User talk:Benoît Prieur/Archives 2021

Archives

Archive

• May 2023-January 2024
• 2022-May 2023
• 2021
• 2020 (part 2)
• 2019
• 2017-2018
• 2016
• 2015
• 2014
• 2013
• 2012
• 2011
• 2010

Copyright status: File:Chemin sur l'île (Neyron) en janvier 2021.jpg

Copyright status: File:Chemin sur l'île (Neyron) en janvier 2021.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Chemin sur l'île (Neyron) en janvier 2021.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:06, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaque Ici est né de Claude Louis Mathieu (astronome) à Mâcon (janvier 2021).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me --PantheraLeo1359531 15:38, 30 January 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 2 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Buste de Théodore Jouvet, Valence-(janvier 2021).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments I'd wished angle of view would be slightly more in front. Image quality is good though! --Etaped 22:48, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Façade de l'Hôtel-Dieu de Beaune - porte en bois.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me --PantheraLeo1359531 17:43, 1 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 4 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Magasin de musique Azzato, rue de la Violette (Bruxelles).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steven Sun 03:24, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Please participate in the Universal Code of Conduct consultation on Wikimedia Commons!

Dear Benoît Prieur

Thank you for your hard work to create the sum of all knowledge that is freely sharable to every single human being across the world. As our diverse community grows, we need a guideline that will help all of our work collectively and constructively where everyone feels safe, welcomed, and part of a team. That is why the Wikimedia movement is working on establishing a global guideline called the Universal Code of Conduct, often referred to as UCoC.

After the months-long policy consultation, we have prepared a policy (available in many languages) that has been ratified by the Board of Trustees. We’re currently in the second phase of the process. During this round of consultation, we want to discuss the implementation of this policy. As a member of the functionary team of Wikimedia Commons, your opinion on enforcement is of great value. We want to hear from you on how this policy can be enforced on the Wikimedia Commons community and what might be needed to do so. There are a few enforcement questions so you can easily outline your answers based on them. Please do not hesitate to bring any more questions/challenges you think are not yet discussed.

The discussion is taking place on Commons:Universal Code of Conduct consultation. You can also share your thoughts by replying to this message (Please ping me so I get notified), posting your message on my talk page. I am aware that some thoughts cannot be expressed publicly, so you can always share your opinion by emailing me as well.

As a valued member of the Commons community, please share your thoughts, ideas, and experiences that relate to UCoC. Let us know what needs to be improved so we can build a more friendly and cooperative space to increase editor engagement and retention of new users.

Wikimedia projects are governed by you. So, it is you who needs to step up to ensure a safe, comfortable, and pleasant working environment.

Let me know if you have any questions.

Thank you! Wikitanvir (WMF) (talk) 10:18, 5 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Magasin d'instruments de musique, rue de Lorraine (Beaune).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 10:14, 3 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 6 February 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Folklore 2021 is on!

You are humbly invited to participate in the Wiki Loves Folklore 2021 an international photography contest organized on Wikimedia Commons to document folklore and intangible cultural heritage from different regions, including, folk creative activities and many more. It is held every year from the 1st till the 28th of February.

You can help in enriching the folklore documentation on Commons from your region by taking photos, audios, videos, and submitting them in this commons contest.

Kind regards,

Wiki loves Folklore International Team

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:04, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ciel jaune-orangé en février 2021 dans l'Ain en raison des vents apportant du sable du Sahara.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 00:54, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

crèche de Noël église Saint-Pierre de Mâcon

Bonjour, il semblerait que la Crèche de noël 2020 de l'église Saint-Pierre de Mâcon que vous avez photographié, ressemble à celle de la Basilique Notre Dame des Enfants, fabriquée à Vaucouleurs.

File:Nativity-scene-bergers-carton-romain-polychrome-1887-basilique-NDDE.jpg

Cordialement. --Ideefixe (talk) 13:07, 9 February 2021 (UTC)

@Ideefixe: Bonjour,

Je ne connais pas l'histoire de la fabrication de cette crèche, mais effectivement il y a ressemblance.

Vaucouleurs est un lieu spécialisé en réalisation de crèche ?

Merci pour la découverte en tout cas, ----Benoît (d) 16:24, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

PS : peut-être faisiez-vous référence à cela => [1] ? ----Benoît (d) 16:26, 10 February 2021 (UTC)

@Benoît Prieur: Merci pour votre réponse. Oui, je faisais référence à cela => pres-de-bourges-une-commune-recupere-sa-creche-disparue-depuis-30-ans.--Ideefixe (talk) 22:04, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Please take a short survey regarding UCoC

Hello Benoît Prieur,

I would like to inform you that we now have a survey in place to take part in the UCoC consultation. It is not a long one and should take less than 10 minutes to complete. You can take the survey even if you have already participated in the on-wiki consultation. It has a different set of questions and allows you to participate anonymously and privately.

