User talk:Xenotron/Archive 4

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
File:Metro train 81-718.0-719.0.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ymblanter (talk) 22:43, 27 February 2019 (UTC)

File:Komunarivska station 2, Dnipropetrovsk.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ymblanter (talk) 11:03, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Prospekt Svobody station 2, Dnipropetrovsk.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ymblanter (talk) 15:22, 2 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Metalurgiv station 2, Dnipropetrovsk.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ymblanter (talk) 07:32, 3 April 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:05, 16 April 2019 (UTC)

Need your presence at Featured video candidates

We request the honor of your presence at Featured video candidates
Dear Xenotron,
Featured video candidates needs your help and you can participate by reviewing or nominating your videos for the FV tag.

You can start reviewing/nominating videos now. Welcome! -- Eatcha (Talk-Page ) 20:51, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

Категоризация станций

Нужен совет. Есть, к примеру, Category:Kiyevsky Rail Terminal. И есть в реале протяжённая станция Москва-Пассажирская-Киевская, включающая в т.ч. вокзал, но категории (пока?) не имеющая. Как лучше категоризовать фото этой станции вроде File:Moscow, railroad tracks west of Kievsky Terminal (31394808936).jpg - ? Retired electrician (talk) 17:45, 13 July 2019 (UTC)

File:Moscow metro E 3605 museum car information poster.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

AVRS (talk) 15:47, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Привет! Создал новый шаблон {{Stroi.mos.ru}}. Можешь прогнать ботом по всем иллюстрациям оттуда? По мотивам данного обсуждения: Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with transport.mos.ru --Александр Мотин (talk) 18:04, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

@Александр Мотин: Привет! Прогнать я конечно могу, прада не ботом а спецутилитами утилитами вроде Cat-a-lot. Но для начала шаблон не мешало бы доработать по аналогии с Mos.ru по части автовстроенной лицензии и перевода на русский. Только есть ли смысл в отдельном шаблоне, если сайт находится в доменной зоне mos.ru и использует ту же лицензию CC-BY? Помио stroi., у сайтов Москвы есть огромное число поддоменов, где прямо указана лицензия CC-BY 3.0 или 4.0, и на каждый из них шаблонов не напасёшься - это и управы округов (например cao.mos.ru, zelao.mos.ru и т.д.), портал "Узнай Москву" um.mos.ru, различные департаменты и т.д. На мой взгляд, лучше доработать сам шаблон mos.ru, введя как второй параметр название поддомена, чтобы он отображался как префикс в атрибуции. Иначе такими темпами нам придётся под каждой поддомен со свободной лицензией шаблон переделывать и будет перебор. В качестве первого параметра сейчас там используется версия лицензии - 3 или 4.
P.S. До недавнего времени я, честно говоря, не был уверен до конца, можно ли брать файлы со stroi.mos.ru, т.к. на нём вообще ничего не было сказано про условия использования, и я, учитывая что все сайты *.mos.ru относятся к Правительству Москвы и с головного сайта была приведена ссылка на Stroi + на большинстве из них была указана лицензия CC-BY 3.0 или 4.0, считал, что если на центральном сайте дана разрешительная лицензия, она автоматически распространяется на его поддомены, если на них не указано обратное (исключение мне встречалось только на duma.mos.ru, где в условиях использования был указан словесный аналог лицензии CC-BY-NC-ND). И лицензионные проверяющие своими аппрувами подтверждали такую трактовку, я после этого тоже помаленьку грузил оттуда файлы с учётом этого негласного консенсуса. Однако теперь, насколько я могу судить, ситуация с лицензиями касаемо поддоменов (в отличие от подразделов) далеко но столь радужна, но по крайней мере на Stroi.mos.ru наконец-то админы зашевелились и вставили ссылку на лицензию, такую же как и на mos.ru. Правда на transport.mos.ru ситуация сейчас такая-же неопределённая как и на stroi.mos.ru до недавнего времени, и про лицензию ни слова не сказано. Xenotron (talk) 20:09, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
Да это я сегодня написал в редакцию stroi.mos.ru, попросил для не слишком грамотных участников Викисклада дополнительно проставить отдельную ссылку об условиях использования инфы с их сайта, чтобы избавить их файлы от нападок, они сегодня через несколько часов и поправили. Так все правильно ты говоришь, что лицензии mos.ru достаточно в тех формулировках. Но, к сожалению, появились люди, которым, видимо эти свободные файлы поперек горла встали по какой-то причине. Насчет шаблона ты прав если действительно можно сделать так, как ты говоришь. --Александр Мотин (talk) 21:01, 2 October 2019 (UTC)
Спасибо. Можно попробовать ещё запросить transport.mos.ru. Я правда не нашёл у них формы, зато она есть на новой версии сайта вот здесь. На новом движке у них есть внизу панель информации, что облегчает задачу по добавлению ссылки на лицензию, особенно учитывая что новый сайт в стадии бета-теста и админам проще будет его поправить. Думаю стоит и туда заодно написать с просьбой добавить информацию об условиях или лицензии. Если напишут несколько юзеров то будет больше шансов их расшевелить. Как аргумент можно указать что большинство московских сайтов включая mos, stroi.mos, data.mos и администрации районов уже перешли на данную лицензию и попросить сделать ссылку по аналогии.
Доработал шаблон Mos.ru и сделал редирект с {{Stroi.mos.ru}}. Теперь там появился дополнительный параметр subdomain (или второй безымянный параметр при его отсутствии) который подставляется префикс в виде указанного значения в адресную ссылку и атрибуцию. Для некоторых сайтов я также поменял названия в русской и английской версиях в зависимости от этого субдомена и проставил условие проставления файла в ту или иную категорию. Можешь посмотреть исходный код {{Mos.ru}} и {{Mos.ru/ru}} как выглядит синтаксис оператора выбора по значению строки switch (в конце указано дефолтное значение), проверки существования параметра if и эквивалентности двух значений ifeq, после которых первым указывается подстановка если уловии = да, а во втором - если нет. При желании можно дополнить или доработать. Только сайты округов и районов я не стал добавлять, их реально много Xenotron (talk) 22:58, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Tatra KT4C 224 in Vinnitsya.webm

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  简体中文‎  繁體中文‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Tatra KT4C 224 in Vinnitsya.webm, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Tatra KT4C 224 in Vinnitsya.webm]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

— Racconish💬 16:41, 21 October 2019 (UTC)

File:Dnipropetrovsk Zavodska.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Maxinvestigator (talk) 02:28, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

  • To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
  • To perform file name swaps.
  • When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:36, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at Wikimedia Commons.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 22:05, 23 November 2019 (UTC)