User talk:PetarM/Archive 3

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Taraxacum officinale side makro.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 20:20, 6 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 9 June 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Lorenzo di Magnifico visits king Ferdinand of Aragon in Naples (Palazzo Vecchio, Florence).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lorenzo di Magnifico visits king Ferdinand of Aragon in Naples (Palazzo Vecchio, Florence).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 11 June 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Taraxacum officinale side makro.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Taraxacum officinale side makro.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 12 June 2016 (UTC)

FP

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Домашняя муха.png and Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Мебельная моль.jpg. Do I understand correctly that 2 nominations closed because of their uniformity and a nomination in one day? If remove one nomination, the second will follow the rules? JukoFF (talk) 19:42, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nymphaea Laydekeri Purpurata.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Halavar 18:59, 16 June 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schwäbisch Hall in winter.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Bgag 02:45, 17 June 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 June 2016 (UTC)

Category:Groufie

Groufie has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Josve05a (talk) 02:07, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Podarcis sicula taking morning sunbath (Italian wall lizard).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 21:58, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:12, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Blocked

Blocked Indefinitely

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing Commons. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{Unblock}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. For more information, see Appealing a block. See the block log for the reason that you have been blocked and the name of the administrator who blocked you. (Redacted).

lNeverCry 08:12, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

(Redacted). lNeverCry 08:47, 14 October 2016 (UTC)

@INeverCry: , anything new on this issue? PetarM is a good-faith and long-term contributor of numerous featured and quality images; blocking him indefinitely for a single incident - even not with the purpose to (Redacted) but only to comment - seems much exaggerated to me. The removal of the comment and a warning/explanation would suffice. --Eleassar ^(t/p) 16:26, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

(Redacted) lNeverCry 18:30, 15 October 2016 (UTC)

@INeverCry: could we please remove the sensitive medical information from the block notice and redact any further mentions of this as appropriate - it was unfortunate that PetarM brought the issue up, it's inappropriate that it's being repeated more widely during the unblock discussion.

 Done lNeverCry 09:55, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

@PetarM: you need to recognise (as you should do, being such a long-standing contributor) that we don't inflict our own point of view on material hosted on Commons; we act in a strictly neutral, impartial manner, and we most certainly do not make extremely problematic postings accusing a living person of inappropriate behaviour. I would also add (in a professional capacity, as a medicinal chemist) that the ongoing issues surrounding this case are exceptionally complicated and nothing like as straightforward as the hackers who released this information make out. It's certainly not something contributors to Commons should be worrying about when they should be judging a picture purely on the technical and artistic merit of the image being reviewed.

You're a valuable contributor to Commons, I do hope that you and a reviewing administrator can agree on a course of action which will enable your prompt unblocking. Nick (talk) 09:27, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Unblock request

Unblock request declined This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without discussion. Request reason: "Abuse of administrator power in Feautered photos voting site" Decline reason: "It does not appear that you understand what you did was wrong. Commons is a mellow wiki, and should not engage in discussions about BLPs. The block may be lowered pending AN-discussion, but as it stands now, the block itself is justified, since it is disruptive editing and has nothing to do with this project or its mission. To make comments about the subjects of an image, instead of the image itself on an FP-voting page, is out of line. Only when you've demonstrated that you understand why you were blocked in the first place (since it wasn't to manipultate an FP-vote), should an unblock be considered. (t) Josve05a (c) 21:40, 16 October 2016 (UTC)" Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log) (unblock) (Change local status for a global block) (contribs)

...and to be able to write to disscusion page of my block, to solve situation. --Mile (talk) 11:21, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

 Oppose (Redacted) If you're going to accuse me of tool abuse rather than take responsibility for your own behavior and assure us it won't happen again, I fully object to any unblock of your account. lNeverCry 19:46, 16 October 2016 (UTC)

• PetarM, see my comment at AN. As most admins agreed that your comment is inappropriate you need to acknowledge it as per the blocking policy. Note that this is a recent update; so you may not aware of it. Jee 03:43, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

I can write now, seems kind of unblock was made. But in upper corner there writes "This user is currently blocked...". Jkadavoor e is "unblock request" necessary here ? --Mile (talk) 12:22, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Yes; only talk page access is restored. You're still blocked. Jee 14:03, 19 October 2016 (UTC)

Unblock request granted This blocked user asked to be unblocked, and one or more administrators has reviewed and granted this request. Request reason: "I apology for comment made on FPC. Sure it wont happaned in this and other case anymore. Apology to all users there will also be in place." Unblock reason: "As long as the behavior isn't repeated (please leave the d-word out of all comments), I have no problem with unblocking your account. I hope we can put this unpleasant incident behind us and move forward with better work. lNeverCry 08:19, 20 October 2016 (UTC)" This template should be archived normally.