As a member of the Commons functionaries, your opinion is especially essential. Please click here to participate in the survey.

You are still welcome to participate in the on-wiki discussions. If you prefer you can have your say by sending me an email. You can also drop me an email if you want to have a one-to-one chat.

Thank you for your participation! Wikitanvir (WMF) 13:53, 12 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Repère kilométrique 35.103 - Route des Échets (Mas Rillier).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 18:16, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tour du château de Miribel (ruines) en février 2021 (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 18:22, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue de la Pavotière (Miribel).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 07:21, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Restaurant Le Saint Martin, place Saint-Martin à Miribel (Ain).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment The left side of the building is not vertical, while the rigt side is OK, the same is for windows. Can you correct it?  Done Thank you for the observation. --Benoît Prieur 20:45, 10 February 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 06:48, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Une cabane dans un arbre, Chemin de Lazare (Mas Rillier).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 02:14, 13 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte en bois de la Villa des Sources à Miribel (Ain).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:28, 15 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Urgence climatique - inscription Grande rue (Miribel) - février 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ezarate 14:12, 16 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 19 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place de l'Église rénovée et l'église de Neyron en février 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 11:56, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Entrée du fort de Sermenaz (février 2021).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Perhaps there is a big contrast but ok --Ezarate 22:27, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tractopelle près du fort de Sermenaz (Neyron) en février 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 20:20, 20 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 23 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chemin de ronde autour du fort de Sermenaz (en février 2021).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 16:48, 21 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Un chemin dans les bois du coteau à Beynost en février 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 06:57, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boîte à livres, chemin des Grandes Terres (Neyron).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 09:40, 25 February 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 28 February 2021 (UTC)

Cross-wiki harassment

Can you, please, delete this file? --Mykola7 (talk) 14:46, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

@Mykola7:  Done. ----Benoît (d) 14:49, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passage entre deux cours du Palais des Ducs de Bourgogne à Dijon en février 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality (and I remember walking through this passageway repeatedly when I visited Dijon in 2012). -- Ikan Kekek 22:12, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaque commémorative au policier Joël Chambault, rue des Forges (Dijon).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK. --A.Savin 12:45, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Fontaine sculptée place Darcy (Dijon) en février 2021.jpg

File:Fontaine sculptée place Darcy (Dijon) en février 2021.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ComputerHotline (talk) 05:51, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

@ComputerHotline: Max Blondat décédé en 1925. Cordialement, ----Benoît (d) 06:53, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Stèle d'Eugène Piron (Dijon) - médaillon par Paul Gasq.jpg

File:Stèle d'Eugène Piron (Dijon) - médaillon par Paul Gasq.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ComputerHotline (talk) 05:52, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

@ComputerHotline: Paul Gasq décédé en 1944. Cordialement, ----Benoît (d) 06:53, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Stèle d'Eugène Piron (Dijon) - inscription - signature de Paul Gasq.jpg

File:Stèle d'Eugène Piron (Dijon) - inscription - signature de Paul Gasq.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ComputerHotline (talk) 05:52, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

@ComputerHotline: Paul Gasq décédé en 1944. Cordialement, ----Benoît (d) 06:53, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Statue endommagée (jardin Darcy) en février 2021.jpg

File:Statue endommagée (jardin Darcy) en février 2021.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ComputerHotline (talk) 05:52, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

@ComputerHotline: Non identifiable, (possiblement, sans certitude) François Rude décédé...en 1855. Cordialement, ----Benoît (d) 06:55, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Statue dans le jardin Darcy (Dijon) en février 2021.jpg

File:Statue dans le jardin Darcy (Dijon) en février 2021.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ComputerHotline (talk) 05:52, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

@ComputerHotline: (probablement) François Rude décédé...en 1855. Cordialement, ----Benoît (d) 06:54, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

File:Viaduc du Chavanon - July 2012 - 1.JPG

File:Viaduc du Chavanon - July 2012 - 1.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Also

• File:Viaduc du Chavanon - July 2012 - 2.JPG
• File:Viaduc du Chavanon - July 2012 - 3.JPG

(note: notice added by user other than nominator: JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 12:40, 25 March 2021 (UTC))

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Billet de 100 livres syriennes (1).jpg

And also:

• File:Billet de 100 livres syriennes (2).jpg
• File:Billet de 100 livres syriennes (3).jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 06:29, 1 April 2021 (UTC)

