User talk:Sam.Donvil

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Sam.Donvil!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 08:32, 4 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

Hello! The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey. We want to know how well we are supporting your work on and off wiki, and how we can change or improve things in the future.^{[survey 1]} The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation. You have been randomly selected to take this survey as we would like to hear from your Wikimedia community. To say thank you for your time, we are giving away 20 Wikimedia T-shirts to randomly selected people who take the survey.^{[survey 2]} The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes.

Take the survey now!

You can find more information about this project. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. Please visit our frequently asked questions page to find more information about this survey. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email to surveys@wikimedia.org.

Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 20:09, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

↑ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
↑ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

(Sorry to write in Engilsh)

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 07:59, 24 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Depicts testing[edit]

I noticed that you tried out depicts on Test-Commons. Please take a moment to let the developers know what you think, whether it's answering their direct questions, leaving your own feedback, or even noting if you don't have any feedback to give at this time. It would be much appreciated. Thanks. Keegan (WMF) (talk) 18:45, 29 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Images from Jakob Smitsmuseum[edit]

Hoi Sam, mooie uploads! De categorie Category:Images from Jakob Smitsmuseum geeft aan wat de bron van een afbeelding is, niet wat het is. Dit soort bron categorieën maken we altijd verborgen. Het is gebruikelijk om dit soort bron categorieën door middel van een sjabloon toe te voegen. Bijvoorbeeld {{Cleveland Museum of Art-source}} en direct een categorie van het type werk toe te voegen. Voor werken in het publieke domein kan je het beste altijd (een variant van) het {{PD-art}} sjabloon gebruiken. In dit geval heb ik er {{Licensed-PD-Art|PD-old-auto-1923|Cc-zero|deathyear=1635}} ([1]) van gemaakt. Multichill (talk) 09:48, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thx voor de tip. Ik heb deze categorie systhematisch toegepast op aanraden van Romaine. Ik zal in het vervolg de sjabloon toevoegen!--Sam.Donvil (talk) 13:34, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Seghers, Daniël (1590-1661); schilder en jezuïet, Lievens, Jan, Felixarchief, 12 9365 recto.jpg[edit]

File:Seghers, Daniël (1590-1661); schilder en jezuïet, Lievens, Jan, Felixarchief, 12 9365 recto.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

GMG ^talk 14:20, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

FelixArchief[edit]

First off, thanks for uploading all these. I've been picking through some of them, adding categories and adding them to projects as needed. I was going to ask, quite a few of these seem to be of the opposite side of the page from the main media. Do these contain some pertinent information or do you think they may have been included in the batch by accident? GMG ^talk 14:37, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Dear GreenMeansGo, thank you for enriching the metadata and adding categories! I'm not sure I understood what you mean by opposite side of the page. If you mean the colorcharts on the bottom, it's because these are images donated by the institution itself. Leaving in the color chart improves usability and shows that this is in fact a colorcorrected quality reproduction. If so desired they can ofcourse be cropped from there. Is this what you mean?--Sam.Donvil (talk) 13:44, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Zich omkerende meisjeskop, Wilhelm Lehmbruck, 1910, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 2006-A.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Zich omkerende meisjeskop, Wilhelm Lehmbruck, 1910, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 2006-A.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Zich omkerende meisjeskop, Wilhelm Lehmbruck, 1910, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 2006-A.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Martin Sg. (talk) 18:39, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Zelfportret, Torajirō Kojima, 2000, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 2000-D.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Zelfportret, Torajirō Kojima, 2000, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 2000-D.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Martin Sg. (talk) 18:41, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:De sterrenvisser, Frits Van den Berghe, 1920, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1987-A.jpg[edit]

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:De sterrenvisser, Frits Van den Berghe, 1920, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1987-A.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:De sterrenvisser, Frits Van den Berghe, 1920, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1987-A.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Martin Sg. (talk) 18:41, 25 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Zelfportret, Torajirō Kojima, 2000, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 2000-D.jpg[edit]

File:Zelfportret, Torajirō Kojima, 2000, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 2000-D.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