(Block log) (unblock) (Change local status for a global block) (contribs)

--Mile (talk) 07:59, 20 October 2016 (UTC)

It looks this has been resolved, then. Daniel Case (talk) 04:12, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Daniel Case block is solved, but not this sitation, i wasnt left to say one word there on Block of PetarM. It looks like prosecutor, judge and jury was in one person. Asked yesterday to speak, but they archivated my case... will wait till they open, or speak on seperate topic. Issue went far from what is beeing seen. --Mile (talk) 05:59, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

 Comment If the situation isn't resolved, then your unblock request above is patently false. You also threaten revenge: "will wait till they open, or speak on seperate topic". This kind of behavior can't be tolerated here, and I won't tolerate it. You made a false unblock request then you put out some questionable accusations. There were plenty of editors and admins who found your vote/comments problematic. I took this to COM:AN for comments and advice. You used an IP (178.221.149.79) to evade your block there and try to comment, rather than commenting in an unblock request here. When you finally made an unblock request, it was denied by an uninvolved admin. How am I judge and jury, when an admin I hardly know denies your unblock request. @Nick: , @Odder: , @Revent: , @Natuur12: , @Christian Ferrer: , @Colin: , @Eleassar: , @Josve05a: Any suggestions on how to go forward with this? I'm not going to edit Commons with the worry that this individual is going to get revenge on me for my block at some time as he says above. He also pretty much told Daniel Case that his unblock request, which I took in good faith, was just said to get unblocked. This isn't appropriate behavior from an experienced editor and admin. I've already stated that I likely over-reacted originally, and that I could've handled things a bit better, not excusing PetarM's vote and comments which were inappropriate. I've apologized and will apologize again for being heavy handed. But nobody should have to edit Commons under threat, and I certainly won't. Either the situation is resolved or it's not. The above reply to Daniel is completely inappropriate. lNeverCry 10:17, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

PetarM: There were many users who agreed that what you said was problematic and has no place on Commons. I await your full statement with interest before I can begin to formulate a full response. I don't think the block by INeverCry is particularly helpful at this stage, but similarly, the rhetoric shown by you, PetarM, is certainly not helpful. Nick (talk) 10:32, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

• I disagree with the block, see Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Blocks and protections#Block of User:PetarM Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 10:36, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
• INeverCry, I don't read the text you quoted as "threaten revenge" or anything blockworthy, yet you've blocked him again. It is hard to know what PetarM is still upset about precisely. If he's still upset about the comment about the athlete then I would strongly advise him not to mention the subject again on Commons or I will support an indef block and it would be right that the unblock request was "false". Nobody cares about his opinions on her or athletics, only about photography. If it is about how INC handled the block then I share some concerns about that but it seems INC is reflective on this and hopefully we can put that in the past and move on. But if Petar wishes to complain about his block or INC's actions, then that is his right, and is separate from him agreeing/apologising for the thing that got him blocked. It seems he feels he can't do this in a public forum because that discussion was closed and though he asked for it to be reopened. And perhaps PetarM will grumble about INC at some future topic, which might be what his comment means. If so, he's hardly the only person on Commons bearing a grudge and much as we'd prefer if everyone loved each other, we don't have "Has a grudge against an admin who blocked him" as criteria for blocking. I suggest INC is overeacting again, but hard to know what PetarM means since it is short. AGF? -- Colin (talk) 10:42, 21 October 2016 (UTC)
  • "will wait till they open, or speak on seperate topic" - What does that mean to you then? That he's waiting for a chance to cuddle with me? Why is it OK for him to say the situation is resolved in an unblock, and then tell Daniel the next day that the block is removed but that the situation is not resolved? AGF about what exactly? lNeverCry 10:50, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

  What it means is that he will explain his case if the topic is reopened (which is true now, because of you). There's nothing saying that he is threatening you. You're just being hypersensitive. ★ Poké⁹⁵ 10:55, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

  Your involvement with Russavia makes your participation here highly inappropriate. lNeverCry 10:57, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Can I please ask everyone to step aside for a moment and take a deep breath or two. I fully support @Nick's request for PetarM to clarify their statement before any action can be taken with regards to their block. I don't think any of this arguing is helpful to anyone, let's just wait for PetarM to respond to this change of circumstances and take it from there. odder (talk) 11:00, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

I unblocked the account, see com:AN/B for my motivation. This has to end and I would like to ask PetarM to leave this situation be. I won't force him, it is merely that it will be unhelpful to pursue this any further. I would like to ask INC to walk away and take a few days of and enjoy the weather. This has to end. Natuur12 (talk) 13:06, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Natuur12 i will let all people to take a rest with it. I will leave all people in queit and wrote it in 2017. Christmas time is comming and New year, and i also have to work my stuff. That time i will be active just on Featured picture candidates "where i belong". --Mile (talk) 14:34, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

Featured picture candidates/File: Dublin Stephen's Green-44.jpg

Hey,

thanks for the feddback. Can i also give some information for the discussion? Or is the discussion only for "special" people? The usability of wikimedia commons is not so easy....

