User talk:Multichill/Archives/2023/April

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Changing "location" to "location of creation"

Hello,

Your bot changed a lot of data from "location" to "location of creation". This change does meet the point the data. Could you kindly change it back into "located in" (P706). This was the aim of the label "location". Please use your bot to place the intended label.

Greetings Hans G. Oberlack (talk) 10:36, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

RDF graph
@Hans G. Oberlack: see Commons:Structured data/Modeling/Location how locations are modeled.
The statements in the structured data apply to the photo, not to the object you see in it. In case of File:Schillerstraße 15 GlienickeNordbahn 2020 NE.jpg, the house is located in Glienicke/Nordbahn (Q585248), not the photo. The photo was only created in Glienicke/Nordbahn (Q585248). So no, I won't change it back. Multichill (talk) 10:47, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
Thanks for explaining. But how do I indicate the location of the depicted object? Hans G. Oberlack (talk) 10:57, 8 April 2023 (UTC)
@Hans G. Oberlack: for everything you see depicts (P180) is used. In this case I see that it's already set to Schillerstraße (Q104507204) so that seems to be covered. Multichill (talk) 11:16, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

Help needed WLKBot

Hi Multichill! Commons:Bots/Requests/WLKBot is sort of stuck. Can you help have a look and let us know if it looks okay to you or if you have any suggestions? I tried to find out what the suggested changes are at Module talk:I18n/objects/data. Does any of those look strange to you? --MGA73 (talk) 13:28, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

@MGA73: like this? Multichill (talk) 16:35, 8 April 2023 (UTC)

When you crop one of

When you crop an image uploaded by BotMultichill, the images source information does not copy over to the cropped file. See this file here. Broichmore (talk) 19:27, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

@Broichmore: whatever tool you're using appears to be broken. You should get that tool fixed or at least fix it by hand. Multichill (talk) 22:09, 9 April 2023 (UTC)
I’m using the standard ‘’commons’’ work tool. Broichmore (talk) 22:20, 9 April 2023 (UTC)

File:ArmsOfDenysOfSiston.jpg

File:ArmsOfDenysOfSiston.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Giltsbeach (talk) 13:11, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Denysarms.jpg

File:Denysarms.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Giltsbeach (talk) 14:45, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

WappenWiki permission

Wappen Wiki is under a CC license. It's on their website. Giltsbeach (talk) 21:06, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

@Giltsbeach: I know, the Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0) which is not an acceptable license here because it doesn't allow commercial usage, see Commons:Copyright_tags#Free_Creative_Commons_licenses. Multichill (talk) 21:23, 11 April 2023 (UTC)
My bad, I didn't now non-commercial was not allowed. Giltsbeach (talk) 21:35, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Flickr - NewsPhoto! - After the Iran elections (Jun 20th).jpg

File:Flickr - NewsPhoto! - After the Iran elections (Jun 20th).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

HeminKurdistan (talk) 17:10, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

In lieu of a barnstar...


Much more useful than certain categories. Or barnstars. Jmabel ! talk 00:08, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

Making GeographBot requests?

Hi,

I'm not sure if here's the place to ask - I will comment that Commons:Batch uploading/Geograph doesn't seem to have anywhere on it - but is there a way to request the GeographBot to upload a selection of Geograph images? I've tried to set aside user James T M Towill's Cumbria Easter Rally 2023 photos, even setting aside a Commons category for it, but I've found that uploading those individually and having to manually input all the copyright, date, time and especially location data for each file is going to be an infuriatingly slow process. As you can see on my Flickr2Commons alt, I've done this manually on occasion for one or two other Geograph photos, but I simply don't have the time, nor the geographic knowledge of Cumbria, to do this batch of about ten rally photos.

Seeing as how the GeographBot is a bit stuck in the realm of photos uploaded in 2015 at the minute, it looks likely that the photos probably won't be uploaded for quite a while yet - I'll ask again, is there a way of requesting the bot to upload a specific batch of photos instead of having to go through user input for some of the most recent uploads? Hullian111 (talk) 15:41, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

@Hullian111: Have you found the "reuse" link under each photo on Geograph? It leads to a page that has a link (labelled "directly upload this picture to Wikimedia Commons" at the bottom that should fill in everything on Special:Upload apart from the categories. If it doesn't work for you, let me know and I can upload the pictures: it should only take a few minutes. --bjh21 (talk) 15:47, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
Whew, that worked and saved me a lot of time! Thanks, will try this from now on, saves me manually filling in a credit line every time. Hullian111 (talk) 15:55, 15 April 2023 (UTC)
@Hullian111 and Bjh21: I'm happy to see you found a solution together. Geograph has 7.4M images, we have 4.6M images so about 2.8M more to go. Based on these statistics, the bot uploads about 100.000 a month so about 28 months of uploading left to get to april 2023. So I guess we'll be in sync somewhere in 2025? Multichill (talk) 17:56, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

British Library

I need some guidance, please, I'm uploading some images, what do I need to do? to ensure your bot does not duplicate my work.

Here's an example. File:Plate 12, The Shah Nujeef.jpg.

Previous discussions were, that including an accession number in the script, was all that was required. Which of these numbers is appropriate for the British Library? Thanks. Broichmore (talk) 10:34, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Osemozotan.png

File:Osemozotan.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

Marbletan (talk) 14:39, 20 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Jean-Talon Blue Line.jpg

File:Jean-Talon Blue Line.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!
Afrikaans ∙ Bahasa Indonesia ∙ bosanski ∙ català ∙ čeština ∙ dansk ∙ Deutsch ∙ Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ ∙ eesti ∙ English ∙ español ∙ Esperanto ∙ français ∙ galego ∙ hrvatski ∙ íslenska ∙ italiano ∙ magyar ∙ Nederlands ∙ norsk bokmål ∙ norsk nynorsk ∙ occitan ∙ Plattdüütsch ∙ polski ∙ português ∙ português do Brasil ∙ română ∙ shqip ∙ sicilianu ∙ slovenčina ∙ slovenščina ∙ suomi ∙ svenska ∙ Tiếng Việt ∙ Türkçe ∙ Zazaki ∙ Ελληνικά ∙ беларуская ∙ беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ ∙ български ∙ македонски ∙ русский ∙ српски / srpski ∙ українська ∙ հայերեն ∙ বাংলা ∙ മലയാളം ∙ ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ ∙ မြန်မာဘာသာ ∙ ไทย ∙ 조선말 ∙ 한국어 ∙ 日本語 ∙ 简体中文‎ ∙ 繁體中文‎ ∙ עברית ∙ العربية ∙ پښتو ∙ فارسی ∙ ދިވެހިބަސް ∙ +/−

DS (talk) 22:49, 29 April 2023 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Multichill/Archives/2023/April&oldid=804150116"