User talk:Vantey

日本語でおk。

Welcome to the Commons, Vantey!

First steps tutorial Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki ‒ it is really easy. Getting help More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.		Goodies, tips and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities. All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~ Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!) To link to an image page, write this: `[[:Image:Foo.jpg]]`, it makes this: `Image:Foo.jpg` If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper Made a mistake? Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: `{{bad name\|Correct name}}` For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Yann 14:53, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Order of translation links

I have reverted your reverts. I'm not aware of any policy that dicatates that the order should be that of an ensoteric ISO standard. However, they should be in an order that helps people to find what they need. If there is a Finnish speaking person who does not speak English, it would make very little sense to place the link they need in a place according to the English name of the language. Samulili (talk) 09:37, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

あなたの考えはフィンランド人POVです。「英語がわからないフィンランド人が多いから、見つけにくい」から何なんですか? そのことが、フィンランド人"だけ"に配慮して国際的なルールをその部分だけ歪める根拠になるのですか? ここは国際的なプロジェクトであり、フィンランド人専用あるいはフィンランド人中心のコミュニティではありません。 "Suomi" の言語コードが "fi" であるのが個人的に気に入らないのなら、言語コードを "su" にでもしてもらえるようにあなたがISOに働きかけてください。 --Vantey (talk) 09:56, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I do not know what you are saying, and you must understand that from by babel information. This has nothing to do with POV/NPOV. The mission is to help people. Samulili (talk) 12:26, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

あなたは機械翻訳を使うなどして大筋だけでも理解しようとする努力をしたのですか? それとも、自分に都合が悪くなったら、読めないふりをして、あげくに曲解ですか? 「ファイルの収録基準としてのNPOV」にははじめから関係ありません。

英語がわからない人は、このコモンズには世界中から来ています。なぜ、フィンランド人"だけ"に特別な配慮をしなければならないのですか? フィンランド人というのは世界中で特別に偉いのですか? 繰り返しますが、あなたの考え方はフィンランド人POVです。 --Vantey (talk) 13:01, 20 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Translation please

It would be very helpful if you could translate your message from this post you made to Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Carpkazu‎ because I don't know what you are trying to tell us. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 15:26, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done --Vantey (talk) 11:39, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Category:World_War_II_by_country

I noticed a lot of activities related to renaming category:Country during World War II to category:Country in World War II please pause in that effort until discussion at Commons:Village_pump#Category:World_War_II_by_country is resolved. --Jarekt (talk) 18:50, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

People in trees

Hi! Please look at Category talk:People with trees. --MGA73 (talk) 10:33, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ライセンス変更に関する取り扱いについてお尋ね

こんにちは、Yasuです。こちらでは初めましてでしょうか。よろしくお願いします。

さて、実は私が撮影しアップロードしましたこの画像なのですが、このたびVanteyさんの利用者ページからリンクされていることに気付き、辿っていってVanteyさんのブログを拝見して初めて事情を知りました。

ウィキメディアで有効な個々のライセンスに関しては、私も最低限の知識は持っているつもりですが、このような場合の扱いは経験がないため、お伺いさせていただきました。お手数ですが、お時間のある際にでもご回答いただけますと幸いです。Yasu (talk) 16:18, 19 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

すみません。「事を荒立てた」のはもっぱら私のみの責に帰することで、当該画像の著作者がお気を揉まれるようなことではないのですが、ご心配をおかけしてしまったようです。

ライセンスを後から緩和したらその効力が遡及するのかどうかは、私にも知識不足でお答えできません。実際にライセンスを緩和したほうがいいのかどうかについては私は助言できる立場にはありませんし、何ともいえないのですが、かつてCassiopeia sweetさんが同様の目に遭ったことがあり、それ以来「同様事例を発見次第、自作画像側をPDにしている」と伺ったことがあります。主に著作者自身の精神衛生のためにはありかもしれない、などと頓珍漢な所見は自ブログのほうに記しました。あまりまともなお答えができなくて申し訳ないです。 --Vantey (talk) 18:00, 25 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

お返事ありがとうございます。ブログも改めて拝見しました。著作権やライセンスの啓蒙という主旨はよく分かりますし、またこうやってご紹介いただけなかったら私としても事情を知らないままだったわけですから、Vanteyさんこそお気に病まれることのないよう願います。

Cassiopeia sweetさんの事例もご紹介いただきありがとうございます。たいへん参考になりました。当該画像については、何もしないよりはいいかもしれない、ということでライセンスをPDに変更しておきました。すぐにとはいきませんが、いずれ現地を再訪の折にもっと質の高い写真を改めて撮り直して、別名でアップロードした後に当該画像は削除してもらうことも考えております。

ただ、今後のために明記しますが、今回の私の措置は、諸々の事情を総合的に勘案して判断したことによるもので、今後同様に無断使用を発見した場合も、Cassiopeia sweetさんのように必ずライセンス条件の緩和手続きを取ることを確約するものではないことを書いておきたいと思います。たとえば、無断使用していたのが大きな利益をあげている優良企業であったり、あるいは被写体とまったく関係のない第三者であれば、まったく正反対の対応をするかもしれません。このような考え方もあるのだとご理解いただければ幸いです。Yasu (talk) 14:46, 26 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

meaningless edit

On this edit and other edit, you added user who upload the media, but these basic information is always stored in history page. You need not add it yourself, and you should stop continues reverting. Best Regards, --Chime (talk) 00:39, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

