User talk:Rama/Archive 15

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive 10 ← Archive 13 Archive 14 Archive 15

File:Duhameldemonceau.jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Duhameldemonceau.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: This is not an original painting by François-Hubert Drouais, but a 1966 copy made by the Russian-French painter Vladimir Zveguintsov (1913–2006). His works are still copyrighted until 70 years after his death had been passed. This work would be out of copyright in 2077.
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

 83.61.231.21 19:49, 14 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Scale

Template:Scale is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified:

CSD T2 (unused template)

If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted).
All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log.
If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

العربية ∙ Deutsch ∙ English ∙ español ∙ français ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ 日本語 ∙ português ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 简体中文 ∙ 繁體中文 ∙ +/−

– Pbrks (t • c) 20:01, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Éric Barone

Bonjour, la photo que vous avez prise au salon du livre de Genève en 2019 et dénommée File:Eric Barone-IMG 0178-square.jpeg n'est pas celle d'Éric Barone qui a son article sur WP et dont l'infobox avait repris votre photo par le biais de Wikidata. Je vous remercie de bien vouloir attribuer votre photo à la bonne personne. Bien cordialement, Patrub01 (talk) 09:09, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour,
merci pour l'information, j'ai demandé la suppression des deux images affectées.
Bonne continuation ! Rama (talk) 12:01, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merci et bonne journée. Patrub01 (talk) 14:00, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

FranceOccupee.jpg

Hi! I have a question about this picture: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:FranceOccupee.jpg of which you are listed as one of the authors. In the second and third map of that picture the Zone de peuplement allemand in dark pink is extended to cover the whole of Franche-Comté. I'd like to find more details about this territorial change. Do you have any information about it? Thank you very much! 195.62.160.60 08:25, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,
there were zones unilaterally drawn by the Nazis, where they prohibited refugees from returning to their homes and where they intended to encourage the settlement of German colonisers. The long-term plan being to encroach even further West into France than Alsace and Moselle. You find it mentioned in Paxton's Vichy France: Old Guard and New Order, 1940-1944, Knopf, 2015 (p.13), for instance.
Cheers! Rama (talk) 13:34, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your kind response. I fear my question was not clear enough. I'm aware of that area of German occupation beyond Alsace and Lorrain, the zone réservée. The problem is that your map is the only one I've ever seen in which this zone réservée is extended to cover the entire Franche-Comté. In every other case I'm aware of it covers only part of it. Looking at your map it seems like after November 1942 Germany expanded their zone de peuplement allemand to include all of Franche-Comté. I'd like to find more information about this little specific detail. --79.13.168.175 21:57, 11 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ah sorry. I think that must be the work of User:Spiridon_Ion_Cepleanu, at least I do not remember changing the limits of the Zone Réservée. Cheers! Rama (talk) 07:23, 12 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Minas-Tirith-Rama-b.svg

File:Minas-Tirith-Rama-b.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : 痛.

And also:

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 18:17, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:20, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 05:16, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sakai-IMG 9833.jpg

File:Sakai-IMG 9833.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A09 (talk) 14:25, 12 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Quai du Seujet 12-16-IMG 4397.JPG

Copyright status: File:Quai du Seujet 12-16-IMG 4397.JPG

bahasa melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ deutsch ∙ english ∙ español ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ português ∙ polski ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ türkçe ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ ತುಳು ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ עברית ∙ العربيَّة ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Quai du Seujet 12-16-IMG 4397.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:16, 7 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 17:00, 17 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Antoine Argoud-portrait.jpg

File:Antoine Argoud-portrait.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Chianti (talk) 23:56, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:SCAF NGF-523616-P-BEF36-987.jpg

File:SCAF NGF-523616-P-BEF36-987.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

79.173.136.58 13:36, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

File:Foundation plaque-IMG 6301.jpg

https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Foundation_plaque-IMG_6301.jpg

Hello! I would be grateful if you could tell me which museum or collection this object is in. Thank you very much. 41.34.203.192 12:09, 29 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,
it is on display at the Musée d'archéologie méditerranéenne in Marseille.
Cheers! Rama (talk) 12:20, 30 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! 41.34.203.192 14:04, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays!

