User talk:Elitre/Archive 3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
  • Archive 1 (August 2006/July 2012, with history)
  • Archive 2 (July 2012/May 2016, with history)

Editing News #2—2016

[edit]

17:18, 3 July 2016 (UTC)

Editing News #3—2016

[edit]

17:48, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

Grazie per la wikigita insieme e qualche domanda

[edit]

Gentile Elitre, anche questa edizione 2016 di Wiki Loves Monuments Italia si è conclusa, con sempre nuovi traguardi conseguiti. Grazie per aver partecipato alle nostre WikiGite: sono un importante tassello della macchina del concorso che permette ogni anno di coinvolgere nuovi fotografi e nuovi appassionati nel mondo della cultura libera.

Proprio per questo vogliamo sentire la tua opinione: ci piacerebbe che tu rispondessi a qualche semplice domanda, per poter valutare l'esperienza e migliorarla per le prossime edizioni. Rispondi al questionario.

Prenditi tutto il tempo di cui hai bisogno per rispondere alle domande che preferisci. Aspettiamo una tua risposta.

Grazie per la tua partecipazione, che ci aiuta a migliorare i nostri progetti.

Per l'organizzazione di Wiki Loves Monuments, Cristian Cenci (WMI) ({{int:Talkpagelinktext}}) 11:49, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

[edit]
  1. This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

De-adminship warning

[edit]
This talk page in other languages:

Dear Elitre, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Feb-Mar 2017 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you, odder (talk) 02:00, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

?

[edit]

Hi, how are you I had a feeling for it , i undo the modifications ;)--Bachounda (talk) 15:21, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Editing News #1—2017

[edit]

17:59, 12 May 2017 (UTC)

Your VFC installation method is deprecated

[edit]

Hello Elitre, we are aware that using the old installation method of VFC (via common.js, which you are using) may not work reliably anymore and can break other scripts as well. A detailed explanation can be found here. Important: To prevent problems please remove the old VFC installation code from your common.js and instead enable the VFC gadget in your preferences. Thanks! --VFC devs (q) 16:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

Hello

I'm writing you as one of the most active Commons users right now. Since a while now, the idea of a dedicated Commons conference has been floating around. But since the last Wikimania concrete steps have been taken to actually make it happen next year. If you're interested in participation or maybe willing to help organize the first ever Commons Conference, I invite you to check out the project page and leave your comments; or just show your support for the idea, by signing up.

Cheers,

--Touzrimounir (talk) 22:15, 6 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Le Emer

[edit]

Vedo ora il tuo intervento, grazie :).--Eustace Bagge (talk) 08:38, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Libro "Le Imprescindibili"

[edit]

Ciao. Avevo inserito la licenza del file della copertina preso a modello e non quella della creazione del libro. Ho corretto, grazie. --Camelia (talk) 11:55, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Salute, link a pagine esterne con chiaro intento promozionale (vedi qui) sono consentiti? In caso contrario è consigliabile avvertire l'utente o fare una segnalazione? E a chi?--StefBiondo 13:05, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fatemi sapere se devo toglierlo. Comunque quello è il mio sito e come lavoro da casa (e non è un'azienda) quello è il mio sito che ovviamente rappresenta me e la mia attività di libero professionista. --Pivari (talk) 13:53, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Se non è legato alla tua attività su Commons, non è strettamente necessario, imho. --Elitre (talk) 12:49, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sempre in vetta

[edit]

Vedo File:ItWikiCon 2017 - Miscellaneous 08.jpg. :) --Nemo 09:03, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Se vuoi rettificare. --Nemo 12:00, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Next Stop, Axum, Ethiopia (2809170679).jpg

[edit]
العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Next Stop, Axum, Ethiopia (2809170679).jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ruthven (msg) 11:29, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

De-adminship warning

[edit]
This talk page in other languages:

Dear {{subst:PAGENAME}}. I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you --B dash (talk) 02:26, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Problema tecnico?

[edit]

Ciao, sto provando a caricare un'immagine da qualche ora (ne ho già caricate altre, senza problemi), ma non riesco a farlo né tramite Commons né tramite wikipedia (IT)... Mi sai aiutare?--Moxmarco (talk) 17:47, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

[edit]

For deleting the mistaken uploads of people in red lanyards! :-) Rehman 08:46, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Largest African military communications exercise concludes (7494025252).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Zenwort (talk) 02:48, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

De-adminship warning (Feb 2019)

[edit]
This talk page in other languages:

Dear Elitre. I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Feb-Mar 2019 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship. 4nn1l2 (talk) 15:17, 10 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Hi, I just wanted to say thank you for your service to the Wikimedia Commons community! 4nn1l2 (talk) 17:42, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Well 4nn1l2, thanks for your message. Have a nice week, Elitre (talk) 10:28, 11 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Update on the Affiliate-selected Board seats 2019 process

[edit]

Hi all,

The Election Facilitators met on Friday, April 5. We finalized the resolution, which is now frozen. The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation will be asked to approve the resolution.

We have made two small changes to be more inclusive. We extended the date for compliance with AffCom reporting and being in good standing to May 7 to allow time for as many Affiliates as possible to be current with these requirements. The Election Facilitators adjusted the language in case a quorum is not met during the election.

On the talk page of the resolution one issue was raised. The issue looks like to be about a possible candidate. Affiliates will have ample time to discuss the merits of candidates during nomination time, screening time, and they can cast their votes on candidates. The Election Facilitators didn't see the necessity for this change, and left the resolution on this point unchanged.

The Election Facilitators will be Abhinav Srivastava, Lane Rasberry, Jeffrey Keefer, Ad Huikeshoven, Neal McBurnett and Alessandro Marchetti. We will welcome more volunteers to assist us in this process, to reach out to the diversity in language and gender in our communities, and do so in an advisory role.

The nomination period opens on April 15. We are going to prepare nomination pages on Meta. You can expect a call for nominations. There is a draft call, including a candidates' profile section with non-binding guidelines about experience and characteristics for nominees. You are welcome to add your insights, or discuss on the talk page.

Erica Litrenta (WMF staff) supports us in this process. She will reach out to all affiliates through mail and other channels to make sure we are up to date with (user)name and contact details of your primary contact.

On behalf of the Election Facilitators, Ad Huikeshoven 10:42, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello everyone!

  • The Resolution has just been approved by the Board of Trustees!;
  • Nominations phase is now open, from April 15 00:00 UTC to April 30 23:59 UTC. See the Call for Candidates and Nominations pages;
    • Community members may ask questions of the candidates;
  • Your main representative has just received an email to confirm that they are indeed the primary contact and will perform official actions on behalf of your group (such as endorsing candidates and then voting). Some groups also need to verify their eligibility status in due time, as explained in the email;
  • New content is available to spread awareness around the process - the infographic on this page has clickable links and can be translated, and a primer is available, that we hope will be particularly helpful to those new to such a process;
  • Finally, you are welcome to help with translations! Pick one page from the ASBS category and, in the next couple of weeks, please consider translating profiles of the candidates in particular.

Thanks for your attention! The Facilitators for ASBS 2019, 07:30, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Samba Ndokh Mbaye.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

P 1 9 9   15:51, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2022 voting is open!

[edit]
2022 Picture of the Year: Saint John Church of Sohrol in Iran.

Read this message in your language

Dear Wikimedian,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2022 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the seventeenth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2022) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the two most popular images in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just three images to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on UTC.

Click here to vote now!

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2021 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:14, 20 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

[edit]
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 05:04, 25 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]