なぜあなたはそれを最新の版から隠すことにそんなに必死なのですか? 著作権を侵害するマテリアルをあなたがアップロードした事実を、あなたは隠したいのでしょうか? あなたは後ろめたいのですか、それともあなたは責任を逃れたいのですか? ならば、あなたはそのようなマテリアルをアップロードすべきではありません。 --Vantey (talk) 08:28, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your opinion is completely misdirected. Upload information are always stored in history page, therefore, you need not add these redundant information by yourself. By the way, you seem too aggressive. If you were not good, please take a short rest for cool down, before continuing this discussion. It is only a my advice. --Chime (talk) 10:39, 15 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's JAPANESE MODERN ART

Images_of_Tower_of_the_Sun is ART.But that photo is Fair_Use. Thank you to comment,I love freedom.-MOTOI Kenkichi (talk) 15:07, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

That's logic was wrong.Fair_Use is strictly forbidden on Commons.Sorry.--MOTOI Kenkichi (talk) 22:42, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hongkong Tramways Limited vs Hong Kong Tramways Limited

I prefer the later. Well, how to move?--Csmardcoe (talk) 03:32, 17 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Free image of Canon PowerShot SX100 IS

Hi! Can you make and upload a free image of SX100 IS camera to illustrate these articles: ru:Canon PowerShot SX100 IS, pl:Canon PowerShot SX100 IS, zh:Canon PowerShot SX100 IS?--Sergei (talk) 07:31, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Translation of Template:Created with CombineZP

Hi Vantey.
I contact you because you translated Template:Created with CombineZP into another language. I've done some changes on Template:Created with CombineZP/en to improve the templates Quality. Would you kindly translate that addition as well.
Thanks a lot --D-Kuru (talk) 14:13, 3 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't use Template:iL in deletion request discussions. For admins with DelReqHandler enabled, which is all of us who regularly handle DRs, it makes it much more difficult to figure out which link to click on:

File:Kasadomaru4000.JPG [keep] [del] (edit [keep] [del] · last [keep] [del] · history [keep] [del] · watch [keep] [del] · unwatch [keep] [del] · global usage · find cats · logs · purge [keep] [del] · w · search · links · DR [keep] [del] · del [keep] [del] · undel)

If you just use

[[:File:Kasadomaru4000.JPG]]

everything works normally -- it shows up for us as

File:Kasadomaru4000.JPG [keep] [del].

Thanks, Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:50, 7 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Categories:Ships of ......

I found that you removed the ships category for Hawaii Superferry. These categories are to devide between the company and the ships. Extra images of the company have sometimes nothing to do with the ships and it gives the possibility of adding Ships by operator, when the company also has a lot of other activities. --Stunteltje (talk) 19:15, 21 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Aspirin_chem.png

File:Aspirin_chem.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Yikrazuul (talk) 18:17, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for fixing all the categories, and sorry for creating all that extra work. Still new at this. :) --Griffinofwales (talk) 21:49, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

US Navy temporary categories

Hi Vantey, I saw you undid the category redirect at Category:Images from US Navy, location JOINT BASE PEARL HARBOR-HICKAM, Hawaii, but I didn't see an explanation why. All the "Images from US Navy ..." are temporary categories generated by the bot during upload, in general photos of military facilities or military vessels go directly into the appropriate category, as the temporary category is largely redundant. In other cases the temporary category is kept, so the normal category for the place isn't swamped with US Navy photos. Please let me know if there was a reason, otherwise I'll restore the redirect, and in a few days a bot will move the images into Category:Joint Base Pearl Harbor-Hickam. Benchill (talk) 03:11, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ja localization

Thanks for the sitenotice localization. Can you also do the same for the script the notice relates to? You can edit User:Rd232/myuploads.js directly or leave a note at User talk:Rd232/myuploads.js. cheers, Rd232 (talk) 22:42, 26 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DEFAULTSORT

Do you understand what {{DEFAULTSORT:}} does? -- Queeg (talk) 17:45, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is a "sortkey" and when you remove it, you are requiring additional categories to use the same information and notation that you replaced http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Category:Videos_of_World_War_II&curid=12706107&diff=59630146&oldid=58178783

That is the reason that I am going to undo your change and ask that you undo any other changes you made like this.

Thank you. -- Queeg (talk) 17:53, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

So, I just looked and you are taking the long way for a sortkey :)

The way that I use {{DEFAULTSORT:}} is to put what will most often be the correct sortkey there -- in the example that I just undid {{DEFAULTSORT:World War II}} so that all categories will sort on "World War II" and not on "Videos of" and then exceptions get the manual sort key like [[Category:World War II| Videos of]]. That space in front of the sort key separates it from the actual subcategories of "World War II".

