User talk:Adelfrank

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Suchhilfe[edit]

(https://w.wiki/4Hw)

Bild[edit]

Hallo Adelfrank, ich habe auf [1] parallel zu dir noch etwas ergänzt, unsere Bearbeitungen haben sich dabei wohl überschnitten. Grüße, —Pill (talk) 15:02, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Adelfrank, die permissions-commons-Adresse ist eine Dokumentationsinstanz für Bildfreigaben. In der Regel ist es so, dass wenn jemand fremde Bilder hochlädt, er diese einfach mit der Angabe {{OTRS pending}} kennzeichnet - damit zeigt er, dass er ein "ok" vom Urheber hat, das aber noch nicht beim Support-Team dokumentiert ist. Danach sendet dann der Rechteinhaber (bzw. Fotograf) eine Genehmigung unter Angabe des Bildnamens an permissions-commons-de@wikimedia.org, und das Support-Team trägt dann einen Hinweis auf diese E-Mail (oder E-Mail-Korrspondenz, falls es Rückfragen gibt) auf der Bildbeschreibungsseite ein. Es geht natürlich auch andersherum - die Freigabe wird zuerst bearbeitet und das Bild wird dann hochgeladen -, in diesen Fällen wäre es aber am Besten, wenn das in der Mail des Rechteinhabers auch irgendwie steht (also zum Beispiel: "Das Bild wird erst noch hochgeladen, ich schicke euch dann noch den Namen des Bildes, damit ihr die Freigabe eintragen könnt").
Im konkreten Fall habe ich durch deine Angaben hier das Ticket (also den zugehörigen Mailverkehr) in unserem System gefunden und die Angaben auf der Bildbeschreibungsseite entsprechend modifiziert (einen Hinweis auf die Mail eingetragen und die Lizenz entsprechend der Angaben in der eigegangenen Genehmigung umgeändert): File:Martinus-Kirche Berlin-Tegel.jpg. Die Angelegenheit sollte damit erledigt sein. Kannst du dem Urheber noch mitteilen, dass sich die Rückfrage unsererseits damit geklärt hat? Ansonsten würde ich das kurz klarstellen, damit sich die erzeugte Verwirrung in Grenzen hält :-). Grüße, —Pill (talk) 14:57, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ich werde mich mit dem Urheber in Verbindung setzen. Finde es schon so peinlich genug, wegen eines Fotos Leute dermaßen zuzumailen. - Hätte ich diese Info vorher bekommen, wäre es nicht so weit gekommen. Túrelios Art bringt mich nicht zum ersten mal auf die Palme. Sein bröckchenweises HInwerfen von Halb-Informationen und die überhebliche Art konnte ich einfach nicht länger ertragen. Die commons sind (scheinbar bewusst) so unübersichtlich und schwer durchschaubar, dass ich allen meinen Bekannten eindringlich davon abrate Bilder bei commons einzustellen. Ich halte das auch nur einmal pro Jahr aus. Wikipedia find ich gut - Communs aber ist der absolut schwärzeste Teil an Wikipedia. - Das war mal wieder ein Beweis, dass sich seit 2008 nicht viel geändert hat. - Ich denke das war auch das letzte mal dass ich hier um Hilfe gebeten habe. Nächstens hau ich's rein oder lass es sein. Na gut, dafür kannst Du nichts. Ich danke Dir für Deine Info u. die Korr. --Adelfrank (talk) 18:02, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Gut, ich schließe das Ticket dann ab. Du kannst dich zukünftig in solchen Fragen auch gerne an mich oder Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard (gerne auf Deutsch, auch wenn die Seite sonst meist auf Englisch gehalten ist) wenden, die dort aktiven Nutzer verfügen selbst über Zugangsrechte zum E-Mail-System und können so auch versuchen, solche Bilder gleich allfälligen Genehmigungs-E-Mails zuzuordnen. Es tut mir leid, dass deine Erfahrungen in diesem Projekt so negativ waren. Grüße, —Pill (talk) 18:52, 2 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Túrelio, gibt es eine Möglichkeit das obige Bild von Prinz Harald nach Wikimedia Commons zu exportieren? Bei [File:PrinceHaraldDenmark.jpg] steht: photograph from private collection Stender, Copenhagen 1911 - Zu Stender konnte ich nichts finden, überhaupt nicht schlüssig, ob es sich um eine Sammlung Stender oder Photograph Stender handelt. Da das Bild allemal über 100 Jahre alt ist, müsste es doch exportierbar sein, oder? - Nächste Frage wäre dann, wie macht man das? Kannst Du helfen? Wäre toll. LG --Adelfrank (talk) 23:20, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, der Umstand, dass die Datei von einer inzwischen geblockten Sockenpuppe hochgeladen wurde und mit no-Commons markiert ist, macht es nicht gerade leichter. Auf Commons wäre das Foto mit {{PD-Denmark50}} sicher zulässig, du könntest es damit allein aber nicht auf :de benutzen. Du müsstest erst noch mehr recherchieren. Z.B. die angeblich unmittelbare Quelle "Wartenberg Trust", was ist das? Haben die eine Website, wo die Postkarte gezeigt wird? Gibt es dort oder anderswo Hinweis auf Stender? --Túrelio (talk) 06:18, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nein konnte zu Stender leider nichts finden. Zu Wartenberg Trust gibt es auf wp:en etwas, scheint in jedem Fall nur eine Sammlung zu sein. Aber ist auch nicht so dramatisch, wenns nicht geht dann schau ich mal wenn ich Zeit hab in meiner eienen Sammlung, da werde ich sicher was finden. Schönen Dank, trotzdem. LG --Adelfrank (talk) 18:06, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ortsteilkirchen[edit]