SandraF (WMF) (talk) 19:12, 29 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gruterus, Janus (1560-1627); klassiek filoloog, antiquaar, dichter en bibliothecaris (alias Jan de Gruytere), Felixarchief, 12 9279 verso.jpg[edit]

File:Gruterus, Janus (1560-1627); klassiek filoloog, antiquaar, dichter en bibliothecaris (alias Jan de Gruytere), Felixarchief, 12 9279 verso.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Adelfrank (talk) 21:31, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moeder en kind, Ernest Midy, collectie Jakob Smitsmuseum, 0425.jpg didn't upload completely[edit]

Hi, Many thanks for your recent uploads. Just to flag up that File:Moeder en kind, Ernest Midy, collectie Jakob Smitsmuseum, 0425.jpg doesn't appear to have uploaded correctly. Please can you have another go at this? Just overwrite the existing image by clicking the 'Upload a new version of this file' link so you don't have to do the whole thing from scratch. Many thanks. Crep171166 (talk) 15:53, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Moeder en kind, Ernest Midy, collectie Jakob Smitsmuseum, 0425.jpg[edit]

File:Moeder en kind, Ernest Midy, collectie Jakob Smitsmuseum, 0425.jpg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD F7 (file is empty, corrupt, or in a disallowed format): No response to request to re-upload since 8 October 2020

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

Crep1711 (talk) 13:40, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OpenRefine starts SDC development! 💎[edit]

Hello Sam! I hope all is well :-) As you may be very well aware, OpenRefine has started development of features for Structured Data on Wikimedia Commons. Would you like to be informed about ongoing work? You can sign up here to receive occasional updates on a Wikimedia talk page of your choice. Also, feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions! SFauconnier (talk) 16:26, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Reinaert de Vos voor de vierschaar van Koning Nobel den leeuw. Naverteld en uitgegeven door Stijn Streuvels, Gustave Van de Woestijne, 1900, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 2008-D-9.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Reinaert de Vos voor de vierschaar van Koning Nobel den leeuw. Naverteld en uitgegeven door Stijn Streuvels, Gustave Van de Woestijne, 1900, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 2008-D-9.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Reinaert de Vos voor de vierschaar van Koning Nobel den leeuw. Naverteld en uitgegeven door Stijn Streuvels, Gustave Van de Woestijne, 1900, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 2008-D-9.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 21:05, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hoi @Sam.Donvil, blijkbaar heb ik jouw overlegpagina op mijn volglijst, want ik kreeg een bericht via e-mail. Volgens mij ben je aan het test uploaden met OpenRefine ter voorbereiding van je workshop? Zorg dat je bij alle bestanden de licentie (copyright status) niet enkel in de structured data stopt, maar ook in de Wikitext, anders is het auteursrecht niet zichtbaar en worden de bestanden genomineerd voor verwijdering. Je kan bijvoorbeeld deze Wikitext gebruiken voor alle bestanden die een kunstwerk tonen dat op Wikidata staat en die publiek domein zijn:

=={{int:filedesc}}==
{{Artwork}}
=={{int:license-header}}==
{{PD-Art|PD-old-auto}}

Zie ook https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Structured_data/Modeling/Visual_artworks (pagina is nog under construction). Groetjes, Spinster (talk) 22:02, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Bespotting van Christus, Jakob Smits, 1926, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1951-K.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Bespotting van Christus, Jakob Smits, 1926, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1951-K.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bespotting van Christus, Jakob Smits, 1926, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1951-K.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 22:07, 27 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, I have updated the wikitext, including the Qid for the artwork pulling in more metadata and the public domain template. Thank you for your patience. With kind regards,

Sam Sam.Donvil (talk) 16:28, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Schets, Antoine Wiertz, Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1922-E.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Schets, Antoine Wiertz, Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1922-E.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Schets, Antoine Wiertz, Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1922-E.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 13:24, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, I have updated the wikitext, including the Qid for the artwork pulling in more metadata and the public domain template. Thank you for your patience. With kind regards,

Sam Sam.Donvil (talk) 16:28, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:De Grote Markt in Brussel, Gustave Walckiers, 1890, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1892-F.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:De Grote Markt in Brussel, Gustave Walckiers, 1890, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1892-F.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:De Grote Markt in Brussel, Gustave Walckiers, 1890, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1892-F.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 14:24, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, I have updated the wikitext, including the Qid for the artwork pulling in more metadata and the public domain template. Thank you for your patience. With kind regards,