I write this now so that you will continue to repair the sortkeys here, you were doing a nice job of it except for that one exception :) -- Queeg (talk) 18:01, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

DEFAULTSORTについて正しく理解していないのは、あなたのほうです。

Category:Videos of World War IIはCategory:World War II by medium内において、Vでソートされなければなりません。Wではありません。DEFAULTSORTを使えばWになってしまいます。このような場合は、DEFAULTSORTを使うべきではありません。Wは"DEFAULT"にはなり得ないからです。このような場合は、Wでソートすべきカテゴリにだけ個別にソートキーを指定すべきなのです。 --Vantey (talk) 18:12, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Now it is:

[[Category:World War II by medium|Video]]

[[Category:Videos of conflicts]]

I did not see the "by medium". I am sorry. -- Queeg (talk) 19:04, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ magyar ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ქართული ∙ 한국어 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hello, Vantey!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 13:36, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image:20100914 ja-Project-Shippitsu shien.png was uncategorized on 14 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:36, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Image:20100912 ja-Wikipedia-WikiProject Shippitsu shien.png was uncategorized on 14 December 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:36, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Fg2

Hi! Last summer you made posts to User talk:Fg2, inquiries about some of his images. I would like to inform you that Fg2 is dead. He will be unable to answer your questions. WhisperToMe (talk) 16:27, 7 January 2012 (UTC) Okay, I noticed that the image statuses in question had been resolved anyway. I'll make notes on Fg2's talk page to show that the matters have been resolved. WhisperToMe (talk) 16:31, 7 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Taepodong-2 scheme mod.jpg

File:Taepodong-2 scheme mod.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

178.9.20.73 12:31, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File description 書き換えの件

はじめまして。利用者ページによれば日本語を母語とされているとのことなので、遠慮なく日本語で書かせていただきます。

私がアップロードした以下2ファイルについてFile descriptionを別フォーマットに書き換えられておられるのを拝見しました。

Commonsに投稿するからには、他者による改変を容認しなければならないという原則は、アップロードを含む編集画面に必ず表示されていることですから止めはしません。しかし今回のように全然ちがうテンプレートに変えてしまうのは、私からすれば署名の書き換えに等しいほどの改変であり、率直にいって好感を持ちません。私はすべてのファイルについて、築き上げた統一スタイルのFile descriptionで投稿することに決めており、航空や鉄道、自動車などにみられる分野特化テンプレートを使うつもりはまったくありません。

さらに、other_versionsについては誤解があると指摘せざるをえません。

同じファイルの別バージョンがコモンズ上にある場合（例: カラー版と白黒版の画像）、この欄にそのファイルへのウィキリンクを書きます。
— Commons:ファースト・ステップ/クオリティと説明#ファイルの説明

If there are other version of this file within Wikimedia Commons (for example a black and white version of a color image, or a cropped or uncropped version) use this field to link to these versions with a wikilink.
— Commons:First_steps/Quality_and_description#Good_file_descriptions

すなわちここでいうVersionは、同じファイルのモノクロ・フルカラー版やクロップ（トリミング）の有無といった派生編集のことを指しています。決してFile:TokyoMPD AB139 JA14MP RJTI 20100618-001.jpgとFile:TokyoMPD AB139 JA14MP RJTI 20100618-002.jpgのような同一対象物の別写真を列挙する欄ではありません。

File descriptionについて、botが日付やライセンスを一定の書式に統一することにはメリットを認めますが、初版投稿者（作者）の意に沿わない別のフォーマットに置き換えてしまう今回のような編集に際しては慎重に臨んでいただきたいというのが私の心情です。長文失礼いたしました。--J o (talk) 17:08, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

追伸　上記2ファイルに加え、File:KobeFireBureau BK117C-2 JA02KB 20090906-001.jpgについては、File descriptionのテンプレート置き換え直前の状態に戻させていただいた旨、申し添えます。--J o (talk) 17:47, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Category:IMO_6125398

Category:IMO_6125398 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Windroff (talk) 02:29, 14 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Altezza with Miku one-point 20110814.jpg

File:Altezza with Miku one-point 20110814.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Ju Ta 09:26, 1 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:全国相互利用記念ICOCA.pngの削除についての質問

先般、御貴殿の方からの申立により、著作権侵害案件あつかいで、私のアップしたICOCAの画像が削除されました。如何せん、今の今になってその事実に気づきましたので、その削除議論について全く参加も出来ませんで、結果論として（語弊があるかもしれませんが）御貴殿の意見が一方的に通ってしまった形となっています。それで、ひとつお伺いしたいのですが、あのカードはどうして削除されたのでしょうか？それからあれが削除されてしかるべきだというのであれば、なぜ、その他の各種カード（少なくともその他のICOCAなどのICカード）の画像が削除されずに済んでいるのでしょうか？明確な基準があるというのであれば、わかるのですが、現状では物凄く曖昧に感じ、個人的には承服致しかねるというのが正直な所です。個人的には今すぐにでも再アップしたいのですが、また、削除とアップの繰り返しとなるのもどうかと考えておりますので、まずは御意見をお伺いしたく存じます。なお、あのカードのどこを探してもコピーライツ表示の○の中にCというのも、著作権に関する表示もなかったという事実があるということも付け加えさせて頂きます。--吉田宅浪 (talk) 11:37, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

まず根本的な認識として、©などの著作権表示が無ければ著作権が発生・存在しないなどと考えるのは危険かつ無法的な考えです。そのような考えをお持ちであるのならば、その認識を改めない限りは他人の著作物を含む画像をアップロードするのは厳におやめになるべきです。現在の著作権の発生要件の国際的な主流では、著作物の要件を満たす創作物はすべて、著作権表示の有無にかかわらず創作された瞬間に自動的に、著作権による保護の対象となる著作物となります。

