User talk:PantheraLeo1359531/Archive 2021

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Deutsch: Archiv 2021. Hier werden abgeschlossene Diskussionen vom Jahre 2021 angezeigt.
English: Archive 2021. Here you can find older discussions of 2021.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3090 Eagle OC 24G, 24576 MiB GDDR6X liegend Front 20201114.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rhododendrites 19:56, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gigabyte GeForce RTX 3090 Eagle OC 24G, 24576 MiB GDDR6X Backplate 20201114 HDR.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alte Bahnposthalle Hof, rechte Hälfte 20201121 DSC6232.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:47, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alte Bahnposthalle Hof, eingebetteter Bereich 20201121 DSC6231.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:47, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alte Bahnposthalle Hof, rechte Hälfte 20201121 DSC6222.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 15:57, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alte Bahnposthalle Hof, linke Hälfte 20201121 DSC6214.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 15:57, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alte Bahnposthalle Hof, Bereich mit Wänden 20201121 DSC6275.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Granada 06:20, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alte Bahnposthalle Hof, Schaltkasten 20201121 DSC6276.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Granada 06:20, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alte Bahnposthalle Hof, Treppenhaus 20201121 DSC6281.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Granada 06:20, 13 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alte Bahnposthalle Hof, Türbereich 20201121 DSC6263.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:03, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alte Bahnposthalle Hof, Bahnhallensegment 20201121 DSC6235.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:03, 14 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Asus-ROG-Strix-Z390-F-Gaming-Motherboard 20201120 DSC6025.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support GQ --Palauenc05 17:13, 15 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alte Bahnposthalle Hof, eingebetteter Bereich 20201121 DSC6207.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 15:05, 15 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolink-Continuum-1200W-Netzteil Anschlüsse 20201120 DSC6061.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:05, 16 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolink-Continuum-1200W-Netzteil Radiator 20201120 DSC6056.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rhododendrites 16:14, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kolink-Continuum-1200W-Netzteil Rückseite 20201120 DSC6104.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rhododendrites 16:14, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 25 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jonsbo CR-1000 GT CPU-Kühler, ARGB - 120mm, schwarz 20201120 DSC6194.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Tilt/perspective correction needed --Poco a poco 15:15, 17 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks, done --PantheraLeo1359531 19:19, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:55, 23 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:07, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Computergeschäft Foxx Hof 20201126 DSC6546.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:50, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alter Feuermelder am Hotel Strauß Hof 20201126DSC6545.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:50, 25 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Autonomes E-Shuttle in Hofer Altstadt 20201126 DSC6567.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and perspective is ok --Etaped 19:28, 26 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 29 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schalter und Anschlüsse PC 20201120 DSC6139.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 19:18, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 30 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Autonomes E-Shuttle in Hofer Altstadt 20201126 DSC6581.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Autonomes E-Shuttle in Hofer Altstadt 20201126 DSC6575.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Infostein zum Hofer Pilgerhospiz 20201210 DSC6679.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 16:33, 30 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Situation Hofer Altstadt COVID-19 20201210 DSC6694.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:36, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Situation Hofer Altstadt COVID-19 20201210 DSC6690.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 17:01, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Situation Hofer Altstadt COVID-19 20201210 Dsc6681013021 00RAWb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 17:38, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maskenpflicht-Hinweiskarte Hof 20201210 DSC6678.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:05, 31 January 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Überblick Altstadt Hof während COVID-19-Pandemie 20201210 DSC6719.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Etaped 22:48, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Situation Hofer Altstadt COVID-19 20201210 DSC6709.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 17:35, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fahrplan Busse Hof mit Corona-Leugner-Aufkleber 20201126 DSC6590.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 12:52, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 4 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rathausvorplatz Ludwigstraße Hof 20201210 DSC6762.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:21, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Situation COVID-19 in der Hofer Innenstadt 20201210 DSC6737.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:21, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haltestelle in Hof mit weihnachtlichen Elementen 20201210 DSC6728.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:22, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Situation Hofer Altstadt COVID-19 20201210 DSC6686.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The foreground should be cropped out. --Ermell 17:37, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ DoneThanks, cropped out :) --PantheraLeo1359531 17:39, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:04, 2 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feuerwehrauto am Rathaus Hof 20201210 DSC6768.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I might abit nitpicky, but the vertical line of the house edges in the background are slight right leaning. However IQ is really good. --Etaped 17:21, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feuerwehrauto am Rathaus Hof 20201210 DSC6764.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Etaped 17:21, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Situation Hofer Altstadt COVID-19 20201210 DSC6692.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The foreground should be cropped out. --Ermell 17:37, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks, cropped --PantheraLeo1359531 17:35, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
The half person at the right as well. --Ermell 20:04, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks, done :) --PantheraLeo1359531 17:54, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. Thanks. --Ermell 08:39, 4 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hofer Altstadt während COVID-19-Pandemie 20201210 DSC6839.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:36, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hofer Altstadt während COVID-19-Pandemie 20201210 DSC6828.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 12:43, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Infotafel Baumaßnahmen Altstädter Schule Hof 20201210 DSC6873.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 19:54, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! COVID-19-Hinweise an der Altstadtpassage 20201210 DSC6864.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 18:28, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! COVID-19-Situation am Oberen Tor (Hof) 20201210 DSC6855.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I would prefer a more factual description in German rather than ("Dieses Foto dokumentiert die Auswirkungen für die Nachwelt." Nonetheless QI for me. --Tuxyso 18:31, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Situation Hofer Altstadt COVID-19 20201210 DSC6703.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 19:59, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Situation Hofer Altstadt COVID-19 20201210 DSC6696.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 22:57, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jugendzentrum Q in Hof geschlossen 20201210 DSC6918.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:04, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alle-Speisen-zum-mitnehmen-Schild Hof 20201210 DSC6909.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:03, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wärschtlamo-Stand am Oberen Tor 20201210 DSC6736 cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The category/mother cat are confusing to me, isn't that a seller stand? culture of Hof? can you please, elaborate? The left side is also leaning in --Poco a poco 18:57, 2 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks, fixed. Yes, I see this as a selling stand, and concerning the sausage guy cat :) --PantheraLeo1359531 17:49, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Info The Wärschtlamo has a long history in the city and is established in culture like beer or the "Schlappentag". --PantheraLeo1359531 17:50, 3 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 20:54, 11 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Freistehendes Tor am Jugendzentrum Q in Hof 20201210 DSC6928.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 13:43, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maskenshop in Hofer Altstadt 20201210 DSC6819.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:16, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wärschtlamo am Stand 20201210 DSC6813.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:15, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Situation Hofer Altstadt COVID-19 20201210 DSC6701.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Buildings and pylons on the left side need perspective correction.--KaiBorgeest 22:57, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thank you, fixed --PantheraLeo1359531 12:42, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Tesla Delacroix 20:10, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! DreiE Hof COVID-19-Schutzmaßnahmen 20201223 DSC7015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 17:33, 16 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Räumfahrzeug in Krötenbruck Hof 20210110 DSC7399.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 17:19, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Winterlandschaft in Hof Krötenbruck 20210110 DSC7390.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 17:19, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Winterlandschaft in Hof Krötenbruck 20210110 DSC7386.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 21:28, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hofer Altstadt während COVID-19-Pandemie 20201210 DSC6851.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
CA should be removed. --Ermell 19:47, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks, CAs removed --PantheraLeo1359531 12:16, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but still some left. --Ermell 07:13, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Cropped out :) --PantheraLeo1359531 17:16, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. Crop at the left could be better. --Ermell 20:34, 19 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Interesse an α7R II?[edit]

Hallo PantheraLeo1359531,

nur eine kurze Frage: Hättest Du ganz eventuell Interesse an meiner α7R II? Ich habe mir eine (gebrauchte) α7R IV gekauft und würde mich freuen, die α7R II in gute Hände weiterzugeben. Sie ist in sehr gutem Zustand. Die meisten denken bei den α7R-Modellen nur an die hohe Auflösung, aber die α7R II hätte für Dich gegenüber der α7 u.a. auch folgende ganz praktische Vorteile:

  • stabileres Gehäuse und insbesondere stabileres Bajonett;
  • griffigeres Gehäuse mit besserem Griff;
  • größeres und besseres Sucher-Bild;
  • sensor-seitige Bildstabilisierung (IBIS), was das Fotografieren aus der Hand wirklich deutlich erleichtert, da deutlich längere Belichtungen ohne Verwacklung möglich sind;
  • deutlich besserer Autofocus (mehr Messfelder auf einer größeren Fläche des Sensors);
  • Augen-Autofocus;
  • höhere Bildschärfe, da ohne Tiefpassfilter auf dem Sensor;
  • ein leiserer Verschluss, der nicht mehr so „kracht“, und die Möglichkeit einer geräuschlosen Aufnhame mit rein elektronischem Verschluss;
  • Urheber- und Copyright-Info wird automatisch in jedes Bild geschrieben;
  • und viele weitere kleine Verbesserungen.

Verschenken kann ich sie leider nicht (bin selbst nicht reich), ich könnte aber einen Wiki-Sonderpreis anbieten ;–). Also, falls Du evtl. Interesse hättest, schick mir einfach eine E-Mail. Ansonsten nichts für ungut, ich wollte einfach mal fragen. :-) Herzliche Grüße, --Aristeas (talk) 11:03, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Winterlandschaft in Hof Krötenbruck 20210110 DSC7388.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 08:46, 20 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CVJM-Eingangsbereich Hof 20201210 DSC6862.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 07:24, 20 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Verschneites Hof während der COVID-19-Pandemie 20210114 DSC7428.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:28, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großfahrzeug in Hof 20210114 DSC7421CENS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:19, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Verschneite Schneeschienen in Hof 20210114 DSC7416.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:23, 21 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Originalzustand bei Screenshots von Linux-Deverate[edit]

Moin PantheraLeo1359531,

ich habe eine Sache vergessen dir zu sagen, weil es mir gerade bei Xubuntu und bei Linux Mint auffällt. Du hast Änderungen an der Taskleiste durchgeführt (Uhr mit Sekunden und Datum und auch Änderung der Schrift), was ja nicht schlecht ist. Allerdings wurde mir vor einiger Zeit gesagt, dass der Originalzustand verwendet werden soll, so wie er bei der Live-Session ist. Man kann das System installieren und dann ablichten, aber da soll halt noch nichts verändert sein, damit man sieht, wie das Deverat im Original aussieht. Kannst du dies bitte nächstes Mal mit berücksichtigen? Ansonsten danke für deine besseren qualitativen Fotos. LG, --Funkruf (talk) 15:41, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Funkruf, danke für deine Nachricht, allerdings halte ich das persönlich im Rahmen, auch da ich innerhalb des OS agiere. Ich persönlich halte beides für möglich. Ich persönlich mache es so wie ich es mache, weil ja, man zeigen soll wie das OS aussieht, aber auch wie bei einer üblichen Anwendung aussieht. Die Icons auf der Arbeitsfläche sind realistischer, weil das eben nahezu alle Menschen tun. Das mit dem Originalzustand kann man so machen, aber das ist meines Wissens weder eine offizielle Regel noch sehr häufig vorzufinden. Für mich soll der Screenshot auch etwas zeigen, was das OS kann. Ich hoffe, das ist okay so :).

PS: Du meinst sicher das "Derivate" aus lat. "derivare": ableiten.

Grüße, -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 15:48, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blick in Kammergutweg Hof DSC7407CENS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Perryprog 18:09, 22 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blick über die Altstadt während COVID-19-Pandemie in Hof 20210114 DSC7452.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Pudelek 20:25, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! COVID-19-Pandemie in Hofer Altstadt 20210114 DSC7458.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 20:01, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! COVID-19-Pandemie in Hofer Altstadt 20210114 DSC7456.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:51, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 26 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Verschneite Gleise bei Sonnenschein Hof 20210121 DSC7494.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 18:01, 24 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marienstraße 69 Hof 20210114 DSC7476.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Top might have been sharper, but for me it is good quality --Michielverbeek 18:46, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schneelandschaft am Bismarckturm Hof 20210114 DSC7481.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 17:33, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! COVID-19-Pandemie in Hofer Altstadt 20210121 DSC7528.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:59, 26 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 1 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Adapter für interne HDD-Festplatten Rückseite 20210201 DSC7581.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality --Alexander Novikov 20:15, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Adapter für interne HDD-Festplatten Vorderseite 20210201 DSC7579.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality --Alexander Novikov 20:19, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Warnhinweis Vorsicht Dachlawine 20210121 DSC7558.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Really good quality. --Geoprofi Lars 18:33, 27 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 18:28, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weggeworfene FFP2-Maske in Hof 20210121 DSC7489.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 18:35, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Winterlandschaft in Hof Krötenbruck 20210110 DSC7394.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Geoprofi Lars 18:31, 27 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! KN95-Maske in Hof 20210204 DSC7587.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 17:33, 28 February 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Weggeworfener Röhrenfernseher 20210218 DSC7755.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 13:32, 2 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rückseite ST2000LM015-2E8174 2000,3 GB HDD002 corr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Christian Ferrer 23:09, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abrissbaustelle Bahnhofstraße 10 Hof 20210218 DSC7784.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 21:35, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abrissbaustelle Bahnhofstraße 10 Hof 20210218 DSC7778.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 21:37, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gedenktafel Textil-, Bauarbeitergewerkschaft in Marienstraße Hof 20210223 DSC8060.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, I think it would be nice to hightlight the mistakes in the description. --Nefronus 00:09, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Straßenschuild an DSC7933.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 17:45, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Postkasten an Eppenreuther Straße Hof 20210223 DSC7928.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Alexander Novikov 16:07, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! COVID-19-Infotexte in Hof 20210223 DSC8013.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 14:33, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! COVID-19-Infotexte in Hof 20210223 DSC8008.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Bgag 14:43, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abrissbaustelle Bahnhofstraße 10 Hof 20210218 DSC7772.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Comment The verticals of the red building behind the vehicle look not vertical. Could you fix it? --LexKurochkin 15:46, 3 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thx, fixed --PantheraLeo1359531 17:57, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support OK, Thank you! --LexKurochkin 11:52, 6 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! COVID-19-Warnhinweise an Bäckerei Herzog 20210121 DSC7557.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:03, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feuerwehr Lehsten Gesamtgebäude 20210303 DSC8114.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 10:46, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HDD001 Rückseite WDC WD3200LUCT-62RC2Y0 20210218 corr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 07:41, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Verschneite Baustelle in Hof, Rosenbühl 20210114 DSC7478.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
May be the image is improvable: It's too dark and leaning out. And please check for sharpness and (minor) CAs. --XRay 05:52, 4 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thx, done --PantheraLeo1359531 18:04, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thank you. IMO OK now. --XRay 07:25, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baugerüst an Gebäude an Lorenzstraße Hof 20210223 DSC8042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:51, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Informationstafel in Bensersiel 20200907 DSC2880.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 14:57, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abrissbaustelle Bahnhofstraße 10 Hof 20210218 DSC7793 cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Comment The same perspective problem: verticals of the closest to camera brick building are fine, but at the right side of the image buildings are leaning. --LexKurochkin 06:55, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thx, fixed --PantheraLeo1359531 15:45, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support OK, thank you! --LexKurochkin 18:04, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Platte mit Himmelsrichtungen in Bensersiel 20210903 DSC2991.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 15:23, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Am Strand von Bensersiel 20200907 DSC2997.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 14:53, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Am Strand von Bensersiel 20200907 DSC2988.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. I like the photo. Thanks! --LexKurochkin 14:23, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! ;) -- PantheraLeo1359531 14:32, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HDD004 Vorderseite WDC WD3200LUCT-62RC2Y0 20210218 corr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 07:54, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HDD003 Vorderseite ST2000LM015-2E8174 2000,3 GB 20210218 corr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 07:54, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abrissbaustelle Bahnhofstraße 10 Hof 20210218 DSC7775.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 06:55, 9 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 12 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brücke im Von-Thünen-Park 20200907 DSC3065.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 14:22, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Teich im Von-Thünen-Park Bensersiel 20200907 DSC3062.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 14:23, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fluss in Bensersiel 20200907 DSC3057.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 17:48, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sielanlage in Bensersiel 20200907 DSC3045.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 14:19, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haus am Strand von Bensersiel 20200907 DSC3011.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 06:53, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Halb zugemauertes Fenster in Bensersiel 20200907 DSC3004.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:24, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Auswirkungen der COVID-19-Pandemie in Hof 20210218 DSC7905.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Please ad the category of self portait by Wikipedian ;-) --Moroder 07:39, 10 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the hint :D --PantheraLeo1359531 15:01, 10 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ferienhaus in Oll Deep, Bensersiel 20200907 DSC3078.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK (a cloud is slightly overexposed though). --A.Savin 21:14, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mit Watt umhüllte Schuhe 20200908 DSC3139.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 20:01, 11 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordseetherme Bensersiel 20200907 DSC3067.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:16, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feuerwehr Lehsten Garage 20210303 DSC8111.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 08:31, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rettungsdienst auf Langeoog 20200910 DSC3321.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:25, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hauptstraße 22, Langeoog 20200910 DSC3319.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tournasol7 17:57, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pferdekutsche auf Langeoog 20200910 DSC3297.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 13:54, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Auto der Stadtwerke Hof 20210223 DSC7990 cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:09, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Auto des BR Hof 20210223 DSC7974.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 09:10, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kindergarten auf Langeoog 20200910 DSC3341.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 11:24, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Langeoog auf Langeoog 20200910 DSC3335.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 11:03, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feuerwehr Lehsten Gesamtanlage 20210303 DSC8117.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:12, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Infos zu Präsenzgottesdiensten während COVID-19-Pandemie 20210302 DSC8069.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:10, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! "Bekleben verboten"-Schild auf Kasten Hof 20210223 DSC8005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice! --Moroder 04:59, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Allee Barkhausenstraße, Langeoog 20200910 DSC3332.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 13:25, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hauptstraße auf Langeoog 20200910 DSC3302.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Same problems with the foreground as the next one. --Ermell 14:11, 13 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks, fixed --PantheraLeo1359531 15:49, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 16:35, 15 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hauptstraße mit Blick auf Wasserturm, Langeoog 20200910 DSC3448.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 13:42, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yachten im Bensersieler Hafen bei Sonnenuntergang 20200909 DSC3292.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 21:24, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Informationstafel in Bensersiel 20200907 DSC3005.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 11:11, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seestraße 29, Bensersiel, Esens 20200907 DSC2876.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The quality standards have been complied with. --F. Riedelio 14:05, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Inselbahnhof Langeoog 20200910 DSC3295.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support I like it --Mike1979 Russia 14:36, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kiebitznest in An der Kaapdüne 20200910 DSC3478.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support I like it --Mike1979 Russia 14:36, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Túllio F 15:10, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! An der Kaapdüne, Langeoog 20200910 DSC3464.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:48, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordseeheilbad Bensersiel-Esens 20200908 DSC3085.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support OK. --C messier 20:26, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Park auf Langeoog 20200910 DSC3314.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Natur um den Pilsumer Leuchtturm 20200911 DSC3533.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 17:07, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Informationstafel über den Nationalpark Wattenmeer 20200911 DSC3517.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:59, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Straße Richtung Nordsee 20200911 DSC3504.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:00, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yachten im Bensersieler Hafen bei Sonnenuntergang 20200909 DSC3215.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:23, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schild Strandeingang Bensersiel 20200908 DSC3084.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 10:14, 18 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promoted[edit]

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Langeoog (ship, 1945).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

--VICBot2 (talk) 00:20, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pilsumer Leuchtturm 20200911 DSC3561.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --A.Savin 15:17, 19 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlosspark am Pilsumer Leuchtturm 20200911 DSC3558.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 19:42, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasserturm auf Langeoog 20200910 DSC3431.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:31, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasserturm auf Langeoog 20200910 DSC3429.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:24, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strandkorb auf Langeoog 20200910 DSC3330.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 12:36, 19 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 22 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hinweisschild zum Abstandhalten auf Langeoog 20200910 DSC3344.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good Quality. --F. Riedelio 09:50, 20 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category discussion warning

Endless loops has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Watchduck (quack) 23:37, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Menschliche Hand umgrenzt menschliche Silhouette 20200911 DSC3711.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. If you're not familiar with the Canadian comedy TV show, "The Kids in the Hall", do a web search for "kids in the hall i'm crushing your head". -- Ikan Kekek 04:34, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the hint :) --PantheraLeo1359531 14:08, 21 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schilder im Neuenburger Urwald 20200912 DSC3751.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:39, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Natur des Neuenburger Urwaldes 20200912 DSC3727.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:43, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mittelstraße, Langeoog 20200910 DSC3475.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. If you want to further improve this photo, a slight purple CA in the upper right corner (roof against the sky) could be addressed. --Lion-hearted85 11:40, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Natur im Neuenburger Urwald 20200912 DSC3876.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 18:19, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landschaft auf Langeoog 20200910 DSC3484.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 13:49, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vogelbeobachtungshütte beim Pilsumer Leuchtturm 20200911 DSC3672.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 13:12, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Muscheln am Langeooger Strand 20200910 DSC3408.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Uncalibrated color space (sRGB recommended). --F. Riedelio 08:46, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. Regarding colour space: “Uncalibrated” is just the name which is displayed (for some strange historical reasons) when the EXIF data say that a photo uses the Adobe RGB (1998) colour space. While Adobe RGB (1998) is not perfect (just as sRGB is far from perfect), it is a well-established colour space and used quite often, even here on Commons. Of course it would not be necessary to use Adobe RGB for this photo, AFAICS it does not contain (much) colours which cannot be represented in sRGB; but IMHO it is OK if a user prefers Adobe RGB for his photos. --Aristeas 10:12, 26 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Inselhotel Langeoog 20200910 DSC3458.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haupstraße, Langeoog 20200910 DSC3442.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 29 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasserturm auf Langeoog 20200910 142953.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 18:53, 27 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Infoschild Niedersächisches Wattenmeer 20200910 DSC3481.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Uncalibrated color space (sRGB recommended); English desccription: "Information board" instead of "Information". --F. Riedelio 16:19, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Regarding colour space: “Uncalibrated” is just the name which is displayed (for some strange historical reasons) when the EXIF data say that a photo uses the Adobe RGB (1998) colour space. While Adobe RGB (1998) is not perfect (just as sRGB is far from perfect), it is a well-established colour space and used quite often, even here on Commons. Of course it would not be necessary to use Adobe RGB for this photo, AFAICS it does not contain (much) colours which cannot be represented in sRGB; but IMHO it is OK if a user prefers Adobe RGB for his photos. --Aristeas 10:12, 26 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support English description has been changed, therefore IMHO OK now. --Aristeas 14:17, 27 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! TV-Ports an Fernseher 20210309 DSC8375.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 13:46, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Verlegte Haltestelle "Thersienstraße" in Hof 20200309 DSC8392.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 19:30, 29 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vielitzer Straße 32, Selb 20210307 DSC8160.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 19:01, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vielitzer Straße 32, Selb 20210307 DSC8159.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 19:03, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vielitzer Straße 32, Selb 20210307 DSC8158.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 12:59, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vielitzer Straße 32, Selb 20210307 DSC8150.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 19:07, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 2 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]



Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baustelle am Beginn der Vielitzer Straße, Selb 20210307 DSC8187.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 13:06, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baustelle an Marienstraße, Selb 20200307 DSC8206.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 12:37, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baustelle an Marienstraße, Selb 20200307 DSC8203.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 12:37, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baustelle an Marienstraße, Selb 20200307 DSC8180.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Neither from compositional view (excavator is cut, too much foreground) nor from aesthetic view a nice photo, but QI for me :) --Tuxyso 18:50, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baustellbereich in Selb, Vielitzer Straße 20210307 DSC8174.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --Tuxyso 18:53, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Natur im Neuenburger Urwald 20200912 DSC3794.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Cropping a bit from the top you could avoid the blown highlights. --Ermell 16:00, 23 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thx, fixed --PantheraLeo1359531 12:13, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 18:25, 31 March 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rückseite Intel i486 DX2 CPU002.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 11:02, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pins Intel i486 DX2 CPU001.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 11:03, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schild(er) im Neuenburger Urwald 20200912 DSC3775.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Comment Unfavorable camera position (perspective horizontal correction possible?), otherwise OK. --F. Riedelio 07:58, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thx, fixed --PantheraLeo1359531 12:15, 31 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good Quality. --F. Riedelio 07:11, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strand von Bensersiel 20200908 DSC3086.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The horizon is tilted --C messier 20:26, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thx, fixed --PantheraLeo1359531 14:16, 21 March 2021 (UTC) Comment Better but still there is some tilt. --C messier 19:21, 24 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks, fixed --PantheraLeo1359531 13:36, 30 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Good quality. Please make the caption/description more informative, including state/country/etc. --Tagooty 06:12, 2 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! "FCK CVD" 20210319 Dsc8457040221 00RAWb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 20:25, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:13, 9 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vorderseite Sony Tough SF-M64T SDUHSII011CORRklein.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 15:34, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rückseite Sony Tough SF-M64T SDUHSII010klein.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 15:35, 10 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 13 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eingang zur Dreieinigkeitskirche Hof 20210404 DSC08580.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 14:13, 18 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 21 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bushaltestelle Ludwig-Uhland-Straße Hof 20210424 Dsc08782042421 RAW0003.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 15:46, 24 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Julia-Menge -0.4+0.6i.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hartz-iv-symbolbild-102.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Loominade (talk) 11:11, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rückansicht des Johann-Christian-Reinhart Gymnasium Hof 20210426 Dsc08922042621 RAW0015.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 15:43, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Verkehrszeichen Impfzentrum Hof 20210426 DSC08861.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, but the traffic sign cut in 2/3 is distracting. However, it might be impossible to remove it and including it in full would not help either. --Nefronus 19:12, 28 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 1 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Avoir renaming.[edit]

Hello, I saw you ked directly after uploading a file for renaming. It can just have be a mistake you made. But avoid renaming by entering the right name during uploading. Its less work for you, for other users and for the servers. Thanks. --Havang(nl) (talk) 20:05, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thanks for your work. Yes, I accidentally made this mistake and saw it as it was too late. I try my best to avoid it in the future :). Best regards, --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:10, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dreieinigkeitskirche Hof 20210425 DSC08810.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not the most beautiful church, but good quality photo --Michielverbeek 17:22, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bushaltestelle Wilhelm-Raabe-Straße Hof 20210425 DSC08804.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 20:51, 30 April 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 3 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hermann-Löns-Straße Hof 20210425DSC08803 CENS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 03:18, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Viktor-von-Scheffel-Straße 5-7 Hof 20210425 DSC08797 cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 20:45, 1 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hermann-Löns-Straße 36 Hof 20210425 DSC08830.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI --Lmbuga 17:35, 2 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dreieinigkeitskirche Hof 20210425 DSC08818.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality for me. --F. Riedelio 06:36, 3 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abgesagte Gottesdienste aufgrund COVID-19-Pandemie Hof 20210425 DSC08822.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality --Domob 13:33, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Richtungsweisende Schilder am Q-Bogen Hof 2021026 DSC08855.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:25, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luftsteg Hof (Saale) 20210426 DSC08849.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:11, 5 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zufahrt Impfzentrum Hofer Land Hof 20210426 DSC08868.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 18:38, 6 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Straßenschild Gorch-Fock-Straße Hof 20210425 DSC08835.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Perspective correction required (street name tilts to the right). --F. Riedelio 07:36, 5 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thank you, this should work now :) --PantheraLeo1359531 17:31, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 07:26, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Apfeldorn bei der Dreieinigkeitskirche Hof 20210425 DSC08823.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Comment Good quality in general. However, there's something weird on the upper edge of the sign below the tree, maybe some kind of CA or artefact from processing? Can you do something about this? --Domob 13:33, 4 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ DoneThank you for the hint, could fix it :) --PantheraLeo1359531 17:22, 6 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thanks for the fix, good quality. --Domob 08:12, 7 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 10 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baustelle am Rosenbühl 20210426 DSC08914.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rhododendrites 18:27, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ortsschild Hof am Untreusee 20210508 134205.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 06:06, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alter Altglascontainer 20210425 DSC08826.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Comment IMHO, it needs perspective correction. --C messier 21:14, 7 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thank you, fixed :) --PantheraLeo1359531 15:02, 9 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --C messier 20:38, 9 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:09, 12 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A file you uploaded is on the main page!

File:10 Sexualities To Know About - YouTube.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! COVID-19-Sperrmaßnahme Park Bismarckturm Hof 20210426 DSC08930.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 08:43, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tafel "Der Münsterknabe Johannes" Hof 20210426 DSC08929.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --LexKurochkin 08:41, 10 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blick auf den Untreusee mit Steg 20210510 DSC09220.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Wilfredor 19:49, 11 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Verkehrszeichen Ernst-Reuther-Straße Hof 20210503 DSC08957CENS.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:26, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hof-Hauptbahnhof mit Gleisen 20210503 DSC08943.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:26, 12 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Profilbild von YT-Kanal Nintendokater.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Lord Belbury (talk) 11:23, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Textzug Impfung Hofer Land Hof 20210426 DSC08859.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 09:14, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brücke am JCRG Hof 20210503 DSC08987.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 20:10, 15 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bemalte Steine am JCRG Hof 20210426 DSC08905.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 11:35, 15 May 2021 (UTC) 11:33, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bismarckturm Hof, Südostansicht 20210503 DSC09023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 16:25, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eingangsbereich Finanzamt Hof 20210503 DSC08961.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Visible violett chromatic aberration on top left should be removed. --F. Riedelio 12:07, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ DoneThanks, tried to fix it --PantheraLeo1359531 17:08, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 08:48, 16 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Freier Platz JCRG Hof 20210503 DSC08999.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Lmbuga 21:46, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:06, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baustelle mit Explosionsgefahr Kammergutweg Hof 20210503 DSC09049.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 04:30, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Infotafel Bismarckturm Hof 20210503 DSC09043.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Lmbuga 18:04, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 22 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasser des Untreusee Hof 20210510 DSC09272.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 19:30, 22 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasser des Untreusee Hof 20210510 DSC09247.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:31, 23 May 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gratulation zur RIV[edit]

Hallo PantheraLeo1359531,

Gratulation zur α7R IV! Bist Du soweit zufrieden? Herzliche Grüße, --Aristeas (talk) 10:57, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Hallo Aristeas,

danke dir für deine Nachricht! :) Ja, ich muss sagen, ich freue mich über die Qualität, die die Kamera raushauen kann. Klar, es gibt immer Kleinigkeiten die man kritisieren kann, aber hey, die Kameratechnik schreitet stark voran. Jetzt gilt es, gute Fotos zu machen und ältere zu aktualisieren, damit der Stand der Technik wiedergegeben wird.

Grüße! --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:06, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo PantheraLeo1359531,
danke für Deine Antwort! Es freut mich sehr, dass Du mit der Kamera glücklich bist. Ich selbst fremdle immer noch ein bisschen mit der Belichtungseinstellung (die α7R IV ist meiner vorigen R II in dieser Hinsicht zwar sehr ähnlich, aber die Belichtung wird, wenn ich genauso wie früher mit Zebra 100+ und Histogramm arbeite, oft nicht optimal; da muss es ein paar subtile Unterschiede geben, die ich noch austesten muss). In Sachen Ergonomie ist die R IV aber auf jeden Fall ein großer Fortschritt, insbesondere der Sucher ist natürlich viel besser als in allen früheren α7-Kameras und für mich eine wirkliche Erleichterung. Herzliche Grüße, --Aristeas (talk) 17:54, 27 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Hallo Aristeas,
das kann ich durchaus verstehen, bei der mehrheitlichen Verbesserung gibt es immer mal wieder kleine Rückschritte. Wichtig ist aber, inwieweit das korrigierbar oder überbrückbar ist, meiner Meinung nach. Aber eine RII ist auch sehr gut, viele Kamerasysteme reichen da auch nicht ran, gerade APS-C-Modelle und darunter. Ich versuche gerade Fotos in meiner Umgebung auszutauschen, da sind extreme qualitative Sprünge dabei. Da sind bei Kameras sehr gut. Es gibt ja immer wieder Debatten, ob die Pixelmenge wirklich durch jetzige Objektive ausgereizt werden kann. Joa :)

Grüße, --12:06, 28 May 2021 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hofer Geschichtswege 60 (Der eiserne Kanzler) 20210503 DSC09017.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:01, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ostfront JCRG Hof 20210503 DSC08995.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:01, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:08, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiese am Untreusee Hof 20210510 DSC09381.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:31, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiese am Untreusee Hof 20210510 DSC09380.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 17:31, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasser des Untreusee Hof 20210510 DSC09243.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:29, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wasser des Untreusee Hof 20210510 DSC09225.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 05:29, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unterführung am Untreusee Hof 20210510 DSC09421.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 15:19, 29 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blick auf Stege und Gastwirtschaft Untreusee Hof 20210510 DSC09298.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 9 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Infoschild Maskenpflicht am Untreusee 20210508 DSC09069 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 18:52, 7 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Einstein1 Hof 20210530 DSC00117.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:46, 8 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 11 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Straßenschilder am Untreusee Hof 20210510 DSC09358.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The mast tilts slightly to the right. --F. Riedelio 07:15, 30 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thank you, fixed :) --PantheraLeo1359531 13:43, 7 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 11:48, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 12 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seitenansicht Grundschule Krötenbruck Hof 20210508 DSC09060.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:45, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Front Grundschule Krötenbruck Hof 20210508 DSC09055.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 06:45, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pfad nahe Untreubach Hof 20210508 DSC09086.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 23:21, 12 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grundschule Krötenbruck Zusatzbau Hof 20210508 DSC09215.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 15:52, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grundschule Krötenbruck Zusatzbau Hof 20210508 DSC09206.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 16:50, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Trachtengeschäft mit Einlassverbot für Geimpfte Hof 20210612 DSC00428.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 07:12, 13 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 16 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wilhelm-Kohlhoff-Straße 5, Hof 20210519 DSC09428.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 18:13, 15 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nur ein Tipp zu den DSC-Nummern[edit]

Hallo PantheraLeo1359531,

mir fällt gerade auf, dass Du bei Deinen Foto-Uploads den Namen der originalen Bilddatei (z.B. „DSC09247“) in den Dateinamen einfügst. Das ist eine gute Idee, um ähnliche Aufnahmen unterscheiden und die originale Bilddatei schneller finden zu können.

Leider haben die DSC-Nummern zwei Nachteile:

  1. Sie gehen nur bis DSC09999, danach beginnt die Kamera wieder bei DSC00001. Daher hat man nach einer Weile viele gleichnamige originale Bilddateien auf der Platte, was zu Konfusion führen kann (bei mir jedenfalls ;–), und auf Commons wiederholen sich die Nummern auch.
  2. Zahllose Kameras zahlloser Fotografen produzieren Fotos mit DSC-irgendwas-Namen; wenn man auf Commons mit einer Eingabe wie „DSC09247“ nach einem Foto sucht (was an sich sehr praktisch ist), erscheint oft eine ganze Flut von Bildern.

Falls Dich das stört (mich hat es gestört), kannst Du das ändern. Die neueren A7x-Kameras erlauben Dir, in den Grundeinstellungen die ersten drei Buchstaben der Dateinamen zu ändern. Meine Lösung ist daher, alle Dateinamen statt mit „DSC“ mit „RQA“ beginnen zu lassen – die Kamera macht das für mich automatisch schon beim Aufnehmen, ich muss es nur einmal einstellen. Sobald ich feststelle, dass ich der 9999. Datei nahekomme, sodass die Zählung von vorne beginnen würde, ändere ich den letzten Buchstaben, aus „RQA“ wird „RQB“; usw. Funktioniert sehr einfach, alle Bild-Dateinamen auf meiner Festplatte sind jetzt eindeutig, und auch auf Commons bekomme ich, wenn ich einen Dateinamen wie „RQH02421“ eingebe, sofort genau das richtige Bild angezeigt.

Ich dachte nur, ich schreibe Dir das, weil dieser Trick wenig bekannt ist. Du könntest Deine Bilder ja mit „PLA“, „PLB“ usw. benennen lassen ;–). Falls es Dir egal ist, kein Problem, bitte einfach ignorieren. Herzliche Grüße, --Aristeas (talk) 09:16, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, ich danke Dir sehr für den Tipp mit den drei Buchstaben! Das wusste ich wirklich nicht :D, ich werde das mal abändern. Ich habe noch paar Fotos auf Lager, aber danach sind die neuen Kennungen da. Danke dir ;)

Grüße, --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 10:18, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Alternativ kann man das auch beim Import auf die Festplatte fixieren, dann kann man gleich auf 5 oder 6 Stellig gehen. Die Canonsoftware kann das halbwegs, müsste also auch bei Sony gehen. Ich mach mittlerweile beim Lightroomimport. Careerfromhome (talk) 12:35, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ja, absolut, da hat man natürlich noch viel mehr Möglichkeiten! An meiner Kamera-basierten Lösung gefällt mir, dass sie für mich noch „idiotensicherer“ ist (der Idiot bin ich ;–): manchmal ziehe ich vorab einige Bilder von der Speicherkarte, weil sie dringend gebraucht werden usw., und da ist es vorteilhaft, dass die Kamera selbst gleich die Namen vergibt, denn dann habe ich von anfang an überall die gleichen eindeutigen Namen. --Aristeas (talk) 15:11, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, ein schöner Austausch wie ich sehe :D. Ich denke mal, ggf. kann man auch den Zähler bei Zehntausend und Hunderttausend manuell selber mitzählen mit einem automatisieren Programm wie "RenameMaster" allen Dateien anhängen. Aber ich muss zugeben, dass für mich die Nummerierung nicht sooo wichtig ist :). Viele Fotos werden (zumindest bei mir) aussortiert, da fällt für mich der Zähler als valider Parameter weg. Aber jeder muss seinen zu ihm/ihren zu ihr passenden Worfklow finden :)
--PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 19:04, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eppenreuther Straße 83, Metzgerei Kratz Hof 20210523 DSC09477 cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good light and quality. --Aristeas 16:40, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karte an Eppenreuther Straße Hof 20210523 DSC09455.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 22:22, 17 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schild am Untreusee Hof 20210508 DSC09153.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 14:39, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bushaltestelle Krötenbruck Hof 20210523 DSC09459.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Not perfectly sharp at 100%, but very high resolution so this is definitely fine for me. --Domob 14:48, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 22 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sternwarte Hof 20210523 DSC09560.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:37, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eppenreuther Straße 17, Haut- und Laserzentrum Hof-Marktredwitz Hof 20210523 DSC09513.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 19:28, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eppenreuther Straße 26a, Allgemeinmedizin Dr. Westphal, Dr. Rochleder Hof 20210523 DSC09523.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:40, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eppenreuther Straße 28, Haus A 20210523 DSC09509.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
* Support Good quality. --IamMM 10:39, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eppenreuther Straße 23, Gemeinschaftspraxis Dr. G. Schmehling und S. Motzke Hof 20210523 DSC09505.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good, but a little bit too dark. --XRay 03:37, 18 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks, fixed :) --PantheraLeo1359531 19:55, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality now. Thank you. --XRay 04:28, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eppenreuther Straße 85, Prestige K.D Barbershop Hof 20210523 DSC09469.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please clean the dust spot. --Steindy 22:22, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks, fixed :) --PantheraLeo1359531 19:59, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:45, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 23 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münsterschule Hof 20210523 DSC09553.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 15:38, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Statuen Münsterschule Hof 20210523 DSC09551.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:01, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münsterschule Hof 20210523 DSC09548.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:21, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münsterschule Hof 20210523 DSC09545.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:21, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Münsterschule Hof 20210523 DSC09538.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 15:38, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bushaltestelle Münsterschule Hof 20210523 DSC09532.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 05:17, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Max-Eichhorn-Straße Hof 20210523 DSC09564 cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 17:50, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Einstein1 in Regenbogenfarben 20210623 HOF01309.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Good quality. --IamMM 16:49, 24 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Robert-Koch-Straße Hof 20210523 DSC09611.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:08, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eppenreuther Straße 44 Sparkasse Hochfranken Hof 20210523 DSC09602.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 18:36, 25 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 28 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bushaltestelle Krötenbruck Hof 20210523 DSC09650.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 01:40, 27 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ehemalige Tankstelle Eppenreuther Straße Hof 20210523 DSC09637.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:17, 26 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dreieinigkeitskirche Hof Klinkerbau mit Kirchturm Hof 20210523 DSC09728.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:12, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 1 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Glocke bei der Auferstehungskirche Moschendorf Hof 20210524 DSC09809.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:46, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Auferstehungskirche Hof-Moschendorf 20210524 DSC09796.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:46, 30 June 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Friedrich-Ebert-Brücke Hof 0210529 DSC09851x.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 18:53, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hofer Geschichtswege 40 20210529 DSC09831.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:06, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bushaltestelle HofBad Hof 20210529 DSC09827.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 21:06, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bushaltestelle Robert-Koch-Straße Hof 20210523 DSC09609 cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Nefronus 18:27, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:14, 6 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HofBad 20210529 DSC09824.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:15, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 7 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Komplex Lorenzkirche Hof 20210529 DSC09927.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 14:54, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Komplex Lorenzkirche Hof 20210529 DSC09955.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 20:43, 5 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 8 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Autoverkehr am Pestalozziplatz Hof 20210529 DSC09990.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:53, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Königstraße 76, 95028 Hof 20210529 DSC09977.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:53, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Auto Lieferservice Rotes Schloß Hof 20210529 DSC09994.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ezarate 16:31, 9 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oranger VW New Beetle 20210524 DSC09751.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Very nice. --Nefronus 20:06, 10 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fabrikzeile Hof 20210529 DSC00029.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nefronus 16:26, 12 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fabrikzeile 31, Hof 20210529 DSC00042.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 19:46, 14 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Platz und Haus B HAW Hof 20210530 DSC00093.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 14:49, 15 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hofer Geschichtswege 84, Hof 20210530 DSC00083.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 23:15, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 19 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Übersichtskarte Hochschule Hof 20210530 DSC00320.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:19, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tafel Haus G Hochschule Hof 20210530 DSC00313.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:19, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aufsteller Hochschule Hof 20210530 DSC00300.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:15, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tafel Haus B Hochschule Hof DSC00221.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:15, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tafel Hochschule Hof 20210530 DSC00086.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:15, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Albert-Einstein-Straße Infotafel Hof 20210530 DSC00166.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kindergarten Kinderoase 20210612 HOF01657.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:09, 26 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heinrich-Gerber-Denkmal Hof 20210612 DSC00948.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Shame about the cloud behind the white part of the object. But good quality for me.--Famberhorst 16:42, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:42, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16 GiB-DDR4-RAM-Riegel RAM019FIX Small Crop 90 PCNT.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:45, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dacharbeiten Eppenreuther Straße 86, 95032 Hof 20210614 DSC01035.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. The leafes on the top should be cutted. --Steindy 23:40, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ich werde gerade nostalgisch (auch wenn ich damals mit 3.0 angefangen habe). Hast Du wirklich noch einen lauffähigen 386er, oder ist das System irgendwie emuliert? De728631 (talk) 20:14, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Das freut mich zu hören :). Leider nein, ich habe mal ein Bild von einer i486er-CPU (DX) hochgeladen, aber leider ist das System nur emuliert :D. Ich bin auch zugegebenermaßen noch zu jung für die Systeme :). --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 20:17, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Trotzdem vielen Dank für den Upload. Sowas hat ja schon dokumentarischen Wert. De728631 (talk) 20:24, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sehr gerne! Definitiv! Ich hab mal geguckt, ob identisch dieser Screenshot vorhanden war, und er war es nicht. Deswegen habe ich ihn mal hochgeladen :). --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 15:24, 6 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sonnenschein in Hof-Krötenbruck 20210811 HOF03043crop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 11:37, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Skalen der Unendlichkeit 20191028.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Jochen Burghardt (talk) 15:35, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kaugummiautomat am Kammergutweg 20210721 HOF01408.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 15:27, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wilhelm-Kohlhoff-Straße-Baum auf Wendehammerinsel 20210721 HOF01403.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please remove the disturbing object. --Steindy 00:12, 20 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thanks, fixed --PantheraLeo1359531 10:35, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:41, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zigarettenautomat am Südring 20210721 HOF01385.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
please fix the white borders at the top right and left and at the bottom --Sandro Halank 20:42, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Thank you, fixed :) --PantheraLeo1359531 10:32, 22 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Sandro Halank 14:01, 22 August 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:15, 25 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zigarettenautomat am Südring 20210721 HOF01382.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mandelbrot20210829 FIX A1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Victuallers (talk) 17:12, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Übersicht Altstadt 20210722 HOF01430.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
People at the left should be cropped out IMO --Ermell 07:28, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support A bit too much pavement at the bottom, but IMO good enough for QI. --Palauenc05 08:02, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 31 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altstadt 12 20210722 HOF01437.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:53, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bernhard-Lichtenberg-Platz 1, Pfarramt St. Marien 20210722 HOF01432.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very good quality. --Cayambe 10:40, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poststraße 2 20210722 HOF01457.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:17, 30 August 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 2 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altstadt 35 20210722 HOF01479crop.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 19:31, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altstadt 41 20210722 Hof01482 RAW 202108240893.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kritzolina 17:42, 4 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beschädigte Tischtennisplatte am JCRG 20210904 HOF05258.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:53, 5 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marienstraße 40 20210722 Hof01496 RAW 202108240905.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:44, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Luitpoldstraße 8, Bäckerei 20210722 Hof01493 RAW 202108240903.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 17:44, 6 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mahnmal Treue der Heimat 20210722 Hof01559 RAW 202108250990.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 16:33, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blücherstraße 20210722 Hof01575 RAW 202108271010cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:17, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fußballplatz Bismarckturmpark 20210722 Hof01604 RAW 202108271035CROP.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 17:03, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Agentur für Arbeit Bayreuth-Hof Hermann-Löns-Straße 20210726 HOF01690.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 15:34, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hochspannungshäuschen Brüder-Grimm-Straße 20210726 HOF01789.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 17:56, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Samsung 870 QVO 8TB SATA 2,5 Zoll Internes Solid State Drive (SSD) (MZ-77Q8T0BW) 20211008 SSD023 corr.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support The flat scan produces an odd effect (wouldn't be able to tell this from a flat plate if not for the printing), but good quality for QI --Rhododendrites 17:47, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiese am Krötenhofer Weg 20210722 Hof01621 RAW 202108271051.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality although I have not found a tower. --F. Riedelio 06:32, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for your note. Indeed it was hard to find, I added an annotation :) --PantheraLeo1359531 13:08, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:17, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pausenplatz GSK 20210807 HOF02145.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 23:44, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eppenreuther Straße, Hotel Munzert 20210807 HOF02116.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 18:23, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Mandeldrop20210909 04 ABC123 00001 65535x65535.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

118.96.184.230 04:43, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altbau GSK Hof 20210807 Hof02148 RAW 202110131194.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:35, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

T289781[edit]

Seems like there may be a problem with your request here Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:41, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me know, I received an email about this task. I will take a new try to upload it directly :), now some problems with uploading seem to be fixed --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 13:43, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ferienhaus in Oll Deep, Bensersiel 20200907 Dsc3078032521 00RAWb.tif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

116.206.12.42 16:23, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Unterrichtungstafel Deutsche Teilung + Ullitz 20210808 HOF02393.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Unterrichtungstafel Deutsche Teilung + Ullitz 20210808 HOF02393.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 21:05, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 10:24, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drei-Freistaaten-Stein 20210808 HOF02429.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:16, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:17, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bahnhaltestelle Feilitzsch 20210808 HOF02414.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:16, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 06:59, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

FM Promotion[edit]

This file has been promoted to Featured media!

The file File:MandelbulbRot 00000-10501 VP9 slow lossless.webm, which you nominated at Commons:Featured media candidates/File:MandelbulbRot 00000-10501 VP9 slow lossless.webm, has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another file, please do so.

/FeaturedMediaBot (talk) 21:00, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grund- und Mittelschule Bayerisches Vogtland 20210808 HOF02479.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 20:25, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 07:01, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Nintendo Switch OLED-Modell (BeatEmUps) 20211001 07.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Abu-Dun (talk) 13:43, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! ZDF-Hochhaus Mainz 20211105 HOF0779900001020211121 RAW-Exportcens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 20:34, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 07:09, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A file you uploaded is on the main page!

File:MandelbulbRot 00000-10501 VP9 slow lossless.webm, that you uploaded, is on the main page today. Thank you for your contributions to this project.

//EatchaBot (talk) 00:00, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! E-Auto des ZDF 20211105 HOF0780900002120211121 RAW-Exportcens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:38, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 07:06, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Logo Zero-COVID.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request.


Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

Acabashi (talk) 20:36, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


@Acabashi: : Objection: Work meets not threshold of originality in my opinion. --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 20:39, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Info Objection successful, file kept --PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 11:46, 7 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bismarckturm Front 20210809 HOF02708.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:12, 5 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! JCRG Haupteinfahrt Fassade 20210809 HOF02782.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 17:15, 6 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 07:12, 9 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schillerstraße 33 20210812 HOF03119 RAW-Export 20211213000408cens.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:09, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Schöne Feiertage![edit]

A somewhat naive, but nice nativity scene in Weil der Stadt, Germany Happy Holidays, PantheraLeo1359531
  • Merry Christmas and a happy new year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Frohe Weihnachten und ein gutes neues Jahr!
  • Желаю вам счастливого Рождества и Нового года!

--Aristeas (talk) 17:39, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays 2021/2022![edit]

  * Happy Holidays 2021/2022, PantheraLeo1359531! *  
  • Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
  • Joyeux Noël! Bonne année!
  • Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
  • Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
  • ¡Feliz Navidad y próspero año nuevo!
  • Щасливого Різдва! З Новим роком!

   -- George Chernilevsky talk 19:18, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! JCRG-Röhre 20210814 HOF03362.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:14, 24 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:11, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

The Original Barnstar
Köszönöm a példa lehetőséget! Luckylukee81 (talk) 07:13, 28 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Einstein1 20210815 HOF03518.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MIGORMCZ 20:04, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]