User talk:Palickap/Archive 7

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Palosirkka (talk) 09:05, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Yes, it was a mistake. Thank you. palickap (talk) 09:08, 24 February 2022 (UTC)


Palosirkka (talk) 19:28, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

Přidávání duplicitních kategorií k sochám

Zdravím, prosím nepřidávejte duplicitní kategorie k Sochám. Například pokud je (pod)kategorie Category:Sculptures in Slavonice správně v podkategorii Category:Culture of Slavonice, nepřidávejte tam již další kategorii Category:Slavonice a podobně i u jiných lokalit (toto je na Wikipedii i Commons zavedený systém). Děkuji. --Zelenymuzik (talk) 08:40, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Dobrý den, pokouším se o pravý opak, aby kategorie nebyly duplicitní a aby soubory byly zařazeny co nejhlouběji. Tady v tomto případě jsem ale poprvé měl sám problém jako uživatel. Sochy jsou v té kultuře hodně utopené a když jsem na to narazil poprvé, myslel jsem si, že je někdo vymazal. Totéž platí u kategorií Buildings in... Tady si myslím, že buildings a structures jsou prakticky totéž. Pod structures kolegové řadí jinak všechno možné, například Category:Structures in Hradec Králové. Většina těch kategorií by měla být stejně pod Buildings... A některé by tam neměly být vůbec - např. Cultural monuments... - tady jde většinou o budovy, ale jsou to i sochy, pomníky, parky, kašny... , tedy sotva structures. Neumím zas tak dobře anglicky, ale když zkoumám význam tohoto pojmu ve slovníku nebo na anglické wikipedii, nezdá se mi, že by tam spadal takový pelmel (sculptures a culture - budiž). To, co jsem dělal, mělo tedy usnadnit hledání souborů a takovéto dvoucestné hledání mi připadá přijatelnější než skrytí kategorií a souborů, které je jen pro zasvěcené. Nechci tedy dělat nic protisystémového nebo kazit práci druhým. S pozdravem palickap (talk) 15:28, 1 March 2022 (UTC)
File:Javorník (JE), Tančírna v Račím údolí, historický snímek.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

King of ♥ 01:10, 9 March 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Harold (talk) 15:08, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Ljubljana, Mesarski most, plastike (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TadejM (t/p) 14:55, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Ljubljana, Josip Plečnik.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TadejM (t/p) 15:04, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Kamniška Bistrica, kaplica.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TadejM (t/p) 15:14, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Ljubljana, Gustav Mahler.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TadejM (t/p) 15:18, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Ljubljana, Gledališka stolba (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TadejM (t/p) 15:21, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Ljubljana, Kongresni trg (3).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TadejM (t/p) 15:21, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Ljubljana, Plečnikov trg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

TadejM (t/p) 15:25, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, TadejM (t/p) 15:28, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, TadejM (t/p) 15:30, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, TadejM (t/p) 15:37, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, TadejM (t/p) 15:46, 28 October 2022 (UTC)

File:Lucca, Piazza Bernardini, Lucca Comics & Games 2019.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 06:44, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

Proplacení nákladů na foto cesty

Ahoj,

blíží se konec roku, pokud jsi letos podnikl nějaké foto cesty, které nemáš zadané v Trackeru a chtěl bys zažádat o proplacení nákladů na dopravu, tak je prosím zadej, doplň nebo odešli ke schválení. Pokud s vyplňováním tiketu budeš mít jakýkoliv problém, tak mi napiš a rád ti poradím. Richard Sekerak (WMCZ) (talk) 22:53, 2 December 2022 (UTC)

Rozlišovač železničních zastávek

Zdravím. Ohledně této editace a pojmenování kategorie pro železniční zastávku Zašová si dovoluji odkázat na tuto diskusi z roku 2009, která tehdy pomohla vnést systém do pojmenovávání kategorií železničních stanic a zastávek. Tehdy bylo 5 kolegů pro variantu, aby se stanice od zastávek v názvech kategorií nerozlišovaly, a pouze dva kolegové byli pro rozlišování. Klíčovým argumentem tehdy bylo, že v té době neexistoval žádný veřejný zdroj, podle kterého by bylo možné spolehlivě určit, co je stanice a co je zastávka - a ti dva kolegové, kteří byli pro rozlišování, také neuměli vysvětlit, odkud pro to rozlišení brát směrodatné údaje.

Dnes už je situace trochu jiná v tom, že takový veřejný zdroj máme (alespoň pro provozované stanice a zastávky ve správě SŽ), ovšem zase se nám to komplikuje tím, že některá nádraží byla vnitřními provozními předpisy degradována na tzv. "dopravny D3", u nichž není jasné, čím vlastně ve smyslu obecně závazné legislativy jsou (zda stanicemi, nebo zastávkami), přičemž typ dopravny označený číslem vnitřního předpisu jednoho z provozovatelů drah pochopitelně obecně závazná legislativa nezná a nepočítá s ním (ve vztahu k řízení dopravy se v dopravním řádu píše o "stanovených dopravnách", ale v té souvislosti se nijak neřeší, zda taková dopravna je z přepravního hlediska stanicí, nebo zastávkou). Přepravní řád používá pro stanice a zastávky (jiný typ místa pro nástup a výstup cestujících nezná) legislativní zkratku "stanice", a to se pak odráží i ve smluvních přepravních podmínkách, legislativě upravující jízdní řády atd. V zásadě tedy tady na Commons používáme obdobné zjednodušení, jaké používá i česká přepravní legislativa. Nebýt těch "dopraven D3" jako podivného mezistupně, už bych asi dávno prosazoval, abychom si dali tu práci a rozlišení stanic a zastávek tady zavedli - jak v názvech, tak v kategorizaci. Ale ony ty české termíny ani nejsou úplně konzistentní - to, co na železnici je zastávkou, se na metru nebo lanovce nazývá stanicí. Ještě někdy do 60. let u nás i tramvaje a autobusy měly stanice. A ještě tu máme takové špeky, jako zastávku, která se nachází v obvodu železniční stanice. Bylo by tedy dost problematické se pokoušet tato dobově podmíněná lokální specifika terminologie přenášet do anglického překladu, když ne ve všech zemích takovéto rozlišení znají, nebo ho mají trochu jiné. ŠJů (talk) 00:51, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Vy mně ale dáváte (dáváš)ǃ ː-)
Věnuju té kategorizaci na Commons hodně času a abych dával některé editace zpátky, na to asi nebudu mít ani čas ani chuť. Pokud jsem správně pochopil - nechce se mi celou tou anglickou konverzací prokousávat - je lepší zůstat u univerzálního označení train station. OK, budu se toho držet.
Podobný nesoulad asi byl taky u pojmů village/municipality a district/city district/village of... Taková diskuse už tu asi taky dřív proběhla, intuitivně jsem se ale přiklonil k většinově používanému označení village pro obec v ČR. Nikdo to po mně neopravuje, tak asi OK.
Kdybys(te) měl nějaké další rady a připomínky, rád si je pročtu. Někdy se mi zdá, že se pohybuji po poli neoraném. Zvláště kategorizace asi 55 000 fotek z drobnepamatky.cz je nekonečná. Zatím mě to ale baví. palickap (talk) 09:28, 16 December 2022 (UTC)

Zapojte se do Mikrosoutěže architektura 2023

Vážení a milí fotografové a fotografky,

protože jste se nedávno zapojili do některé z našich fotografických soutěžích, zvu vás k účasti na Mikrosoutěži architektura 2023. Tato soutěž se zaměřuje na dokumentování nenafocených staveb a jejich detailů. Fotografie můžete nahrát na Commons do 15. března 2023. Hrajeme o poukaz na foto-služby.

Více informací najdete na stránce Mikrosoutěž architektura 2023.

Díky, že fotíte!

S přáním dobrého světla, --Richard Sekerak (WMCZ) (talk) 11:26, 24 February 2023 (UTC)

Změna pravidel proplácení Fotíme Česko

Dobrý den,
v uplynulých letech jste se zapojil do projektu Fotíme Česko, a proto bychom Vás chtěli informovat o tom, že se dojde k úpravě pravidel na proplacení nákladů. Od 1. července 2023 bude platit, že vytvořený tiket je nutno vyplnit a odeslat k proplacení do 3 měsíců, od jeho vytvoření. Dále se mění to, že všechny tikety vytvořené v daném kalendářním roce budou uzavřeny k 31.12. téhož roku.
V případě, že se Vám nepodaří tuto lhůtu splnit, napište na mail Richard.sekerak@wikimedia.cz a pokusíme se najít jiné řešení.Richard Sekerak (WMCZ) (talk) 17:40, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

Díky, beru na vědomí. palickap (talk) 18:05, 14 May 2023 (UTC)