削除された理由としては、依頼理由の「著作権の存在する他人製作の絵画の著作物の二次的著作物」であること、および対処理由の「（被写体に描かれた絵画が）本人製作ではない」ことに尽きます。当該画像のカードの意匠は、そこに描かれた著作権の存在する絵画がその主要な構成要素であったため、そのように判断されました。

お尋ねの「基準」としては、被写体がそうではないこと、つまり「著作物の要件を満たさない創作性の低い情報の羅列」、および「画像全体の中では問題にするべきほどではない僅少な要素」のみによって構成されていることが基準となります。そして現在削除されずに存続しているものは、著作物たる要件に満たないとみなされているのだと思います。詳しくはCommons:Threshold of originalityをお読みください。 --Vantey (talk) 14:15, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

すみません。説明不足でした。私が言いたいのはこういうことです。御貴殿もお示しになられている「画像全体の中では問題にするべきほどではない僅少な要素」と「著作物の要件を満たさない創作性の低い情報の羅列」の２つなのですが（例えば、本の表紙や看板に書かれた文字文章などはこの時点でアウトでしょうね）、この２要件を満たしていると思われるもので、なおかつ、©などの著作権表示という奴もない物、という要件を必要十分に満たしていると思われるものをアップしたのに、なぜ削除されなければならなかったのかなあということなのです。もし、あのカードの画像が消される必用があるのなら、カード画像は（私がアップしたもの以外にも）数多く削除されてしかるべきだと思うというのが、私の個人的な意見であって、そういうわけで疑義が生じましたのでこちらに寄せていただいたのです。

「まず根本的な認識として、©などの著作権表示が無ければ著作権が発生・存在しないなどと考えるのは危険かつ無法的な考えです。そのような考えをお持ちであるのならば、その認識を改めない限りは他人の著作物を含む画像をアップロードするのは厳におやめになるべきです。」ということですが、その御意見は、全く持って正しいと思いますし、小生も同様に考えております。ところで、私の基本的な画像投稿内容と方針を覧ていただければ、わかると思いますが、そのような考えはこれっぽっちも抱いてはおりませんし、ましてや、そういう危険な考えの持ち主であると思われたというのは正直に申し上げて心外でなりません。私は他人に著作権及びその隣接権のあるものを上げる気はありませんし、基準に照らし合わせて、アウトだったというのならば、それは納得しますが、現状では、「なぜ、この画像だけ？」という疑問が拭い捨てきれないのです。

しつこいようで申し訳ありませんが、再度お答えいただければ幸いです。--吉田宅浪 (talk) 16:43, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ですから削除依頼の時点から何度も指摘されたように、当該画像に関しては明らかに他者の著作権を侵害するものであった（少なくとも削除対処を行う管理者にはそう判断された）から削除されたのです。他の画像なるものがどれを指しているか知りませんが、仮にそれをここで指摘されたところで当該画像の違法性が薄まるわけでもなければ、基準が緩まるわけでもないのです。他の画像は関係ありません。他の画像の中にも問題のあるものが発見されれば、今後削除依頼にかけられることもあるでしょう（現にいくつか削除審議中ですが）。

「基準に照らし合わせて、アウトだったというのならば、それは納得します」とおっしゃるように、まさに基準に照らしてアウトだったのです。ですから、そういうことでご納得いただければと存じます。 --Vantey (talk) 18:00, 3 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

では、その基準というのと、削除についての異議申立てというのはどちらへ行ってお伺いすればよろしいのでしょうか？如何せん、連休中に、御貴殿が審議に出されて（別にこれ自体は悪いことではなく、寧ろ良いことだと思います。）、たったの数時間で、それも、連休中の夜間を含む時間帯で、アップ主もパソコンから離れているであろうと容易に想像がつく時間帯にこのような形で削除されたのは、（削除されたのは御貴殿ではありませんので、ここは御貴殿のせいでは、無いことは無論百も承知なのですが）あまりにもひどい話であると考えていて、納得出来ないというのもあるのです。もうひとつ言わせてもらえば、なぜ、削除依頼をお出しになる前に、予め一声小生のノート頁や、他の所で声をおかけいただけなかったのか？依頼を出して、すぐ削除というのでは、事実上、アップした本人が申し開きをする機会を与えていないに等しく、其のような事が許されるのかということなのです。

そのうえ、削除なさった方は外国の方のようで日本国内の事情（著作権やその他の法的事情）も、（そもそも画像の内容怪しいものです）詳しくご存知でいらっしゃらないように思われます。

なお、私が申し上げた「基準に照らし合わせて、アウトだったというのならば、それは納得します」というのは、削除する方の裁量については含んではおりませんので悪しからず御承知ください。

また、別に他の画像がおかしいから違法性を薄めようという魂胆は、全く持ってはおりません。「基準がおかしいのではないですか？」という事を申し上げる一例として、小生は述べたわけでありますので、そのような魂胆の持ち主であるかのように言われることも、これまた心外です。

色々とご面倒をお掛けしていることは百も承知なのですが、如何せん、あまりに急なことで無慈悲すぎるというかなんというかで、今回のこの案件が、仮に一般的に見てアウトになる基準を超えていたとしたら、この案件については分からなくもないのですが、今後自身のアップした写真（例えば、風景写真など）でも、同様に依頼が出された時にも、また、依頼審議から阻害されるのではないかという恐れを抱いているわけなのです。それで、こうして（自分でも思うくらい）しつこく、ここでお伺いしているのです。鬱陶しいと思われるかもしれませんが、その辺りの基準について書かれた所を、少なくとも日本語では見つけることはできませんでしたので、御存知だったらと藁にも縋る思いでお伺いしておりますので、どうか、お答えいただければ助かります。　--吉田宅浪 (talk) 02:46, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

