User talk:Christian Ferrer/Archive17
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
|
2013 • feb-jun • jul-aug • sep-oct • nov-dec |
January - February 2016
FP Promotion
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Cabrières et le Pic de Vissou 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cabrières et le Pic de Vissou 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Salagou Lake, Liausson 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 January 2016 (UTC)
Happy New Year!
|
| Have a great 2016. -- Colin (talk) 11:59, 1 January 2016 (UTC) |
Bonne Année 2016 !
|
Classique, mais... merci quand même pour ta participation sur Commons ! Yann (talk) 13:36, 1 January 2016 (UTC) |
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Salagou Lake, Liausson 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Bonne année!
|
Je vous présente mes meilleurs voeux pour la nouvelle année. Ivar (talk) 07:37, 2 January 2016 (UTC) |
New Year wishes.
You are also cordially health and a happy 2016 wished.
--Famberhorst (talk) 16:11, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
BONNES ANNEE
Merci de cette belle image des environs de Sète où il a beaucoup neigé manifestement... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 16:51, 2 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Salagou Lake, Liausson 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Bonne année!
Happy New Year and best wishes!--ArildV (talk) 19:57, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
QI Tunisia training
As part of the project Quality images training in Tunisia, the Wikimedia TN user group is looking for a Wikimedia commons User able to organize a training about Quality images, featured pictures, Valued images and Graphic Lab/Photography in Tunisia from February 18th to 22th, 2016. To participate please fill this form --Touzrimounir (talk) 20:01, 3 January 2016 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
_01.jpg){kind=small}
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
_01.jpg){kind=link}
Blue Moon (ship, 1975).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Blue Moon (ship, 1975) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Salagou Lake, Liausson 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 5 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
._S%C3%A8te_06.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Cettarames (ship). Sète 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
,_S%C3%A8te_01.jpg){kind=small}
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
,_S%C3%A8te_01.jpg){kind=link}
Kirkeholmen (ship, 2010).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Rhapsody
Bonsoir,
Avant tout, je te souhaite une excellente année 2016.
J’ai vu que le Rhapsody (ancien Napoléon Bonaparte de la SNCM) était passé à Sète récemment. Est-ce que tu as eu l’occasion de le photographier pendant son escale?
Aussi, j’ai publier l’article sur Cettarames tout à l’heure, si tu veux y ajouter quelque chose.
Bonne soirée et meilleurs vœux. --Lev. Anthony (talk) 21:57, 6 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Lev. Anthony: bonjour, merci et mes plus sincères vœux pour toi aussi. Apparement le Rhapsody ainsi qu'un autre navire du meme genre ont été racheté par une compagnie qui fait la liaison avec l'Afrique. Ce sont des lignes régulières à Sète, cela fait plusieurs fois que je vois ces navires, et je ne manquerai surement pas de les voir à nouveau. Hélas l'hiver aidant, lorsque je sors du travail il commence à faire nuit, mais les jours rallongent et l'occasion de les prendre en photo viendra surement. j'irai jeter un coup d'oeil à l'article, et si je trouve des infos pertinentes à rajouter, tu peux compter sur moi pour le faire. Bonne journée, Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:39, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Silesian - Moravian Beskids in winter 2014.JPG, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Silesian - Moravian Beskids in winter 2014.JPG has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! La Roque, Salagou Lake 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Happy New Year!
