User talk:Mr.Nostalgic/Archive

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
File:Nude, RP-F-F17712.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Peli (talk) 13:11, 1 January 2023 (UTC)

PD Day 2023

Dag Mr. Nostalgic, voor als je tijd en zin hebt, het werk van nl:Diana Coomans is nu in PD, er zijn op Commons slechts een paar zwart wit foto's van haar werk. Zie bijv. https://www.artnet.com/artists/diana-coomans/ . Kan je het daar eenvoudig vanaf plukken (niks is eenvoudig natuurlijk). Met vriendelijke groet, en gelukkig nieuwjaar! Ellywa (talk) 22:38, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Twee euro-munt, herdenkingsmunt Erasmus, 2011, objectnr 90326(2).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Alexander Roumega (talk) 10:15, 5 January 2023 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for all the pictures, I put one of them on the page about the Watersnoodwedstrijd on the Dutch Wikipedia, and am sure I will use plenty more of the ones you uploaded! Maarten1963 (talk) 20:31, 19 January 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 09:01, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Suggestie: CollectieGelderland

Hoi Mr.Nostalgic, op je user-pagina zeg je dat suggesties welkom zijn: tijdens het zoeken naar afbeeldingen van Abraham van Overbeeke kwam ik een link naar CollectieGelderland tegen waar zes rechtenvrije (publiek domein) afbeeldingen van hem staan, deze staan zo ver ik kan zien nog niet op hier op commons. CollectieGelderland heeft 71299 rechtenvrije afbeeldingen. Heb jij interesse/tijd om die 6 of 71299 toe te voegen? Difool (talk) 12:56, 25 January 2023 (UTC)

Hoi Difool,
Ik was even op vakantie en had het wat druk met werk.
De 6 waar jij om vraagt zal ik zsm uploaden. Voor de rest 71299-6 ben ik aan het zoeken of er enige logica in zit om ze sequentieel te doorlopen. Tot dusver kan ik dat nog niet vinden.
Groetjes,
Alf
Mr.Nostalgic (talk) 12:54, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
Net gedaan!
Wil je ze zelf nog catagoriseren of heb je liever dat ik dat doe?
Groetjes,
Alf Mr.Nostalgic (talk) 14:00, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
Mooi en bedankt! Ik heb de afbeeldingen zelf gecategoriseerd.
Met betrekking tot de automatisering: bij de 'date' zag ik dat je {{between|1890,1914}} gebruikte, in plaats van {{between|1890|1914}} en een paar keer werd de 1914 een 1940, bv deze
Succes met de rest, lijkt me een flinke taak. Groetjes Difool (talk) 17:33, 28 January 2023 (UTC)
File:Een foto van Albert Einstein, Bestanddeelnr 926-8464.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

193.146.182.88 09:26, 14 February 2023 (UTC)

File:Affiche van Beatrix met (grote) blote borsten () en 40+ Edammer kaas, Bestanddeelnr 930-7858.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JopkeB (talk) 10:05, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

File:Juliana ontvangt op Paleis-Soestdijk 1e exemplaar van ee herdenkingsinhuldiging, Bestanddeelnr 930-7664.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JopkeB (talk) 10:23, 28 February 2023 (UTC)

The Rijksmuseum illustrations of the French republican calendar

@Mr.Nostalgic: Thank you very much for your uploads of the high-resolution Rijksmuseum images into the category of Les Mois républicains.

One of the images, though, has a different style. The image for Germinal, and only Germinal, is in colour. I have tried multiple searches (by subject=calendar, by engraver, etc) of the site of the Rijksmuseum for an alternate image, one in the same style as the other 11, but without success. Could you confirm that they do not have a matching image? (It's a shame as you can do a lot more when you have a full set of something! I started to load details from the monochrome versions today eg en:User:Scarabocchio/calendar#Winter/3:_Ventôse). Best, Scarabocchio (talk) 16:03, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

I have found a suitable copy (for my purposes), at the Carnavalet museum in Paris. I will upload it tomorrow. Scarabocchio (talk) 19:24, 5 March 2023 (UTC)

Nederlandse foto's van 22 September 1908.