異議申し立て窓口はCommons:削除撤回依頼です。ですが失礼ながらあの画像に関して言えば、復帰の見込みは極めて薄いと言わざるを得ないでしょう。削除審議の期間は原則1週間ですが、当該画像の著作権侵害があまりにも誰の目にも明らかだったからこそ管理者の方も早期対処されたのではないでしょうか。審議が早期終了となったことで異議申し立ての機会が失われたことへの憤懣はわからないでもありませんが、正直なところ、審議時間を長くとって言い分を聞いたところで当該画像が存続終了に傾く要素があったとは思えません。それほど明らかな著作権侵害でしたし、その結論がおかしいとは私は思いません。著作権侵害をしてはいけないという「基準がおかしい」とおっしゃるならば、コモンズではそういうファイルは受け入れない方針ですので、コモンズではなく他のサイトにでも行くべきでしょう。

これだけ説明しても当該画像が削除された理由が今でも本当にわからないのでしたら、当該画像について「創作性が低いと思われる」などと今でも思っておられるのでしたら、「よそへどうぞ」と言う以外にもはやあなたに対してできるアドバイスはありません。 --Vantey (talk) 10:35, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

失礼ですが、最後の「よそへどうぞ」は、ひどい言い草だと思います。正直に申し上げて、小生は納得はできないまでも、そういうことなのだったら、再アップは控えておこう。どちらにしろ一度削除されたものは、その手順に誤りのあるものであったにせよ、そう判断されたのは仕方がないと考えていなくもありませんし、あの画像の再アップでまた同様のことがあっても面倒なだけですから、実際に金輪際する気もありません。ただ、小生は、今後別の画像をアップするにあたって、一般論として、どういうものがアウトでどういうものがセーフなのかがきになっているのと、今後も審議時間というのは何でもかんでもあのようにアップ主の申開きができないように短時間で処理するという事があるのかという疑問があり、そのあたりに熟知なさっておられるような雰囲気を、御貴殿は漂わせておられるので、御貴殿はそういう方で尚且つ日本人の方だというので御伺いしたのです。今回、小生のあの画像が、御貴殿に消されたのは運が悪かった（削除そのものではなく依頼人が御貴殿だったという意味です）として、諦めることにしましょう。ですが、小生は、今後も著作権侵害ではないと日本の現行の法解釈に則って想像がつく画像（無論ウィキ内の基準もですが）を今後もアップするということを宣言して失礼致します。

「これだけ説明しても当該画像が削除された理由が今でも本当にわからないのでしたら、当該画像について「創作性が低いと思われる」などと今でも思っておられるのでしたら、「よそへどうぞ」と言う以外にもはやあなたに対してできるアドバイスはありません。」という部分ですが、その言い草は撤回していただきたいと思います。例えば、小生のノートページを見て頂ければ、分かるかとは思いますが、過去に問題ありとされたものにおいて、問題のあったものは自身の手で削除していること、問題なきものは申し開きの上で存続していただけるよう要望を出したことを鑑みれば、著作権侵害に対して小生がどれほど気を使っているかも分かるでしょうし、その考えは誤解というものです。--吉田宅浪 (talk) 14:23, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

（追記）これは、あの画像そのものについてのはなしですが、もしかして、あれにキャラクターが写り込んでいたのが、アウトの理由なのですかね？もしそうだというのなら、あの画像については、まだ納得出来ますが……　でもそうだとすると、例えば、他の方の画像ですがFile:GEO Ponta Card.jpgなんかはどうして消されずにずっと残っているんでしょうか？というような所から来る、率直な疑問に対して、現行のウィキ内の基準がよく分からないので一般的基準をお伺いしたいのです。それに御貴殿は、この画像についての当方からの回答でも依頼先にも此方にも、以来提出理由をただ著作権侵害である故に、削除されたと述べられるのみで、どこがどうアウトだったかを具体的に述べていらっしゃらないではありませんか。それで、「これだけ説明しても当該画像が削除された理由が今でも本当にわからないのでしたら、当該画像について「創作性が低いと思われる」などと今でも思っておられるのでしたら、「よそへどうぞ」と言う以外にもはやあなたに対してできるアドバイスはありません。」と、自身の説明を全く不備がないように誇って、そのような言い草は、小生もあまり言えた方ではありませんが人としてどうなのでしょう？--吉田宅浪 (talk) 14:40, 4 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Japanese Ramen SapporoIchiban taste of the sesame.jpg

この削除依頼ページはCategory:Packaging-related deletion requests/keptに入れないほうがいいとお考えのようですが[1]、理由を教えていただけませんか。その後削除されてはいますが、その場での結論は存続となった議論ページですので、このカテゴリに入れてもいいと私は思いました。 --whym (talk) 23:41, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

当該画像は、以下のような経過で最終的に削除に至っています。

削除依頼A提起。「商品包装に関して著作権上問題ではないか」
存続意見。「画像内の"一部の要素C"について問題ない」（つまりはtextlogoであるとの主張）
削除依頼A、存続終了
削除依頼B提起。「商品包装に関して著作権上問題ではないか」
削除依頼Bにより削除

