User talk:Pjt56

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Pjt56!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Pjt56!

Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:20, 12 October 2009 (UTC)

• Image:Djurgarden from Kastellholmen.jpg was uncategorized on 11 October 2009.
• Image:HohenheimGardens-pjt1.jpg was uncategorized on 24 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:03, 25 July 2011 (UTC)
• Image:HohenheimGardens-pjt2.jpg was uncategorized on 25 July 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:36, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
• Image:IcelandAnimals-pjt (3).jpg was uncategorized on 4 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:36, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
• Image:IcelandAnimals-pjt (4).jpg was uncategorized on 4 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:36, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
• Image:IcelandAnimals-pjt (7).jpg was uncategorized on 4 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:36, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
• Image:IcelandAnimals-pjt (8).jpg was uncategorized on 4 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:36, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
• Image:IcelandAnimals-pjt (2).jpg was uncategorized on 4 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:36, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
• Image:LaPrisgiona-pjt2.jpg was uncategorized on 15 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 16:47, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

Colletes parasitised photo

Hi, if it is OK with you, I would like to use your photo of a parasitised ivy bee (Colletes Hederae) for a talk I am preparing at a local french association. The event is free to attend for all.

Your picture on Alcantara

Hi, your picture on Alcantara is now published on italian magazine FAME DI SUD (www.famedisud.it) Facebook Page

Edible fungi in basket

Guten Tag!

Lesen Sie, bitte Commons:Kriterien für wertvolle Bilder.

Das Messer ist ein gewöhnliches Instrument für die Pilze. Es widerspricht den Kriterien auf jeden Fall nicht. VI ist nicht FI.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen, --George Chernilevsky ^talk 19:07, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

> Wie kann ich mein Oppose zurücknehmen?

<s> {{oppose}} old info... </s>

new vote and some info...

Zum Beispiel:

 Oppose old info...

Ich bin kein Commons Administrator, nur der Benutzer.

Es ist treu, es ist hier sehr spannend. Es ist die gute Gesellschaft der Freunde und der Gleichgesinnten.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen, --George Chernilevsky ^talk 22:34, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

What are VI

Hello, Thanks for your interest in Valued Images project. Be aware that Valued Images are not the same as Quality Images. In peculiar, technical quality isn't of such importance. VI rules say: For photographs, the quality achievable using the built-in camera in a modern mobile phone should normally be good enough. The image must look good on-screen at the review size. VI must meet these 6 criteria. A VI is the most valuable illustration of all images on Commons which fall within the scope of the nomination. Note that most valuable does not necessarily imply the best technical quality. Valued images are less about perfect technical quality and more about your ingenuity in finding good and valuable subjects which matter, and about the useability of the information on the image page, see Valued image value for further details. --Myrabella (talk) 10:07, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schiller edit1.jpg

Would you reconsider your review in light of the response? Durova (talk) 06:54, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Episyrphus balteatus 1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Episyrphus balteatus 1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 00:01, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Old Rauma, Finland.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Question Could you please clarify the scope? Is the scope the whole city of Rauma or just Old Rauma (the category you link to)? -- MattiPaavola (talk) 12:29, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
  •  Comment sorry, you're right. Scope is Old Rauma --Pjt56 (talk) 20:19, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
•  Support A good representative image of Old Rauma. The challenger is File:VanhaRauma1.jpg, but it is lacking geocode. -- MattiPaavola (talk) 16:29, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 18:42, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! LightsVintageMBTruck 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good composition and exposition. --Cayambe 22:13, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Lights on vintage Daimler-Benz truck 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good, as the preceding one. --Cayambe 22:13, 17 January 2010 (UTC)

Green Beetle

Maybe Chrysolina herbacea but can you give the length (mm.) and place at lest the country Nce photo Notafly (talk) 21:18, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chrysolina herbacea-pjt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Episyrphus balteatus on Borago officinalis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments High-quality contribution, thanks. --Iotatau 20:37, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Episyrphus balteatus on Borago officinalis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments High-quality contribution, thanks. --Iotatau 20:37, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality image

