User talk:Orgelputzer

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Orgelputzer!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 11:12, 1 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, VIGNERON (talk) 07:15, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Heilig Kreuz, Regensburg.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:38, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Josef Renner an der Heinssen-Orgel.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:43, 26 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Modell Steinerne Brücke.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Modell Steinerne Brücke.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:10, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, VIGNERON (talk) 12:21, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Orgelputzer, erfüllt der Standort, von dem aus du dieses Foto aufgenommen hast, die geltenden Bedingungen der Panoramafreiheit, gemäß de:Panoramafreiheit#Kriterium_„öffentlich“? (Ich frage das, weil du ja "im Innenhof" angegeben hast, wobei sich das auf den Standort des Werks bezieht, nicht auf deinen) --Túrelio (talk) 09:45, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Túrelio, der Innenhof ist zu einer Seite offen und damit für jedermann frei zugänglich. Somit ist die Panoramafreiheit erfüllt! --Orgelputzer (talk) 09:53, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 16:07, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:St. Paul Regensburg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 10:12, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Orgelputzer, ich gehe davon aus, dass du bei der Aufnahme dieses Fotos nicht draußen, vor der Kirche, gestanden hast, richtig? Deshalb gibt es hier nämlich ein Problem mit der Pan.freiheit. --Túrelio (talk) 19:41, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Túrelio, ja, ich habe bei geöffneten Türen in die Kirche hineinfotografiert! Ich will Dir nicht zu nahe treten, aber mich nervt es extrem, dass ich mich Dir gegenüber ständig wegen meiner Fotos verantworten muss, siehe oben beim Ludwiggymnasium! --Orgelputzer (talk) 08:43, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Ich bin, wie meine anderen Admin-Kollegen, von der Community gewählt worden, um u.a. auf die Einhaltung des Urheberrechts und unserer sonstigen "Spielregeln" zu achten bzw. diese durchzusetzen. In genau in dieser Funktion habe ich dich zu 2 deiner Uploads um eine Klärung gebeten (2x binnen 24 Monaten = ständig?).
Da ich aus vielfacher Erfahrung weiß, dass auch gutwillige Hochlader in der Freude über eine schöne Aufnahme mal die Feinheiten der Panoramafreiheit vernachlässigen, habe ich in beiden erwähnten Fällen, bei denen prima vista eine Verletzung der Panoramafreiheit naheliegt, den freundlicheren, aber für mich aufwendigeren Weg gewählt, zunächst einmal beim Hochlader nachzufragen, statt aufgrund des URV-Verdachts einfach direkt einen LA zu stellen, wie es eher dem Usus entspricht. Wenn dir dieser Weg lieber ist, bitte sehr. --Túrelio (talk) 09:30, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Túrelio, ich verstehe! Dann nehme ich das oben Gesagte zurück und betrachte Deinen Hinweis als "freundlichen Akt"! Somit bedanke ich mich für Deine Nachricht und wünsche Dir ein frohes Weiterschaffen hier und einen schönen Tag! --Orgelputzer (talk) 09:42, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright status: File:Kampmann Bodo Justitia LG Braunschweig 2022 (Brunswyk)3.JPG

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kampmann Bodo Justitia LG Braunschweig 2022 (Brunswyk)3.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 12:05, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Eine Orgel? Eine Orgel![edit]

Hallo Orgelputzer,

ich bin gerade über die verlinkte Nominierung für die Kategorie "Featured Media" gestolpert. Sie fällt ja eher in dein Fach als in meines, was hältst du davon? Kritzolina (talk) 15:53, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Das ist hervorragend gemacht und sehr informativ! Danke für den Hinweis --Orgelputzer (talk) 10:59, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Und aus Frankreich (entschuldigung mein Deutsch) ein großes Dankeschön an beide (Kritzolina und Orgelputzer) für diesen Bericht und für diese Abstimmung. Ich hoffe, bald eine ausführlichere Übersetzung in Ihre Sprache erstellen zu können. Ich weiß, das ist schon einigermaßen verständlich, aber wir müssen es noch ein bisschen besser machen. Beste grüße,
Smcj~frwiki (talk) 12:55, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Bonjour Smcj~frwiki, pas de modestie inutile: ton allemand et ton panneau d'affichage sont excellents! C'est avec plaisir que nous avons voté pour! Salutations du --Orgelputzer (talk) 14:41, 19 January 2024 (UTC) ("Nettoyeur d'orgues")[reply]
Eerste mein Deutsch stammt von automatischen Übersetzern, sicherlich von mir korrigiert nach dem, was ich weiß (vor dreißig Jahren, sieben Monate in Deutschland), bei dem aber immer die Gefahr besteht, dass der Sinn verfehlt wird… Auf dieser Punkt ist es also keine falsche Bescheidenheit; es ist Realismus. Für meinen SVG hätte ich ihn nicht zur Abstimmung vorgeschlagen, wenn ich ihn nicht für würdig gehalten hätte. Beispielsweise habe ich bei der Übersetzung der Notennotation für die Stimmenumfang ins Deutsche vergessen, die Tastaturen zu übersetzen… Dies werde ich bei der nächsten Übersetzung nachholen, da ich die Versionen nicht gern vervielfachen möchte, um zu wenig Beitrag zu leisten. Ich weiß, dass Ihr es versteht; aber trotzdem C5 für uns, es ist immer noch c’’’ für Euch…
Ich mag den pseudo „Orgelputzer“; Meint er Orgelbauer?
Smcj~frwiki (talk) 16:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Smcj~frwiki, da ich oft Orgeln repariere und restauriere muss ich oft die Pfeifen reinigen. Daher ist das eigentlich eine Tätigkeit die der Orgelbauer macht, also salopp "Orgel putzen" Schönes Wochenende wünscht Dir der --Orgelputzer (talk) 09:41, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Es ist lustig… Vor etwas mehr als zwanzig Jahren habe ich eine andere Grafik programmiert. Es war kein SVG (das zu jung war, als dass ich ihm vertrauen konnte), sondern ASCII-Kunst. Es ist ein Paradoxon, das ich gerne teile, da in diesem speziellen Fall das alte ASCII aus rein buchhalterischer Sicht effizienter ist als das sehr moderne SVG. Ich habe eine Frage an Dir: Verdrängt die „salopp“, von der spricht Du mal, den Orgelputzer, von dem Du behauptest, dass er diese diese Web Seite problemlos versteht?
Smcj~frwiki (talk) 20:38, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]