User talk:EoRdE6

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Didn't agree with one of my non-admin DR closures? Feel free to undo it but please pop a note below letting me know why. Thanks!

Babel user information
en
This user is a native English speaker.
fr-1
Cette personne peut contribuer avec un niveau élémentaire de français.
PH-2
This user is able to take good quality photographs.
VG-0
This user is interested in learning vector graphics.
Users by language

Please delete File:Photo of Konstantin Vanshenkin.jpg ![edit]

It hoped that it must be enough to write that author of the file gave it me with unlimited permission for publication. But now I see warning template... Please delete the file, and after that I'll ask author to upload it herself. Thank You! Александр Васильев (talk) 20:00, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Even if the owner re-uploads the file, no one on WikiCommons could tell. I suggest you follow the links provided above and send written permission to that email with a brief description of the situation (See COM:ET). Don't worry, you should have a week to do this. Thanks! Даже если владелец повторно загружает файл, никто на WikiCommons не мог сказать. Я предлагаю вам следить за ссылки, представленные выше, и отправить письменное разрешение этом письме с кратким описанием ситуации (см COM: ET). Не волнуйтесь, вы должны иметь в неделю, чтобы сделать это. Спасибо! Rough translation by Google Translate EoRdE6 (talk) 20:06, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Thank You for answer! But author of this files lives in Moscow and I leave in Kiev. I can't get permission on paper from she! That's why I request You to simply delete file to let her upload it from Moscow and write permission herself in the page! Александр Васильев (talk) 22:02, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That's fine, just go to the image page and paste {{speedydelete|7. Author or uploader request deletion}} at the top of the page. EoRdE6 (talk) 00:08, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry![edit]

Sorry! I have change my signature (User talk:FritsHG) FritsHG Question? 08:08, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 19:11, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

renaming[edit]

Per your statement on the DN, please take care of renaming and recategorizing File:Hudson Patterson (14689524106).jpg this image, thanks! Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:21, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 19:24, 19 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, Dear Patroller![edit]

English ∙ español ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ∙ Türkçe  ∙ +/−

Counter Vandalism Unit

Hi EoRdE6,

You now have the Patroller right and may call yourself a patroller! Please take a moment to read the updated Commons:Patrol to learn how Patrolling works and how we use it to fight vandalism.

As you know already, the patrolling functionality is enabled for all edits, not just for new-page creations. This enables us to keep track of, for example, edits made by anonymous users here on Commons.

We could use your help at the Counter Vandalism Unit. For example by patrolling an Anonymous-edits checklist and checking a day-part.

If you have any questions please leave a message on the CVU talkpage or ask for help on IRC in #wikimedia-commons.

-- Rillke(q?) 19:24, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Appreciate your trust and time. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 19:28, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept image still marked for delete[edit]

Hello, I just noticed that this image was marked as kept but is still marked for deletion: File:Aljo Bendijo as one of the hosts of One Morning cafe shown simulcast over RPN 9, PTV 4 and IBC 13- 2014-04-01 17-34.jpg. Thanks, The Haz talk 04:02, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Hazmat2: Fixed, thanks! EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 23:09, 31 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! The Haz talk 02:58, 1 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:FritzAdam.jpg[edit]

File:FritzAdam.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Leyo 21:22, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

BTW: You transferred the preview version (475 × 600 pixels) instead of the full size (555 × 701 pixels). Did you do this on purpose, e.g. since the quality is so bad? --Leyo 15:07, 20 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Nope, complete rookie mistake that was. Feel free to overwrite if it is better. Thanks! EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 03:14, 23 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Naturalis Biodiversity Center - L.1915777 - Rosa elliptica Tausch ex Tratt. var. andresiana - herbarium sheet.jpg[edit]

Dear EoRdE6,

I saw you do not recognise the OTRS-permission PermissionOTRS | id=2015050810012748 | Edoderoo added by Dutch OTRS here. As in my previous mass uploads (some 3000, e.g. Category:Images from the Peace Palace Library, hopefully thousands of Naturalis images to come) I am allowed to use the given OTRS-permission (without |Edoderoo) on later uploads in the same approved project. If you are allowed entry in the OTRS ticket system, you can read the discussion (in Dutch).

  • Is there a systematic problem?
  • Could you please put the permission back on the Rosa elliptica? (Like it?)