Please check sky noise on pictures below my candidate, which are already promoted. Many of them got quiet higher noise, i dont find my noise high at all. I agree with distortion. Regards, Petar. --Mile (talk) 22:40, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Distortion fixed, thanx. --Mile (talk) 23:22, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

True, everything can be fixed with software, but in my case sky noise is low. Check other pictures which are already nominated. --Mile (talk) 09:20, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stuttgart Gasometer.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Ikar.us 21:20, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stuttgart-Gaisburg Panorama.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. Interesting dark mood. --Cayambe 14:24, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Leica M1.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 10:01, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Good after formatting scope now --George Chernilevsky ^talk 10:37, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 06:35, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Killesbergturm.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support True, the other total views don't extend to the ground tip. --Ikar.us (talk) 23:19, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Ikar.us (talk) 23:40, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Killesberg Tower 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI --Pudelek 12:51, 24 March 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image Image:Osmia cornuta copulation 2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Osmia cornuta copulation 2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 07:04, 10 April 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mercedes-Benz Museum at night.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful color QI IMO --Croucrou 21:54, 13 April 2010 (UTC)

Mating bees

Your image of the mating bees (and the voyeur ant) is superb. Congratulations! I was also pleased to realize I'm not alone rasing those questions about the women beggar. Cheers -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 19:00, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

• Thanks for your support! The fact is I came to your page to comment on your assessment of the beggar picture. But then I saw the promotion template and realized that I haven't payed much attention to your picture when it passed through FPC. That was a serious flaw which I felt should be corrected immediately... -- Alvesgaspar (talk) 12:19, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Osmia cornuta.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Comment Best in scope for me but missing geocoding.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:10, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Done sorry! --Pjt56 (talk) 09:32, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
•  Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:36, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 04:32, 6 May 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Aeshna affinis-pjt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good --The High Fin Sperm Whale 18:34, 11 July 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Polistes dominula-pjt2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Awesome work! --DaNASCAT 17:50, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Beetle-pjt1.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:37, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Dragonfly-pjt4.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:39, 15 August 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Schloss Solitude.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

•  Support Best in scope. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 22:21, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 07:41, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Tringa totanus in flight.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support Best in scope --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 18:15, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 21:05, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Kunstmuseum Stuttgart, exterior at night.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Comment - I tend to support but could you add (exterior) to the scope name as usual for this kind of photos.--MrPanyGoff 08:47, 22 February 2011 (UTC) - I agree to add exterior, but also at night. the proposed scope would be:Kunstmuseum Stuttgart, exterior by night.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 11:33, 23 February 2011 (UTC) - done --Pjt56 (talk) 19:28, 23 February 2011 (UTC)

•  Support For me it is the best so far.--MrPanyGoff 06:30, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:24, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

TUSC token b6c3ce6cd2ab8c03e0a0019ad9be1994

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Grüne Spinne falsch bestimmt! ;-)

Hallo Pjt56,

nachdem du mich auf meiner Disk bezüglich der grünen Spinne angeschrieben hattest habe ich bei Benutzer:Mhohner angefragt und der hat deine Annahme bestätigt! Meine Bestimmung war falsch und deine Vermutung war richtig! Ich habe jetzt auch gleich eine Umbennenung veranlasst und die Beschreibung sowie die Cat angepasst. Nochmals vielen Dank für den Hinweis und bis die Tage, besten Gruß mathias K 15:02, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

...und da isses auch schon passiert. ;-) Gruß mathias K 15:09, 19 June 2012 (UTC)

Phoenicopterus roseus-pjt1.jpg

Perfect I changed the caption of the image and the caption in French Wikipedia. (A month before I was in the Venice lagoon to make images of reconstrution of the ecosystem). Can you read the caption in German this picture? Uncarina ankaranensis MHNT.jpg. Because I do not speak any language of Goethe. Thank you for these linguistic exchanges internationals. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:03, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Fly-pjt16.jpg

Hallo Pjt56, das abgebildete Tier würde ich als Platystoma seminiatonis (Familie Platystomatidae) einordnen. Gruß, --Pristurus (talk) 19:40, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