Hey mister, Een aantal foto's in de categorie "Netherlands photographs taken on 1908-09-22" staan volgens de omschrijving van het Nationaal Archief op de juiste plek, maar volgens de datering op het bestand zelf niet. Welke zou leidend moeten zijn, volgens jou? Verderː ik weet niet of ik het al eerder heb geschreven, maar mijn complimenten voor je goede werken hier.Groetjes, Jeff5102 (talk) 21:12, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

Het Nationaal Archief heeft zelf al gezien dat de foto van de sluis uit 1875 ook echt uit 1875 is, en heeft dat inmiddels ook bij de bron aangepast. Maar zelfs als dat niet zou zijn gebeurd, lijkt het me evident dat de omschrijving op de foto voorgaat, desnoods met een vermelding erbij "Source date mistakenly 22 Sept. 1908". Vysotsky (talk) 23:27, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Excuses dat ik voordrong met mijn antwoord. Met die complimenten voor Mr.Nostalgic ben ik het uiteraard helemaal eens! Vysotsky (talk) 23:48, 14 March 2023 (UTC)
Heren, de complimenten zijn wederzijds. Geweldig werk en vooral doorzettingsvermogen. Het lijkt onuitputtelijk. :)
File:Schilder Herman Gordijn met officieel staatsportret Koningin Beatrix, Bestanddeelnr 253-8779.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JopkeB (talk) 06:36, 21 March 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 15:31, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Frank Scholten

You've uploaded a lot of images from this photographer, marked as a CC BY-SA license, but your sources all say CC BY. In addition, I'm reasonably certain this library's license claims aren't valid because Scholten died more than 80 years ago and the library just put up scans, so they should all really be in the public domain. But you're the experienced one here. If you agree with me, could you automate updating all of these? (and if you disagree with me, revert this one.) Snowmanonahoe (talk) 19:40, 26 March 2023 (UTC)

Hi Snowmanonahoe,
I will ask the librarian and let you know.
Regards Mr.Nostalgic (talk) 08:52, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
I guess User:Snowmaonahoe is right. The license given by the Library is incorrect, as Frank Scholten died in 1942. To my best knowledge the license should be {{PD-old-80}}{{PD-US-expired}}. Vysotsky (talk) 15:10, 28 March 2023 (UTC)
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Collectie Fotocollectie Rijksvoorlichtingsdienst Eigen, fotonummer 156-0480, Bestanddeelnr 156-0480.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Ellywa (talk) 08:54, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Collectie Fotocollectie Rijksvoorlichtingsdienst Eigen, fotonummer 156-0480, Bestanddeelnr 156-0480.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Vysotsky (talk) 09:14, 3 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Activiteiten van minister van onderwijs cals, Bestanddeelnr 091-1387.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mdd (talk) 23:55, 11 April 2023 (UTC)

Hoi Alf, op de eerste plaats ook mijn dank voor het vele werk dat je op Commons verricht. Ik weet dat je je normaal buiten deze discussies houd, en dat is ook best verstandig. Het verdedigen van dit soort werk is van een hele andere orde, dan het verzorgen van de grootschalige uploads. En daar lopen een aantal zaken volgens mij al jaren structureel mis juridisch gezien, en dat probeer ik al jaren beter bespreekbaar te krijgen.

Naast deze juridische problematiek is er echter ook een organisatorische problematiek of onderhouds-technische problematiek, die al jaren sluimert. Deze problematiek ligt eigenlijk achter deze verwijderingsnominatie: Net als Commons zelf ontwikkelen de inzichten bij instituties als het Nationaal Archief. Ze updaten hun eigen informatie, waarmee soms zoals in dit geval, er een bestand tussen "de wal en het schip valt." De eerdere vrijgave van dat bestand is gebaseerd op onvolledige informatie, die nu achterhaald blijkt te zijn.

