User talk:PantheraLeo1359531/Archive 2023

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winter in Krötenbruck, Kammergutweg West 20221212 HOF07147 20221216000322cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:03, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winter in Krötenbruck, Kammergutweg 20221212 HOF07154 20221216000323cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 15:05, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winter in Krötenbruck, Südring 20221212 HOF07106 20221216000308cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Lion-hearted85 15:05, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

File:NVIDIA RTX 4090 Founders Edition - Verpackung (ZMASLO).png

File:NVIDIA RTX 4090 Founders Edition - Verpackung (ZMASLO).png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Minorax^«¦talk¦» 09:08, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Marktkauf Hof 20220614 HOF04863 20221221000420cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It's a bit dull and monotonous. --SHB2000 22:56, 27 December 2022 (UTC)  Support Good enough for QI. --MB-one 19:31, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Humongous Meshes

Hi. Why are the CPU STLs so large? (CPU 20230106 001.stl, CPU 20230106 002.stl, CPU 20230106 003.stl, CPU 20230106 004.stl, CPU 20230106 005.stl, 1.13 GB each) Do they contain the internal structure of the CPU? Like, the individual transistors? Unfortunately Commons seems to time out, when it tries to render them, and I didn't want to download a whole gigabyte just to check. TilmannR (talk) 22:34, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

@TilmannR: Thank you for your message! Unfortunately, no. They show a CPU similar to the Intel 8086 in different variants. The files are huges, indeed, and unfortunately I realized this too late in the creation process. The feet might be the reason for the size. Processes like smoothing, NURBS converting and other curves increase file sizes of meshes, but sometimes this is needed to display objects smoothly so they don't look edgy. You are right, the previews of STL only work for meshes that are around 150 MiBs or smaller (which is not really much infact). Depending on the source, some meshes can even be larger in file sizes. :) Greetings --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:54, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Here is a preview of the model:

--PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 15:07, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

@PantheraLeo1359531: Interesting. Thanks for the screenshot!

"​The files are huge, indeed, and unfortunately I realized this too late in the creation process. "

I don't have MeshLab installed right now, but apparently there are various options for decimation in the menu Filters → Remeshing, Simplification and Reconstruction. Would you consider overwriting the meshes with decimated versions? Let's say we consider a regular 400-gon to be a reasonably smooth approximation of a circle. Then a cylinder would have 1600 triangles and a sphere approximately 160k. Since each pin has about two cylinders worth of curvature, you'd expect 40 pins to have about 1600×2×40=128k triangles. And I guess the rest of the mesh needs about 400k triangles for all the spherical surfaces. Therefore decimating the mesh from currently 24M faces to no more than 1M triangles should be fine. TilmannR (talk) 00:07, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

@TilmannR: I can try. The problem is that some simplification processes are inaccurate, but I will give it a try. :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:39, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

@TilmannR: I was able to rework number 4, I try to do so with the others later, greetings :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:15, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Adventgemeinde Hof 20220628 HOF05539 20221229000662.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. (Real nice, Bravo) --Terragio67 20:35, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hospitalkirche Hof 20220628 HOF05614 20221229000710cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 19:01, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Verkehrszeichen Diensttreppe 20220628 HOF05513 20221229000654.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 19:15, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Meinel-Bräu 20220628 HOF05522 20221229000657.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 15:07, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haus Theresienstein 20220628 HOF05489 20221229000644.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 15:05, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wilhelm-Kohlhoff-Straße 20221212 HOF07135 20221216000316cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Oversized --Poco a poco 18:29, 2 January 2023 (UTC)  Done Thanks, fixed :) --PantheraLeo1359531 16:18, 6 January 2023 (UTC)  Support Still 50 MB too much without a significant improvement of quality. Still I'll promote it but I don't agree with oversizing the images making the hosting and download more tedious --Poco a poco 20:16, 6 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Froschbrunnen botanischer Garten Hof 20220628 HOF05327 20221229000526.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 17:22, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Froschbrunnen botanischer Garten Hof 20220628 HOF05330 20221229000529.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 17:22, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhofstraße 13 Eingang 20220923 HOF04893 20230107000749cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jsamwrites 17:48, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Komplex Hospital 20220628 HOF05587 20221229000692.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:26, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Komplex Hospital 20220628 HOF05605 20221229000704cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:26, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kindergarten in der Neustadt e.V. 20220628 HOF05544 20221229000665cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality, excellent sharpness. --Aristeas 08:46, 7 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Unterne Steinerne Brücke 20220628 HOF05528 20221229000658.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 18:03, 11 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Category:Lützi_bleibt