Sam Sam.Donvil (talk) 16:29, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:De crypte van de basiliek San Martino ai Monti in Rome, Jodocus Sebastiaen van den Abeele, Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1951-A.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:De crypte van de basiliek San Martino ai Monti in Rome, Jodocus Sebastiaen van den Abeele, Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1951-A.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:De crypte van de basiliek San Martino ai Monti in Rome, Jodocus Sebastiaen van den Abeele, Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1951-A.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 15:24, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, I have updated the wikitext, including the Qid for the artwork pulling in more metadata and the public domain template. Thank you for your patience. With kind regards,

Sam Sam.Donvil (talk) 16:30, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Leielandschap of De weg naar het Patijntje in Gent, César de Cock, 1863, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1883-E, met kader.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Leielandschap of De weg naar het Patijntje in Gent, César de Cock, 1863, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1883-E, met kader.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Leielandschap of De weg naar het Patijntje in Gent, César de Cock, 1863, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1883-E, met kader.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:24, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, I have updated the wikitext, including the Qid for the artwork pulling in more metadata and the public domain template. Thank you for your patience. With kind regards,

Sam Sam.Donvil (talk) 16:30, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Worstelaars in Bretagne (Frankrijk), Lucien Simon, 1898, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1914-AZ.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Worstelaars in Bretagne (Frankrijk), Lucien Simon, 1898, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1914-AZ.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Worstelaars in Bretagne (Frankrijk), Lucien Simon, 1898, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1914-AZ.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:24, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, I have updated the wikitext, including the Qid for the artwork pulling in more metadata and the public domain template. Thank you for your patience. With kind regards,

Sam Sam.Donvil (talk) 16:30, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Zelfportret, Jodocus Sebastiaen van den Abeele, 1900, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1963-A.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Zelfportret, Jodocus Sebastiaen van den Abeele, 1900, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1963-A.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Zelfportret, Jodocus Sebastiaen van den Abeele, 1900, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1963-A.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 18:24, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, I have updated the wikitext, including the Qid for the artwork pulling in more metadata and the public domain template. Thank you for your patience. With kind regards,

Sam Sam.Donvil (talk) 16:30, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Vossenjacht, Paul de Vos, Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1902-B.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Vossenjacht, Paul de Vos, Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1902-B.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Vossenjacht, Paul de Vos, Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1902-B.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 19:24, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, I have updated the wikitext, including the Qid for the artwork pulling in more metadata and the public domain template. Thank you for your patience. With kind regards,

Sam Sam.Donvil (talk) 16:31, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Zonnige dag, Emile Claus, 1899, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1904-X.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Zonnige dag, Emile Claus, 1899, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1904-X.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Zonnige dag, Emile Claus, 1899, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1904-X.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 20:24, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, I have updated the wikitext, including the Qid for the artwork pulling in more metadata and the public domain template. Thank you for your patience. With kind regards,

Sam Sam.Donvil (talk) 16:31, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Polyxena geofferd op de brandstapel van Achilles, Joseph Stallaert, 1875, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1877-E, met kader.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Polyxena geofferd op de brandstapel van Achilles, Joseph Stallaert, 1875, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1877-E, met kader.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Polyxena geofferd op de brandstapel van Achilles, Joseph Stallaert, 1875, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1877-E, met kader.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 21:24, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, I have updated the wikitext, including the Qid for the artwork pulling in more metadata and the public domain template. Thank you for your patience. With kind regards,

Sam Sam.Donvil (talk) 16:31, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Het leven van Christus en Maria, Frans Francken I, 1580, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, S-95, open 2.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Het leven van Christus en Maria, Frans Francken I, 1580, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, S-95, open 2.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Het leven van Christus en Maria, Frans Francken I, 1580, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, S-95, open 2.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 22:24, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, I have updated the wikitext, including the Qid for the artwork pulling in more metadata and the public domain template. Thank you for your patience. With kind regards,

