User talk:Marek Banach
|
|
Witaj!
Czy jesteś całkowicie przekonany do racji bytu tej podkategorii? Zaczynające się od Unidentified mają służyć tym, którzy potrafiliby rozpoznać żywą istotę lub przedmiot. Jeśli podkategoryzować to raczej według zastosowania pojazdów. Oddzielnie typowo rodzinne, oddzielnie coś co wygląda na śmieciarkę... Pozdr. --Starscream (talk) 21:34, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
Please use sub-categories[edit]
––Apalsola t • c 00:21, 11 February 2011 (UTC)
| Category discussion notification | Category:Fastbacks_in_Warsaw has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. |
80.187.107.24 19:37, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
Please, try to keep number of categories within reasonable bounds. The category Buses in Týnec nad Sázavou is redundant - Týnec nad Sázavou is a very small city and has not its own system of urban transport. Buses photographed there are categorized by operator, by transport system (PID) and by bus station (Category:Týnec nad Sázavou, bus station) - what makes sense to add the category Category:Buses in Týnec nad Sázavou? --ŠJů (talk) 04:14, 18 June 2011 (UTC)
Hello!
Can you write a short description at the head of this category? Per COM:CAT, categories need a short description for their purposes. In this specific case, you could write two sentences about the difference between Category:Mercedes-Benz chassis and Category:Mercedes-Benz buses: using {{en|...}}. Thank you for your support! Regards, High Contrast (talk) 14:38, 2 August 2011 (UTC)
|
Category:Bedford_Supreme has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Redrose64 (talk) 09:59, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
Thanks[edit]
After I returned from Wikiexpedition on 31st July, I countinued to travel through Europe. So I have many pictures, but no time. I uploaded all I could from the first two days (and I hope I will do the rest very soon), but unfortunately there is not enough time for description and categories (I hope I will do this during november and december). So thank you for your categorization, especially categorization of buses - like this one - you helped me a lot. For me it would be terrible work :-) --Aktron (talk) 10:06, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
Bus catting[edit]
Hi Mark. A couple of things. I notice you've been adding cats to UK bus images that have been cropped - ie those in Category:Cropped UK bus images. As per the category's description, I had intended that if a bus image has been cropped the source image doesn't need full categorising, to avoid unecessary duplication. Eg there's not much point having both this and this in the single deck coach cat, etc. So if you don't mind I'd like to remove the extra cats on cropped source images.
_2003_DAF_SB4000_Van_Hool_Aliz%C3%A9e,_20_July_2008.jpg){kind=link}
Secondly, I notice you created Category:Full-size buses in the United Kingdom and have already put some images in it (Van Hools?), but personally I don't see what it adds over and above what was already in the cat structure of Category:Buses in the United Kingdom by type, as explained in its description. Ie what's the difference for example between a single deck coach and a full size bus (bearing in mind the UK type tree has branches for midi and mini coaches), such that we need both cats on one image, as happens in the above example. If a 'full size' cat is needed for consistency with the other countries, I suggest it only needs to be a holder for the categories that already covered whatever 'full size' is being defined as here. Is it just a different name for any full length rigid? If so, do you mind if I empty that cat and just add it to the single/double deck buses/coaches cats (which as said, should currently only contain lengths above 'midi' size).
Ultra7 (talk) 18:56, 8 September 2011 (UTC)
|
|
Solaris Urbino 18 Hybrid Allison has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
80.187.106.124 20:31, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
|
|
Solaris Urbino 18 Hybrid Vossloh Kiepe has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
80.187.106.124 20:32, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
|
|
Buses built in unknown years has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
80.187.96.90 13:15, 18 October 2011 (UTC) (copied here by --ŠJů (talk) 16:46, 18 October 2011 (UTC))
empty or not empty[edit]
Cześć, Marek. I first wondered about your revert because this page exists since 2009, and I didn't change anything when reverting your revert, so I can only guess that something must have been broken the time you clicked the link ;-) Anyway, that was likely due to the global interwiki failure and following caching problems. --:bdk: 02:55, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
Bimet[edit]
Hi.
