User talk:Rrburke/Archive 2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4

Saras oil refinery and ARST bus and train

I wrote to the companies and I'm waiting for an answer. Unfortunately, it's Easter time and many people are on holyday.--Roburq (talk) 13:55, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

 ==Cagliari container terminal port= I wrote them and they have yet answered me, but they want to examine the photo and the links. I'm waiting for a second answer.--Roburq (talk) 13:55, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

GOOD NEWS: the authorization--Roburq (talk) 09:15, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Oggetto: authorization Da: [email address redacted] A: <permissions-commons@wikimedia.org> CC: <[email address redacted]> Data: 03/04/2013 09:27

AI hereby affirm that PORTO INDUSTRIALE CAGLIARI SPA - C.I.C.T. the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of and http://www.cict.it/images/gallery/maersk1.jpg

I agree to STANDARD CHOICE publish that work under the free license "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0" (unported) and GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts). I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws. I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites. I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me. I am aware that the free license only concerns copyright, and I reserve the option to take action against anyone who uses this work in a libelous way, or in violation of personality rights, trademark restrictions, etc. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the work may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

PORTO INDUSTRIALE CAGLIARI SPA C.P. 483 - CAGLIARI CENTRO 09124, CAGLIARI -SARDINIA, ITALY 3 rd April 2013 --Roburq (talk) 09:15, 3 April 2013 (UTC)


The autirization has been sent yesterday but th photo has been deleteed!!!!--Roburq (talk) 06:49, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi, Mauro. Not to worry. Now that you have the authorization you can simply upload the file again. Here are the steps:
  • First, go to this upload form:
http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Upload&uploadformstyle=basic
  • Choose the file to upload in the field "Source filename:"
  • Choose a descriptive filename in the field "Destination filename:", but make sure to use a new filename and not to upload over an existing file
  • Drop this into the "Summary" field:
{{Information
|Description=Aerial view of the Cagliari International Container Terminal (CICT)
|Source=[http://www.cict.it/images/gallery/overview.jpg CICT website]
|Date=2007-05-11 05:01
|Author=[http://www.cict.it/ Cagliari Internatioanl Container Terminal] (copyright-holder)
|Permission={{subst:OP}}
|other_versions=
}}
  • For "Licensing" choose "Attribution ShareAlike 3.0"
  • Click the + symbol at "Categories" and add Aerial photographs of Cagliari‎ and Container terminals
  • Click the "Upload File" button
  • Next, forward the email you received from Hetty Lewis to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org with an introductory explanation. Make sure the email also includes:
    • the image attached or a link to the image at the CICT website
    • a link to the file you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons (or they may not be able to find it)

If there's any problem, let me know.

--Rrburke (talk) 15:18, 5 April 2013 (UTC)

Sorry, I can't succeed! I choose any kind of destination name. Rejected! Then I try to change the name of the file. Rejected. Then I download again the file with a differen name. Rejected. Every time it says me that there is already this file cancelled.....

Hi, Mauro. Sorry to be so long getting back to you. I have uploaded the file to File:Aerial view of the Cagliari International Container Terminal.jpg. Please forward the email you received from C.I.C.T. to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, along with the following:
Let me know if you have any problems. --Rrburke (talk) 13:21, 25 April 2013 (UTC)

Is cannoneris and molentargius, deleted

I'm trying to contact the authors: I find and wrote one of them, Still waiting.

Hi, Roburq. Don't worry: if they give their permission, the files can be undeleted. Please see Commons:Undeletion requests for more information. --Rrburke (talk) 02:05, 30 March 2013 (UTC)

Hi Rrburke, I find a quite similar photo of Molentargiua which is covered by Creative Commons License. May I upload it and change the photo? thanks Mauro--Roburq (talk) 07:47, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi, Roburq. You don't need my permission :) . But make sure the license permits unrestricted commercial re-use and the right to make derivative works. For more information about acceptable licenses, please see Commons:Licenze#Licenze accettabili.
Also, it's preferable that you upload the file under new filename. --Rrburke (talk) 15:45, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Ok, thanks

What do you think about this?

http://www.sardegnaturismo.it/ Note legali Copyright All text, sound, photographs, video, graphics and software contained within this site are protected under the laws on copyright, patents and those related to intellectual property. The trademarks, names and companies mentioned on this site belong to their respective owners and may be protected by patents and / or copyrights granted or registered by the authorities. Can then be downloaded or used for personal and non-commercial purposes, hence nothing, not even in part, be reproduced, modified or resold for profit. The site's contents have no legal value, you must refer to the texts adopted and published in the official paper of the Official Bulletin of the Region of Sardinia and the Official Gazette. Recall also that in case of discrepancy the latter prevail in the material published on the site.

