Template:VICpromoted
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
scope.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
This documentation is transcluded from Template:VICpromoted/doc.
Usage
This template is used for informing the nominator (or other stakeholders) of a valued image candidate on the users talk page that the image has been promoted. To do that, insert the following:
== Valued image promotion ==
{{VICpromoted|image name|scope
|review=The review comments
|subpage=VIC subpage if different from image name (optional)
|role=creator|editor|nominator (default)|uploader}}
-- ~~~~
where image name is the name of the promoted image (excluding Image:), scope is a copy of the scope parameter, review is a copy of the contents of the review parameter (excluding any archives) and role is the type of stakeholder in the review. The role defaults to the nominator when this parameter is not specified.
Examples
Standard usage to the nominator where subpage=image name
{{VICpromoted|Manhattan Bridge Construction 1909.jpg|The construction of the [[w:Manhattan Bridge|Manhattan Bridge]]|review=
*{{Comment}} I think it is the best illustration of the construction of the Manhattan Bridge and VI worthy.
-- [[User:Slaunger|Slaunger]] 13:43, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
*{{Support}} I can't find anything better, but it's not eligible (yet) as it has not been geocoded.
--[[User:MichaelMaggs|MichaelMaggs]] 19:39, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
*: {{Comment}} Hmm.. the guideline actually says geocoding is not mandatory for historic images. In this case we might get
acheive an approximate location by looking at the photo and compare with GE, but it will be a guess and not very accurate.
In that case I think it is better to drop geocoding. -- [[User:Slaunger|Slaunger]] 20:22, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Result: 1 support -> promoted. -- [[User:Slaunger|Slaunger]] 23:07, 11 March 2008 (UTC)
}}
-- ~~~~
gives:
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
The construction of the Manhattan Bridge.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
review
To creator when subpage differs from the image name
{{VICpromoted|Hamburg Hafen Containerterminal.jpg|Port container cranes
|review={{Info}} I believe this image is a more valuable illustration of a port container crane than [[:Image:Container Crane Mainz Port I.jpg]]. And it meets all the VI criteria. -- [[User:Slaunger|Slaunger]] 20:27, 18 May 2008 (UTC)<br>
*{{Support}} -- Agree -- [[User:Alvesgaspar|Alvesgaspar]] 21:47, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
*{{Support}} As do I. --[[User:MichaelMaggs|MichaelMaggs]] 08:02, 20 May 2008 (UTC)
*{{Support}} Same here [[User:Mrmariokartguy|Mrmariokartguy]] 20:41, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Result: 3 support at the end of the test review phase. =>
(Test) promoted. -- [[User:Slaunger|Slaunger]] 23:04, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
|subpage=Hamburg Hafen Containerterminal.jpg
|role=creator}}
gives
Congratulations! The image you created was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Port container cranes.
review