Category:Lützi_bleibt has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Jnmths (talk) 21:24, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pirk 20220710 HOF05886 20230110000811cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 18:55, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pirk 20220710 HOF05841 20230110000793.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 18:52, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gaststätte Grüner Baum Pirk 20220710 HOF05825 20230110000789cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 18:52, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick auf das Pirker Umland 20220710 HOF05989 20230110000844.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 19:36, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stein 20220710 HOF05942 20230113000852cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments It looks like it needs a perspective correction, but I checked the verticals and I saw that everything is straight --Michielverbeek 16:17, 15 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Meinels Bas 20220628 HOF05553 20221229000670cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The file size should be reduced significantly for better usability. --Ermell 11:51, 8 January 2023 (UTC) I afraid I cannot in this case. But as for many pictures, there are smaller renders, or the dimensions can be adjusted after a download --PantheraLeo1359531 18:46, 14 January 2023 (UTC)  Support I do not agree with you but the quality is good. --Ermell 20:44, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Umgeknickter Baum 20220710 HOF06004 20230110000849.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 08:56, 17 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 20 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Weizenfeld in Hof 20220712 HOF06228 20230116000898.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:40, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kunstwerk Heideweg 20220712 HOF06219 20230116000896.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 14:54, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DreiE Hof 20221223 001.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 04:28, 24 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freiwillige Feuerwehr der Stadt Hof - Löschgruppe Hofeck 20220712 HOF06360 20230116000929cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Radomianin 15:51, 23 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Restaurant Hertlein 20220716 HOF06746 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 19:20, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Max Wurst 20220716 HOF06796 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jmh2o 17:36, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hofecker Schule 20220716 HOF06557 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 16:44, 28 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zobelsreuth 20220724 HOF07067 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 22:28, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dreieinigkeitskirche Hof 20220724 HOF07179 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Alexander-93 18:02, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piuskirche 20220724 HOF07120 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. So much detail, wow! --Mike Peel 20:30, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zobelsreuth 20220724 HOF07104 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 07:09, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jugendherberge Hof 20220724 HOF07007 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 21:20, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frisörsalon 20220724 HOF06948 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:43, 1 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 4 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schillergymnasium Hof im Winter 20230129 HOF08376 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 15:17, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wilhelmstraße 3 nach Teilabriss im Winter 20230129 HOF08252 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 15:17, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zeichen Landbauamt Hof 20230129 HOF08215 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support I would have made a square crop out of it, but good quality. --FlocciNivis 15:17, 7 February 2023 (UTC) Thank you for this hint :) --PantheraLeo1359531 19:42, 7 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Statuette St. Marien Hof 20230129 HOF08533 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:47, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Logo Diakonissenhaus Hof 20230129 HOF08474 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 17:45, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Detail Diakonissenhaus Biengäßchen 20230129 HOF08469 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 17:44, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Detail Kunst Kinder mit Korb 20230129 HOF08307 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 17:33, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baudenkmal an Stephanstraße 20220714 HOF06834 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:52, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brezel mit Löwen 20230129 HOF08614 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 01:34, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schriftzug "Ora et labora" 20230129 HOF08605 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Romainbehar 23:14, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gotische Fenster St.Marien 20230129 HOF08541 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support The framing is a bit strange... but Good quality. --Cayambe 19:01, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick Richtung Hofer Südosten 20220803 HOF08191 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 20:07, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick Richtung Hofer Nordwesten 20220803 HOF08164 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:30, 13 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 16 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Goethe-Übernachtung 20230129 HOF08200 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Cayambe 19:40, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dürre in Hof 20220728 HOF07239 RAW-Export corr.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 21:30, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedrich-Rückert-Straße 20220728 HOF07259 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 21:30, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Theodor-Storm-Straße 20220728 HOF07231 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 21:30, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Südring 20220728 HOF07192 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 21:30, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Strauß-Areal im Winter 20230129 HOF08435 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Nice and sharp, and good verticals. --Mike Peel 21:24, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Relief Kinder mit Tieren 20230129 HOF08590 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 15:52, 15 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Emaille-Kreuz DreiE Hof 20221223 HOF07310-HDR.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Emaille-Kreuz DreiE Hof 20221223 HOF07310-HDR.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:01, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sitz BRK Hof 20220803 HOF08313 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 20:46, 17 February 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 20:49, 17 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Finanzamt Hof 20220803 HOF08388 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 17:35, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Finanzamt Hof 20220803 HOF08401 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 17:36, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Autohändler Auto Müller 20220803 HOF08387 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 16:27, 18 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blick auf Saale von Saalebrücke 20220807 HOF08509 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Miha Peče 17:24, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hof Zedtwitzer Straße 20220807 HOF08482 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice sharp image of those grimy asbestos shingles.--Der Angemeldete 18:20, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Flaggen Dachser, EU, Deutschland 20220807 HOF08463 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Der Angemeldete 18:04, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jahnstraße 20220803 HOF08260 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 18:45, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fahrradweg endend in Baum 20220803 HOF08282 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 15:44, 20 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gebäudezug Bahnhofstraße 20220416 HOF00715 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:50, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rekkenzeplatz 20220809 HOF08805 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:52, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gebäudezug Sophienstraße 20220809 HOF08722 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 02:22, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hof-Unterkotzau Nord 20220807 HOF08504 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 12:05, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kreuzung Landwehrstraße, Roonstraße 20220809 HOF08882 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:21, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vorplatz Haupteingang JCRG Hof 20220814 HOF00097-HDR RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Fabian Roudra Baroi 21:25, 26 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Atrium JCRG Hof 20220814 HOF00055 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments There is a bit too much of foreground here for my taste, but nonetheless Good quality. --Cayambe 19:31, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Südliches Gebäude JGAW Hof 20220814 HOF00076 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:21, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freier Platz am Atrium JCRG Hof 20220814 HOF00067 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 10:22, 1 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gasthof Grüne Linde 20220816 HOF00638 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 20:08, 3 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! FFW Wölbattendorf 20220816 HOF00607 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Drow male 08:50, 6 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altes Geldhaus 20220816 HOF00944 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 09:04, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadt Hof, Jugend und Soziales, Betreuungsstelle Heimaufsicht 20220816 HOF00814 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 09:05, 8 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frankenpost 20220816 HOF00977 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 18:36, 9 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 March 2023 (UTC)

MOTD Notification

⭐ A file you uploaded is on the main page! ⭐ File: На Київщині прикордонники, спільно із побратимами зі ЗС України, дістали на сушу вертоліт рашистів.webm , that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:01, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Stadtbücherei Hof 20220823 HOF04922 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Der Angemeldete 21:38, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hinterhof in Hof 20221101 HOF06197 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 16:08, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 6 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geöffneter Joy-Con (rechts, rot) 20221017 HOF06053 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:28, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geöffneter Joy-Con (rechts, rot) 20221017 HOF06056 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:01, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Geöffneter Joy-Con (rechts, rot) 20221017 HOF06103 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:27, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schützenstraße 2 20220816 HOF00864 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 20:01, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altes Geldhaus 20220816 HOF00945 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 08:10, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bushaltestelle Bismarckstraße 20221101 HOF06316 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 18:24, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Innenleben der Nintendo Switch 20230405 HOF09139 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WILO SE Werk Hof 20230410 HOF09999 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 16:09, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Earth 2023 - Deutschland

Hallo PantheraLeo1359531,

bald ist es soweit: Vom 1. Mai bis zum 31. Mai 2023 findet zum elften Mal der internationale Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth statt. Dabei können unter anderem Nationalparks, Naturschutzgebiete, Geotope und Naturdenkmäler fotografiert und die Fotos hochgeladen werden. Du hast an einem der vergangenen Fotowettbewerbe teilgenommen. Deshalb laden wir dich ein, auch dieses Jahr wieder mitzumachen. Wir freuen uns auf deine Fotos!

• Sieger WLE 2022 – Landschaft
• 
  Hohes Ufer zwischen Ahrenshoop und Wustrow, Fischland
• 
  Biotop Nördliche Lothdorfer Wiese
• 
  Aisch bei Willersdorf im FFH Aischgrund

• Sieger WLE 2022 – Detail
• 
  Gemeine Goldwespe im NSG Wittenberge Rühstädter Elbniederung
• 
  Libellen-Schmetterlingshaft im Naturschutzgebiet Badberg (Kaiserstuhl)
• 
  Blüte eines Schmalblättrigen Weidenröschens im Naturpark Taunus

Der Wettbewerb ist zweigeteilt, das heißt wir unterscheiden zwischen den beiden Wettbewerbskategorien Landschaft und Detail/Makro. Zu Landschaft zählen auch geschützte Einzelbäume. In der Wettbewerbskategorie Detail/Makro werden Pflanzen, Tiere und Pilze bewertet.

Es sind wie immer viele spannende Motive überall in Deutschland zu finden. Neben Naturdenkmälern wie alten Bäumen oder Naturparks im Gebirge und am Meer können Geotope wie Findlinge, Quellen und Aufschlüsse oder FFH-Gebiete fotografiert werden, um sie unter anderem in der Wikipedia zu dokumentieren. Auch im vergangenen Jahr sind zahlreiche neue Listen und Artikel in diesen Bereichen entstanden, für die wir uns über Fotos freuen – zum Beispiel in Sachsen die Liste der Naturdenkmale in Wurzen.

Als Einstieg für die Suche nach Motiven hilft diese Übersichtsseite. Weitere Informationen erhältst du bei WLE 2023 – Deutschland und unter dieser Anleitung.

