User talk:Benoît Prieur/Archives 2015
![]() |
File:Podium - classement général du Tour de l'Ain 2013.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Guiggz (talk) 22:51, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Julien Jurdie - Tour de l'Ain 2013.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Guiggz (talk) 22:53, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Éric Sikora en 2013.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Guiggz (talk) 22:54, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Sikora - mai 2014.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Guiggz (talk) 22:59, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Éric Sikora en mai 2014.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Guiggz (talk) 23:00, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Daniel Moreira mai 2014.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Guiggz (talk) 23:03, 4 January 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Podium Tour de l'Ain 2013 - Kenny Elissonde - maillot blanc.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Guiggz (talk) 09:32, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Francis Mourey - 2.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Guiggz (talk) 09:33, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Critérium du Dauphiné 2013 - 4e étape (clm) - 31.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Guiggz (talk) 11:40, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Critérium du Dauphiné 2013 - 4e étape (clm) - 32.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Guiggz (talk) 11:40, 5 January 2015 (UTC)
Liens Wikidata
[edit]Que penses-tu de ça (discussion de septembre 2014) ? Petro [pronto?] 14:05, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
- Pas ou plus le cas. Notre seule contrainte c'est si le lien wikidata vers commons pointe déjà vers une page, on le le retire surtout pas pour mettre la catégorie. En clair, soit on ne fait rien, soit on n'ajoute de l'info sur wikidata. On n'en retire jamais (même pour une bonne raison). --Aga (d) 14:08, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
ton mail du 17 mars
[edit]Coucou,
Je ne suis pas de Beauvais mais j'y ai de la famille et je viens souvent le week end. Perso je suis un peu plus au sud. merci pour l'invitation mais ca va pas etre possible je bosse. par contre je peux te conseiller le MUDO. https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/MUDO_-_Musée_de_l%27Oise il est gratuit actuellement. a+ --Chatsam (talk) 20:39, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Catégorisation
[edit]J'ai une fois de plus défait ta modification. J'utilise pour mes courses mon propre système de classification depuis l'année passée. À chaque fois qu'une équipe participe à une course, la page de la galerie est catégorisée et apparaît dans l'espace consacré aux pages dans les catégories 2015 des équipes cyclistes (comme ici). Ça me permet d'une part de savoir en un instant à quelles courses j'ai croisé cette équipe, et d'autre part, ça me permet de n'avoir qu'un lien à leur envoyer pour qu'elles puissent accéder au travail que j'ai effectué sur elles, avec une mise à jour qui est beaucoup plus simple que si je tenais un dossier sur une page annexe ou si je leur envoyais à chaque course la galerie, ce que mon temps limité ne me permettrait pas de faire. PS : et cette catégorisation est aussi chronologique.
Ce système fonctionne parfaitement, aussi je ne reviendrai pas en arrière. Jérémy-Günther-Heinz Jähnick (talk) 17:09, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
- On croit rêver...Il ne t'aura pas échappé que c'est un projet collaboratif ici et que "ton propre système qui marche très bien" tu peux le garder pour ton garage. Suggestion : ne pas forcément imposer cette catégorisation hérétique au reste du monde. Le minimum serait quand même que tu t'inscrives un tout petit peu dans le collectif. Cela dit, je prends bonne note de ta réponse et me ferai un plaisir de la contextualiser plus avant quand il le faudra. --Aga (d) 17:20, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
- « au reste du monde » Quelques Wikimédiens ne sont rien par rapport à toutes les personnes extérieures qui sont amenées à consulter mon travail, et qui m'ont entre autres choses parlé de ce système de dossiers. Il fut un temps où quelques personnes avaient trouvé à redire que j'emploie des descriptions centralisées en un point unique, et finalement, ça a très bien fonctionné et je n'ai plus aucune réflexion. Je travaille déjà de manière collaborative, mais cette notion de collaboratif s'étend bien au-delà de Wikipédia. En d'autres termes, je collabore déjà avec des organisateurs et des équipes. Si j'ai développé des galeries à la place des catégories, c'était justement une question de communication à l'extérieur, parce que c'est bien de travailler pour Wikipédia, mais il faut aussi que le travail soit vu par les premiers intéressés. J'ai régulièrement des idées qui sortent des sentiers battus, mais jusqu'à présent ça a toujours marché malgré quelques réticences au début (la fameuse peur du changement). J'aimerais juste que l'on me fasse confiance dès le début, ça me permettrait d'avancer encore plus rapidement (prochaine phase d'ailleurs, les résultats des courses sur Wikidata). Sinon oui, tu pourras ressortir ce que j'ai dit au moment opportun : je ne m'occupe pas de connaître les avis de collègues Wikipédiens parce que je contribue généralement à un niveau plus poussé. Je ne suis pas meilleur dans le cyclisme que mes quelques collègues Wikipédiens (bien au contraire, je n'y connaît rien), mais j'ai toujours eu des facilités pour imaginer des nouveautés et pour communiquer à l'extérieur. Ceci dit, quand je ne sais vraiment pas, là je consulte d'autres avis. Sur le cyclisme, j'ai tout un tas de projets qui sont encore dans les cartons, et leur avenir se joue déjà maintenant. Fais-moi confiance et tu verras que ça fonctionnera. Jérémy-Günther-Heinz Jähnick (talk) 17:51, 10 April 2015 (UTC) PS : pour être un peu plus précis, ceci n'est qu'une petite partie du système de catégorisation, qui permet de classer les coureurs dans leurs équipes, de regrouper les fichiers par équipes et par courses, d'afficher dans la description le nom de l'équipe...