Hi, Roburq. Unfortunately the license is not free enough: material uploaded to Commons must permit unrestricted commercial re-use. Licenses that restrict commercial use (or the creation of derivative works) are not acceptable on Commons. Please see Commons:Licenze#Licenze accettabili for more information. This link also explains acceptable and unacceptable restrictions in the definition of Free Culture licenses.
Some examples of acceptable and unacceptable licenses may help:
  • Acceptable licenses:
  • Unacceptable licenses:
Please feel free to ask if you need more help. --Rrburke (talk) 15:45, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks a lot again. I'm uploadin photographs from the site of the Comune di Cagliari which has choosen Creative Commons for all its contents, or, actually, I have understood in such a way. http://www.comune.cagliari.it/portale/it/condizioni_uso.page;jsessionid=B52E52BBDB86BF1BFA06B836184933F2

Hi, Roburq. Unfortunately the Comune di Cagliari has chosen the (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0) license, which is not compatible with Commons' licensing policy because it does not permit unrestricted commercial use:
  • “Non commerciale” (non commercial): si concedono al licenziatario determinate libertà sull'opera a condizione che l’utilizzazione di questa non sia prevalentemente intesa o diretta al perseguimento di un vantaggio commerciale o di un compenso monetario privato. Il diritto allo sfruttamento commerciale dell’opera rimane in capo all’autore che potrà decidere con quali modalità commercializzare l’opera stessa.
--Rrburke (talk) 17:29, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Oh no!!! It's a jungle: there is written Licenza C.C., versione 2.5 italiana!!! that I suppose coincides with licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 and so I must erase the last two photo I uploaded because their restricted commercial use. Actually, there is not the name of the author, so they are property of municipality at all. But I'll suppose it's flyweight, isn'it ?

Hi, Roburq. My mistake: it is "Attribuzione - Non commerciale - Condividi allo stesso modo 2.5 (ITALIA)". But this license does not permit commercial use, as you can see here at Section 4(c), which begins "Tu non puoi esercitare alcuno dei diritti a Te concessi al precedente punto 3..." etc. --Rrburke (talk) 18:06, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Thanks Rrburke. It is a very restricted policy because it is quite impossible to find good photos in the web with every permission. It is a pity. But Dura lex, sed lex. I'm not a good photographer, and weather is still rainy, but I have a good camera (all automatic :-) : next month I'll try to take some good photo. By, have a good week! As for me, tomorrow working again, bleah!!!

Hi, Roburq. Try having a look here to see if there is anything you find useful. These are all CC-BY-SA 2.0. You have a good week, too. --Rrburke (talk) 19:18, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 18:25, 2 April 2013 (UTC)

C-SPAN Video Library

Hi there, Rrburke, just saw your notice on my Talk page about the C-SPAN Video Library screenshot as a potential copyvio. I recommended to C-SPAN's comms team that they release images under a CC-BY license from their (well-established) Flickr account for use on the C-SPAN article, and I'd figured this was sufficient. If I've missed anything in the upload, would you please let me know? Cheers, WWB Too (talk) 13:49, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Hi, WWB Too. My mistake: I reverted my copyvio tag while I looked at the Flickr pages: I found a link off C-SPAN website to the Flickr page, so obviously it's affiliated with C-SPAN. I'm a file reviewer, so I'll approve the files. I have to say I'm a little surprised the whoever manages the Flickr account has the authority to license broadcast images or screencaps of the website, but whatever. Cheers! --Rrburke (talk) 13:59, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
No worries. The release was approved by Howard Mortman, C-SPAN's communications director, who reports directly to co-CEOs Swain and Kennedy. All should be OK; I figured this would be easier than OTRS. Cheers, WWB Too (talk) 14:23, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
Hi again, WWB Too. The reason the FlickreviewR bot wasn't able to review and approve the files is that the info template lacked a direct link in the "source" field to the Flickr file page. Adding such a link automates the approval, making it faster. Cheers. --Rrburke (talk) 14:45, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Permission for a photo I uploaded