Damit der Upload für dich einfacher ist, haben wir in diesem Jahr die einzelnen Hochladeseiten für die Bundesländer abgeschafft, alle Fotos werden über dasselbe Formular hochgeladen. Außerdem haben wir das Layout unserer WLE-Seiten geändert.

Damit es ab 1. Mai mit dem Upload schnell geht:

Upload your photos for WLE 

Außerdem laden wir dich ein, vom 1. Mai bis 30. Juni 2023 an der Vorjury teilzunehmen. Damit bewertest du die hochgeladenen Bilder und ermittelst so gemeinsam mit der Jury, die im Juli tagen wird, die Sieger von Wiki Loves Earth 2023 in Deutschland. Das Vorjurytool ist bald hier freigeschaltet. Du benötigst dafür nur deinen Benutzernamen und das Passwort.

Vorjury-Tool 

Für Fragen steht das Organisationsteam gerne auf der Support-Seite zur Verfügung. Falls du im nächsten Jahr keine Einladung für Wiki Loves Earth Deutschland haben möchtest, trag dich bitte hier ein. Wir würden das natürlich schade finden, da wir uns auf deine Fotos freuen.

Viel Spaß und Erfolg beim Fotowettbewerb 2023 wünscht dir im Namen des Organisationsteams --Z ^thomas 15:25, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WILO SE Werk Hof 20230410 HOF00242 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 17:00, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosenbühl 20230410 HOF00229 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 17:00, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Carl-Orff-Straße 20230410 HOF00168 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 19:44, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neubaugebiet Rosenbühl HOF00178 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 19:43, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ostermarsch in Hof (Saale) am 08.04.2023 HOF09514 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Modern primat 13:03, 17 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dorfstraße bei Nacht, Kirchdorf in Tirol 20220907 HOF04654 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality.--Alexander-93 19:20, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchdorf in Tirol bei Nacht 20220907 HOF04655 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice work --Mister rf 14:40, 18 April 2023 (UTC) Thank you :) --PantheraLeo1359531 15:34, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PTSV Hof 20230410 HOF00138 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Purple CA on the left side that should be removed (see the note) --Halavar 21:32, 17 April 2023 (UTC)  Done Thank you, I tried to remove it :) --PantheraLeo1359531 18:22, 18 April 2023 (UTC)  Support Very good! QI for me. --Halavar 19:11, 18 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Neubaugebiet Rosenbühl HOF00212 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 17:54, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osseck HOF09785 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 17:54, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Osseck HOF09834 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good quality. --Augustgeyler 19:52, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, 512 GB, Lavender mit S-Pen 20230416 HOF00335 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice work --Mister rf 06:22, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra, 512 GB, Lavender 20230416 HOF00318 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Nice work --Mister rf 06:22, 19 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchdorf in Tirol 20220906 HOF04529 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 17:56, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchdorf in Tirol 20220906 HOF04507 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 17:56, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kirchdorf in Tirol 20220906 HOF04480 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. Well balanced. --Augustgeyler 18:57, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kunstwerk Hl. Johannes Nepomuk 20220906 HOF04336 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 21:51, 21 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Going am Wilden Kaiser 20220905 HOF04155 RAW-Export (2) cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 19:07, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Going am Wilden Kaiser 20220905 HOF04151 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 18:34, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Going am Wilden Kaiser 20220905 HOF04101 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 18:34, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Going am Wilden Kaiser 20220905 HOF04096 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 18:34, 24 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Going am Wilden Kaiser 20220905 HOF04185 RAW-Export cens besser.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good quality. --Augustgeyler 20:57, 25 April 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Modern primat 21:37, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Going am Wilden Kaiser 20220905 HOF04081 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 22:02, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ellmau 20220905 HOF04267 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 22:02, 25 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ellmau 20220905 HOF04259 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 20:05, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ellmau 20220905 HOF04236 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 20:05, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Going am Wilden Kaiser 20220905 HOF04189 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:40, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ellmau 20220905 HOF04198 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:40, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Natur um Kirchdorf in Tirol 20220906 HOF04441 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 07:22, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baustelle Sana Klinikum Hof 20230422 HOF00695 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 19:16, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baufortschritt ZWE 20230422 HOF01241 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 18:29, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KFC 20230422 HOF00758 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good quality. --Augustgeyler 21:22, 30 April 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Agip Tankstelle 20230422 HOF00817 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 23:21, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schollenteichstraße 26-28 20230422 HOF00960 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 23:21, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schollenteichstraße 12 20230422 HOF00995 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 23:21, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bäckerei Dörsch 20230422 HOF01138 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 20:02, 2 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 5 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! BRK-Heim 20230422 HOF01173 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good quality. --Augustgeyler 06:48, 3 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wohnbau mit Gerüst 20230422 HOF00965 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Probably too large volume for common use and such a simple motif. --Milseburg 17:34, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

PNG als Weg zu mehr Farbtiefe und Kontrastumfang?

Ich bin über Deine Antwort bei QI auf Deine Strategie aufmerksam und neugierig geworden. Heißt, Du spielst lieber als PNG aus, weil Du dort mehr als 8bit zur Verfügung hast? Welchen Farbraum verwendest Du? Ich dachte wir sind hier auf Commons ja ohnehin leider auf SRGB begrenzt. August Geyler (talk) 14:53, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

