Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, P e z i!

First steps tutorial

Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content).

You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki.

Getting help

More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks

Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities.
You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads.
Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~.
To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg.
You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account.
There are several tools to upload files.
Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful.

Made a mistake?

Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it.
Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 13:41, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

File:Memorial des Martyrs de la Deportation-Paris.jpg

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Memorial des Martyrs de la Deportation-Paris.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice composition. --Kadellar 17:01, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiener Berufsrettung-Zentrale DSC 0643a ShiftN.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --A.Savin 14:27, 15 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Memorial des Martyrs de la Deportation-Paris.jpg

Yours sincerely, Coyau (talk) 20:48, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ang. din bild på Riksdagshuset, Stockholm/Regarding your photo of the Parliament Building in Stockholm[edit]

Hej

Har du något ID-nummer från Riksantikvarieämbetets bebyggelse eller fornminnesregister för detta foto av Riksdagshuset, Stockholm [1] som du laddat in som bidrag till Wiki Loves Monuments tävlingen? Endast foton av object registrerade som byggnadsminnen/fornminnen av Riksantikvaireämbetet kan delta in den svenska tävlingen i Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Med vänlig hälsning

Stefan Elfving (WMSE) (talk) 10:28, 22 September 2013 (UTC) Wikimedia Sverige[reply]

Hello

Do you have any ID number from the register of buildings or ancient monuments kept by the Swedish National Heritage Board for this photo of the Parliament Building, Stockholm [2] that you have uploaded as a contribution to the Wiki Loves Monuments competion? Only photos of objects registrered as building heritage/ancient monument by the Swedish National Heritage Board can participate in the Swedish Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 competition.

Regards,

Stefan Elfving (WMSE) (talk) 10:28, 22 September 2013 (UTC) Wikimedia Sweden[reply]

Sorry, but I just assumed, that this building must be on the list. Can't believe such a building not being cultural heritage monument.

Regards,

--P e z i (talk) 11:08, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have once again checked the registers of the Swedish National Board and the Parliament Building isn't in them. I have therefore withdrawn this photo from the contest.

I'm sorry for this, but the other photos uploaded by you is valid and remains in the Wiki Loves Monuments contest in Sweden.

Stefan Elfving (WMSE) (talk) 08:55, 25 September 2013 (UTC) Wikimedia Sweden[reply]

Many thanks for your effort! --P e z i (talk) 09:03, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Peter

I have know eventually found ID number for this object from the Ancient Monument database (Fornsök) of the Swedish National Heritage Board so you can disregard my previous question about that. I have also added our Fornminne template which contains the ID number. The list on Wikipedia of ancient monuments in the Stockholm Municipality have also been added with this object. AND YOUR PHOTO OF THE PARLIAMENT BUILDING IS BACK ON THE CONTEST! I'm sorry for the inconvenience that I can have caused you!

Regards,

Stefan Elfving (WMSE) (talk) 15:08, 26 September 2013 (UTC) Wikimedia Sweden[reply]

Hej Stefan,

I'm very happy that the photo is back in the contest, but even more that my feeling was right about the monumemnt status of the building :-)

Thanks a lot again for continuing to search the ID.

Regards --P e z i (talk) 17:23, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palais-des-Beaux-Arts-DSC 0124w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 20:34, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palais-des-Beaux-Arts-DSC 0127w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:15, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Figuren am Haus der Wiener Kaufmannschaft-DSC 3535w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:27, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Figuren am Haus der Wiener Kaufmannschaft-DSC 3537w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 14:27, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Technische Universitaet Wien Bibliothek.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:21, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Jean de Montmartre.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 07:21, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Heldendenkmal der Roten Armee DSC 1814a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:45, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Staatsoper-DSC 0231a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:21, 19 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Genius-Julisaeule-Place de la Bastille-DSC 2360w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments CommentNice view, but I'm unhappy with the burnt highlights at the main object. -- Smial 08:13, 17 September 2013 (UTC) Comment new version uploaded; reprocessed from RAW --P e z i 21:23, 17 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support Ok ;-) --Smial 12:38, 18 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riksdagshuset Stockholm-DSC 0151w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support ok --A.Savin 13:26, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordiska museet-Stockholm-DSC 0124w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, maybe be tilted ccw? not sure --Poco a poco 10:57, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nationalmuseum Stockholm-DSC 0040w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:13, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordiska museet-Stockholm-DSC 0045w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Some noise but I think its ok for QI. I have also been there:) --ArildV 21:27, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rathausbalkon Luebeck-DSC 0451w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality --Lmbuga 23:25, 21 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Opera Garnier-DSC 2543w.jpg[edit]

File:Opera Garnier-DSC 2543w.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Pymouss Let’s talk - 21:50, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Volcán Incahuasi edit.jpg[edit]