   * Happy Holidays! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:51, 22 December 2023 (UTC)   [reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 10:02, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bessa Myftiu IMG 2852.jpg

File:Bessa Myftiu IMG 2852.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Mussklprozz (talk) 14:16, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category

When you want to ask for speedy-delete of an empty category, best practice is to mark it with {{SD|C2}} if it would be OK to re-create it in the future, given that appropriate content becomes available or {{SD|C1}} if it is an inappropriate category name that should not be reused. In particular, this is better practice than just blanking the category page, as you did at Category:Untitled-Max Weber-Friedhof Rosenberg. ("C1" and "C2" come from Commons:Criteria for speedy deletion). Jmabel ! talk 21:30, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Rama (talk) 06:49, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

OS requests

Hello Rama, can you confirm that your team is receiving OS emails to your distribution? We are following up on ticket:2024012510012009 — xaosflux Talk 11:07, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,
I am sorry, I do not have access to the ticket, so can only speak in general terms. There have been instances in the past where a user contacted one of us directly because their messages were not getting through on our mailing list. I have not received anything from the mailing list in the recent days, and I will bring the attention of my colleagues to this message.
Cheers! Rama (talk) 12:56, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
That ticket is in the stewards queue, I sent (or at least attempted to send) the text of it to the commonswiki os address a couple days ago. I just sent another forward to oversight-commons@lists.wikimedia.org - if you don't see would you check your listserv moderation queue? — xaosflux Talk 14:22, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, yes I now realise what you are referring to. Both your messages did in fact go through, there is a bit of thinking going on as to what to do. I hope we can get back to you with an answer soon. Cheers! Rama (talk) 20:08, 29 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Rama was this addressed such that we can close our ticket? (Our ticket is from the customer asserting that stewards assistance is needed as local oversight is unavailable). — xaosflux Talk 16:45, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Basically there is a general consensus among the Commons Oversights that the situation does not warrant Oversight action, but we do not have clear procedures to communicate that. I am fairly confused. Sorry about that, it should not fall upon you to request updates like this. Rama (talk) 19:08, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
No worries. Your team is obviously not unavailable, so no need for us to do anything, thank you for the udpate. When we decline (which the stewards are not actually doing in this case), we usually send customers a templated sort of response such as:

We appreciate you bringing this to our attention. Unfortunately, the edits associated with your request cannot be suppressed under our policy <https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Oversight_policy>. Thank you for sharing your concerns and please contact us again if you have any in the future.

Best regards, — xaosflux Talk 21:01, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and thoughts on usage of Template:Art Photo

Salut! Merci beaucoup for your addition of {{Art Photo}} on and creation of Wikidata items for File:Bellbeaker culture - beaker - Musée Unterlinden inv. no. Ao.221.jpg and File:Bellbeaker culture - beaker - Musée Unterlinden inv. no. Ap.222.jpg!! This is the exact work I try to do myself as well, but often do not succeed to finish for my uploads here. Especially because I often have a very similar workflow I have some questions/hints/thoughts:

  1. Some data can be stored/moved/retrieved from Structured Data for Commons which I think is advantageous (and 1–3 are currently already done by bot automatically):
    1. |photo date=: stored in inception (P571) if it's not higher precision than day. (cf. phab:T266407.)
    2. |source=: stored in source of file (P7482)
    3. |photographer=: stored in creator (P170)
    4. |wikidata=: stored in depicts (P180) + main subject (P921) (for 2D works: + digital representation of (P6243))
  2. I think the description I have given {{en|1=Bellbeaker culture - beaker - Musée Unterlinden inv. no. Ap.221}} better fits into |description= rather than |photo description=.
  3. I prefer to give license information like this:
    == {{int:license-header}} ==
    {{Licensed-PD|{{PD-old-100-expired}}|{{self|cc-by-4.0}}}}
    rather than using |artwork license= and |photo license=. Because this doesn't break up the maybe interesting information about the photo (as opposed to the in a way technical license information) into two parts and consumes less vertical space because the tag templates are not in the table created by {{Art Photo}}. Are you aware of any wider discussion of the two options on Commons?