Hi Christian, thanks for your kind message. Hope you had some nice holidays! --El Grafo (talk) 12:00, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! La Roque, Salagou Lake 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
|
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Kirkeholmen (ship, 2010), Sète 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Tarassac hamlet, Hérault 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 9 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Gulls over a fishing trawler, Sète 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vineyards in Berlou panoramic 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Salagou Lake, Liausson 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vineyards in Berlou 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Salagou Lake, Liausson 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Village of Berlou 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chalutier, Quai Paul Riquet, Sète 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 January 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Munich airport winter panorama 2015.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Munich airport winter panorama 2015.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Malva sylvestris, Frontignan 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vineyards in Berlou panoramic 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Vineyards in Berlou 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chalutier, Quai Paul Riquet, Sète 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Malva sylvestris, Frontignan 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chalutier, Quai Paul Riquet, Sète 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Galatella sedifolia, Vic-la-Gardiole 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Berlou panoramic 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pieris brassicae, Vic-la-Gardiole 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Église Sainte-Cécile de Loupian 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pieris brassicae, Vic-la-Gardiole 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Deletion
Please delete this file uploaded by mistake (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Padurea_spanzuratilor_1922.jpg). I chose a wrong destination. It s a file under fair use. Thanks. --Haptokar (talk) 08:27, 17 January 2016 (UTC)
Thank you, HNY
|
|
Dear friend |
| Happy New Year and best wishes!! Jean (talk) 14:59, 17 January 2016 (UTC) |
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pieris brassicae, Vic-la-Gardiole 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chorthippus biguttulus, Vic-la-Gardiole 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
|
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Salagou Lake, Liausson 10.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Salagou Lake, Liausson 10.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Peter Lindbergh
Bonjour. Je vois que tu as supprimé une image File:Anna-favorite-1988-11-lindbergh.jpg. Sur la page française du photographe Peter Lindbergh, il y a d'autres images du même contributeur (?) qui sont sans aucun doute sous copyright vu que ce sont les plus célèbres du photographe. Au moins File:The-wild-ones-wild-at-heart-peter-lindbergh.jpg et avec une absolue certitude pour File:Kate-moss-1994-peter-lindberg.jpg, l'une des dix grandes images de Kate Moss. Il y a également une vidéo qui, en toute logique, est protégée également. Ce contributeur passe son temps ces derniers jours à mettre des images sur cet article. J'avais bien vu les images sous copyright, mais je n'ai pas l'habitude de Commons et ne savais pas comment les signaler. Je te laisse donc ce message et retourne sur WP:fr. Amicalement, --Arroser (talk) 21:10, 18 January 2016 (UTC)
Done Bonjour, tu as raison, merci. J'ai supprimé les photos. Pour la vidéo, c'est moins évident, le source semble à première vue "fiable", à savoir toutes les versions sur internet que j'ai vu de cette vidéo conduisent à l'auteur "NOWNESS", et la license à la source est OK... à suivre..... Cordialement, Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:51, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chorthippus biguttulus, Vic-la-Gardiole 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
There is clearly no consensus to delete. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 16:14, 19 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chorthippus biguttulus, Vic-la-Gardiole 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 21 January 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Benny Trapp Westliche Sandboa Eryx jaculus.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Benny Trapp Westliche Sandboa Eryx jaculus.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chorthippus biguttulus, Vic-la-Gardiole 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nezara viridula, Vic-la-Gardiole 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Admin's Barnstar |
| You're very active as admin. Keep up your good work! We can be proud to have you here on commons. Steinsplitter (talk) 17:17, 23 January 2016 (UTC) |
- You're nice, thanks :) Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:55, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
|
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:La Roque, Salagou Lake 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:La Roque, Salagou Lake 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Nezara viridula, Vic-la-Gardiole 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Octon Panorama 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Pontia daplidice, Vic-la-Gardiole 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Salagou Lake Panorama, Octon 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Crematogaster scutellaris, Vic-la-Gardiole 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
My Picture of Saigon
The picture of Saigon that u deleted does not have any issue to the other copyright so please keep it Sincerely Bqn1996
- Sadly I don't know what picture you talk about. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:27, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Saint-Martin Church, Canet 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Octon and surrounding 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 29 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Salagou Lake, Liausson 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 30 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Salagou Lake, Liausson 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Mountain massif of Fjølhaugen at Knutevika in Senja, Troms, Norway, 2015 September.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mountain massif of Fjølhaugen at Knutevika in Senja, Troms, Norway, 2015 September.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Salagou Lake, Liausson 15.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Former windmill, Salasc 01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Former windmill, Salasc 01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
Translation needed:
Hi! Could you please translate this watchlist notice into FR? Thanks in advance! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:40, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
[[Commons:Photo challenge]]''': Time to vote for [[Commons:Photo challenge/2016 - January - Diagonals/Voting|'''Diagonals''' (January)]] and [[Commons:Photo challenge/2016 - January - Wheels/Voting|'''Wheels''' (January)]]. Submit your entries for [[Commons:Photo challenge/2016 - February - Mailboxes|'''Mailboxes''' (February)]] and [[Commons:Photo challenge/2016 - February - Reflections|'''Reflections''' (February)]]
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Chorthippus biguttulus, Vic-la-Gardiole 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Salagou Lake, Liausson 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Coursan from the bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 4 February 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Aude River in Coursan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Reason for deleting Naavu Manushyare?