Hi, I tried to fix the images. Regards!!!! --Ezarateesteban 00:14, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

unfortunately you've put in some artefacts when removing the dustspot. Besides that there is also noise in the upper sky and for me the picture has very unnatural colors; could be, that the landscape is really like that, but I don't have any comparison. Regards, --P e z i (talk) 19:32, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zitadelle Juelich-DSC 0066a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support OK --A.Savin 12:39, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zitadelle Juelich-DSC 0015w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality--Lmbuga 19:18, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rickmer Rickmers-DSC 0291a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Foreground is not very attractive, but nevertheless QI for me. --Iifar 15:07, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cap San Diego-DSC 0417.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Very nice mood, can you reduce noise on the sky? Or you can sharpen without the sky. --Iifar 14:47, 24 September 2013 (UTC) Comment tried to upload version with noise reduction --P e z i 15:50, 24 September 2013 (UTC) Comment Please compare now. --Iifar 16:22, 24 September 2013 (UTC) Commentfor me it looks perfect now. --P e z i 19:01, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Good work. Nice and good quality now--Lmbuga 19:18, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:09, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, dann sage ich danke für das Vertrauen. LG --P e z i (talk) 22:45, 27 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hexenturm Jülich-DSC 0004w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Nice light, but upper crop is imho too tight. --Iifar 16:24, 24 September 2013 (UTC) Comment new version uploaded; that's all I can get out of the RAW --P e z i 20:34, 24 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
IMHO good for QI --Berthold Werner 12:23, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Koreanisches-Restaurant-Irissee-Donaupark-DSC2375a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 07:11, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

QI[edit]

(poor english) Please, if you upload 11 images, make comments about another images. Ideally you comment 11 images that are not yours if you upload 11 images. --Miguel Bugallo (Lmbuga) 01:07, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

it's not my usual behaviour to flood the nomination without reviewing. This time it was already 2:00 in the morning. I'l do some reviews soon. BTW I've withdrawn 8 of the 11 nominations because of deletion request. --P e z i (talk) 13:57, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Palais de Chaillot-Sculpture exterieur-DSC 2334w.jpg[edit]

File:Palais de Chaillot-Sculpture exterieur-DSC 2334w.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Pymouss Let’s talk - 09:51, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Palais de Chaillot-Sculpture exterieur-DSC 2335w.jpg[edit]

File:Palais de Chaillot-Sculpture exterieur-DSC 2335w.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Pymouss Let’s talk - 09:57, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Palais de Chaillot-Sculpture exterieur-DSC 2337w.jpg[edit]

File:Palais de Chaillot-Sculpture exterieur-DSC 2337w.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Pymouss Let’s talk - 10:01, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Palais de Chaillot-Sculpture exterieur-DSC 2340w.jpg[edit]

File:Palais de Chaillot-Sculpture exterieur-DSC 2340w.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Pymouss Let’s talk - 10:07, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Palais de Chaillot-Sculpture exterieur-DSC 2344w.jpg[edit]

File:Palais de Chaillot-Sculpture exterieur-DSC 2344w.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Pymouss Let’s talk - 10:11, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Palais de Chaillot-Sculpture exterieur-DSC 2347w.jpg[edit]

File:Palais de Chaillot-Sculpture exterieur-DSC 2347w.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Pymouss Let’s talk - 10:28, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Palais de Chaillot-Sculpture exterieur-DSC 2349w.jpg[edit]

File:Palais de Chaillot-Sculpture exterieur-DSC 2349w.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Pymouss Let’s talk - 10:37, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Passat-Travemuende-DSC 0509w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Tuxyso 21:56, 25 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haus der Wiener Kaufmannschaft-DSC 3549w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments The upper windows could be straighter but the main subject is QI. --JLPC 17:33, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! A.R.C.-Gloria Colombia mit Michel Hamburg-DSC 0414a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment I added a bit sharpness, please revert, if it's not better. --Iifar 15:02, 24 September 2013 (UTC) Comment thanks! looks better. --P e z i 15:56, 24 September 2013 (UTC) Support --Iifar 08:11, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pfarrkirche Aspang-Markt-DSC 3794w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Smial 10:49, 26 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oktober 2013[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benediktinerstift Altenburg-Statuen am Vorplatz-DSC 2944w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:11, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benediktinerstift Altenburg-Statue am Vorplatz-DSC 2940w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 08:41, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benediktinerstift Altenburg-DSC 3064w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI for me--Lmbuga 00:56, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! An der Obertrave 15 Luebeck-DSC 0478b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 13:03, 29 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! An der Obertrave-Luebeck-DSC 0482w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Affected:

