User talk:MGA73/Archive 40
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Eleassar (t/p) 13:26, 9 December 2013 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely Darwin Ahoy! 11:17, 18 December 2013 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:HotSpringsNPmap.png
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:HotSpringsNPmap.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
JurgenNL (talk) 16:24, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Centfrancs.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Centfrancs.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Yann (talk) 09:19, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
File:Centfrancs.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
MGA73 (talk) 15:36, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:CayoLargoSatellite.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:CayoLargoSatellite.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
JuTa 22:38, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 16:56, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 16:59, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
New URL for OgreBot's old version filemover
Hello. I've identified you as a user who has previously used OgreBot's old version filemover. Please note the new URL: toollabs:magog/oldver.php. Thanks. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:39, 5 January 2014 (UTC)
File:Bobby&Flex2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Stefan4 (talk) 16:01, 12 January 2014 (UTC)
File:PRD.png
Hello, I have added Macau on the your Pearl River Delta map. Hope this is OK. I am not sure to be allowed to modify other people pictures! In case please delete my updated revision. Thanks --Thepat (talk) 16:48, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- It's a wiki so it is ok to change other users pictures. In some cases it is better to upload the new version with a new name. If someone think this is one of these cases then they will just revert or move the new version to a new name. So don't worry :-) --MGA73 (talk) 16:52, 20 January 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Labattblueboy (talk) 07:28, 16 January 2014 (UTC)
File:Sri Lanka Matha.ogg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Stefan4 (talk) 11:46, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
File:YosriTahiCicak.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ohconfucius (talk) 02:22, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
File:YosriCicak1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ohconfucius (talk) 02:23, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
De-adminship warning
Dear MGA73/Archive 40, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.
If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Feb-Mar 2014 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.
You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.
Thank you, odder (talk) 20:33, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
- Thank you for the notice. I'll see what I can do. --MGA73 (talk) 07:25, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Amphetamine formula pl s.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gce (talk) 14:23, 14 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Safdarjung 5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Andy king50 (talk) 11:47, 16 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Tampere 27000.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Andyrom75 (talk) 10:08, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Marrakesh map small1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Andyrom75 (talk) 10:13, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Ventotene 1 27000 mappa.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Andyrom75 (talk) 10:50, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Lalashan,Taoyuan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
INeverCry 18:45, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
File:FAT 2007.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Flickrworker (talk) 20:10, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Piranflag.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Cwbm (commons) (talk) 07:47, 15 March 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:ChandigarhSecretariat.JPG
- File:Kinnaur 048.JPG
- File:Kinnaur 219.JPG
- File:Kinnaur 311.JPG
- File:Kinnaur 408.jpg
Yours sincerely, Sanyam Bahga Sanyambahga (talk) 08:32, 29 March 2014 (UTC)
File:General Post Office (GPO), detail, Sydney - Wiki0063.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sardaka (talk) 06:47, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Sanyam Bahga Sanyambahga (talk) 14:41, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Вікі любить Землю, 1–31 травня / Wiki Loves Earth, May 1–31, 2014
Вітаємо!
З 1 по 31 травня 2014 буде проходити конкурс «Вікі любить Землю», метою якого є фотографування пам'яток природи. Цього року конкурс став міжнародним. Зі списками пам'яток природи України можна ознайомитися тут. Приєднуйтеся!
Більше інформації про конкурс читати тут. – Оргкомітет «Вікі любить Землю» (in english) 20:54, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Blue Safari submarine tour.JPG
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Blue Safari submarine tour.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:47, 14 April 2014 (UTC)
File:One of the more picturescue cottages in Glebe, Glebe, New South Wales - West0011.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sardaka (talk) 07:37, 16 April 2014 (UTC)
File:St Mary's Cathedral, Sydney - Wiki0051.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sardaka (talk) 08:01, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
ArchiveBot
Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:41, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
File:Statue of Gujo Dance.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Vantey (talk) 22:31, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Badami 033.JPG
- File:HathiSinghJainTemple.jpg
- File:IbrahimRoza.jpg
- File:NehruCentre.jpg
- File:Pondy 019.jpg
Yours sincerely, Sanyam Bahga Sanyambahga (talk) 10:21, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello
Hello MGA73. I will go based on that it's you I should like to address regarding NorthJutland.png. Why have you taken Fjerritslev (3.341 residents) and Dronninglund (3.328 residents) when Aars (8.105 residents) and Hadsund (4883 residents) not included. Hadsund have as a pedestrian zone as in example. Loegstoer and Hobro. But there are no pedestrian street in Dronninglund. --Søren1997 (talk // contributions) 09:16, 19 April 2014 (UTC)
- Hi. I am not the creator of the map. I copied it from Wikivoyage WTS to Wikimedia Commons along with thousands of other files. The original author was (WT-shared) ClausHansen.