• Hallo @Augustgeyler: !
• Ja, unter anderem. Also bei Commons können wir neben sRGB bspw. auch Adobe RGB benutzen, aber auch die Farbtiefe frei variieren. RGB8 ist die übliche Farbtiefe mit 16.777.216 Farben. Über PNG können wir auch RGB16 nutzen, mit TIF sogar RGB32. Diese können auch auf Commons hochgeladen werden. TIF-Files mit RGB32 produzieren jedoch keine Vorschauen. JPG arbeitet ausschließlich mit RGB8 und ohne Transparenzkanal. Da das Auge sehr helle und sehr dunkle Bereiche weniger nuanciert wahrnimmt, wird bei JPEG meist diese Helligkeitswerte stärker komprimiert, was die Bearbeitungsmöglichkeiten reduziert. Ich hatte immer mal wieder mit Adobe RGB gearbeitet, jedoch gab es da auf COM:QIC immer wieder Debatten um die "richtige" Farbwiedergabe. Bei anderen Farbräumen weiß ich nicht, inwieweit es um Support für Commons steht, aber meist richtet es sich nach den Möglichkeiten des jeweiligen Dateityps. Erfahrungsgemäß kriegt man auch "unkonventionellere" Dateien auf Commons (sofern sie den korrekten MIME-Typ haben), jedoch ohne Garantie, dass ein Thumbnail gerendet wird, und mehr :). Bei Commons:File types und den weiterführenden Links gibt es womöglich mehr Informationen zu den einzelnen Dateitypen. Beim Phabricator können neue Funktionen und Dateieigenschaften debattiert werden, die besondere Einstellungen haben.
• Grüße, --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 15:13, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baustelle Sana Klinikum Hof 20230422 HOF00708 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 06:42, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sony FE 24-70mm F2.8 GM 20230506 HOF01555 RAW-Export 1.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 19:19, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nintendo Switch – OLED-Modell mit gedockter Konsole 20230506 HOF01624 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Very good quality. --LexKurochkin 14:20, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sony FE 20mm F1.8 G 20230506 HOF01543 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment As the background was removed, the image should be marked as retouched. --LexKurochkin 13:44, 7 May 2023 (UTC)  DoneThanks, added --PantheraLeo1359531 14:16, 7 May 2023 (UTC)  Support Thanks! Good quality. --LexKurochkin 14:19, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! KFC 20230422 HOF00763 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Question Very good image. But why did you decide to use png format here? --Augustgeyler 16:45, 4 May 2023 (UTC) I decided to do so because it allows better editing options, especially for extreme bright or dark areas, to come nearer to a RAW image editing :) --PantheraLeo1359531 13:13, 7 May 2023 (UTC)  Support  Thank you. Good quality. --Augustgeyler 14:59, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! MGS in Hof (Saale) 20230422 HOF00740 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Done Thanks, fixed :) --PantheraLeo1359531 13:11, 7 May 2023 (UTC) Good quality. --Imehling 13:47, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baustelle Sana Klinikum Hof 20230422 HOF00708 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Imehling 06:42, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Schollenteichstraße 20230422 HOF00999 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:19, 7 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 10 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baufortschritt ZWE Hof 20230422 HOF01248 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --痛 00:32, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Nintendo Switch – OLED-Modell-Docking Station 20230506 HOF01637 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 17:20, 9 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Söll in Tirol 20220904 HOF01677 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality --Halavar 19:30, 11 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rendering von Seite Sierpiński-Pyramide 20230513 002 RGB16.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mister rf 15:39, 13 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 16 May 2023 (UTC)

Unclear date

Hi, for several files like File:SheetMetal004 PREVIEW.jpg you added a date like {{otherdate|2019-12-20|2019-12-23}} which cannot be rendered. What is meant with it, between? --Arnd 🇺🇦 (talk) 08:27, 17 May 2023 (UTC)

Thank you, yes I forgot the parameter "-", which means between. I will have a look at this. Thanks! --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:53, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

 Done Should be correct now :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:15, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ludwigstraße 52 20230508 HOF02016 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 18:11, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ludwigstraße 36 20230508 HOF02007 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 21:29, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Maxplatz 1 20230508 HOF01999 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 19:43, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! An der Michaelisbrücke 2 20230508 HOF01760 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mister rf 13:54, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Städtische Kunsteisbahn Eisteich 20230508 HOF01795 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mister rf 13:58, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 18 May 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! PET-Behältnis 20230517 HOF03488 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --BigDom 07:33, 30 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krematorium Hof 20230521 HOF03831 RAW-Export besser.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 18:10, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Krematorium Hof 20230521 HOF03817 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 18:10, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedhof Hof 20230521 HOF03875 RAW-Export besser.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vasmar1 13:38, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Friedhof Hof 20230521 HOF03747 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vasmar1 13:37, 31 May 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 3 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Benjamin Scholz (jungsfragen).png

File:Benjamin Scholz (jungsfragen).png is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: CSD F10 (personal photos by non-contributors) If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Lymantria (talk) 07:36, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Theresienstein 20230521 HOF03994 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 06:24, 7 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 10 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fabrikzeile 2-6 20230526 HOF04396 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:31, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fabrikzeile 2-6 20230526 HOF04200 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Radomianin 20:32, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! WÖHRL 20230526 HOF04532 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:32, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Karolinenstraße 28 20230526 HOF04506 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Radomianin 20:35, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Technisches Rathaus Hof 20230526 HOF04488 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 13:41, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Fabrikzeile 21 20230526 HOF04230 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. Meybe, volume a bit bulky for ordinary use. --Milseburg 13:08, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gasthof "Zur Linde" 20230526 HOF04153 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Mostly good quality, but perspective is off on the right-hand side - e.g., the car appears stretched/too wide, the right-hand building edge also isn't vertical. Fixable? --Mike Peel 07:15, 10 June 2023 (UTC)  Done Thank you, I uploaded a new version :) --PantheraLeo1359531 15:58, 16 June 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. Better now, thanks! --Mike Peel 19:37, 16 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baustelle ZWE 20230528 HOF04613 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:26, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Albert-Einstein-Straße 20230528 HOF04686 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 22:51, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Iisys 20230528 HOF04661 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 22:51, 17 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Leimitzer Milchhaisla 20230528 HOF04917 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vasmar1 19:55, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kriegerdenkmal Leimitz 20230528 HOF04937 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vasmar1 19:55, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Freiwillige Feuerwehr Leimitz 20230528 HOF04993 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 15:47, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bauernhof an Haidter Straße 20230528 HOF04881 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vasmar1 20:02, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ferienwohnung Leimitz 20230528 HOF04877 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Vasmar1 20:02, 18 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ehemalige Landesgrenze in Mödlareuth 20230617 HOF00040 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 15:15, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 591. Hofer Schlappentag 20230605 HOF05409 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 18:06, 26 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kampfpanzer T - 34 85 in Mödlareuth 20230617 HOF00173 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Stifone 16:01, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ehemalige Landesgrenze in Mödlareuth 20230617 HOF00032 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support strong sharpening pattern, but good enough --Grunpfnul 18:47, 27 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ehemalige Landesgrenze in Mödlareuth 20230617 HOF00057 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:14, 28 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Wahlplakate Sachsen Linke und SPD 02082019.jpg

File:Wahlplakate Sachsen Linke und SPD 02082019.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:52, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Wahlplakat der FDP und der Partei die PARTEI 20190828 035.jpg

File:Wahlplakat der FDP und der Partei die PARTEI 20190828 035.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:53, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Wahlplakat der PARTEI 20190828 033.jpg

File:Wahlplakat der PARTEI 20190828 033.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:56, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Wahlplakat der Humanisten 20190828 038.jpg

File:Wahlplakat der Humanisten 20190828 038.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:56, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Wahlplakat der Humanisten 20190828 025.jpg

File:Wahlplakat der Humanisten 20190828 025.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:56, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Wahlplakat der PARTEI 20190828 034.jpg

File:Wahlplakat der PARTEI 20190828 034.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 03:57, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Wahlplakat der FDP, SPD und NDP vor Plauen 20190828 013.jpg

File:Wahlplakat der FDP, SPD und NDP vor Plauen 20190828 013.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:00, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Wahlplakat der PARTEI 20190828 039.jpg

File:Wahlplakat der PARTEI 20190828 039.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:00, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ehemalige Landesgrenze in Mödlareuth 20230617 HOF00016 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 12:12, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 591. Hofer Schlappentag 20230605 HOF05452 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 11:18, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Restaurant Delphi 20230619 HOF00377 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:10, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Restaurant Delphi 20230619 HOF00373 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 04:10, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Löwentürklopfer 20230619 HOF00259 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 16:36, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sonne scheint durch Kubushochzeit, Campus Hof 20230528 HOF04596 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Considering the lens flares to be part of the composition, I'd say QI. --MB-one 12:18, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hanno-Stoffe GmbH 20230625 HOF00759 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Oh, nice, below 20 MB --Poco a poco 18:45, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ortsrand Jägersruh 20230625 HOF00657 RAW-Export 1.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 15:36, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Döberlitzer Straße 20230625 HOF00599 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 15:36, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Theresienstein 20230521 HOF03951 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --XRay 14:51, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