ここで2.と3.に着目すれば、削除依頼Aを「存続事例」として収集したくなるのはわかります。

しかしよく見てください。1.と4.の依頼事由は同じではありませんか。1.の依頼も、理由において特段"要素C"だけに関して問題とした依頼ではありません。

とすると結局のところ、削除依頼Aは、当該画像が含んでいるすべての要素に関して検討がなされなかった不完全な審議、不適切な存続であったということにならないでしょうか。

（まあ依頼Bのほうとて審議が尽くされているようには見えませんけど。依頼Bの原提起者と別人によって追加された後段は、別の依頼Dで前に一度存続終了した画像Eも理由の説明なく追加された挙句に前回と同じ存続意見によって再び存続終了するなど杜撰な讒訴のような側面もあり（その傍証として、各アップロード者への削除審議告知がなされていない）、必ずしも「前回依頼で考慮されなかった要素C以外の部分についても再検討せよ」という趣旨の依頼であったかどうかは判りかねるのですが。）ですが依頼Bでは、少なくとも管理者の心象には（要素C以外の部分について再検討されて）"削除すべきもの"とされた訳で。実際に対処されたという事実は重いです。

また削除依頼を分野別に収集するカテゴリが存在することの使命を「後学の人の目に触れる機会を供することで、知見を蓄積、共有すること」とするならば、ファイルが削除されて参照できない存続事例は、実例に即してみてなぜ存続になったのかがわからないので、基本的に、後の役には立ちません。集めたところで、それは単に「存続終了された事実の収集」であるにとどまります。仮に依頼1と依頼2の依頼事由からして全く異なるのであれば、依頼2後にファイルが削除されたものでも依頼1を収集する意義があることはあり得ますが、本件の場合は、そういう事例にはあたらないと判断しました。本件依頼Aと同一の経過を辿った存続事例でしたら上掲依頼Dなども既に収集されてあり、一応間に合っています。単なる「存続事実の収集」をすべきだということでしたら、最近一旦存続後に再審議で削除されたこの事例Fはkeptのカテゴリにも加えるべきだ、という話にもなってきます。

少し前に日本のFOP案件を洗った際、同一事由で何度も削除依頼に出され、結局は後の依頼で削除されたものの、時の存続論者の声が大きかったばかりにその時は存続となった「赤リンクファイルの存続案件」が結構出てきました。それらは、後の役には立たないと判断し、存続事例としての収集対象からは外してあります。 --Vantey (talk) 10:43, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

私は間違って一度 kept になった事例も、勘違いされることの多い種類のものとして参考になるのではと思い、カテゴリに入れて参照しやすくしておく意味はあると思いました。存続の結論が以後くつがえされ削除されたことは赤リンクになっていることよって明らかなので、誤った事例と正しい事例が混同される恐れもないと思います。ご指摘のとおり、私の見方では、Commons:Deletion requests/File:Japanese Sapporo Ichiban Sio Ramen.JPGは kept と deleted 両方にはいることになります。区別をもっとはっきりさせたいということであれば、誤った事例はCategory:Packaging-related deletion requests以下に新しいカテゴリを作って入れたほうがいいのかもしれません。 --whym (talk) 14:18, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Files_transfered_from_other_Wikimedia_projects

Category:Files_transfered_from_other_Wikimedia_projects has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 03:48, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Thomas_the_Tank_Engine_and_Friends

Thomas the Tank Engine and Friends has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Acather96 (talk) 17:56, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Thomas_the_Tank_Engine_and_Friends-related_trains_in_Japan

Thomas the Tank Engine and Friends-related trains in Japan has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Acather96 (talk) 19:45, 19 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:ShinjyukuSt EastGate at night in 2008.jpg

Please don't remove Categories. Thanks. --Benzoyl (talk) 06:26, 26 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Tugboats in Washington State and Category:Mississippi River tugboats

You recently removed the contents of Category:Tugboats in Washington State and Category:Mississippi River tugboats, but, as I noted at User talk:Fastily, I couldn't find any explanation as to why you did so.

Could you please bear in mind that:

when you remove all the content from a category, it is likely to be removed, as it is traditional for administrators to remove empty categories;
third parties, outside the system of wikimedia projects, link to categories, and there is absolutely no way to know whether a long-standing category has been linked to.
when a long-standing category, that has been linked to by outside third parties, is removed, it leaves dangling links, eroding the commons' reputation for reliability.

Is there a reason you didn't follow the advice at Commons:Rename a category and place a {{Move}} template on the earlier category?

The way categories are implemented make it tricky, or even impossible, for an administrator who encounters an empty category to determine that it once held meaningful content. There are contributors who do not follow the advice at Commons:Rename a category and place a {{Move}} template on the earlier category, but who do not ignore the danger caused by dangling links, because they leave a {{Category redirect}}.

I urge you, in the strongest possible terms, if you are going to do any more work on categories, please, never just create a parallel category with your preferred name, and then remove all the content from the earlier category, by placing it in the new category. Please follow the advice in Commons:Rename a category and place a {{Move}} template on the earlier category.