File:Su Santidad Papa Francisco.jpg

File:Su Santidad Papa Francisco.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Frodar (talk) 19:23, 10 April 2021 (UTC)

Category:Monuments_historiques_in_Senegal

Monuments historiques in Senegal has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Themightyquill (talk) 05:42, 13 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Porte d'En-Bas (Pérouges) en avril 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:39, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue du Souterrain depuis la rue des Rondes à Pérouges en avril 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 10:53, 18 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaque reprenant une phrase de Robert Bréban à Pérouges (avril 2021).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 10:07, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La rue du Prince en direction de la place de la Halle ensoleillée (avril 2021).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, nice composition. -- Ikan Kekek 08:42, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vue drone de la cité médiévale de Pérouges (avril 2021).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality ! --Sebring12Hrs 13:34, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaque en hommage de la Libération de Pérouges.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:48, 25 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 April 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue de la Halle à Pérouges en avril 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 15:16, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue de la Filaterie (Pérouges) en avril 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 10:03, 27 April 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Travaux d'enrobage à proximité de Disneyland Paris (juillet 2020), terminés.jpg

Yours sincerely, Elisfkc (talk) 20:09, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pont de Savines en mai 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Remontees 22:20, 1 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chemin de Pra Paisset (Les Orres).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:20, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 19 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bergerie Gautier (Les Orres) - mai 2021 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:30, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

37.164.164.201 15:00, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

droit d utilisation

Bonjour Benoît, J'ai repéré cette plaque d'une rue de Lyon : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ruebizolon001.jpg?uselang=fr que j'aimerais utiliser pour illustrer la fiche agenda sur le site de la BmL pour un atelier wiki qui aura lieu en novembre. Pourrais-tu stp me communiquer la mention telle que tu souhaites la voir apparaitre comme auteur de cette photo ?

Merci, Virginie pour l'équipe numelyo --Cliomarc (talk) 11:43, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

@Cliomarc: Coucou :)

En fait je ne suis pas l'auteur original ; j'ai juste amélioré un peu l'image (contraste, lumière, orthogonalité).

Le crédit suivant serait très bien : "Taguelmoust - CC-By-SA".

Il existe aussi cette autre version de cette plaque de rue sur Commons : File:Lyon 2e - Rue Clotilde Bizolon - Plaque (mars 2019).jpg.

Bien à toi, ----Benoît (d) 11:49, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

@Benoît Prieur:

Merci pour la rapidité de ce retour. Et pour la précision, j'ai pensé que tu avais refait la photo, pas juste améliorée. En tout cas j'ai cité son auteur à l'identique. Merci encore --Cliomarc (talk) 14:59, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paysage hauteurs des Orres (Hautes-Alpes) en mai 2021 (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 21:22, 27 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Un cairn aux Orres (proximité source de Jérusalem).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 10:44, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

Just a hint

Hello Benoît,

I wanted to leave a annotation in the discussion for your last FP candidate, but you were faster and have already removed it. ;–) So I write it here.

I do not think that the photo would have succeeded at FPC, but calling it “very bad quality”, as someone did in an unconsidered manner, was a strong exaggeration. IMHO the quality of your photo is decent, it is much better than millions of the photos we have here on Commons, and it is a very valuable photo of the bridge. The composition is fine. It is just one of the cases in which the image processing of the iPhone is a bit unfortunate. The background of the photo is a bit out of focus (that’s OK! it’s a photo of the bridge), and there is probably also some haze. But the iPhone (like most smartphones often do) did not recognize the different levels of sharpness and has tried to sharpen up everything. This leads to some ‘painterly’ rendering of the unsharp landscape which is irritating for people who are used to the results of DSLRs and MILCs which render these out-of-focus areas quite differently. I guess this is what has irritated the FP reviewers. (Some younger people, used to smartphone photos, will probably think the other way around, consider the iPhone photo as natural and decline the softer background created by DSLR/MILC cameras. ;–)

I was startled by the “very bad quality” remark. This kind of exaggerated remarks is IMHO not useful, it is easy to feel them to be an insult, even when the reviewer did not mean that. We are losing too many photographers because of such misunderstandings, impoliteness and quarrels. Therefore I wantend to write you (just as another Commons photographer) to make clear that your contributions to Commons are very valuable. You do an excellent job in documenting e.g. the France of today, including many often ignored aspects, you have an excellent eye for motifs, so please keep on the good work. All the best for you, --Aristeas (talk) 14:08, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Hi @Aristeas:

Thank you very much for your kind and empathetic message.

I was not offended by the bitter appreciation of the quality of my photo (but indeed a few months / years ago I would have found it hurtful). No risk of discouragement for me here: I hit the road here with a lot of pleasure.