File:Palais de Chaillot-DSC 2199w.jpg

Yours sincerely, Myrabella (talk) 10:10, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Franz von Assisi Kirche-DSC 0004w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI --Rjcastillo 00:40, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Petzenkirchen-DSC 4033w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI --Rjcastillo 00:40, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lotsenhaus Seemannshoeft-Hamburg-DSC 0171w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:07, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lotsenhaus Seemannshoeft-Hamburg-DSC 0172w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI --Rjcastillo 00:40, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hochhaus Neue Donau-DSC 0016w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:26, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Georg-Coch-Denkmal-DSC1243w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI --Rjcastillo 13:09, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Otto Haus-Rax-DSC 5053w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Personally, I would have cropped a good portion of the empty sky above. But this might be a matter of taste. It is a good picture. --Johannes Robalotoff 20:16, 29 September 2013 (UTC) Comment you're right about the sky, but just wanted to keep the summit cross in the upper right corner --P e z i 22:07, 29 September 2013 (UTC) Comment Oh, I did not mean to crop the summit cross, of course. If one crops the sky at all, then only slightly above the summit cross. --Johannes Robalotoff 14:57, 30 September 2013 (UTC) your opinion on the new upload would by highly appreciated --P e z i 22:50, 1 October 2013 (UTC) Comment Exactly as I would have done it. --Johannes Robalotoff 18:36, 4 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Muenze-Oesterreich-Fassadendetail-DSC 3730w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 11:48, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eulen an Fassade TU Bibliothek-DSC 3585w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 12:15, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stadtgartendirektion-DSC 3602w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 14:05, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turmspitze-St Othmar u d Weissgerbern-DSC 0155a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 19:24, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vienna University of Technology DSC1189.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments slightly tilted to the right --A.Savin 13:33, 10 October 2013 (UTC) Done corrected version uploaded --P e z i 14:15, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Akademietheater-DSC 0654w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Really good quality. Pymouss 21:17, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palais-Ephrussi-DSC 0734w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 12:18, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hochhaus Neue Donau-DSC 0023w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good image. Criteria for QI met. --Tufta 16:00, 10 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! TU Bibl 01 DSC1099w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI --Rjcastillo 01:39, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bahnhof Aspang-DSC 0020a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI --Rjcastillo 01:36, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Denkmal Woellersdorf-DSC 4044b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:47, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Denkmal Woellersdorf-DSC 4049w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI for me--Lmbuga 20:14, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Denkmal Woellersdorf-DSC 4068w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:33, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Denkmal Woellersdorf-DSC 4063w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 13:42, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Denkmal Woellersdorf-DSC 4067w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 13:42, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Denkmal Woellersdorf-DSC 4044b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:47, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Denkmal Woellersdorf-DSC 4049w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI for me--Lmbuga 20:14, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Denkmal Woellersdorf-DSC 4068w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:33, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Donaukilometer 1913-DSC 0042a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Kreuzschnabel 23:13, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burgtheater-Kasino-DSC 0012w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 09:55, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burgtheater-Kasino-DSC 0012w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 09:55, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Badeschiff-Wien DSC1227w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Also seems ok to me - pool looks blue enough --Bahnfrend 08:57, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opera Garnier-DSC 0789w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment new version uploaded --P e z i 21:25, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opera Garnier-DSC 0787w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment new version uploaded --P e z i 21:25, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Badeschiff-Wien DSC1227w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Also seems ok to me - pool looks blue enough --Bahnfrend 08:57, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opera Garnier-DSC 0789w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment new version uploaded --P e z i 21:25, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opera Garnier-DSC 0787w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment new version uploaded --P e z i 21:25, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Af Chapman-DSC 0210w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 05:57, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dry Streambed-Leitha DSC 0016w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 13:32, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Akademietheater-DSC 0654w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Really good quality. Pymouss 21:17, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! TU Bibl 01 DSC1099w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI --Rjcastillo 01:39, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bahnhof Aspang-DSC 0020a.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI --Rjcastillo 01:36, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Denkmal Woellersdorf-DSC 4044b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 18:47, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Denkmal Woellersdorf-DSC 4049w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI for me--Lmbuga 20:14, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Denkmal Woellersdorf-DSC 4068w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:33, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burgtheater-Kasino-DSC 0012w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 09:55, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Badeschiff-Wien DSC1227w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Also seems ok to me - pool looks blue enough --Bahnfrend 08:57, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opera Garnier-DSC 0789w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment new version uploaded --P e z i 21:25, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opera Garnier-DSC 0787w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment new version uploaded --P e z i 21:25, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Betriebshafen Deutsch Altenburg-DSC 0015w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for QI. --NorbertNagel 19:29, 14 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benediktinerstift Altenburg-DSC 3067w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Doanaustadtbruecke Detail-DSC 0009w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment In my opinion there is to much red in the sky. -- Spurzem 20:00, 15 October 2013 (UTC) CommentThanks for review, tried to adjust WB in RAW. --P e z i 20:39, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
QI now -- Spurzem 21:08, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Europa Travemuende-DSC 0518w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality & interesting light situation. --NorbertNagel 20:02, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Franzoesische Botschaft-DSC 3565w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:22, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Franzoesische Botschaft-DSC 3561w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 14:46, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gear Actuation-Boeing-737-800 EL-AL approaching VIE-DSC 3259w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:18, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Navigators room Rickmer-Rickmers-DSC 0330w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 20:52, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sergels torg-Stockholm-DSC 0115w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 10:39, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aspang-Markt-DSC 0006w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 11:51, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Foto: Dry Streambed-Leitha DSC 0016w.jpg[edit]

Lieber Peter, wenn deine angegebene Kameraposition stimmt, dann zeigt das Bild nicht das Bett der Leitha, die erst einige hundert Meter flussabwärts durch den Zusammenfluss mit der Pitten beginnt, sondern das der Schwarza! --wg (talk) 19:01, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Wolfgang,

erwischt! Und zwar gleich doppelt: 1. Habe die Position korrigiert (ich bin nämlich auf der Brücke der Erlacher Straße gestanden; Auto war am kleinen Parkplatz nördlich der Brücke. 2. Damit ist der Zusammenfluss von Pitten und Schwarza noch einmal 200m weiter entfernt :-)

Die Beschreibung habe ich jetzt auch geändert. Den Filenamen kann man irgendwie verschieben soweit ich das bisher mitbekommen habe. Kann ich das selbst?