Thanks Geo Swan (talk) 14:29, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Boats_in_New_York

Boats in New York has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

Geo Swan (talk) 14:58, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Cfd forTrain interiors in Japan by class

I've declined the speedy and opened a CfD atCommons:Categories for discussion/2014/08/Category:Train interiors in Japan by class, I'd just like to repeat that nominating under bad name was not really appropriate.--KTo288 (talk) 10:34, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Unexplained removal of category from file page

Hi. In a recent edit to File:KFTEC 20140525 057 1000 KEIKYU YELLOW HAPPY TRAIN.jpg, I noticed you removed the category Category:Rail transport events in Japan. In case it is not clear from the image description, this photo was taken at the annual public open day event held at Kurihama, so the category is certainly applicable. Anyway, don't worry, as I have restored the category. Thanks. --DAJF (talk) 08:24, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

これは失礼いたしました。確かに言いたいことはよく理解しています。

当該写真については「単にイベント内で撮られた写真」であるというだけで、単なる（というよりあまりに完璧な）形式写真であり、ヘッドマーク・観客の姿や案内板・普段はあまりない方向幕や異形式の並びなどといった具体的なイベント要素の写り込みが全く無く、この写真のみを単体で観た場合に「イベントの様子等を表した写真」であると判断できない写真である、言い換えると個別許可に基づく施設内立ち入りによる公開日以外の撮影と（画像説明なしでは）区別できない、ということでカテゴリを（一旦）外しました。

日本では一部の防衛施設の公開行事についてCategory:Yokota Air Base Friendship Festivalのように個別カテゴリが徐々に整備されつつありますが、その他の業務施設・工事現場等の公開行事を包含するカテゴリがまったく未整備であり（それどころか直接の親カテゴリとなるべき鉄道車両基地の個別カテゴリの整備状況すら十分ではない）、本件画像は最終的にはいずれ置かれるべきこれらカテゴリの下位の個別イベントのカテゴリにこそ収容されるべきだと考えます。 --Vantey (talk) 14:37, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

カテゴリー変更についての質問です

こんばんは。DAJFと申します。今度は日本語で聞きたいことがあります。。。　Vanteyさんは現在Category:Interiors of Odakyu 3100 seriesからCategory:Interior of Odakyu 3100 seriesへ多くのファイルを移動しているようですが、なぜですか？　英語の文法を考えると不自然ですし、Category:Train interiors of Odakyu Electric Railwayも複数形となっていますが、わざわざ移動させる何かの理由がありますでしょうか？　お手数ですが、コメントお願いします。--DAJF (talk) 12:22, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

そもそも親カテゴリが複数形なのは、「A形式の内装」「B形式の内装」…をまとめたカテゴリであるからであって、個別の形式については複数形ではおかしいという判断です。これはCategory:Building interiorsやCategory:Ship interiors by ship name以下の個別建物・個船カテゴリにおいても同様に単数形の命名となっており、これは英文法上も、またコモンズ全体の中でも、議論の余地もなく自明であると考えています。

なお、この返答を待たずにリバートをされていますが、ならば逆に、複数形でなければおかしいという論拠をご提示ください。「1形式中に複数の形態の部屋があるから」というのはだめです。上記個別建物のカテゴリについても同様のことが言えるからです。 --Vantey (talk) 12:37, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

お返事ありがとうございます。こちはまだリバートしていませんが、ちゃんとした議論が必要だと考えており、とりあえず「Speedy Delete」は外させてもらいました。これからCommons:Categories for discussionに出すつもりですが。Category:Building interiorsやCategory:Ship interiors by ship nameの場合、一つの建物や船となりますが、電車などの場合、一編成だけではありませんので、不自然に感じます。たとえ「Interiors of E331 series」でしたら、さすがにVanteyさんがおっしゃる通りおかしいです。　申し訳ありませんが、元のCategory:Interiors of Odakyu 3100 seriesに戻すべきだとまだ思いますので、Commons:Categories for discussionに出します。準備ができましたら、Vanteyさんからのコメントもお願いします。　--DAJF (talk) 12:50, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Code issues in User:Vantey/common.js

Hi Vantey, I am a bored bot (this is kind of a computer program) that is watching the recent changes and tapping buttons like I did now.

Curious about the reason? Possibly not but I will tell you anyway:

You edited User:Vantey/common.js. Glad to see you coding in javascript! Have you ever considered becoming a MediaWiki hacker?
Though, that change appears to introduce 1 new jshint issue — the page's status is now having warnings. Note that invalid or ambiguous code often has unwanted side effects like breaking other tools for you. If you cannot find out how to fix it, I suggest blanking the page for now.
To help you understanding where the issues are, I have aggregated a report here and now. If you have questions, don't hesitate to ask users experienced in javascript writing for help. But do not ask the bot's operators (chronically overwrought) unless you suspect an error of mine. If you prefer not getting spammed by me, you can opt-out reports by adding {{ValidationOptOut|type=all}} to your user page or cmb-opt-out anywhere on your your global user page on Meta. Good luck at Wikimedia Commons and happy hacking!