• Danke, Pristurus! Ich habe die Umbenennung der Datei veranlasst und die Beschreibung geändert. Falls du Zeit und Lust hast: ich habe in meiner Galerie noch eine ganze Reihe weiterer nicht bestimmter Insektenfotos ... Grüße, --Pjt56 (talk) 07:35, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. INeverCry 18:39, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Category:Pages using Information template with incorrect parameter

Hallo Pjt56. Bitte passe deine Uploadvorlage an, damit dieser Parameterfehler nicht mehr vorkommt („Other“ ist in Template:Information nicht als Parameter enthalten). --Leyo 21:57, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

File:Taormina-pjt1.jpg

Hello Ptj56, I used part of your image Taormina-pjt1.jpg for a pagebanner on Wikivoyage, and gave it the name Taormina-pjt1_Pan.jpg. Because this is not on Wikipedia, I make this announcement on your discussion page. I hope I did it correct with the license. --FredTC (talk) 08:34, 23 December 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:CKLee Stuttgart 5.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:CKLee Stuttgart 5.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

• File:Epilobium montanum-pjt1.jpg
• File:Epilobium montanum-pjt2.jpg
• File:Epilobium montanum-pjt3.jpg
• File:Port de Sóller-pjt.jpg
• File:Weilheim Teck Panorama-pjt.jpg

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 19:33, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Cyclamen hederifolium in Sardinia

Dear,

It is indeed a Cyclamen hederifolium or its var. confusum (Syn. C. confusum). It is not possible to differentiate them without looking at the leave.

Another possible cyclamen should be C. africanum, which however does not occur in Europe.

If you want, I can rename your file (I am a "filemover").

Best regards, --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 19:09, 17 January 2014 (UTC)

Dear,

In the meantime I have renamed it accordingly.

FYI: I have 5 Cyclamen species in my garden (mid-Belgium): C. hederifolium, C. coum, C. cilicium, C. purpurascens and C. pseudibericum. The first two are strong growing and sowed by ants, so that these species are widespread in my garden. C. coum is now blooming with the first crocuses (C. imperati 'De Jager' and C. sieberi 'Bowles White').

Beste Grüße aus Belgien, --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 10:55, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Gonocerus acuteangulatus-pjt.jpg

I used a copy of your photo at http://gwydir.demon.co.uk/insects/WatchList.htm with a copyright statement - I hope this is in order.--Keith Edkins (talk) 11:10, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Fine with me. Thanks for notifying me! --Pjt56 (talk) 16:35, 4 September 2014 (UTC)

Vespula - Dolichovespula

Hi Pjt56, Vespula vulgaris-pjt6.jpg zeigt eine Langkopfwespe. Vermutlich Dolichovespula saxonica. Beachte den Abstand zwischen Augen und Kiefern. Der ist bei Vespula stets kürzer als bei Dolichovespula. Die dunkle Zeichnung auf dem Clypeus kann, trotz einiger variabilität, auch hilfreich bei der Bestimmung sein (V. vulgaris -> wie ein hängender Hammer; D. saxonica -> +- wie ein Dreizack). Gerade die Dolichovespula scheinen leider ziemlich variabel gezeichnet zu sein.

Gruß --Aiwok (talk) 13:01, 9 October 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:MuranoTorreOrologio-pjt.jpg

Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 23:43, 2 February 2015 (UTC)

Fjadrárgljúfur-pjt - Used for Class

Hello, PJT56,

Just letting you know we are using your photo for a discussion about erosion in our geology class in Mongolia tomorrow.

Beautiful shot! Carrie Wallestad, lecturer, Mongolia International University

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bismarckturm-pjt2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Sorry, I thought there was one but you are right the pciture is ok --Ermell 13:51, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

Panoramabilder

Hinweis, da du ab und zu :-) Panoramabilder hochlädst:

1. Bau anstelle eines Hinweises in der Beschreibung das Template:Panorama ein. Das setzt einen vorformulierten Hinweis auf die Beschreibungsseite und erleichtert auch das automatische Auffinden von Panoramabildern. Format: {{Panorama|<Objekt>|<Anzahl der Einzelbilder>|<Stitching-Software>}} (z.B. unter „Sonstige Informationen“ in der Upload-Maske). Ich habe das bei File:AltbachPowerPlant-pjt2.jpg schonmal vorgenommen.