- Faudrait vraiment que tu redescendes à mon avis. Au moins arrêter de te regarder le nombril. "Mais j'ai toujours eu des facilités pour imaginer des nouveautés et pour communiquer à l'extérieur" : si c'est du même tonneau qu'à "l'intérieur" tu commences à sérieusement me faire peur.
- Pour recentrer un peu le débat (qui n'en est pas un d'ailleurs) : je prétends simplement que sur Commons, on catégorise de façon logique, descriptive et factuelle et non pour satisfaire une organisation personnelle si géniale soit-elle. Rien à voir avec la confiance etc. Je n'ai rien contre les iconoclastes et autres (auto-proclamés) visionnaires, mais il me semble qu'il y a un corpus minimal à respecter tout de même...
- Malheureusement, je doute pouvoir te convaincre... néanmoins je vous souhaite - à ton génie et à toi-même - une bonne soirée. --Aga (d) 18:13, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
- Puisque tu veux savoir pour ce qui concerne l'extérieur, il y a deux chefs de presse flamands journalistes corporatistes que je ne peux pas voir en peinture (ils refusent mes demandes d'accréditations bien que Wikipédia soit le 5e site mondial en fréquentation) et je le leur fait bien savoir, si je faisais la même chose sur Wikipédia je serais bloqué. Je suis également bien en froid avec quelques médias qui se trouvent me devoir de l'argent pour des utilisations sous des conditions différentes, et j'utilise tous les moyens possibles pour recouvrer ce qui m'est dû. Si j'ai changé d'APN le mois dernier, c'est parce qu'après avoir demandé gentiment mes droits d'auteurs, j'ai dû me montrer « bien plus persuasif ». Pour ce dernier point, c'est déjà de notoriété publique, mais je ne donne jamais plus de détails sur les méthodes employées (je vais d'ailleurs bientôt rechercher des nouveau cas, car j'aimerais bien un écran 40 pouces pour mon ordinateur), il faut dire que la ligne jaune est très allègrement franchie. Pour le reste, il n'y a rien à redire, je sais me montrer très agréable envers ceux qui me facilitent le travail, je fournis les fichiers réalisés aux organisateurs qui m'accréditent. Je discute régulièrement avec des coureurs, et quand je les photographie j'indique que c'est destiné à Wikipédia. Une fois les photos prises, je ne manque pas de les remercier. Peu importe leur âge, je vouvoie les coureurs (c'est plus simple pour s'y retrouver). Globalement je discute avec tout un tas de personnes chaque jour de course car c'est bien connu que je n'ai pas ma langue dans ma poche, mais ça me permet de promouvoir Wikipédia en tant qu'acteur de la médiatisation du cyclisme. Il y a donc des choses qui ont de quoi faire peur, mais elles concernent le traitement des nuisibles, et de ce côté j'ai une diplomatie digne de Vladimir Poutine. Pour le reste, je sais très bien soigner mes relations, il ne faut pas oublier que c'est mon travail et un de mes gagne-pains. J'ai donc un intérêt plus important que ce que l'on pourrait croire que tout fonctionne comme une mécanique bien huilée. Jérémy-Günther-Heinz Jähnick (talk) 17:09, 14 April 2015 (UTC)
- « au reste du monde » Quelques Wikimédiens ne sont rien par rapport à toutes les personnes extérieures qui sont amenées à consulter mon travail, et qui m'ont entre autres choses parlé de ce système de dossiers. Il fut un temps où quelques personnes avaient trouvé à redire que j'emploie des descriptions centralisées en un point unique, et finalement, ça a très bien fonctionné et je n'ai plus aucune réflexion. Je travaille déjà de manière collaborative, mais cette notion de collaboratif s'étend bien au-delà de Wikipédia. En d'autres termes, je collabore déjà avec des organisateurs et des équipes. Si j'ai développé des galeries à la place des catégories, c'était justement une question de communication à l'extérieur, parce que c'est bien de travailler pour Wikipédia, mais il faut aussi que le travail soit vu par les premiers intéressés. J'ai