JPEG-Komprimierung und Artefakte

Tetraeder zur blauen Stunde, Bottrop

Hallo PantheraLeo1359531, zunächst einmal vielen Dank an deine wachen Augen. Ich exportiere meine Fotos normalerweise immer auf einer Qualitätsstufe von 90 % aus Capture One heraus, weil man manchmal doch Unterschiede zur standardmäßigen Einstellung (80 %) sieht, mir zu den 100 % bisher bis auf sehr wenige Ausnahmen keine Unterschiede aufgefallen sind, letzte jedoch eine deutlich höhere Dateigröße zur Folge hat, weshalb ich mich stets für die 90 % entschieden habe. Ich habe das Foto des Tetraeders nun mit 100 % exportiert und als neue Version der hiesigen Datei hochgeladen. Ich muss mir ehrlicherweise jedoch eingestehen, dass ich keinen Unterschied sehen kann – vielleicht schaue ich aber auch nicht an den richtigen Stellen. Ist dir vielleicht in Erinnerung geblieben, wo du die Artefakte gesehen hast? Eventuell ist es etwas an der Aufnahme selbst, was korrigiert werden könnte. Viele Grüße Anil Ö. (talk) 16:06, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

@Аныл Озташ: Hi! Danke dir für deine Antwort! Die Qualitätsstufe von 90% wird oft als empfohlene Kompressionsstufe angegeben. Die Stufe ist oft so gewählt, dass einerseits eine hohe Qualität ausgesucht wird, die für die menschlichen Augen keine Kompressionsartefakte sehen lassen, andererseits möglichst klein ist. Für Projekte wie Commons empfiehlt sich tatsächlich 100% oder zumindest eine Stufe vor der höchsten Qualität, weil diese meist auch mehr Bearbeitungsspielraum bietet. Das Foto von dir gefällt mir sehr gut. Nun kann es jedoch sein, dass jemand eine Version bevorzugt, wo die dunklen Himmelsbereiche aufgehellt werden. Dies würde die Kompressionsartefakte deutlicher machen.

Verlustbehaftete Formate komprimieren üblicherweise so, dass zuerst unbedeutende Bereiche komprimiert werden, und "schwer erkennbare" Bereiche (üblicherweise helle und dunkle Bereiche). Das jedoch macht das Bearbeiten, oder in manchen Fällen, das Reparieren der Bilder schwerer. Die Dateigröße ist ein gutes Argument, allerdings können wir auf Commons großzügiger sein :). Wenn du möchtest, kannst du mal ein Foto deiner Wahl in verschiedenen Qualitätsstufen exportieren und danach die Fotos mit extremen Kontrastwerten, Dunstreduktion etc. ausstatten. Da zeigt sich tatsächlich ein deutliches Gefälle zwischen 90 und 100%. Je nach Foto schätze ich, dass etwa 1 Megabyte pro Megapixel so groß ist, dass selbst mit Nachbearbeitung und mehr praktisch keine Artefakte oder dergleichen sichtbar sind. Ich muss aber auch zugeben, dass ich da teilweise relativ penibel bin :D.

Ich arbeite tatsächlich mittlerweile mit PNG, da das keine verlustbehaftete Kompression zulässt. JPEGs komprimieren meist in 8x8 Pixelrastern, weshalb der RAW-Output der Kamera deutlich verändert wird, aber das ist jedem selbst überlassen :).

Grüße! --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 16:31, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi und danke für deine ausführliche Antwort und die hilfreichen Informationen. Ich werde bei Gelegenheit mal einige Fotos nochmal neu hochladen – für den Fall, dass die RAW-Datei irgendwann mal abhanden kommt und man sich dann nicht unnötig ärgert. Der Hinweis bzgl. der Kontrastwerte ist gut; ich mache das manchmal, um etwaige Sensorflecken sichtbar zu machen, wo ich welche vermute oder erwarte. Mit Blick auf Artefakte habe ich da noch nie dran gedacht; JPGs unterlaufen bei mir für gewöhnlich auch keinem Bearbeitungsprozess mehr, aber als Quasi-Mastering kann man diesen Schritt das denke ich gut mit einbauen. An PNG statt JPG habe ich zumindest bei einigen Bildern auch schon gedacht, schrecke da aber doch etwas vor der Dateigröße zurück, die wiederum andere bei der Weiternutzung abschrecken könnte. Natürlich gibt es aber einen Grund, warum sich die Größe einer solchen Datei im Bereich der RAW-Aufnahme liegt. --Anil Ö. (talk) 18:18, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

@Аныл Озташ: Genau :). Wenn du möchtest, kann du zumindest bei besonders gelungenen Fotos eine PNG-Version hochladen und verlinken. Und die Größe der PNG-Dateien relativiert sich auch über die Zeit :). Heute sind 50 MB für ein Foto relativ viel, in 5 Jahren ist das schon viel üblicher :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 12:46, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

PS: PNG unterstützt auch 16 bit Farbkanal, was die meisten Kameras unterstützen. Mit der höheren Farbtiefe sind Farbübergänge und -gradienten fließender --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 12:55, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

PS: Mir gefallen übrigens deine Fotomotive, sind schöne Ansichten dabei! --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 16:36, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Vielen Dank! :-) --Anil Ö. (talk) 18:18, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 591. Hofer Schlappentag 20230605 HOF05656 RAW-Export cens (cropped).png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 11:19, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Golfballfassade 20230627 HOF01243 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 18:55, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Tür Graben 35 20230627 HOF01043 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 16:21, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gaststätte Mühldamm 20230627 HOF01201 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 19:07, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Fabric047 8K Roughness.png

Hello!