Regarding the Wikidata items bell beaker (Q124459869) and bell beaker (Q124459893):

  1. instance of (P31) item of collection or exhibition (Q18593264) shouldn't be used this way I think. Because:
    1. It hits this constraint which refers to d:Talk:Q18593264#instance of = item of collection or exhibition.
    2. In this case it is over-classification because archaeological artifact (Q220659) is already a subclass of item of collection or exhibition (Q18593264), cf. the (collapsed) "Classification of the class archaeological artifact (Q220659)" which gets displayed if you open d:Talk:Q220659.

Sorry for the very lengthy text! Feel free to reply to only parts if you prefer and merci d'avance! Cdlt, --Marsupium (talk) 12:46, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and thank you for your thoughts.
I did not know that the Structured Data would automatically feed the Art Photo template, although in hindsight it makes sense. Today I Learnt!
I do not have strong opinions on points 2 and 3, other than that as author you should obviously be able to chose your preferred convention if two are equally valid.
Thank you also for clarifying "item of collection or exhibition"; I thought of it as "being on display", but from the point of view you describe it does make sense that as it be redundant with "archaeological artefact".
Cheers! Rama (talk) 13:40, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice d'une oeuvre du Musée Carnavalet erronée

Bonjour Rama,

Je vous informe que les informations relatives à cette œuvre sont partiellement erronées: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vengeance_populaire_apr%C3%A8s_la_prise_de_la_Bastille-Landon-IMG_2365.JPG?uselang=fr

Il s'agit d'une peinture de Charles Thévenin, dit Carle, et non de Charles Paul Landon.

Son titre est :"Le marquis de Pelleport (1754-1807) tente, en vain, de sauver le major de la Bastille, Antoine-Jérôme de Losme-Salbray, le 14 juillet 1789" et non "Vengeance populaire après la prise de la Bastille"

Voici le portail des collections de Paris Musées sur lequel vous pourrez consulter la notice exacte : https://www.parismuseescollections.paris.fr/fr/musee-carnavalet/oeuvres/le-marquis-de-pelleport-1754-1807-tente-en-vain-de-sauver-le-major-de-la#infos-principales

Je vous remercie par avance de bien vouloir procéder aux corrections nécessaires.

Je suis moi-même chargée de la photothèque des collections de Paris Musées, aussi n'hésitez pas à me contacter pour de plus amples informations : isabelle.leguern@paris.fr Bien cordialement;

Isabelle LE GUERN 194.153.110.6 10:01, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Madame,
un grand merci pour ces précieuses indications. J'ai corrigé le nom du fichier, et mis la notice à jour (en vérité, simplement établi le lien avec la notice Wikidata, où l'œuvre était déjà renseignée). J'ai également retiré l'image des articles de Wikipédia sur Charles Paul Landon, où elle était affichée par la même erreur.
Les missions des projets Wikimedia et celles des institution patrimoniales sont allignées, et je suis heureux de voir ici un exemple de cette symbiose à l'œuvre.
Encore merci et une excellente continuation à vous, Rama (talk) 12:20, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Médaille de la Résistance avec rosette - avers.jpg

العربية ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца) ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ বাংলা ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ فارسی ∙ suomi ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ עברית ∙ hrvatski ∙ magyar ∙ հայերեն ∙ italiano ∙ 日本語 ∙ ಕನ್ನಡ ∙ 한국어 ∙ lietuvių ∙ latviešu ∙ македонски ∙ മലയാളം ∙ मराठी ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ română ∙ русский ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ српски / srpski ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ Türkçe ∙ українська ∙ اردو ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（简体） ∙ 中文（繁體） ∙ +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Médaille de la Résistance avec rosette - avers.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Quick1984 (talk) 06:13, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Rama/Archive_15&oldid=869716176"