Thanks, Hansmuller (talk) 08:40, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Hansmuller: I have put the permission back on the image. While I don't understand all of what you said, I trust the OTRS permission has been verified by a dutch OTRS volunteer and you were simply adding the tags back. No worries, I have restored the tag and will leave the rest alone. EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 18:31, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Perhaps this problem is something to sort out with the national permission OTRS offices together, so that there can be no misunderstandings (like mentioning explicitly in the tag which uploader is entitled to place the tag)...or... leave the ambiguity as it is, as long as all goes well ;-) Cheers, Hansmuller (talk) 10:44, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Apple iPad Comparison.jpg[edit]

File:Apple iPad Comparison.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

–Totie (talk) 04:47, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Samsung Galaxy S6.jpg[edit]

File:Samsung Galaxy S6.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

–Totie (talk) 04:49, 13 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhododendron Canescens Closeup.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Ah,...Greenville, home, sweet home :) --Poco a poco 21:33, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mount Lebanon Chapel and Cemetery 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:39, 7 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Union Jack in London 2016.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It's tilted CCW and categorization (for example location) should be improved. --XRay 19:19, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Improved the cats, will do a very minor straighten to match the buildings once I get back to my PC. EoRdE6 19:50, 10 January 2017 (UTC)  Comment ... EoRdE6 22:02, 13 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak  Support May be it's still leaning in at the right, may be it'S the building itself. --XRay 06:37, 14 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! NCDOT Fort Fisher ferry 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ermell 08:42, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Rainbow Samsung Logo.PNG[edit]

File:Rainbow Samsung Logo.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Ubcule (talk) 15:53, 8 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ruggles Station renovation sign.jpg[edit]

File:Ruggles Station renovation sign.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:51, 22 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi EoRdE6,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikimedia Commons and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 01:02, 10 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi EoRdE6,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 15:20, 20 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder: Community Insights Survey[edit]

Share your experience in this survey

Hi EoRdE6,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely,

RMaung (WMF) 19:58, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, Dear Filemover![edit]

العربيَّة ∙ Deutsch ∙ español ∙ English ∙ français ∙ português ∙ русский ∙ українська ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ 中文（中国大陆）‎ ∙ 中文（台灣）‎ ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ +/−

Hi EoRdE6, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

- FitIndia Talk Mail 03:31, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Galaxy S8 in hand.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Galaxy S8 in hand.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

  • This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: COM:SS
Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans ∙ asturianu ∙ azərbaycanca ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ Bahasa Melayu ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ English ∙ español ∙ euskara ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ italiano ∙ Lëtzebuergesch ∙ magyar ∙ Malti ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Türkçe ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ тоҷикӣ ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ मराठी ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 中文（简体）‎ ∙ 中文（繁體）‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ فارسی ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 15:54, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@A1Cafel: I respectfully disagree that this photo is considered in any way a screenshot when that is clearly not the main focus of the image.... EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 16:00, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Galaxy S8 in hand.jpg[edit]

File:Galaxy S8 in hand.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

A1Cafel (talk) 16:15, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File names[edit]

Great shots of Park Street and Alewife! Would you be willing to adopt the same filename style that I do, with the month and year at the end? I feel that it better positions Commons to be a long-term archive, especially with subjects like MBTA stations that may be significantly modified from year to year, since users can see the date in a category or search. Cheers, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:12, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Pi.1415926535: Sure, I always struggle balancing lengthy file names and detailed file names but I see your point (and I take no issue with you modifying my uploads if you think you can make them work better into the overall structure because I know you have basically singlehandedly organized MBTA files on here). I'll do my best to do that going forward and may take a stab at modifying my existing ones tomorrow when I'm more awake.
On a side note, how on earth do you find out about new transit uploads so quickly? I'm impressed... EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 03:16, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! Your file names tend to be on the shorter side anyway; appending the month and year shouldn't make them too long. I might rename a few where the date is particularly important.
An obsessive amount of editing (and checking my watchlists) while I'm sheltered-in-place indefinitely. In this case, you happened to upload them while I was cooking dinner, and I started editing as I ate. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:37, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:NHCS Logo - REA.jpg[edit]

File:NHCS Logo - REA.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Marchjuly (talk) 02:53, 10 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

South Coast Rail photos[edit]

Thanks so much for getting those aerial shots! East Taunton has been damn near impossible to photograph from the ground, so I'm incredibly grateful that you were able to get some from the air. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:13, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Of course! I'd been meaning to make a trip out there for ages anyway, I was disappointed I couldn't get any farther than the access road so I'm glad I brought the drone, would've been a serious waste of a $10 weekend CR pass and a lot of biking if I didn't have anything to show for it... EoRdE6(Come Talk to Me!) 04:21, 16 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:EoRdE6&oldid=868684804"