2. Ordne die Bilder auch in die passendste Unterkategorie von Category:Panoramics ein, z.B. Category:Panoramics_in_Stuttgart.

Danke! --Kreuzschnabel 07:26, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Geocoding

Noch praktischer wäre es, wenn du deine Bilder geographisch verortest (sie können dann auch über interaktive Karten gefunden werden). (Als ich noch bei QI mitgemischt habe, war es kaum möglich, ein nicht-geocodiertes Bild promotet zu bekommen, haben sich die Standards da seitdem so aufgeweicht?) Angegeben wird üblicherweise der Kamerastandort mit Template:Location, z.B. in der Form {{Location dec|B.reite|L.änge}}. Ist nur ein wichtiges Objekt im Bild, kannst du auch den Objektstandort mit Template:Object Location angeben. Genaue Koordinaten liefert dir Google Maps auf Klick in die Landschaft. --Kreuzschnabel 07:42, 27 February 2016 (UTC)

Canyon

Hi!

I am using your beautiful image https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/79/Fjadr%C3%A1rglj%C3%BAfur-pjt.jpg

as study matter for my digital photography photoshop assignment under the Creative Commons Attribution terms.

Thanks :)

• Thanks for notifying me. I'd appreciate a link or pdf to the final result (and a signature ...). Best, --Pjt56 (talk) 15:46, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

==

Hallo

I just tweeted your lovely File:Coreus marginatus-pjt.jpg image at https://twitter.com/Javiermedia/status/739220927938973696 (after a couple of similar theme scenes). Regards --Javier ME (talk) 22:37, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

Use of image

I used an image of yours of Seydisfjordur on http://sturnidae.com/cruises/ports/Sey.php. Thank you.

15:28, 12 July 2016 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jgw321 (talk • contribs) 15:30, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

JG. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jgw321 (talk • contribs) 15:28, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

I used your image of Monreale Church on Blogsicilia.it — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.104.252.133 (talk) 11:24, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

File:Isodontia mexicana-pjt2.jpg

I used a copy of your photo at http://gwydir.demon.co.uk/insects/WatchList.htm with a copyright statement, to report that the wasp has now been found in Britain. Thank you for providing this image.--Keith Edkins (talk) 22:32, 28 August 2016 (UTC)

• Thanks for notifying me! It is interesting to observe that the species moves further and further north. --Pjt56 (talk) 16:48, 29 August 2016 (UTC)

Copyvio by an Icelandic business

Hi Pjt56, as you were writing on File:Reykjavík-pjt1.jpg you appreciate a notice if someone finds your picture on a site other than Wikipedia. So look at http://taxipickup.is/iceland-tours/ on the bottom right. I find them using a number of CC-licensed files on their site with neither attribution nor mentioning the license, including a pic by me, which is why I was writing them 4 times (!) since 2015. One time they responded promising to have their "website manager" fix this, but nothing happened and I happen to get fed by them and willing to hire a lawyer. What do you think? Would you possibly join, also maybe helping to contact others whose copyrights apparently have been violated by that business to have them join? I have no experience yet with the Icelandic lawyer sector but there seem to be some lawyers in Reykjavik around who have specialized in copyright issues. Beschde Grüße aussem Remstal ;) --dealerofsalvation 17:17, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi Remstäler, thanks for notifying me about those guys. Yes, if we find others to join I'd be willing to spend a moderate amount of money. In other cases companies who were for one reason or another not able or willing to publish copyright information offered to pay me a reasonable fee - which I usually accepted :-) Maybe we should try that first: send them an invoice ... Best regards from the Landeshauptstadt, --Pjt56 (talk) 17:41, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for the idea, I'll think about it, but in my previous polite mails I was telling them I was not interested in money but in proper attribution so I'm not yet sure if I'll change my mind about that ... but if you want you can go ahead and send them an invoice on your behalf. BTW at User:Dealerofsalvation/taxipickup.is Copyvios I'm systematically investigating more copyvios by them. --dealerofsalvation 19:49, 12 March 2017 (UTC)

Hans Dijkema, ZC4

Hi Pt56, I'm using your image Scilla Maritima, as an illustration for the Materia Medica in my Homeopathy Program. Just to let you know.