Sam Sam.Donvil (talk) 16:31, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Grafiekmap met 15 hout- en linosneden, Gustave De Smet, 1920, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 2010-E-1, voorwoord.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Grafiekmap met 15 hout- en linosneden, Gustave De Smet, 1920, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 2010-E-1, voorwoord.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Grafiekmap met 15 hout- en linosneden, Gustave De Smet, 1920, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 2010-E-1, voorwoord.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 23:24, 30 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, I have updated the wikitext, including the Qid for the artwork pulling in more metadata and the public domain template. Thank you for your patience. With kind regards,

Sam Sam.Donvil (talk) 16:32, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Armenkamer in Utrecht, Joost Cornelsz Droochsloot, Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1914-IA.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Armenkamer in Utrecht, Joost Cornelsz Droochsloot, Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1914-IA.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Armenkamer in Utrecht, Joost Cornelsz Droochsloot, Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1914-IA.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 00:24, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, I have updated the wikitext, including the Qid for the artwork pulling in more metadata and the public domain template. Thank you for your patience. With kind regards,

Sam Sam.Donvil (talk) 16:32, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Landschap, Gustave De Smet, 1940, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1994-G.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Landschap, Gustave De Smet, 1940, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1994-G.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Landschap, Gustave De Smet, 1940, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1994-G.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 01:24, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, I have updated the wikitext, including the Qid for the artwork pulling in more metadata and the public domain template. Thank you for your patience. With kind regards,

Sam Sam.Donvil (talk) 16:32, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Vissers of Nederlandse vissers, Gustave De Smet, 1918, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 2010-E-15.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Vissers of Nederlandse vissers, Gustave De Smet, 1918, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 2010-E-15.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Vissers of Nederlandse vissers, Gustave De Smet, 1918, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 2010-E-15.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 02:24, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, I have updated the wikitext, including the Qid for the artwork pulling in more metadata and the public domain template. Thank you for your patience. With kind regards,

Sam Sam.Donvil (talk) 16:33, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:De marteldood van de heilige Sebastiaan, Louis Tytgadt, 1900, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1883-Q.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:De marteldood van de heilige Sebastiaan, Louis Tytgadt, 1900, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1883-Q.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:De marteldood van de heilige Sebastiaan, Louis Tytgadt, 1900, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1883-Q.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 03:24, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, I have updated the wikitext, including the Qid for the artwork pulling in more metadata and the public domain template. Thank you for your patience. With kind regards,

Sam Sam.Donvil (talk) 16:33, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Danseressen, Jean-Luis Forain, Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1911-HG.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Danseressen, Jean-Luis Forain, Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1911-HG.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Danseressen, Jean-Luis Forain, Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1911-HG.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 04:24, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, I have updated the wikitext, including the Qid for the artwork pulling in more metadata and the public domain template. Thank you for your patience. With kind regards,

Sam Sam.Donvil (talk) 16:33, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Bloemenkrans, Daniel Seghers, 1650, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1886-A.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Bloemenkrans, Daniel Seghers, 1650, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1886-A.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Bloemenkrans, Daniel Seghers, 1650, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1886-A.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 05:24, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, I have updated the wikitext, including the Qid for the artwork pulling in more metadata and the public domain template. Thank you for your patience. With kind regards,

Sam Sam.Donvil (talk) 16:33, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Albert en Isabella bezoeken het atelier van Peter Paul Rubens, Edward Dujardin, 1838, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1838-E.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Albert en Isabella bezoeken het atelier van Peter Paul Rubens, Edward Dujardin, 1838, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1838-E.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Albert en Isabella bezoeken het atelier van Peter Paul Rubens, Edward Dujardin, 1838, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1838-E.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 06:24, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, I have updated the wikitext, including the Qid for the artwork pulling in more metadata and the public domain template. Thank you for your patience. With kind regards,

Sam Sam.Donvil (talk) 16:34, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Christus en de overspelige vrouw, Jacob Jordaens, 1670, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, S-6.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Christus en de overspelige vrouw, Jacob Jordaens, 1670, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, S-6.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Christus en de overspelige vrouw, Jacob Jordaens, 1670, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, S-6.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 07:24, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, I have updated the wikitext, including the Qid for the artwork pulling in more metadata and the public domain template. Thank you for your patience. With kind regards,