régulièrement des idées qui sortent des sentiers battus, mais jusqu'à présent ça a toujours marché malgré quelques réticences au début (la fameuse peur du changement). J'aimerais juste que l'on me fasse confiance dès le début, ça me permettrait d'avancer encore plus rapidement (prochaine phase d'ailleurs, les résultats des courses sur Wikidata). Sinon oui, tu pourras ressortir ce que j'ai dit au moment opportun : je ne m'occupe pas de connaître les avis de collègues Wikipédiens parce que je contribue généralement à un niveau plus poussé. Je ne suis pas meilleur dans le cyclisme que mes quelques collègues Wikipédiens (bien au contraire, je n'y connaît rien), mais j'ai toujours eu des facilités pour imaginer des nouveautés et pour communiquer à l'extérieur. Ceci dit, quand je ne sais vraiment pas, là je consulte d'autres avis. Sur le cyclisme, j'ai tout un tas de projets qui sont encore dans les cartons, et leur avenir se joue déjà maintenant. Fais-moi confiance et tu verras que ça fonctionnera. Jérémy-Günther-Heinz Jähnick (talk) 17:51, 10 April 2015 (UTC) PS : pour être un peu plus précis, ceci n'est qu'une petite partie du système de catégorisation, qui permet de classer les coureurs dans leurs équipes, de regrouper les fichiers par équipes et par courses, d'afficher dans la description le nom de l'équipe...
Bonjour,
J'ai recoupé cette photo et supprimé les anciennes versions. Merci de respecter le droit à l'image. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 12:22, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
- Benh voyons. --Aga (d) 12:43, 22 April 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Tour panoramique de La Duchère.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
![]() |
File:Kiev 2014 - WmCEE (21).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
INeverCry 09:29, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Clamecy décembre 2014 (24).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Civa (talk) 11:22, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Besoin de toi pour des renommages...
[edit]Bonjour,
Pourrais tu renommer ces 4 photos :
- File:TdB 2015 - Bridgestone Anchor (1).JPG en File:TdB 2015 - Équipe Bridgestone Anchor (1).JPG
- File:TdB 2015 - Bridgestone Anchor (2).JPG en File:TdB 2015 - Équipe Bridgestone Anchor (2).JPG
- File:TdB 2015 - Bridgestone Anchor (3).JPG en File:TdB 2015 - Équipe Bridgestone Anchor (3).JPG
- File:TdB 2015 - Bridgestone Anchor (4).JPG en File:TdB 2015 - Équipe Bridgestone Anchor (4).JPG
D'avance merci. Petro [pronto?] 18:01, 19 May 2015 (UTC)
- Salut,
- Commen ça va ?
Done : bravo pour les photos du TdB, chaque année plus réussies !
- ++, --Aga (d) 06:33, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
- Merci pour les renommages.
- En 2013, pour la première fois, j'ai pris des photos pas terribles avec un vieil appareil. J'ai depuis l'an dernier investi dans un nouveau compact et c'est vrai que la différence est notable. Petro [pronto?] 11:19, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Thibaut120094 (talk) 09:30, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Gare de Marne-la-Vallée.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:18, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Intérieur gare de Marne-la-Vallée.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:19, 24 June 2015 (UTC)
Musées
[edit]Salut Agamitsudo! Peux tu prendre quelques photos des musées parisiens? Il y a encore des liens rouges ici. Merci! J'aime beaucoup tes photos, mais Paris n'a pas seulement des rues et plaques de rue. Cordialement!--Paris 16 (talk) 20:39, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
- Salut Paris16 :),
- En fait j'ai déjà prévu un peu de le faire (j'ai bloqué quelques nocturnes dans les mois qui viennent) mais je n'avais pas idée de ce qui restait à illustrer : du coup je vais étudier la liste et vais m'employer à bleuir quelques liens.