File:ViolinChinRest-pjt.JPG

Hello, we are using your image at 'chinrest' on the English Wiktionary [1]. I hope that is OK. It's a very good image. Please let me know on my talkpage there if there is any problem. Thank you. Kaixinguo~enwiktionary (talk) 18:44, 7 April 2018 (UTC)

File:Metellina mengei-pjt.jpg

Hi, I edited your picture File:Metellina mengei-pjt.jpg a bit, to reduce the over-exposure of the original. Just to let you know that I'm using the edited version in a talk on spiders. Peter coxhead (talk) 13:10, 30 August 2018 (UTC)

Use of the File Dunguaire Castle outside Wikipedia

I will use the Image in the Shadowiki (a wiki / fanpage about Shadowrun, because the castle is mentioned there (in the Sourcebook "Tír na nÓg" from FASA).
--Käpt'n Karel (talk) 23:16, 2 January 2019 (UTC)

Use of guillemot pic

Hi,

I used your picture of a flying guillemot https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Cepphus_grylle-pjt.jpg in a ppt for a species identification course at the University of Helsinki. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Altair75 (talk • contribs) 12:33, 7 March 2019 (UTC)

Use of Hverarond image

I would gladly use your image of Hverarond geothermal area (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hverar%C3%B6nd-pjt.jpg) in website https://www.wondermondo.com, the short description of Hverarönd. Thanks! Daarznieks (talk) 07:37, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Hello Daarznieks, feel free to use the image! Nice site! Regards, --Pjt56 (talk) 13:33, 8 July 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! StadtBibliothekStuttgart-pjt3-18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:29, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cygnus olor-pjt6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 04:43, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

Unerwünschte Zusatzangaben in den Infobox-Feldern

Hallo Pjt56,

bitte setze in dem Autorenfeld des Infobox-Template nur deinen Namen (mit Link) ein. Weitergehende Hinweise kannst du gerne außerhalb des Infobox-Templates oder auf deiner Userpage angeben. --Arch2all (talk) 09:07, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Zum einen: Wo steht, dass Zusatzangaben in Infoboxen unerwünscht sind? Zum anderen: Wenn du schon die Datei bearbeitest, tue das bitte so, dass keine Fehlermeldungen entstehen. Nur deshalb habe ich revertiert. --Pjt56 (talk) 10:30, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Die Infoboxen dienen als Grundlage für einige Tools/Anwendungen zur automatischen Generierung von korrekten Lizenz-/Urheberangaben. Extraangaben beeinträchtigen den Output dieser Anwendungen. Aber auch ansonsten ist es einfach unpassend in ein genau definiertes Feld wie z.B.ː author etwas anderes als eben den Autor/die Autorin hineinzuschreiben. --Arch2all (talk) 14:07, 25 March 2020 (UTC)

Monreale Church pic

I would like to use your photo for an article on the Easter celebration in Sicily on Blogsicilia.it — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 80.104.252.133 (talk) 11:30, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Hello, feel free to use the image. Please indicate "PJT56 / Wikimedia Commons / CC BY-SA 4.0" as the source. I'd appreciate a link or a pdf of the final result. --Pjt56 (talk) 13:27, 11 April 2020 (UTC)

Zur Info as requested, Outside use of image

Wespen lange Beine gefährlich -- Southpark (talk) 09:44, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

Danke, netter Artikel! --Pjt56 (talk) 10:18, 18 April 2020 (UTC)

File:DiachylonJar-pjt.jpg

Hello!. You should always try to categorize your uploaded media in a more accurate category. In this case Category:Ointments. Before upload a media, you should browse by categories to determine the most convenient one/s (or create a new category). Thanks. Jmarchn (talk) 15:40, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Update on usage of 2 images of the Papyrus

Per your request, this is to let you know that I am using 2 of your images of the Papayrus (File:Cyperus papyrus-pjt2.jpg, File:Cyperus papyrus-pjt4.jpg) in the website http://alamapa.com/ (a website in Hebrew focused on mapping the Bible), specifically in the page for the biblical Papyrus (http://alamapa.com/bplant/%d7%92%d7%9e%d7%90).

