29.svg.png)
Вітаємо!
З 1 по 31 травня 2014 буде проходити конкурс «Вікі любить Землю», метою якого є фотографування пам'яток природи. Цього року конкурс став міжнародним. Зі списками пам'яток природи України можна ознайомитися тут. Приєднуйтеся!
Більше інформації про конкурс читати тут. – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить Землю» (in english) 20:54, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Petrov Victor ([[User talk:Petrov Victor|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:18, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
FP Promotion
Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:05, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
Hej
Hej, Mile, gde si. Hvala za spomenicu! :) Ja sam inače slabo aktivan već neko vreme. Svratim tek ponekad. Tek sam sad video poruku. Kako je kod tebe? Dosta slikaš? --Lošmi ([[User talk:Lošmi|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:03, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Valued Image Promotion
FP Promotion
Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:23, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
FPC reworked
Hi! I reworked an image at FPC, you were right and it had some perspective distortion, but not anymore. Would you please check it again now? Here's the link. Thank you! --Kadellar ([[User talk:Kadellar|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:27, 19 November 2014 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
Quality Image Promotion
What??
What happened to the picture here?? ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 15:44, 6 December 2014 (UTC) It's a glitch. Sorry. ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 17:49, 6 December 2014 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
Valued Image Promotion
Happy holidays! 2015!
![]() |
* * * Happy Holidays 2015 ! * * * | |
* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:49, 24 December 2014 (UTC) |
FP Promotion
Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:03, 29 December 2014 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
FP Promotion
Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 22:02, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
FP Promotion
Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:03, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Hej
Hej Mile, izvini na neodgovaranju ali nisam dolazio na Commons duže vreme. Drago mi je da ti je izabrana slika. --Lošmi ([[User talk:Lošmi|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:26, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
Valued Image Promotion
FP Promotion
Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:01, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Thurs ([[User talk:Thurs|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:46, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
FP Promotion
Template:FPpromotion /FPCBot ([[User talk:FPCBot|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 05:02, 31 March 2015 (UTC)