Hallo Adelfrank, warum löschst Du eigentich bei Ortsteilkirchen die keys raus? Bsp Category:Linari (Barberino Val d'Elsa) stehen jetzt alle Kirchen unter S. Hab ich übersehen das die da unerwünscht sind? Dich grüßt LigaDue (talk) 22:06, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo LigaDue, aber nur in den villages, nicht in churches in XYZ. Es macht wenig Sinn in einem Dorf Pieve San Donato statt unter P wie Pieve unter D zu stellen. Das Dorf mit den meisten Kirchen hat 4, die braucht man wirklich nicht unter 4 verschiedene Buchstaben stellen, zumal alle Ortsteile mit nur je einer Kirche sämtlich unter S wie San/Santa stehen. - Bei churches in XYZ habe ich dagegen sogar keys eingefügt. - Eine Villa oder z.B. das Castello Linari wirst Du auch bei castles in der Stadt XYZ unter L, im Ortsteil aber unter C stellen, oder nicht? Adelfrank (talk) 12:31, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Adelfrank, es ging mir nur um die Ortsteile, ich fand es Übersichtlicher, ist aber auch ok. Grüße, LigaDue (talk) 21:30, 28 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Standard building categories[edit]

Hi Adelfrank! Thanks for all your good work. For categories like "Frescos of Cathedral (Matera)" we normally use the preposition "in", like "Frescos in the Cathedral (Matera)". See for instance Category:Frescos in Santa Maria del Fiore (Florence) or Category:Paintings in Madonna dell'Orto (Venice). Same preposition "in" also for paintings and sculptures. I see you are doing many many new categories, so please try to apply a common standard. Thank you. --Sailko (talk) 11:28, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Sailko: , "Paintings in", I always take this. My mention is, you can change the place and put a painting in another place (church, museum ...) - But the most frescos are for ever a part of the building. But it's no problem to change from "Frescos of" to "Frescos in" - The problem is, I can not see a standard. It is different between many places. The most (I think) put it on the end, like these:

Category:Cathedral (Albenga) - Frescos; Category:Madonna della Pace (Albisola Superiore) - Frescos; Category:Pieve di Lemine - Frescos; Category:Santa Maria del Carmine (Florence) - Cloister - Frescos

What do you prefer, as standard "Frescos in Cathedral (Matera)" or "Cathedral (Matera) - Frescos" ? Or what you write above as standard: "Frescos in the Cathedral (Matera)" Adelfrank (talk) 13:36, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! I agree there is at least 2 standards. I have no preference, just "of" I have never heard before, and I was told when I was a beginner to use the preposition "in". The "-" is also ok for me. Thank you. --Sailko (talk) 14:28, 10 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your removals[edit]

Hello Adel.

I am not very versed in how Wikipedia works so I may be making mistakes. I noticed that you consistently remove photos I have inserted onto wiki pages for composer Aaron Zigman, actor Bradley James and writer Samuel W. Gailey.

Each time I have added photos that I own the copyright of or I have personally taken at an event. The only one I did not take but the photographer gave me copyright license for is the one for Bradley James however when I tried to give credit to the author you denied it.

Please help me understand or remove your removal?