Thanks, --Aaadir (talk) 06:22, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

I was very pleased to find this image to use. I am a Bible teacher in the Republic of Moldova. We are studying the book of Exodus and I was looking for an image of papyrus to include in my worksheet. Yours was the best image I found. Thank you for making it available. - Jacob September 22, 2022 — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 188.131.119.232 (talk) 08:44, 22 September 2022 (UTC)

Picture of Stadtbibliothek Stuttgart

Hi Pjt56 your picture of the Stadtbibliothek Stuttgart is now published on the instagram page "aucheinarchitekt" — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jpsma (talk • contribs) 14:18, 14 April 2021 (UTC)

84

Hello. I’m borrowing a Weisenhof picture for my memoir, not to publish, as I visited there 1978 with Belfast students. Now at 84 I wish 14 grandchildren to know what made this funny old man. Thanks, John Berry

Use of HafenPlochingen-pjt1.jpg

Hallo Pjt56,

ich beabsichtige, das o.g. Foto außerhalb der Wikipedia als Beispielbild für "Schrott" zu verwenden, natürlich mit der entsprechenden Quellenangabe und Angabe der Lizenz. Frage dazu: Wenn ich das Foto zuschneode, zählt das noch nicht als "Bearbeitung", die ich zusätzlich angeben müsste, oder doch?

Danke Salmosalar — Preceding unsigned comment added by Salmosalar (talk • contribs) 08:14, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Hallo Salmosalar, das sehe ich nicht so eng. Wenn du eine übliche Quellenangabe machst, reicht das für mich aus. Viele Grüße, --Pjt56 (talk) 10:06, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Use of Strathisla Distillery

I used this picture on Twitter. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NobbyR (talk • contribs) 08:43, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

BoschRenningen-pjt.jpg

Hi Pjt56, I used this image in a presentation for personal use. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 126.249.43.102 (talk) 19:34, 12 December 2022 (UTC)

Identification update for File:Rhysella approximator-pjt1.jpg, -pjt2.jpg, and -pjt3.jpg

Hi Pjt56, I just wanted to drop by since you had requested identification review for these images. These are actually some species of Dolichomitus (Ichneumonidae: Pimplinae: Ephialtini). This genus in particular is often mistaken for various Rhyssinae due to the very long ovipositors. The easiest way to separate them is that Rhyssinae such as Rhyssella always have transverse ridges on the mesoscutum, which is almost never found outside of the subfamily (with a rare exception of Pseudorhyssa). The -pjt2.jpg image is incredibly useful here since the sculpturing of the mesoscutum is visible (with punctures and notauli, but no transverse ridges). Gorgeous detail, by the way! I've already updated the IDs on the files but wanted to make sure you got the notes directly. Cheers! Lhikan634 (talk) 01:28, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi Lhikan634, thanks for your helpful input! It is good to have an additional expert source for the identification of insects. The guys at www.entomologie.de who I contact routinely remained silent on those images, so I searched the web myself, knowing well that identifying wasps based on photos is risky. May I get back to you if I have other problem cases in the future?

BTW, I have a bunch of other photos of the insect. What would you need to see to determine the species? Best, Pjt56 (talk) 06:46, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

I'm always happy to assist where I can. Wasps are very species rich, though, so how much I can help is going to vary depending on the family or even genus, for instance. I don't have a key to Dolichomitus of your area on hand, and it's often fairly species rich (9 spp. in the UK, for instance). Off the top of my head, one very similar species is D. imperator, but I believe other similar species like D. mesocentrus are also in range. Lhikan634 (talk) 08:59, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

I did find a key, but I'm completely lost with many of the technical terms. If you'd find the time and nerves to delve into it, I'd appreciate it very much. Pjt56 (talk) 12:18, 9 June 2023 (UTC)