Would you be able to reupload File:Fabric047 8K Roughness.png? Both Wikimedia as well as my browser fails to render anything. And it says 0 x 0 pixels. Jonteemil (talk) 12:02, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Ditto File:Metal036 8K NormalGL.png Jonteemil (talk) 12:06, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for mentioning! The files were indeed damaged. In this case, it was once an upload error, once the source file was damaged. I will look up other files and repair them. Greetings! --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 12:47, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Awesome, no problem. I found that also File:ScatteredLeaves001 8K NormalDX.png is damaged. Jonteemil (talk) 12:53, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Done :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:00, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Brilliant, I have also now found File:WoodSiding009 16K Displacement.png which should be the last one. Jonteemil (talk) 13:06, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you, haha, let's hope it :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:12, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CSD in Bayreuth 2023 HOF02768 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Piediluco 18:42, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CSD in Bayreuth 2023 HOF02973 RAW-Export gut.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:40, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blaues Haus 20230721 HOF03715 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Llez 05:28, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Bootstrap sina-weibo.svg

File:Bootstrap sina-weibo.svg is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: CSD F3 (derivative work of non-free content): en:File:Sina_Weibo.svg & Commons:Deletion requests/File:Weibo icon.svg If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Larryasou (talk) 11:19, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for cleaning up! :) Indeed, the file must be deleted --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 12:01, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! La-Spezia-Platz Bayreuth 20230627 HOF03244 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 18:28, 24 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 July 2023 (UTC)

FPC: Tetraeder Bottrop bei Nacht

Tetraeder Bottrop bei Nacht

Hi PantheraLeo1359531, nach deiner Anmerkung habe ich mir ein paar Gedanken dazu gemacht und würde das Bild ggf. dann doch als FP nominieren. Eine einzige Sache hat es, die mich etwas stört, nämlich dass ich offenbar rund einen Meter zu weit rechts vom Bauwerk stand, also nicht gerade gegenüber der Kante – Entfernung und Dunkelheit kamen vor Ort erschwerend hinzu. Es könnte dadurch den Eindruck erwecken, als wäre das Foto schief, was es aber nicht ist; die mittlere Kante zur vVrtikalen läuft oben an der Spitze einfach nur mit den anderen zusammen. Meinst du man sollte den Versuch so wagen? Ich würde ungern mühsam versuchen, das zu begradigen, was im Grunde nur dazu führen würde, die Perspektive zu verfälschen. Viele Grüße --Anil Ö. (talk) 00:00, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Das ist tatsächlich eine schwierige Frage. Einerseits ist die Komposition des Fotos einfach fantastisch, allerdings könnte es tatsächlich einige Leute geben, die auf eine symmetrische Ausrichtung insistieren. Ich vermute fast, dass eine digitale Korrektur aufgrund der verschiedenen Entfernungen der Bestandteile des Baus schwierig wird. Ich würde Folgendes vorschlagen: Sollte sich bald eine erneute Möglichkeit für dieses Motiv finden, und du Zeit und Lust hast, dieses erneut zu fotografieren, kannst du dies machen, wenn nicht, würde ich es einfach mal nominieren :). Da ich durchaus Chancen für das Bild sehe, würde ich eines der beiden Dinge versuchen. Vielleicht kann man irgendwie so argumentieren, dass eine perfekte symmetrische Ausrichtung des Fraktals nicht möglich oder erwünscht war, weil vielleicht der Mond sonst nicht mehr zentriert wäre, oder so :). Ich drücke jedenfalls die Daumen! Grüße --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 10:33, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Solche nicht absolut frontalen Ansichten haben den Vorteil, dass die Tiefe des Motivs besser erkennbar ist; vielleicht wäre das auch ein Argument --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 10:35, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Und letzten Endes ist die Beurteilung der exzellenten Bilder auch Geschmackssache. Wenn die Reviewer mehrheitlich dermaßen beeindruckt von der Konstellation und dem Gefühl sind, das das Foto rüberbringt, kann man über die Ausrichtung weggehen. Manche mögen vielleicht auch allzu "perfekte" Fotografien nicht unbedingt --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 10:37, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blaues Haus bei Nacht 20230722 HOF04010 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ParisTaras 22:50, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Balkenkraftwerk 20230505 HOF01474 RAW-Export cens.png

File:Balkenkraftwerk 20230505 HOF01474 RAW-Export cens.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

93.204.191.195 12:46, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! CONTIPARK Parkhaus City 20230704 HOF01894 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ParisTaras 21:20, 1 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blaues Haus bei Nacht 20230722 HOF04000 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:22, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Blaues Haus und Fabrikzeile 20230722 HOF04008 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:21, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auguststraße 8 20230704 HOF01698 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but please add the name of the village to the file description --Llez 05:48, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Auguststraße 10 20230704 HOF01703 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but please add the name of the village to the file description --Llez 05:48, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:VirtualBox Linux Deepin 20.1 LARGE 16 03 2021 21 55 48.png

And also:

• File:VirtualBox Linux Deepin 20.1 LARGE 16 03 2021 21 56 46.png
• File:VirtualBox Linux Deepin 20.1 LARGE 16 03 2021 21 57 12.png
• File:VirtualBox Linux Deepin 20.1 LARGE 16 03 2021 22 00 01.png
• File:VirtualBox Linux Deepin 20.1 LARGE 17 03 2021 11 00 50.png

Yours sincerely, Larryasou (talk) 14:42, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grundschule Moschendorf 20230708 HOF02348 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Lorax 02:46, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TÜV SÜD Service-Center Hof 20230708 HOF02576 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Аныл Озташ 22:27, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TÜV SÜD Service-Center Hof 20230708 HOF02571 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --D-Kuru 18:43, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bikewash Hof 20230708 HOF02640 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ParisTaras 20:52, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Herrmann & Wittrock 20230708 HOF02634 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 14:51, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Integratives Kinderhaus der Lebenshilfe Hof 20230708 HOF02587 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 18:01, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Integratives Kinderhaus der Lebenshilfe Hof 20230708 HOF02590 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 18:01, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le-go Bekleidungswerke 20230708 HOF02017 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 05:47, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le-go Bekleidungswerke 20230708 HOF02023 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 05:47, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Le-go Bekleidungswerke 20230708 HOF02019 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 05:47, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Jahresbericht über die Städtische Töchterschule in Hof. 25. 1894-95.pdf

Please provide a completed {{Book}} template on the file description page for your upload. It helps automate eventual Index: creation at Wikisource, as well providing additional catalog data on Commons. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 15:46, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Thank you, I didn't know that :). Will fill it in soon --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 15:53, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! TÜV SÜD Service-Center Hof 20230708 HOF02568 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 08:23, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Brötchentaste am Parkautomaten 20230818 HOF06320 RAW-Export 1.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Crop bottom until unfinished parts aren't in the photo. --多多123 17:34, 26 August 2023 (UTC)  Done Thanks, bottom cropped --PantheraLeo1359531 12:44, 29 August 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --多多123 16:14, 31 August 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gasthof Rotes Ross 20230904 HOF08056 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 21:33, 5 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grundschule Krötenbruck bei Nacht 20230821 HOF06614 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 16:36, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 152. Geburtstag der Hofer Wärschtlamänner 20230906 HOF08434 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:49, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wohnhäuser in Ernst-Reuter-Straße 20230719 HOF03369 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 15:17, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Kim Jong-un and Vladimir Putin (2023-09-13) 07.jpg

And also:

• File:Kim Jong-un and Vladimir Putin (2023-09-13) 09.jpg
• File:Kim Jong-un and Vladimir Putin (2023-09-13) 10.jpg
• File:Kim Jong-un and Vladimir Putin (2023-09-13) 12.jpg
• File:Kim Jong-un and Vladimir Putin (2023-09-13) 13.jpg
• File:Kim Jong-un and Vladimir Putin (2023-09-13) 14.jpg
• File:Kim Jong-un and Vladimir Putin (2023-09-13) 15.jpg
• File:Kim Jong-un and Vladimir Putin (2023-09-13) 16.jpg
• File:Kim Jong-un and Vladimir Putin (2023-09-13) 17.jpg

Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 08:42, 14 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wilhelm-Kohlhoff-Straße bei Nacht 20230821 HOF06616 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Lens flare, fixable? --F. Riedelio 15:30, 8 September 2023 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the hint, flares in the sky removed. Rays around light sources cannot be removed, so I hope this suits now :) --PantheraLeo1359531 14:49, 11 September 2023 (UTC)  Support Good Quality now. --F. Riedelio 13:23, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 152. Geburtstag der Hofer Wärschtlamänner 20230906 HOF08435 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Looks o.k. to me. --Robert Flogaus-Faust 10:41, 15 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baustellenfortschritt Sana Klinikum Hof 20230806 HOF05584 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 19:59, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ernst-Reuter-Straße 1 20230806 HOF05524 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --WikiEuropian 22:58, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Wunsiedler Straße 5 20230806 HOF05502 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --WikiEuropian 22:58, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hans-Böckler-Straße 25 20230806 HOF05488 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 15:03, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Bahnhofstraße 2a 20230719 HOF03278 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments IMO you can crop the image cutting out the black car on the left... --Terragio67 15:29, 8 September 2023 (UTC)  DoneThank you, crop applied :) --PantheraLeo1359531 14:40, 14 September 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Terragio67 20:22, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

File tagging File:Anne Rothäuser.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Anne Rothäuser.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

 

Krd 19:12, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

 On hold Thanks, I sent an email again to the copyright holder :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 12:57, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hans-Böckler-Straße 25 20230806 HOF05485 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 13:10, 16 September 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Túllio F 14:43, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sophienschule, Uhr mit Verzierungen 20230915 HOF09127 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 15:25, 19 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

File:Ionicons logo-discord.svg

File:Ionicons logo-discord.svg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Kelly The Angel.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 00:56, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

File:Ionicons logo-discord.svg

File:Ionicons logo-discord.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:54, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Klosterstraße_(Hof_(Saale))_in_2023

Klosterstraße (Hof (Saale)) in 2023 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Kleeblatt187 (talk) 20:47, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Klosterstraße_(Hof_(Saale))_by_year

Klosterstraße (Hof (Saale)) by year has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Kleeblatt187 (talk) 20:48, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! DDR-Grenzbeobachtungsturm 20231003 HOF00364 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Stifone 18:46, 5 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

FE 70-200mm F4 G

Hallo PantheraLeo1359531,

eine ganz kurze dumme Frage: Hast Du eventuell Interesse an meinem Objektiv Sony FE 70-200mm F4 G? Ich nutze es kaum mehr, da ich mich oft entweder mit 85mm begnüge oder gleich das 100-400mm-Objektiv mitschleppe (schwer!). Es handelt sich um die erste Generation des Objektives, es ist also nicht so toll wie die brandneue Version II, aber schlecht ist es auch nicht, es hat mir eine Menge schöner Bilder eingebracht (siehe Abfrage meiner Fotos), darunter einige FPs, und ist zu schade, um nur herzumzustehen ...

Das nur als Anfrage. Ich will Commons nicht als Verkaufsplattform misbrauchen, ich dachte nur, Du hast vielleicht Interesse. Falls nicht, sorry, bitte einfach ignorieren! Beste Grüße von --Aristeas (talk) 13:23, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi Aristeas,

zunächst danke Dir für Deine Anfrage. Tatsächlich spare ich gerade für das 24-70 F2.8 GM II und habe schon andere Ausgaben geplant. Momentan fokussiere ich mich eher auf Weitwinkel und Standardzoom, den Telebereich werde ich wahrscheinlich später angehen (monentan fallen mir noch nicht soo viele Anwendungsbereiche ein), und wenn preislich machbar, im G-Master-Segment :). Ich hoffe aber, dass du einen glücklichen neuen Besitzer finden kannst :D. (Meine Absicht ist, Objektive zu finden, die einerseits bezahlbar sind und andererseits auch die enorme Pixelzahl der Sony a7R V ausschöpfen können). Ich habe mal die G und G-Master-Objektive verglichen, und die G-Objektive bieten gute Qualität bei guten Preisen, aber mich reizt tatsächlich die oberere Liga :).

Ich habe mir mal Deine Fotos angeschaut, und sie sind wirklich gelungen!

Vielen Dank und liebe Grüße, --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:34, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Hallo PantheraLeo1359531, vielen (verspäteten, Sorry!) Dank für Deine Antwort! Klar, ich wollte ja nur mal fragen ;–).

Gratulation noch zur α7R V! Ich werde noch ein Weilchen bei der α7R IV bleiben, da ich fast immer manuell fokussiere und mir daher die Neuerungen der V nicht viel bringen würden (die Bildqualität scheint mehr oder minder gleich geblieben zu sein, die Tests widersprechen sich hier, sodass die Bilanz ± 0 ist); aber da/wenn Du den Autofocus benutzt und oft sich bewegende Objekte (Personen) hast, ist die V natürlich ein großer Fortschritt. Und natürlich der neue Sucher.

Zum Thema Weitwinkel würde ich Dir, falls Du auch hier ein Zoom erwägst, übrigens den Tipp geben, zu überlegen, ob es Dir mehr um „so weit wie möglich“ geht (z.B. für Architektur-Innenaufnahmen oder enge Gassen) oder um „es soll praktisch sein“. Ich habe das Sony FE 12-24mm F2.8 GM und für Architektur ist das super, aber es ist oft sehr lästig, für 35mm zwischendurch dauernd das Objektiv zu wechseln; besonders bei Demos etc., die Du ja auch fotografierst, wäre das wohl belastend. Daher sind die üblichen 16–35mm-Objektive für viele Zwecke erheblich praktischer, das GM ist auch hier sehr gut (in diesem Fall wohl auch schon in Version I) und noch weiter als 16mm muss es m.E. eigentlich nur für Architektur-Innenaufnahmen oder enge Gassen sein. Falls Du Dich doch für ein noch weiteres Weitwinkel-Zoom entscheidest, würde ich einen Blick auf das Sigma 14-24mm F2.8 DG DN werfen: es ist praktisch genauso gut wie das Sony FE 12-24mm F2.8 GM (ich habe sie verglichen) und gleichzeitig erheblich günstiger; ich habe das GM nur, weil ich es gebraucht bekommen habe.

Herzliche Grüße und gut Licht, --Aristeas (talk) 11:33, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi Aristeas!

Danke!