- I agree that it looks strange to include smaller cities and exclude larger cities. You are welcome to update the image. --MGA73 (talk) 15:53, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
- I really want to update the image, but I'm not quite sure how it's made. I is perfectly aware that in some way are made in http://www.openstreetmap.org/ --Søren1997 (talk // contributions) 14:49, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
- Jeg har det samme problem :-) Men originalen bør være File:NorthJutland.svg, så hvis du har et program, der kan rette svg-filer så kan du måske bruge den fil som start. Jeg ved godt, at filen ser "mindre" ud, men hvis du åbner filen i en tekst-editor så kan du se fx Thisted som ellers ikke er synlig. --MGA73 (talk) 17:15, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
- Jeg har ikke noget porgram til rette svg-filer men måske kan jeg finde et på nettet. En anden ting er, hvordan downloader jeg svg-filen fra Wikipedia, og får den over på min computer. Jeg kan godt downloade billedet men ikke i SVG? Vh --Søren1997 (talk // contributions) 16:12, 23 April 2014 (UTC)
- Jeg har det samme problem :-) Men originalen bør være File:NorthJutland.svg, så hvis du har et program, der kan rette svg-filer så kan du måske bruge den fil som start. Jeg ved godt, at filen ser "mindre" ud, men hvis du åbner filen i en tekst-editor så kan du se fx Thisted som ellers ikke er synlig. --MGA73 (talk) 17:15, 22 April 2014 (UTC)
- Ja det er bare at google på nettet og vælge et program. Du kan evt. prøve at se på Help:SVG eller her.
- Du kan hente filen ved at højreklikke på teksten under billedet hvor der står "Original file (SVG file, nominally 744 × 1,052 pixels, file size: 1.05 MB)" og så vælge "Gem link som ....". --MGA73 (talk) 17:51, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
File:Bincang.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
FDMS 4 13:35, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
File:Chollagarden.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Jarekt (talk) 16:27, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
File:Sproochatlas error meldung safari.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Marcgalrespons 20:35, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
File:St Andrew's Cathedral, George Street, Sydney - Wiki0061.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sardaka (talk) 07:55, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
File:St Andrew's Cathedral, Sydney - Wiki0053.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Sardaka (talk) 07:57, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
File:Skyline FFM2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Pedelecs (talk) 17:29, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
File:Frankfurt train.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Pedelecs (talk) 17:32, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:322ndad.jpg
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:322ndad.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:406SptBdeSSI.jpg
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:406SptBdeSSI.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:406SptBdeSSI.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:08, 2 May 2014 (UTC)
File:MACG-28 insignia.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ces1775 (talk) 05:47, 16 May 2014 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Aguinaldo Sig.png
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Aguinaldo Sig.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:44, 20 May 2014 (UTC)
Categorisation of your bot2 uploads
Hi MGA73, thanks for your contributions to commons and for the ones of your bots!! Here just an idea to improve your baby: at the moment all the bot2-uploads are landing in the desert of Category:Media needing categories and vegetating there with ten-thousends of their kind. Today I found for example File:Bath Royal Crescent wts.jpg and File:Bath Royal Crescent wts.jpg which were lasting their categorisation for one and a half year. And everyday the number of uncategorised medias is increasing. I try to categorise them but it is like tilting at windmills. So it would be great for everybody if it s possible to give the uloaded images at least one category. You import them from wikivoyage, right? Are there no categories which you can transfer to commons? All the images will gain when people could find them more easily by categories. THANKS A LOT!!! If your bot have this feature already then forget about all this? Best regards --W like wiki (talk) 18:58, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
- Hi. I know that categorizing is a big job. Some time ago I categorized thousands of images with my bot trying to get rid of uncategorized files. But then I found other tasks to work on and the mass transfer of files from Wikivoyage was one of them.