- I'm pretty new to the world of bus bodywork makers in Argentina so I do not know if I am right. Reading the web site I see that the name of the company seems to be "Carrocerías Bimet S.A." made by another company named "Centro Carrocero Corwin S.A." (this is probably the result of a company fusion or something like that). The only place where I see the Bi-Met spelling is in the name of the bus models and on the picture you are pointing out. In Google it seems to appear more times referred as Bimet than Bi-Met. I think that this problem is related to poor brand management by the company and there is not a clear answer. We should ask them directly. I favor the name "Bimet". However, If you think that the category should be renamed, just feel free to do it.
Best regards, Barcex (talk) 01:20, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
"Buses in London"[edit]
Regarding this image and Category:Buses in London. I am well aware the image was taken 'in London' - the reason I am removing the category is that the image has nothing whatsover to do with 'buses in London', it's just a random private coach that just happened to be there at that time. Under the current system for categorising UK buses by location, this is not an image that currently gets a location category - those are reserved for cases where it makes sense, ie where the location is likely to mean something to the image such as for local public transport routes, local tour operators, or regularly scheduled long distance coach services. If you disagree with this logic then fair enough, but I can guarantee that is how it has been done so far, so there's no point trying to change it for just one image, all that does it make it look like an odd one out. And if you really want to add locations to all these other images which don't currently have one, I would say it's better do it using separate categories, such as 'visiting coaches in London', instead of lumping in buses regularly seen in London alongside random visitors. Ultra7 (talk) 22:26, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
Categorization[edit]
Marek, I appreciate the desire for grouping all Brazilian-built VW Gols (for instance) together, but it is often impossible to tell where the car is built, which onl leads to photos becoming very hard to find as they are unnecessarily splintered over several often hard to locate categories. This Gol for instance, is raced in Uruguay but may very well be built in Brazil. I think it is better to group all of the Gols together, and having Gol listed in VW do Brazil as well as other pertinent categories. Best, Mr.choppers (talk) 05:05, 15 March 2012 (UTC)
- I now see that you only made this split because MB-One rejected the idea of listing VW Gol in both the VW BR and the VW RA categories - well, I believe he was wrong and you were right, so I have restored the logical status quo. Speak to me if you have any concerns, and best regards, Mr.choppers (talk) 05:18, 16 March 2012 (UTC)
Mercedes-Benz OF 1418[edit]
Hey Marek, in regards to the Category:Mercedes-Benz OF 1418, the Mercedes-Benz OF 1418 chassis are made in Argentina, the bodies may be made in Brazil, here Daimler corporate web site → article Mercedes-Benz Argentina for your reference. Kind regards. — Moebiusuibeom-en (talk) 00:11, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- Marek, supposedly the chasis are made in Argentina and exported to Brazil in CDK form, here data → Mercedes-Benz Argentina S.A.. Adjustments should be made to also include Argentina- Category:Mercedes-Benz chassis buses (Argentina) — Moebiusuibeom-en (talk) 00:42, 30 April 2012 (UTC)
- Ok, you've got the precise data, nevertheless, i have the understanding that Brazil usually does engine while Argentina generally the chasis, both Mercedes Brazil and Argentina work in conjunction in the production of vehicles, so does Ford and probably others, within the Common Market Group, Mercosur, where do they put them together?, almost certainly in either countries!
- Hey listen, if you be so kind, could you finish entering data or correcting same of the following page: Mercedes-Benz OF → es - Kind regards Moebiusuibeom-en (talk) 15:57, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
|
|
Wiktoria Białystok has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
188.104.99.52 20:20, 9 May 2012 (UTC)
Categorizing[edit]
Good work on renaming categories and generally improving their organization. Thanks! mr.choppers (talk)-en- 16:11, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
Category:Astra Iveco vehicles[edit]
Hello!
The Category:Astra Iveco vehicles was named incorrectly. The correct category name would be just Category:Astra vehicles or Category:Iveco-Astra vehicles [per http://www.astraspa.com/ING/home.asp]. Or did I miss something? --High Contrast (talk) 12:45, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Policyjny Autosan H7 Solina[edit]
Witam.