ISSUE: line 24 character 92: Script URL. - Evidence: mw.util.addPortletLink('p-tb', 'javascript:importScript("MediaWiki:VisualFileChange.js");', 'Perform batch task', 't-AjaxQuickDeleteOnDemand');

Your CommonsMaintenanceBot (talk) at 06:41, 28 October 2014 (UTC).[reply]

File:Defense.gov News Photo 041230-M-0931T-002.jpg loader identification

Hello. I'm not sure that it is 644ER, but I strongly doubt that it is 544E because the operating device (not sure about the term) is different, it lacks grille-ish thingy in its top. Probably we should place the file into John Deere military vehicles. Regards, Ain92 (talk) Ain92 (talk) 13:56, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

PS Moreover, the operating device is very similar to JD 644ER (I'm sure because of the distinctive rear counter balancing weight) pictured at File:US Navy 040229-N-8055R-005 A U.S. Navy C-130T Hercules assigned to the ^ldquo,Capital Express^rdquo, of Fleet Logistic Squadron Five Three (VR-53) takes on fresh food for U.S. Forces.jpg. Ain92 (talk) 13:59, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

cat deletions with bad name

Please refrain from tagging long standing cats with bad name just because you have created a new cat with different name. If the move cat option is not available for you tag the old cat with {{Category redirect}}. You had broken lots of Commons links with your actions. Thank you.--Denniss (talk) 19:04, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Water-bomber PBY

Please see Classic air tankers enhance rest stop in Greybull, Wyoming, Re your removal of cats for PB4Y Privateer #127. --Pete Tillman (talk) 14:50, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Firefighting aircraft > Category:Consolidated P4Y-2 Privateer firefighting aircraft‎ > Category:N6884C (aircraft) > these files.

Please see COM:OVERCAT. --Vantey (talk) 15:07, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, didn't look far enough up the cat-tree! Cheers, Pete Tillman (talk) 15:42, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Bell UH-1N Twin Huey

Please see Category talk:Bell 212. Do you happen to have reliable sources for either version? It is really unclear. Thank you. --Uli Elch (talk) 10:42, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

United States Air Force squadrons

I see you have been moving images of squadron emblems out of categories like Squadrons of the United States Air Force to categories like Squadron emblems of the United States Air Force. I have no opinion on this. However, nearly all of these images are already categorized as squadron emblems. The category Squadron emblems of the United States Air Force has 42 subcategories and that is where most of them are, so your moves cause the images to appear multiple times in the category tree. --Lineagegeek (talk) 13:58, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:CC Sakura itachari.jpg

File:CC Sakura itachari.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

And also:

Yours sincerely, 1989 16:53, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:CC Sakura itachari.jpg

File:CC Sakura itachari.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

1989 18:58, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ikachari 20110814.jpg

File:Ikachari 20110814.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

1989 19:00, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kadokawa entrance.jpg

File:Kadokawa entrance.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

1989 19:05, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kadokawa hall.jpg

File:Kadokawa hall.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

1989 19:05, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thomas Land Express PKG-RU1ESAJ Y4801.jpg

File:Thomas Land Express PKG-RU1ESAJ Y4801.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

1989 19:16, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thomas Land Express PKG-RU1ESAJ Y4801 rear.jpg

File:Thomas Land Express PKG-RU1ESAJ Y4801 rear.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

1989 19:16, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bāb al ‘Azīzīyah, Tripoli, Tsarrbuus, LY..jpg

File:Bāb al ‘Azīzīyah, Tripoli, Tsarrbuus, LY..jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Taivo (talk) 18:26, 22 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:USS Cyclops N13451.jpg

File:USS Cyclops N13451.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

This file is a duplicate of the following files: File:USS Cyclops (1910-1918) - 19-N-13451.jpg.

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

- Revent^talk 09:21, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Building in Al Hazzan Area 20140620 2.jpg

File:Building in Al Hazzan Area 20140620 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

...Captain......Tälk tö me.. 06:49, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

Hello Vantey, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:24, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:MediaWiki_upload_form

MediaWiki upload form has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 20:09, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hoffmann-La Roche logo.svg

File:Hoffmann-La Roche logo.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: File is a non free logo

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ Malti ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ தமிழ் ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : PrakashAdhikari.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 17:13, 22 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Iga-Tetsudou200Series05.JPG

And also:

Yours sincerely, 廣九直通車 (talk) 03:15, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Adrenalina.png

File:Adrenalina.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

DMacks (talk) 23:24, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Japanese_FOP_cases/deleted/3D_artworks

Japanese FOP cases/deleted/3D artworks has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenščina ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ತುಳು ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ไทย ∙ עברית ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文 ∙ +/−

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:36, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Advertising in Stratford.jpg

File:Advertising in Stratford.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Zazaki ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ Esperanto ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 조선말 ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ norsk ∙ occitan ∙ polski ∙ پښتو ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ shqip ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 03:31, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Vantey

Order of translation links

Translation please

People in trees

ライセンス変更に関する取り扱いについてお尋ね

meaningless edit

That's JAPANESE MODERN ART

Hongkong Tramways Limited vs Hong Kong Tramways Limited

Free image of Canon PowerShot SX100 IS

Translation of Template:Created with CombineZP

Categories:Ships of ......

Thanks

US Navy temporary categories

ja localization

DEFAULTSORT

Tip: Categorizing images

Fg2

File description 書き換えの件

File:全国相互利用記念ICOCA.pngの削除についての質問

Category:Tugboats in Washington State and Category:Mississippi River tugboats

Cfd forTrain interiors in Japan by class

Unexplained removal of category from file page

カテゴリー変更についての質問です

Code issues in User:Vantey/common.js

File:Defense.gov News Photo 041230-M-0931T-002.jpg loader identification

cat deletions with bad name

Water-bomber PBY

Category:Bell UH-1N Twin Huey

United States Air Force squadrons

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

Notification about possible deletion

Navigation menu

Search