- The problem with files from Wikivoyage was that the files needed to be copied to Commons in a hurry because otherwise Wikivoyage would have thousands of articles with red links. At the time I copied the files commonsense (that my bot use when it tries to find categories) were not updated to work on Wikivoyage.
- I suppose it would be possible to use a bot to add categories now with a few tweaks of the script. I have not been active with my bot(s) for some months now but I have plans to start up again when I have more time. Your idea seems like a good one to start with.
- Thank you for your comments :-) --MGA73 (talk) 19:12, 21 May 2014 (UTC)
- I see, so thank you for your emergency work for wikivoyage! and for your reply (pretty fast for beeing not active :) --W like wiki (talk) 21:19, 22 May 2014 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Aguinaldo Sig.png
This media may be deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Aguinaldo Sig.png, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:17, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
File:YosriHospitalDivrigi1128.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—LX (talk, contribs) 09:15, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
File:YosriHospitalNur Al Din1154.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
—LX (talk, contribs) 09:15, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
File:Osasco00.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gunnex (talk) 11:20, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
File:Dresdenshoppingarea.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 15:37, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Roy Williams fan appreciation.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
68.203.24.100 20:54, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Simms autograph session.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
68.203.24.100 20:54, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Floortrader.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
—LX (talk, contribs) 13:35, 15 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Onuma Roten Night2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Mippzon (talk) 21:05, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Barco Mirafondos.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Mippzon (talk) 07:07, 21 June 2014 (UTC)
Transferable to Commons?
Are MediaWiki screenshots free? e.g. [1] and [2]? ...Aurora... (talk) 03:35, 5 June 2014 (UTC)
- Yes unless there are larger parts of a copyrighted image included. I would say that the two images are ok. --MGA73 (talk) 13:37, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
- Oh. I just noticed that the logo / flower is licensed freely File:MediaWiki logo without tagline.png --MGA73 (talk) 18:48, 18 June 2014 (UTC)
- Cool, thanks. I'll do that soon. ...Aurora... (talk) 22:51, 23 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Lake Malawi- Florence Holiday Resort.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Tine (talk) 18:37, 25 June 2014 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:1SpaceBdeSSI.jpg
This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:1SpaceBdeSSI.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:1SpaceBdeSSI.jpg]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Ellin Beltz (talk) 13:55, 27 June 2014 (UTC)
File:Rincon-Faro.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Gunnex (talk) 17:39, 28 June 2014 (UTC)
File:UP Police Flag.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Mahir256 (talk) 04:41, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Template:Idw/layout Sardaka (talk) 08:34, 9 July 2014 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Pildirüüstaja (talk) 16:26, 12 July 2014 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Affected:
Yours sincerely Эlcobbola talk 16:27, 24 July 2014 (UTC)
Sources
Greetings I see from Category:Images without source, page 1, that you have uploaded images without source recently. Would it be possible for you to go through your contributions and source those images as well as be very careful to not omit sources on uploads in the future? Thank you so much for your help. Ellin Beltz ([[User talk:Ellin Beltz|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 01:24, 25 July 2014 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Rosario Berganza 02:46, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Rosario Berganza 02:47, 28 July 2014 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate January (talk) 13:45, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate 27.99.121.145 08:08, 5 August 2014 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 09:46, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate MGA73 ([[User talk:MGA73#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 15:56, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Richard Avery ([[User talk:Richard Avery|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:59, 16 August 2014 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Vitalie Ciubotaru ([[User talk:Vitalie Ciubotaru|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 02:43, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Affected:
Yours sincerely, Stefan4 ([[User talk:Stefan4|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:31, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate INeverCry 04:10, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Richard Avery ([[User talk:Richard Avery|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:38, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
File:333teruelmercancias.jpg is not derived from File:RN333-031.JPG, is a photograph different from File:RN333-031.JPG, made from another angle.--JT Curses ([[User talk:Jtcurses|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:04, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- @ JT Curses Oh sorry... They looked alike to me. The text on File:333teruelmercancias.jpg says the source is http://www.ferropedia.es/wiki/Archivo:333teruelmercancias.jpg and there it is said that the source is "Colección del autor." (Collection of author) but it also mention Commons so I thought it was originally from Commons.