Dear,
It seems you have deleted File:Naavu manushyare - Niranjana.pdf. May I know the reason why? This book has been relicensed under CC-BY-SA 4.0 by Tejaswini Niranjana. Please check File:Tejaswini Niranjana CC-BY-SA Declaration.pdf. Please let me know if any other information needed. --రహ్మానుద్దీన్ (talk) 13:03, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- @రహ్మానుద్దీన్: Hello, I saw no evidence of free previous publication and/or permission when I found the file, and I'm currently not sure, or at least not convinced, that the document/permission provided here is enough, please see Commons:OTRS and/or Commons:Undeletion requests. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:01, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
Salut, S'il y a un {{OTRS pending}}, on attend en général un mois avant de supprimer le fichier. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 18:18, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
- Salut, ok, enregistré! Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:49, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Paul-Löbe-Haus, Westseite, Frontalansicht, Berlin-Mitte, 151223, ako.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Paul-Löbe-Haus, Westseite, Frontalansicht, Berlin-Mitte, 151223, ako.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Église Notre-Dame de la Rominguère.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
Suomen poliisin miekkatunnus
The file Suomen poliisin miekkatunnus.svg is not a transparent image, but it has a colour. --Fennoscandic (talk) 01:03, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Maybe, maybe not. However disruptive editing or uploading may result in a block, even if you're right, the discussion is the only way possible. I'm far not a specialist of this topic but the current emblem seems fine [1]. But if you don't agree, and it's your right, you can not impose your point of views by uploading and reuoplading again and again your version on an existing file. You can try to discuss with other interested users on their talk page, begin a discussion at the file talk page or start a new topic at the Commons:Village pump to a wider audience. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:40, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
- Of course the discussion, but nothing has happened. By the way, the discussion and consensus would probably have needed in the past, too. --Fennoscandic (talk) 13:55, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Miaoli-County Taiwan Quanhua-Temple-03.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Miaoli-County Taiwan Quanhua-Temple-03.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bridge, Coursan 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 7 February 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bridge, Coursan 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 8 February 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bridge, Coursan 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Bridge, Coursan 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Église Notre-Dame de la Rominguère 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Église Notre-Dame de la Rominguère 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Dawn in the harbour of Sète.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 11 February 2016 (UTC)
Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Notre-Dame de la Rominguère, Aude, France. Southern façade..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
Quality Image Promotion
,_S%C3%A8te_02.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! SNAV Sardegna (ship, 1989), Sète 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 February 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
,_S%C3%A8te_03.jpg) |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! SNAV Sardegna (ship, 1989), Sète 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 13 February 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Equus zebra hartmannae - Etosha 2015.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Equus zebra hartmannae - Etosha 2015.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Thank you very much, merci beaucoup!
For editing and nominating the image
at the FPC. 
--Johann Jaritz (talk) 15:01, 15 February 2016 (UTC)
Why did you erased my files since Im the graphic designer/owner of the .jpg deleted
Hi!,
You have deleted files of my property,
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/6/6f/ISIDRIS-Wiki.jpg/400px-ISIDRIS-Wiki.jpg https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/50/Fire%2C-Stone-and-Blood_Tapa.jpg https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/02/Higher_isidris.jpg/664px-Higher_isidris.jpg
I'm the creator of the images since I was the graphic designer. So I autorice myself obviously to upload it.
Can you give me please the reason why you deleting the file without knowing this important point?
It's no fare AT ALL that I have to receive a warning of account delection for uploading files I've created don't you think?