Sam Sam.Donvil (talk) 16:34, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Doop in Vlaanderen in de 18de eeuw (studie), Félix de Vigne, 1862, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1904-EE, met kader.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Doop in Vlaanderen in de 18de eeuw (studie), Félix de Vigne, 1862, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1904-EE, met kader.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Doop in Vlaanderen in de 18de eeuw (studie), Félix de Vigne, 1862, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1904-EE, met kader.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 08:05, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, I have updated the wikitext, including the Qid for the artwork pulling in more metadata and the public domain template. Thank you for your patience. With kind regards,

Sam Sam.Donvil (talk) 16:34, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Begrafenis van de boer, Eugène Laermans, Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 2003-X.jpg[edit]

File:Begrafenis van de boer, Eugène Laermans, Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 2003-X.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Abzeronow (talk) 18:00, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, I have updated the wikitext, including the Qid for the artwork pulling in more metadata and the public domain template. Thank you for your patience. With kind regards,

Sam Sam.Donvil (talk) 16:35, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bloemenmarkt in Menton (Cote d Azur), Anna De Weert, 1928, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1950-BC.jpg[edit]

File:Bloemenmarkt in Menton (Cote d Azur), Anna De Weert, 1928, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1950-BC.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Abzeronow (talk) 18:36, 5 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, I have updated the wikitext, including the Qid for the artwork pulling in more metadata and the public domain template. Thank you for your patience. With kind regards,

Sam Sam.Donvil (talk) 16:35, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:De val der heiligen, Frits Van den Berghe, 1933, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1933-Z.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Abzeronow (talk) 20:42, 6 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, I have updated the wikitext, including the Qid for the artwork pulling in more metadata and the public domain template. Thank you for your patience. With kind regards,

Sam Sam.Donvil (talk) 16:35, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:De mens in het heelal, Frits Van den Berghe, 1933, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1986-D, met kader.jpg

And also:

Yours sincerely, Abzeronow (talk) 17:52, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, I have updated the wikitext, including the Qid for the artwork pulling in more metadata and the public domain template. Thank you for your patience. With kind regards,

Sam Sam.Donvil (talk) 16:27, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, I have updated the wikitext, including the Qid for the artwork pulling in more metadata and the public domain template. Thank you for your patience. With kind regards,

Sam Sam.Donvil (talk) 16:35, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hier 4 keer reageren heeft geen zin. Dit is puur een notificatie. Je moet op Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Media without a license as of 1 December 2022 reageren. Multichill (talk) 12:26, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Je uploads[edit]

Hoi Sam, ik zie dat je uploaden in OpenRefine aan de praat hebt gekregen en bestanden van het Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent hier online hebt gezet. Er is van alles fout met deze uploads zoals wel te merken is aan alle recente berichten hier. Wat is je plan nu? Heb je hulp nodig? Je kan het echt niet zo achterlaten. Multichill (talk) 13:04, 9 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

We hebben je ook nog mail gestuurd en totaal geen reactie. Dat is geen acceptabel gedrag. Onderstaande is een laatste waarschuwing. Multichill (talk) 13:02, 23 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Beste Maarten, excuses voor de late reactie. Deze upload was een test op de nieuwe uploadworkflow via openrefine te testen. Ik heb deze uitgevoerd zoals mij was uitgelegd en hetin de documentatie stond. Het blijkt inderdaad dat niet alle data zomaar meekwam en dat er toch een minimum aan wikitext meekomt. Ik heb sinds die upload jammer genoeg geen tijd gehad om de fouten recht te zetten maar het is altijd mijn intentie geweest om dit te doen. Kan je even meegeven naar welk emailadres je die mail gestuurd hebt? Sam.Donvil (talk) 10:46, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, I assure you that I made sure to filter out any non-PD works in this upload and that these images were provided by the institution itself. Sam.Donvil (talk) 10:48, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sandra heeft je op 9 december een email gestuurd met mij op de cc naar je meemoo.be adres. Die zal je wel gemist hebben. Hebben ze niet uitgelegd dat je eerst met een kleine batch moet testen, verbeteren, volgende batch, etc. totdat het in een keer goed gaat? Je hebt nu enorm veel extra werk veroorzaakt.