Du kannst scheinbar meine Gedanken lesen :D. Das mit dem Zoom ist ein guter Punkt. Ich habe mir damals die 20mm-Festbrennweite Sony FE 20mm F1.8G gekauft, weil sie günstig war und ziemlich gute Fotos schießt (dieser Weitwinkel reicht in der Innenstadt oft). Manchmal ist jedoch tatsächlich Zoom nötig, aber kein extremer wie bei der 24-70mm GM. Ich werde mir wahrscheinlich gegen Ende nächsten Jahres deshalb die 16-35mm GM II holen, da sie einerseits die flexible Zoommöglichkeit gibt (Zoomumfang reicht bei Architekturshots absolut) und bei den Tests wirklich gut abschneidet. Bei 12mm habe ich bisschen die Sorge, dass das Blickfeld zu weit ist und womöglich nicht ganz so realistisch aussieht, wie ich es mir wünsche (manchmal ist natürlich ein derartig weiter Blickwinkel notwendig). In Hof selbst gibt es glücklicherweise kaum richtig enge Orte, da sind 12mm eher nicht notwendig. Die 16-35mm-Linse kostet momentan noch relativ viel, da warte ich noch ein bisschen. Bis dahin reichen die 20mm und bei Demos etc. die 24-70mm.

Ich habe auch länger überlegt, ob es Sinn macht, zur a7R V zu wechseln, aber im Nachhinein bereue ich es nicht. Richtig, die Sensorqualität ist praktisch gleich (mir sind jetzt keine Unterschiede aufgefallen), aber was sich deutlich macht, ist, zumindest bei mir, dass der Bildstabilisator sehr viel zufriedenstellender ist. Bei der IV hatte ich bei 20mm und 1/125s oder länger nicht selten Verwackelungen, bei der V ist es bis 1/40s meist kein Problem. Klappbarer LCD ist praktisch, brauche ich aber meist weniger. Verbesserte Fernsteuerung per Smartphone hilft meist bei Stativarbeit. Da ich auch filme, sind 4K-Videos in 60FPS sehr praktisch, bei ruhigen Motiven und Kameraführungen ist die 8K-Funktion auch fein. Eine eigene Videokamera lohnt sich da also nicht. Was auch merklich schneller ist, ist der Prozessor, das fällt schon sehr auf. Es gibt etliche kleine Neuerungen, aber letzten Endes kommt es drauf an, ob einem die Verbesserungen so wichtig sind, dass ein Umstieg lohnt. Aber die a7R IV ist verglichen mit der Konkurrenz auch nach 4 Jahren kaum geschlagen, das muss man einfach sagen :).

Grüße --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:53, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:DDR-Grenzbeobachtungsturm 20231003 HOF00364 RAW-Export.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:DDR-Grenzbeobachtungsturm 20231003 HOF00364 RAW-Export.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 05:00, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Theresienstraße 29 20230816 HOF06163 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --MB-one 15:38, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 17 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baufortschritt Sana Klinikum Hof 20231015 HOF00784-HDR RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --ArildV 06:25, 16 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 19 October 2023 (UTC)

Category:Piratenpartei_Bayern

Piratenpartei Bayern has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Westsächsisch (talk) 01:00, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis, da ist natürlich eine Diskussion wichtig :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:57, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vorstadt 3, Gebhardt Baustoffe 20230818 HOF06223 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 19:02, 23 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Baufortschritt Sana Klinikum Hof 20231015 HOF00796-HDR RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments If the object is the building site, I'd crop the traffic light pole, as it's distracting. Otherwise good. --MB-one 18:29, 19 October 2023 (UTC)  Done Thanks, crop applied :) --PantheraLeo1359531 15:04, 23 October 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 11:32, 24 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 27 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 57. Internationale Hofer Filmtage 20231028 HOF01481 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:53, 29 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Gebhardt Baustoffe 20230818 HOF06207 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 13:52, 30 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 2 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petit Paris 20230824 HOF07604 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:29, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petit Paris 20230824 HOF07560 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:29, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Petit Paris 20230824 HOF07545 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:29, 5 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Altstädter Schule mit Gerüst 20230904 HOF08076 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 19:38, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kreuzung Königstraße, Oberer Anger, Mühlstraße, Pfarr 20230904 HOF07950 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 19:38, 14 November 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 17 November 2023 (UTC)

Bad tiff

hi! there are many tiff cut off at 10mb, e.g. File:DOP40 - Landkreis Kitzingen 32578 5519 (Bayerische Vermessungsverwaltung).tif File:DOP40 - Landkreis Neustadt a.d.Waldnaab 32745 5508 (Bayerische Vermessungsverwaltung).tif. you might want to overwrite them with the original version. it's probably due to this bug https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T350917 . RZuo (talk) 22:21, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

• @RZuo: Damn, thank you for mentioning! Is there a tool that lists me all files in a category with a file size of 10 MiB? Thank I can correct all corrupt files. I will repair the listed ones right now. Greeting --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:16, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

  https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?search=filesize%3A10239%2C10241+incategory%3A%22Files_uploaded_by_PantheraLeo1359531%22 . :) --RZuo (talk) 14:19, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Thanks a lot, I will upload new versions :) --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:21, 2 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Großer Sitzungssaal des Rathauses Hof 20231125 HOF02235-HDR RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:44, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dachstuhl des Rathauses Hof 20231125 HOF02596-HDR RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The lower corner is pitch black, any chance to recover details from this? After all it's supposedly HDR. --Plozessor 06:44, 6 December 2023 (UTC)  Info I adjusted the dark area a little bit above absolute black. I intended this to emphasize the effect of the shining light and to make the scene more dramatical --PantheraLeo1359531 16:41, 6 December 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality now! --Plozessor 17:08, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haupteingang Max-Reger-Schule 20230907 HOF08644 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:44, 6 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 9 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Winter am Bismarckturm 20231201 HOF02799 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 16:41, 8 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 11 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dachstuhl des Rathauses Hof 20231125 HOF02669-HDR RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 06:49, 10 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rosenbühler Weg 20231201 HOF02793 RAW-Export.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 15 December 2023 (UTC)

Frohe Weihnachten und schöne Feiertage!

✴ Happy Holidays, PantheraLeo1359531 ✴ Merry Christmas and a happy new year! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Buon Natale e felice anno nuovo! Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr! Aristeas (talk) 17:21, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

Happy holidays!

		* Happy Holidays! *
		Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Joyeux Noël! Bonne année! Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr! ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo! Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!    -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:48, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kugelpanorama der Grundschule Krötenbruck in Hof (Saale) 20231217.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Plozessor 05:49, 24 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 07:57, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

Category:Musik by Scott Buckley

Category:Musik by Scott Buckley is considered to fulfill the criteria for speedy deletion and has been marked on its page. The following reason has been specified: one file was merged to Category:Audio files of Scott Buckley (composer) If you believe the content does not meet the criteria for speedy deletion, you may replace the speedy deletion tag with a regular deletion request (if the content has not been deleted) or request undeletion (if the content has already been deleted). All your uploads, including deleted ones, are listed in your upload log. If you need help, please read our frequently asked questions or visit the help desk. Please do not remove this message from your talk page. You may set up archiving instead. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Prototyperspective (talk) 11:39, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

 Info  Done Inhalt der Kategorie wurde in andere Kategorie übertragen; nun leere Kategorie nicht mehr nötig --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 15:49, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! JCRG im Winter 20231222HOF03485 RAW-Export cens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Can be debated why this must be PNG with 60 MB that takes ages to load, but that is not the topic of QI. Picture is good. --Plozessor 05:37, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 29 December 2023 (UTC)