User talk:Rbrausse/2009-2014

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Rbrausse!

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans  العربية  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  Esperanto  español  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  magyar  íslenska  italiano  日本語  ქართული  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−


Hello, Rbrausse!
Tip: Add categories to your files
Tip: Add categories to your files

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:08, 17 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I noticed you made some distribution maps derived from IUCN. You may be interested in this partnership. Regards, GoEThe (talk) 12:48, 8 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hypoxylon_Fragiforme.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa (talk) 17:00, 31 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rbrausse, sei doch bitte so nett und kennzeichne Deinen Vorschlag im Rename Template zu dieser Datei bitte als den Deinen. Vielleicht bin ich ja einfach nur altmodisch, aber ich halte UTF8 in Dateinamen für keine so gute Idee - und daher wäre es mir ganz recht, wenn es nicht so aussieht, als wäre der Vorschlag von mir. Gruß, --Burkhard (talk) 20:10, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

uppsa, ich kenne das rename-template nur in Verwendung ohne Unterschrift - war keine Absicht. und zur Nutzung des vollen Zeichensatzes berufe ich mich auf Commons:Language policy, Dateien falsch zu benennen um ASCII-only-Usern entgegenzukommen halte ich für eher sinnfrei, spätestens ein copy&paste hilft immer aus (wichtig ist eben eine sinnvoll internationalisierte Beschreibung, um das Zeug auffindbar zu machen; aber da ist es einerlei ober es jetzt ue oder ü heißt... Rbrausse (talk) 20:49, 6 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Sie ist nun hier: File:Karte Muehlenradweg.png - Dann sind wir gleichzeitig das eklige gif-Format los. ;) Bzgl. ASCII oder nicht bin ich mir immer etwas unklar: Einerseits sind korrekte Namen gut, andererseits denke ich daran wie aufgeschmissen ich immer bin, wenn ich mit Dateinamen arbeite, die beispielsweise in Chinesisch geschrieben sind - da hilft dann wirklich nur noch copy & paste - Übersichtlich ist das aber nicht mehr, wenn man es mit mehreren Dateien auf einmal zu tun hat. ;) Viele Grüße --Saibo (Δ) 02:34, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ich will da überhaupt keine Grundsatzdebatte draus machen und hätte auch mit einem Umlaut gut leben können (sonst hätte ich Deine Änderung ja revertiert). Andererseits gehe ich davon auss, dass nur eine Minderheit der Commons-Benutzer tatsächlich Umlaute auf Ihrem Keyboard vorfinden werden (und noch weniger ein ß) - und denke, dass es einige Vorteile hat, Dateinamen tatsächlich tippen zu können und nicht nur kopieren zu müssen. Gruß, --Burkhard (talk) 12:12, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
ehrlich gesagt habe ich auf Grundsatzdiskussionen eh keine Lust :) [Nebenbemerkung: ich würde jetzt kein Rename-Bapperl setzen, nur um aus einem oe ein ö oder ø (um ein Zeichen zu wählen, welches sich in meinem Tastaturlayout nicht findet) zu machen. doch wenn eine Namensänderung/Neuanlage sowieso notwendig ist nehme ich keine Rücksicht auf die Layouts anderer...] Grüße, Rbrausse (talk) 12:51, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ja, nur deswegen umzubenennen wäre natürlich Käse (egal welche Richtung). Wie auch immer - einfach ist das Thema nicht. Beste Grüße an euch. --Saibo (Δ) 15:02, 7 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Trouts[edit]

Hi! For first sorry for my clumsy english. Taxonomy of the Salmo genus is still well confused...I think no two ichthiologists have the same idea about it. I applied the taxonomy of the Kottelat & Freyhof Handbook of freshwater fish of Europe, probably the newest and more updated book about European freshwater ichthyology. For K & F "macrostigma" is limited to Maghreb Mediterranean streams while the southern European "macrostigma-like" trouts are to be classified as Salmo cettii. The S. trutta macrostigma from Corse are considered as conspecific to S. cettii from Sardinia, Sicily or continental Italy. Regards--Etrusko25 (talk) 08:45, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, a great syntesis! That's OK --Etrusko25 (talk) 23:35, 17 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
That's my work...poor Etrusko! But I find it funny! Have a good wiki-work!--Etrusko25 (talk) 20:12, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talk back[edit]

Hello, I left you a message on my nomination page. wikitanvir (talk) 04:00, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rbrausse,

See? Don't Stop Believin' Commons admin... We may surprise you ;) Béria Lima msg 13:52, 10 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please give images better names[edit]

العربية  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  français  עברית  italiano  日本語  magyar  македонски  മലയാളം  Nederlands  polski  português  русский  sicilianu  slovenščina  suomi  Tiếng Việt  Türkçe  українська  中文  +/−


I noticed you've uploaded File:Iris_delavayi.jpg and I thought I should draw your attention to a common error. Please give uploaded files meaningful names. Otherwise they are difficult to track and it is hard to tell what the file is about without actually looking at it. I suggest you rename your image with an intuitive name that describes the file itself. Thanks, and happy editing!