Punten om te verbeteren

Eerste kopje int:filedesc is weggevallen
Normaal gebruiken we {{PD-art}}, zie [2]. Er is geen {{Cc-zero}} licentie om op terug te vallen toch (zoals bijvoorbeeld Rijksmuseum en de MET)?
Zit nu helemaal geen categorie op de afbeeldingen en dan zijn ze niet te vinden. Categorie voor museum en kunstenaar is goed om toe te voegen
Afbeeldingen op Commons moeten in het publiek domein zijn in het land van oorsprong en in de VS. Voor België moet de maker 70 jaar dood zijn dus vanaf volgende week voor 1953. Voor de VS moet het werk meer dan 95 jaar geleden gepubliceerd zijn dus vanaf volgende week voor 1928. Voor een aantal van je uploads is de maker wel lang genoeg dood, maar is het werk te recent. Die zullen verwijderd worden en in een categorie zoals Category:Undelete in 2037 terechtkomen zodat ze over een aantal jaren weer uit de prullenbak kunnen worden gevist.

Er zijn nu al meer dan 500 afbeeldingen verwijderd. Je kan dat zien aan alle rode links hierboven. Ik denk dat opnieuw uploaden het minste werk is omdat je het dan in een keer goed kan doen. Multichill (talk) 13:09, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hoi Maarten,

Ik had na de upload meteen de wikitext geappend met een categorie met de perform batch tasks tooling in Wikimedia Commons en had toen de indruk dat dit gelukt was. Ik heb je opmerkingen in ieder geval opgenomen in de documentatie die ik aan het maken ben voor upload. Ik neem ook mee dat er naast BE ook met US copyright rekening moet gehouden worden. Dit heeft wel een grote impact. Dit jaar had ik Muzee gevraagd om naar een upload van werk van Constant Permeke te kijken. Deze is in BE PD maar een groot aantal werken zullen dan niet mee kunnen. Ik zal hen verwittigen. Ik heb de mail overigens gevonden. Ik had ze wel gelezen maar er zal iets tussen zijn gekomen. In ieder geval mijn excuses voor het ongemakt en ik zal begin 2023 de rest (die ook US PD zijn) opnieuw opladen. Sam.Donvil (talk) 13:50, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sam, I'm also working on slowly requesting undeletion for the files that I was unable to put licenses on before they got deleted. Definitely make sure the artworks are public domain in the US as well before they are uploaded. Abzeronow (talk) 16:17, 30 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations[edit]

Hello Sam.Donvil.

You have uploaded one or more files that are copyright violations. You have done so despite requests from editors not to do so, and despite their instructions. See Commons:Licensing for the copyright policy on Wikimedia Commons. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter useful.

This is your last warning. The next time you upload a file that violates copyright, you will be blocked. Please leave me a message if you have further questions.

Copyright status: File:Maria met Kind, Meester van de Magdalenalegende, 1520, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1957-AC.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Maria met Kind, Meester van de Magdalenalegende, 1520, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1957-AC.jpg

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Maria met Kind, Meester van de Magdalenalegende, 1520, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1957-AC.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 23:09, 29 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your opinion about OpenRefine and its Wikimedia Commons features: two (!) surveys[edit]

Hi! You have recently tried/used Wikimedia Commons features in OpenRefine (uploading files, or editing existing files). I'm curious to hear how this has gone, also if you only briefly tried these features.

To help the OpenRefine team with future improvements, it would be immensely helpful if you would be willing to spend a bit of time filling in two surveys. (Yes, two! Each of them uses a different method and (open source) platform). Both will run until approximately end October 2023.

A first, classical, survey (fully anonymous) where you can tell us how you use the Commons features in OpenRefine, and how you (want to) learn to use them better;
A second, more experimental survey (also fully anonymous) in which you prioritize the features that matter most to you. This second survey is a bit strange in that you can 'just keep clicking'. Feel free to use it as long or as briefly as you want; you can stop any time. Please also add your own suggestions!