Nu wordt er op incidentele basis ingegrepen, op losse files, maar afgelopen jaar ook op grote schaal met een deel van de NHA-collectie. Nu is mijn vraag hier of je hierover wel eens nagedacht hebt? Met name over de vraag hoe dit structureel opgelost zou kunnen worden? Een oplossing zou kunnen zijn dat het NA speciaal voor ons een register overlegd van updates, die wij dan kunnen volgen. Zou zouden we pro-actief optreden en kunnen we nominaties zoals deze voorkomen. -- Mdd (talk) 12:36, 12 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Aankomst van dr Drees en echtgenote in Israel, zomerzegels 1960, Bestanddeelnr 911-1142.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : JopkeB.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 08:57, 15 April 2023 (UTC)

missing pages

Hoi Alf, many thanks for your uploads! Three files have been found by a database query that are lacking a file description page:

Can you please add them? Bedankt + groet, Achim55 (talk) 21:23, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Hi Achim55, bedankt voor je hulp en mededeling, ik heb ze aangepast. Groetjes, Alf Mr.Nostalgic (talk) 07:33, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Double parisis en billon de Philippe VI, 1341, NM397(2).jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Double parisis en billon de Philippe VI, 1341, NM397(2).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:53, 27 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Double parisis en billon de Philippe VI, 1341, NM397(2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 19:55, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Munten in het Musée Carnavalet

Numismatics Barnstar
Bedankt voor het uploaden van duizenden munten in het Musée Carnavalet. Deze afbeeldingen hebben heel veel waarde. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 20:04, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

File:Actualités.588.Une affreuse perspective. G.20051.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion. (Reason: None)

Why not upload a picture of a plant, animal, or anything else which fits into our scope. You can contribute any media type you want, including but not limited to images, videos, music, and 3D models. Start uploading now! If you don't have anything to upload at the moment, why not take a look at our best images or best videos, sounds and 3D models. If you have any doubts/questions don't hesitate to visit our help desk.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Moonflower9145.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 18:46, 6 May 2023 (UTC)

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Portrait-charge de Jean-Louis Tulou (1786-1865), flûtiste de l'Opéra, S63(8).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Portrait-charge de Jean-Louis Tulou (1786-1865), flûtiste de l'Opéra, S63(8).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Mandamae60.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot 2 (talk) 13:05, 14 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Portrait sérieux de Lebastard, médecin, S1230.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Streetlampguy301 (talk) 14:15, 4 May 2023 (UTC)

Please delete. When a proper one is available i will try uploading that one. Regards Mr.Nostalgic (talk) 15:25, 23 May 2023 (UTC)
File:Naakte vrouw in bos, RP-F-F00037.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Peli (talk) 15:15, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Twee douillettes en een naakte, rennende jonge vrouw met rugtatoeage in de tuin van Slot Zuylen, RP-F-00-5009.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Peli (talk) 15:25, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Kokon chomon jū 古今著聞集 Recueil des traditions de jadis et de naguère, M.C. 4738(388).jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kokon chomon jū 古今著聞集 Recueil des traditions de jadis et de naguère, M.C. 4738(388).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:24, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Kokon chomon jū 古今著聞集 Recueil des traditions de jadis et de naguère, M.C. 4738(387).jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kokon chomon jū 古今著聞集 Recueil des traditions de jadis et de naguère, M.C. 4738(387).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 17:24, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Kokon chomon jū 古今著聞集 Recueil des traditions de jadis et de naguère, M.C. 4738(417).jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kokon chomon jū 古今著聞集 Recueil des traditions de jadis et de naguère, M.C. 4738(417).jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 18:22, 26 May 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Image paul poiret aiglon 1963.25.3 1796643.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Image paul poiret aiglon 1963.25.3 1796643.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 08:05, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

File:Polaroid repro foto Miroslav Hak, RP-F-F15130.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Peli (talk) 23:40, 3 June 2023 (UTC)


File:Statiefoto Karl Gustav en Silvia van Zweden, Bestanddeelnr 928-8393.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

81.41.175.237 10:53, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Prive-opnamen, Bestanddeelnr 170-2770.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Paulbe (talk) 01:05, 15 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Dirk van Bronkhorst op zijn sterfbed tijdens het beleg van Leiden in 1574, SK-A-4170.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mbch331 (talk) 17:13, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