I can send screen captures of my photoshop software with the project open of every file.. but I don't think every people that upload their fles here can do such a thing. Well I can.
Thanks for your answer and support.
Isidris (talk) 03:33, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Hi, these files looks derivative works of some things previously created.
- if you're not the author then it's a copyright violation until we have an evidence of a free previous publication or we have an OTRS permission
- if you're the author then these file are likely out of scope as personal artworks. some exemples of what is out of our Commons:Project scope : "(...) Artwork without obvious educational use, including non-educational artwork uploaded to showcase the artist's skills" or "Advertising or self-promotion."
- If you think the deletions were not right regarding the project scope and/or regarding licensing then try undeletion requests. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:37, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Congratulations
you did really a good work with Johann´s picture! He is really happy about the result. I´m sure, this one will be part of the best 30th at the POTY-contest next year. The supporting is overwhelming.--Hubertl 11:08, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you, me too, I think this image has potential to be POTY finalist. And maybe also has the potential to be published one day in a magazine or a book... Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:50, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- I am effectively surprised, grateful and amazed by all the reactions to that image. Thank you once again for your support, Christian. --Johann Jaritz (talk) 04:02, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
- I am effectively surprised, grateful and amazed by all the reactions to that image. Thank you once again for your support, Christian.
FP Promotion
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Vineyards in Prades-sur-Vernazobre 02.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Vineyards in Prades-sur-Vernazobre 02.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:05, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Deletion file
Hello, I don't understand why this file (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Logo_Stichting_Dommelbimd.jpg) has been deleted. The author of the file has given me all copyrights to publish this on Wikipedia commons and thus releasing the file for public use.
Thanks in advance. The Marvelist (talk) 13:12, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Hello, complex logos are artworks and are protected by authors' rights. To be uploaded there we must have evidence the logos are free licensed (hyperlink to the free licensed source) or a permission must be send via OTRS by the rights owner. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:08, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
Hello, thank you for your quick respons. So if I understand correctly I have to send an email to the OTRS in which the copyrightholder sais he/she releases the file for public use?
Thanks in advance
PS: sorry if this is not the correct way to reply to the comment, still have to go figure that out sometime ;-) The Marvelist (talk) 21:32, 16 February 2016 (UTC)
- Hello, for your case the correct way is written step by step there : Commons:OTRS#If you are not the copyright holder Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:39, 17 February 2016 (UTC)
Aboriginal flag
Hellacious close, leaving multiple people comments. Hopefully, you agree with my rationale. What you said was helpful, and influential. I disagree slightly... the display in Israel is not itself illegal, with permission or not, because the flag is itself below the TOO there. Berne only obligates nations to give foreign works the same protection they would give the same work it it was domestic. A work that would not be protected if domestic does not gain protection because it was under a foreign copyright. The display was almost certainly unauthorized, but it's a bit moot, both because it is a unprotected work in Israel, and because FOP does not apply to it. The display there has nothing at all to do with it's status in the country of origin, however, and policy requires we respect that, even in regards to derivative works. The reproduction in Israel was not, itself, 'authorized' by a FOP exemption, so it's status as a a derivative work is not separate from that of the original... it's just a derivative work of a copyrighted object, made without permission. I completely agree with you that using FOP to circumvent copyright is morally wrong, even if we think the net result in certain cases is silly. No act by a third party, unless with express permission, can affect the rights of the original owner. No court would sanction that... it's a recipe for chaos. Revent (talk) 01:15, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
- I agree with you, I understand now it's not an illegal display in Israel. My main point was indeed that, here on Commons, our policies requires to respect the law of the country of origin. Thank you, Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:27, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Riverbank of Canal du Rhône à Sète, Saint-Gilles 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 18 February 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Silybum marianum, Saint-Gilles 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
|
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Klagenfurt Annabichl Waltendorfer Strasse Hochsitz im Morgendunst 04022016 2686.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Klagenfurt Annabichl Waltendorfer Strasse Hochsitz im Morgendunst 04022016 2686.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 20 February 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Trail in Saint-Gilles 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Photo Egouts de Paris - De Condat
Bonjour Christian, il n'y a pas de violation car j'ai l'autorisation des droits d'auteur ...