Wrzuciłem właśnie na Wikimedia Commons zdjęcia autobusu warszawskiej policji. Natrafiłem jednak na pewien problem:
Ze swoich zdjęć wywnioskowałem, że musi to być model Autosan H7 Solina, jednak na tej stronie znalazłem informację, że pojazd o takim numerze rejestracyjnym (HPZ A660) to model Autosan H7-10I czyli policyjna wersja autobusu generacji poprzedzającej H7 Solina. Artykuł na polskiej Wikipedii wspomina tylko o więźniarkach Autosan H7-10DW, ale nie ma tam nic o innych policyjnych wersjach autobusu H7 Solina. Jestem przy tym pewien, że pojazd na zdjęciu na pewno nie jest więźniarką.
Pozdrawiam. - SuperTank17 (talk) 15:46, 1 July 2012 (UTC)
Hey Mister Banach, can you please create a Category for Daily 2011, or a Subcategory 2011 for the 2009, i want too load a Picture of the new Modell there. dear.−−Zweileben (talk) 10:41, 13 July 2012 (UTC) Thank you very much!Dear−−Zweileben (talk) 10:57, 13 July 2012 (UTC)
|
|
Category:Siemens_Combino_Plus has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
-- Tuválkin ✉ 02:04, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
|
|
MAN Trucks (Poland) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
High Contrast (talk) 11:11, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
Can you please help? Please take part in the discussion. Thank you, Marek! --High Contrast (talk) 22:30, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Marian Mazur, przełom lat 70-80.jpg[edit]
|
| This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Marian Mazur, przełom lat 70-80.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Marian Mazur, przełom lat 70-80.jpg]]).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Masur (talk) 20:46, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
San H01A/B[edit]
Cześć, znasz się na modelach Autosanu, więc chciałem cię spytać o poprawność kategorii: czy ten model File:San H01B summer 2013 1.jpg (latem 2013 stał przed siedzibę Autosanu) - czy to jest San H01B czy San H01A? (pierwotnie nazwałem go B, ale wczoraj inny użytkownik przeniósł zdjęcia pod A). Chciałbvm się upewnić. Pozdrawiam! Lowdown (talk) 09:16, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
Global account[edit]
Hi Marek! As a Steward I'm involved in the upcoming unification of all accounts organized by the Wikimedia Foundation (see m:Single User Login finalisation announcement). By looking at your account, I realized that you don't have a global account yet. In order to secure your name, I recommend you to create such account on your own by submitting your password on Special:MergeAccount and unifying your local accounts. If you have any problems with doing that or further questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Cheers, —DerHexer (Talk) 20:19, 14 January 2015 (UTC)
Bicycles[edit]
I see you edited Category:Historical bicycles and/or Category:Vintage bicycles, so you may be interested in Commons:Categories for discussion/2017/08/Category:Historical bicycles and Category:Vintage bicycles. - Jmabel ! talk 16:05, 7 August 2017 (UTC)
|
|
Trains in Tallinn has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Geo Swan (talk) 04:11, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
|
|
Watzke Verkehrsbetrieb has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
Öffis Graz (talk) 10:22, 12 May 2022 (UTC)
|
|
Jonckheere Arrow has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
–Davey2010Talk 00:17, 9 November 2022 (UTC)
CFD[edit]
A few of your Peugeot categories have been nominated for discussion - I want to rename them but would rather get consensus first, Link: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Categories_for_discussion/2023/02/Category:Peugeot_Expert_I, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 01:50, 19 February 2023 (UTC)
|
|
Category:Buses_in_Concepcion,_Chile has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
186.172.196.27 02:56, 10 June 2023 (UTC)
Hello there, i'm from Catania , I live there and I've never seen this bus.
Looking at the image you can find some logos of other company, none from Catani, neither from Italy, but spanish.
Why in the following oldid edit you added, without any accordance of evidence or other ref/sources, those wrong information?
https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:ZEUS_eelectric_DILIXI.jpg&diff=next&oldid=65774592 GiovanniPen (talk) 09:15, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