Hi: Can you help please? I am no longer active on Wikipedia and don’t quite know how to handle an email I received yesterday from the Wikimedia Commons notification system about a photo I uploaded a year ago: “Please send permission for File:Peter Scott-Morgan (seated) as Chairman of BCS Robotics Committee in 1983.jpg to OTRS”. As I had not kept the details I emailed the original source. His Permission for Use is attached below and, as explained by his email, it is also on his website http://www.scott-morgan.com/blog/about/academia-and-business/. He also gives you permission to contact him directly if necessary (to do so I just clicked ‘Contact’ on the Entry Page of his website: www.scott-morgan.com - that produces: XXXXXXXXX@scott-morgan.com ). Thanks for helping! LisaNotsimpson (talk) 12:26, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

EMAILED CONFIRMATION: From: Dr Peter B Scott-Morgan Sent: 23 April 2013 17:13 To: 'Lisa XXXXXXXXX' Subject: RE: Please forward to: Dr Peter B Scott-Morgan

Dear Lisa: Yes I do remember you; no need to apologise… I suspect that you retrieved the picture you mention from this page on my website http://www.scott-morgan.com/blog/about/academia-and-business/ where it is labelled as ‘Copyright Free’ (if you hover over the picture you will see the Permission for Use). In answer to Wikipedia’s query, the picture was taken at my request by a colleague using my own camera – so the copyright was definitely mine to use as I chose. And my choice was to make it fully-publically available with no restrictions. Anyone can use it – including, of course, Wikipedia… Hope that helps. If Wikipedia needs to contact me directly then I have no objection. All the best, Peter Scott-Morgan


From: Lisa XXXXXXXXX Sent: 23 April 2013 10:59 To: XXXXXXXXX@scott-morgan.com Subject: Please forward to: Dr Peter B Scott-Morgan

Dear Dr Scott-Morgan

Sorry to disturb you! You might remember that I contacted you a year ago alerting you to a Wikipedia entry I had contributed about you. I have now just been requested to prove the "Permission for use" of the black-and-white 1983 picture I used of you as Chairman of the BCS Robotics Committee. Unfortunately I no longer have my notes about the article. Could you please confirm that the picture is indeed in the public domain (otherwise I worry it may be deleted)? Thanks very much. And apologies once again!!

Hi, Lisa. Happy to help.
The process for verifying permission is called OTRS (Open-source Ticket Request System). It sounds more onerous than it is: all it requires is an email from the copyright-holder sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org stating that he or she agrees to publish the image under a free license. Typically OTRS requires that the email be sent from an address associated with the website from which the image is taken, but I imagine that simply forwarding the email you received from Dr. Scott-Morgan will suffice. In general, Wikimedia would prefer the copyright-holder to fill out the declaration of consent you can find at Commons:Email templates, but Dr. Scott-Morgan's email is clear enough that there probably won't be a problem.
The email you send should include, along with Dr. Scott-Morgan's email:
Once you've sent the email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org, edit the file page, replacing with {{no permission since|month=April|day=23|year=2013}} with {{subst:OP}}.
If you run into any trouble, let me know. If you need more information about OTRS, please have a look at Commons:OTRS.
Incidentally, as a precaution I redacted your surname and the email address from your message. --Rrburke (talk) 14:19, 24 April 2013 (UTC)

All done! Thanks very much for your help!! LisaNotsimpson (talk) 12:23, 26 April 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Aerial view of the Cagliari International Container Terminal.jpg

català ∙ čeština ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ magyar ∙ português do Brasil ∙ Nederlands ∙ português ∙ français ∙ македонски ∙ slovenščina ∙ русский ∙ suomi ∙ 日本語 ∙ +/−
File:Aerial view of the Cagliari International Container Terminal.jpg which you uploaded has been tagged with {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the Volunteer Response Team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the Volunteer Response Team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org now. Please quote the file name ("File:Aerial view of the Cagliari International Container Terminal.jpg") in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the VRT noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up or contact a VRT member directly.

JuTa 17:56, 3 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Wiseman-infobox.jpg

Hello, I have the permission for this file, but it was already deleted. I asked the copyright holder to upload it again, maybe that way it will work, but he got the following message: "There was another file already on the site with the same content, but it was deleted." Please help me, what to do.Deligabi (talk) 11:17, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi, Deligabi. Not to worry: if the copyright-holder has given permission, the file can be undeleted by posting a request at this page: Commons:Undeletion requests. However, the copyright-holder must be able to demonstrate that he or she indeed holds the copyright to the image. This is done by a process called OTRS which you can read about at this page Commons:OTRS. In short, the copyright-hold must send an email to the address permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. The email should be similar to the template here Commons:OTRS#Declaration of consent for all enquiries. Make sure that the email specifies that the file in question was uploaded under the file name File:Wiseman-infobox.jpg, but that it was deleted. After that,post a request to Commons:Undeletion requests stating that the copyright-holder has agreed to publish this image under a free license and has sent an email to OTRS.
If you find any of this confusing or run into any trouble, I would be happy to try to help you. Just post another message here and I will respond. Rrburke (talk) 15:56, 30 June 2013 (UTC)