Many thanks! With kind regards, SFauconnier (talk) 09:46, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[1] This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.

[2] Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

[survey 1]

[survey 2]

User talk:Sam.Donvil

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey[edit]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey[edit]

Depicts testing[edit]

Category:Images from Jakob Smitsmuseum[edit]

File:Seghers, Daniël (1590-1661); schilder en jezuïet, Lievens, Jan, Felixarchief, 12 9365 recto.jpg[edit]

FelixArchief[edit]

File tagging File:Zich omkerende meisjeskop, Wilhelm Lehmbruck, 1910, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 2006-A.jpg[edit]

File tagging File:Zelfportret, Torajirō Kojima, 2000, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 2000-D.jpg[edit]

File tagging File:De sterrenvisser, Frits Van den Berghe, 1920, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1987-A.jpg[edit]

File:Zelfportret, Torajirō Kojima, 2000, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 2000-D.jpg[edit]

File:Gruterus, Janus (1560-1627); klassiek filoloog, antiquaar, dichter en bibliothecaris (alias Jan de Gruytere), Felixarchief, 12 9279 verso.jpg[edit]

File:Moeder en kind, Ernest Midy, collectie Jakob Smitsmuseum, 0425.jpg didn't upload completely[edit]

File:Moeder en kind, Ernest Midy, collectie Jakob Smitsmuseum, 0425.jpg[edit]

OpenRefine starts SDC development! 💎[edit]

Copyright status: File:Reinaert de Vos voor de vierschaar van Koning Nobel den leeuw. Naverteld en uitgegeven door Stijn Streuvels, Gustave Van de Woestijne, 1900, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 2008-D-9.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Bespotting van Christus, Jakob Smits, 1926, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1951-K.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Schets, Antoine Wiertz, Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1922-E.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:De Grote Markt in Brussel, Gustave Walckiers, 1890, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1892-F.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:De crypte van de basiliek San Martino ai Monti in Rome, Jodocus Sebastiaen van den Abeele, Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1951-A.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Leielandschap of De weg naar het Patijntje in Gent, César de Cock, 1863, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1883-E, met kader.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Worstelaars in Bretagne (Frankrijk), Lucien Simon, 1898, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1914-AZ.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Zelfportret, Jodocus Sebastiaen van den Abeele, 1900, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1963-A.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Vossenjacht, Paul de Vos, Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1902-B.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Zonnige dag, Emile Claus, 1899, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1904-X.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Polyxena geofferd op de brandstapel van Achilles, Joseph Stallaert, 1875, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1877-E, met kader.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Het leven van Christus en Maria, Frans Francken I, 1580, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, S-95, open 2.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Grafiekmap met 15 hout- en linosneden, Gustave De Smet, 1920, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 2010-E-1, voorwoord.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Armenkamer in Utrecht, Joost Cornelsz Droochsloot, Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1914-IA.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Landschap, Gustave De Smet, 1940, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1994-G.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Vissers of Nederlandse vissers, Gustave De Smet, 1918, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 2010-E-15.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:De marteldood van de heilige Sebastiaan, Louis Tytgadt, 1900, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1883-Q.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Danseressen, Jean-Luis Forain, Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1911-HG.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Bloemenkrans, Daniel Seghers, 1650, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1886-A.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Albert en Isabella bezoeken het atelier van Peter Paul Rubens, Edward Dujardin, 1838, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1838-E.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Christus en de overspelige vrouw, Jacob Jordaens, 1670, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, S-6.jpg[edit]

Copyright status: File:Doop in Vlaanderen in de 18de eeuw (studie), Félix de Vigne, 1862, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1904-EE, met kader.jpg[edit]

File:Begrafenis van de boer, Eugène Laermans, Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 2003-X.jpg[edit]

File:Bloemenmarkt in Menton (Cote d Azur), Anna De Weert, 1928, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1950-BC.jpg[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Je uploads[edit]

Copyright violations[edit]

Copyright status: File:Maria met Kind, Meester van de Magdalenalegende, 1520, Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten Gent, 1957-AC.jpg[edit]

Your opinion about OpenRefine and its Wikimedia Commons features: two (!) surveys[edit]

Navigation menu

Search