Merci de modifier la suppression
Cordialment
--Buddha1789 (talk) 08:53, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- Bonjour, le problème est que la photo a précèdement déjà été publiée ici, et si je comprends bien l'auteur est Sélène de Condat. Si vous avez effectivement une autorisation de l'auteur ou meme si vous etes l'auteur, suivez pas à pas les instruction qui se trouvent ici, si l'autorisation est conforme l'image sera restaurée. Mais sachez que cela peut prendre un certain délai, nous sommes tous volontaire, et beaucoup de demandes peuvent etre en attente. Cordialement, Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:14, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Украинский национальной союз.jpg
why you deleted File:Украинский национальной союз.jpg?(CesarNS1980 (talk) 10:34, 22 February 2016 (UTC)).
- Only simple logos / emblems (below TOO) can be uploaded here without permission. We need an evidence they are free licensed by their author, or a permission from the author via OTRS. Or the logo / emblem fall for a reason or another in the public domain. Here I deleted it because it seems to be a modern emblem, there is no permission from the author and do not think it is in public domain. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:10, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- My friend! This logo was created by me personally. I gave it to the head of this organization.I can give you first sketch.(CesarNS1980 (talk) 12:24, 22 February 2016 (UTC)).
- I started an undeletion request there Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#File:Украинский национальной союз.jpg, to have further opinions. Please add comment there now. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:30, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
the first sample
this is the first sketch of the coat of arms
@CesarNS1980: please add comment there now : Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#File:Украинский национальной союз.jpg Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:34, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
- already added. see I did the right thing?(CesarNS1980 (talk) 14:36, 22 February 2016 (UTC))
- yes you did, now you have just to wait, an administrator will look at this Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:39, 22 February 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Trail in Saint-Gilles 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
About of oppose vote
Do not feel bad for your vote, I would have done the same. Unfortunately I have nothing to show you and you do not trust me because you don't know me. I respect your decision. I am open to any questions you want. --The Photographer (talk) 15:46, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- @The Photographer: the Rfa is on good way to be extended and if so then very far to be dead, take my oppose vote as an advertisement to stay polite in every situations
and good lucks, merde en français.Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:55, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- I strike this as since I saw that I'm not sure about what I must think, no matter whoever started. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:02, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
- If I can be an administrator of course I will be more polite to users especially when it comes to making important decisions. However, deep down, I will always be myself. When I saw the lock on Wikimedia Portuguese, I would like to confess you that caused me surprise and laughter. --The Photographer (talk) 16:02, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Canal du Rhône à Sète, Saint-Gilles 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Camargue cattle, Saint-Gilles 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
Deletion of Welsh language posters
I note that you have deleted a number of Welsh language posters eg Saron_cil_y_drws_-_poster.jpg. Do you have a link to the discussion please? Llywelyn2000 (talk) 09:00, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- No, there was no discussions. The file have been tagued for speedy deletion, I deleted it because the file is a derivative work of an existing work, and I saw no evidence the original work is free or in the public domain. Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:31, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
- Can I suggest you discuss any images containing a language you do not understand with the wiki-language community of that poster. It might be just another poster for you, but the uploader may feel very differently. We could easily have moved them to cy-space on a Non-free licence. Are there no rules on deletion of non-English language images on Commons? Thanks! Llywelyn2000 (talk) 20:08, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Trail in Saint-Gilles 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 25 February 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Camargue cattle, Saint-Gilles 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Thank you for the new rights. --C messier (talk) 13:33, 26 February 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Camargue cattle, Saint-Gilles 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Deletion of CV Richard Dirnhofer
Hi, beginning January I uploaded the CV of Richard Dirnhofer on "his" Wikipedia site Mr. Dirnhofers his behalf. Now I learned that you have deleted the link, for what reason ever. As I am not a frequent user of Wikipedia I am not quite sure, why that happened. I don't know, if I did not stick to Wikipedia rules or why did that happen? Thank you so much in advance for clarification. Best regards Virtopsianer
- Hi, it have been deleted following this nomination : Commons:Deletion requests/File:CV - R. Dirnhofer.pdf, the rules can be found at Commons:Project scope. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:30, 27 February 2016 (UTC)
Quality Image Promotion
 |
Your image has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! Camargue cattle, Saint-Gilles 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
|
--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Medieval Europe Logo
Hi Christian,
the image i've recently uploaded https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Melogo.jpg has been deleted but i'm one of the developer of the browser game. What can i do to accept the image in the wikimedia commons?