Looking forward to meet you again on Wikimedia Commons or somewhere else.

All the best. ----Benoît (d) 06:17, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chemin non carrossable Ancien Canal Chenevrier (Crévoux) et paysage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK for me --PantheraLeo1359531 16:04, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le torrent du Crévoux à Crévoux en mai 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:19, 7 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Monument aux morts maquisards 39-45 (Crots) proche abbaye.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 07:45, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Un nuage au-dessus de Crévoux (Hautes-Alpes) proche cascades (mai 2021).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:20, 8 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Un canal d'irrigation - plaine sous le Roc (Embrun). - mai 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 19:15, 9 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

File:Éric Piccoli (2014).jpg

File:Éric Piccoli (2014).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Forb87 Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

A1Cafel (talk) 14:05, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grande Tombe de Villeroy (Chauconin-Neufmontiers) - juin 2021 (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 15:55, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stand de choses à vendre ou échanger ou donner en bord de route (Embrun).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 03:26, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Square Garabed et Victoria Hadjian - khatchkar.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 17:59, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue du 24-avril-1915 (Décines-Charpieu) - panneau de rue.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:42, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 15 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boîte à livres installée dans l'ancienne gare de Villette-d'Anthon.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:30, 14 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La plage à Kalyves (Crète) en juillet 2021 (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Please align the horizon --Ermell 08:03, 16 July 2021 (UTC) -@Ermell: thank you. Done. --Benoît Prieur 05:29, 17 July 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:32, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Excursion botanique CEN Rhône-Alpes Camp de La Valbonne (juin 2021) - 24.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brochette d'espadon à Georgioúpoli (Crète) en juillet 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:16, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La chapelle Saint-Nicolas de Georgioúpoli en juillet 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 10:16, 20 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Johnny-Hallyday (Charvieu-Chavagneux) - panneau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 21:47, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boîte aux lettres ancienne - en usage - à Saint-Baudille-de-la-Tour (juillet 2021).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 18:45, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Une église à Sellia, région de La Canée (Crète).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:16, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Une chapelle isolée à Vamos (Crète).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 15:30, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frederik Frison à l'issue de la 2e étape du Tour de l'Ain 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:40, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bus Gazprom-RusVelo à l'hôtel Lyon-Est (Saint-Maurice-de-Beynost) au matin de la 1ere étape du Tour de l'Ain 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 14:07, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alexander Serov (directeur sportif Gazprom) au matin de la première étape du Tour de l'Ain 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ezarate 13:21, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Eddy Finé au matin de la troisième étape du Tour de l'Ain 2021 (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 12:50, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bus Lotto-Soudal à l'issue de la 2e étape du Tour de l'Ain 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 09:59, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontaine de la source du Merloux Saint-Maurice-de-Beynost).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 14:53, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fontaine de la source du Merloux Saint-Maurice-de-Beynost) - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 14:53, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panneau Le Merloux à Saint-Maurice-de-Beynost et route vers Margnolias.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 15:59, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nacer Bouhanni au matin de la première étape du Tour de l'Ain 2021 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 08:40, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 6 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place Charles Rouvière (Optevoz).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective correction is needed. --F. Riedelio 07:13, 7 August 2021 (UTC);  Done @F. Riedelio: Thanks :) --Benoît Prieur 05:44, 9 August 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 12:56, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Musée-maison du patrimoine de Hières-sur-Amby - entrée.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:29, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vue de la chapelle militaire de La Valbonne Saint Jean-Paul II en août 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 16:11, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Chapelle militaire de La Valbonne Saint Jean-Paul II - clocher.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Berthold Werner 16:11, 14 August 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

MOTD Notification

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐ File:Église Saint-Martin de Miribel (Ain, France).webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Merci c'est top et ça fait plaisir. ----Benoît (d) 05:53, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaque Maison habitée par Edme Courot (Clamecy).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:31, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue de la Monnaie. à Clamecy avec un monument historique de part et d'autre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:31, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Notre-Dame de Bethléem de Clamecy en travaux en septembre 2021 (cropped).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Commonists 12:02, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:41, 8 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pizzeria La Vieille Rome à Clamecy (Nièvre) - Maison natale de Gabriel Alapetite.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very pretty building, good quality. An even sharper photo of this motif might have a chance at FPC. -- Ikan Kekek 00:27, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vieille ferme à Tramoyes (1600) - depuis la cour intérieure.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 18:30, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Henri Ferré (Lyon) en août 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:48, 10 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cheese cake by Arthur pour l'anniversaire d'Hector (2021).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 22:32, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Niche et Vierge à Plateau d'Hauteville (Ain) en septembre 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 17:24, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cathédrale Notre-Dame d'Embrun - inscription sur une pierre (août 2021).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 07:41, 12 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 15 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stade Marc-Vivien Foé - plaque commémorative (Lyon).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:53, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Terrain secondaire du Stade du Forum (Ain Sud) après dépôt du nouveau synthétique (septembre 2021) - 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Hillopo2018 07:19, 14 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:40, 17 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tombe famille C. Duc - cimetière nouveau de la Guillotière.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:35, 16 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 19 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maison forte de Montherot de Balan (Ain) - tour en septembre 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:00, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Boîte à livres VivaLivres à Balan (Ain).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:05, 18 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Un tram - Avenue Corentin-Cariou (Paris) - septembre 2021 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Y.ssk 16:23, 21 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Plus que quelques jours pour participer à Wiki Loves Monuments France !