Deleted files

Good morning, I am trying to upload some pictures from which I have the rights but I previously used on Carles&Sofia official website. Some are pictures of newspaper reviews from which I took the pictures as well. I'm new using Wikipedia commons and provably didn't fill the forms correctly. Could you please tell me what do I need to do to be allowed to use these pictures in Wikipedia? The files that have been deleted are the following:

  • File:Carles & Sofia piano duo.jpg (used on the official website)
  • File:Carles and Sofia.jpg (used on the official website)
  • File:Carles & Sofia. Golden Recordings.jpg (used on the official website)
  • File:JIN MAO CONCERT HALL.jpg (picture of a hand program)
  • File:Freiberger Zeitung. 16.01.2006.jpg (newspaper review)
  • File:Diario Levante. 27.04.2001.jpg (newspaper review)
  • File:L'Eco di Bergamo. 01.02.2006.jpg (newspaper review)
  • File:Est Républicain 13.07.2007.jpg (newspaper review)
  • File:CD Compact. Enero 1997.jpg (newspaper review)
  • File:Vers l'Avenir 25.05.2001.jpg (newspaper review)

Thank you in advance and sorry for the trouble I might have caused. Your sincerely User:Littleparrot1

Hi, Littleparrot1. Welcome to Wikimedia Commons. I'd be happy to try to help. In the case of the newspaper clippings, these probably can't be used on Wikimedia Commons because they are likely copyrighted by their publisher, the owner of the newspaper. This is probably also true of the Jin Mao Concert Hall program: the concert hall probably holds the copyright. As for the cover of the CD, it is probably copyrighted by the record label, KNS Classical. If they agree to publish it under a free license such as Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (please see http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/es), it can be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. Otherwise it can't, because Wikimedia Commons can only accept free files (for a definition, please see http://freedomdefined.org/Definition/Es). To learn more about Wikimedia Commons' licensing policy, please see Commons:Licensing/es.
The others may be easier to license if you are the copyright-holder. However, because they have been published on the website previously, first it must be confirmed that you are the copyright-holder. This is done by a process called OTRS, which you can read about at Commons:OTRS/es. In short, the copyright-holder must send an email to the address permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. The email should be similar to the template here Commons:OTRS#Declaration of consent for all enquiries (unfortunately there is currently no Spanish translation of the letter). Make sure that the email specifies the file names of the files that were deleted. After that, post a request to Commons:Undeletion requests stating that the copyright-holder has agreed to publish these images under a free license and has sent an email to OTRS.
If you find any of this confusing or run into any trouble, I would be happy to try to help you. Just post another message here and I will respond. Rrburke (talk) 14:03, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your prompt response. It is a major help. I still have some questions: What must KNSClassical do to allow to publish the CD cover under free licence? Does de founder of the label need to send a declaration of consent as well or is there another procedure? And finally, what information of the copyright holder must be specified in the last part of the Declaration of consent form, where it says SENDER NAME AND DETAILS (to allow further verification of authenticity). What information should the copyright-holder include there?

Thank you very much for your support Kind regards

thank you very much. User:Littleparrot1

Hi, again. If the record label indeed holds the copyright, then a representative of the company who has the authority to do so (not necessarily the founder, but someone duly empowered) must send a declaration.
As for "SENDER NAME AND DETAILS", it should include the name and contact information of the copyright holder or his or her representative. In the case of a representative, it should specify what position the person holds that permits him or her to speak on the copyright-holder's behalf -- for example, "business manager" or "agent" or the like. It is better if the email is sent from an address clearly associated with the copyright-holder -- for in this case [someone]@carlesandsofia.com would be appropriate, because it would make the verification easier.
Again, please let me know if you have any questions or experience any difficulty. --Rrburke (talk) 21:50, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

Again thank you very much for your kind response and your support. I'm going to send the declaration of consent today and see if it works. Kind regards,