So, the first node of the key to females referring to the dorsal lobe is a part of the very tip of the ovipositor. This alone means that there's probably no chance of keying out the species. What we normally view as the ovipositor is really just the 2 parts of the sheath that surround the ovipositor. The ovipositor itself rests within this sheath and is usually thinner than a human hair. So in -pjt3.jpg, the long black protrusion pointing to the left of the image is just the sheath (the actual ovipositor appears to go entirely inside the hole to the right of the image). The ovipositor itself is a lot narrower than the sheath. Using -pjt1.jpg, the sheath is the thicker black protrusion on the abdomen pointed to the left while the ovipositor in the narrower reddish-brown protrusion pointed to the right. The traits in the key, then, are incredibly minute sculpturing on the very tip of the hair-thin ovipositor. I wouldn't expect to be able to see this outside of the lab with a specimen under the microscope. Lhikan634 (talk) 02:33, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for trying anyway! I found an image that shows some detail:

Does it help? If not, let's call it a day. Pjt56 (talk) 09:43, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Regrettably it isn't clear enough for keying. Even so, this is a remarkable view of the ovipositor tip. It's not common to see this much in photos. Lhikan634 (talk) 01:54, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Ok - thanks again. Once more it paid off to take and keep as many photos as possible until the identification is finished. Pjt56 (talk) 06:12, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

WeissenhofMuseum-pjt.jpg

Hi Pjt56, I used this image in a presentation for a school's class presentation. Thank you, Luzma ==Welcome== — Preceding unsigned comment added by Luzma.galvarez (talk • contribs) 10:54, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Landungsbrücke Fellbach-pjt.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:31, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Re: Sphex funerarius

Hi Pjt56, S. funerarius as far as I know it has become the main species in the genus found in Germany, and your photo is quite representative of the species. The information on the German Wikipedia page is really about half correct in terms of habitat. They nest in sandy to sparsely vegetated areas, but they take nectar and hunt in surrounding areas that can be more fertile, such as grasslands or even allotments. BWARS (Bees Wasps & Ants Recording Society) has a bit more info. Weiser's 2020 paper should cover the species' biology in greater detail, if you have access to the AES's journals or request the paper from the author. Lhikan634 (talk) 20:34, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the confirmation, and thanks for the references! I'll have a look at them and perhaps update the Wikipedia text. Pjt56 (talk) 06:29, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Picture of Stadtbibliothek Stuttgart

Hi Pjt56! I used your photo of the Stadtbibliothek Stuttgart for https://archiguesser.com (it will be the last picture for this project). Thank you for your great work ! Flibust1er (talk) 09:32, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

Gebrauch von Schloss Hohenheim bei Stuttgart. Panorama aus 5 Einzelbildern.

Hallo Pjt56,

ich wollte dich darüber informieren, dass ich dein schönes Bild von Schloss Hohenheim als Hintergrund in ein Videoprojekt verwedet habe. In dem besagten Video geht es um die Zusammenfassung des Theaterstücks Fritz - A German Hero von Peter Paul Zahl. Dieses handelt von den jungen Jahren von Friedrich Schiller.

Beste Grüße, JH 2003:EB:7727:161F:D04D:DF3:F700:85BD 10:42, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:VitraHausInterior-pjt.jpg

Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 07:41, 9 April 2024 (UTC)

Osmia cornuta

Hi Pjt56, I added your photo Osmia cornuta-pjt3.jpg to a bee lesson for children. Thank you! Natasja 2A02:A46D:130B:1:E52A:CEB3:712C:C52D 09:41, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:VitraFireStation-pjt2.jpg

Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 08:16, 30 June 2024 (UTC)

File:Akranes-pjt3.jpg

File:Akranes-pjt3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 09:34, 18 July 2024 (UTC)

File:Liederhalle Stuttgart pjt9.jpg

Hello! I’ll want to use your lovely Liederhalle pic in an insta post about the Mozartsaal. If you provide your insta handle, happy to tag you! Thank You! 148.252.129.168 07:08, 25 August 2024 (UTC)

File: Glyphotaelius pellucidus-pjt.jpg

Hello pjt56, I use your Köcherfliege in the protocol of our September meeting of NABU-AG Naturgarten Münster to illustrate the announcement of the NABU NRW Webinar "Insektenkunde für alle", naming you as the author of the pic and Wikimedia Commons as the source platform. Thanks for your high-quality photo and your generosity to share it! 2003:C8:FF2F:3700:F8AA:D11:937F:B48B 16:27, 7 October 2024 (UTC)