Bonjour,

Le concours Wiki Loves Monuments France est ouvert pour une semaine encore, jusqu'au 30 septembre. Déjà plus de 6 000 photos ont été importées cette année alors vous aussi rejoignez le concours ! Cette campagne de contribution concerne tous les monuments et objets mobiliers présents dans la base Mérimée et dans la base Palissy. De l'imposant château aux ruines industrielles, de la verrière décorative au reliquaire, c'est un impressionnant patrimoine qui attend d'être photographié et documenté. Vous pouvez dès à présent mettre en ligne autant de photos que vous le souhaitez de ces monuments et objets du patrimoine français. Nous attendons vos photos avec impatience !

Les plus belles photos seront sélectionnées par un jury national composé d'amateurs et de professionnels, de contributeurs à Wikimedia Commons et d'acteurs du patrimoine. Un jury international constituera ensuite une sélection des meilleures photographies mondiales.

Si vous avez des questions, l'équipe organisatrice se fera un plaisir d'y répondre.

P.S. : vous recevez ce message parce que vous avez participé au concours Wiki Loves Monuments en France

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:34, 26 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hôtel-Dieu de Lyon depuis le pont de la Guillotière en septembre 2021 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:26, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hôtel-Dieu de Lyon depuis le pont de la Guillotière en septembre 2021 (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:26, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 27 September 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cimetière ancien de la Guillotière en août 2021 - panneau allée 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:44, 30 September 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tombe entretenue par les HCL suite à un legs par Mme Marmy veuve Boucaud (1943) au cimetière ancien de la Guillotière (Lyon).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 16:04, 8 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 11 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Église Saint-Augustin de Lyon (octobre 2021).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:31, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tombe de Patrice Berger au Nouveau cimetière de la Croix-Rousse en octobre 2021 (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:11, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tombe de Patrice Berger au Nouveau cimetière de la Croix-Rousse en octobre 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:07, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tombe des Soeurs du Prado (Nouveau cimetière de la Guillotière).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 08:19, 15 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nouvelle fontaine rue centrale à Beynost en octobre 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Verticals are not straight. Picture needs perspective correction. --Halavar 18:23, 17 October 2021 (UTC); @Halavar:  Done thanks :) --Benoît Prieur 18:30, 17 October 2021 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --Halavar 22:01, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tombe des frères Lumière (Nouveau cimetière de la Guillotière) août 2021 (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 11:52, 18 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Un bus Colibri direction Miribel à l'intersection de la rue des Gravelles et de la rue des Andrés (Saint-Maurice-de-Beynost) en octobre 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:40, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Saint-Maximin - inscription Covid égal Arnaque du siècle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 16:01, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rue Saint-Maximin (Lyon) en octobre 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 16:03, 23 October 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 October 2021 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Blessed Carlo Acutis (49697934528).png

This file may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Blessed Carlo Acutis (49697934528).png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Jordi (talk) 11:00, 1 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Plaque à René Borghini et Esther Poggio à Monaco (ruelle Chanoine Georges Franzi).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 09:03, 5 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:06, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Place Saint Nicolas (Monaco) en novembre 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 20:58, 10 November 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 13 November 2021 (UTC)

File:Blessed Carlo Acutis (49697934528).png

File:Blessed Carlo Acutis (49697934528).png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: Derivative work of copyrighted photograph Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Di (they-them) (talk) 23:24, 8 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Un sentier agricole et un champ en décembre 2021 dans le brouillard à Jons.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 14:16, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 25 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jardin Guylaine Gouzou-Testud (Lyon 4e) - plaque de rue (décembre 2021).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 15:39, 27 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Paysage agricole à Chaneins (Ain) - vaches à viande en décembre 2021.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 22:12, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 31 December 2021 (UTC)