- Merci encore pour ton aide !
- --Aga (d) 07:00, 7 July 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Le Jour ni l'Heure 6134 Maurice Utrillo, 1883-1955, Pérouges, Ain.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Tekstman (talk) 08:57, 12 July 2015 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Champ de tir Ariane IV à Kourou.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Uwe W. (talk) 20:16, 27 July 2015 (UTC)
File tagging File:Indila à Roissy.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Indila à Roissy.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
The Photographer (talk) 16:13, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Charles Alzieu - stade Jean-Bouin - 1928.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Charles Alzieu - stade Jean-Bouin - 1928.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:44, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:Jacqueline Combernoux.jpg
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Jacqueline Combernoux.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
And also:
Yours sincerely, Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:48, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
Attention, please
[edit]Ciao, hai inserito la categoria di un comune (laico) italiano in una religiosa, sbagliando pure perché le chiese che sono nel comune (laico) di Aggius sono tutte nella diocesi di Tempio-Ampurias non nell'Arcidiocesi di Sassari.--Threecharlie (talk) 13:00, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
- scusiamo per l'errore...
- Grazie. --Aga (d) 13:30, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
- No problem, mi hai dato la possibilità di fare un po' d'ordine anche in altre categorie simili. Buon lavoro :-)--Threecharlie (talk) 14:21, 3 September 2015 (UTC)
Pierre Buraglio - mention erronée
[edit]Bonsoir, Je vous remercie de contribuer aux pages de Pierre Buraglio https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pierre_Buraglio, mais vous avez fait mention (en référence) : "lithographe", cet artiste utilise bien ce principe de reproduction avec Franck Bordas et moi-même, mais il n'est en aucun cas lithographe de métier. Merci de bien vouloir supprimer cette mention erronée. Je vous en remercie par avance. Cordialement, Claude Buraglio
Please note that I have removed the misplaced license tag from your credit template; a credit template is not to be misused as license template. Some images may be reported here as mising license but that should be easy to fix. If you want to upgrade the CC-by-sa license of your images from 3.0 to 4.0 you may ask for a Bot operator at Commons:Bots/Work requests to do this for you. A change from CC-by-3.0 to CC-by-4.0 is possible as well but not from -by to -by-sa. --Denniss (talk) 20:07, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
interwikis
[edit]Hi. If you change interwikis, please move all of them, not only few. For the Category:Giants graves before there was 7 interwikis, now with your intervention they are only 3. "You don't think so" that it was better before... it is so! Best regards, --DenghiùComm (talk) 14:21, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
- Hi
,
- "7 iw" were actually hard-coded interwikis: fr was not there for example and this fact is not so logical. There are "only" 3 iw because the category is linked to wikipedia categories thanks to wikidata. I created the Giants graves page linked to ...11 wikipedia articles through wikidata link. I don't see the advantage to keep something not up-to-date.
- Regards. --Benoît Prieur (d) 14:28, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
- Why iw links are in the gallery and not in the category? It's more important the category! --DenghiùComm (talk) 15:17, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
- It's the convention or at least the implicit agreement:
- If there is at least one wp category for this commons category => the commons category is linked to wp categories;
- Otherwise the commons category is linked to wp articles.
- Regards,
- --Benoît Prieur (d) 17:34, 3 October 2015 (UTC)
File:Les Jeunes1921.jpg, File:Les Jeunes1904.jpg
[edit]De façon générale j'ai versé à OTRS une autorisation permanente signée Jean Vintezl, alors président de la FSCF pour verser sur Wikimedia tout document extrait des archives fédérales. Cependant les deux fichiers suivants (File:Les Jeunes1921.jpg et File:Les Jeunes1904.jpg) me semblent représenter des documents tombés dans le domaine public compte-tenu de leurs dates (1904, 1921).--Claude PIARD (talk) 21:53, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
- Hi,
- In that case please fill/indicate the relevant license.
- Regards, --Benoît Prieur (d) 05:25, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
A page has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |