Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log/June 2013
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 31 May 2013 at 20:40:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info BMW conglomerate in Munich (Germany) including the manufacturing plant, the BMW Welt, the BMW Tower and the BMW Museum. All by me, Poco a poco (talk) 20:40, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Support --Poco a poco (talk) 20:40, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 21:07, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Oppose No wow. Looks like any other developed industrial urban landscape. Daniel Case (talk) 00:26, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Oppose The horizon is not straight (tilted), and some buildings, especially the museum, looks distorded.--Jebulon (talk) 09:52, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Support For me there's plenty of wow due to the contrast between the distinctive foreground buildings and the background, helped along by the wide-angle lens. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:45, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2013 at 21:40:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info Blässhuhn im Nest, Fulica atra; all by -- Böhringer (talk) 21:40, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Böhringer (talk) 21:40, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 08:05, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Oppose I don't like the idea. Tomer T (talk) 09:27, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Support — Emilia (talk) 10:32, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Thous straws in the foreground are distracting and don't allow to see the bird properly. Kruusamägi (talk) 11:57, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Clipped whites, composition with strange focus on the water behind the bird, important parts of the bird (beak) hidden. --Julian H. (talk/files) 13:32, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination thanks for your votes - --Böhringer (talk) 21:08, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2013 at 21:22:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info ♂ Stockente Anas platyrhynchos; all by -- Böhringer (talk) 21:22, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Böhringer (talk) 21:22, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Support I wished it had not been an ordinary "Stockente" but a more interesting bird, but the photo is really good :) --Tuxyso (talk) 22:02, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Oppose For me, nothing special we donna have already. --Yikrazuul (talk) 17:10, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Support Better than some pictures already here. --Kadellar (talk) 12:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose per Yikrazuul. Kruusamägi (talk) 13:50, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Obviously the quality is higher than some Mallard FP we already have, but grasses are too disturbing, sorry Böhringer (>_<) --Laitche (talk) 14:48, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
thanks for your votes - *
I withdraw my nomination --Böhringer (talk) 21:09, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2013 at 20:55:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created & uploaded by Lmbuga - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 20:55, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 20:55, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 22:45, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:39, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 10:39, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Support Very good --Rjcastillo (talk) 13:37, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Support Lovely --Llorenzi (talk) 14:48, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 16:32, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 23:07, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Support --MehdiTalk 05:07, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Support --Böhringer (talk) 12:19, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Support--Earth100 (talk) 14:26, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Support --JLPC (talk) 21:00, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Support Poco2 08:54, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Imagoura Kasumi Coast04bs4440.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jun 2013 at 08:38:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created & uploaded by 663highland - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 08:38, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 08:38, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Support Looks like a giant Tortoise! JKadavoor Jee 11:20, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Володимир Ф (talk) 05:45, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 16:51, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Support,--Jacopo188 (talk) 08:55, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 09:23, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:55, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:42, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 23:12, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Not sharp at full resolution.--Earth100 (talk) 14:33, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
very nice Lpele (talk) 22:59, 1 June 2013 (UTC)Support
- Not enough contributions. B.p. 05:33, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jun 2013 at 16:20:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by ESO/INAF-VST/OmegaCAM/A. Grado/INAF-Capodimonte Observatory, uploaded/nominated by Stas1995
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 16:20, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 18:53, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Support. --JaviP96 21:05, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Support Astonishing! Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 13:30, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 23:07, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Support--Earth100 (talk) 14:27, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Alternative
[edit]Info created by ESO/INAF-VST/OmegaCAM/A. Grado/INAF-Capodimonte Observatory, uploaded/nominated by Stas1995
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 16:42, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Oppose I prefer the original. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 23:07, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Support--Earth100 (talk) 14:27, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
File:Beethoven-Haus.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2013 at 15:56:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Der Wolf im Wald -- Wolf im Wald (de) 15:56, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Wolf im Wald (de) 15:56, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Nothing interesting here to be featured. --Earth100 (talk) 02:18, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Oppose per Earth100 — Stas1995 (talk) 09:04, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
File:Fortuny - La Vicaría (Museo Nacional de Arte de Cataluña, 1870. Óleo sobre tabla, 60 x 93,5 cm).jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2013 at 09:24:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Marià Fortuny - uploaded by Artwork - nominated by Armbrust -- User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 09:24, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Support -- User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 09:24, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Support Good work -- Arcalino (talk) 12:42, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 17:10, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Neutral Too be honest: When I look at the cracks in the paint at 100%, I get the impression that it's not as sharp as it could be. Parts of the jacket of the man sitting on the bench on the right look blurry too, but of course it's hard to determine what's the picture and what's the replication without beeing able to see the original. All in all, I fail to see the "wow" in this digital replication – the sheer size of 11,915 × 7,254 pixels is nice, but not too unusual anymore nowadays. --El Grafo (talk) 17:31, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Support Tomer T (talk) 07:49, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Gießen-Uniklinik-Parkhaus.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2013 at 19:53:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Kreuzschnabel - uploaded by Kreuzschnabel - nominated by Kreuzschnabel -- Kreuzschnabel (talk) 19:53, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Kreuzschnabel (talk) 19:53, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Oppose sorry, nothing special for an FP. --A.Savin 11:08, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Oppose per A.Savin. Kruusamägi (talk) 11:58, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Oppose per A.Savin — Stas1995 (talk) 09:04, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose per A.Savin --Laitche (talk) 14:08, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Megalaima faiostricta - Khao Yai.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2013 at 11:10:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison - nominated by Citron -- Citron (talk) 11:10, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Citron (talk) 11:10, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Oppose disturbing motion blur. Tomer T (talk) 11:55, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Support two birds, one in action, good quality, FP for me --Arcalino (talk) 16:10, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Neutral I really like the effect of one still bird and one moving. But the blurriness of the bottom of the tree and the tail of the still bird disturbs me. --SuperJew (talk) 19:09, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Support Interesting idea, high quality. --Tuxyso (talk) 08:17, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Support --Böhringer (talk) 10:16, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Oppose per Tomer. --Ivar (talk) 17:20, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Oppose as Tomer and Ivar. -- Joydeep Talk 18:16, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Oppose second bird (from above) is blurred in motion. If it wasn't so, I would have voted "support" — Stas1995 (talk) 17:00, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
SupportOutstandingly sharp! One in action is no problem.--Earth100 (talk) 14:33, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
File:Monumento al Perro Nevado.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 3 Jun 2013 at 22:48:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info All by Rjcastillo -- Rjcastillo (talk) 22:48, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Rjcastillo (talk) 22:48, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Володимир Ф (talk) 05:44, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Really I don't like it. --Llorenzi (talk) 11:47, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Comment I think not helps your comment. Explain your reasoning to improve my skills. Thanks for reviews. --Rjcastillo (talk) 13:05, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Oppose A nice documentary image, but imho the very foggy air and sky leads to missing contrast. Partly the missing contrast could be fixed but all in all the light is not sufficient for a featured picture. Sometimes foggy air can transport a certain (mystic) message but with the motive at hand I would expect a colorful and brilliant image which is not possible under this conditions. --Tuxyso (talk) 17:58, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
File:Passiflora edulis flower in Hong Kong Mar 9 2013.JPG, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2013 at 13:58:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by User:Earth100 - uploaded by User:Earth100 - nominated by User:Earth100 -- Earth100 (talk) 13:58, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Support --Earth100 (talk) 13:58, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Oppose unsharp at full resolution. Tomer T (talk) 15:46, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Per Tomer - unsharp. shouldn't be QI either, don't know how it got QI status. Also it is not a very flattering image of this flower, consider for instance this image. --SuperJew (talk) 19:58, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Comment was promoted here by Bgag with the comment Good quality. --SuperJew (talk) 20:01, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Comment also other images of this user which have QI status are rather low quality. See images: Ipomoea cairica, Passion fruit, Passiflora coccinea, Bombax ceiba. --SuperJew (talk) 20:06, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Artifacts and sharpened noise at full resolution. Poor technical quality. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 23:08, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
File:Pillnitz Labe 2012 3.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2013 at 21:37:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Karelj -- Karelj (talk) 21:37, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Karelj (talk) 21:37, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Neutral This is a just quality picture, but not FP for me. — Stas1995 (talk) 16:46, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Good Quality, but missing wow, sorry --Arcalino (talk) 17:54, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
File:Rosa Kardinal.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 4 Jun 2013 at 06:49:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info All by Laitche -- Laitche (talk) 06:50, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Laitche (talk) 06:50, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 16:33, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Support--Earth100 (talk) 14:29, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Alternative (Crop)
[edit]Support -- Laitche (talk) 10:56, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Support--Earth100 (talk) 14:29, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Alternative2 (Tone)
[edit]Info Derivative by Keraunoscopia
Support -- Laitche (talk) 10:56, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Support--Earth100 (talk) 14:29, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
File:Walter Laki 1.JPG, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2013 at 15:47:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by AleXXw - uploaded by AleXXw - nominated by AleXXw -- AleXXw 15:47, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Support -- AleXXw 15:47, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2013 at 21:45:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info Panoramic view over the Westphalian medieval town of Warburg
created by Tuxyso - uploaded by Tuxyso - nominated by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 21:45, 23 May 2013 (UTC)Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 21:45, 23 May 2013 (UTC)
Oppose It's a well-chosen image of an (ahem) echt-German townscape, but ... while it has great EV for this it is also compositionally unexceptional (the technical way of saying "no wow") and in fact some of the foliage in the front is a little unsharp. Lovely color, I will say. Daniel Case (talk) 00:25, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
- I understand your first point. "No wow" is a subjective matter, unfortunately I cannot change it - In the past I've also opposed due to "too less Wow", but most of these cases were less important single buildings photographed at neutral light. The point with the foliage is unclear to me: The foliage at the left front has nothing to do with the main motive (panoramic view) but has only the function to get an impression of the spatial distances - I see no reason why these should be as sharp as the houses. Does the term echt-German really exist?--Tuxyso (talk) 05:40, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
The underexposed foliage on left top and bottom is distracting. I prefer this AOV. JKadavoor Jee 07:02, 24 May 2013 (UTC)Oppose
- Sorry, but the panorama you linked to is not convincing, especially regarding quality, composition is also not concvincing. I took a similar shot but unfortunately with distracting cars. I cannot really understand why the reviewers here focus on the (unimportant) leafs rather than on the motive. The leafs function only as framing to the panoramic view - this a quite common shooting techique (see comment above regarding spatial distances).
Done Nonetheless I have slightly brightened the leafs in the foreground. --Tuxyso (talk) 07:21, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
- Leaves are OK now. I like your other composition more; the green foliage is well distributed than center weighted here. (Although I'm a nature lover; I have much tolerance to other fellow humans and their basic necessities like cars. (I don't think the world looks more beautiful without distracting humans and their toys.) JKadavoor Jee 11:35, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
- File:Stadtpanorama-Warburg-2013.jpg is added to Warburg. Could you add the sight notes as in File:Stadtpanorama Warburg.JPG, please? JKadavoor Jee 11:42, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Done I've added multi language notes to both files. --Tuxyso (talk) 14:55, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
- File:Stadtpanorama-Warburg-2013.jpg is added to Warburg. Could you add the sight notes as in File:Stadtpanorama Warburg.JPG, please? JKadavoor Jee 11:42, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
- Leaves are OK now. I like your other composition more; the green foliage is well distributed than center weighted here. (Although I'm a nature lover; I have much tolerance to other fellow humans and their basic necessities like cars. (I don't think the world looks more beautiful without distracting humans and their toys.) JKadavoor Jee 11:35, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, but the panorama you linked to is not convincing, especially regarding quality, composition is also not concvincing. I took a similar shot but unfortunately with distracting cars. I cannot really understand why the reviewers here focus on the (unimportant) leafs rather than on the motive. The leafs function only as framing to the panoramic view - this a quite common shooting techique (see comment above regarding spatial distances).
Support Can´t follow the arguments above, technical good panorama of a nice european town worth FP -- Arcalino (talk) 12:39, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 16:20, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 18:37, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:07, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 16:53, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Support -— George Chernilevsky talk 22:18, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Support,--Jacopo188 (talk) 08:55, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 19:59, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jun 2013 at 13:40:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 13:40, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 13:40, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 16:19, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:10, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 19:49, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Support --Cayambe (talk) 13:03, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Support --Doucus (talk) 14:17, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Support --Karelj (talk) 21:43, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Support --JLPC (talk) 17:41, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Oppose bad quality (unsharp, seems to be (excessively) noise reduced esp. in the middle of the image) --kaʁstn Disk/Cat 10:41, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Info Sorry, no noise reduction was done. This are old, historical windows, not in the best condition, especially that in the middle. There are some more in the church and they are originally not arranged in this way. I mounted the best of them in this way, others are damaged or only partly visible.--Llez (talk) 15:41, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
- Old windows? There's no information of the date, do you know it? It doesn't seem that old. --Selbymay (talk) 06:14, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
- As far as I know, 16.th century --Llez (talk) 10:19, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
- Well, I'm afraid not, the colors and the style are modern. Even if one may, hardly, recognize Mantegna's painting in the main window, this is a modern stained glass. --Selbymay (talk) 20:04, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
- As far as I know, 16.th century --Llez (talk) 10:19, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
- Old windows? There's no information of the date, do you know it? It doesn't seem that old. --Selbymay (talk) 06:14, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Support Tomer T (talk) 16:34, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Oppose As kaʁstn. B.p. 07:18, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Oppose - sorry, have to agree with Carschten. In full view, big parts look like digitally zoomed to me. Imo it has nothing to do with the condition of the windows. --A.Savin 12:43, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Per above. --JaviP96 21:50, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Great Lpele (talk) 23:02, 1 June 2013 (UTC)Support
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2013 at 07:52:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Moroder - uploaded by Moroder - nominated by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:52, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:52, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2013 at 12:20:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info Lutheran Cathedral, Helsinki Senate Square, Helsinki, Finnland. All by me, Poco2 12:20, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Poco2 12:20, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 12:32, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 10:22, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 15:54, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Julian H. (talk/files) 18:21, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JLPC (talk) 08:22, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --The Photographer (talk) 12:45, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 15:40, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Böhringer (talk) 09:50, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --ArildV (talk) 16:01, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --патриот8790Say whatever you want 18:24, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2013 at 14:49:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Kyores - uploaded by Kyores - nominated by Kyores -- Kyores (talk) 14:49, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Kyores (talk) 14:49, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Very nice picture! ;-) --Nickispeaki (talk) 21:33, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose - Duck not in its natural habitat, background distracting.Crisco 1492 (talk) 19:23, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Comment the duck not being in its natural habitat does not adversely affect the photo; in fact, in quite an opposite fashion it contributes to the artistic and scientific value of the piece. the duck is standing on paving stones, placed by humans. creatures such as mallards have quite happily integrated themselves into our artificial world. thus, in a way, these paving stones are no less this mallard's habitat than the man-made canal on which it swims. 86.172.85.134 20:38, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Nothing special for an FP. Problems with sharpness, magenta
chromatic aberration. Unpleasant shadow. --A.Savin 23:25, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose -- As above + poor composition and lighting.Fotoriety (talk) 02:46, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Head is out of focus. It is neither a QI. --Tuxyso (talk) 09:14, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination. I took a better look after reading these comments. Kyores (talk) 14:28, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2013 at 17:28:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created & uploaded by Selbymay - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 17:28, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 17:28, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Joydeep Talk 18:12, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 18:23, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 21:48, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Ivar (talk) 05:55, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Kikos (talk) 19:19, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:50, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JLPC (talk) 08:21, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 15:39, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Very Good! -- Arcalino (talk) 19:48, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Comment Thanks for this nomination, Tomer T! --Selbymay (talk) 06:45, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Böhringer (talk) 09:50, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --ArildV (talk) 16:08, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --патриот8790Say whatever you want 18:24, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2013 at 06:24:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Moroder - uploaded by Moroder - nominated by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:24, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 06:24, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Support Very nice. There's just a white halo around the roof, easy to fix. --Selbymay (talk) 08:10, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 10:40, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Support Tomer T (talk) 11:22, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Support --Rjcastillo (talk) 13:35, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 13:52, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Support Lovely --Llorenzi (talk) 14:47, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 16:33, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 21:49, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Support --The High Fin Sperm Whale 23:07, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Support --MehdiTalk 05:07, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Support --Julian H. (talk/files) 06:41, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Support --Böhringer (talk) 12:19, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Support--Earth100 (talk) 14:26, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Support--JLPC (talk) 21:01, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Support Poco2 08:54, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Support--Aftab1995 (talk) 18:26, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose The perspective looks strange to me. There's something about the corrections that have been applied to it that makes the Basilica look like it's leaning to the right. Or maybe it's in the original image. It may just be me, but if I give it a rotate of about 0.8 of a degree, it looks more 'natural'. Cheers, Ben Aveling 07:09, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 6 Jun 2013 at 18:36:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Kurz and Allison - uploaded and nominated by Mmxx -- ■ MMXX talk 18:36, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Support ■ MMXX talk 18:36, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 17:54, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Support — Emilia (talk) 02:48, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 12:02, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Gildir (talk) 15:03, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 19:39, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:55, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Strong oppose Overexposed, not good restored.--Claus (talk) 13:33, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
- Please, don't use in the future templates like {{strong oppose}} or {{weak support}}, the bot doesn't recognize them. Alternatively do it like this: '''Strong''' {{oppose}} Poco2 07:59, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Tomer T (talk) 13:50, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
File:C4 photosynthesis is really complicated.svg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2013 at 22:57:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info Some plants such as corn have evolved some modifications to photosynthesis, increasing its efficiency by separating the light reactions (oxygen generating phase) from the dark reactions (sugar generating phase). One modification is C4 photosynthesis (The NADP-ME version is depicted here). C4 photosynthesis is complicated. I made this poster to make it slightly more understandable. :)
Sources
[1], [2], [3], [4], File:C4 photosynthesis NADP-ME type.svg, and the C4 photosynthesis article.
A simpler version, without scary chemistry can be found at File:C4 photosynthesis is less complicated.svg. All by Kelvinsong — Kelvinsong (talk) 22:57, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Support — Kelvinsong (talk) 22:57, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Support --MehdiTalk 05:07, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 09:03, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Support--Earth100 (talk) 14:34, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Support High E.V. Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 20:08, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Honestly spoken: Yes, this picture is on the one hand too complicated (much text, not very clearly represented - one have too look very closely), but on the other side it is not sufficient presented in a biochemical way, e. g. the PEPCK- and the ME-NAD-typ are neglected impo). What we have here is maybe a good picture for a poster, but I think for a wiki-article it is not suitable. --Yikrazuul (talk) 17:09, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
- I focused on the NADP-ME type, because in previous diagrams, whenever I tried to do a "generic" version of a pathway, it never turned out well. This time I just did corn NADP-ME because corn is the most well known C4 plant (other than crabgrass) and the NADP-ME version is the simplest. Also, pictures on Commons are not just for wikipedia articles. That is an EnFP criterion, not a Commons FP one.—Kelvinsong (talk) 17:48, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
- Do not get me wrong: I like your pictures, that is true. You have well proven your outstanding craftsmanship of difficult pictures. But this one goes a little bit too far in a certain way as mentioned, maybe even a little bit too simplified and hence misleading. --Yikrazuul (talk) 20:30, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
- Alright, do you want me to throw in all the other small details like the pyrophosphate, aspartate, etc? Maybe throw in the PEPCK and NADME mitochondrion in those variant pathways too? Because what happens when you do that is you start to get a lot of asterices and a lot of branching and sidenotes. Take a look at a standard picture of a plant or animal cell in a textbook. There is a lot of diversity in cell types, but you don't see acrosomes or T-tubules or statoliths in those pictures, because you illustrate the simplest version of a structure or pathway that exists.—Kelvinsong (talk) 14:17, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Child cast net in Laguna de Raya.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 8 Jun 2013 at 02:32:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info All by -- The Photographer (talk) 02:32, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Support -- The Photographer (talk) 02:32, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Support Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 20:06, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 19:39, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Support Poco2 08:54, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose nice photo but the person is too small in this composition and image size is too small as this kind of pic and there is no reason to featured except color. --Laitche (talk) 10:42, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
- Size is not the most important, but the composition. If we go into a career of sensors, photographers surely all underdeveloped countries, to stay out. --The Photographer (talk) 02:15, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- I was just voting on the photo, if I have to consider about circumstances of photographers then I can't vote. I think... --Laitche (talk) 05:08, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- I'm talking about the size of the photo, not the circumstances of the photographers. I'll explain. If I had taken this photo with a D800, it is likely that the size and has not been a problem, however, the value of a d800 is equivalent to the price of a big house in my country. Where I'm going with all this?, Attach too much importance to the size automatically kills any chance of a photograph of an underdeveloped country. Then, the number of people with FP becomes elite. In summary, the current requirements are sufficient, plus size probably go over there, but not yet. --The Photographer (talk) 12:21, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- What I'm saying is that about the size as this kind of pic not all pics and image size is not big point to oppose. I think they don't need D800's pixels (7,360 × 4,912). I would support when a photo is good if the size is small like this one ✿ --Laitche (talk) 13:49, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- ps. I'm opposing this one. This one was taken by D800E :) --Laitche (talk) 14:26, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- I think I understand your point of view, thank you very much for talking with me ;) グラシアス --The Photographer (talk) 15:13, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
- Size is not the most important, but the composition. If we go into a career of sensors, photographers surely all underdeveloped countries, to stay out. --The Photographer (talk) 02:15, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Per Laitche. --Yikrazuul (talk) 16:56, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Cortes del Condado de Wabash, Wabash, Indiana, Estados Unidos, 2012-11-12, DD 01.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2013 at 17:53:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info Wabash County Courthouse, Wabash, Indiana, USA. All by me, Poco2 17:53, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Poco2 17:53, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Joydeep Talk 18:12, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Well done. Some distortion problems (imagen se alarga en la parte de arriba) --The Photographer (talk) 12:43, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 15:39, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Support technical good work! -- Arcalino (talk) 19:46, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Kadellar (talk) 22:47, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 22:02, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Great detail. I suppose I'd prefer a tighter crop but who am I to argue with this? Daniel Case (talk) 03:53, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Böhringer (talk) 09:49, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --патриот8790Say whatever you want 18:24, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 00:35, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 13:58, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Laguna de Raya.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jun 2013 at 13:07:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info all by -- The Photographer (talk) 13:07, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 09:04, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 19:54, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Support --Karelj (talk) 20:50, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Lanzarote 1 Luc Viatour.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jun 2013 at 15:39:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Luc Viatour - uploaded by Luc Viatour - nominated by Mono -- —Mono 15:39, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Support -- —Mono 15:39, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Support Very nice! -- Arcalino (talk) 19:47, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 23:13, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Not that good for me. The shadows in foreground are disturbing, and I suspect some sharpening halo between the hill and the sky. The distortion looks not natural... Well, not a FP, in my opinion.--Jebulon (talk) 23:16, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Support --Karelj (talk) 21:41, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 16:47, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Support Tomer T (talk) 19:32, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Support,--Jacopo188 (talk) 08:55, 28 May 2013 (UTC)
Support A little too much in shadow, but overall very good. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:42, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 16:33, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Good sharpness, saturation is a little high but still ok. --Julian H. (talk/files) 18:10, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Support
- Per The High Fin Sperm Whale, support if the border is fixed.
Oppose --Julian H. (talk/files) 16:07, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
- Per The High Fin Sperm Whale, support if the border is fixed.
Oppose I very much like the image a lot but there is some sort of one-pixel wide border around the image. If this is fixed I will support it. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 23:10, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Support--Earth100 (talk) 14:32, 30 May 2013 (UTC)
Support In spite of the improvable lighting Poco2 08:55, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Observatorium Mays 2013.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2013 at 08:46:16 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info Observatorium (Observatory), Södra Hammarbyhamnen, Stockholm and a beautiful nordic summer night. Observatorium was created by artist Gunilla Bandolin in 2002. Material: Canadian oak, fiber optics. In the background Södermalm and Sofia kyrka. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 08:46, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- ArildV (talk) 08:46, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Poco2 08:53, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 09:09, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Posterization in shadow. --Laitche (talk) 09:47, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Support new version Nice atmosphere in spite of a bit posterization and false color ✿ --Laitche (talk) 04:32, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
per Laitche. --Julian H. (talk/files) 18:05, 1 June 2013 (UTC)Oppose
Support Not good but ok now, the rest is really nice. --Julian H. (talk/files) 08:22, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Info I uploaded a new version.--ArildV (talk) 19:00, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 21:46, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 10:26, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Nice mood --Ras67 (talk) 15:26, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Daniel Case (talk) 03:47, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --патриот8790Say whatever you want 18:26, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Repairing of the Washington Monument.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2013 at 16:10:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by U.S. Department of Agriculture - uploaded by Slick - nominated by Slick -- Slick (talk) 16:10, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Slick (talk) 16:10, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Comment Appears to be rather noisy/unsharp at full resolution and the crop at the bottom is a bit too tight for my taste. Might a good candidate for Commons:Valued image candidates, however. --El Grafo (talk) 09:13, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Too tight crop. --Kikos (talk) 19:21, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Too tight crop. --Claus (talk) 13:28, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Yosemite meadows 2004-09-04.jpg (delist), delisted
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jun 2013 at 22:17:58
Info Unsharp, bad lighting (Original nomination; previous delist discussion)
Delist -- Tomer T (talk) 22:17, 24 May 2013 (UTC)
Delist , if not for the quality then for the composition, cutting off tree and hill on top with all the grass on the bottom. --Julian H. (talk/files) 14:45, 25 May 2013 (UTC)
Delist -- Arcalino (talk) 10:16, 26 May 2013 (UTC)
Delist — Stas1995 (talk) 16:27, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Delist --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:41, 29 May 2013 (UTC)
Delist Kruusamägi (talk) 19:55, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Delist --Kadellar (talk) 12:40, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Confirmed results: Result: 7 delist, 0 keep, 0 neutral => delisted. /Poco2 07:44, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
File:2013-06-02 23-06-34-Amaranthus-61f.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2013 at 07:48:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 07:48, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 07:48, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose We do not know how you look. There is no scale or Spotted on the picture even less about the caption. If it comes in FP should at least treat captions. The species is not known. Technically I continue to not understand, how you can do 61 images, while 3 or 4 would have the same result. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:22, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
- Wrong : 3 or 4 don't have the same result because the DoF is short. --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:36, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose as above -- Arcalino (talk) 19:38, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
File:2013-06-02 23-15-44-Amaranthus-57f.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2013 at 07:47:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 07:47, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 07:47, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose We do not know how you look. There is no scale or Spotted on the picture even less about the caption. If it comes in FP should at least treat captions. The species is not known. Technically I continue to not understand, how you can do 57 images, while 3 or 4 would have the same result. In this image, a frame on net zonnes be interresting. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:47, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
- Wrong : 3 or 4 don't have the same result because the DoF is short. --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:36, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Central gate of the Milan Cathedral.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2013 at 13:09:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Kiril Simeonovski - uploaded by Kiril Simeonovski - nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:09, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 13:09, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose A little low technical quality (lack of sharpness). The perspective distortion could be corrected. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:11, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
- While I agree the detail on the gate isn't good enough for FP (compare File:Duomo Out S5.jpg), the perspective "distortion" can't be "corrected". The top of the gate is further away and features at the top are observed from below. No mathematical algorithm can change the viewpoint to half-way up the gate or further back. Such software fixes only really work with essentially flat subjects or where the degree of correction required is small. The solution is to take the photograph from futher back (and higher-up if possible), though that isn't easy with a popular tourist spot. And this gate is so detailed, that a stitched image would be beneficial. Colin (talk) 17:32, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose as above. A solution could be using a tilt/shift lens -- Arcalino (talk) 19:35, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
- He he. Excuse me for labouring the point but no, that won't help either. Sure, the verticals with be straight and the focus would be sharp from top-to-bottom, but the viewpoint of features towards the top of the image will still be "from below" rather than "straight on". One could probably get away with this for the ironwork of the gate but not the 3D surround. Also, do you realise that your "solution" (T/S lens + full-frame camera) costs approximately 100x the equipment used here? :-) If one can't get further back to take the whole pic straight-on then other ideas are making the perspective a feature (shoot from real close up) to emphasise the height, or just focus on an interesting part of the gate. Colin (talk) 21:30, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
- I completely agree with Colin: Artificially rectangulating (is that even a real word?) the gate would certainly do more harm than good. Apart from that, lack of sharpness etc. prevents me from dupporting →
Oppose --El Grafo (talk) 11:10, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Bad Kreuznach - Altstadt, Mannheimerstraße.JPG, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 9 Jun 2013 at 15:16:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 15:16, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 15:16, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
Nice color balance for a by night pictureLpele (talk) 22:47, 1 June 2013 (UTC)Support
- Not enough contributions. B.p. 05:33, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Nice! Arcalino (talk) 10:28, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Support--Maire (talk) 19:19, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Termitenhuegel-kenia.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2013 at 05:33:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Kreuzschnabel - uploaded by Kreuzschnabel - nominated by Kreuzschnabel -- Kreuzschnabel (talk) 05:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Kreuzschnabel (talk) 05:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Poco2 08:53, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 09:10, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
--Julian H. (talk/files) 18:04, 1 June 2013 (UTC)Oppose A lot of wow but too much CA. Wouldn't be that bad if the main subject wasn't on the edge where CAs are really strong.
Info >You’re right, there was some CA in the lower left corner at the "root" of the mound. Fixed & new version uploaded. --Kreuzschnabel (talk) 17:31, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Yes, better now. Thank you. --Julian H. (talk/files) 17:40, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 21:47, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose sorry, bad crop. --Alchemist-hp (talk) 09:54, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2013 at 07:11:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info all by me -- Hockei (talk) 07:11, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Hockei (talk) 07:11, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Poco2 08:53, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 09:10, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Comment May be a bit much sharpend and remove the spots getting better. --Laitche (talk) 09:58, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Neutral tending to oppose, because of the tight crop at the bottom. --Kadellar (talk) 12:37, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Info This is the end of the picture, so that it's not possible to expand it there. --Hockei (talk) 12:55, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Support but as Kadellar, bottom crop could be better. -- Joydeep Talk 18:12, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 21:47, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 09:18, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Imperial Academy of Arts.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2013 at 08:04:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info Imperial Academy of Arts in Saint Petersburg. Built in 1764-1789 by Jean-Baptiste Vallin de la Mothe and Alexander F. Kokorinov
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Florstein -- Alex Florstein (talk) 08:04, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Abstain as author. -- Alex Florstein (talk) 08:04, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 09:09, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Neutral a bit over exposure --Laitche (talk) 09:50, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Comment Histogram for this photo here. There are no overexposed areas. --Alex Florstein (talk) 11:22, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
- I believe my eyes than histogram, left side of pillars are a bit overexposed :) --Laitche (talk) 11:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
- Okay, I'll believe it too. :) New version with softer highlights uploaded. --Alex Florstein (talk) 12:16, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
- From the first I didn't oppose, may be before version has more dynamic-range than new version, may be I shouldn't have voted neutral, sorry Alex and please believe yourself ✿ --Laitche (talk) 13:10, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
- Okay, I'll believe it too. :) New version with softer highlights uploaded. --Alex Florstein (talk) 12:16, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
- I believe my eyes than histogram, left side of pillars are a bit overexposed :) --Laitche (talk) 11:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Joydeep Talk 18:12, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Good quality image, but nothing special to be featured picture. --Karelj (talk) 20:53, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 19:53, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Neutral Quality is good, the water is really nice with regard to color and surface structure. But I would crop MUCH tighter at the top (about 50% of the current size). --Tuxyso (talk) 06:38, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Mediterranean Closure 3D Animation - M.Mantero.ogv, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2013 at 11:26:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Manuel Mantero & Daniel Garcia-Castellanos - uploaded by gaianauta - nominated by gaianauta -- Gaianauta (talk) 11:26, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Gaianauta (talk) 11:26, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Very cool-looking. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:27, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Hockei (talk) 07:42, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 21:47, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Very interesting! -- Arcalino (talk) 10:25, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Comment based on a nature paper, created by the authors themselves → should be "wow" enough ;-) Why don't you go ahead and add a reference to that paper to the file description? Just one "problem": The source says only CC-BY-SA, so we would either need the GFDL to be removed from our file description page or a confirmation for that license from the authors (e.g. via Commons:OTRS). And maybe change the license to Creative Commons at Youtube. When that's resolved I'll be happy to support. --El Grafo (talk) 17:08, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Onion flower.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2013 at 12:14:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created, uploaded and nominated by sfu
Abstain -- sfu (talk) 12:14, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Schmucksalmler Hyphessobrycon bentosi.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2013 at 11:15:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created &uploaded by Holleday - nominated by Citron -- Citron (talk) 11:15, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Citron (talk) 11:15, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 13:49, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Pine✉ 05:21, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2013 at 12:26:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info Line out during the game of the 2013 Women's European Qualification Tournament for WRWC France 2014 between Italy and Spain 7-38(b). Created, uploaded and nominated by Kadellar -- Kadellar (talk) 12:26, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Kadellar (talk) 12:26, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Tomer T (talk) 12:38, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:51, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Support nice. --PierreSelim (talk) 20:54, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Poco2 19:47, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Tsui (talk) 20:38, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Support--JLPC (talk) 10:08, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Comment Thank you all for your support. --Kadellar (talk) 19:25, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Colias hyale, Goldene Acht 04.JPG, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 Jun 2013 at 21:10:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info Colias hyale, Goldene Acht; all by -- Böhringer (talk) 21:10, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Böhringer (talk) 21:10, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Joydeep Talk 18:11, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Maybe a bit to dark. --Hockei (talk) 19:38, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Comment Agree, too dark Poco2 19:47, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 10:23, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 08:10, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:51, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Support good enough. --Pine✉ 05:21, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 09:19, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2013 at 04:08:04 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info one of 400 surviving drawings of the original 10,000 used to make the animated film Gertie the Dinosaur (1914)
Info created by Winsor McCay - uploaded by Curly Turkey - nominated by Curly Turkey -- Curly Turkey (talk) 04:08, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Info Library of Congress image
Support -- Curly Turkey (talk) 04:08, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:58, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Support although I think this could do with a bit of restoration work (I keep meaning to get around to it...)Crisco 1492 (talk) 19:25, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Ras67 (talk) 00:53, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Le bois Protat.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2013 at 23:16:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by an anonymous mediaeval artist - uploaded by Curly Turkey - nominated by Curly Turkey -- Curly Turkey (talk) 23:16, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Curly Turkey (talk) 23:16, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Very useful picture : it's the oldest surviving woodcut in the Western world. But I vote too late ! It's too bad ! -- Trace (talk) 11:57, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Orchis tridentata-Blueten-2.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2013 at 07:34:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info Orchis tridentata (Three-toothed orchid). I've photographed this beautiful orchid not in a botanic garden but in nature on a meadow of Warburger Börde
created by Tuxyso - uploaded by Tuxyso - nominated by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 07:34, 2 June 2013 (UTC)Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 07:34, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Support More wow than all the buildings here together. B.p. 11:41, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:50, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 19:51, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Böhringer (talk) 09:50, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --патриот8790Say whatever you want 18:24, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Support nice simple composition. --Kadellar (talk) 20:50, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 09:20, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 11:11, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Trapping of three councilmen of Dutch East Indies.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2013 at 19:21:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Reinier Vinkeles and Jacobus Buys - uploaded by Crisco 1492 with light restoration work - nominated by Crisco 1492 -- Crisco 1492 (talk) 19:21, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Crisco 1492 (talk) 19:21, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2013 at 18:53:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created & uploaded by Lmbuga - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 18:53, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 18:53, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 14:15, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JLPC (talk) 10:04, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 13:22, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
File:England Great Army map.svg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2013 at 18:29:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by User:Hel-hama - uploaded by User:Hel-hama - nominated by User:Hel-hama -- Hel-hama (talk) 18:29, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Hel-hama (talk) 18:29, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
File:NASA helmet for T-38 Speyer front top.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2013 at 18:24:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Julian Herzog - uploaded by Julian Herzog - nominated by Pine -- Pine✉ 18:24, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Pine✉ 18:24, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Support and thanks for the nomination. --Julian H. (talk/files) 16:45, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose No wow.--Claus (talk) 13:27, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Gildir (talk) 22:08, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
- weak
Oppose lack of wow-factor, busy background and reflections on the glasses are rather disturbing. However, I think it would make a very nice candidate for Commons:Valued image candidates in the Category:NASA T-38. --El Grafo (talk) 08:54, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
File:New born Frisian red white calf.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2013 at 09:05:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Uberprutser - uploaded by Uberprutser - nominated by Uberprutser -- Uberprutser (talk) 09:05, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Kikos (talk) 11:23, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Support I can't resist it--ArildV (talk) 16:10, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Support —Bruce1eetalk 05:55, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Nice capture, high quality, good composition. --Tuxyso (talk) 06:31, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 06:40, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 13:57, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Nice, but can we have the species name please?? --Kadellar (talk) 19:29, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Slick (talk) 20:18, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Ras67 (talk) 00:52, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:37, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Idobi (talk) 07:34, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 16:49, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Maire (talk) 19:25, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 09:21, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JLPC (talk) 10:05, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
- Pile-on
Support Illustrates the concept of maternal love without overdoing the "Awww ..." factor. Daniel Case (talk) 05:44, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Rembrandt van Rijn-De Nachtwacht-1642.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2013 at 00:41:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Rembrandt - uploaded by Wiebew - nominated by Kiril Simeonovski -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 00:41, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 00:41, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 07:28, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Support good work --Arcalino (talk) 19:44, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 08:08, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Too small.--Claus (talk) 13:25, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
- The main problem with that image is that the colours are darker and do not represent the painting originally. Another problem may be the fact that some browsers will need some time to run it properly.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:33, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
- Re:browsers: Why? That’s MediaWiki job to thumbnail it to whatever size is desired ; and there is ZoomViewer as well. Jean-Fred (talk) 13:20, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
- The main problem with that image is that the colours are darker and do not represent the painting originally. Another problem may be the fact that some browsers will need some time to run it properly.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 21:33, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2013 at 22:12:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by NASA Sr. Contract Photographer Bill Ingalls - uploaded and nominated by Ras67 (talk) 22:12, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Info A telephoto lens shot of a bomb sniffing dog ahead of the Soyuz TMA-09M spacecraft as it is rolled out.
Support The Depth of field and the slight vignetting give this picture the right mood. -- Ras67 (talk) 22:12, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Support per nom --El Grafo (talk) 11:12, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Gildir (talk) 15:16, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 15:42, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose no wow to me. Tomer T (talk) 04:55, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Support—Kelvinsong (talk) 20:54, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Karelj (talk) 21:11, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2013 at 11:55:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Léna - uploaded by User:Léna - nominated by Léna -- Léna (talk) 11:55, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Info Stained glass window in the former Longwy steel factory by Louis Majorelle. Artistic value : Longwy steel factory's stained glasses are the only stained glasses by major artist Louis Majorelle and are a remarquable example of Art Déco. Historical value : the stained glasses illustrate the history of steel factory which had a huge impact on the area. Léna (talk) 11:55, 6 June 2013 (UTC)]]
Support -- Léna (talk) 11:55, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JLPC (talk) 20:52, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Tomer T (talk) 05:07, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 06:39, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 10:43, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 13:57, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
The current description, especially the license tag is not sufficient. It completely negelects the copyright status of the window itself. If the window was created before 1923, {{PD-old-auto-1923|1926}} might be the right choice for the window. Please add the year of creation to the description so we can figure out what template fits best here. If you wish to keep an additional CC-0 tag for your part of the work, that should be fine I guess. I have also added {{Creator:Louis Majorelle}} to the "author=" field (in addition to your name). BTW: All this basically applies to all the files in the category. Sorry for being such a pedant – I'll be happy to support as soon as that's resolved. --El Grafo (talk) 14:06, 7 June 2013 (UTC)Oppose for the moment:
- While I agree with you that it's not clearly described that the artwork is PD, I'm pretty sure it's simple to fix with {{Art photo}} and Commons:International copyright quick reference guide :-). PierreSelim (talk) 14:50, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
- I have no doubt that this is fixable – would already have done that myself if the year of creation had been available. I wouldn't even insist on {{Art photo}} – looks like a real monster of a template ;-) --El Grafo (talk) 15:12, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks for pointing this issue out. Actually, it is not {{PD-1923}}, since the stained glass were created in 1928 (and designed / conceived earlier). However, Majorelle, the copyright holder, died in 1926, so the artwork was in public domain in France in 1996 (as early as 1985 because at that time PD was 50 years postmortem). So PD-1996. Léna (talk) 19:37, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
- Great! I've changed the template to {{PD-old-auto-1996}}, so that the copyright status in France (and other countries) is also mentioned.
Support of course, as promised above. --El Grafo (talk) 21:09, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
- Great! I've changed the template to {{PD-old-auto-1996}}, so that the copyright status in France (and other countries) is also mentioned.
- While I agree with you that it's not clearly described that the artwork is PD, I'm pretty sure it's simple to fix with {{Art photo}} and Commons:International copyright quick reference guide :-). PierreSelim (talk) 14:50, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Ras67 (talk) 00:58, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 10:36, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Maire (talk) 19:23, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Wallace at University of Alabama edit2.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2013 at 18:22:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Warren K. Leffler - uploaded by Calliopejen1 - nominated by Patriot8790 -- патриот8790Say whatever you want 18:22, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- патриот8790Say whatever you want 18:22, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
File:YAL-1A Airborne Laser unstowed.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2013 at 18:42:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by the United States Missile Defense Agency - uploaded by Pmsyyz - nominated by Pine -- Pine✉ 18:42, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Pine✉ 18:42, 2 June 2013 (UTC)
Comment Great shot, but I don't like the composition: too much sky above and below the airplane, while it could benefit from some additional space to the right and left. I've nominated a cropped version as an alternative (see below). --El Grafo (talk) 09:02, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
- I like the alt. Thanks. --Pine✉ 05:47, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Alternative
[edit]Info created by the United States Missile Defense Agency, cropped version by User:El Grafo --El Grafo (talk) 09:02, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --El Grafo (talk) 09:02, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Pine✉ 05:47, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Support better version --Llorenzi (talk) 21:35, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 08:09, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Claus (talk) 13:26, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Julian H. (talk/files) 18:20, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:07, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 22:00, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Lovely gradient in back. Daniel Case (talk) 03:51, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 13:58, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Godot13 (talk) 03:49, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Bahá'í Terraces at night.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2013 at 09:20:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created & uploaded by Ig1208 - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 09:20, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 09:20, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Ehm, nice name for picture, clearly understandable, easy to remember... :-) --Karelj (talk) 20:59, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
I wanted to use Template:Rename, but looking at Template:File renaming reasons/en - there is no renaming reason that will fit this case.Tomer T (talk) 07:51, 4 June 2013 (UTC)- Requested for a name change now. Tomer T (talk) 07:55, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
- Changed now by Myrabella, thanks. Tomer T (talk) 08:02, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 16:28, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Support lovely picture. --Llorenzi (talk) 21:35, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Too dark.--Claus (talk) 13:26, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Poco2 22:07, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Danilishe lake view 1.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2013 at 10:35:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Nino Verde - uploaded by Nino Verde - nominated by Nino Verde -- Nino Verde (talk) 10:35, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Nino Verde (talk) 10:35, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --A.Savin 11:42, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose I do not really see what is featureable here - possibly due to missing background information. But from a photographic viewpoint this is "only" a good photograph of a lake with its bank - imho nothing special, same as this, this, this or this. I also do not see interesting light or a real eye-catcher. Nonetheless the post-processing (color, noise management on dark areas and sharpness) is quite good. --Tuxyso (talk) 12:22, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
- Normally I hate to comment FPC votes, but I must say it's a quite poor comparison. Here, we have some dramatic atmosphere due to rippled waters and heavy clouds. To me, the scenery looks like a painting. On Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural, one can see lots of much more "ordinary" shots. --A.Savin 19:20, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
- I see your point, but the photo does not work this way for me. I do not see "heavy clouds", sorry. I made a circumstantial comment instead of writing only "no wow" to explain my problems with this nomination. On FPC there are often subjective impressions which make the difference because at least 90% of the FPCs are wihtout doubt technically very good (as the nomination here). Please regard my vote as it is - as very subjective assessment. --Tuxyso (talk) 19:58, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
- Normally I hate to comment FPC votes, but I must say it's a quite poor comparison. Here, we have some dramatic atmosphere due to rippled waters and heavy clouds. To me, the scenery looks like a painting. On Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural, one can see lots of much more "ordinary" shots. --A.Savin 19:20, 3 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose I agree with Tuxyso . This contest is made to amaze us. But then I see a beautiful picture, but not surprising.--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:54, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose as other opposers -- Arcalino (talk) 19:42, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Support. I like this theme :) — Stas1995 (talk) 08:07, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Nothing featurable, IMHO. --Dey.sandip (talk) 08:29, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Nickispeaki (talk) 21:37, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Good picture, but as noted above unexceptional. Daniel Case (talk) 03:50, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
File:STS-135 final flyaround of ISS 1.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2013 at 23:16:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by NASA - uploaded by Leebrandoncremer - nominated by Craigboy
Info An image taken by the final Space Shuttle crew as they departed from the completed International Space Station, the station has been called the Space Shuttle's legacy. The space station is also seen as a stepping stone to even grander goals, such as lunar colonization.
--Craigboy (talk) 08:41, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Post-result-comment This nomination was added to Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list at 2013-06-06T10:43:02, which is only 1.5 days ago. The nomination however is much older. Something went wrong there. I thinks someone should re-nominate this and add it immediately. Other opinions? --Julian H. (talk/files) 16:31, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
- I'm having trouble renominating it.--Craigboy (talk) 06:51, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- You can't do this within this nomination, you have to create one as Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:STS-135 final flyaround of ISS 1.jpg/2 I think. --Julian H. (talk/files) 08:12, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- That worked, thank you.--Craigboy (talk) 13:38, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- You can't do this within this nomination, you have to create one as Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:STS-135 final flyaround of ISS 1.jpg/2 I think. --Julian H. (talk/files) 08:12, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Smoo Cave-Second Chamber.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2013 at 16:04:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Florian Fuchs - uploaded by Florian Fuchs - nominated by Florian Fuchs -- Florian Fuchs (talk) 16:04, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Florian Fuchs (talk) 16:04, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Tomer T (talk) 16:39, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 19:15, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Very much looks like the waterfall has had a purple brush painting over it. -- Colin (talk) 20:47, 7 June 2013 (UTC)- The picture had the "vivid color"-option in Lightroom active. I changed it back to normal. I also corrected the white balance. --Florian Fuchs (talk) 05:26, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Better now. I was surprised at the effect -- there was a clear border to the purple in the lower left of the water. There's a still little bit at the top of the fall. Is that waterfall artificially lit with coloured light? Could that explain why some parts get coloured and some are clear, and why one might get a colour-shadow along the rock edge? Colin (talk) 11:23, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, the water comes from the outside. Additionally, they installed a spotlight that illuminates the cave. --Florian Fuchs (talk) 12:07, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- The picture had the "vivid color"-option in Lightroom active. I changed it back to normal. I also corrected the white balance. --Florian Fuchs (talk) 05:26, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 06:34, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Support rather soft at the left, but great scene nevertheless. --A.Savin 11:08, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Really great. Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 11:31, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Well done, nice. --Selbymay (talk) 20:21, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 22:51, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 11:10, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Support--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:26, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Daniel Case (talk) 05:55, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 18:19, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Karelj (talk) 21:08, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
File:37 Hohe Warte.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2013 at 11:27:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info all by darkweasel94 -- darkweasel94 11:27, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- darkweasel94 11:27, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose No remaining texture in bright areas and the dark areas are unnaturally bright. Overall quality is not great, partly because the brightening of the shadows highlights the noise. --Julian H. (talk/files) 14:38, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Unnatural contrast. Or does it serve a purpose? Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 15:18, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- I have uploaded a new version which I hope is better, esp. concerning Julian Herzog's criticism. I don't quite understand Jan Arkesteijn's criticism: where exactly do you think the contrast is unnatural? darkweasel94 09:53, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Unnatural contrast --Atamari (talk) 12:36, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose per others, sorry. — Stas1995 (talk) 18:21, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Low contrast, unnatural colors : no FP, sorry. - Trace (talk) 11:38, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Question Even after staring at the photo for minutes, I still cannot understand what you all mean. Can anybody of you say where exactly the contrast or the colors look unnatural to you, and how you'd expect things to look? To me, who was actually there, the colors look totally natural. darkweasel94 22:00, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Rio limon venezuela89.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2013 at 02:52:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info Girl paddling in limón river. created by Jaimeluisgg - uploaded by Jaimeluisgg - nominated by -- The Photographer (talk) 02:52, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- The Photographer (talk) 02:52, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose No wow. Daniel Case (talk) 05:48, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose This is just a quality image, but no FP, sorry. Trace (talk) 11:39, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Artist’s impression of GJ 1214b in transit.jpg
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2013 at 10:52:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by ESO/VVV Survey/D. Minniti, uploaded/nominated by Stas1995 — Stas1995 (talk) 10:52, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 10:52, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Ras67 (talk) 00:49, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination — Stas1995 (talk) 13:43, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Life Ball 2013 - magenta carpet Celestial Tableau by Darrell Thorne and The Gods 04.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2013 at 22:54:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Tsui (talk) 22:54, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Tsui (talk) 22:54, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Very good, and unusual. --A.Savin 23:30, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Only the figure in the center is sharp. Kruusamägi (talk) 10:41, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Comment Well, yes, because that is where the focus of the whole picture lies. The other two are in the foreground, blurred, building the frame for the one in the center (further enhanced by the 'rays' of his headdress). It was supposed to be like that. --Tsui (talk) 12:36, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Support I like the idea. The two artists on the sides are clearly out of focus, they are just "the environment" of the one in the middle, who's looking at the camera. --Kadellar (talk) 19:32, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Maire (talk) 19:29, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Support--ArildV (talk) 08:15, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Lake Geneva after storm.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2013 at 09:41:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created & uploaded by Rulexip - nominated by YLSS -- YLSS (talk) 09:41, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- YLSS (talk) 09:41, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Great shot! --Tuxyso (talk) 09:47, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Too small for a landscape photo.--Claus (talk) 13:23, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Beautiful, but not enough detail. --A.Savin 23:33, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Comment Very nice in thumbnail :) --Laitche (talk) 18:25, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Support I don't think detail is important here. Tomer T (talk) 09:10, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose as above, too small size -- Arcalino (talk) 10:24, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
- Weak
Support Great mood, but the resolution is borderline. --Ras67 (talk) 01:03, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Good shot with a beautiful idea but the lightning is bad and unevenly distributed through the whole picture with underexposure in the top-left corner.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:45, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2013 at 08:33:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by PJDespa - uploaded by PJDespa - nominated by PJDespa -- PJDespa (talk) 08:33, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Original view, photography of the instantPJDespa (talk) 08:33, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose -- Not a compelling composition. Not all bridge is visible. Man is distracting (and should be cloned out of aesthetics). While photos of bridges in towns like this are useful, I think you'll have a hard job getting them featured because not many people go wow for concrete. Colin (talk) 11:54, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination-- PJDespa (talk) 19:09, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2013 at 08:40:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by PJDespa - uploaded by PJDespa - nominated by PJDespa -- PJDespa (talk) 08:40, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- PJDespa (talk) 08:40, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination --PJDespa (talk) 19:12, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
File:9207 May 2013.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2013 at 12:39:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info 2-axled double-ended work car built by ASEA IN 1907. Sinced 1994 used by Djurgårdslinjen, a heritage tramway in Stockholm, Sweden. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 12:39, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- ArildV (talk) 12:39, 5 June 2013 (UTC)
Support nice composition -- Arcalino (talk) 15:47, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --патриот8790Say whatever you want 18:23, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Support though there is something about the composition that makes it seem out of balance somehow, I really like the colors and the overall appearance. --Tsui (talk) 20:21, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Comment I don't like the crop on the bottom part.--Llorenzi (talk) 21:09, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Comment Thank you or your comments. I uploaded a new version. I cant do much about the crop. But I think the tilt was overcorrected in the first version, and when I corrected it, I got a little more space in front of the car. The new version is also uploaded full resolution.--ArildV (talk) 22:04, 6 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 06:42, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 10:42, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 13:57, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Neutral In principle, pretty nice, but I (who takes a lot of tram photos and would love to support) think it would be much better with an even slightly more appealing background than just the wall of a depot. darkweasel94 18:34, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Godot13 (talk) 03:36, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- I'm no expert, but it may be a bit tricky since you uploaded a new version and some people voted on the old version (and the new version). This may need an alternate version with the original...--Godot13 (talk) 03:44, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- I think you are allowed to make small improvements/corrections (for example, remove dustspots, perspective correction, tilt) without adding an alternate version.--ArildV (talk) 06:30, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- I'm no expert, but it may be a bit tricky since you uploaded a new version and some people voted on the old version (and the new version). This may need an alternate version with the original...--Godot13 (talk) 03:44, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Nice and interesting -- MJJR (talk) 21:09, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2013 at 22:12:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info Saint Roland's statue, Riga, Latvia. All by me, Poco2 22:12, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Poco2 22:12, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Quality ok (sharpness, contrast, colours), well composed (background, foreground). FI for me. --Caecilius Mauß (talk) 11:19, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose A useful picture but not FP. The composition is cluttered and the rear buildings are all sloping at angles. The statue is shot from too close-up and the vertical perspective "correction" has stretched the face and makes the weather vanes look odd. File:Roland Riga.jpg shows it is possible to photograph this more straight-on rather than from below. Colin (talk) 19:54, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Poco2 17:21, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Fishmonger smiling.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jun 2013 at 13:51:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info all by -- The Photographer (talk) 13:51, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Support but what about a tighter crop? (note added) --Kadellar (talk) 21:23, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Graugans-Jungtier-Schwalm-Nette-2013-02.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2013 at 06:23:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info Gray goose (Anser anser) juvenile photographed in nature park Schwalm-Nette . I thought about this alternative for nomination but imho the nominated one is better from a compositional aspect. If you are of another opinion please let me know. Please note that this is not a photo from a zoo.
created by Tuxyso - uploaded by Tuxyso - nominated by TuxysoSupport -- Tuxyso (talk) 06:23, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 09:12, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Nothing special for an FP, neither the expression nor the background are particularly good. --A.Savin 10:58, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Same : nothig special, low contrast between the bird's body and the background : this is just a quality image, no FP. -- Trace (talk) 11:46, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2013 at 07:55:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Pyb - uploaded by Pyb - nominated by Pyb -- Pyb (talk) 07:55, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Pyb (talk) 07:55, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Comment Nice timing and composition, but can I suggest two things? I'd brighten it, because it looks underexposed, the t-shirt might be ok but not the face or the hair; and I would undo a little the noise reduction, which imo is a bit too strong, I bet there's finer detail in the image. I hope this is an useful comment. --Kadellar (talk) 19:21, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for your comments. I've uploaded a new version. Pyb (talk) 03:57, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Thanks!! Deserves FP, let's wait for the votes ;) --Kadellar (talk) 19:04, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Thank you for your comments. I've uploaded a new version. Pyb (talk) 03:57, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Support the last version uploaded, I like the timing and composition. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:46, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Support--Jebulon (talk) 19:45, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support and added in the fr:WP article. --Myrabella (talk) 22:14, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Coyau (talk) 22:30, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:04, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Image:Kennedybrücke, Bonn.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2013 at 10:31:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Caecilius Mauß -- Caecilius Mauß (talk) 10:31, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose. Now enought "wow" effect, unnatural colours. — Stas1995 (talk) 18:26, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Question I´ve raised exposure and rarely contrast, dynamic and luminance of the braking lights. I haven´t changed coulours and my monitor has been calibrated last week, so there may be something wrong with my coulour rendition. May I have a hint, what coulours are unnatural? Thanks --Caecilius Mauß (talk) 20:21, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Comment As far as I'm concerned, it's not the tone of the colors or something like that, it's the lack of color. When I saw the thumbnail first, I thought it was black and white only. It looks a bit like absolutely everything in this scene was covered by a thick layer of soot. Whether one considers theat to be "artistic" or "unrealistic" is of course in the eye of the beholder. Apart from that, there is a significant amount of noise in large parts of the image – the most obvious areas are e.g. the spire in the background, the building on the left or those flag-like signs mounted to the poles along the road. --El Grafo (talk) 14:05, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Info
Done Forced Noise Reduction. @El Grafo - Thanks for reviewing. The black and white appearance is the "wow-factor" I hoped to express. I think you know the cologne lowland area with its damp climate and often hazy light conditions (e.g. File:Koeln-Bonner-bucht-panorama.jpg, File:Panorama Bonn.jpg). I took a back lighted shot to get a b/w or sepia appearance. If you look at the sky, you won´t find usual or "natural" colours, neither in mine than in the example files. This is what it often looks like in the evening in this area. (By the way, "Self-praise is no recommendation", so I pull back my own support. :) )--Caecilius Mauß (talk) 20:11, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Support The backlight makes this image featurable IMO. B.p. 13:38, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jun 2013 at 10:00:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 10:00, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 10:00, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose This is a just quality image, but no FP, sorry. — Stas1995 (talk) 18:30, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Same : just a quality image, no FP. — Trace (talk) 11:31, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination --Pudelek (talk) 09:52, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2013 at 06:15:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created & uploaded by Chensiyuan - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 06:15, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 06:15, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Raghith 10:13, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 21:13, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Trace (talk) 21:42, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Nice, good exposure, noise well managed. --Tuxyso (talk) 21:52, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 09:27, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Katrouchka90 (talk) 13:56, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 14:48, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Cayambe (talk) 05:10, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:21, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Böhringer (talk) 13:40, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 14:20, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Very good noise control. -- Joydeep Talk 18:08, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --MehdiTalk 10:10, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Poco2 10:23, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 17:35, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:05, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Support I'm a Singaporean living in Singapore, but yet I never saw/knew that Singapore ever had such beautiful fireworks. A little embarrassing. :P --Arctic Kangaroo (✉ • ✎) 05:51, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Mexico Basin 1519 map-en.svg
File:Fomalhaut planet.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2013 at 00:54:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by ESA, NASA, and L. Calcada (ESO for STScI) - uploaded by NuclearVacuum - nominated by Ras67 (talk) 00:54, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
- An artistic conception of Fomalhaut b orbiting its sun, Fomalhaut.
Support Impressive image -- Ras67 (talk) 00:54, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Idobi (talk) 07:34, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 09:10, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 10:33, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 14:14, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Comment
Info It should be stressed that it is an artistic conception and not an actual photo. --G Furtado (talk) 17:30, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Done --Ras67 (talk) 22:05, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Makes an interesting real exoplanet look like something you expect the Enterprise to visit ("Sir, that debris ... it's really a Dyson swarm.") Daniel Case (talk) 05:52, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Support—Kelvinsong (talk) 20:50, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 14:16, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Not my "artistic conception". I think it is confusing with reality.--Jebulon (talk) 19:42, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Le bois Protat - block and print.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2013 at 12:06:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Curly Turkey - uploaded by Curly Turkey - nominated by Trace -- Trace (talk) 12:06, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Useful picture : it's the oldest surviving woodcut in the Western world -- Trace (talk) 12:06, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Nymphs and Satyr, by William-Adolphe Bouguereau.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2013 at 10:20:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by William-Adolphe Bouguereau - uploaded by Jan Arkesteijn - nominated by Jan Arkesteijn -- Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 10:20, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 10:20, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Question Isn't this the same work as the following one ? -- Trace (talk) 11:55, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- It's the version from 2013-03-25T18:23:12. The colours are closer to the original. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 12:53, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Polyporus squamosus 2013 G1.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2013 at 06:34:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created, uploaded by George Chernilevsky - nominated by -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:34, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Info Bracket fungi Dryad's saddle (Polyporus squamosus)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 06:34, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 14:00, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 21:12, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JLPC (talk) 10:05, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Böhringer (talk) 13:40, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 14:20, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Joydeep Talk 18:07, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Cayambe (talk) 07:56, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --MehdiTalk 10:08, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Neutral Good shot and subject but the shadows are pretty harsh and the WB doesn't feed right (too cold) due to the flash Poco2 10:25, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 17:35, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 09:07, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Schloss-Moyland-2013-02.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2013 at 21:20:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Tuxyso - uploaded by Tuxyso - nominated by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 21:20, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 21:20, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Despite strong distorsions at the borders, very nice. --Selbymay (talk) 10:45, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review.
Question Do you mean distortions at the building or at the border of the photo at the leafs? Distortion at the borders are inevitable with wide-angle (10mm x 1.5) perspectives. But imho the leafs build a nice framing for the castle. Also note that the tower in the center is not vertically straight (see other photos in the category) --Tuxyso (talk) 10:57, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, I've noticed the 10mm, so distortions are unavoidable, in the leaves for this picture. Maybe a little less vegetation (with 12mm or more) would have been enough to frame the castle but I don't know the place and it's pretty nice the way it is. --Selbymay (talk) 11:50, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info. What do you (and the others) think about this alternative crop? I am not sure. Imho the nomination with the centered compositon is more dramatic. --Tuxyso (talk) 13:00, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, I've noticed the 10mm, so distortions are unavoidable, in the leaves for this picture. Maybe a little less vegetation (with 12mm or more) would have been enough to frame the castle but I don't know the place and it's pretty nice the way it is. --Selbymay (talk) 11:50, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review.
Support Great composition which highlights the context of the subject. Foreground, middleground and background also well used. The trees contribute a nice framing element that make the subject appear behind a curtain of leaves. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:46, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Very atmospheric shot (I prefer the current version, no need in alternative crops, I think). --Alex Florstein (talk) 13:55, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Impressive --Laitche (talk) 16:15, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Good.-- Arcalino (talk) 16:58, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Trace (talk) 21:44, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Very Good --Rjcastillo (talk) 01:52, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JLPC (talk) 10:06, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Tomascastelazo (talk) 02:55, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support So beautiful. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 05:18, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Böhringer (talk) 13:41, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 14:18, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Poco2 21:25, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --MehdiTalk 10:10, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 17:37, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Support - Genial! Die Spiegelungen auf dem Wasser sind interessant.. -- Wolf im Wald (de) 02:21, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Skyline de Chicago desde el centro, Illinois, Estados Unidos, 2012-10-20, DD 06.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2013 at 22:09:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info Skyline of Chicago, Illinois, USA. All by me, Poco2 22:09, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Poco2 22:09, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Julian H. (talk/files) 22:55, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 09:11, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 14:15, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Maire (talk) 19:19, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 22:50, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JLPC (talk) 10:03, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Colin (talk) 20:05, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Nice shot but the clouds in the sky make a strong contrast and spoil the composition overall. I also don't think its an ideal perspective with the trees and the object in the park covering some of the focal buildings in the background.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 22:37, 9 June 2013 (UTC)
Support I like the clouds who add nicely the color and the mood to the picture. --Moonik (talk) 05:06, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Support How can that sky be disturbing? --Kadellar (talk) 21:25, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- The sky and the sunlight reflection on the buildings are fine, but the composition of the clouds is not.--Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 23:34, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Trace (talk) 11:44, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 14:16, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 13:30, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
File:ChiangKai-shek memorial2009 amk.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2013 at 12:56:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created & uploaded by AngMoKio - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 12:56, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 12:56, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Katrouchka90 (talk) 13:55, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 12:38, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 14:23, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 21:40, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Pudelek (talk) 09:50, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 17:34, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- Weak
Support. Slightly off-center and not particularly sharp, but nice picture overall with good colors. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:06, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Yarl ✉ 19:39, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:51, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
File:2013-06-09 16-31-13-syrphidae.JPG, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2013 at 06:35:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 06:35, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 06:35, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 10:17, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- PJDespa (talk) 15:50, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Katrouchka90 (talk) 13:54, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Harsh Flash. Red channel blown. Lacks fine detail. Unspecific filename. -- Colin (talk) 17:16, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 14:17, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose per Colin.--Jebulon (talk) 19:48, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 18:20, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
File:2013-06-09 15-52-03-coleoptera.JPG, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2013 at 06:34:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 06:34, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 06:34, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 10:17, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --PJDespa (talk) 17:05, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Katrouchka90 (talk) 13:56, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Harsh Flash. Red channel blown. Unspecific file name. -- Colin (talk) 17:11, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Per Colin.--Jebulon (talk) 19:50, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jun 2013 at 21:16:28 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info Game of the 2013 Women's European Qualification Tournament for WRWC France 2014 between Italy and Spain 7-38(b). Created, uploaded and nominated by Kadellar -- Kadellar (talk) 21:16, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Kadellar (talk) 21:16, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Kiril Simeonovski (talk) 23:37, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --ArildV (talk) 08:11, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Katrouchka90 (talk) 13:56, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 14:16, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jun 2013 at 13:48:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created & uploaded by Chensiyuan - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 13:48, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 13:48, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Алый Король (talk) 14:37, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Nice lighting but CA, distortions, lack of detail and posterization --Laitche (talk) 17:04, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- What about this version? Tomer T (talk) 18:38, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- About down-sampling version, CA looks better others are almost same I think :) --Laitche (talk) 19:17, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Where's the lack of detail? Tomer T (talk) 20:54, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Many parts do not come in definition. --Laitche (talk) 21:22, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Can you give examples? Tomer T (talk) 07:23, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
- Many parts do not come in definition. --Laitche (talk) 21:22, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Where's the lack of detail? Tomer T (talk) 20:54, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- About down-sampling version, CA looks better others are almost same I think :) --Laitche (talk) 19:17, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- What about this version? Tomer T (talk) 18:38, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
Alternative
[edit]Support Tomer T (talk) 20:54, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 06:13, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Refuge Bel-Lachat gr5 Chamonix.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2013 at 19:43:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by USERNAME - uploaded by USERNAME - nominated by USERNAME -- Tcherome (talk) 19:43, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Tcherome (talk) 19:43, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Noisy, with clarity problems. —Mono 01:14, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Hunburgturm Burgholz innen.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2013 at 09:47:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Hydro - uploaded by Hydro - nominated by Trace -- Trace (talk) 09:47, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Abstain as nominator. -- Trace (talk) 09:47, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Middle Rhine - view from Burg Sooneck 2.JPG, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2013 at 09:26:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 09:26, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Pudelek (talk) 09:26, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Meh. Competently done but no wow. I think I see what you were trying for—the juxtaposition of that bench and the view. If you come back when the weather's nicer and everything's green, then crop in more tightly, I think you might have it. Daniel Case (talk) 04:08, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Caligo eurilochus bananenfalter.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2013 at 11:54:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Pro2 - uploaded by Pro2 - nominated by Pro2 -- pro2 11:54, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- pro2 11:54, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose That barbed wire is a bit disturbing. I'm not comparing with the existing FP or with the lead picture in Wikipedia. But it seems comparable to this semi-natural shot; which is more detailed and in high res. JKadavoor Jee 13:58, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose per Jkadavoor. --Arctic Kangaroo (✉ • ✎) 05:46, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Balaklava bay.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2013 at 18:30:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created, uploaded and nominated by --Mile (talk) 18:30, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Mile (talk) 18:30, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Trace (talk) 21:36, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Support – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 05:13, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 12:32, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 14:25, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Comment Parts of the image seem a bit blured (specially at harbor) and the land-sky boarder seems to have some halo? Kruusamägi (talk) 21:38, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Info There is some dust seen at that stone-work factory also in original picture. Some parts arent part of centre of pictures, which are made with poor Sony E 16 mm lens - just couldnt get better with that lens. --Mile (talk) 22:31, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support —Mono 01:15, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Support. Well done! Nice panorama, nice colors, high EV. I visited here several times -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:42, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Per George Chernilevsky. Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 13:03, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 17:33, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- J.-H. Janßen (talk) 19:49, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Doleschallia bisaltide bisaltide (Autumn Leaf) - male, January 2013, Singapore.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2013 at 16:43:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info A male Autumn Leaf resting on the ground, shot near Singapore Changi Airport, Singapore. Created by Arctic Kangaroo - uploaded by Arctic Kangaroo - nominated by me -- JKadavoor Jee 16:43, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Great details; I never see the wing scales this much clear in a in vivo shot. JKadavoor Jee 16:43, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Per Jkadavoor -- Colin (talk) 17:07, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Impressive, great details, useful -- Trace (talk) 21:37, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 12:33, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Böhringer (talk) 13:38, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 14:24, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Joydeep Talk 18:05, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --MehdiTalk 10:08, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 17:34, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Support as creator.
--Arctic Kangaroo (✉ • ✎) 05:30, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- J.-H. Janßen (talk) 19:43, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
File:1 day old chick hatchling 2.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2013 at 20:00:02 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Uberprutser - uploaded by Uberprutser - nominated by Uberprutser -- Uberprutser (talk) 20:00, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Tomer T (talk) 06:21, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Penyulap ☏ 08:51, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 14:17, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Good quality but the composition is not at FP level, the white-black object in the background is quite disturbing Poco2 10:21, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/72/1_day_old_chick_hatchling_2_cgi.jpg/220px-1_day_old_chick_hatchling_2_cgi.jpg)
- The chick is in a hatching factory I expect, there is equipment used there, like incubators and cages. The chick is standing in what looks a lot like a spoon, used to reach out to the bottom of the cage that the chick is in and pick it up. Without the handle, it would look strange to chicken wranglers. Penyulap ☏ 11:10, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- Actually, if I rotated the handle so it is hidden behind the chick, then it would look like a chick with a little black mohawk
Penyulap ☏ 16:04, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- Actually, if I rotated the handle so it is hidden behind the chick, then it would look like a chick with a little black mohawk
- The chick is in a hatching factory I expect, there is equipment used there, like incubators and cages. The chick is standing in what looks a lot like a spoon, used to reach out to the bottom of the cage that the chick is in and pick it up. Without the handle, it would look strange to chicken wranglers. Penyulap ☏ 11:10, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Comment The black/white thing is part of the balance scale. Being a balance scale this is also the reason why the weight of the chick is mentioned in the description. -unsigned comment by User:212.123.168.11
- thank you very much for the information ! That makes perfect sense, I shall add it to the description. Penyulap ☏ 13:14, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
File:High Pressure.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2013 at 21:11:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by NASA - uploaded by Earth100 - nominated by ABC paulista -- ABC paulista (talk) 21:11, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- ABC paulista (talk) 21:11, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Support ØSalamander (Talk / Contributions) 21:45, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support—High EV—Kelvinsong (talk) 21:32, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Korsö Kroksö Sandön February 2013.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2013 at 19:07:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info Korsö, Kroksö and Sandön (Sandhamn) islands in Stockholm archipelago. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Arild Vågen (talk) 19:07, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- ArildV (talk) 19:07, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Look FP to me. Trace (talk) 21:41, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Kruusamägi (talk) 09:27, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 12:54, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 14:21, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --MehdiTalk 10:08, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 17:34, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Siegestor München abends.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2013 at 22:16:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info all by Der Wolf im Wald -- Wolf im Wald (de) 22:16, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Wolf im Wald (de) 22:16, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose --Kikos (talk) 19:13, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
- Any reason? --A.Savin 19:30, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --A.Savin 19:30, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Impressive. -- Trace (talk) 21:44, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Well done --Rjcastillo (talk) 01:54, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Tomer T (talk) 12:57, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 12:34, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 14:19, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --MehdiTalk 10:10, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 17:36, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:04, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Stadtbild München.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2013 at 22:21:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info all by Der Wolf im Wald -- Wolf im Wald (de) 22:21, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Wolf im Wald (de) 22:21, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 14:03, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Couldn't you add notes ? E. g. what are the two churches and the building in foreground ?-- Trace (talk) 21:43, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 14:20, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Alchemist-hp (talk) 19:46, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support - very good! --Pudelek (talk) 09:51, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --MehdiTalk 10:10, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 17:36, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose The crop looks a bit random to me. I don't understand the purpose of the composition.--Jebulon (talk) 21:50, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- J.-H. Janßen (talk) 19:54, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Stuhrling Tourbillon Movement.ogv, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2013 at 16:18:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Eric Kilby from USA - uploaded by Mahanga - nominated by Claus
Support -- Claus (talk) 16:18, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 14:21, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Yarl ✉ 19:39, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Yun dj & Mun Ih & Chang Jh.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2013 at 18:52:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Unknown photographer(Public domain) - uploaded by Levriea and salamander724 - nominated by salamander724 -- ØSalamander (Talk / Contributions) 18:52, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
detailed info
- This photo is one Korean friends' middle school years.
- (back row) The rightest is Yun Dong-ju. He was talented for literature and has been highly acclaimed at home. In university, he was arrested by Japanese Empire for writing poems of resistance. And was dead by medical experiment on a living body. It was 1945, only 6 months earlier than Empire's fall.
- (back low) The leftest is Chang Chun-ha. He was drafted by Japanese Imperial Army but ran away to became Korean segregationist soldier. After Korean independence, he became a journalist. His periodical Sa-sang-ge("The System of Idea") triggered April revolution(1960). In 1975, while he planning unidentified conspiracy against dictator, was assassinated by unkown someone.
- (back row) The center is Moon Ik-hwan. He became Presbyterian minister and took part in retranslation of Korean Bible in 1970s. After Chang(the leftest)'s dead, He devoted himself to movement for democracy. He died of a heart failure on January 18, 1994.
- (front row) He is Chung Il-kwon. In 1940s, he joined the Manchu State(which was a puppet state of Japanese Empire) army and became military police captain. After Empire's fall, he transfered to Korean Nation's Army and distareged as full general. He cooperated President Park Jeong-hee, who was militant dictator. So he became the prime minister and the chairman of the national assembly. He died on Jenuary 17, 1994, almost same day of Moon(the center of back low).
- This photo is more than only middle schooler friends' photo. This is an irony itself of modern Korean history.
Support -- ØSalamander (Talk / Contributions) 18:52, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Support this photograph expresses that these schoolmates were all close each other during their middle school years, but their path of life became totally different. I think this picture depicts the historical irony well. -- Shyoon1 (talk) 21:33, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Ánsar común (Anser anser) en el Parque Olímpico, Múnich, Alemania 2012-04-28, DD 04.JPG, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2013 at 21:26:05 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info Greylag Goose (Anser anser) in the Olympic Park, Munich, Germany. All by me, Poco2 21:26, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Poco2 21:26, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Tomer T (talk) 09:52, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 14:56, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Neutral It's nice to a certain extent, but would be better if we can see the legs. --Arctic Kangaroo (✉ • ✎) 05:56, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 18:19, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2013 at 13:50:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created & uploaded by EvelinL - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 13:50, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 13:50, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Comment - the horizon is tilted --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 16:52, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
- Fixed. Tomer T (talk) 17:23, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Comment - sorry, but still a little tilted down on the left side --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 19:11, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
- I can't see no tilt. So obviously I cannot fix it. Tomer T (talk) 19:32, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Comment - fixed a small tilt, but this reduced the file size. --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 19:51, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Comment Nice mood pic ✿ --Laitche (talk) 16:54, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 16:31, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
File:MosOblast 05-2012 Marfino Estate 04.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2013 at 19:24:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info All by A.Savin 19:24, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --A.Savin 19:24, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Comment There is a little CA, see image note for an example. Not a huuuuge problem, but if it is fixable? Also the projection really gets stretched at the etches, at the limit of what is reasonable for this projection, probably because the field-of-view is large. Nice colors and light. --Slaunger (talk) 21:18, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose The sky looks much oversaturated, has some noise (probably from sharpening the clouds) and shows a strange brightness distribution: The center of the sky is less bright than the borders (polarizer + wide angle lens?). The sharpness at the left side of the fassade is at the low end. Nonetheless a good composition but in the current version no FP for me. --Tuxyso (talk) 21:48, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Katrouchka90 (talk) 13:56, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 16:45, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 14:21, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Unfortunately I have to agree with Tuxyso, the poor quality of the left side of the building ruins this FP nomination, sorry, Poco2 21:24, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose per Tuxyso, sorry. --Ivar (talk) 12:36, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Sky's too dark. Daniel Case (talk) 04:13, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- J.-H. Janßen (talk) 19:45, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
File:SARHingham.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2013 at 21:05:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Timothy Valentine - uploaded by MarmadukePercy - nominated by evrik -- Evrik (talk) 21:05, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Evrik (talk) 21:05, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Katrouchka90 (talk) 13:56, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 12:54, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 14:22, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose The subject is blurry and the background disturbing, sorry, not a FP to me, Poco2 21:21, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Main object is not sharp. --Tuxyso (talk) 13:21, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose ack Tuxyso and Poco square --Laitche (talk) 20:45, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Gildir (talk) 20:48, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Viborg Cathedral June 2012.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 21 Jun 2013 at 20:43:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info Created and uploaded by Slaunger - edited by Selbymay - nominated by Slaunger -- Slaunger (talk) 20:43, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Info Since the cathedral has several nearby buildings, it is challenging to capture it illuminated without distracting shadows. However, in June the sun is sufficiently high in the evenings to just allow for a uniform soft evening light on the granite surface of the Western wall - when sunny. Furthermore, you have to get quite close in order to get an unobstructed view of this facade, and you get a quite wide field of view. I have done my best to find a reasonable compromise between geometric distortions and this wide field of view. The off-centered view was chosen as I could use the stairs of a building at that position to get some more elevation and look over the parked cars. --Slaunger (talk) 20:43, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Abstain as nominator. -- Slaunger (talk) 20:43, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Katrouchka90 (talk) 13:56, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Tomer T (talk) 09:22, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Great job, great size and great light. Shame of the cars, but I guess they are unavoidable. FP anyway.--Jebulon (talk) 19:34, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Astoria Hotel SPB.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2013 at 08:29:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Florstein -- Alex Florstein (talk) 08:29, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Abstain as author. -- Alex Florstein (talk) 08:29, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Old valuable hotel in Russia and nice photo -- George Chernilevsky talk 09:37, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --A.Savin 10:45, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Ivar (talk) 12:38, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Joydeep Talk 13:07, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 13:32, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 17:32, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Yarl ✉ 19:37, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Böhringer (talk) 21:25, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JLPC (talk) 21:28, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Support argh! my eyes! my eyes! — Penyulap ☏ 10:58, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
File:HH 901 and HH 902 in the Carina nebula (captured by the Hubble Space Telescope).jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 22 Jun 2013 at 11:36:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by NASA - uploaded by Tryphon - nominated by Mahan -- MaHaN MSG 11:36, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- MaHaN MSG 11:36, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Katrouchka90 (talk) 13:55, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 14:22, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- J.-H. Janßen (talk) 19:50, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Liguus virgineus 01.JPG, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2013 at 10:18:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 10:18, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Llez (talk) 10:18, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 17:52, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Cayambe (talk) 19:57, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Trace (talk) 20:25, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Looks like some tasty ice cream cones. Crashed not only my browser but my computer as well when I tried to open it in high-res, so it must be good. Daniel Case (talk) 04:05, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Joydeep Talk 13:08, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 16:50, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- J.-H. Janßen (talk) 19:56, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
- Comments: Although this is indeed an amazing species, it is fairly common in collections, and this is not really a very good shell as they go: it has a pretty bad scar on the shell from what was probably a predation attempt (or maybe from falling out of its tree), and the surface of the interior of the shell is a little damaged, probably from the soft parts rotting out. So it's not an ideal shell, but still its a useful image of course. Invertzoo (talk) 12:49, 19 June 2013 (UTC), from WikiProject Gastropods.
Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 18:11, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 23:20, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2013 at 12:48:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by ESO/F. Kamphues, uploaded/nominated by Stas1995 — Stas1995 (talk) 12:48, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 12:48, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 14:27, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Ivar (talk) 15:00, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Waow. -- Trace (talk) 20:50, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Comment Nice, but the observatory (in the center) is tilted, could it be that the whole picture is tilted? or maybe stitching problems? Poco2 21:17, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support. --Julian H. (talk/files) 21:52, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 17:32, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Yarl ✉ 19:37, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- J.-H. Janßen (talk) 20:08, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Support—Kelvinsong (talk) 21:30, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Support — Penyulap ☏ 10:59, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
File:First Lake of Rosporden, France.JPG, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jun 2013 at 16:45:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info -- — Mouh2jijel [Talk] 16:45, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose I like the idea of sharing the view with the birds, but pictures of birds in a town lake are common and this one isn't exceptional enough for FP. Colin (talk) 20:02, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose per above composition issues, plus color is too washed-out. Daniel Case (talk) 21:37, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jun 2013 at 17:02:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by George Schlegel and George Degen, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:02, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:02, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Very high quality + resolution. Great. Colin (talk) 20:04, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Simply great.--Jebulon (talk) 20:32, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Very good. --Selbymay (talk) 08:07, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Useful, very good : a masterpiece. -- Trace (talk) 20:49, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Cayambe (talk) 05:51, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Gnangarra 10:27, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JLPC (talk) 18:18, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Arcalino (talk) 09:23, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:48, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 13:08, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
File:House Sparrow - female, June 2012, Great Ocean Road, Victoria, Australia.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jun 2013 at 03:26:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info A female House Sparrow perching on a rope at a carpark near The Twelve Apostles, along Great Ocean Road in Victoria, Australia. Created by Arctic Kangaroo - uploaded by Arctic Kangaroo - nominated by Arctic Kangaroo -- Arctic Kangaroo (✉ • ✎) 03:26, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Arctic Kangaroo (✉ • ✎) 03:26, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Good composition but this is a common bird and the quality isn't at FP standard. We have larger/sharper/less-noisy images like File:Passer domesticus - Bürkliplatz 2010-09-08 18-09-58.JPG. -- Colin (talk) 20:16, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Iris ensata Thunb.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2013 at 11:59:51 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Laitche -- Laitche (talk) 11:59, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Laitche (talk) 11:59, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Tomer T (talk) 13:42, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 14:26, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Poco2 21:18, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 17:33, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 07:32, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 14:29, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose A very good QI, but nothing more IMO, sorry.--Jebulon (talk) 16:06, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose as Jebulon --Böhringer (talk) 21:10, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 18:13, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose as Jebulon, though not far from it. --Julian H. (talk/files) 10:26, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Support — Penyulap ☏ 11:01, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Nicola Peltz (soft contrast).jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 23 Jun 2013 at 05:11:54 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d1/Nicola_Peltz_%28soft_contrast_pink%29.jpg/300px-Nicola_Peltz_%28soft_contrast_pink%29.jpg)
Info created by Justin Campbell (photographer), Keraunoscopia (derivative) - uploaded by Keraunoscopia - nominated by Keraunoscopia -- – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 05:11, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 05:11, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Nice portrait. Prefer your softer version. I'm not sure of the merit of converting an AdobeRGB JPG to sRGB because JPGs have so few bits that this is lossy (though hopefully Lightroom/Photoshop are less simple-minded than browsers when converting colour spaces). I know the sRGB is more likely to display correctly on displays, but the damage once done when the AdobeRGB JPG was created. Colin (talk) 20:04, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
- Hey Colin. I have the .psd file in AdobeRGB, I can upload that over this file and either revert back to sRGB for web viewing or leave the AdobeRGB file as the most recent upload. What do you think? – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 20:22, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
- As I said, I'm not sure. I think Lightroom/Photoshop dither when converting colourspaces (rather than the simple nearest-colour algorithm that browsers use that causes posterisation). So any fears I have over lossy conversion might not in practice be visible. And the advantage that the sRGB will show properly for more people is a definite gain, rather than my theoretical loss. Have you considered contacting the original photographer: perhaps they an regenerate an sRGB one for the web, and fix any processing issues people see. Colin (talk) 08:19, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- The only means of communicating with him that I could find is through Twitter, probably the most pathetic way of getting in touch with anyone (but I tried a few days ago anyway). No reply, not a big surprise there. Ah well. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 18:12, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
- As I said, I'm not sure. I think Lightroom/Photoshop dither when converting colourspaces (rather than the simple nearest-colour algorithm that browsers use that causes posterisation). So any fears I have over lossy conversion might not in practice be visible. And the advantage that the sRGB will show properly for more people is a definite gain, rather than my theoretical loss. Have you considered contacting the original photographer: perhaps they an regenerate an sRGB one for the web, and fix any processing issues people see. Colin (talk) 08:19, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- Hey Colin. I have the .psd file in AdobeRGB, I can upload that over this file and either revert back to sRGB for web viewing or leave the AdobeRGB file as the most recent upload. What do you think? – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 20:22, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose-- Unfortunate post-processing problems: ugly posterization of the right background; pink "ghosts" between the left-side hairs; the post-processing messed the left of the chin and the top-center of the hairs, leaving these parts confused while the whole picture is sharp. Please re-process. Sting (talk) 22:58, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
- None of that is my doing, that's in the original photo. I could try and go in and attempt to correct the pink ghosts. The 'posterization' looked more like texture to me. I did an on-purpose extreme curves tweak just to see what was going on back there and it doesn't look like posterization to me (I could very well be wrong). As for the chin, I'm not sure I follow you. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 01:51, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, at first I thought the background was posterised but now I think it is just that the photographer's textured sky background is in focus rather than blurred. Colin (talk) 08:19, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- That's not a printed background pattern but definitely an over-processing problem and it's even more obvious where the background interacts with the hairs. Sting (talk) 14:08, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, at first I thought the background was posterised but now I think it is just that the photographer's textured sky background is in focus rather than blurred. Colin (talk) 08:19, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
- None of that is my doing, that's in the original photo. I could try and go in and attempt to correct the pink ghosts. The 'posterization' looked more like texture to me. I did an on-purpose extreme curves tweak just to see what was going on back there and it doesn't look like posterization to me (I could very well be wrong). As for the chin, I'm not sure I follow you. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 01:51, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Gildir (talk) 20:47, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
- {vote delete} unused personal picture, out of scope. Oh, wait, this is Featured pics, sorry, forget I said that. Penyulap ☏ 11:03, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
- What? I'm confused. The image is used in its article and will probably be moved back to lead soon. There's been a lot of unstableness with this image simply due to some sockpuppetry going on, but I didn't think that mattered on Commons, hence my nomination here instead of over at en w. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 16:13, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
- The image is a good illustration of the subject, but not so much of portrait photography. Penyulap ☏ 10:33, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
- What? I'm confused. The image is used in its article and will probably be moved back to lead soon. There's been a lot of unstableness with this image simply due to some sockpuppetry going on, but I didn't think that mattered on Commons, hence my nomination here instead of over at en w. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 16:13, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Support--Canoe1967 (talk) 17:50, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
- I added an Alt/Edit. Removing what little pink there was was surprisingly a little frustrating, and I ended up seeing more pink halos throughout the background, so I just changed the background to match (as best I could) the ghost pink color. Yay/nay? – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 17:54, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Panorama of Danube in Vienna.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2013 at 17:16:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Dmitry A. Mottl - uploaded by Dmottl - nominated by Dmottl -- Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 17:16, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Dmitry A. Mottl (talk) 17:16, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2013 at 18:13:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Nicolas Chalmandrier - uploaded, stitched, restored and nominated by me -- Jebulon (talk) 18:13, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Support this very nice folio with maps, high size and resolution, with a lot of details. Left above, the city of La Rochelle during the "Great Siege" (1627-1628). Left below, a map of the Province of Aunis in 1773. Right, a map of the city in 1773, when design and engraving where made, and below, some miniatures of fortifications of other cities in Aunis. I did not find any mistake, and it has a very high artistic and EV IMO. Very carefully restored by me. I'm very interested by this part of the world, because the geocode shows... the house where I was born ! -- Jebulon (talk) 18:13, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Useful, good quality, best in scope. -- Trace (talk) 05:08, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Impressive map, high EV, excellent restoration. --Cayambe (talk) 17:17, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JLPC (talk) 21:27, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Impressive --ArildV (talk) 09:08, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 11:21, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Paris 16 (talk) 14:45, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- J.-H. Janßen (talk) 19:46, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 07:10, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 13:09, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Sankt Nikolaus Prösels Apsis.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2013 at 07:59:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Moroder - uploaded by Moroder - nominated by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:59, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:59, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --ArildV (talk) 08:10, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Nice. --Llorenzi (talk) 15:46, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Nice photography indeed. --PJDespa (talk) 17:14, 11 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Very Good. -- Arcalino (talk) 17:01, 12 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JLPC (talk) 10:06, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Nice image and great work. Jacopo Werther iγ∂ψ=mψ 12:48, 13 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Michael Barera (talk) 14:17, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --MehdiTalk 10:12, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 17:37, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Sickla kaj June 2013.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2013 at 09:29:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info Evening in Sickla kaj, Hammarby sjöstad, Stockholm. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- ArildV (talk) 09:29, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- ArildV (talk) 09:29, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --A.Savin 10:43, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Ivar (talk) 12:34, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 20:07, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 07:10, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 07:34, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Tomer T (talk) 08:19, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Nice. --Tuxyso (talk) 13:23, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 15:54, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Nice without rainbow, FP with !! --Jebulon (talk) 16:02, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Joydeep Talk 17:48, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Yarl ✉ 19:37, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Caught me by surprise on a late-night scrollthrough. Nice perspective that enhances the rainbow. Daniel Case (talk) 05:48, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Moonik (talk) 13:25, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JLPC (talk) 21:28, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 11:23, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Support in nice light. --Laitche (talk) 19:29, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- J.-H. Janßen (talk) 20:05, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Maire (talk) 15:47, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- SaməkTalk 21:40, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jun 2013 at 18:01:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Richard Goldschmidt (photography); Keraunoscopia (derivative) - uploaded by Keraunoscopia - nominated by Keraunoscopia -- – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 18:01, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 18:01, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose A significant improvement over the original but it still has quality issues and is a good but not excellent portrait. Colin (talk) 19:58, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
- I take that as a compliment, believe it or not. The original was missing a color profile and apparently I have issues when that happens. Seems I managed to avoid at least some problems with this this time around :) – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 20:19, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
- The original was pretty over-exposed strong flash, though not clipped so you managed to rescue the JPG somewhat. But there's just no texture or hair detail at all. She's pretty so that helps; I think most of us would look awful shot like that. Colin (talk) 20:27, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
- I take that as a compliment, believe it or not. The original was missing a color profile and apparently I have issues when that happens. Seems I managed to avoid at least some problems with this this time around :) – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 20:19, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Chloroplast (standalone version)-en.svg2 (delist), not delisted, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 Jun 2013 at 20:43:31
Info I redrew this diagram for scientific accuracy—see File:Chloroplast II.svg (Original nomination)
Delist and replace — Kelvinsong (talk) 21:08, 22 May 2013 (UTC)
Delist and replace Too technical for a review for me; but I don't want to neglect the efforts. JKadavoor Jee 13:02, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
New
Borderless
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jun 2013 at 13:18:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created & uploaded by Alex.vasenin - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 13:18, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 13:18, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- J.-H. Janßen (talk) 19:42, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Poco2 19:43, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Support — Penyulap ☏ 10:57, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Tomer T (talk) 18:43, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 Jun 2013 at 23:42:20 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created, uploaded and nominated by 663h (talk) -- 663h (talk) 23:42, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- 663h (talk) 23:42, 15 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Trace (talk) 14:03, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 14:27, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Dark parts are maybe a bit too dark, and it needs a crop below IMO, but it is a very impressive picture of an interesting monument.--Jebulon (talk) 16:00, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose An interesting monument for sure, but more than half of the building is in unfortunate shadow. Also the centered composition does not work for me. Perspective and form of the building implies a building slightly shifted to the left (seen from the center) --Tuxyso (talk) 16:28, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Support per Jeb although half of the building is in shadows (per Tuxyso). JKadavoor Jee 14:07, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose per Tuxyso. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:59, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Info Matsumoto Castle, also known as the "Crow Castle".--663h (talk) 11:33, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Support — Penyulap ☏ 10:57, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Briza media - keskmine värihein.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2013 at 15:19:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info all by Ivar (talk) 15:19, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Abstain as author -- Ivar (talk) 15:19, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Support — Stas1995 (talk) 19:02, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Trace (talk) 05:09, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 16:49, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- H. Krisp (talk) 18:12, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Support—Kelvinsong (talk) 21:29, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Vamps (talk) 15:16, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 13:09, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Support--Earth100 (talk) 13:19, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Kreuzeskirche -2013.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2013 at 08:59:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info Church "Kreuzeskirche" in Essen photographed from the Weberplatz with town hall of Essen in den background
created by Tuxyso - uploaded by Tuxyso - nominated by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 08:59, 16 June 2013 (UTC)Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 08:59, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Trace (talk) 14:02, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Nice shot, could be a Valued image. But no big wow for an FP, and the cloud is maybe a bit unfavourable (unlike here etc.) --A.Savin 16:11, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
File:BMW Welt, Múnich, Alemania, 2013-04-22, DD 10.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 25 Jun 2013 at 23:45:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info Motorbike BMW R1200GS exposed in the BMW Welt, Munich, Germany. All by me, Poco2 23:45, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Poco2 23:45, 16 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Tomer T (talk) 13:52, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Very cool, and the background gives the impression of a zooming effect. – Kerαunoςcopia◁galaxies 18:05, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose details lost into the background, handlebar/dash/visor area lacks detail Gnangarra 10:39, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
- Actually, in my opinion, if there is something that could be criticize about this image, it would be that the background has too much detail taking away some attention off the subject of the picture. Poco2 19:41, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Gildir (talk) 20:47, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Maybe f4 instead of f10 would have helped to get an undistracting background, but I like colours and composition. --Kadellar (talk) 18:54, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JLPC (talk) 21:00, 24 June 2013 (UTC)
File:City of perth night gnangarra.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2013 at 07:48:52 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created, uploaded & nominated by Gnangarra -- Gnangarra 07:48, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Gnangarra 07:48, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Comment It needs a tilt and a perspective correction Poco2 19:32, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