This is just an information. New name might be File:unknown Iris.jpg. Renaming will be carried out by a filemover. No action at your side is required. Thank you. RE rillke questions? 13:02, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Mimesa equestris[edit]

Moin, Das Bild File:Mimesa equestris.jpg zeigt eine weibliche Schlupfwespe. Dies ist am Körperbau des Tieres eigentlich recht gut zu erkennen (lange Fühler, Legestachel..) allein die Farben stimmen mit der kleinen Mimesa eqestris recht gut überein. Leider hat sich dieses irtümliche Bild jetzt schon recht weit in der Wikipedia verbreitet. Ich werde es aus den Artikeln in denen es Falsch eingebaut ist erstmal einfach entfernen. So übrigens müsste das Mimesa equestris vermutlich eher aussehen: http://www.flickr.com/photos/habropoda/2867957305/ Ich kenne mich mit den Urheberrechten bei flickr nicht aus, aber ich befürchte, dass man das verlinkte Bild hier nicht verwenden darf. Vielleicht finde ich auch noch ein geeignetes Bild auf meine Platte, das ich Hochladen könnte, aber da muss ich selber auch noch mal etwas weiter Merkmale vergleichen.. Sie zu fotografieren ist bei manchen Viechern doch deutlich einfacher als sie zu identifizieren.

Gruß, --Aiwok (talk) 16:28, 15 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nachtrag: Ich habe da noch etwas gefunden und hochgeladen, was recht nah dran ist.
File:Mimesa bruxellensis 3.JPG
Gruß --Aiwok (talk) 15:53, 16 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
danke für die Korrektur - ich persönlich habe keine Ahnung und hatte mich da blind auf die Meinung in der Lebewesenbestimmung bei de.WP verlassen.
im Zweifelsfall ist kein Bild immer besser als ein möglicherweise verkehrtes :)
Grüße, Rbrausse (talk) 18:10, 18 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Acholeplasma palmae.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Bomazi (talk) 10:40, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent travail[edit]

Hello Rbrausse, I just discovered nice world about your work on fr:Utilisateur:Poleta33 talk page.
So I also discovered your excellent work on commons.
I will follow your work and do mine which involves adding {{Taxonavigation}}, {{ReptileDB genus}} and {{IUCN}} (Like this).
Would you do something for me? When you create a category like Category:Lygisaurus sesbrauna, would you mind adding a sortkey ? Even for a monotypic genus.
You just need to do that.
It would avoid me a lot of work.
Thanks in advance,
Best regards Liné1 (talk) 18:10, 16 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This file is outdated and too large for the two rough areas depicted (coming originally from IUCN Red List, I guess). May be you will use not PNG format but JPEG? Bogomolov.PL (talk) 19:43, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • The map from the IUCN Red List is very, very rough, you see. It is only one possible variant: if actual systematic status was drastically changed the portions from Russia and Western and Southern Mongolia, from Inner Mongolia in China were described as different species we can agree with this rough map. Do you know something about this? If no, we need a better map, as I've made with File:Meriones unguiculatus range PL.png (see the IUCN Red List map [1] - this is a horror).
  • And about the file type. The PNG file is the best for the common maps without the textured relief raster information when image consists of lines and color filled areas (see my File:Meriones unguiculatus range PL.png). But the DTM model depictions are better in the JPEG format, without any visible digital noise this image in JPEG is 672 KB, but in PNG 2.74 MB, 4 times more. If it's no difference why load larger file? Bogomolov.PL (talk) 20:25, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
    • I've used Windows Paint (former Paintbrush) to convert the PNG file to JPEG, this software is free and comes with Windows. You open image with Paint, next you save it as a JPEG. The JPEG artifacts are dangerous when we can notice them, but we can not.
    • I will ask my collegues (listed in sources at IUCN Red List page) for the information about taxonomic status and range as my field of interest are the mammals, you see. I was interested in this map as I was observing this species in the numerous points far out the range depicted on your map. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 21:24, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
      • I have a negative experience with IUCN Red List corrections, I've send the corrections list to the Red List (concerning this map) but with no response and no result.
      • Just now I am preparing the 2012 year report for the grant concerning small mammals of Mongolia but next I will try find an extra time for lizards. Bogomolov.PL (talk) 22:38, 9 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Rbrausse, File:Sialia mexicana distribution.png is splendid, but I think it applies to Sialia sialis, not Sialia mexicana. The latter species is familiar to me. Range maps are a major enhancement to species articles. If you need to change a filename, please add {{Rename}} to its file page. Best wishes, Walter Siegmund (talk) 18:44, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

hmm, I'm quite sure I used the correct shape... I'll be back in a minute, let me check this. Rbrausse (talk) 18:54, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
okay, you're right and I'm wrong: I actually used the wrong distribution map. Shit :/ Rbrausse (talk) 19:11, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It was easily corrected and no harm occurred. Thank you for checking. Best wishes, Walter Siegmund (talk) 19:59, 10 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
but but - the embarrassment! :) Confusing mexicana with sialis is such a stupid and avoidable error... I checked the new S. mexicana map thrice: it should be the correct one. Rbrausse (talk) 07:53, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Your map is similar to that of Sibley for the species. It is a valued addition to the article. Good work. --Walter Siegmund (talk) 16:34, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
File:Decodon verticillatus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nonenmac (talk) 22:20, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Abell 2029.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Huntster (t @ c) 18:46, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ssc2006-08a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Huntster (t @ c) 12:57, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

NGC 2240 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Pikador (talk) 17:07, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]