File:Oscar Peterson by Harry Palmer (1984).jpg

Hello!,

File:Oscar Peterson by Harry Palmer (1984).jpg, which you uploaded, is tagged for speedy deletion. Unfortunately, copyrighted images from the collection of Library and Archives Canada may not be used commercially and may not be freely modified without special permission. For more information, you can see Category:Images from Library and Archives Canada, the letter from LAC, Commons:Deletion requests/Library and Archives Canada non-PD images and the pages [1] and [2] on the website of LAC. -- Asclepias (talk) 00:51, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi, Asclepias. I understand the concern, but I think the issue is contestable, and as such doesn't qualify for speedy deletion but instead should be afforded a deletion discussion. Rrburke (talk) 01:26, 6 July 2013 (UTC)

arquivos

Os arquivos que eu carreguei tinha sim conteúdo livre. Atribuição a Creative Commons. (talk)

Oi. Capas de livros possuem direitos autorais. A pessoa que os carregou para o Flickr não é portador dos direitos autorais. Por favor, veja Commons:License laundering/pt. Tchau, --Rrburke (talk) 20:32, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

File:BeefCutChuck.svg

File:BeefCutChuck.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Closeapple (talk) 17:16, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Question

Hello Rrburke, do you know the source of this illustration: Cypripedium candidum ?. Greetings. Orchi (talk) 13:22, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Orchi. Yes: it's from a public domain field guide called Wetland flora: Field office illustrated guide to plant species which is produced by the NRCS National Wetland Team in Fort Worth, TX. It's published by the United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service. The source page is here and information about its copyright status is here. Cheers. --Rrburke (talk) 13:29, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
....thanks for the quick answer. Orchi (talk) 13:32, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Monumenta 2014

Hi Rrburke! Some pictures are copyright violations, it's my fault. But File:Monumenta 2014 at the Grand Palais, Paris 25 May 2014 (6).jpg is OK. It is a detail of a big artwork.--Paris 16 (talk) 20:52, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Copyright

Hi RRburke,

I have updated the copyright source of the images to a more specific link.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:M%C3%BCller-Brockmann_2.jpg

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:M%C3%BCller-Brockmann.jpg

Please look at it to remove the advice of bad copiryght for them.

Regards.

SCreativasJG

Hi, SCreativasJG. The problem isn't with the photographs as much as it is with the copyright status of the underlying works. They appear to be promotional posters advertising concerts dating from the 1950s. It's possible that, as mere text and geometric shapes, the may fall below the threshold of originality necessary to merit copyright. However, if they are copyrightable then they remain copyrighted because their copyright has not expired. As I say, this is a question of the copyright status of the posters themselves, not the photographs. --Rrburke (talk) 22:05, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

Violazione di copyright in un immagine donata con licenza CC BY SA ?

Salve, Ieri ho caricato due immagini che l'autore ha donato a wikimedia. Per essere in trasparenza totale ho fatto cambiare la licenza delle foto caricate sul suo account flickr in CC BY-SA, quando le ho caricate ho detto chi era l'autore cosi come riporta la licenza (nome e cognome), la licenza delle immagini che ha dato e la url dell'immagine di flickr in modo da risalire alla licenza. Questa mattina in wikimedia mi hai scritto un avviso di segnalazione di possibile violazione di copyright. come mai? cosa posso fare o devo fare altro per evitare la segnalazione? Grazie --DomenicoTurrisi (talk) 12:00, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Infringement of copyright in a given image under CC BY SA?

Hello, Yesterday I uploaded two images that the author has given to Flickr. To be total transparency I did change the license of uploaded photos on his flickr account in CC BY-SA, when I loaded I told him who was the author as well as shows the license (full name), the license of the images that and gave the url of the image to flickr in order to trace the license. This morning on Flickr I've written a warning signal of possible copyright infringement. how so? What can I do or I have to do to avoid the message? Thank you --DomenicoTurrisi (talk) 12:04, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Infringement of copyright in a given image under CC BY SA?

Hello, Yesterday I uploaded two images that the author has given to Flickr. To be total transparency I did change the license of uploaded photos on his flickr account in CC BY-SA, when I loaded I told him who was the author as well as shows the license (full name), the license of the images that and gave the url of the image to flickr in order to trace the license. This morning on Flickr I've written a warning signal of possible copyright infringement. how so? What can I do or I have to do to avoid the message? Thank you --DomenicoTurrisi (talk) 12:04, 30 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi, Domenico. The problem with the images is that the person who owns the Flickr account is not the person who took the photographs. The Flickr user uploaded the images to his account, but he didn't have the right to licnse them CC-BY-SA. There are a lot of copyright violations on Flickr, so it's usually prudent to check anything on Flickr that looks like a professional photo to make sure the Flick user has the right to license the image. This can sometimes be difficult, but using the EXIF data and Google Images are good ways to detect copyright violations. --Rrburke (talk) 16:11, 30 June 2014 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rrburke/Archive_2&oldid=225850967"