User talk:Victuallers/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

your gif type magic square image

sample gif animation

Hi Victuallers! I used your file at test.wikipedia.
Please follow the link from commons:Help desk#today this is a draft · how to improve the SVG file.
Can you please help? If not can you get some help from skilled users?
Thanks in advance for any support! Best regards lɛʁi ʁɑjnhɑʁt (Leri Reinhart)
‫·‏לערי ריינהארט‏·‏T‏·‏m‏:‏Th‏·‏T‏·‏email me‏·‏‬ 21:35, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Mercy Adisafe.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--Krdbot 02:00, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

File:1940s family Ransome Kuti.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Goldsztajn (talk) 07:06, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

File:CM Naveen Patnaik during AAC2017.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

clpo13(talk) 23:25, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Buidhe (talk) 18:42, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

Uploads YouTube

Dear Victuallers, I only upload stills from videos from YouTube with a Creative Commons license. Licenses at YouTube videos are frequently changed though. The link to the archived video at archive.org is also given, with the correct CC license still visible. Vysotsky (talk) 23:21, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

At the same time I like your proposals for deletion, as they will speed up the process of confirmation of the CC licenses. Here are some more files uploaded by me awaiting confirmation of the stated licenses. Vysotsky (talk) 23:32, 13 July 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Real life bukola.png

Copyright status: File:Real life bukola.png

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Real life bukola.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:05, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

License review

Hi, could you please review license for this file: File:Alicja Szemplinska.jpg. Thanks in advance. ArturSik (talk) 18:35, 8 August 2020 (UTC) Twas done Victuallers (talk) 08:50, 25 August 2020 (UTC)


File:2019 Nari Shakti Puraskar award from the President of India in Delhi.png has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: No source information provided and doesn't seem like own work.)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now ! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : LifetimeWiki.

And also:

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 16:11, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:2019 Nari Shakti Puraskar award from the President of India in Delhi.png

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:2019 Nari Shakti Puraskar award from the President of India in Delhi.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Wdwd (talk) 08:58, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Ms. Gauri Maulekhi - -NariShakti Puraskar 2017 Awardee (Individual).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Taivo (talk) 10:49, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Ethel de la Coer in 1929 or 30.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ethel de la Coer in 1929 or 30.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 11:05, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2020! Please help with this survey

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Dear Victuallers,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2020, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again for a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 200K+ pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey.

Please fill in this short survey and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2020.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team, 08:21, 14 November 2020 (UTC)

Hi, Victuallers, I was wondering if you could take a closer look at the description of the file, seems like mixed up. Thank you for your time. Lotje (talk) 13:04, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Cancelling deletion request

Hi, I was wondering if you would be able to cancel this deletion request. I created it by mistake as the file qualified for speedy deletion and had already been removed and I don’t really know how to undo the request and delete the nomination page. Best wishes. ArturSik (talk) 14:20, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

@ArturSik: Can you can just load it again and explain why it is there again? I don't have the power on commons to undelete things Victuallers (talk) 15:53, 22 December 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Ytoyoda (talk) 19:37, 29 December 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:47, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Strongly object Victuallers (talk) 11:10, 5 January 2021 (UTC)

hi

Please resotre my page to pre October 2020 I am being attacked.Major credits are missing.Please don't let trolls or vandals write your herstory incorrectly - or negate my achievements. Major creidts are missing./Please refix form pre october 2020.. @WikiWomenInRed

please fix the page that has been vandalized again ! since you fixed it two hours ago 

@jimmy_wales

@Wikipedia

@HeralddeParis — Preceding unsigned comment added by Springwater88 (talk • contribs) 08:30, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

There appears to be edit warring happening with several accounts trying to introduce uncited information. I have protected the article to help see who is who. Do not edit your own page. Make comments on the talk page if you have issues. Victuallers (talk) 08:37, 26 January 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Amakuru (talk • contribs) 10:17, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Affected:

Cheers − Amakuru (talk) 10:18, 18 February 2021 (UTC)

Mairi Hedderwick pics

Much as I like the new Mairi Hedderwick pics you have uploaded, I am not sure whether they can be used here.

Although they are on Flickr as CC-BY, they also carry the wording "No sales or syndication", which is a narrower condition than CC-BY, and I am not sure we can host it here. (It's getting close to CC-BY-NC, which we definitely can't host here). "No sales" is a clear restriction on some commercial forms of re-use, and "no syndication" looks like no re-licensing. Jheald (talk) 17:56, 16 March 2021 (UTC)

@Jheald: I'm aware of that but I think you will find that the publisher in this case the Scottish government has decided that it is OK. That's OK for me but I know that some times the consensus is that despite it being overseen by a large responsible body that we know more and we can see what was intended despite the contradiction. I would say trust the last decision made by the Scots gov, but its the decision of the consensus I guess. Victuallers (talk) 20:11, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
I thought about this overnight and on second thoughts lets delete these images. The point above is important but the stake is not large enough to debate. Cheers Victuallers (talk) 08:10, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Thanks. No hard feelings, I hope. It would be great if you could be in touch with the Scottish Government and get to the bottom of this, because they would be lovely images to be able to have. Jheald (talk) 08:35, 17 March 2021 (UTC) I have done. Victuallers (talk) 10:46, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Hey folks, I was in touch with the ScotGov folk about their Flickr account a month or so ago (with my user:Sara Thomas (WMUK) hat on) - they kindly moved almost everything (with a few exceptions) to CC-BY-SA, but there were a few that they had to exclude, these ones were some of them. I'm uploading the rest (filtered somewhat to only take over what's relevant and suitable for commons to c:Category:Images from the Scottish Government Flickr account. More info here. Lirazelf (talk) 12:33, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
@Lirazelf: It is brilliant work, I have been bigging it up with Ewan, Karen and Melissa. It has already spawned an article from me and I have labelled&catted several of the images. Hopefully the other big Scots institutions will follow the lead. The Royal Society said they would and Ed University makes good moves in that direction. In the case though of the images here then it appears that the change licensing mistakenly moved these images into commons. We are going to delete them as we wanted to show ppl like Scotgov that they can be generous and wiki will revert if they make a mistake.