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fuel gauge (Toyota Corolla).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:26, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

Good evening,

Thank you for your comments on my photos. I corrected the red channel.
Sincerely,--Famberhorst (talk) 17:37, 27 October 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Fuel gauge (Toyota Corolla).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fuel gauge (Toyota Corolla).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Spiral stairs (Art Deco, Nebotičnik, Ljubljana).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 09:05, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Spiral stairs (Art Deco, Nebotičnik, Ljubljana).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Spiral stairs (Art Deco, Nebotičnik, Ljubljana).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 3 November 2016 (UTC)

File:Wooden spiral stairs (Nebotičnik, Ljubljana).jpg

File:Wooden spiral stairs (Nebotičnik, Ljubljana).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar ^(t/p) 12:48, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Spiral stairs (Art Deco, Nebotičnik, Ljubljana).jpg

And also:

• File:Spiral stairs (спирално степениште).jpg
• File:Wooden spiral stairs (Nebotičnik, Ljubljana) croped.jpg

Yours sincerely, Eleassar ^(t/p) 12:49, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rifling of a cannon (M75; 90mm; y.1891; Austro-Hungarian; exposed in Ljubljana, Slovenia).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. From 007 with love. --Berthold Werner 12:28, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dance of Death (replica of 15th century fresco; National Gallery of Slovenia).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:21, 7 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Passion of Jesus (sculpture "Crucifixion of Jesus" observing "Virgin Mary cradling the dead body of Jesus").jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Great focus on Mary. --Jkadavoor 04:03, 9 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 November 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Wooden spiral stairs (Nebotičnik, Ljubljana).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wooden spiral stairs (Nebotičnik, Ljubljana).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 14 November 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Rifling of a cannon (M75; 90mm; y.1891; Austro-Hungarian; exposed in Ljubljana, Slovenia).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Rifling of a cannon (M75; 90mm; y.1891; Austro-Hungarian; exposed in Ljubljana, Slovenia).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 15 November 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Dance of Death (replica of 15th century fresco; National Gallery of Slovenia).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dance of Death (replica of 15th century fresco; National Gallery of Slovenia).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:01, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

To clarify

This is what you think I am and this is what I really am. Thank you for making me smile a lot today, it was a very long time since someone suggested I was too young for something. Cheers, cart-Talk 20:56, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tičarjev dom na Vršiču (Vršič pass, Julian Alps, Slovenia).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Hubertl 21:01, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Passion of Jesus (sculpture "Crucifixion of Jesus" observing "Virgin Mary cradling the dead body of Jesus").jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Passion of Jesus (sculpture "Crucifixion of Jesus" observing "Virgin Mary cradling the dead body of Jesus").jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:07, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign for User:The Photographer

Please excuse me spamming you. As a regular on Feature Picture Candidatess you will recognise User:The Photographer, who has 86 Featured Pictures. His contributions cover the architecture and culture of Brazil and Venezuela. He has basic photographic equipment: an old D300 camera and 35mm lens, and lives in a poor country where photographic equipment is expensive. The Photographer has recently taken several images using the technique where multiple frames are stitched together to create a high-resolution panorama. However, many times frustrated with the stitching errors that result from trying to take such photos without a proper panoramic head for his tripod. This special equipment permits the camera to be rotated around the entrance pupil of the lens, and eliminates such errors. Having a panoramic head would greatly increase the potential for The Photographer to create sharp high-resolution images for Commons. In addition, the purchase of a fisheye lens would enable 180 × 360° panoramas to be taken, which are a great way to explore a scene as though one is really there.

Please see the discussion about the Crowd-funding campaign on User talk:The Photographer#Generosity Crowdfunding Campaign and visit the Generosity Crowd-funding Campaign page to consider donating. Even a modest donation will make a difference if many people contribute. Thanks. -- Colin (talk) 13:26, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tičarjev dom na Vršiču (Vršič pass, Julian Alps, Slovenia).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 18:02, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blejsko jezero (Lake Bled in autumn).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 22:23, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Rifling of a cannon.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

 Support --Jacek Halicki (talk) 11:29, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Result: 1 support, 0 oppose =>
promoted. Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:03, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Thank you

Thank you for your comment. I have adjusted the text.
Sincerely,
--Famberhorst (talk) 18:56, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Photo request

Hey Mile, could you do me a favour? I need one photo of something like that:File:Simulation of EVF.jpg I don't have a EVF camera, so combine photos to create something to simulate it. The idea is to show that adjustments in camera, could be seen via visor. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton ^m 18:32, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton ^{m you read my mind, some few hours ago i put my macro into EVF, but problem, you dont get it all, all from inside i mean. I will see what i can do. Since around 20-30% of EVF was visible. --Mile (talk) 18:58, 25 November 2016 (UTC)}

Wow! Nice coincidence, but serious?