Carnavalet import

Hello ! Do you have a github repository where you store the script you use to upload images from Carnavet collection ? I think there are several improvements that can be done (for instance using Category:Collections of Musée Carnavalet or its subcategories and would like to work on it :) Léna (talk) 13:03, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Hi Lena,
I am using some simple scripting with Pulover Macro Creator to download from one side and upload it to commons. I am using 3 computers but have to adjust the code for every pc individualy.
Sorry i cant help you.
Regards,
Alf Mr.Nostalgic (talk) 13:09, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
Oh!
You see, it is really nice to upload all pictures from museums into Commons, but it would be even better to format the metadata in a way that makes discovery of these images easier. See for instance Category:Fonds André Cros - Archives municipales de Toulouse. The code for the upload is here.
The issue here is since you don't share your script(s), there is no way for me to improve all the files you imported without waiting for the images to be uploaded in Commons, and from here do some scripting or semi-automatic changes. It is a slow process, that also put a harder-than-necessary load on Wikimedia servers.
It's still good that you do these uploads obviously, I'm just pointing out you can go further with mass-upload since it's something you look interested in :) Léna (talk) 13:21, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
I am happy to share the code file of PMC by sending it to a mail address. The issues i have is that i do not know upfront what kind of object it is i am downloading and then uploading. It can be a photograph or a work of art etc. So that is why i am just uploading it with this format you see.
Let me know if i can help. Mr.Nostalgic (talk) 14:10, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Archiefwebsite RMO online

Geen idee of er nog een betere plek is om dit nieuws te verspreiden, dus doe ik het maar zoː

ːDeze week is de nieuwe archiefwebsite van het Rijksmuseum van Oudheden online gegaan. De verouderde techniek van de voorganger noopte het museum afgelopen jaar tot het maken van een nieuwe online omgeving voor het gedigitaliseerde papieren archief en fotografisch materiaal. Uiteindelijk streeft het museum naar een volledig online en doorzoekbaar archief. De splinternieuwe website kunt u bezoeken via de url https://archieven.rmo.nl. (...)

ːNieuw op de archiefwebsite is het gevarieerde fotoarchief van het museum. Het Rijksmuseum van Oudheden beheert rond 170.000 beelddragers, waaronder dia’s, afdrukken, negatieven en filmopnames. De collectie omvat museum-gerelateerde opnames, maar ook beelddragers waarop landschappen, vindplaatsen, personen en onderzoekssituaties te zien zijn. Het oudste beeldmateriaal dateert rond 1888. Op de archiefwebsite staan intussen meer dan 1500 foto’s. Uiteindelijk is de wens om meer dan 100.000 dia’s, afdrukken, negatieven en glasdia’s beschikbaar te maken voor het publiek.

Zie verder dit bericht. Voor Commons is dit een mooie fundgrube, zoals de Duitsers zo treffend zeggen. Kijk maar of je er iets mee kunt, of verspreid het bericht aan anderen als je denkt dat deze er meer aan hebben. Een fijne avond, en nog bedankt voor alle inspanningen die je voor Commons de afgelopen jaren gedaan hebt. Groetjes, Jeff5102 (talk) 18:27, 25 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi Jeff,
Bedankt voor de hint. Zodra ik klaar ben met het uploaden van nog ongeveer 150.000 Paris Musees foto's (nog ongeveer 10 weken bezig), zal ik deze gaan doen als niemand anders het dan al opgepakt heeft.
Groetjes,
Alf Mr.Nostalgic (talk) 11:11, 31 July 2023 (UTC)
File:Europazegels 1964 motief is een bloem, Bestanddeelnr 916-2915.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 16:13, 2 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Onafhankelijkheidspostzegels uit Suriname zegels die ontwikkeling symboliseren,, Bestanddeelnr 928-2492.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 00:58, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Surinaamse postzegels jaar van de vrouw, Bestanddeelnr 927-9174.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 01:00, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Onafhankelijkheidspostzegels uit Suriname Hoge waarden met Centrale Bank , Para, Bestanddeelnr 928-2490.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 01:00, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Onafhankelijkheidspostzegels uit Suriname zegels die ontwikkeling symboliseren, Bestanddeelnr 928-2491.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 01:01, 4 August 2023 (UTC)

Pay attention to copyright
File:Pétrus Borel, 1498(6).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.

The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.)

Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Afrikaans  asturianu  azərbaycanca  Bahasa Indonesia  Bahasa Melayu  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  English  español  euskara  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  Lëtzebuergesch  magyar  Malti  Nederlands  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  oʻzbekcha / ўзбекча  Plattdüütsch  polski  português  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Tiếng Việt  Zazaki  Ελληνικά  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  српски / srpski  тоҷикӣ  українська  հայերեն  मराठी  বাংলা  മലയാളം  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ไทย  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  עברית  العربية  فارسی  +/−

--EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Image barre jean-jacques le comte de par ppm4032 592793.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Image barre jean-jacques le comte de par ppm4032 592793.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

And also:

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 14:06, 7 August 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Image hugo victor trumeau avec m 1042 568417.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Image hugo victor trumeau avec m 1042 568417.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 11:05, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Image atget eugene jean eugene auguste atget dit 10 rue visconti ph33421 1761204.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Image atget eugene jean eugene auguste atget dit 10 rue visconti ph33421 1761204.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 16:05, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Opening van de Daniël den Hoed kliniek (1965) (cropped).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Multichill (talk) 21:03, 15 August 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Image vierge daniel daniel urrabieta ortiz y vierge dit femme espagnole ppd328 1573054.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Image vierge daniel daniel urrabieta ortiz y vierge dit femme espagnole ppd328 1573054.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 09:05, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Surinaamse kinderpostzegels, Bestanddeelnr 927-5187.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 06:28, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 10:57, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:30, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Matr1x-101 {user - talk? - useless contributions} 15:19, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

Musée Carnavalet

Hello Mr.Nostalgic, would it be possible to upload correct versions of File:Marie-Thérèse-Charlotte, duchesse d'Angoulême, dite Madame Royale (1778-1851), ND2386(2).jpg and File:Marie-Thérèse-Charlotte, duchesse d'Angoulême, dite Madame Royale (1778-1851), ND2386(2).jpg? These files are not very useful in their present state. Thx! Fransvannes (talk) 20:20, 1 September 2023 (UTC)

File:Officiële eerstedag-envelop met Amsterdam 700-zegels, objectnr A 56804.1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Adamant1 (talk) 22:00, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Issue with script

Hello ! Several of the images you're currently uploading, such as File:Useescollections.paris.frfrmusee-jean-moulinoeuvresetiquette-de-caisse-contenant-quatre-panzerfaust-60-recette-de-cu, Paris Musées 20230920114854.jpg, have no metadata. Could you stop your script and reimport the missing data ? Léna (talk) 09:52, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Hi Lena,
Do you have other examples? I do not know a quick find for this.
I changed the one you mentioned.
Regards,
Alf Mr.Nostalgic (talk) 10:37, 20 September 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 18:08, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you

The Photographer's Barnstar
Thank you for uploading images of entire collections of museums! Awesome for anyone interested to see and learn! --Neoclassicism Enthusiast (talk) 08:13, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
Thank you. Mr.Nostalgic (talk) 08:21, 29 September 2023 (UTC)

Suggestion

When you upload files, it would be helpful if you could use the {{Creator}} templates. Makes it easier to track who did what. DS (talk) 18:37, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

MAD and the Louvre

Yo! Could you please upload the images of the collections from the Museum of Decorative Arts and the Louvre, just like how you did with the Petit Palais or Musée Carnavalet? They would be really helpful for some articles which I want to work on, like the one on Art Deco. Thank you! --Neoclassicism Enthusiast (talk) 18:17, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Hi Neoclassicism Enthusiast,
It seems that all works of both musea are copyright protected, so i am not allowed to upload them to Commons. :(
Regards,
Alf Mr.Nostalgic (talk) 19:04, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Vijftig jaar Republiek in Rusland, Bestanddeelnr 920-8260.jpg

العربية  català  čeština  Deutsch  English  español  hrvatski  italiano  slovenščina  Tiếng Việt  беларуская‎  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  русский  ไทย  မြန်မာဘာသာ  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This file may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Vijftig jaar Republiek in Rusland, Bestanddeelnr 920-8260.jpg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Alex Spade (talk) 10:30, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Spiegel, AK-RAK-1989-8.jpg

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Spiegel, AK-RAK-1989-8.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 13:05, 13 December 2023 (UTC)

File:Petrus Hermanus Bon (1847-1943) in zijn leerapotheek, objectnr 3983.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

XenonX3 (talk) 18:49, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Beeldje Tower of sun. objectnr BA 4205.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:01, 2 January 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Adamant1 (talk) 11:24, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Wie: rinck, Waar: door, Met Toelichting:

Hoi Mr. N. kunt U uitleggen waarom het gebruikte uploadsjabloon of systeem voor werken in het Rijksmuseum na zoveel jaar nog steeds dit soort fouten produceert? Of kunt U mij uitleggen hoe U denkt deze fouten te gaan herstellen? Wie: Waar: Wanneer: en nog tal van trefwoorden worden vaak op onzinnige wijze afgebroken in leesteksten terwijl daarnaast het ontbreken van spaties bij onderwerp zulk soort woorden produceert "regionsbattle" etc. etc. en ga zo maar door. Is het sjabloon in de tijd van AI echt niet anders op te stellen of aan te passen? Groet Peli (talk) 15:39, 3 January 2024 (UTC)

Hoi Peli,
Helaas ben ik maar een simpele programmeur en kan ik geen AI programmeren en ben ik ook geen medewerker van het Rijksmuseum. Het zou ideaal zijn als het Rijksmuseum zelf de foto's met info zou uploaden in WikiMedia Commons. Het Sjabloon is niet echt een sjabloon, maar gewoon een samenstelling van karakters dat dan een sjabloon wordt.
De website van het Rijksmuseum is niet consistent genoeg om onderscheid te kunnen maken wanneer een woord gebruikt wordt in een zin of als een begin van een indicatie.
Het down-, en uploaden van de data gebeurt met een Macrocreator script wat ik graag ter beschikking stel aan een ieder die de mogelijkheid ziet om dit te verbeteren.
Het script is niet het zelfde als een aantal jaren geleden omdat de website van het Rijksmuseum regelmatig veranderd op kleine details en deze door het script opgemerkt dienen te worden.
Mogt u zelf een AI weten die een tekst van de website om kan zetten in een goed sjabloon of iets dergelijks, dan zou ik dat graag willen weten want dan zal ik die in het script opnemen.
Verder hoop ik er op dat als mensen zo een fout tegen komen, dat ze deze dan even wijzigen, wat op zich niet veel werk is. Dat staat natuurlijk iedereen vrij om te doen.
Vriendelijke groet,
Alf, Mr.Nostalgic (talk) 16:54, 3 January 2024 (UTC)
Hoi Alf, bedankt voor de uitleg. Ik zou het script wel graag eens willen zien.
Er zijn globaal twee soorten problemen in deze kwestie.
B. De unsorted list van makers en onderwerpen worden niet correct vertaald naar een comma separated list. Dit levert tekstfragmenten waar spaties en komma's ontbreken, deze tekst is nog doorzoekbaar en met een beetje goede wil ook leesbaar. De engelse keywords zijn wel wat irritant want onmogelijk massaal te repareren.
Het andere aandachtspunt is met wie en waar. In tegenstelling tot wat in 'water' worden deze woorden direct opgepikt en geformateerd ongeacht de context zoals in Wie: ringermeer Wie: len Wie: n etc. (Wenen).
Door het probleem met de Wie: len ben ik in dit correctiewerk gekomen. Een spatie typen is inderdaad niet zo'n grote klus. Maar meer dan 150.000 pagina's in broncode lezen om spaties te typen is zeerzeker een enorme tijdrovende klus. Daarom lijkt het me zeker de moeite waard het script te perfectioneren ook al zou dat drie mensen een een week of meer kosten.
Suggestie: als het bij wat in water geen probleem is, kan daar misschien afgekeken worden hoe om te gaan met wie en waar, en nog een aantal keywords die minder vaak voorkomen zoals toelichting en oplage.
Dus heb wel interesse in helpen met verbeteren van het script. Ik kan hier niet met breedband uploaden.
B. Heb geen grote interesse meer om nog handmatig fouten op te lossen die massaal door een script aangemaakt worden. Dat is gewoon niet meer te doen. - Maar niet getreurd er zijn er nog een paar die het leuk vinden iedere kunstenaarsnaam door zijn complete biografie te vervangen (verstopt onder een pijltje), en ieder belangrijk trefwoord aan een wikipedia pagina te koppelen. Zelf vindt ik het formaat van de descriptions zonder links en poespas zoals ze meestal zijn het prettigst. Groet Peli (talk) 07:26, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Hoi Peli,
Ik denk dat ik de issues met Wat/Waar/Wie mogelijk opgelost heb. Ik heb een alarm in mijn script gebouwd om dit te checken.
Mocht je het script nog willen zien, het is een .PMC bestand en helaas alleen met de Pulover Macro Creator te laden en bekijken. Deze is gratis te downloaden en ik kan je deze toesturen.
Laat maar even weten. Heb je misschien nog wat andere bestanden die verkeerd zijn? Dan kan ik kijken of ik hier nog iets op kan verzinnen.
Groetjes,
Alf Mr.Nostalgic (talk) 20:33, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Hallo Mr.Nostalgic een update van de layout zou misschien het lezen vergemakkelijken. MarcoSwart op de nl.wiktionary bracht me op het idee nadat hij de tekst had ontrafeld. Wat denk je van:

Identificatie
Titel(s): Tegel met spreuk die betrekking heeft op het huwelijk
Objecttype: tegel
Objectnummer: BK-NM-12400-28
Opschriften / Merken: opschrift, voorkant tegel, geschilderd in blauw:

Den mens Is Prijslijk Die 't Huwelijk Blameert
Hij Boet ook wijslijk Die 't overspel Hanteert

DIE DIT AANSCHOUWD,
EEN GOEDE VROUW,
DIE VIND VERMAAK
<br

Een
Dierbaar
Pand
Brand
Stookie
Een

Een
Groot
Plasier
Dier
Monster
Een

Een
Steun
Voor t Huijs
Kruijs
Droevig
Een

Drie
Wordt
Geagt
Verwagt
Wordt
Drie

EN WEL INZIET,
EEN KWADE VROUW,
OF GROOT VERDRIET

Die Een Vrouw Troudt
Die Hem Eerlijk Houd

Is Een Dwaas En Een Sot
misdoet Tegen Gods Gebod

opschrift, voorkant tegel, geschilderd in mangaan: Rotterdam = Den/ 26 Julij 1780

Thanks. Lotje (talk) 17:13, 19 January 2024 (UTC)

Hoi Lotje,
Goed idee. Ga gerust je gang.
Groetjes,
Alf, Mr.Nostalgic (talk) 18:57, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
File:Overzicht van het tribunaal, Bestanddeelnr 930-9754.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tggyggu (talk) 23:31, 20 January 2024 (UTC)

Datering corpsballen-foto's

Hoi mister, even over "Dinner of the Leiden student sorority V.V.S.L. and their male companions on the occasion of the lustrum in 1940, AHM-F-59329-369." De website geeft aan "Published: 20 January 1940." Echter, in de glasplaat zelf is "3.2.40" gekrast. Ik ben daarom geneigd om deze foto dan onder "Netherlands photographs taken on 1940-02-03" te categoriseren. Ik heb eind vorig jaar voor AHM-F-59138-199 hetzelfde gevraagd, maar na een doorverwijzing heb ik niets meer gehoord. Dus zal ik dan 3 februari 1940 als datum aanhouden? En zal ik dan bij twijfel de in de glasplaat gekraste datum aanhouden in soortgelijke gevallen? Groetjes, Jeff5102 (talk) 09:14, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Hoi Jeff,
Ik denk dat jou voorstel de meest voor de hand liggende is. Maar mogelijk is misschien ook dat de glasplaten zelf op die datum geproduceerd zijn?
Maar ik denk dat je moet doen dat je goed dunkt. Mochten we later meer inzicht krijgen in deze, dan kan dat altijd nog veranderd worden toch?
Groetjes, Alf Mr.Nostalgic (talk) 16:22, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

ːHoi Alf, het is niet de productiedatum van de glasplaten, denk ik. Eerder zag ik een glasplaat die volgens de website op 29 januari 1940 was genomen, terwijl de glasplaat zelf 28.1.40 aangaf. Maar bedankt voor het overlegǃ ː) Groetjes, Jeff5102 (talk) 12:19, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Hoi Jeff,
Mooi dat je daar ook aan gedacht hebt. Dan denk ik idd dat jouw voorstel het meest voor de hand liggende is.
Groetjes, Alf Mr.Nostalgic (talk) 12:25, 24 January 2024 (UTC)

Paris Musées

Hello,

Thank you very much for this huge import. Have you upload all the files under free license? I'll update the page of the project. Pyb en résidence (talk) 10:01, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Hi Pyb en résidence,
Indeed i iploaded them under the licence available and according to Paris Musee it was CC0.
Regards, Alf Mr.Nostalgic (talk) 16:25, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Paradise Chronicle (talk) 16:53, 25 January 2024 (UTC)

File:Kipati Tjintomandi, pasirah van Bramanita op Sumatra, KITLV 32112.tiff has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Nostapedia (talk) 21:38, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Hallo Mr.Nostalgic, kan je description bij deze file eens bekijken? Ziet er nogal vreemd uit. Cheers. Lotje (talk) 05:31, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Hoi Lotje,
Bedankt dat je mij daarop attendeerd. Er zit een foutje in het programma dat ik hiervoor gebruik, wat eens in de zoveel duizend uploads voor komt en helaas kan ik dat zelf niet wijzigen.
Mocht je er meer tegenkomen, dan blijf ze vooral doormelden.
Groetjes, Alf Mr.Nostalgic (talk) 07:34, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

@Mr.Nostalgic: kan je de beschrijving eens nazien? Thanks. Lotje (talk) 04:49, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Hoi Lotje,
Gedaan en bedankt weer.
Groetjes,
Alf Mr.Nostalgic (talk) 19:24, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

File:250cc race Voorop Phil Read , daarachter Mike Duff, Bestanddeelnr 917-9050.jpg

Hallo Mr. Nostalgic. Ik zie dat je bij dit bestand bij de 250cc-klasse al een vraagteken hebt gezet. Terecht. Het is de 350cc-klasse. De rijder voorop is dan ook niet Phil Read, maar Jim Redman. Het is absoluut een Honda met het startnummer 1 van de regerend wereldkampioen. In de 250cc-klasse was dat Read (Yamaha), in de 350cc-klasse Redman (Honda). Redman rijdt dus op kop, voor Mike Duff met zijn Yamaha. Met vriendelijke groet, Piero (talk) 16:03, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Zeer goed mogelijk. Bij het origineel (Nationaal Archief) heeft iemand gezegd: "Geen Phil Read, maar Luigi Taveri 1(Ch)Honda, 5e, Mike Duff 9(Cnd)Yamaha, 1e, Y.Katayama 7(Jpn)Suzuki, 2e, Ernst Degner 5(D)Suzuki, 125cc-Dutch TT Assen 1965." Dat klopt dus niet? Hier staat nog een aantal foto's, wellicht dat vergelijking ook duidelijkheid voor de rest brengt? Vysotsky (talk) 21:36, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:Doos met “Playmobil” brandweerauto, objectnr 90443(1).JPG. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that this file was not a derivative work of a non-free work, you may request undeletion.

čeština  dansk  Deutsch  English  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  polski  português  português do Brasil  sicilianu  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  ไทย  日本語  Tiếng Việt  中文  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−

And also:

Yours sincerely, Grandmaster Huon (talk) 19:13, 7 March 2024 (UTC)

Spaarnestad. Rijksmuseum, etc...

Goed bezig, Alfǃ Ik heb dus weer genoeg beeldmateriaal om te categoriseren. Dat wordt een heel werk, maar dat ben ik (vooralsnog) niet zat. Ik ben vooral blij met die oude foto's van Spaarnestad. Ik categoriseer nu ook die foto's van die vooroorlogse corpsballen op dag, maar als ik niet uitkijk, lijkt het dadelijk nog of vooroorlogs Nederland alleen maar uit diners van Leidse corpsballen bestond. Dit geeft wat meer balans. Groetjes, Jeff5102 (talk) 20:27, 18 March 2024 (UTC) Hoi Jeff, nog een paar 1000 te gaan en dan is alles over (31.000+ foto's) van SpaarneStad Photo. Dan heb ik ook nog een paar duizend die ouder zijn dan 70 jaar waarvan de fotograaf onbekend is. Spaarnestad Photo heeft daar zeer hun best gedaan om de photograaf op te sporen, maar dus niet gevonden. Ik denk dat het safe is om die ook te uploaden. Groetjes, Alf