User talk:Benoît Prieur/Archives 2011
Centrale_nucléaire_du_Bugey_et_champ_de_tournesol.jpg
[edit]![]() |
File:Centrale_nucléaire_du_Bugey_et_champ_de_tournesol.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
MorganKevinJ(talk) 00:25, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
why ?
[edit]Hello,
I have seen your removal of categories in the File:Blason Bonnefamille.svg. I do not understand what can be the reasons for such a removal. Could you please explain this to me ?
Yours, Frédéric (talk) 19:35, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
- Hello Frédéric,
- Actually, this article Armorial des communes de l'Isère indicates another coat of arms for Bonnefamille, the "official" one. I meant to create a category like 'Others known coat of arms of Bonnefamille'; finally, I decided to do an "undo" on my change. In real, Bonnefamille owns only one coat, but it is not an issue if its commons category has two coats.
- Sorry for wonderings that I have caused,
- --Agamitsudo (talk) 09:17, 26 February 2011 (UTC)
- Hello Frédéric,
![]() |
File:Canal-de-Miribel-A-la-gare-deCrépieux.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Copyright status: File:Viaduc H et V Basch.JPG
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:Viaduc H et V Basch.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
matanya • talk 07:49, 10 April 2011 (UTC)
This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot
![]() |
File:Cristiano Ronaldo - december 8, 2010 in Madrid - Real Madrid vs AJ Auxerre.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Ytoyoda (talk) 09:39, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
User_talk:Frachet#File:Bourg_011.JPG
[edit]Hallo Agamitsudo, you might want to participate at those DRs here User_talk:Frachet#File:Bourg_011.JPG. And a general tip: please notify the uploaders on their talk pages if you tag something for deletion. They should know it. There is a copy and paste template on each tag which you can copy and paste it on the uploader's talk page. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 21:50, 13 July 2011 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:L'église Saint-Romain de Miribel en juillet 2011 - 2.JPG
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:L'église Saint-Romain de Miribel en juillet 2011 - 2.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
GeorgHH • talk 13:30, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Copyright status: File:L'église Saint-Romain de Miribel en juillet 2011.JPG
[edit]![]() |
This media may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading File:L'église Saint-Romain de Miribel en juillet 2011.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.
If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you. |
GeorgHH • talk 13:30, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
File tagging File:StatueGastonBoulevardPachecoBruxelles.JPG
[edit]![]() |
This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:StatueGastonBoulevardPachecoBruxelles.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:StatueGastonBoulevardPachecoBruxelles.JPG]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Esby (talk) 21:09, 9 August 2011 (UTC)
Carillon du Mas Rillier
[edit]Bonsoir,
L'auteur du carillon, Louis Mortamet, est mort en 1956. Son travail est toujours soumis au droit d'auteur en France. Par conséquent, ces images vont être supprimées.
Cordialement, Trizek here or on fr:wp 16:33, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Carillon_du_Mas_Rillier_-_septembre_2011_-_01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Trizek here or on fr:wp 16:39, 7 September 2011 (UTC)
Catégorisation de Gratte-ciel
[edit]Bonjour,
Oui, Gratte-ciel est un bien quartier de Villeurbanne (et sans doute le plus connu) mais il est paradoxalement enfoui sous deux catégories pas évidentes : il faut le chercher d'abord dans "Geography of Villeurbanne" puis dans une sous-catégorie "Neighbourhoods of Villeurbanne", qui ne contient qu'une seule sous-catégorie : "Gratte-ciel". Cela me semble assez peu logique et surtout peu pratique. Dans un premier temps j'ai conclu que la catégorie "Gratte-ciel" n'existait pas. Il me semblerait préférable au moins de faire dépendre "Gratte-ciel" directement de "Villeurbanne", quitte à passer aussi par les cases "Geography" et "Neighbourhoods".
Je voudrais aussi faire observer que "quartier" se dit plutôt "district" ou "quarter" en anglais, et que "neighbourhood" (qu'on trouve aussi dans les dictionnaires pour "quartier") est plutôt le voisinage, c'est-à-dire le quartier par rapport auquel on se situe. "There are 10 neighbourhoods in the city", par exemple, ne se dit pas, alors qu'on peut dire "Is there a swimming-pool in your neighbourhood?"