LG, Peter --P e z i (talk) 19:33, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Force Traveller Kuoni ambulance, 2008.JPG[edit]

That's great! Thanks very much. Bahnfrend (talk) 02:29, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schulschiff-Bertha von Suttner-Gymnasium-Wien-DSC 0018w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:37, 19 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Raiffeisenzentrale-DSC 0603w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:48, 21 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sender Reichenau an der Rax-DSC 5219w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:57, 22 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Apis melifera on Hypericum perforatum-DSC 5123w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 17:14, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gentianella germanica-DSC 5044w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 11:56, 23 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordiska-museet Stockholm-Fassadendetail-DSC 0087w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 21:38, 24 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Technische Universitaet Wien-DSC1103w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good, but I think the perspective correction is too much here. I know you've made it perfect, but it just looks unnatural. --Mattbuck 21:38, 24 October 2013 (UTC) Comment so you would prefer this less shifted version: File:Technische Universitaet Wien-DSC1103w2 less shift.jpg? --P e z i 10:50, 25 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Loewengasse 5-DSC 4616w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:20, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bergstation Raxseilbahn und Sender Reichenau an der Rax-DSC 5208w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice. --Mattbuck 23:25, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Franzensbrueckenstr-21 Schuettelstr-1-DSC 3457w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice light, but could you slightly increase the shadow areas under the bridge? --Tuxyso 21:19, 29 October 2013 (UTC) Comment Thanks for review; new version uploaded. --P e z i 21:44, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
looks good now. --Tuxyso 21:56, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gemeindebauten Schuettelstr 1-und-3-DSC 4606w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality! --NorbertNagel 18:37, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Polizeidiensthundeinspektion Ost-DSC 4589w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Florstein 17:12, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leuchtturm Canal du Midi-Etang de Thau-DSC 0262w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI --Rjcastillo 01:55, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Leuchtturm Canal du Midi-Etang de Thau-DSC 0260w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 16:24, 31 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Goldenes Lamm-DSC 3597w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment It's not a bad image, but barrel distortion IMO--Lmbuga 22:50, 31 October 2013 (UTC) Done thanks for review. Rectified verssion uploaded --P e z i 09:45, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
QI for me--Lmbuga 12:04, 1 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No problem ![edit]

Pas de problème : tu avais traduit en allemand la légende d'une de mes photos, il y a deux ou trois semaines, je t'ai simplement remercié en rectifiant, à mon tour, seulement deux ou trois mots. -- Bien cordialement

D7100 vs. D7000[edit]

Hallo P e z i! Ich habe gerade gesehen, dass das Foto vom Außenministerium mit der D7100 entstanden ist. Da ich in absehbarer Zeit wohl nicht ins Vollformatlager umsteige überlege ich, ob sich ggf. ein Umstieg auf die D7100 lohnt. Aktuell bin ich noch mit der D7000 unterwegs, die du vorher offenbar auch hattest. Wie sind deine Erfahrungen mit der D7100er, gerad eim Vergleich zur D7000? --Tuxyso (talk) 22:17, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Tuxyso! Ich hatte vorher eine D200 und habe mir fallweise die D7000 meines Sohnes ausgeborgt. Von der D200 kommend ist der Sprung ziemlich groß: Deutlich geringeres Rauschen bei höheren ISO Werten, Auflösung mehr als doppelt so hoch, Videofunktion (die ich nicht sehr nutze, aber mein Sohn liebt sie) usw. Der Unterschied zur 7000 ist natürlich wesentlich kleiner aber auch da gibt es einige Verbesserungen speziell bei den Bedienungselementen.

Ich habe mir vor eineinhalb Jahren übers Wochenende mal eine D800E ausgeborgt mit einem Nikkor 14-24/2.8. Danach lange davon geträumt auf Vollformat umzusteigen aber aus Gründen des hohen Preises den Kauf immer wieder verschoben. Dann kam die D600 raus und ich dachte "Das ist es". Zum Glück habe ich nicht sofort zugeschlagen, mittlerweile bin ich nämlich überzeugt, dass mit Ausnahme des Vollformats (das nat. Vorteile hat) die D7100 die bessere Wahl ist. Von den Features in der Bedienung hat die 7100 sehr viele Details, die auch die 800 hat und die in der 600 fehlen.

Noch ein anderes Detail, das mir beim reviewing der QIs aufgefallen ist: Die Leute mit D800(E) stoßen zunehmend an die Grenzen der Objektive. D.h. beim Kauf einer Vollformatkamera müsste man gleichzeitig in einige neue Linsen investieren; und das ist dann weit jenseits meiner Möglichkeiten.

Kurz zusammengefasst: Ich bin sehr zufrieden mit meiner D7100 und kann sie nur empfehlen, wobei der Qualitätsgewinn bei dir von der 7000 kommend eben nicht so gewaltig, aber doch sehr deutlich ist.

LG --P e z i (talk) 22:51, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Pezi! Du sprichst viele interessante Aspekte an. Ein paar Kommentare dazu von mir: Ein Freund von mir hat eine D800, die ich mir auch hin und wieder ausgeborgt habe. Ich konnte auch einige Male mit der "Holy Trinity" (14-24, 24-70, 70-200/VRII) fotografieren. Zweifelsfrei ist das eine tolle Kombi, aber auch teure Kombi. Für mich gibt es aktuell zwei Hauptgründe, warum ich noch nicht auf Vollformat umgestiegen bin: Tele-Brennweiten sind i.d.R. sehr teuer, zudem der Crop-Faktor von 1,5 wegfällt. Ultra-WW finde ich an FF ebenfalls sehr teuer, lichtstarke Zooms sowieso. Der Reiz an FF ist hingegen der deutlich höherer Dynamikumfang und das bessere Rauschverhalten.
Zu den D800-QI-Nominierungen: Deinen Eindruck hinsichtlich geschmischter Qualität von D800-QIC teile ich, allerdings nicht deine Erklärung dafür. In Foren (z.T. auch Fotozeitschriften) wird immer wieder gebetsmühlenartig wiederholt, welche hohen Anforderungen die D800 an Objektive stellt. Spannend ist allerdings, dass die Anforderungen der D7000 (bezogen auf die Pixeldichte) genauso hoch sind, die von deiner D7100 sogar deutlich höher. Aktuelle Objektive bringen die D800 keinesfalls an ihre Grenzen - aus meiner Sicht wird dieser Aspektiv völlig überbewertet. Was natürlich richtig ist, dass Objektivfehler (Dejustierung, Fehlfokus, Randunschärfe) mit der D800 schneller aufzudecken sind. Der Grund, warum einige QICs das Potenzial der D800 nicht annäherend ausschöpfen ist eher in der Nachbearbeitung zu suchen. Wenn ich mir z.B. File:Hof Wohlauf in Barbian 01.JPG, File:Vedla_capela_y_tubla_de_mur_La_Val_03.JPG (oder auch weitere des gleichen Users) anschaue wird dieses Problem sehr schnell deutlich. Meines Wissens verwendet der User die Fotos direkt aus der Kamera als Jpg. Damit verschenkt man bei der D800 einfach viel zu viel. Die Bilder sind ja nicht schlecht, aber nicht annäherend so wie sie sein könnten. Was qualitätstechnisch mit einer D800 möglich ist zeigen z.B. File:Hera_temple_II_-_Paestum_-_Poseidonia_-_July_13th_2013_-_11.jpg, File:Beach_in_Tropea_-_Calabria_-_Italy_-_July_17th_2013_-_02.jpg (ebenso viele weitere Bilder des gleichen Users). Der Unterschied liegt keinesfalls bei den Objektiven, sondern bei einem vernünftigen RAW-Workflow, auf den offenbar einige D800-User keine Lust haben (vielleicht wegen der Datenmengen).
Zurück zum Thema: Ich höre bei dir also große Zufriedenheit mit der D7100 heraus. Die Bedienung hat sich ein ein paar Detailpunkten zur D7000 verbessert. Das Modus-Wahlrad ist jetzt arretiert, so dass man bei Verwendung eines Batteriegriffs nicht mehr mit der Nase den Modus verstellt. Hättest du ggf. die Möglichkeit mir ein paar RAWs deiner Gebäude Aufnahmen zur Verfügung zu stellen? Dann würde ich die Qualität auch noch mal unter die Lupe nehmen. Interessant ist ja, welche Detailauflösung der Sensor tatsächlich bringt. Das zur Zeit schärfste Nikkor (AF-G 85mm f1.8) löst an der D7000 z.B. mit 11 MPix auf, an der D7100 "nur" mit 15 Mpix, s. D7100 vs. D7000. Kostentechnisch wäre ein Sprung zur D7100 (gerade wenn ich gebraucht kaufen würde) am günstigsten. Ich müsste mir nur einen neuen Batteriegriff kaufen. Vollformat würde viele Folgekosten nach sich ziehen. Insbesondere die Kosten teurer Zoom-Objektive scheue ich momentan. Auf der anderen Seite fotografiere ich auch viel mit Festbrennweiten und die sind, abgesehen vom 35mm/f1.8 alle vollformattauglich. Ich glaube übrigens, dass die D600/610 besser ist als ihr Ruf. Das Ölproblem scheint inzwischen gelöst bzw. ein Austausch unproblematisch. Die Detailauflösung ist im Vergleich zur D7100 deutlich höher (s. D600) obwohl die Megapixel nominell identisch sind. Wenn ich mir etwa die Detailauflösung solcher Aufnahmen anschaue, kann mir niemand sagen, dass die D600 eine schlechte Kamera ist - da werde ich schon etwas neidisch auf D600-Besitzer :) --Tuxyso (talk) 08:16, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ich gebe dir 100% recht, dass das Ergebnis sehr stark davon abhängig ist, wie man sein "Instrument spielt", aber das gilt ja nicht nur beim Fotografieren. "It's the rider, not the bike" sagen die Einspurigen :-). Und es stimmt auch, dass die 600er eine sehr gute Kamera ist. (Hab gesehen, dass die 610er jetzt immerhin auch den Empfänger für IR-Fernauslöser hat). Aber ein bisschen klingt die DX/FX Diskussion manchmal nach Religionskrieg - früher war es halt die Diskussion Kleinbild/Mittelformat ...

Zu deiner Frage nach RAW-Files: Sag einfach welches Bild du gerne hättest und ich schau mal wie wir den Transfer machen können.

LG --P e z i (talk) 13:13, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

An den beiden RAWs wäre ich interessiert: File:Loewengasse 5-DSC 4616w.jpg und File:Franzensbrueckenstr-21 Schuettelstr-1-DSC 3457w.jpg. Die Unterschiede hinsichtlich der Detailauflösung D7000 vs. D7100 ließen sich sehr einfach testen wenn du ein Motiv mit beiden Kameras und gleicher Optik aufnimmst und die D7100-Aufnahme dann unter Nachschärfung auf D7000-Größe runterskalierst. Danke schon mal, viele Grüße, --Tuxyso (talk) 14:51, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hast du mich etwa vergessen? :) Falls du eine Möglichkeit brauchst die RAWs hochzuladen, kann ich dir diese gerne per SendEmail-Funktion zukommen lassen. Viele Grüße, --Tuxyso (talk) 06:58, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nein, ich hab dich nicht vergessen :-) Allerdings halte ich die beiden Fotos für nicht sehr aussagekräftig (nachbearbeitet mit ShiftN bzw. starker Beschnitt). Weiteres ist vielleicht wirklich per Mail einfacher. LG --P e z i (talk) 08:48, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holstentor-Lübeck-DSC 0429w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schneeekanone-DSC 5049w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok for QI --Martin Kraft 23:51, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sessellift und Schneekanone-DSC 5039w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok for QI --Martin Kraft 23:51, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Plaque au histoire d un olivier-pres de Pont du Gard-DSC 0032w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:23, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Olivier-pres de Pont du Gard-DSC 0032w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Do you really believe it's 1100 years old? :-) --Cayambe 16:58, 4 November 2013 (UTC) Comment thanks for review. I don't have any reason to not believe what the governement of the departement Gard has written on the plate (see photo to the left) --P e z i 18:15, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oesterr Aussenministerium Nationalfeiertag-DSC 4694w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK, but I would typ some masked sharpening to reduce the overall noise level (especially of the sky) --Tuxyso 21:29, 5 November 2013 (UTC) Comment thanks for review and thanks for advice. New version uploaded. --P e z i 22:11, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Looks better. --Tuxyso 22:14, 5 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liebenberg-Denkmal Goettin Victoria-DSC 4645w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:35, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ehemaliges k u k Kriegsministerium-Fassadendetail-DSC 5014w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
CommentThe roof is slightly leaning to the left : easy to fix. --JLPC 15:38, 6 November 2013 (UTC) Donethanks for review. new version uploaded --P e z i 17:38, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
QI now. --JLPC 22:09, 6 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stockholm at night-DSC 0220w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:55, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aerospatiale SA-319 Alouette III-Heckrotor-DSC 4871w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 12:55, 7 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katarinahissen-DSC 0124w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 16:47, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Uebergang Pestingbach-DSC 3980w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:44, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Murtalviadukt-DSC 3950w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 15:44, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nikon D200 mit Batteriehandgrif-DSC 4107w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI --Rjcastillo 01:52, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Twin City Liner-Erdberger Steg-DSC 4516w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 18:59, 11 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nikon FA-DSC 4067w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:02, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Josef Stiny Hof TU-Wien-DSC 3573w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support very good --A.Savin 17:20, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kieslinger TU-Wien Hof-DSC 3582w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:46, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nikon FA-DSC 4079w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Kreuzschnabel 19:41, 12 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Images Candidates[edit]

Hi Cekli829,
would be very nice to give some words about the reason when you vote against a Quality Images Candidate. Just "No" is a bit strange ... Cheers, --P e z i (talk) 18:31, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Essentially, "Per above" ;) I take into account the next time. Best regards, --►Cekli 829 18:42, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Muenze Oesterreich Fassadendetail-DSC 3647w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments This picture should be categorized, and needs a slight perspective correction (see note please). Otherwise QI, when corrections done.--Jebulon 14:35, 12 November 2013 (UTC) Done thanks for review. New version uploaded --P e z i 15:25, 12 November 2013 (UTC) Better, thank you, added in some categories.The more categories you find for your pictures, the more it is visible in commons ! --Jebulon 20:06, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Promotion unerwünscht?[edit]

... oder ein Editfehler? --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 19:31, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, zweiteres. Scheint ein Bearbeitungskonflikt gewesen zu sein ... LG und Danke! --P e z i (talk) 19:35, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Dachte ich mir schon :) Ist wirklich ein tolles Bild. --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 19:39, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skulpturengruppe-Donaupark-Wien-DSC2382b.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 21:31, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Deckengemaelde Stift Altenburg-DSC 3039w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

The best licence in the world[edit]

Hi there, please note that the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-ShareAlike licence (CC-BY-NC-SA) is the best licence available. Thank you very much. 171.207.189.50 16:45, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Could you please let me select which license is applied to my pictures? --P e z i (talk) 16:48, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Haha ok. But you let people make $$$ out of your pictures??? Hahahaha...what a joke you are. 171.207.189.50 16:49, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RBI-RBZ-Wien-DSC 0607w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments An eye catcher! --Cccefalon 19:26, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stadtpark-Wien-Lichtinstallation-DSC 0638w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for me. --JLPC 18:06, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

template license[edit]

if you want to use custom templates you can do it safely, but it's just that the first information is given with the template license and international standards, available in all languages (which is also much lighter and without images), custom templates must be installed below. Do not you think it is more correct?--Pava (talk) 18:04, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know - I'm new here and try to learn. Point is just, that from my 177 uploaded images 108 were promoted QI and in this way some of the regulars looked at it. During this process nobody except you told me that there is any issue about the license. Seems just strange to me ... --P e z i (talk) 18:10, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

but there is no a problem, I just reversed the order, I did not delete anything, it's a problem for you that I made the change? I'm not admonishing anyone, in fact I asked a comment. you're at it, you can create the template for the Italian? if you want I'll give you a hand --Pava (talk) 18:41, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Had a look at the italian version of the page and think I've got your point now: In italian both entrys are named "licenza" as in the german version the point in the box is "Genehmigung" and the second point is "Lizenz" which has a distinct different meaning. But I don't have any problem with the places of the templates ... --P e z i (talk) 19:04, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rainbow-in-Vienna-DSC 0560w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 17:28, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Donaustadtbruecke-DSC 0020w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments There is - for my personal taste - too much magenta in the blue colour of the sky, but it is still QI for me. --Cccefalon 11:18, 20 November 2013 (UTC) Comment thanks for the hint; tried to reduce --P e z i 09:47, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! RBI-Zentrale-DSC 3654w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Stretched on left? Mattbuck 23:15, 17 November 2013 (UTC) Comment you are right (wide angle lense). I've cropped the distorted area, better now? --P e z i 15:27, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Could you also correct the perspective on the left please? Mattbuck 21:39, 19 November 2013 (UTC) Done new version uploaded --P e z i 22:39, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not perfect but better. Mattbuck 17:38, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carnuntum Buergerhaus-DSC 0056w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Some white parts need to be fixed : see notes, please. QI then. --JLPC 16:39, 22 November 2013 (UTC) Done thanks for review. Made the corrections in RAW and also slightly changed WB to warmer. --P e z i 18:40, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support now. --JLPC 21:38, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Donaukanal-DSC 3488w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 09:52, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

العربية ∙ català ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form) ∙ English ∙ español ∙ eesti ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ magyar ∙ italiano ∙ Nederlands ∙ polski ∙ română ∙ svenska ∙ ไทย ∙ українська ∙ +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear P e z i,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Windpark-Hoeflein-Lower-Austria-DSC 0008w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 21:43, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wienfluss Stadtparksteg-DSC1265w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:18, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stadtparksteg-DSC1268w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 16:32, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aspang Markt-DSC 0045w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --NorbertNagel 11:32, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gloucester railway station MMB 51 43194.jpg[edit]

I have sharpened this image - would you mind taking a second look? -mattbuck (Talk) 22:31, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

There is also a perspective issue (leaning out left) which I didn't mention because the unsharpness seemed too bad for sharpening for me. --P e z i (talk) 22:38, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zitadelle Juelich-DSC 0012w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:20, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wienfluss-Portal Saeule-SO-DSC 5180w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 21:46, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wienfluss-Portal Saeule-NW-DSC 5183w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments OK for QI, although a bit unsharp --A.Savin 15:36, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Celebrity Summit-DSC 0134w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Martin Kraft 00:00, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! IUAV-DSC 0204w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cccefalon 20:45, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wienfluss-Portal Saeule-SO-DSC 5175w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 15:50, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wienfluss-Portal Saeule-NW-DSC 5187w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Done thanks for review; new version uploaded. --P e z i 19:40, 26 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Excellent! --Moroder 13:13, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parlament Wien-DSC 0238w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

December 2013[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! August-Bergmann-Hof Favoritenstrasse 8-DSC 5409w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 17:39, 28 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Cap San Diego-DSC 0417.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cap San Diego-DSC 0417.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 06:01, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Main building of the Vienna University of Technology, north facade.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Deutsch-Altenburg Karner-DSC 0067w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 08:39, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Église Saint-Jean-de-Montmartre,Paris, Exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Guggenheim Venedig-DSC 0053w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 07:28, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nymphaea alba flower-and-leaves-DSC 3326w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Blown out areas, fixable? Poco a poco 22:46, 1 December 2013 (UTC) Done thanks for review. New version uploaded --P e z i 06:08, 2 December 2013 (UTC)Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:19, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Library of the Vienna University of Technology, building.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Herzlichen Glückwunsch zur erfolgreiche Teilnahme am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in Deutschland[edit]

Hallo P e z i,

etwas spät, aber noch nicht zu spät, möchte ich dir hiermit, pünktlich zum Nikolaus, im Namen der Juroren das Goldene Gummibärchen für deine erfolgreiche Teilnahme am Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments überreichen.

Dein Preisträgerfoto ist...
Platz 11

Ich hoffe dir hat der Wettbewerb mindestens ebenso viel Freude bereitet wie uns. Sehen wir dich 2014 wieder?

Ein besinnliches Adventswochenende und viel Erfolg im nächsten Jahr wünscht dir, Anika (talk) 08:11, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Servus Anika,

danke für die lieben Wünsche; das Gummibärli hat schon auf meiner userpage ein Zuhause gefunden :-)

und zu den Fragen: Ja, mir hat es sehr viel Spaß gemacht beim Wettbewerb mitzumachen und ich habe auch einiges dabei gelernt (hochladen, einbinden, kategorisieren). Zum nächsten Jahr: Denke schon, dass ich wieder dabei sein werden; meine Vorräte mit Bildern aus .de sind halt jetzt ziemlich aufgebraucht ...

herzlichen Dank auch noch für die Organisation des Bewerbs und alles Gute im derzeit stürmischen Norden --P e z i (talk) 08:34, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Na danke für den "Norden". Aber stürmisch ist es hier auch, hast schon recht.

Lieben Gruß, Anika (talk) 09:39, 6 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Celebrity Summit-DSC 0134w.jpg[edit]

Désolé j'ai rectifié : Pour Evidemment! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:12, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Autochocado.jpg[edit]

Hi, I tried to fix the image. Regards!!! Ezarateesteban 23:55, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,

I'm sorry, but there is still a perspective distortion in the picture. I think you looked at the stand of the swing on the playground to the left but this is not vertikal. Have a look at the lamp poles in the background they leaning out to the left. In addition the background is rather noisy (don't know how that can occur with ISO 100). And most of all: I don't see the "Encyclopedic Value" of the image ...

Cheers, --P e z i (talk) 08:24, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wildbachverbauung DSC 0106w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Comment Can you remove the cyan CA over the tree tops and the blurry object in the sky (see annotation)? --Cccefalon 07:26, 7 December 2013 (UTC) Done? I've made a try; unfortunately don't have a RAW of this ... --P e z i 10:16, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Support the improvement is ok for QI imo --Cccefalon 15:33, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wildbachverbauung-DSC 0042w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 11:21, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Renaissance bay window of Lübeck town hall.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiental-DSC 0004w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 18:13, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiental-DSC 0002w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support --A.Savin 16:57, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Castle Petzenkirchen, View from South.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Celebrity Summit-DSC 0134w.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Celebrity Summit-DSC 0134w.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wiental-DSC 0007w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Support Good quality. --XRay 10:17, 10 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Svea Livgarde-DSC 0225w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:09, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Gloria (ship, 1968), moored at Hamburg 2011.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Donaustadtbruecke-Praterbruecke-DSC 0024w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--ArildV 08:31, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Stift Altenburg - Prunkräume, Bibliotheksvestibül.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marinesektion Kriegsministerium-DSC 0023w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Acceptable, though not perfectly symmetric --Smial 23:54, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Muenchenbryggeriet-Stockholm-DSC 0081w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me. --JLPC 17:15, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Category:Palais des Beaux Arts, Exterior.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Le vieux moulin-DSC 0038w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --JLPC 23:31, 14 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Donauuferbahn-Oberleitung-DSC 5892w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --c

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear P e z i,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,

the Wiki Loves Monuments team

your message[edit]

hi P e z i, sure, just go ahead. Gryffindor (talk) 12:00, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kleingasse 2 DSC 5704w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --XRay 08:24, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:Svea Livgarde-DSC 0225w.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Svea Livgarde-DSC 0225w.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 14:01, 21 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haus der Industrie-DSC 0203w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok.--ArildV 01:29, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vordere-Zollamtstr-11-DSC 3678w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments It still looks a bit strange, but I don't want to be nitpicking. Should be QI now. --Smial 07:15, 20 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Celebrity Summit-DSC 0134w.jpg[edit]

Congratulations your image is "image of the day" on Wikipedia France --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:10, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merci beaucoup! C'est un beau cadeau de Noël pour moi :-) --P e z i (talk) 10:54, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sh..t ! I was to congratulate you for the same reason, but I see that my dear friend Archaeo was the first (again ! But normal: among many things, he is crazy about Venice). Anyway, a very good picture indeed ! As for me, I discovered Wien recently, and I like this city very much Have a nice Xmas !--Jebulon (talk) 17:28, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks to you also and All the Best for Xmas and New Year! --P e z i (talk) 19:22, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas[edit]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

★ Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted ★
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sentry boxes in Sweden.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.

review

FP Promotion[edit]

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★

The image File:TU Bibl 01 DSC1099w.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:TU Bibl 01 DSC1099w.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 27 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hauptplatz 13 Aspang Markt-DSC 5968w.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Stepro 02:58, 23 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:P e z i/Archiv 2013

September 2013[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Ang. din bild på Riksdagshuset, Stockholm/Regarding your photo of the Parliament Building in Stockholm[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

File:Opera Garnier-DSC 2543w.jpg[edit]

File:Volcán Incahuasi edit.jpg[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Autopatrol given[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

QI[edit]

File:Palais de Chaillot-Sculpture exterieur-DSC 2334w.jpg[edit]

File:Palais de Chaillot-Sculpture exterieur-DSC 2335w.jpg[edit]

File:Palais de Chaillot-Sculpture exterieur-DSC 2337w.jpg[edit]

File:Palais de Chaillot-Sculpture exterieur-DSC 2340w.jpg[edit]

File:Palais de Chaillot-Sculpture exterieur-DSC 2344w.jpg[edit]

File:Palais de Chaillot-Sculpture exterieur-DSC 2347w.jpg[edit]

File:Palais de Chaillot-Sculpture exterieur-DSC 2349w.jpg[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Oktober 2013[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Foto: Dry Streambed-Leitha DSC 0016w.jpg[edit]

File:Force Traveller Kuoni ambulance, 2008.JPG[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

November 2013[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

No problem ![edit]

D7100 vs. D7000[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Images Candidates[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Promotion unerwünscht?[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

The best licence in the world[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

template license[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

File:Gloucester railway station MMB 51 43194.jpg[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

December 2013[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

FP Promotion[edit]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Valued Image Promotion[edit]