User talk:Rbrausse

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
archived discussions
2009-2014

Acanthocercus atricollis distribution.png[edit]

Thanks for the above map. very useful. The species is more widespread in northern South Africa than shown, and also occurs at Kivu Lake in Rwanda. Maybe you can add that at some point. JMK (talk) 18:38, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi JMK,
the maps are not drawn by me but based on the published data of the IUCN - and the A. atricollis distribution in IUCN's current geo DB is identical to the one I created for Commons in 2012.
So I'm unfortunately not able to help you, as my map-foo is too weak to create correct distibutions on my own.
rbrausse (talk) 19:34, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
File:Digging Thomomys bottae alpinus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Animalparty (talk) 03:46, 20 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Thrips tabaci.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Kopiersperre (talk) 21:06, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:47, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Helicophagus wandersii.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paul_012 (talk) 02:46, 27 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely EugeneZelenko (talk) 21:01, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed taxonomy[edit]

Hello Rbrausse, I think the determination of this picture File:Urocystis colchici on an onion seedling.jpg is wrong. Do you want to discuss about it in the discussion page? Thanks in advance. --Abalg (talk) 08:22, 11 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]