- The photographer is Jean Pierre Vergez and the uploader on ferropedia is Maquinista. Is that perhaps the same person? If not how do we know that the author agreed to GFDL.
- Another file this http://www.ferropedia.es/wiki/Archivo:RN10309.JPG was uploaded by you (Jtcurses). Are you the photographer or where did you get the photo? --MGA73 ([[User talk:MGA73#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:19, 11 September 2014 (UTC)
- The uploader on ferropedia is "Maquinista" because Ferrropedia moved his server and "Maquinista" is an administrator. Originally, the picture was uploaded to Ferropedia by its author. The mention of Commons said that the file was then uploaded to commons, their origin is not commons. "http://www.ferropedia.es/wiki/Archivo:RN10309.JPG" and "http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:RN333-031.JPG" comes from commons. Sorry, I do not speak English properly.--JT Curses ([[User talk:Jtcurses|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:59, 12 September 2014 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate Affected:
And also:
Yours sincerely, Mike Peel ([[User talk:Mike Peel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:24, 13 September 2014 (UTC)
Template:Autotranslate . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 16 September 2014 (UTC)
You have broken Template:Tl
Hi.
Normally, I don't write message titles like this but your edit on 15 September has removed the previously valid Template:Para and Template:Para, prompting Template:U to mark many images as not having licenses. See Category:Media without a license: needs history check for details.
Please take corrective action.
Best regards,
Codename Lisa ([[User talk:Codename Lisa|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:23, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Codename Lisa. Thank you for telling me. I will see what I can do about that. --MGA73 ([[User talk:MGA73#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:33, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Codename Lisa. I could fix most of the cases but some cases were not possible to fix so I reverted the change of the template instead. Guess we have to find another way to clear Category:License migration candidates. --MGA73 ([[User talk:MGA73#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:01, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- Well, maybe I can help with that. I am a template editor on English Wikipedia but I don't understand the license migration issue properly. What was your original concern?
- Best regards,
- Codename Lisa ([[User talk:Codename Lisa|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:33, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Codename Lisa. If a file uses Template:Tl then it may be eligible for license migration and you see the Template:Tl template below the GFDL. The idea is that if there is also a Template:Tl or similar then license migration is redundant (and only the GFDL should be visible). If not then we can add different codes to tell the GFDL template what to do. The codes can be seen on Commons:License Migration Task Force/Migration. If the file is eligible for relicense then the template adds a new license like on File:Quail2.png. It is complicated in multi license templates :-( I copied the code from the Template:Tl template. A work around solution is to move the licenses outside the template. --MGA73 ([[User talk:MGA73#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:33, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- Problem seems to be solved at Template talk:Free screenshot. :-D --MGA73 ([[User talk:MGA73#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:21, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- That's great news. Well done. Codename Lisa ([[User talk:Codename Lisa|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 09:21, 19 September 2014 (UTC)
- Problem seems to be solved at Template talk:Free screenshot. :-D --MGA73 ([[User talk:MGA73#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 17:21, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Codename Lisa. If a file uses Template:Tl then it may be eligible for license migration and you see the Template:Tl template below the GFDL. The idea is that if there is also a Template:Tl or similar then license migration is redundant (and only the GFDL should be visible). If not then we can add different codes to tell the GFDL template what to do. The codes can be seen on Commons:License Migration Task Force/Migration. If the file is eligible for relicense then the template adds a new license like on File:Quail2.png. It is complicated in multi license templates :-( I copied the code from the Template:Tl template. A work around solution is to move the licenses outside the template. --MGA73 ([[User talk:MGA73#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:33, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- Hi Codename Lisa. I could fix most of the cases but some cases were not possible to fix so I reverted the change of the template instead. Guess we have to find another way to clear Category:License migration candidates. --MGA73 ([[User talk:MGA73#top|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 11:01, 18 September 2014 (UTC)