Very much appreciated,

Ayncg

Hello Ayncg. File:Bradley james.jpg or File:Bradley James by Amanda Peixoto-Elkins.jpg is not your own work! - You need permissions. _ Here you can find all informations: Commons:Photographs of identifiable people (in different languages) - See also: Commons:Photographs of identifiable people/checklist. If your problem is after reading this pages not cleared, go to Commons:Help desk and ask there. - Regards Adelfrank (talk) 05:14, 20 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Remove İmages[edit]

  • Hi Error in {{reply to}}: Input contains forbidden characters. Tankyou for editing work but i have one Question. Why are you deleting the pictures I added? İt is my work>. I have these works in the photoshop. dont delet plse. --Atro S (talk) 15:02, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, I do'nt delete any pic! I make only suggestions for deletions. - About which picture we talk? This: File:Tohid-Malikzade-Dilmaqani.jpg? -If it's really your own work, how you declared, send an e-mail to Wikimedia Commons. - See also: Commons:Photographs of identifiable people/checklist - Regards Adelfrank (talk) 15:31, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
For the pics they really your own work, click in every file and send your permission to Wikimedia Commons. You declared all pics as your own work and it's not enough now to write me when some really own works. File:Azargoşnasb Temple.png is possible your own work, if you have an own space shuttle, may be not. If you have more questions go to Commons:Help desk and ask there. There are more people, possible you get there another answer for your problem. Adelfrank (talk) 18:59, 4 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion Nomination.[edit]

Hi There,

I hope you are well.

You have nominated my photo (Rob Locke.jpg) to be deleted for possible copyright infringement.

I own this image. It is of me. I am an actor and it is my professional headshot, which I am free to use as I wish.

I see that the photographer, Peter Adams, automatically included his information in the meta data, but I own the copyright.

Please can you advise what I need to do to stop my image from being deleted?

Thank you for your help.

Rob Locke www.roblocke.com www.imdb.me/roblocke

Deletion marked[edit]

Hello there I got a notification that you have marked a photo uploaded by me (Shivraj actor.jpg) for express deletion. Allow me to explain.

I am a new user on Wikipedia and I try my best to enrich the content by adding relevant, useful and authentic information on the wiki pages.

This photo was taken by myself, is of the hindi film actor Shivraj, who has acted in several hindi movies from 60s, 70s.. His photo was missing on the wiki page and therefore I uploaded and added it. It helps the wikipedia users to know about him and his identity.

Hence, request you to not to delete the photo.

Thank you, Diiigo Diiigo (talk) 02:13, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Diiigo - An upload of a screenshot is not "own work" how you declared. - Here you can find more informations: Commons:Photographs of identifiable people (in different languages) - See also: Commons:Photographs of identifiable people/checklist. Regards Adelfrank (talk) 03:38, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Re[edit]

Hi. Sadly, I can't. Perhaps it's in a queue where I don't have access. You may need an OTRS admin. Sorry. --Ganímedes (talk) 00:38, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

OH sorry Ganímedes, I was thinking that you are one. I asked stepro, but no answer: https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Stepro. So i must wait, sorry Adelfrank (talk) 00:42, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Don't worry. May @user:Ruthven can help. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 01:23, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I've checked and added/corrected the information. Cheers (BTW Ganímedes, you should have access to permission queues, right?) --Ruthven (msg) 09:05, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Hi, Ruthven, I do, but for some reason, the software didn't allow me to see this ticket. Thanks a lot for your kidness, as usual. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 11:25, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Deletion request of Pallavi Subhash.jpg published by Samar PS (User)[edit]

Respected sir,

You have made a request to delete Pallavi Subhash.jpg published by Samar PS. What details I have to provide to fullfill the needs.

Hello Samar PS, I remove the deletion-process. We need your permission. For this files that's your own work or you have the copyright send an email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. See here: Commons:OTRS or Commons:Email templates. Regards Adelfrank (talk) 05:48, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion Nomination[edit]

Hello,

I hope you are well. You have nominated my photo (Ruby Barker.jpg) to be deleted for possible copyright infringement. Ruby owns this image as it is of her and she sent it to me. She is an actor and it is her professional headshot, which she has paid for and is free to use as she wishes.

I have named the photographer, Steve Piper, but Ruby owns the copyright and has given me permission to use it on Wikipedia.

Please can you advise what I need to do to stop my image from being deleted?

Thank you for your help.

Erin

Hello Erin it was deleted on 5th: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Ruby_Barker.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1 . Make a new upload and Ruby Barker or Steve Piper must send short after uploading an e-mail to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org with the permission that you have the copyright. See also here: Commons:OTRS or Commons:Email templates. Regards Adelfrank (talk) 09:51, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Louise Bénédicte de Bourbon-Condé -> Category:Louise Bénédicte de Bourbon[edit]

Hello, sorry I don't speak German, but I thought I'd make you aware that you moved the category to the wrong name. Her full name was A L B de Bourbon, yes but she signed simply as Louise Bénédicte as you can see from the signature by her own hand in her category. Could you move it back to the previous and correct name at all please? Thanks 51.6.94.200 15:53, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Datta (surname) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


kashmīrī 17:23, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]