- are you suggesting that I distort the buildings shape? Gnangarra 01:00, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
- No, I suggest that you correct the existing tilt and distortion, so that verticals become vertical. Poco2 18:44, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
- are you suggesting that I distort the buildings shape? Gnangarra 01:00, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Schloss-Moyland-2013-01.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2013 at 07:13:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Tuxyso - uploaded by Tuxyso - nominated by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 07:13, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 07:13, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Question As the following picture by Tuxyso has just been featured,
![](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/0/02/Schloss-Moyland-2013-02.jpg/220px-Schloss-Moyland-2013-02.jpg)
which one is the best in scope ? -- Trace (talk) 20:07, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Info I see no problem that the other photo is already featured, it shows Moyland castle fromt a very different perspective. For an appropriate photographic representation of the castle the photographer faces the problem that the nomination here shows the very characteristic front of the moated castle without the surronding water but with some element of the landscape architecture of the yard. The other photo which is already featured shows the surronding water but not the characteristic front of the building. Why not nominate both photos? There is "no best in scope" - both perspectives are useful. --Tuxyso (talk) 20:35, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Arcalino (talk) 11:20, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose The two pictures are useful but this one has a severe issue : the distorsion of the towers. The correction would have been less visible from a little more distant point of view. --Selbymay (talk) 17:08, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
- Hehe, I've waited for this comment :) The towers are not distorted, it is a special characteristic of the architecture. Look at GMaps: [5] or take a look at the official website. The towers are not rounded but have and elliptic form. From my standpoint there is no possibility to go back further. The towers look that way in real. --Tuxyso (talk) 19:15, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
- Well, I've checked the other pictures (a lot are similar in the category) and it's the only one showing the elliptic form so obviously. Either real or not, I still prefer the other one. --Selbymay (talk) 21:02, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- J.-H. Janßen (talk) 20:00, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose The second one (already FP) is lovely and I missed supporting it when it got nominated. The first not special enough imo and File:Schloss Moyland Panorama, 1.jpg has nicer composition with the two benches and willow tree. BTW: I think there's a risk that "support" votes might be cast for the second image - it isn't an alt nomination. -- Colin (talk) 20:51, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Definitely not the best in scope, I also prefer File:Schloss Moyland Panorama, 1.jpg. Just a quality image, no FP. Sorry. Trace (talk) 20:49, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, I disagree. Please look thoroughly: The photo File:Schloss Moyland Panorama, 1.jpg has several quality issues. If you understand German take a look on this German FPC archive. In short: There are problems with the colors, sky, stitching and with inhomogeneous sharpness distribution. --Tuxyso (talk) 21:13, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
- I don't dispute that the other image has some quality issues (though it is pretty good for a compact camera), but its composition is superior and the composition here is not wow enough imo. Colin (talk) 21:40, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
- Same as Colin : superior composition of File:Schloss Moyland Panorama, 1.jpg. And the german discussion you mention is about File:Schloss Moyland Panorama, 2.jpg, which is not the same picture… and therefore has not the same composition !-- Trace (talk) 15:16, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
- I am with you that File:Schloss Moyland Panorama, 1.jpg is also quite good. But currently there is not yet a white bench :) My photo shows a tigther crop with less surrondings - it's a matter of taste. What about an alternative nomination? I have two running ones and cannot nominate it. --Tuxyso (talk) 11:33, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
- Same as Colin : superior composition of File:Schloss Moyland Panorama, 1.jpg. And the german discussion you mention is about File:Schloss Moyland Panorama, 2.jpg, which is not the same picture… and therefore has not the same composition !-- Trace (talk) 15:16, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
- I don't dispute that the other image has some quality issues (though it is pretty good for a compact camera), but its composition is superior and the composition here is not wow enough imo. Colin (talk) 21:40, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
- Sorry, I disagree. Please look thoroughly: The photo File:Schloss Moyland Panorama, 1.jpg has several quality issues. If you understand German take a look on this German FPC archive. In short: There are problems with the colors, sky, stitching and with inhomogeneous sharpness distribution. --Tuxyso (talk) 21:13, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Support — Penyulap ☏ 10:57, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2013 at 11:15:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by MichaD - uploaded by MichaD - nominated by Alborzagros -- Alborzagros (talk) 11:15, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Alborzagros (talk) 11:15, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Poco2 12:46, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Support One of the best insect shots I've seen here for a couple of month. Level of detail and sharpness in impressive. Very good! --Tuxyso (talk) 15:00, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Support JKadavoor Jee 15:49, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Ivar (talk) 17:37, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Joydeep Talk 17:53, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 18:43, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Kadellar (talk) 18:46, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Trace (talk) 22:38, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Cayambe (talk) 06:00, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --ArildV (talk) 09:12, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 13:07, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 18:32, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Neutral Rule of thirds? No space in front of the butterfly. But it's still one of the best, so I won't oppose. --Arctic Kangaroo (✉ • ✎) 09:20, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Böhringer (talk) 10:09, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 15:00, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Arcalino (talk) 15:11, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Gidip (talk) 16:27, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Support. --Julian H. (talk/files) 17:41, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Santa Maria della Salute from Hotel Monaco.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jun 2013 at 07:12:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Moroder - uploaded by Moroder - nominated by Moroder -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:12, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 07:12, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Support I like it. --Llorenzi (talk) 17:32, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Sunset from the ISS.JPG, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 26 Jun 2013 at 19:37:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by NASA/ISS Expedition 23 astronauts - uploaded by Originalwana - nominated by Pine -- Pine✉ 19:37, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Pine✉ 19:37, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose I know it's from space but, you know, all sunsets are pretty and from a picture point of view, this is really not special. Colin (talk) 20:21, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Gildir (talk) 20:45, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
SupportIt's really taken from space.--Earth100 (talk) 13:19, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 5 Jul 2013 at 06:40:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info A rare subspecies of sand pink (Dianthus arenarius ssp. arenarius). All by Ivar (talk) 06:40, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Abstain as author -- Ivar (talk) 06:40, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Neutral Maybe a valued pic, but not excellent. Distracting background. -- -donald- (talk) 07:41, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination --Ivar (talk) 19:22, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Chloroplast movement.svg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2013 at 17:35:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info When plant cells are exposed to direct sunlight, their chloroplasts stack along the anticlinal cell walls to minimize exposure. In the dark they spread out in sheets along the periclinal walls to maximize light absorption.
Support — Kelvinsong (talk) 17:35, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Support As good as all the other diagrams we've been seeing from you. Daniel Case (talk) 21:31, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Support — Penyulap ☏ 10:49, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Filipendula vulgaris - angerpist.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2013 at 15:50:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info Dropwort (Filipendula vulgaris). Alvar in Keila, Northwestern Estonia. All by Ivar (talk) 15:50, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Abstain as author -- Ivar (talk) 15:50, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Support—Kelvinsong (talk) 17:32, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Good quality shot but lacking wow and originality to me Poco2 19:27, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Vamps (talk) 15:14, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 18:31, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Arcalino (talk) 15:16, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Penyulap ☏ 11:57, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Support And this is one heck of a high res image.--Earth100 (talk) 13:16, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 20:45, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jun 2013 at 16:56:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by John Masey Wright and Edward Scriven, restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:56, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 16:56, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Colin (talk) 20:07, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JLPC (talk) 18:19, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Cayambe (talk) 07:50, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 13:08, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 14:52, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Laitche (talk) 21:22, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Kuyalnik (dead part).jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2013 at 15:14:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Yuriy Kvach - uploaded by Yuriy Kvach - nominated by Yuriy Kvach -- Yuriy Kvach (talk) 15:14, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Yuriy Kvach (talk) 15:14, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Comment Slightly underexposed imo.--ArildV (talk) 09:34, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Manel Comas - 01.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2013 at 10:01:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info Manel Comas, Spanish basketball coach. Created, uploaded and nominated by Kadellar (talk) 10:02, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Kadellar (talk) 10:02, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Peloid production, Kuyalnik.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2013 at 09:14:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Yuriy Kvach - uploaded by Yuriy Kvach - nominated by Yuriy Kvach -- Yuriy Kvach (talk) 09:14, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Yuriy Kvach (talk) 09:14, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
File:SBB Re 6-6 Hardturmviadukt.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 28 Jun 2013 at 20:58:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info all by Kabelleger -- Kabelleger (talk) 20:58, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Info A freight train takes the single track branch of the Hardturm viaduct towards Zürich Altstetten. A DPZ trainset is waiting for it to clear the track, and if you look closely, you can even find a VBZ Cobra tram.
Abstain as author -- Kabelleger (talk) 20:58, 19 June 2013 (UTC)
Comment
There's an awful lot of colour moire on the buildings. Have you tried fixing it with Lightroom/Photoshop? It isn't easy for such a large amount. I'm intrigued about the building on the left. Have you perspective-corrected this image? I think there's some vertical stretching as a result (the top floors are taller than the bottom ones) but the building really does have bigger windows towards the top than the bottom (horizontally at least). So it is hard to be sure.Colin (talk) 21:37, 19 June 2013 (UTC)Comment Thanks for your comment, I'll see what I can do about the moire tonight. Yes, the picture is perspective corrected (wide-angle shot, there's no room to do it differently), but the windows of the topmost floor are actually higher than those of the floors below (I passed by that building this morning and checked). --Kabelleger (talk) 08:52, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Comment I have fixed the moire as good as I could, unfortunately it's still not 100% optimal everywhere :( --Kabelleger (talk) 20:58, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
- Good job !. Maybe you better check the low pass filter of your camera cause I think it's too much moire and false color for a photo taken in 5D Mark III :) --Laitche (talk) 03:11, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Very detailed. -- Colin (talk) 17:13, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Sanqing Shan 2013.06.15 10-47-24.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2013 at 09:15:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info w:Mount Sanqing, UNESCO World Heritage Site, created, uploaded & nominated by User:Zhangzhugang -- Zhangzhugang (talk) 09:15, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Zhangzhugang (talk) 09:15, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- has a very even light Gnangarra 10:22, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Colin (talk) 19:11, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Support I was going to say, what's with the sky?—until I realized it wasn't sky. Great shot love the depth of field, detail and perspective. All it needs is the Yes logo in the upper left. Daniel Case (talk) 21:35, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose The photo (and composition) is really nice but has serious processing problems. Especially the leafs look very strange and overprocessed. --Tuxyso (talk) 21:36, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Quality problems created through processing. --Julian H. (talk/files) 11:02, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose per Tuxyso, sorry. --Kadellar (talk) 18:49, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Per above. --JaviP96 13:07, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Support I open this in the graphics processing software to fix it, but on close inspection all I can see is the expected depth of field. I'm not saying there aren't 'processing problems', it's just that I just can't see them. Looks like the mountain the Karate Kid climbs to plant the Bonsai tree. The interesting nature of the image is quite enough to make it a winner, possibly if the photographer wants to be out of our league, they can read about focus stacking and then upload the component images to the Commons:Graphics lab and we can assemble them for you. Penyulap ☏ 05:37, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
OpposeNot sharp enough. This is typical of chinese mailanders.--Earth100 (talk) 13:17, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Sneeuwklokjes 1.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2013 at 16:32:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created & uploaded by Uberprutser - nominated by Tomer T (talk) 16:32, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Tomer T (talk) 16:32, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Maire (talk) 21:29, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Support — Penyulap ☏ 10:49, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Sharp, and it looks like bells!--Earth100 (talk) 13:15, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Arcalino (talk) 15:14, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- 18:40, 27 June 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by George Chernilevsky (talk • contribs)
File:Église Saint-Sébastien de Noyal (Côtes-d'Armor) 2.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 2 Jul 2013 at 09:01:09 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Mouh2jijel - uploaded by Mouh2jijel - nominated by Mouh2jijel -- — Mouh2jijel [Talk] 09:01, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- — Mouh2jijel [Talk] 09:01, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Sorry, this photo reaches neither the quality nor the featured picture bar. The image is remarkable unsharp, probably there is dirt on the lens. Beneath the serious quality issues the centered and frontal composition is unfortunate because the three dimensional structure of the building is completely hidden. --Tuxyso (talk) 14:52, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Unsharp. Please, try Quality images candidates first. --Cayambe (talk) 15:37, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Blown highlights on right. Shouldn't have been shot in this light. Daniel Case (talk) 15:33, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 27 Jun 2013 at 22:02:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Colin - uploaded by Colin - nominated by Colin -- Colin (talk) 22:02, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Support An impressive 5m x 1.5m x 0.3m standing stone with typical Arran landscape, captured in 36MP detail. -- Colin (talk) 22:02, 18 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Gnangarra 10:25, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Support — Draceane diskuse 15:11, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JLPC (talk) 18:18, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Poco2 19:43, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose Interesting subject but there is no factor for FP, sorry Colin. --Laitche (talk) 01:53, 21 June 2013 (UTC)--Laitche (talk) 10:19, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
- Of course I know this photo is high quality, especially green and blue is so beautiful ✿ --Laitche (talk) 02:48, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Composition, subject and blue sky of Scotland make it wow for me. --Myrabella (talk) 08:02, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
weak oppose The photo has got a really high quality and nice colors. Contrary to the others I am not convinced of the composition. The standing stone intercepts the declining hill from the right. The two compositional elements in the midground (village) and background (mountain) are too small to really open a relation to the stone. The different ascending and declining lines are too flat to be dramatic enough. Nonetheless a nice shot. --Tuxyso (talk) 21:08, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Support — Penyulap ☏ 10:50, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Ю. Данилевский (talk) 19:11, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:47, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 13:08, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Michael Gäbler (talk) 14:47, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Brandenburger Tor morgens.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 1 Jul 2013 at 02:50:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created, uploaded and nominated by Der Wolf im Wald -- Wolf im Wald (de) 02:50, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Wolf im Wald (de) 02:50, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Support This photo is astonishing at the fact that there are no people at the "Brandenburger Tor" (despite a small cyclist behind the gate). Remember that this gate is one of the most visited sights in Germany. The light in the early morning is ideal, because the rising sun illuminates the characteristic front of the gate perfectly and only at this day time. A well done photograph of a seldom view of this gate. --Tuxyso (talk) 06:49, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --A.Savin 08:24, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Support per Tuxyso. Tomer T (talk) 08:54, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Arcalino (talk) 09:22, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
- The bot does not like your nomination :) --Tuxyso (talk) 13:38, 22 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --JaviP96 13:07, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Alex Florstein (talk) 18:33, 23 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Julian H. (talk/files) 17:42, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- I see you took the picture at 05.27, which means you had to get up pretty early, well worth the effort! MartinD (talk) 20:02, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Pudelek (talk) 14:54, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
File:Halictus tetrazonianellus male 2.jpg, featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 29 Jun 2013 at 22:28:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info all by me -- Gidip (talk) 22:28, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Gidip (talk) 22:28, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Vamps (talk) 15:25, 21 June 2013 (UTC)
Support--Earth100 (talk) 13:14, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Support JKadavoor Jee 13:49, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Joydeep Talk 18:01, 25 June 2013 (UTC)
Support Tomer T (talk) 12:01, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Arcalino (talk) 15:13, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Support --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:07, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:41, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 7 Jul 2013 at 23:39:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
Info created by Endrjuch - uploaded by Endrjuch - nominated by Endrjuch -- Endrjuch (talk) 23:39, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Support -- Endrjuch (talk) 23:39, 28 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose on several grounds not the least of which this is too small. Saffron Blaze (talk) 02:18, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Oppose due to tiny size and large copyright notice. --Tuxyso (talk) 06:28, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
![]() |
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: It is too small, only 0.7MPx. Minimum is 2MPx. - G Furtado (talk) 12:00, 29 June 2013 (UTC) | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |