User talk:Shizhao/2020

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
File:Pfp nanjing2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Wcam (talk) 14:57, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Category discussion warning

Similar images has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Estopedist1 (talk) 09:56, 18 January 2020 (UTC)

FYI/QIC

Hello! Just for your information: One vote per image at COM:QIC/L is enough. More than one vote is only necessary at the consensual review. Please review images without review first. --XRay talk 12:49, 19 January 2020 (UTC)

翻译通知:Commons:Wiki Loves Folklore

嗨!Shizhao,

您收到此通知,是因为您作为一名中文、简体中文和繁体中文的翻译者在Wikimedia Commons注册了。页面Commons:Wiki Loves Folklore已提供翻译。您可在此翻译:

这个页面有高重要度。


非常感谢您的帮助。像您一样的翻译者正在不断努力帮助Wikimedia Commons成为一个真正多语言的社群。

您可以更改您的通知设置

感谢您! Wikimedia Commons翻译协调员‎, 06:40, 27 January 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Roy17 (talk) 01:05, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Ratteu藝人形象圖.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Aaa1357932 (talk) 03:40, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

This is my own art, so I have the copyright Licensing tutorial zh This said I can upload my own art — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aaa1357932 (talk • contribs) 03:44, 17 March 2020 (UTC) https://www.deviantart.com/coffee-ratteu/art/My-New-Profile-Pic-806600992?ga_changes=1&ga_submit_new=10%3A1584439649&ga_type=edit Now I'd changed the copyright to cc — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aaa1357932 (talk • contribs) 10:10, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

Red panda

Hi Shizhao, I think you know Commons:Bots which reads "All bots running on Wikimedia Commons must have advance permission to do so." but I didn't find any at Commons:Bots/Requests. --Achim (talk) 21:11, 1 March 2020 (UTC)

Thanks. see Commons:Bots/Requests/Red panda bot--shizhao (talk) 02:23, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
File:Petronas Towers 1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:51, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Petronas Towers 3.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 02:52, 4 March 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Anthodioctes calcaratus, m, right, La Cruz, CR 2018-11-16-15.07.42 ZS PMax UDR (46534284854).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Anthodioctes calcaratus, m, right, La Cruz, CR 2018-11-16-15.07.42 ZS PMax UDR (46534284854).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

FP Promotion

This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Kalophrynus interlineatus, Striped sticky frog - Khao Khitchakut District (33500345788).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Kalophrynus interlineatus, Striped sticky frog - Khao Khitchakut District (33500345788).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 9 March 2020 (UTC)

File:Willow in the Red Zone, Christchurch, New Zealand.jpg

Why did you revert me here? The image is not tilted. Please see a discussion here. --Podzemnik (talk) 19:42, 11 March 2020 (UTC)

首页 has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Miactroll (talk) 03:51, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

File:十九世紀華人移民全球路線圖.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Zhu Zi Ling (talk) 20:32, 14 April 2020 (UTC)

Kevin Wang from the 2006 CWMC meetup - His romanized Chinese name?

Hi, Shizhao?

I went on File:CWC06 Banner Test 1.jpg to add to the description but I couldn't find Kevin Wang on archives of the HKU Journalism and Media Studies Centre website from circa 2006. If this was an actual faculty or staff, I wonder what years he was active. If you remember whether he was a faculty member, postdoc, staff, or student, I would appreciate it! Also I noticed HKU uses a different English name from the one in the banner, something I noted in the English description.

WhisperToMe (talk) 02:32, 19 April 2020 (UTC)

sorry, I do not know him--shizhao (talk) 02:49, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
I see. Anyhow, happy editing! WhisperToMe (talk) 07:33, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Hanafuda

Hi. You delete SVG-file in nominate Commons:Categories for discussion/2020/04/Category:SVG Hanafuda (image set). Me intresting - this file Category:SVG Hanafuda (image set); superseded PNG delete too?--Чорний Кіт (talk) 10:21, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

License review of VOA file

Hi Shizhao, File:İD bayrağı ile bir militan.jpg looks like a screenshot from propaganda footage, but you passed it for review.--BevinKacon (talk) 18:12, 25 April 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 03:25, 3 May 2020 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:AUD20-Transp-DSC03053.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 06:56, 10 May 2020 (UTC)

来源为北科百科的自由版权图像

有些来源链接无法显示缩略图,要点击“原始文件”才可以查看图片,如[1]。--DavidHuai1999 (talk) 03:13, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

File:2012学生会文体部.jpg的源页面挂了{{NoRightsReserved}},等同于公有领域。--27.122.58.238 03:57, 12 May 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Mussklprozz (talk) 07:13, 20 May 2020 (UTC)

overcooked screenshots

你好,

Overcooked (zh:胡闹厨房) 2 screenshot 是一特別例子,因讀取畫面截圖上注明了

"Please feel free to use any video footage or screen captures of the way in whatever way you like"

可隨意以任何方式使用任何視頻或截圖

故我認為此截圖是維基所容許的

SYSS Mouse (talk) 04:15, 10 June 2020 (UTC)

请求复原File:廖城兰(大马美食家食公子)造型照.jpg

@Shizao: 您好,我希望能复原此图片,因为我是这图片的原主。希望能予我复原。(Patricialiew (talk) 15:09, 24 June 2020 (UTC)

FOP violation Bot uploads

Please stop transfering files in violation of COM:FOP, such as File:The Burj Al Arab - Flickr - bryangeek.jpg. Thank you.--BevinKacon (talk) 11:55, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Poster Defend Moscow.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Poster Defend Moscow.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Alex Spade (talk) 14:43, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Niuhuru Empress Xiao Quan Cheng.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:31, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Tetea Hmar (cropped).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Tetea Hmar (cropped).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Wvdp (talk) 11:37, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, 廣九直通車 (talk) 05:05, 31 July 2020 (UTC)

Red panda bot overwrites existing files

Specifically, it does so if the descriptions and users match. See the file history of File:Ose to publish this photo I'd like to be attributed as Joshua Davis, and if you include a link please send people to jdavis.info. This is not required, but is highly appreciated since I give my work awa - Flickr - JoshuaDavisPhotography.jpg for an example. I don't think this is particularly common, but you might want to adopt the convention of adding the photo ID onto the end to the upload, as some of the other Flickr uploading bots do, to stop this from happening. Vahurzpu (talk) 07:14, 14 August 2020 (UTC)

有关文件 Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell.png

您好,看到您是中文使用者,所以我使用中文向您沟通。 关于我上传的文件 File:Kurzgesagt – In a Nutshell.png ,我已经得到Kurzgesagt组织的相关授权,因涉及对方律师的个人信息,相关证据我将使用邮件发出。 谢谢。--Hubble-3 (talk) 04:08, 16 August 2020 (UTC)

真实发光

https://www.bilibili.com/p/h5/22775907?share_medium=android&share_source=copy_link&bbid=XY3A2B234EF3681F3A8B4419A8D2CE5EA79F2&ts=1558521273714

本张专辑遵守 CC BY 4.0 协议。授权协议非常明显,专辑封面也是专辑的一部分,所以版权应该没有问题。Liuxingy (talk) 03:18, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Qiantang River Bridge has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this gallery, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

David290 (talk) 12:59, 30 August 2020 (UTC)

Red panda bot suggestion


Hi! I was wondering if you could add a space before the categories in the files the bot uploads? It would make it easier to look at the source. Thank you for such a useful bot! --Palosirkka (talk) 11:08, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

To delete

Please delete theese files:

--Gisel (talk) 07:04, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, 03:00, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

License review request

Hello, I recently uploaded a screencap from a official Youtube video released by former Malaysian prime minister Najib Razak. I have included all the relevant information for review. Upon taking a look at the backlog stretching back to 2018, however, I would like to request to fast-track the process for my upload, as the person in question has been convicted in Malaysia and sentenced to prison time, which means his Youtube channel could go down without warning. Thank you. Seloloving (talk) 15:16, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Duplicate uploads

Hi Shizhao - just been checking some uploads by red panda bot and put in Category:Birds. Quite a few are duplicates of files already uploaded on Commons - the problem seems to be images which have been edited in any way, e.g. having a border or a watermark cropped, or light / colour balance corrections made. Could you find some way the bot checks against original uploads to detect duplicates, rather than current versions of files, please? Thanks! - MPF (talk) 08:59, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Seems not easy--shizhao (talk) 01:03, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Leeminhobynewscn.jpg

please go through the previous in the discussion page the issue is already been solved in that page...Eventhough the server down since its old and works rarely...As a reporter working at www.news.cn and being the owner of the photo i took this photo with my camera this photo will also come under my own work i grant full rights to wikipedia to use this photo in several pages freely without any objections and i release it under free license since its my own work.. xiexie..:):) and I would also like to note that this image has been taken solely by me 7 years before and the copyright license has been expired now.. its free of use... xiexie..:):) Dominicoz (talk) 09:51, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

File:IPad Air 4 temp.png很明显是从苹果官网复制下来,我先后对该文件标注了no permission和copyright violation,但均被上传者移除,请问是否可以帮忙检视下该文件是否符合commons的版权要求?以及印象中普通用户不能移除速删标记,为啥他可以操作呢…谢谢!--Tim Wu (talk) 03:35, 1 October 2020 (UTC)


COM:AN/U

Deutsch  English  español  français  italiano  magyar  Nederlands  português  sicilianu  slovenščina  svenska  Tagalog  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  македонски  русский  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  العربية  +/−


Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Repeated improper removal and addition of templates to File:Leeminhobynewscn.jpg. This is in relation to an issue with which you may have been involved.

Verbcatcher (talk) 16:03, 2 October 2020 (UTC)

Don't tag 10+ year uploads for semi-speedy deletion

Please only use the semi-speedy deletion process for recent files, not for 10+ year old files like File:Vlaamse-vlag.jpg. I expected you to know that as an admin. Multichill (talk) 17:42, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

And this one is very counter productive too, see Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#Group_license_review_request_for_Fæ's_2014_uploads_from_Picasa. Multichill (talk) 17:50, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

Upload date vs. creation date on Flickr

Hi, your bot uploaded a very nice photo like this back in August. It took the upload date on Flickr and added it into the "date" column with a {{Taken on}} template. It should really only use that template when it is actually the creation date, not the upload date. If it is the upload date, it could use something like {{Published on}}, or no template at all, or even no date at all; even that is better than to have a definitive statement of "taken on" with a wrong date! In this case (where the difference was more than a year!) I fixed it by taking the date from the EXIF data and adding that with {{Exif date}}; this is also something you could look into your bot doing where appropriate. Tokfo (talk) 17:29, 10 October 2020 (UTC)

This may be a problem with the flickr API. see the image flickr API data:
{ "photo": { "id": "49942249223", "server": "65535", "farm": 66, "dateuploaded": "1590609142", "isfavorite": 0, "license": 9, "safety_level": 0, "rotation": 0, "originalsecret": "1612a08f47", "originalformat": "jpg", 
    "owner": { "nsid": "141783395@N02", "username": "Pierre Blaché", "realname": "Pierre Blaché", "location": "Paris, France", "iconserver": "65535", "iconfarm": 66, "path_alias": "pierre9x6" }, 
    "title": { "_content": "Vienna, Austria" }, 
    "description": { "_content": "<a href=\"https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/pierre9x6\/\" rel=\"noreferrer nofollow\"> 🡆 Instagram 🡄 <\/a>" }, 
    "visibility": { "ispublic": 1, "isfriend": 0, "isfamily": 0 }, 
    "dates": { "posted": "1590609142", "taken": "2020-05-27 00:30:37", "takengranularity": 0, "takenunknown": 1, "lastupdate": "1591307544" }, "views": "4653", 
    "editability": { "cancomment": 0, "canaddmeta": 0 }, 
    "publiceditability": { "cancomment": 1, "canaddmeta": 1 }, 
    "usage": { "candownload": 1, "canblog": 0, "canprint": 0, "canshare": 1 }, 
    "comments": { "_content": 23 }, 
    "notes": { 
      "note": [
        
      ] }
 ...

--shizhao (talk) 00:54, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Is there a documentation of this somewhere? I'm not familiar with it but my guess would be that "takenunknown": 1 could mean to treat it as a publication date? Certainly if I visit the file page on Flickr, it just says "Uploaded on May 27, 2020", while for many other photos it says "Taken on". So Flickr clearly has the necessary data. Tokfo (talk) 07:31, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
""taken": "2020-05-27 00:30:37"" is taken time, in EXIF of the image is "File change date and time", so this may be a flickr's API error--shizhao (talk) 07:53, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Wcam (talk) 12:34, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Ferrari Roma image

I made a talkpage discussion, since trying to provide evidence that I uploaded it with permission from the author is the usual website sources. The author is a friend of mine on Discord who went to the show where that Ferrari Roma was. --Vauxford (talk) 22:48, 22 October 2020 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Temphkid1.jpg

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Temphkid1.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

廣九直通車 (talk) 06:14, 31 October 2020 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:The reconstructed Zhoukoudian skull.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: No evidence the uploader is the copyright holder
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Dunkleosteus77.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 19:10, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Mrcl lxmna (talk) 04:14, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

树人

这些图片均得到授权 Whyjsjjsjj (talk) 15:31, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

树人图片

本人得到拍摄者与被拍摄者的同意,上传图片 Whyjsjjsjj (talk) 15:35, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

怎么说明这些图片是我的 Whyjsjjsjj (talk) 15:47, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

照片

请问怎么添加编辑摘要 Whyjsjjsjj (talk) 15:47, 27 November 2020 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Kanagawa-ch-map.png

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Kanagawa-ch-map.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 12:45, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

File:Kanagawa-ch-map.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

  — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 13:14, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Happy holidays 2020/2021!

  * Happy Holidays 2020/2021, Shizhao! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   -- George Chernilevsky talk 13:40, 23 December 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:20, 30 December 2020 (UTC)