The optical view finder I give up to try to get the infos inside:

And exposed to just the flour. Not the best photo at all, however the message is there. :) -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton ^m 14:21, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hybrid pansy (yellow-violet).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ajepbah 18:47, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panasonic Lumix DMC-G80.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Self-winding wristwatch (transparent backside).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 09:24, 30 November 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 3 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Stopića Pećina2.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stopića Pećina2.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Self-winding wristwatch (transparent backside).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Self-winding wristwatch (transparent backside).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pelargonium zonale (Geraniaceae).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:53, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Pelargonium zonale (Geraniaceae).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Pelargonium zonale (Geraniaceae).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Citizen wristwatch.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 16:33, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Citizen wristwatch.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Citizen wristwatch.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Francis II & I, Holy Roman Emperor.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Not 100% sure about the WB, quality is good --Poco a poco 17:36, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Francis II & I, Holy Roman Emperor.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Francis II & I, Holy Roman Emperor.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:02, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hooded crow (Corvus cornix) at Gulf of Trieste.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 22:03, 19 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! After first Communion (Carl Frithjof Smith, 1892).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Reasonably good for an amateur digitization --Daniel Case 06:58, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Some holiday joy

Since 1959, it is a Swedish tradition to (at 3 pm) watch Donald Duck and other Disney cartoons on TV. The most appreciated part is about Donald as bird photographer in Clown of the Jungle. I think most users at FPC can relate to the frustrated Donald (especially the parrot scene), which is why I'm sharing it with you. Happy Holiday! --cart-Talk 15:05, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

Happy holidays! 2017! ;)

		* * * * * * * Happy Holidays 2017 ! * * * * * * *
		* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! * Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année! * Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! * Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом! * ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! * Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! -- George Chernilevsky talk 18:17, 24 December 2016 (UTC)

File:Serb.artillerylate19th..jpg

File:Serb.artillerylate19th..jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jcb (talk) 16:32, 29 December 2016 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Prague skyline at dawn.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Prague skyline at dawn.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:03, 30 December 2016 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Water droplet laying on a damask.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Basotxerri 18:28, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 January 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Water droplet laying on a damask.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Water droplet laying on a damask.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:05, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Wikipedia - FactsMatter2016.webm, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wikipedia - FactsMatter2016.webm has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Venus de Milo (replica, Slovenian National Gallery).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Livioandronico2013 21:30, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Panasonic G80.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ermell 13:44, 7 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Steam locomotive running gear.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:16, 8 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Komatsu bulldozer pushing coal in Power plant Ljubljana (winter 2017).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Jacek Halicki 09:31, 11 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 14 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nutria (Myocastor coypus) in a partially frozen river Ljubljanica.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Sandro Halank 12:30, 13 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

File:Banknote portrait pattern (Intaglio printing).jpg

File:Banknote portrait pattern (Intaglio printing).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

lNeverCry 09:12, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

File:Banknote portrait pattern (Intaglio printing).jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Banknote portrait pattern (Intaglio printing).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Peulle 08:45, 16 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Komatsu bulldozer pushing coal in Power plant Ljubljana (winter 2017).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Komatsu bulldozer pushing coal in Power plant Ljubljana (winter 2017).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Category:Taken with Panasonic Lumix DMC-G85/G80

Hi :-) I was trying to fix the categories to match it with this category movement, but I've failed. I hope I had reverted back all my edits. I'm very sorry for the confusion :( Wieralee (talk) 12:19, 21 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Banknote portrait pattern (Intaglio print, tactile effect).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cvmontuy 19:00, 19 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

Seriously?

Am I reading this right? First its quality images so we evaluate on technical merit, composition and categorisation. We don't evaluate on personal political views or opinions. Second, I do think you misunderstand the purpose of protesting. Men can also support women... EoRdE6^{(Come Talk to Me!)} 17:14, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Candle (Slava celebration).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:22, 22 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Franz Joseph I (bust).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Uoaei1 08:38, 24 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 27 January 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Nutria (Myocastor coypus) in a partially frozen river Ljubljanica.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Nutria (Myocastor coypus) in a partially frozen river Ljubljanica.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 1 February 2017 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fountain pen writing (literacy).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --W.carter 20:00, 30 January 2017 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 2 February 2017 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Franz Joseph I (bust).jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Franz Joseph I (bust).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:03, 2 February 2017 (UTC)