Cordialement, Camster (talk) 14:20, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
- Bonjour Camster,
- La catégorisation sur commons est destinée à donner toujours plus de sens aux images (processus probablement infini) et non à économiser un ou deux clics à un amateur de photographies villeurbannaises. En l’occurrence, Gratte-ciel est un quartier de Villeurbanne, il y a donc plus de sens à le placer dans la catégorie:Quartier de Villeurbanne que dans catégorie:Villeurbanne ou dans catégorie:Quartier.
- Concernant vos observations au sujet du nommage en anglais : district revêt plutôt un caractère administratif. De plus, Neighborhoods est largement utilisé (dans le sens de quartier) sur commons (voir Category:Neighborhoods by city) ; mais vous avez raison, quarter est (dans une moindre mesure mais avec les interwikis), également utilisé (voir Category:City quarters). À vrai dire, ces deux catégories mériteraient sans doute d'être fusionner. Tout cela ne doit néanmoins pas remettre en cause votre abonnement à Today in English
.
- Cordialement, --Agamitsudo (talk) 15:24, 11 September 2011 (UTC)
- Bonjour Agamitsudo, et merci pour votre réponse.
- Vous avez raison sur le fait que "la catégorisation sur commons est destinée à donner toujours plus de sens aux images" ; toutefois elle sert aussi à l'utilisateur de l'encyclopédie à s'orienter et à trouver, aussi rapidement que possible, ce qu'il cherche, le problème n'étant pas essentiellement d'"économiser quelques clics". Il faut donc trouver un compromis, je pense, entre une arborescence fine de catégories et la commodité d'emploi. Je vais donc faire dépendre aussi la catégorie "Gratte-ciel" directement de "Villeurbanne". Ce sera redondant, mais la redondance n'est pas toujours inutile à la transmission de l'information...
- Pour le reste et en toute modestie je me permets de vous signaler que je suis agrégé d'anglais, ce qui ne m'a pas empêché il y a quelques années de m'abonner à Today in English
- Camster (talk) 07:06, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
- Bonjour Camster,
- J'ai modifié hier, un certain nombre de choses autour de la catégorie en question dans laquelle apparaissent maintenant d'autres quartiers. Si vous voulez jeter un œil ?
- Cordialement, --Agamitsudo (talk) 07:13, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
- Effectivement c'est mieux : "Neighbourhoods" a maintenant plusieurs sous-catégories et est plus facile à trouver, donc "Gratte-ciel" aussi. Je renonce donc à ma modification - Bonne journée, Camster (talk) 08:19, 12 September 2011 (UTC)
- Bonjour Camster,
- Pour le reste et en toute modestie je me permets de vous signaler que je suis agrégé d'anglais, ce qui ne m'a pas empêché il y a quelques années de m'abonner à Today in English
Usine Tase
[edit]Salut,
Désolé pour ma modification trop rapide sur Category:Usine Tase. Je n’avais pas pensé/eu le temps de vérifier l’article sur WP. Ceci dit, il faut au moins laisser le numéro d’inventaire en attendant que la base Mérimée soit mise à jour (si elle l’est un jour…).
Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 17:40, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
- Bonsoir Vigneron,
- Oulà, pas de problème. Du coup, j'en profite pour te féliciter pour ton travail de vérification des uploads liés à WLM 2011.
- À bientôt,
- --Agamitsudo (talk) 19:04, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Rennomeur de Fichier
[edit]Comme demandé tu fais maintenant partie des renommeurs de fichiers petit veinard ;) bien sûr à n'utiliser que sur les cas confus et en prévenant les auteurs quand ce n'est pas de toi qu'il s'agit ;) Otourly (talk) 08:57, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
- Merci mon grand.
- Je te recontacte rapidement. --Agamitsudo (talk) 07:35, 9 October 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
Monuments historiques in Saint-Maurice-de-Gourdans has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
GFreihalter (talk) 12:00, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
Category:Religious_buildings_in_Saint-Maurice-de-Gourdans has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
GFreihalter (talk) 12:03, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
![]() |
Buildings in Saint-Maurice-de-Gourdans has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
GFreihalter (talk) 12:04, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished
[edit]![]() |
Dear Benoît Prieur,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. |
![]() |
- Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 20:10, 17 October 2011 (UTC)