Regards
- Hi, if the image is in our scope then an OTRS permission must be send by an official of the game, in which he must explicitly agree to the publication in a license that we accept. Regards, Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:30, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
- Hi Christian, I just sent the OTRS permission email. Regards, Sunchaser~itwiki (talk) 09:34, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
- Then you have just to wait, may be that there will be a waiting time as the OTRS service is run by volunteers and they sometimes have a lot of work. Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:37, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Kaohsiung Taiwan Floating-dock-Jong-Shyn-01.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kaohsiung Taiwan Floating-dock-Jong-Shyn-01.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
FP Promotion
 |
★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★
The image File:Regierungsviertel,_Berlin-Mitte,_Blaue_Stunde,_Panorama,_160206,_ako.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Regierungsviertel, Berlin-Mitte, Blaue Stunde, HDR, Panorama, 160206, ako.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so. |
|
/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
Free port of Vladivostok
Hi Christian Ferrer,
I just realised that you deleted the file illustrating the way the Free Port of Vladivostok works (see this). I would be glad to know why you preserved this file, and not the translation I have made of it. For your information, as you do not seem to understand Russian, the site where this picture has been published stated that the contents might be used and modified as lon as the origin of the document appears clearly.
Kindly,
Polypone (talk) 08:29, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
- Hi, the links you provided for the license on the first file did no work, then nor me neither Taivo, who is Russian speaker, did no find an evidence the images are free. The only thing we can see is "Copyright © Eastern Economic Forum, 2016". I nominated for deletion the file above too. @Taivo: is this link ok [2] to restore the deleted files? That seems to be another website? Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:28, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
- The site itself is good (Russian ministery of development of Far East). So if the file is found on the site, then it is free (and its derivatives also). The license of the site is generally {{PD-RU-exempt}}. Taivo (talk) 11:39, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Taivo: Thanks but I don't understand, do you mean these files must be undeleted : Commons:Deletion requests/File:Free Port Vladivostok en.jpg? Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:11, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
- They are obviously derivative works of Russian-language file. But I did not find the Russian file on mentioned site. If the Russian file is found on the site, has proper source and correct PD-RU-exempt license, then English and German version can be restored, not earlier. Taivo (talk) 12:17, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
- Hi there,
Thank you for taking my request seriously. I found the original picture on the website of the Minvostokrazvitya (Russian ministery of development of Far East) -> see this page. Will you consider it valid, or is there still a problem? Polypone (talk) 12:43, 29 February 2016 (UTC)- That's seems fine, @Taivo: can you confirm please? Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:50, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, I confirm, that's the same. Taivo (talk) 12:57, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
- So, is it possible to restore the files you have deleted? Polypone (talk) 13:10, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
- yes, here we go. Christian Ferrer (talk) 16:46, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
- So, is it possible to restore the files you have deleted? Polypone (talk) 13:10, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, I confirm, that's the same. Taivo (talk) 12:57, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
- That's seems fine, @Taivo: can you confirm please? Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:50, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
- Hi there,
- They are obviously derivative works of Russian-language file. But I did not find the Russian file on mentioned site. If the Russian file is found on the site, has proper source and correct PD-RU-exempt license, then English and German version can be restored, not earlier. Taivo (talk) 12:17, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
- @Taivo: Thanks but I don't understand, do you mean these files must be undeleted : Commons:Deletion requests/File:Free Port Vladivostok en.jpg? Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:11, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
- The site itself is good (Russian ministery of development of Far East). So if the file is found on the site, then it is free (and its derivatives also). The license of the site is generally {{PD-RU-exempt}}. Taivo (talk) 11:39, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
- Merci ! Polypone (talk) 18:39, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
